bashford manor corridor
Transcription
bashford manor corridor
BASHFORD MANOR CORRIDOR STREETSCAPE STUDY Table of Contents Introduction3 History4 Existing Conditions 5 Project Process 7 Community Engagement and Participation Walkability Survey Public Visioning Workshop Student Concepts Public Review Workshop UK Student Proposal: Project 1 UK Student Proposal: Project 2 UK Student Proposal: Project 3 UK Student Proposal: Project 4 UK Student Proposal: Project 5 UK Student Proposal: Project 6 7 7 8 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 City Solutions Center Plan Development 16 Phasing Plan 20 Suggested Funding 23 City Solutions Center Center For Neighborhoods Formed in 2008, the University of Louisville’s City Solutions Center extends U of L’s urban mission across Kentucky by providing hands-on consulting to help communities engage citizens to define challenges, develop buy-in for solutions, and create implementation plans for measurable results. The Center draws upon existing faculty, staff, and student expertise throughout the University of Louisville to provide resources to assist Kentucky’s communities. The City Solutions Center offices are housed at U of L’s Urban Design Studio. Center For Neighborhoods cultivates grassroots leadership, provides leadership education, partners with neighborhoods in community planning efforts, facilitates civic dialogue amongst stakeholders, and actively participates in neighborhood-based development and improvement projects. Center For Neighborhoods, formerly the Louisville Community Design Center, has pursued its mission since 1972. For more information about the Center For Neighborhoods visit our website at: http://centerforneighborhoods.org For more information about the City Solutions Center visit our website at: http://citysolutions.louisville.edu or contact: Steven C. Bourassa, Ph.D. Director 426 W. Bloom Street Louisville, KY 40208 Phone: (502) 852-5720 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Patrick Piuma, M.U.P. Associate Director 507 S. Third Street Louisville, KY 40202 Phone: (502) 587-7015 E-mail: [email protected] Introduction In 2010, Louisville Councilmen Jim King (District 10) and Brent Ackerson (District 26), with the assistance of Councilman Tom Owen (District 8), commissioned Center For Neighborhoods (CFN) and the University of Louisville’s City Solutions Center (CSC) to develop a conceptual streetscape plan for the Bardstown Road Corridor, an effort to be patterned after a successful earlier effort focused on the Preston Highway corridor of Louisville. Subsequently, the CFN and CSC engaged the assistance of the landscape architecture department of the University of Kentucky to develop a set of preliminary design studies for the corridor via a fourth-year undergraduate studio conducted during the Spring Semester 2011. To provide for broad-based involvement of area residents and other key stakeholders, the CFN, CSC, and UK convened a community design workshop in January 2011 at the community meeting room of Brooklawn Child and Family Services on Goldsmith Lane. Based upon the community’s input, twelve students from the UK landscape architecture studio developed six conceptual corridor plans, which were presented to the community at an open critique, again at Brooklawn, in May. CSC’s Director of Planning, Michael McCoy, employed the UK plans and the corresponding record of community feedback to develop the plans contained within this volume. Aerial image of Bashford Manor Corridor study area 3 Introduction The premise behind this effort is that improvements to the streetscape – increasing the accessibility, walkability, and natural attractiveness of the corridor to the surrounding neighborhoods – will lead to a stronger interrelationship between corridor businesses and their most immediate market and, therefore, to a more viable and cohesive district. This plan reveals, to the best of the designers’ ability, the aspirations of the surrounding neighborhoods for the automotive, bicycle, and pedestrian way that commonly serves its transportation needs, as well as a standard of public landscape well above what currently exists within the Bardstown Road right-of-way between Gardiner and Hikes lanes. To accomplish anything resembling the scope of this design will require the substantial involvement and cooperation of local government, of neighborhoods and – equally important – of property owners and developers seeking to renew the vitality of this important suburban corridor and district. Given the extensive length of Bardstown Road and the various characteristics and neighborhoods the roadway touches, during the process of the study a group of stakeholders decided to give the project a more distinctive name, that of the Bashford Manor Corridor. From this point on the study area will be referred to as the Bashford Manor Corridor while Bardstown Road will be used to refer to the actual physical roadway when required for clarification. History In order to understand how any area can be improved it is important to understand how the current built form came to be. In 1949, construction began on Louisville’s first “outer beltway,” connecting Breckinridge Lane to Bardstown Road in the area between the historic Farmington plantation and the open farmland located along Goldsmith Lane. Thus was formed one of Louisville’s first postwar suburban commercial nodes – the area surrounding the junction of the new beltway that would become the Watterson Expressway (I-264) with the primary radial known as Bardstown Road (US 31). Photo of Watterson Expressway in 1957 Source: Royal Photo Company Collection, Photographic Archives, University of Louisville, http://digital.library.louisville.edu/u?