Richmond Promise

Transcription

Richmond Promise

City of Richmond
2014 – 2022 Housing Element Update
& Potential Just Cause Eviction Policy Recommendations
1
April 14, 2015 – Community Workshop
AGENDA
Welcome & Introductions
Summary of Housing Element Community
Feedback
Q & A Session/Discussion
Just Cause Eviction Policy Research
 Q & A Session/Discussion
Next Steps
2
SUMMARY OF HOUSING
ELEMENT COMMUNITY
FEEDBACK
Brian
Harrington,
Lisa Wise
Consulting
WHAT IS A HOUSING ELEMENT?

Part of the City’s General Plan

Provides housing policies and
analysis

Sets stage for private market
development

Does not build housing or provide
funding
Richmond 2014 – 2022 Housing Element Update | Community Workshop| April 14, 2015 |
4
REQUIRED COMPONENTS ( G C § 6 5 5 8 0 E T S E Q )
 Review of previous Housing Element
 Update Housing Needs Assessment
 Inventory Resources and Constraints
 Facilitate public participation
 Revise Goals, Policies, Programs, and
Quantified Objectives
5
UPDATE PROCESS / BACKGROUND
Previous Housing Element (2007-2014) part of
2030 Comprehensive General Plan Update


Additional Outreach

Adopted January, 2013
Current Housing Element 2014-2022


Confirm Vacant Land Inventory to meet RHNA

Update Needs Assessment & Resource Constraints

Public Outreach

Modify goals, policies and programs
6
SUMMARY OF HOUSING NEEDS
 Population & Growth – RHNA
 Age Distribution & Racial
Composition
 Household Tenure & Income
 Homeless Population
7
POPULATION GROWTH
2000
2010
%
Change
City of Richmond
99,216
103,701
4.5%
Contra Costa County
948,816
1,049,025
10.6%
6,783,760
7,150,739
5%
Jurisdiction
Bay Area (ABAG)
Source: US Census (ABAG Compiled Data)
8
HOUSEHOLD TENURE
Jurisdiction
City of
Richmond
Contra Costa
County
Bay Area
(ABAG)
Households
2010
%
Owner
%
Renter
Change in
Ownership
Rate since
2000
36,093
56%
44%
-1.6%
375,364
67%
32%
-2.2%
2,608,023
52%
48%
-1.6%
9
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Households 2000
Households
2013 Estimate
2013 % of
Total
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $14,999
3,489
2,020
2,618
2,226
7.2%
6.1%
$15,000 to $24,999
3,894
3,530
9.7%
$25,000 to $34,999
$35,000 to $49,999
3,958
6,138
3,346
4,802
9.2%
13.3%
$50,000 to $74,999
6,849
6,466
17.9%
4,251
2,986
701
455
$44,210
4,976
4,626
1,994
1,624
$54,589
13.7%
12.8%
5.5%
4.5%
NA
Income Level
$75,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 or more
Median Household Income
10
HOUSEHOLD INCOME & POVERT Y
Jurisdiction
City of
Richmond
Contra Costa
County
California
2011
Median
Income
2000-2011
Percent
Change
2000
Poverty
Rate
2010
Poverty
Rate
$54,554
-8.6%
16.2%
17.5%
$79,135
-7.9%
7.6%
9.9%
$61,132
-3.5%
14.2%
14.4%
11
REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ALLOCATION
(RHNA)
Income Category
2007-2014 2014-2022
Very Low-Income
(50% of Median Family Income)
Low-Income
(50% to 80% of Median Family Income)
Moderate-Income
(80% to 120% of Median Family Income)
Above Moderate-Income
(120+% of Median Family Income)
TOTAL
391
438
339
305
540
410
1,556
1,282
2,826
2,435
Source: ABAG Compiled Data
12
RICHMOND AGE DISTRIBUTION
Age
2000
2010
Under 5
5-19
20-34
35-44
45-59
60-74
75+
8%
23%
23%
16%
18%
9%
5%
7%
20%
23%
14%
20%
11%
4%
13
RICHMOND RACIAL COMPOSITION
Race/Ethnicity
2000
2010
%
Change
Hispanic or Latino
Non-Hispanic White
Black or African
American
American Indian
Asian
Hawaiian and Pacific
Islander
Other Race
Two or More Races
TOTAL
26,319
21,081
40,921
17,769
55%
-16%
35,279
26,872
-24%
351
12,077
250
13,783
-29%
14%
476
462
-3%
400
3,233
99,216
585
3,059
103,701
46%
-5%
4.5%
14
HOMELESS – CONTRA COSTA COUNT Y
2014 Homeless Point in Time Count: 2,263
(Sheltered individuals)
In Fiscal Year 2013-14, 8,409 men, women &
children received shelter, support services, or
housing assistance

