Cestar News RCAR 2012 - Generali Innovation Center for
Transcription
Cestar News RCAR 2012 - Generali Innovation Center for
Page 1 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Buongiorno, sono lieto di trasmettervi un numero speciale di Cestar News dedicato al meeting internazionale RCAR 2012, che si è tenuto nel mese di Settembre in Germania. In questo numero vi presenteremo alcune delle ricerche più interessanti, condotte dai Centri di Ricerca presenti nel resto del mondo. Quest’anno abbiamo selezionato cinque ricerche riguardanti argomenti sui quali anche il Cestar sta operando in questi mesi, in particolare: • Riparazioni non professionali – realizzata dal Centro Tedesco KTI • Progetto “Pay as you Speed” in Svezia – realizzato dal Folksam • L’impatto sui sinistri dei nuovi sistemi di sicurezza attiva ed il nuovo crash test ideato dal Centro Americano IIHS • Analisi Biomeccanica – condotta dal Centro Spagnolo Centro Zaragoza. Confidando nel vostro interesse e gradimento, vi invio i miei migliori saluti, Marco Castelli This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 2 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 In this issue: • KTI (Germania) Fair Repair vs Professional repair of VW Passat ……...……...…………...p.3 • Folksam (Svezia) “Green Light” – Pay as You Speed Concept……………......…………....…p.5 • IIHS (USA) Crash Avoidance System Evaluations………………..........……………..…p.8 • CENTRO ZARAGOZA (Spagna) Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research …..…p.11 • IIHS (USA) Results of Small Overlap Frontal Crash Tests …………………….…..…p.14 This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 3 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Fair Repair vs Professional repair of VW Passat Non-professional repairs can have a negative influence on the deformation behaviour of a vehicle involved in a crash. The introduction by OEM’s of new materials and production techniques in cars makes it increasingly important that the repair of such cars is carried out with appropriate techniques and quality. These are the aims described in a project named “Fair Repair”, to which this paper is linked. KTI, with the support of the OEM tested the side structure of a VW Passat, MY 2005. With a side impact at 50 km/h (Euro NCAP standard) it was shown that a non-professional repair of a vehicle previously damaged in the same side impact scenario results in negative influences on the crashworthiness and protection afforded by the structure. With the same scenario we crashed a car with 50 km/h and have done a professional repair. The following scenario, including two high-speed crash tests was carried out, and then analysed: 1) The car was damaged by a side impact similar to an intrusion by the front of another car into the passenger side of the test vehicle, according to the side-impact tests of Euro NCAP. 2) A repair was carried out as if done in a car body shop or garage with no information about the correct way to repair this particular car and without the correct tools or welding machines. The repair conforms to a typical standard carried out about 10 years (two car generations) ago. This would be considered as a non-professional repair by today’s standards. 3) After the repair, this vehicle was involved in a follow-up crash simulation in the same configuration i.e. a side impact on the repaired passenger side, at the same speed. The exemplary vehicle, a VW Passat model B6 variant was chosen for the tests as its structure represented state of the art car bodies with several highstrength and ultra high-strength steels. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 4 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 NON-PROFESSIONAL REPAIR - CRASH TEST 1 After the side impact the car was severely damaged on the passenger side, as intended. The sill and the floor/undercarriage behind it were particularly distorted. Additionally, the doors and the B-pillar were considerably damaged. The pyrotechnic protection/restraint systems (Front and rear passenger side airbags, front passenger belt pre-tensioner and passenger side curtain airbag) were correctly deployed. Overall the car body structure deformed and behaved as expected. The deformed inner sill, made from ultra high strength steel, was re-shaped and partially replaced on a bench then re-fitted using a MAG welding process. Figures 6 to 9 show the non professional repair being carried out. The “Professional” repair would include complete renewal of the B-Pillar and other deformed structures with components made from high strength steel. A partial repair of such steels is not acceptable, as the structure and therefore the strength of the material will be severely degraded while welding and reforming. After completing the repair the car was crashed again under the same conditions as the first test in order to make a fair assessment on equal terms. It was immediately evident that there was a substantial difference, with far more comprehensive deformation of the car body after the second impact. The Bpillar had noticeably higher intrusion into the passenger compartment in comparison with the first crash, especially at the lower part at the connection with the sill. The pyrotechnic protection/restraint systems (Front and rear passenger side airbags and the front passenger belt pre-tensioner) were correctly deployed but the passenger side curtain airbag failed to operate. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 5 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 PROFESSIONAL REPAIR - CRASH TEST 1 The VW Passat were impacted again in accordance with the appropriate Euro NCAP test programme. After the side impact at 50 km/h, KTI compared the results of the Euro NCAP test performed on a undamaged car with the professional repaired vehicle. The side curtain airbag on the unrepaired vehicle deployed. OEM information was used during the repair. The damaged car was repaired with an Inverter type welding machine with adequate maximum current (10 kA) and a variable pressure to join the high-strength steel safely. After removal of exterior attachment parts the car was fixed on a bench. In order to replacement part correctly, we used alignment brackets. To preparation of new parts, were severance cut marked and cut. By repairing this vehicle on a bench, we were able to restore it to factory specifications. The complete B-Pillar and other deformed structures with components made from high strength steel were replaced. New components were attached with welding and adhesive. After completing the repair the car was crashed again under the same conditions as the first test in order to make a fair assessment on equal terms. The pyrotechnic protection/restraint systems (Front and rear passenger side airbags, front passenger belt pre-tensioner and passenger side curtain airbag) were correctly deployed. The tests have shown the professional repaired vehicles to perform in a similar way to that of an original undamaged vehicle. From the results obtained by this project it is clear that only a repair carried out according to the OEM’s information could be described as Expert and Professional. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 6 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 “Green Light” – Pay as You Speed Concept Is it possible to change driver behavior by economic incentives and thereby reducing crash risk and CO2 emissions? During 2010 Folksam started a project together with the Swedish Transport Administration and a major Swedish motor club to evaluate a PAYS concept consisting of informative ISA linked with economic incentives for not speeding. A one year Pay-as-you-speed trial with economic incentives for keeping speed limits using Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) was conducted in Sweden during 2011-2012. The full incentive was a 30% discount of the insurance premium. The partecipants were private insurance customers and they were randomized into a test group (n=135) and a control group (n=90). When deiving the drivers in the test group were informed and warned visually when the speed limit was exceeded. They could also follow the driving results on a personal website. The control group was not given any feedback at all. for analyzing the effect of ISA the proportion of distance driven above the speed limit was compared between the two groups. Surveys were sent out to the participants before and after the trial asking questions about for instance acceptance and usbility. The ISA (Intelligent Speed Adaption) system: o Informs the driver of the speed limit and warns the driver only visually when the speed limit is being exceeded; o Based on a GPS receiver, continuously identifies the position of the vehicle, connected to a national road The ISA (Intelligent Speed Adaption) system database including the speed limits of the National road network o The system is automatically activated when the engine is started o Records speeding measured through automatic count of whenever speed limit is exceeded This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 7 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 This picture shows the proportions of driving according to the speed limit (green), between 0 and 5Km/h above the limit (yellow), and at least 5Km/h above the speed limit (red). The evaluation of the pay-as-you-speed concept showed that the test group sognificantly reduced the proportion of distance above the speed limit. The proportion “red” driving was 14% for the control group and 6% for the test group. The distribution of speeding was also analysed, and it was found that the effect was higher the higher violetion of speed. The reduced speeding in the test group did not have any large effect on the average speed compared to the controll group. The test group had less than 1min longer travel time per hour travelled. The results remained constant over the test period. A side effect of reducing speeding was that the fuel consumption was reduced and thereby the CO2 emissions. The average reduction was calculated to approximately 300kg CO2 per year. The lowered fuel consuption corresponds to an average lowered fuel cost of 200 E per driver each tear. The average premium discount for the test group was 21%, coresponding to 100€ per driver per year. the reduced proportion of speeding for the test group can be correlared to reduced risk of fatality and disabling injury. The fatality risk would be reduced by 20% and the risk of seious injury by 5-10%. The results show that a Pay-as-You-Speed concept i san effective way to reduce speed violations. Hence, it has the possibility to reduce crash severity and thereby to save lives. This could be an important step towards a safer road transport system. The majority of the particapations were in favor of the concept (9/10) which indicates the potential of a new insurance product in the future. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 8 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Crash Avoidance System Evaluations The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reported last year that Volvo City Safety was reducing insurance claims for motor vehicle crashes in the United States, based on results for the Volvo XC60. This year, the Institute has followed that initial report with a report on three additional crash avoidance technologies: forward collision warning with and without autonomous braking, adaptive (steerable) headlamps, and lane departure warning. As expected, forward collision warning is reducing insurance claims and reduces them more when autonomous braking is available. This finding supports the Volvo City Safety finding that front to rear collisions can be reduced with forward collision prevention systems. Adaptive headlamps also are reducing the frequency of claims, especially of claims for damage to other vehicles (property damage liability). This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 9 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Counterbalancing that reduction from an insurance perspective is that the remaining crashes of vehicles with adaptive headlamps cost more to repair, on average, so that overall insurance losses are actually higher for some vehicles with adaptive headlamps. Results for lane departure warning are surprising – vehicles with the feature had higher insurance claim frequencies than those without, with the exception of Volvo vehicles, where lane departure warning was sold only in combination with forward collision warning with autobrake. It is likely that the Volvo results reflect the benefits of forward collision prevention rather than lane departure warning. It is possible that the high severity crashes that lane departure warning is intended to prevent are too infrequent among insurance claims to provide a good test of this feature. However, additional analyses looking at the frequency of only high severity claims had similar results. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 10 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 These data confirm the promise of collision avoidance systems but also reveal that not all systems may work as expected. In predicting how vehicles respond, testing is important to understand the different philosophies automakers have employed in designing their systems. Testing already conducted by the Institute shows quite large differences in philosophy, and the next step is to further understand these differences and examine whether they make a difference in real world crashes. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 11 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research Knowledge of the behaviour of the human body during a crash is essential to develop effective safety systems for occupant’s protection. ATD (Anthropometric Test Devices or, commonly, dummies) and computer models are the main tools to design new restraints, but: Their biofidelity is assessed and directly compared with results from PMHS (POST MORTEM HUMAN SUBJECT). Experiments involving PMHS since the 1960s, but current technologies have the potential of a deeper characterization of the body structures during the crash. Limited biofidelity of current human surrogates (dummies). PMHS are not perfect, but are a better model. There are few centers capable of performing PMHS tests worldwide, so we can see the importance of a new European one. The project herein presented, called BIO-ADVANCE ( BIOADVANCE is a Marie Curie Action, from the 7th Framework Programme, co-funded by the European Commission), will contribute to elucidate the complex motion undergone by the human spine during frontal and oblique crashes, being furthermore the starting point for a continuous research line, involving PMHS testing at CZ’s new facilities in Motorland, Alcañiz, coordinated by the University of Zaragoza, in cooperation with the Center for Applied Biomechanics of the University of Virginia. This research is expected that will impact effectively both the scholarly knowledge on injury prevention and tissue tolerance as well as the applied research to develop innovative concepts for car occupant’s protection. The objectives of project are: This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 12 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Research objectives 1: CHARACTERIZATION OF SPINAL INJURIES IN MVC AND THEIR INFLUENCE IN HEAD INJURIES. Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research Analysis of injury databases to obtain the frequency and characteristics of spinal injuries in frontal and oblique MVC (Motor Vehicle Crashes). Relationships between spinal injuries and head injuries. Research objectives 2: REALIZATION OF FULL INSTRUMENTED SLED TEST USING THE ATD HYBRID III AND SIX PMHS. Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research PMHS previously screened to avoid any prior condition that could influence in the results. PMHS instrumented with accelerometers and reflective markers to track their motion. 