/royal,11284 4 History The first to recognize the commercial potential for the area was prominent Louisville developer J. Graham Brown, who would begin construction of the Brown Suburban Hotel complex in 1955 at a site on the west side of Bardstown Road between Goldsmith Lane and then-undeveloped farmland to the south. Secondary commercial development would soon emerge along the east side of Bardstown parallel to the Brown Suburban, including an automobile service station at the southeast corner of Bardstown and Goldsmith Lane and medical offices for downtown doctors offering the convenience of once-a-week hours to patients residing in the rapidly expanding suburbs. In 1964, this Bardstown Road corridor south of the new Watterson Expressway would witness the completion of Louisville’s first modern suburban movie theaters, Cinemas 1 and 2, on the 20-acre farm plot immediately to the south of the Brown Suburban. One block to the south of the Cinemas site, the former Bashford Manor thoroughbred horse farm would become the site of Bashford Manor Mall, completing by the early 1970’s the 20-year transformation of formerly open farmland lying along Bardstown Road into Louisville’s most recognizable suburban commercial, entertainment, and motel district. In concert with the emergence of the Bardstown Road commercial corridor, postwar suburban neighborhoods of single-family homes, apartments, and condominiums were developed in the areas immediately adjacent to the corridor down to Hikes Lane, and along Hikes, Goldsmith and Bashford Manor lanes to the east and west of Bardstown Road. Over the years, the corridor would increasingly provide the convenience of department stores, discount stores, shops and restaurants to the immediate area, although the scale, site configuration, and regional draw of the Cinemas and of the motels would always prove less amenable to the surrounding neighborhoods. This relationship grew more uneasy in later years, as the former Brown Suburban and Travelodge began to show their age and their economic obsolescence relative to the contemporary hotel market. The greatest impact to the district occurred, however, in the mid-2000’s, with the decision by the national owners of the Showcase Cinemas to abandon their Bardstown Road facility in favor of a newer complex of theaters located along the next regional beltway to the south – a site, like its predecessor, chosen to follow the outward expansion of the population center of metropolitan Louisville. By 2011, the 20-acre Cinema site stood vacant, its future altogether uncertain. These recent transitions led public officials and the adjacent neighborhoods – Bon Air, Bashford Manor, Highgate Springs, Bon Air Estates – to begin urging greater attention to the circumstances of the corridor.1 1Information related to the history of development along the Bardstown Road corridor was from the authors’ observations and recollections and from J. E. Kleber, ed., The Encyclopedia of Louisville, Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2001. This figure-ground rendering of the corridor gives a quick glimpse of the scale of the old Showcase Cinemas site (in red) relative to that of the built environment surrounding it View of the cleared Showcase Cinemas site looking west from Bardstown Road Existing Conditions General streetscape view along the study area of Bardstown Road that illustrates the auto-centric nature of the corridor Streetscape view of a section of Bardstown Road in the Highlands that illustrates the more pedestrian and compact form of the built environment As mentioned earlier, the study section of Bardstown Road developed in large part due to the construction of the Watterson Expressway in the early 1950s when the area began to establish the configuration of its built form evident today. This section of roadway lies in stark contrast to one of the most celebrated stretches of roadway in Louisville just a couple miles north along the same Bardstown Road, where a walkable, intensely concentrated corridor of commercial and residential uses creates a vibrant pedestrian environment for several miles. The streetcar was the dominant mode of transportation at the time that the stretch of Bardstown Road in the Highlands developed and the structure of the area reflects the constraints and opportunities of the era. Though the circumstances and temporal differences that provided the bone structure of these two areas are very different, there often is the inclination to compare the two and this was done