Jürgen Habermas.

Transcription

Jürgen Habermas.

Luca Corchia
Jürgen Habermas.
A bibliography
2. Studies on Jürgen Habermas (1962-2015)
Department of Political Science, University of Pisa (Italy)
March 2016
This document is bibliographical research in progress, useful to the realization the book
Habermas global. Wirkungsgeschichte seines Werks, edit by Luca Corchia, Stefan MüllerDoohm, William Outhwaite, Stuttgart, J. B. Metzler Verlag, 2019.
It is also an incomplete research.
For this reason, further your references and corrections are welcome:
Luca Corchia
Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche, Università di Pisa,
Via Filippo Serafini 3, 56126 – Pisa (Italy)
[email protected]
2. Studies on Jürgen Habermas (1962-2015)
1962
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Busch, C., Habermas, Jürgen; von Friedeburg, Ludwig; Oehler, Christoph; Weltz, Friedrich:
Student und Politik. Eine soziologische Untersuchung zum politischen Bewusstsein Frankfurter Studenten, in «Revue française de sociologie», III, 1, 1962, pp. 8384.
Eulau H., Habermas, Jürgen; von Friedeburg, Ludwig; Oehler, Christoph; Weltz, Friedrich:
Student und Politik: Eine soziologische Untersuchung zum politischen Bewusstsein Frankfurter Studenten, in «American Sociological Review», XXVII, 1, 1962,
pp. 108-109.
Pross H., Ursachen der Meinungsmüdigkeit. Die Auflösung der bürgerlichen Öffentlichkeit
[Jürgen Habermas „Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”], in «Die Zeit», 10.8.1962.
Pross H., Meinungsmüdigkeit – eine europäische Krankheit [Jürgen Habermas], in «St.
Galler Tagblatt», 12.8.1962.
Sontheimer K., Habermas, Jürgen: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in «Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 26.9.1962.
1964
6.
7.
8.
Albert H., Der Mythos der totalen Vernunft. Dialektische Ansprüche im Lichte undialektischer Kritik, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XVI,
1964, pp. 225-256; repr. in Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H., Pilot H., Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, ed. by H.
Mauss, F. Fürstenberg, Neuwied/Berlin, Luchterhand, 1969, pp. 193-234; tr. en.
G. Adey, D. Frisby, The Myth of Total Reason, in Th.W. Adorno, H. Albert, R.
Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, K. Popper, The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, London, Heinemann Educational Books, 1976, pp. 163-197; tr. it. by A.
Marietti Solmi, Il mito della ragione totale. Pretese dialettiche alla luce di una critica adialettica,
in Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H., Pilot H.,
Dialettica e positivismo in sociologia. Dieci interventi nella discussione, ed. by H. Mauss, F.
Fürstenberg, Torino, Einaudi, 1972, pp. 189-227.
Arndt H.J., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in «Der Staat», III, 3, 1964, pp. 335345.
Bendix R., Habermas, Jürgen: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, Untersuchungen
zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in «American Sociological Review», XXIX, 1, 1964, p. 128.
4
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
JÜRGEN HABERMAS. A BIBLIOGRAPHY
Fischer H.-D., Zur Problematik der »Öffentlichen Meinung«, in «Politische Vierteljahresschrift», V, 3, 1964, pp. 359-364.
Huber H., Habermas, Jürgen: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen
zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in «JuristenZeitung», XIX, 2,
1964, pp. 79-80.
Kuhn H., Habermas, Jürgen: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen
zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in «Historische Zeitschrift»,
CXCVIII, 1, 1964, pp. 94-96.
Mohler A., Die Fünfte Republik. Was steht hinter de Gaulle?, in «Die Zeit», 18.9.1964.
Rassem M. Habermas, Jürgen; Hennis, W.; Schnur, R.: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in
«Philosophische Rundschau», XII, 1/2, 1964, pp. 116-122.
Pross H., Politik, Wissenschaft und Philosophie [Eric Weil / Wilhelm Hennis / Jürgen
Habermas], in «ST. Galler Tagblatt», 31.5.1964
Pross H., Nachdenkliches über Politik [Eric Weil / Jürgen Habermas], in «Süddeutsche
Zeitung», 17.8.1964.
Unknown, Habermas, Jürgen: Theorie und Praxis, Sozialphilosophische Studien, in
«Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly», ‫ו”ט‬, ‫’ד‬, 1964, p. 502.
1965
17.
18.
19.
20.
Albert H., Im Rücken des Positivismus. Dialektische Umwege in kritischer Beleuchtung, in
«Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XVII, 1965, pp. 879908; repr. in Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H.,
Pilot H., Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie (PDS), ed. by H. Mauss, F.
Fürstenberg, Neuwied/Berlin, Luchterhand, 1969, pp. 267-305; tr. en. G. Adey,
D. Frisby, Behind Positivism’s Back?, in Th.W. Adorno, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J.
Habermas, H. Pilot, K. Popper, The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, London,
Heinemann Educational Books, 1976, pp. 226-257; tr. it. by A. Marietti Solmi, Alle
spalle del positivismo? Manovre di aggiramento dialettiche alla luce della critica, in Adorno
Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H., Pilot H., Dialettica e
positivismo in sociologia. Dieci interventi nella discussione (PDS), ed. by H. Mauss, F. Fürstenberg, Torino, Einaudi, 1972, pp. 261-296.
Baier H., Soziologie als dialogische Vernunft: zu einem Buch von Juergen Habermas, in
«Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XVI,
2, 1965, pp. 167-175.
Mayntz R., Habermas, Jürgen; Tenbruck, Friedrich H.: Jugend und Gesellschaft, in «American Journal of Sociology», LXXI, 3, 1965, pp. 350-351.
Prakke H., Habermas, Jürgen: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen
zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in «Zeitschrift für die gesamte
Staatswissenschaft», CXXI, 2, 1965, pp. 377-378.
Luca Corchia, Department of Political Science, University of Pisa, March 2016
2. STUDIES ON JÜRGEN HABERMAS (1962-2015)
5
1966
21.
22.
23.
24.
Baier H., Soziologie und Geschichte. Überlegungen zur Kontroverse zwischen dialektischer und
neupositivistischer Soziologie, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 5, 1966,
pp. 67-91; repr. in Kritik und Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie. Aufsätze über Adorno,
Horkheimer, Marcuse, Benjamin, Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach, 1975, pp. 359-380.
Berger S.D., Topitsch, Ernst; Habermas, Jürgen: Theorie und Praxis, in «Social Research», XXXIII, 1, 1966, pp. 137-146.
Hinterhuber G., Habermas, J.: Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in «Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali», LXXIV, 37, 2, 1966, pp. 197-199.
Kubíčková M., Ze sociologických výpovědí o západoněmecké mládeži (Je současná mládež
skeptická?), in «Sociologický Časopis», II, 1, 1966, pp. 36-52.
1967
25.
26.
27.
Denker R., Individualismus und mündige Gesellschaft : Simmel, Popper, Habermas,
Dostojewskij, Camus, Ortega, Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln, Mainz, Kohlhammer Verlag,
1967.
Gadamer H.G., Rhetorik, Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, in Id., Kleine Schriften I,
Tübingen, Mohr, 1967, pp. 113-130; repr. in AA.VV., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 57-82; tr. it. Retorica, ermeneutica e critica
dell’ideologia, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1979,
pp. 71-94.
Grossner C., Philosophie deutscher Revolutionäre, in «Die Zeit», 1.10.1967.
1968
8.
9.
10.
11.
Abendroth W., Bemerkungen zu den Differenzen zwischen den studentischen Oppositionen
und Jürgen Habermas, in «Marxistische Blätter», VI, 6, 1968, pp. 77-83; as Demokratisch-liberale und revolutionär-sozialistische Kritik? Zum Konflikt zwischen den studentischen
Oppositionen und Jürgen Habermas, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 131-142.
Apel K.O., Szientistik, Hermeneutik, Ideologiekritik: Entwurf einer Wissenschaftslehre in
erkenntnisanthropologischer Sicht, in «Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie», I, 1968, pp.
15-45; repr. in AA.VV., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1971, pp. 7-44; tr. it. Scientificità, ermeneutica, critica dell’ideologia. Abbozzo di una dottrina
della scienza nella prospettiva di un’antropologia della conoscenza, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e
critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1979, pp. 25-59.
Bollnow O.F., Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, in «Zeitschrift für Pädagogik»,
XIV, 1, 1968, pp. 69-77.
Brückner P., Die Geburt der Kritik aus dem Geiste des Gerüchts, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische
Verlagsanstalt, 1968, p. 71-89; repr. in Kraushaar W. (ed.), Frankfurter Schule und
6
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Studentenbewegung. Von der Flaschenpost zum Molotowcocktail 1946 bis 1995, Hamburg,
Hamburger Edition, HIS Verlag, 2003, pp. 425-433.
Cerutti F., La polemica tra Habermas e la SDS, in «Belfagor», XXIII, 5, 1968.
Cerutti F., Zum Faschismusbegriff vgl.besonders den Beitrag, in Negt O., Abendroth W.
(eds.), Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt,
1968, pp. 34-47.
Dömer K., Uber den Gebrauch klinischer Begriffe in der Politischen Diskussion, in Negt
O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 59-69.
Gauthier Y., La logique des sciences sociales, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical
Review», VI, 1968, pp. 604-609.
Günther G., Kritische Bemerkungen zur gegenwärtigen Wissenschaftstheorie: “Zur Logik der
Sozialwissenschaften”, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XIX, 3-4, 1968, pp. 328-341; repr. in Günther G., Kritik und
Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie. Aufsätze über Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Benjamin,
Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach, 1975, pp. 306-319.
Krippendorf E., Zum Verhältnis zwischen Inhalt und Form von Demonstrationstechniken,
in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 162-175.
Kuhn H., Die marxistische Reuse, in Id., Rebellion gegen die Freiheit. Über das Generationsproblem und die Jugendunruhen unserer Zeit, Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln-Mainz, W. Kohlhammer, 1968, pp. 55-70.
Lederer H., Revolutionäre Strategie und liberales Maklertum, in Negt O., Abendroth
W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 114-130.
Lefèvre W., Zur Theorie der Palastrevolution, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die
Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968,
pp. 143-149.
Meschkat K., Über Bundesgenossen und Bündnispolitik, in Negt O., Abendroth W.
(eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 201-209.
Negt O., Einleitung, in Id., (ed.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 17-32.
Negt O., Studentischer Protest – Liberalismus – ›Linksfaschismus‹, in «Kursbuch» 13,
1968, pp. 189-190.
Neusüss A., Praxis und Theorie, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 48-58.
Offe C., Kapitalismus-Analyse als Selbsteinschätzung, in Negt O. (ed.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 106112.
Pilot H. Jürgen Habermas’ empirisch falsifizierbare Geschichtsphilosophie, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XX, 2, 1968, pp. 288-308; repr. in
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
7
Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H., Pilot H.,
Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie (PDS), ed. by H. Mauss, F. Fürstenberg,
Neuwied/Berlin, Luchterhand, 1969, pp. 307-334; tr. en. G. Adey, D. Frisby, Jürgen Habermas’ Empirically Falsifable Philosophy of History, in Th.W. Adorno, H. Albert,
R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, K. Popper, The Positivist Dispute in German
Sociology, London, Heinemann Educational Books, 1976, pp. 258-282; tr. it. by A.
Marietti Solmi, La filosofia della storia di J. Habermas e la sua falsificabilità empirica, in
Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R., Dahrendorf R., Habermas J., Albert H., Pilot H.,
Dialettica e positivismo in sociologia. Dieci interventi nella discussione, ed. by H. Mauss, F.
Fürstenberg, Torino, Einaudi, 1972, pp. 297-324; tr. fr. La philosophie de l’histoire empiriquement réfutable de Jürgen Habermas, in Adorno Th.W., Popper K.R. et al., De
Vienne à Francfort. La querelle allemande des sciences sociales, Bruxelles, Éditions Complexe, 1979, pp. 213-231.
Reiche R., Verteidigung der “neune Sensibilität”, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die
Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968,
pp. 90-103.
Rolshausen C., Neue Probleme und alter Kapitalismus, in Negt O., Abendroth W.
(eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 150-155.
Schauer H., Über die Gewerkschaften und den Aktionsspielraum der antiautoritären Protestbewegung, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.), Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas,
Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1968, pp. 176-184.
Schmidt S.J., Zur Grammatik sprachlichen und nichtsprachlichen Handelns: sprachphilosophische Bemerkungen zur soziologischen Handlungstheorie von Juergen Habermas, in «Soziale
Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis », XIX, 3-4,
1968, pp. 360-372; repr. in Schmidt S.J., Kritik und Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie.
Aufsätze über Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Benjamin, Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach,
1975, pp. 320-332; repr. in Steger H. (ed.), Soziolinguistik: Ansätze zur soziolinguistischen Theoriebildung, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftl. Buchges, 1982, pp. 73-91.
Schrader-Klebert K., Der Begriff des Transzendentalen bei Juergen Habermas, in «Soziale
Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XIX, 3-4,
1968, pp. 342-359; repr. in Kritik und Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie. Aufsätze über
Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse, Benjamin, Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach, 1975, pp.
288-305.
Wolf F., Gegen den Schein einer gesicherten Strategie, in Negt O., Abendroth W. (eds.),
Die Linke antwortet Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt,
1968, pp. 156-161.
1969
33.
Bubner R., Was ist Kritische Theorie?: Kritische Theorie. Eine Dokumentation. 2
Bände, by Max Horkheimer; Erkenntnisund Interesse (1965), in: Technik und Wissenschaft als ‚Ideologie’, by Jürgen Habermas; Erkenntnis und Interesse, by Jürgen
8
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
Habermas, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XVI, 3-4, 1969, pp. 213-249; repr. in
AA.VV., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 160209; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. V. Section
VI: Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 281-321; tr. it. Che
cos’è la teoria critica?, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana,
1979, pp. 168-215.
Damus R., Habermas und der “heimliche Positivismus” bei Marx, in «Sozialistische Politik», I, 4, 1969, pp. 22-46.
Revolutionäre. Können und Wollen, in «Der Spiegel», 9, 24.2.1969, pp. 146-147.
Deininger D., Befreiung – aber wie? Jürgen Habermas über Technik, Wissenschaft und Lebenspraxis, in «Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 31.5.1969.
Digilio M., Un nuovo “Methodenstreit”. Popper-Albert contro Adorno-Habermas, in «La
critica sociologica», VIII, 1968-69, pp. 40-55.
Giegel H.J., Die Logik der seelischen Ereignisse, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1969.
Grossner C., Philosophie deutscher Revolutionäre, in «Die Zeit», 1.10.1967.
Häberle P., Öffentlichkeit und Verfassung: Bemerkungen zur 3. Aufl. von Jürgen Habermas, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in «Zeitschrift für Politik», XVI, 2, 1969,
pp. 273-287.
Huch K.J., Interesse an Emanzipation, in «Neue Rundschau», LXXX, 4, 1969, pp.
534-548; repr. as Interesse an Emanzipation. Jürgen Habermas und das Problem einer materialistischen Erkenntnistheorie, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 22-40.
Hülsmann H., Erkenntnis und Interesse, in «Soziale Welt», XX, 2, 1969, pp. 199213.
Ley H., Philosophische Probleme Der Wissenschaftlichen Leitung Des Gesamtgesellschaftlichen Lebensprozesses Der Sozialistischen Gesellschaft, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XVII, 1969, pp. 140-165.
Lichtheim G., From Historicism to Marxist Humanism, in «The Times Literary Supplement», 5.6.1969; repr. in Lichtheim G., From Marx to Hegel, New York, Herder
and Herder, 1971, pp. 160-181.
Lobkowicz N., Interesse und Objektivität, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XVI, 3-4,
1969, pp. 249-272; repr. in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis
und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 169-199; repr. in Lobkowicz N.,
Kritik und Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie. Aufsätze über Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse,
Benjamin, Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach, 1975, pp. 333-358; tr. en. Interest and Objectivity, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences» II, 3, 1972, pp. 193-210, repr. in
Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. V. Section VI: Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 313-***.
Müller W., Habermas und die “Anwendung” der “Arbeitswerttheorie”, in «Sozialistische
Politik», I, 4, 1969.
Negt O., Protesta studentesca, liberalismo, fascismo di sinistra, Backhaus G. (ed.), Kursbuch: l’opposizione extraparlamentare, Milano, Mondadori, 1969, pp. 189-190.
Preuß U.K., Das Politische Mandat der Studentenschaft: Mit Gutachten von Robert Have-
49.
50.
51.
52.
9
mann, Werner Hofmann, Jürgen Habermas/Albrecht Wellmer, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1969.
Rolshausen C., Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie, in «Sozialistische Politik», I, 4,
1969, pp. 47-64.
Theunissen M., Gesellschaft und Geschichte: Zur Kritik der Kritischen Theorie, in Id., Kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft, Berlin-New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1969, pp. 1-40; tr.
en. Society and History: A critique of Critical Theory, in von Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 241-272.
von Bormann C., Die Zweideutigkeit der hermeneutischen Erfahrung, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XVI, 2, 1969, pp. 92-119; repr. in AA.VV., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 83-119; tr. it. L’ambiguità
dell’ermeneutica, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana,
1979, pp. 95-130.
Wellmer A., Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie und Positivismus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1969; tr. en. Critical Theory of Society, New York, Herder and Herder, 1971.
1970
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
Altmann R., Brüder Im Nichts – Zur Auseinandersetzung Jürgen Habermas’ Mit Arnold
Gehlens Ethik, in «Merkur», 24, 1970, pp. 577-582.
Apel K.O., Wissenschaft als Emanzipation? Eine kritische Würdigung der Wissenschaftskonzeption der “Kritischen Theorie”, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», I, 1, 1970, pp. 173-195; repr. in Id., Transformation der Philosophie, Vol. II, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp. 128-***: repr. in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu
Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 318-348.
Apel K.O., Szientismus oder transzendentale Hermeneutik? Zur Frage nach dem Subjekt
der Zeicheninterpretation in der Semiotik des Pragmatismus, in Bubner R., Cramer K.,
Wiehl R. (eds.), Hermeneutik und Dialektik. Bd. I. Festschrift für Hans-Georg Gadamer,
Tübingen, Mohr, 1970, pp. 105-145; tr. it. Scientismo o ermeneutica trascendentale? Il problema del soggetto dell’interpretazione dei segni nella semiotica del pragmatismo, in Apel K.O.,
Comunità e comunicazione, Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier, 1977, pp. 168-204.
Badura B., Ein neuer Primat der Interpretation?: zum Problem der Emanzipation bei Juergen Habermas, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung
und Praxis», XXI, 3, 1970, pp. 321-329; repr. in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu
Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 386-400.
Bauermann R., Rotscher J., Zur Ideologie Der Neuen Linken, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XVIII, 1970, pp. 282-304.
Bahr H.D., Kritik der politischen Technologie: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Herbert Marcuse und Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1970.
Birnbaum N., Mit dem Latein am Ende, in «Change in Higher Education», II, 2,
1970, pp. 48-55.
Böhler D., Zum Problem Des ‘Emanzipatorischen Interesses’ und Seiner Gesellschaftlichen
Wahrnehmung, in «Man and World», III, 2, 1970, pp. 26-53.
10
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
Casini P., L’eclissi della scienza, in «Rivista di Filosofia», 61, 1970, pp. 239-262.
Ceppa L., Habermas. Teoria e prassi nella società tecnologica, in «Rivista di Filosofia», LXI, 2, 1970, pp. 221-224.
Dahmer H., Psychoanalyse und historischer Materialismus, in «Psyche», XII, 3, 1970,
pp. 172-177.
de Vries J., Jürgen Habermas, erkenntnis und interesse, in «Theologie Und Philosophie», XLV, 4, 1970, pp. 568-571.
Euchner W., Conflits de méthodes dans la sociologie allemande, in «Archives de Philosophie», 33, 1970, pp. 177-222.
Flöistad G., Social Concepts of Action: Notes on Habermas proposal for a Social Theory of
Action», in «Inquiry», 13, 1-4, 1970, pp. 175-198.
Frenzel I., Was wird aus der Frankfurter Schule?, in «Die Zeit», 13.3.1970.
Grossner C., Der letzte Richter der kritischen Theorie, in «Die Zeitz, 13.3.1970, pp. 810.
Hahn E., Die theoretischen Grundlagen der Soziologie von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt am
Main, Institut für Marxistische Studien und Forschungen (IMSF), 21-22.2.1970; in
«Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XVIII, 8, 1970, pp. 915-930; repr. in von
Heisler J.H., Steigerwald R., Schleifstein J. (eds.), Die “Frankfurter Schule” im Lichte
des Marxismus. Zur Kritik der Philosophie und Soziologie von Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse,
Habermas. Materialien einer wissenschaftlichen Tagung aus Anlass des 100. Geburtstages von
W. I. Lenin, Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Marxistische Blätter, 1970, pp. 70-89; repr. in
Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 220-243.
Hellesness J., Education and the Concept of Critique, in «Continuum», 8, 1970, pp. 4051.
Kisiel Th., Ideology Critique and Phenomenology, in «Philosophy Today», XIV, 1970,
pp. 151-160.
Lorenzer A., Sprachzerstörung und Rekonstruktion, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1970.
Lukes S.M., Methodological Individualism Reconsidered, in Emmet D.M., Macintyre
A.C. (eds.), Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis, New York, MacMillan, 1970,
pp. 76-88.
Ponsetto A., J. Habermas, ossia il tentativo per la fondazione di una teoria critica della società, in «La civiltà cattolica», CXXI, 4, 1970, pp. 42-52.
Radnitzky G., Contemporary Schools of Metascience, Göteborg, Akademievörlaget,
19702.
Rohrmoser G., Das Elend der kritischen Theorie. Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas, Freiburg, Rombasch, 1970, 19732.
Rusconi G.E., Conoscenza e interesse in Habermas, in «Quaderni di sociologia», XIX,
3-4, 1970, pp. 436-452; tr. de. Erkenntnis und Interesse bei Habermas, in Dallmayr F.R.
(ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1974, pp. 107-134.
Rusconi G.E., Habermas getta la spugna?, in «La critica sociologica», 16, 1970, pp.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
11
143-145.
Santucci A., Habermas e la teoria critica della società, in Habermas J., Logica delle scienze
sociali, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1970, pp. VII-XXVIII.
Santucci A., Habermas, la teoria critica della società e le scienze sociali, in «Il Mulino»,
XIX, 1, 1970, pp. 95-110.
Shapiro J.-J., From Marcuse to Habermas, in «Continuum», 8, 1970, pp. 65-76.
Schroyer T., Marx und Habermas, in «Continuum», 8, 1970, pp. 52-64.
Schroyer T., Towards Critical Theory for Advanced Industrial Society, in Dreitzel H.P.
(ed.), Recent. Sociology 2, New York, Macmilian, 1970, pp. 209-234.
Therborn G., The Frankfurt School, in «New Left Review», 63, 1970, pp. 65-96.
Unknow, Jürgen Habermas, Logica delle scienze sociali, “Teoria e prassi nella società tecnologica”, in «Il Politico», XXXV, 2, 1970, pp. 408-409
von Heiseler J., Kritische Theorie und dialektischer Materialismus, in «Internationale
Dialog Zeitschrift», 3, 1970, pp. 322-338.
von Heisler J.H., Steigerwald R., Schleifstein J. (eds.), Die “Frankfurter Schule” im
Lichte des Marxismus. Zur Kritik der Philosophie und Soziologie von Horkheimer, Adorno,
Marcuse, Habermas. Materialien einer wissenschaftlichen Tagung aus Anlass des 100. Geburtstages von W. I. Lenin, Frankfurt am Main, Institut für Marxistische Studien und Forschungen (IMSF), 21-22.2.1970; Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Marxistische Blätter, 1970.
1971
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
Albert H., Kritische Rationalität und Politische Theologie, in Id., Plädoyer für Kritischen
Rationalismus, München, Piper, 1971, pp. 45-75; tr. it. Razionalità critica e teologia politica, in Id., Difesa del razionalismo critico, Roma, Armando 1975, pp. 101-218.
Anacker U., Erkenntnis und Interesse: Ein Diskussionsbeitrag Zu Jürgen Habermas,
in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», LXXVIII, 1971, pp. 394-401; repr. in Dallmayr
F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. **-**.
Bauermann R., Rotscher J., Zur Marxverfälschung der linksliberalen “Kritischen Theorie”
der Frankfurter Schule, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XIX, 12, 1971, pp.
1440-1459.
Beyer W.R., Die Sünden der Frankfurter Schule, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1971.
Böhler D., Zur Geltung des emanzipatorischen Interesses, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp.
349-368.
Böhler D., Metakritik der Marxschen Ideologiekritik. Prolegomenon zu einer reflektierten
Ideologiekritik und Theorie-Praxis-Vermittlung, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971.
Carabana J., La teoría dialéctica del conocimiento de Jürgen Habermas, in «Teorema:
Revista Internacional de Filosofía», 1, 1971, pp. 43-56.
Cassano F., Autocritica della società contemporanea. Weber, Mills, Habermas, Bari, De
Donato, 1971.
12
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
Dienst K., Religionsunterricht-Interaktion-Gesellschaft. Zur Theorie der Symbolischen Interaktion, in «Der Evangelische Erzieher», XXIII, 1, 1971, pp. 10-22.
Eisele V., Theory and Praxis. The View from Frankfurt, in «Berkeley Journal of Sociology», XVI, 1971, pp. 94-105.
Faber G.K, Theorie der Geschichtswissenschaft, München, Beck, 1971.
Gadamer H.G., Replik, in Bubner R., Cramer K., Wiehl R. (eds.), Hermeneutik und
Dialektik, Tübingen, Mohr, 1970, pp. 283-310; tr. it., Replica, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1979, pp. 284-315.
Giegel J., Reflexion und Emanzipation, in AA.VV., Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 244-282; tr. it. Riflessione ed emancipazione, in
AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1979, pp. 247-283.
Grossner C., Verfall der Philosophie. Politik deutscher Philosophen, Hamburg, Christian
Wegner, 1971; München, Nymphenburger Verlag, 1981; tr. it. I filosofi tedeschi contemporanei tra neomarxismo, ermeneutica e razionalismo critico, Assisi, Città Nuova, 1980,
pp. 29-46, 205-212.
Hornung K., Protestbewegung und Hochschulreform, in «Der Staat», X, 3, 1971, pp.
357-382.
Huber W., Friedensforschung Und Geschichte, in «Internationale Dialog Zeitschrift»,
4, 1971, pp. 291-301.
Kelly D.A., Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy and Phenomenological Research», XXXII, 2,
1971, pp. 281-283.
Kofler L., Technologische Rationalität im Spätkapitalismus, Frankfurt a.M., Makol,
1971.
Krahl H.J., Konstitution und Klassenkampf, Frankfurt a.M., Neue Kritik, 1971; tr. it.
part. Attualità della rivoluzione, Roma, Manifestolibri, 1988.
Lepenies W., Anthropologie und Gesellschaftskritik. Zur Kontroverse Gehlen-Habermas, in
Lepenies W., Nolte H., Kritik der Anthropologie. Marx und Freud, Gehlen und Habermas
über Aggression, München, Hanser, 1971, pp. 77-103; tr. it. Antropologia e critica sociale.
Sulla controversia Gehlen-Habermas, in Lepenies W., Nolte H., Critica dell’antropologia,
Milano 1978, pp. 79-106.
Ley H., Müller Th. Kritische Vernunft und Revolution: Zur Kontroverse zwischen Hans
Albert und Jürgen Habermas, Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein, 1971.
Lorenzer A., Symbol, Interaktion und Praxis, in Id., Psychoanalyse als Sozialwissenschaft,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 9-59.
Löser W., Hermeneutik oder Kritik? Die Kontroverse zwischen H.G. Gadamer und Jürgen
Habermas, in «Stimmen der Zeit», XCVI, 188, 1971, pp. 50-59.
Luhmann N., Systemtheoretische Argumentationen. Eine Entgegnung auf Jürgen Habermas,
in Habermas J., Luhmann N., Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1971, pp. 291-298; tr. it. Argomentazioni teoretico-sistematiche. Una replica a Jürgen Habermas, in Habermas J., Luhmann N., Teoria della società o tecnologia sociale, Milano, Etas Kompass Libri, 1973, pp. 196-274.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
13
Milic V., Method of Critical Theory, in «Praxis: A Philosophical Journal», 1971, pp.
625-656.
Moravia S. Jürgen Habermas, Logica delle scienze sociali, in «Il ponte», XXVII,
8/9, 1971, pp. 1028-1029.
Nipperdey Th., Habermas Jürgen: Erkenntnis und Interesse, in «Vierteljahrschrift
für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte», LVIII, 3, 1971, p. 392.
Ott H., L’herméneutique de la société. Le problème de l’historicité collective, in «Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto», 48, 1971, pp. 240-260.
Ritsert J., Rolshausen C., Der Konservativismus der kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt a.M.,
Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1971.
Rohrmoser G., Grondslagen voor een revolutie?: Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen
Habermas, Antwerpen, Patmos, 1971.
Rusconi G.E., Una ridefinizione del concetto di prassi, in Habermas J.; tr. it. Prassi politica e teoria critica della società, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1973, pp. 7-28.
Schneider W., Theorie Der Praxis-Im Genetivus Subjectivus: Wegbereiter Einer Kritischen
Gesellschaftstheorie, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXV, 1971, pp.
25-47.
Solms F., Dimensionen Des Friedens, in «Internationale Dialog Zeitschrift», 4, 1971,
pp. 310-324.
Terenzio V., Autoriflessione come Scienza, in «Rivista di Studi Crociani», 8, 1971, pp.
65-71.
Therborn G., Jürgen Habermas: A New Eclecticism, in «New Left Review», 67, 1971,
pp. 69-83; tr. de. Habermas, Jürgen: Ein neuer Eklektiker, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp.
244-267; tr. es. Jürgen Habermas: un nuevo eclecticismo, in «Teorema: Revista
Internacional de Filosofía», 6, 1972, pp. 57-81.
Wellmer A., Erklärung und Kausalität. Kritik des Hempel-Oppenheim-Modells der Erklärung, University of Frankfurt a.M., 1971.
Wiatr J.J., Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Science & Society», XXXV, 3, 1971, pp. 373-375.
1972
125.
126.
127.
Apel K.O., Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft als transzendentale Voraussetzung der Sozialwissenschaften, in Riedel M. (ed.), Rehabilitierung der praktischen Philosophie,
Freiburg, 1972; tr. it. L’Apriori della comunità di comunicazione e i fondamenti dell’etica , in
Id., Comunità e comunicazione, Torino, Rosenberg & Sellier, 1977, pp. 205-268
Ballestrem K., McCarthy A., Thesen zur Begründung einer kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft, in «Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheoriez», III, 1, 1972, pp. 4962.
Bauermann R., Rotscher J., Neuformulierung von Kategorien des Historischen Materialismus, in Id., Dialektik der Anpassung. Die Aussöhung der “Kritischen Theorie” mit den impe-
14
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
rialistischen Herrschaftsverhältnissen», Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Marxistische Kritik, 1972,
pp. 27-42.
Beckermann A., Die realistischen Voraussetzungen der Konsensustheorie von J. Habermas,
in «Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», III, 1, 1972, pp. 63-80.
Ceppa L., Ideologia tecnocratica e contestazione culturale nella sociologia di Habermas, in
«Rivista di storia contemporanea», I, 2, 1972, pp. 225-255.
Ceppa L., J. Habermas, Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, in «Storia contemporanea», 1, 1972.
Coser L.A., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Political
Science Quarterly», LXXXVII, 3, 1972, pp. 507-509.
Dallmayr F.R., Reason and Emancipation: Notes on Habermas, in «Man and World»,
V, 1, 1972, pp. 79-109.
Dallmayr F.R., II – Critical Theory Criticized: Habermas’s Knowledge and Human Interest
and Its Aftermath, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», II, 3 (Review Symposium on
Habermas), 1972, pp. 211-229.
Eisele V., Theory and Praxis: The View From Frankfurt. Toward a Rational Society
by Jürgen Habermas; Critical Theory of Society by Albrecht Wellmer, in «Berkeley Journal of Sociology», 16, 1972, pp. 94-105.
Fontane P.E., Habermas Jürgen, Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, in «Contemporary Sociology», I, 2, 1972, pp. 134-135.
Gajano A., Le ambiguità della dialettica: la teoria critica della società di J. Habermas I. Il
concetto di partecipazione politica, in «Rivista trimestrale», 33-34, 1972, pp. 154-177.
Gajano A., Le ambiguità della dialettica: la teoria critica della società di J. Habermas II.
L’opinione pubblica, in «Rivista trimestrale», 35-36, 1972, pp. 403-437.
Glaser W.R., Soziales und instrumentales Handeln: Probleme der Technologie bei Arnold
Gehlen und Jürgen Habermas, Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln-Mainz, W. Kohlhammer, 1972.
Hesse M., In Defense of Objectivity, in «Proceedings of British Accademy», 1972, pp.
85-96; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen
Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 93-106.
Huussen G.M., Kee B., Kritieke Beperkingen En Beperkte Kritiek: De Discussie Tussen
Jürgen Habermas En Hans Albert, in «Philosophia Reformata», 37, 1972, pp. 174193.
Hill M.A., VI – Jürgen Habermas: A Social Science of the Mind, in «Philosophy of the
Social Sciences», II, 3 (Review Symposium on Habermas), 1972, pp. 247-259.
Hondrich K.O., Systemtheorie als Instrument der Gesellschaftsanalyse: Forschungsbezogene
Kritik eines Theorieansatzes, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche
Forschung und Praxis», XXIII, 1, 1972, pp. 1-16; repr. in Maciejewski F. (ed.),
Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie: Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann- Diskussion,
Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp. 88-114.
Jacobelli Isoldi A.M., Il contributo di J. Habermas alla determinazione del rapporto fra
coscienza critica e prassi, Roma, Bulzoni, 1972.
Kloss G., Illusory Accomplishments and sombre prospects in German University Reform:
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
153.
154.
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
160.
15
Hochschulreform – Gefahr im Verzuge? Mit einem Gesetzentwurf, by Lothar
Schmidt; Protestbewegung und Hochschulreform, by Jürgen Habermas; Abschied von
der Hochschulpolitik oder Die Universität im Fadenkreuz des Versagens, by Helmut Schelsky, in «Minerva», X, 3, 1972, pp. 495-498.
König E., Wertfreiheit und Rechtfertigung von Normen im Positivismusstreit, in «Zeitschrift für Soziologie», I, 3, 1972, pp. 225-239.
Krüger L., Überlegungen zum Verhältnis wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis und gesellschaftlicher
Interessen, in «Georgia Augusta», 5, 1972, pp. 18-28; repr. in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.),
Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974,
pp. 200-219.
Lenhardt Ch., III – Rise and Fall of Transcendental Anthropology, in «Philosophy of
the Social Sciences», II, 3 (Review Symposium on Habermas), 1972, pp. 231-246.
Ludwig H., Das Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis bei Jürgen Habermas, in «Jahrbuch
für Christliche Sozialwissenschaften», 13, 1972, pp. 271-287.
Lukes S., Habermas Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, in «The British
Journal of Sociology», XXIII, 4, 1972, pp. 499-500.
Massari T., La “teoria sociale critica” di J. Habermas, in «Rivista di filosofia», LXIII, 2,
1972, pp. 129-143.
Meyer Th., Zwischen Spekulation und Erfahrung. Einige Bemerkungen zur Wissenschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a. M., Makol Verlag, 1972.
Misgeldal D., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Dialogue», XI, 4, 1972, pp. 639-643.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Teoria critica y razón prática (a propósito de Jürgen Habermas,
Madrid, Istituto Alemán de Cultura, 3.1972; in «Sistema: Revista de ciencias
sociales», 3, 1973, pp. 33-58.
Nichols Ch., V – Science or Reflection: Habermas on Freud, in «Philosophy of Social
Science», II, 3 (Review Symposium on Habermas), 1972, pp. 261-270; repr. in Dallmayr
F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 401-417.
O’Neill J., Can Phenomenology be Critical?, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», II,
1972, pp. 1-13.
Parsons H.L., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy and Phenomenological Research», XXXIII, 2, 1972, pp. 281-282.
Poppi A., L’emancipazione etico-politica dalla razionalità positivistica e tecnocratica secondo J.
Habermas, in «Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica», XLIV, 3, 1972, pp. 471-484.
Riesterer B., Habermas Jürgen, Knowledge and Human Interests, in «Journal of
Thought», VII, 3, 1972, pp. 207-210.
Rusconi G.E., La proposta di razionalità politica di J. Habermas e le sue aporie, in Schmidt A., Rusconi G.E., La scuola di Francoforte. Origine e significato attuale, Bari, Laterza, 1972, pp. 179-240.
Schnadëlbach H., Über den Realismus. Ein Nachtrag zum Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, in «Zeitschrift fur allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», III, 1, 1972, pp.
88-112.
16
161.
162.
163.
164.
165.
166.
167.
168.
169.
170.
Schneider J., Zirker, Herbert; Lehmann, William C.; Blumenberg, Hans; Habermas, Jürgen; Henrich, Dieter; Taubes, Jacob: Vom Ursprung des Unterschieds in den Rangordnungen
und Ständen der Gesellschaft. Theorie 1, in «VSWG: Vierteljahrschrift für Sozial- und
Wirtschaftsgeschichte», LIX, 3, 1972, pp. 417-418.
Schroyer T., The Dialectical Foundations of Critical Theory: J. Habermas’ Metatheoretical
Investigations, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 1972, pp. 93-114
tr. de. Die dialektischen Grundlagen der kritischen Theorie, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 4140.
Schulz W., Der Gegensatz von kritischer und analytischer Theorie in der Soziologie, in Id.,
Philosophie in der veränderten Welt, Pfullingen, Neske, 1972, pp. 158-176.
Shapiro J.J., The Dialectic of Theory and Practice in the Age of Technological Rationality:
Herbert Marcuse and Jürgen Habermas, in Howard D., Klare K. (eds.), The Unknown
Dimension: European Marxism since Lenin, New York-London, Basic Books, 1972,
pp. 276-303.
Simon-Schaefer R., Über die Parallelisierung von Interessen und Wissenschaftssorten, in
Hübner K., Menne A. (eds.), Natur und Geschichte. X. Deutscher Kongreß für Philosophie. Kiel 8-12.10.1972, Hamburg, Meiner 1973, pp. 438-443.
Spaemann R., Die Utopie de Herrschaftsfreiheit, in «Merkur», XXVI, 1972, pp. 735752.
Steinbeck W., Habermas, Jürgen: Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’, in
«Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXVI, 3, 1972, pp. 469-470 .
Strasser S., De dialoog als bakermat van de waarheid, in «Tijdschrift voor filosofie», 34,
1972, pp. 323-347.
Trentin G., Conoscenza e interesse. Problemi epistemologici nella sociologia critica di J. Habermas, in «Rivista di teologia», IV, 1972, pp. 121-132.
van Steenbergen B., Jürgen Habermas, in Bertels C.P., Petersma E., Filosofie van de
20e Eeuw, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1972, pp. 175-190.
1973
171.
172.
173.
174.
Ambrosch H., Medick H., Rauh G., Geschichte, Geschichtsphilosophie: kritische Geschichtswissenschaft, in «Sozialwissenschaftliche Informationen für Unterricht und
Studium», II, 2, 1973, pp. 53-56.
Bar-Hillel Y., On Habermas’ Hermeneutic Philosophy of Language, in «Synthese», 26,
1973, pp. 1-11.
Beck Jørgensen T, En introduktion til Habermas: Borgerlig offentlighed, Forlaget GMT,
Udgivet år, 1973.
Bock Ph.K., Youth, University, and Democracy, by Gottfried Dietze; Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, by Jürgen Habermas, in «American Anthropologist», LXXV, 2, 1973, pp. 569-570.
175.
176.
177.
178.
179.
180.
181.
182.
183.
184.
185.
186.
187.
188.
189.
190.
191.
192.
17
Domin G., Lanfermann H.H., Mocek R., Pälike D., Zur Wissenschaftskonzeption
von Jürgen Habermas als Repräsentant der Frankfurt Schule, in Id., Bürgerliche Wissenschaftsaffassungen und ideologischer Klassenkampf, Berlin, Akademie-Verlag, 1973, pp. 136-143.
Ferguson Th., The Political Economy of Knowledge and The Changing Politics of Philosophy
of Science, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 1973, pp. 124-137.
Feuerstein Th., Emanzipation und Rationalität einer kritischen Erziehungswissenschaft.
Methodologische Grundlagen im Anschluß an Habermas, München, Kösel, 1973.
Galli C., Alcune interpretazioni italiane della Scuola di Francoforte, in «Il Mulino», 1973,
pp. 648-671.
Hammer F., Wie atheistische ist die Kritische Theorie?, in «Internationale Dialog Zeitschrift», VI, 1973, pp. 325-332.
Hawthorn G., The Interest of Scientific Knowledge: Knowledge and Human Interests,
by Jürgen Habermas; Towards a Rational Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Science
Studies», III, 1, 1973, pp. 78-87.
Held D., Habermas. Gesellschaft und Wissenschaft als Kommunikation, in Id., Kommunikationsforschung – Wissenschaft oder Ideologie?, München, C. Hanser, 1973, pp. 107-141.
Høibraaten H., “Jürgen Habermas’ Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, the materialist conception of history and modern research on democracy, Bergen, Universitetet i Bergen, Filosofisk Institutt, 1973.
Hymes D., Speech and Language: On the Origins and Foundations of Inequality among
Speakers, in «Daedalus», 102, 1973, pp. 59-85; repr. in Id., Ethnolinguistic Essays,
Washington, Centre for Applied Linguistics, 1980.
Kamper D., Habermas: Erkenntnis und Interesse, in Id., Geschichte und menschlich Natur, München, Hanser, 1973.
Klumpp E., Mündigkeit als ethisches Prinzip?, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXVII, 2, 1973, pp. 222-236.
Kultgen J., Valuations and Theories of Social Interaction, in «Southwestern Journal of
Philosophy», 4, 1973, pp. 139-153.
Jäger W., Öffentlichkeit und Parlamentarismus. Eine Kritik an Jürgen Habermas, Stuttgart-Berlin-Köln-Mainz, W. Kohlhammer, 1973.
Jay M., The dialectical imagination: a history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950, Boston, Little Brown, 1973; tr. it. L’immaginazione dialettica.
Storia della Scuola di Francoforte e dell’Istituto per le ricerche sociali 1923-1950, Torino, Einaudi, 1979.
Ladmiral J.-R., Préface, in J. Habermas, La Technique et la science comme «idéologie»,
Paris, Gallimard, 1973, pp. **-**.
Lipp W., Plan, Sprache und Gründung, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft
oder Sozialtechnologie. Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp. 162-208.
Lorenzer A., Über den Gegenstand der Psychoanalyse, oder: Sprache und Interaktion,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp. 134-**.
Maciejewski F., Vorwort, in Id. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Bei-
18
193.
194.
195.
196.
197.
198.
199.
200.
201.
202.
203.
204.
205.
206.
207.
träge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1973, pp. 7-8.
McCarthy Th., A Theory of Communicative Competence, in «Philosophy of the Social
Sciences», III, 1973, pp. 135-156.
Menéndez Ureña E., La teoría crítica de la Escuela de Frankfurt, in «Pensamiento.
Revista de investigación e información filosófica», XXIX, 114-115, 1973, pp. 175194.
Mertens H., Naar een verruiming van de existentiële interpretatie van de eschatologische boodschap, in «Bijdragen», XXXIV, 4, 1973, pp. 350-370.
Metz-Göckel S., Kommunikatives Handeln und Diskurs: Ein Modell für die Hochschuldidaktik?, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und
Praxis», XXIV, 2-3, 1973, pp. 318-333.
Münch R., Realismus und transzendentale Erkenntniskritik. Zur Kontroverse zwischen Kritischem Rationalismus und Dialektik, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», IV, 1, 1973, pp. 98-107.
Münch R., Traditionelle und kritische Theorie. J. Habermas’ Versuch der Grundlegung einer
aufklärerischen und emanzipatorischen Gesellschafttheorie, Id., Gesellschaftstheorie und Ideologiekritik, Hamburg, Hoffmann und Campe, 1973.
Opp K.-D., Hummell H.J., Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der “Kritischen Theorie”. Eine
Analyse von Jürgen Habermas’ “Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’”, in Opp K.-D.,
Hummell H.J., Kritik der Soziologie, Frankfurt a.M., Athenäum Verlag, 1973, pp.
113-132.
Pannenberg W., Wisenschaftstheorie und Theologie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973;
tr. it. Epistemologia e teologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1975.
Ricoeur P., Ethics and Culture. Habermas and Gadamer in Dialogue, in «Philosophy
Today», XVII, 4, 1973, pp. 153-165; tr. es. Ética y cultura. Habermas y Gadamer en
diálogo, in Id., Ética y cultura, Buenos Aires, Docencia, 1984, pp. 19-36.
Ruddick S., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Canadian
Journal of Philosophy», II, 4, 1973, pp. 545-569.
Schroyer T., Jürgen Habermas oder die Dialektisierung der Dialektik, in Id., The Critique
of Domination. The Origins and Developmente of Critical Theory, Boston, Beacon Press,
1973, pp. 357-365; tr. fr. Critique de la domination. Origines et développment de la théorie
critique, Paris, Payot, 1989.
Sievers B.R., Knowledge, mind, and action: Cassirer, Ryle, Habermas, and the epistemological approach to contemporary political theory, Stanford, Stanford University, 1973.
Silvers S., The Critical Theory of Science, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», 4, 1973, pp. 108-132.
Tjaden K.H., Bemerkungen zur historisch-materialistischen Konzeption der Struktur gesellschaftlicher Systeme, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie.
Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1973, pp. 78-87.
Tomasetta L., La rifeudalizzazione della sfera pubblica, in «Problemi del socialismo»,
208.
209.
210.
211.
212.
213.
214.
215.
19
XVI-XVII, 1973, pp. 533-551.
Uña Juarez, O., Una aproximación descriptiva a Conocimiento e interés de J. Habermas, in
«Anuario Jurídico Escurialense», 16, 1984, pp. 279-285.
Vallance E., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Philosophical Quarterly», XXIII, 91, 1973, pp. 170-172.
van der Heijden M.W., De macht in het denken van Romano Guardini en Juergen Habermas: analyse, konfrontatie, theologische betekenis, Tilburg, University of Tilburg, 1973.
von Hentig H., “Komplexitätsreduktion” durch Systeme oder “Vereinfachung” durch Diskurs?, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Beiträge zur
Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp.
115-144.
von Hentig H., Konsenstheorie. Über die Schwierigkeit, gemeinsam nützlich Wahrheiten
näherzukommen, in «Neue Sammlung», XIII, 1973, pp. 265-283.
Weinrich H., System, Diskurs, Didaktik und die Diktatur des Sitzfleisches, in Maciejewski F., Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Beiträge zur Habermas-LuhmannDiskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973,
pp.145-161.
Willms B., Kritik und Politik. J. Habermas oder das politische Defizit der “kritischen Theorie”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973.
Willms B., System und Subjekt oder die politische Antinomie der Gesellschaftstheorie, in
Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Beiträge zur HabermasLuhmann-Diskussion, Supplement I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1973, pp. 43-77.
1974
216.
217.
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
Blanchette O., Language, The Primordial Labor of History: A Critique of Critical Social
Theory in Habermas, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», I, 1974, pp. 325-382.
Böhler D., Über das Defizit an Dialektik bei Habermas und Marx, in Dallmayr F.R.
1974, pp. 369-385.
Bordogna L., Il concetto di “sfera pubblica” in Habermas e le sue matrici culturali, in «Studi di sociologia», XII, 2, 1974, pp. 229-250.
Braun P., Willamowski K.-D., Planung und Demokratie, in «Sozialwissenschaftliche
Informationen für Unterricht und Studium», III, 4, 1974, pp. 121-124.
Bunge M., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Technology and Culture»,
XV, 3, 1974, p. 539.
Bußhoff H., Zur neueren Diskussion des Sinnproblems: einige politiktheoretische Bemerkungen, in «Kölner. Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XXVI, 4, 1974,
pp. 715-741.
Ciardo M., La trascrizione sociologica di un problema speculativo: la mediazione dialettica tra
teoria e prassi, in «Rivista di Studi Crociani», 11, 1974, pp. 162-170.
Dallmayr W., Einleitung, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkennt-
20
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
nis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. **-**.
Dallmayr W., Epilog, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis
und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. **-**.
Eder K., Komplexität, Evolution und Geschichte, Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement II, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 9-42.
Eley L., Komplexität als Erscheinung, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft
oder Sozialtechnologie. Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement II,
Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 130-153.
Evans J.C., Husserl und Habermas, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’
“Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 268-294.
Fach W., Diskurs und Herrschaft: Überlegungen zu Habermas’ Legitimationslogik, in
«Zeitschrift für Soziologie», 3, 1974, pp. 221-228.
Feuer L.S., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», III, 4, 1974, pp. 318-319.
Fløistad G., Soziale Handlungsbegriffe: Bemerkungen zu Habermas’ Vorschlag einer sozialen Erkenntnistheorie, in Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und
Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 71-106.
Gozzi G., Dialettica e razionalismo critico: analisi del dibattito metodologico tra Popper e la
scuola di Francoforte, in «Il mulino», XXII, 1, 1974, pp. 66-92.
Heidtmann B., Traditionelle und ideologische Determinanten einer Theorie sozialer Systeme
und ihrer Kritik, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie.
Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement II, Frankfurt a. M.,
Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 154-185.
Hejl P., Zur Diskrepanz zwischen struktureller Komplexität und traditionalen Darstellungsmitteln der funktional-strukturellen Systemtheorie, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der
Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement II, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 186-**.
Henrich D., Kritik de Verständigungsverhältnisse. Laudation für Jürgen Habermas, in
Habermas J., Henrich D. (eds.), Zwei Reden. Aus Anlaß der Vereihung des Hegel-Preises,
Howard R., A Politics in Search of the Political, in «Theory and Society», I, 1, 1974,
pp. 271-306.
Innis R.E., Theory and Praxis, By Jürgen Habermas, in «Social Praxis», II, 1974, pp.
145-156.
Kamper D., Hermeneutik--Theorie Einer Praxis?, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», V, 1, 1974, pp. 39-53.
Kimmerle H., Die Funktion Der Hermeneutik in Den Positiven Wissenschaften, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», 5, 1974, pp. 54-73.
Kisiel Th., Habermas’ Reinigung von reiner Theorie: Kritische Theorie ohne Ontologie?, in
Dallmayr F.R. (ed.), Materialien zu Habermas’ “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 295-317.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
245.
246.
247.
248.
249.
250.
251.
252.
253.
254.
21
Koenen E., Steinbacher K., Die Wahrheitsfähigkeit von Evolutionstheorien und die Evolutionsabhängigkeit von Wahrheit, in Maciejewski F. (ed.), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Supplement II, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 92-129.
Kupffer H., Zum Verhältnis von Erziehung und Sozialstruktur, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XXV, 2, 1974, pp. 235245.
Ladmiral J.-R., Préface, in J. Habermas, Profils philosophiques et politiques, Paris, Gallimard, 1974, pp. **-**.
Laska P., A Note on Habermas and the Labor Theory of Value, in «New German Critique», 3, 1974, pp. 154-162.
Lassahn R., Kritische Erziehungswissenschaft., Die implizite Bildungstheorie bei J. Habermas, in Id., Einführung in die Pädagogik. Heidelberg, Quelle und Meyer, 1974.
Lauenstein D., Das Ich und die Gesellschaft. Einführung in die philosophische Soziologie im
Kontrast zu Max Weber und Jürgen Habermas in der Denkweise Plotins und Fichtes, Stuttgart, Verlag Freies Geistesleben, 1974.
Loonen B.W.N., Kritiek en hermeneutiek: een filosofisch werkstuk over wetenschap en verstaan bij Habermas en Gadamer, Tilburg, University of Tilburg, 1974.
Lorenzer A., Die Wahrheit der psychoanalytischen Erkenntnis. Ein historischmaterialistischer Entwurf, Frankfurt a.M., Imago-Druck, 1974, pp. 60-80.
Narr W.D., Runze W., Zur Kritik der politischen Soziologie, in Maciejewski F. (ed.),
Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie. Neue Beiträge zur Habermas-LuhmannDiskussion, Supplement II, Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, 1974, pp. 43-91.
Posner R., Diskurs als Mittel der Aufklärung – Zur Theorie der rationalen Kommunikation bei Habermas und Albert, in Gerhardt M. (ed.), Linguistik und Sprachphilosophie,
München, List, 1974, pp. 280-303; tr. en. Discourse as a Means to Enlightenment, in
«Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science», XLIII, 1975, pp. 641-660; repr. as
Discourse as a Means to Enlightenment: Two Theories of Rational Communication, in Posner
R., Rational Discourse and Poetic Communication: Methods of Linguistic, Literary, and Philosophical Analysis, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1982, pp. 205-222.
Rohrmoser G., Das Elend der kritischen Theorie. Jürgen Habermas, in Dallmayr F.R.
1974, pp. 135-153.
Sarrazin Th., Spreer F., Tietzel M., Krise und Planung in marxistischer Sicht:: Das Beispiel Habermas, in «Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik»,
19, 1974, pp. 293-318.
Schmied-Kowarzik W., Habermas’ dialektische Wissenschaftstheorie und ihr Scheitern am
Problem der Grundlegung praktischer Wissenschaften, in Id., Dialektische Pädagogik, KöselMünchen, 1974.
Tessitore F., Jürgen Habermas su Vico, in «Bollettino del centro di studi Vichiani»,
4, 1973-74, pp. 176-178.
Totaro F., Habermas contro Popper e alcune osservazioni dialettiche sull’epistemologia analitica di Popper, in AA. VV., Le più recenti epistemologie. Popper-Hempel, Gregoriana, Pado-
22
255.
va 1974, pp. 169-177.
Vázquez de Prada V., Capital monopolista y sociedad autoritaria (La involución autoritaria
en la R. F. A.), de J. Habermas y otros, in «Revista de estudios políticos», 195-196,
1974, pp. 271-280.
1975
256.
257.
258.
259.
260.
261.
262.
263.
264.
265.
266.
267.
268.
269.
270.
271.
Abels H., Alltagswirklichkeit und Situation: Neue Bezugspunkte soziologischer Forschung,
in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis»,
XXVI, 2, 1975, pp. 227-249.
Ahlers R., How Critical is Critical Theory?, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 3, 1975,
pp. 119-132.
Antiseri D., Introduzione all’edizione italiana, in Albert H., Difesa del razionalismo critico,
Roma, Armando 1975, pp. 5-56.
Barreau H., Connaissance et intérêt. A propos des thèses de Jürgen Habermas, Strasbourg,
Université Louis Pasteur, 1975.
Beyer W.R., Eine Gegendarstellung, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung»,
XXIX, 1975, p. 462.
Bisky L., Zur Kritik der bürgerlichen Massenkommunikationsforschung, Leipzig, KarlMarx-Universität, 1975.
Blakeley Th.J., Responses To “Theory and Practice”, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 4,
1975, pp. 353-354.
Blanchette O., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Studies in Soviet
Thought», XV, 4, 1975, pp. 341-351.
Bubner R., Theory and Practice in the Light of the Hermeneutic-Criticist Controversy, in
«Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 4, 1975, pp. 337-352.
Bubner R., Summation (of Symposium on “Theory and Practice”), in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 4, 1975, pp. 359-362.
Buttemeyer W., Der Streit um “Positivistische” Erziehungswissenschaft in Deutschland, in
«Scientia: An International Review of Scientific Synthesis», 110, 1975, pp. 419-468.
Cavallera H.A., J. Habermas. “Prassi politica e teoria critica della società”, in «Giornale
critico della filosofia italiana», VI, 4, 1975, pp. 594-**.
Deutsch K.L., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The
American Political Science Review», LXIX, 1, 1975, pp. 245-246.
Di Pol R.S., La scuola di Francoforte: analisi delle tematiche pedagogiche, in «I Problemi
della Pedagogia», XXI, 2, 1975, pp. 201-229.
Fach W., J. Habermas: Kontroverse über “Herrschaft und Legitimität”, in « Soziale Welt:
Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XXVI, 1975, pp.
110-121.
Fach W., Anmerkungen zu Friedrich W. Stallbergs Habermas-Verteidigung, in «Zeitschrift für Soziologie», IV, 1, 1975, p. 99.
272.
273.
274.
275.
276.
277.
278.
279.
280.
281.
282.
283.
284.
285.
286.
287.
288.
289.
23
Fiala V., Gesek L., Mucha H., Pachner F., Saipt O., Zur Frage der Ethik des Sozialwissenschaftlers, in «Österreichisches Jahrbuch für Soziologie», 1974-1975, pp. 137179.
Freundlieb D., Zur Problematik einer Diskurstheorie der Wahrheit, in «Zeitschrift für
allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», VI, 1, 1975, pp. 82-107.
Gadamer H.G., Hermeneutics and Social Science, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 4,
1975, pp. 307-330.
Geuss R., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas; Erkenntnis und
Interesse. Mit Einem Neuen Nachwort, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Journal of Philosophy», LXXII, 22, 1975, pp. 810-819.
Giegel H.J., System und Krise. Kritik der Luhmannschen Gesellschaftstheorie. Beitrag zur
Habermas-Luhmann-Diskussion, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1975.
Japp K.P., Krisentheorien und Konfliktpotentiale, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus
Verlag, 1975, pp. 63-76.
Jiménez Blanco J., Sobre la disputa del postivismo en la sociología alemana, in «Revista
Español de la Opinión Pùblica», 42, 1975, pp. 105-121.
Keane J., On Tools and Language: Habermas on Work and Interaction, in «New German Critique», 6, 1975, pp. 82-100; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp.
3-19.
Keane J., Work and Interaction, in «Arena», 38, 1975, pp. 51-68.
Kimmel B., Althusser and Habermas, in «The Human Factor», XIII, 1, 1975, pp.
90-106.
Kuhlmann W., Reflexion und kommunikative Erfahrung, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1975.
Leist A., Ein Plädoyer für die Beendigung und Konsenstheorie de Wahrheits-kriterien, in
«Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», VI, 2, 1975, pp. 217-234.
Lenk K., Dialektik bei Marx. Erinnerung an den Ursprung der kritischen Gesellschaftheorie, in Kritik und Interpretation der Kritischen Theorie. Aufsätze über Adorno, Horkheimer,
Marcuse, Benjamin, Habermas, Giessen, Achenbach, 1975, pp. 1-12.
MacRae D. Jr., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «American Journal of
Sociology», LXXX, 4, 1975, pp. 1078-1079.
McCarthy Th., Responses to “Theory and Practice”, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 4,
1975, pp. 355-356.
McLuskie Ed., Against a science of human communication: The role of hermeneutics in contributing arguments from the Frankfurt School, in «Journal of Communication Inquiry»,
I, 2, 1975, pp. 7-19.
Menéndez Ureña E., Teoría y praxis en la fenomenología trascendental (E. Husserl) y en la
teoría crítica (J. Habermas), in «Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e información
filosófica», XXXI, 123, 1975, pp. 231-244.
Meriggi M.G., Habermas, il movimento studentesco e la classe operaia, in Habermas J.,
Lavoro e Interazione, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1975, pp. 7-21.
24
290.
291.
292.
293.
294.
295.
296.
297.
298.
299.
300.
301.
302.
303.
304.
305.
306.
307.
308.
Miller M., Jürgen Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of
Critical Thought», 25, 1975, pp. 210-220.
Miller R.W., Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Philosophical Review», LXXXIV, 2, 1975, pp. 261-266.
Misgeld D., Emancipation, Enlightenment, and Liberation: An Approach toward Foundational Inquiry into Education, in «Interchange», VI, 3, 1975, pp. 23-37.
Misgeld D., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Canadian Journal of
Sociology», I, 2, 1975, pp. 247-253.
Müller W., Neusüss Ch., The Illusion of State Socialism and The Contradiction Between
Wage Labor and Capital, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 25,
1975, pp. 13-90.
Nuissl E., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in Id., Massenmedien im System bürgerlicher
Herrschaft, Berlin, Volker Spiess, 1975, pp. 19-29.
Oger E., Realisme versus transcendentaalfilosofie? : een poging tot confrontatie van de epistemologieën van K. Popper en J. Habermas, in AA.VV. (ed.), Handelingen van het 30e
Vlaams filologencongres, Gent 1-3 april 1975, Leuven, Symons, 1975, pp. 71-77.
Outhwaite W., Understanding Social Life: The Method Called “Verstehen”, London,
Allen & Unwin, 1975.
Palermo J., Pedagogy as a Critical Hermeneutic, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», II, 3,
1975, pp. 137-145.
Raulet G., Préface, in J. Habermas, Théorie et pratique, tr. fr. by G. Raulet, Paris,
Payot 1975, pp. **-**.
Reimann B.W., Therapie und Diskurs. Zur Problematik von Analogieschlüssen, in « Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XXVI, 4,
1975, pp. 469-477.
Rendtorff T., Gesellschaft ohne Religion? Theologische Aspekte einer sozialtheoretischen
Kontro-verse (Luhmann/ Habermas), München, R. Piper & Co. Verlag, 1975.
Rusconi G.E., Marxism in West Germany, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 25, 1975, pp. 6-12.
Sarrazin Th., Spreer F., Tietzel M., Krise und Planung in Marxistischer Sicht. Das Beispiel Habermas’, in Lührs G. et. al. (eds.), Kritischer Rationalismus und Sozialdemokratie,
Berlin, Dietz, 1975, pp. 213-243.
Simon-Schaefer R., Zimmerli Ch.W., Theorie zwischen Kritik und Praxis. Jürgen Habermas und die Frankfurter Schule, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, FrommannHolzboog,
1975.
Smelser N.J., Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Social Forces», LIII, 4,
1975, p. 650.
Stallberg F.W., Legitimation und Diskurs: Zur Habermas-Analyse Wolfgang Fachs, in
«Zeitschrift für Soziologie», IV, 1, 1975, pp. 96-98.
Sullivan W.M., Two Options in Modern Social Theory: Whitehead and Habermas, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XV, 1975, pp. 83-98.
Vogelsang I., Ludwig Wittgensteins Sprachspiel und die Theorie der kommunikativen Kom-
309.
310.
311.
25
petenz von Jürgen Habermas in einem Strukturen Vergleich, Wien, 1975.
Winfield R., The Dilemma of Labor, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 24, 1975, pp. 115-128.
Zoeckler C., Habermas, in Id., Dilthey und die Hermeneutik, Stuttgert, Metzler, 1975,
pp. 139-164.
Zöller M., Die Unfähigkeit zur Politik: Politikbegriff und Wissenschaftsverständnis von
Humboldt bis Habermas, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1975.
1976
312.
313.
314.
315.
316.
317.
318.
319.
320.
321.
322.
323.
324.
325.
Accarino B., Interazione e critica delle forme politiche. Note su Habermas e sulla rilettura di
Hegel, in «Aut-Aut», CLV-VI, 1976, pp. 21-47.
Agger B., Marcuse and Habermas on New Science, in «Polity», IX, 2, 1976, pp. 158181.
Angelini G., Colombo G., Sequeri P.A., Teologia, ermeneutica e teoria, in «Teologia»,
1976, pp. 5-35, 91-134.
Benvenuti L., J. Habermas. Logica delle scienze sociali, in «Lingua e stile», XI, 1976,
pp. 631-**.
Bernstein R.J., The Critical Theory of Society, in Id., The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory, New York-London, Blackwell Publishing, 1976, pp. 171-236.
Bollnow O.F., Paul Ricoeur Und Die Probleme Der Hermeneutik, in «Zeitschrift für
philosophische Forschung», XXX, 1976, pp. 389-412.
Brinkmann D., Das Theorie-Praxis-Problem bei Marx und Habermas, Hamburg, Presseverl., Knut Reim, 1976.
Ceppa L., Nota del traduttore, in Ottomeyer K., Comportamento sociale ed economia. Per
una teoria marxistica dell’interazione e per una critica di Habermas e Lorenzer, Torino, Musolini, 1977, pp. IV-XX.
Domin G., Mocek R., Pälike D., Zu den Wissenschaftsauffassungen der sogenannten kritischen Theorie, in Domin G. et. al. (eds.), Bürgerliche Wissenschaftsaffassungen in der Krise,
Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Marxistiche Blätter, 1976, pp. 72-146.
Dottori R., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia nella polemica tra Gadamer e Habermas, in
«Giornale critico della filosofia italiana», LV, 1976, pp. 559-583.
Eickelpasch R., Arbeit-Interaktion-Diskurs. Zur anthropologischen Begründung der Gesellschaftskritik bei Jürgen Habermas, in «Zeitschrift für Soziologie», V, 3, 1976, pp. 201214.
Ellerbrock J., Jaritz P., Kühnert W., Schmitz U., Ansätze materialistischer Sprachtheorie, in «Das Argument», XVIII, 95, 1976, pp. 44-69.
Finkel E., Zur Kritik des theoretischen Anspruchs und der grundbegrifflichen Struktur des
soziologisch-philosophischen Ansatzes von Jürgen Habermas, Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, 1976.
Flynn Th.R., The Use and Abuse of Utopias, in «Modern Schoolman: A Quarterly
Journal of Philosophy», 53, 1976, pp. 235-263.
26
326.
327.
328.
329.
330.
331.
332.
333.
334.
335.
336.
337.
338.
339.
340.
341.
Franzen W., Die Geisteswissenschaften und die Praxis. Kritische Überlegungen zu einem
Aspekt der wissenschaftstheoretischen Konzeption von Jürgen Habermas, in «Studia Philosophica» 36, 1976, pp. 52-83.
Gerber M., Zur Korrespondenz- und Konsenstheorie der Wahrheit, in «Zeitschrift für
allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», VII, 1, 1976, pp. 39-57.
Giddens A., Hermeneutics and Critical Theory, Gadamer, Apel, Habermas, in Id., New
Rules of Sociological Method. A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies, London, Hutchinson, 1976, pp. 54-70; tr. it. Ermeneutica e teoria critica, in Id., Nuove regole del metodo
sociologico, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1979.
Girndt H., Drei kritische Thesen zur Legitimationstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, in «Politische Vierteljahresschrift», XVII, 7, 1976, pp. 62-71.
Gripp H., Zur rationalen Begründbarkeit moralischer Werte: Ein Plädoyer für den “herrschaftsfreien Diskurs”, in «Die Mitarbeit», XXV, 4, 1976, pp. 322-332.
Halapier J., Die Verwechslung der Entwicklung der Technik mit der Entwicklung der kapitalistischen Technisierung, in «Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie», I, 2-3, 1976,
pp. 102-104.
Held D., Simon L., Habermas’ Theory of Crisis in Late capitalism, in «Radical Philosopher’s News Journal», VI, 1976, pp. 1-19; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
School. Critical Assessments, Vol. V. Section VI: Jürgen Habermas, London-New York,
Routledge, 1994, pp. 241-256.
Held D., Simon L., Toward Understanding Habermas: Legitimation Crisis, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «New German Critique», VII, 1976, pp. 136-145.
Höffe O., Kritische Überlegungen zur Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit (Habermas) in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», LXXXIII, 2, 1976, pp. 314-332.
Honneth A., Terrorismus und Gesellschaftskritik, in J. Habermas (ed.), Stichworte zur
‘Geistigen Situation der Zeit’, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp 1979, pp. 265-293; repr. in
Wellmer A. (ed.), Endspiele: Die unversöhnliche Moderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1993, pp. 278-305; tr. en. Terrorism and Social Criticism, in «Telos», 48, 1981, pp. 6578; repr. as Terrorism and the Critique of Society, in J. Habermas (ed.), Observations on
“the Spiritual Situation of the Age”, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1984, pp. 283-307.
Howard D. Moral Development and Ego Identity: A Clarification, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 27, 1976, pp. 176-182.
Hülsmann H., Die Schwierigkeiten des Jürgen Habermas beim Versuch, Theorie und Praxis zu vermitteln, in «Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik», 1, 1976, pp. 5770.
Ilting K.H., Geltung als Konsens, in «Neue Helfte für Philosophie», X, 1976, pp. 2050.
Kaplan M.A., Alienation and Identification, New York, Free Press, 1976.
Klapwijk J., Dialektiek der verlichting: Een verkenning in het neomarxisme van de Frankfurter Schule, Assen-Amsterdam, Van Gorcum, 1976; tr. en. Dialectic of Enlightenment.
Critical Theory and the Messianic Light, Eugene (OR), Wipf & Stock, 2010.
Krüger M., Notes on a Materialistic Theory of Interaction, in «The Cornell Journal of
342.
343.
344.
345.
346.
347.
348.
349.
350.
351.
352.
353.
354.
355.
356.
357.
358.
27
Social Relations», XI, 1, 1976, pp. 97-104.
Landmann M., Critiques of Reason from Weber to Bloch, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 29, 1976, pp. 187-198.
Malherbe J.F., Des énonces protocolaires aux décisions épistémiques un chapitre de l’histoire
récente de l’épistémologie anglo-saxonne, in «Revue Philosophique de Louvain», LXXIV,
1976, pp. 594-622.
Martens E., Der Zwang der Wahrheit. Zum Dezisionismusproblem bei Jürgen Habermas,
in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», LXXXIII, 2, 1976, pp. 392-401.
Marx W., Habermas’ Philosophical Conception of History, in «Cultural Hermeneutics»,
III, 1976, pp. 335-348.
McCarthy Th., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., Legitimation Crisis, London,
Heinemann, 1976, pp. VII-XXIV.
Meyer G.P., Revolutionstheorien heute: Ein kritischer Überblick in historischer Absicht, in
«Geschichte und Gesellschaft», 2, 1976, pp. 122-176.
Milde U., Bürgerliche Öffentlichkeit als Modell der Literaturentwicklung des 18. Jahrhunderts, in Mattenklott G., Scherpe Kl.R. (eds.), Westberliner Projekt, Grundkurs 18. Jahrhundert, Kronberg, Scriptor Verlag, 1976, pp. 41-73.
Misgeld D., Critical Theory and Hermeneutics: The Debate between Gadamer and Habermas, in O’Neil J. (ed.), On Critical Theory, New York, Seabury, 1976, pp. 164-183.
Mishler E.G., Skinnerism: Materialism Minus The Dialectic, in «Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour», 6, 1976, pp. 21-47.
Nielsen K., Can There Be An Emancipatory Rationality?, in «Critica: Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofia», 8, 1976, pp. 79-102.
Nielsen K., The Political Relevance of Habermas, in «Radical Philosopher’s News
Journal», 7, 1976, pp. 1-10.
O’Neill J., The Problem of Sense: Habermas v. Luhmann, in Id., On Critical Theory, New
York, Seabury, 1976, pp. 184-204
Ottomeyer K., Soziales Verhalten und Ökonomie im Kapitalismus. Vorüberlegungen zur
systematischen Vermittlung von Interaktionstheorie und Politischer Ökonomie, Gißen, Focus
Verlag, 1976, pp. 19-42; tr. it. Comportamento sociale ed economia. Per una teoria marxistica dell’interazione e per una critica di Habermas e Lorenzer, Torino, Musolini, 1977, pp.
21-56.
Overend T., Habermas’ Knowledge and human interests: an exegesis of Habermas’
Knowledge and human interests, Bundoora (Vic.), La Trobe University, 1976.
Paris R., Schwierigkeiten einer marxistischen Interaktionstheorie: Anmerkungen zu einem
Programm der Vermittlung von Kritik der politischen Ökonomie und Interaktionstheorie, in
«Gesellschaft: Beiträge zur Marxschen Theorie», 7, 1976, pp. 11-44.
Peukert H., Wissenschaftstheorie – Handlungstheorie – Fundamentale Theologie. Analysen
zu Ansatz und Status theologischer Theoriebildung, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1978; tr. en. by J.
Bohman, Science, Actions, and Fundamental Theology, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1984.
Rasmussen D., Advanced Capitalism and Social Theory. Habermas on the Problem of Le-
28
359.
360.
361.
362.
363.
364.
365.
366.
367.
368.
369.
370.
371.
372.
373.
374.
375.
gitimation, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», III, 4, 1976, pp. 349-366.
Roncolini G., Habermas e la crisi della razionalità nel capitalismo maturo, in «Critica sociologica», XXXVIII, 1976, pp. 67-72.
Shapiro J.J., Reply to Miller’s Review of Legitimation Crisis, in «Telos: A Quarterly
Journal of Critical Thought», 29, 1976, pp. 170-176.
Signore M., La teoria dell’”emancipazione storicamente adeguata” in J. Habermas, in AA.
VV., Teoria e prassi, Padova, Gregoriana, 1976, pp. 125-138.
Simons E., Drei kritische Zusatz-Thesen zur Legitimations-theorie von Jürgen Habermas, in
«Politische Vierteljahresschrift», XVII, 7, 1976, pp. 72-75.
Tranoy K.E., The Foundations of Cognitive Activity: An Historical and Systematic Sketch,
in «Inquiry», XIX, 1976, pp. 131-150.
Tugendhat E., Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie, Frankfurt a.M., 1976.
Unknow, Habermas’ neues Buch: Eine ungewöhnlich reaktionäre Staatsphilosophie, in
«Marxistische Studenten Zeitung», 14, 13.12.1976.
Van Den Enden H., De Wetenschap Op Het Beklaagdenbankje: Over Zin En Onzin
Van De Wetenschapskritiek Der Frankfurter Schule, in «Philosophica», XVII, 1976, pp.
107-149.
Van Hooft S., Habermas’s Communicative Ethics, in «Social praxis», IV, 1-2, 1976,
pp. 147-175.
Verbruggen F., Marcuse, Habermas, De Man, T’ao Chi’ien, Ginsburg, Darwin, et al., en
de Problematiek Van Het Zgn Wetenschapsethos, in «Philosophica», XVII, 1976, pp. 77106.
Vincent J.M., La Théorie critique de l’école de Francfort, Paris, Galilée, 1976.
Vincent J.M., La Théorie critique et républicanisme kantien, in «Futur antérieur», 41-42,
1976, pp. 1-14.
Wegener R., Jürgen Habermas und die Kritik der «Kritik der politischen Ökonomie», in
«Mehrwert», X, 1976, pp. 3-68.
Weitzel R.I., The deontology of Habermas, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor
Wijsbegeerte», LXVIII, 4, 1976, pp. 222-231.
Widmer H., Anmerkungen Zum Zeitdiagnostischen Anspruch Der Philosophie, in «Studia
Philosophica», 36, 1976, pp. 204-225.
Widmer H., Conocimiento e interés en Jürgen Habermas, in «Pensamiento. Revista de
investigación e información filosófica», XXXII, 127, 1976, pp. 281-302.
Zahn L., Die letzte Epoche der Philosophie: von Hegel bis Habermas : Kommentarband,
Stuttgart, Ernst Klett, 1976.
1977
376.
Apel K.O., Types of Social Science in the Light of Human Interests of Knowledge, in «Social
Research», VIL, 3, 1977, pp. 425-470.
377.
378.
379.
380.
381.
382.
383.
384.
385.
386.
387.
388.
389.
390.
391.
392.
393.
29
Arnason J.P., Marx and Habermas, in Arnason J.P, Birchall B., Overend T., Habermas Symposium, Bundoora (Vic.), La Trobe University, 1977; tr. de. Marx und
Habermas, in Honneth A., Jaeggi U. (eds.), Arbeit, Handlung, Normativität. Theorien des
Historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt a.M., 1980, pp. 137-184; tr. it. Habermas e Marx,
in Habermas J., Dialettica della razionalizzazione, Milano, Unicopli, 1983, pp. 387422.
Asperen G.M. van, Historisch materialisme en ethiek bij Habermas, in «Nederlands
theologisch tijdschrift», XXXI, 1977, pp. 326-338.
Bauss G., Der Kongreß von Hannover: “Hochschule und Demokratie”, in Id., Die Studentenbewegung der sechziger Jahre in der Bundesrepublik und Westberlin, Köln, PahlRugenstein, 1977, pp. 61-64.
Bauss G., Karl Marx-Universität in Frankfurt/Main, in Id., Die Studentenbewegung der
sechziger Jahre in der Bundesrepublik und Westberlin, Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein, 1977, pp.
266-270.
Beatty J., Practical Discourse and the Egoist, in «Southern Journal of Philosophy», 15,
1977, pp. 141-150.
Beyer W.R., Der Begriff Interaktion: eine Sackgasse im Verwirklicliungsprozeß der Philosophie, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XXV, 3, 1977, pp. 305-321.
Birchall B.C., Radicalization of the Critique of Knowledge, in Arnason J.P, Birchall B.,
Overend T., Habermas Symposium, Bundoora (Vic.), La Trobe University, 1977;
repr. as Radicalization of The Critique of Knowledge: Epistemology Overcome Or Reinstatement of An Error?, in «Man and World», X, 1977, pp. 367-381.
Bilden H., Das unhistorische Subjekt. Zur Kritik sozialisationstheoretischer Grundkonzepte,
Weinheim, Basel, Beltz, 1977.
Brand A., Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. A Comparison of Weber, Popper and
Habermas, in «The Netherland’s Journal of Sociology», XIII, 1, 1977, pp. 1-20.
Brüggemann B., Sozialisation durch Sprache?: zum Konzept von Ich-Identität bei Jürgen
Habermas, in von Frithjof H. (ed.), Die Sache der Sprache: Beiträge zu einem sozialwissenschaftlichen Verständnis von Sprache, Stuttgart, Metzler, 1977, pp. 188-219.
Burkhardt R.J., Philosophy Legitimation Crisis, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Social
Theory and Practice», IV, 2, 1977, p. 241.
Cremades Gil J.J., Razon Practica y Razon Juridica, in «Anales de la Catedra
Francisco Suarez», XVII, 1977, pp. 1-24.
Esser H., Klenovits K., Zehnpfennig H., Wissenschaftstheorie. Teil 2, Funktionsanalyse und her-meneutisch-dialektische Ansätze, Stuttgart, B.G. Teubner, 1977, pp. 176-216.
Dworkin R., Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1977.
Factor R., Turner S.P., The Critique of Positivist Social Science in Leo Strauss and Jürgen
Habermas, in «Sociological Analysis and Theory», VII, 3, 1977, pp. 185-206.
Fellsches J., Kritik der Rollentheorie. Die Diskurstheorie, in Id., Moralische Erziehung als
politische Bildung. Heidelberg, Quelle und Meyer, 1977, pp. 92-98; pp. 99-107.
Garceau B., Un débat entre positivistes et critiques de l’idéologie, in «Revue de l’Université
d’Ottawa», 47, 1977, pp. 313-321.
30
394.
395.
396.
397.
398.
399.
400.