3 pure frontal impacts and 3 oblique, at different speeds. Hybrid III previous tests will be carried out to check all the instrumentation. Research objectives 3: ANALYSIS OF THE DATA AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE 6DOF OF THE HUMAN SPINE. Obtaining the 6-dof motion of the head and individualvertebrae. Analysis of extension, shear, translation and rotation, experienced at different levels of spine during the impact. Comparison of PMHS data with the performance of ATD spine. Recommendations to increase the biofidelity of the spine of the dummies (physical and virtual). Research objectives 4: ASSESSMENT OF HOW MANY INJURIES COULD BE PREVENTED SHOULD ATD SPINE BE BIOFIDELIC. Combining the results from epidemiological studies with the results obtained after PMHS tests. Estimation of how many head and spinal injuries can be prevented should the ATD spine be more biofidelic. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 13 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Structural Objective 1: DEVELOPMENT OF A COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENT TO OBTAIN HUMAN TISSUE FROM DONORS. A collaborative agreement will be signed so that PMHS can be moved to the facilities for testing. Structural Objective 2: DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPERATIONAL PROTOCOL FOR THE PROCUREMENT, HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OF HUMAN TISSUE TO BE USED IN INJURY PREVENTION RESEARCH. To protect the personnel operating with human tissue from infection. To make sure that the human tissue is always handled with the maximum care and respect. Structural Objective 3: ADAPTATION OF THE FACILITIES TO THE PARTICULARITIES OF PMHS TESTING. Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research Different tests will be done at CZ’s facilities in Alcañiz. Current facilities must be slightly remodelled to adapt them for work using human tissue. As part of this remodelling, an autopsy room and freezers to store the bodies will be needed. SUMMARY: ADVANCE OF THE STATE OF THE ART Road Safety Advances Based on Impact Biomechanics Research 1- It will bring together epidemiology and injury biomechanics to show the safety benefits of PMHS research. 2- It will contribute to the creation of a novel research model. 3- The project will characterize the 6-dof motion of selectedvertebral bodies during frontal and oblique impacts (there is no published work in the scientific literature). 4- The project will make use of motion capture techniques, applied to the analysis of the motion of a car occupant during an impact, which has only been performed by the University of Virginia until now. 5- BIO-ADVANCE will reduce the complex motion of human spine by using the helical axis description that will allow to construct a more biofidelic ATD spine. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 14 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 Results of Small Overlap Frontal Crash Tests Last fall, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety publicized its plans to add a small overlap crashworthiness evaluation to its suite of consumerinformation tests. The new test assesses occupant protection in a 64 kph, 25 percent offset frontal crash into a rigid barrier. Small overlap crashes account for about 20 percent of frontal crashes that result in serious injury or death. For most vehicles, a 25 percent overlap frontal impact misses the primary crashenergy structures and results in crash forces going directly into the wheel, suspension system and firewall. Such crashes often have high levels of occupant compartment intrusion. Since the impact occurs toward the vehicle’s outer edge, the vehicle has a tendency to rotate during the collision, resulting in the driver’s head moving outboard, away from the frontal airbag. Real crashes of this type result in head injuries from contact with outboard structures. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 15 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 The IIHS has completed testing of the first group of vehicles – midsize luxury cars. There is a wide range of performance in the three primary rating categories – structure, injury and occupant kinematics. Structurally, the Volvo S60 was best, with only a few centimeters of intrusion, whereas the Lexus IS had nearly ten times as much. Dummies in all vehicles indicated low risk of head or chest injury, but there was a wide range of leg injury risk. The Lincoln MKZ and Volvo measures were low, in contrast to high measures for the Lexus ES and VW CC. Occupant motion varied greatly as well, with the dummy completely missing the front airbag in the Lincoln. In comparison, the Acura TL had good dummy interaction with the frontal airbag, and the side curtain airbag helped protect the head. This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden Page 16 Special Issue – RCAR 2012 CESTAR S.C.R.L. RCAR Member Via C. Pisacane, 48 20016 PERO (MI) Tel. 02 38100356 web site: www.cestar.it Director Marco Castelli [email protected] In charge of the Department for Automotive Study and Research Eng. Giorgio Ighina [email protected] In charge of the Engineering and Design Department Eng. Andrea Mondini [email protected] Engineering and Training Cestar News Copy Editor Eng. Luca Ventola [email protected] This document is a property of CESTAR Copy and circulation are forbidden