current limitations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Transcription
current limitations of transcatheter aortic valve implantation
CURRENT LIMITATIONS OF TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION Amit Segev, MD, FESC, FACC Interventional Cardiology Unit Chaim Sheba Medical Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center CURRENT LIMITATIONS OF TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION? Amit Segev, MD, FESC, FACC Interventional Cardiology Unit Chaim Sheba Medical Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Disclosures • Proctor (TAVI) – Edwards, Medtronic • Global advisory board – Medtronic • Speaker – Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Edwards Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Outline • Complications after TAVI / SAVR – Stroke – Vascular complications and bleeding – Para-valvular leak – High degree AV block perm. pacemaker • Significance of PVL after TAVI • Valve durability • Non “classical” AS indications Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Stroke in PARTNER -1y Smith CR et al NEJM 2011 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Stroke at 2y – PARTNER Kodali SK et al. NEJM 2013 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Vascular Complications PARTNER – Cohort A Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center This can be expected with TF TAVI Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Increased rate of stroke and vascular complications in PARTNER 22-24F Sheaths No retroflex delivery system Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center CoreValve US Pivotal: Study Disposition 18F delivery system Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 2-Year All-cause Mortality Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 11 CoreValve US Pivotal: All Stroke Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 12 CoreValve US Pivotal: Major Stroke Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 13 CoreValve US Pivotal: All-Cause Mortality or Major Stroke Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 14 Subgroup Analysis for 1 Year Mortality Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 15 Subgroup Analysis for 1 Year Mortality Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 16 FRANCE 2 Registry NEJM 2012 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Prevalence & significance of para-valvular leak Sining JM et al. JACC 2012 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Percent of Evaluable Echocardiograms Paravalvular Leak PARTNER Cohort B – 5y N= Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Mortality by Paravalvular Leak All-Cause Mortality Cardiovascular Mortality None-Mild (n = 142) None-Mild (n = 142) Moderate-Severe (n = 23) Moderate-Severe (n = 23) 78.3% 74.6% 69.2% 51.3% p (log rank) = 0.510 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer p (log rank) = 0.043 The Leviev Heart Center PVL in US Pivotal – Extreme Risk Sheba Medical Center TCTTel 2014 Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center PVL in US Pivotal Randomized Patients Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 23 PVL and All-Cause Mortality – US Pivotal Sheba Medical Center TCTTel 2014 Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 24 Significant PVL after TAVI Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Post-dilation Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center High degree AV block requiring permanent pacemaker • PARTNER (Sapien) – 2y – TAVI – 7.2% – SAVR – 6.4% • France Registry – Sapien XT – 11.5% – CoreValve – 24.2% • CoreValve US Pivotal randomized trial – 1y – TAVI – 22.3% – SAVR – 11.3% • Evolute R – 11.7% • Sapien3 – 10.1% Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Impact of PPM on prognosis Buellesfeld L, JACC 2012 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center TAVI Valve Durability Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Valve durability (PARTNER) Mean Gradient & Valve Area EOA Mean Gradient Valve Area (cm²) Mean Gradient (mmHg) Error bars = ± 1 Std Dev N= 159 86 70 44 31 15 163 91 71 46 31 15 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center US Pivotal - Echo Findings Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 32 Non-AS Indications Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Not suitable for TAVI? • Oval-shaped annulus? Annulus size over-estimated? • Asymmetric calcifications • Diseased and enlarged ascending aorta Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center • 11 patients with Edwards-sapien valve • 2 deaths • 1 late conversion to