401.
402.
403.
404.
405.
406.
407.
408.
409.
Giddens A., Habermas’ Critique of Hermeneutics, in Id., Studies in the Social and Political
Theory, London, Hutchinson, 1977, pp. 135-164.
Giddens A., Habermas’s Social and Political Theory: Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, by Jürgen Habermas; Knowledge and Human Interests, by Jürgen Habermas; Theory and Practice, by Jürgen Habermas; Legitimation
Crisis, by Jürgen Habermas, in «American Journal of Sociology», LXXXIII, 1, 1977,
pp. 198-212.
Gozzi G., Linguaggio e ideologia in Habermas, Trento, Unicoop, 1977.
Gozzi G., Ragione e bisogni in Habermas, in «Aut-Aut», CLXII, 1977, pp. 25-48.
Griese H.M., Menschenbilder in der Soziologie, in «Medizin Mensch Gesellschaft», II,
3, 1977, pp. 123-129.
Hearn F., Toward A Critical Theory of Play, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 30, 1977, pp. 145-160.
Hennis W., Legitimität. Zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft, in Id., Politik und
praktische Philosophie. Schriften zur politischen Theorie, Stuttgart, Klett Cotta, 1977, pp.
198-243.
Hess H., Die Entstehung zentraler Herrschaftsinstanzen durch die Bildung klientelärer Gefolgschaft: zur Diskussion um die Entstehung staatlich organisierter Gesellschaften, in «Kölner
Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XXIX, 4, 1977, pp. 762-778.
Hjørland B., Psykologi og informationsvidenskab, in «Nordisk Psykologi», XXIX, 3,
1977, pp. 204-219.
Holtkamp R., Habermas: Arbeit als instrumentales Handeln, in Id., Wissenschaftstheorie
zwi-schen gesellschaftlicher Totalität und positiver Einzelwissenschaft, Lollar, Achenbach,
1977, pp. 58-65.
Honneth A., Arbeit und instrumentelles Handeln. Kategoriale Probleme einer Kritischen
Gesellschaftstheorie, in Honneth A., Jaeggi U. (eds.), Arbeit, Handlung, Normativität.
Theorien des Historischen Materialismus 2, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1980, pp. 185233; tr. en. Work and Instrumental Action, in «New German Critique», 25, 1982, pp.
Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 20-39; tr. it. Lavoro e azione
strumentale, in Protti M. (ed.), Dopo la scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen
Habermas, Milano, Unicopli, 1984, pp. 141-170.
Howard D., From Critical Theory towards Political Theory: Jürgen Habermas, in Id., The
Marxian Legacy, New York-London, MacMillan, 1977.
Kaiser H.R., Staat und gesellschaftliche Integration. Zur Analyse und Kritik des Staatbegriffs
bei Jürgen Habermas und Claus Offe, Marburg, Verlag Arbeiterbewegung und Gesellschaftswissenschaft, 1977.
Kirsch W., Der Wandel einer Organisation als Problem der politischen Planung, in «Sozialwissenschaftliche Annalen Reihe A», I, 3, 1977, pp. 97-111.
Kunstmann W., Gesellschaft-Emanzipation-Diskurs. Darstellung und Kritik der Gesellschaftstheorie von J. Habermas, München, Fink, 1977.
La Capra D., Habermas and the Grounding of Critical Theory, in «History and Theory:
410.
411.
412.
413.
414.
415.
416.
417.
418.
419.
420.
421.
422.
423.
424.
425.
426.
427.
428.
31
Studies in the Philosophy of History», 16, 1977, pp. 237-264.
Ladmiral J.R., Travail et interaction dans l’oeuvre de Jürgen Habermas, in Tiffeneau D.
(ed.), La sémantique de l’action, Paris, Éd. Du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1977, pp. 259-270.
Lafrance G., La Science et la Politique: Présentation du Problème, in «Revue de
l’Université d’Ottawa», 47, 1977, pp. 307-312.
Lanigan R.I., Critical theory as a philosophy of communication, Paper presented at the
27th annual convention of the International Communication Association, Berlin
West, Germany, 1977.
Leist A., Was Heisst Universalpragmatik?, in «Germanistische Linguistik», 5-6, 1977.
Lemert Ch., Gillan G., The New Alternative In Critical Sociology: Foucault’s Discorsive
Analysis, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», IV, 1977, pp. 309-320.
Ludz P.Ch., Reflexionen zum Verhältnis von Sozialwissenschaften und praktischer Politik,
in von Horst B., Freiheit und Sachzwang: Beiträge zu Ehren Helmut Schelskys, Opladen,
Westdeutscher Verlag, 1977, pp. 10-22.
Marin J.R., Habermas: nuevo enfoque de la filosofia trascendental, in « Teorema: Revista
Internacional de Filosofía », VII, 3-4, 1977, pp. 347-352.
Maurer R.K., Jürgen Habermas Aufhebung Der Philosophie, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXIV, 8, 1977, pp. 1-70.
Mcguire R.R., Speech Acts, Communicative Competence and the Paradox of Authority, in
«Philosophy and Rhetoric», 10, 1977, pp. 30-45.
McIntosh D., Habermas on Freud, in «Social Research», XLIV, 3, 1977, pp. 562598.
Melegari C. M., Review of Il ruolo sociale della religione. Saggi e conversazioni, in
«Studi di Sociologia», XV, 4, 1977, pp. 402-404.
Mellos K., The Habermasian Perspective in the Critique of Technocratic Consciousness, in
«Revue de l’Université d’Ottawa», 47, 1977, pp. 427-431.
Merkl P. H., Trends in German Political Science: A Review Essay, in «The American
Political Science Review», 1, 1977, pp. 1097-1108.
Misgeld D., Discourse and Conversation: The Theory of Communicative Competence and
Hermeneutics In The Light of the Debate between Habermas and Gadamer, in «Cultural
Hermeneutics», IV, 1977, pp. 321-344.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Teoría crítica y razón práctica, a propósito de Jürgen Habermas, in
Id., La razón sin esperanza, Taurus, Madrid, 1977, pp. 145-177.
Nielsen K., Rationality, Needs and Politics: Remarks on Rationality as Emancipation and
Enlightenment, in «Cultural Hermeneutics», IV, 1977, pp. 281-308.
Oetzel K.D., Vernunft und Parteilichkeit. Zu Habermas’ Strategie einer Rekonstruktion
des historischen Materialismus, in «Leviathan: Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft», V, 4,
1977, pp. 552-577.
Ortíz Osés A., Habermas: un teórico de la comunicación social, in «Arbor», 381-382,
1977, pp. 73-88.
Overend T., Social Realism and Social Idealism: two Competing Orientations on the Rela-
32
429.
430.
431.
432.
433.
434.
435.
436.
437.
438.
439.
440.
441.
442.
443.
tion between Theory, Praxis and Objectivity, in Arnason J.P, Birchall B., Overend T.,
Habermas Symposium, Bundoora (Vic.), La Trobe University, 1977; repr. in «Inquiry», XXI, 1978, pp. 271-311.
Petrysnk N., The Frankfurt School’s Theory of manipulation, in «Journal of Communication», XXVII, 3, 1977, pp. 32-40.
Rammstedt O., Rönsch H.D., Bürgerbeteiligung und Bürgerinitiativen: Legitimation und
Partizipation in der Demokratie angesichts gesellschaftlicher Konfliktsituationen, VillingenSchwenningen, Neckar-Verlag, 1977, pp. 91-157.
Reich N., Zum Verhältnis Von Markt Und Recht als Gegenstand Sozial ökonomischer
Theorienbildung, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXIII, 1977, pp.
485-514.
Reid H.G., Yannarella E.J., Critical Political Theory and Moral Development. On Kohlberg, Hampden-Turner and Habermas, in «Theory and Society», IV, 4, 1977, pp. 505541.
Rieder J., The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, by Daniel Bell; Legitimation
Crisis, by Jürgen Habermas; The Fiscal Crisis of the State, by James O’Connor, in «Contemporary Sociology», VI, 4, 1977, pp. 411-416.
Riedmüller B., Crisis as Crisis of Legitimation. A Critique of Jürgen Habermas’s concept of
a Political Crisis Theory, in «International Journal of Politics», VII, 2, 1977, pp. 83117.
Roth V.M., Mit Marx an Marx vorbei? Histomat 1 und Histomat 2. Diskussionsbeitrag
zu Jürgen Habermasì’ Thesen zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, in Henrich D. (ed.), Ist systematische Philosophie möglich?, Hegel-Studien, XVII, Bonn, Bouvier, 1977, pp. 583-593.
Rumpf H., Über den Sinn technischen Handelns, in Lenk H. (ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliche
Handlungstheorien und spezielle systemwissenschaftliche Ansätze, München, Fink, 1977, pp.
387-408.
Schmidt J., Praxis and Temporality: Karel Kosik’s Political Theory, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 30, 1977, pp. 71-84.
Schnädelbach H., Diskurs, in Id., Reflexion und Diskurs. Fragen einer Logik der Philosophie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhkamp, 1977, pp. 135-175.
Schrape K., Theorien normative Strukturen und ihres Wandels, Teil I, Theoretische Einführung, Rekonstruktion und Kritik der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, Basel, Social Strategies
Publishers Co-operative Society, 1977.
Siemek J., Marxismus und hermeneutische Tradition, in AA.VV., Phänomenologie und
Marxismus, I. Konzepte und Methode, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1977, pp. 45-70;
tr. it. Marxismo e tradizione ermeneutica, in «Marx 101», 3, 1977.
Signore M., Habermas e la fattibilità della storia in senso emancipante, in AA. VV., Un
nuovo impegno politico dell’intellettuale, Massimo, Milano 1977, pp. 245-255.
Simon-Schaefer R., Analytische Wissenschaftstheorie Und Dialektik, in «Erkenntnis:
An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy», XI, 3, 1977, pp. 365-382.
Spülbeck V., Herrschaftsfreie Kommunikation als emanzipatorische Praxis: Jürgen Haber-
444.
445.
446.
447.
448.
449.
450.
451.
452.
33
mas , in Id., Neomarxismus und Theologie. Gesellschaftskritik in Kritischer Theorie und Politischer Theologie, Freiburg, Herder Verlag, 1977, pp. 109-169.
Van Peursen C.A., Presentday Philosophies, in «Methodology and Science», 10, 1977,
pp. 240-257.
Vobruba G., Legitimation und Güterknappheit: ein Beitrag zur Rekonstruktion des Legitimationsproblems im Spätkapitalismus, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XXIX, 2, 1977, pp. 355-363.
Vogel U., “Soziales Lernen” als Element soziologischer Sozialisationstheorie, in «Kölner
Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XXIX, 1, 1977, pp. 32-44.
Wandschneider D., Der Begriff Praktischer Vernunft In Objektivistischer, Formalistischer
Und Kognitivistischer Verkürzung, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung»,
XXXI, 1977, pp. 85-99.
Wellmer A., Kommunikation und Emanzipation. Überlegungen zur “sprachanalytischen
Wende” der kritischen Theorie, in AA.VV., Theorien des Historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1977, pp. 465-500; tr. it. Comunicazione ed emancipazione. Riflessioni sulla “svolta linguistica” della Teoria Critica, in J. Habermas, Dialettica della razionalizzazione, Milano, Unicopli, 1983, pp. 297-324; tr. es. Comunicación y emancipación.
Reflexiones sobre el ‘giro lingüístico de la Teoría Crítica’, in «Isegoría», 1, 1990, pp. 15-48.
Wetzel M., Logik Der Handlungsschemata: Ansatz Zu Einer Neuen Wissenschaft Der
Erfahrung Des Bewußtseins, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXIII,
1977, pp. 59-78.
Wiley N., The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, by Daniel Bell; Legitimation
Crisis, by Jürgen Habermas; The Fiscal Crisis of the State, by James O’Connor, in «Contemporary Sociology», VI, 4, 1977, pp. 416-424.
Wolff F., Windaus E. (eds.), Studentenbewegung 1967-69. Protokolle und Materialien,
Frankfurt a.M., Roter Stern, 1977.
Wulf Ch., Kritische Erziehungswissenschaft, in Id., Theorien und Konzepte der Erziehungswissenschaft, München, Juventa, 1977, pp. 137-207.
1978
453.
454.
455.
456.
Abel G., Von Der Gesellschaftlichen Arbeit Zum Wissenchaftlichen, Kommunikationssystem, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXIV, 1978, pp. 501-508.
Adamson W., Beyond Reform or Revolution: Political Education in Gramsci, Habermas,
and Arendt, in «Theory and Society», V, 1978, pp. 29-60.
Alexy R., Habermas’ Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit, in Id., Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung.
Apel K.O., Sprechakttheorie und Begründung ethischer Normen, in Lorenz K. (ed.), Konstruktionen versus Positinen. Beiträge zur Diskussion um die konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie.
Vol. II. Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, Berlin-New York, W. de Gruyter, 1978, pp.
37-106.
34
457.
458.
459.
460.
461.
462.
463.
464.
465.
466.
467.
468.
469.
470.
471.
472.
473.
474.
Arenilla L., Ecology: A Different Perspective, in «Diogenes», 104, 1978, pp. 1-22.
Assel H.G., Zum Ideologieproblem der Gegenwart: Habermas als Ideologiekritiker, in «Die
Mitarbeit», XXVII, 1, 1978, pp. 1-16.
Assoun P.L., Raulet G., Marxisme et théorie critique, Paris, Payot, 1978.
Bärenz H., Diskursbegriff und kritische Erziehungswissenschaft, in «Pädagogische
Rundschau», XXXII, 2, 1978, pp. 91-111.
Baum G., La comunicazione nella chiesa, in «Concilium», 1978, pp. 13-18.
Bauman Z., Hermeneutics and Social Science, New York, Columbia University Press,
1978.
Belardinelli S., Scienza e filosofia pratica. Saggio su Jürgen Habermas, Urbino, CLUEB,
1978.
Flood T., Jürgen Habermas’s Critique of Marxism, in «Science and Society», XLI, 4,
1978, pp. 448-464.
Dallmayr W., Fragen an Habermas und Apel, in Oelmüller W. (ed.), Transzendentalphilosophische Normenbegründungen, Ferdinand Schöningh, Paderborn, 1978, pp. 2737.
Doorne F.J.M. van, Kommunikatief handelen, zelfreflektie en rationale rekonstruktie: notities bij Habermas’ onderzoeksprogramma, in Plattel M.G., Rijk M.C., de Lange H.M.,
Rijnvos C.J. (eds.), Ontwikkelingen in het sociale denken, Ambo, Baarn, 1978, p. 164178.
Galeazzi U., La Scuola di Francoforte, Roma, La Città Nuova, 1978.
Görtzen R., van Gelder F., Jürgen Habermas: een primaire bibliographie, in «Kennis en
Methode», II, 1978; tr. en. Jürgen Habermas: The Complete Oeuvre: A Bibliography of
Primary Literature, Translations and Reviews, in «Hume Studies», 2, 1979, pp. 285-300.
Haug F., Dialektische Theorie und empirische Methodik, in «Das Argument. Zeitschrift
für Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften», XX, 111, 1978, pp. 644-656.
Hesse M., Habermas’ Consensus Theory of Truth, in Asquith P., Hacking I., Proceedings
of the 1978 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, PSA, 1978, pp. 373396; repr. in Hesse M., Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science,
Brighton (Sussex), The Harvester Press, 1980, pp. 206-231.
Hohendahl P.U., Kritische Theorie, Öffentlichkeit und Kultur. Anmerkungen zu Jürgen
Habermas und seinen Kritikern, in «Basis: Jahrbuch für deutsche Gegenwartsliteratur»,
VIII, 1978, pp. 60-90; tr. en. Critical Theory, Public Sphere and Culture, in «New German Critique», 16, 1979, pp. 89-116; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School.
Critical Assessments, Vol. V. Section VI: Jürgen Habermas, London-New York,
Routledge, 1994, pp. 215-240.
Holzer H., Evolution oder Geschichte?: Einführung in Theorien gesellschaftlicher Entwicklung, Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein, 1978.
Hoy D.C., The Critical Circle: Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1978.
Hrubi F.R., Geltung und Konsens: Vorarbeiten zu einer Theorie der Kommunikation mit
besonderer Berücksichtigung der Argumentation, Wien, 1978.
475.
476.
477.
478.
479.
480.
481.
482.
483.
484.
485.
486.
487.
488.
489.
490.
491.
492.
493.
494.
495.
35
Kisiel Th., Habermas’ Purge of Pure Theory: Critical Theory Without Ontology?, in «Human Studies», I, 1, 1978, pp. 167-183.
Korthals M., Kunneman H., Arbeid en Normativiteit bij Marx en Habermas, Amsterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1978.
Kramm E., Dialektik und Kommunikation im Denken von Jürgen Habermas, Berlin,
1978.
Kuss K.L., Der “tiefenhermeneutische” Einheitsanspruch bei Jürgen Habermas, Regensburg, 1978.
Maldame J.M., Science et Technique, in «Revue Thomiste», 78, 1978, pp. 634-656.
Manfrin S., Il Vico di Habermas, in «Filosofia oggi», I, 1, 1978, pp. 31-36.
Menéndez Ureña E., La teoría crítica de la sociedad de Habermas. La crisis de la sociedad
industrializada, Madrid, Tecnos, 1978.
Miller J., Some Implications of Nietzsche’s Thought For Marxism, in «Telos: A Quarterly
McCarthy Th., The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1978; tr. es. La teoría crítica de Jürgen Habermas, Madrid, Tecnos, 1987.
McCarthy Th., History and Evolution: On the Changing Relation of Theory to Practice in
the Work of Jürgen Habermas, in Asquith P., Hacking I., Proceedings of the 1978 Biennial
Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, PSA, 1978, pp. 397-423.
Möller H.J., Psychoanalyse als hermeneutische Wissenschaft, in Id., Psychoanalyse – erklärende Wissenschaft oder Deutungskunst, München, Fink, 1978, pp. 162-209.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Ética y comunicación (Una discusión del pensamiento ético-político
de Jürgen Habermas), in «Revista de Estudios Políticos», 56, 1987, pp. 7-63.
Mutz R., Über manipulative und kritische Publizität, in Id., Sicherheitspolitik und demokratische Öffentlichkeit in der BRD. Problem der Analyse, Kritik und Kontrolle militärischer
Macht, München, Oldenbourg, 1978, pp. 72-78.
Mutz R., Zum Rationalitätsgehalt kritischer Öffentlichkeit, in Id., Sicherheitspolitik und
demokratische Öffentlichkeit in der BRD. Problem der Analyse, Kritik und Kontrolle militärischer Macht, München, Oldenbourg, 1978, pp. 83-88.
Nielsen K., Rationality as Emancipation and Enlightenment, in «International Studies
in Philosophy», X, 1978, pp. 33-50.
Nielsen K., Technology as Ideology, in «Research in Philosophy and Technology», 1,
1978, pp. 131-147.
Nijk A.J., Hermeneutiek en Ideologiekritiek, in «Kennis en Methode», II, 1978, pp.,
282-318.
Overend T., Enquiry and Ideology: Haberman’ Trichotomous Conception of Science, in
«Philosophy of the Social Sciences», VIII, 1978, pp. 1-13.
Overend T., Social realism and social idealism: Two competing orientations on the relation
between theory, praxis, and objectivity, in «Inquiry», XXI, 1-4, 1978, pp. 271-311.
Plaut M., Positivism in Poulantzas, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 31, 1978, pp. 159-167.
Rammert W., Technologie als Problem kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie: eine vergleichende Dar-
36
496.
497.
498.
499.
500.
501.
502.
503.
504.
505.
506.
507.
508.
509.
510.
511.
512.
stellung der Theorieansätze von H. Marcuse, J. Habermas und H.D. Bahr, in «Mehrwert»,
15, 1978, pp. 59-85.
Ray L.J., Habermas, Legitimation and the State, in «Journal for the Theory of Social
Behaviour», 8, 1978, pp. 149-163.
Rex J., Legitimation, Ideology and Culture in Late Capitalist Societies: Legitimation Crisis, by Jürgen Habermas; The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology, by Alvin W.
Gouldner; The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, by Daniel Bell, in «Sociology»,
XII, 3, 1978, pp. 561-566.
Roncolini G., La crisi della legittimità borghese. Capitalismo e razionalità nel pensiero di J.
Habermas, Napoli, Liguori, 1978.
Rorty R., Epistemological Behaviorism and the De-Transcendentalization of Analytic Philosophy, in «Neue Hefte für Philosophie», XIV, 1978, pp. 115-142.
Sass H.M., Das Wort Toleranz Im Gebrauchspolitischen Streit, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXII, 1978, pp. 577-590.
Sass H.M., Ideational Politics and the Word Tolerance, in «Philosophy and Rhetoric»,
11, 1978, pp. 98-113.
Schopf A., Die Motivation zu sittlichem Handeln. Zur Unterscheidung kognitiver und motivationaler Begründungen der praktischen Philosophie und Ethik, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXII, 1978, pp. 494-509.
Schäfer A., Kooperative Kritik an der Gesellschaft und kritische Kommunikation, in Id.,
Kritische Kommunikation und gefähardete Identität. Zur anthroposoziologischen Grundlegung
einer kritischen Erziehungstheorie, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1978, pp. 194-433.
Sheffrin S., Habermas, Depoliticization, and Consumer Theory, in «Journal of Economic Issues», XII, 4, 1978, pp. 785-797.
Scott J.P., Critical Social Theory: an introduction and critique, in «British Journal of Sociology», XXIX, 1, 1978, pp. 1-21.
Siebert R.J., Communication without Domination, in Baum G., Greeley A. (eds.),
Communication in the Church, New York, Seabury Press, 1978, pp. 81-94; tr. it Comunicare senza dominare, iin «Concilium», 1978, pp. 144-164 .
Silvers S., Science and Rationality an Examination of Koningsveld’s Theory of Science, in
«Kennis en Methode», II, 1978, pp. 71-80.
Stockman N., Habermas, Marcuse, and the Aufhebung of Science and Technology, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», VIII, 1978, pp. 15-35.
Sullivan W.M., Communication and the Recovery of Meaning: An Interpretation of
Habermas, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», 18, 1978, pp. 69-86.
Treptow E., Habermas’ Stellung zu Marx, in Id., Aspekte zu Epikur, Lukács, Habermas, München, Uni-Druk, 1978, pp. 103-113.
Tugendhat E., Zur Entwicklung von moralischen Begründungsstrukturen in modernen
Recht, in Convegno Argomentazione e diritto, München, 9.1978; repr. in «Archiv für
Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», XIV, 1980, pp. 1-20.
Tuschling B., Die “offene” und die “abstrakte” Gesellschaft. Habermas und die Konzeption
von Vergesellschaftung der klassichbürgergelichen Rechts –und Staatsphilosophie, Berlin, Ar-
513.
514.
515.
516.
517.
518.
519.
520.
37
gumentum Verlag, 1978.
Tuschling B., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in «Das Argument», 25-26, 1978, pp.
7-37.
Tuschling B., Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus, in «Das Argument», 25-26,
1978, pp. 168-182.
Tuschling B., Habermas und Popper: Streit um eine nichtexistente Alternative, in «Das
Argument», 25-26, 1978, pp. 182-201.
Tuschling B., “Freiheit” und “Vernunft” in der “offenen” Gesellschaft, in «Das Argument», 25-26, 1978, pp. 420-435.
Van Parijs Ph., Karl Popper, le Cercle de Vienne et l’école de Francfort, in «Revue Philosophique de Louvain», LXXVI, 1978, pp. 359-370.
Wardekker W., Actie-Onderzoek in De Onderwijskunde: Een Poging Tot Structurering, in
«Kennis en Methode», II, 1978, pp. 41-54.
Weiss J., Die Soziologie Und Die Aufhebung Der Philosophie, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXII, 1978, pp. 556-567.
Wilson H.T., The Poverty of Sociology: “Society” as Concept and Object in Sociological Theory, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», VIII, 1978, pp. 187-204.
1979
521.
522.
523.
524.
525.
526.
527.
528.
529.
Agger B. Work and authority in Marcuse and Habermas, in «Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences», II, 3, 1979, pp. 191-208.
Albert H., Geschichte und Gesetz. Zur Kritik des methodologischen Historismus, in Salamun K. (ed.), Sozialphilosophie als Aufklärung. Festschrift für Ernst Topitsch, Tübingen,
1979, pp. 111-132; tr. it. Scienza e Ragione Critica, in «Rivista di Filosofia», 72, 1981,
pp. 171-191.
Aldrich B.C., Doing Sociology with Video Tape, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston (Mass.) 8.1979.
Alford C.F., Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«New German Critique», XVIII, 1979, pp. 176-180.
Arnason J.P. Review of Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus, in
«Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 1979, 39, pp. 201-218; repr. in
Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas,
London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 157-176.
Artus H., Erkenntnis und Interesse, in Id., Integrale Soziologie. Voraussetzungen und
Grundzüge ihrer wissenschaftstheoretischen Einheit, München, W. Fink, 1979, pp. 137155.
Aune J.A., The Contribution of Habermas to Rhetorical Validity, in «Journal of the
American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 104-111.
Beatty J., “Communicative Competence” and the Skeptic, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», VI, 1979, pp. 267-288.
Blakeley Th.J., Praxis and Labor in Jürgen Habermas, in «Studies in Soviet Thought»,
38
530.
531.
532.
533.
534.
535.
536.
537.
538.
539.
540.
541.
542.
543.
544.
20, 1979, pp. 291-294.
Böhler D., Konstituierung des Handlungsbegriffs. Teleologisches und quasi-dialogisches Rekon-struktionsmodell, in Lenk H. (ed.), Handlungstheorien – interdisziplinär. Vol. 2, I.
Halbbd.: Handlungserklärungen und philosophische Handlungsinterpretation, München, W.
Fink Verlag, 1979, pp. 161-197.
Buchli E., Critica dell’antropologia. Marx e Freud, Gehlen e Habermas sull’aggressività, in
«Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica», LXXI, 1979, pp. 239-240.
Burleson B.R., On the Foundations of Rationality: Toulmin, Habermas, and the a Priori of
Reason, in «Journal of the American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 112127.
Burleson B.R., Kline S.L., Habermas’ theory of communication: A critical explication, in
«Quarterly Journal of Speech», LXV, 4, 1979, pp. 412-428.
Cohen J., Why More Political Theory, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 40, 1979, pp. 70-94; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical
Assessments, Vol. V. Section VI: Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge,
1994, pp. 257-280; tr. it. Perché ancora una teoria politica? in J. Habermas, Dialettica della
razionalizzazione, Milano, Unicopli, 1983, pp. 325-354.
Cushman D.P., Dietrich D., A Critical Recontruction of Jürgen Habermas’ Holistic Approch to Retoric as Social Philosophy, in «Journal of the American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 128-137.
Đinđić Z., Marx’ kritische Gesellschaftstheorie und das Problem der Begründung, Konstanz, Universität Konstanz, 1979.
Ealy S.D., Communication, speech, and politics: Habermas and political analysis, Athens
(Georgia), University of Georgia, 1979; repr. in Washinton D.C., University Press
of America, 1981.
Engels E.M., Mündigkeit: Eine Anthropologische Kategorie? Überlegungen zum transzendentalphilosophischen Anspruch der gesellschaftskritischen Konzeption von Jürgen Habermas, in
«Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXIII, 1979, pp. 389-411.
Farrell Th.B., Habermas on Argumentation Theory: Some Emerging Topics, in «Journal
of the American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 77-82.
Farrell Th.B., Mine J.A., Critical theory and communication: A selective literature review, in
«Quarterly Journal of Speech», 65, 1979, pp. 93-120.
Fleck Ch., Der prominente Überbau. Studien zur Sozialisationstheorie und Evolutionstheorie
von Jürgen Habermas, Graz, 1979.
Flórez Miguel C., Habermas y la Lógica de las Ciencias Sociales, in «Cuadernos
salmantinos de filosofía», VI, 1979, pp. 157-168.
Forester J., Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Theory and Society», X, 5, 1981, pp. 745-750.
Furth P., Interaktion als ein Grundbegriff des historischen Idealismus: Argumente gegen Habermas’ Versuch, Gesellschaftstheorie als ‘Kritik’ zu begründen, in von Bernhard H., Katzenstein R. (eds.), Soziologie und Praxis: Studium, Forschung, Beruf, Köln, PahlRugenstein, 1979, pp. 161-184.
545.
546.
547.
548.
549.
550.
551.
552.
553.
554.
555.
556.
557.
558.
559.
560.
561.
39
Görtzen R., Gelder F. van, Jürgen Habermas: the complete oeuvre: a bibliography of primary literature, translations and reviews, in «Human studies», 2, 1979, pp. 283-300.
Heller A., Marxist Ethics and the Future of Eastern Europe, in «Telos: A Quarterly
Holz H.H., On the Unity of the Natural and Social Sciences, in «Revolutionary World»,
34, 1979, pp. 60-73.
Holzer H., Zur aktuellen evolutionssoziologischen Diskussion in der BRD: Klaus Eders
Argumentation als Überwindung der Habermas/Luhmann-Position?, in von Bernhard H.,
Katzenstein R. (eds.), Soziologie und Praxis: Studium, Forschung, Beruf, Köln, PahlRugenstein, 1979, pp. 185-198.
Honneth A., Adorno und Habermas. Zur kommunikationstheoretischen Wende kritischer
Sozialphilosophie, in «Merkur», XXXIII, 7, 1979, pp. 648-665; tr. en. Communication
and Reconciliation: Habermas’ Critique of Adorno, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of
Critical Thought», 34, 1, 1979, pp. 45-61; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School.
Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994,
pp. 40-55.
Horster D., Die Subjekt-Objekt-Beziehung im Deutschen Idealismus und in der Marxschen
Philosophie, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1979, pp. 1-25.
Jehenson R., The Social Distribution of Knowledge in Formal Organizations: A Critical
Theoretical Perspective, in «Human Studies», II, 1979, pp. 111-129.
Kemmis S., Hughes C., Curriculum Evaluation in Higher Education: Self Reflection in a
Critical Community, Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Queensland (Australia),
11-14.5.1979.
Keuth H., Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung? Die Konsenstheorien der Wahrheit und der Richtigkeit von Jürgen Habermas, in «Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie», X,
2, 1979, pp. 375-393.
Kline S.L., Toward a Contemporary Linguistic Interpretation of the Concept of Stasis, in
«Journal of the American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 95-103.
Koreng Ch., Norm und Interaktion bei Jürgen Habermas, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1979.
Korthals M., Anthropologie en Maatschappijkritiek Van De Frankfurter Schule, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte», 71, 1979, pp. 23-35.
Korthals M., Wetenschap en politieke besluitvorming, de visie van Habermas, in «Wetenschap en samenleving», 3, 1979, pp. 18-24.
Korthals M., Kunneman H., Arbeid en interaktie, Muiderberg, Coutinho, 1979.
Kortian G., Métacritique, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit 1979; tr. en. by J. Raffan,
Metacritique: the philosophical argument of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.
Kunneman H., Cognitieve en Normatieve Rationaliteit, in «Kennis en Methode», III,
1979, pp. 173-198.
Leisering L., Wissenszerstörung und Rekonstruktion: Analyse und Kritik der wissenssoziologischen Implikationen der Theorie von Niklas Luhmann mit vergleichenden Seitenblicken auf
40
562.
563.
564.
565.
566.
567.
568.
569.
570.
571.
572.
573.
574.
575.
576.
577.
578.
579.
580.
Mannheim, Habermas und Marx, Bielefeld 1979.
Lockwood D., Soziale Integration und Systemintegration, in Zapf W. (ed.), Theorien des
sozialen Wandels, Köln, 1979, pp. 124-137.
Löwenthal R., Gesellschaftliche Transformation und demokratische Legitimität. Zu Jürgen
Habermas’ Analyse der Krisentendenzen im «Spätkapitalismus», in Id., Gesellschaftswndel und
Kulturkrise, Frankfurt a.M., Fischer, 1979, pp. 58-84.
Luban D., On Habermas on Arendt on Power, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
VI, 1979, pp. 79-95.
Marquard O., Identität: Schwundtelos und Mini-Essenz: Bemerkungen zur Genealogie einer
aktuellen Diskussion, in Id., Stierle K. (eds.), Identität : Arbeitsergebnisse einer Forschungsgruppe 8, München, Fink, 1979, pp. 347-369.
McCarthy Th., Translator’s Introduction?, in Habermas J., Communication and the Evolution of Society, Boston, Beacon Press, 1979, pp. VII-XXIV.
Mendelson J., The Habermas–Gadamer Debate, in «New German Critique», 18,
1979, pp. 44-73.
Münch R., Wissenschaftstheorie und Wissenschaftssoziologie: Argumente zu ihrer Unterscheidung, in von Kurt S. (ed.), Sozialphilosophie als Aufklärung : Festschrift für Ernst Topitsch, Tübingen, Mohr, Siebeck, 1979, pp. 153-171.
Murray J.P., Enlightenment Roots of Habermas’ Critique of Marx, in «Modern Schoolman», 57, 1979, pp. 1-24.
Nicholson L., Jürgen Habermas and Social Theory, in «The Review of Education», V,
3, 1979, pp. 215-220.
Oberreuter H., Parlament und Öffentlichkeit?, in Langenbucher W.R. (ed.), Politik
und Kommunikation. Uber die öffentliche Meinungsbildung, München, Piper, 1979, pp. 6278.
Overend T., Interests, Objectivity and the Positivist Dispute in Social Theory, in «Social
Praxis», VI, 1979, pp. 69-91.
Oevermann U., Contra J. Habermas, Unpublished, Frankfurt a.M, University of
Frankfurt, 1979.
Pieper A., Das ethische Fundament des praktischen Diskurses, in Id., Pragmatische und
ethische Normenbegründung, Freiburg-München, F. Alber, 1979, pp. 146-174.
Poulain J., Vers Une Pragmatique Nucleaire de la Communication, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XVIII, 1979, pp. 471-499.
Raulet G., Actualité de Habermas, in «Quinzaine Littéraire», 301, 1979.
Ray, L.J, Critical Theory and Positivism: Popper and The Frankfurt School, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», IX, 1979, pp. 149-173.
Reimann B.W., Die Pädagogik des Diskurses in soziologischer Perspektive, in «Neue
Sammlung», XIX, 4, 1979, pp. 379-400.
Ripanti G., Editoriale, in AA.VV., Ermeneutica e critica dell’ideologia, Brescia, Queriniana, 1979, pp. 7-22.
Rockmore T., Habermas and the Reconstruction of Historical Materialism, in «The Journal of Value Inquiry», XIII, 3, 1979, pp. 195-206.
581.
582.
583.
584.
585.
586.
587.
588.
589.
590.
591.
592.
593.
594.
595.
596.
597.
598.
41
Roemer R.E., The University and The Cultural Complex, in «Journal of Thought», 14,
1979, pp. 249-254.
Rohrmoser G., Habermas, in Weger K.H. (ed.), Religionskritik von der Aufklärung bis
zur Gegenwart. Autoren-Lexikon von Adorno bis Wittgenstein, Freiburg, Herder Verlag,
1979, pp. 132-136.
Rossvaer V., Kant’s Moral Philosophy: An Interpretation of the Categorical Imperative, Oslo, Universitetsforlag, 1979.
Schmidt J., Offensive Critical Theory: Reply to Honneth, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal
of Critical Thought», 39, 1979, pp. 62-70; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge,
1994, pp. 56-64.
Sensat J. jr., Habermas and Marxism. An Appraisal, Beverly Hills-London, Sage
Publications, 1979.
Siebert R.J., From Critical Theory of Society to Theology of Communicative Praxis, Washington Dc, University Press of America, 1979.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Critical Theory of Religion, in «Telos», 1979, pp. 50-68.
Smith, A., Habermas and his Marxist Critics, in «Long Island Philosophical Society»,
12.12.1979.
Stillman P.G., Hegel and Habermas on Legitimation Crises, in «New England Political
Science Association Convention», 4, 1979.
Swart H.A.P., Kritiek Van Habermas Consensus-Theorie Van De Waarheid, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte», 71, 1979, pp. 167-172.
Thompson J.B., Critical Hermeneutics. A Study in the Thought of Paul Ricoeur and Jürgen
Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979, 1981, 1995.
Turski G., Some Considerations on Intersubjectivity and Language, in «Gnosis: A Journal
of Philosophic Interest», 1, 1979, pp. 29-44.
Vossberg H., Zur Kritik und Selbstkritik der antiautoritären Bewegung, in Id., Studentenrevolte und Marxismus. Zur Marxrezeption in der Studentenbewegung auf Grundlage ihrer politischen So-zialisationsgeschichte, München, Minerva, 1979, pp. 273-319.
Weihe U., Diskurs und Komplexität. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Handlungsbezug
der Gesellschaftslehren von Habermas und Luhmann, Stuttgart, Hochschulverlag, 1979.
Wellmer A., Praktische Philosophie und Theorie der Gesellschaft. Zur Problem der normativen Grundlagen einer kritischen Sozialwissenschaft, in Oelmüller W. (ed.), Normen und Geschichte, Paderborn, Schöning, 1979, pp. 140-174.
Wenzel J.W., Jürgen Habermas and the Dialectical Perspective on Argumentation, in
«Journal of the American Forensic Association», VI, 2, 1979, pp. 83-94.
White S.K., Rationality and the Foundations of Political Philosophy. An Introduction to
Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of Politics», XLI, 4, 1979, pp. 11561171.
Whitebook J., The Problem of Nature in Habermas, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of
Critical Thought», 40, 1979, pp. 51-69; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School.
42
599.
600.
pp. 65-92
Wisman J.D., Toward a Humanist Reconstruction of Economic Science, in «Journal of
Economic Issues», XIII, 1, 1979, pp. 19-48.
Zaret D., Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«American Journal of Sociology», LXXXVII, 2, 1981, pp. 472-473.
1980
601.
602.
603.
604.
605.
606.
607.
608.
609.
610.
611.
612.
613.
614.
615.
Adamson W.L., Hegemony and Revolution, Los Angeles, University of California
Press, 1980.
Arac J., The Function of Foucault at The Present Time, in «Humanities in Society», 3,
1980, pp. 73-86.
Ardigò A., Crisi di governabilità e mondi vitali, Bologna, Cappelli, 1980.
Barley D., Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit bei Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Wissenschaft und
Lebenswahrheit. Zwei Bereiche der Wirklichkeitserfahrung, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1980,
pp. 105-133.
Belardinelli S., Jürgen Habermas e la ricostruzione del materialismo storico, in «Sociologia», XIV, 3, 1980, pp. 108-122.
Bernstein R.J., Comment on the Relationship of Habermas’s Views to Hegel, in Verene
D.P. (ed.), Hegel’s Social and Political Thought. The philosophy of objective spirit, New York,
Humanities Press, 1980, pp. 235-239.
Besnier J.M., Le marxisme au passé, in «Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale»,
LXXXV, 3, 1980, pp. 387-411.
Bleicher J., Contemporary Hermeneutics, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 1980; tr. it. L’ermeneutica contemporanea, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1986, pp. 177-263.
Böhler D., Entwicklungsprobleme und Entwicklungsschwellen der praktischen Vernunft, in
Böhler D., Apel K.O., Berlich A., Plumpe G. (eds.), Praktische Philosophie/Ethik:
Aktuelle Materialien. Reader zum Funkkolleg, Frankfurt a.M., Fischer Taschenbuch,
1980, pp. 123-154.
Bologh Wallach R., Dialectical Phenomenology: Marx’s Method, London-New York,
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.
Boon L., Moet de Wetenschap Rationeel Zijn?, in «Kennis en Methode», IV, 1980, pp.
140-151.
Brüggemann B., Die Utopie der besseren Verständigung. Zur Rekonstruktion des Identitätkonzeptes, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1980.
Bukdahl J.K., Videnskab og kritik: Jürgen Habermas’ kritik af det positivistiske fornuftbegreb, Id., Kritiske tolkninger: videnskabsteoretiske essays, København, Gyldendal, 1980.
De Klerk P. Gericht en Ongericht Fundamenteel Onderzoek, in «Kennis en Methode»,
IV, 1980, pp. 246-263.
Döbert R., Methodologische und forschungsstrategische Implikationen von evolutionstheoretischen Stadienmodellen, in Honneth A., Jaeggi U. (eds.), Arbeit, Handlung, Normativität.
616.
617.
618.
619.
620.
621.
622.
623.
624.
625.
626.
627.
628.
629.
630.
631.
632.
633.
43
Theorien des Historischen Materialismus 2, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1980, pp. 524560.
Dove K., The Relationship of Habermas’s Views to Hegel, in Verene D.Ph. (ed.), Hegel’s Social and Political Thought. The philosophy of objective spirit, Atlantic, Highlands
Humanities Press, 1980, pp. 40-46.
Ferry J.M., Habermas critique de Hannah Arendt, in «Esprit», 6, 1980, pp. 109-124.
Forester J., Listening: The Social Policy of Everyday Life, in «Social Praxis», VII, 1980,
pp. 219-232.
Forester J., Critical Theory and Planning Practice, in «Journal of the American Planning Association», XLVI, 3, 1980, pp. 275-286.
Gabás R., J. Habermas. Dominio técnico y comunidad lingüística, Barcelona, Ariel, 1980.
Gay W., Justification of Legal Authority, in «Phenomenology Versus Critical Theory,
Journal of Social Philosophy», 11, 1980, pp. 1-7.
Gottlieb R.S., Communication and Human Evolution, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«The Philosophical Review», LXXXIX, 2, 1980, pp. 295-298.
Gozzi G., Linguaggio, Stato, lavoro. J. Habermas: teoria e ideologia, Firenze, La Nuova
Italia Scientifica, 1980.
Goulding J.W., Kline S.L., Nederman C.J., Jürgen Habermas: An International Bibliography, in «Political Theory», VIII, 2, 1980, pp. 259-285.
Guariglia O.N., Ideologia: Predeterminacion o Distorsion?, in «Revista Latinoamericana
de Filosofia», 6, 1980, pp. 155-164.
Habermehl W., Zur sogenannten Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit, in Id., The Popper-Kuhn
controversy and the non-statement view of theories: a plea for “exalted” rationalism, Bielefeld,
Universität Bielefeld, 1980, pp. 12-21.
Heeney T., Review of Communication and the evolution of society, in «Quarterly
Journal of Speech», 66, 1980, p. 347.
Held D., Critical Theory: Habermas, in Id., Introduction to Critical Theory. Horkheimer to
Habermas, London, Hutchinson, 1980, pp. 249-350.
Held D., The Importance and Limitations of Critical Theory, in Id., Introduction to Critical
Theory. Horkheimer to Habermas, London, Hutchinson, 1980, pp. 353-400.
Honneth A., Joas H., Moralentwicklung und Naturbeherrschung. Zur Theorie der soziokulturellen Evolution von Jürgen Habermas, in Honneth A., Joas H. (eds.), Soziales Handeln und Menschliche Natur. Anthropologische Grundlagen der Sozialwissenschaften, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1980, pp. 141-160; tr. en. Moral evolution and
domination of nature. Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Socio-cultural evolution, in Id., Id., Social
Action and Human Nature, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 151167.
Horster D., Habermas zur Einführung, Hannover, SOAK, 1980.
How A.R., Dialogue as Productive Limitation in Social Theory: The Habermas-Gadamer
Debate, in «Journal of the British Society of Phenomenology», XI, 2, 1980, pp. 131143.
Keat R., The Critique of Positivism, Annual conference of the British Sociological
44
634.
635.
636.
637.
638.
639.
640.
641.
642.
643.
644.
645.
646.
647.
648.
Association, University of Lancaster, 4.1980; in Id. The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas, Freud and the Critique of Positivism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1981, pp. 12-37.
Kitschelt H., Moralisches Argumentieren und Sozialtheorie. Prozedurale Ethik bei John
Rawls und Jürgen Habermas, in «Archiv für Rechts – und Sozialphilosophie», LXVI,
3, 1980, pp. 391-429.
Kockelmans J.J., Some Reflections on the Meaning and Function of Interpretative Sociology,
in «Tijdschrift voor Filosofie», 42, 1980, pp. 294-324.
Kogge P., Habermas’ Marx-Kritik und sein Verständnis des Marxschen Arbeitsbegriffs, in
Id., Der Marxsche Begriff vom “menschlichen Wesen”. Seine Bedeutung für die Erschließung
von Perspektiven in der heutigen Pädagogik, Frankfurt a.M., Haag & Herchen, 1980, pp.
236-267.
Kopp M., Die normativ-praktische Herrschafts- und Legitimitätskonzeption: Jürgen Habermas, in Kopp M., Müller H.S. (eds.), Herrschaft und Legitimität in modernen Industriegesellschaften. Eine Unter-suchung der Ansätze von Max Weber, Niklas Luhmann, Claus Offe,
Jürgen Habermas, München, Verlagsgesellsachaft, 1980, pp. 167-218.
Kunneman H., Rationaliteit En Consensus, in «Kennis en Methode», IV, 1980, pp.
229-245.
Maffettone S., Critica e analisi. Saggio sulla filosofia di Jürgen Habermas, Napoli, Liguori, 1980.
Manier M.F., Entwicklungslogik und Reziprozität kommunikativer Ethik. Eine inhaltsanalytische Untersuchung zum Einfluß Kritischer Theorie (Habermas) auf die Gestaltung von
Curricula im Elementarbereich – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Begründungszusammenhangs Piaget-Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Haag & Herchen, 1980.
Mantoro Romero R., La reconstrucción del materialismo histórico de Jürgen Habermas, in
«Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas», XII, 1980, pp. 117-139.
Mardones J.M., La ideología según la Teoría Crítica de la Escuela de Frankfurt (M.
Horkheimer, T. W. Adorno y J. Habermas), in «Pensamiento: Revista de investigación
e Información filosófica», XXXVI, 144, 1980, pp. 387-400.
Martin W.C., Science Fiction as Social Movement: Ideology and Resource Mobilization in
Cultural Production and Reproduction, Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the
Popular Culture Association of the South, Winston-Salem (NC), 16-18.10.1980.
McCarthy Th., Rationality and Relativism in Habermas’ Critical Theory, in «Noûs», 14,
1980, pp. 75-76.
Miguelez R., Ideologia: Argumentacion Y Finalidad, in «Revista Latinoamericana de
Filosofia», 6, 1980, pp. 151-154.
Mingers J.C., Towards an Appropriate Social Theory for Applied Systems Thinking: Critical Theory and Soft Systems Methodology, in «Journal of Applied Systems Analysis», 7,
1980, pp. 41-50.
Misgeld D., Ultimate Self-Responsibility, Practical Reasoning and Practical Action, in
«Human Studies», III, 1980, pp. 255-278.
Mörth I., La sociologie de la religion comme théorie critique (l’école de Francfort), in «Social
Compass», XXVII, 1, 1980, pp. 27-50.
649.
650.
651.
652.
653.
654.
655.
656.
657.
658.
659.
660.
661.
662.
663.
664.
665.
45
Nagl L., Fundierungsprobleme der Gesellschaftstheorie: Historisch-systematische Studien,
Wien, Universität Wien, 1980; as Gesellschaft und Autonomie. Historisch-systematische
Studien zur Entwicklung der Sozialtheorie von Hegel bis Habermas, Wien, Österreichische
Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1983.
Nauta L., De Verraderlijke Lacune-Metafoor, in «Kennis en Methode», IV, 1980, pp.
276-285.
Nelsen K., Enlightenment and Amoralism, in «Agora», 4, 1980, pp. 85-89.
Privitera W., Note su Habermas e Feyerabend, in «L’uomo, un segno», IV, 2-3, 1980.
Rasehorn Th., Presse und politische Kultur am Beispiel eines ‘Weltblatts’, in «Frankfurter
Hefte», XXXV, 9, 1980, pp. 18-24.
Riedmüller B., Evolution und Krise: mit dem Recht ist in der Krise kein Staat zu machen,
Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1980.
Ruelland J.G., La Controverse Habermas-Popper, in «La Petite Revue de Philosophie», II, 1, 1980, pp. 105-136.
Schelsky H., Die Soziologen und das Recht, in Id., Die Soziologen und das Recht : Abhandlungen und Vorträge zur Soziologie von Recht, Institution und Planung, Opladen,
Westdt. Verl., 1980, pp. 77-94.
Schiffer W., Theorien der Geschichtsschreibung und ihre erzältheoretische Relevanz: Danto,
Habermas, Baumgartner, Droysen, Stuttgart, Metzler, 1980.
Schurz G., Soziale Erwartungen und Ideale Sprechsituation: Ein Formales Modell, in
«Conceptus: Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 14, 1980, pp. 47-57.
Steigerwald R., Revision des historischen Materialismus, Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Bürgerliche Philosophie und Revisionismus im imperialistischen Deutschland, Frankfurt a.M., Verlag
Marxistische Blätter, 1980, pp. 243-261.
Steininger R., Thesen zur formalen Legitimität, in «Politische Vierteljahresschrift»,
XXI, 3, 1980, pp. 267-283.
Van Der Berg, A., Critical Theory: is there still hope?, in «American Journal of Sociology», 86, 1980, pp. 449-478.
Vezzali M., Habermas: filosofia e mondo dell’uomo, in «Studium», 76, 1980, pp. 628636.
Waiser M., An Alternative Theoretical Approach for the Study of Literacy and Its Role in
Development, Paper presented at the Latin American Studies Association National
Meeting, Bloomington (IN), 17-19.10.1980.
White S.K., Reason and Authority in Habermas: A Critique of the Critics, in «The
American Political Science Review», LXXIV, 4, 1980, pp. 1007-1017.
Wimmer R., Habermas’ und Apel Entwurf einer argumentativen Ethik, in Id., Universalisierung in der Ethik. Analyse, Kritik und Rekonstruktion ethiscer Rationalitätsansprüche,
1981
666.
Agger B., A Critical Theory of Dialogue, in «Humanities in Society», 4, 1981, pp. 7-
46
667.
668.
669.
670.
671.
672.
673.
674.
675.
676.
677.
678.
679.
680.
681.
682.
683.
684.
685.
30.
Alexy R., Die Idee einer prozeduralen Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, in Aarnio A.,
Niiniluoto, Uusitalo L. (eds.), Methodologie und Erkenntnistheorie der juristischen Argumentation, Berlin, Duncker & Humbolt, 1981.
Allen M., Nicolai Hartmann’s Anthropology of Knowledge, in «Journal of the British
Society for Phenomenology», XII, 1981, pp. 41-54.
Apel K.O., C.S. Peirce and the Post-Tarskian Problem of an Adequate Explication of the
Meaning of Truth, in «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly
Journal in American Philosophy», 18, 1981, pp. 3-17.
Benhabib S., Modernity and the Aporias of Critical Theory, in «Telos: A Quarterly
Blass J.L., Bildung als Reduktion von Komplexität. Nietzsche, Luhmann, Habermas, in
«Pädagogische Rundschau», XXXV, 1, 1981, pp. 23-38.
Brunkhorst H., Parteilichkeit für Vernunft. Philosophische und politische Schriften von Jürgen Habermas, in «Zeit und Bild», XXXIII, 1981, p. 4.
Buck G., Von der Texthermeneutik zur Handlungshermeneutik, in von Fuhrmann M.,
Jauß H.R., Pannenberg W. (eds.), Text und Applikation: Theologie, Jurisprudenz und Literaturwissenschaft im hermeneutischen Gespräch, München, Fink, 1981, pp. 525-535.
Butterwegge Ch., Die systemtheoretische Wendung der Staatsdiskussion durch J. Habermas
und C. Offe, in Institut für Marxistische Studien und Forschungen, Der Staat im
staatsmonopolistischen Kapitalismus der Bundesrepublik : Staatsdiskussion und Staatstheorie,
1981, pp. 163-172.
Cavallucci V., J. Habermas, Die Moderne - ein unvollendetes Projekt, in «Trimestre», XIII-XIV, 4-1, 1980/1981, pp. 172-178.
Cortella L., Crisi e razionalità. Da Nietzsche a Habermas, Guida, Napoli 1981.
Czuma H., Rede Oder Gewalt, in «Conceptus: Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 15,
1981, pp. 102-111.
Dallmayr F.R., Beyond Dogma and Despair: Toward A Critical Phenomenology of Politics,
Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.
Dallmayr F.R., Twilight of Subjectivity, Amherst, University of Mass. Press, 1981.
Depew D.J., The Habermas: Gadamer Debate in Hegelian Perspective, in «Philosophy
and Social Criticism», VIII, 1981, pp. 425-446.
Di Domenico G., Habermas e la democrazia politica, in «Il centauro», 3, 1981, pp.
199-202.
Eberle F., Intentionales Handeln und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung, Frankfurt a.M.,
Campus Verlag, 1981.
Echeverria E.J., Criticism and Commitment: Major Themes in Contemporary Post-Critical
Philosophy, Atlantic, Highlands Humanities Press, 1981.
Eyerman R., Shipway D., Habermas on Work and Culture, in «Theory and Society»,
X, 4, 1981, pp. 547-566.
Ferry J.-M., Vérité humaine et liberté humaine chez Habermas, in «Les Etudes philosophiques», 2, 1981.
686.
687.
688.
689.
690.
691.
692.
693.
694.
695.
696.
697.
698.
699.
700.
701.
702.
703.
47
Ferry J.-M., Roux A., Théorie analytique et théorie critique: Habermas et Freud, in «Pouvoirs», 11, 1981.
Friedman G., The Political Philosophy of the Frankfurt School, New York-London,
Cornell University Press, 1981.
Gall R.S., Between Tradition and Critique, in «Auslegung», 8, 1981, pp. 5-18.
Geuss R., The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School, Cambridge
University Press, 1981; tr. it. L’idea di una teoria critica. Habermas e la Scuola di Francoforte, Roma, Armando Editore, 1989.
Glebe-Moller J., The Good Samaritan in Recent American Moral Philosophy, in «Philosophical Investigations», 4, 1981, pp. 38-52.
Gottlieb R.S., The Contemporary Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas: Knowledge and
Human Interests; Theory and Practice; Legitimation Crisis; Communicationand
the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», XCI, 2, 1981, pp. 280295.
Gross D., On Critical Theory, in «Humanities in Society», 4, 1981, pp. 89-100.
Heckmann H.D., Was ist Wahrheit?: eine systematisch-kritische Untersuchung philosophischer Wahrheitsmodelle, Heidelberg, Winter, 1981.
Hettlage R., Die argumentative Auflösung des Interesses: eine kritische Würdigung des Habermas’schen Kommunikationsmodells der Gesellschaft, in «Politische Studien: Zweimonatszeitschrift für Politik und Zeitgeschehen», XXXII, 255, 1981, pp. 25-40.
Honneth A., Ein unabgeschlossenes Kapitel kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie: zu Thomas Mc
Carthy: Kritik der Verständigungsverhältnisse, in «Ästhetik und Kommunikation», XII,
45-46, 1981, pp. 162-170.
Honneth A., Moralbewußtsein und soziale Klassenherrschaft: einige Schwierigkeiten in der
Analyse normativer Handlungspotentiale, in «Leviathan», IX, 3-4, 1981, pp. 556-570; tr.
en. Moral Consciousness and Class Domination: Some Problems in the Analysis of Hidden
Morality, in «Praxis International», II, 2, 1982, pp. 12-25.
James D., From Marx To Incoherence: A Critique of Habermas, in «Journal of Social
Philosophy», 12, 1981, pp. 10-16.
Luhmann N., Ausdifferenzierung des Rechts, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1981.
Kallscheuer O., Auf der Suche nach einer politischen Theorie bei Jürgen Habermas, in «Ästhetik und Kommunikation», XII, 45/46, 1981, pp. 171-182.
Keat R., Knowledge, Objects and Interests, in Id. The Politics of Social Theory: Habermas,
Freud and the Critique of Positivism, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1981, pp. 66-93.
Kemp R., Cooke P., Repoliticising The ‘Public Sphere’: A Reconsideration of Habermas,
in «Social Praxis», VIII, 3-4, 1981, pp. 125-142.
Kerber H., Gesellschaftstheorie als Erkenntniskritik? Zur Kritik der Marx-Rezeption
durch Habermas, in Kunstmann W., Sander E. (eds.) “Kritische Theorie” zwischen Theologie und Evolutions-theorie. Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit der “Frankfurter Schule”,
München, W. Fink, 1981, pp. 124-213.
Kister J., Application of Empirical: Rational and Hermeneutic Science Modes of Inquiry to a
Study of Home and Family Life for Curriculum Development, Paper presented at the
48
704.
705.
706.
707.
708.
709.
710.
711.
712.
713.
714.
715.
716.
717.
718.
719.
Midwest Regional Conference on Qualitative Research in Education, Kent (OH),
1981.
Korthals M., Wetenschap en ideologiekritiek, in «Tijdschrift voor Filosofie», 43, 1981,
p.734-746.
Krois J.M., Peirce’s Speculative Rhetoric and the Problem of Natural Law, in «Philosophy
and Rhetoric», 14, 1981, pp. 16-30.
Kunstmann W., Geschichte als Konstruktion der Vernunft. Bemerkungen zur Evolutionstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, in Kunstmann W., Sander E. (eds.), “Kritische Theorie”
zwischen Theologie und Evolutions-theorie. Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit der “Frankfurter Schule”, München, W. Fink, 1981, pp. 266-325.
MacIntyre A., After Virtue, London, Duckworth, 1981.
McCann D.P., Habermas and the Theologians, in «Religious Studies review», XVII, 1,
1981, pp. 14-21.
McLuskie Ed., The Embeddedness of Communication in the Slime of History: Themes
Leading to the Thesis of a Communication Crisis, in «Journal of Communication Inquiry», VII, 3, 1981, pp. 3-31.
Messmann A., Zur Entwicklung eines hermeneutischen Paradigmas auf der Grundlage der
materialistischen Wissenschaftsauffassung: Versuch einer Anwendung von Bestimmungsmomenten des Deutungsinstrumentariums auf den Theorieansatz von Jürgen Habermas, Bremen,
Universität Bremen, 1981.
Misgeld D., Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Contemporary Sociology», X, 4, 1981, pp. 585-586.
Montoro Romero R., Hacia la construcción de una teoría de la interpretación: en torno al
debate Habermas-Gadamer, in «Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas»,
XIV, 1981, pp. 47-68.
Nielsen K., Probing Critical Theory, in «International Studies in Philosophy», XIII,
1981, pp. 61-83.
Rodríguez Ibáñez J.E., Habermas y Parsons: La búsqueda del reencantamiento del mundo,
in «Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas», XVI, 1981, pp. 91-122.
Roellecke G., Zum Einfluß der öffentlichen Meinung auf die Rechtsanwendung, in von
Horst Baier H., Kepplinger M., Reumann K. (eds.), Öffentliche Meinung und sozialer
Wandel: für Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1981, pp. 7185.
Rusconi G.E., “Discorso” e decisione. Il tentativo di Habermas di fondare una razionalità
politica, in «Materiali filosofici», 6, 1981, pp. 43-69; repr. in AA.VV., Ricerche politiche,
Milano, Il Saggiatore, 1982, pp. 49-82.
Seyfarth C., The West German Discussion of Max Weber’s Sociology of Religion since the
1960s, in «Social Compass», 27, 1, 1980, pp. 9-25.
Smith T., The Scope of The Social Sciences in Weber and Habermas, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», VIII, 1, 1981, pp. 68-83.
Theunissen M., Kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft. Zwei Studien, Berlin-New York,
Walter de Gruyter, 1981.
720.
721.
722.
723.
724.
725.
726.
49
Thome H., Legitimitätstheorien: Der normativ-kritische Ansatz von Jürgen Habermas, in
Id., Legitimitätstheorien und die Dynamik kollektiver Einstellungen. Probleme der Verknüpfung von Theorie und Empirie, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1981, pp. 29-43.
Tugendhat E., Langage et Etique, in «Critique», XXXVII, 413, 1981, pp. 10381074; tr. de. Sprache und Ethik, in Id., Philosophische Aufsätze, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1992, pp. 275-314; tr. it. L’approccio semantico alla morale, e Morale e comunicazione, in Tugendhat E., Problemi di etica, Torino, Einaudi, 1987, pp. 44-66, 83-101.
Van Den Bersselaar V., De “Logica” Van Habermas’ Weg Naar De Theorie Van Het
Communicatieve Handelen, in «Kennis en Methode», V, 1981, pp. 226-249.
Van Luijk H., Kritiek Van De Ethische Rede, in «Bijdragen», XLII, 1, 1981, pp. 4674.
Wagner R., Die Unterordnung der Erkenntnis unter die Kritik: Kritik an Adorno und Habermas, Düsseldorf, 1981.
Wilson H T., Response to Ray’s Critical Theory and Positivism: Popper and The Frankfurt
School, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XI, 1981, pp. 45-48.
Young I.M., Toward A Critical Theory of Justice, in «Social Theory and Practice», 7,
1981, pp. 279-302.
1982
727.
728.
729.
730.
731.
732.
733.
734.
735.
Allen Van Roden R., Emancipation and Subjectivity: A Projected Kant-Habermas Confrontation, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», IX, 1982, pp. 281-304.
Alvarez M., Hermeneútica y racionalidad según las concepciones de Gadamer, Apel y
Habermas, in «Aporía», IV, 15-16, 1980, pp. 5-33.
Arato A., Critical Sociology and Authoritarian State Socialism, in Thompson J.B., Held
D. (eds.), Habermas – Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 196-219.
Arens E., Kommunikative Handlungen. Die paradigmatische Bedeutung der Gleichnisse Jesu
für eine Handlungstheorie, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1982; tr. en. Logic of Pragmatic Thinking:
from Pierce to Habermas, Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press, 1994.
Arnason, J.F., Universal pragmatics and historical materialism, in «Acta sociologica»,
XXV, 3, 1982, pp. 219-233.
Bal P., Ippel P., Waarheen met het Strafrecht? Met Habermas op Weg, in «Recht en Kritiek», 8, 1982, pp. 434-462.
Bartels M., Sprache Und Soziales Handeln: Eine Auseinandersetzung Mit Habermas’
Sprachbegriff, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXVI, 1982, pp.
226-233.
Benhabib S., The Methodological Illusion of Modern Political Theory: The Case of Rawls
and Habermas, in «Neue Heftefur Philosophie», XXI, 1982, pp. 47-74; repr. in
Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas,
London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 285-308.
Berger J., Die Versprachlichung des Sakralen und die Entsprachlichung der Ökonomie, in
«Zeitschrift für Soziologie», XI, 4, 1982, pp. 353-365; repr. in Joas H., Honneth A.
50
736.
737.
738.
739.
740.
741.
742.
743.
744.
745.
746.
747.
748.
749.
750.
(eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 255-277; tr. en. Jürgen Habermas,
Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 57, 1983, pp. 194-205; repr. as The Linguistification of the Sacred and the Delinguistification of the Economy, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press,
1991, pp. 165-180.
Bonß W., Honneth A., (eds.), Sozialforschung als Kritik: zum sozialwissenschaftlichen
Potential der Kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1982.
Bredo E., Feinberg W., The Critical Approach to Social and Educational Research, in Id.
(eds.), Knoeledge and Values in Social and Educational Research, Philadelphia, Temple
University Press, 1982, pp. 271-291.
Breuer S., Die Depotenzierung der Kritischen Theorie. Über Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Leviathan», X, 1, 1982, pp. 132-146.
Brunkhorst H., Anteil der Moral an der Menschwerdung des Affen. J. Habermas “Theorie
des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Zeit und Bild», XI, 1982, p. 4.
Bubner R., Habermas’ s Concept of Critical Theory, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds.),
Habermas – Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 42-56.
Bubner R., Rationalität als Lebensform. Zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Merkur», XXXVI, 4, 1982, pp. 341-355; tr. it. Razionalità come forma di vita, in Bubner R., Azione, linguaggio e ragione. I concetti fondamentali della filosofia
pratica, Bologna, II Mulino, 1985, pp. 271-292.
Bühner R., Birnmeyer A., Ideologie und Diskurs. Zur Theorie von Jürgen Habermas und
ihrer Rezeption in der Pädagogik, Frankfurt a.M., Haag & Herchen, 1982.
Cortes Encinas, A., La crisis de la sociedad en Jürgen Habermas, in «Cuadernos de
realidades sociales», XX-XXI, 1, 1982, pp. 325-333.
Dercksen W., Marxisme Zonder Dialectiek; Wat Is Dat?, in «Kennis en Methode»,
VI, 1982, pp. 176-183.
Dux G., Die Rekonstruktion der Anfänge. Zu Jürgen Habermas ? Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns?, in «Soziologische Revue», V, 4 1982, pp. 381-392.
Flórez Miguel C., La noción de crítica y sus formas en Habermas, in «Cuadernos
salmantinos de filosofía», IX, 1982, pp. 63-78.
Garz D., Zur Bedeutung rekonstruktiver Sozialisationstheorien in der Erziehungswissenschaft
– unter besondere berücksichtigung der Arbeit von L. Kohlberg, Hamburg, Universität
Hamburg, 1982.
Giacometti M., Lavoro, interazione, ideologia. Un saggio su J. Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1982.
Giddens A., Labour and Interaction, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds.), Habermas.
Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 149-161; tr. es. Trabajo e interacción en
Habermas, in Id., Política, sociología y teoría social. Reflexiones sobre el pensamiento social
clásico y contemporáneo, Barcelona, Paidós, 1997, pp. 265-278.
Giddens A., Reason without revolution? Habermas “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Praxis International», II, 3, 1982, pp. 318-338; repr. in Bernstein R.J.
751.
752.
753.
754.
755.
756.
757.
758.
759.
760.
761.
762.
763.
764.
765.
766.
767.
51
(ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1985, pp. 95-121.
Görtzen R., Jürgen Habermas: Eine Bibliographie seiner Schriften und der Sekundärliteratur 1952-1981, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1982.
Hall J.A., Gellner and Habermas on Epistemology and Politics or Need We Feel Disenchanted?, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XII, 1982, pp. 387-408.
Heidorn J., Legitimität und Regierbarkeit. Studien zu den Legitimitätstheorien von Max
Weber, Nklas Luhmann, Jürgen Habermas und Unregierbarkeitsforschung, Berlin, Duncker
& Humblot, 1982.
Held D., Crisis Tendencies Legitimation and the State, in Thompson J.B., Held D.
(eds.), Habermas. Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 181-195.
Heller A., Habermas and Marxism, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (ed.), Habermas –
Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 21-41.
Hesse M., Science and Objectivity, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds.), Habermas –
Honneth A., Von Adorno zu Habermas. Zum Gestaltwandel kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie, in Bonss W., Honneth A. (eds.), Sozialforschung als Kritik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1982, pp. 87-126; tr. it. Da Adorno ad Habermas. Il mutamento di forma della teoria critica della società (1976-1982), in Habermas J., Dialettica della razionalizzazione, Milano, Unicopli, 1983, pp. 355-386.
Honolka H., Is it Possible to Change the Laws of the Social Sciences, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», IX, 1982, pp. 191-226.
Horster D., Der Kantische Methodische Solipsismus Und Die Theorien Von Apel Und
Habermas, in «Kant-Studien», 73, 1982, pp. 463-471.
Horster D., Kommunikative Ethik: Sinn ist eine knappe und immer knapper werdende Ressource, in «Frankfurter Hefte», XXXVII, 10, 1982, pp. 35-41.
Ingram D., The Possibility of a Communication Ethic Reconsidered: Habermas, Gadamer,
and Bourdieu on Discorse, in «Man and World», XV, 2, 1982, pp. 149-161.
Jay M., Should Intellectual History Take a Linguistic Turn?: Reflections on the HabermasGadamer Debate, in LaCapra D., Kaplan S.L. (eds.), Modern European Intellectual History, Ithaca-London: Cornell University Press, 1982, pp.86-110; repr. in Jay M., Finde-siècle Socialism and other Essays, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1988, pp. 17-36.
Jiménez Redondo M., La trayectoria intelectual de Jürgen Habermas, in J. Habermas,
Sobre Nietzsche y otros ensayos, Tecnos, Madrid, 1982), pp. 9-30.
Keane J., Elements of a Radical Theory of Public Life: From Tönnnies to Habermas and
Beyond, in «Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory», VI, 3, 1982, pp. 1149.
Kilminster R., Zur Utopiediskussion aus soziologischer Sicht, in Voßkamp W. (ed.),
Utopieforschung: interdisziplinäre Studien zur neuzeitlichen Utopie. 1, Stuttgart, Metzler,
1982, pp. 64-96.
Korthals M., Habermas, in Bor J. (ed.), 25 eeuwen filosofie, Amsterdam-Meppel,
Boom, 1982, pp. 283-290.
Ladmiral J.R., Jürgen Habermas – ou: le changenment de signe de la Théorie critique, in
52
768.
769.
770.
771.
772.
773.
774.
775.
776.
777.
778.
779.
780.
781.
782.
783.
784.
785.
786.
787.
788.
«Projet», 168, 1982, pp. 987-999.
Luhmann N., Autopoiesis, Handlung und kommunikative Verständigung, in «Zeitschrift
für Soziologie», XI, 4, 1982, pp. 366-379.
Lukes P.J., Marxism, morality and justice, in Parkinson G.H.R. (ed.), Marx and Marxisms, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 177-205.
Lukes S., Of Gods and Demons: Habermas and Practical Reason, in Thompson J.B.,
Held D. (eds.), Habermas – Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 134-148.
Martínez F.J., Recensión de La reconstrucción del materialismo histórico de J.
Habermas, in «Revista Filosofía CSIC», 1982.
McCarthy Th., Rationality and Relativism: Habermas’s “Overcoming” of Hermeneutics, in
Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds.), Habermas – Critical Debates, London, Macmillan,
1982, pp. 57-78.
Michel K.M., Nun sprecht mal schön!, in «Der Spiegel», 12, 22.3.1982, pp. 210-215.
Montero Moliner F., Método y objetivo de las ciencias sociales según Habermas, in
«Universidad y Sociedad», 1982, pp. 47-65.
Monti J., Ethics and Public Policy: The Conditions of Public Moral Discourse, Washington, University Press of America, 1982.
Morrow R., Théorie critique et matérialisme historique: J. Habmeras, in «Sociologie et
Societés», XIV, 2, 1982, pp. 97-111.
Münch R., Von der Rationalisierung zur Verdinglichung der Lebenswelt?, in «Soziologische Revue», V, 4, 1982, pp. 390-397.
Nägele R., Freud, Habermas und die Dialektik der Aufklärung. Über reale und ideale
Diskurse, in «Der Wunderblock. Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse», IX, 1982, pp. 3560.
Nelken D., Is There a Crisis in Law and Legal Ideology?, in «Journal of Law and Society», 9, 1982, pp. 177-189.
O’Neill J. (ed.), For Marx Against Althusser: and Other Essays, Washington, University Press of America, 1982.
Orkin M., Analytical Hermeneutics: Interpretative social enquiry after Wittgenstein, in
«South African Journal of Sociology», XII, 2, 1981, pp. 3-25.
Ottmann H., Cognitive Interests and Self-Reflection, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds),
Habermas. Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 79-97.
Peperzak A, Over Waarheid, in «Tijdschrift voor Filosofie», 44, 1982, pp. 3-52.
Pettit P., Habermas on Truth and Justice, in Parkinson G.H.R. (ed.), Marx and marxisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 207-228.
Plant R., Jürgen Habermas and the Idea of Legitimation Crisis, in «European Journal of
Political Research», X, 4, 1982, pp. 341-352.
Podak K., Verteidigung unverkürzter Vernunft. Jürgen Habermas legt seine “Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Süddeutsche Zeitung», 94, 24-25.4.1982, pp. I-II.
Poggiali A., Il Freud di Habermas, in «Studi urbinati», LV, 1981-82, pp. 127-160.
Rasmussen D.M., Communicative Action and Philosophy: Reflections on Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Philosophical and Social Criticism», IX, 1, 1982,
789.
790.
791.
792.
793.
794.
795.
796.
797.
798.
799.
800.
801.
802.
803.
804.
805.
53
pp. 2-28.
Raulet G., L’appel de l’histoire: La theorie critique de l’école de Francfort face au contexte
francais, in «Philosophiques», 9, 1982, pp. 163-174.
Ray L.J., Reply to Wilson’s Response To Ray’s “Critical Theory and Positivism: Popper and
The Frankfurt School”, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XII, 1982, pp. 415418.
Rivelaygue J., Habermas et le Maintien de la philosophie, in «Archives de Philosophie»,
XLII, 2, 1982, pp. 257-298.
Rockmore T., Bemerkungen zum Neo-Marxismus: Sartre und Habermas, in «Zeitschrift
für philosophische Forschung», XXXVI, 2, 1982, pp. 234-251.
Rüddenklau E., Gesellschaftliche Arbeit oder Arbeit und Interaktion? Zum Stellenwert des
Arbeitsbegriffes bei Habermas, Marx und Hegel, New York-Bern-Frankfurt a.M., Peter
Lang, 1982.
Schmid M., Habermas’s Theory of Social Evolution, in Thompson J.B., Held D. (eds.),
Habermas – Critical Debates, London, Macmillan, 1982, pp. 162-181.
Schmidt J., Jürgen Habermas and the Difficulties of Enlightenment, in «Social Research»,
IL, 1, 1982, pp. 181-208.
Schnädelbach H., Transformation der Kritischen Theorie: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 Bände, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Pilosophische Rundschau», XXIX,
3/4, 1982, pp. 161-178; repr. in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 15-34; tr. en. The Transformation of Critical Theory, in Joas
H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of
Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 7-22.
Schneider H.J., Gibt Es Eine ‘Tanszendental’-Bzw: “Universalpragmatik”?, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXVI, 1982, pp. 208-225.
Sica G., Habermas e il metodo della sociologia critica, Pisa, Edizioni ETS, 1982.
Smith J.W., Boey A., Habermas Hegelized, in «Philosophy Research Archives»,
1511, 1982, pp. 8-**.
Söllner A., Jürgen Habermas und die kritische Theorie des gegenwärtigen Rechtsstaates: Versuch einer wissenschaftsgeschichtlichen Einordnung, in «Leviathan», X, 1, 1982, pp. 97-131.
Teubner G., Reflexives Recht Entwicklungsmodelle Des Rechts in Vergleichender Perspektive, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 68, 1982, pp. 13-59.
Thompson J.B., Universal Pragmatics, in Thompson J., Held D. (eds.), Habermas.
von Doorne F., Naar nieuwe grondslagen van sociaalwetenschappe-lijk onderzoek. De
ontwikkeling van Habermas’ reconstructieve filosofie in de jaren 1960-1980, Tilburg, 1982.
Ware R.X., Habermas’s Evolutions, in «Canadian Journal of Philosophy», XII, 3,
1982, pp. 591-620.
Yearley S., The Relationship Between Epistemological and Sociological Cognitive Interest, in
«Studies in History and Philosophy of Science», 13, 1982, pp. 353-388.
54
1983
806.
807.
808.
809.
810.
811.
812.
813.
814.
815.
816.
817.
818.
819.
820.
821.
Agazzi Emilio, Premessa, in AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di J.
Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983.
Agazzi Emilio, Presentazione, in Habermas J., Dialettica della razionalizzazione, Milano, Unicopli, 1983, pp. 1-21.
Alessi A., Ideologia e religione, Roma, LAS, 1983, pp. 9-21.
Andersen J.E., Sprog som konkret utopi?, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J., Stounbjerg
P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Apel K.O., Lässt sich ethische Vernunft von stategischer Zweckrationalität unterscheiden?
Zum Problem der Rationalität sozialer Kommunikation und Interaktion, in «Archivio di Filosofia», LI, 1-3, 1983, pp. 375-434; repr. in van Reijen W., Apel K.O. (eds.), Rationales Handeln und Gesellschaftstheorie, Bochum, Germinal Verlag, 1984, pp. 23-79.
Bader V.M., Schmerzlose Entkopplung Von System Und Lebenswelt?, in «Kennis en
Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983,
pp. 329-355.
Belardinelli S., Scienza e filosofia pratica, Saggio su J. Habermas, Urbino, La Nottola,
1983.
Berger J., Review of Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 1983, 57, pp. 194-205; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.),
Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York,
Routledge, 1994, pp. 177-189.
Bernstein R.J., Beyond Objectivism and Relativism, Philadelphia, University Pennsylvania Press, 1983.
Bernstein R.J., What is the Difference that Makes a Difference? Gadamer, Habermas, and
Rorty, in Asquith P.D., Nickles T. (eds.), Proceedings of the Philosophy Science Association,
East Lansing, MI, PSA, 2, 1983; repr. in Bernstein R.J., Philosophical Profiles, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1986, pp. 21-57.
Blasius D., Michel Foucaults ‘denkende’ Betrachtung der Geschichte, in «Kriminalsoziologische Bibliographie», X, 41, 1983, pp. 69-83.
Bonß W., Kritische Theorie als empirische Wissenschaft. Zur Methodologie “postkonventioneller” Sozialforschung, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XXXIV, 1, 1983, pp. 57-89.
Brunkhorst H., Kommunikative Vernunft und rächende Gewalt, in «Sozialwissenschaftliche Literatur-Rundschaut», VI, 8-9, 1983, pp. 7-34.
Brunkhorst H., Kritische Erziehungswissenschaft und Kritische Theorie, in «Zeitschrift
für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie», 1, 1983, pp. 73-91.
Brunkhorst H., Mehr als eine Flaschenpost, Kritische Theorie und Sozialwissenschaften, in
von Friedeburg L., Habermas J., (eds), Adorno-Konferenz, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1983, pp. 314–327.
Brunkhorst H., Paradigmakern und Theoriendynamik der Kritischen Theorie der Gesellschaft – Personen und Programme, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftli-
822.
823.
824.
825.
826.
827.
828.
829.
830.
831.
832.
833.
834.
835.
836.
837.
55
che Forschung und Praxis», XXXIV, 1, 1983, pp. 22-57; tr. it. Nucleo paradigmatico e
dinamica teorica della Teoria Critica della società, in Protti (ed.) Dopo la scuola di Francoforte.
Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1984, pp. 171-207.
Brusa Zappellini G., Sulla ricostruzione habermasiana del materialismo storico, in
AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. 91-142.
Calloni M., Bibliografia. Scritti di Habermas e su Habermas apparsi in italiano, in
AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, Palermo, ILA
Palma, 1983, pp. 5-48.
Canovan M., A Case of Distorted Communication: A Note on Habermas and Arendt, in
«Political Theory, XI, 1, 1983, pp. 105-116.
Carmagnola F., Ragion pratica. Nodi della tradizione filosofica in Habermas, in AA.VV.,
La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo,
1983, pp. 23-90.
Ceppa L., La teoria dell’agire comunicativo in Apel e Habermas, in «Quaderni della
Fondazione Collegio San Carlo di Modena», 2, 1983, pp. 25-46.