numerous times by participants in the Bashford Manor Corridor study. Though there are good reasons and useful insight that can be gained from observations of the Highlands’ portion of Bardstown Road, the comparison can often blur the realities and possibilities that the study area offers. This study looks specifically at the area within the right-of-way along the street and does not prescribe changes to land use or form. However, the streetscape can serve as a starting point to advance more significant change along the corridor and create a “complete street” that fosters more activity that can benefit everyone. In order to begin the process of improving the streetscape, we must begin by examining current conditions. Beginning at the north end of the study area at the intersection of Gardiner Lane and Bardstown Road, a great deal of attention has been invested in creating an inviting streetscape for traffic exiting off of the Watterson Expressway, as well as beautification of the entryways and roadside landscaping of Sullivan College and the corner of the shopping center parking lot. The sidewalks are wide, relatively new and well maintained. This condition is con- 5 Existing Conditions sistent on both sides of the road and continues under the expressway. However, the maintenance of the walkway deteriorates significantly once on the south side of the Watterson Expressway. The exit ramps utilize a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) to control traffic. This interchange system compresses the two intersections created by the on- and off-ramps into a single signalized intersection. This type of interchange has been found to be more efficient in handling heavy to medium automobile traffic but can pose more difficulties for bicycle and pedestrian crossing due to the wider crossing distances. Accommodating the crossing speeds of cyclists and pedestrians typically decreases the efficiency of this type of interchange.2 The roadway width and number of travel lanes fluctuates along the length of the corridor, but generally consists of six lanes of traffic with a turn lane in the middle. Moving southbound along the corridor past the Watterson interchange, the roadway is actually eight lanes of traffic, including multiple turn lanes, and begins to choke down after crossing Goldsmith Lane. The once continuously uninterrupted sidewalk begins to break up with multiple curb cuts along the west side of the roadway to accommodate restaurants and other commercial entities, though the maintenance of the sidewalk and landscaping is in much better condition near the commercial uses. The crossing width of Bardstown Road at the intersection is quite expansive at about 125 feet from curb to curb with no pedestrian refuge, particularly on the north side of the intersection. Landscaping on north side of Watterson Expressway near Sullivan University Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) at Bardstown Road and the Watterson Expressway Once south of Goldsmith Lane continuing to Heather Lane by the old Showcase Cinemas site, the western sidewalk loses the verge, or green grassy strip between the roadway and the sidewalk intermittently for a significant section of the corridor. The lack of separation creates a sense of being unsafe and exposed to the automobiles racing by. It is 2M. Qureshi et al., Design of Single Point Urban Interchanges, Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Department of Transportation, 2004. Photo offers a good example of a number of serious accessibility and safety issues along the corridor all in one corner. One example of how the abundance of signage along certain sections of the corridor creates visual clutter Footprints in the sand serve as an indication that, even without a sidewalk in front of the Showcase Cinemas site, a great deal of foot traffic still exists also along this section that we begin to see some serious accessibility issues. A number of curb cuts do not have ramps, leaving wheelchair bound travelers to their own devices. To add insult to injury, even if someone in a wheelchair were to manage to get onto the sidewalk again, there are multiple instances where utility poles obstruct the sidewalk, in some cases right in the middle, forcing people out into the street. There are also some seriously deteriorated sections of the sidewalk. Curb cuts and other breaks in the sidewalk along the west side of this section of road are minimal given the auto-centric nature of the commercial uses; however, the east side does not fare nearly as well. Along the same quarter-mile stretch, the east side has 11 curb cuts and secondary roadway entrances to the five on the west side. Though the sheer number is bad enough for pedestrian connectivity and safety, a number of the curb cuts along the east side are extremely large and ill-defined, creating multiple unnecessary conflict points. There are no trees remotely near the road along this entire section of roadway, creating a very unattractive hardscape lacking pedestrian shelter from the elements. There is, however, an abundance of signage along this section of roadway