Hot Topics in Employment Law - SHRM
Transcription
Hot Topics in Employment Law - SHRM
Hot Topics in Employment Law What to Expect from Courts, Congress & Agencies Greg Hare, Esq. Managing Shareholder Ogletree Deakins-Atlanta [email protected] 404-870-1758 Georgia House passes medical marijuana bill Feb 25, 2015 The Georgia House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to decriminalize the possession of a form of medical marijuana. Under legislation House lawmakers passed 158-2 and sent on to the state Senate, Georgians who bring the marijuana derivative cannabidiol obtained outside of Georgia into the state for treatment of certain illnesses would not be subject to prosecution. The bill includes a provision to form a state commission to look for ways to create a growth/distribution model for medical marijuana within a sufficiently narrow scope to satisfy objections of those worried about encouraging recreational use of the drug. The original bill also was expanded as it went through the House to allow cannabidiol for treatment of a wider range of diseases that affect adults as well as children, including cancer, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease and sickle cell anemia. LEGAL MARIJUANA • Medical – Georgia + 23 states • Recreational? – Colorado, Washington, Alaska, etc. – Soon, Oregon & D.C. • Stoned at Work? Drug Test Failures? • When in Doubt, Run Your Business! CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS EEOC SAYS: NO BLANKET RULE • Screening process should include “an individualized assessment” • Look at correlation between job duties and the past criminal conduct • Any exclusion must be “job related” and consistent with “business necessity” Nathan Deal signs ‘ban the box’ hiring policy February 24, 2015 Job seekers applying for work with the state of Georgia will no longer need to disclose prior criminal convictions on their initial applications. Gov. Nathan Deal signed an executive order implementing a “ban the box” policy that outlaws a requirement for people with criminal histories to disclose that information on a job form. “Such policies will allow returning citizens an opportunity to explain their unique circumstances in person to a potential employer,” read the order. The council’s report said it was a barrier to employment that could exclude released inmates from consideration even if they are qualified for the job and the conviction has no bearing on the work. What Does This Mean …? • Nothing for private sector in GA! – Only applicants for state jobs • Nationally? – 6 states ban the box for all employers – 13 states, only public sector • And what about the EEOC’s push? COURTS SAY… EEOC IS OVERREACHING! • Peoplemark, Inc. (Oct. 2013): – EEOC accused company of refusing to hire applicants with criminal record – Court ordered EEOC to pay $750K in fees and costs • Freeman Event Planning (Aug. 2013): – EEOC’s allegation that criminal checks have disparate impact on minorities is a mere “theory in search of facts to support it” – EEOC approach “condemns use of common sense” Caution Still Key … Despite EEOC Background Check Loss February 23, 2015 The Fourth Circuit 's recent rejection of a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission lawsuit against event services company Freeman marked the second resounding loss in less than a year for the agency …, but lawyers say employers that use similar hiring screens should continue to exercise caution. Friday's ruling calling the work of EEOC expert “utterly unreliable.” PRUDENT PRACTICE SAYS • Be prepared to state justification for your background check practice • Plus up your job descriptions, e.g.: – This position is financially sensitive because it involves handling of money – This position is safety sensitive because employee will be entering customer homes – This position is security sensitive because employee will be entrusted with valuable merchandise/cargo WELLNESS PROGRAMS … UNDER ATTACK? Why have a Wellness Program? • • • • • Healthier lifestyles Team building Reduce company’s aggregate healthcare costs 200+ employees = 94% have wellness All good, right? BUT … • Don’t forget the ADA restrictions on subjecting employees to physical & medical examinations • Must be … – Job related – Consistent with business necessity OK, SO WHAT’S THE NEWS? EEOC v. Orion Energy Systems (ED Wisc Aug 2014) • Wellness program required employees to … – Disclose medical history – Blood tests – Range of motion test • Employee refused because … – She perceived it as not voluntary – Feared for confidentiality • Company then … – Forced employee to pay 100% hc premiums – Fired her the month after refusal to partake • EEOC sued for ADA violation AND AGAIN … EEOC v. Flambeau Plastics (WD Wisc Oct 2014) • Wellness program required employees to … – Health risk assessment – medical history – Biometric test – blood-work and body measurements – Participants got 75% of hc premium covered • Employee was on LOA – Congestive heart failure & cardiomyopathy – Missed wellness roll-out – Denied chance to re-test upon return • Company foisted 100% of hc premium to him – Couldn’t afford = canceled • EEOC sued for ADA violation EEOC VIEW • “Voluntary” means non-participants … – Can’t be punished with huge penalties (100%) – Can’t have hc coverage canceled – Can’t be disciplined/fired/harassed • Otherwise, participation is really, actually “mandatory” – Which violates ADA • Key Takeaway – Incent participants, don’t punish abstainers She’s Not Here Pregnancy & Postpartum Issues • Understanding exposures – FMLA, PDA & Title VII • Pre-delivery – Medical appointments, pop-up absences • Young v. UPS (US Sup Ct 2015) – What if pregnant employee can’t perform essential functions? – Light duty, like wc employees? • Post-partum: what if still unable …? Ultimate Issue Pregnancy & Postpartum Issues • Does law merely require employers to refrain from discrimination, based on pregnancy? • Or, does it require affirmative accommodation of pregnant/post-pregnant employees … i.e., like under the ADA? SAME SEX ISSUES IN THE WORKPLACE – LATEST UPDATE U.S. v. Windsor (Sup. Ct. June 2013) • not a blanket federal mandate requiring legal recognition of SSM • rather, it adds fresh paint to principle that “the states . . . possess full power over the subject of marriage and divorce” (Haddock v. Haddock, Sup. Ct. 1906) • federal government should not interfere with state-level definitions of “marriage” SO THEN WHAT HAPPENED??? • Marriage = 1 Man, 1 Woman – State Statutes – Constitutional Amendments – Voter-Approved Initiatives (Prop 8) • Can the courts overturn the “will of the people”? LAWSUITS ABOUND… • Constitutional Challenges: Arguing that … – SSS have a fundamental right to share in the institution of marriage under equal protection clause • Many courts struck down bans on SSM – Overturned majority rule … • 37 states now allow; 13 do not • Supreme Court will to give clarity – Oral argument in April – Decision in June WHAT DOES ALL THIS MEAN FOR EMPLOYERS? • SSS are “married” for all federal purposes (everywhere): – Can file joint tax return – Can inherit property – taxation like a spouse – Can be “spouse” for health insurance – Can be “spouse” for retirement benefits DOL Finalizes Expanded Same-Sex Couples' FMLA Rights February 23, 2015 The U.S. Department of Labor will finalize a rule to extend the Family and Medical Leave Act’s protections to married samesex couples regardless of whether the state they live in recognizes their union, the agency announced on Monday. The final rule, which will be published on Feb. 25 and will take effect on March 27, means that same-sex spouses can avail themselves of the same right to federal job-protected leave as opposite-sex married couples, the DOL stated in its announcement of the final rule on Monday. EEOC Files Historic Sex Bias Suits For Transgender Workers Law360, New York - September 25, 2014 The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Thursday filed its first ever lawsuits over alleged sex discrimination against transgender individuals, targeting a funeral home and an eye clinic that purportedly fired employees who were transitioning from male to female. In two separate suits, the EEOC claims Michigan-based Harris Funeral Homes Inc. and Florida-based Lakeland Eye Clinic discriminated against two transgender workers by firing them for being transgender and not conforming to “the employer’s gender-based expectations,” according to statements from the agency. Dress Codes? Employers perhaps may be required to allow employees to appear and to dress consistent with their gender expression regardless of their physical gender. FLSA REFRESHER ON OVERTIME EXEMPTIONS OVERTIME EXEMPTIONS Under the Fair Labor Standards Act • • • Jobs are classified as either Exempt or Non-exempt Exempt means the position does not require overtime pay Non-exempt means the position requires overtime pay for over 40 in a week … which requires accurate record keeping WHY ARE SOME JOBS EXEMPT? • Practical Answer – for those who play some role in running the Company, they get paid a fixed amount to accomplish their job – i.e., not based on how many hours they work or when they work EXEMPT vs. NON-EXEMPT How do we know if a position is exempt or non-exempt? May be exempt if it meets: 1. Salary Basis (but more) 2. Salary Level 3. Duties Tests WHAT IS THE CURRENT SALARY LEVEL? • At least $455 per week, on a salaried basis • That’s not a lot … – $23,660 vs. $24,250? WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF EXEMPT POSITIONS ? • Most Common Exemptions – Executive – Administrative – Professional/Creative – Computer Professional – Outside Sales • Primary Duties Test – Not sole duty – Not majority of duties Prepare for Imminent FLSA White-Collar Regulations • Raise the Floor – $40,000 -$50,000 could become minimum salary for OT exemption • Primary Duties would become a quantitative “math equation” – Greater than 50% of hours worked on exempt tasks (the “CA Rule”) • Purpose & Effect – Turn many, many more workers into hourly wage earners NLRB UPDATE Welcome to Ambush Elections! • Effective date: April 14, 2015 • Dramatically speeds up union organizing timeline – No longer 42-50 days – Maybe as short as 10-20 days • Coupled with NLRB’s other recent pro-union decisions ... – Cherry-picking voters – Union access to company email • Employer beware! OGLETREE FOOTPRINT ALWAYS NEARBY Denver Kansas City Minneapolis Portland St. Louis Chicago Indianapolis Detroit Metro Pittsburgh Boston Cleveland Stamford New York City Morristown Philadelphia Washington, DC Richmond San Francisco Raleigh Charlotte Greenville Las Vegas Torrance Columbia Los Angeles Charleston San Diego Phoenix Orange County Atlanta Birmingham Tucson Dallas San Antonio Houston Austin Nashville Memphis Jackson New Orleans Tampa ODNSS State Bar Admissions ODNSS Offices* *We also have offices in Mexico (Mexico City) – Germany (Berlin) – England (London) Miami St. Thomas Stay Informed! Gregory Hare Ogletree Deakins 191 Peachtree St., # 4800 Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 870-1758 greg.hare.ogletreedeakins.com