Cerutti F., Habermas e Marx, in «Paradigmi», I, 3, 1983, pp. 479-510; tr. de. Habermas und Marx, in «Leviathan», XI, 2, 1983, pp. 352-375.
Cohen J.L., Review: The Anglo-American Reception of Critical, in «Contemporary Sociology», XII, 3, 1983, pp. 268-270.
Cristin R., Greblo E., La teoria dell’agire comunicativo di J. Habermas, in «Aut aut»,
XXXII, 1983, pp. 143-149.
De Vries G., Leefwereld En Systeem--Een Theorie Die Mank Gaat, in «Kennis en Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983, pp.
313-328.
Feig G., Der Dualismus von “Arbeit” und “Interaktion” in einer “kolonialisierten Praxis”:
Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Wissenschafts- und Praxisorientierung. Eine Analyse und Konzeption
für die Arbeitslehre, Frankfurt a.M.-Bern-New York, Peter Lang, 1983, pp. 61-69.
Ferraro A., Habermas: una ricostruzione del materialismo storico, in «Critica marxista»,
XXI, 2-3, 1983, pp. 187-201.
Ferraro A., J. Habermas: tra teoria della conoscenza, ideologia e formazione d’identità, in
AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. 143-174.
Freitag B., Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns und Genetische Psychologie. Ein Dialog
zwischen Jürgen Habermas und Jean Piaget, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und
Sozialpsychologie», XXXV, 3, 1983, pp. 555-576.
Furth H., A Developmental Perspective on the Social Theory of Habermas, in «Human
Development», XXVI, 4, 1983, pp. 181-197.
Grünbaum A., Freud’s Theory: The Perspective of a Philosopher of Science, in «Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association», 57, 1, 1983, pp.
5-31.
Grünbaum A., Psychoanalysis and Hermeneutics: An Ill-Conceived Marriage, in «Dialectics and Humanism», 10, 1983, pp. 135-146.
56
838.
839.
840.
841.
842.
843.
844.
845.
846.
847.
848.
849.
850.
851.
852.
853.
854.
855.
856.
Gunz J., Das Erkenntnisproblem in der aktivierenden Sozialforschung, in «Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie», VIII, 4, 1983, pp. 23-28.
Hawes L.C., Communication and the Evolution of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Philosophy & Rhetoric», XVI, 2, 1983, pp. 130-136.
Hekman, S., Some notes on the universal and conventional in social theory: Wittgenstein and
Habermas, in «The Social Science Journal», 20, 1983, pp. 1-15.
Held D., Krieger J., Accumulation, Legitimation, and the State. The Ideas of Claus Offe
and Jürgen Habermas, in Held D. (ed.), States and Societies, Oxford, Martin RobinsonThe Open University, 1983, pp. 487-497.
Henningsen M., Habermas oder die Angst vor der Traumzeit, in Gehlen R., Wolf B.
(eds.), Der gläserne Zaun. Aufsätze zu Hans Peter Duerrs “Traumzeit”, Frankfurt a.M.,
Syndikat, 1983, pp. 24-31.
Ingram D., The Historical Genesis of The Gadamer/Habermas Controversy, in
«Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy», X, 1-2, 1983, pp. 86-151.
Jørgensen D., Oplysning i det æstetiske moderne, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J.,
Stounbjerg P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Kessler A., Identität und Kritik. Zu Habermas’ Interpretation des psychoanalytischen Prozesses, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1983.
Kimmerle H., Het Verleden als Het Andere Van De Tegenwoordige Tijd, in «Tijdschrift
voor Filosofie», 45, 1983, pp. 570-588.
Kimmerle H., Identiteit Bij Habermas En Derrida: Reconstrueren of Deconstrueren?, in
«Kennis en Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983, pp. 402-415.
Korthals M., Filosofie en intersubjectiviteit, Samsom, Alphen a/d Rijn, 1983.
Korthals M., Hanlungstheorie Und Entwicklungstheorie Im Werke Von Marx Und Habermas, in «Praxis International», III, 3, 1983, pp. 274-296.
Korthals M., Kunneman H., De Theorie Van Het Communicatieve Handelen: Een
Vraaggesprek Met Jürgen Habermas, in «Kennis en Methode», VII, 1983, pp. 295-312.
Korthals M., Ontwikkeling en stimulering van persoonlijke identiteit, in «Pedagogische
Verhandelingen», IX, 2/3, 1983, pp. 135-142.
Korthals M., Widdershoven G., Maatschappijtheorie, Maatschappijkritiek En Psychotherapie, in «Kennis en Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische
maatschappijtheorie), 1983, pp. 434-455.
Kunneman H., Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen. Een samenvatting,
Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1983/84.
Kunneman H., Surplus Vervreemding En Communicatieve Arbeidsinstituties, in «Kennis
en Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983,
pp. 416-433.
Küsters G.W., Rechtskritik ohne Recht: zu Habermas “Theorie des kommunikativen
Handelns” , in «Rechtstheorie», XIV, 2, 1983, pp. 95-114.
Langner Ph., Wahrhaft Wahr. Die kritische Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, Bielefeld,
Colleg Verlag, 1983.
857.
858.
859.
860.
861.
862.
863.
864.
865.
866.
867.
868.
869.
870.
871.
872.
873.
874.
875.
57
Lawrence F.G., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., Philosophical-Political Profiles
(PPP), Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1983, pp.VII-XXV.
Liessmann K., Zaungäste - Über die Grenzen des Denkens: Prolegonema zu einer hermeneutischen Soziologie der Vernunft, in «Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie», VIII,
2, 1983, pp. 17-28.
Louw P.E., Habermas: A new theory of praxis through communicative action?, in «Communicatio», IX, 1, 1983, pp. 9-14.
Luhmann N., Legitimation durch Verfahren, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1983.
Luhmann N., Rechtssoziologie, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1983.
Maddox R.L., Hermeneutic Circle-Vicious or Victorious, in «Philosophy Today»,
XVII, 1983, pp. 66-76.
Marković M., The Idea of Critique in Social Theory, in «Praxis International», III, 2,
1983, pp. 108-120.
Marzocchi V., Razionalità comunicativa e dialettica della razionalizzazione: A proposito
dell’ultima opera di J. Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società». Nietzsche: Attualità di
una filosofia inattuale, VI, 3, 1983, pp. 70-85.
Matthiesen U., Dickicht der Lebenswelt und die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
München, Fink, 1983.
Mcbride W.L., The Practical Relevance of Practical Philosophy, in «Philosophy in Context», 13, 1983, pp. 31-44.
Mendenhall V., Essai sur l’incompétence esthétique, in «Philosophiques», 10, 1983, pp.
341-360.
Misgeld D., Communication and Societal Rationalization: A Review Essay of Jürgen Habermas’s “Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns”, in «The Canadian Journal of
Sociology», VIII, 4, 1983, pp. 433-453.
Moon J.D., Political Ethics and Critical Theory, in Sabia D.R jr., Wallulis J. (eds.),
Changing Social Science: Critical Theory and Other Critical, Perspectives, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1983, pp. 171-188.
Mörth I., Religionssoziologie als Kritische Theorie, in Daiber K.F., Luckmann Th.
(eds.), Religion in den Gegenwartsströmungen der deutschen Soziologie, München, Kaiser,
1983, pp. 38-85.
Nagl L., Autonomie Als Voraussetzung Des “Verstandnisorientierten Handelns”, in
XVIIth World Congress of Philosophy, Philosophy and Culture, Montreal 1983, Editions du Beffroi, Montreal 1986, pp. 560-566.
Nielsen H.K., Habermas og den sociale frigørelse, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J.,
Stounbjerg P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Nielsen K., On Rationality and Essentially Contested Concepts, in «Communication
and Cognition», 16, 1983, pp. 269-282.
Nørager T., Normativiteten hos Habermas, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J., Stounbjerg P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Nørager, T., Man må tage parti for fornuften, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J., Stounbjerg P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983, pp.
58
876.
877.
878.
879.
880.
881.
882.
883.
884.
885.
886.
887.
888.
889.
890.
891.
892.
893.
894.
68-**.
Oelkers J., Pädagogische Anmerkung zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Zeitschrift für Pädagogik», XXX, 2, 1983, pp. 271-280.
Outlaw L.T., Critical Theory in a Period of Radical Transformation, in «Praxis International», III, 2, 1983, pp. 138-146.
Overend T., Social Idealism and The Problem of Objectivity, St. Lucia University
Queensland Press, 1983.
Pearse H., Brother, can you Spare a Paradigm? the Theory beneath the Practice, in «Studies
in Art Education», XXIV, 3, 1983, pp. 158-163.
Peterson R.T., Marx and The Crisis In Social Dialectic, in «Praxis International», III,
3, 1983, pp. 348-358.
Power M.K., Jürgen Habermas and transcendental philosophy, Cambridge, University of
Cambridge, 1983.
Preukert H., Kritische Theorie und Pädagogik, in «Zeitschrift für Pädagogik», XXX, 2,
1983, pp. 195-217.
Privitera W., Comunicazione ed emancipazione. La svolta linguistica della teoria di Jürgen
Habermas, in AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas,
ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. 175-224.
Protti M., Dopo Adorno. J. Habermas e la questione del metodo delle scienze sociali, in
AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. 35-80; repr. in Protti M. (ed.) Dopo la scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul
pensiero di J. Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1984, pp. 35-79.
Protti M., Jürgen Habermas e l’idea di volontà razionale, in AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. 99-116.
Protti M., Jürgen Habermas: dalla critica ad Adorno alla costituzione discorsiva della società,
in «Sociologia», XVII, 2, 1983, pp. 31-63.
Protti M., Presentazione di Jürgen Habermas, in AA.VV., La Ragione emancipativa. Studi
sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, ILA Palma, Palermo, 1983, pp. IX-XVI.
Raulet G., Disqualifizierung des Marxismus: zur Rezeption der Kritischen Theorie in
Frankreich, in «Praxis International», III, 2, 1983, pp. 161-184.
Raulet G., La Fin de la Raison dans l’histoire, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical
Review», XXII, 1983, pp. 631-646.
Reitan R. Rationalitet eller rationalisme?, in Andersen J.E., Schanz H.J., Stounbjerg
P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas, Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Reuter M., Beschreibung und Dekonstruktion der Kommunikationstheorie: Funktionieren,
Scheitern Hoffnung auf Kommunikation, Berlin, 1983.
Rotenstreich N., Conservatism and Traditionalism, in «Praxis International», III, 4,
1983, pp. 412-422.
Roth R., Gesellschaftstheoretische Konzepte zur Analyse neuer sozialer Bewegungen, in «Politische Vierteljahresschrift», XXIV, 3, 1983, pp. 311-328.
Sabia D.R. jr., Wallulis J., The Idea of a Critical Social Science, in Id. (eds.), Changing
Social Science: Critical Theory and Other Critical, Perspectives, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY
895.
896.
897.
898.
899.
900.
901.
902.
903.
904.
905.
906.
907.
908.
909.
59
Press, 1983, pp. 3-30.
Schanz H.-J., Th.H. Jørgen, Den ældre Frankfurterskole--og Habermas, in Andersen
J.E., Schanz H.J., Stounbjerg P. (eds.), Det moderne – en bog om Jürgen Habermas,
Modtryk, Århus, 1983.
Seigfried H., Contribution to the Debate: Professor Wallulis on Theory and Emancipation,
in Tymieniecka A.T. (ed.), Foundations of Morality, Human Rights and the Human Sciences: Phenomenology in a Foundational Dialogue with the Human Sciences, Dordrecht, D.
Reidel Publishing Company, 1983, pp. 275-280.
Skirbekk G., Pragmatism in Apel and Habermas, in Fløistad G. (ed.), Contemporary
Philosophy. A New Survey, The Hague-Boston-London, Martinus Nijhoff, 1983, pp.
387-416.
Smith A., Ethics and Politics in the Work of Jürgen Habermas, in «Interpretation: A
Journal of Political Philosophy», XI, 3, 1983, pp. 333-351.
Summer C.S., Law, Legitimation and The Advanced Capitalist State, The Jurisprudence
and Social Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in Sugerman D. (ed.), Legality, Ideology and The
State, London-New York, Academic Press, 1983, pp. 110-158.
Svi Shapiro H., Habermas, O’Connor, and Wolfe, and The Crisis of The WelfareCapitalist State, Conservative Politics and the Roots of Educational Policy in the 1980s, in
«Educational Theory», XXXIII, 3-4, 1983, pp. 135-147.
Terrin A.N., Spiegare o comprendere la religione?, Padova, Edizioni Messaggero, 1983.
Teubner G., Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law, in «Law and Society
Review», XVII, 1983, pp. 239-285.
Thompson J.B., Rationality and Social Rationalization: An Assessment of Habermas’s
Theory of Communicative Action: Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band I:
Handlungrsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Band II: Zur Kritik
der funktionalistischen Vernunft, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociology», XVII, 2, 1983,
pp. 278-294; repr. in Id., Studies in the Theory of Ideology, Berkley-Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1984, pp. 279-302.
Thompson J.B., Reading and Understanding, in «Times Literary Supplement», 8-41983.
Umhauer G., Zum Normativen Fundament Sprachlicher Verständigung in der Konzeption,
Einer Idealen Sprechsituation, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung»,
XXXVII, 1983, pp. 88-101.
van Doorne F., Vromen J., Twee onder economen gangbare opvattingen van rationaliteit;
een analyse in het licht van Habermas’ algemene handelingstheorie, in «Kennis en Methode»,
VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983, pp. 368-383.
Van Luijk H., Habermas En Het Ideologiedebat, in «Kennis en Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983, pp. 384-401.
Van Nieuwstadt J., De Relatieve Zelfstandigheid Van Taalhandelingen, in «Kennis en
Methode», VII, 4 (Systeem en leefwereld. Habermas’ kritische maatschappijtheorie), 1983,
pp. 356-367.
Vollrath E., J. Habermas’ fundamentalistischer Fehlschluss, in «Det Staat», XXII, 1983,
pp. 406 ss.
60
910.
911.
912.
913.
914.
915.
916.
917.
918.
919.
Volpi F., Ritratti critici di contemporanei. Jürgen Habermas, in «Belfagor», XXXVIII, 2,
1983, pp. 167-194.
Wallace G., Tickle L., Middle Schools: the heart of schools in crisis, in «British Journal of
Sociology of Education», IV, 3, 1983, pp. 223-240.
Wallulis J., The relationships of theory and emancipation in Husserl and Habermas, in «Analecta Husserliana», XV, 1983. pp. 249-273.
Ware R.X., Habermas’s Evolutions, in «Canadian Journal of Philosophy», 12, 1982
pp. 591-620.
Weiss J., Verständigungsorientierung und Kritik. Zur “Theorie des kommunivativen Handelns” von J. Habermas, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpeychologie»,
XXXV, 1, 1983, pp. 108-120.
Wellmer A., Reason, Utopia and the Dialectic of Enlightenment, in «Praxis International», III, 2, 1983, pp. 83-107; repr. in Bernstein R.J. (ed.), Habermas and Modernity,
Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1985, pp. 35-66.
White S.K., Habermas on the Foundation of Ethics and Political Theory, in Sabia D.R.
jr., Wallulis J. (eds.), Changing Social Science. Critical Theory and other Critical Perspectives,
Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1983, pp. 157-170.
White S.K., The Normative Basis of Critical Theory, in «Polity», 16, 1983, pp. 150-164.
Wolff K.H., Surrender-and-Catch and Critical Theory, in «Praxis International», III, 3,
1983, pp. 147-160.
Zimmermann R., Marx, Habermas und Das Problem Der Gesellschaftlichen Emanzipation, in «Praxis International», III, 4, 1983, pp. 395-411.
1984
920.
921.
922.
923.
924.
925.
Agazzi Emilio, La ricostruzione del materialismo storico proposta da Jürgen Habermas, in
«Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 4, 1984, pp. 93-123.
Apel K.O., The Situation of Humanity as an Ethical Problem Action, in «Praxis International», IV, 3, 1984, pp. 250-265.
Arato A., Autoritärer Sozialismus und die Frankfurter Schule, Symposiums der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth A.,
Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 193-206.
Arnason J.P., Die Dialektik der Aufklärung und die postfunktionalistische Gesellschaftstheorie, Symposiums der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 1015.12.1984; in Honneth A., Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen,
Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 207-222.
Balbus I.D., Habermas and Feminism: (Male) Communication and the Evolution of (Patriarchal) Society, in «New Political Science», V, 1, 1984, pp. 27-47.
Belardinelli S., Discorso e prassi, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 4, 1984, pp.
32-44.
926.
927.
928.
929.
930.
931.
932.
933.
934.
935.
936.
937.
938.
939.
940.
941.
942.
943.
61
Belardinelli S., Scienza e filosofia pratica, in «Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica»,
LXXVI, 1984, pp. 508-**.
Benhabib S., Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean-François Lyotard, in
«New German Critique», 33, 1984, pp. 103-126.
Bernstein J., Habermas, in Pelczynski A., Gray J. (eds.), Conceptions of Liberty and
Political Philosophy, London, Athlone, 1984, pp. 397-425.
Berten A., John Rawls, Jürgen Habemas et la rationalité des normes, in Ladrière J., Van
Paris Ph. (eds.), Fondements d’une théorie de la justice. Essais sur la phi-losophie politique de
John Rawls, Louvain-la-Neuve, Ed. de L’lnstitut Supérieur de philosophie, 1984,
pp. 183-194.
Blankenburg E., The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner’s Case for “Reflexive
Law”, in «Law and Society Review», XVIII, 1984, pp. 273-289.
Bohnen A., Handlung, Lebenswelt und System in der soziologischen Theoriebildung: zur
Kritik der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas, in «Zeitschrift für
Soziologie», XIII, 3, 1984, pp. 191-203.
Borsoni P., Legittimazione e scambio politico nel dibattito Habermas-Luhmann, in «Critica
sociologica», LXIX, 1984, pp. 48-63.
Brena G.L., Seminario di studio sul pensiero di ]ürgen Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e
Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 7-18.
Bubner R., Rationalität, Lebensform und Geschichte, in Schnadëlbach H. (ed.), Rationalität. Philosophische Beiträge, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1984, pp. 198-**.
Calcaterra M.R., Ideologia e razionalità: saggio su Jürgen Habermas, Roma, Gangemi,
1984.
Calloni M., Bibliografia. Scritti di e su Habermas apparsi in italiano (1966-1984), in «Fenomenologia e Società», 4, 1984, pp. 14-143.
Calloni M., Jürgen Habermas: La fondazione della “Offentlichkeit” come interazione emancipativa della modernità, in Protti M. (ed.) Dopo la scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul pensiero di
Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1984, pp. 1-34.
Calloni M., Ragione, linguaggio ed emancipazione in Habermas, in «Civiltà Mediterranea», 9, 1984, pp. 8-9.
Ceppa L., Dialettica dell’illuminismo e opinione pubblica: i modelli di Habermas e Koselleck,
in «Studi storici», XXV, 2, 1984, pp. 343-352.
Cerutti F., Philosophie und Sozialforschung. Zum ursprünglichen Programm der kritischen
Theorie, Symposiums der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 1015.12.1984; in Honneth A., Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen,
Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 275-284.
Cobben P.G., Habermas’ Theorie Van Het Kommunikatieve Handelen, in «Tijdschrift
voor Filosofie», 46, 2, 1984, pp. 216-268.
Cobben P.G., Identiteit En Diskurs, in «Kennis en Methode», VIII, 1984, pp. 6374.
Cohen J.L., Arato A., Social Movements, Civil Society, and the Problem of Sovereignty, in
«Praxis International», IV, 3, 1984, pp. 266-283.
62
944.
945.
946.
947.
948.
949.
950.
951.
952.
953.
954.
955.
956.
957.
958.
959.
960.
961.
Cortella L., Habermas e la svolta comunicativa della filosofia contemporanea tedesca, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 19-41.
Craib I., Modern Social Theory: from Parsons to Habermas, New York, St. Martin’s
Press, 1984.
Cristin R., Passaggi. Note sulla teoria della comunicazione di J. Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 68-89.
Cunico G., Dall’ontologia alla critica: la prima svolta nel pensiero di Habermas, Casale
Monferrato, Marietti, 1984.
Cunico G., Discorso argomentativo e problema del senso in Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 42-67.
Dal Lago A., Piccola apologia della discordia. Osservazioni sull’ermeneutica della trasparenza
in Habermas, in Protti M. (ed.) Dopo la scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul pensiero di J. Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1984, pp. 117-140.
Dallmayr F.R., Is Critical Theory a Humanism, in Id., Polis and Praxis. Exercices in
Contemporary Political Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1984, pp. 133-165.
Dallmayr F.R., Language and Politics: Why Does Language Matter To Political Philosophy,
Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
Dallmayr F.R., Life-World and Communicative Action, in Id., Polis and Praxis. Exercices
in Contemporary Political Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1984, pp. 224-253.
Dallmayr F.R., Response To Comments On His Twilight of Subjectivity, in «Philosophy
and Social Criticism», X, 1984, pp. 121-130.
de Rezende Pinto J.M., Administração e liberdade: um estudo do Conselho de Escola a luz
da teoria da ação comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de
Campinas, 1984.
De Schrijver G., Wholeness In Society--A Contemporary Understanding of The Question of
Theodicy, in «Tijdschrift voor de Studie van de Verlichting en van Het Vrije
Denken», 12, 1984, pp. 377-394.
del Aguila Tejerina R., Crítica y reivindicación de la utopía: la racionalización del
pensamiento utópico, in «Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas», 25, 1984,
pp. 37-70.
del Aguila Tejerina R., Vallespín Oña F., La racionalidad dialógica: sobre Rawls y
Habermas, in «Zona abierta», 31, 1984, pp. 93-126.
Doeleman W., Philosophische Methodik: Apel vs. Habermas, in van Reijen W., Apel
K.O. (eds.), Rationales Handeln und Gesellschaftstheorie, Bochum, Germinal Verlag,
1984, pp. 115-130.
Doody J.A., Recent Reconstructions of Political Philosophy, in «Philosophy Today»,
XXVIII, 1984, pp. 215-228.
Dumm Th.L., The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1, Reason and the
Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The American Political Science
Review», LXXVIII, 4, 1984, pp. 1185-1186.
Edelstein W., Habermas J. (eds.), Soziale Interaktion und soziales Verstehen. Beiträge
zur Entwicklung der Interaktionskompetenz, Frankfurt a.M., 1984, pp. 113-166.
962.
963.
964.
965.
966.
967.
968.
969.
970.
971.
972.
973.
974.
975.
976.
977.
63
Eyerman, R., Social movements and social theory, in «Sociology», 18, 1984, pp. 71-82.
Fahrenbach H., Zum anthropologischen Bezugsrahmen der “Theorie des kommunikativen
Handelns” von Jürgen Habermas, in von Reijen W., Apel K.O. (ed.), Rationales Handeln
und Gesellschaftstheorie, Bochum, Germinal- Verlag, 1984, pp. 81-113.
Ferraro A., Jürgen Habermas: un mutamento di paradigma nel concetto di “ragione”, in
Protti M. (ed.) Dopo la scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1984, pp. 81-116.
Ferry J.-M., Administration rationnelle ou politique raisonnable ? Habermas et Weber, in
«Raison présente», 77, 1984.
Fetscher I., Zur aktuellen politischen Bedeutung der Frankfurter Schule, Symposiums der
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth A.,
Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 3-7.
Fischer K.G., Emanzipation, in Wulf Ch. (ed.), Wörterbuch der Erziehung, Zürich,
Piper 1984, pp. 156-160.
Fistetti F., La ragione discorsiva di J. Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e società», VII, 4,
1984, pp. 7-3; repr. in Fistetti F., Idoli del politico: per una sinistra senza dogmi, Bari, Dedalo, 1990, pp. 113-143.
Flanagan K., Hermeneutics: A Sociology of Misunderstanding, in «Philosophical Studies», 30, 1984, pp. 270-281.
Flay J.C., Habermas, Eurocommunism and the theory of communication, in Fischer N. et.
al. (eds.), Continuity and Change in Marxism, New York, Atlantic Highlands, 1984,
pp. 131-143.
Fleming M., Habermas, Marx and the Question of Ethics, Symposiums der Alexander
von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth A., Wellmer A.
(eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp.
139-150.
Fleming M., Political Discourse within the Context of Universal Communicative Competence,
in International Colloquium on The Structuring of Political Discourse/La Structuration du
Discours Politique, University of Western Ontario, 10.1984.
Garz D., Strukturgenese und Moral. Rekonstruktive Sozialisationsforschung in den Sozialund Erziehungswissenschaften, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1984.
Gerhards J., Kritische Einwände, in Id., Wahrheit und Ideologie. Eine kritische Einführung
in die Systemtheorie von Niklas Luhmann, Köln, Janus Presse, 1984, pp. 70-94.
Greblo E., Individui e società nel pensiero di Habermas, in «Il mulino», XXXIII, 1,
1984, pp. 11-37.
Gripp H., Jürgen Habermas. Und es gibt sie doch - Zur kommunikationstheoretischen Begründung von Vernunft bei Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn-München-Wien-Zürich, Schönigh, 1984.
Grünbaum A., Critique of Habermas’s Philosophy of Psychoanalysis, in Id., The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. A Philosophical Critique, Berkeley-London, University of California Press, 1984, pp. 9-42; tr. it. I fondamenti della psicoanalisi, Milano, Il Saggiatore,
1988.
64
978.
979.
980.
981.
982.
983.
984.
985.
986.
987.
988.
989.
990.
991.
Haferkamp H., Interaktionsaspekte, Handlungszusammenhänge und die Rolle des Wissenstransfers: eine handlungstheoretische Kritik der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in
«Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XXXVI, 4, 1984, pp.
783-798.
Heller A., The Discourse Ethics of Habermas: Critique and Appraisal, in «Thesis Eleven», 10-11, 1984-85, pp. 5-17; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 273284.
Herrlitz W., Über Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie der kommunikativen Handelns, sprachtheoretischer Hintergrund – sprachdidaktische Perspektiven, in «Der Spiegel», II, 1, 1984, pp. 544.
Hoesterey I., Die Moderne am Ende? Zu den ästhetischen Positionen von Jürgen Habermas
und Clement Greenberg, in «Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft», XXIX, 1, 1984, pp. 19-32.
Holmberg C.B., Stray the course: Technology’s impact upon the representative-elector artifact,
in «Communication Quarterly», XXXII, 2, March 1984, pp. 84-90.
Howard D., Hermeneutik und Kritische Theorie: Aufklärung als Politik, Symposiums
der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth
A., Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New York, de
Gruyter, 1986, pp. 167-178.
Hugh Adler F., Philosophical-Political Profiles, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Antioch Review», XLII, 3, 1984, p. 375.
Jay M., Habermas and Modernism, in «Praxis International», IV, 1, 1984, pp. 1-14;
repr. in Bernstein R.J. (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1985,
pp. 125-139; repr. in Jay M., Fin-de-siècle Socialism and other Essays, London-New
York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1988, pp. 123-136.
Jay M., Habermas and the Reconstruction of Marxist Holism, in Id., Marxism and Totality.
The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas, Berkeley, University of California Press & Cambridge, Polity Press, & Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1984, pp. 462509.
Jehenson R., Effectiveness, Expertise and Excellence as Ideological Fictions: A Contribution
To A Critical Phenomenology of The Formal Organization, in «Human Studies», 7, 1984,
pp. 3-22.
Jimenez Perona A., Mas Torres S., Tecnica Y Legitimacion En Habermas, in «
Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía », XIV, 3-4, 1984, pp. 511-546.
Joja C., Herméneutique et théorie de la Communication, in «Revue Roumaine de Philosophie et Logique», 28, 1984, pp. 242-248.
Keane J., Elements of a Radical Theory of Public Life: From Tönnnies to Habermas and
Beyond, in «Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory», VIII, 1-2, 1984, pp.
139-162.
Kern L., Das Diktat Des Besseren Arguments: Eine Entscheidungslogische Rekonstruktion
Des Praktischen Diskurses, in «Conceptus: Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 18, 1984, pp.
992.
993.
994.
995.
996.
997.
998.
999.
1000.
1001.
1002.
1003.
1004.
1005.
1006.
1007.
1008.
1009.
65
33-45.
Keulartz F.W.J., Kolonisering, disciplinering en vergelijkbaarheid : over de verhouding tussen
Foucault en Habermas, in «Krisis», IV, 1984, pp. 85-93.
Korthals M., Grundbegriffe der Gesellschaftstheorie bei Marx und Habermas, in van Reijen W., Apel K.O. (eds.), Rationales Handeln und Gesellschaftstheorie, Bochum, Germinal Verlag, 1984, pp. 157-182.
Korthals M.J.A.A., Handlungstheorie und Entwicklungstheorie im Werke von Marx und
Habermas, in «Praxis International», 3, 1983/84, pp. 274-296.
Kunneman H., Het Identiteitsdiskurs Ter Discussie, in «Kennis en Methode», VIII,
1984, pp. 75-82.
Laermans R., Foucault en Habermas: een kritiek op de integratiepoging van Keulartz en
Kunneman, in «Krisis», IV, 1984 pp. 86-92.
Lassman P., Social structure, history and evolution, in «Economy and Society», XIII, 1,
1984, pp. 1-19.
Lind G., Lind O., Demokratie und Moralische Urteilskompetenz: Über Grundlagen und
empirische Befunde öffentlicher Moral in demokratischen Industriegesellschaften, in «Sicherheit
und Frieden», 2, 1984, pp. 2-7.
Lobkowicz N., Wie könnte eine politische Philosophie aussehen?, in «Philosophische
Rundschau», XXXI, 1984, pp. 236-263.
Luque E., Sobre antropología política (diálogo polémico con un viejo discurso), in «Revista
española de investigaciones sociológicas», 25, 1984, pp. 71-94.
Marcus-Tar J., Tarr Z., Foundations of the Frankfurt School of Social Research, New
Brunswick-New York, Transaction Books, 1984.
Mardones J.M., La reconstrucción de la Teoría Crítica por J. Habermas. A propósito de
“Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e
información filosófica», XL, 158, 1984, pp. 159-178.
Marga A., Sobre los tipos de ciencias, in «Revue Roumaine de Philosophie et Logique», 28, 1984, pp. 267-271.
Margolis J., Historicism, Universalism, and the Threat of Relativism, in «Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry», 67, 1984, pp. 308326.
Margolis J., Pragmatism without Foundations, in «American Philosophical Quarterly»,
21, 1984, pp. 69-80.
Marramao G., Illuminismo e attualità: il moderno come interrogazione sul presente. Due testi
di M. Foucault e J. Habermas, in «Il Centauro», 11-12, 1984, pp. 221-228.
Mas Torres S., Jiménez Perona A., Técnica y legitimación en Habermas, in «Teorema:
Revista internacional de filosofía», XIV, 3-4, 1984, pp. 511-546.
McCarthy Th., Philosophie und WissenSoziologie. Zur Aktualität der Kritischen Theorie,
Symposiums der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984;
in Honneth A., Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New
York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 113-127.
McCarthy Th., Reflections on Rationalization in the Theory of Communicative Action, in
66
1010.
1011.
1012.
1013.
1014.
1015.
1016.
1017.
1018.
1019.
1020.
1021.
1022.
1023.
1024.
«Praxis International», IV, 2, 1984, pp. 177-191; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
1994, pp. 190-204.
McCarthy Th., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., The Theory of Communicative
Action, Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society (TKH I), Cambridge (UK), Polity Press, 1984, pp. V-XXXVIII.
McCumber J., Reflection and Emancipation in Habermas, in «Southern Journal of Philosophy», 22, 1984, pp. 71-82.
Miguelez R., Dialogo Y Democrazia, in «Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia», 10,
1984, pp. 111-120.
Misgeld D., Critical Theory and Sociological Theory, in «Philosophy of Social Science»,
XIV, 1984, pp. 78-**.
Morrow R., Critical Theory and Critical Sociology, in «Canadian Review of Sociology
and Anthropology», 22, 1985, pp. 710-747
Munger F., Seon C., Critical Legal Studies versus Critical Legal Theory: A Comment on
Method, in «Law & Policy», 6, 1984, pp. 257-297.
Nagl L., Die Wahrheitsfrage Abwischen Sprachanalytischer Transformation Und HistorischSystematischer Dimensionierung, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXXI, 1984, pp. 8594.
Nolte H., Kommunikative Kompetenz und Leibapriori: Zur philosophischen Anthropologie
von Jürgen Habermas und Karl-Otto Apel, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXX, 1984, pp. 518-539.
Oevermann U., Warum Habermas’ Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns ein Fundament für soziologische Theorie, insbesondere für soziologische Strukturtheorie, nicht abgeben kann,
Frankfurt a.M, University of Frankfurt, 1984.
Passerin d’Entrèves M., La teoria della razionalità in Habermas ovvero le ragioni del moderno, in «Fenomenologia e società», VII, 4, 1984, pp. 45-61.
Petrović G., Die Bedeutung der Frankfurter Schule heute, Symposiums der Alexander
von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth A. Wellmer A.
13-24.
Petrović G., Die Frankfurter Schule und die Zagreber Philosophie der Praxis, IX Fachsymposium der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, 121984, Ludwigsburg; in
Honneth A., Wellmer A., Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Walter de Gruyter,
Berlin-New York, 1986, pp. 59-85.
Ponsetto A., Emancipazione e mondo della vita. L’influsso della fenomenologia husserliana
nel pensiero di Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 90-119.
Privitera W., Jürgen Habermas e l’idea di volontà razionale, in Protti M. (ed.) Dopo la
scuola di Francoforte. Studi sul pensiero di Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1984,
pp. 99-115.
Protti M., Dalla prima teoria critica all’ultima: Jürgen Habermas A.D. 1982, in «Fenomenologia e società», VII, 4, 1984, pp. 62-81.
1025.
1026.
1027.
1028.
1029.
1030.
1031.
1032.
1033.
1034.
1035.
1036.
1037.
1038.
1039.
1040.
1041.
67
Protti M., L’itinerario critico. Tre studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Franco Angeli,
1984.
Radder J.A., De materiële realisering van wetenschap: een filosofiese visie op de experimentele
natuurwetenschappen, ontwikkeld in discussie met Habermas, Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1984; tr. en. The Material Realization of Science: A Philosophical View
on the Experimental Natural Sciences. Developed in Discussion with Habermas, Amsterdam,
Van Gorcum, 1988.
Rajan R.S., History and Nature, in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XI, 1984, pp.
15-50.
Rasmussen D.M., Explorations of the Lebenswelt: Reflections on Schutz and Habermas, in
«Human Studies», 7, 1984, pp. 127-132.
Rorty R., Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity, in «Praxis International», IV, 1,
1984, pp. 32-44; repr. in Bernstein R.J. (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Oxford, Basil
Blackwell, 1985, pp. 161-175; tr. it. Habermas e Lyotard sulla condizione postmoderna, in
Id., Scritti filosofici. Vol. II, Bari-Roma, Laterza, 1993, pp. 221-238; tr. es. Habermas y
Lyotard sobre la postmodernidad, in «Revista de Occidente», 85, 1988, pp. 71- 92
Ruys P., van Doorne F., Die Struktur einer Sprechhandlung in Habermas’ Forschungsprogramm, in van Reijen W., Apel K.O. (eds.), Rationales Handeln und Gesellschaftstheorie, Bochum, Germinal Verlag, 1984, pp. 201-218.
Schaap G., Jürgen Habermas, Vrijheid, Amsterdam, 1984.
Schmid-Schönbein Th., Zwecktätigkeit und Verständigung: über Jürgen Habermas’
“Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Jahrbuch Ökonomie und Gesellschaft»,
2, 1984, pp. 173-199.
Schmied-Kowarz W., Dialetik, in Wulf Ch. (ed.), Wörterbuch der Erziehung, Zürich,
Piper 1984, pp. 141-145.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Critical Theory: Religious Dimension, in «The Ecumenist»,
1984, pp. 20-35.
Smith A., Two Theories of Historical Materialism: G.A. Cohen and Jürgen Habermas, in
«Theory and Society», XIII, 4, 1984, pp. 513-540.
Strasser S., Was ist Handlungsrationalität? Nachdenkliches im Zusammenhang mit Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie»,
XVI, 1984, pp. 153-172.
Tarozzi A., J. Habermas: per una teoria dell’evoluzione sociale, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 4, 1984, pp. 82-92.
Teubner G., Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg, in «Law and
Society Review», XVIII, 1984, pp. 291-301.
Uña Juárez F.O., Una aproximación descriptiva de conocimiento e interés de J. Habermas,
in «Anuario jurídico y económico escurialense», 16, 1984, pp. 279-286.
van Luijk H., Het Wijkend Subject: Twee Bijdragen Aan Een Theorie Van De Ethische,
Actor, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte», 76, 1984, pp. 171192.
van Niekerk P.J., Kapitalisme en demokrasie in die kritiese in samelewingsteorie van Jürgen
68
1042.
1043.
1044.
1045.
1046.
1047.
1048.
1049.
1050.
1051.
1052.
1053.
1054.
1055.
Habermas, in «South African Journal of Sociology», XV, 1, 1984, pp. 38-45.
van Reijen W., Philosophie als Kritik: Einführung in die Kritische Theorie, Königstein,
Athenäum Verlag, 1984.
Vincent J.M., Action et communication, in «L’année sociologique», XXXIV, 1984,
pp. 241-253.
Volpi F., Ragione, linguaggio, mondo della vita: problemi filosofici della “summa sociologica”
di Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», VII, 2, 1984, pp. 120-140.
Walkup J., When A Psychoanalyst Makes Sense, What Does He Make It Out of?, in
«Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», XV, 1984, pp. 180-196.
Watson S., Jürgen Habermas and Jean-Francois Lyotard: Post Modernism and The Crisis of
Rationality, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», X, 2, 1984, pp. 1-24.
Wellmer A., Die Bedeutung der Frankfurter Schule heute, Symposiums der Alexander
von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984; in Honneth A., Wellmer A.
25-34.
White S.K., Habermas Communicative Ethics and the Development of Moral Consciousness,
in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», X, 2, 1984, pp. 25-48.
Whitebook J., Reason and Happiness: Some Psychoanalytic Themes in Critical Theory, in
«Praxis International», IV, 1, 1984, pp. 15-31; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
1994, pp. 316-333.
Wohlfarth I., Postscriptum: Habermas contra Horkheimer/Adorno contra Habermas,
Symposiums der Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Ludwigsburg, 10-15.12.1984;
in Honneth A., Wellmer A. (eds.), Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen, Berlin-New
York, de Gruyter, 1986, pp. 55-58.
Wolff K.H., Habermas and Schutz: Philosophical-Political Profiles, by Jürgen Habermas; Alfred Schutz: An Intellectual Biography, by Helmut R. Wagner, in «Contemporary Sociology», XIII, 4, 1984, pp. 422-424.
Wolin R., Modernism vs. Postmodernism, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 62, 1984-85, pp. 9-29.
Wuthnow R., Hunter J., Bergersens A., Kuzweil E., The Critical theory of Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Id., Id., Id., Cultural analysis: the work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas,
Michel Foucault, and Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1984, pp. 179-239; tr. es. Análisis cultural. La obra de Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas,
Michel Foucault y Jürgen Habermas, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 1988.
Young D.McP., Habermas’ discourse ethics, Oxford, University of Oxford, 1984.
Zimmermann R., Emancipation and Rationality: Foundational Problems in the Theories of
Marx and Habermas, in «Ratio», 26, 1984, pp. 143-166; tr. de. Das Problem einer politischen Theorie der Emanzipation bei Marx. und Habermas und die Frage nach ihrer ethischen
Fundierung, in Angehrn E., Lohmann G. (eds.), Ethik und Marx: Moralkritik und
Normative Grundlagen der Marxschen Theorie, Königstein, Hain Verlag bei Athenaum,
1986, pp. 239-267.
69
1985
1056.
1057.
1058.
1059.
1060.
1061.
1062.
1063.
1064.
1065.
1066.
1067.
1068.
Agazzi Emilio, Introduzione all’edizione italiana, in Habermas J.; tr. it. Etica del discorso, Bari-Roma, Laterza, 1985, pp. V-XXX.
Agger B., The Dialectic of Deindustrialisation: An Essay on Advanced Capitalism, in Forester J. (ed.), Critical Theory and Public Life, Cambridge-London, MIT Press, 1985,
pp. 3-21.
Albrecht J., Scientific Discourse and Pratical Dialoge, in Id., Planning as Social Process.
The Use of Critical Theory, Frankfurt a.M.-Bern-New York, Peter Lang, 1985, pp. 5384.
Alexander J.C., Habermas’ New Critical Theory: Its Promise and Problems, in «American Journal of Sociology», XCI, 2, 1985, pp. 400-424; repr. as Habermas and Critical
Theory: Beyond the Marxian Dilemma?, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative
Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge,
MIT Press, 1991, pp. 49-73; tr. de. Habermas’ neue Kritische Theorie: Anspruch und
Probleme, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen
Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986,
pp. 73-109.
Alford C.F., Jürgen Habermas and the Dialectic of Enlightenment: What is Theoretically
Fruitful Knowledge?, in «Social Research», 52, 1985, pp. 119-149.
Alford C.F., Science and the Revenge of Nature: Marcuse and Habermas, Gainesville,
University Presses of South Florida, 1985.
Alford J., Is Jürgen Habermas’ Reconstructive Science really Science?, in «Theory and Society», XIV, 3, 1985, pp. 321-340.
Allen W.W., Cornell Society for the Humanities Colloquium on Habermas, Sixth International Kant Congress, State College, Pennsylvania, 9.1985.
Allen W.W., Habermas’ Defense of Rationalism, in «New German Critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 145-164; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
1994, pp. 233-249.
Apel K.-O., Ist die Ethik der idealen Kommunikationsgemeinschaft eine Utopie?: zum Verhältnis von Ethik, Utopie und Utopiekritik, in Vosskamp W. (ed.), Utopieforschung. Interdisziplinäre Studien zur neuzeitlichen Utopie, vol. I, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1985, pp.
325-355; tr. en. Is the Ethics of the Ideal Communication Community a Utopia? On the Relationship between Ethics, Utopia, and the Critique of Utopia, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr D.
(eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990,
pp. 23-58.
Arbib M.A. In Search Of The Person: Philosophical Explorations In Cognitive Science,
Amherst, University Of Mass. Press, 1985.
Baurmann M., Understanding as an Aim and Aims of Understanding, in Seebaß G.,
Tuomela R. (eds.), Social Action, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985, pp. 187-196.
Benhabib S., The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controvers
and Feminist Theory, in «Praxis International», V, 4, 1985, pp. 402-425.
70
1069.
1070.
1071.
1072.
1073.
1074.
1075.
1076.
1077.
1078.
1079.
1080.
1081.
1082.
1083.
1084.
1085.
1086.
1087.
1088.
Benhabib S., The Utopian Dimension in Communicative Ethics, in «New German Critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 83-96.
Bernstein R, Introduction, in Bernstein R.J. (ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Oxford,
Basil Blackwell, 1985, pp. 1-32; tr. es. Habermas y la modernidad, Madrid, Cátedra,
1985, 19912.
Böhler D., Rekonstruktive Pragmatik. Von der Bewußtseinsphilosophie zur Kommunikations-reflexion: Neubegründung der praktischen Wissenschaften und Philosophie, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1985.
Boladeras Cucurella M., Razón crítica y sociedad. De Max Weber a la Escuela de
Frankfurt, Barcelona, Biblioteca Universitaria de filosofia, 1985.
Bonß W., Dubiel H., Gamm G., Hesse H., Honneth A., Karpenstein-Eßbach
Ch., Kimmerle G., Die Zukunft der Vernunft. Eine Auseinandersetzung, Tübingen, Edition Diskord im Konkursbuchverlag, 1985.
Brunkhorst H., Die Habermassche Theorie des kommunikativen Handeln, in «Problems
of Culture», XV, 1, 1985, pp. 97-103.
Buchel W., Zur Geschichte Der Physik, in «Philosophia Naturalis», 22, 1985.
Burger H., Philosophy of Subjectivity and the Modernity (In Serbo-Croatian), in
«Filozofska Istrazivanja», 14, 1985, pp. 567-574.
Christoph K., Am Anfang war das Wort. Zur Gesellschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas,
in «Leviathan», XIII, 4, 1985, pp. 334-356.
Cole D., Getting There: Reflections on Trashing from Feminist Jurisprudence and Critical
Theory, in «Harvard Women’s Law Journal», 8, 1985, pp. 59-91.
Colom González F., Poder y legitimación en la obra de Jürgen Habermas. Una
aproximación a su filosofía política, Madrid, Universidad Complutense, 1985.
Cortina Orts A., Crítica y utopia. La Escuela de Frankfurt, Madrid, Editorial Cincel,
1985.
Cortina Orts A., La hermenéutica crítica en Apel y Habermas. Ciencia reconstructiva o
hermenéutica trascendental?, in «Estudios filosóficos», XXXV, 95, 1985, pp. 83-114.
Culler J., Communicative Competence and Normative Force, in «New German Critique»,
35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 133-144.
Davey N., Habermas’s Contribution to Hermeneutic Theory, in «Journal of the British
Society for Phenomenology», XVI, 2, 1985, pp. 109-131.
Davis S.T., Naturalism and The Resurrection: A Reply To Habermas, in «Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of ChristianPhilosophers», 2, 1985, pp. 303-308.
Dubiel H., Die Zukunft der Vernunft. Eine Auseinandersetzung, in Teilnehmer Wolfgang Bonß, Tübingen, edition diskord im Konkursbuchverlag 1985.
Erpenbeck J., Habermas. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln, in «Deutsche
Literaturzeitung», CVI, 12, 1985.
Ferrara A., A Critique of Habermas’s Diskursethik, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of
Critical Thought», 64, 1985, pp. 45-74.
Ferraris M., Habermas, Foucault, Derrida. A proposito di neoilluminismo e neoconservatorismo, in «Aut-Aut», CCVIII, 1985, pp. 41-46.
1089.
1090.
1091.
1092.
1093.
1094.
1095.
1096.
1097.
1098.
1099.
1100.
1101.
1102.
71
Flynn B.C., Reading Habermas Reading Freud, in «Human Studies», VIII, 1, 1985,
pp. 57-76.
Forester J., Critical theory and Planning Practice, In Id., (ed.), Critical Theory and Public
Life, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1985, pp. 202-231.
Forester J., Introduction: The Applied Turn in Contemporary Critical Theory, in Id., (ed.),
Critical Theory and Public Life, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1985, pp. IX-XIX.
Fraser N., What’s Critical About Critical Theory?: The Case of Habermas and Gender, in
«New German critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 97-131; repr. in
Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, LondonNew York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 21-56; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.),
Frankfurt School. Critical Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York,
Routledge, 1994, pp. 205-232; tr. de. Was ist kritisch an der Kritischen Theorie?: Habermas und die Geschlechterfrage, in Ostner I., Lichtblau K. (eds.), Feministische Vernunftkritik: Ansätze und Traditionen, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1992, pp. 99-146; tr. es.
¿Qué hay de crítico en la teoría crítica? El caso de Habermas y el género, in Id., Fortunas del
feminismo. Del capitalismo gestionado por el estado a la crisis neoliberal, Madrid, Traficantes
de Sueños, 2005, pp. 39-74.
Gelder F. von, Habermas’ Begriff des historischen Materialismus, Frankfurt a.M., Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, 1985; Frankfurt a.M.-Bern-New York-Paris,
Peter Lang, 1990.
Giddens A., Jürgen Habermas, in Skinner Q. (ed.), The Return of Grand Theory in
Human Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985, pp. 121-139; tr. es.
Jürgen Habermas, Skinner Q. (ed.), El retorno de la Gran Teoría en las ciencias humanas,
Madrid, Alianza, 1988, pp. 119-135.
Gmünder U., Kritische Theorie: Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas, Stuttgart,
Metzler, 1985.
Gottwald F., Religion oder Diskurs? Zur Kritik der Habermasschen Religionsverständnisses,
in «Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte», XXXVII, 3, 1985, pp. 193202.
Gripp H., Und es gibt sie doch. Zur Kommunikationstheoretischen Begründung von Vernunft
bei Jürgen Habermas, München/Wien, Schoning, 1985.
Groothoff H.H., Zur Bedeutung der Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas für die Pädagogik, in «Pädagogische Rundschau», XXXIX, 3, 1985, pp. 275-298.
Gross D., Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas, Michel
Foucault and Jürgen Habermas, by Robert Wuthnow, James Davison Hunter, Albert
Bergesen, Edith Kurzweil, in «Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion», XXIV, 1,
1985, pp. 108-109.
Haferkamp H., Critique of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in Seebaß G.,
Tuomela R. (eds.), Social Action, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985, pp. 197-205.
Halfmann J., The German Left and Democracy: Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age”, by Jürgen Habermas, in «New German Critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 165-186.
Hartmann K., Human Agency Between Life-World And System: Habermas’s Latest Ver-
72
1103.
1104.
1105.
1106.
1107.
1108.
1109.
1110.
1111.
1112.
1113.
1114.
1115.
1116.
1117.
1118.
1119.
sion of Critical Theory, in «Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», XVI,
2, 1985, pp.145-155.
Hesse H., Widersprüche der Moderne : Einwände gegen Habermas’ Konzept kommunikativer Rationalität - Contradictions of modernity : objections against Habermas’ concept of
communicative rationality, in Gamm G. (ed.), Angesichts objektiver Verblendung. Über die
Paradoxien Kritischer Theorie, Tübingen, Gehrke, 1985, pp. 252-281.
Hiley D.R., Foucault and the Question Of Enlightenment, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XI, 1985, pp. 63-84.
Hjort A.M., The Conditions Of Dialogue: Approaches To The Habermas-Gadamer Debite,
in «Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy», 4, 1985, pp. 11-37.
Hohendahl P.U., The Dialectic of Enlightenment Revisited: Habermas’ Critique of the
Frankfurt School, in «New German critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985,
pp. 3-26.
Höhn H.J., Glaube im Diskurs. Notizen zur diskursiven Verantwortung christlicher Glaubensvermittlung, in «Theologie und Philosophie», LX, 2, 1985, pp. 213-238.
Höhn H.J., Kirche und kommunikatives Handeln: Studien zur Theologie und Praxis der
Kirche in d. Auseinandersetzung mit den Sozialtheorien Niklas Luhmanns und Jürgen Habermas’, Frankfurt a.M., Josef Knecht, 1985.
Hollinger R., Practical Reason and Hermeneutics, in «Philosophy and Rhetoric», 18,
1985, pp. 113-122.
Honneth A., Kritik der Mach. Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1985; tr. en. Critique of Power. Reflective stages in a critical social theory, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 1997; tr. it. Critica del potere. La teoria della società in
Adorno, Foucault e Habermas, Bari, Edizioni Dedalo, 2002.
How A.R., A Case of Creative Misreading: Habermas’s Evaluation of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics, in «Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», XVI, 2, 1985, pp.
132-144.
Hoy D.C., Interpreting the Law: Hermeneutical and Poststructuralist Perspectives, in
«Southern California Law Review», 58, 1985, pp. 135-176.
Iakovlev M.V., The “Critical Theory” of Society and the Total Critique of Ideology, in «Soviet Studies in Philosophy», XXIV, 2, 1985, pp. 3-40.
Innerarity D., Praxis e intersubjetividad. La teoría crítica de Jürgen Habermas,
Pamplòona, Eunsa, 1985.
Izzo A., Dilthey e la teoria critica della società, in Bianco E. (ed.), Dilthey e il pensiero del
novecento, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1985, pp. 253-257.
Jakob S., Zwischen Gespräch Und Diskurs. Untersuchungen zur sozialhermeneutischen Begründung der Agogik anhand einer Gegenüberstellung von Hans-Georg Gadamer und Jürgen
Habermas, Bern, Paul Haupt, 1985.
Kearney R., Modern Movements in European Philosophy: Some Introductory Remarks, in
«Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy», 4, 1985, pp. 51-61.
Keulartz F.W.J., Rondom Habermas: analyses en kritieken, Meppel, Boom, 1985.
Klein J., Beyond Hermeneutics: Zur Philosophie Der Literatur-Und Geisteswissenschaften,
1120.
1121.
1122.
1123.
1124.
1125.
1126.
1127.
1128.
1129.
1130.
1131.
1132.
1133.
1134.
1135.
73
Essen, Die Blaue Eule, 1985.
Klostermaier K., Moksa and Critical Theory, in «Philosophy East and West», 35,
1985, pp. 61-72.
Koch F., Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns als Kritik von Geschichts-philosophie, Frankfurt a.M.–Bern–New York, Peter Lang, 1985.
Korthals M., Habermas’ ontwikkelingstheorie en haar pedagogische consequenties, in
«Nederlands Tijdschrift voor opvoeding en onderwijs», 1, 1985, pp. 170-177.
Kothari R., Meaning, Truth and Ethical-Value, in «Praxis International», V, 3, 1985,
pp. 225-246.
Kroger J., Prophetic-Critical and Practical-Strategic Tasks Of Theology: Habermas And
Liberation Theology, in «Theological Studies», 46, 1, 1985.
Maddox R.L., Contemporary Hermeneutic Philosophy and Theological Studies, in «Religious Studies: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion», 21, 1985,
pp. 517-529.
Mara G.M., After Virtue, Autonomy: Jürgen Habermas and Greek Political Theory, in
«Journal of Politics», XLVII, 4, 1985, pp. 1036-1061.
Mardones J.M., El comienzo de la teoría crítica: La teoría de la acción comunicativa de J.
Habermas, in «Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales», 65, 1985, pp. 117-138.
Mardones J.M., Razón comunicativa y teoría crítica. La fundamentación normativa de la
teoría crítica de la sociedad, Bilbao, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco,
1985.
Marx W., The Philosophy of F.W.J. Schelling. History, System, And Freedom, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1985.
Maynard M., Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, by Hubert L. Dreyfus; Cultural Analysis: The Work of Peter L. Berger, Mary Douglas,
Michel Foucault and Jürgen Habermas, by Robert Wuthnow, James Davison Hunter,
Albert Bergesen, Edith Kurzweil, in «The British Journal of Sociology», XXXVI, 1,
1985, pp. 148-149.
Mayrl W.W., Modernity and Its Discontents: A German Perspective. Observations on The Spiritual Situation of the Age, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary
Sociology», XIV, 2, 1985, pp. 167-170.
McCarthy Th., Complexity and Democracy, or the Seducements of Systems Theory, in
«New German Critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 27-53; repr. in
Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The
Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 119-139; tr. de.
Komplexität und Demokratie - die Versuchungen der Systemtheorie, in Joas H., Honneth A.
(eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 177-215.
Mccumber J., Critical Theory and Poetic Interaction, in «Praxis International», V, 3,
1985, pp. 268-282.
Meijer W.A.J., De pedagogiek en de communicatietheorie van Habermas, in «Nederlands
tijdschrift voor opvoeding, vorming en onderwijs», I, 1985, pp. 195-203.
Meschonnic H., Le Langage chez Habermas, in Id., Critique de la Théorie Critique. Lan-
74
1136.
1137.
1138.
1139.
1140.
1141.
1142.
1143.
1144.
1145.
1146.
1147.
1148.
1149.
1150.
1151.
1152.
1153.
1154.
1155.
gage et histoire, Paris, Presses Universitaires de Vincennes, 1985, pp. 153-200.
Mezirow J., Concept and Action in Adult Education, in «Adult Education Quarterly»,
XXXV, 3, 1985, pp. 142-151.
Misgeld D., Critical Hermeneutics versus NeoParsonsianism, in «New German Critique», 35 (Issue on Jürgen Habermas), 1985, pp. 55-82.
Misgeld D., Education and Cultural Invasion: Critical Social Theory, Education as Instrucrion, and the “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, in Forester J. (ed.), Critical Theory and Public
Life, Cambridge-London, MIT Press, 1985, pp. 77-118.
Nauta L.W., De Heuristische Beperkingen Van De Dialectiek, in «Kennis en Methode», IX, 1985, pp. 182-198.
Nielsen G.M., Communication et esthétique culturelle dans deux sociologies critique: J. Habermas et M. Rioux, in «Sociologie et société», XVII, 2, 1985, pp. 13-26.
Nørager T., Systemverden og livsverden. Jürgen Habermas’ konstruktion af det moderne,
Forlaget ANIS, Århus 1985.
Nusser K.H., Totalität ohne Subjekt. Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XXXIX, 4, 1985, pp. 590-600.
Oliveira C., Discurso filosófico de la modernidad de Jürgen Habermas, in «Agora», 5,
1985, pp. 255-260.
Petrucciani S., Tanto per intenderci. L’etica del discorso di J. Habermas e K.O. Apel, in «Il
Manifesto», 4-9-1985.
Pojana M., Zum Konzept der kommunikativen Rationalität bei Jürgen Habermas, Essen,
Die Blaue Eule, 1985.
Raes K., Kommunikatief Handelen en Juridisering, in «Recht en Kritiek», 11, 1985, pp.
114-150.
Rauche, G A., Theory and Practice In Philosophical Argument, in «Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel», 15, 1985, pp. 25-39.
Rawls J., Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical, in «Philosophy and Public Affairs», 14, 1985, pp. 223-251; tr. es. Justicia como imparcialidad: política, no metafísica, in
Gómez Sánchez C. (ed.), Doce textos fundamentales de la ética del siglo XX, Alianza
Editorial, 2002, pp. 187-229.
Roderick R., Habermas on Rationality, in «Man and World», XVIII, 1985, pp. 203218.
Rodger J.J., On the Degeneration of the Public Sphere, in «Political studies», XXXII, 2,
1985, pp. 203-217.
Rosenthal Abigail L., Getting Past Marx And Freud, in «Clio», 15, 1985, pp. 61-82.
Schöfthaler T., Soziologie als “interaktionsfreie Kommunikation”. Niklas Luhmann leidenschaftlichen Antihumanismus, in «Das Argument», XXVII, 151, 1985, pp. 372-383.
Seel M., Die Kunst der Entzweiung. Zum Begriff der ästhetischen Rationalität, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1985.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Critical Theory: Theological Dimension, in «The Conrad
Grebel Review», 1985, pp. 22-39.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Reconstruction of Historical Materialism: Religious Dimension,
1156.
1157.
1158.
1159.
1160.
1161.
1162.
1163.
1164.
1165.
1166.
1167.
1168.
1169.
1170.
1171.
75
Part 1, in «Centre Oecumenique de Liaisons Internationales», 1, 1985, pp. 1-6.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Reconstruction of Historical Materialism: Religious Dimension,
Part 2, in «Centre Oecumenique de Liaisons Internationales», 2, 1985, pp. 10-18.
Siebert R.J., Response” to J. Toews on “Habermas’s Critical Theory: Theological Dimension,
in «Conrad Grebel Review», 3, 1985, pp. 288-292.
Siebert R.J., The Critical Theory of Religion. The Frankfurt School, New York-BerlinAmsterdam, Mouton, 1985.
Skjei E., I. A comment on performative, subject, and proposition in Habermas’s theory of
communication, in «Inquiry», XXVIII, 1-4, 1985, pp. 87-105.
Skovsmose O., Mathematical Education versus Critical Education, in «Educational
Studies in Mathematics», 16, 1985, pp. 337-354.
Slobodan Z., Habermas i praxis-filozofija, in «Theoria», l-2, 1985, pp. 79-97.
Smith A., Habermas on the University: Bildung in the Age of Technology, in «Descriptions», 11, 1985, pp. 274-85.
Spencer L., Philosophical-Political Profiles, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of the
British Society for Phenomenology», XVI, 2, 1985, pp. 212-213.
Stern L., Hermeneutics and Intellectual History, in «Journal of the History of Ideas»,
46, 1985, pp. 287-296.
Tugendhat E., Habermas on Communicative Action, in Seebaß G., Tuomela R. (eds.),
Social Action, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1985, pp. 179-186.
Van der Burg W., De Rechtstheorie van Jürgen Habermas, in «Recht en Kritiek», 11,
1985, pp. 6-26.
Waldenfels B., Vernunftordnung und positive Ordnungen: Anmerkungen zu dem nicht ausgetragenen Streit zwischen Habermas und Foucault, in Id. (ed.), In den Netzen der Lebenswelt,
Weisshaupt B., Überlegungen zur Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas, in «Studia Philosophica», XL, 1985, pp. 78-88.
Wellmer A., Zur Dialektik von Moderne und PostModerne. Vernunfkritik nach Adorno,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1985; tr. it. La dialettica moderno-postmoderno. La critica della
ragione dopo Adorno, Milano, Unicopli, 1987.
Young I.M., Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of
Moral and Political Theory, in «Praxis International», V, 4, 1985, pp. 381-401.
Zimmermann R., Utopie – Rationalität – Politik. Zu Kritik, Rekonstruktion und Systematik einer emanzipatorischen Gesellaschaftstheorie bei Marx und Habermas, FreiburgMünchen, Karl Albert, 1985.
1986
1172.
1173.
Aboulafia M., Habermas und Mead: Über Universalität und Individualität?, in Joas H.,
Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 406-432.
Alexy R., Theorie der Grundrechte, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986.
76
1174.
1175.
1176.
1177.
1178.
1179.
1180.
1181.
1182.
1183.
1184.
1185.
1186.
Angehrn E., Krise Der Vernunft: Neuere Beitrage Zur Diagnose Und Kritik Der Moderne,
in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXXIII, 1986, pp. 161-209.
Apel K.O., Grenzen der Diskursethik? Versuch einer Zwischenbilanz, in «Zeitschrift für
philosophische Forschung», XL, 1, 1986, pp. 3-31; tr. it. Limiti dell’etica del discorso?
Tentativo di un bilancio intermedio, in Bartolomei Vasconcelos T., Calloni M. (eds.),
Etiche in dialogo. Tesi sulla razionalità pratica, Genova, Marietti, 1990, pp. 28-58.
Arens E., H.J. Höhn, Kirche und kommunikatives Handeln. Studien zur Theologie und Praxis der Kirche in der Auseinandersetzung mit den Sozialtheorien von
Niklas Luhmann und Jürgen Habermas, in «Theologische Revue», 82, 1986, pp.
212-214.
Arnason, J.P., Die Moderne als Projekt im Spannungsfeld, in Joas H., Honneth A.
(eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 278-326; tr. en. Modernity as Project and as Field of Tension, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays
on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press,
1991, pp. 181-213.
Ashworth M.R., Habermas and Postmodern Architecture, in «Australian Journal of
Art», V, 1, 1986, pp. 113-119.
Beier F.J., Die Körpernatur des Menschen als Grenze für einen objektivistischen Naturbegriff:
ein “blinder Fleck” in der Erkenntnistheorie von Jürgen Habermas, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung und Praxis», XXXVII, 4, 1986, pp.
446-464.
Benhabib S., The Critique of Functionalist Reason, in Id., Critique, Norm and Utopia. A
study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York, Columbia University Press,
1986, pp. 224-278.
Benhabib S., Toward a Communicative Ethics and Autonomy, in Id., Critique, Norm and
Utopia. A study of the Foundations of Critical Theory, New York, Columbia University
Press, 1986, pp. 279-353.
Bernstein R.J., The Rage Against Reason, in «Philosophy and Literature», 10, 1986;
repr. in Bernstein R.J., New Constellation. The Ethical Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992, pp. 31-56; tr. it. La collera contro la
ragione, in Id., La nuova costellazione. Gli orizzonti etico-politici del moderno/postmoderno,
Milano, Feltrinelli, 1994, pp. 39-59.
Bessonov B.N., The Frankfurt School and the Social Conceptions of the Contemporary Petty-Bourgeois Left-Radical Movement, in «Soviet Studies in Philosophy», XXIV, 4, 1986,
pp. 3-46.
Bettini R., L’ultimo Habermas: appunti sulla teoria dell’agire comunicativo e della relativa
razionalità, in «Sociologia e ricerca sociale», VII, 19, 1986, pp. 143-149.
Blakeley Th. J., Lukács and the Frankfurt School in the Soviet Union, in «Studies in Soviet Thought», 31, 1986, pp. 47-51.
Bohman J.F., Formal Pragmatics and Social Criticism: The Philosophy of Language and
Critique of Ideology in Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action , in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XII, 4, 1986, pp. 331-353.
1187.
1188.
1189.
1190.
1191.
1192.
1193.
1194.
1195.
1196.
1197.
1198.
1199.
1200.
1201.
77
Bohn C., Über die Einheit der Formen der Kommunikation. Kommunikation und Handlung bei Habermas und Luhmann, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Münster, Liberación, 1986,
pp. 67-74.
Bouchindhomme C., Introduction, in Habermas J., Morale et communication. Conscience
morale et activité communicationnelle, Paris, Cerf, 1986.
Bovone L., Teorie della quotidianità: ricerca di senso o negazione di senso?, in «Studi di
sociologia», XXIV, 1986, pp. 20-36.
Boyne R., The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The British Journal of Sociology»,
XXXVII, 4, 1986, pp. 599-602
Brumlik M., Jürgen Habermas und die kulturkritische Linke, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger
F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
Münster, Liberación, 1986, pp. 15-23.
Cloots A., Een inleiding in het denken van E. Levinas, L. Wittgenstein, A. Whitehead en J.
Habermas, Amersfoort, Acco, 1986.
Cortese, A. J., Habermas and Kohlberg: morality, justice and rationality, in «Current Perspectives in Social Theory», 7, 1986, pp. 141-156.
Costantineau P., L’Étique par-delà la sémantique et la pragmatique, in «Critique», XL,
475, 1986, pp. 1210-1224.
Cotesta V., Riferimento e Verità, in «Aquinas: Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia»,
29, 1986, pp. 465-502.
Danielzyk R., Volz F.R., Statt einer Einleitung, Danielzyk R., Volz F.R. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Münster,
Liberación, 1986, pp. 5-13.
Degenaar J.J., Values Within The Language Game of Philosophy, in «South African
Journal of Philosophy», V, 1986, pp. 103-110.
Dews P., Editor’s Introduction, in J. Habermas, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with
Jürgen Habermas (AaS), ed. by P. Dews, London-New York, Verso, 1986, pp. 1-32.
Döbert R., Wider die Vernachlässigung des Inhalts in den Moraltheorien von Kohlberg und
Habermas. Implikationen für die Relativismus/UniversalismusKontroverse, in Edelstein W.,
Nunner-Winkler G. (eds.), Zur Bestimmung der Moral. Philosophische und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Moralforschung, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 86-125.
Dreyfus H., Rabinow P., Habermas et Foucault. Qu’est-ce que l’âge d’homme?, in «Critique», 471-472, 1986, pp. 857-872.
Dux G., Kommunikative Vernunft und Interesse. Zur Rekonstruktion der normativen Ordnung in egalitär und herrschaftlich organisierten Gesellschaften, in Honneth A., Joas H.
(eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zur J. Habermas? ?Theorie des Kommunikativen
Handelns?, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 110-143; tr. en. n Communicative
Reason and Interess: On the Reconstructiton of the Normative Order in Societies Sstructured by
Egualitarianism or Domination, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative Action:
Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT
Press, 1991, pp. 74-96.
78
1202.
1203.
1204.
1205.
1206.
1207.
1208.
1209.
1210.
1211.
1212.
1213.
1214.
1215.
1216.
Dworkin R., Law’s Empire, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1986.
Ebeling H., Heidegger und Habermas. Zukunftsformen der Philosophie, in AA.VV., Heidegger. Editorial, in «Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Philosophie», VIII, 2, 1986, pp. 6774.
Eder K., Prozedurale Rationalität: Moderne Rechtsentwicklung jenseits von formaler Rationalisierung, in «Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie», 7, 1986, pp. 1-30.
Eicher P., Die Botschaft von der Versöhnung und die Theorie kommunikativen Handelns,
in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns, Münster, Liberación, 1986, pp. 124-156; repr. in Arens E.
(ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 199-223; tr.
it. Il messaggio della riconciliazione e la teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas e la teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria dell’agire
comunicativo, Brescia, Queriniana, 1992, pp. 151-176; tr. fr. Le message de la réconciliation et la théorie de l’agir communicationnel, in E. Arens (ed.), Habermas et la théologie, Paris, Cerf, 1993, pp. 75-102.
Ferry J.M., Habermas et le modèle de la discussion, in «Social Science Information»,
XXV, 1, 1986, pp. 29-52.
Ferry J.M., L’anthropologie philosophique: un héritage des métaphysiques humanistes pour les
sciences humaines, in «Revue de Synthèse», CVII, 4, 1986, pp. 361-384.
Fjelland R., Natur und instrumentelle Vernunft. Bemerkungen zu Marcuse, Habermas und
Apel, in Böhler D., Nordenstam T., Skirbekk G. (eds.), Die pragmatische Wende.
Sprachspielpragmatik oder Transzendentalpragmatik?, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986,
pp. 239-258.
Franceschelli O., Modernità e reificazione. L’agire comunicativo nel pensiero di Habermas,
in «Sociologia», XX, 1, 1986, pp. 3-22.
Francesconi R., The implications of Habermas’s theory of legitimation for rhetorical criticism,
in «Communication Monographs», LIII, 1, 1986, pp. 16-35.
Fraser N., Movimientos Sociales Vs Burocracias Disciplinarias: Los Discursos De Las
Necesidades Sociales, in «Dianoia», 32, 1986, pp. 167-202.
Frisby D., Sayer D., Society, London-New York, Routledge & K. Paul, 1986.
Funk N., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Philosophical Review», XCV, 2,
1986, pp. 269-272.
García Marzá V.D., Jürgen Habermas: una alternativa ética: A propósito de
“Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln”, in «Pensamiento. Revista de
investigación e información filosófica», XLII, 168, 1986, pp. 459-467.
García Marzá V.D., Posibilidad actual y desarrollo de una ética comunicativa en la obra de
J. Habermas, in «Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciència», 9-10, 1986, pp. 405-414.
Gephart W., Sozialarbeit zwischen System und Lebenswelt: über die Chancen menschlichen
Handelns in den Sozialstrukturen der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit, in Elting A. (ed.), Menschliches
Handeln und Sozialstruktur : Leonhard Lowinski zum 60. Geburtstag, Opladen, Leske &
Budrich, 1986, pp. 255-270.
1217.
1218.
1219.
1220.
1221.
1222.
1223.
1224.
1225.
1226.
1227.
1228.
1229.
1230.
1231.
1232.
79
González Soriano J.A., Habermas: razón y revolución, in «Logos: Anales del
Seminario de Metafísica», 21, 1986, pp. 203-218.
Görtzen R., Habermas’ Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Eine bibliographische
Auswahl, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen
Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986,
pp. 455-518.
Grady H., Wells S., Toward a Rhetoric of Intersubjectivity: Introducing Jürgen Habermas,
in «Journal of Advanced Composition», 6, 1985-86, pp. 33-47.
Grohs D., Spuren der Vernunft in der Geschichte’. Der Weg von Jürgen Habermas zur
“Theorie de kommunikativen Handelns” im Schatten Max Webers, in «Geschichte und
Gesellschaft», XII, 4, 1986, pp. 443-476; repr. in Grohs D., Anthropologische Dimensionen der Geschichte, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1992, pp. 190-233.
Grondin J., De Heidegger à Habermas, in «Les études philosophiques», 1 (‘Heidegger’), 1986, pp. 15-31.
Grondin J., Rationalité et agir communicationnel chez Habermas, in «Critique», 464-465,
1986, pp. 40-59.
Groothoff H-H., La importancia de la ética del discurso de Jürgen Habermas para la
pedagogía, in «Revista de Educación», 280, 1986, pp. 81-103.
Haarscher G., Perelman and Habermas, in «Law and Philosophy», V, 3, 1986, pp.
331-342.
Harden I., Lewis N., The Noble Lie: The British Constitution and the Rule of Law,
London, Hutchinson, 1986.
Henrich D., Was ist Metaphysik, was Moderne? Thesen gegen Jürgen Habermas, in «Merkur», 448, 40, 1986, pp. 494-508; repr. in Henrich D., Konzepte . Essays zur Philosophie in der Zeit, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1987, pp. 11-43.
Herf J., Observations on the Spiritual Situation of the Age, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«American Journal of Sociology», XCI, 4, 1986, pp. 985-988.
Heyer Caput M., J. Habermas. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Zwölf Verlesungen, in «Filosofia», XXXVII, 2, 1986, pp. 167-**.
Hildebrand K., Das Zeitalter der Tyrannen, in « Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung »,
31.7.1986; repr. in Kühnl R. (ed.), Streit ums Geschichtsbild. Die “Historiker-Debatte”.
Darstellung, Dokumentation, Kritik , Köln, Pahl-Rugenstein, 1987, pp. 56-61.
Hohendahl P.U., Habermas’ Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 69, 1986, pp. 49-65.
Honneth A., Diskursethik und implizites Gerechtigkeitskomzept. Eine Diskussionsbemerkung, in W. Kuhlmann (ed.), Moralität und Sittlichkeit. Das Problem Hegels und die Diskursethik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhkamp, 1986, pp. 183-193; repr. in Angehrn E., Lohmann G. (eds.), Ethik und Marx. Moralkritik und normative Grandlagen der Marxschen
Theorie, Königstein, Hain Verlag bei Athenäum, 1986, pp. 268-274; tr. es. La ética
discursiva y su concepto implícito de justicia, in Apel K.O., Cortina A., De Zan J.,
Michelini D., Etica comunicativa y Democracia, Barcelona, Crítica, 1991, pp. 164-174
Hoy D.C., Power, Repression, Progress: Foucault, Lukes and the Frankfurt School, in Id.
(ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986.
80
1233.
1234.
1235.
1236.
1237.
1238.
1239.
1240.
1241.
1242.
1243.
1244.
1245.
1246.
1247.
Husson Ch., Expanding the Legal Vocabulary: The Challenge Posed by the Deconstruction
and Defense of Law, in «Yale Law Journal», 95, 1986, pp. 969-991.
Ingram D., Foucault and the Frankfurt School: A Discourse On Nietzsche, Power And
Knowledge, in «Praxis International», VI, 3, 1986, pp. 311-327.
Joas H., Die unglückliche Ehe von Hermeneutik und Funktionalismus, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 144-176; tr. en. The Unhappy Marriage of Hermeneutics and Functionalism, in «Praxis International», VIII, 1
(Current Debates in Critical Social Theory: An Exchange on ‘The Theory of
Communicative Action”, 1988, pp. 34-51; repr. in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.),
Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action,
Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 97-118; tr. es. El infeliz casamiento de la hermenéutica
y el funcionalismo, in Id., Pragmatismo y teoría de la sociedad, Madrid, CIS/Siglo XXI,
1998, pp. 167-198.
John I.D., “The scientist” as role model for “the psychologist”, in «Australian Psychologist», XXI, 2, 1986, pp. 219-240.
Kearney R., Modern Movements in European Philosophy, Manchester, Manchester
University Press, 1986.
Kennedy E., Carl Schmitt und die “Frankfurter Schule”: deutsche Liberalismuskritik im
20. Jahrhundert, in «Geschichte und Gesellschaft», XII, 3, 1986, pp. 380-419.
Kern L., Von Habermas zu Rawls: Praktischer Diskurs und Vertragsmodell im entscheidungslogischen Vergleich, in Kern L., Müller H.P. (eds.), Gerechtigkeit, Diskurs oder
Markt? Die neuen Ansätze in der Vertragstheorie, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag,
1986, pp. 83-95.
Kierans K., On The Limits of Contemporary Reflection On Freedom: An Analysis of
Marxist And Existentialist Responses To Hegel, in «Dionysius», 10, 1986, pp. 85-128.
Kimmerle G., Verwerfungen: Vergleichende Studien zu Adorno und Habermas, Tübingen, Gehrke, 1986.
Kimmerle H., Universalitei “ voor ons” – Over de Tentatieve Universalistische Cultuurtheorie van Max Weber en Habermas’ Interpretatie daarvan, in van Doorne F., Korthals M.
(eds.), Filosofie en maatschappijkritiek. In debat met Habermas, Meppel-Amsterdam,
Boom, 1986, pp. 611-627.
Knips I., Kommunikative Rationalität. Probleme eines diskurstheoretischen Zuganges zur
Moderne (Technologiediskussion), in «Widerspruch», VI, 1, 1986, pp. 49-60.
Komesaroff P.A., Habermas and the Positivism Dispute, in Id., Objectivity, Science and
Society. Interpreting Nature and Society in the Age of the Crisis of Science, London-New
York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986, pp. 76-92.
Korthals M., De ideale communicatiegemeenschap, in van Doorne F., Korthals M.
(eds.), Filosofie en maatschappijkritiek. In debat met Habermas, Meppel-Amsterdam,
Boom, 1986, pp. 54-70.
Korthals M., Inleiding, in van Doorne F., Korthals M. (eds.), Filosofie en maatschappijkritiek. In debat met Habermas, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1986, pp. 7-11.
Korthals M., Kritiek van de maatschappijkritische rede: De structuur van de maatschap-
1248.
1249.
1250.
1251.
1252.
1253.
1254.
1255.
1256.
1257.
1258.
1259.
1260.
1261.
1262.
1263.
81
pijkritiek van de Frankfurter Schule, Muiderberg, Coutinho, 1986.
Krüger H.P., Kommunikatives Handeln oder gesamtgesellschaftliche Kommunikationsweise,
in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’
“Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 216254; tr. en. Communicative Action or the Mode for Communication for Society as a Whole, in
Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 140-164.
Kuhlmann W., Philosophie und Rekonstruktive Wissenschaft. Bemerkungen zu J. Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XL, 2, 1986, pp. 224-234.
Kunneman, H., De waarheidstrechter. Een communicatietheoretisch perspectief op wetenschap
en samenleving, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1986.
Küsters G.W., Recht Der Kritik Oder Kritik Ohne Recht: Bemerkungen Zu Struktur,
Logik Und Widerspruch Von Habermas’ Werk, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XL, 1986, pp. 388-403.
Ladeur K.H., “Prozedurale Rationalität” - Steigerung der Legitimationsfähigkeit oder der
Leistungsfähigkeit des Rechtssystems?, in «Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie», VII, 2,
1986, pp. 265-274.
Laermans R., Het postmodernisties spook getemd? : Habermas’ herijking van het moderne
filosofiese vertoog, in «Krisis», VI, 1986, pp. 19-38.
Lenk H., Simon-Schaefer R., Wertende Vernunft als Sozialwissenschaft? Zur Kritik der
‘Kritischen’ Theorie, in Lenk H. (ed.), Zwischen Wissenschaftstheorie und Sozialwissenschaft,
Linkenbach A., Opake Gestalten des Denkens. Jürgen Habermas und die Rationalität
fremder Lebensformen, München, Wilhelm Fink, 1986.
Luijk H.J.L., Met Habermas kijken naar een bedrijfsschandaal : de Manville-affaire, in «Filosofie & praktijk», VII, 1986 pp. 16-35.