producing a particularly cluttered, distracting and “noisy” visual environment. From Heather Lane to Bashford Manor Lane the built form continues with similar commercial uses on the east side of the roadway while the expansive and oppressive grayfield parking lot of the Showcase Cinemas site creates a visual void to the west. The stretch ultimately begins to transition to residential uses south of the Cinemas site on both sides of the road approaching Bashford Manor Lane. Amazingly again, there are 10 curb cuts along the east side to the four on the west side, including the Glenworth Avenue break in the sidewalk. A distinct character change happens along the corridor from Bashford Manor Lane to Hikes Lane. The roadway itself widens with the addition of a planted median broken by several turn lanes. The east side is primarily residential for two thirds of the roadway until reaching the Bardstown 6 Existing Conditions Road - Buechel Bypass split which creates a commercial island with several businesses disconnected from the pedestrian infrastructure. The west side is dominated by fast food restaurants, banks and other commercial uses related to the vast shopping center complex that has replaced the Bashford Manner Mall along Bashford Manor Lane as well as the Kroger at the corner of Hikes Lane and Buechel Bypass. Due to the recent development of the commercial area on the east side, the sidewalk infrastructure is probably the best overall section along the entire corridor from Bashford Manor Lane to the pedestrian bridge crossing the stormwater channel about 1000 feet away. There is a great amount of separation from the roadway, only one break in the sidewalk for the roadway access into the shopping center and well maintained landscaping. However, once a pedestrian reaches the bridge, accessibility is thrown out the window. The bridge is accessible only by climbing stairs and, once on the other side, the pedestrian is dumped out into a parking lot with no sidewalk, save for a short stint near the entrance to the Kroger parking lot, the rest of the way to Hikes Lane. Crossing this section of the corridor by either foot or vehicle is no small task. The auto lanes appear to somewhat haphazardly navigate the split of the roadway as well as multiple turns across the median at varying distances and configurations. The pedestrian experience is significantly worse. There appears to be little if any thought put towards pedestrian safety at the intersection with Hikes Lane. As motorists prepare to enter or leave the bypass across Hikes Lane, the vehicle speeds are much faster than along the rest of the corridor. The absence of sidewalks may well be a calculated decision to reduce the chances of people actually trying to walk around this area, though during site visits there were several people observed walking along the side of the road. Though the Bashford Manor Corridor may never be Bardstown Road in the Highlands, there are significant opportunities to greatly improve the function, mobility and beauty of this stretch of roadway. The only access for pedestrians across the drainage ditch on the west side of Bardstown Road near the old Bashford Manor Mall site is across a bridge that lacks ramp access Sidewalk improvements along the Bashford Manor Mall site give an example of adequate facilities that are wide enough and where obstacles are accommodated by appropriate adjustments There is no a sidewalk within 100 feet of this bus stop Project Process Community Engagement and Participation Walkability Survey The City Solutions Center and Center For Neighborhoods utilized a “bottom-up” approach to developing the plan for the Bashford Manor Corridor. Rather than the design team creating a plan and presenting it to the community for feedback, the process included community involvement from the beginning and the plan was derived from community input and feedback to insure the participants’ ideas and needs were the basis of the design. This feedback was used throughout the process to make adjustments or changes when participants were involved at each stage of the process, collecting data about the existing walkability and land use conditions, engaging in creative problem-solving, and ultimately resulting in the plan recommended in this report. The process was divided into three phases: 1) inventory, 2) analysis, and 3) synthesis. Walkable neighborhoods benefit all people who travel the corridor by foot, stroller, bicycle (cyclists under the age of 14), or wheelchair. Studies have found that residents in walkable neighborhoods achieve higher levels of physical activity through walking for utility purposes that cause a significant decrease in obesity levels.3 Research has also indicated that commercial establishments have increased values in walkable neighborhoods.4 Residents and other users benefit from an enhanced sense of connection and safety due to greater interaction among neighbors. The inventory phase identified the existing conditions within the study area. The purpose of this step was to gather as much useful information as possible about the study area in a reasonable