sAVR Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Sapien (n = 51) CoreValve (n = 91) P value Transcatheter Valve Mean size, mm 26.4 28.5 0.0001 < CT-based Valve Sizing 78.8% 56.0% 0.01 Femoral Access 64.7% 86.8% 0.003 Valve Malposition 4.0% 7.8% 0.5 Valve Embolization 4.0% 1.1% 0.29 Tamponade 0 5.7% 0.16 Conversion to SAVR 3.9% 1.1% 0.29 Fluoroscopy time, min 14 20 0.004 Mortality: 30d 4.9%, 6M 9.3%, 1y 15.9%. No difference according to valve type Borderline predictors of worse 1y survival CoreValve (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.16-0.99; P = 0.05) valve embolization (OR 5.70; 95% CI 0.99-32.72; P = 0.052 Mylotte D et al. ACC 2014 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Patho-Anatomical issues of AS vs. AR • Thickening and calcification AS >> AR • Annular size AS < AR • Aortic root dilation AS << AR Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Pure Aortic Regurgitation – Case • • • • 63y old male s/p CABG s/p repair of type A aortic dissection Intractable heart failure – Severe AR, LVEF 30% – Aortic annulus 27 mm • EUROSCORE – 49.9%!! • Trans-axillary CoreValve 29 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Evaluation of aortic arch by CTA & angio Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Severe AR – After CoreValve Implantation Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Alive @ 3y NYHA FC I Mild-mod AR Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center TAVI for Pure Native AR World Wide Registry Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Results - VARC Outcomes TAVI for Pure Native Valve AR • 30-day mortality • Total – 4 (9.3%) • Cardiovascular – 1 (2.3%) • 30-day stroke • Major – 2 (4.7%) • Minor - 0 • 1-year mortality • Total - 6/28 (21.4%) • Cardiovascular - 3/28 (10.7%) Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 30d NYHA FC NYHA Functional Class 100% Number of Patients 90% 80% Deaths 70% Class 4 60% Class 3 50% Class 2 40% Class 1 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer 30 day The Leviev Heart Center Valve-in-Valve Global Registry JAMA 2014 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Valve-in-Valve Global Registry Outcome according to mechanism of valve failure Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Dvir D et al. JAMA 2014 The Leviev Heart Center Valve-in-Valve Global Registry Outcome according to surgical valve size Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Dvir D et al. JAMA 2014 The Leviev Heart Center Valve-in-Valve Global Registry Outcome in Sapien vs. Corevalve use Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Dvir D et al. JAMA 2014 The Leviev Heart Center Severe AS & AR (Mitroflow 23) LVEDP = Ao diastloic pressure Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Post VIV CoreValve 23mm AI Index >25 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center TAVI in failed mitral & tricuspid bioprostheses Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days Edwards SAPIEN Valves (As Treated Patients) PARTNER I and II Trials Overall and TF Patients 175 Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer 344 240 SAPIEN 271 282 SXT 583 491 1072 SAPIEN 3 947 The Leviev Heart Center All Strokes at 30 Days Edwards SAPIEN Valves PARTNER I and II Trials Neurologist evaluations (pre- and post) Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 30-Day Outcomes – Evolute R Event, % * KM Rate (%) All-cause mortality 0.0 All stroke 0.0 Moderate or severe PVL 3.4 Permanent pacemaker implantation 11.7 * Percentages obtained from Kaplan Meier estimates Source: Meredith IT, et al. Early Results from the CoreValve Evolut R CE Study [2101-295]. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American College of Cardiology. March 14, 2015. Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center 54 Conclusions • TAVI is a well-established procedure currently evaluated for intermediate risk patients. – – – – Low stroke rate PVL is still the main obstacle for the procedure PPM – similar to surgery Durability – optimism…. • S3 & EvoluteR – excellent initial results • TAVI can be safely and efficaciously expanded to “non-classical” AS patients – VIV – Need more data in bicupid valves and pure AR Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center Thank-you Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer The Leviev Heart Center
Similar documents
Patient Selection for Transcatheter Aortic Valve
Patient Selection Criteria Within 45 days of the date of the procedure Echocardiography: calcific aortic valve stenosis mean gradient> 40 mmHg or jet velocity >4 m/s AVA < 0.8 cm2 or AVAI < 0.5 cm...
More information