Maus I., Rechtstheorie und politische Theorie im Industriekapitalismus, München, Wilhelm Fink, 1986.
McCarthy Th., Philosophical Foundations of Political Theology; Kant, Peukert and the
Frankfurt School, in Rouner L.S. (ed.), Civil Religion and Politcal Theology, Notre Dame,
IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 1986, pp. 23-40.
Mertens J., Communicatief en strategisch handelen: inleiding tot de handelingstheorie van Habermas, Muiderberg, Coutinho, 1986.
Mertens Th., Habermas en Searle: Kritische Beschouwingen Bij De Theorie Van Het
Communicatieve Handelen, in «Tijdschrift voor Filosofie», 48, 1986, pp. 66-93.
Misgeld D., Modernity and Social Science. Habermas and Rorty, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XII, 3, 1986, pp. 355-370.
Muguerza Carpintier J., La obediencia al Derecho y el imperativo de la disidencia (Una
intrusión en un debate), in «Sistema», 70, 1986, pp. 27-40.
Mullen T., Constitutional Protection of Human Rights, in Campbell T., Goldberg D.,
McLean S., Mullen T. (eds.), Human Rights: From Rhetoric to Reality, Oxford, Basil
Blackwell, 1986.
82
1264.
1265.
1266.
1267.
1268.
1269.
1270.
1271.
1272.
1273.
1274.
1275.
1276.
1277.
1278.
Müller H., Kritische Theorie und Revolutionärer Humanismus, in «Zeitschrift für interdisziplinäre Wissenschaft», XLI, 2, 1986, pp. 153-163.
Münch R., Differenzierung, Rationalisierung, Interpenetration: die Herausbildung der modernen Gesellschaft, in Reimann H. (ed.), Soziologie und Ethnologie: zur Interaktion zwischen
zwei Disziplinen. Beiträge zu einem Symposium aus Anlaß des 80. Geburtstages von Wilhelm
Emil Mühlmann, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1986, pp. 48-72.
Nacke B., Normenbegründung und politische Praxis. Orientierungshilfe durch herrschaftsfreien Diskurs bei Jürgen Habermas und philosophischen Diskurs bei Willi Oelmüller?, Essen,
Die Blaue Eule, 1986.
Nelson J.L., Television and its Audiences as Dimensions of Being: Critical Theory and Phenomenology, in «Human Studies», 9, 1986, pp. 55-69.
Nolte P., Soziologische Theorie und Geschichte. Was können Historiker von Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns” lernen?, in «Geschichte und Gesellschaft»,
XII, 4, 1986, pp. 530-547.
Nordquist J., Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, 1 – Jürgen Habermas, A Santa Cruz,
Reference & Research, 1986.
Pantham Th., Habermas’ Practical Discourse and Gandhi’s Satyagraha, in «Praxis International», VI, 2, 1986, pp. 190-205.
Phillips D., Toward a Just Social Order, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1986.
Piché C., Entre la Philosophie et la Science: le reconstructionnisme hermeneutique de J. Habermas, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXV, 1, 1986, pp. 119-142.
Räder H.G., Wakenhut R., Militär und der Eigensinn der Lebenswelt: gesellschaftstheoretische Überlegungen zum Phänomen der moralischen Segmentation zwischen ‘zivilen’ und ‘militärischen’ Situationen, in Vogt W.R. (ed.), Militär als Gegenkultur: Streitkräfte im Wandel der
Gesellschaft. 1, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 1986, pp. 89-108.
Raes K., Legalisation, Communication and Strategy: A Critique of Habermas’ Approach to
Law, in «Journal of Law and Society», 13, 1986, 183-206.
Raulet G., Jürgen Habermas et le discours philosophique de la postmodernité, in «Allemagnes d’aujourd’hui», 94-95, 1986, pp. 73-97 ; repr. in Raulet G. (ed.), Le siège de
la Raison ou une philosophie entre plusieurs chaises. Bilan de la philosophie allemande actuelle, in
«Allemagnes d’aujourd’hui», 99-100, 1987; tr. it. Habermas e il discorso filosofico della
postmodernità, in «Intersezioni», VIII, 4, 1988; tr. de. Habermas und der philosophische
Diskurs der Postmoderne, in G. Schmid-Noerr (ed.), Metamorphosen der Aufklärung, Tübingen, Diskord, 1988; tr. en. Habermas and the philosophical discourse of postmodernity, in
«Thesis Eleven», 23, 1989.
Redner H., The Ends of Philosophy, Totowa, Rowman & Allanheld, 1986.
Renk H., Recht als Ausdruck moralisch-praktischer Vernunft oder als Mittel systemischer
Steuerung? Zum Habermasschen Verrechtlichungskonzept, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F.
(eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
Requejo Coll L.F., Estado social y teoría critica, in «Revista de Estudios Políticos»,
54, 1986, pp. 167-187.
1279.
1280.
1281.
1282.
1283.
1284.
1285.
1286.
1287.
1288.
1289.
1290.
1291.
1292.
1293.
1294.
83
Ricoeur P.,Taylor G.H. (eds.), Lectures On Ideology and Utopia, New York, Columbia University Press, 1986.
Roderick R., Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory, Basingstoke-London,
MacMillan, 1986.
Roderick R., Habermas und das Problem der Rationalität, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F.
(eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns,
Roderick R., The Theory of Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Political Theory», XIV, 1, 1986, pp. 152-156
Rolshausen C., Nichts als Soziologie, in Papcke S. (ed.), Ordnung und Theorie: Beiträge
zur Geschichte der Soziologie in Deutschland, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftl. Buchges., 1986,
pp. 113-144.
Rose M., Habermas and Postmodern Architecture, in «Journal: Australian Journal of
Art», V, 1, 1986, pp. 113-119.
Rothberg D.J., Rationality and Religion in Habermas’ Recent Work: Some Remarks Between Critical Theory and The Phenomenology of Religion, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XII, 3, 1986, pp. 221-243.
Rüb M., Konsensus oder Different? Haben sich Jürgen Habermas und Jean-François Lyotard
(noch) etwas zu sagen? Versuch eines Vergleichs, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Münster,
Liberación, 1986, pp. 87-99.
Rusconi G.E., Introduzione all’edizione italiana, in J. Habermas, Teoria dell’agire comunicativo (TKH), Bologna, Il Mulino, 1986, pp. 9-41.
Schatzki Th.R., The Rationalization of Meaning and Understanding: Davidson and Habermas, in «Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and
Philosophy of Science», 69, 1986, pp. 51-79.
Schöps E., Die Theorie der Moderne und ihre Indifferenzen gegenüber der Arbeitswelt, in
Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Münster, Liberación, 1986, pp. 42-50.
Seel M., Die zwei Bedeutungen ‘kommunikativer’ Rationalität. Bemerkungen zu Habermas’
Kritik der Pluralen Vernunft, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln.
Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 53-72; tr. en. The Two Meanings of ‘Communicative’ Rationality, in
Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 36-48.
Seel M., Eine zweite Moderne? Zu Jürgen Habermas: “Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne”, in «Merkur», 40, 1986, pp. 245-251.
Sensat J. jr., Recasting Marx. Habermas’s Proposals, in Buczkowski P., Klawiter A.
(eds.), Theories of Ideology and Ideology of Theories, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1986, pp. 123146.
Shapiro G., Gadamer, Habermas And The Death of Art, in «British Journal of Aesthetics», 26, 1986, pp. 39-47.
Simpson L., On Habermas and Particularity: Is There Room for Race and Gender on the
84
1295.
1296.
1297.
1298.
1299.
1300.
1301.
1302.
1303.
1304.
1305.
1306.
1307.
1308.
1309.
Glassy Plains of Ideal Discourse?, in «Praxis International», VI, 3, 1986, pp. 328-340.
Smith S.B., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», XCVI, 3, 1986, pp. 638641.
Söllner A., Jenseits von Carl Schmitt: wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Richtigstellung zur politischen
Theorie im Umkreis der “Frankfurter Schule”, in «Geschichte und Gesellschaft», XII, 4, 1986,
pp. 502-529.
Süsske R., Divide et Impera. Phänomenologisches Vagabundieren im Gehäuse der “Theorie
des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Danielzyk R., Rüdiger F. (eds.), Vernunft der Moderne? Zu Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Münster, Liberación, 1986,
pp. 87-99.
Taylor Ch., Die Motive der Verfahrensethik, in W. Kuhlmann (ed.), Moralität und Sittlichkeit. Das Problem Hegels und die Diskursethik, Frankfurt a.M., 1986, pp. 101-135.
Taylor Ch., Sprache und Gesellschaft, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives
Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 35-52; tr. en. Language and Society, in Joas H., Honneth
A. (eds.), Communicative Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative
Action, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1991, pp. 23-35.
Taylor Ch., Sprache und Gesellschaft, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives
Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 35-52.
Torpey J., Ethics and Critical Theory: From Horkheimer to Habermas, in «Telos: A
Quarterly Journal of Critical Though: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought»,
69, 1986, pp. 68-86.
Utz A.F., Legitimität und Regierbarkeit, in «Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie», 72,
4, 1986, pp. 523-530.
van Reijen W., Philosophie als Kritik: Einführung in die Kritische Theorie, Konigstein,
Athenaum, 1986.
Vromen J.J., De machinale economie in de kritische theorie, in van Doorne F., Korthals
M. (eds.), Filosofie en maatschappijkritiek. In debat met Habermas, Meppel-Amsterdam,
Boom, 1986, pp. 130-144.
Wachterhauser B.R. (ed.), Hermeneutics and Modern Philosophy, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1986.
Waldenfels B., Division ou dispersion de la raison?, in «Les études philosophiques», 4,
1986, pp. 473-484.
Weiß J., Die ‘Bindungseffekte’ kommunikativen Handelns. Einige skeptische Bemerkungen,
in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’
“Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986, pp. 433454.
Wellbery D.B., Nietzsche, Art, Postmodernism. A Reply to Habermas, Jürgen, in «Stanford Italian Review», VI, 1-2, 1986, pp. 77-104.
Wellmer A., Ethik und Dialog. Elemente des moralischen Urteils bei Kant und in der Dis-
1310.
1311.
1312.
1313.
1314.
1315.
1316.
1317.
1318.
85
kurs-ethik, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1986.
West P.L., Towards a Christian theology of work: A critical appropriation of the thought of
Juergen Habermas, Cambridge, University of Cambridge, 1986.
White S.K., Foucault’s challenge to critical theory, in «The American Political Science
Review», 80, 1986, 419-432.
White S.K., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas; Theorie des Kommunikatives Handeln.
Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der functionalistischen Vernunft, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The
Journal of Politics», XLVIII, 1, 1986, pp. 236-239.
Wiggins O.P., Michael A.S., Techniques and Persons: Habermas Reflections on Medical
Ethics, in «Human Studies», IX, 4, 1986, pp. 365-377.
Wilson J., Observations on “The Spiritual Situation of the Age”: Contemporary
German Perspectives, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Review of Religious Research»,
XXVIII, 3, 1987, pp. 287-289.
Wilson H.T., Critical theory’s critique of social science: Episodes in a changing problematic
from Adorno to Habermas, Part I, in «Journal: History of European Ideas», VII, 3,
1986, pp. 127-147.
Wilson H.T., Critical theory’s critique of social science: Episodes in a changing problematic
from Adorno to Habermas, Part II, in «Journal: History of European Ideas», VII, 3,
1986, pp. 287-302.
Wuthnow R., Sociology and the Pursuit of Rationality: The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XV, 2, 1986, pp. 194-197
Zabalardo García Muro J.L., La Fundamentación teórica de la razón práctica en ele
programa de la pragmática universal de Jürgen Habermas, in «Zona abierta», XLI-XLII, 13, 1986-1987, pp. 221-257.
1987
1319.
1320.
1321.
1322.
1323.
1324.
Adamson W., Gramsci and the Politics of Civil Society, in «Praxis International», VII,
3-4, 1987, pp. 320-339.
Addario N., Dalla teoria dell’agire comunicativo alla teoria della società?, in «Rassegna
Italiana di Sociologia», XXVIII, 3, 1987, pp. 456-463.
Alanen Y.O., Räkköläinen V., Till en mera integrerad psykiatri—olika terapiformer i teoretiskt och kliniskt perspektiv, in «Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidsskrift», XLI, 4, 1987, pp.
251-259.
Alexy R., Rechtssystem und Praktische Vernunft, in ««Rechtstheorie», XVIII, 2, 1987,
pp. 405-419.
Alford C.F., Habermas, Post-Freudian Psychoanalysis, and the End of Individual, in
«Theory, Culture and Society», IV, 1, 1987, pp. 3-29.
Álvarez Gómez M.E., Sobre la acción comunicativa en J. Habermas, in «Cuadernos
salmantinos de filosofía», XIV, 1987, pp. 37-54.
86
1325.
1326.
1327.
1328.
1329.
1330.
1331.
1332.
1333.
1334.
1335.
1336.
1337.
1338.
1339.
1340.
1341.
1342.
Apel K.O., Fallibilismus, Konsenstheorie er Wahrheit und Leztbegründung, in Forum für
Philosophie Bad Homburg (ed.), Philosophie und Begründung, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1987, pp. 116-211; tr. it. Fallibilismo, teoria della verità come consenso e fondazione
ultima, in Id., Discorso, verità, responsabilità. Le ragioni della fondazione: con Habermas contro
Habermas, Milano, Guerini, 1997, pp. 65-168.
Apel K.O., Sprachliche Bedeutung, Wahrheit und normative Gültigkeit, in «Archivio di
Filosofia, 55, 1987, pp. 51-88; tr. it. Significato illocutivo e validità normativa, in Id., Discorso, verità, responsabilità. Le ragioni della fondazione: con Habermas contro Habermas, Milano, Guerini, 1997, pp. 169-188.
Augstein R. (ed.), Historikerschreit: Die Dokumentation der Kontroverse um die Einzigartigkeit der nationalsozialistischen Judenvernichtung, Zürich, Piper, 1987.
Bauer K., Der Denkweg von Jürgen Habermas zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns.
Grundlagen einer neuen Fundamentaltheologie?, Regensburg, S. Roderer Verlag, 1987.
Baxter H., System and Life-World in Habermas’s “Theory of Communicative Action”, in
«Theory and Society», XVI, 1, 1987, pp. 39-86.
Beiner R., On the Disunity of Theory and Practice, in «Praxis International», VII, 1,
1988, pp. 34-51.
Benhabib S., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «The Journal of Philosophy», LXXXIV, 12, 1987, pp. 752-757.
Bengoa Ruiz de Anzúa J., Los actos de habla y la teoría de la acción comunicativa según J.
Habermas, in «Letras de Deusto», XVII, 38, 1987, pp. 27-40.
Bernstein J.M., The Politics of Fulfilment and Transfiguration, in «Radical Philosophy:
A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 47, 1987, pp. 21-29.
Bertalan P., Társadalmi rendszer és életvilág. Jürgen Habermas elmélete a „kommunikatív
cselekvés”-ről, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 2, 1987, pp. 225-291.
Böhler D., Du Paradigme de la conscience à celui de la communication, in Janicaud D.
(ed.), Les pouvoirs de la science. Un siècle de prise de conscience, Paris, J. Vrin, 1987, pp.
201-217.
Boladeras Cucurella M., La teoría de la acción comunicativa de J. Habermas, in «Taula:
Quaderns de pensament», 7-8, 1987, pp. 99-112.
Bondolfi A., Lo sviluppo morale dell’individuo e delle istituzioni sociali nella scuola di. Habermas, in «Rassegna di teologia», XXVIII, 3, 1987, pp. 251-269.
Borges B.I., Os Sentidos da Critica, in «Educacao e Filosofia», II, 3, 1987, pp. 61-79.
Bouchindhomme C., Une flèche dans le cœur du temps présent, in «Les Cahiers de Philosophie», 3 – Habermas, l’activité communicationnelle, 1987, pp. 163-183.
Bové P.A., The Function of the Literary Critic in the Postmodern World, in Buttigieg J.A.
(ed.), Criticism without Boundaries. Directions and Crosscurrents in Postmodern Critical Theory, Notre Dame, IN, University of Notre Dame Press, 1987, pp. 23-50.
Braaten J., Rational Consensual Procedure: Argumentation Or Weighted Averaging, in
«Synthese: An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science», 71, 1987, pp. 347-354.
Brand A., Ethical Rationalization and ‘Juridification’: Habermas’ Critical Legal Theory, in
1343.
1344.
1345.
1346.
1347.
1348.
1349.
1350.
1351.
1352.
1353.
1354.
1355.
1356.
1357.
1358.
1359.
1360.
1361.
87
«Australian Journal of Law and Society», 4, 1987, pp. 103-127.
Brand A., Ethical Rationalization and “Juridification”: Habermas’ Critical Legal Theory,
in «Australian Journal of Law and Society», 4, 1987, pp. 103-127.
Brod H., The “spirit” of Hegelian politics: public opinion and legislative debate from Hegel to
Habermas, in Stillman P.G., Hegel’s philosophy of Spirit, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press,
1987, pp. 124-144.
Brown D., Doctrine of Salvation. The social context. Salvation: Marx to Habermas, in Id.,
Continental Philosophy and Modern Theology. An Engagement, Oxford-New York, Basil
Blackwell, 1987, pp. 139-150.
Burbules N.C., Ideology Critique and the Philosophy of Education, Philosophy of Education,
in «Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society»,
43, 1987, pp. 47-58.
Burger H., Subjektnocentrirana filozofija i komunikativna intersubjektivnost, in «Filozofska Istrazivanja», 23, 1987, pp. 1365-1381.
Calcaterra M.R., Il dibattito su Habermas nei Paesi anglo-sassoni, in «Paradigmi», V, 15,
1987, pp. 581-594.
Calcaterra M.R., Oggettività e verità della scienza: Habermas e Peirce, in «Il pensiero»,
XXVIII, 1987, pp. 67-88.
Cascardi A.J., Genealogies of Modernism, in «Philosophy and Literature», 11, 1987,
pp. 207-225.
Ceppa L., J. Habermas, Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in «L’indice» , IV, 1, 1987,
p. 35.
Collins R., Habermas and the Search for Reason, in «Semiotica», LXIV, 1-2, 1987, pp.
157-169.
Couture T., Habermas, Rorty and the Purpose of Philosophy, in «Eidos: The Canadian
Graduate Journal of Philosophy», 6, 1987, pp. 53-69.
Crespi F., Social action and the ambivalence of communication: a critique of Habermas theory,
in «European journal of communication», II, 4, 1987, pp. 415-425.
Crespi F., Strutture della comunicazione e azione sociale nell’ultimo Habermas, in «Stato e
mercato», XX, 1987, pp. 281-294.
Cunigo G., Errore e verità nel prospettivismo comunicativo di J. Habermas, in Caracciolo
A. (ed.), Il problema dell’errore nelle concezioni pluriprospettivistiche della verità, Genova, Il
Melangolo, 1987, pp. 186-289.
Dal Lago A., Lo spettro della teoria, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», XXVIII, 3,
1987, pp. 443-455.
Dallmayr F.R., The Discourse of Modernity: Hegel and Habermas, in «Journal of Philosophy», 84, 1987, pp. 682-692.
Diner D. (ed.), Ist der Nationalsozialismus Geschichte? Zu Historisierung und Historikerstreit, Frankfurt a.M., Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1987.
Donati P.P., Jürgen Habermas e l’equivoca forza dei mondi vitali ‘razionalizzati’, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», XXVIII, 2, 1987, pp. 299-307.
Eder K., Die Autorität des Rechts: Eine soziale Kritik prozeduraler Rationalität, in «Zeit-
88
1362.
1363.
1364.
1365.
1366.
1367.
1368.
1369.
1370.
1371.
1372.
1373.
1374.
1375.
1376.
1377.
1378.
1379.
1380.
schrift für Rechtssoziologie», 8, 1987, pp. 193-230.
Erler G., Muller R.D., Rose Th., Ueberschär G.R., Wette W., Geschichtswende?
Entsorgungsversuche zur deutschen Geschichte, Freiburg, Dreisam Verlag, 1987.
Ewald F., Habermas: dialectique de la raison moderne. Portrait, in «Le Magazine littéraire», 242, 5.1987.
Febbrajo A., Tre interpretazioni della giuridificazione, in «Politica del Diritto», 1, 1987,
pp. 25-40.
Ferrara A., A Critical of Habermas’s Consensus Theory of Truth, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XIII, 1, 1987, pp. 39-67; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
1994, pp. 250-272.
Ferrara A., La razionalità procedurale come terza via tra metafisica e nichilismo, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», XXVIII, 2, 1987, pp. 291-299.
Ferry J.M., Habermas, l’étique de la communication, in «Les Cahiers de Philosophie», 3
– Habermas, l’activité communicationnelle, 1987, pp. 59-100.
Ferry J.M., Habermas. L’étique de la communication, Paris, Presses Universitaire de
France, 1987.
Fleming M., Force and Consent: Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in Department of Political Science, University of Western Ontario, 1.1987.
Fleming M., Habermas on Foucault or Defense of Enlightenment, in Canadian Political
Science Association Meeting, Hamilton, Ontario, 6.1987.
Foisy S., Entre le Chef-D’oeuvre de la Critique et le Bad Painting de la Philosophie, in «La
Petite Revue de Philosophie», 9, 1987, pp. 25-53.
Gallagher S., Hermeneutics and education, Albany (NY), SUNY Press, 1992.
Gamm G., Eindimensionale Kommunikation. Vernunft und Rhetorik in Jürgen Habermas’
“Deutung der Moderne”, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1987.
Giurlanda P., Gadamer and Habermas – The Debate Over Doubt, in Id., Faith and
Knowledge: A Critical Inquiry, Lanham (MD), University Press of America, 1987, pp.
98-128.
Giurlanda P., Habermas’ Critique of Gadamer: Does It Stand Up?, in «International
Philosophical Quarterly», XXVII, 1, 1987, pp. 33-41.
Gomila Benejam A., ¿Qué filosofía? El debate entre Habermas y Rorty, in «Contextos»,
10, 1987, pp. 117-141.
Greven M.Th., Power and Communication in Habermas and Luhmann: A critique of
Communicative Reductionism, in Parekh B., Pantham T. (eds.), Political Discourse: Explorations in Indian and Western Political Thought, New Delhi, Sage, 1987, pp. 179-193.
Grünbaum A., Die Epistemologie der Psychoanalyse bei Habermas, in Id., Psychoanalyse in
wissenschaftstheoretischer Sicht. Zum Werk Sigmund Freuds und seiner Rezeption, Konstanz,
Universitätsverlag, 1987, pp. 29-51.
Guariglia O., Razon practica e intereses de la accion, in «Dianoia», 33, 1987, pp. 53-68.
Haferkamp H., Autopoietisches soziales System oder konstruktives soziales Handeln? Zur
Ankunft der Handlungstheorie und zur Abweisung empirischer Forschung in Niklas Luh-
1381.
1382.
1383.
1384.
1385.
1386.
1387.
1388.
1389.
1390.
1391.
1392.
1393.
1394.
1395.
1396.
1397.
1398.
89
manns Systemtheorie, in Haferkamp H., Schmid M. (eds.), Sinn, Kommunikation und soziale Differenzierung. Beiträge zu Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
a.M., 1987, p. 51-88.
Hahn B., Schöttler P., Jürgen Habermas und das «ungetrübte Bewußtsein des Bruchs, in
Gestenberger H., Schmidt D. (eds.), Normalität oder Normalisierung? Geschichtwerkstätten und Faschismusanalyse, Münster, Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1987, pp. 170-177.
Healy P., Is Habermas’s Consensus Theory of Truth?, in «Irish Philosophical Journal»,
IV, 1987, pp. 145-152.
Heller A., Beyond Justice, New York, Basil Blackwell, 1987.
Henrich D., What is Metaphysics – What is Modernity? Twelve Theses agaist Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Konzepte, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1987, pp. 11-43; repr. in von
Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 291-319.
Hoffmann H. (ed.), Gegen den Versuch. Vergangenheit zu verbiegen. Eine Diskussion um
politische Kultur in der Bundesrepublik aus Anlaß der Frankfurter Römerberggespräche 1986,
Frankfurt a.M., Athenäum Verlag, 1987.
Holton R.J., The Idea of Crisis in Modern Society, in «The British Journal of Sociology», XXXVIII, 4, 1987, pp. 502–520.
Holzer H., Kommunikation oder Gesellschaftliche Arbeit. Zur Theorie des Kommunikativen
Handelns von Jürgen Habermas, Berlin-Ost, Akademie-Verlag, 1987.
How A.R., The Theory of Communicative Action, I. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», XVIII, 2, 1987, pp. 192-194.
Ingram D., Habermas and the Dialectic of Reason, New Haven-London, Yale University Press, 1987.
Ingram D., Philosophy and the Aesthetic Mediation of Life: Weber and Habermas on the
Paradox of Rationality, in «Philosophical Forum», 18, 1987, pp. 329-357.
Jacob A., Jürgen Habermas, Morale et Communication: Conscience morale et activité communicationnelle, in «L’Homme et la société», LXXXV, 3, 1987, p. 188.
Kiss G., Paradigmawechsel in der Kritischen Theorie: Jürgen Habermas’ intersubjektiver Ansatz, Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke, 1987.
Kodalle K.M., Versprachlichung des Sakralen? Zur religionsphilosophischen Auseinandersetzung mit J. Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XII, 1, 1987, pp. 39-66.
Koenis S., Over Enkele Problemen Bij De Interpretatie Van Sociaal-Filosofische Teksten,
in «Kennis en Methode», XI, 1987, pp. 272-284.
Korthals M., Niet Relativeren Maar Relateren, in «Kennis en Methode», XI, 1987,
pp. 387-396.
Kramer L.S., Habermas and the foundations of critical theory, in «History of European
Ideas», VIII, 6, 1987, pp. 762-763.
Kunneman H., Drie Sombere Argumenten Over De Toekomst Van De Sociale Wetenschappen, in «Kennis en Methode», XI, 1987, pp. 298-314.
Lakeland P.F., Ethics and Communicative Action: the Need for Critical Theory in Catholic
90
1399.
1400.
1401.
1402.
1403.
1404.
1405.
1406.
1407.
1408.
1409.
1410.
1411.
1412.
1413.
1414.
Social Teaching, in «Thought: Fordham University Quarterly», LXII, 1987, pp. 5973.
López Molina A.M., La crisis de la teoría del conocimiento en las «fases abandonadas de la
reflexión». Interpretación habermasiana, in «Logos. Anales del seminario de metafísica»,
XXII, 1987-1988, pp. 153-184.
Lötsch M., Thomas M., Soziologische Kontroversen um die Intelligenz heute, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XXXV, 8, 1987, pp. 692-702.
Luf G., Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Recht und Lebenswelt, in Mock E., Varga C.
(eds.), Rechtskultur - Denkkultur: Ergebnisse des ungarisch-österreichischen Symposiums der
internationalen Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 1987, Wiesbaden, Steiner,
1989, pp. 36-48.
Luhmann N., Die Richtigkeit soziologischer Theorie, in «Merkur», XIL, 455, 1987, pp.
36-49.
Lukes T.J., Science and the Revenge of Nature. Marcuse and Habermas by C.
Fred Alford, in «Political Theory», XV, 2, 1987, pp. 262-265.
Maestre Sánchez A., Las diferencias y relaciones entre Apel y Habermas, in «Zona
abierta», XLIII-XLIV, 4-9, 1987, pp. 113-138.
Manin B., On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. A Sketch of a Theory of Political Deliberation, in «Political Theory», XV, 3, 1987, pp. 338-368.
Martín Cebollero, J. B., Jürgen Habermas. Crítica de la emancipación humana desde una
perspectiva psicosocial, in «Clínica y análisis grupal», IX, 4, 46, 1987, pp. 530-538.
Maus I., Verrechtlichung, Entrechtlichung und der Funktionswandel von Institutionen, in
Göhler G. (ed.), Grundfragen der Theorie politischer Institutionen: Forschungsstand - Probleme - Perspektiven, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987, pp. 132-172.
McCarthy Th., Introduction, in J. Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity:
Twelve Lectures (PDM), Cambridge, MIT Press, 1987, pp. VII-XVII.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Ética y comunicación (Una discusión del pensamiento político de
Jürgen Habermas), in «Revista de estudios políticos», 56, 1987, pp. 7-64.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Habermas en “El Reino de los Fines”: Variaciones Sobre Un
Tema Kantiano, in «Dianoia», 33, 1987, pp. 17-52; repr. in Muguerza Carpintier J.,
Esplendor y miseria de la ética kantiana, Esperanza Guisin, Barcelona, 1988, pp. 97139.
Müller U., Hermeneutik als Modernitätskritik. Kritische Bemerkungen zur Postmodernismus-Debatte aus Anlaß zweier neuer Bücher, in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», XCIV,
1987, pp. 209-221.
Murphy P., Meaning, Truth and Ethical-Value, in «Praxis International», VII, 1,
1987, pp. 225-246.
Nielsen D.A., A Theory of Communicative Action or a Sociology of Civilizations? Critique
of Jürgen Habermas, in «International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society», I, 1,
1987, pp. 159-188.
Nielsen K., Legitimation and Ideology, in «Ratio: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy», 29, 1987, pp. 111-121.
1415.
1416.
1417.
1418.
1419.
1420.
1421.
1422.
1423.
1424.
1425.
1426.
1427.
1428.
1429.
1430.
1431.
1432.
1433.
91
Nørager T., Hovedlinier i Habermas seneste forfatterskab, in Thyssen O. (ed.), Samtalens
fornuft, Rosinante, København, 1987, pp. 83-103.
Paden R., Lyotard, Postmodernism, and the Crisis in Higher Education, in «International
Studies in Philosophy», XIX, 1987, pp. 53-58.
Paden R., Post-Structuralism and Neo-Romanticism or is Macintyre a Young Conservative?,
in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIII, 1987, pp. 125-143.
Peto B., Social System and Life-World: Jürgen Habermas’s Theory On Communicative Action, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 2, 1987, pp. 225-291.
Petrucciani S., Habermas tra moderno e post-moderno, in «La rivista trimestrale», 3-4,
1987, pp. 246-253.
Petrucciani S., Il Moderno nella “Teoria dell’agire comunicativo” di J. Habermas, in «La
rivista trimestrale», 3-4, 1987, pp. 143-168.
Preglau M., Wachstumskrise und Gesellschaftstheorie: Krisenanalyse am Beispiel der Frankfurter Schule, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1987.
Protti M., Jürgen Habermas, o dell’illuminismo come ideologia, in Crespi F. (ed.), Ideologia
e produzione di senso nella società contemporanea, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1987, pp. 159168.
Pulzer P., Germany: whose history?, in «Times Literary Supplement», 28.10.1987, pp.
1076, 1088.
Pusey M., Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Ellis Horwood Limited &
Tavistock Publications, 1987; Chichester, Ellis Horwood, 1988; New York,
Routledge, 1993.
Raes K., Vanjuridisch realisme tot kritische rechtstheorie: De Critical Legal Studies Movement in de Verenigde Staten, in «Nederlandsjuristenblad», 25, 1987, pp. 777-782.
Rath N., Habermas’ Kritik Adornos, in FriesenH., Schnell M.W. (eds.), Spannungsfelder der Diskurse: Philosophie nach 1945 in Deutschland und Frankreich, Münster, Lit Verlag, 1987, pp. 33-52.
Revilla Guzmán C., “Reflexión” e “Historia” : Una perspectiva sobre la obra de J.
Habermas, in «Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», XXII, 1987-1988, pp.
141-152.
Rochlitz R, L’idée de l’activité communicationnelle, in «Les Cahiers de Philosophie», 3 –
Habermas, l’activité communicationnelle, 1987, pp. 35-57.
Rockmore T., Theory and Practice Again: Habermas on Historical Materialism, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIII, 1987, pp. 211-225.
Rustemeyer D., Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie jenseits von Dialektik und vernünftiger Subjektivität?, in Friesen H., Schnell M.W.(ed.), Spannungsfelder der Diskurse: Philosophie
nach 1945 in Deutschland und Frankreich, Münster, Lit Verlag, 1987, pp. 93-130.
Saiedi N., A Critique of Habermas’ Theory of Practical Rationality, in «Studies in Soviet
Thought», XXXIII, 3, 1987, pp. 251-265.
Schafer A., Aufklarung Und Verdinglichung, Frankfurt a.M., Athenaum, 1987.
Scheit H., Rekonstruktion der “Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit”: Jürgen Habermas, in Id.,
Wahrheit – Diskurs – Demokratie. Studien zur “Konsensustheorie der Wahrheit”. Freiburg-
92
1434.
1435.
1436.
1437.
1438.
1439.
1440.
1441.
1442.
1443.
1444.
1445.
1446.
1447.
1448.
1449.
1450.
1451.
1452.
München, Karl Alber, 1987, pp. 86-108.
Schiedermair H., Deutschland als Ganzes: Der Historikerstreit und die nationale Identität,
in «Die Politische Meinung», XXXII, 233, 1987, pp. 4-12.
Schnädelbach H., Dialektik und Diskurs, in «Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XII, 1, 1987.
Sciabarra Ch., The Crisis of Libertarian Dualism, in «Critical Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics and Society, 1, 1987, pp. 86-99.
Smith A., Habermas and History: The Institutionalization of Discourse as Historical Project,
in Dauenhauer B.P. (ed.), At the Nexus of Philosophy and History, Athens (GA)London, University of Georgia Press, 1987, pp. 201-222.
Sotelo Martínez I., Modernidad/posmodernidad: un diálogo fallido: sobre “Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne” de Jürgen Habermas, in «Saber leer», 2, 1987, pp. 4-5.
Stein E., Dialética e hermenêutica: uma controvérsia sobre o método em filosofia, in
Habermas J., Dialética e hermenêutica: para a crítica da hermenêutica de Gadamer, Porto
Alegre, L&PM, 1987.
Strydom P., Collective Learning: Habermas’s Concessions and their Theoretical Implications,
in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIII, 1987, pp. 265-281.
Thiebaut C., Transitar fronteras, in «La balsa de la medusa», 4, 1987, pp. 98-104.
Thomassen N., Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in «Danish Yearbook of Philosophy»,
XXIV, 1987, pp. 77-96.
Tordoir P., Services Markets and the Economics of Social Interaction, in «The Service
Industries Journal», VII, 4, 1987, pp. 82-88.
van Reijen W., Miss Marx, Terminals und Grands Récits oder, Kratzt Habermas, wo es
nicht juckt?, in Kamper D., van Reijen W. (eds), Die unvollendete Vernunft: Moderne versus Postmoderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp 1987, pp. 536-569.
Walsh Th.G., Religion And Communicative Action, in «Thought: Fordham University Quarterly», 62, 1987, pp. 111-125.
Waschkuhn A., Allgemeine Institutionentheorie als Rahmen für die Theorie po-litischer Institutionen, in Göhler G. (ed.), Grundfragen der Theorie politischer Institutionen, Opladen,
Waschkuhn A., Politische Systemtheorie. Entwicklung, Modelle, Kritik. Eine Einführung,
Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1987.
Welch S.D., A Genealogy of the Logic of Deterrence, Habermas, Foucault and a Feminist
Ethic of Risk, in «Union Seminary Quarterly Review», 2, 1987, pp. 3-32.
Welsch W., Unsere postmoderne Moderne, Weinheim, Acta Humaniora, 1987, pp.
159-165.
West D., Power and formation: New Foundations for a radical concept of Power, in «Inquiry», XXX, 1-2, 1987, pp. 137-154.
White S.K., Justice and the Postmodern Problematic, in «Praxis International», VII, 3-4,
1987, pp. 306-319.
Widdershoven G.A.M., Handelen en rationaliteit: een systematisch overzicht van het denken van Wittgenstein, Merleau-Ponty, Gadamer en Habermas, Meppel, Boom, 1987.
1453.
1454.
1455.
1456.
93
Wing-Chchan W.C., Phenomenology and Communicative Ethics, in Tymieniecka A.T.
(ed.), Morality Within the Life and Social World, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1987.
Yoon P.J., Habermas and Foucault: on Ideology-Critique and Power/Knowledge Nexus, in
«Kinesis: Graduate Journal in Philosophy», 17, 1987, pp. 87-103.
Zalabardo García-Muro J.L., La fundamentación teórica de la razón práctica: el programa
de la pragmática universal de Jürgen Habermas, in «Zona abierta», 41-42, 1987, pp. 221258.
Zimmerli W.Ch., Kommunikation und Metaphysik. Zu den Anfangsgründen von Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Oelmüller W. (ed.), Metaphysik heute?,
Paderborn-München, F. Schöningh, 1987, pp. 97-111.
1988
1457.
1458.
1459.
1460.
1461.
1462.
1463.
1464.
1465.
1466.
1467.
1468.
1469.
Albert H., Critical Rationalism: The Problem of Method in Social Sciences, in «Ratio Juris», I, 1, 1988, pp. 1-19.
Apel K.-O., Zurück zur Normalität? - Oder könnten wir aus der nationalen Katastrophe
etwas Besonderes gelernt haben? Das Problem des (welt-) geschichtlichen Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral aus spezifisch deutscher Sicht, in Id., Diskurs und Verantwortung: Das
Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988,
pp. 370-474.
Arnason J.P., Praxis und Interpretation: sozialphilosophische Studien, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1988.
Aronowitz S., Habermas: The Retreat from the Critique, in Id., Science As Power: Discourse And Ideology In Modern Society, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press,
1988, pp. 146-168.
Aumetre J., Habermas et Althusser: Critique de l’ideologie scientiste et Critique de
l’humanisme idéologique, in «Philosophiques», 15, 1988, pp. 141-167.
Babin D., Au-dela des Lumieres, in «De Philosophia», 7, 1988, pp. 1-30.
Bachmaier P., Zwischen Relativismus Und Letzbegrundung: Konvergenzen Und Divergenzen in Der Pragmatischhermeneutischen Orientierung Der Philosophie, in «Philosophische
Rundschau», XXXV, 1988, pp. 182-198.
Bader V.M., Macht Of Waarheid?, in «Kennis en Methode», XII, 1988, pp. 138157.
Bal P., Dwangkommunikatie in de Rechtszaal, Arnhem Gouda Quint, 1988.
Baratta A., Silbernagel M., Neue Legitimationsstrategien des Strafrechts und ihre Kritik als
Realität als Kritik, in «Kriminologisches Journal», 20, 1988, pp. 32-49.
Barcellona P., Comunicazione e prescrizione nel linguaggio giuridico, in «Problemi del socialismo», 1, 1988, pp. 57-68.
Bauman Z., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Sociology», XXII, 3, 1988, pp. 473-475.
Baynes K., Crisis and the Life-world in Husserl and Habermas, in Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Northwestern University, 10.1988; repr. in
94
1470.
1471.
1472.
1473.
1474.
1475.
1476.
1477.
1478.
1479.
1480.
1481.
1482.
1483.
1484.
1485.
1486.
Dallery A., Scott C., Roberts P.H., Crises in Continental Philosophy, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1990, pp. 57-68.
Baynes K., The Liberal/Communitarian Controversy and Communicative Ethics, in
George Mason University, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, and
Teachers’ College, Columbia University, 3.1988; in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, ¾, 1988, pp. 293-313; rerp. in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs.
communitarianism: contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990,
pp. 61-81.
Bernstein J.M., The Causality of Fate: Modernity and Modernism in Habermas, in «Praxis International», VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Philosophical
Discourse of Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 407-425.
Bernstein R.J., Fred Dallmayr’s Critique of Habermas, in «Political Theory», XVI,
1988, pp. 580-593.
Bertalan P., Life of Values and Society: Social-Psychological Sketches to an Ontology of Society, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 1988, pp. 5-6.
Bertalan P., Racionalitások a modern társadalomban, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle»,
1988, pp. 1-2.
Bourg D., Ethique et pragmatique, in «Bijdragen», XLIX, 2, 1988, pp. 139-149.
Braun C., Diskurstheoretische Normenbegrüdung in der Rechtswissenschaft, in ««Rechtstheorie», XIX, 1988, pp. 238-261.
Broniak Ch., What Is Emancipation For Habermas?, in «Philosophy Today», XXXII,
1988, pp. 195-206.
Brückmeier K., Kritik der Organisationsgesellschaft. Wege der systemtheoretischen Auflösung
der Gesellschaft von M. Weber, Parsons, Luhmann und Habermas, Münster, Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1988.
Burger R., Lob der Niedertracht – Probleme in der Universalethik von Habermas und Apel,
in «Leviathan», XVI, 4, 1988, pp. 443-456.
Calhoun, C., Populist Politics, Communication Media and Large Scale Societal Integration’,
in «Sociological Theory», VI, 2, 1988, pp. 219–241.
Calloni M., Jürgen Habermas: Etica del discorso, in «Fenomenologia e Società», 1,
1988, pp. 191-195.
Cassin B., Habla Si Eres Un Hombre O La Exclusion Trascendental, in «Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia», 14, 1988, pp. 291-302.
Chaumont J.M., Philosophie Critique De L’histoire, in «Revue Philosophique de
Louvain», LXXXVI, 1988, pp. 213-231.
Cobben P.G., De autonomie van het subjekt in de verwetenschappelijkte samenleving: Een
kritiese konfrontatie met het denken van Hegel, Marx, Althusser en Habermas, Doctoral
thesis, Tilburg University Repository, 1988.
Cohen J.L., Discourse Ethics and Civil Society, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 315-337; repr. in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism, Boston, MIT Press, 1990, pp. 83-105.
Cohen J.L., Heller, Habermas and Justice: A Review of Agnes Heller’s Beyond Justice, in
1487.
1488.
1489.
1490.
1491.
1492.
1493.
1494.
1495.
1496.
1497.
1498.
1499.
1500.
1501.
1502.
95
«Praxis International», VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 491-497.
Cunico G., Critica e ragione utopica. A confronto con Habermas e Bloch, Genova, Marietti, 1988.
Cunico G., Filosofia pratica e razionalità comunicativa. Moralität e Sittlichkeit nella prospettiva di J. Habermas, in Berti E. (ed.), Tradizione e attualità della filosofia pratica, Genova,
Marietti, 1988, pp. 249-272.
Dallmayr F.R., Habermas and Rationality, in «Political Theory», XVI, 4, 1988, pp.
553-579.
Dallmayr F.R., The Discourse of Modernity: Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger (and Habermas),
in «Praxis International», VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 311-406; repr. in Passerin
d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity.
Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press,
1995, pp. 59-96.
De Haan W., The Necessity of Punishment in a Just Social Order, in «International
Journal of the Sociology of Law», 16, 1988, pp. 433-453.
De la Iglesia J.L., La recuperacíon del Dilthey per Habermas, in Jiménez Redondo M. et
al. (eds.), Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J. Habermas, Madrid,
Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 39-58.
De Olaso E., Una Bancarrota De La Razon Pura, in «Revista Latinoamericana de
Filosofia», 14, 1988, pp. 303-322.
De Simone A., Habermas. Le metamorfosi della razionalità e il paradosso della razionalizzazione, Lecce, Milella, 1988.
De Simone A., Les potentialités de crise du capitalisme tardif, in «Actuel Marx», 3, 1988,
pp. 130-148.
De Zan J., Nuevos desarrollos del programa de la etica comunicativa, in «Cuadernos de
Etica», 5, 1988, pp. 81-90.
DeHaven-Smit L., Philosophical Critique of Policy Analysis. Lindblom, Habermas, and
the Great Society, Gainesville, FLA, University of Florida Press, 1988.
Deroche L., Morale et communication, in «L’année sociologique», 38, 1988, pp. 362373.
Doeleman W., Theories of Communicative Action and Psychoanalysis, Utrecht Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht (Netherlands), 1988; in «Theory, Culture & Society»,
VII, 4, 1990, pp. 103-115.
Doppelt G., Beyond liberalism and communitarianism : towards a critical theory of social
justice, , in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 271-292; repr. in
Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: contemporary debates in ethics,
Dorschel A., Is There any Normative Claim Internal To Stating Facts?, in «Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal», 21, 1988, pp. 5-16.
Dubiel H., Kritische Theorie der Gesellschaft. Eine Einführende Rekonstruction von den Anfängen im Horkheimer-Kreis bis Habermas, Weinheim, Juventa Verlag, 1988, 20012.
96
1503.
1504.
1505.
1506.
1507.
1508.
1509.
1510.
1511.
1512.
1513.
1514.
1515.
1516.
1517.
1518.
1519.
1520.
1521.
Dumm Th.L., The Trial of Postmodernism. The Politics of Post-Modern Aesthetics: Habermas Contra Foucault, in «Political Theory», XVI, 2, 1988, pp. 209-228.
Eder K., Critique of Habermas’s Contribution to the Sociology of Law, in «Law and Society Review», XXII, 1988, pp. 931-944.
Fay B., Social Theory and Political Practice, London, Unwin Hyman, 1988.
Felts A.A., Fields Ch.B., Technical and Symbolic Reasoning: An Application of Habermas’ Ideological Analysis to the Legal Arena, in «Quarterly Journal of Ideology», 12, 1988,
pp. 1-15.
Ferrara A., Universalisms: Procedural, Contextualist and Prudential, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 243-269; repr. in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism, Boston, MIT Press, 1990, pp. 11-38.
Ferry J.-M., Jürgen Habermas, in Encyclopédie Hachette, Annuel 1988, Paris, Editions
Hachette, 1988.
Fields A.B., In Defense Of Political Economy And Systemic Analysis: A critique of prevailing theoretical approaches to the new social movements, in Nelson
C.,Grossberg L. (eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture, Urbana, University of
Illinois Press, 1988, pp. 141-156
Fleming M., Interpretation as Assimilation: Habermas’s Disquieting Thesis, in American
Southwestern Social Science Association Meeting, Houston, Texas, 3.1988.
Fleming M., Technology and the Problem of Democratic Control: The Contribution of Jürgen
Habermas, in Day R.B., Beiner R., Masciulli J. (eds.), Democratic Theory and Technological Society, Armonk, NY, M.E. Sharpe, 1988, pp. 90-109.
Frank M., Comment fonder une morale aujourd’hui: Remarques à propos du debat Habermas- Tugendhat, in «Revue Internationale de Philosophie», 42, 1988, pp. 361-382.
Frank M., Die Grenzen der Verständigung. Ein Geistergespräch zwischen Lyotard und Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988.
Freundlieb D., Rationalism vs. Irrationalism? Habermas’s Response to Foucault, «Inquiry», XXXI, 2, 1988, pp. 171-192.
Früchtl J., “Kein unschlichtbarer Streit”: M. Frank, Die Grenzen der Verständigung. Ein
Geistergespräch zwischen Lyotard und Habermas, in «Süddeutsche Zeitung», 5.10.1988.
Früchtl J., Die positive Entzauberung der Frankfurter Schule, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXXV, 1-2, 1988, pp. 33-41; tr. it. Il positivo disincantamento della Scuola di
Francoforte, in Calloni M. et. al. (eds.), La Scuola di Francoforte oggi, Napoli, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 1989, pp. 50-58.
Fuchs E., Entre Raison et Conviction: La Place de l’éthique dans la société moderne, in
«Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie», 120, 1988, pp. 453-463.
Füllsack M., Geltungsansprüche und Beobachtungen zweiter Ordnung. Wie nahe kommen
sich Diskurs- und Systemtheorie?, in «Soziale Systeme», IV, 1, 1988, pp. 185-198.
Funk, N., Habermas and the Social Goods, in «Social Text», 18, 1988, pp. 19-37.
Gasché R., Postmodernism and Rationality, in «Journal of Philosophy», LXXXV, 10,
1988, pp. 528-538.
Geiss I., Die Habermas-Kontroverse. Ein deutscher Streit, Berlin, Siedler Verlag, 1988.
1522.
1523.
1524.
1525.
1526.
1527.
1528.
1529.
1530.
1531.
1532.
1533.
1534.
1535.
1536.
97
Gerhardt V., Metaphysik und ihre Kritik. Zur Methaphysikdebatte zwischen Jürgen Habermas und Dieter Henrich, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLII, 1,
1988, pp. 45-70.
Grondin J., La réification de Lukács a Habermas. L’impact de “Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein„ sur la théorie critique, in «Archives de Philosophie», LI, 1988, pp. 627-646 ;
tr. en. Reification. From Lukács to Habermas, in Rockmore T. (ed.), Lukács Today. Essays in Marxist Philosophy, Boston-Dordrecht, Reidel, 1988, pp. 86-107.
Gunnemann J.P., Human Rights And Modernity: The Truth Of The Fiction Of Individual Rights, in «Journal of Religious Ethics», 16, 1988, pp. 160-189.
Günther K., Der Sinn für Angemessenheit. Anwendungskiskurse in Morale und Recht,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988.
Günther K., Impartial Application of Moral and Legal Norms: A Contribution to Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 425-432;
repr. in D.M. Rasmussen (ed.), Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 199-206.
Guzmán C., ‘Reflexiones’ e ‘historia’: una perspectiva sobre la obra de J. Habermas, in
«Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», 22, 1988, pp. 141-52.
Hart A.F., Habermas: communicative reason and the moral realization of a normative order,
Montréal, McGill University, 1988.
Haungs P., Diesseits oder jenseits von Carl Schmitt?: zu einer Kontroverse um die “Frankfurter Schule” und Jürgen Habermas, in Maier H., Matz U., Sontheimer K., Weinacht P.L.
(eds.), Politik, Philosophie, Praxis: Festschrift für Wilhelm Hennis zum 65. Geburtstag,
Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1988, pp. 526-544.
Holzer H., Kommunikative Rationalität als Basis Der Kritik: Zur Theorie Des Kommunikativen Handelns Von Jürgen Habermas, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
XXXVI, 11, 1988, pp. 989-1003.
Honneth A., Atomism and ethical life: on Hegel’s critique of the French Revolution, in
«Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 359-368; repr. in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 129-138.
Hoogland J. Habermas en het postmodernisme, in «Beweging», LII, 1988, pp. 113-115.
Horster D., Habermas zur Einführung, Hamburg, Junius, 1988.
Howard D., The Hermeneutical Dimension of Critical Theory, in «Praxis International»,
VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Philosophical Discourse of
Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 476-490.
Hoy D.C., Splitting the Difference: Habermas’s Critique of Derrida, in «Praxis International», VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 447-464; repr. in Hoy D., Splitting the Difference:
Habermas’s Critique of Derrida, in Passerin d’Entrèves M. (ed.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity,
Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 124-146.
Ingram D., The Postmodern Kantianism of Arendt and Lyotard, in «Review of Metaphysics», 42, 1988, pp. 51-77.
98
1537.
1538.
1539.
1540.
1541.
1542.
1543.
1544.
1545.
1546.
1547.
1548.
1549.
1550.
1551.
1552.
1553.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, La lógica de las ciencias sociales,
Madrid, Tecnos, 1988, pp. 9-12.
Jiménez Redondo M., La fundamentación de la razón practica en la Escuela de Erlangen,
in Jiménez Redondo M. et al. (eds.), Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J.
Habermas, Madrid, Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 7-22.
Jiménez Redondo M., La teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas (II), in Jiménez
Redondo M. et al. (eds.), Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J. Habermas,
Madrid, Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 129-146.
Kaufmann J.N., Formations discursives et dispositifs de pouvoir: Habermas critique de Foucault, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXVII, 1988, pp. 41-57.
Kelly M., The Gadamer-Habermas Debate Revisited: The Question Of Ethics, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, 3/4, 1988, pp. 369-389; repr. in Rasmussen D.
(ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism : contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 139-159.
Kimmerle H., Ist Derridas Denken Ursprungsphilosophie? Zu Habermas’ Deutung der
philosophischen “Postmoderne”, in Frank M., Raulet G., van Reijen W. (eds.), Die Frage
nach dem Subjekt, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988, pp. 267-282.
Kirsten J.M., Die postmoderne projek: Aspekte van die hedendaagse afskeiding van die moderne?, in «South African Journal of Philosophy », VII, 1988, pp. 18-36.
Kochinke J., Versuch, Habermas kritisch zu lesen, in «Leviathan», XVI, 1, 1988, pp.
44-76.
Koningsveld H., Communicatief handelen bij Habermas, in «Handelingen, T. Handelingstheoretisch Onderzoek», 2, 1988, pp. 45-51.
Korthals M., The Philosophical Foundation Of The Social Sciences In The Theory Of Jürgen
Habermas, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XVIII, 1988, pp. 69-72.
Kunneman H., Some Critical Remarks on Habermas’s Analysis of Science and Technology,
in Utrecht Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht (Netherlands), 1988; in «Theory,
Culture & Society», VII, 4, 1990, pp. 117-125.
Lanigan R.L., Phenomenology of Communication: Merleau-Ponty’s Thematics in Communicology and Semiology, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 1988.
Leaman J., The decontamination of German history: Jürgen Habermas and the ‘Historikerstreit’ in West Germany, in «Economy and Society», XVII, 4, 1988, pp. 518520.
Lieth W., Martin Buber und Jürgen Habermas. Krise, Dialog und Kommunikation. Konstanz, Hartung-Gorre, 1988.
Linde H., Zur Soziologie des Sports: Versuch einer empirischen Kritik soziologischer Theoreme, in Id., Kritische Empirie: Beiträge zur Soziologie und Bevölkerungswissenschaft 19371987, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 1988, pp. 108-125.
López Molina, A. M., La crisis de la teoría del conocimiento en la ‘fases avanzadas de la
reflexión’. Interpretación habermasiana, in «Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», 22,
1988, pp. 153-181.
Loughlin M., Tinkering with the constitution, in «Modern Law Review», LI, 4, 1988
1554.
1555.
1556.
1557.
1558.
1559.
1560.
1561.
1562.
1563.
1564.
1565.
1566.
1567.
1568.
1569.
99
pp. 531-548.
Lovat T.J., Action Research and the Praxis Model of Religious Education: A critique, in
«British Journal of Religious Education», XI, 1, 1988, pp. 30-37.
Machado C.E.J., O conceito de racionalidade em Habermas: “a guinada lingüística” da
teoria crítica, in «Trans/Form/Ação. Revista de Filosofia», 11, 1988, pp. 31-44.
MacIntyre A., Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, University of Notre
Dame, 1988.
Maestre Sánchez A., En torno al libro de J. Habermas: “Der philosophische Diskur der
Moderne”, in «Revista de estudios políticos», 59, 1988, pp. 253-267.
Maestre Sánchez A., La teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas (I), in Jiménez
Redondo M. et al. (eds.), Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J. Habermas,
Madrid, Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 103-128.
Martin B., The Enlightenment’s Talking Cure: Habermas, Legitimation Crisis, And The
Recent Political Landscape, in «Southwest Philosophy Review», 4, 1988, pp. 33-43.
Martínez F.J., Ciencia y técnica come ideología, in Jiménez Redondo M. et al. (eds.),
Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J. Habermas, Madrid, Fundación de
Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 23-38.
Martínez F.J., La constitución del sujeto moral en Habermas, in Jiménez Redondo M. et
al. (eds.), Racionalidad y acción comunicativa en la obra de J. Habermas, Madrid,
Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1988, pp. 59-74.
Marzocchi V., Competenza morale e giustificazione di un’etica dei principi in J. Rawls e J.
Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XI, 3, 1988, pp. 137-148.
McCumber J., Philosophy as the Heteronomous Center of Modern Discourse: Jürgen Habermas, in Silverman H.J. (ed.), Philosophy and Non-Philosophy Since Merleau-Ponty,
London, Routledge, & New York, Chapman and Hall, 1988, pp. 211-231, 332336.
Merz K., Některým problémům konzervativní kritiky marxismu-leninismu leninismu. 80.
let, in «Filosofický časopis», XXXVI, 1988, pp. 530-548.
Mootz F., The Ontological Basis of Legal Hermeneutics: A Proposed Model of Inquiry
Based on the Work of Gadamer, Habermas, and Ricoeur, in «Boston University Law Review», 68, 1988, pp. 523-617.
Muguerza Carpintier J., The Alternative of Dissent, Delivered at The Instituto de
Derechos Humanos of The Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 19-20.4.1988,
in Peterson G.B. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 10, Salt Lake City,
University of Utah Press, 1989.
Nagl L., Zeigt die Habermassche Kommunikationstheorie einen “Ausweg aus der Subjektphilo-sophie”? Erwägungen zur Studie “Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne”, in Frank M.,
Raulet G., van Reijen W. (eds.), Die Frage nach dem Subjekt, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1988, pp. 346-372.
Nolan M., The Historikerstreit and Social History, in «New German Critique», 44,
1988, pp. 51-80.
Norris Ch., Deconstruction, Postmodernism and Philosophy: Habermas On Derrida, in
«Praxis International», VIII, 4 (“Symposium on Jürgen Habermas’s “The PhiloLuca Corchia, Department of Political Science, University of Pisa, March 2016
100
1570.
1571.
1572.
1573.
1574.
1575.
1576.
1577.
1578.
1579.
1580.
1581.
1582.
1583.
1584.
1585.
1586.
1587.
1588.
1589.
sophical Discourse of Modernity”“), 1988, pp. 426-446; as Deconstruction, Postmodernism and Philosophy: Habermas’s Critique of Derrida, in in Passerin d’Entrèves M.,
Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on
“The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 97-123.
Northey R., Conflicting Principles of Canadian Environmental Reform: Trubek and Habermas v. Law and Economics and the Law Reform Commission, in «Dalhousie Law Journal», 11, 1988, pp. 639-662.
Olivier B., The critical difference: Deconstruction and postmodernism, in «Journal of Literary Studies», IV, 3, 1988, pp. 287-298.
Pensky M., Habermas’s Schadensabwicklung, in «German Society and Politics», XIII,
1988, pp. 45-50.
Pereyra, C., Teoría de la verdad-consenso, in «Zona Abierta», 48-49, 1988, pp. 161176.
Pertierra R., The Rationality Problematique: An Anthropological Review of Habermas’
Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I, in «Social Analysis», XXIII, 1988, pp. 72-88.
Petho B., Life of Values And Society: Social-Psychological Sketches to an Ontology of Society, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 1988, pp. 5-6.
Petitdemange G., Jürgen Habermas, in «Etude», 368, 1988, pp. 69-76.
Petrucciani S., Etica dell’argomentazione, Genova, Marietti, 1988.
Pfeufer Kahn R., The Problem of Power in Habermas, in «Human Studies», 11, 1988,
pp. 361-387.
Pijnenburg L., Naar een communicatietheoretisch geinspireerde feministische theorie : een
onderzoek naar de relatie tussen de theorieen van Chodorow en Habermas in termen van de relatie tussen filosofie, sociologie en psychoanalyse, Tilburg, University of Tilburg, 1988.
Pokol B., Racionalitások a modern társadalomban, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle»,
1988, pp. 1-2.
Rabinbach A., Editor’s Introduction, in «New German Critique», 44, 1988, pp. 3-4.
Rajchman J., Habermas’s Complaint, in «New German Critique», 45, 1988, pp. 163191.
Rasmussen D., Communication Theory and the Critique of the Law: Habermas and Unger
on the Law, in «Praxis International», VIII, 2, 1988, pp. 155-170.
Ray L., Foucault, Critical Theory and the Decomposition of the Historical Subject, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIV, 1988, pp. 69-110.
Revilla Guzmán C., «Reflexión» e «historia»: una perspectiva sobre la obra de J. Habermas,
in «Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», 22, 1987-1988, pp. 141-152.
Rockmore T., De l’intérêt de la Raison, in «Archives de Philosophie», 51, 1988, pp.
441-455.
Ruane J., Todd, J., The application of Critical Theory, in «Political Studies», 36, 1988,
pp. 533-538.
Sahmel K.H., Die kritische Theorie: Bruchstücke, Würzburg, Königshausen &
Neumann, 1988.
Santiago N.C., Constructivismo epistemológico: Entre Rawls y Habermas, in «Doxa:
1590.
1591.
1592.
1593.
1594.
1595.
1596.
1597.
1598.
1599.
1600.
1601.
1602.
1603.
1604.
101
Cuadernos de filosofía del derecho», 5, 1988, pp. 87-106.
Saretzki Th., Collective Action Versus Functionalism: Some Remarks On Joas’ Critique, in
«Praxis International», VIII, 1 (“Current Debates in Critical Social Theory: An Exchange on ‘The Theory of Communicative Action”“), 1988, pp. 52-72.
Schmidt-Waldherr H., Die “Entbindung der Vernunft”?: zur Habermas’schen “Theorie
des kommunikativen Handelns”, in Kulke C. (ed.), Rationalität und sinnliche Vernunft:
Frauen in der patriarchalen Realität, Pfaffenweiler, Centaurus-Verl.-Ges., 1988, pp. 4554.
Segady T.W., Rationality and irrationality: New directions in Weberian theory, critique, and
research, in «Sociological Spectrum», VIII, 1, 1988, pp. 85-100.
Shearmur J., Habermas: A Critical Approach, in «Critical Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics and Society», II, 1, 1988, pp. 39-50.
Siulli, F., Foundations of societal constitutionalism: principles from the concepts of communicative action and procedural legality, in «The British Journal of Sociology», 39, 1988, pp.
377-408.
Strydom P., Habermas and New Social Movements, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of
Critical Thought», LXXXV, 1990, pp. 156-164.
Thies J., Germany’s History War: Zweierlei Untergang. Die Zerschlagung des
Deutschen Reiches und das Ende des europäischen Judentums, by Andreas Hillgruber; Historikerstreit. Die Dokumentation der Kontroverse um die Einzigartigkeit der nationalsozialistischen Judenvernichtung; Eine Art Schadensabwicklung, by Jürgen Habermas;
Nach Hitler. Der schwierige Umgang mit unserer Geschichte, by Beiträge von Martin
Broszat; Hermann Graml; Klaus-Dietmar Henke, in «The World Today», XLIV, 4,
1988, pp. 69-72.
Todd L.M., Connections between values methods and critique in sociology: a study of undergraduate induction from the perspectives of Habermas and Kuhn, Lancashire, University of
Salford, 1988.
Torpey J., Introduction: Habermas and the Historians, in «New German Critique», 44,
1988, pp. 5-24.
Treiber H., La place de Max Weber dans la sociologie du droit allemande contemporaine, in
«Droit et société», 9, 1988, pp. 211-267.
Tushnet M., Comment on Eder, in «Law and Society Review», XXII, 1988, pp. 945948.
van der Burg W., Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments,
Utrecht Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht (Netherlands), 1988; in «Theory, Culture & Society», VII, 4, 1990, pp. 105-111.
van Reijen W., Introduction to the Utrecht Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht (Netherlands), 1988; in «Theory, Culture & Society»,
VII, 4, 1990, pp. 91-93.
van Reijen W., Philosophical-Political Polytheism: Habermas versus Lyotard, Utrecht
Symposium on Habermas, Utrecht (Netherlands), 1988; in «Theory, Culture &
Society», VII, 4, 1990, pp. 95-103.
Vannuccini V., L’imputato Heidegger, in «la Repubblica», 5.11.1988, p. 33.
102
1605.
1606.
1607.
1608.
1609.
1610.
1611.
1612.
1613.
1614.
1615.
1616.
1617.
1618.
Vogel S., Habermas and Science, in «Praxis International», VIII, 3, 1988, pp. 329349.
Volpi F., Spaesamento postmetafisico?, in Barbieri G., Vidali P. (eds.), La ragione possibile. Per una geografia della cultura, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1988, pp. 75-87.
Wagner G., Zipprian H., Macht und Geltung. Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas’ sprachtheoretischer Grundlegung der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Leviathan», XVI,
3, 1988, pp. 395-405.
Warnke G., Habermas, Art and Aesthetic Reflection: David Ingram’s ‘Habermas and the
Dialectic of Reason’, in «Praxis International», VIII, 1 (“Utopia and Aesthetic Rationality in Habermas’s Work”), 1988, pp. 91-98.
Watkins P., Regional Boards of Education: mediating links betweens social investment and
social consumption, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education», IX, 4, 1988, pp.
453-472.
Wehler H.U., Die Gegenwehr. Die Kritik beginnt: Jürgen Habermas in Id., Entsorgung der
deutschen Vergangenheit? Ein polemischer Essay zum “Historikerstreit”, München, Verlag
C.H. Beck ,1988, pp. 79-87; tr. it. Il contrattacco, in Id., Le mani sulla storia. Germania:
riscrivere il passato?, Firenze, Ponte alle Grazie, 1989, pp. 71-77.
Welsch W., Einleitung, in Id. (ed.), Wege aus der Moderne. Schlüsseltexte der PostmoderneDiskussion, Weinheim, VCH Verlagsgs. Acta humaniora, 1988, pp. 1-45.
White S.K., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The American Political Science Review», LXXXII, 3, 1988, pp.
974-975.
Whitebook J., Reconciling the Irreconcilable: Utopianism after Habermas, in «Praxis International», VIII, 1 (“Utopia and Aesthetic Rationality in Habermas’s Work”),
1988, pp. 73-90.
Wiggers, J. H., Contract en Rede: Hegel, Rawls en Habermas over de Grondslag van de Politieke Filosofie, in «Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie», XVI, 1987, pp. 47-70.
Wiggershaus R., Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte – Theoretische Entwicklung – Politische Bedeutung, München, Wien, 1988; tr. it. La Scuola di Francoforte. Storia, sviluppo teorico, significato politico, Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 1992.
Wissinger J., Schule als Lebenswelt. Eine handlungstheoretische Untersuchung über die Entstehung von Schulschwierigkeiten, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1988.
Young R.E., Critical Teaching and Learning, in «Educational Theory», XXXVIII, 1,
1988, pp. 47-59.
Young R.E., Moral Development, Ego Autonomy, and Questions of Practicality in the Critical Theory of Schooling, in «Educational Theory», XXXVIII, 1, 1988, pp. 391-404.
1989
1619.
Acedo García A., Notas acerca del concepto “autorreflexión reconstructiva” en J. Habermas,
in «Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciència», 15-16, 1989, pp. 271-273.
1620.
1621.
1622.
1623.
1624.
1625.
1626.
1627.
1628.
1629.
103
Alexy R., On Necessary Relations between Law and Morality, in «Ratio Juris», II, 1989,
pp. 167-183.
Alexy R., Probleme der Diskurstheorie, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIII, 1, 1989, pp. 81-94.
Angulo Rasco J.F., La estructura y los intereses de la tecnologia de la educacion: un analisis
critico, in «Revista de Educación», 289, 1989, pp. 175-214.
Antonio, R.J., The normative foundations of emancipatory theory: evolutionary versus pragmatic perspectives, in «American Journal of Sociology», 94, 1989, pp. 721-748.
Apel K.O., Normative Begründung der “Kritischen Theorie” durch Rekurs auf lebensweltliche Sittlichkeit? Ein transzendentalpragmatisch orientierter Versuch, mit Habermas gegen Habermas zu denken, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 15-65; tr. en. Normatively grounding “critical theory” by recourse to the lifeword? A trascendental-pragmatic attempt to think with Habermas
against Habermas, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT
Press 1992, pp. 125-170; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol.
III, London, Sage, 2002, pp. 344-378; tr. it. Fondazione normativa della “teoria critica”
tramite ricorso all’eticità del mondo della vita?, in Apel K.O., Discorso, verità, responsabilità,
Milano, Guerini, 1997, pp. 189-236.
Arens E., Theologie nach Habermas. Eine Einführung, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und
die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 9-38; tr. it. La teologia secondo Habermas. Una introduzione, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas e la teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria dell’agire comunicativo, Brescia, Queriniana,
1992, pp. 15-52; tr. fr. La théologie après Habermas. Une introduction, in E. Arens (ed.),
Habermas et la théologie, Paris, Cerf, 1993, pp. 9-43.
Arnason J.P., Weltauslegung und Verständigung, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe
C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas
zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 66-88; tr. en. World Interpretation and Mutual Understanding, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A.
(eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen
Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 247-268.
Baynes K., Rational Reconstruction and Social Criticism: Habermas’s Model of Interpretative Social Science, in «The Philosophical Forum», 21, 1989, pp. 122-145; repr. in
Kelly M. (ed.), Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and Politics, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 122-145; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School.
pp. 135-156.
Beiner R., Do We Need A Philosophical Ethics: Theory, Prudence, And The Primacy Of
Ethos, in «Philosophical Forum», 20, 1989, pp. 230-241.
Belliotti R.A., Radical Politics and Nonfoundational Morality, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», 29, 1989, pp. 33-51.
104
1630.
1631.
1632.
1633.
1634.
1635.
1636.
1637.
1638.
1639.
1640.
1641.
Benhabib Sh., Autonomy, Modemity, and Community Communitarianism and Critical
Social Theory in Dialogue, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.),
Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 373-394; repr. in Honneth A., McCarthy Th.,
Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of
Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1992, pp. 39-59.
Beriain J., La reconstrucción del discurso de la modernidad según Habermas, in «Estudios
Filosóficos», 108, 1989, pp. 319-340.
Bernstein J., Praxis and Aporia: Habermas’ Critique of Castoriadis, in Busino G. (ed.),
Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius Castoriadis,
Genève, Librairie Droz, 1989, pp. 111-123; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt
1994, pp. 157-176.
Bernstein R.J., Foucault: Critique as a Philosophie Ethos, in Honneth A., McCarty
Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 395-425;
repr. in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interven-tions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth
birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. **-**.
Berten A., Habermas, l’éthique et la politique, in «Revue Philosophique de Louvain»,
LXXXVII, 1989, pp. 74-96.
Bogen D.E., A reappraisal Of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action in Light of
Detailed Investigations of Social Praxis, in «Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour»,
XIX, 1, 1989, pp. 47-77.
Bohman J.F., Participating in enlightenment: Habermas’ cognitivist interpretation of democracy, in Dascal M., Gruengard O. (eds.), Knowledge and Politics: Case Studies in the Relationship between Epistemology and Political Philosophy, Boulder, Westview Press, 1989,
pp. 264-289.
Bohman J.F., System and Lifeworld: Habermas and the Problem of Holism, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XV, 4, 1989, pp. 58-89.
Boll M., Die Figur des “homme” in Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, in
Hirschfeld D., Debatin B. (eds.) Antinomien der Öffentlichkeit: Texte zum Streit über die
Selbstthematisierung der Gesellschaft, Hamburg, Argument-Verlag, 1989, pp. 187-200.
Bolte G., Unkritische Theorie. Gegen Habermas, Lüneburg, Dietrich zu Klampen,
1989.
Bondolfi A., Etica, potere e scienze umane: incontro-scontro a distanza tra Habermas e Foucault, in «Cenobio», 1989, pp. 250-261; repr. in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli,
1992, pp. 283-297.
Bonete Perales E., Tugendhat contra Rawls y Habermas, in «Anuario de filosofía del
derecho», 6, 1989, pp. 339-350.
1642.
1643.
1644.
1645.
1646.
1647.
1648.
1649.
1650.
1651.
1652.
1653.
1654.
105
Brady J., A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, by Jürgen Habermas, in «German Politics & Society», XVII, 2, 51, 1999, pp. 100-105.
Brand A., The Force of Reason. An Introduction to Habermas’ Theory of Communicative
Action, London, Allen & Unwin, 1990, pp. 1-64.
Bronner S.E., Kellner Douglas M., (eds.), Critical Theory and Society: A Reader,
London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.
Brunkhorst H., Kultur und bürgerliche Gesellschaft Die Einheit der Vernunft in der Entzweiung der Gesellschaft, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.),
Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 426-452; tr. en. Culture and Bourgeois Society:
The Unity of Reason in a Divided Society, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C.,
Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1992, pp. 145-170.
Bürger P., Kunst und Rationalität Zur Dialektik von symbolischer und allegorischer Form,
in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im
Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 89-105; tr. en. Art and Rationality: On the Dialectic of Symbolic and Allegorical Form, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press
1992, pp. 220-238.
Cahoone L.E., Buchler On Habermas On Modernity, in «Southern Journal of Philosophy»,
27, 1989, pp. 461-477.
Calhoun C., Social Theory and the Law: Systems Theory, Normative Justification, and
Postmodernism, in «Northwestern University Law Review», 83, 1989, pp. 398-460.
Calloni M., L’odissea della ragion pratica nel Moderno: sulle produttive aporie della Teoria
Critica della Società, in Calloni M. et. al. (eds.), La Scuola di Francoforte oggi, Napoli, Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici, 1989, pp. 9-29.
Carracedo J.R., La razon etica, in «Themata», VII, 1989, pp. 155-168.
Castoriadis C., Power, Politics, Autonomy, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C.,
Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas
zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 453-181; repr. in Castoriadis C., Power, Politics, Autonomy, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 269297.
Clement G., Is the Moral Point of View Monological or Dialogical? The Kantian Background of Habermas’ Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy Today», XXXIII, 2, 1989, pp.
159-173.
Cobben P.G., ‘Communicatief handelen’ als theoretisch grondbegrip, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte», LXXXI, 4, 1989, pp. 241-263.
Cobben P.G., Kan Legitimiteit zuiver Procedureel Gegarandeerd Worden? Een Kritische
Beschouwing over Habermas’ Conceptie van de Verhouding tussen Moraal, Recht en Politiek, in
106
1655.
1656.
1657.
1658.
1659.
1660.
1661.
1662.
1663.
1664.
1665.
1666.
1667.
«Recht en Kritiek», 15, 1989, pp. 262-279.
Cobben P.G., Ter inleiding: Jürgen Habermas als de Dr.Arnheim van de filosofie, in «Stoicheia», IV, 3, 1989, pp. 1-8.
Cohen J., Arato A., Politics and Reconstruction of the Concept of Civil Society, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im prozess
der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989,
pp. 121-142; repr. in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas
on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 121-142.
Corbi J.E., Habermas: pragmática universal y normatividad, in «Daimon. Revista de
filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 39-57.
Cortella L., Filosofia e dialogo: Habermas e il ruolo della struttura dialogica nella costituzione
del sapere filosofico, in «Cernobio», XXXVIII, 3, 1989, pp. 197-219; repr. in Ostinelli
M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas,
Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 79-105.
Cortina A., La ética discursiva, in Camps V. (ed.), Historia de la ética, Barcelona,
Crítica, 1989, pp. **-**.
D’Amico R., Historicism and Knowledge, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 1989.
Dahrendorf R., Zeitgenosse Habermas. Jürgen Habermas zum sechzigsten Geburtstag, in
«Merkur», 484, 6, 1989, pp. 478-487.
Dan-Cohen M., Law, Community, and Communication, in «Duke Law Journal», 6,
1989, pp. 1654-1676.
Davis Ch., Kommunikative Rationalität und die Grundlegung christlicher Hoffnung, in
Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion
und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 96114; tr. en. Pluralism, Privacy, and the Interior Self, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992,
pp. 152-172.
Dean R.G., Fenby B.L., Exploring Epistemologies: Social Work Action as a Reflection of
Philosophical Assumptions, in «Journal of Social Work Education», XXV, 1, 1989, pp.
46-54.
Denninger E., Wissenschaftlich-technischer Sachverstand und staatliche Technologiesteuerung
durch Recht, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 627-656.
Diumenjó J., Jürgen Habermas, Le discours philosophique de la modernité, in «Estudios
Franciscanos», 90, 394, 1989.
Dubiel H., Herrschaft oder Emanzipation? Der Streit um die Erbschft der kritischen Theorie, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen.
Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 504-518; tr. en. Domination or Emancipation? The Debate over the Her-
1668.
1669.
1670.
1671.
1672.
1673.
1674.
1675.
1676.
1677.
1678.
107
itage of Critical Theory, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.),
Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 3-16.
Dutra D.J.V., Aspectos da Teoria da Racionalidade em Habermas (Das Categorias da
Filosofia da Consciência ao Paradigma da Acao Comunicativa), in «Chronos. Educs»,
XXII, 2, 1989, pp. 127-135.
Eder K., Politik und Kultur Zur kultursoziologischen Analyse politischer Partizipation, in
Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1989, pp. 519-548; tr. en. Politics and Culture: On the Socioculturale Analysis of Political
Partecipation, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), CulturalPolitical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his
sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 95-120.
Ferrara A., Critical Theory and Its Discontents. On Wellmer’s Critique of Habermas, in
«Praxis International», IX, 3, 1989, pp. 305-320; tr. it. Consenso e giudizio nel dibattito
sulla Diskursethik. Il caso di Albrecht Wellmer, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XII, 3,
1989, pp. 131-150.
Ferrara A., Modernità e razionalità nel pensiero dell’ultimo Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XII, 1, 1989, pp. 9-38.
Fetscher I., Aufklärung über Aufklärung, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C.,
zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 657-689.
Fleming M., The Gender of Critical Theory, in «Cultural Critique», 13, 1989, pp. 119141.
Flynn Th.R., Foucault and the Politics of Postmodernity, in «Noûs», 23, 1989, pp. 187198.
Frank A.W., Habermas’s Interactionism: The Micro-Macro Link to Politics, in «Symbolic
Interaction», XII, 2, 1989, pp. 353-360.
Frank M., Jean-François Lyotard und Jürgen Habermas über Dissens und Konsensus, in
von Clemens B., Mülletr-Schöll U. (eds.), Mensch und Moderne. Beiträge zur philosophischen Anthropologie und Gesellschaftskritik, Würzburg, 1989, pp. 208-224; tr. it. Jean
François Lyotard e Jürgen Habermas: a proposito di dissenso e di consenso, in Ostinelli M.,
Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 243-265.
Frankenberg G., Down by Law: Irony, Seriousness, and Reason, in Joerges C., Trubek
D.M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An American-German Debate, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1989.
Frankenberg G., Unordnung kann sein Versuch über Systeme, Recht und Ungehorsam, in
Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1989, pp. 690-712; tr. en. Disorder is Possible: An Essay on Systems, Laws, and Disobedience, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth
108
1679.
1680.
1681.
1682.
1683.
1684.
1685.
1686.
1687.
1688.
1689.
1690.
1691.
birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 17-38.
Fraser N., Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory,
Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1989.
Fritscher W., Differenzierung, Verdinglichung und Abstraktion. Über einige Beiträge, die
eine autopoietische Systemtheorie zu einer kritischen Theorie moderner Rationalität leisten kann,
Frankfurt a.M.-Bern-New York-Paris, Peter Lang, 1989.
Früchtl J., Nietzsche come sfida per Adorno e Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società»,
XII., 1, 1989, pp. 131-144; tr. de. Radikalität und Konsequenz in der Wahrheitstheorie.
Nietzsche als Herausforderung für Adorno und Habermas, in «Nietzsche Studien», XIX,
1990, pp. 431-461
Gadamer H.-G., Kultur und Medien, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum
60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 713-732; tr. en. Culture and Media, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth
Garcia V.D., Caracteristicas y limites de la etica discorsiva, in «Quaderns de Filosofia i
Ciencia», 1989, pp. 15-16.
Gonzalez H., Interactivity and feedback in third World development campaigns, in «Critical
Studies in Mass Communication», VI, 3, 1989, pp. 295-314.
