Internal Hemorrhoid Non Surgical Treatment GI Clinic North Houston

Internal
Hemorrhoid
Non
Surgical Treatment GI Clinic
North Houston
Internal Hemorrhoid Non
Surgical Treatment
INFRARED COAGULATION – Internal
Hemorrhoid Non Surgical Treatment
New In Office Treatment – GI Clinic
North Houston
Hemorrhoids Non Surgical Treatment Patient Education (pdf
read…)
Hemorrhoids Non Surgical Patient Treatment – Technology (pdf
read..)
Research – Internal Hemorrhoid
Clinical Applications – Optimal Nonsurgical Treatment of
Hemorrhoids
Optimal Nonsurgical Treatment of Hemorrhoids: A Comparative Analysis of Infrared Coagulation, Rubber Band Ligation, and Injection Sclerotherapy
John F. Johanson, M.D., and Alfred Rimm, Ph.D.
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Rockford, Illinois, and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Despite an abundance of nonsurgical hemorrhoid therapies, none has been consistently more efficacious. By combining data from multiple clinical trials in a meta-analysis, the present study
compared the efficacy and complications of infrared coagulation, injection sclerotherapy, and rubber band ligation to determine the optimal nonoperative hemorrhoid treatment. All published
clinical trials comparing the three methods were identified by computer search and review of appropriate English language journals. Five trials studying 863 patients satisfied all inclusion
criteria. Results demonstrated that similar numbers of patients were asymptomatic 12 months after treatment, regardless of initial therapy. However, significantly fewer patients undergoing
rubber band ligation required additional treatment because symptoms had recurred. Although rubber band ligation demonstrated greater long-term efficacy, it was associated with a
significantly higher incidence of posttreatment pain. In contrast, infrared coagulation was associated with both fewer and less severe complications. Thus, when all factors are considered,
infrared coagulation may in fact be the optimal nonoperative hemorrhoid treatment.
INTRODUCTION
Numerous nonoperative treatments have been proposed for the management of first-degree (nonprolapsing) and second-degree (prolapsing but spontaneously reducing) hemorrhoids. These include
cryotherapy, laser therapy, bipolar diathermy, infrared photocoagulation. injection sclerotherapy, and rubber band ligation (1, 2). Despite a number of randomized comparative clinical
trials, no single therapy has been shown to be consistently better (3—10). The absence of a clear advantage among the various modalities may indicate that they are equally effective.
Alternatively, previous trials may have lacked sufficient statistical power to demonstrate any true differences. The problem of inRecc”ivc”d Mai” 4, 1992; accepted Juh” 6. 1992.
Sufficient statistical power can be overcome by performing a meta-analysis—a statistical technique that allows for the combination of data from multiple clinical trials so as to pool their
results (11). This study, using a metaanalysis, compares the therapeutic efficacy of infrared photocoagulation and injection sclerotherapy with rubber band ligation in the treatment of
first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. Furthermore, we examine the complications of each therapy in order to determine the optimal method for the nonoperative treatment of hemorrhoids.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Presented in part at the 56th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology. Boston, MA, October, 1991. Previously published in abstract form: Am J Gastroenterol
1991:86:1372.
Reprint requests and correspondence: John F. iohanson. M.D.. 401 Roxbury Road. Rockford. IL. 61107-5078.
REFERENCES
1.Smith LE. Hemorrhoids: A review of current techniques and management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1987:16:79—91.
2.Dennison AR, Wherry DC, Moms DL. Hemorrhoids: Nonoperative management. Surg Clin North Am 1988:68:1401—9.
3.Weinstein Si. Rypins EB. Houck I. et al. Single session treatment for bleeding hemorrhoids. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 165:
479—82.
4.Templeton JL, Spence RAJ. Kennedy TL. et al. Comparison of infrared coagulation and rubber band ligation for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids: A randomized prospective clinical trial.
Br Med J 1983:286:1387—9.
5.Ambrose NS, Hares MM. Alexander-Williams I. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of photocoagulation and rubber band ligation in treatment of hemorrhoids. Br Mcdi 1983:286:
1389—91.
6.Walker AJ, Leicester Ri. Nicholls RI, et aI. A prospective study of infrared coagulation, injection, and rubber band ligation in the treatment of hemorrhoids. mi Colorect Dis 1990:5:113—6.
7.Gartell PC. Sheridan RI. McGinn FP. Outpatient treatment of hemorrhoids: A randomized clinical trial to compare rubber band ligation with phenol injection. Br I Surg 1985:72:478—9.
8.Sim AIW, Murie IA. Mackenzie I. Comparison of rubber band ligation and sclerosant injection for first- and second-degree hemorrhoids: A prospective clinical trial. Acta Chir Scand 1981:
147:717—20.
9.Sim AJW, Murie IA. Mackenzie I. Three-year follow-up study on the treatment of first- and second-degree hemorrhoids by sclerosant injection or rubber band ligation. Surg Gynecol Obstet
1983:157:534—6.
10.Ambrose NS. Morris D. Alexander-Williams I, et al. A randomized trial of photocoagulation or injection sclerotherapy for the treatment of first- and second-degree hemorrhoids. Dis Colon
Rectum 1985:28:238—40.
11.DerSimonian R. Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986:7:177—88.
12.iohanson IF, Sonnenberg A. The prevalence of hemorrhoids and chronic constipation: An epidemiologic study. Gastroenterology
1990:98:380—6.
13.Berlin IA. Laird N. Sacks HS. et al. A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Statist Med 1989:8:141—51.
14.Oldridge NB. Guyatt GH. Fischer ME. et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: Combined experience of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 1988:260:945—50.
15.Goodman SN. Have you ever meta.analysis you didn”t like” Ann Inter Med 1991:114:244—6.
16.Iohanson iF. Sonnenberg A. Temporal changes in the occurrence of hemorrhoids in the United States and England. Dis Colon Rectum 1991:34:585—93.
17.LefTE. Hemorrhoids: Current approaches to an ancient problem. Postgrad Med 1987:82:95—101.
18.Wechter DG. Luna GK. An unusual complication of rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:
137—40.
19.Marshman D. Huber P1, Timmerman W, et al. hemorrhoidal ligation: A review of efficacy. Dis Colon Rectum 1989:32:
369—77.
20.Shemesh El. Kodner Ii, Fry RD. et aI. Severe complication of rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum
1987:30:199—200.
21.Quevedo-Bonilla G, Farkas AM. Abcarian H. et al. Septic complications of hemorrhoidal banding. Arch Surg 1988:123:650—1.
22.Clay LD III, White Ii Jr. Davidson IT. et al. Early recognition and successful management of pelvic cellulitis following hemorrhoidal banding. Dis Colon Rectum 1986:29:579—81.
23.Scarpa Fl. Hillis W. Sabetta JR. Pelvic cellulitis: A life-threatening complication of hemorrhoidal banding. Surgery 1988:
103:383—5.