23% of homeless households are families

34% are children or youths
Source:The
majority have a disabling condition
Contra Costa Health Services
15
HOMELESS – CIT Y OF RICHMOND
Unsheltered Homeless
Counts:
Richmond
North Richmond
Total
Point in Time
142
13
155
Numbers do not include homeless in shelters
Source: Contra Costa Inter-Jurisdictional Council on Homelessness Homeless Count 2013
16
REVIEW OF GOALS AND PUBLIC INPUT
1. Balanced Supply of Housing
2. Better Neighborhoods & Quality of
Life
3. Expanded Housing Opportunities
for Special Needs Groups
4. Equal Housing Access for All
17
GOAL 1 BALANCED SUPPLY OF HOUSING –
COMMUNIT Y INPUT
 Provide balanced neighborhoods
and de-concentrate poverty
 Ensure housing access for all
groups

Determine if discrimination is occurring
 Use development/impact fees to
develop affordable housing
18
GOAL 2 BETTER NEIGHBORHOODS & QUALIT Y
OF LIFE - COMMUNIT Y INPUT
 Proactively seek funding for improvement
programs
 Preserve & enhance Richmond’s unique
Neighborhoods
 Provide more information and resources
for residents AND property
owners/managers
 Improve blighted conditions through
enforcement AND incentives
19
GOAL 3 EXPANDED HOUSING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR SPECIAL NEEDS
GROUPS – COMMUNIT Y INPUT
 Transitional housing and re-entry
support is a critical need
 Provide special assistance and
outreach for elderly and disabled to
ensure fair treatment
 Support Homeless Population
20
GOAL 4 EQUAL HOUSING ACCESS FOR ALL –
COMMUNIT Y INPUT
 Eviction protection is needed for
both tenants and property owners
 Rent control is needed, especially
for those with special needs
 Increased education, outreach, and
transparency is needed for all
groups
21
POTENTIAL CHANGES TO EXISTING PROGRAMS
Proactively seek funding sources for
affordable housing and programs
Programs H1.6.1 – 1.6.4 : Funding for
Affordable Housing Development
Program H2.1.1 Development Impact
fees
22
Strengthen education and outreach for
renters & property owners/managers &
special needs groups
 Program H2.5.1 Online Housing
Resource Center
 Program 2.5.2 Housing Education &
Workshops
23
Increase education outreach and
services for special needs groups
 Program H3.6.1 Homelessness
Coordination Efforts
 Program H3.6.3 Funding for
Emergency, Transitional and
Supportive Housing
24
Strengthen and clarify tenant
protections based on policy research
and community input
 Program H4.2.2 Expansion of Just
Cause for Eviction Ordinance
 Program H4.2.3 Rent Control
Ordinance Study
25
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NEW PROGRAMS
 Housing/Commercial Impact Fees
 Richmond Housing Rehabilitation
Fund
 Balanced Neighborhoods
 Homelessness
26
CALIFORNIA SENATE BILL
(SB) 2 COMPLIANCE
ORDINANCE
Lina Velasco,
Senior Planner
SB2: EMERGENCY SHELTERS AND
TRANSITIONAL AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING

Effective January 1, 2008

SB2 clarifies and strengthens housing element law
to ensure zoning encourages and facilities
emergency shelters and limits denial of emergency
shelters and transitional and supportive housing

Requires at least one zone be identified (with
sufficient capacity) to permit emergency shelters
without a conditional use permit or other
discretionary action
28
SB2 CONTINUED…

Written and objective standards may be applied as specified
in statue, including maximum number of beds, provision of
onsite management, length of stay and security.

Transitional and supportive housing shall be considered a
residential use and subject to those restrictions that apply
to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone.

Replace Homeless Shelter definition with Emergency Shelter
definition to meet state standards.