Gottlieb R.S. (eds.), An Anthology Of Western Marxism: From Lukács and Gramsci to
Socialist-Feminism, New York, Oxford University Press, 1989.
Gröbl-Steinbach E., Die Moderne - eine unendliche Geschichte?, in «Österreichische
Zeitschrift für Soziologie», XIV, 1, 1989, pp. 16-25.
Grondin J., Grodin J., Habermas und das Problem der Individualität: Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Philosophische Aufsätze, by Jürgen Habermas; Die Grenzen der Verständigung. Ein Geistergespräch zwischen Lyotard und Habermas, by Manfred
Frank; Diskurs und Verantwortung. Das Problem des Übergangs zur postkonventionellen Moral, by Karl-Otto Apel; Denken, das an der Zeit ist, by Florian Rötzer;
Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, by Axel Honneth, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXXVI, 3,
1989, pp. 187-205.
Guibentif P., Et Habermas? Le Droit dans l’Œuvre de Jürgen Habermas: Élements
d’Orientation, in «Droit et Société», 11/12, 1989, pp. 159-189.
Günther K., Ein normativer Begriff der Kohärenz. Für eine Theorie der juristischen Argumentation, in «Rechtstheorie», XX, 1989, pp. 163-190; tr. en. A normative conception of
coherence for a discursive theory of legal justification, in «Ratio juris», II, 2, 1989, pp. 155166.
Henrich D., Die Anfänge der Theorie des Subjekts (1789), in Honneth A., McCarty
Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 106-170.
Höhn H.-J., Sozialethik im Diskurs: Skizzen zum Gespräch zwischen Diskursethik und
1692.
1693.
1694.
1695.
1696.
1697.
1698.
1699.
1700.
1701.
1702.
1703.
1704.
1705.
109
Katholischer Soziallehre, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 179-198.
Höhn H.J., Vernunft--Kommunikation--Diskurs: Zu Anspruch Und Grenze Der Transzendtalpragmatik Als Basistheorie Der Philosophie, in «Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie», 36, 1989, pp. 93-128.
Honneth A., Kritische Theorie: vom Zentrum zur Peripherie einer Denktradition, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XLI, 1, 1989, pp. 1-32.
Honneth A., Moralische Entwicklung und sozialer Kampf Sozialphilosophische Lehren aus
Hegels Frühwerk, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 549-573; tr. en. in Honneth A., Moral Development and
Social Struggle: Hegel’s Early Sociale-Philosophical Doctrines, in Honneth A., McCarthy
Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project
of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1992, pp. 197-218.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas, in Lutz B. (ed.), Metzler Philosophen Lexikon, Stuttgart,
Metzler, 1989, pp. 303-307.
Hunyadi M., La souveraineté de la procédure, in «Lignes», VII, 3, 1989, pp. 9-27.
Innerarity D., Habermas y el discurso filosófico de la modernidad, in «Persona y
derecho», 21, 1989, pp. 9-22; repr. in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp.
217-224; repr. in Id., Dialéctica de la modernidad, Madrid, Rialp, 1990, pp. 93-112.
Janik A., Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy, Norwell, Kluwer, 1989.
Jay M., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «History and Theory», XXVIII, 1, 1989, pp. 94-112.
Jay M., The Debate over Performative Contradiction: Habermas vs the Post-structuralists, in
Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im
Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 171-189; repr. in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge
(Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 261-279.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Identidades nacionales y
postnacionales, Madrid, Tecnos, 1989, pp. 9-13.
Jiménez Redondo, M., Problemas de construcción en Teoría de la Acción Comunicativa, in
«Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 133-158.
Keuth H., Zum Positivismusstreit, in Siebeck P. (ed.), Wissenschaft und Werturteil. Zu
Werturteilsdiskussion und Positivismusstreit, Tübingen, Mohr, 1989, pp. 93-190.
Kluge A., “Zeitenwechsel (rasch)”, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 813-***.
Knips I., Symbolische Formen und Akteure. Zur Frage einer Individualität des Theoretikers
und Autors (S. Bourdieu und J. Habermas), in «Widerspruch», IX, 16-17, 1989, pp. 6375.
110
1706.
1707.
1708.
1709.
1710.
1711.
1712.
1713.
1714.
1715.
1716.
1717.
1718.
1719.
1720.
1721.
1722.
Korthals M., Art and Morality: Critical Theory About the Conflict and Harmony between
Art and Morality, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XV, 3, 1989, pp. 241-251.
Korthals M., Communicatieve en koloniserende media, in «Massacommunicatie», XVII,
3, 1989, pp. 207-219.
Korthals M.J.A.A., De nieuwe onoverzichtelijkheid en andere opstellen, Meppel, Boom,
1989.
Künzler J., Medien und Gesellschaftstheorie. Die Medienkonzepte von Talcott Parsons, Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann, Stuttgart, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, 1989.
Kuypers E.L.G.E., Is pedagogisch handelen (meer dan) een communicatieve praxis? :
pedagogiek en de communicatietheorie van J. Habermas, Maastricht, Climacus, 1989.
Lamacchia A., Razionalità critica nella filosofia moderna, Manduria (Ta), Piero Lacaita
Editore, 1989.
Lamb M.L., Communicative Praxis and Theology, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die
Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 241-270; tr. en. Communicative Praxis and Theology: Beyond Modern Nihilism and Dogmatism, in Browning D.S., Schüssler
Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad,
1992, pp. 92-118; tr. it. Prassi comunicativa e teologia, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas e la
teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria dell’agire comunicativo, Brescia, Queriniana, 1992, pp. 185-225; tr. fr. Praxis communicationnelle et théologie
par-delà le nihilisme et le dogmatisme, in E. Arens (ed.), Habermas et la théologie, Paris,
Cerf, 1993, pp. 123-156.
Leist A., Diesseits Der “Transzendentalpragmatik”: Gibt Es Sprachpragmatische Argumente Für Moral?, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIII, 1989, pp. 301317.
Levin D.M., The Body Politic: The Embodiment of Praxis In Foucault And Habermas, in
«Praxis International», IX, 1-2, 1989, pp. 112-132.
Levin D.M., The Listening Self: Personal Growth, Social Change And The Closure Of
Metaphysics, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989.
López M.T., Habermas: después de la moralidad, antes de la eticidad, in «Daimon.
Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 99-112.
Love N.S., Foucault & Habermas on Discourse & Democracy, in «Polity», XXII, 2,
1989, pp. 269-293.
Löwenthal L., Bref von Leo Löwenthal, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C.,
zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 11-14.
Luntley M., On the critique of values, in «Inquiry», 32, 4, 1989, pp. 399-417.
Luntley M., On the Critique of Values, in «Inquiry», XXXII, 4, 1989, pp. 399-417.
Maesschalck M., Habermas interprète de Schelling, in «Archives de Philosophie», 52,
1989, pp. 639-658.
Maestre A., ¿El fracaso de la teoría crítica?, in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1,
1989, pp. 225-236.
1723.
1724.
1725.
1726.
1727.
1728.
1729.
1730.
1731.
1732.
1733.
1734.
1735.
111
Margolis J., Postscript on Modernism and Postmodernism, Both, in «Theory, Culture and
Society», VI, 1, 1989, pp. 5-30.
Mari E.E., El concepto de causalidad en la lectura habermasiana de Freud: Hermeneutica
versus ciencia explicativa, in «Cuadernos de Etica», 8, 1989, pp. 47-67.
Matuštík M.B., Habermas on Communicative Reason and Performative Contradiction, in
«New German Critique», 47, 1989, pp. 163-92.
McCarthy Th., Philosophy and Social Practice: Avoiding the Ethnocentric Predicament, in
Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im
Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 190-209; repr. in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge
(Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 241-260.
McCumber J., Poetic Interaction: Language, Freedom, Reason, Chicago, University of
Chicago Press, 1989.
Medina E., La ciencia en las sociedades avanzadas: Habermas y la nueva teoría crítica, in
Id., Conocimiento y sociología de la ciencia, Madrid, CIS, 1989, pp. 222-301.
Meese E., Parker A. (eds.), The Difference Within: Feminism and Critical Theory, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1989.
Melcic D., Interpretation and Solidarity – An Interview with Richard Bernstein, in «Praxis
International», IX, 3, 1989, pp. 201-219.
Mette N., Identität ohne Religion? Eine religionspädagogische Herausforderung, in Arens E.
(ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 160-178; tr.
it. Identità senza religione? Una sfida alla pedagogia religiosa, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas e
la teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria dell’agire comunicativo, Brescia, Queriniana, 1992, pp. 125-150.
Metz J.B., Anamnetische Vernunft Anmerkungen eines Theologen zur Krise der Geisteswissenschaften, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 773-738; tr. en. Anamnestic Reason: A Theologian’s Remarks on
the Crisis in the Geisteswissenschaften, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 189194.
Montanari M., Jürgen Habermas fra «Teoria critica» e «Neo-illuminismo», in Lamacchia
A. (ed.), Razionalità critica nella filosofia moderna, Manduria (Ta), Piero Lacaita Editore,
1989, pp. 205-224.
Müller-Schöll U., Vernunft und Augenblick: zur Binnenstruktur der Lebens-Welt bei Jürgen Habermas und Ernst Bloch, in Bellut C., Müller-Schöll U. (eds.), Mensch und Moderne: Beiträge zur philosophischen Anthropologie und Gesellschaftskritik, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1989, pp. 183-207.
Murphy W.T., The Habermas Effect: Critical Theory and Academic Law, in «Current
Legal Problems», 42, 1989, pp. 135-165.
112
1736.
1737.
1738.
1739.
1740.
1741.
1742.
1743.
1744.
1745.
1746.
1747.
Nagl L., Rationalization of Society and Discourse: Jürgen Habermas´ social philosophy, in
Peden C., Sterba J.P. (eds.), Freedom, Equality and Social Change, The Edwin Mellen
Press, Lewiston/Lampeter/Queenstown, 1989, p. 372-384.
Nagl L., The Enlightenment – a Stranded Project? Habermas on Nietzsche as a ‘Turning
Point’ to Postmodernity, in «History of European Ideas», 1989, pp. 743-750.
Nagl L., The enlightenment—a stranded project? Habermas on Nietzsche as a ‘turning point’
to postmodernity, in «History of European Ideas», XI, 1-6, 1989, pp. 743-750.
Naharro J.L., Globalidad y autorreferencia como formas del absolutismo desaparecido en N.
Luhmann y J. Habermas, in AA.VV., Política social, Congreso de Sociología III, San
Sebastian, vol. 1, 1989, pp. 82-95.
Negt O., Autonomie und Eingriff. Ein deutscher Intellektueller mit politischem Urteilsvermögen: Jürgen Habermas, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 16.6.1989; repr. in Negt O.,
Horster D., Zimmermann J., Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G. (eds.), Theorie
und Praxis heute. Ein Kolloquium zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Materialis Verlag, 1990, pp. 14-15.
Nunner-Winkler G., Wissen und Wollen Ein Beitrag zur frühkindlichen Moralentwicklung, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen.
Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 574-600; tr. en. Knowing and wanting on moral development in early childhood, in Nunner-Winkler G., Knowing and Wanting: On Moral Development in Early
Childhood, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), CulturalPolitical Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his
sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 219-244.
Offe C., Bindung, Fessel, Bremse Die Unübersichtlichkeit von Selbstbeschränkungsformeln,
in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im
Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 739-774; tr. en. Bindings, Shackles, Brakes: On Self-Limitation Strategies, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth
Okumura T., Shakaikagaku ni okeru ‘Seikatsu’ no Gainen to Sono Shatei: Schutz, Habermas kara Husserl, in «Japanese Sociological Review», XXXIX, 4, 1989, pp. 34-48.
Pauly W., Wahrheit und Konsens. Die Erkenntnistheorie von Jürgen Habermas und ihre
theologische Relevanz, Frankfurt a.M.-Bern-New York-Paris, Peter Lang, 1989.
Pensky M. On the Use and Abuse of Memory: Habermas, Anamnestic Solidarity, and the
Historikerstreit, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XV, 4, 1989, pp. 351-380;
Rasmussen D.M., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas, New York, Sage Publications,
2001.
Percesepe G.J., Future(S) of Philosophy: The Marginal Thinking of Jacques Derrida, New
York, Lang, 1989.
Petrović G., Truth and Pluralism, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer
A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Ge-
1748.
1749.
1750.
1751.
1752.
1753.
1754.
1755.
1756.
1757.
1758.
1759.
1760.
1761.
1762.
113
burtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 210-230.
Peukert H., Kommunikatives Handeln, Systeme der Machtsteigerung und die unvollendeten
Projekte Aufklärung und Theologie, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge
zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns,
Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 39-64; tr. en. Enlightenment and Theology as Unfinished
Projects, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 43-65; tr. it. Agire comunicativo, sistemi di
accrescimento del potere, e illuminismo e teologia come progetti incompiuti, in Arens E. (ed.),
Habermas e la teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria
dell’agire comunicativo, Brescia, Queriniana, 1992, pp. 53-84; tr. fr. Agir communicationnel, systèmes de l’accroissement de puissance et les projets inachevés des Lumières et de la théologie,
in E. Arens (ed.), Habermas et la théologie, Paris, Cerf, 1993, pp. 45-73.
Placher W.C., Unapologetic Theology: A Christian Voice in a Pluralistic Conversation,
Louisville, Westminster, 1989.
Ploeger A.K., Diskurs. De plaats van geloofservaringen binnen de rationele handelingstheorie
van Jürgen Habermas, Groningen, University of Groningen, 1989.
Poster M., Critical Theory and Poststructuralism: In Search of a Context, Ithaca, Cornell
Preuß U.K., Rationality Potentials of Law: Allocative, Distributive and Communicative
Rationality, in Joerges C., Trubek D.M. (eds.), Critical Legal Thought: An AmericanGerman Debate, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1989.
Prins B., Women, morality and the problem of exclusion. A critical inquiry into the ethical
theories of Jürgen Habermas and Nel Noddings, Groningen, University of Groningen,
1989.
Redding P., Habermas’s Theory of Argumentation, in «Journal of Value Inquiry»,
XXII, 1, 1989, pp. 15-32.
Redondo M.J., Problemas de construcción en teoría de la acción comunicativa, in «Daimon.
Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 133-158.
Renaut A., Ere de l’individu. Contribution à l’histoire de la Subjectivité, Paris, Gallimard,
1989.
Rochberg-Halton E., Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Etherealization, in
«Symbolic Interaction», XII, 2, 1989, pp. 333-353.
Rockmore T., Habermas on Historical Materialism, Bloomington-Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, 1989.
Rockmore T., Modernity and Reason: Habermas and Hegel, in «Man and World»,
XXII, 1989, pp. 233-246.
Ruano de la Fuente Y., Habermas: Sobre una reflexión metodológica de la teoría crítica, in
«Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», 23, 1989, pp. 227-240.
Rubio Carracedo J., Posición original y acción comunicativa (Rawls y Habermas), iin
«Revista de estudios políticos», 64, 1989, pp. 225-234.
Rusconi G.E., Razionalità comunicativa, razionalità politica, in L. Sciolla, L. Ricolfi
(ed.), Il soggetto dell’azione: paradigmi sociologici ed immagini dell’attore sociale, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1989, pp. 213-231; repr. in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e
114
1763.
1764.
1765.
1766.
1767.
1768.
1769.
1770.
1771.
1772.
1773.
critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp.
199-217.
Sánchez Meca D., Nihilismo y sociedad ideal de la comunicación. De Nietzsche a
Habermas, in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 59-74.
Schiller, H.-E., Habermas und die Kritische Theorie, in Bolte G. (ed.), Unkritische Theorie. Gegen Habermas, Lüneburg, zu Klampen, 1989, pp. 101-121.
Schnädelbach H., Das Gesicht im Sand Foucault und der anthropologische, in Honneth
A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der
Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp.
231-261; tr. en. The Face in the Sand: Foucault and the Antropological Slumber, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the
Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 311-340.
Schüssler Fiorenza F., Die Kirche als Interpretationsgemeinschaft, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 115-144; tr. en. The
Church as a Community of Interpretation: Political Theology Between Discourse Ethics and
Hermeneutical Reconstruction, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 66-91; tr. it. La
chiesa come comunità dell’interpretazione, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas e la teologia. Contributi per la ricezione, discussione e critica teologica della teoria dell’agire comunicativo, Brescia,
Queriniana, 1992, pp. 87-123.
Schweppenhäuser G., Die ‘kommunikativ verflüssigte Moral’. Zur Diskursethik bei Habermas, in Bolte G. (ed.), Unkritische Theorie: Gegen Habermas, Lüneburg, zu Klampen, 1989, pp. 122-145.
Sevilla S., La transformación materialista de la filosofía trascendental, in «Daimon. Revista
de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 159-175.
Shapiro M.J., Weighing Anchor: Postmodern Journeys from the Life-World, in White S.K.
(ed.), Life-World and Politics: Between Modernity and Postmodernity: Essays in Honor of Fred
R. Dallmayr, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1989, pp. 139-165.
Shusterman R., Postmodernism and the Aesthetic Turn: The Philosophical Discourse
of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, by Jürgen Habermas; The Ideologies of Theory: Essays, 1971-1986, by Fredric Jameson; Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, by Richard
Rorty, in «Poetics Today», X, 3, 1989, pp. 605-622.
Siebert R.J., Die Kommunikatives Handeln und Transzendenz: Gerechtigkeit, Liebe und
Versöhnung, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 65-95.
Siebert R.J., From Critical Theory to Communicative Political Theory. Universal Solidarity,
New York-Bern-Frankfurt a.M., Peter Lang, 1989.
Siljander P., Education as a Communicative Action: aspects of critical-emancipatoric pedagogy, in «Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research», XXXIII, 2, 1989, pp. 111121.
1774.
1775.
1776.
1777.
1778.
1779.
1780.
1781.
1782.
1783.
1784.
1785.
1786.
1787.
115
Simpson E., Conservatism, Radicalism and Democratic Practice, in «Praxis International», IX, 3, 1989, pp. 273-286.
Simpson G.M., Die Versprachlichung (und Verflüssigung?) des Sakralen. Eine theologische
Untersuchung zu Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie der Religion, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und
die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 145-159; tr. en. The Linguistification (and Liquifaction?) of the Sacred: A Theological Consideration of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Religion, in «Exploration», 7, 1989, pp. 21-35; repr. as Theologia Crucis and the Forensically Fraught World: Engaging Helmut Peukert and Jürgen Habermas, in Browning
D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New
York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 173-205.
Slaughter R.A., Cultural Reconstruction in the Post-modern World, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXI, 3, 1989, pp. 255-270.
Smith B.H., Contingencies of Value, in «National Forum: Phi Kappa Phi Journal»,
69, 1989, pp. 22-24.
Solum L., Freedom of Communicative Action: A Theory of the First Amendment Freedom
of Speech, in «Northwestern University Law Review», 83, 1989, pp. 54-135.
Stofberg J.A., Objectivity and Ideology, in «South African Journal of Philosophy»,
VIII, 1989, pp. 16-29.
Strong T.B., Aesthetic Authority and Tradition: Nietzsche and the Greeks, in «History of
European Ideas», 1989, pp. 989-1007.
Taylor Ch., Inwardness and the Culture of Modernity, in Honneth A., McCarty Th.,
Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen
Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 601-624; repr. in
Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in
the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 88110.
Teigas D., Knowledge and hermeneutic understanding: a study of the Habermas-Gadamer
debate, Canterbury, University of Kent at Canterbury, 1990.
Teubner G., How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law, in
«Law and Society Review», XXIII, 1989, pp. 727-757.
Teubner G., Recht als autopoietisches System, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989,
Theunissen M., Die Zeitvergessenheit der Metaphysik Zum Streit um Parmenides, Fr 8,56a, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen.
Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 262-304; tr. en. Metaphysics’ Forgetfulness of Time: On the Controversy
over Parmenides, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press
1992, pp. 3-28.
Thiebaut C., Los límites del procedimentalismo, in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1,
1989, pp. 113-131.
Thyen A., Negative Dialektik und Erfahrung: zur Rationalität des Nichtidentischen bei
Adorno, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M., 1989.
116
1788.
1789.
1790.
1791.
1792.
1793.
1794.
1795.
1796.
1797.
1798.
1799.
1800.
1801.
1802.
1803.
1804.
1805.
Trans V.D., On Human Rationality – Habermas’ Theory of Consensus, in «Philosophical Review», 12, 1989, pp. 389-430.
Trey G.A., Habermas’s Postmodern Adventure: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Diacritics», XIX, 2, 1989, pp. 66-79.
Trom D., Habermas (Jürgen), L’espace public. Archéologie de la publicité comme dimension
constitutive de la société bourgeoise, in «Politix», II, 5, 1989, pp. 95-96.
Tucker, K., Ideology and social movements: the contributions of Habermas, in «Sociological
Inquiry», 59, 1989, pp. 30-47.
Tugendhat E., Überlegungen zur Methode der Philosophie aus analytischer Sicht, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess
pp. 305-317; tr. en. Reflections on Philosophical Method form an Analytic Point of View, in
Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in
the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 113124.
Tully J., Wittgenstein And Political Philosophy: Understanding Practices Of Critical Reflection, in «Political Theory», XVII, 1989, pp. 172-204.
Tuori K., Discourse Ethics and the Legitimacy of Law, in «Ratio Juris», II, 2, 1989, pp.
125-143.
Tuori K., Legitimität des modernen Rechts, in «Rechtstheorie», XX, 1989, pp. 221243.
Turgeon P., Pour une raison polyphonique. Jürgen Habermas, Le Discours philosophique de la modernité, in «Liberté», XXXI, 2, 1989, pp. 127-132.
Ujaldon E., Informe bibliográfico sobre la obra de Habermas, in «Daimon. Revista de
filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 255-270.
Uusitalo L., Efficiency, Effectiveness and Legitimation: Criteria for the Evaluation of Norms,
in «Ratio Juris», II, 1989, pp. 194-201.
Vattimo, Ermeneutica e teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in L. Sciolla, L. Ricolfi (eds.), Il
soggetto dell’azione: paradigmi sociologici ed immagini dell’attore sociale, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1989, pp. 233-245.
Vilar G., Cultura, Estética e Ilustración. En torno a las ideas estéticas de J. Habermas, in
«La balsa de la 519 medusa», 12, 1989, pp. 43-57.
Villacañas Berlanga J.L., Racionalización y evolución: teoría e historia de la modernidad en
la obra de Habermas, in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1, 1989, pp. 177-216.
Visker R., Het Statuut Van De Genealogie: Kanttekeningen Bij Nietzsche En Foucault, in
«Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte», 81, 1989, pp. 178-187.
Vogel S.M., Habermas and Marcuse on Technology, Western Social Science Association, Albuquerque, 29.4.1989.
Vollrath E., Metapolis und Apolitie. Defizite der Wahrnehmung des Politischen in der Kritischen Theorie und bei Jürgen Habermas, in «Perspektiven der Philosophie», 15, 1989,
pp. 191-232.
Wagner G., Zipprian H., Wie ist soziale Ordnung möglich?: vom Hobbesschen Problem
1806.
1807.
1808.
1809.
1810.
1811.
1812.
1813.
1814.
1815.
117
und von den Schwierigkeiten mit der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Archiv für
Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXXV, 4, 1989, pp. 490-501.
Warren M., Liberal Constitutionalism as Ideology: Marx and Habermas, in «Political
Theory», XVII, 1989, pp. 511-534.
Wehler H.-U., Geschichtswissenschaft heutzutage: Aufklärung oder Sinnstiftung?, in Honneth A., McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess
pp. 775-793.
Wellmer A. Was ist eine pragmatische Bedeutungstheorie? Variationen über den Satz “Wir
verstehen einen Sprechakt, wenn wir wissen, was ihn akzeptabel macht”, in Honneth A.,
McCarty Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp.
318-370; tr. en. What Is a Pragmatic Theory of Meaning? Variations on the Proposition ‘We
Understand a Speech Act When We Know What Makes It Acceptable, in Honneth A.,
McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Philosophical Interventions in the Unfinished
Project of Enlightenment, Cambridge (Mass), MIT Press 1992, pp. 171-219; tr. es. ¿Qué
es una teoría pragmática del significado? Variaciones sobre la proposición “Comprendemos un
acto de habla, si sabemos lo que lo hace aceptable”, in «Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 1,
1989, pp. 9-38. 29.
Welty G., A Critique of Habermas’ Proposed “Reconstruction of Historical Materialism”,
Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1989.
Wenz G., Verständigungsorientierte Subjektivität. Eine Erinnerung an den Kommunikations Kommunikationstheoretiker F. D. E. Schleiermacher, in Arens E. (ed.), Habermas und
die Theologie. Beiträge zur theologischen Rezeption, Diskussion und Kritik der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1989, pp. 224-240; tr. fr. Une subjectivité
orientée vers l’intercompréhension: souvenirs d’un théoricien de la communication, F. D. E.
Schleiermacher, in E. Arens (ed.), Habermas et la théologie, Paris, Cerf, 1993, pp. 103122.
Wenzel H., Hochmuth U., Die Kontingenz von Kommunikation: zur kritischen Theorie
des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XLI, 2, 1989, pp. 241-269.
Wetzel M., Diskurse als Wege zur Dialektik, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIII, 2, 1989, pp. 213-241.
White S.K., The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity, Cambridge, University Press, 1989.
Whitebook J., Intersubjectivity and the Monadic Core of the Psyche: Habermas and Castoriadis on the Unconscious, in «Praxis International», IX, 4, 1989, pp. 347-364; in Busino
G. (ed.), Autonomie et autotransformation de la société. La philosophie militante de Cornelius
Castoriadis, Genève, Librairie Droz, 1989, pp. 225-244; repr. in Passerin d’Entrèves
M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays
on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 172193.
Wiethölter R., Ist unserem Recht der Prozeß zu machen?, in Honneth A., McCarty Th.,
118
1816.
1817.
1818.
Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen. Im Prozess der Aufklärung: Jürgen
Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1989, pp. 794-812
Wolin R., Introduction, in J. Habermas, The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and
the Historian’s Debate, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1989, pp. VII-XXXII.
Young R.E., A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children’s future, Hemel
Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989; tr. es. part. La crisis de la educación actual:
Habermas y el futuro de nuestros hijos, in «Revista de Educación», 291, 1990, pp. 7-31.
Zuñiga J., Habermas and Modernity, by Richard J. Bernstein, in Noûs, XXIII, 2,
1989, pp. 272-274.
1990
1819.
1820.
1821.
1822.
1823.
1824.
1825.
1826.
1827.
1828.
1829.
1830.
1831.
Agazzi E., Dopo Francoforte la Metafisica, Jürgen Habermas, Karl otto Apel, Gadamer,
Napoli, Liguori, 1990.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Habermas: alternativa crítica a una teoría pura, in Insausti X.U.,
Aguirre Oraa J.M. (eds.), Pensamiento crítico, ética y absoluto: homenaje a José Manzana,
1928-1978, Vitoria, Eset, 1990, pp. 34-62.
Alcala R., Hermeneutica y Realismo Cientifico, in «Analogia Filosofica», IV, 2, 1990,
pp. 161-172.
Alexy R., A Theory of Practical Discourse, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr F. (eds.), The
Communicative Ethics Controversy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 151-190.
Alexy R., Problems of Discursive Rationality in Law, in Maihofer W., Sprenger G.
(eds.), Law and the States in Modern Times, Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1990.
Andersen H., Morality in Three Social Theories: Parsons, Analytical Marxism and Habermas, in «Acta Sociologica», XXXIII, 4, 1990, pp. 321-339.
Bal P., Procedurele Rationaliteit en Mensenrechten in het Strafproces, in «Recht en Kritiek», 16, pp. 259-279.
Balaban O., On Justice and Legitimation: A Critique of Jürgen Habermas’ Concept of Historical Reconstructivism, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIX, 2,
1990, pp. 273-277.
Balaban O., Subject and Consciousness: A Philosophical Inquiry into Self-Consciousness,
Totowa, Rowman & Littlefield, 1990.
Barber M., Alma Gonzalez: Otherness as Attending to the Other, in Dallery A., Scott
C., Roberts P.H. (eds.), The Question of the Other, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1990,
pp. 119-126.
Bayard C., The Intellectual in the Post Modern Age: East/West Contrasts, in «Philosophy Today», XXXVI, 1990, pp. 291-302.
Benhabib S., Afterword: Communicative Ethics and Contemporary Controversies in Pratical
Philosophy, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr F.R. (eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy,
Benhabib S., In the Shadow of Aristotle And Hegel: Communicative Ethics And Current
1832.
1833.
1834.
1835.
1836.
1837.
1838.
1839.
1840.
1841.
1842.
1843.
1844.
1845.
1846.
1847.
119
Controversies In Practical Philosophy, in «Philosophical Forum», 21, 1990, pp. 1-31.
Beriain J., La reconstrucción del proceso de racionalización occidental según J. Habermas:
Mundo de la Vida, crisis y racionalidad sistémica, in «Revista de Estudios Políticos», 67,
1990, pp. 153-188.
Bernath K., Abortion and Infanticide, in «European Journal of Special Needs Education», V, 1, March 1990, pp. 43-47.
Berten A., De la ética puritana a la ética de la fraternidad: Weber y Habermas, in Insausti
X, Aguirre Oraa J.M. (eds.), Pensamiento crítico, ética y absoluto: homenaje a José Manzana,
1928-1978, 1990, pp. 347-366.
Bishop Merrill S.A., Linguistics as a Borderline Case in Abeunt Studia in Mores: A Festschrift for Helga Doblin, Lang, New York 1990.
Boettke P.J., Jürgen Habermas, On the Logic of the Social Sciences, in «Southern
Economic Journal», LVII, 1, 1990, pp. 251-252.
Bogner C., Die Versöhnung der mit sich selber zerfallenen Moderne. Zum Verhältnis von
Ethik und Gesellschaftstheorie bei J. Habermas, München, tuduv Verlag, 1990.
Böhelr D., Transcendental Pragmatics and Critical Morality: On the Possibility and Moral
Significance of a Self-Enlightenment of Reason, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr F.R. (eds.), The
Bohman J.F., Communication, Ideology, and Democratic Theory, in «American Political
Science Review», LXXXIV, 1, 1990, pp. 93-104.
Brena G.L., Agire comunicativo e secolarizzazione dell’etica in J. Habermas. I. L’agire comunicativo e il suo contesto problematico, in «La civiltà cattolica», CXLI, 4, 1990, pp. 142149.
Calhoun C.J., Civil Society and Political Life: The Structural Transformation of the
Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XIX, 2, 1990, pp. 312-316.
Calloni M., Comunicazione, giudizio e azione: sul contrasto fra teleologia e deontologia nella
filosofia pratica, in Bartolomei Vasconcelos T., Calloni M. (eds.), Etiche in dialogo. Tesi
sulla razionalità pratica, Genova, Marietti, 1990, pp. 81-108.
Calloni M., Diskursethik e democrazia: oltre la dialettica dell’Illuminismo, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, I Incontro di studi – La Teoria critica: Francoforte e
oltre, 31.10-1.11.1990.
Christoph K., Habermas´ Psychoanalyse-Rezeption, in Negt O., Horster D., Zimmermann J., Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G., (eds.), Theorie und Praxis heute.
Ein Kolloquium zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Materialis Verlag, 1990, pp. 49-54.
Colom González F., Legitimidad y democracia: dos décadas de un debate inconcluso, in
«Isegoría», 2, 1990, pp. 162-169.
Cook D., Remapping Modernity, in «British Journal of Aesthetics», XXX, 1, 1990,
pp. 35-45.
Cortella L., Per una teoria critica della modernità, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, I Incontro di studi – La Teoria critica: Francoforte e oltre, 31.10-1.11.1990.
120
1848.
1849.
1850.
1851.
1852.
1853.
1854.
1855.
1856.
1857.
1858.
1859.
1860.
1861.
1862.
1863.
1864.
1865.
Cortina A., Diskursethik und Menschenrechte, in «Archiv fur Rechts – und Sozialphilosophie», 76, 1990, pp. 37-49.
Créau A., Kommunikative Vernunft als “entmystifiziertes Schicksal”. Denkmotive des frühen Hegel in der Theorie J. Habermas’, Frankfurt a.M., Athenäum, 1990.
Cutrofello A., Derrida’s Deconstruction of the Ideal of Legitimation, in «Man and
World», XXIII, 2, 1990, pp. 157-173.
Daley J.M., Angulo J., People-Centered Community Planning, in «Community Development Society. Journal», XXI, 2, 1990, pp. 88-103.
Davis Ch., Theology and Political Society, New York, Cambridge University Press,
1990.
de Haan W., The Politics of Redress: Crime, Punishment and Penal Abolition, London,
Allen & Unwin, 1990.
de Haven-Smith L., Philosophical Critiques of Policy Analysis. Lindblom, Habermas, and
the Great Society, Gainesville, University of Florida Press, 1990.
Deficits y excesos del último Habermas, in «La balsa de la medusa», 14, 1990, pp. 100109.
Dietz S., Lebenswelt und System als Ort und Perspektive. Untersuchungen zur kritischen
Gesellschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, Hamburg, 1990.
Döbert R., Against the neglect of “content” in the moral theories of Kohlberg and Habermas:
Implications for the relativism universalism controversy, in Wren T.E. (ed.), The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion between Philosophy and the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1990, pp. 71-108.
Doepke F., The Endorsements of Interpretation, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XX, 3, 1990, pp. 277-294.
Domínguez Bilbao R., El impacto de la teoría habermasiana en la psicología social. El
intento de sincretismo entre los paradigmas nomotético e ideográfico, in AA.VV., Análisis e
intervención social, Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social III, Santiago de Compostela,
vol. 1, 1990, pp. 454-460.
Dorschel A., Handlungstypen und Kriterien. Zu Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen
Handelns”, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIV, 2, 1990, pp. 220252.
Dreyfus S., Dreyfus H., What is morality? A Phenomenological Account of the Development of Ethical Expertise, in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism : contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 237-264.
Dryzek J.S., Discursive democracy: politics, policy, and political science, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Dussel E.D., Jürgen Habermas [1929-], in Id., El último Marx (1863-1882) y la
liberación latinoamericana: un comentario a la tercera y a la cuarta redacción de “El capital”,
Delegación Coyoacán, Siglo XXI, 1990, pp. 319-333 .
Eckersley R., Habermas and Green Political Thought. Two Roads Diverging, in « Theory
and Society», XIX, 6, 1990, pp. 739-776.
Fernández Agis D., Habermas-Foucault: funcionalismo ético versus postcriticismo, in
1866.
1867.
1868.
1869.
1870.
1871.
1872.
1873.
1874.
1875.
1876.
1877.
1878.
1879.
1880.
1881.
1882.
121
«Paideia», XI, 6, 1990, pp. 16-23.
Finger M., The subject-person of adult education in the crisis of modernity, in «Studies in
Continuing Education», XII, 1, 1990, pp. 24-30.
Fish S., Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies, Durham, Duke University Press, 1990.
Flego G., Frojdomarksizam i Frankfurtska škola, in «Filozofska Istrazivanja»,
XXXIV, 1990, pp. 105-112.
Fleming M., Interpretation and Transformative Force: With/Against Habermas, in Canadian Society for Hermeneutics and Postmodern Thought, Victoria, British Columbia, 5.1990.
Fleming M., Rationality and the Witches: Habermas and Winch, in Department of Philosophy, McMaster University, 10.1990.
Fraser N., in Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy, in «Social Text», 25-26, 1990, pp. 56-80; repr. in Calhoun C. (ed.),
Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 109-142;
fr. fr. Repenser l’espace public: une contribution à la critique de la démocratie réellement existante, in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 103-134.
Fritzsche H., Dialog und Verständigung – Erwägungen zu einer modernen Verständigunskultur, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XXXVIII, 5, 1990, pp. 401-410.
Funk N., Habermas and Solidarity, in «Philosophical Inquiry: International Quarterly», XII, 3-4, 1990, pp. 17-31.
Ganßmann H., Kommunikation und Arbeit: zum Arbeitsbegriff bei Habermas, in König
H., von Greiff B., Schauer H. (eds.), Sozialphilosophie der industriellen Arbeit, Opladen,
García Marzá D., La ética discursiva: análisis y desarrollo de la propuesta ética de Jürgen
Habermas, tesis doctoral, Universitat de València, 1990.
Garzón E., Consenso, racionalidad y legitimidad, in «Isegoria», 2, 1990, pp. 13-28.
Geiman K.P., Habermas’ Early Lifeworld Appropriation: A Critical Assessment, in
«Man and World», XXIII, 1, 1990, pp. 63-83.
Görtzen R., Habermas in Nederland. Een geannoteerd literatuuroverzicht, in von Reijen
W. (ed.), Habermas leidraad, Utrecht, ISOR, 1990, pp. 83-123.
Görtzen R., Jürgen Habermas: A Bibliography, in Rasmussen D.M., Reading Habermas, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990, pp. 114-140; tr. it. Jürgen Habermas, una bibliografia, in Rasmussen D.M., Leggere Habermas. Con una bibliografia di René Gortzen, Napoli,
Liguori, 1993, pp. 155-194.
Gross A.G., Persuasion and peer review in science: Habermas’s ideal speech situation applied,
in «History of the Human Sciences», I, 3, 1990, pp. 195-209.
Guariglia O., Los fundamentos discursivos de la democracia y los conflictos de intereses, in
«Dianoia», 1990, pp. 83-95.
Hall J.R., Epistemology and Sociohistorical Inquiry, in «Annual Review of Sociology»,
16, 1990, pp. 329-351.
122
1883.
1884.
1885.
1886.
1887.
1888.
1889.
1890.
1891.
1892.
1893.
1894.
1895.
1896.
1897.
1898.
1899.
1900.
1901.
Handler J.S., Law and the Search for Community, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.
Hirschbein R., What If They Gave a Crisis and Nobody Came: A Hermeneutical Analysis, Westport, Greenwood Publishing Group, 1990.
Hodge J., Habermas and Foucault: Contesting Rationality, in «Irish Philosophical
Journal», 1990, pp. 60-78.
Höffe O., Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Id., Kategorische Rechtsprinzipien. Ein Kontrapunkt der Moderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1990, pp. 351390.
Höffe O., Kantian Skepticism toward Transcendental Ethics, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr
F. (eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990,
pp. 193-218.
Holz K. (ed.), Soziologie zwischen Moderne und Postmoderne: Untersuchungen zum Subjekt, Erkenntnis und Moral, Gießen, Focus Verlag, 1990.
Honneth A., Moralbewusstsein und soziale Klassenherrschaftp, in Id., Die zerrissene Welt
des Sozialen, Frankfurt a. M. Suhrkamp, 1990, pp. 192-201.
Horster D., Erkenntnis und Moral bei Habermas, in Negt O., Horster D., Zimmermann J., Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G. (eds.), Theorie und Praxis heute. Ein
Kolloquium zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M.,
Materialis Verlag, 1990.
Hunyadi M., Ethik und Theorie des Subjektes. Strukturalismus und Diskursethik,
in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», XCVII, 1, 1990.
Hunyadi M., Une morale post-métaphysique. Introduction à la pensée morale de Jürgen Habermas, in «Revue de Theologie et de Philosophie», 122, 1990, pp. 467-483.
Ilting K.H., The Basic of the Validity of Moral Norms, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr F.
(eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990,
pp. 220-255.
Ingram D., Critical Theory and Philosophy, New York, Paragon House, 1990.
Ingram D., Dworkin, Habermas, and the CLS Movement on Moral Criticism in Law, in
«Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVI, 1990, pp. 237-268.
Izzo A., Individuo e interazione in J. Habermas, in Id. (ed.), Il ritorno del soggetto, Roma,
Bulzoni, 1990, pp. 23-42.
Janicaud D., Racionalidad, fuerza y poder: Foucault y las críticas de Habermas, in
AA.VV., Michel Foucault, filósofo, Barcelona, Gedisa, 1990, pp. 279-297
Kaniowski A.M., Critical Activity and Ethics: The Problem of Generalization, in «Praxis
International», X, 1-2, 1990, pp. 117-130.
Kelly M., MacIntyre, Habermas and Philosophical Ethics, in «Philosophical Forum»,
21, 1990, pp. 70-93; in Kelly M. (ed.), Hermeneutics and Critical Theory in Ethics and
Politics, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 70-93.
Kissling Ch., Die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns in Diskussion, in «Freiburger
Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie», XXXVII, 1-2, 1990, pp. 233-252.
Kneer G., Die Pathologien der Modern. Zur Zeitdiagnose in der “Theorie des kommunikati-
1902.
1903.
1904.
1905.
1906.
1907.
1908.
1909.
1910.
1911.
1912.
1913.
1914.
1915.
1916.
1917.
1918.
1919.
1920.
123
ven Handelns” von Jürgen Habermas, Opladen, Westdeutschen Verlag, 1990.
Korthals M., Conflict and harmony, in von Engelsdorp Gastelaars Ph. (ed.), Critical
Theory Today, Rotterdam, Universitaire Pers, 1990, pp. 145-156.
Korthals M., Consensus en dissensus bij Habermas, in Widdershoven G., de Boer Th.
(eds.), Hermeneutiek in discussie, Delft, Eburon, 1990, pp.72-80.
Krüger H.P., Kritik der kommunikativen Vernunft. Kommunikationsorientierte Wissenschafts-forschung im Streit mit Sohn Rethel, Toulmin und Habermas, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1990.
Kuhlmann A., Das gute Leben und der Sinn. Jürgen Habermas über Moraltheorie und Philosophie, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 274, 1990, pp. 13-**.
Kuypers E.L.G.E., F. Nietzsche en de grondslagenproblematiek van de sociale wetenschappen - met een excursie naar J. Habermas, in Id., Nietzsche nu of nooit, Leuven, Apeldoorn,
1990, pp. **-**.
Ladriére P., De l’Expérience Étique à une Étique de la Discussion, in «Cahiers Internationaux de Sociologie», 37, 1990, pp. 43-68.
Lakeland P., Theology and Critical Theory: The Discourse of the Church, Nashville, Abingdon Press, 1990.
Lara M.P., La identidad social en Habermas: entre el consenso y la alteridad, in «Doxa:
Cuadernos de filosofía del derecho», 7, 1990, pp. 257-272.
Lash S., The sociology of postmodernism, London, Routledge, 1990; tr. it. Modernismo e
postmodernismo. I mutamenti culturali delle società complesse, Roma, Armando, 2000.
Lenoble J., Jugement juridique et jugement pratique: de Kant a la philosophie dulangage, in
«Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale», 1990, pp. 339-365.
Lingard B., Accountability and Control: a sociological account of secondary school assessment
in Queensland, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education», XI, 2, 1990, pp. 171188.
Linklater A., Beyond realism and Marxism: critical theory and international relations, New
York, St. Martin’s Press, 1990.
Loparic Z., Habermas e o Terror Pratico, in «Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de
Filosofia», XIII, 2, 1990.
Lövenich F., Modernisierung des Idealismus. Die Aktualisierung von Hegels Kantkritik in
Habermas’ kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie, in «Hegel-Studien», XXV, 1990, pp. 119–128
Lövenich F., Paradigmenwechsel. Über die Dialektik der Aufklärung in der revidierten Kritischen Theorie, Würzburg, Königshausen und Neumann, 1990.
Lövenich F., The Systematization des Kontrafaktischen (in Serbo-Croatian), in «Filozofska Istrazivanja», 35, 1990, pp. 479-496.
Mann P., Unifying Discourse: City College as a Post-Modern Public Sphere, in «Social
Text», 25-26, 1990, pp. 81-102.
Marcil-Lacoste L., Les enjeux egalitaires du consensus rationnel: Habermas et ses sources, in
«Laval Theologique et Philosophique», XLVI, 3, 1990, pp. 317-335.
Margolis J., Les trois sortes d’universalite dans l’hermeneutique de H G Gadamer, in «Archives de Philosophie», 1990, pp. 559-571.
124
1921.
1922.
1923.
1924.
1925.
1926.
1927.
1928.
1929.
1930.
1931.
1932.
1933.
1934.
1935.
1936.
1937.
Matuštík M.B., “Jürgen Habermas at 60”. A feature on the Habermas Festschrift, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVI, 1, 1990, pp. 61-80.
Matuštík M.B., “Jürgen Habermas at 60”. A feature on the Habermas Festschrift, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVI, 2, 1990, pp. 159-160.
McCarthy Th., Introduction, in Habermas J., Moral Consciousness and Communicative
Action (MB), Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. VII-XIII.
Melkevik B., Le modèle communicationnel en science juridique : Habermas et le droit, in
«Les Cahiers de droit», XXXI, 3, 1990, pp. 901-915.
Mesa J.A., Concepto de interacción en el planteamiento de J. Habermas, in «Universitas
Philosophica», 14, 1990, pp. 45-74.
Milliano R. de, Tussen waarheid en werkelijkheid: een begripsbepaling in het licht van Jürgen
Habermas’ consensustheorie van de waarheid, Amsterdam, 1990.
Moss L., Ethical Expertise and Moral Maturity: Conflict or Complement?, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVI, 1990, pp. 227-235.
Mouffe Ch., Rawls: political philosophy without politics, in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1990, pp. 217-235.
Munnichs G., De actualiteit van Habermas’ koloniseringsthese, in «Filosofie & praktijk»,
11, 1990, pp. 57-74.
Murray J.P., Schuler J., Historical Materialism Revisited: Habermas’s Theory of History,
in Peden C., Hudson Y (eds.), Terrorism, Justice and Social Values, LewistonQueenston-Lampeter, The Edwin Mellen Press, 1990, pp. 39-52.
Nagl L., Das neue (post-analytische) Interesse an der Praanalytischen Philosophie, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XXXVII, 1990, pp. 257-270.
Némedi D., Habermas und das Problem der normativen Basis der Kritischen Theorie, in
Engeldorp Castelaars Ph., Magala S., Preuss O. (eds), Critics and Critical Theory in
Eastern Europe, Rotterdam, Universitaire Pers Rotterdam, 1990, pp. 129-165.
Nielsen K., The Generalized Others and the Concrete Other: A Response of Marie Fleming,
in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XVII, 2, 1990, pp. 163-171.
Nielsen T.M., Jürgen Habermas: morality, society and ethics, in «Acta sociologica»,
XXXIII, 2, 1990, pp. 93-114.
Noam G., Beyond Freud and Piaget: Biographical Worlds--Interpersonal Self, in Wren T.
(ed.), The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Studies in contemporary German social thought, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1990, pp. 360-399.
Norris Ch., Deconstruction Postmodernism: Derrida, Habermas, John Searle, in Id.,
What’s Wrong with Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy, Harvester
Wheatsheaf, 1990, pp. 49-77.
Nunner-Winkler G., Moral Relativism and Strict Universalism, , in Wren T. (ed.), The
moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Studies
in contemporary German social thought, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 109126.
1938.
1939.
1940.
1941.
1942.
1943.
1944.
1945.
1946.
1947.
1948.
1949.
1950.
1951.
1952.
1953.
1954.
125
Olafson F.A:, Habermas as a Philosopher: The Theory of Communicative Action, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», C, 3, 1990, pp. 641-657.
Ollig H.L., Das unerledigte Metaphysikproblem: Anmerkungen zur jumgsten Metaphysikdiskussion im deutschen Sprachraum, in «Theologie und Philosophie», LXV, 1, 1990,
pp. 31-68.
Orth-Peine H., Identitätsbildung im sozialgeschichtlichen Wandel, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1990.
Paulson S., Laßt sich die reine Rechtslehre transzendental begründen?, in «Rechtstheorie»,
XXI, 1990, pp. 155-179.
Petrucciani S., Problemi dell’etica del discorso, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, I Incontro di studi – La Teoria critica: Francoforte e oltre, 31.10-1.11.1990.
Pistone S., Habermas e la riunificazione tedesca, in «Federalista», XXXII, 2, 1990, pp.
160-**.
Polan D., The Public’s Fear, or Media as Monster in Habermas, Negt, and Kluge: The
Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of
Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Social Text», 25/26, 1990, pp. 260-266.
Polkinghorne D., Psychology after philosophy, in Faulconer J.E. (ed.), Reconsidering Psychology: Perspectives from Continental Philosophy, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press,
1990, pp. 92-115.
Postone M., History and Critical Social Theory: The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XIX, 2, 1990, pp. 170-176.
Pourtois H., Quelques remarques sur l’idée de démocratie délibérative, Frankfurt a.M.,
J.W. Goethe Universität, 12.1990, pp. 1-20.
Prins B., Ethiek als tekstuele praktijk: over vrouwen, moraal en uitsluiting, Amsterdam,
Krisis, 1990.
Prins B., How to resist a forceful invitation. Strategies of exclusion and inclusion in Habermas’ communicative ethics. Post-graduate course Feminist theory and the women’s movement,
Dubrovnik, 1990.
Protti M., Postfazione, in Habermas J., La rivoluzione in corso (NR KPS VII), Milano,
Feltrinelli, 1990, pp. 225-235.
Protti M., Weber e Habermas: paradigmi concorrenti nelle scienze sociali, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, I Incontro di studi – La Teoria critica: Francoforte e oltre, 31.10-1.11.1990.
Puka B., The Majesty and Mystery of Kohlberg’s Stage 6, in Wren T. (ed.), The moral
domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences. Studies in
contemporary German social thought, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 182-223.
Rasmussen D., Universalism vs. communitarianism: an introduction, in Rasmussen D.
(ed.), Universalism vs. communitarianism: contemporary debates in ethics, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1990, pp. 11-38.
Rasmussen D.M., Reading Habermas, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990; tr. it. Leggere
Habermas. Con una bibliografia di René Gortzen, Napoli, Liguori editore, 1993.
126
1955.
1956.
1957.
1958.
1959.
1960.
1961.
1962.
1963.
1964.
1965.
1966.
1967.
1968.
1969.
1970.
1971.
Rasmussen D.M., Universalism vs. Communitarianism: Contemporary Debates in Ethics,
Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990.
Razquin J.B., La reconstrucción del proceso de racionalización occidental según J. Habermas:
Mundo de la vida, crisis y racionalidad sistémica, in «Revista de estudios políticos», 67,
1990, pp. 153-188.
Rehg W.S.J., Discourse Ethics and the Communitarian Critique of Neo-Kantianism, in
«Philosophical Forum», 22, 1990, pp. 120-138; in Fultner B. (ed.), Habermas: Key
Concepts, London, Acumen Press, 2011, pp. 115-139.
Roderick R., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XIX, 2, 1990, pp. 316-317.
Ronald R., The Aesthetics of the Critical Theorists: Studies on Benjamin, Adorno, Marcuse,
and Habermas, Lewiston, N.Y., Edwin Mellen Press, 1990.
Rorty R., Truth and Freedom: A Reply to Thomas McCarthy, in «Critical Inquiry»,
XVI, 3, 1900, pp. 633-643.
Scaff L.A., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into
a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas; The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The American
Political Science Review», LXXXIV, 3, 1990, pp. 967-968.
Schäfer G., Der Stachel Jürgen Habermas, in Negt O., Horster D., Zimmermann J.,
Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G. (eds.), Theorie und Praxis heute. Ein Kolloquium
zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Materialis
Verlag, 1990, pp. 64-73.
Schiller H.E., Zur sozialphilosophischen Bedeutung des Sprachbegriffs Wilhelm von Humboldts. Seine Beziehung zur kritischen Theorie bei Marcuse, Habermas und Adorno, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIV, 2, 1990, pp. 253-272.
Schmidt H., Jürgen Habermas: Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne, in «Deutsche
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XXXVIII, 10, 1990, pp. 1004-1007.
Schmidt Th.M., E. Arens (Hg.),”Habermas und die Theologie’’, in «Theologie und
Philosophie», LXV, 2, 1990.
Senfft H., Kein Abschied von Hitler. Ein Blick hinter die Fassaden des “Historikerstreits”,
Köln, Hamburger Stiftung für Sozialgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts, 1990.
Siebert H., Die Habermas-Rezeption in der Erwachsenenbildung, in Negt O., Horster
D., Zimmermann J., Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G. (eds.), Theorie und Praxis
heute. Ein Kolloquium zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen Habermas,
Frankfurt a.M., Materialis Verlag, 1990, pp. 55-63.
Siebert R.J., Habermas’s Communicative Ethics, in The Proceedings of the Heracleitean Society. A Report on Philosophy and Criticism of the Artys and Sciences, 15, 1990, pp. 61-104.
Siebert R.J., Intimation of the Infinite in Horkheimer, Adorno and Habermas, in «The
Michigan Academician», XXII, 2, 1990, pp. 161-185.
Sotelo I., Moralidad, legalidad, legitimidad: reflexiones sobre la ética de la responsabilidad, in
«Isegoría», 2, 1990, pp. 29-44.
Thorp Th.R., Derrida and Habermas on the Subject of Political Philosophy, in Dallery
1972.
1973.
1974.
1975.
1976.
1977.
1978.
1979.
1980.
1981.
1982.
1983.
1984.
1985.
1986.
1987.
1988.
127
A.B., Scott C.E., Roberts P.H. (eds.), Crises in Continental Philosophy, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1990, pp. 87-104.
Trey G.A., Modern Normativity and the Politics of Deregulation, in «Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy», XVI, 2, 1990, pp. 137-147.
Turner S., Will the Circle Be Unbroken? On the Logic of the Social Sciences, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XIX, 2, 1990, pp. 311-312.
Valdecantos A., Deficits y excesos del último Habermas, in «La balsa de la medusa», 14,
1990, pp. 100-109.
Van der Burg W., Jürgen Habermas on Law and Morality: Some Critical Comments, in
«Theory, Culture and Society», VII, 1990, pp. 105-111.
Vilar G., Cultura, Estética e Illustración, En torno a las ideas estéticas de J. Habermas, in
«La balsa de la medusa», 12, 1989, pp. 43-57.
Villar Ezcurra A., “Ensayos políticos” de Jürgen Habermas, in «Revista de la Facultad
de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense», 76, 1989-1990, pp. 409-420.
Vogel S.M., Habermas and Marcuse on Technology and Ideology, Center for the Humanities, Wesleyan University, 5.11.1990.
Vogel S.M., The Habermas-Marcuse Debate Revisited, American Philosophical Association, New Orleans, 27.4.1990; repr. as ‘New Science, New Nature’: The HabermasMarcuse Debate Revisited, in «Research in Philosophy and Technology», 11, 1991, pp.
157-178; repr. in Rasmussen D.M., Swindal J. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas, London,
Sage Publications, 2002; repr. in Feenberg A., Hannas A. (eds.), Technology and the
Politics of Knowledge, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1995.
von Soosten J., Zur theologischen Rezeption von Jürgen Habermas’ “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik», 34, 2, 1990, pp. 129-143.
Von Wright G.H., On Law and Morality: A Dialogue, in «Ratio Juris», III, 1990, pp.
321-330.
Wallulis J., The Hermenutics of life history: personal achievemnet and history in Gadamer,
Habermas, and Erikson, Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press, 1990.
Warnke G., Rawls, Habermas, and Real Talk: A Reply to Walzer, in «Philosophical
Forum», 21, 1990, pp. 197-203.
Warsitz R.P., Zwischen Verstehen und Erklären. Die widerständige Erfahrung der Psychoanalyse, bei Karl Jaspers, Jürgen Habermas und Jacques Lacan, Würzburg, Königshausen
und Neumann, 1990.
Weiß J., Institution und Subjektivität, in Göhler G., Lenk K., Schmalz-Bruns R.
(eds.), Die Rationalität politischer Institutionen: interdisziplinäre Perspektiven, Baden-Baden,
Nomos Verl.-Ges., 1990, pp. 145-154.
Wellmer A., Practical Philosophy and the Theory of Society: On the Problem of the Normative Foundations of a Critical Social Science, in Benhabib S., Dallmayr F. (eds.), The
Willard Ch.A., Authority, in «Informal Logic», X, 1990, pp. 11-22.
Wolin R., On Misunderstanding Habermas: A Response to Rajchman, in «New German
Critique», 49, 1990, pp. 139-154
128
1989.
1990.
1991.
1992.
Wren T.E., The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and
the Social Sciences, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1990.
Young R.E., Habermas’s Ontology of Learning: Reconstructing Dewey, in «Educational
Theory», XL, 4, 1990, pp. 471-482.
Zimmermann J., Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns und ästhetische Rationalität, in
Negt O., Horster D., Zimmermann J., Christoph K., Siebert H., Schäfer G. (eds.),
Theorie und Praxis heute. Ein Kolloquium zur Theorie und politischen Wirksamkeit von Jürgen
Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Materialis Verlag, 1990, pp. 32-41.
Zolo D., Epistemologia e teoria politica, in «Teoria: Rivista di Filosofia», 1990, pp. 5162.
1991
1993.
1994.
1995.
1996.
1997.
1998.
1999.
2000.
2001.
2002.
Aboulafia M., Philosophy, Social Theory, and the Thought of George Herbert Mead, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1991.
Agar M., Writing left in America, in «Discourse Processes», XIV, 2, 1991, pp. 261276.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Habermas: teoria del conocimiento y teoria de la sociedad, in
«Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e información filosófica», XLVII, 188,
1991, pp. 415-448.
Alexy R., Eine diskurstheoretische Konzeption der praktischen Vernunft, in
Alexy R., Dreier R. (eds.), Rechtssystem und praktische Vernunft, Verhandlungen des
15. Weltkongresses für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR) in Göttingen, August
1991, in Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 51, 1993, pp. 11-29.
Amengual G., La solidatitat segons J. Habermas, Universitat de les Illes Balears,
Palma de Mallorca, 1991.
Andolfi F., Habermas e la teoria dello sviluppo morale, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991; in «Fenomenologia e società», XVII, 1,
1994, pp. 68-83.
Arens E, Kommunikative Rationalität und Religion. Die Theorie des kommunikatives
Handelns als Herausforderung politischer Theologie, in Arens E., Ottmar J., Rottländer P.
(eds.), Erinnerung, Befreiung, Solidarität: Benjamin, Marcuse, Habermas und die politische
Theologie, Düsseldorf, Patmos, 1991, pp. 145-200.
Arpini A., Razón instrumental y razón comunicativa: un comentario sobre tres obras de
Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophia: anuario de Filosofía», 1, 1991, pp. 21-36.
Attwell A., Sanctions and power in school: Habermas’ communicative and strategic action
categories applied in educational research, Southampton, University of Southampton,
1991.
Baccelli L., Produzione e agire comunicativo, in Id., Praxis e poiesis nella filosofia politica
moderna, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1991, pp. 161-237.
2003.
2004.
2005.
2006.
2007.
2008.
2009.
2010.
2011.
2012.
2013.
2014.
2015.
2016.
129
Badillo R., The Emancipative Theory of Jürgen Habermas and Metaphysics, Washington,
D.C., Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, Cultural Heritage And Contemporary Change, Series I. Culture and Values, 13, 1991.
Balkenhol N., “Kommunikative Rationalität und politische Institutionen in der kritischen
Gesellschaft von J. Habermas, Hamburg, Kovac, 1991.
Bambach R., Prof. Dr. Jürgen Habermas, in Nida-Rümelin J. (ed.), Philosophie der Gegenwart. In Einzeldarstellungen, Stuttgart, Kröner, 1991, pp. 210–217.
Bapat J., A Candidate Paradigm for Human Ecology, in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XVIII, 1991, pp. 335-359.
Baratta A., Les Fonctions Instrumentales et les Fonctions Symboliques du Droit Pénal, in
«Déviance et Société», 15, 1991, pp. 1-25.
Bartlett L., The Dialectic between Theory and Method in Critical Interpretive Research, in
«British Educational Research Journal», XVII, 1, 1991, pp. 19-33.
Bartolomei Vasconcelos T., L’utopia della morale, ovvero la non fondabilità delle massime
nell’etica del discorso, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di
studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 12.11.1991.
Baynes K., From Social Contract Theory to Normative Social Criticism, Albany, State
University of New York Press, 1991.
Baynes K., Liberal Neutrality and Deliberative Politics, in Philosophy and Social Science Conference, Dubrovnik, 4.1991; repr. in Kalamazoo College, Kalamazoo,
Michigan, 10.1992; repr. in «Praxis International», XII, 1, 1992, pp. 50-69; tr. de.
Liberale Neutralität, Pluralismus und deliberative Politik, in van den Brink B., van Reijen
V. (eds.), Bürgergesellschaft, Recht, und Demokratie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1995,
pp. 360-384
Beck E., Identität der Person: Sozialphilosophische Studien zu Kierkegaard, Adorno und
Habermas, in «Kierkegaardiana», 19, 1991.
Belardinelli S., La teoria consensual de la verdad de Jürgen Habermas, in «Anuario
Filosofico», XXIV, 1, 1991, pp. 115-123.
Benhabib S., Modelle des öffentlichen Raums: Hannah Arendt, die liberale Tradition und
Jürgen Habermas, in «Soziale Welt: Zeitschrift für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung
und Praxis», XLII, 2, 1991, pp. 147-165; tr. en. Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jürgen Habermas, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the
Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 73-97; repr. in Benhabib S.,
Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1992, pp. 89-120; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges
Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 237-266.
Berman R. A., The Gulf War and Intellectuals, in Germany and the United States, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 88, 1991, pp. 167-179.
Bermbach U., Überlegungen zur kommunikationstheoretischen Fundierung von Demokratie,
in Greven M.Th. (ed.), Macht in der Demokratie: Denkanstöße zur Wiederbelebung einer
klassischen Frage in der zeitgenössischen Politischen Theorie, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verl.Ges., 1991, pp. 239-251.
130
2017.
2018.
2019.
2020.
2021.
2022.
2023.
2024.
2025.
2026.
2027.
2028.
2029.
2030.
2031.
2032.
2033.
2034.
2035.
2036.
Bernasconi R., Habermas and Arendt on the Philosopher’s “Error”: Tracking the diabolical
in Heidegger, in «Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal», XIII, 1991, pp. 3-24.
Blanke Th., Versprachlichung: Aspekte zum zeitdiagnostischen Gehalt von Jürgen Habermas’ Diskurs der Moderne, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Jenseits der Utopie, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 1991, pp. 175-195.
Bogner H., Zu Jürgen Habermas’ Option fur Fortschritt, Vernunft und Demokratie, in
«Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 1991, pp. 245-254.
Borucka-Arctowa M., Le Rôle de la Compétence à la Communication: L’Expérience
Franco-Polonaise de Socialisation Juridique, in «Droit et Société», 19, 1991, pp. 277-286.
Braaten J., Habermas’s Critical Theory of Society, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1991.
Brena G.L., Agire comunicativo e secolarizzazione dell’etica in J. Habermas. II. Etica laica e
religione nella “Teoria dell’agire comunicativo”, in «La civiltà cattolica», CXLII, 1, 1991,
pp. 152-162.
Brena G.L., Problemi di legittimazione e teologia, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Buchwalter A., Habermas’ Observations on ‘The Spiritual Situation of the Age’, “Workshop on German Affairs”, Boston, Goethe-Institute, 5.1981.
Budke U.D., Bemerkungen zu kommunikationstheoretischen Elementen in der analytischen
Sozialpsychologie Erich Fromms, in Internationalen Erich-Fromm-Gesellschaft (ed.),
Erich Fromm und die Kritische Theorie. Jahrbuch. Vol. 2, Münster, LIT-Verlag, 1991, pp.
265-314.
Bühler P., Habermas et l’éthique théologique, in «Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie», CXXIII, 1991, pp 179-193.
Calloni M., Critica e ragione utopica, in «Fenomenologia e Società», 2, 1991, pp. 3-6.
Calloni M., Democrazia etnica o patriottismo costituzionale? Diritti e conflitti culturali nella
trasformazione dello Stato nazionale, in «Iter», 2-3, 1991, pp. 185-213.
Calloni M., Dopo Francoforte. Dopo la metafisica, in «Iride», 6, 1991, pp. 59-60.
Calloni M., Habermas e il discorso filosofico dell’antichità, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Calloni M., Introduzione all’edizione italiana, in Habermas J.; tr. it. Il pensiero postmetafisico, Bari-Roma. Laterza, 1991, pp. V-VIII.
Calloni M., Note di traduzione e glossario, in Habermas J.; tr. it. Il pensiero postmetafisico, Bari-Roma, Laterza, 1991, pp. 291-295.
Campeol A., Campeol G., Environmental questions, ethical values and territorial planning,
in «Global Bioethics», IV, 14, 1991, pp. 39-43.
Campbell G., Work on Reason: The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, by Hans Blumenberg; Work on Myth, by Hans Blumenberg; The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Diacritics», XXI, 4, 1991, pp. 53-68.
Ceppa L., Habermas, Farfalloni, Feltrinelli, in «Belfagor», XLVI, 3, 1991.
Cobben P.G., De Rechtstheorie van Jürgen Habermas: Ontwikkeling en Receptie, in
2037.
2038.
2039.
2040.
2041.
2042.
2043.
2044.
2045.
2046.
2047.
2048.
2049.
2050.
2051.
2052.
2053.
2054.
131
«Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie», XX, 2, 1991, pp. 107-123.
Cortella L., Filosofia pratica e razionalità dialogica, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’
di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del
diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Cortina A., La razón práctica como herencia de la Ilustración, in «Enrahonar», 17, 1991,
pp. 31-42.
Créau A., Kommunikative Vernunft als «entmystifiziertes Schicksal». Denkmotive des frühen
Hegel in der Theorie von J. Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Hain, 1991.
Dallmayr F.R., Between Freiburg and Frankfurt, Amherst, University of Mass. Press,
1991.
Demirovic A., Zivilgesellschaft, Öffentlichkeit, Demokratie, in «Das Argument», 33, 1,
1991, pp. 41-55.
DiFabio U., Offener Diskurs und geschlossene Systeme: das Verhältnis von Individuum und
Gesellschaft in argumentations- und systemtheoretischer Perspektive, Berlin, Duncker &
Humblot, 1991.
Doody J.A, MacIntyre and Habermas on the Practical Reason, in «American Catholic
Philosophical Quarterly», 65, 2, 1991, pp. 143-158.
Doody J.A., Radical Hermeneutics, Critical Theory, and the Political, in «International
Philosophical Quarterly», 1991, pp. 329-341.
Erickson I.M., Lyotard and the postmodernity debate, Durham City, Durham University, 1991.
Esser H., Aufklärung als Passion - (Zwischen-)Betrachtungen als Theorie, in «Soziologische Revue», XIV, 1, 1991, pp. 5-13.
Esteban J.I, Habermas on Weber: Rationality, Rationalization, and the Diagnosis of the
Times, in «Gnosis», III, 4, 1991, pp. 93-115.
Ewert G.D., Habermas and Education: A Comprehensive Overview of the Influence of Habermas in Educational Literature, in «Review of Educational Research», LXI, 3, 1991,
pp. 345–378.
Fadini U., Sovranità e comunicazione: a partire da Bataille, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso,
teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Ferrara A., L’evoluzione del pensiero etico di Habermas, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Ferraro A., Habermas e la ragione scettica, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Fields E.E., Understanding Activist Fundamentalism: Capitalist Crisis and the ‘Colonization of the Lifeworld’, in «Sociological Analysis», 52, 1991, pp. 175-190.
Fleming M., Communicative Action, Truthfulness and Truth, in Department of Philosophy, University of Frankfurt, Germany, 5.1991.
Flyvbjerg B., Sustaining Non-Rationalized Practices: Body-Mind, Power and Situational
132
2055.
2056.
2057.
2058.
2059.
2060.
2061.
2062.
2063.
2064.
2065.
2066.
2067.
2068.
2069.
2070.
Ethics – Interview with Hubert and Stuart Dreyfus, in «Praxis International», XI, 1, 1991,
pp. 93-113.
Früchtl J., Ästhetische Erfahrung und Einheit der Vernunft. Thesen im Anschluß an Kant
und Habermas, in Koppe F. (ed.), Perspektiven der Kunstphilosophie, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1991, pp. 147-164.
Früchtl J., Moral begründen ist schwer: Die Rolle der Mitleidsethik bei Adorno und Habermas, in «Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch», 72, 1991, pp. 36-44.
Garcia Marza V.D., Etica y Derecho (una reflexion sobre los limites del procedimiento etico),
in «Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciencia», 18, 1991, pp. 33-42.
Gebauer R., Fragwürdige Umgangsformen. Jürgen Habermas und das vernunftkritische Erbe
der älteren Kritischen Theorie, in Eickelpasch R. (ed.), Unübersichtliche Moderne? Zur Diagnose und Kritik der Gegenwartsgesellschaft, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1991, pp.
11-33.
Giegel H.J., Über Systeme und Lebenswelten, in «Soziologische Revue», XIV, 1, 1991,
pp. 14-20.
Gómez Sánchez C., Culpa y progreso. Tres lecturas de Freud: Bloch, Ricoeur, Habermas,
in Aramayo R.R., Muguerza Carpintier J., Quesada Castro F. (eds.), Etica día tras
día: homenaje al profesor Aranguren en su ochenta cumpleaño, Madrid, Trotta, 1991, pp.
221-236.
Gordon D., Reply to Chmielewski: Cooperation by Definition, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», 1991, pp. 105-108.
Görtzen, R., Habermas. Werk und internationale Wirkung, in Horster D. (ed.), Jürgen
Habermas, Stuttgart, Metzler, 1991, pp. 130-163.
Greven M.Th., Macht und Politik in der ‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns’ von Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Macht in der Demokratie Denkanstöße zur Wiederbelebung einer klassischen Frage in der zeitgenössischen Politischen Theorie, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verl.-Ges.,
1991, pp. 213-238.
Griffioen S., The Metaphor of the Covenant in Habermas, in «Faith and Philosophy»,
VIIII, 4, 1991, pp. 524-540.
Grundmann R., Mantziaris C., Fundamentalist Intolerance or Civil Disobedience?, in
«Political Theory», XIX, 1991, pp. 572-605.
Harris C., Power, Modernity, and Historical Geography, in «Annals of the Association
of American Geographers», LXXXI, 4, 1991, pp. 671-683.
Heelan P.A., On the Logic of the Social Sciences, by Jürgen Habermas; The Material Realization of Science: A Philosophical View on the Experimental Natural Sciences. Developed in Discussion with Habermas, by Hans Radder, in «Isis»,
LXXXII, 1, 1991, pp. 177-178.
Heim R., Habermas, Freud und die Rationalität. Die Psychoanalyse im Brennpunkt der
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in «Psyche», XLV, 7, 1991, pp. 561-589.
Hendley S., Reason and Relativism: A Sartrean Investigation, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY
Press, 1991.
Hilgendorf E., Die Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Argumentation in der Ju-
2071.
2072.
2073.
2074.
2075.
2076.
2077.
2078.
2079.
2080.
2081.
2082.
2083.
2084.
2085.
2086.
2087.
2088.
2089.
2090.
133
risprudenz. Zur Rezeption von analytischer Philosophie und Kritischer Theorie in der Grundlagenforschung der Jurisprudenz, Berlin, Duncker & Humbolt, 1991, pp. 158-185.
Hoefnagel B.C.A., Heeft Habermas de rede gefundeerd?, in Gremmen H.G.J., Lijmbach S.E.E.M. (eds.), Toegepaste filosofie in praktijk, Wageningse Sociologische Studies, 32, Pudoc, Wageningen, 1991, pp. 163-168.
Hoekema A.J., Legitimiteit door legaliteit, over het recht van de overheid, Nijmegen, Ars
Aequi Libri, 1991.
Holub R.C., Jürgen Habermas. Critic in the Public Sphere, London-New York,
Hope W., Media representations of the New Zealand economy: an exercise in critical theory,
Auckland, University of Auckland, 1991.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas. Sammlung Metzler, Stuttgart, Metzler, 1991.
Horster D., Sozialismus und Demokratie, in «Frankfurter Hefte» 1, 1991, pp. 57-63.
How A.R., Habermas on Historical Materialism, by Tom Rockmore, in «Journal of the
British Society for Phenomenology», XXII, 1, 1991, pp. 86-89.
Hoy D.C., Is Hermeneutics Ethnocentric?, in Bohman J.F., Hiley D.R., Shusterman
R. (eds.), The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, Ithaca (N.Y.), Cornell University Press, 1991, pp. 155-175.
Huspek M., Taking aim on Habermas’s critical theory: On the road toward a critical hermeneutics, in «Communication Monographs», LVIII, 2, 1991, pp. 225-233.
Ineichen H., Philosophische Hermeneutik, Freiburg-München, Alber, 1991.
Ingram D., Habermas on Aesthetics and Rationality: Completing the Project of Enlightenment, «New German Critique», 53, 1991, pp. 67-103.
Jary D., Beyond Objectivity and Relativism: Feyerabend’s Two Argumentative, Chains’ and
Sociology, in «Poznán studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities»,
22, 1991, pp. 39-57.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, La necesidad de revisión de la
izquierda, Madrid, Tecnos, 1991, pp. 11-16.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción: Kant y Hegel en el pensamiento de Habermas, in J.
Habermas, Escritos sobre moralidad y eticidad, Barcelona, Paidós, 1991, pp. 9-63.
Joas H., Honneth A., Introduction, in Joas H., Honneth A. (eds.), Communicative
Action: Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s The Theory of Communicative Action, Cambridge,
MIT Press, 1991, pp. 1-6.
Johnson J., Habermas on Strategic and Communicative Action, in «Political Theory»,
XIX, 2, 1991, pp. 181-201.
Kamaryt J., Possibilities and Limits of the Control over Nature and Man, in «Filozofia»,
XLVI, 2, 1991, pp. 153-165.
Kantzenbach F.W., Tendenzwende in der Religionskritik?, in «Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte», 43, 1991, pp. 324-333.
Kelly M., On the Logic of the Social Sciences, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», CI,
2, 1991, pp. 413-415.
Kerber H., Ist die Kantische Theorie eine Theorie entfremdeter Erkenntnis?, in «Deutsche
134
2091.
2092.
2093.
2094.
2095.
2096.
2097.
2098.
2099.
2100.
2101.
2102.
2103.
2104.
2105.
2106.
2107.
2108.
2109.
2110.
2111.
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 1991, pp. 262-271.
Kettner M., Stichwort: Diskursethik, in «Bijdragen», LII, 2, 1991, pp. 201-206.
Kissling Ch., Habermas et la théologie: Notes pour une discussion entre la théologie et la
Théorie de l’agir communicationnel, in «Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Teologie», 1991, pp. 235-244.
Kjelland-Mørdre I., Nærradionettet i Oslo - et mangfoldig enfold?: et demokratiperspektiv
på nærradionettet i Oslo, Oslo, University of Oslo, 1991.
Korthals M., Rationalisering, in von Vucht Tijssen L., van Reijen W. (eds.), Kennis
en werkelijkheid, Muiderberg, Coutinho, 1991, pp. 151-164.
Krieglstein W., The Dice-Playing God: Reflections on Life in a Post-Modern Age, in Lanham, University Press of America, 1991.
Kuhlmann A., Das gute Leben und der Sinn. Jürgen Habermas über Moraltheorie und Philosophie, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 274, 26.11.1991, p. 13.
Kunneman H., Der Wahrheitstrichter: Habermas und die Postmoderne, Frankfurt a.M.,
Campus Verlag, 1991.
Lakeland P.F., Providence and Political Responsibility: The Nature of Praxis in an Age of
Apocalypse, in «Modern Theology», 1991, pp. 351-362.
Lange, R. de, A just measure of law?, in «Recht en Kritiek», XVII, 2, 1991, pp. 226238.
Lara M.P., Habermas frente a su tradición, in Borja Sarmiento G., García Canal M.I.
(eds.), Marcuse y la cultura del 68, México, UAM-X, 1991, pp. 111-125.
Larmore Ch., Romanticism and Modernity, in «Inquiry», XXXIV, 1991, pp. 77-89.
Leedes G.C., The Discourse Ethics Alternative to Rust v. Sullivan, in «University of
Richmond Law Review», 26, 1991, pp. 87-143.
Lengkeek J., Clubs Between Life-World and System A Theoretical Approach to the Meaning of Watersport Clubs, in «Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure», XIV, 2, 1991, pp.
447-464.
Liao L.W., Modern Social Theory: from Parsons to Habermas, Taipei, Laureate Books,
1991.
Londoño O.G., Los enfoques de las ciencias sociales normativo-analíticas y empíricosanalíticas en Jürgen Habermas, in «Franciscanum», 33, 98-99, 1991, pp. 161-170.
Lopez Saenz M.C., La precaria unidad de la razón: J. Habermas, in «Contextos», 1718, 1991, pp. 31-66.
Love N.S., Ideal Speech and Feminist Discourse, in «Women & Politics», XI, 3, 1991,
pp. 101-122.
Low-Beer M., Selbsttauschung, Germany, Alber, 1991.
Luke T.W., The Discourse of Deterrence: National Security as Communicative Interaction, in
«Journal of Social Philosophy», 1991, pp. 30-44.
Marada R., From Practical Theory to Theoretical Practice (in Czech), in «Filosofický
časopis», XXXVIII, 1991, pp. 755-770.
Marzocchi V., Un confronto con l’itinerario teorico di K.O. Apel, in Istituto filosofico
‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del diLuca Corchia, Department of Political Science, University of Pisa, March 2016
2112.
2113.
2114.
2115.
2116.
2117.
2118.
2119.
2120.
2121.
2122.
2123.
2124.
2125.
2126.
2127.
2128.
135
scorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Masschelein J., The relevance of Habermas’ communicative turn. Some reflections on education as communicative action, in «Studies in Philosophy and Education», 11, 1991, pp.
95-111.
Matuštík M.B., A Study in Communicative and Existential Ethics, Ph.D. Philosophy,
Fordham University, New York, 5.1991.
Matuštík M.J., Habermas’s Reading of Kierkegaard: Notes from a Conversation, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVII, 4, 1991, pp. 313-323.
Matuštík M.J., Havel and Habermas on Identity and Revolution, in «Praxis International», X, 3-4, 1991, pp. 261-277.
Matustik M.J., Merleau-Ponty on Taking the Attitude of the Other, in «Journal of the
British Society for Phenomenology», XXII, 1, 1991, pp. 44-52.
McCarthy Th., Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary
Critical Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1991; tr. de. Ideale und Illusionen. Dekonstruktion und Rekonstruktion in der kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1993.
Meynell H., Habermas: An Unstable Compromise, in «American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly», LXV, 2, 1991, pp. 189-201.
Miranda A.T., Acción comunicativa y proceso educativo: J. Habermas y M. Lipman, in
«Ensayo», 5, 1991, pp. 33-46.
Misgeld D., Modernity and Hermeneutics: A Critical–Theoretical Rejoinder, in Silverman
H.J. (ed.), Gadamer and Hermeneutics: Science, Culture, Literature, London-New York,
Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1991, pp. 163-177.