amount of time. It allowed participants to investigate what “is” through a walkability survey and encouraged them to begin imagining what “could be.” A walkability survey is designed to provide an opportunity to raise awareness of conditions that affect the safety, accessibility and quality of life of an area. The basic approach is to have resident participants and facilitators physically walk the area they are studying armed with a survey listing several questions to consider. This walkability assessment tool helps to illuminate issues that are not typically perceived while driving the corridor. The second phase, analysis, involved an assessment of the existing conditions to determine the needs and preferences of the community for changing the corridor. This involved a “visioning” process for the future of the area, which included creative problem solving and the proposal of specific features participants would like to see in the corridor. In September 2010 the Center For Neighborhoods and residents from Bon Air, Bashford Manor, Bon Air Estates, and Highgate Springs performed a walkability survey focused along the Bashford Manor Corridor of Bardstown Road. The survey participants met at the Bon Air Library and separated into teams to examine different sections of Bardstown Road. Each group observed their section of the corridor and assessed sidewalks, safety issues, amenities, and barriers utilizing the walkability assessment tool. In the final phase, synthesis, the CSC facilitation team integrated the information gathered from community input during the two public meetings, developing a concept plan that was presented to community participants for feedback. 3B.E Saelens, J.F. Sallis, J.B. Black, & D. Chen, Neighborhoodbased differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation, American Journal of Public Health, 2003, 93 (9), 1552–1558. 4G. Pivo & J.D. Fisher, The Walkability Premium in Commercial Real Estate Investments, Responsible Property Investing Center, University of Arizona & Benecki Center for Real Estate Studies, Indiana University, 2010. 7 Process Participants in the walkability survey identified several primary issues along the corridor. There was general consensus that the lack of visual interest and amenities such as benches, trash cans and bus shelters was one of the main issues affecting walkability. This strikes at the heart of walkable neighborhoods, for if the area does not offer a rich visual environment and the amenities to accommodate pedestrians it does not matter how great the sidewalks and crosswalks are, as few people will use them. Although outside of the scope of this study, current land use patterns are a major contributor to this problem. Land use changes might relocate parking to the rear of buildings, allowing the structures to be located closer to the street. Even with low levels of pedestrian traffic, it is still important that those who do travel the corridor, often out of necessity, not be impeded by poor or non-existent infrastructure. To that point, another major issue identified by the participants was a need to complete the sidewalk infrastructure and improve street crossings. In several locations utility poles are right in the middle of the sidewalk making it impossible for wheelchair access along these sections of sidewalk. In other areas the sidewalks are narrow, in poor condition, or do not exist at all. Poorly marked pedestrian crossings and the considerable width of Bardstown Road not only reduce the perceived, but also the real safety of the corridor. Other issues that stood out among the participants were the need for more tree plantings where possible, more lighting, buffered sidewalks with more space between pedestrians and automobile traffic, reduced signage clutter, and a general cleanup of the corridor including the removal of graffiti and garbage specifically around the two waterways that go under Bardstown Road. Many of these issues relate to a need for a beautification of the corridor. Public Visioning Workshop The first public workshop of the Bashford Manor Corridor project was held in January 2011, at the Brooklawn Child and Family Services campus. Approximately 40 participants, 12 students from a University of Kentucky Landscape Architecture studio led by Ryan Hargrove, and facilitating staff attended the meeting. Several Metro Council sponsors and public representatives were also in attendance. The range of representatives provided valuable insight during the visioning and breakout sessions of this workshop. Michael McCoy of the City Solutions Center and Jack Trawick of the Center For Neighborhoods facilitate a group visioning session during the workshop The workshop began with a review of the background on the project and introduction of facilitation staff by Jack Trawick of the Center For Neighborhoods. Trawick went on to acknowledge the Councilmen who were instrumental bringing this process to fruition: Brent Ackerson, Jim King, and Tom Owen. Michael McCoy and Patrick Piuma of the City Solutions Center gave an overview of the workshop. After the workshop introduction, the attendees