Using PDF-4+/Organics to discover and analyze polymorphs
Transcription
Using PDF-4+/Organics to discover and analyze polymorphs
Using PDF‐4+/Organics to discover and analyze polymorphs T.G. Fawcett, S. N. Kabbekodu, F. Needham, J. R. Blanton, D. M. Crane, J. Faber International Centre for Diffraction Data Indentifying Polymorphs • In this presentation we heavily use the graphics capability embedded in PDF‐ 4/Organics. The graphics package was added with Release 2008*. From the Start button Open up PDF-4 Organics 2008 * With releases before 2008, all searches shown can be run but they would have to be graphed by a separate program Method • Use crystallographic, structural, chemical or diffraction fields that are indicators of polymorphism (see next slide) • Plot the results • Compare the data • Use graphics interfaces to compare diffraction patterns, entry cards, editors comments etc. Differences in Polymorphs in the solid state Search Fields in PDF-4/Organics Molecular Symmetry Examine Crystal System, Space Group, Space Group Number, Pearson Symbols Molecular Volume Examine Author Cell, Crystal Cell and Reduced Cells, Cell Axis Ratio’s, Cell Volumes Molecular Packing Examine Powder patterns for differences in interplanar spacing, examine strong lines (d1, d2, d3) and long lines (l1, l2, l3) Hierarchal Search for Polymorphs – General Method Use any combination of fields shown on the prior slide Space Group vs Volume Examine Groups Within a group Examine d‐spacings or Cell edges or Structural classes Similar but not identical patterns • Compare instrumental details • Compare specimen preparation • Compare physical properties •Use molecular visualization tools* •Use cluster analyses* Compare Diffraction Patterns * May require additional software Perform a Seach – Point and Click the Search Icon on the Toolbar Search Structure Chemistry Elements References - 48 Searches Perform a Search (48 Searches, 66 Fields) ‐ Get results and then plot Polymorph Map Glycine – 68 Determinations, 5 SG’s Molecular Symmetry International Space Group Molecular Volume – Reduced Cell Volume Polymorph Map Glycine – 68 Determinations Symmetry vs Volume with inserts of the diffraction patterns for the points in question Glycine – Volume vs a cell edge Compaction series (useful for tableting) Plots two parameters in a Volume Change Glycine Reduced Cell a vs Cell c Straight line changes in cell parameters are often due to thermal expansion or contraction in a temperature or pressure series AZT Polymorphs ‐ Reduced Volume vs Cell Edge 3 Forms, same space group Need to examine molecular packing and subtle differences in diffraction patterns Note: The low temperature form has a molecular configuration change from room temperature forms Low Temp Form Subtle polymorphism Molecular visualization (CSD) shows 2 similar configurations that vary in methyl group rotation and close contacts 2 Room Temp Forms 1. Dyer et al Molecular Drawings by Conquest, 2 Room Temperature Polymorphs of AZT 2. Brinbaum et. al Short C..N contact to azide 5 Reference Patterns for Cocaine some superimpose (same polymorph) others don’t (different polymorph) Cocaine Patterns suggest at least 3 Forms or 2 Forms & impurity 1&3 1 2 3 Codeine 4 Determinations, 2 Forms Famotidine – 2 Polymorphs Red Cell a vs Cell volume Temperature Series Polymorphs A &B – both as a temperature series Polymorphs of Famotidine Tablet of Pepcid AC Same molecule, two different crystalline forms What is Pepcid AC ? Microcrystalline Cellulose Form I beta + Famotidine Form B Heroin 2 or 3 Polymorphs Orthorhombic Monoclinic 3 Determinations Heroin – Orthorhombic Form Different Polymorphs or poor experimental technique? Cimetidine12 Determinations – 8 Crystal structures Reduced cell a vs cell c Possible polymorphism with a group 2 Major groups Comparison of key diffraction interplanar spacings indicate a complex polymorphism Cimetidine Largest Diffraction Line (long line, highest d) Strongest Diffraction Line Cimetidine Cimetidine – Strong Lines 9 possible polymorphs Monoclinic D 4 patterns, Monoclinic A, Form I Monoclinic Z Form B Form IV Not shown – Patterns for Form II and Form III, 3 patterns not identified by form Carbamazepine ‐ Cell vs Space Group 16 Determinations, 11 Single Crystal in 5 different space groups Carbamazepine – Reduced Cells vs Cell a Beta Form IV Alpha Gamma Interplanar Spacings d1 vs l1, suggests many polymorphs Author Assignments Alpha Form, R-3 Form II 3 Determinations, Inconsistent Note: Several lower quality determinations can be reasonably assigned to one of these four forms. Beta Form, P21/n, P21/c Form III 7 Determinations, Consistent 2 Unassigned Gamma Form, P-1 Form I 4 Determinations, Only 1 assigned by author Form IV, C2/c 1 Determination Carbamazepine ‐ Cell vs Space Group 16 Determinations, 11 Single Crystal, in 5 different space groups Note: Can assign all 5 powder patterns to one of these groups by comparing diffraction patterns Alpha Beta Form IV Gamma Gamma Are these the same ? (probably) Note: P1 deleted because of poor Figure of merit relative to P-1 P1 P-1 To determine similarity you also need to look at expermental methods for both data collection and specimen preparation Using PDF‐4+ to discover and analyze polymorphs • 48 Searches • 66 Field Display • Graphics Interface Point and Click JAVA interface • Use multiple measurements of symmetry, molecular size, molecular volume, packing and molecular orientation to discover and identify polymorphism