Mocnik R., From Historical Marxisms to Historical Materialism: Toward the Theory of
Ideology, in «Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal», XIII, 1991, pp. 117-137.
Nagele R., Theater, Theory, Speculation: Walter Benjamin and the Scenes of Modernity,
Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Nassehi A., Habermas, Lyotard und die Suche nach dem ausgeschlossenen Dritten, in Eickelpasch R. (ed.), Unübersichtliche Moderne?: zur Diagnose und Kritik der Gegenwartsgesellschaft, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1991, pp. 175-233.
Nicholson G., Answers to Critical Theory, in Silverman H.J. (ed.), Gadamer and Hermeneutics: Science, Culture, Literature, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1991, pp. 151-162.
Nordquist J., Jürgen Habermas II: A Bibliography, in «Social Theory: A Bibliographic
Series», 22, 1991.
Noya Miranda F.J., Por un “situacionismo sistémico”: La teoría de sistemas sociales y el
análisis institucional en el estudio de los nuevos movimientos sociales, in «Revista española de
investigaciones sociológicas», 55, 1991, pp. 25-45.
Nussbaum Ch., Habermas and Grünbaum on the Logic of Psychoanalytic Explanations, in
«Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVII, 3, 1991, pp. 193-216.
Patomaki H., Concepts of Action, Structure and Power in “Critical Social Realism”: A Positive and Reconstructive Critique, in «Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour», XXI,
136
2129.
2130.
2131.
2132.
2133.
2134.
2135.
2136.
2137.
2138.
2139.
2140.
2141.
2142.
2143.
2144.
2145.
2146.
2147.
2148.
2149.
2, 1991, pp. 221-250.
Peters B., Rationalität, Recht und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp. 1991.
Petrucciani S., Etica del discorso e filosofia politica, in «La ragione possibile: rivista di
filosofia e teoria sociale», 1, 1991.
Petrucciani S., Etica del discorso e questione della democrazia, in Istituto filosofico
‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Piché C., Art and Democracy in Habermas, in Silverman H.J., Welton D. (eds.), Writing the Politics of Difference, Stony Brook, SUNY Press, 1991, pp. 265-274.
Pippin R.B., Hegel, Modernity, and Habermas, in «Monist: An International Quarterly Journal of General Philosophical Inquiry», 1991, LXXIV, 3, pp. 329-357.
Poole R., Morality and Modernity, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1991.
Pourtois H., Le débat libéraux-communautariens: quelques repères, Louvain, Institut supérieur de philosophie, Université catholique de Louvain, 10.1991, pp. 1-18.
Pourtois H., Rationalisation sociale et rationalité juridique: Une lecture de Jürgen Habermas,
in «Revue Philosophique de Louvain», LXXXIX, 1991, pp. 469-498.
Power M., The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «Mind», C, 2, 1991, pp. 295-297.
Prior Olmos A., La teoría de la acción social de J. Habermas, in «Daimon. Revista de
filosofía», 3, 1991, pp. 173-196.
Privitera W., La teoria critica dall’utopia alla democrazia, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso, teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Pulcini E., I pensatori neri e la scuola di Francoforte: Bataille, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, II Incontro di studi – Aspetti della sfera pratica: etica del discorso,
teoria del diritto, razionalità politica, 1-2.11.1991.
Raes K, Rechtsbeginselen en de morele eenheid van het recht, in «Ars Aequi», XL, 1991,
pp. 673-684.
Rajchman J., Philosophical Events: Essays of the ‘80s, New York, Columbia University Press, 1991.
Reese-Schafer W., Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1991.
Rehg W.S.J., Discourse and the Moral Point of View: Deriving a Dialogical Principle of
Universalization, in «Inquiry», XXXIV, 1991, pp. 27-48.
Requejo Coll L.F., Teoría crítica y estado social: neokantismo y socialdemocracia en J.
Habermas, Barcelona, Anthropos, 1991.
Rochlitz R., Culture et «système» chez Habermas, in «Réseaux», V, 1, 1991, pp. 7-17.
Rojas P., Las realizaciones de la razón (Foucauh, Habermas, Derrida), in «Logos: Anales
del Seminario de Metafísica», 25, 1991, pp. 71-94.
Rorty R., Essays on Heidegger and Others: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, New York,
Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Rosenfeld M., Affirmative Action and Justice: A Philosophical and Constitutional Inquiry,
2150.
2151.
2152.
2153.
2154.
2155.
2156.
2157.
2158.
2159.
2160.
2161.
2162.
2163.
2164.
2165.
2166.
2167.
2168.
137
New Haven, Yale University Press, 1991.
Saccamano N., The Consolations of Ambivalence: Habermas and the Public Sphere, in
«MLN», CVI, 3, 1991, pp. 685-698.
Sandrelli C., Jürgen Habermas e Karl-Otto Apel sui fondamenti normativi della teoria critica,
in Curi U. (ed.), I limiti della politica, Milano, Franco Angeli, 1991, pp. 154-179.
Scannone J.C., Nueva modernidad adveniente y cultura emergente en America Latina, in
«Stromata», 1991, pp. 145-192.
Scharff R.C., Habermas on Heidegger’s Being and Time, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XXXI, 2, 1991, pp. 189-201.
Schmidt A., Materialismus als nachmetaphysisches und metaphysisches Denken, in Früchtl
J., Calloni M., Geist gegen Zeitgeist. Erinnern an Adorno, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1991, pp. 33-46.
Schmidt D.J., Changing the Subject: Heidegger, the National and Epochal, in «Graduate
Faculty Philosophy Journal», XIII, 1991, pp. 441-464.
Schmidt Th.M., J. Habermas, ‘‘Nachmetaphysisches Denken’’, in «Protosoziologie», 1,
1991.
Schnadëlbach H., Philosophieren Lerner, in Früchtl J., Calloni M., Geist gegen Zeitgeist.
Erinnern an Adorno, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1991, pp. 54-67.
Scholz O.R., Diskurse, Diskurse. Brüder und Schwestern bei Habermas, in «Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung», 263, 12.11.1991.
Schrag C.O., Reconstructing Reason in the Aftermath of Deconstruction, in «Critical Review», V, 2, 1991, pp. 247-260.
Schuon K.Th., Von der Diskursethik zur Gerechtigkeitstheorie, in Reese-Schäfer W.,
Schuon K.Th. (eds.), Ethik und Politik, Marburg, 1991, pp. 36-61.
Searle J.R., Response: Meaning, Intentionality, and Speech Acts, in Lepore E., van Gulick R., John Searle and His Critics, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1991, pp. 81-102.
Seerveld C., Footprints in the Snow, in «Philosophia Reformata», 1991, pp. 1-34.
Sica A., The Power of Talk: The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2:
Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«American Journal of Sociology», XCVII, 2, 1991, pp. 524-533.
Sitter-Liver B., Neuvermessung des Rechts- und Staatsdiskurses: Zu Otfried Hoffes Theorie
der Politischen Gerechtigkeit, in «Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie», 1991, pp. 83-109.
Smith A., The Role of Ethics in Social Theory: Essays from a Habermasian Perspective, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1991.
Speranza J.L., Un Grice aleman? En torno de las estrategias conversacionales: acercade
Habermas acerca de Grice, in «Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia», XVII, 1, 1991,
pp. 133-148.
Thiessen R., Jürgen Habermas: Retter der Moderne, in «Du: die Zeitschrift der Kultur», 51, 1991, pp. 27-29.
Trey G.A., Communicative Ethics in the Face of Alterity: Habermas, Levinas and the
Problem of Post-Conventional Universalism, in «Praxis International», XI, 4, 1991, pp.
138
2169.
2170.
2171.
2172.
2173.
2174.
2175.
2176.
2177.
2178.
2179.
412-427.
Unknow, De nieuwe onoverzichtelijkheid en andere opstellen, in «Tijdschrift voor filosofie», 53, 1991 p. 165.
van den Belt H., Habermas versus Rorty: rationaliteit versus radicaal constructivisme, in
Gremmen H.G.J., Lijmbach S.E.E.M. (eds.), Toegepaste filosofie in praktijk, Wageningse Sociologische Studies, 32, Pudoc, Wageningen, 1991, pp. 146-162.
Von Haaften W., Wittgenstein en Habermas over de taalgemeen-schap, in Kuypers E.
(ed.), Wittgenstein, Kampen-Kapellen, Kok Agora/DNB/Pelckmans, 1991.
Vries J.J.W.D. de, De dwang van het systeem : diagnose en remedie bij Habermas en Adorno, Kampen, Kok Agora, 1993.
Wagner G., Zipprian H., Intersubjectivity and Critical Consciousness: Remarks on Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in «Inquiry», XXXIV, 1, 1991, pp. 49-62.
Wallulis J., The Hermeneutics of Life History: Personal Achievement and History in Gadamer, Habermas, and Erikson, Evanston, Northwestern University Press, 1991.
Weberman D., Historische Objektivitat, New York, Lang, 1991.
Wellmer A., The Persistence of Modernity, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1991.
White S.K., Political theory and postmodernism, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 1991.
Wolf A., Jürgen Habermas, in Wallace R.A., Wolf A., Contemporary Sociological Theory,
Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1991; tr. it. Jürgen Habermas: razionalizzazione e teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in Wallace R.A., Wolf A., La teoria sociologia contemporanea,
Bologna, il Mulino, 1985, pp. 140-152.
Zimmerli W.Ch., Jürgen Habermas: Auf der Suche nach der Identität von Theorie und
Praxis, in Speck J. (ed.), Grundprobleme der großen Philosophen. Philosophie der Gegenwart
IV. Weber, Buber, Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck
& Ruprecht, 1991, pp. 223-270.
1992
2180.
2181.
2182.
2183.
2184.
2185.
Adalbjarnardóttir S., Reaching consensus in conflict situations in childhood, in «Nordisk
Psykologi», XLIV, 2, 1992, pp. 116-137.
Adam A., Abgründe der Begründung. Jürgen Habermas über Demokratie und Moral, in
«Süddeutsche Zeitung», 11.12.1992.
Agger B., The Discourse of Domination: From the Frankfurt School to Postmodernism, Evanston, Ill., Northwestern University Press, 1992.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Jürgen Habermas: Bibliografía de 1981 a 1990, in «Scriptorium
victoriense», XXXIX, 1-2, 1992, pp. 126-172.
Aldrich V.C., Margonis F., Critical Theory of a Conservative Stamp, in «Educational
Theory», XLII, 2, 1992, pp. 231-250.
Alexy R., A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason, in «Ratio Juris», V,
1992, pp. 231-251.
2186.
2187.
2188.
2189.
2190.
2191.
2192.
2193.
2194.
2195.
2196.
2197.
2198.
2199.
2200.
2201.
2202.
139
Alexy R., Begriff und Geltung des Rechts, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag,
1992; tr. it. Concetto e validità del diritto, Torino, Einaudi, 1997; tr. es. El concepto y la
validez del Derecho, Barcelona, Gedisa, 1994.
Amengual i Coll G., La solidaridad según Jürgen Habermas, in «Cuadernos
salmantinos de filosofía», XIX, 1992, pp. 221-240.
Antaki Ch., Comentario al artículo «Actitudes, evaluación y racionalidad», de E. Crespo, in
«Estudios de Psicología», 13, 47, 1992, pp. 51-53.
Antonio R.J., Kellner D., Communication, Democratization, and Modernity: Critical Reflections on Habermas and Dewey, in «Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3 (“Habermas,
Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”), 1992, pp. 277-298.
Apel K.O., Illokutionäre Bedeutung und normative Gültigkeit: Die transzendentalpragmatische Begründung der uneingeschränkten kommunikativen Verständigung, in «Protosoziologie», 2, 1992, pp. 2-15.
Arantes P.E., Arantes O.B., Um Ponto Cego no Projeto Moderno de Jürgen Habermas,
Brasiliense, Ed. São Paulo, 1992.
Arantes U., Le roi est mort! Vive le roi?, in «Trans/Form/ Ação: Revista de Filosofia», 15, 1992, pp. 113-121.
Arens E., Christopraxis: Grundzüge theologischer Handlungstheorie, Freiburg, Herder
Verlag, 1992.
Aroso Linhares J.M., Habermas y la argumentación jurídica, in «Revista de la Facultad
de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense», 79, 1991-1992, pp. 27-53.
Assoun P.L., Métapsychologie et théorie de la communication Freud versus Habermas, in
«Communication and Cognition», XXV, 1, 1992, pp. 11-28.
Avalos B., Education for the Poor: Quality or relevance?, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education», 13, 4, 1992, pp. 419-436 .
Back K.W., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into
a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Public Opinion Quarterly», LVI, 2, 1992, pp. 257-258.
Baker K.M., Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France: Variations on a
Theme by Habermas, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 181-210.
Baroni R., Processi di apprendimento collettivo e teoria dell’agire comunicativo. Annotazioni
sulla nozione di genere, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 233-242.
Barsky R.F., The construction through discourse of the productive other: the case of the Convention refugee hearing, Montréal, McGill University, 1992.
Barthel G., La querelle des intellectuels Allemands sur la nation en 1990, in «History of
European Ideas», XV, 1-3, 1992, pp. 17-22.
Baynes K., Democracy and the “Rechtsstaat”: Remarks on Habermas’s “Faktizität und
Geltung”, in Conference on Habermas’s Legal Theory, Cardozo Law School,
9.1992; repr. in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 201-232.
140
2203.
2204.
2205.
2206.
2207.
2208.
2209.
2210.
2211.
2212.
2213.
2214.
2215.
2216.
2217.
2218.
2219.
Baynes K., The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, Habermas, Albany
(N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1992.
Belgrad J., Identität als Spiel. Iene Kritik des Identitätskonzepts con J. Habermas, Opladen, Westdeutsche Verlag, 1992.
Benedetti C., Habermas e la pragmatica: tra convenzionalismo e trascendentalismo, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 140-157.
Bengoa Ruiz de Anzúa J., De Heidegger a Habermas: hermenéutica y fundamentación
última en la filosofía contemporánea, Barcelona, Herder, 1992.
Benhabib S., Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary
Ethics, New York, Routledge, 1992; tr. de. Selbst im Kontext. Kommunikative Ethik im
Spannungsfeld von Feminismus, Kommunitarismus und Postmoderne, Frankfurt a.M., 1995.
Bernstein R.J., An Allegory of Modernity/Postmodernity: Habermas and Derrida, in Id.,
New Constellation. The Ethical Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity, Cambridge,
Polity Press, 1992, pp. 199-229; repr. in Thomassen L.A. (ed.), The DerridaHabermas Reader, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, pp. 71-97; tr. it. Un’allegoria del
moderno/postmoderno: Habermas e Derrida, in Id., La nuova costellazione. Gli orizzonti eticopolitici del moderno/postmoderno, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1994, pp. 173-198.
Bianchin M., L’argomento trascendentale. Contraddizione performativa e fondazione ultima,
in «Verifiche», XXI, 2, 1992, pp. 73-103.
Blake N., Modernity and the Problem of Cultural Pluralism, in «Journal of Philosophy
of Education», XXVI, 1, 1992, pp. 39-50.
Bodei R., Comunicazione e comunità: Habermas e Rorty, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V.
(eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 264-282.
Boyte H.C., The Pragmatic Ends of Popular Politics, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and
the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 340-357.
Braaten J., Jürgen Habermas, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1992.
Braaten J., The Succession of Theories and the Recession of Practice, in «Social Theory and
Practice», 18, 1, 1992, pp. 81-111.
Brink H.H.A., Aan een prognose waag ik mij liever niet, in «Filosofie Magazine», II, 2,
1993, p. 17.
Britos, M., Analisis de la racionalidad social desde el concepto de accion comunicativa: Una
nueva perspectiva para abordar la problematica educativa, in «Stromata», 48, 1-2, 1992, pp.
169-182.
Butler J., La critique habermassienne d’Heidegger. Repenser la politique et l’ontologie ou “
répétition et oubli”, in AA.VV., Penser après Heidegger, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1992, pp.
125-134.
Calhoun C., Introduction, in Id., (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 1-49.
Calloni M., Sfere di valore: riconnettere senza de-differenziare, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, III Incontro di studi – La teoria critica e i suoi critici, 31.10-
2220.
2221.
2222.
2223.
2224.
2225.
2226.
2227.
2228.
2229.
2230.
2231.
2232.
2233.
2234.
2235.
2236.
2237.
141
1.11.1992.
Canivet M., Le principe éthique d’universalité et discussion, in «Revue Philosophique de
Louvain», XC, 1992, pp. 32-49.
Cascardi A.J., The Subject of Modernity, New York, Cambridge University Press,
1992.
Ceppa L., Habermas e Bohrer sulla guerra nel Golfo, in «Belfagor», VIIL, 1992, pp. 7987.
Cheal D., Ritual: Communication in Action, in «Sociological Analysis», LIII, 4, 1992,
pp. 363-374.
Cobben P., Persoon, substantie en gemeenschap: Over de innerlijke samenhang tussen de positie van de liberals en de communitarians, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor
Wijsbegeerte», LXXXIV, 4, 1992, pp. 237-257.
Cobben P.G., Geld in de context van leefwereld en systeem, in Korthals M., Kunneman
H. (eds.), Het communicatieve paradigma. Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1992, pp. 171-190.
Cobben P.G., Habermas’ universales, moralisches Bewusstsein im Lichte der Grundlinien
der Philosophie des Rechts, in Kimmerle H., Lefevre W. (eds.), Hegel im Kontext der
Wirkungsgeschichte: Zweiter Teil, Bochum, Germinal, 1992, pp. 329-333.
Cohen J.L., Arato A., Civil Society and Political Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1992.
Coles R., Communicative Action and Dialogical Ethics: Habermas and Foucault, in «Polity», 25, 1992, pp. 71-94.
Colom Costa E., Modernità e nuova sensibilità, in «Acta Philosophica», I, 1, 1992,
pp. 74-83.
Colom González F., Las Caras del Leviatán: Una Lectura Política de la Teoría Crítica,
Barcelona, Anthropos, 1992.
Cometti J.P., Raison, argumentation et légitimation: Habermas, Apel et les apories de la
communication, in «Philosophiques», XIX, 1, 1992, pp. 3-24.
Cooke M., Habermas, Autonomy and the Identity of the Self, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XVIII, 3-4, 1992, pp. 269-291.
Cope M.A., The Hermeneutics of Life History: Personal Achievement and History in Gadamer, Habermas and Erickson, by Jerald Wallulis, in «Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», XXIII, 3, 1992, pp. 292-293.
Corson D.J., Social Justice and Minority Language Policy, in «Educational Theory», 42,
2, 1992, pp. 181-200.
Costa P., Politica e potere in Habermas, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, III Incontro di studi – La teoria critica e i suoi critici, 31.10-1.11.1992.
Crocker N., The Problem of Community, in «Southwest Philosophical Studies», 14,
1992, pp. 50-62.
Dallmayr F.R., Critical Theory and Reconciliation, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992,
pp. 119-151.
142
2238.
2239.
2240.
2241.
2242.
2243.
2244.
2245.
2246.
2247.
2248.
2249.
2250.
2251.
2252.
2253.
Dallmayr F.R., Critical Theory and Reconciliation, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992,
pp. 119-151.
Davis Ch., Pluralism, Privacy, and the Interior Self, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992,
pp. 152-172.
Deflem M., De Communicatie-Theoretische Benadering van het Recht: Fundamenten en Kritieken van de Rechtssociologie van Jürgen Habermas, in «Recht en Kritiek», 18, 1992, pp.
235-258.
Deflem M., Jürgen Habermas: Pflegevater oder Sorgenkind der abolitionistischen Perspektive,
in «Kriminologisches Journal», XXIV, 2, 1992, pp. 330-351.
Dews P., Postscript to the Introduction, in J. Habermas, Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas (AaS), ed. by P. Dews, London-New York, Verso, 19922,
pp. 33-42.
Donaggio E., La “reificazione” nella Teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in Istituto filosofico
‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, III Incontro di studi – La teoria critica e i suoi critici, 31.101.11.1992; as Reificazione e teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in «Fenomenologia e Società»,
XVI, 1, 1993, pp. 143-150.
Dubiel H., Domination or Emancipation? The Debate over the Heritage of Critical Theory,
in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 3-16.
Dunne M., Johnston J., An awareness of epistemological assumptions: the case of gender
studies, in «International Journal of Science Education», XIV, 5, 1992, pp. 515-526.
Dutra D.J.V., A Fundamentacao da Teoria Crítica em Habermas, in «Caderno Cultural», I, 0, 1992.
Dutra D.J.V., A pragramática universal: verdade e ética em Habermas, Porto Alegre,
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 1992.
Dwars I., Application Discourse and the Special Case-Thesis, in «Ratio Juris», V, 1992,
pp. 67-78.
Eastby J.H., Habermas on the new conservatism, in «History of European Ideas»,
XIV, 5, 1992, pp. 729-733.
Eder K., Politics and Culture: On the Socioculturale Analysis of Political Partecipation, in
Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions
In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday,
Eley G., Nations, Publis, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the NineteenthCentury, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1992, pp. 289-338.
Erjavec A., From Here to There – But When and If? Modernity and After (in Hungarian), in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 1992, pp. 3-4.
Esteban J.I., Habermas on Weber: the structure of modernity, the content of modernization
2254.
2255.
2256.
2257.
2258.
2259.
2260.
2261.
2262.
2263.
2264.
2265.
2266.
2267.
2268.
2269.
143
and the diagnosis of the times, Montréal, Concordia University, 1992.
Fabrocini F., Elementi di una teoria della conoscenza basata sull’azione: il contributo di
Wittgenstein, Piaget e Habermas alle scienze cognitive, Roma, Pontificia Universitas Gregoriana, 1992.
Ferrara A., Morale ed etica: una difficile distinzione, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’
di Gallarate, III Incontro di studi – La teoria critica e i suoi critici, 31.10-1.11.1992.
Ferry J.-M., La rationalisation habermassienne de la prudence, in St. Rials R. (ed.), Une
Prudence moderne?, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.
Figal G.,Jürgen Habermas, in Hügli A., Lübcke P. (eds.), Philosophie im 20. Jahrhundert. Vol. I, Reinbek, 1992, pp. 366-384.
Fleming M., Gender and the Public Sphere, in Theory, Culture and Society Conference, Champion, Pennsylvania, 5.1992.
Fleming M., Women’s Place in Communicative Reason, in Harvey E.D., Okruhlik K.
(eds.), Women and Reason, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1992, pp. 245262.
Flynn B.C., Political Philosophy at the Closure of Metaphysics, Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press, 1992.
Forester J., Critical Ethnography: Fieldwork in a Habermasian Way, Alvesson M.,
Willmott H. (eds.), Critical Management Studies, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage
Publications, 1992, pp. 46-65.
Fortin-Melkevik A., The Reciprocal Exclusiveness of Modernity and Religion among Contemporary Thinkers: Jürgen Habermas and Marcel Gauchet, in «Concilium», 6, 1992, pp.
57-66.
Frankenberg G., Disorder is Possible: An Essay on Systems, Laws, and Disobedience, in
Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C., Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions
In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday,
Gadamer H.G., Culture and Media, in Honneth A., McCarthy Th., Offe C.,
Wellmer A. (eds.), Cultural-Political Interventions In The Unfinished Project of Enlightenment. For Jürgen Habermas on his sixtieth birthday, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1992, pp. 171-188.
Gaitan Riveros C., La racionalidad comunicativa y la ‘praxis’ filosófica actual, in
«Universitas Philosophica», 19, 1992, pp. 63-76 .
Gallagher S., Language and Imperfect Consensus: Merleau-Ponty’s Contribution to the Habermas-Gadamer Debate, in Busch T., Gallagher S. (eds.), Merleau-Ponty, Hermeneutics,
and Postmodernism, Albany (N.Y.), The SUNY Press, 1992, pp. 69-82.
García Amado J.A., Justicia, democracia y validez del derecho en Jürgen Habermas, in
«Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales», 107, 1992, pp. 115-126.
García Marzá V.D., Ética de la justicia. Jürgen Habermas y la ética discursiva, Madrid,
Tecnos, 1992.
Gardiner M., The Dialogics of Critique, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 1992.
144
2270.
2271.
2272.
2273.
2274.
2275.
2276.
2277.
2278.
2279.
2280.
2281.
2282.
2283.
2284.
2285.
2286.
2287.
Garnham N., The Media and the Public Sphere, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the
Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 359-375.
Genovese R., Soggettività, intersoggettività e senso. Una critica di Mead e Habermas, in
Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen
Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 158-174.
Gil Martín F.J., Habermas y Rorty sobre la metáfora, in Vide C.M. (ed.), Lenguajes
naturales y lenguajes formales, VIII Congreso de lenguajes naturales y lenguajes
formales, Girona, 21-25.09.1992, pp. 349-356.
Goodman D., Public Sphere and Private Life: Toward a Synthesis of Current Historiographical Approaches to the Old Regime, in «History and Theory», 31, 1, 1992, pp. 1-20.
Goodnight G. Th., Habermas, The Public Sphere, and Controversy, in «International
Journal of Public Opinion Research», IV, 3, 1992, pp. 243-255.
Gröbl-Steinbach E., Jürgen Habermas: “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns” (1981),
in AA.VV., Interpretationen. Hauptwerke der Philosophie, 20. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart, Reclam, 1992, pp. 362-396.
Grumley J.E., Two Views of the Paradigm of Production, in «Praxis International», XII,
2, 1992, pp. 181-204.
Günther K., Die Freiheit der Stellungnahme als politisches Grundrecht, in «Archiv für
Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 54, 1992, pp. 58-73.
Günther K., Universalistische Normenbegründung und Normenwendung in Recht und Moral, in Herberger M., Neumann U., Rüssmann U. (eds.), Individualisierung und Generalisierung im Rechtsdenken, Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1992.
Gurnah A., The Uncertain science: criticism of sociological formalism, London-New York,
Hall J.R., Where History and Sociology Meet: Forms of Discourse and Sociohistorical Inquiry,
in «Sociological Theory», X, 2, 1992, pp. 164-193.
Halton E., Habermas and Rorty: Between Scylla and Charybdis, in «Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3 (“Habermas, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”), 1992, pp. 333-356.
Hanks C., Thinking about Democracy and Exclusion: Jürgen Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action and Contemporary Politics, in «Southwest Philosophy Review», VIII,
1, 1992, pp. 145-155.
Harrison K., Gender & normative biases in Habermas’s Ideal Speech situation, Australian
Communication Association National Conference, Gold Coast (Australia), Bond
University, 1992.
Hayim G., Naturalism and the Crisis of Rationalism in Habermas, in «Social Theory
and Practice», XVIII, 2, 1992, pp. 187-209.
Herrera Líma M., Equal Respect among Unequal partners: Gender Difference and the Constitution of Moral Subjects, in «Philosophy East and West», XLII, 2, 1992, pp. 263275.
Hinkle G., Habermas, Mead, and Rationality, in «Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3
(“Habermas, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”), 1992, pp. 315-332.
Hohendahl P.U., The Public Sphere: Models and Boundaries, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Ha-
2288.
2289.
2290.
2291.
2292.
2293.
2294.
2295.
2296.
2297.
2298.
2299.
2300.
2301.
2302.
2303.
2304.
145
bermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 99-141.
Homann H., Verstehen und Hermeneutik: Gadamers und Habermas’ Diltheyinterpretation, in «Annali di sociologia», VIII, 1, 1992, pp. 407-413.
Honneth A., Von Adorno zu Habermas. Zum Gestaltwandel kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie, in Bonß W., Honneth A. (eds.), Sozialforschung als Kritik. Das sozialwissenschaftliche
Potential der Kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1982, pp. 87-126; tr. en.
From Adorno to Habermas, in Honneth A., The fragmented world of the social. Essays in
Social and Political Philosophy, Albany, State University of New York Press, 1995, pp.
92-120.
Hoppe H., Ethische Positionen im Vergleich: Utilitarismus (Hare) - Vertragstheorie
(Rawls) – Diskursethik (Apel/ Habermas), in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
L, 5, 1992, pp. 503-512.
Horster D., Habermas: an introduction, Philadelphia, Pennbridge Books, 1992.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas in der Schule, in «Information Philosophie», XX, 3,
1992, pp. 62-66.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas’ Rechtsphilosophie, in «Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte», XXXIX, 12, 1992, pp. 1138-1141.
Horster D., Welche neuen Werte brauchen wir? Bemerkungen zur lebenweltorientierten Bildung, in «VHS-Texte & Beiträge», 5-1992, pp. 41-66.
Hostetler K., Solidarity and Moral Community, in «Philosophy of Education»,
XLVIII, 1992, pp. 316-323.
How A.R., On the Logic of the Social Science, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of
the British Society for Phenomenology», XXIII, 3, 1992, pp. 294-296.
Hunyadi M., Avant-propos, in Habermas J., De l’éthique de la discussion, Paris, éd. du
Cerf, 1992.
Ibáñez P.A., Ni fiscal instructor, ni Habermas “procesalista” (a pesar de Vives Antón), in
«Jueces para la democracia», 16-17, 1992, pp. 43-59.
Iggers G.G., The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The American Historical Review», XCVII, 3, 1992, pp.
871-872.
Ingram D., Habermas: Enlightenment and the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, in
Sills Ch., Jensen G.H., The Philosophy of Discourse. Vol. 2, London, Heinemann,
1992, pp. 129-54.
Joas H., An Underestimated Alternative: America and the Limits of ‘Critical Theory’, in
«Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3 (“Habermas, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”),
1992, pp. 261-276.
Johnson C., Applying Habermas to Australian political culture, in «Australian Journal
of Political Science», XXVII, 1, 1992, pp. 55-70.
Kaplan L., Antimetaphysics and the Liberal Quandary, in «Philosophy of the Social
Sciences», XXII, 4, 1992, pp. 492-511.
Katzenbach D., Die soziale Konstitution der Vernunft: Erklären, Verstehen und Verständigung bei Piaget, Freud und Habermas, Heidelberg, Asanger, 1992.
146
2305.
2306.
2307.
2308.
2309.
2310.
2311.
2312.
2313.
2314.
2315.
2316.
2317.
2318.
2319.
2320.
Kellner D., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas;
The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historian’s Debate, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXI, 2, 1992, pp. 278-279.
Kempkes H.L., Universalistische Rechtfertigung der Pädagogik und die Theorie Habermas’,
in «Pädagogische Rundschau», XLVI, 3, 1992, pp. 283-296.
Keulartz F.W.J., De verkeerde wereld van Jürgen Habermas: over motieven en achtergronden
van zijn ontwikkeling, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1992.
Kolb D., Heidegger and Habermas on Criticism and Totality, in «Philosophy and Phenomenological Research», LII, 3, 1992, pp. 683-693.
Komlosi L.I., Action-Theory and Philosophical Pragmatics (in Hungarian), in «Magyar
Filozofiai Szemle», 1992, pp. 5-6.
Korthals M., Habermas, in Bor J., Teppema S. (eds.), 25 eeuwen filosofie, Amsterdam-Meppel, Boom, 1992, pp. 355-358.
Korthals M., Is de wereld van Jürgen Habermas verkeerd? , in «Krisis», 12, 4, 1992, pp.
66-70.
Korthals, M., Identiteit en opvoeding in het tijdperk van modernisering, in Korthals M.,
Kunneman H. (eds.), Het communicatieve paradigma. Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van
Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1992,
pp. 125-141.
Köveker D., Zur Kategorisierbarkeit “verdeckt” und “offen strategischen Sprachgebrauchs.
Das Parasitismus-Argument von Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of General Philosophy of
Science», 23, 1992, pp. 289-311.
Kramer L, Habermas, History, and Critical Theory, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and
the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, pp. 236-257.
Krüger H.P., Communication Based Analysis of Scientifically Specific Demands for Recognition, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 40, 11, 1992, pp. 1259-1278.
Kunneman H., De strijdigheid. Het geheime bondgenootschap van Habermas en Lyotard,
in Korthals M., Kunneman H. (eds.), Het communicatieve paradigma. Mogelijkheden en
beperkingen van Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen, Meppel-Amsterdam,
Boom, 1992.
La Vopa A.J., Conceiving a Public: Ideas and Society in Eighteenth-Century Europe: Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society,
by Reinhart Koselleck; The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Journal of
Modern History», LXIV, 1, 1992, pp. 79-116.
Lamb M., Communicative Praxis and Theology: Beyond Modern Nihilism and Dogmatism,
in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 92-118.
Landes J.B., Jürgen Habermas’s The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: A
Feminist Inquiry, in «Praxis International», XII, 1, 1992, pp. 106-127.
Lee B., Textualuity, Mediation and Public Discourse, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and
2321.
2322.
2323.
2324.
2325.
2326.
2327.
2328.
2329.
2330.
2331.
2332.
2333.
2334.
2335.
2336.
2337.
2338.
2339.
147
Leydet D., Patriotisme constitutionnel et identité nationale, in «Philosophiques», XIX, 2,
1992, pp. 81-92.
Link Th., Mensch und Natur: zum Begriff der Natur in den sozialwissenschaftlichen Theorien der Gegenwart, Köln, Böhlau, 1992.
Luhmann N., Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System, in «Cardozo Law Review», XIII, 1992, pp. 1419-1441.
Maffettone S., Etica del discorso: una critica, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992,
pp. 191-198.
Makkreel R., Purposiveness in History: Its Status after Kant, Hegel, Dilthey and Habermas,
in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVIII, 3-4, 1992, pp. 221-234.
Mardones J.M., Religione e Teoria Critica. Il potenziale critico della religione di fronte al progetto di J. Habermas, in «Filosofia e teologia», VI, 3, 1992, pp. 415-**.
Matuštík M.B., Identity and Power: Contribution to the Debate between the Postmodernity of
Michel Foucault and the Critical Modernism of Jürgen Habermas, in «Filosofický časopis»,
XXXIX, 2, 1992, pp. 177-198.
Maus I., Zur Aufklärung der Demokratietheorie. Rechts – und demokratietheoretische Überlegungen im Anschluß an Kant, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1992.
McCarty Th., Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics, in Calhoun C.
(ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 5171; tr. es. El discurso práctico: la relación de la moralidad con la política, in Herrera Lima M.
(ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política, Madrid, Alianza, 1993, pp. 147-171.
Melchior J., Postmoderne Konflikte um den Konsensus-Begriff. Zum “Widerstreit” zwischen
Lyotard und Habermas, Wien, Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), 1992.
Melkevik B., Transformation du droit: Le point de vue du modèle communicationnel, in
«Cahiers de droit», XXXIII, 1, 1992, pp. 115-139.
Mirchandani R., Habermas, Discourse Ethics, and Assuring the Moral Point of View, in
«Social Theory», 12, 1992, pp. 231-249.
Molteni M., Discorso e decisione. Una metacritica della critica di Habermas al decisionismo,
in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su Jürgen
Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 218-232.
Montero F., Mundo y acción comunicativa según Habermas, in «Fragmentos de filosofía», 1, 1992, pp. 149-165.
Moody Harry R., Ethics in an Aging Society, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University
Press, 1992.
Moore Brooke N., Bruder K., Philosophy: The Power of Ideas, Mountain View, Mayfield, 1992.
Moritz P., Kritik des Paradigmenwechsels. Mit Horkheimer gegen Habermas, Lüneburg,
Zu Klampen, 1992.
Mouzelis N., Social and system integration: Habermas’ view, in «British journal of sociology», XLIII, 2, 1992, pp. 267-288.
Muguerza Carpintier J., De la realidad de la violencia a la no-violencia como utopía, in
148
2340.
2341.
2342.
2343.
2344.
2345.
2346.
2347.
2348.
2349.
2350.
2351.
2352.
2353.
2354.
2355.
«Revista Internacional de Sociología», 2, 1992, pp. 107-120.
Norris C., Deconstruction, Postmodernism and Philosophy: Habermas on Derrida, in
Wood D. (ed.), Derrida: A Critical Reader, Oxfrod, Blackwell, 1992, pp. 167-192.
Nuyen A.T., Rorty’s Hermeneutics and the Problem of Relativism, in «Man and World»,
XXV, 1, 1992, pp. 69-78.
Osés Gorráiz J. M., El vivir y la fatiga: la fatiga de vivir, in «Eurídicez, 2, 1992, pp.
183-196.
Ostinelli M., Sul principio dell’etica del discorso di Jürgen Habermas: un confronto critico con
le obiezioni scettiche di Bernard Williams, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e
critica della comunicazione. Studi su J.Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 175190.
Pantham Th., Some Dimensions of the Universality of Philosophical Hermeneutics: A Conversation with Hans-Georg Gadamer, in «Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research»,
9, 3, 1992, pp. 123-135.
Parsons S.D., Explaining Technology and Society: The Problem of Nature in Habermas, in
«Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXII, 2, 1992, pp. 218-230.
Pearse H., Beyond Paradigms: Art Education Theory and Practice in a Postparadigmatic
World, in «Studies in Art Education», XXXIII, 4, 1992, pp. 244-252.
Pedroni V., Jürgen Habermas e le possibilità di una filosofia trascendentale, in Ostinelli M.,
Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica della comunicazione. Studi su J.Habermas, Milano,
FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 106-139.
Pellecchia P., Sulle tracce del postmoderno (I), in «Aquinas: Rivista Internazionale di
Filosofia», 35, 2, 1992, pp. 341-379.
Penas Ibáñez B., Mímesis y realismos: una discusión relevante para la caracterización de
modernismo y postmodernismo, in «Cuadernos de investigación filológica», 18, 1992, pp.
109-128
Perri M.L., Sindrome del tempo e ragione scettica: il pensiero post-metafisico nell’ultimo Habermas, in «Verifiche», XXI, 2, 1992, pp. 147-172.
Peukert H., Enlightenment and Theology as Unfinished Projects, in Browning D.S.,
Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York,
Crossroad, 1992, pp. 43-65.
Pijnenburg, L.F.P., Het psychologische gesprek volgens Habermas: “talking cure” of “curing
talk”?, in Korthals M., Kunneman H. (eds.), Het communicatieve paradigma. Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van Habermas’ theorie van het communicatieve handelen, MeppelAmsterdam, Boom, 1992, pp. 77-98.
Pintos de Cea-Naharro J.L., La crítica de la Ilustración desde Adorno a Habermas, in
Agra Romero M.J., Ríos Vicente J., González Fernández M., Rodríguez Camarero
L. (eds.), Simposio sobre el pensamiento filosófico y político en la Ilustración francesa, 911.10.1989, Santiago de Compostela, 1992, pp. 381-392
Poster M., Postmodernity and the Politics of Multiculturalism: The Lyotard-Habermas Debate Over Social Theory, in «Modern Fiction Studies», XXVIII, 3, 1992, pp. 567-580.
Postone M., Political Theory and Historical Analysis, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas
2356.
2357.
2358.
2359.
2360.
2361.
2362.
2363.
2364.
2365.
2366.
2367.
2368.
2369.
2370.
2371.
2372.
149
and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 164-179.
Pourtois H., Les concepts de système et monde vécu dans la théorie sociale de J. Habermas,
Louvain, Centre de Philosophie du Droit et Groupes de recherches sociologiques
sur les mutations culturelles, Université catholique de Louvain, 1992, pp. 1-21.
Pourtois H., Théorie sociale et jugement juridique. A propos de J. Habermas et de Kl.
Günther, in «Archives de Philosophie du Droit», 37, 1992, pp. 303-312.
Prado P.W. Jr., Argumentation and Aesthetics: Reflections on Communication and the Differend, in «Philosophy Today», 4, 1992, pp. 351-366; tr. fr. Argumentation et esthétique.
Réflexions autour de la communication et du différend, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R.
(eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996, pp. 39-68; repr. in «Ethica»,
IX, 2, 1997, pp. 75-180.
Privitera W., Prefazione, in Habermas J., Dopo l’utopia, Venezia, Marsilio, 1992, pp.
VII-VIII.
Raffel S., Habermas, Lyotard and the Concept of Justice, London, Macmillan, 1992.
Rasmussen D.B., Political Legitimacy and Discourse Ethics, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XXXII, 1, 1992, pp. 17-34.
Reed E.D., Salvation in a social context: the impact of Hegelian social theory on modern understanding of soteriology, with particular reference to the Phenomenology of Spirit, Durham
City, Durham University, 1992.
Rehg W.S.J., Das Gerechte und das Gute in der Diskursethik, in «Philosophie und Religion», 7, 1992-1993, pp. 193-215.
Richetti J., The Public Sphere and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Social Criticism and Narrative Enactment, in «Eighteenth-Century Life», XVI, 3, 1992, pp. 114-129.
Rosenthal J., What is life?: a Habermas critique, in «Social science information»,
XXXI, 1, 1992, pp. 5-42.
Ruiter W. de, Evolutie van de laser : een systeemperspectief op wetenschap, technologie en samenleving, Eindhoven, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1992.
Ryan M.P., Gender and Public Access: Women’s Politic in Nineteenth-Century America, in
Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1992, pp. 259-287.
Sandrelli C., Il più recente dibattito tedesco sulla teoria dell’agire comunicativo e gli ultimi sviluppi della riflessione habermasiana, in Ostinelli M., Pedroni V. (eds.), Fondazione e critica
della comunicazione. Studi su J.Habermas, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1992, pp. 298-315.
Savický N., Strukturalismus a poststrukturalismus jako epizoda „věčného” sporu mezi analogisty a anomalisty, in «Slovo a slovesnost», 53, 1992, pp. 208-211.
Scherer K.R., Issues in the Study of Justice, in Scherer K.R (eds.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 1-14.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Die Konturen eines neuen Liberalismus? Zur Debatte um Liberalismus,
Kommunitarismus und “Civil Society”, in «PVS», 33, 4, 1992, pp. 662-672.
Schudson M., Was There Ever a Public Sphere? If So, When? The Reflections on the
American Case, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1992, pp. 143-162.
150
2373.
2374.
2375.
2376.
2377.
2378.
2379.
2380.
2381.
2382.
2383.
2384.
2385.
2386.
2387.
2388.
2389.
2390.
Schussler Fiorenza F., A Select Annotated Bibliography, in Browning D.S., Schüssler
Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad,
1992, pp. 251-256.
Schussler Fiorenza F., Introduction: A Critical Reception for a Practical Public Theology,
in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 1-18.
Schüssler Fiorenza F., Introduction: A Critical Reception for a Practical Public Theology,
in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 1-18.
Schussler Fiorenza F., The Church as a Community of Interpretation: Political Theology
between Discourse Ethics and Hermeneutical Reconstruction, in Browning D.S., Schüssler
Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad,
1992, pp. 66-91.
Sciulli D., Habermas, Critical Theory, and the Relativistic Predicament, in «Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3 (“Habermas, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”), 1992, pp. 299314.
Shalin D.N., Critical Theory and the Pragmatist Challenge, in «American Journal of
Sociology», XCVIII, 2, 1992, pp. 237-279.
Shalin D.N., Introduction: Habermas, Pragmatism, Interactionism, in «Symbolic Interaction», XV, 3 (“Habermas, Pragmatism, and Critical Theory”), 1992, pp. 251-260.
Siep L., Mit Radikalen vernünftig reden?, in «Der Spiegel», 43, 1992, pp. 292-298.
Simon D., Die Einheit des Rechts in der Vielheit der Systeme, in « Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 285, 8.12.1992.
Simpson G.M., Theologia Crucis and the Forensically Fraught World: Engaging Helmut
Peukert and Jürgen Habermas, in Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 173-205.
Sintomer Y., Power and Civil Society: Foucault vs Habermas, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XVIII, 3-4, 1992, pp. 357-378.
Smith N.H., Modernity, crisis and critique: an examination of rival philosophical conceptions
in the work of Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor, Glasgow, University of Glasgow,
1992.
Smith N.H., The Spirit of Modernity: Jürgen Habermas, in «Radical Philosophy: A
Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», LX, 1992, pp. 23-29.
Steuerman E., Habermas versus Lyotard, in Benjamin A., Lyotard J. (eds.), Judging
Lyotard, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1992, pp. 99-118.
Strydom P., The Ontogenetic Fallacy: The Immanent Critique of Habermas’ Developmental
Logical Theory of Evolution, in «Theory, Culture and Society», IX, 3, 1992, pp. 65-93.
Suzete Motta A., Interesse e razão: de Kant a Habermas, Campinas, Universidade
Estadual de Campinas, 1992.
Taganyi Z., Cultural, Structural and Cognitive Sciences and Crossroads of Intellectual Traditions (in Hungarian), in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 1992, pp. 5-6.
Teubner G., De collisione discursuum. Jürgen Habermas’ rechtstheoretische Schrift “Faktizi-
2391.
2392.
2393.
2394.
2395.
2396.
2397.
2398.
2399.
2400.
2401.
2402.
2403.
2404.
2405.
2406.
151
tät und Geltung”, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 263, 11.11.1992; tr. en. “De Collisione
Discursuum”: Communicative Rationalities in Law, Morality, and Politics, in «Cardozo Law
Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”),
1996, pp. 901-918; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and
Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp.
173-189.
Thiebaut C., Los Limites de la Comunidad, Madrid, CSIC, 1992.
Tietz U., Transzendentale Argumente versus conceptual scheme: Bemerkungen zum Begründungsstreit zwischen Universalismus und Kontextualismus, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für
Philosophie», XL, 8, 1992, pp. 916-936.
Tönnies S., Die Linken verlassen die sinkenden Massen. Jürgen Habermas und die Asylfrage, in «Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 23.12.1992, p. 28.
Tracy D., Theology, Critical Social Theory, and the Public Realm, in Browning D.S.,
Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York,
Tracy D., Theology, Critical Social Theory, and the Public Realm, in Browning D.S.,
Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology, New York,
Tschannen O., Les théories de la sécularisation, Genève, Droz, 1992.
Tubbs N., Habermas and Critique, in Id., Hegel and the Dialectic of Enlightenment. The
Recognition of Education in Civil Society, University of Warwick, 1992.pp. 41-89
Ulfig A., Was sind reflexive Sprechhandlungen? Bemerkungen zum Verhaltnis von Reflexion
und Sprache, in «Protosoziologie», 2, 1.1992, pp. 47-62.
Varnengo R., La racionalidad en el derecho, in «Sistema», 107, 1992, pp. 95-103.
Varnengo R., Legalidad y Legitimidad: los fundamentos morales del derecho, in «Revista de
Estudios Politicos», 77, 1992, pp. 267-283.
Villa D.R., Postmernism and the Public Sphere, in «The American Political Science
Review», 86, 1992, pp. 712-721.
Visker R., Habermas on Heidegger and Foucault: Meaning and Validity in the Philosophical
Discourse of Modernity, in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist
Philosophy», 61, 1992, pp. 15-22; repr. in Bernstein J. (ed.), Frankfurt School. Critical
Assessments, Vol. VI. Jürgen Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp.
334-348.
Vromen J.J., Speltheorie en communicatief handelen, in Korthals M., Kunneman H.
(eds.), Het communicatieve paradigma. Mogelijkheden en beperkingen van Habermas’ theorie
van het communicatieve handelen, Meppel-Amsterdam, Boom, 1992, pp. 55-75.
Walker B., Habermas and Pluralist Political Theory, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XVIII, 1, 1992, pp. 81-102.
Wallace K., Metaphysics and Validation, in Rockmore T., Singer B.J. (eds.), Antifoundationalism: Old and New, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1992, pp. 209238.
Warner M, The Mass Public and the Mass Subject, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and
152
2407.
2408.
2409.
2410.
2411.
2412.
2413.
2414.
2415.
2416.
Weberman D., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Philosophical Review», CI, 4, 1992, pp. 924-926.
Wehling P., Die Moderne als Sozialmythos: zur Kritik sozialwissenschaftlicher Modernisierungstheorien, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1992.
Wellmer A., Konsens als Telos der sprachlichen Kommunikation?, in Giegel H.J. (ed.),
Kommunikation und Konsens in modernen Gesellschaften, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1992, pp. 18-30.
Werner W., De fundering van het juridisch discours, in «Recht en Kritiek», XVIII, 1,
1992, pp. 52-66.
Westphal M., The Cheating of Cratylus (Genitivus Subjectivus), in Caputo J.D., Marsh
J.L., Westphal M. (eds.), Modernity and Its Discontents, New York, Fordham University Press, 1992, pp. 163-82.
Whitton B.J., Universal Pragmatics and the Formation of Western Civilization: A Critique
of Habermas’s Theory of Human Moral Evolution, in «History and Theory: Studies in
the Philosophy of History», XXXI, 3, pp. 299-312.
Williams H., Fearon-Jones J., Jürgen Habermas and Neo-Marxism, in Tivey L.,
Wright A. (eds.), Political Thinkers and Political Ideas since 1945, London, Edward Elgar, 1992, pp. 115-133.
Wuthnow R., Rationality and the Limits of Rational Theory: A Sociological Critique, in
Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds.), Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology, New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 206-225.
Wuthnow R., Rationality and the Limits of Rational Theory: A Sociological Critique, in
Browning D.S., Schüssler Fiorenza F. (eds), Habermas, Modernity and Public Theology,
New York, Crossroad, 1992, pp. 206-250.
Zaret D., Religion, Science, and Printing in the Public Spheres in Seventeenth-Century England, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1992, pp. 212-234.
1993
2417.
2418.
2419.
2420.
2421.
Agger B., Gender, Culture, and Power: Toward a Feminist Postmodern Critical Theory,
New York, Praeger, 1993.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Raison critique ou raison herméneutique?, in «Revue Philosophique
de Louvain», XCI, 1993, pp. 409-440.
Albert H., Dialektische Denkwege. Jürgen Habermas und der kritische Rationalismus, in
Albert H., Salamun K., Mensch und Gesellschaft aus der Sicht des kritischen Rationalismus,
Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1993, pp.11-40.
Alejandro R., Communication and Public Sphere: The Case of Habermas, in Id., Hermeneutics, citizenship, and the public sphere, Albany (NY), SUNY Press, 1993, pp. 179-204.
Alexy R., Eine diskurstheoretische Konzeption der praktischen Vernunft, in
Alexy R., Dreier R., Rechtssystem und praktische Vernunft, Archiv für Rechts- und So-
2422.
2423.
2424.
2425.
2426.
2427.
2428.
2429.
2430.
2431.
2432.
2433.
2434.
2435.
2436.
2437.
2438.
2439.
153
zialphilosophie, Beiheft 51, 1993.
Alexy R., Justification and Application of Norms, in «Ratio Juris», VI, 1993, pp. 157170.
Angehrn E., Das unvollendete Projekt der Demokratie, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XL, 4, 1993, pp. 257-264.
Apel K.O., L’éthique du discours comme éthique de la responsabilité: une transformation
postmétaphysique de l’éthique Kantienne, in «Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale»,
XCVIII, 4, 1993, pp. 505-537.
Aragaki H., Communicative Ethics and the Morality of Discourse, in «Praxis International», XIII, 2, 1993, pp. 154-171.
Arce Carrascoso J.L., J. Habermas: La critica de la razon interesada, in «Convivium:
Revista de Filosofia», 5, 1993, pp. 40-62.
Arpini A., Qué nos dice Habermas: Algunas reflexiones desde las coordenadas históricosociales latinoamericanas, in «Cuadernos de Etica», 1516, 1993, pp. 9-22.
Bader V.M., Viel Geltung und immer weniger Faktizität: zur Kritik an Jürgen Habermas’
diskurstheoretischer Rechts- und Demokratietheorie, in Ganßmann H., Krüger S. (eds.),
Produktion -Klassentheorie: Festschrift für Sebastian Herkommer, Hamburg, VSA-Verlag,
1993, pp. 50-78.
Baltas A., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas,
in «Philosophy of Science», LX, 3, 1993, pp. 521-523.
Barnett R., The Idea of Academic Administration, in «Journal of Philosophy of Education», XXVII, 2, 1993, pp. 179-192.
Baynes K., The Communicative Ethics Controversy, in International Communication
Association, Washington D.C., 5.1993.
Baynes K., Transcendental Arguments and Rational Reconstructions, in Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, New Orleans, 10.1993.
Bello E., Lectura etica del pensamiento ilustrado, in «Revista de Filosofia», 7, 1993, pp.
169-178.
Bernstein R., Faire la part de ce qui sépare Rorty et Habermas et se situer dans l’entre-deux,
Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 211.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions.
De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 14-23.
Berten A., Habermas critique de Rawls. La position originelle du point de vue de la pragmatique universelle », Louvain-La-Neuve, Université catholique de Louvain, 1993.
Birmingham P., Political Philosophy at the Closure of Metaphysics, in «Graduate Faculty
Philosophy Journal», XVI, 2, 1993, pp. 499-509.
Bohman J.F., Welterschliessung und radikale Kritik, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 3, 1993, pp. 563-574.
Bonnet A., Aspectos políticos del pensamiento de J. Habermas: una lectura crítica, in
«Cuadernos de Etica», 1516, 1993, pp. 121-145.
Bouchindhomme Ch., A quoi bon une théorie de la rationalité?, Actes du Colloque
autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gail-
154
2440.
2441.
2442.
2443.
2444.
2445.
2446.
2447.
2448.
2449.
2450.
2451.
2452.
2453.
2454.
2455.
2456.
lard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à
Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 107-122.
Bovero M., Postmetafisica e politica in Habermas, in «Teoria politica», IX, 1, 1993, pp.
151-160.
Brena G.L., “Habermas e la teologia”, in «La Civiltà Cattolica», CXIV, 3, 1993,
pp. 51-54.
Brink B. van den, Goldmann Ch., Boorn R. van de, Gulik K. van, Thomassen
P., Geen alternatief voor de rechtsstaat?, in «Filosofie Magazine», II, 2 (Jürgen Habermas en
de (Duitse) Rechtsstaat), 1993, pp. 21-24.
Brink B. van den, Introductie, in «Filosofie Magazine», II, 2 (Jürgen Habermas en de
(Duitse) Rechtsstaat), 1993, pp. 16-17.
Brodsky G.M., Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «American Journal of Sociology», XCIX, 2, 1993, pp. 508-510
Burkart P., Critical distance: politics between the Habermasian dualisms, Montréal,
McGill University, 1993.
Cabot M., De Habermas a Adorno: sentido de un ‘retroceso’, in «Estudios Filosóficos»,
121, 1993, pp. 451-478.
Calhoun C. Habermas and the Public Sphere, in «Conference: A Journal of Philosophy and Theory», 4, 2, 1993; repr. in Appleby J., Covington E., Hoyt D. (eds.),
Knowledge and Postmodernism in Historical Perspective, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 1996, pp. 521-538.
Calloni M., L’identità tedesca in transizione. Sulla ‘nuova’, ma non più,’grande’ Germania,
in «Quaderni di azione sociale», 9, 1993, pp. 83-100.
Cavazzani G., La teoria critica e Weber: la razionalizzazione e l’analisi di Habermas, in
Id., Interpretazioni di Weber e teorie della società, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1993, pp. 43-87.
Cometti J.-P., Quelle rationalité ? Quelle modernité ?, Actes du Colloque autour de
Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F.,
Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen
Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 47-70.
Cooke M., Habermas and Consensus, in «European Journal of Philosophy», I, 3,
1993, pp. 247-267.
Cooper D.E., Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Philosophical Quarterly, XLIII, 173, 1993, pp. 572-574.
Corredor C., Intentos de formulacion de una teoria general de actos de habla (J. Searle y J.
Habermas), in « Daimon: Revista de Filosofia», 6, 1993, pp. 119-130.
Cortella L., La teoria critica fra dialettica e dialogica, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’
di Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria critica?, 29-30.10.1993.
Cortes Rodas F.L., Praktische Philosophie und Theorie der Gesellschaft: zur Kritik und
Rekonstruktion einer emanzipatorischen Gesellschafts- und Moraltheorie bei Habermas, Konstanz, Hartung-Gorre, 1993.
Costa P., Politica e potere: Habermas lettore di Hannah Arendt, in «Fenomenologia e
societa», XVI, 1, 1993, pp. 135-141.
2457.
2458.
2459.
2460.
2461.
2462.
2463.
2464.
2465.
2466.
2467.
2468.
2469.
2470.
2471.
2472.
2473.
2474.
155
Couture T., Habermas, Values, and the Rational, Internal Structure of Communication, in
«Journal of Value Inquiry», XXVII, 3-4, 1993, pp. 403-416.
Couzens Hoy D., Solidarité ou universalité? , Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen
Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J.,
Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas,
Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 155-168.
Crespi F., Evento e struttura. Per una teoria del mutamento sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino,
1993.
Cronin C.P., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., Justification and Application.
Remarks on Discourse Ethics (ED), Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1993, pp. XIXXXI.
Cunigo G., Jürgen Habermas (1929-): la religione oltre i limiti della ragione comunicativa, in
Penzo G., Gibellini R. (eds.), Dio nella filosofia del Novecento, Brescia, Queriniana,
1993, pp. 439-448.
Cutrofello A., Speculative Logic, Deconstruction, and Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophical
Forum», XXIV, 4, 1993, pp. 319-330.
Day M.M., Critical accounting pedagogy in practice: (re)constructions of ‘a true and fair view’,
Wollongong, University of Wollongong, 1993.
De Beer C.S., Dialogal Thinking (in Dutch), in «South African Journal of Philosophy», XII, 4, 1993, pp. 112-117.
De Simone A., Tradizione e modernità. Ermeneutica, filosofia pratica e teoria politica nel
primo Habermas, Urbino, Quattroventi, 1993.
Delruelle É., Le Consensus impossible: le différend entre éthique et politique chez H. Arendt
et J. Habermas, Bruxelles, Ousia, 1993.
Descombes V., Une question de chronologie, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen
Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 383-408.
Dews P., Faktizität, Geltung und Öffentlichkeit, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 1993, pp. 359-364.
Dietz S., Lebenswelt und System. Widerstreitende Ansätze in der Gesellschaftstheorie von J.
Habermas, Würzburg, Könighausen und Neumann, 1993.
Donahue M.E., Felts A., Police Ethics: A Critical Perspective, in «Journal of Criminal
Justice», XXI, 1993, pp. 339-352.
Duarri Canovas M., Mundo de la vida y acción comunicativa, in Actas de la II Semana de
Fenomenología. Sobre el Concepto de Mundo de la Vida, UNED, Madrid 1993, pp. 329336.
Dunne J., Back to the Rough Ground, Notre Dame, University Notre Dame Press,
1993.
Esquith S.L., Democratic Political Dialogue, in Nowak L. (ed.), Poznan Studies in the
Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1993, 33, pp. 51-68.
Fairfield P., Habermas, Kohlberg, and the Myth of Expertise, in «Eidos: The Canadian
156
2475.
2476.
2477.
2478.
2479.
2480.
2481.
2482.
2483.
2484.
2485.
2486.
2487.
2488.
2489.
2490.
2491.
Graduate Journal of Philosophy», XI, 1-2, 1993, pp. 77-91.
Farrell Th.B., Norms of Rhetorical Culture, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1993.
Feldman S.M., The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional Jurisprudence: Michelman, Habermas, and Civic Republicanism, in
«Georgetown Law Journal», 81, 1993, pp. 2243-2290.
Ferraro A.E., La norma basica de Hans Kelsen como presupuesto pragmatico del discurso
juridico, in «Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia», XIX, 1, 1993, pp. 133-140.
Ferry J.-M., Les idéalisations de la pratique communicationnelle sont-elles “métaphysiques”?,
Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 211.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions.
Ferry J.M., Une Approche Philosophique de la Rationalité, in «Juridique Droits», 18,
1993, pp. 89-98.
Filippone C., Forme dell’esperienza e aporie della negazione (seconda parte), in «Giornale
di Metafisica», XV, 2, 1993, pp. 225-259.
Fink-Eitel H. Innerweltliche Transzendenz. Zum gegenwärtigen Stand kritischer Gesellschafts-theorie, in «Merkur», 528, 47, 3, 1993, pp. 237-245.
Flax J., Multiples: On the Contemporary Politics of Subjectivity, in «Human Studies»,
XVI, 1-2, 1993, pp. 33-49.
Fleming M., Women’s Experiences and Critical Theory, in Canadian Society for
Women in Philosophy, Calgary, Alberta, 9.1993.
Fleming M., Working in the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Habermas, Foucault and
Derrida, in Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, New Orleans,
Lousiana, 10.1993; in «Philosophy Today», XL, 1-4, 1996, pp. 169-178.
Foisy S., L’ambiguïté du sens esthétique transcendental: Notes sur la troisième Critique, in
«Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXII, 4, 1993, pp. 659-679.
Forst R., Kommunitarismus und Liberalismus – Stationen einer Debatte, in Honneth A.
(ed.), Kommunitarismus. Eine Debatte über die moralischen Grundlagen moderner Gesellschaften, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1993, pp. 181-219.
Frank M., Wider den apriorischen Intersubjektivismus. Einwände aus Sartrescher Inspiration, in von Brumlik M., Brunkhorst H. (eds.), Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt a. M., Fischer, 1993, pp. 273-289; tr. en. Against a priori Intersubjectivism: An Alternative Inspired by Sartre, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical
Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston Brill, 2004, pp. 259279.
Frey B., Kirschgässner G., Diskursethik, Politische Ökonomie und Volksabstimmungen,
in «Analyse & Kritik», XV, 2 , 1993, pp. 129-149.
Früchtl J., “Leben wie ein gutes Tier”: Ethik zwischen Mitleid und Diskurs, in «Deutsche
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 6, 1993, pp. 981-994.
Gallagher S., The Historikerstreit and the Critique of Nationalism, in «History of European Ideas», XVI, 1993, pp. 921-926.
García Amado J.A., La filosofía del derecho de Jürgen Habermas, in «Doxa: Cuadernos
2492.
2493.
2494.
2495.
2496.
2497.
2498.
2499.
2500.
2501.
2502.
2503.
2504.
2505.
2506.
2507.
2508.
2509.
157
de filosofía del derecho», XIII, 1993, pp. 235-258.
García Carrasco J., Acción pedagógica y acción comunicativa: reflexiones a partir de textos de
J. Habermas, in «Revista de educación», 302, 1993, pp. 129-164.
Garcia Marza V.D., El mundo de la vida: Husserl y Habermas, in Actas de la II
Semana de Fenomenología. Sobre el Concepto de Mundo de la Vida, UNED,
Madrid 1993, pp. 241-258.
Gebauer R., Letzte Begründung. Eine Kritik der Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas,
München, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1993.
Gephart W., Gesellschaftstheorie und Recht: das Recht im soziologischen Diskurs der Moderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1993.
Gérard N., Jürgen Habermas, De l’éthique de la discussion, in «Genèses», XI, 1,
1993, p. 170 .
Germain G.G., A Discourse on Disenchantment: Reflections on Politics and Technology,
Albany (NY), SUNY Press, 1993.
Gnoli A., Habermas sotto accusa, in «la Repubblica», 22.6.1993, p. 34.
Goldblatt D.S., Social theory and the environment: an analysis of the writings of Giddens,
Gorz and Habermas on environmental degradation and environmental politics, Cambridge,
University of Cambridge, 1993.
Gonzaga de Souza D., O princío de universalizaçäo em kant e em habermas, in «Veritas:
revista da Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», XXXVIII, 152,
1993, pp. 595-608.
Gröbl-Steinbach E., Jenseits von Gesellschaftskritik: Zur (Un)Möglichkeit Kritischer Theorie im kommunikationstheoretischen Paradigma, in Balog A., Schülein J.A. (eds.), Soziologie und Gesellschaftskritik : Beiträge zum Verhältnis von Normativität und sozialwissenschaftlicher Analyse, 1993, pp. 111-126.
Grünbaum A., The Philosophical Critique of Freud, in Robinson P. (ed.), Freud and
His Critics, Berkeley-Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1993, pp. 179266.
Guillemot J.L., L’évolution de la critique de l’herméneutique chez Habermas, in «Eidos:
The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy», XI, 1-2, 1993, pp. 55-75.
Günther K., Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy’s “Special-Case Thesis”, in «Ratio Juris»,
VI, 1993, pp. 143-156.
Günther K., The sense of appropriateness: application discourses in morality and law, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1993.
Gutierrez C.B., Ackerman contra Rawls: del velo de ignorancia a la ciencia ficcion: Illusiones
sistematicas liberales, in «Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia», XIX, 1, 1993, pp. 1732.
Habermeier R., Die Marxismus-Kritik des frühen Habermas, in «Hitotsubashi Journal
of Social Studies», XXV , 1993, pp. 135-152.
Hafner A., Sehnsucht – Affekt und Antrieb: Begriff, Struktur und praktische Bedeutung,
Freiburg, Alber, 1993.
Hansen A.S., Two countries in the wake of war: political legitimacy and the German ques-
158
2510.
2511.
2512.
2513.
2514.
2515.
2516.
2517.
2518.
2519.
2520.
2521.
2522.
2523.
2524.
2525.
tion, Oslo, University of Oslo, 1993.
Herrera Líma M., Justificación y aplicación en la ética discursiva, in Id. (ed.), Jürgen
Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política. Propuestas y críticas, México, Alianza, 1993, pp.
117-145.
Hesse H., Von Lammern und Raubvogeln: Randbemerkungen zu Nietzsches Genealogie der
Moral, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 5, 1993, pp. 895-904.
Höffe O., Eine Konversion der Kritischen Theorie? Zu Habermas’ Rechts- und Staatstheorie, in «Rechtshistorisches Journal», 12, 1993, pp. 70-88; tr. it. Una conversione della
teoria critica? Sulla teoria del diritto e dello Stato di Habermas, in «Rivista internazionale
del diritto», LXXI, 4, 1994, pp. 270-290.
Honneth A., L’autonomie décentrée, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas
et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf,
1998, pp. 239-252.
Hottois G., La science postmoderne, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas
1998, pp. 25-46.
Hoy T., Derrida: Postmodernism and Political Theory, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XIX, 3-4, 1993, pp. 243-260.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Etica discursiva, derecho y democracia, in «Análisis político», 20,
1993, pp. 5-19.
Hudson W., Habermas’s The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, in Freundlieb D.,
Hudson W. (eds.), Reason and Its Other: Rationality in Modern German Philosophy and
Culture, Providence-Oxford, Berg,1993, pp. 107-131.
Hunnicutt B.K., History as a Profession vs. Habermas’s Musse, and Foucault’s Genealogy,
Baltimore, Social Science History Association’s Annual Meeting, 11.1993.
Ingram D., The Limits and Possibilities of Communicative Ethics for DemocraticTheory, in
«Political Theory», XXI, 2, 1993, pp. 294-321.
Jespers F.P.M., Contingentie, contextualiteit en godsdienst bij Rorty’, in «Bijdragen,
Tijdschrift voor Filosofie en Theologie», LIV, 3, 1993, pp. 234-253.
Jiménez Redondo M., Jürgen Habermas: facticidad y validez, in «Debats», 43/44,
1993, pp. 115-120.
Joas H., Pragmatism and Social Theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1993.
Johnson J., Is talk really cheap? Prompting conversation between critical theory and rational
choice, in «The American Political Science Review», 87, 1993, pp. 74-86.
Kelkel A., La modernité et la mutation du politique, Actes du Colloque autour de
Kemmis S., Foucault, Habermas and Evaluation, in «Curriculum Studies», I, 1, 1993,
pp. 35-54.
2526.
2527.
2528.
2529.
2530.
2531.
2532.
2533.
2534.
2535.
2536.
2537.
2538.
2539.
2540.
2541.
2542.
159
Kettner M., Scientific Knowledge, Discourse Ethics and Consensus Formation in the Public
Domain, in Winkler E.R., Coombs J.R. (eds.), Applied Ethics: A Reader, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1993.
Keuth H., Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung: zur Kritik der kritischen Theorie, Tübingen,
Mohr Siebeck, 1993.
Kingwell M., Interpretation, Dialogue and the Just Citizen, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XIX, 2, 1993, pp. 115-144.
Knapp M., Gottes Herrschaft als Zukunft der Welt. Bibeltheologische, theologiegeschichtliche
und systematische Studien zur Grundlegung einer Reich-Gottes. Theologie in Auseinandersetzung
mit Jürgen Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Würzburg, Bonner Dogmatische Studien, 1993.
Kompridis M., Über Welterschließung: Heidegger, Habermas, Dewey, in «Deutsche
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 3, 1993, pp. 525-538.
Korthals M., Habermas, in Bor J., Teppema S. (eds.), 25 eeuwen filosofie, Amsterdam-Meppel, Boom, 1993, pp. 355-358.
Korthals M., On the Justification of Societal Development Claims, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XIX, 1, 1993, pp. 25-41.
Kortian G., Le problème de la vérité et de son énonciation, Actes du Colloque autour de
Kujundzic N., Buschert W., Staging the Life-World: Habermas and the Recuperation of
Austin’s Speech Act Theory, in «Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour», XXIII,
1, 1993, pp. 105-116.
Kunneman H.P.J.M., Stretching Habermas, in «Kampen», 1993, pp. 96-108.
Lafont C., The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1993.
Lang A., Jürgen Habermas’ Verständigungsparadigma als theoretischer und forschungsleitender Rahmen in der Kommunikationswissenschaft, in Bentele G., Rühl M. (eds.), Theorien
öffentlicher Kommunikation. Problemfelder, Positionen, Perspektiven, München, Ölschläger,
1993, pp. 214-218.
Larmore C., Die Wurzeln radikaler Demokratie, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 2, 1993, pp. 321-327.
Larochelle G., Theories of Post-Modernity and the Rhetorical Turn in the Social Sciences, in
«Epistemologia», XVI, 1, 1993, pp. 3-38.
Lensmire T.J., Following the Child, Socioanalysis, and Threats to Community: Teacher Response to Children’s Texts, in «Curriculum Inquiry», XXIII, 3, 1993, pp. 265-299.
Lilly J.R., Deflem M., Penologie en Profijt: Een Exploratief Onderzoek naar de Bestraffingsindustrie, in «Delikt & Delinkwent», 23, 1993, pp. 511-527.
Lübbe W., Wie ist Legitimität durch Legalität möglich? Rekonstruktion der Antwort Max
Webers, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 70, 1993, pp. 80-90.
Lüderssen, K., Wer einigt sich mit wem? Die Bedeutung des Diskurses für das Recht, in
160
2543.
2544.
2545.
2546.
2547.
2548.
2549.
2550.
2551.
2552.
2553.
2554.
2555.
2556.
2557.
2558.
«Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 5.5.1993.
Luhmann N., Quod omnes tangit… Anmerkungen zur Rechtstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, in «Rechtshistorisches Journal», XII, 1993, pp. 36-56; tr. en. “Quod Omnes
Tangit”: Remarks on Jürgen Habermas’s Legal Theory, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII,
4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 883-899;
repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 157-172; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Luhmann N., The Code of the Moral, in «Cardozo Law Review», XIV, 1993, pp.
995-1009.
Maffettone S., Giustificare la giustizia, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria critica?, 29-30.10.1993.
Manimtim M.V., The concept of lifeworld in Jürgen Habermas, Roma, Tip. Poliglotta
della Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1993.
Mansbridge J., Feminism and Democratic Community, in «Democratic Community»,
XXXV, 1993, pp. 339-395.
Marsh J.L., The Religious Significance of Habermas, in «Faith and Philosophy», X, 4,
1993, pp. 521-538.
Martínez Velasco J., Habermas: Racionalidad crítica y comunicacional, in «Philosophica
Malacitana», 6, 1993, pp. 121-134.
Martins C.A., Democracia Burguesa e Política Educacional, in «Cadernos da FFC», 2, 1,
1993, pp. 1-11.
Marzocchi V., La trasformazione della teoria critica: dalla critica della ragione strumentale
alla giustificazione della razionalità comunicativa, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria critica?, 29-30.10.1993.
Matuštík M.B., Postnational Identity: Critical Theory and Existential Philosophy in Habermas, Kierkegaard, and Havel, New York, Guilford Press, 1993.
Matuštík M.B., Postnational Identity: Critical Theory Existential Philosophy in Habermas,
Kierkegaard, and Havel, in «Thesis Eleven», 34, 1993, pp. 89-103.
McCahery J., Modernist and Postmodernist Perspectives on Public Law in British Critical
Legal Studies, in «Social & Legal Studies», 2, 1993, pp. 397-421.
McCarthy, Th., La pragmática de la razón comunicativa, in «Isegoriaz», 8, 1993, pp.
65-84.
McLuskie E., Against Transformations of Communication into Control: Continuities in the
Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of Communication», XLIII, 1, 1993,
pp. 154-165.
Mehring R., Legitimität durch kommunikative Verfahren?, in «Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger», 46, 1993, pp. 177-188.
Menke Ch., Impartialité et contrainte, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris,
2559.
2560.
2561.
2562.
2563.
2564.
2565.
2566.
2567.
2568.
2569.
2570.
2571.
2572.
2573.
2574.
2575.
161
Cerf, 1998, pp. 343-364.
Merkel R., Was ist das Recht?, in «Die Zeit», 7, 12.02.1993, p. 57.
Meyer W.J., Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas,
in «The Journal of Religion», LXXIII, 4, 1993, pp. 646-647.
Monsalve Solórzano A., Ética argumentativa, in «Estudios de Filosofia», 8, 1993,
pp. 105-119.
Montefiore A., Identité personnelle et identité culturelle, Actes du Colloque autour de
Mouffe Ch., Ethique de la décision ou éthique de la discussion?, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard
F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à
Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 325-330.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Sobre la condición metafísica y/o postmetafisica del sujeto moral, in
Herrera Lima M. (ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política. Propuestas y críticas,
México, Alianza, 1993, pp. 173-191.
Nielsen K., Skeptical Remarks on the Scope of Philosophy: Rorty vs Habermas, in «Social
Theory and Practice», XIX, 2, 1993, pp. 117-160.
Noiriel G., Jürgen Habermas, De l’éthique de la discussion, in Genèses, XI, 1,
1993, p. 170.
Nuyen A.T., Habermas, Adorno and the Possibility of Immanent Critique, in «American
Catholic Philosophical Quarterly», LXVI, 3, 1993, pp. 331-340.
O’Neill O., Kommunikative Rationalität und praktische Vernunft, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 2 (“Symposium zu Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und
Geltung”), 1993, pp. 329-332.
Orts E.W., Positive Law and Systemic Legitimacy: A Comment on Hart and Habermas, in
«Ratio Juris», VI, 3, 1993, pp. 245-278.
Osborne P., Finke S., Critical Theory in Germany Today: An Interview with Alex Honneth, in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 65,
1993, pp. 33-40.
Palmer L.M., Anarchy and the Condition of Contemporary Humanism, in «History of
European Ideas», XVI, 4-6, 1993, pp. 577-583.
Pereda C., Una utopía trascendental: la reflexión, ‘experiencia olvidada’, según Jürgen
Habermas, in Herrera Lima M. (ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política.
Propuestas y críticas, México, Alianza, 1993, pp. 227-248.
Peters J.D., Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere, in «Media, Culture & Society», XV, 4, 1993, pp. 541-571.
Peukert H., Basic Problems of a Critical Theory of Education, in «Journal of Philosophy
of Education», XXVII, 2, 1993, pp. 159-170.
Pezzella M., Dalla dialettica dell’illuminismo al discorso filosofico della modernità, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria cri-
162
2576.
2577.
2578.
2579.
2580.
2581.
2582.
2583.
2584.
2585.
2586.
2587.
2588.
2589.
2590.
2591.
2592.
2593.
tica?, 29-30.10.1993.
Pickard D., Applied Nietzsche: The Problem of Reflexivity in Habermas, A Postmodern
Critique, in «Auslegung», XIX, 1, 1993, pp. 1-21.
Poulain J., Le plérôme pragmatique de la modernité, Actes du Colloque autour de
Pourtois H., La démocratie délibérative à l’épreuve du libéralisme politique, in Weinstock
D. (ed.) Le défi du pluralisme, Montréal, Lekton, 1993, pp. 105-134.
Pourtois H., Le système juridique comme système social. Le débat Habermas-Luhmann, in
«Recherches sociologiques», XXIV, 1-2, 1993, pp. 5-24.
Power M., Habermas and Transcendental Arguments: A Reappraisal, in «Philosophy of
the Social Sciences», XXIII, 1, 1993, pp. 26-49.
Preyer G., Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie
und Sozialpsychologie», XLV, 2, 1993, pp. 373-376.
Prior Olmos A., Habermas y el universalismo moral, in «Daimon. Revista de
filosofía», 7, 1993, pp. 145-155.
Rademacher C., Versöhnung oder Verständigung? Kritik der Habermasschen AdornoRevision, Lüneburg, zu Klampen, 1993.
Raes K., Habermas’ recht, in «Filosofie Magazine», II, 2 (Jürgen Habermas en de (Duitse) Rechtsstaat), 1993, p. 24.
Ranciere J., La mésentente, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R.
(ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998,
pp. 169-186.
Rasmussen D., Repenser la subjectivité, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris,
Cerf, 1998, pp. 253-266.
Rasmussen D.M., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «The Philosophical Quarterly», XLIII, 173, 1993, pp. 571-572.
Ray L.J., Rethinking critical theory: emancipation in the age of global social movements, London, Sage Publications, 1993.
Regolo L., Sì, Habermas è un nemico, in «la Repubblica», 23.6.1993, p. 34.
Reijen W.L. van, “Und?”, in «Filosofie Magazine», II, 2 (Jürgen Habermas en de (Duitse) Rechtsstaat), 1993, p. 19
Renaut A., Habermas ou Rawls, in «Réseaux», LX, 11, 1993, pp. 123-136.
Rescher N., Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus, Clarendon Press, 1993.
Rochlitz R., Logiques et résistances, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas
1998, pp. 267-278.
2594.
2595.
2596.
2597.
2598.
2599.
2600.
2601.
2602.
2603.
2604.
2605.
2606.
2607.
2608.
2609.
163
Rodríguez Ibáñez J.E., Después de Parsons y Habermas: el neoconstitucionalismo
sociológico o la vuelta a los orígenes de la teoría social contemporánea, in Lamo de Espinosa
E., Rodríguez Ibáñez J.E. (eds.), Problemas de teoría social contemporánea, Madrid,
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 1993, pp. 267-289.
Röhl K.F., Verfahrensgerechtigkeit (Procedural Justice), in «Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie», 14, 1993, pp. 1-34.
Rorty R., Les assertions expriment-elles des prétentions à une validité universelle?, Actes du
Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 211.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions.
Rosales J.M., Apuntes para una modernidad revisada: Habermas y el proyecto de la
racionalidad comunicativa, in «Themata», XI, 1993, pp. 173-185.
Rusconi G.E., La democrazia può fare a meno della nazione? Un confronto con J. Habermas, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria critica?, 29-30.10.1993.
Rüsen J., Wissenschaft ist eine institutionalisierte Chance der Vernunft, «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 2 (“Symposium zu Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und
Geltung”), 1993, pp. 365-376.