participated in a group visioning process. Workshop attendees were asked to visualize the future Bashford Manor Corridor in 15-20 years. What might the area look and sound like? Taking turns and raising hands, participants were able to call out their ideas and hopes as the facilitators wrote their Participants break out into groups around maps of the corridor to begin identifying assets and issues 8 Process comments onto large posters on the walls to make sure that they were capturing the true thoughts and views of the participants. Six breakout groups were then formed around tables with maps, markers, and other materials to help them identify the existing positives and negatives along the corridor. Due to the size of the study area, the corridor was divided into three segments with two groups exploring issues and positive aspects of each of the three sections for approximately 30 minutes. Those same breakout groups continued their discussion of the areas by brainstorming potential physical improvements along their sections of the corridor for another half hour. Once the exercises were complete, two representatives from each breakout group explained their ideas during a group report-out. Student Concepts Twelve University of Kentucky (UK) students in the Department of Landscape Architecture Spring 2011 Design Studio IV led by Ryan Hargrove attended the first public workshop to work with participants on mapping and visioning exercises. Following the workshop the students returned to Lexington with the charge of creating six conceptual redevelopment schemes for this segment of Bardstown Road from the Watterson Expressway to Hikes Lane. Armed with base maps and the collected information and input generated by the corridor stakeholders, they spent the next four weeks of their studio course concentrating on developing solutions that addressed the concerns, questions and suggestions that were offered by residents, public officials and business owners. overall, while a number of respondents thought that Project Six (page 15) was probably the most feasible. There was a great deal of interest and appreciation for the walkability of project three, though walkability appeared to be a consistent focus of comment and concern voiced in the evaluation forms. Respondents often cited the area of Bardstown Road in the Highlands as a model for what they would like to see happen along the Bashford Manor Corridor, while some pointed out that it would be unrealistic to expect that built form to be replicated. The collected responses were organized and used by the CSC staff to inform their design considerations as they subsequently undertook the development of a final, composite concept based on the students’ work and the stakeholders’ review comments. Student work was guided and critiqued in-house at the University of Kentucky by Professor Hargrove together with Horst Schach and Michael McCoy, during normal MondayWednesday-Friday class sessions and at separate midproject and final project juries. Public Review Workshop In April 2011, the six two-student design concept proposals were presented to a gathering of approximately 25 stakeholders at a public exhibit in the gymnasium at Brooklawn, site of the first pubic design workshop in January. The stakeholders spent an hour and a half examining each of the six concepts that were each broken up into three sections: North, Central and South. Participants filled out an evaluation form for each plan, recording their general opinions and specific likes and dislikes. Portions of each student proposal garnered positive responses. Out of all the student concepts presented, Project Three (page 12) appears to have been the most preferred 9 Process Participants reviewing the student concept proposals during the April 2011 public review workshop UK Student Proposal: Project 1 10 Student Concepts UK Student Proposal: Project 2 11 Student Concepts UK Student Proposal: Project 3 12 Student Concepts UK Student Proposal: Project 4 13 Student Concepts UK Student Proposal: Project 5 14 Student Concepts UK Student Proposal: Project 6 15 Student Concepts City Solutions Center Plan Development After reviewing the UK students’ design concepts and stakeholder comments, the staff of the CSC developed a final overall concept for the redevelopment of Bardstown Road’s public right-of-way. This plan attempts to integrate as many of the valuable suggestions from the UK projects and public comments as possible while also considering the practicalities of roadway design, public open space aesthetics, storm water management, environmental sustainability and the Complete Streets initiatives of providing equal and safe opportunities for a desirable multi-modality of walking, biking and driving. • Upgraded crosswalks, made of brick or colored precast concrete pavers, at every currently signalized intersection will improve walkability and safety of local residents as they walk along the corridor for exercise and to access retail establishments along the corridor. The main elements of the final concept plan are: • Pullouts along the corridor at bus stops allow for safer