a collaboration between charleston orwig and datassential
Transcription
a collaboration between charleston orwig and datassential
a collaboration between charleston orwig and Datassential SURVEY respondents 1,000 CONSUMERS An online survey of 1,000 consumers (a nationally representative sample, covering standard demographics) by Datassential, a nationally known research firm focused on the food system. 2 Consumers are obsessed with food. And not just eating and cooking it. They want to know who grew it, where and how. A big part of the discussion centers on GMOs, Genetically Modified Organisms. To help our clients understand and better communicate with consumers, Charleston Orwig recently sponsored research with 1,000 consumers to learn their knowledge and attitudes about GMOs. Conducted by Datassential, a nationally known research firm, the findings proved very intriguing— and useful for anyone who wants to better understand and communicate with consumers. The food industry has plenty of work ahead of them if they want to increase awareness of the role GMOs play in the food system. Knowing what consumers currently think is obviously an essential first step. Perceived level of understanding Concerns and issues Which GMO benefits may resonate Turn the page to see what we found. how they broke down into five 5% (n =53) never heard the term levels of understanding VERY in-depth not included in remainder of survey 13% (n =129) AWARE 18% (n =182) but don’t understand Not all respondents had even heard the term GMO. Our research zeroed in on the 95 percent who did claim some understanding. And what we learned from that group proved quite interesting. FAIR 33% (n =328) how well do you believe you understand what genetically modified (GMO) seeds, plants, animals and food products are and what they mean to you as a consumer? GOOD (n =1,005) 31% (n =313) 5 VERY 65% 23% good overwhelmingly male 43% Fair 31% in-depth boomers 4% 6% none aware Adult MilleNnials (age 25 – 34) comprise the bulk of this group 15% very in-depth 41% 40% good 36% fair Taking a closer look at the group with “very in-depth” understanding revealed some interesting statistics. 55% are parents, largely of children under the age of 6 55% of respondents reporting a household income of $75,000 – $99,999 claim to have a “good” or “very in‑depth” understanding of GMOs. Baby Boomers, the largest age group participating in the survey (31 percent), may be more amenable to learning about GMO benefits than other respondents. Forty-three percent of Boomer respondents indicated they have a “fair” understanding of GMOs, while 23 percent said their understanding is “good.” Because Boomers grew up during a time of rapid advancements in science and technology, including those in food production, they may be more likely to approach the GMO topic impartially. 7 The opportunity The 13 percent reporting “very in-depth” understanding of GMOs are an interesting subgroup. In general, consumers perceive the presence of GMOs in their foods and beverages as much lower than the widely accepted estimates of 70 – 90 percent. Here’s what two groups actually believe to be the percentage of GMOs in their food. They’re least likely to be interested in benefits. VERY in-depth Consumers at all levels of awareness are interested in learning about all facets of GMOs. AWARE 52% 57% Most likely to perceive disadvantages. but don’t understand 8 Most interested in banning GMOs either at the corporate or federal level. Believe half or more Believe at least half of their food and beverage purchases include GMOs. of their food and beverage purchases include GMOs. more than 40% are interested in understanding the benefits. Consumers are more We also wanted to learn how GMO attributes resonated with consumers. As you might expect, opinions were all over the map. The percentages proved to be quite interesting. 61% 61% 55% 49% 40% 34% 30% accepting of GMO use in plants than in animals. GMOs can be used to make fruits and vegetables higher in vitamins and minerals GMOs can be used to make fruits and vegetables more resistant to drought, disease and infestation GMOs can be used to grow fruits and vegetables that taste better Using GMOs to develop meat with a better taste is acceptable GMO use is acceptable in developing salmon that grows faster and costs less per pound Use genetic material from an animal to create a new disease-resistant orange Use genetic material from an animal to create a fast-growing species of fish 16% 14% 18% 22% 30% 38% 41% Results based off of a 5-point scale; positive results (top two boxes) vs. the negative results (bottom two boxes) 11 what about GMOs do you want to learn more about? want to know how GMOs impact their own and their family’s health 60% 49% interested in research on the safety of GMOs and what items are most likely to be GMO who do you trust to MOnitor 59% 42% 21% The research clearly indicates most consumers are concerned with the potential safety and health impacts of GMOs, and they have varying opinions on who should provide GMO oversight. VERY in-depth GMOs? U.S. Department of Agriculture federal regulation expect the food industry to self-regulate Only a third are interested in a full ban, either by the federal government or voluntarily by individual corporations. Consumers indicating they have “in-depth” knowledge of GMOs are significantly more likely to want corporations or the federal government to ban GMOs. 13 While GMOs inhibit pests from damaging crops, they are fearfully dangerous to humans, animals and our earth. There is nothing redeeming in GMOs and I avoid them as much as possible. We’ve included some verbatim responses from consumers. These provide a further glimpse into their thoughts and opinions. GMOs help use less toxic fertilizers and less water usage. I’m not sure why, but there are no studies to know the effects and consequences of growing and consuming GMO products. I do not believe that GMOs benefit anybody except some of the most vile corporations in the world. I really don’t know what the benefits are—need to find out more. I think that modification can make foods, etc., larger, more uniform in size, more appealing in color and possibly more nutritious. GMOs feed a greater amount of people for less cost, and produce a crop able to withstand insects, drought and disease. 15 Another in a series of research studies dedicated to advancing our knowledge on the issues and trends most important to our agriculture and food-system clients. Charleston Orwig provides strategic communications within every aspect of the food system—from production through processing and distribution to the point of retail. This expertise is demonstrated through two complementary disciplines, reputation management and integrated marketing. Information is invaluable. Datassential is a leading source of insights for the food community. Combining operator and consumer research with a variety of tracking, analytic and database resources, Datassential gathers the information that food manufacturers, food service operators and trade associations rely on. Some of the tools used to deliver accurate and relevant data include Datassential MenuTrends,™ MenuTrends INSIDER,™ Firefly™ and Optimize.™ The research conducted by Datassential in January 2014 included 1,000 consumer respondents from all U.S. regions and demographic types. 515 W. NORTH SHORE DRIVE, HARTLAND, WI 53029 p: 262.563.5100 www.charlestonorwig.com