Sánchez T., Bernardo M., J. Habermas: Del Uso Pragmático, Ético, y Moral de la Razón
Práctica (Vom pragmatischen, ethischen und moralischen Gebrauch der praktischen Vernunft) ,
in «Philosophica Malacitana», 6, 1993, pp. 207-223.
Sargent S., Jürgen Habermas and the Ethics of Gatekeeping, in «Cataloging and Classification Quarterly», XVI, 3, 1993, pp. 7-15.
Sättele H., Hacia una crítica psicoanalítica de la teoría del sujeto en Jürgen Habermas, in
Herrera Lima M. (ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política. Propuestas y críticas,
México, Alianza, 1993, pp. 249-272.
Scheuerman B., Neumann versus Habermas: The Frankfurt School and the Case of the
Rule of Law, in «Praxis International», XIII, 1, 1993, pp. 50-67.
Schlink B., Abenddämmerung oder Morgendämmerung? Zu Jürgen Habermas “Diskurstheorie des demokratischen Rechtsstaats”, in «Rechtshistorisches Journal», 12 , 1993, pp. 5769.
Schweiker W., Accounting for Ourselves: Accounting Practice and the Discourse of Ethics, in
«Accounting, Organizations and Society», 18, 1993, pp. 231-252.
Shelly R., Habermas and the Normative Foundations of a Radical Politics, in «Thesis
Eleven», 35, 1993, pp. 62-83.
Shils E., Nazionalismo, nazionalità e società civile, “Fulvio Guerrini Lecture”, Centro
Einaudi, Torino, 22.6.1993, Centro di ricerca Luigi Einaudi, XXVIII, 123, 1993.
Shipman J.S., Jürgen Habermas and Collection Development, in «Cataloging & Classification Quarterly», XVI, 3, 1993, pp. 17-25.
Shusterman R., La raison et l’esthétique entre modernité et postmodernité, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in
Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard
Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 279-294.
164
2610.
2611.
2612.
2613.
2614.
2615.
2616.
2617.
2618.
2619.
2620.
2621.
2622.
2623.
2624.
2625.
Skirbekk G., Rationality and Modernity: Essays in Philosophical Pragmatics, Oslo, Scandinavian University Press, 1993.
Somek A., Unbestimmtheit: Habermas und die Critical Legal studies. Einige Bemerkungen
über die Funktion von Rechtsparadigmen für die Rechtsanwendung im demokratischen Rechtsstaat, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie», XLI, 2, 1993, pp. 343-357.
Sonnet E., The politics of representation: modernism, feminism, postmodernism, Nottingham, University of Nottingham, 1993.
Souza J.J., O princípio de universalização em Kant e em Habermas, in «Veritas»,
XXXVIII, 152, 1993, pp. 597-607.
Spinosa Ch., Dreyfus H., Une critique heideggérienne de la critique de la modernité chez
Habermas et Rorty, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty,
Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 187-210.
Strydom P., Sociocultural Evolution or the Social Evolution of Practical Reason: Eder’s Critique of Habermas, in «Praxis International», XIII, 3, 1993, pp. 304-322.
Tallar F., Moralisches Leben als SelbstAufklärung, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 5, 1993, pp. 815-827.
Thiebaut C., Derechos humanos: frágiles virtudes de la modernidad, entre otros, in Herrera
Lima M. (ed.), Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política. Propuestas y críticas, México,
Alianza, 1993, pp. 193-225.
Thiebaut C., La réflexivité des croyances morales, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen
Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 231-238.
Tietz U., Faktizität, Geltung und Demokratie. Bemerkungen zu Habermas’ Diskurstheorie
der Wahrheit und der Normenbegündung, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie»,
XLI, 2, 1993, pp. 333-342.
Tönnies S., Nahrung, die Hunger macht. Die Meister des Paradoxen: Jürgen Habermas,
Niklas Luhmann und das Formale als Grundlage der Philosophie, in «Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 25.8.1993, p. 32.
Trabant J., Habermas liest Humboldt, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
XLI, 4, 1993, pp. 639-651.
Treibel A., Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus; Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Id., Einführung in soziologische Theorien der Gegenwart, Opladen, Westdeutschen
Verlag, 1993, pp. 45-65, 153-178.
Tucker K.H., Aesthetics, Play, and Cultural Memory: Giddens and Habermas on the
Postmodern Challenge, in «Sociological Theory», XI, 2, 1993, pp. 194-211.
Udard C., Formes de la rationalité publique et démocratie chez John Rawls, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen Habermas et Richard Rorty, Cerisy-la-Salle, 2-11.7.1993; in
Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (ed.), La Modernité en questions. De Richard
Rorty à Jürgen Habermas, Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 331-342.
Vandenberghe F., Contra-Facticiteit en Geldigheid: De Staat van de Discussie, in «Kri-
2626.
2627.
2628.
2629.
2630.
2631.
2632.
2633.
2634.
2635.
165
sis», 51, 1993, pp. 76-79.
Veca S., Una teoria normativa della politica può essere critica? , in Istituto filosofico
‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, IV Incontro di studi – Cosa significa Teoria critica?, 2930.10.1993.
von Dews P., Agreeing What’s Right, in «London Review of Books», 15, 1993, pp.
Habermas, London-New York, Routledge, 1994, pp. 309-315.
von Dews P., Faktizität, Geltung und Öffentlichkeit, «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLI, 2 (“Symposium zu Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung”),
1993, pp. 359-364.
Wagner G., Gesellschaftstheorie als politische Theologie?: zur Kritik und Überwindung der
Theorien normativer Integration, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1993.
Warren M., Can Participatory Democracy Produce Better Selves? Psychological Dimension of
Habermas’s Discursive Model of Democracy, in «Political Psychology», XIV, 1993, pp.
209-234.
Wayne N., Unité, identité et nationalisme libéral, in «Lekton», III, 2, 1993, pp. 35-64.
Wellmer A., Bedingungen einer demokratischen Kultur, in M. Brumlik, H. Brunkhorst
(eds.), Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1993, pp. 173-196.
Wellmer A., Critique de la raison herméneutique, Actes du Colloque autour de Jürgen
Paris, Cerf, 1998, pp. 123 -154.
Wellmer A., Wahrheit, Kontingenz, Moderne, in Id., Endspiele: die unversöhnliche, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1993, pp. 157-177.
Wells G.G., Autonomy, Self-Consciousness and National Moral Responsibility, in «History of European Ideas», XVI, 4-6, 1993, pp. 949-955.
1994
2636.
2637.
2638.
2639.
2640.
Agazzi E., Linee fondamentali della teoria critica in Italia, in Cingoli M., Calloni M.,
Ferraro E A. (eds.), L’impegno della ragione. Per Emilio Agazzi, Milano, Unicopli,
1994, pp. 311-389.
Ajzner J., Some Problems of Rationality, Understanding, and Universalistic Ethics in the
Context of Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXIV, 4, 1994, pp. 466-484.
Alario M., Environmental Destruction and the Public Sphere: On Habermas’s Discursive
Model and Political Ecology, in «Social Theory and Practice», XX, 3, 1994, pp. 327341.
Albert A., Ein hermeneutischer Rückfall. Jürgen Habermas und der kritische Rationalismus,
in «Logos», XCIV, 1, 1993, pp. 3-34.
Alexy R., Basic rights and democracy in Jürgen Habermas’s procedural paradigma of the law,
in «Ratio Juris», VII, 2, 1994, pp. 227-238; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K.,
166
2641.
2642.
2643.
2644.
2645.
2646.
2647.
2648.
2649.
2650.
2651.
2652.
2653.
2654.
2655.
2656.
2657.
2658.
2659.
Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 391-402.
Andersen H., Faktizität und Geltung, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Acta Sociologica»,
XXXVII, 1, 1994, pp. 93-99
Angiolini V., Costituzione, politica, diritto: noterelle su temi di J. Habermas e G. Zagrebelsky in «Jus», 1, 1994, pp. 25-40.
Apel K.O., Das Problem des offenen strategischen Sprachgebrauchs in transzendentalpragmatischer Sicht, in Burchhert H. (ed.), Diskurs über Sprache, Würzburg, Königshausen
and Neumann, 1994, pp. 31-52; tr. it. Il problema dell’uso linguistico apertamente strategico
nella prospettiva pragmatico-trascendentale, in Id., Discorso, verità, responsabilità, Milano,
Guerini, 1997, pp. 237-260.
Arce Carrascoso J.L., Subjetividad y racionalidad comunicativa en J. Habermas, in
«Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», XXVIII, 1994, pp. 59-84.
Aune J.A., Rhetoric and Marxism, Boulder, Westview Press, 1994.
Bader V.M., Eenheid van de communicatieve rede, recht en complexe maatschappijen, in
«Recht en kritiek», XX, 1994, pp. 111-144.
Bal P., Discourse Ethics and Human Rights in Criminal Procedure, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 71-99; repr. in Deflem M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 71-100.
Baynes K., Communicative ethics, the public sphere and communication media, in «Critical
Studies in Mass Communication», XI, 4, 1994, pp. 315-326.
Baynes K., Deliberative Politics and Law, in Conference on Habermas’s Faktizität
und Geltung, Tilbourg University, The Netherlands, 1.1994.
Baynes K., Pluralism and Deliberative Politics, in Political Science Dept, Northwestern University, 3.1994.
Becker H., Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei Carl Schmitt und Jürgen Habermas,
Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1994.
Belardinelli S., Agire comunicativo, democrazia e diritti in J. Habermas, in Gatti R. (ed.),
Democrazia, ragione e verità, Milano, Edizioni Massimo, 1994, pp. 133-153.
Bertilsson M., Faktizitat und Geltung: Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts
und des Demokratischen Rechtstaats, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXIII, 1, 1994, pp. 156-159.
Biesta Gert J.J., Education as Practical Intersubjectivity: Towards a Critical-Pragmatic Understanding of Education, in «Educational Theory», XLIV, 3, 1994, pp. 299-317.
Blanke Th., Nötigung S., Zu Jürgen Habermas “Faktizität und Geltung”, in «Kritische
Justiz», XXVII, 4, 1994, pp. 439-461.
Blaug R., Habermas’ Treatment for Relativism, in «Politics», XIV, 2, 1994, pp. 1-22.
Bohman J.F., Complexity, Pluralism, and the Constitutional State: On Habermas’ Faktizitat und Geltung, in «Law and Society Review», XXVIII, 4, 1994, pp. 897-930.
Bohman J.F., Pluralism, Complexity and the Constitutional State: On the Relation of Law
and Democracy, in «Law and Society Review», XXVIII, 4, 1994, pp. 801-834.
Bortolotti L., Tra agire comunicativo e agire strategico. Discussione sulla problematica religioso-teologica nella teoria dell’agire comunicativo di J. Habermas, in «Studia Patavina», XLI, 1-
2660.
2661.
2662.
2663.
2664.
2665.
2666.
2667.
2668.
2669.
2670.
2671.
2672.
2673.
2674.
2675.
2676.
2677.
2678.
2679.
167
4, 1994, pp. 133-182.
Burrell G., Modernism, Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis 4: The Contribution of
Jürgen Habermas, in «Organization studies», 15, 1, 1994, pp. 1-19.
Cabiddu M.A., Metodo e scienze non giuridiche: note in margine a morale, diritto, politica di
Jürgen Habermas, in «Jus», 1, 1994, pp. 41-48.
Calloni M., Postfazione, in Habermas J., Dialettica della razionalizzazione, Milano,
Unicopli, 19942, pp. 297-300.
Calloni M., Sfere di valore e conflitti: quale universalismo? Weber, Habermas e
l’osservazione/partecipazione all’agire pratico, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVII, 1,
1994, pp. 48-67.
Casebeer K., Paris is closer than Frankfurt: the nth American Exceptionalism, in «Law &
Society Review», 4, 1994, pp. 931-937.
Ceppa L., Appunti su “Faktizität und Geltung” di Habermas, in «Teoria politica», X,
2, 1994, pp. 169-181.
Ceppa L., Legittimità tramite legalità. L’innesto habermasiano della ragion pratica nel diritto
positivo (Tanner Lectures), in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVII, 1, 1994, pp. 84-100.
Comesaña M., La Teoría de la Verdad en Habermas, in «Dianoia», XL, 1994, pp.
245-261.
Cooke M., Language and Reason: a Study of Habermas’s Pragmatics, Cambridge
(Mass.), MIT Press, 1994.
Cooke M., Postkonventionelle Selbstverwirklichung: Überlegungen zur praktischen Subjektivität, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 1, 1994, pp. 61-72.
Cooke M., Realizing the Post-Conventional Self, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
XX, 1-2, 1994, pp. 87-101.
Cornelison R.T., Habermas, Modernity, and Public Theology. Edited by Don S.
Browning and Francis Schüssler Fiorenza, in «Horizons», XXI, 1, 1994, pp. 204-205.
Cortella L., Per una razionalità pratica dialogica, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVII,
1, 1994, pp. 5-27.
Costantino S., Sfere di legittimità e processi di legittimazione. Weber, Schmitt, Luhmann,
Habermas, Torino, Giappichelli, 1994.
Courtois S., Le faillibilisme de Jürgen Habermas et ses difficultés: un faillibilisme conséquent
est-il possible?, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXIII, 2, 1994, pp.
253-282.
Couzens Hoy D., McCarthy Th., Critical Theory, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1994.
Créau A., Kommunikative Vernunft als entmystifiziertes Schicksal: Denkmotive des frühen
Hegel in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, in «Escritos de Filosofia», XIII, 25-26, 1994.
Critchley S., Habermas und Derrida werden verheiratet, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für
Philosophie», XLII, 6, 1994, pp. 1025-1036.
Dahms H.J., Positivismusstreit: Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem
logischen Positivismus, dem Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1994.
Davis F.J., Discourse Ethics and Ethical Realism: A Realist Realignment of Discourse Eth-
168
2680.
2681.
2682.
2683.
2684.
2685.
2686.
2687.
2688.
2689.
2690.
2691.
2692.
2693.
2694.
2695.
ics, in «European Journal of Philosophy», II, 2, 1994, pp. 125-142.
de Rezende Pinto J.M., Administração e liberdade: um estudo do Conselho de Escola a luz
da teoria da ação comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de
Campinas, 1994.
Deflem M., Habermas, Modernity and Law: A Bibliography, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 151-166; repr. in Deflem M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 151-166.
Deflem M., Introduction: law in Habermas’s theory of communicative action, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 1-20; repr. in «Cardozo Law Review»,
XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 120; repr. in Deflem M., (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 1-20.
Dews P., Lebenswelt, Metaphysik und Naturethik bei Habermas, in
Zierhofer W., Steiner D. (eds.), Vernunft angesichts der Umweltzerstörung, Opladen,
Di Gaspare G., Stato sociale e Stato di diritto in Forsthoff e Habermas, in «Jus», 1, 1994,
pp. 115-134.
Diggins J.P., The Promise of Pragmatism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press,
1994.
Domingues J.M., Sociological theory and the problem of collective subjectivity, with special
reference to Marx, Parsons, Habermas and Giddens, London, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1994.
Donaggio E., Un’«illuminante incoerenza»: Jürgen Habermas legge Weber, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVII, 2, 1994, pp. 86-116.
Dreier R., Diskurstheorie und Rechtsphilosophie: Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas’ Faktizitat und Geltung, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLVIII, 1, 1994,
pp. 90-103.
Dreier R., Rechtsphilosophie und Diskurstheorie. Bemerkungen zu Habermas’ “Faktizität
und Geltung”, in «Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung», XLVIII, 1994, pp.
90-103.
Elliott B., Maclennan D., Education, Modernity and Neo-consewative School Reform in
Canada, Britain and the US, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education», 15, 2,
1994, pp. 165-185.
Elliott Ch., Towards Moral Communication and Consensus, in «Cambridge Journal of
Education», 24, 3, 1994, pp. 393-398.
Erwin E., The Logic of Psychoanalytic Explanations: A Reply to Nussbaum, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 3, 1994, pp. 103-108.
Evans F., Technology as Art and the Spheres of Freedom and Necessity, in «Research in
Philosophy and Technology», XIV, 1994, pp. 219-234.
Fairfield P., Habermas, Lyotard and Political Discourse, in «Reason Papers», XIX,
1994, pp. 58-80.
Fairlamb H.L., Critical conditions: postmodernity and the question of foundations, Cam-
2696.
2697.
2698.
2699.
2700.
2701.
2702.
2703.
2704.
2705.
2706.
2707.
2708.
2709.
2710.
2711.
2712.
2713.
169
bridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Ferrara A., Riflessioni critiche sull’etica del discorso, in «Fenomenologia e Società»,
XVII, 1, 1994, pp. 28-47.
Ferrer U.S., La autoderteminación y sus paradojas, in «Anuario Filosófico», 2, 1994,
779-796.
Fine R., The ‘new nationalism’ and democracy: A critique of Pro Patria, in «Democratization», 1, 2, 1994, pp. 423-443.
Fleming M., Critical Theory Between Modernity and Postmodernity: the Feminist Challenge
for Critical Theory, in Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Seattle, Washington, 9.1994.
Fleming M., Habermas, Gender, Rationality, in Technische Universität, Berlin,
Germany, 2.1994.
Forst R., Kontexte der Gerechtigkeit. Politische Philosophie jenseits von Liberalismus und
Kommunitarismus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1994; tr. en. Contexts of Justice. Political
Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism, Berkeley-Los Angeles, University
of California Press, 2002.
Frie R., Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the work of Sarte, Binswanger, Lacan and Habermas, Cambridge, University of Cambridge, 1994.
Gamwell F., Metaphysics and the Rationalization of Society, in «Process Studies»,
XXIII, 3-4, 1994, pp. 219-237.
Gandesha, S., Marcuse, Habermas and the Critique of Technology, in Abromeit J., Cobb
M. (eds.) Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 1994, pp. 188-208.
García González G.M., Historia y crítica de la opinión pública. Una aproximación, in
«Aula», VI, 1994, pp. 197-206.
Gebauer R., Jürgen Habermas und das Prinzip des zu vermeidenden performativen Widerspruchs, in «Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XIX, 2, 1994, pp. 23-40.
Giacoia Jr. O., Nietzsche e A Modernidade Segundo Habermas, in «Idéias», I, 1, 1994,
pp. 25-50.
Gimeno Lorente P., ¿Puede la Institución Escolar contribuir en la construcción de sociedades
más racionales? La Institución Escolar a la luz de TAC, in «Teoría de la Educación», VI,
1994, pp. 93-126.
Ginev D., Beyond the Normalizing Explanation, in «Philosophia: Philosophical
Quarterly of Israel», XXIII, 1-4, 1994, pp. 145-156.
Giovagnoli R., Unita e molteplicità in Jürgen Habermas, in «Aquinas: Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia», XXXVII, 1, 1994, pp. 197-208.
Gomez E. S., Legitimacion y racionalizacion – Weber y Habermas: la dimension normativa
de un orden secularizado, Barcelona, Anthropos, 1994.
Gómez Ibáñez V., La liquidacion de la Filosofia: Notas sobre la disputa entre R. Rorty y
J. Habermas, in «Convivium: Revista de Filosofia», VI, 1994, pp. 104-128.
Gordon D., Citizens without Sovereignty: Equality and Sociability in French Thought,
1670-1789, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.
170
2714.
2715.
2716.
2717.
2718.
2719.
2720.
2721.
2722.
2723.
2724.
2725.
Grundy S., Which Way toward the Year 2000? Contrasting Policy Discourses in Two Education Systems, in «Curriculum Inquiry», 24, 3, 1994, pp. 327-347.
Guibentif P., Approaching the Production of Law through Habermas’s Concept of Communicative Action, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 45-70; repr. in
Deflem M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996,
pp. 45-70.
Gunnarsson L., Diskurs ohne Konsens, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
XLII, 2, 1994, pp. 313-326.
Gunnemann J.P., Habermas and MacIntyre on Moral Learning, in «Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics», 1994, pp. 83-108.
Günther K., Diskurstheorie des Rechts oder Naturrecht in diskurstheoretischem Gewand, in
«Kritische Justiz», XXVII, 4, 1994, pp. 470-487.
Hall D.L., Richard Rorty: Prophet and Poet of the New Pragmatism, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1994.
Hauser G.A., The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry
into a Category of Bourgeois Society, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy & Rhetoric», XXVII, 1, 1994, pp. 70-76
Hollinger R.., Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach, Newbury
Park, Sage Publications, 1994.
Honneth A., Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Habermas und die etische Herausforderung der
Postmoderne, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 2, 1994, pp. 195-220;
tr. en. The other of justice: Habermas and the ethical challenge of posmodernism, in Stephen
K. White (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 289-324; repr. in Honneth A., Disrespect. The normative foundations of Critical Theory, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2007, pp. 99-128; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate,
2011, pp. **-**; tr. it. L’altro della giustizia: Habermas e la sfida etica del postmoderno, in
«Fenomenologia e Società», XVIII, 1, 1995, pp. 83-114; tr. es. Lo otro de la justicia.
Habermas y el desafío ético del posmodernismo, in Honneth A., Crítica del agravio moral,
Buenos Aires, FCE-UAM, 2009, pp. 151-196.
Honneth A., Die Soziale Dynamik von Mißachung: Zur Ortsbestimmung einer kritischen
Gesellschaftstheorie, in Görg Ch. (ed.), Gesellschaft in Übergang: Perspektiven kritischer Soziologie, Darmstadt, WBG, 1994, pp. 45-62; tr. en. The Social Dynamics of Disrespect: Situating Critical Theory Today, in «Constellations», 1-2, 1994, pp. 255-269; repr. in von
Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 320-337; tr.
fr. La dynamique sociale du mépris. D’où parle une théorie critique de la société, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996,
pp. 215-238.
Horowitz A., The Comedy of Enlightenment: Weber, Habermas, and the Critique of Reification, in Horowitz A., Maley T. (eds), Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight
of Enlightenment, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 195-222.
Horster D., Das Recht der modernen Gesellschaft. Luhmanns Antwort auf Habermas, in
2726.
2727.
2728.
2729.
2730.
2731.
2732.
2733.
2734.
2735.
2736.
2737.
2738.
2739.
2740.
2741.
2742.
2743.
2744.
2745.
171
«Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte», XLI, 4, 1994, pp. 371-374.
Hoy D., McCarthy Th., Critical Theory, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1994.
Hunyadi M., Éthique et médiation, in «Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale»,
XCIX, 2, 1994, pp. 259-280.
Ingram D., Foucault and Habermas on the Subject of Reason, in Gutting G. (ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to Foucault, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp.
215-261.
Izzo A., Sociologia, teoria critica ed ermeneutica: Jürgen Habermas., in Id., Storia del pensiero
sociologico, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1994, pp. 210-240.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Teoría de la acción comunicativa:
complementos y estudios previos, Cátedra, Madrid, 1994, pp. 9-13.
Johnson J., Public Sphere, postmodernism and polemic, in «The American Political Science Review», 88, 1994, pp. 427-430.
Kavoulakos K., The Relationship of Realism and Utopianism in the Theories on Democracy
of Habermas and Castoriadis, in «Society and Nature», 3, 1994, pp. 69-97.
Kelly M., Foucault, Habermas, and the Self-Referentiality of Critique, in Id. (ed.), Critique
and Power. Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
1994, pp. 365-400.
Kingwell M., The Polite Citizen; Or, Justice as Civil Discourse, in «Philosophical Forum», XXV, 3, 1994, pp. 241-266.
Knight J, Johnson J., Aggregation and Deliberation: On The Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy, in «Political Theory», XXII, 1994, pp. 277-296.
Knodt E., Toward a Non-Foundationalist Epistemology: The Habermas-Luhmann Controversy Revisited, in «New German Critique», 61, 1994, pp. 77-100.
Kompridis N., On World Disclosure: Heidegger, Habermas, and Dewey, in «Thesis
Eleven», 37, 1994, pp. 29-45.
Kouba P., Die Vorurteile der Philosophen: Reflexionen zu Nietzsches Vernunftkritik, in
«Nietzsche-Studien: Internationales Jahrbuch für die Nietzsche-Forschung»,
XXIII, 1994, pp. 168-174.
Krüger H.P., Rationaler Pluralismus. Zu Reschers Habermas-Kritik, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 2, 1994, pp. 291-303.
Kunneman H.P.J.M., De ambivalentie van de mensenrechten, in «Filosofie», IV, 3,
1994, pp. 8-13.
Kupka T., Jürgen Habermas’ diskurstheoretische Reformulierung des klassischen Vernunftsrechts, in «Kritische Justiz», XXVII, 4, 1994, pp. 461-469.
Lafont C., Spannungen im Wahrheitsbegriff, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 6, 1994, pp. 1007-1023.
Lalonde M.P., Of love, truth, and reason: critical theology and the challenge of Jürgen Habermas, Montréal, Concordia University, 1994, New York, Peter Lang, 1999.
Leite Araujo L.B., Weber e Habermas: religião e razão moderna, in «Síntese Nova»,
XXI, 64, 1994, pp. 15-41.
Levin D.M., Making Sense: The Work of Eugene Gendlin, in «Human Studies», XVII,
172
2746.
2747.
2748.
2749.
2750.
2751.
2752.
2753.
2754.
2755.
2756.
2757.
2758.
2759.
3, 1994, pp. 343-353.
Lopez Molina A.M., Trabajo e Interaccion como Intereses Rectores del Conocimiento, in
«Anales del Seminario de Metafisica», XXVIII, 1994, pp. 103-120.
López Pina A., Del procedimiento como fundamento moral: sobre “Faktizität und Geltung”
de Jürgen Habermas, in «Saber leer», LXXIII, 1994, pp. 8-9.
Low-Beer M., Sind wir einzigartig? Zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewusstsein und Individualität, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 1, 1994, pp. 121-139.
Mardones J.M., Teorías de la legitimación del poder hoy: J. Habermas y la teoría del discurso,
in «Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales», CXX, 1994, pp. 39-58.
Marzocchi V., Criticità e/o fondazione filosofica? Dalla critica della ragione strumentale
(Horkheimer e Adorno) alla giustificazione della razionalità comunicativa (Habermas, Apel e
oltre), in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVII, 2, 1994, pp. 117-140.
Matuštík M.J., Democratic Multicultures and Cosmopolis: Beyond the Aporias of the Politics
of Identity and Difference, in «Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies», XII, 1, 1994, pp.
63-89.
McCarthy Th., Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue, in «Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy», CV, 1, 1994, pp. 44-63; tr. de. Kantianischer Konstruktivismus und Rekonstruktivismus: Rawls und Habermas im Dialog, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 44,
1996, pp. 931-950; tr. es. Constructivismo y reconstructivismo Kantianos: Rawls y Habermas
en diálogo, in Gimbernat Ordeig J.A. (ed)., La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen
Habermas, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 1997, pp. 35-62.
McCarthy Th., Legitimacy and Diversity: Dialectical Reflections on Analytical Distinctions,
in «Protosoziologie», VI, 1994, pp. 199-228; repr. in «Cardozo Law Review»,
XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp.
1083-1126; ; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy.
Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 115-154; repr.
in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 415-426; tr. es. Unidad en la diferencia:
reflexiones sobre el derecho cosmopolita, in «Isegoria», 1997, pp. 37-59.
McIntosh D., Language, Self, and Lifeworld in Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in «Theory and Society», XXIII, 1, 1994, pp. 1-33.
Meadwell H., The Foundations of Habermas’s Universal Pragmatics, in «Theory and
Society», XXIII, 5, 1994, pp. 711-727.
Meehan J., Autonomy, Recognition and Respect: Habermas, Benjamin, Honneth, in «Constellations», I, 2, 1994, pp. 270-285.
Mendieta E., G.H. Mead: Linguistically Constituted Intersubjectivity and Ethics, in
«Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American
Philosophy», 30, 4, 1994, pp. 959-1000.
Meyer W.J., Habermas, Jürgen, Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays,
in «Book Reviews», LXXIII, 4, 1994, pp. 466-467.
Misak Ch., Pragmatism and the Transcendental Turn in Truth and Ethics, in «Transac-
2760.
2761.
2762.
2763.
2764.
2765.
2766.
2767.
2768.
2769.
2770.
2771.
2772.
2773.
2774.
2775.
2776.
2777.
2778.
2779.
173
tions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», XXX, 4, 1994, pp. 739-775.
Moggach D., Marx and German Idealism: Labour and the Transcendental Synthesis, in
«History of European Ideas», XIX, 1-3, 1994, pp. 137-143.
Monsalve Solórzano A., Elementos para una ética argumentativa, in «Estudios de
Filosofia», X, 1994, pp. 57-79.
Mora E., Comunicazione e riflessività. Simmel, Habermas, Goffman, Milano, Vita e pensiero, 1994.
Morrow R.A., Critical Theory and Methodology, Newbury Park, Sage Publications,
1994.
Mortier F., De Piaget a Habermas et Rawls: les problèmes de la reconstruction rationnelle du
jugement moral chez Kohlberg, in «Philosophica», LIII, 1, 1994, pp. 5-37.
Mouffe C., La democracia radical: ¿moderna o postmoderna?, in «Leviatán», 55, 1994,
pp. 81-94.
Mucilo de Medeiros G., Habermas e a modernidade: que modernidade?, in «Veritas»,
XXXIX, 153, 1994, pp. 25-42.
Müller H., Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln, in «Zeitschrift für
internationale Beziehungen» I, 1, 1994, pp. 15-44.
Myerson G., Rhetoric, Reason and Society: Rationality as Dialogue, London, Sage Publications, 1994.
Nagl L., (How) Can Law Be Legitimated? Habermas, Rawls, Dworkin, in Pauer-Studer
H. (ed.), Norms, Values, and Society, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1994, pp. 131-142.
Narr W.D., Recht - Demokratie - Weltgesellschaft. Überlegungen anläßlich der Rechtstheoretischen Werke von Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann, in «Prokla», 94-95, 1994, pp.
87-112, 324-344.
Naumann-Beyer W., Annäherung an Derrida oder: Wer spät kommt, den belohnt das
Lesen, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 1, 1994, pp. 15-33.
Nauta L.W., Hahbumaas, in «Filosofie Magazine», III, 3, 1994 p. 6.
Nielsen K., How to Proceed in Philosophy: Remarks after Habermas Teoria, in «A Swedish Journal of Philosophy», LX, 2, 1994, pp. 99-128; repr. in «Tesis Eleven», 37,
1994, pp. 10-28.
Nimni E., L’impossibilità del patriottismo costituzionale: una critica ad Habermas, in «Iride
- Filosofia e discussione pubblica», XIII, 1994, pp. 670-682.
Norbrook D., Areopagitica, Censorship, and the Early Modern Public Sphere, in Burt R.
(ed.), The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism, and the Public Sphere,
Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1994, pp. 3-33.
Novaes Thomaz de Menezes A.B., Habermas e a fenomenologia do fato moral de Strawson, in «Princípios: Revista de Filosofia», I, 1, 1994, pp. 7-15.
O’Neill O., Practical Reason and Possible Community: A Reply to Jean-Marc Ferry, in
«Ratio Juris», VII, 3, 1994, pp. 308-313.
O’Neill S., Morality, Ethical Life and the Persistence of Universalism, in «Theory, Culture and Society», XI, 2, 1994, pp. 129-149.
O’Neill W., The Ethics of Our Climate: Hermeneutics and Ethical Theory, Washington,
174
2780.
2781.
2782.
2783.
2784.
2785.
2786.
2787.
2788.
2789.
2790.
2791.
2792.
2793.
2794.
2795.
2796.
Georgetown University Press, 1994.
Olivier B., Derrida: Philosophy or literature?, in «Journal of Literary Studies», X, 2,
1994, pp. 151-164.
Outhwaite W., Autonomy and Solidarity: Interviews with Jürgen Habermas;
Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXIII, 3, 1994, pp. 456-458.
Outhwaite W., Habermas. A Critical Introduction, Stanford, Stanford University
Press, 1994.
Perri M.L., Il mutamento di paradigma e la “patologia sociale” in Jürgen Habermas, Ancona, Transeuropa, 1994.
Peters B., On Reconstructive Legal and Political Theory, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 101-134; repr. in Deflem M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and
Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 101-134.
Petrucciani S., L’argomentazione confutativa in prospettiva trascendental-pragmatica, in «La
Cultura. Rivista di filosofia, letteratura, storia», XXXII, 3, 1994, pp. 447-475.
Petrucciani S., Sulla giustificazione razionale della norma etica, in «Fenomenologia e
Società», XVII, 1, 1994, pp. 133-153.
Phillips A., Dealing With Difference: A Politics of Ideas or a Politics of Presence?, in
«Constellations», 1, 1, 1994, pp. 74-91.
Poster M., Critical Theory and Technoculture: Habermas and Baudrillard, in Kellner D.
(ed.), Baudrillard: A Cultural Reader, Oxford-Cambridge (Mass.), Blackwell, 1994,
pp. 68-88.
Prieto Navarro E., Algunas consideraciones sobre las relaciones entre derecho e integración
social en el último Habermas, in «Doxa: Cuadernos de filosofía del derecho», XV-XVI,
1-2, 1994, pp. 339-352.
Prins B., Is alles bespreekbaar?: Jürgen Habermas en de feministische rechtskritiek, in
«Nederlands tijdschrift voor rechtsfilosofie en rechtstheorie», 23, 1994, pp. 48-60.
Privitera W., Emilio Agazzi interprete di Habermas, in Cingoli M., Calloni M. Ferraro
A. (eds.), L’impegno della ragione. Per Emilio Agazzi, Milano, Unicopli, 1994, pp. 311389.
Privitera W., Un’opinione pubblica rachitica, in «Reset», 7, 1994.
Radcliffe J., The Australian Broadcasting Tribunal’s Australian Content Inquiry 19831990: a case study in The dynamics of a public policy debate, Canberra, University of Canberra, 1994.
Rasmussen D., How Is Valid Law Possible? A Review of “Faktizität und Geltung” by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XX, 4, 1994, pp. 21-44; repr.
as How Is Valid Law Possible? A Review of Between Facts and Norms by Jürgen Habermas,
in Deflem M. (ed.), Habermas, Modernity and Law, London, Sage Publications, 1996,
pp. 21-44.
Reese-Schäfer W., Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1994.
Rehg W.S.J., Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas,
Berkeley, University of California Press, 1994.
2797.
2798.
2799.
2800.
2801.
2802.
2803.
2804.
2805.
2806.
2807.
2808.
2809.
2810.
2811.
2812.
175
Reyes Mate M., La herencia pendiente de la ‘razón anamnética’, in «Isegoría», 10, 1994,
pp. 117-132.
Roermund G.C.G.J., Solidariteit onder vreemden: de rechtstheorie van Jürgen Habermas, in
«Nederlands tijdschrift voor rechtsfilosofie en rechtstheorie», 23, 1994, pp. 120156.
Rømer Christensen H., Among flappers and respectable girls. Gender and culture in the
Danish YWCA 1880–1940, in «NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender
Research», 2, 1, 1994, pp. 51-61.
Rorty R., Sind Aussagen universelle Geltungsanspruche?, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für
Rosati M., Consenso e razionalità. Riflessioni sulla teoria dell’agire comunicativo, Roma,
Armando, 1994.
Rosati M., Socializzazione e identità e nel pensiero di J. Habermas, in «Scuola Democratica», 1-2, 1994, pp. 282-292; repr. in 2, 2015, pp. 361-376.
Roundy Blyler N., Habermas, empowerment, and professional discourse, in «Technical
Communication Quarterly», 3, 2, March 1994, pp. 125-145.
Rubio Carracedo, J., El paradigma ético: Justicia, solidardid y autonomía, in
«Philosophica Malacitana», 7, 1994, pp. 127-146.
Sáez Rueda L., Acerca del Conflicto Entre los Discursos Metafisico, Postmetafisico y
Teologico, in “Daimon. Revista de filosofía», 8, 1994, pp. 63-82.
Sandrelli, C., Recensione di J. Habermas, Faktizitat und Geltung. Beitrage zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des democratischen Rechtsstaats, in «Filosofia politica» 1, 1994, pp.
139-141.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Radikalisierung und Selbstbeschränkung. Überlegungen zu einer reflexiven Modernisierung der Demokratie, in «Neue Soziale Bewegungen», VII, 1, 1994, pp.
18-33; repr. in Greven M.Th., Kühler P., Schmitz M. (eds.), Politikwissenschaft als
kritische Theorie. Festschrift für Kurt Lenk, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1994, pp.
495-525.
Schmidt Th.M., Immanente Transzendenz und der Sinn des Unbedingten. Zur Bestimmung
des Verhältnisses von Religion und Philosophie bei Jürgen Habermas, Hauser L., Nordhofen
E. (eds.), Im Netz der Begriffe. Religionsphilosophische Analysen, Altenberge, Oros Verlag, 1994, pp. 78-96.
Schudson M., The Public Sphere and Its Problems: Bringing the State (Back) In, in
«Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy», VIII, 2, 1994, pp. 529546.
Seccombe Eastland L., Habermas, emancipation, and relationship change: An exploration
of recovery processes as a model for social transformation, in «Journal of Applied Communication Research», XXII, 2, 1994, pp. 162-176.
Serrano Gómez E., Legitimación y racionalización: Weber y Habermas: la dimensión
normativa de un orden secularizado, Barcelona, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana,
Anthropos, 1994.
Siebert R.J., The Critique of Force in Right and State: From Hegel through Benjamin and
Marcuse to Habermas, in «Hegel-Jahrbuch», 94, 1994, pp. 169-184.
176
2813.
2814.
2815.
2816.
2817.
2818.
2819.
2820.
2821.
2822.
2823.
2824.
2825.
2826.
2827.
2828.
2829.
2830.
2831.
Simon J., Between power and knowledge: Habermas, Foucault, and the future of legal studies,
in «Law & Society Review», XXVIII, 4, 1994, pp. 947-961.
Smith N.H., Charles Taylor, Strong Hermeneutics and the Politics of Difference, in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 68, 1994, pp. 1927.
Stevenson N., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociology», XXVIII, 4, 1994, pp. 1010-1011.
Still J., What Foucault Fails to Acknowledge ...: Feminists and The History of Sexuality, in
«History of the Human Sciences», VII, 2, 1994, pp. 150-157.
Swindal J.C., The Problem of Problematization in Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XX, 3, 1994, pp. 1-18.
Thiebaut L.C., Democracia y diferencia: un aspecto del debate sobre el multiculturalismo, in
«Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez», 31, 1994, pp. 41-60.
Tietz U., Zur hermeneutischen Transformation der Sprachanalyse, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 5, 1994, pp. 861-881.
Tran V.D., The Dialectic of Tradition and Modernity, in «Philosophical Review», 17,
1994, pp. 129-163.
Tweedy J., Hunt A., The Future of the Welfare State and Social Rights: Reflections on Habermas, in «Journal of Law and Society», XXI, 3, 1994, pp. 288-316.
van Reijen W., Derrida. Ein unvollendeter Habermas?, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für
Vandenberg A., Tregenza I., Rational economics and the public sphere: An essay in retrieval, in «Australian Journal of Political Science», 29, 2, 1994, pp. 338-353.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Acerca del ‘giro jurídico’ de la teoría crítica, in «Isegoría», 10, 1994,
pp. 179-185.
Vermes Ch., Validity and validation in Kant’s and Habermas’ moral theories, Montréal,
Concordia University, 1994.
von Schomberg R., The Erosion of Our Value Spheres: The Ways in which Society Copes
with Scientific, Moral, and Ethical Uncertainty, Tilburg, Tilburg Universityin, 27.1.1994;
in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas
Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 219-237.
von Schomberg R., WertSphären, argumentative Vernunft und die gesellschaftliche Bewaltigung von wissenschaftlicher und moralisch-ethischer Unsicherheit, in Apel, K.O., Kettner M.
(eds.) Mythos Wertfreiheit? Neue Beitrage zur Objektivität in den Human und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 1994, pp.235-255
Vonèche J., Parrat-Dayan S., La partie, le tout et l’équilibration, in «Philosophica»,
LIV, 2, 1994, pp. 9-42.
Wain K., Competing Conceptions of the Educated Public, in «Journal of Philosophy of
Education», XXVIII, 2, 1994, pp. 149-159.
Wauzzinski R.A., Technological Pessimism, in «Perspectives on Science and Christian
Faith», XLVI, 1994, pp. 98-114.
Weinberger O., Habermas on democracy and justice. Limits of a sound conception, in «Ra-
2832.
2833.
177
tio Juris», VII, 2, 1994, pp. 239-253.
Williams H., Democracy and Right in Habermas’s Theory of Facticity and Value, in «History of Political Thought», XV, 2, 1994, pp. 269-283.
Wüstehube A.,”Acquiescence” oder “kommunikative Rationalität”. Zu Reschers Kritik an
Habermas, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLII, 2, 1994, pp. 327-334.
1995
2834.
2835.
2836.
2837.
2838.
2839.
2840.
2841.
2842.
2843.
2844.
2845.
2846.
2847.
Aboulafia M., Habermas and Mead: On Universality and Individuality, in «Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory», II, l, 1995, pp.
94-113.
Aladjem T.K., Of Truth and Disagreement: Habermas, Foucault, and Democratic Discourse, in «History of European Ideas», XX, 4-6, 1995, pp. 909-914.
Alexy R., Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs. Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 1995.
Allen D.S., Separating the Press and the Public, in «Journal of Mass Media Ethics», 10,
4, 1995, pp. 197-209.
Alway J., Critical Theory and Political Possibilities: Conceptions of Emancipatory Politics in
the Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, and Habermas, Westport, Conn., Greenwood Press, 1995.
Alzuru J., Una visión del mundo, in «Apuntes Filosoficos», 78, 1995, pp. 183-198.
Apel K.O., Auflösung der Diskursethik? Zur Architektonik der Diskursdifferenzierung in
Habermas’ Faktizität und Geltung, in Id., Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzendental-pragmatischen Ansatzes, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 727-837; tr. it.
Dissoluzione dell’etica del discorso? Sull’architettonica della differenziazione dei discorsi in “Fatti
e norme” di Habermas, in Id., Discorso, verità, responsabilità, Milano, Guerini, 1997, pp.
261-368.
Arantes Otília B.F., The New Architecture of Old Times: What’s To Be Done?, in
«Trans/Form/ Ação: Revista de Filosofia», 18, 1995, pp. 15-22.
Baehr A.R, Remarks on Rawls and Habermas on the Liberties of the Moderns and of the
Ancients, 12th Annual Conference of the North American Society for Social Philosophy, Colby College, Colby, Maine, 13.8.1995.
Bagnoli C., Habermas e Rawls: un confronto, in «Filosofia e questioni pubbliche», I, 1,
1995, pp. 122-129.
Baynes K., Symposium: Robert B. Pippin’s Modernism as a Philosophical Problem: Modernity as Autonomy, in «Inquiry», XXXVIII, 3, 1995, pp. 289-303.
Bell J.A., Philosophizing the Double-Bind: Deleuze Reads Nietzsche, in «Philosophy Today», XXXIX, 4, 1995, pp. 371-390.
Belsey A., Bernstein J.M., Recovering Ethical Life: Jürgen Habermas and the Future of Critical Theory, in «Journal of Applied Philosophy», XII, 3, 1995, p. 301.
Bengoa Ruiz de Azua J., De Heidegger a Habermas, in «Dialogo Filosofico», XI, 1,
1995.
178
2848.
2849.
2850.
2851.
2852.
2853.
2854.
2855.
2856.
2857.
2858.
2859.
2860.
2861.
2862.
2863.
2864.
2865.
2866.
Benhabib S., Ein deliberatives Modell demokratischer Legitimation, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLIII, 1995 pp. 3-29.
Benhabib S., The Debate over Woman and Moral Theory Revisted, in Meehan J. (ed.),
Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London-New York,
Berciano Villalibre M., El problema de la ontología en Habermas, Pamplona, Servicio
de publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 1995.
Bermbach U., Plädoyer für eine ungeteilte Öffentlichkeit, in Göhler G. (ed.), Macht der
Öffentlichkeit – Öffentlichkeit der Macht, Baden-Baden, 1995, pp. 25-37.
Berni S., Habermas e del pensiero neoconservatore, in «Il Ponte», LI, 10, 1995, pp. 8194.
Bernstein J.M., Recovering Ethical Life. Jürgen Habermas and the future of Critical Theory,
London, Routledge, 1995.
Bernstein J.M., The Causality of Fate: Modernity and Modernism in Habermas, in in
Passerin d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of
Modernity. Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity
Press, 1995, pp. 245-268.
Best S., The Politics of Historical Vision. Marx, Foucault, Habermas, New York, Guilford Press, 1995.
Bianchin M., Ragione e linguaggio. Ermeneutica, epistemologia e teoria critica in Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Guerini e Associati, 1995.
Bianchin M., Recensione di J. Habermas, “Testi filosofici e contesti storici”, in «Bollettino
della società filosofica italiana», 1, 1995, pp. 116-118.
Biella J., Jürgen habermas: da pragmática universal à ambigüidade transcendental, in
«Princípios: Revista de Filosofia», II, 2, 1995.
Blake N., Ideal Speech Conditions, Modern Discourse and Education, in «Journal of Philosophy of Education», XXIX, 3, 1995, pp. 355-367.
Blake N., Truth, Identity and Community in the University, in «Curriculum Studies», 3,
3, 1995, pp. 263-281.
Blaug R., The Distortion of the Face to Face: Communicative Reason and Social Work Practice, in «British Journal of Social Work», XXV, 4, 1995, pp. 423-439.
Bohman J.F., Critical Theory, in Audi R., Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Bohman J.F., Modernization and Impediments to Democracy: The Problems of Hypercomplexity and Hyperrationality, in «Theoria», 86, 1995-96, pp. 1-20.
Bohman J.F., Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem
of Moral Conflict, in «Political Theory», XXIII, 2, 1995, pp. 253-279.
Bohman J.F., The Public Spheres of the Cosmopolital Citizen, in «Proceedings of the 8th
International Kant Congress», Vol. III, Milwaukee, Marquette University Press, 1995,
pp. 1056-1080.
Bohman J.F., Two Versions of the Linguistic Turn: Habermas’s Criticisms of Poststructuralism, in in Passerin d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished
2867.
2868.
2869.
2870.
2871.
2872.
2873.
2874.
2875.
2876.
2877.
2878.
2879.
2880.
2881.
2882.
179
Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 191-214.
Boladeras Cucurella M., Derechos fundamentales y ciudadanía europea según J. Habermas,
AA.VV., La constitución española en el ordenamiento comunitario europeo (I), XVI Jornadas
de estudio, 2, 1995, pp. 1547-1562.
Braaten J., From Communicative Rationality to Communicative Thinking: A Basis for Feminist Theory and Practice, in Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 139-162.
Bracken P.J., Beyond Liberation: Michel Foucault and the Notion of a Critical Psychiatry,
in «Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology», II, 1, 1995, pp. 1-13.
Bremer M.E., Ist die Tranzendentalpragmatik letztebegrundet oder holistisch?, in «Journal
for General Philosophy of Science», XXVI, 1, 1995, pp. 153-168.
Buchwalter A., The Co-Primordiality of Public and Private Autonomy in Hegel and Habermas, Chicago, APA, 5.1995; repr. in “17th International Association of Law and
Social Philosophy”, World Congress, Bologna, 6.1995.
Carrasco J.G., El ámbito de la formación, in «Comunicación, Lenguaje y Educación»,
VII, 4, 1995, pp. 103-122.
Cavin R.G., Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus?,
in «Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian, Philosophers», XII,
3, 1995, pp. 361-379.
Ceppa L., J. Habermas: dalla Diskursethik alla filosofia del diritto, in «Paradigmi», XIII,
37, 1995, pp. 41-53.
Chambers S., Discourse and Democratic Practices, in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge
Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 233259.
Charmbers S., The Debate over Women and Moral Theory Revisited, in Meehan J. (ed.),
Chriss J.J., Habermas, Goffman, and Communicative Action: Implications for Professional
Practice, in «American Sociological Review», LX, 4, 1995, pp. 545-565.
Cohen J.L., Critical Social Theory and Feminist Critiques: The Debate with Jürgen Habermas, in Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse,
London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 57-90; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate,
2011, pp. **-**.
Coles R., Identity and Difference in the Ethical Positions of Adorno and Habermas, in
White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge
Cooke M., Selfhood and Solidarity, in «Constellations», I, 3, 1995, pp. 337-357.
Coole D., Habermas and the Question of Alterity, in Passerin d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on “The
Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 221-244.
Cortella L., Dopo il sapere assoluto. L’eredità hegeliana nell’epoca post-metafisica, Milano,
180
2883.
2884.
2885.
2886.
2887.
2888.
2889.
2890.
2891.
2892.
2893.
2894.
2895.
2896.
2897.
2898.
2899.
2900.
2901.
Guerini e Associati, 1995.
Cortés Rodas F., Racionalidad comunicativa y política deliberativa en Habermas, in
«Estudios de Filosofia», 12, 1995, pp. 107-121.
Costa P., Che cosa significa teoria critica?, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVIII, 2,
1995, pp. 78-116.
Couture T., Feminist Criticisms of Habermas’s Ethics and Politics, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXIV, 2, 1995, pp. 259-279.
Dahlgren P., Television and the Public Sphere, London, Sage Publications, 1995.
Dale A., Politikkens normative grunnlag: Jürgen Habermas’ diskursteoretiske utfordringer til
Robert Dahls teori om prosedyredemokratiet, Oslo, University of Oslo, 1995.
Darier E., The Michel Foucault galaxy: Dancing under the stars, in «Modern & Contemporary France», 3, 3, 1995, pp. 322-325.
De Beus J., Bounded Culture and Liberal Equality, in «Philosophica», LVI, 2, 1995,
pp. 29-57.
De Simone A., Dalla metafora alla storia. Modelli ermeneutici e scienze umane: saggi su
Ricoeur, Gadamer e Habermas, Urbino, Quattroventi, 1995.
De Zan J., Una teoría del estado de derecho, in «Cuadernos de Etica», 1920, 1995, pp.
169-180.
Dean J., Discourse in Different Voices, in Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas:
Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
1995, pp. 205-230.
Dews P., Lifeworld, Metaphysics and the Ethics of Nature in Habermas, and Modernity,
Self-Consciousness and the Scope of Philosophy: Jürgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich in Debate, in Id., The Limits of Disenchantment: Essays on Contemporary European Philosophy,
London, Verso, 1995.
Dews P., The Paradigm Shift to Communication and the Question of Subjectivity: Reflections
on Habermas, Lacan and Mead, in «Revue Internationale de Philosphie», 4, 1995, pp.
483-519.
Douramanis D., Mapping Habermas. A bibliography of primary literature 1952-1995, in
Mapping Habermas from German to English: A Bibliography of Primary Literature 1952–
1995, Sydney, Eurotext, 1995.
Dryzek J.S., Critical Theory as a Research Program, in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge
Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 97-119.
Duarte Rodrigo A.P., Expressao como fundamentação, in «Kriterion: Revista de
Filosofia», XXXV, 91, 1995, pp. 45-66.
Dubreuil G.H., Prise de risque, confiance et cohésion sociale, in «Les Echos», 17042,
11.12.1995, p. 52.
Dworkin R., Constitutionalism and Democracy, in «European Journal of Philosophy»,
III, 1, 1995, pp. 2-11.
Eckersley R., Liberal Democracy and the Rights of Nature: The Struggle for Inclusion, in
«Environmental Politics», VI, 1, 1995, pp. 169–198.
Elizalde Luciano H., ¿Que es la Razón Comunicativa? Una síntesis de concepto de razón
2902.
2903.
2904.
2905.
2906.
2907.
2908.
2909.
2910.
2911.
2912.
2913.
2914.
2915.
2916.
2917.
181
comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas, in «Derecho y opinión», 3-4, 1995-1996, pp. 453466.
Engländer A., Grundrechte als Kompensation diskursethischer Defizite? Kritische Anmerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas’ Diskurstheorie del Rechts, in «Archiv Für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophi », LXXXI, 1995, pp. 483-495.
Eriksen E. O., Statsvitenskapen og konstitusjonstenkningen - bidrag til en konstruktiv politisk teori, in Eriksen E.O. (ed.), Deliberativ politikk. Demokrati i teori og praksis, Oslo,
Tano, 1995, pp. 46-70.
Eriksen E.O., Introduksjon til en deliberative politikkmodell, in Eriksen E.O. (ed.), Deliberativ politikk. Demokrati i teori og praksis, Oslo, Tano, 1995, pp. 11-30.
Ferreira Chagas E., Para uma Explicitação do Conceito de Poder em Hannah Arendt à
partir de J. Habermas, in «Educacao e Filosofia», IX, 18, pp. 81-91.
Ferrer U.S., La acción anónima y el sentido (De Weber a Schutz y Habermas), in
«Anuario de filosofía del derecho», 12, 1995, pp. 301-322.
Fessen B., Misslungene Verständigung. Wortmeldungen von Philosophen zum neuen
Deutschland, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLIII, 5, 1995, pp. 861-884.
Fiore F., Le ragioni del diritto: sul positivismo giuridico nella teoria discorsiva di Jürgen Habermas, in «Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica», XXV, 2, 1995, pp. 539554.
Fletcher R., The Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociology», XXIX, 4,
1995, pp. 745-747.
Fleming M., Habermas on Unification and German Identity, in II International German History Research Colloquium, Vancouver, British Columbia, 5.1995.
Flemming M., Women and the ‘Public Use of Reason’, in Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists
Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 117-138
Forst R., Welche Person? Wessen Gemeinschaft? Zur Kontroverse zwischen Liberalismus und
Kommunitarismus, in van den Brink B., van Reijen W. (eds.), Bürgergesellschaft, Recht
und Demokratie, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1995, pp. 213-241; tr. en. Which Person?
Whose Community? On the Controversy Between Liberalism and Communitarianism, in Nascimento A. (ed.), A Matter of Discourse. Community and Communication in Contemporary
Philosophies, Aldershot, Ashgate, 1998, pp. 27-52.
Frank M., Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität, in «Revue Internationale de Philosophie», XLIX, 194, 1995, pp. 405-407, 521-550,
Fultner B., Radical Interpretation or Communicative Action, Diss. Northwestern University, Evanston, 1995.
Gaon S., Thinking the Ethical Relation: The Implications of Deconstruction for Feminist
Political Theory, in «Problematique», III, 1, 1995, pp. 65-78.
García Marzá V.D., Ética de la democrazia, in «Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciencia»,
2526, 1995, pp. 181-187.
Gelder F., Jürgen Habermas: Science and Crisis. An Annotaded Bibliography, New York,
Taylor & Francis, 1995.
182
2918.
2919.
2920.
2921.
2922.
2923.
2924.
2925.
2926.
2927.
2928.
2929.
2930.
2931.
2932.
2933.
2934.
2935.
Gómez Ibáñez V., Mundo administrado o Colonización del mundo de la vida: La
depotenciación de la Teoría crítica de la sociedad en J. Habermas, in «Daimon. Revista de
filosofía», 10, 1995, pp. 103-113.
Gosepath S., The place of equality in Habermas’ and Dworkin’s theories of justice, in «European Journal of Philosophy», III, 1, 1995, pp. 21-35.
Guariglia O., Universalismus und Neuaristotelismus in der zeitgenössischen Ethik, Hildesheim, Olms, 1995.
Guariglia O., Zwei aktuelle Versionen des Universalismus: Jürgen Habermas und John
Rawls, in Id., Universalismus und Neuaristotelismus in der zeitgenössischen Ethik, Georg
Olms Verlag, 1995, pp. 61-82.
Günther K., Legal Adjudication and Democracy: Some Remarks on Dworkin and Habermas, in «European Journal of Philosophy», III, 1, 1995, pp. 36-54.
Hála V., Dialog a kontext: Ke smyslu formalismu a obsahových souvislostí v etické koncepci J.
Habermase, in «Filosofický časopis», XLIII, 2, 1995, pp. 272-286.
Harris S., Pragmatics and Power, in «Journal of Pragmatics», XXIII, 2, 1995, pp.
117-135.
Heath J., The Problem of Foundationalism in Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXI, 1, 1995, pp. 77-100.
Heath J., Threats, Promises and Communicative Action, in «European Journal of Philosophy», III, 3, 1995, pp. 225-241.
Held D., Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge-Oxford, Polity Press, 1995.
Henson J., The Church as a Communicative Community. Engaging Johann Baptist Metz’
Understanding of the Church’s Role in the World and Jürgen Habermas’ Theory of Communicative Action, Leuven, 1995.
Hesse M., Habermas and the Force of Dialectical Argument, in «History of European
Ideas», XXI, 3, 1995, pp. 367-378.
Hewitt M.A., Critical Theory of Religion: A Feminist Analysis, Minneapolis, Fortress
Press, 1995.
Horster D., “Abklärung über Aufklärung”. Ist die Kritische Theorie “konservativ”? Niklas Luhmanns neue Gedankenordnung, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 146, 27-6-1995.
How A., The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social: Back to Bedrock,
London, Avebury, 1995; repr. in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and
Feminist Philosophy», 85, 1997.
Iglesias M., Practical Reason in Habermas: Basis of Legitimacy in Law, in «Revista de
Filosofia», XXI, 1, 1995, pp. 143-161.
Ignacio Sotelo M., Las ideas políticas de Habermas, in «Claves de razón práctica», 57,
1995, pp. 18-33.
Ingram D., The Subject of Justice in Postmodern Discourse, in in Passerin d’Entrèves
M., Benhabib S. (eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays
on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 269300.
2936.
2937.
2938.
2939.
2940.
2941.
2942.
2943.
2944.
2945.
2946.
2947.
2948.
2949.
2950.
2951.
2952.
2953.
183
Innes J.E., Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm: Communicative Action and Interactive
Practice, in «Journal of Planning Education and Research», XIV, 3, 1995, pp. 183190.
Jacobson A.J., Habermas and Luhmann in the American Legal Tradition, in «Journal
for History of Law», 14, 1995, pp. 3-12.
Jakovljevic G., Zum wirkungsgeschichtlichen Bewusstsein (in Serbo-Croatian), in «Theoria: Casopis Filozofskog Drustva Srbije», XXXVIII, 3, 1995, pp. 47-61.
Jespers F.P.M., De theologische receptie van de latere Habermas, in «Bijdragen,
Tijdschrift voor Filosofie en Theologie», XXXV, 2, 1996, pp. 176-186.
Jimânez Redondo M., Pragmática universal y autonomía del significado, in Martínez F.J.,
Jiménez Redondo M. (eds.), Metafísica y política en la obra de J. Habermas, Madrid,
Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1995, pp. **-**.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Conocimiento e interés. Edmund
Husserl. La filosofía en la crisis de la humanidad europea, Valencia, Universidad de
Valencia, 1995, pp. 13-32.
Johnson J., Is Talk Really Cheap? Prompting Conversation Between Critical Theory and
Rational Choice, in «American Political Science Review», LXXXVII, 1, 1995, pp. 7486.
Kattago S., Judgement and Intersubjectivity in Kant and Habermas’s Ethics, in «Conference: A Journal of Philosophy and Theory», V, 2, 1995, pp. 43-58.
Kauark Leite P., Uma leitura pragmático-transcendental dos diálogos galileanos, in
«Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia», XXXV, 91, 1995, pp. 67-81.
Keane J., Structural transformations of the public sphere, in «The Communication Review», 1, 1, 1995, pp. 1-22.
Keck O., Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den internationalen Beziehungen, in
«Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», II, 1, 1995, pp. 5-41.
Kelly M., Gadamer, Foucault and Habermas on Ethical Critique, in Schmidt L.K. (ed.),
The Specter of Relativism. Truth, Dialogue and Phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics,
Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1995, pp. 234-235.
Kendall Timothy J.G., Commentary on Beyond Liberation, in «Philosophy, Psychiatry,
and Psychology», II, 1, 1995, pp. 15-17.
Kerckhove L., Emancipatory Social Science: Habermas on Nietzsche, in «Philosophy in
the Contemporary World», II, 1, 1995, pp. 19-26.
Kersting W., Diskurstheorie kommunikativen Handelns, in Nohlen D., Schultze R.O.
(eds.), Politische Theorien (Lexikon der Politik, Bd. 1), München, 1995, pp. 56-63.
Kettner M., Habermas und die Einheit der praktischen Vernunft, in Wüstehube A.
(ed.), Pragmatische Rationalitätstheorien, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1995,
pp. 85-111.
Keulartz F.W.J., Die verkehrte Welt des Jürgen Habermas. Aus dem Niederländischen von
Inge van der Aart, Hamburg, Junius Verlag, 1995.
Kimmerle H., Das Multiversum der Kulturen: Einstellungen der zeitgenössischen europäischwestlichen Philosophie zu den Philosophien anderer, in «Kulturen Perspektiven der Philo-
184
2954.
2955.
2956.
2957.
2958.
2959.
2960.
2961.
2962.
2963.
2964.
2965.
2966.
2967.
2968.
2969.
2970.
sophie», 21, 1995, pp. 269-292.
Klaus G., Regiert das Recht die Politik? Jürgen Habermas im Dialog mit Ronald Dworkin,
Manuskript der WDR-Fernsehsendung, 25.6.1995.
Kompridis N., Heidegger’s Challenge and the Future of Critical Theory, in von Dews P.,
Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 118-150.
Lafont C., Truth, Knowledge and Reality, in «Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal»,
XVIII, 2, 1995, pp. 109-126; tr. es. Verdad, saber y realidad, in Gimbernat Ordeig
J.A. (ed.), La filosofía moral y política de J.Habermas, Biblioteca Nueva, Madrid, 1997,
pp. 239-260.
Lamb A.W., Freedom, the Self, and Ethical Practice According to Michel Foucault, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XXXV, 4, 1995, pp. 449-467.
Landes J.B., The public and the private sphere: a feminist reconsideration, in Meehan J.
(ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the Subject of Discourse, London-New York,
Lanteigne J., Le bien suprême est-il virtuellement réalise dans le monde? Le jugement politique
chez Jacques Poulain, in «Horizons Philosophiques», V, 2, 1995, pp. 74-83.
Lara M.P., Albrecht Wellmer: Between Spheres of Validity, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XXI, 2, 1995, pp. 1-22.
Larmore C., The foundation of modern democracy: reflections on Jürgen Habermas, in «European Journal of Philosophy», III, 1, 1995, pp. 55-68.
Lau J., Es kommen härtere Tage. Während die Systemtheorie die soziale Frage und die Fatalität der Technik entdeckt, verlegt sich die Kritische Theorie auf die Beobachtung des Feuilletons.
Neue politische Schriften von Niklas Luhmanns und Jürgen Habermas, in «Die Tageszeitung», 18.6.1995, p. 12.
Love N.S., What’s Left of Marx?, in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to
Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 46-66.
Malowitz K., Ernst Tugendhat und die Diskursethik – Notizen zu einem Widerlegungsprogramm, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», XLIX, 4, 1995, pp. 595-604.
Malvern S.B., Inventing Child Art’: Franz Cizek and Modernism, in «British Journal of
Aesthetics», XXXV, 3, 1995, pp. 262-272.
Manfred F., Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität, in «Revue Internationale de Philosphie», 4, 1995, pp. 521-550.
Marques Dias M.C., Direitos Sociais Básicos: Uma Investigañão acerca dos direitos
humanos, in «Episteme NS», 1415, 1-3, 1995, pp. 93-105.
Martínez F.J., Dos lecturas: Machado y Habermas, in «Utopías. Nuestra bandera»,
164, 1995, pp. 173-175.
Martínez F.J., Pensamiento postmetafísico, contextualismo y religión en la obra de J.
Habermas, in Martínez F.J., Jiménez Redondo M. (eds.), Metafísica y política en la obra
de J. Habermas, Madrid, Fundación de Investigaciones Marxistas, 1995, pp. **-**.
Matuštík M.B., Derrida and Habermas on the Aporia of the Politics of Identity and Difference: Towards Radical Democratic Multiculturalism, in «Constellations: An International
Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory», I, 3, 1995, pp. 383-398.
2971.
2972.
2973.
2974.
2975.
2976.
2977.
2978.
2979.
2980.
2981.
2982.
2983.
2984.
2985.
2986.
185
Matuštík M.J., Kierkegaard’s Radical Existential Praxis, or: Why the Individual, Defies
Liberal, Communitarian, and Postmodern Categories, in Matuštík M.J., Westphal M.
(eds.), Kierkegaard in Post/Modernity, Bloomington-Indianapolis, Indiana University
Press, 1995, pp. 239-263.
Maus I., Freiheitsrechte und Volkssouveränität – Zu Jürgen Habermas’ Rekonstruktion des
Systems der Rechte, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVI, 1995, pp. 507-556; tr. en. Liberties and
Popular Sovereignty: On Jürgen Habermas’s Reconstruction of the System of Rights, in
«Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical
Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 825-882; tr. it. Diritti di libertà e sovranità popolare. La ricostruzione habermasiana del sistema dei diritti, in «Teoria politica», XII, 1, 1996, pp. 61-105;
repr. in Maus I., Diritti umani, democrazia e organizzazione globale, Torino, Trauben,
2009, pp. 7-75.
McCarthy Th., Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason, in «European Journal of
Philosophy», 3, 1995, pp. 242-256; repr, in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch.
(eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 3-18.
McCarthy, Th., Practical Discourse and the Relation between Morality and Politics, in «Revue Internationale de Philosophie», XLIX, 194, 1995, pp. 461-481.
Meehan J., Introduction, in Meehan J. (ed.), Feminists Read Habermas: Gendering the
Subject of Discourse, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1995, pp. 1-20.
Mendieta E., Discourse Ethics and Liberation Ethics, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXI, 4, 1995, pp. 111-126.
Metz J.B., Universalistische Moral, in «Dialektik: Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie»,
2, 1995, pp. 13-18.
Meyer W.J., Private Faith or Public Religion? An Assessment of Habermas’s Changing
View of Religion, in «The Journal of Religion», LXXV, 3, 1995, pp. 371-391.
Michelman F.I., Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Journal
of Philosophy», XCIII, 6, 1996, pp. 307-315.
Miedema S., The Beyond in the Midst: The Relevance of Dewey’s Philosophy of Religion for
Education, in «Studies in Philosophy and Education», XIII, 3-4, 1995, pp. 229-241.
Miège B., A propos de la formation de l’espace public en France aux XVIIe et XVIIIe
siècles, in «Recherches et Travaux», 48, 1995, pp. 177-188.
Misgeld D., Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «The Review of Metaphysics», XLVIII, 3, 1995, pp. 657-658.
Mitzrahi W., Optimismo Racional Versus Optimizacion Funcional: Habermas Y La
Discusion Contemporanea Acerca Del Concepto De Derecho, in «Revista de Filosofia» X,
1-2, 1995, pp. 3-31.
Moon J.D., Practical Discourse and Communicative Ethics, in White S.K. (ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995,
pp. 143-164.
Mora E., Comunicazione e riflessività. Simmel, Habermas Goffman, Vita e Pensiero,
1995.
Morrison K.R.B., Habermas and the school curriculum: an evaluation and case study,
Durham, Durham University, 1995.
186
2987.
2988.
2989.
2990.
2991.
2992.
2993.
2994.
2995.
2996.
2997.
2998.
2999.
3000.
3001.
3002.
3003.
3004.
3005.
Müller H., Spielen hilft nicht immer. Die Grenzen des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes und der
Platz der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns in der Analyse internationaler Beziehungen, in
«Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», II, 2, 1995, pp. 371-392.
Myerson G., Democracy, argument and the university, in «Studies in Higher Education», XX, 2, 1995, pp. 125-133.
Nagl L., Lässt sich Recht legitimieren? (Habermas, Rawls, Dworkin), in «Filozofski
Vestnik», XVI, 2, 1995, pp. 145-157.
Navarro Pérez J., El retorno de la referenzia, in «Daimon, Revista de Filosofia», 10,
1995, pp. 117-126.
Nielsen G., Bakhtin and Habermas: Toward a transcultural ethics, in « Theory and Society», XXIV, 6, 1995, pp. 803-835.
Novaes Thomaz de Menezes A.B., A lingüistização do sagrado e a ética do discurso em
Habermas, in «Princípios: Revista de Filosofia», II, 2, 1995.
Nullmeier F., Diskursive Öffentlichkeit, in Göhler G. (ed.), Macht der Öffentlichkeit –
Öffentlichkeit der Macht, Baden-Baden, 1995, pp. 85-112.
Nuyen A.T., Critique of Ideology: Hermeneutics or Critical Theory?, in «Human Studies»,
XVII, 4, 1995, pp. 419-432.
Oehler K., A Response to Habermas, in Ketner K.L. (ed.) Peirce and Contemporary
Thought: Philosophical Inquiries, New York, Fordham University Press, 1995, pp. 267271.
Oehler K., Sachen und Zeichen: Zur Philosophie des Pragmatismus, Frankfurt a.M.,
Klostermann, 1995.
Osborne P., Tactics, Ethics, or Temporality? Heidegger’s Politics Reviewed, in «Radical
Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 70, 1995, pp. 16-28.
Ostovich S.T., Dewey, Habermas, and the University in Society, in «Educational Theory», XLV, 4, 1995, pp. 465-477.
Outhwaite W., Nietzsche and Critical Theory, in Sedgwick P. (ed.), Nietzsche: A Critical Reader, Oxford, Blackwell, 1995, pp. 203-221.
Owen D., Genealogy as examplary critique: reflections on Foucault and the imagination of the
political, in «Economy and Society», 24, 4, 1995, pp. 489-506.
Passerin d’Entrèves M., Introduction, in Passerin d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S.
(eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 1-37.
Pensky M., Universalism and the Situated Critic, in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge
Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 67-94.
Peters M., “After” Auschwitz: ethics and educational policy, in «Discourse: Studies in
the Cultural Politics of Education», 16, 2, 1995, pp. 237-251.
Petrucciani S., Etica del discorso e teoria della libertà, in Id., Marx al tramonto del secolo.
Teoria critica tra passato e futuro, Roma, Manifestolibri, 1995, pp. 115-144.
Petrucciani S., Teoria critica tra Adorno e Habermas: continuità e fratture, in Id., Marx al
tramonto del secolo. Teoria critica tra passato e futuro, Roma, Manifestolibri, 1995, pp. 95114.
3006.
3007.
3008.
3009.
3010.
3011.
3012.
3013.
3014.
3015.
3016.
3017.
3018.
3019.
3020.
3021.
3022.
3023.
187
Piché C., L’héritage néo-kantien de Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Kant et ses épigones: le jugement critique en appel, Paris, Vrin, 1995, pp. 191-245.
Pijnenburg L.F.P., Wetenschap en waarden volgens Habermas, in Luyten J., Hoefnagel
B. (eds.), Het oog van de wetenschapsfilosoof, Amsterdam-Meppel, Boom, 1995, pp.
164-175.
Possenti V., El pensamiento postmetafísico (J. Habermas), in «Diálogo filosófico», 32,
1995, pp. 187-198.
Ralston S.M., Kirkwood W.G., Overcoming managerial bias in employment interviewing,
in «Journal of Applied Communication Research», 23, 1, 1995, pp. 75-92.
Ramos Requejo R., Para una teoría de interpretación textual. De Gadamer a Habermas,
in «Grial», XXXIII, 125, 1995, pp. 61-93.
Rasmussen D.M., Die Rechtswissenschaft und das Problem der Geltung. Kritische Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas, in Demmerling C., Rentsch T., Die Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit, Jena, Academie Verlag, 1995.
Rasmussen D.M., Explorations of the Lebenswelt: Reflections on Schutz and Habermas, in
«Human Studies», XVIII, 2, 1995, pp. 127-132.
Raven D.W., Evolutie van de laser, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor
Wijsbegeerte», LXXXII, 4, 1995, pp. 305-308.
Rawls J., Reply to Habermas’s “Reconciliation Through the public use of Reason”, in «Journal of Philosophy», XCII, 1995, pp. 132-180; as Political liberalism: reply to Habermas,
in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury,
Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**; repr. in Finlayson J.G., Freyenhagen F. (eds.), Habermas
and Rawls: disputing the political, London, Routledge, 2011, pp. 46-90; tr. it. Risposta a
Jürgen Habermas, in «Micromega, Almanacco di Filosofia», 6, 1996, pp. 51-106.
Rehg W.S.J., Existentialism and Formal Pragmatics, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXI, 1995, pp. 135-140.
Rehg W.S.J., The Possibilities for Moral Theory in Capitalist Settings, in «Proceedings of
the Jesuit Philosophical Association», LVII, 1995, pp. 35-42.
Reiman J., Postmodern Argumentation and Post-Postmodern Liberalism, with Comments on
Levinas, Habermas, and Rawls, in «Canadian Journal of Philosophy», 25, Supplement
1, 1995, pp. 251-272.
Renaut A., L’individu, Réflexions sur la philosophie du sujet, Paris, Hatier, 1995.
Robinson Viviane M.J., Dialogue Needs a Point and Purpose, in «Educational Theory», XLV, 2, 1995, pp. 235-249.
Rochlitz R., De L’Expression au sens Perspectives esthétiques Chez Habermas, in «Revue
Internationale de Philosophie», XLIX, 194, 1995, pp. 409-435.
Rodríguez Ramírez C.A., Habermas y Bataille, la superación de la razón moderna, in
«Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica», XXXIII, 81, 1995, pp. 181186.
Romano B., Critica della ragione procedurale: logos e nomos: Teubner, Luhmann, Habermas
discussi con Heidegger e Lacan, Roma, Bulzoni, 1995.
Rorty R., Habermas, Derrida and the Functions of Philosophy, in «Revue Internationale
188
3024.
3025.
3026.
3027.
3028.
3029.
3030.
3031.
3032.
3033.
3034.
3035.
3036.
3037.
3038.
3039.
de Philosophie», XLIX, 194, 1995, pp. 437-459; repr. in Thomassen L.A. (ed.), The
Derrida-Habermas Reader, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, pp. 46-65.
Rosati M., La cittadinanza proceduralizzata di J. Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XVIII, 1, 1995, pp. 129-142.
Rosenfeld M., Law as Discourse: Bridging the Gap between Democracy and Rights: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Harvard Law Review», CVIII, 5, 1995, pp. 11631189.
Ruidíaz García C., Tres visiones contrapuestas de la crisis de legitimidad de las sociedades
actuales: D. Bell, J. Habermas y Ch. Taylor, in «Revista de Estudios Políticos», 88,
1995, pp. 273-288.
Ruiz De Gauna P., Diaz C., Gonzalez V., Garaizar I., Teachers’ Professional Development as a Process of Critical Action Research, in «Educational Action Research», 3, 2,
1995, pp. 183-194.
Saez Rueda L., For Non-Relative Difference and Non-Coercive Dialogue (in SerboCroatian), in «Theoria: Casopis Filozofskog Drustva Srbije», XXXVIII, 4, 1995,
pp. 7-21.
Savidan P., Renaut et L. Ferry: Kant et la pensée post-métaphysique du sujet (ou: Du bon
usage de la troisième Critique ...), in «Eidos», XII, 2, 1995, pp. 71-82.
Sawarjuwono T., Accounting language change: a critical study of Habermas’s theory of communicative action, Wollongong, University of Wollongong, 1995.
Schlosberg D., Communicative Action in Practice: Intersubjectivity and New Social Movements, in «Political Studies», XLIII, 1995, pp. 291-311.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Die “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns” – eine Flaschenpost?
Anmerkungen zur neuesten Theoriedebatte in der IB-Forschung, in «Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen», II, 2, 1995, pp. 347-370.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Reflexive Demokratie. Die partizipatorische Transformation moderner
Politik, Habilitationsschrift, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1995.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Selbstorganisation, Selbstregierung, Selbstverwirklichung: Die Idee der
Öffentlichkeit im Spiegel moderner Demokratietheorie, Göhler G. (ed.), Die Macht der Öffentlichkeit, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlag, 1995, pp. 39-74.
Schmidt J., Habermas and Foucault, in Passerin d’Entrèves M., Benhabib S. (eds.),
Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. Critical Essays on “The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1995, pp. 147-171.
Schochet G., Vices, benefits, and civil society: Mandeville, Habermas, and the distinction
between public and private, in «Prose Studies», 18, 3, 1995, pp. 244-269.
Schuon K.Th., Diskurstheoretisch begründete Demokratietheorie, in «Perspektiven», XII,
3, 1995, pp. 186-197.
Schweppenhäuser G., Aporien des moralphilosophischen Universalismus in Rawls’ Theorie
der Gerechtigkeit, in «Concordia: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 28,
1995, pp. 43-51.
Severino F.N., Consideraciones sobre la teoría socio-crítica de la enseñanza, in
3040.
3041.
3042.
3043.
3044.
3045.
3046.
3047.
3048.
3049.
3050.
3051.
3052.
3053.
3054.
3055.
3056.
3057.
189
«Enseñanza», 13, 1995, pp. 241-260.
Siebert R.J., Kant, Hegel and Habermas: On War and Peace, Ioannina (Greece),
Philosophike Schole Panepistemiou Ioanninon, 1995.
Siraj-Blatghford I., Critical Social Research and the Academy: the role of organic intellectuals
in educational research, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education», 16, 2, 1995, pp.
205-220.
Smith A., Habermasian Political Philosophy and Contemporary Trends in Production and
Consumption, in «International Studies in Philosophy», XXVII, 4, 1995, pp. 85-100.
Somers M.R., What’s Political or Cultural about Political Culture and the Public Spere.
Toward an Historical Sociology of Concept Formation, in «Sociological Theory», XIII, 2,
1995, pp. 113-144.
Sotelo I., Las ideas políticas de Habermas, in «Claves de Razón Política», 57, 1995,
18-32.
Southgate D., Insanity Ascriptions: A Formal Pragmatic Analysis, in «Journal for the
Theory of Social Behaviour», XXV, 3, 1995, pp. 219-235.
Strong T.B., Sposito F.A., Habermas’s Significant Other, in White S.K. (ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995,
pp. 263-288.
Szilágyi M., Egy Elmélet az Erkölcsi Normativitás Esélyeirol, in «Magyar Filozofiai
Szemle», 56, 1995, pp. 803-820.
Teigas D., Knowledge and Hermeneutic understanding. A Study of the Habermas-Gadamer
Debate, London, Associated University Presses, 1995.
Thumfart A., Waschkuhn A., Die Zivilgesellschaft als Substrat und Surrogat in der deliberativen Demokratieauffassung von Jürgen Habermas, in «Perspektiven», XII, 3, 1995,
pp. 197-207.
Tietz U., Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität, in Demmerling Ch., Rentsch T. (eds.), Die
Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit, Berlin, 1995, pp. 208-231.
Tönnies S., Was immer schon vorausgesetzt ist. Apel, Habermas, Hösle, in «Merkur», IL,
552, 1995, pp. 267-273.
Treibel A., Theorie kommunikativen Handelns, Diskursethik und politische Praxis, in
Schäfers B. (ed.), Soziologie in Deutschland, Opladen, Westdeutschen Verlag, 1995,
pp. 134-143.