waiting areas with bus shelter, benches and trash receptacles for bus riders’ use and allow for smoother traffic flows along Bardstown Road with the removal of stopped buses from the travel lane. • A Bardstown Road “roadway diet” that provides the same number of travel and turning lanes as currently exist but with reduced widths. The width reductions recommended are suitable for a roadway with Bardstown Road’s current 35 m.p.h. speed limit. It is recommended that this speed limit be extended from its current termination at approximately Bashford Manor Lane southward to Hikes Lane. Suggested street furniture family, Plainwell Benches & Litter Receptacles by Landscape Forms, Inc. Source: http://www.landscapeforms.com/ SiteCollectionImages/LFI%20Photo%20Gallery/ Plainwell/plainwell17_original.zip • A consistent 6’ wide planting strip next to the curb provides additional opportunities for the planting of shade trees which improve walkability, provide shade for pedestrians, calm traffic speeds and, when combined with the 5’ wide bike lanes, give walkers an 11’ wide buffer zone from vehicular traffic. • Wider planted medians south of Bashford Manor Lane provide additional aesthetic improvements and potential storm water retention and infiltration areas next to Beargrass Creek • Upgraded planting schemes at both the Watterson Expressway interchange areas and at the south end of the corridor near Hikes Lane provide increased visibility to the “gateways” to the newly-named Bashford Manor Corridor • Signage, pedestrian-scaled lighting fixtures and benches along the route provide a general upgrade and new continuity to the corridor making the walking experience safer and more pleasant. • Two additional highway improvements that are made possible by the lane width diet are: o Center planted medians extending the entire length of the corridor that are 16’ wide, except at the locations of left-turn lanes where the median narrows to 7’ in width in order to accommodate a 9’ turning lane. The plantings in the medians will contribute to the improved beauty of the corridor and will act as traffic calmers in the attempt to encourage observance of the 35 m.p.h. speed limit. o Bike lanes, 5’ in width, next to the curbs on both sides of Bardstown Road. Proposed Typical Bashford Manor Corridor Section - 110’ Right-of-Way (varies) 16 Improvement Concept Plan 17 Improvement Concept Plan 18 Improvement Concept Plan 19 Improvement Concept Plan Phasing Plan The City Solutions Center suggests three alternative phasing concepts for the installation of suggested elements along the Bashford Manor Corridor. Concept 1 phases group activity by type along the entire length of the corridor. The types of activity are structural streetscape improvements, addition of plant materials, and installation of street furniture. In contrast, Concepts 2 and 3 break the corridor into smaller zones in which all suggested types of changes are installed during the same time period or process. Phasing Concept 1: Phasing Concept 1 breaks the installation into three main areas of activity along the entire length of the Bashford Manor corridor. Phase A begins with the main structural streetscape changes. Phase B is the completion of all the planting activity, while Phase C is the installation of street furniture, pavers and structures at bus shelters. Phase A would be most costly, but most effective if completed first because of restructuring of road widths and planters, which affects the installation of plant material and street furniture in Phases B and C. Phase A (Streets): • Re-stripe Bardstown Road to reflect the vehicle and bicycle lane suggestions (roadway diet) • Build center medians • Provide curb alterations (where necessary) • Construct precast paver crosswalks 20 Phasing Plan Phase B (Plantings): • Install plantings in center medians • Plant rain gardens in center medians between Bashford Manor Lane and Hikes Lane • Plant shade and ornamental trees in center medians and along street in tree lawns Phase C (Street Furniture): • Install street furniture along the corridor • Install bus shelters, including benches and trash receptacles at the suggested bus stops Phasing Concept 2: Phasing Concept 2 breaks the Bashford Manor corridor into three sections. Phase A includes the northern gateway surrounding the Watterson Expressway, Phase B includes the southern gateway, and Phase C is the connection between A and C. In this concept, Phase A is most important to complete first because it is the primary gateway and entrance into this corridor with its connection to the Watterson Expressway. • Phase A (Northern Gateway) • Phase B (Southern Gateway) • Phase C (Interior of Corridor) 21 Phasing Plan Each Phase consists of the following elements within its zone: • Streetscape improvements, which include restriping lanes, building center medians, providing curb alterations and constructing crosswalks. • Landscape improvements, which include plantings in center medians, addition of rain gardens, and shade and ornamental trees in the center medians and tree lawns. • Street furniture improvements, which include installing