Modify definition of supportive and transitional housing to
meet state requirements.
29
SB2 CONTINUED…
 Allow in CB-Central Business Zone – 50 bed limit with other
performance standards
 Continue to allow emergency shelters in Residential Districts
with 10 beds/persons limits
30
Q & A SESSION/DISCUSSION
Feedback on Potential Program Changes
Input on SB2 Compliance Ordinance
31
JUST CAUSE EVICTION
POLICY RESEARCH
Bill Lindsay,
City Manager
CIT Y COUNCIL DIRECTION
February 17, 2015
Draft a Just Cause for Eviction
Ordinance best suited to the
City of Richmond
Convene a working group of stakeholders
Return in 90 days with policy
recommendations
33
REVIEW OF LAST WEEK’S CONTENT
 Summary of existing housing policies in
Richmond for renters and homeowners
 Overview of California State Law
 Retaliatory or discriminatory eviction prohibited
 Notice requirement for termination of tenancy
 Notice requirement for rent increases
 Review of Richmond’s ordinance 7.105: Eviction
Control on Residential Property in Foreclosure
 Case Studies
34
PERCENT OF FAMILIES WITH INCOMES
BELOW POVERT Y THRESHOLDS
40%
35.80%
35%
2013 Census Poverty Thresholds
31.90%
30%
25%
Household
Size
23.50%
20.90%
20%
17.50%
16.30%
15%
9.90%
10%
8.10%
5%
0%
American Native Hispanic or Other race Black or
Indian and Hawaiian
Latino
African
Alaska and Other Origin (of
American
Native
Pacific any race)
Islander
White
Two or
more races
Annual
Income
1
$11,888
2
$15,142
3
$18,552
4
$23,834
5
$28,265
6
$31,925
Asian
(2009-2013 ACS S1702)
Incomes shown are weighted average
thresholds for household size
35
CASE STUDY RESEARCH
Berkeley
East Palo Alto
Gardena
Glendale
San Diego
San Leandro
Santa Monica
36
COMMON ELEMENTS ACROSS CASE
STUDY JURISDICTIONS
Referral to Legal Assistance
Tenant/Landlord Mediation
Condominium Conversion Ordinance
37
VARIATIONS AMONG JURISDICTIONS
Just Cause Legislation
Relocation Ordinance
Rent Stabilization
Rent Board
38
EXISTING RENTAL HOUSING POLICY IN
RICHMOND
 Percentage of renter -occupied dwelling units: 48.3% (2010 Census)
 Annual Median Household Income: $ 54,589 (2009-201 3 ACS)
39
CITIES WITH
STANDALONE JUST
CAUSE FOR EVICTION
POLICY
40
GLENDALE
 Percentage of renter -occupied dwelling units: 61 .9% (2010 Census)
 Annual Median Household Income: $53,020 (2009 -201 3 ACS)
41
SAN DIEGO
 Percentage of renter -occupied dwelling units: 51 .7%
(2010 Census)
 Annual Median Household Income: $64,058 (2009-201 3 ACS)
42
CITIES WITH RENT
CONTROL, RENT BOARD,
AND JUST CAUSE FOR
EVICTION IN ONE
ORDINANCE
43
BERKELEY
 Percentage of renter -occupied dwelling units: 59.1% (2010 Census)
 Annual Median Houshold Income: $63,31 2 (2009 -201 3 ACS)
44
EAST PALO ALTO
 Pe rce n ta ge o f re n te r - o ccupied dwe l lin g un i t s : 57. 2 %
 An n ua l M e di a n H o us e h old In c o m e: $ 5 0 ,14 2
45
SANTA MONICA
 Percentage of renter -occupied dwelling units: 71 .6% (2010 Census)
 Annual Median Household Income: $73,649 (2009 -201 3 ACS)
46
CITIES WITH MEDIATION
BOARDS IN LIEU OF
RENT CONTROL OR JUST
CAUSE FOR EVICTION
47
SAN LEANDRO
(MEDIATION + NON-BINDING
ARBITRATION)
Percentage of renter-occupied dwelling units: 42.5% (2010 Census)
Annual Median Household Income: $63,055 (2009-2013 ACS)
48
GARDENA
(MANDATORY MEDIATION + BINDING
ARBITRATION)
Percentage of renter-occupied dwelling units: 52.1% (2010 Census)
Annual Median Household Income: $48,251 (2009-2013 ACS)
49
Q & A SESSION/DISCUSSION
 What information gaps still exist?
 What policy option is best suited to
Richmond’s population?
 What additional unintended
consequences should be considered?
50
NEXT STEPS
Just Cause Policy Recommendations to
City Council, later part of May
Draft Housing Element Update to
Planning Commission on May 7, 2015
Draft Housing Element to City Council on
May 19, 2015
51
THANK YOU!
Just Cause for Eviction
Housing Element Update
Bill Lindsay
Lina Velasco
City Manager
(510) 620-6512
Senior Planner
(510) 620-6841
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.ci.richmond.ca.us/housingupdate
52
ZONING MAP
53

Richmond Promise

Transcription

Similar documents

rampion headquarters

Cedar Lake Speedway

Welcome To 7460 Bathrust St #614, Thornhill, L4J7K9 Batya Mishan

Wytestone Plaza

Jamaal Stone - Audition Hunter

At the old art building in leland

October 2015 - Richmond, Utah

Lang Court - Chestertons

Sherando Flyer - Virginia Hemophilia

December 00/January 01