benches, trans receptacles and bus shelters. Phasing Concept 3: Phasing Concept 3 breaks the Bashford Manor corridor into five sections. This phasing concept would be conducted in the same manner as Phasing Concept 2, but instead breaks the sections into smaller segments to tackle one at a time. The choice of Phasing Concept 2 or 3 could depend on funding availability and resources. • Phase A (Northern Gateway) • Phase B (Southern Gateway) • Phase C (Interior of Corridor) • Phase D (Interior of Corridor) • Phase E (Interior of Corridor) 22 Phasing Plan Each Phase consists of the following elements within its zone or area: • Streetscape improvements, which include restriping lanes, building center medians, providing curb alterations and constructing crosswalks. • Landscape improvements, which include plantings in center medians, addition of rain gardens, and shade and ornamental trees in the center medians and tree lawns. • Street furniture improvements, which include installing benches, trans receptacles and bus shelters. Suggested Funding United States Department of Transportation Commonwealth of Kentucky Corporate Grants Transportation Enhancements (TE) Grant Area Development Fund (ADF) Community Grant Program • • Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A legacy for users (SAFETEA-LU) 2005 State Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office Transportation Enhancements federally fund community-based projects that expand travel choices and enhance the transportation experience, paying up to 80% of the project cost, with 20% non-federal match. (http://www.enhancements.org/Te_basics.asp) (http://www.enhancements.org/profile/KYprofile.php) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Community Action for a Renewed Environment (CARE) Grant A competitive grant program offers an innovative way for a community to organize, create partnerships and implement solutions to reduce toxic pollution. Cooperative Agreements amount to approximately $90,000 to $275,000. (http://www.epa.gov/care/ • Kentucky Office of State Grants • Governor’s Office for Local Development (GOLD) and local area development districts Approved ADF state-funded projects are based solely on availability of funds. (http://dlg.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/4A8A90F5795C-4010-9B5EAF4D07C4DE10/0/ OfficeofStateGrantsGuidelinesJune07.pdf) City of Louisville NatureScape Garden and Beautification Grants • Neighborhood Development Fund Louisville Metro Council members have $75,000/year discretionary funds for neighborhood development. Capital Infrastructure Fund • 23 Suggested Funding Walmart and SAM’s CLUB Foundation The Walmart and SAM’s CLUB Foundation strives to provide opportunities that improve the lives of individuals in our communities. Grants are focused on enhancing opportunities in our four main focus areas: Education, Workforce Development / Economic Opportunity, Environmental Sustainability, and Health and Wellness. The Community Grant Program is funded by the Walmart and SAM’S CLUB Foundation and provides matching and direct grants. The Matching Grant program allows local nonprofit organizations to hold fundraisers outside their local Walmart or SAM’S CLUB, with possible match up to $1,000. (http://walmartstores.com/CommunityGiving/8781.aspx) Brightside of Louisville NatureScape Grants help neighborhood groups keep community public spaces looking their best. Awards are $1,500 per cycle, allowing two cycles in a row for up to $3,000 total. (http://www.louisvilleky.gov/Brightside/ Beautification/NatureScapeGrants.htm) • • Louisville Metro Council members have $100,000/year in discretionary funds for capital infrastructure. PNC Economic Development Grants • PNC Foundation, PNC Charitable Trusts, and Charitable Sponsorships • 10-year $100 million dollar initiative Support is given to organizations that help stabilize communities, eliminate blight, attract and retain businesses and residents within the community. (http://www.pncsites.com/pncfoundation/foundation_ grantProcess.html) Bashford Manor Corridor Streetscape Study November 2011 This report was written by J. Michael McCoy, Patrick Piuma, and Steven C. Bourassa of the City Solutions Center at the University of Louisville and Jack Trawick of the Center For Neighborhoods. Photographic contributions by Patrick Piuma and Jack Trawick. Site plan renderings and other graphics created by Michael McCoy. Student concept plans were developed by University of Kentucky Landscape Architecture students Brandon Perry, Chris Deahl, Derek Triplett, D’Wayne Parks, Jason Kulsveen, Chris Fielder, Jason Dabbikeh, Michael Kuryla, Cameron Stone, Tyler Dixon, Spencer Heuke, and Moore Russell, under the direction of Ryan Hargrove. Additional contributions were made by University of Louisville Master of Urban Planning students Megan Enyeart and Abigail Free. This project was made possible through a grant from the Neighborhood Development Fund of Louisville Metro Council, co-sponsored by District 26 Councilman Brent Ackerson and District 10 Councilman Jim King, with support from District 8 Councilman Tom Owen.