Valenti G.D., Ética do discurso. A emancipação do Homem no Trabalho e a Teoria Social
Crítica de Jürgen Habermas, São Paulo, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São
Paulo, 1995.
Vallespín Oña F., Diálogo entre gigantes: Rawls y Habermas, in «Claves de razón
práctica», LV, 1995, pp. 48-55.
van der Linden H., K. Baynes: The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls,
and Habermas, in «Journal: Kant-Studien», LXXXVI, 3, 1995, p. 379.
Van Zyl A., The Dilemma of Grounding in the Modernity-Postmodernity Debate, in
«South African Journal of Philosophy», XIV, 4, 1995, pp. 168-174.
Velasco M., Fundamentación de la ética discursiva: Apel o Habermas?, in «Revista
190
3058.
3059.
3060.
3061.
3062.
3063.
3064.
3065.
3066.
3067.
3068.
3069.
3070.
3071.
3072.
3073.
3074.
3075.
Latinoamericana de Filosofia», XXI, 2, 1995, pp. 317-346.
Venturelli S., The “Principle of Publicity” and Policies of the Information Age, in «Javnost
- The Public», 2, 1, 1995, pp. 7-31.
Vetlesen A.J., Hannah Arendt, Habermas and the Republican Tradition, in «Philosophy
& Social Criticism», XXI, 1, 1995, pp. 1-16.
Vetlesen A.J., Relations with Others in Sartre and Levinas: Assessing Some Implications for
an Ethics of Proximity, in «Constellations», I, 3, 1995, pp. 358-382.
Villa D., Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995.
Villegas L., Algunos Problemas de las Ciencias Reconstructivas, in «Agora: Papeles de
Filosofia», XIV, 2, 1995, pp. 31-39.
Vitale E., Taylor, Habermas, Sen: multiculturalismo, stato di diritto e diseguaglianza, in
«Teoria politica», XI, 3, 1995, pp. 65-88.
Vollrath E., Zwei Begriffe des Politischen? Jürgen Habermas und die störrische Faktizität des
Politischen, in «Politisches Denken», Jahrbuch 1994, Stuttgart, 1995, pp. 175-192.
von Dews P., Morality, Ethics, and Postmetaphysical Thinking’: New Books by Jürgen
Habermas, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», III, 1, 1995, pp. 164173.
von Dews P., The Paradigm Shift to Communication and the Question of Subjectivity: Reflections on Habermas, Lacan and Mead, in «Revue Internationale de Philosophie»,
XLIX, 194, 1995, pp. 483-519; as Communication Paradigms and the Question of Subjectivity: Habermas, Mead and Lacan, in von Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, New
York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 87-117.
Vries J.J.W.D. de, De dwang van het systeem, in «Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift
voor Wijsbegeerte», LXXXVII, 3, 1995, pp. 213-215.
Wain K., MacIntyre and the Idea of an Educated Public, in «Studies in Philosophy and
Education», 14, 1, 1995, pp. 105-123.
Warnke G., Communicative Rationality and Cultural Values, in White S.K. (ed.), The
Cambridge companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995,
pp. 120-142.
Warnke G., Discourse Ethics and Feminist Dilemmas of Difference, in Meehan J. (ed.),
Warren M.E., The Self in Discursive Democracy, in White S.K. (ed.), The Cambridge
companion to Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 167-200.
Weber Ph., Habermas et la théologie. Sous la direction de Edmund Arens, in «Revue
théologique de Louvain», XXVI, 3, 1995, p. 368.
Weigaard J., Representasjon og rasjonalitet, in Eriksen E.O. (ed.), Deliberativ politikk.
Demokrati i teori og praksis, Oslo, Tano, 1995, pp. 70-98.
Weinberger O., Argumentation in Law and Politics, in «Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal», XXVIII, 1, 1995, pp. 37-54.
Weir A., Toward a Model of Self-Identity: Habermas and Kristeva, in Meehan J. (ed.),
3076.
3077.
3078.
3079.
3080.
3081.
3082.
191
Weiss J., A Kritikai Tudományelmélet Alapvonalai, in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 56,
1995, pp. 765-777.
Welton M.R., In Defense of the Lifeworld: A Habermasian Approach to Adult Learning,
in Id. (ed.) In Defense of the Lifeworld: Critical Perspectives on Adult Learning, Albany
(N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1995, pp. 127-156.
Welton M.R., The critical turn in adult education theory, in Id. (ed.) In Defense of the
Lifeworld: Critical Perspectives on Adult Learning, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1995,
pp. 11-38.
White S.K. Reason, Modernity, and Democracy, in Id. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to
Habermas, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 3-16.
Whitebook J., Perversion and utopia: a study in psychoanalysis and critical theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1995.
Young D., Bramdaw N., The dis-closure of the world: Adorno, Derrida and Habermas on
critique, in «Communicatio», XXI, 1, 1995, pp. 50-66
Ziarek K., The Ethos of Everydayness: Heidegger on Poetry and Language, in «Man and
World», XXVIII, 4, 1995, pp. 377-399.
1996
3083.
3084.
3085.
3086.
3087.
3088.
3089.
3090.
3091.
Agra M.X., Justicia, conflicto doctrinal y estabilidad social en el liberalismo político de J.
Rawls, in «Revista Agustiniana», XXXVII, 114, 1996, pp. 999-1048.
Aguilera Carrasco R., Ciencia y técnica com ideología en Habermas, in «Volubilis:
Revista de pensamiento», 3, 1996, pp. 61-68.
Alexy R., Discourse Theory and Human Rights, in «Ratio Juris», IX, 3, 1996, pp. 209235.
Alexy R., Jürgen Habermas’ Theory of Legal Discourse, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
1027-1034; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy.
Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp 226-233.
Alexy R., Reflexive Law, Civil Society, and Negative Rights, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996,
pp.785-790.
Apel K.O., ‘Discourse Ethics’ Before the Challenge of ‘Liberation Philosophy’, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXII, 2, 1996, pp. 1-25.
Apel K.O., Die Vernunftfunktion der kommunikativen Rationalität, in Apel K.O.,
Kettner M., Die eine Vernunft und die vielen Rationalitäten, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1996.
Arato A., Forms of Constitution Making and Theories of Democracy, in «Cardozo Law
Review», XVII, 2, 1996.
Arato A., Procedural Law and Civil Society: Interpreting the Radical Democratic Paradigm,
192
3092.
3093.
3094.
3095.
3096.
3097.
3098.
3099.
3100.
3101.
3102.
3103.
3104.
3105.
3106.
in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1127-1146; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1998, pp 26-36.
Arce Carrascoso J.L., Jürgen Habermas: la estructura de la acción comunicativa como
recinto crítico, in «Anales del seminario de historia de la filosofía», 1, 1996, pp. 189207.
Ariffin Y., The return of Marx in international relations theory, in «Economy and Society», 25, 1, 1996, pp. 127-134.
Arnason J.P., L’autre de la raison et la raison de l’autre, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996.
Atencia Páez, J.M., La teoría crítica y el pensamiento de J. Habermas, Málaga, Librería
Ágora, 1996.
Badia, L., La opinión pública como problema, in «Voces y Culturas», 10, 1996, pp. 5979.
Baehr A.R, Perspectives on Justice in the Family: Rawls, Okin, and Habermas, in New
York Society for Women in Philosophy Social and Political Philosophy Workshop, CUNY, 28.4.1995; as Toward a New Feminist Liberalism: Okin, Rawls, and Habermas, in «Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy», 11, 1, 1996, pp. 49-66;
repr. in Richardson H.R., Weithman P.J. (eds.), The Philosophy of Rawls: A Collection
of Essays. Vol. 3, New York, Garland Publishing, 1999, pp. 295-312.
Barrios Casares M.J., Habermas, ¿un postmetafísico?: Una consideración intempestiva en
torno a la disputa de la postmetafísca entre Jürgen Habermas y Dieter Henrich, in «Er: Revista
de filosofía», XXI, 1996, pp. 39-64.
Bartholini I., Le regole del caso: modelli di razionalità, Torino, L’Harmattan Italia, 1996
Baruzzi A., Habermas. Faktizität und Geltung, in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», CIII,
1, 1996.
Baynes K., Public Reason and Personal Autonomy, in Rasmussen E. (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory, New York, Basil Blackwell, 1996, pp. 243-254.
Baynes K., Substance and Procedure in Habermas’s Democratic Theory, in Conference
on Critical Theory and Alternate Modernities, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
1996
Baynes K., The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, Habermas, in «History of Political Thought», XVII, 3, 1996.
Bericat Alastuey E., La sociedad de la información. Tecnología, cultura y sociedad, in
«Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas», 76, 1996, pp. 99-122.
Bernstein R.J., The Retrieval of the Democratic Ethos, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
1127-1146; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy.
Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 287-306.
Bialas W., Von der Revolution der Klasse zur Evolution der Vernunft: Vernunftsphilosophie
in kommunikationstheoretischer Begründung, Frankfurt a.M., P. Lang, 1996.
3107.
3108.
3109.
3110.
3111.
3112.
3113.
3114.
3115.
3116.
3117.
3118.
3119.
3120.
3121.
3122.
193
Bianchin M., Ragioni e interpretazioni. Fenomenologia, società e politica, Roma, Meltemi,
2006.
Blake N., The Democracy We Need: Situation, Post-Foundationalism and Enlightenment,
in «Journal of Philosophy of Education», XXX, 2, 1996, pp. 215-238.
Blancke Th., Theorie und Praxis. Der Philosoph im Handgemenge, in Krawietz W.,
Preyer G. (eds.), System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des
Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas in «Rechtsstheorie: Zeitschrift für Logik, Methodenlehre, Normentheorie und Soziologie», Zivilgesellschaftliche Assoziationen und
spätmoderner Rechtssstaat, Berlin, Duncker und Humblot, XXVII, 3, 1996, pp.
486-521; repr. in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das
Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
2000, pp. 486-521.
Blaug R., New Developments in Deliberative Democracy, in «Politics», XVI, 2, 1996, pp.
71-77.
Blaug R., New Theories of Discursive Democracy: A User’s Guide, in «Philosophy &
social criticism», XXII, 1, 1996, pp. 49-80.
Bohman J.F, Kelly T., Intelligibility, Rationality and Comparison: The Rationality Debates
Revisited, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXII, 1, 1996, pp. 81-101.
Bohman J.F., Democracy and Critical Theory, in Rasmussen D., Companion to Critical
Theory, Cambridge, Basil Blackwell, 1996, pp. 190-215.
Bohman J.F., Rehg W., Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of
Democratic Legitimacy, in «Journal of Political Philosophy», IV, 1, 1996, pp. 79-99;
repr. in Baynes K., von Schomberg R. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy: Essays on Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 31-60.
Bohman J.F., The Completeness of Macro-Sociological Explanations: System and Lifeworld,
in Preyer G., Peter G., Ulfig A. (eds.), Protosoziologie im Kontext. »Lebenswelt« und »System« in Philosophie und Soziologie, Würzburg, Königshausen und Neumann, 1996, pp.
370-381.
Boladeras Cucurella M., Comunicación, ética y política: Habermas y sus críticos, Madrid,
Tecnos, 1996.
Bonacker Th., Kommunikativer Konsens und sozialer Konflikt: Jürgen Habermas, in Id.
(ed.), Konflikttheorien. Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Einführung mit Quellen, Opladen, VS
Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1996, pp. 97-103.
Bondhus I., Kommunikasjon og handling, Oslo, University of Oslo, 1996.
Bouchindhomme C., La théorie critique: théorie? critique?, in Bouchindhomme C.,
Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996, pp. 139-151.
Bouchindhomme C., Théorie critique, in Raynaud Ph., Rials S. (eds.), Dictionnaire de
philosophie politique, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, 1996, pp. 680-685.
Boudon R., Une éthique est-elle possible en l’absence de croyances dogmatiques?, in «Protosoziologie», 89, 1996, pp. 237-259.
Bowring F., A Lifeworld without a Subject: Habermas and the Pathologies of Modernity, in
«Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 106, 1996, pp. 77-104.
194
3123.
3124.
3125.
3126.
3127.
3128.
3129.
3130.
3131.
3132.
3133.
3134.
3135.
3136.
3137.
3138.
3139.
3140.
3141.
Brunkhorst H., Rorty, Putnam and the Frankfurt School, in «Philosophy & Social
Criticism», XXII, 5, 1996, pp. 1-16.
Buchwalter A., Constitutionalism and Constitutional Patriotism in Hegel and Habermas,
Atlanta, Society for Systematic Philosophy, APA, 12.1996.
Calhoun C., Social Theory and the Public Sphere, in Turner B.S. (ed.), The Blackwell
companion to social theory, Cambridge, Blackwell, 1996, pp. 429-470.
Calloni M., Democrazia teorica e reale. Recensione di J. Habermas, Fatti e norme, in «Reset», XXX, 1996, pp. 58-59.
Calloni M., Patologie e diagnosi della modernità: il filosofo sociale e la sua critica, in «Il Cenobio», 3, 1996, pp.273-296.
Cameron, W.S.K., On Communicative Actors Talking Past One Another: The GadamerHabermas Debite, in «Philosophy Today», XL, 1-4, 1996, pp. 160-168.
Carleheden M., Det andra moderna: om Jürgen Habermas och den samhällsteoretiska diskursen om det moderna, Göteborg, Daidalos, 1996.
Ceppa L., Avvertenza del traduttore, in Habermas J.; tr. it. Fatti e norme. Contributi a
una teoria discorsiva del diritto e della democrazia, Milano, Guerini e Associati, 1996, pp.
XI-XV.
Cerutti F., Identità e politica, in Id. (ed.), Identità e politica, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 1996,
pp. 5-42.
Connelly B., Interpretations of Jürgen Habermas in adult education writings, in «Studies in
the Education of Adults», XXVIII, 2, 1996, pp. 241-252.
Connelly B., The theory of Jürgen Habermas: its application to the theorisation of adult education, Surrey, University of Surrey, 1996.
Cortella L., L’eredità della metafisica, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate,
VI Incontro di studi – Norme culture e dialogo (con J. Habermas), 31.10-1.11.1996.
Cortella L., La teoria critica dalla dialettica alla dialogica, in «Fenomenologia e Società»
XIX, 1-2, 1996, pp. 210-230.
Cortés Rodas F., Liberalismo y democracia deliberativa: consideraciones sobre la
fundamentación de la libertad y la igualdad, in «Revista de Filosofia», XXIV, 3, 1996, pp.
223-240.
Cunico G., Habermas: agire comunicativo e agire tecnologico, in Malusa L., Mauro L.
(eds.), Sapere filosofico e sapere tecnologico, Genova, La Quercia Edizioni, 1996, pp. 5779.
Chambers S., Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discorse, Ithaca,
Cornell University Press, 1996.
Chandler E.V., The Public Sphere and Eighteenth-Century Anxieties about Cultural Production in England, in Spinks C.W., Deely J. (eds.), Semiotics 1995, New York, Peter
Lang, 1996, pp. 111-119.
Chanial P., L’éthique de la communication: une politique des droits démocratiques?, in
«Quaderni», XXVIII, 28, 1996, pp. 147-156.
D’Agostino F., Free Public Reason: Making It Up As We Go, New York, Oxford
3142.
3143.
3144.
3145.
3146.
3147.
3148.
3149.
3150.
3151.
3152.
3153.
3154.
3155.
3156.
3157.
3158.
3159.
3160.
195
Dahrendorf R., Der Diskursrepublikaner. Jürgen Habermas über die “Einbeziehung des
Anderen”, in «Frankfurter Rundschau», 2.10.1996.
Delanty G., Habermas and post-national identity: Theoretical perspectives on the conflict in
Northern Ireland, in «Irish Political Studies», 11, 1, 1996, pp. 20-32.
Di Pinto L., Jürgen Habermas, Hannah Arendt, Nicolai Hartmann. Trittico di estetica,
Levante, 1996.
Dias M.Clara, De la ética del discurso a la moral del respeto universal: una investigación
filosófica acerca de la fundamentación de los derechos humanos, in «Ideas y Valores: Revista
Colombiana de Filosofia», 1996, pp. 42-54.
Dobson A., Democratizing Green Theory: Preconditions and Principles, in Doherty B., de
Geus M. (eds.), Democracy and Green Political Thought, London-New York, Routledge
& Kegan Paul, 1996, pp.132-150.
Dryzek J.S., Democracy in Capitalist Times: Ideals, Limits, and Struggles, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996.
Dubiel H., Kritische Theorie des neuen Kapitalismus?: Skizzierung einer Perspektive, in
«Mitteilungen des Instituts für Sozialforschung», 7, 1996, pp. 33-40.
Dufour M., De l’indéconstructible justice, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXV, 4, 1996, pp. 677-701.
Dussel E., La ética de la liberación ante la ética del discurso, in «Isegoria», 13, 1996, pp.
135-149.
Eickelpasch R., Rationalität bei Habermas, in Eickelpasch R., Nassehi A. (eds.),
Utopie und Moderne, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1996, pp. 11-50.
Englund T., The public and the text, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXVIII, 1,
1996, pp. 1-35.
Ess Ch.M., The Political Computer: Democracy, CMC, and Habermas” , in Id., Ch.M.
(eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1996, pp. 197-230.
Feenberg A., Marcuse or Habermas: Two Critiques of Technology, in «Inquiry»,
XXXIX, 1, 1996, pp. 45-70.
Feeney M.J., Practical Reasons. Pragmatic Liberalism in Kant and Habermas, Duke University, 1996.
Femia J.V., Complexity and Deliberative Democracy, in «Inquiry», XXXIX, 3-4, 1996,
pp. 359-397.
Ferrara A., Democrazia e giustizia nelle società complesse: per una lettura di Habermas, in
«Filosofia e questioni pubbliche», II, 1, 1996, pp. 67-118.
Ferrara A., Democrazia e società complesse: l’approccio deliberativo, in Maffettone S.,
Veca S. (eds.), Manuale di filosofia politica, Roma, Donzelli, 1996, pp. 29-46.
Ferrara A., The communicative paradigm in moral theory, in Rasmussen D.M. (ed.),
Handbook of critical theory, Oxford, Blackwell, 1996, pp. 119-137; repr. in Ungureanu
C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate,
2011, pp. **-**.
Ferrer M., Handlung und Kritik: die Philosophie von Habermas, Konstanz, Hartung-
196
3161.
3162.
3163.
3164.
3165.
3166.
3167.
3168.
3169.
3170.
3171.
3172.
3173.
3174.
3175.
3176.
Gorre, 1996, 19982.
Ferry J.-M., Sur la fondation ultime de la raison: Penser avec Apel contre Apel, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996,
pp. 153-185.
Fine R., Nationalism and its discontents, in «Democratization», III, 4, 1996, pp. 544548.
Fleming M., Rationality and Gender: A Critique of Habermas’s Theory of Modernity, in
Center for Western European Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 5.1996.
Fleming M., Working in the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Habermas, Foucault,
and Derrida, in «Philosophy Today», XL, 1, 1996, pp. 169-178.
Forbath W.E., Short-Circuit: A Critique of Habermas’s Understanding of Law, Politics,
and Economic Life, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and
Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1141-1456; repr. in Rosenfeld M.,
Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 272-286.
Forst R., Justice, Reason, and Critique: Basic Concepts of Critical Theory, in Rasmussen
D. (ed.), The Handbook of Critical Theory, Oxford, Blackwell, 1996, pp. 138-162.
Forst R., Politische Freiheit, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 44, 1996, pp.
211-227; tr. en. Political Liberty: Integrating Five Conceptions of Autonomy, in Christman
J., Anderson J. (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. New Essays, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 226-242.
Franco V., Autonomia e intersoggettività nell’etica del discorso: Jürgen Habermas, in Id.,
Etiche possibili: il paradosso della morale dopo la morte di Dio, Roma, Donzelli, 1996, pp.
159-178.
Frankenberg G., Why Care? – The Trouble with Social Rights, in ««Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”),
1996, pp. 1365-1390.
Fritzell Ch., Pedagogical Split Vision, in «Educational Theory», XLVI, 2, 1996, pp.
203-216.
Frowe I., Critical, Serious Discussion: A Possibility or a Will o’ the Wisp?, in «Prospero:
A Journal of New Thinking in Philosophy for Education», II, 1, 1996, pp. 33-36.
Fultner B., The Redemption of Truth: Idealization, Acceptability and Fallibilism in Habermas’ Theory of Meaning, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», IV, 2,
1996, pp. 233-251.
Gaiger J., Meaning, truth and communication: the philosophical pragmatics of Jürgen Habermas and Karl-Otto Apel, Essex, University of Essex, 1996.
Gallagher S., Extension and Critique: A Response to Robert Young, in «Studies in Philosophy and Education», XV, 4, 1996, pp. 323-328.
Gallagher S., Some Particular Limitations of Postconventional Universality: Hegel and Habermas, in Langsdorf L., Watson S.H., Bower M. (eds.), Phenomenology, interpretation,
and community, Albany (N.Y.), The SUNY Press, 1996, pp. 115-126.
Gemignani P., Modelli nelle teorie dei sistemi, in Toscano M.A., (ed.) Introduzione alla
3177.
3178.
3179.
3180.
3181.
3182.
3183.
3184.
3185.
3186.
3187.
3188.
3189.
3190.
3191.
197
sociologia, FrancoAngeli, Milano, 19969, pp. 282-328.
Giovagnoli R., Jürgen Habermas: il concetto di trascendenza nella teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in «Per la filosofia», 38, 1996, pp. 58-69.
Gómez V., La teoría crítica en españa. Aspectos de una recepción, in «Logos. Anales del
Seminario de Metafísica», 30, 1996, pp. 11-41; repr. in «Constelaciones. Revista de
Teoría Crítica», 1, 2009, pp. 3-35; tr. de. Gómez Ibáñez V., Die Kritische Theorie in
Spanien: Aspekte einer Rezeption, in «Zeitschrift für kritische Theorie», 3, 1996, pp.
109-122.
Goodrich P., Habermas and the Postal Rule, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5
(“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1457-1476.
Gould M., Law and Philosophy: Some Consequences for the Law Deriving from the Sociological Reconstruction of Philosophical Theory, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1239-1364.
Gozzi G., J. Habermas: “Non c’è stato di diritto senza democrazia radicale”, in «Il Pensiero politico», XXIX, 2, 1996, pp. 301-308.
Gracia María C., Las ciencias sociales en Habermas, in Díaz E., La ciencia y el imaginario
social, Ed. Biblos, Buenos Aires, 1996, pp. 231-240.
Günther K., Communicative Freedom, Communicative Power, and Jurisgenesis, in
««Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical
Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1335-1358; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1998, pp. 234-254.
Haacke J., Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-reflection, Rational
Argumentation, in «Millennium: Journal of International Studies», XXV, 2, 1996, pp.
255-290.
Haba E.P., Standortbestimmung in der zeitgenössischen Rechtstheorie – Rawls, Dworkin,
Habermas, Alexy und andere Mitglieder der modernen ‘Heiligen (Rede-) Familie’, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des
Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 277-327.
Haddad F., De Marx a Habermas – O Materialismo Histórico e seu Paradigma
Adequado, São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, 1996.
Hanfland M., Wahrheit und gesellschaftliche Evolution. Zum Zusammenhang des evolutionären Verständnisses von Wahrheit und Vergesellschaftung bei Jürgen Habermas, Marburg,
1996.
Hansen S., Weihegaben zwischen System und Lebenswelt, , in GehrkeH.-J. , Möller A.
(eds.), Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewußtsein, ScriptOralia, Tübingen, 1996, pp. 257-276.
Healey P., Hillier J., Communicative micropolitics: A story of claims and discourses, in «International Planning Studies», I, 2, 1996, pp. 165-184.
Healy P., Situated Rationality and Hermeneutic Understanding: A Gadamerian Approach
to Rationality, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XXXVI, 2, 1996, pp. 155171.
Heath J., Is Language a Game?, in «Canadian Journal of Philosophy», XXVI, 1,
198
3192.
3193.
3194.
3195.
3196.
3197.
3198.
3199.
3200.
3201.
3202.
3203.
3204.
3205.
3206.
1996, pp. 1-28.
Heath J., Rational Choice as Critical Theory, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
XXII, 5, 1996, pp. 43-62.
Heming R., Individuum, Soziogenese und kommunikative Kompetenz. Zur Bestimmung und
Kritik sozialisationstheoretischer Implikationen im Habermas’schen Theorieentwurf, Sinzheim,
1996.
Hemingway J.L., Emanciping Leisure: The Recovery of Freedom in Leisure, in «Journal
of Leisure Research», XXVIII, 1, 1996, pp. 27-43
Herrera Líma M., Multiculturalismo: una revisión crítica, in «Isegoría», 10, 1996, pp.
127-138.
Hogan P., Communicative action, the lifeworlds of learning and the dialogue that we aren’t, in
«International Journal of Philosophical Studies», IV, 2, 1996, pp. 252-272.
Holub R., Timely Normalcy: On Intellectuals, Cultural Translation, and Political Theory:
Die Normalität einer Berliner Republik, by Jürgen Habermas; Timely Meditations:
Martin Heidegger and Postmodern Politics, by Leslie Paul Thiele, in «German Politics & Society», XIV, 2, 39, 1996, pp. 124-134.
Honneth A., Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie, in Id., Pathologien des Sozialen. Die Aufgabe der Sozialphilosophie, Frankfurt a.M., Fischer, 1994; tr. it. Patologie del
sociale: Tradizione e attualità della filosofia sociale, in «Iride», IX, 18, 1996, pp. 295-328.
Howard D., Law and Political Culture, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1391-1430.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Ética fenomenológica y sentimientos morales, in «Revista de
Filosofia», XXIV, 2, 1996, pp. 139-154; repr. in Pintos Peñaranda L., González
López J.L. (eds.), Actas del IV Congreso de Fenomenología: Fenomenología y Ciencias
Humanas, 24-28.9.1996, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 1998, pp. 621628.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Liberalismo y Comunitarismo en diálogo sobre los Derechos Humanos,
in Cortés F., Monsalve A. (eds.), Liberalismo y comunitarísmo, Valencia, Alfons el
Magnànin, 1996. pp. 146-169.
Hutchings K., Kant, Critique and Politics, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 1996.
Jacobson A., Law and Order, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas
on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 919-934; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley,
University of California Press, 1998, pp. 190-203.
Jespers F.P.M., Overleeft godsdienst de rationalisering? Vragen bij de cultuurtheorie van Habermas, in «Bijdragen, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie en Theologie», LVII, 4, 1996, pp.
264-281.
Jiménez Redondo M., Acción comunicativa y teoría de la razón, in «Logos. Anales del
Seminario de Metafísica», 30, 1996, pp. 61-92.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Textos y contextos, Barcelona,
Ariel, 1996, pp. 7-34.
3207.
3208.
3209.
3210.
3211.
3212.
3213.
3214.
3215.
3216.
3217.
3218.
3219.
3220.
199
Jørgensen R.F., The Communicative Organisation, in Holmqvist B., Andersen P.B.,
Klein H., Posner R. (eds.), Signs of work. Semiosis and information processing in organizations, Berlin-New York, de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 269-282.
Kavoulakos K., Jürgen Habermas: The Foundations of Reason and Critical Social Theory,
Athens, Polis, 1996.
Kettner M., Il dissolversi dell’etica in “Fatti e norme” di Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e
societa», XIX, 1-2, 1996, pp. 151-158; tr. en. rev. The Disappearance of Discourse Ethics
in Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms, in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 201-218.
Kimmerle H., Das Multiversum der Kulturen, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1996.
Kingwell M., ‘Phronesis’ and Political Dialogue, in Esquith S.L., Political Dialogue: Theories and Practices, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 1996, pp. 167-182.
Knapp J.A., Essayistic Messages: Internet NewsgroUniversity Presss as an Electronic Public
Sphere, in Porter D. (ed) , Internet Culture, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 1996, pp. 181-197.
Kneer G., Rationalisierung, Disziplinierung und Differenzierung. Sozialtheorie und Zeitdiagnose bei Habermas, Foucault und Luhmann, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1996.
Kögler H.H., The Self-Empowered Subject: Habermas, Foucault and Hermeneutic Reflexivity, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXII, 4, 1996, pp. 13-44.
Kramer L., Habermas, Foucault, and the Legacy of Enlightenment Intellectuals, in Fink L.,
Leonard S.T., Reid D.R. (eds.), Intellectuals and Public Life: Between Radicalism and Reform, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1996, pp. 29-50.
Krawietz W., Editorial: Wahrheit und Vernunft versus Recht? Zur Neuen Unübersichtlichkeit von Prinzipien und Prozeduren, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte,
demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp.
271-274.
Kühnlein M., Aufhebung des Religiösen durch Versprachlichung? Eine religionsphilosophische Untersuchung des Rationalitätskonzeptes von Jürgen Habermas, in «Theologie und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift», LXXI, 3, 1006, pp. 390-409.
Kupke Ch., Philosophie und Wissenschaften der Psyche. lst Philosophie eine Wissenschaft,
und kann es eine Philosophie der Psyche geben?, in Heinze M. (ed.), Psyche im Streit der Theorien, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1996, pp. 147-190.
Ladeur K.H., Rechtliche Ordnungsbildung unter Ungewißheitsbedingungen und intersubjektive Rationalität, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 385-414; tr. it. Superamento della complessità attraverso la capacità di apprendimento del diritto: L’adeguamento del
diritto alle condizioni del Postmoderno, in «Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto», LXXIII, 3, 1996, pp. 480-511.
Lafont C., Pluralism and Universalism in Discourse Ethics, in IV Critical Theory
Roundtable, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 25-27.10.1996; repr. in
Nascimento A. (ed.), A Matter of Discourse: Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies, London, Avebury Press, 1998, pp. 55-78.
200
3221.
3222.
3223.
3224.
3225.
3226.
3227.
3228.
3229.
3230.
3231.
3232.
3233.
3234.
3235.
3236.
3237.
Leeper R.V., Moral Objectivity, Jürgen Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, and Public Relations,
in «Public Relations Review», XXII, 2, 1996, pp. 133-150.
Leferink C., Sprache und Lebensform. Privatsprachliche Tendenzen bei Schizophrenen, in
Heinze M. (ed.), Psyche im Streit der Theorien, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann,
1996, pp. 191-220.
Leite Araujo L.B., Religião e Modernidade em Habermas, São Paulo, Loyola, 1996.
Lenoble J., Law and Undecidability: Toward a New Vision of the Proceduralization of
Law, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy:
Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 935-1004; repr. in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.),
Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1998, pp. 37-81.
Lindahl H., La Política de la Razón (In)suficiente, in «Ideas y Valores: Revista
Colombiana de Filosofia», 1996, pp. 24-41.
López de la Vieja M.T., Ética: Procedimientos Razonables, Padrón, Novo Século,
1996.
Luksic B., Difference and Consensus, in «Filozofska Istrazivanja», 62, 1996, pp. 641651.
Maar W.L., Habermas, o Trabalho Social e os impasses da Teoria Crítica, II Congresso
Latino-Americano de Sociologia do Trabalho, Águas de Lindóia, 1996.
Machan T.R., Individualism and Political Dialogue, in Esquith S.L., Political Dialogue:
Theories and Practices, Amsterdam Atlanta, GA, Rodopi, 1996, pp. 45-56.
Mahrdt H., “Society Is the Biggest Murder Scene of All”: On the Private and Public Spheres
in Ingeborg Bachmann’s Prose, in «Women in German Yearbook: Feminist Studies in
German Literature and Culture», 12, 1996, pp. 167-87.
Makkreel R., Zweckmäßigkeit in der Geschichte. Ihr Status bei Kant, Hegel, Dilthey und
Habermas, in «Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte», 39, 1996, pp. 255-268.
Márquez-Fernández A.B., Postmodernidad y Racionalidad Etica del Discurso, in
«Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
,Iberoamericana y teoria Social», I, 1, 1996, pp. 147-153.
Marsonet M., The Primacy of Practical Reason: An Essay on Nicholas Rescher’s Philosophy, Lanham, University Press of America, 1996.
Martens Th., Cosmopolitanism and Citizenship: Kant against Habermas, in «European
Journal of Philosophy», IV, 3, 1996, pp. 328-347.
Martínez Guzmán V., De la fenomenología comunicativa a la filosofía de la paz, in Pintos
Peñaranda L., González López J.L. (eds.), Actas del IV Congreso de Fenomenología:
Fenomenología y Ciencias Humanas, 24-28.9.1996, Universidad de Santiago de
Compostela, 1998, pp. 87-101.
Martini Rosa M.F., Habermas e a pós-modernidade, in «Veritas: revista da Pontificia
Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», XLI, 162, 1996, pp. 307-314.
Martins A.M., Pluralismo sem Consenso: A crítica de Rescher aos Pressupostos da Teoria da
Acção comunicativa de Haberma, in «Revista Filosofica de Coimbra», V, 9, 1996, pp.
53-74.
3238.
3239.
3240.
3241.
3242.
3243.
3244.
3245.
3246.
3247.
3248.
3249.
3250.
3251.
3252.
201
Marzocchi V., Etica del discorso e diritto, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, VI Incontro di studi – Norme culture e dialogo (con J. Habermas), 30.11-1.12.1996.
Marzocchi V., Habermas: tradimento o trasformazione della Teoria critica? [difesa d’ufficio
della svolta habermasiana dalle accuse del neoadorniano Ch. Türke], in «Almanacchi nuovi»,
1, 1996, pp. 138-143.
Marzocchi V., La ragion pratica comunicativa di J. Habermas: morale, eticità, diritto e democrazia, in «La Cultura», XXXIV, 2, 1996, pp. 255-288.
Maus I., Zum Verhältnis von Recht und Moral aus demokratietheoretischer Sicht, in
Bayertz K. (ed.), Politik und Ethik, Stuttgart, 1996, pp. 194-227.
Melkevik B., Habermas et l’État de droit. Le modèle communicationnel du droit et la reconstruction réflexive de l’État de droit contemporain, in Boulad-Ayoub J., Melkevik B., Robert P. (eds.), L’amour des lois. La crise de la loi moderne dans les sociéteés démocratiques,
Ville de Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1996, pp.
371-387.
Mertens Th., Cosmopolitanism and Citizenship: Kant Against Habermas, in «European
Journal of Philosophy», IV, 3, 1996, pp. 328-347.
Mesure S., Renaut A., La guerre des dieux, Paris, Grasset, 1996.
Michelman F.I., Family Quarrel, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1163-1177; repr. in
Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges,
Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 309-322; as How can the people ever
make the laws? A critique of deliberative democracy, in Ungureanu C., Günther K.,
Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Mora E., Cercando buone ragioni per vivere in società: il contributo di Jürgen Habermas, in
Bovone L., Rovati G. (eds.), Vivere in società: tendenze della teoria sociologica contemporanea, Napoli, Liguori, 1996, pp. 125-149.
Morris M., On the Logic of Performative Contradiction: Habermas and the Radical Critique
of Reason, in «Review of Politics», LVIII, 4, 1996, pp. 735-760.
Motzkin G., Habermas’s Ideal Paradigm of Law, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 45 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 14311440.
Muñoz López B., Educación y desigualdad social: consecuencias de una reforma educativa,
in «Paideia», XVII, 35, 1996, pp. 175-194.
Muñoz Terrón J.M., Fenomenología y teoría de la acción comunicativa. Pérdida de la
posibilidad de enraizamiento corporal de la razón en la asunción habermasiana del paradigma
lingüístico, in Pintos Peñaranda L., González López J.L. (eds.), Actas del IV Congreso
de Fenomenología: Fenomenología y Ciencias Humanas, 24-28.9.1996, Universidad de
Santiago de Compostela, 1998, pp. 507-516.
Neumann U., Zur Interpretation des forensischen Diskurses in der Rechtsphilosophie von
Jürgen Habermas, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer
Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 415-426.
Nieminen H., Democracy, communication, and the forms of publicness: Habermas, Williams, and the British case, London, University of Westminster, 1996.
202
3253.
3254.
3255.
3256.
3257.
3258.
3259.
3260.
3261.
3262.
3263.
3264.
3265.
3266.
3267.
3268.
3269.
3270.
Niznik J., Sanders J.T., Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski, Westport, Praeger, 1996.
Noguera J.A., La teoría crítica: de Frankfurt a Habermas. Una “traducción de la teoría de
la acción comunicativa a la sociología, in «Papers. Revista de sociologia», 50, 1996, pp.
133-153.
Novaes Thomaz de Menezes A.B., Habermas: introdução à metacrítica da razão
instrumental, in «Principios: Revista de Filosofia», III, 4, 1996, pp. 19-26.
Ortiz Pérez L., Herrera Líma M., Jürgen Habermas. Moralidad, ética y política.
Propuestas y críticas, in «Politica y Gobierno», III, 1, 1996, pp. 200-201.
Outhwaite W., General Introduction, in Outhwaite W. (ed.), The Habermas reader,
Outhwaite W., Glossary, in Outhwaite W. (ed.), The Habermas reader, Cambridge,
Polity Press, 1996, pp. 368-371.
Owen D., Foucault, Habermas and the claims of reason, in «History of the Human Sciences», 9, 1996, pp. 119-138.
Pamerleau W.C., Can Habermas’s Discourse Ethics Accommodate the Feminist Perspective?, Hudson Y. (ed.), Rending and Renewing the Social Order, Mellen Press, Lewiston,
1996.
Parkin A.C., On the Practical Relevance of Habermas’s Tanheory of Communicative Action,
in «Social Theory and Practice», XXII, 3, 1996, pp. 417-441.
Pawlik M., Die Verdrängung des Subjekts und ihre Folgen. Begründungsdefizite in Habermas’ “System der Rechte “, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 441-447.
Pedrero V., Conciencia moral, ética discursiva y solidaridad: el paso por la tradición, in
«Laguna: Revista de filosofía», 3, 1995-1996, pp. 111-120.
Pedroni V., Eclisse della ragione e ragione comunicativa, in «Cenobio», XLV, 3, 1996,
pp. 313-327.
Pensky M., Ghost Stories: Critical Remembrance and Justice in Derrida and Habermas, in
Langsdorf L., Watson S.H., Bower M. (eds.), Phenomenology, interpretation, and community, Albany (N.Y.), The SUNY Press, 1996, pp. 237-251.
Peterson R.T., Democracy and Intellectual Mediation: After Liberalism and Socialism, in
Esquith S.L., Political Dialogue: Theories and Practices, Amsterdam Atlanta, GA,
Rodopi, 1996, pp. 183-214.
Peterson R.T., Democratic Philosophical Mediation, in Id., Peterson R.T., Democratic
Philosophy and the Politics of Knowledge, University Park, Penn State University Press,
1996, pp. 280-310.
Peterson R.T., Thinking Philosophically with the Idea of the Division of Labor, in Id., Peterson R.T., Democratic Philosophy and the Politics of Knowledge, University Park, Penn
State University Press, 1996, pp. 115-180.
Petrucciani S., Etica, politica e diritto: note in margine al confronto Apel-Habermas, in
«Fenomenologia e societa», XIX, 1-2, 1996, pp. 169-178.
Pietrykowski B., Knowledge and power in adult education: Beyond Freire and Habermas, in
3271.
3272.
3273.
3274.
3275.
3276.
3277.
3278.
3279.
3280.
3281.
3282.
3283.
3284.
3285.
3286.
203
«Adult Education Quarterly», XLVI, 2, 1996, pp. 82-97.
Pinto L., L’estetica di Jürgen Habermas come etica del comunicare, Id. (ed.), Trittico di estetica, Bari, Levante, 1996, pp. 13-51.
Pinzani A., Problemi di applicazione nella teoria discorsiva della morale e del diritto, in «Ars
Interpretandi», 1, 1996, pp. 55-75.
Pinzani A., Solidarietà e democrazia: Osservazioni su antropologia, diritto e legittimità nella
teoria giuridica di Habermas, in «Iride», IX, 18, 1996, pp. 473-482.
Portinaro P.P., Habermas e la democrazia del XXI secolo, in «La Stampa», 30.5.1996.
Poster M., Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere, in Porter D. (ed.), Internet
Culture, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1996, pp. 201-217.
Power M., Habermas and the Counterfacual Imagination, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
1005-1026; in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 207-225.
Power M.K., Laughlin R.C., Habermas, law and accounting, in «Accounting, Organizations and Society», 21, 1996, pp. 441-467.
Prado J.L.A., Brecha na comunicação: Habermas, o outro, Lacan, São Paulo,
Hacker/Cespuc, 1996.
Pressler Ch.A., Dasilva F.B., Critical Interpretation: Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Sociology
and Interpretation from Weber to Habermas, Albany, State University of New York
Press, 1996, pp. 149-169.
Preuß U.K., Communicative Power and the Concept of Law, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
Preyer G., Hintergrundwissen: Kritik eines Begriffs, in Preyer G., Peter G., Ulfig A.
(eds.), Protosoziologie im Kontext. »Lebenswelt« und »System« in Philosophie und Soziologie,
Würzburg, Königshausen und Neumann, 1996, pp. 81-92.
Preyer G., Peter G., Ulfig A. Einleitung: »Lebenswelt« und »System« in Philosophie und
Soziologie, in Preyer G., Peter G., Ulfig A. (eds.), Protosoziologie im Kontext. »Lebenswelt« und »System« in Philosophie und Soziologie, Würzburg, Königshausen und
Neumann, 1996, pp. 9-26.
Preyer G., Rechtsgeltung – Argumentation – Entscheidung, in «Rechtstheorie», XXVII,
3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen
Habermas), 1996, pp. 367-381.
Preyer G., Zwei Konstruktionsprobleme der “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in
«Berliner Journal für Soziologie», VI, 4, 1996, pp. 551-563.
Privitera W., Il luogo della critica. Per leggere Habermas, Soveria Mannelli, Rubbettino,
1996.
Privitera W., Multiculturalismo tra fatti e norme, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, VI Incontro di studi – Norme culture e dialogo (con J. Habermas), 30.111.12.1996.
204
3287.
3288.
3289.
3290.
3291.
3292.
3293.
3294.
3295.
3296.
3297.
3298.
3299.
3300.
3301.
3302.
Proops A.L.V., Habermas discourse ethics and liberal international society, London, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1996.
Punzi M., Discorso patto diritto. La comunità tra consenso e giustizia nel pensiero di K-O.
Apel, Milano, Giuffrè, 1996.
Quéré L., Vers une anthropologie alternative pour les sciences sociales?, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996,
pp. 105-138.
Rabossi E., Racionalidad dialógica: Falacia y retórica filosófica: El caso dela llamada ‘falacia
naturalista’, in Nudler O. (ed.), La Racionalidad: su poder y sus límites, Buenos AiresBarcelona, Paidos, 1996, pp. 461-470.
Rasmussen D.M., Jurisprudence and Validity, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5
(“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1059-1082.
Raulet G., Critique de la raison communicationnelle, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz
R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996, pp. 69-103.
Rehg W., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1996,
pp. IX-XXXVII.
Rehg W.S.J., Against Subordination: Morality, Discourse, and Decision in the Legal Theory
of Jürgen Habermas, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and
Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1147-1162; in Rosenfeld M., Arato A.
(eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of
California Press, 1998, pp. 257-271.
Rehg W.S.J., Bohman J., Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of
Legitimacy in Faktizität und Geltung, in «Journal of Political Philosophy», IV, 1996,
pp. 79-99.
Rehg W.S.J., Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy: An Overview of the
Argument, in Rasmussen D. (ed.), Handbook of Critical Theory, Oxford, Blackwell,
1996, pp. 166-189.
Rehg W.S.J., Randall R., The Marketplace of Ideas, the Public Interest and Federal Regulation of the Electronic Media: Implications of Habermas’ Theory of Democracy, in «Southern
California Law Review», 69, 1996, pp. 1923-1987.
Rehg W.S.J., The Place of Consensus in Democratic Legitimation: A Recommendation, in
«Rechtstheorie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 461-473.
Riotta G., Ti do il voto ma non mi fido, in «Corriere della Sera», 10.11.1996, p. 23.
Roberts P., Habermas, Philosophes, and Puritans: Rationality and Exclusion in the Dialectical Public Sphere, in «Rhetoric Society Quarterly», XXVI, 1, 1996, pp. 47-68.
Rockmore T., On Hegel’s Epistemology and Contemporary Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, Humanities Press, 1996.
Rochlitz R., Fonction généalogique et force justificative de l’argumentation, in Bouchindhomme C., Rochlitz R. (eds.), Habermas, la raison, la critique, Paris, Cerf, 1996,
pp. 187-214.
3303.
3304.
3305.
3306.
3307.
3308.
3309.
3310.
3311.
3312.
3313.
3314.
3315.
3316.
3317.
3318.
205
Römpp G., Pragmatismus redivivus? Eine Kritik an der Revitalisierung despragmatistischen
Grundgedankens, in «Theologie und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift», 71, 2, 1996,
pp.187-204.
Rorty R., The Ambiguity of “Rationality”, in «Constellations», III, 1, 1996, pp. 73-82.
Rosen M., On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1996.
Rosenfeld M., Arato A., Introduction: Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy:
Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 1147-1162; in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1998, pp. 1-10.
Rosenfeld M., Can Rights, Democracy, and Justice Be Reconciled Through Discourse Theory?, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy:
Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 791-824; in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California
Press, 1998, pp. 82-112.
Rosenfeld M., Preface, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law
and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”), 1996, pp. 767-770.
Sajó A., Constitutional Adjudication in Light of Discourse Theory, in ««Cardozo Law
Review», XVII, 4-5 (“Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges”),
1996, pp. 1193-1230; in Rosenfeld M., Arato A. (eds.), Habermas on Law and Democracy. Critical Exchanges, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 336-370.
Sartori A., Linguaggio e antropologia. Habermas e Gehlen: un confronto critico, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XIX, 3, 1996, pp. 89-105.
Schlink B. The Dynamics of Constitutional Adjudication, in «Cardozo Law Review»,
Schmid-Noerr G., Aus der Vorgeschichte eines gesellschaftstheoretischen Paradigmawechsels
– Horkheimers Kritik an Habermas, in «Konkret», 9, 1996, pp. 43-45.
Schmidt J., Introduction: What Is Enlightenment? A Question, its Context, and Some Consequences, in Schmidt J. (ed.), What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and
Twentieth-Century Questions, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1996, pp. 1-44.
Servaes J., Lie R., Toward a more interpretative communication research ‘framework’: television as a cultural system. An interpretation of Clifford Geertz, in «Communicatio», XXII,
1, 1996, pp. 42-49.
Sheehan Th.W., The Public Sphere in Ulysses-the Colonial Fiction, in Spinks C.W.,
Deely J. (eds.), Semiotics 1995, New York, Peter Lang, 1996, pp. 127-134.
Sölter A.A., Moderne und Kulturkritik. Jürgen Habermas und das Erbe der Kritischen
Theorie, Bonn, Bouvier, 1996.
Steele M., Language and African-American Culture: The Need for Meta-Philosophical, in
«Philosophy Today», XL, 1-4, 1996, pp. 179-187.
Steinhoff U., Probleme der Legitimation des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, in «Rechtstheo-
206
3319.
3320.
3321.
3322.
3323.
3324.
3325.
3326.
3327.
3328.
3329.
3330.
3331.
3332.
3333.
3334.
3335.
rie», XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts
nach Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 449-459.
Tejera V., Has Habermas Understood Peirce?, in «Transactions of the Charles S.
Peirce Society», XXXII, 1, 1996, pp. 107-125.
Therborn G., Critical Theory and the Legacy of Twentieth-Century Marxism, in Turner
B.S. (ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory, Cambridge, Blackwell, 1996, pp. 5382.
Thibault P.J., Van Leeuwen Th., Grammar, Society, and the Speech Act: Renewing the
Connections, in «Journal of Pragmatics», XXV, 4, 1996, pp. 561-585.
Thomä D., German Concord, German Discord: Two Concepts of a Nation and the Challenge of Multiculturalism, in «European Journal of Philosophy», IV, 3, 1996, pp. 348368.
Thompson J.B., La teoría de la esfera pública, in «Voces y Culturas», 10, 1996, pp.
81-96.
Thumfart A., Staatsdiskurs und Selbstbewußtsein, Amsterdam, 1996.
Tlatli S., The Intoxication of the Avant-Garde in Benjamin and Habermas, in Barker S.
(ed.), Signs of Change: Premodern, Modern, Postmodern, Albany (N.Y.), SUNYPress
1996.
Troper M., Constitutional Justice and Democracy, in «Cardozo Law Review», XVII, 2,
1996.
Uriz Pemán M.J., La Ciencia y la Tecnología en la modernidad: un análisis filosófico-social,
in «Euridice», 1996, pp. 117-153.
Vallespín Oña F., Habermas y el derecho, Iglesias Prada J.L. (ed.), Estudios jurídicos en
homenaje al profesor Aurelio Menéndez, Madrid: Marcial Pons,1996, pp. 5527-5539;
repr. as ¿Reconciliación a través del Derecho?: apostillas a facticidad y validez de Jürgen
Habermas, in Gimbernat Ordeig J.A. (ed.), La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen
Van Mill D., Possibility of Rational Outcomes from Democratic Discourse and Procedure, in
«Journal of Politics», LVIII, 3, 1996 pp. 734-752.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Tomarse en serio la desobediencia civil. Un criterio de legitimidad, in
«Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política», 7, 1996, pp. 159-184.
Vogel S., Marcuse, Habermas, and the Retreat to Nature, in Id., Against Nature: The
Concept of Nature in Critical Theory, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1996, pp. 101-144.
Vogel S.M., Habermas and the Ethics of Nature, Conference “Contested Terrains;
Social Conflict and Critique”, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, 22.5.1996; in
Gottleib R. (ed.), The Ecological Community, New York, Routledge, 1997.
Vollrath E., Proteus und Medusa: die politische Apperzeption der deutschen Staatsrechtstradition im Werk von Jürgen Habermas, in «Politische Vierteljahresschrift», XXXVII, 2,
1996, pp. 341-356.
von Dews P., The Truth of the Subject: Language, Validity, and Transcendence in Lacan
and Habermas, in Critchley S., von Dews P. (eds.), Deconstructive Subjectivities, Albany
(N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1996, pp. 149-168.
Von Prittwitz V., Verständigung über die Verständigung. Anmerkungen und Ergänzungen
3336.
3337.
3338.
3339.
3340.
3341.
3342.
3343.
3344.
3345.
3346.
207
zur Debatte über Rationalität und Kommunikation in den Internationalen Beziehungen, in
«Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», III, 1, 1996, pp. 133-148.
Wald B., Abendländische Tugendlehre und moderne Moralphilosophie, in «Prima Philosophia», 9, 4, 1996, pp. 435-445.
Warnke G., Legitimacy and Consensus: Comments on Part of the Work of Thomas McCarthy, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXII, 2, 1996, pp. 67-81.
Warren M.E., Deliberative Democracy and Authority, in «American Political Science
Review», XC, 1996, pp. 46-60.
Weinberger O., Diskursive Demokratie ohne Diskurstheorie, in «Rechtstheorie»,
XXVII, 3 (System der Rechte, demokratischer Rechtsstaat und Diskurstheorie des Rechts nach
Jürgen Habermas), 1996, pp. 427-437.
Wells S., Rogue Cops and Health Care: What Do We Want from Public Writing?, in
«College Composition and Communication», XLVII, 3, 1996, pp. 325-341.
Wiehl R., Karl-Jaspers-Preis 1995. Laudatio auf Jürgen Habermas, in «Heidelberger
Jahrbücher», XL, 1996, pp. 15-24.
Williams H., Bishop C., Wight C., German (Re)Unification: Habermas and his Critics,
in «German Politics», V, 2, 1996, pp. 214-239.
Witkowski L., The Frankfurt School and Structuralism in Jerzy Kmita’s Analysis, in
Zeidler-Janiszewska A. (ed.), Epistemology And History Humanities As A Philosophical
Problem And Jerzy Kmita’s Approach To It, Amsterdam Atlanta, GA, Rodopi, 1996.
Young I.M., Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy, in Benhabib
S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton,
Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 120-136.
Young R., But Education has its own Poetry: Further Steps, in «Studies in Philosophy
and Education», XV, 4, 1996, pp. 329-332.
Zurn Ch.F., The Intersubjective Basis of Morality, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXII, 6, 1996, pp. 113-126.
1997
3347.
3348.
3349.
3350.
3351.
Abaidoo S., Human-nature interaction and the modern agricultural regime: agricultural practices and environmental ethics, Saskatoon, University of Saskatchewan, 1997.
Ahlers R., Reason in Modernity: Hegel in the Current Philosophical Debate, in «Idealistic
Studies», XXVII, 3, 1997, pp. 251-267.
Alexy R., Discourse Theory and Human Rights, in Martin R., Sprenger G. (eds.), Challenges to Law at the End of the 20th Century. Vol. 1, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 67, 1997.
Allard Ph., L’État de droit habermassien et le modèle discursif de la démocratie, in Id., La
citoyenneté et le modèle discursif de la démocratie de Jürgen Habermas, Ville de Québec, Université Laval, 1997, pp. 62-74.
Amdam R., Empowerment planning in local communities: Some experiences from combining
communicative and instrumental rationality in local planning in Norway, in «International
Planning Studies», 2, 3, 1997, pp. 329-345.
208
3352.
3353.
3354.
3355.
3356.
3357.
3358.
3359.
3360.
3361.
3362.
3363.
3364.
3365.
3366.
3367.
3368.
Apel K.-O., Plurality of the good? The problem of affirmative tolerance in a multicultural
society from an ethical point of view, in «Ratio Juris», X, 2, 1997, pp. 199-212; in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate,
2011, pp. 147-160.
Arens E., Interruptions: Critical Theory and Political Theology between Modernity and Postmodernity, in Batstone D. et al. (eds.), Liberation Theologies, Postmodernity, and the Americas, New York, Routledge, 1997, pp. 222-242.
Arens E., Theologie und Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns im Diskurs. Eine Einleitung, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer
Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997, pp. 9-32.
Arens E., Tod und Transzendenz. Eschatologische Anfragen an die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein
theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997,
pp. 135-161.
Aufderheide P., In search of the civic sector: Cable television policy making in Brazil, 1989–
1996, in «Communication Law and Policy», 2, 4, 1997, pp. 563-593.
Avio K.L., Constitutional Contract and Discourse Ethics: The Agreement Theories of James
Buchanan and Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of Theoretical Politics», 9, 1997, pp. 533553.
Baccelli L., Il particolarismo dei diritti, in «Jura Gentium», 1997.
Badía L., La teoría de l’opinió pública i la crítica de la societat: A Theory of Public Opinion
and Criticism of Society, in «Anàlisi: Quaderns de comunicació i cultura», 20, 1997,
pp. 61-83.
Bartholini I., Giochi linguistici e agire comunicativo, in Monti E. (ed.), Sentieri del conoscere: dibattiti metodologici in sociologia, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1997, pp. 263-307.
Bausch K.C., The Habermas/Luhmann Debate and Subsequent Habermasian Perspectives
on Systems Theory, in «Systems Research and Behavioral Science», XIV, 5, 1997, pp.
315-330.
Baynes K., Deliberative Democracy and the Limits of Liberalism, in International Conference on Justice and Law, Federal University, Florianopolis, Brazil, 8.1997; in
von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 15-30.
Baynes K., Deliberative Democracy and the Regress Problem, in «The Modern Schoolman», 73, 1997, pp. 178-184.
Bello E., La aventura de la razón: el pensamiento ilustrado, Madrid, Ed. Akal, 1997.
Blake N., Research, Development and Tacit Capability in the Education System, in
«Cambridge Journal of Education», 27, 2, 1997, pp. 223-234.
Blaug R., Between Fear and Disappointment: Critical, Empirical and Political Uses of Habermas, in «Political studies», XLV, 1, 1997, pp. 100-117.
Boeve L., Critical Consciousness in the Postmodern Condition: New Opportunities for Theology?, in «Philosophy and Theology: Marquette University Quarterly», X, 2, 1997,
pp. 449-468.
Boeve L., De Weg, De Waarheid En Het Leven, in «Bijdragen», 58, 2, 1997, pp.
3369.
3370.
3371.
3372.
3373.
3374.
3375.
3376.
3377.
3378.
3379.
3380.
3381.
3382.
3383.
3384.
3385.
3386.
209
164-188.
Bohman J.F., Die Globalisierung der Öffentlichkeit, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 6, 1997, pp. 927-942.
Bohman J.F., Do Practices Explain Anything? Turner’s Critique of the Theory of Social
Practices, in «History and Theory: Studies in the Philosophy of History», XXXVI, 1,
1997, pp. 93-107.
Bondolfi A., Zwischen Faktizität und Geltung. Zur Bedeutung der Habermasschen Rechtsauffassung für die theologische Ethik, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh,
Paderborn, 1997, pp. 162-178.
Brena G.L., Individualismo e valori asiatici. Domande a Habermas, in «Fenomenologia
e Società», XX, 2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J. Habermas), 1997,
pp. 27-29.
Broadbent J., Laughlin R., Developing Empirical Research: An example informed by a
Habermasian Approach, in «Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal», 10,
1997, pp. 622-649.
Bubner R., Versuch eines Überblicks über die Modernitätsproblematik, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XLIV, 3, 1997, pp. 191-207.
Buchwalter A., Structure or Sentiment? Habermas, Hegel, and the Conditions of Solidarity,
in «Philosophy Today», XLI, 1997, pp. 49-54; repr. in in Rasmussen D., Swindal J.
(eds.), Critical Theory, London, Sage Publications, 2004, pp. 229-237.
Caiano C., La terza fase della Scuola di Francoforte, in «Rivista di filosofia», 3, 1997,
pp. 483-487.
Calloni M., Habermas e la problematica distinzione fra etica e morale: il caso dell’aborto, in
«Fenomenologia e Società», XX, 2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J.
Habermas), 1997, pp. 30-41.
Castoriadis C., Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime, in «Constellations»,
IV, 1, 1997, pp. 1-18.
Cepeda M., Rawls y Habermas: Una disputa en familia, in «Daimon, Revista de
Filosofia», 15, 1997, pp. 51-61.
Ceppa L., Pluralismo etico e universalismo morale in Habermas, in «Teoria politica»,
XIII, 2, 1997, pp. 97-112.
Cirrone S., Le regole dei giochi. Per un modello procedurale di razionalità: Habermas contro
Habermas, Catania, Edizioni del Prisma, 1997.
Cooke M., Are Ethical Conflicts Irreconcilable?, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
XXIII, 2, 1997, pp. 1-19.
Cooke M., Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition,
in «Political Theory», XXV, 2, 1997, pp. 258-288.
Corredor C., Framework of an Intersubjetivist Theory of Meaning, in «Sorites», 1997, pp.
33-60.
Cortés Rodas F, Liberalismo, comunitarismo y ética comunicativa, in «Daimon: Revista
de Filosofia», 15, 1997, pp. 93-106.
Cortés Rodas F., Particularismo ético y universalismo moral: Consideraciones críticassobre las
210
3387.
3388.
3389.
3390.
3391.
3392.
3393.
3394.
3395.
3396.
3397.
3398.
3399.
3400.
3401.
3402.
3403.
3404.
concepciones de racionalidad práctica y del yo en Charles Taylor, in «Estudios de Filosofia»,
15-16, 1997, pp. 179-193.
Davey N., Nietzsche and Habermas: On Objectivity, in «New Nietzsche Studies», II,
1-2, pp. 61-83, 1997.
Davey N., The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social, by
Alan How, in «Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology», 28, 1, 1997, pp.
103-105.
De Mul, Jos, Structuralist and Hermeneutic Approaches to Development, in von Haaften
W., Korthals M., Wren Th.E. (eds.), Philosophy of Development: Reconstructing the Foundations of Human Development and Education, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 223-244.
De Oliveira N., Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault-Habermas Debate, in «Costellations», IV, 4, 1997, pp. 141-144.
De Oliveira N.F., Habermas on Nietzsche and Knowledge, in «New Nietzsche Studies», II, 1-2, pp. 111-120, 1997.
De Simone A., Il paradigma ermeneutico della ragione. Gadamer e Habermas, in «Hermeneutica», 1997, pp. 326-327.
De Zan J., Ética, derecho y política en Karl-Otto Apel y Jürgen Habermas, in Michelini
D., Ortiz G., Wester J. (eds.), Eficiencia y Justicia Sociale, Rio Cuarto, ICALA, 1997.
Delanty G., Habermas and Occidental Rationalism: The Politics of Identity, Social Learning, and the Cultural Limits of Moral Universalism, in «Sociological Theory», XV, 1,
1997, pp. 30-59.
Desmeules L., Enseignement de la philosophie et pratiques transférogènes, in «Philosopher», 20, 1997, pp. 133-139.
Dodd N., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas; The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, by Stephen K. White, in «The British Journal of Sociology», XLVIII, 2, 1997,
pp. 329-330
Donaggio E., Una morte dolcissima. L’eutanasia del marxismo di Jürgen Habermas, in
«Cenobio», XLVI, 2, 1997, pp. 105-123.
Duvenage P., Geregtigheid en heterogeniteit: Oor die etiese wending in diepostmoderne, in
«South African Journal of Philosophy», XVI, 3, 1997, pp. 101-112.
Ebeling H., Habermas und die Idee des ewigen Friedens. Die Unsterblichen und ihr Weltbürgerrecht, in «Logos», IV, 2, 1997.
Elósegui Itxaso M., La inclusión del otro: Habermas y Rawls ante las sociedades
multiculturales, in «Revista de estudios políticos», 98, 1997, pp. 59-84.
Elosegui M., La inclusión del otro. Habermas y Rawls ante las sociedades multiculturales, in
«Revista de Estudios Politicos», 98, 1997.
Endres B., Habermas and Critical Thinking, in «Philosophy of Education», pp. 168177, 1997.
Endres B., Habermas and Critical Thinking, in «Philosophy of Education», 1997,
pp. 168-177.
Esquirol J.M., Marquès A., Amengual G., Ètica i religió en Lévinas, Ricoeur i
3405.
3406.
3407.
3408.
3409.
3410.
3411.
3412.
3413.
3414.
3415.
3416.
3417.
3418.
3419.
3420.
211
Habermas, in «Comprendre: Revista Catalana de Filosofia», I, 2, 1997.
Ferrara A., Ancora su etica e morale in Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XX,
2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J. Habermas), 1997, pp. 42-48.
Ferry J.M., Quel patriotisme au-delà des nationalismes? Réflexion sur les fondements motivationnels d’une citoyenneté européenne, in Birnbaum P. (ed), Sociologie des nationalismes, Paris,
Presse Universitaire de France, 1997, pp. 425-445.
Festenstein M., Pragmatism and Political Theory: From Dewey to Rorty, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Fleming M., Art in Habermas: Margin to Centre/Centre to Margin, in International
Association for Philosophy and Literature, Mobile, Alabama, 5.1997.
Fleming M., Critical Theory Between Modernity and Postmodernity, in Caputo J.D., Bergoffen D. (eds.), Selected Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, in «Philosophy Today», XLI, 1, 1997, pp. 31-39.
Fleming M., Emancipation and Illusion: Rationality and Gender in Habermas’s Theory of
Modernity, University Park, Penn State University Press, 1997.
Forst R., Gerechtigkeit als Fairneß: ethisch, politisch oder moralisch?, in Philosophische
Gesellschaft Bad Homburg, Hinsch W. (eds.), Zur Idee des politischen Liberalismus,
Frie R., Jacques Lacan and Jürgen Habermas: From subjectivity to intersubjective speech, in
Id., Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Modern Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: A Study of Sartre, Binswanger, Lacan, and Habermas, London, Rowman & Littlefield, 1997, pp. 159197; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage,
2009, pp. 3-34.
Fumero F., La Lingüística y los Métodos Cualitativos de Investigación, in «Paradigma», 1,
1997.
Fusfield W., Communication without Constellation? Habermas’s Argumentative Turn in
(and Away from) Critical Theory, in «Communication Theory», VII, 4, 1997, pp. 301320.
Gaffikin M.J.R., Lodh S.C., Critical Studies in Accounting Research, Rationality and
Habermas: A Methodological Reflection, in «Critical perspectives on accounting», VIII,
5, 1997, pp. 433-474.
Gallagher S., Hegel, Foucault, and Critical Hermeneutics, in Id., Hegel, History, and Interpretation, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1997, pp. 145-166.
Gamwell F.I., Habermas and Apel on Communicative Ethics: Their Difference and the
Difference It Makes, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIII, 2, 1997, pp. 21-45.
Ganty É., Habermas et le Discours de la modernité; L’espace public ou la dictature du «On» ;
Science et techniques chez Habermas, in Id., Penser la modernité: Essai sur Heidegger, Habermas et Éric Weil, Namur, Presses Universitaires de Namur, 1997, pp. 35-64, 183198, 419-462.
Garcia Serrano M., Amores amables (A propósito de la interpretación del discurso moral),
in «Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e información filosófica», LIII, 207,
1997, pp. 391-423.
Gay W.C., The Violence of Domination and the Power of Nonviolence, in Kaplan L.D,
212
3421.
3422.
3423.
3424.
3425.
3426.
3427.
3428.
3429.
3430.
3431.
3432.
3433.
3434.
3435.
3436.
3437.
(ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Power and Domination, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 1997.
Gemie Sh., Mirbeau et Habermas: l’exemple du calvaire, in «Cahiers Octave Mirbeau»,
4, 1997, pp. 338-344.
Gerhards J., Diskursive versus liberale Öffentlichkeit. Eine empirische Auseinandersetzung
mit Jürgen Habermas, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialphychologie», XLIX ,1, 1997 pp. 1-34.
Gibbs R., Asymmetry and Mutuality: Habermas and Levinas, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIII, 6, 1997, pp. 51-63.
Gimbernat Ordeig J.A., La recepción de la filosofía de Jürgen Habermas en España, in Id.
(ed.), La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen Habermas, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 1997,
pp. 11-21.
Glebe-Moller J., Kommunikatives Handeln, Konsens, Heiliger Geist. Zur Übersetzung
theologischer in kommunikationstheoretische Kategorien, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives
Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997, pp. 119-134.
Gómez Mendoza M.A., La crítica al “cientificismo” y al “positivismo” en la obra del
Grupo de Investigación Educativa de la Universidad Nacional: una mirada desde la teoría
crítica, in «Revista Educación y Pedagogía», IX-X, 19-20, 1997, pp. 27-57.
Goodnight G.Th., Hingstman D.B., Studies in the public sphere, in «Quarterly Journal of Speech», 83, 3, 1997, pp. 351-370.
Grant C.B., Intersubjetividade: Necessidade social ou impossibilidade cognitiva? Uma
contribuição ao debate entre Habermas e Luhmann, in «Principios: Revista de Filosofia»,
IV, 5, 1997, pp. 5-28.
Gregg B., Democracy in Normatively Fragmented Societies: Between Facts and Norms:
Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas,
in «The Review of Politics», LIX, 4, 1997, pp. 927-930.
Gril P., Alexys Version einer transzendentalpragmatischen Begründung der Diskursregeln im
Unterschied zu Habermas, in « Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXXXIII,
2, 1997, pp. 206-216.
Grimen H., Consensus and Normative Validity, in «Inquiry», XL, 1, 1997, pp. 47-61.
Gross A.G., Walzer A., The Challenger Disaster and the Revival of Rhetoric in Organizational Life, in «Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning», XI, 1,
1997, pp. 75-93.
Gulli U., Struttura e soggettività. Per un confronto tra Marx ed Habermas, Palermo, Ila
Palma, 1997.
Haba E.P., Variantes del pensamiento escapista en una moderna “santa familia”: Sobre
Rawls, Habermas, etc. (Acerca de la concepción “misionera” para las ciencias sociales, in
«Sistema: Revista de ciencias sociales», 137, 1997, pp. 109-125.
Hammer E., Romanticism Revisited, in «Inquiry», XL, 2, 1997, pp. 225-242.
Hance A., The Hermeneutic Significance of the Sensus Communis, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XXXVII, 2, 1997, pp. 133-148.
Hansen K.H, Science and Technology as Social Relations towards a Philosophy of Technology
for Liberal Education, in «International Journal of Technology and Design Educa-
3438.
3439.
3440.
3441.
3442.
3443.
3444.
3445.
3446.
3447.
3448.
3449.
3450.
3451.
3452.
3453.
3454.
3455.
213
tion», VII, 1-2, 1997, pp. 49-63.
Harpes J.P., Kuhlmann W. (eds.), Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik, Münster, Lit,
1997.
Healy P., Between Habermas and Foucault: On the Limits and Possibilities of Critical and
Emancipatory Reason, in «South African Journal of Philosophy», XVI, 4, 1997, pp.
140-149.
Heming R., Öffentlichkeit, Diskurs und Gesellschaft: zum analytischen Potential und zur
Kritik des Begriffs der Öffentlichkeit bei Habermas, Wiesbaden, Dt. Univ.-Verlag, 1997.
Hepburn E.R., The Situated but Directionless Self: The Postmetaphysical World of Benhabib’s Discourse Ethics, in «Journal of Applied Philosophy», XIV, 1, 1997, pp. 5968.
Hernández Pachecho J., Jürgen Habermas. Teoría de la acción comunicativa, in Id.,
Corrientes actuales de la Filosofía, vol. 2: Filosofía social, Madrid, Tecnos, 1997.
Herrero M., Las metamorfosis de lo político, in «Anuario Filosofico», XXX, 3, 1997,
pp. 561-592.
Hewitt M.A., The Eclipse of Subjectivity and Idealizations of the ‘Other’, in «Journal of
Dharma», XXII, 3, 1997, pp. 323-348.
Hohendahl P.U., Introduction, in Habermas J., A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press, 1997, pp. VII-XXIV.
Howard D., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «German Politics & Society», XV, 1,
42, 1997, pp. 140-147.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Democracia participativa y liberalismo político, in «Daimon: Revista
de Filosofia», 15, 1997, pp. 83-91.
Ingram D., Explanation and Understanding Revisited: Bohman and the New Philosophy of
Social Science: On the Logic of the Social Sciences, by Jürgen Habermas; Theory of
Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Human Studies», XX, 4, 1997, pp.
413-428.
Jacobsson K., Discursive Will Formation and the Question of Legitimacy in European Politics, in «Scandinavian Political Studies», 20, 1997, pp. 69-90.
Jalbert J.E., Habermas, Fichte and the Question of Technological Determinism, in «Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association», 70, 1997, pp. 209218.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Más allá del Estado nacional,
Madrid, Trotta, 1997, pp. 9-36.
Johri M., On the universality of Habermas’s discourse ethics, Montréal, McGill University, 1997.
Junker-Kenny M., Praxis gegenseitiger Anerkennung? Die Relevanz der philosophischen
Kritik an Jürgen Habermas’ Ansatz für die Entwicklung eines Begriffs christlicher Praxis, in
«International Journal for Practical Theology», 1997, pp. 41-82.
Kavoulakos K., J. Habermas, The Ethics of Communication, Athens, Enallaktikes
Ekdoseis, 1997.
Kavoulakos K., The Habermas-Gadamer Dispute and the ‘Theoretical Turn’ of Critical
214
3456.
3457.
3458.
3459.
3460.
3461.
3462.
3463.
3464.
3465.
3466.
3467.
3468.
3469.
3470.
3471.
3472.
Theory, in «Revue of Social Research», 92-93, 1997, pp. 93-108.
Kelly M., Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate, in «Constellations», IV, 1, 1997.
Kersting W., Recht, Gerechtigkeit und demokratische Tugend. Abhandlungen zur praktischen Philosophie der Gegenwart, Frankfurt a.M., 1997.
Kettner M., Ofsti A, Intersubjektivität--einige Analyseschritte, in Meggle G., Mundt A.,
(eds.), Analyōmen 2: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference” perspectives in Analytical Philosophy,
Berlin–New York, de Gruyter, 1997, pp. 478-487.
Keul H.K., Kritik der emanzipatorischen Vernunft: zum Aufklärungsbegriff der Kritischen
Theorie, Frankfurt a.M., 1997.
Khisty C.J., Leleur S., Societal planning: Identifying a new role for the transport planner –
Part II: Planning guidelines, in «Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science
Research», 10, 1, March 1997, pp. 27-36.
Kitchen G., Habermas’s Moral Cognitivism, in «Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society», 97, 1997, pp. 317-324.
Knapp M., Die Anderen - der blinde Fleck der Moderne? Überlegungen zum Verhältnis der
Theologie zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives
Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997, pp. 71-96.
Korthals M., Reconstruction and explanation of foundational development, in von Haaften
W., Korthals M., Wren Th.E. (eds.), Philosophy of Development: Reconstructing the Foundations of Human Development and Education, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997, pp. 55-74.
Kozlarek O., Entre el pasado y el futuro: ¿cómo aprender de la historia?, in «Sociológica»,
XII, 34, 1997, pp. 209-218.
Kulynych J.J., Performing Politics: Foucault, Habermas, and Postmodern Participation, in
«Polity», XXX, 2, 1997, pp. 315-347.
La Porta L., Diritto e democrazia in Habermas, in «Critica marxista», 1, 1997, pp. 7678.
Labbè Y., E. Arens (éd.), Habermas et la théologie, in «Revue des Sciences Religieuses», LXXI, 1, 1997, pp. 130-131.
Langthaler R., Nachmetaphysisches Denken?: Kritische Anfragen an Jürgen Habermas,
Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1997.
Leydet D., Habermas’s Decentered View of Society and the Problem of Democratic Legitimacy, in «Symposium», I, 1, 1997, pp. 35-48.
López de la Vieja M.T., Revelancia y aplicabilidad en Etica aplicada, in «Doxa:
Cuadernos de Filosofia del Derecho», 20, 1997, pp. 427-440.
Lowell Stone B., Classical Liberalism and Sociology: Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, by Michael Sandel; Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, by Robert Bellah; Between Facts and
Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen
Habermas, in «Sociological Forum», XII, 3, 1997, pp. 497-512.
Lumer C., Habermas’ Diskursethik, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung»,
3473.
3474.
3475.
3476.
3477.
3478.
3479.
3480.
3481.
3482.
3483.
3484.
3485.
3486.
3487.
3488.
3489.
3490.
215
LI, 1, 1997, pp. 42-64.
Lynch R.A., Distinguishing between Legal and Moral Norms: A Central Problem in Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms, in «Philosophy Today», XLI, 1997, pp. 67-72.
Mahadevan K., Richard Rorty’s Discourse on Theory and Self-Creation: A Perspective, in
«Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XXIV, 1, 1997, pp. 25-39.
Mansbridge J., Taking Coercion Seriously, in «Constellations», III, 3, 1997, pp. 407416.
Mansilla H.C.F., El disciplinamiento social como factor del desarrollo histórico: Unavisión
heterodoxa desde el Terce Mundo, in «Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa
Rica», XXXV, 86, 1997, pp. 185-194.
Margarita C., Rawls y habermas: Una disputa en familia, in «Daimon», XV, 1997, pp.
51-62.
Markell P., Contesting Consensus: Rereading Habermas on the Public Sphere, in «Constellations», III, 3, 1997, pp. 377-400.
Martins A.M., Modelos de Democracia, in «Revista Filosofica de Coimbra», VI, 11,
1997, pp. 85-101.
Marzocchi V., Legittimazione o difesa funzionale dei diritti umani?, in «Fenomenologia
e Società», XX, 2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J. Habermas), 1997,
pp. 14-26.
Mason M., Democratising Nature? The Political Morality of Wilderness–Preservationists, in
«Environmental Values», VI, 3, 1997, pp. 281-306.
Massarenti A., Habermas e Dworkin a New York, in «Ilsole24ore», 14.12.1997.
Massarenti A., Il paradosso del fallibilista. Intervista a Karl Otto Apel che contesta all’amico
Habermas di aver abbandonato il terreno dell’etica del discorso, in «Ilsole24ore», 10/8/1997.
McAdams A.J., Germany after Unification: Normal at Last? Daedalus 123: After the
Wall: Germany, the Germans, and the Burdens of History, by Marc Fisher; In Europe’s Name: Germany and the Divided Continent, by Timothy Garton Ash; The
Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas; Germany and Europe: The Crisis of Unity, by
David Marsh, in «World Politics», XLIX, 2, 1997, pp. 282-308.
McCormick J.P., Habermas’ Discourse Theory of Law: Bridging Anglo-American and
Continental Legal Traditions?: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Modern Law
Review», LX, 5, 1997, pp. 734-743
Meehan J., Interpretation and Social Science, in «Human Studies», XX, 4, 1997, pp.
429-440.
Mejia Quintana O., La teoria del derecho y la democracia en Jürgen Habermas: en torno a
“Faktizität und Geltung” in «Ideas y Valores», 103, 1997, pp. 32-52.
Mertens Th., Cosmopolitanism and Citizenship: Kant Against Habermas, in «European
Journal of Philosophy», V, 3, 1997, pp. 328-347.
Metzler M.S., Organizations, democracy, and the public sphere: The implications of democratic (r)evolution at a nuclear weapons facility, in «Communication Studies», 48, 4, 1997, pp.
333-358.
Moggach D., Hegel and Habermas, in «The European Legacy», 2, 3, 1997, pp. 550-
216
3491.
3492.
3493.
3494.
3495.
3496.
3497.
3498.
3499.
3500.
3501.
3502.
3503.
3504.
3505.
3506.
3507.
3508.
3509.
556.
Mora E., Il dilemma tra vita buona e vita giusta: spunti di riflessione a partire dal contributo
di J. Habermas, in Petrillo A. (ed.), Senza scudo: cultura, valori e comunicazione nelle società
contemporanee, Napoli, La città del sole, 1997, pp. 141-152.
Mouzelis N., Social and System Integration: Lockwood, Habermas, Giddens, in «Sociology», 31, 1997, pp. 111-119.
Muguerza Carpintier J., De la conciencia al discurso: ¿un viaje de ida y vuelta? Algunas
reflexiones en torno a la teoría de los usos de la razón práctica en Jürgen Habermas, in
Gimbernat Ordeig J.A. (ed)., La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen Habermas, Madrid,
Biblioteca Nueva, 1997, pp. 63-110.
Muhl E.H., Racionalidade comunicativa e educação emancipada, Campinas, Universidade
Mukherji A., Habermas’ Pragmatic Universals, in «Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research», XIV, 2, 1997, pp. 31-36.
Muñoz Terrón J.M., La controversia sobre la proyección cartográfica de A. Peters y lateoría
habermasiana de los intereses del conocimiento, in «Paideia», XVIII, 41, 1997, pp. 487-505.
Munro D.K., Mediating difference, the political theories of Jürgen Habermas and Charles
Taylor, London (ON), University of Western Ontario, 1997.
Münz-Koenen I., Konstruktion des Nirgendwo: die Diskursivität des Utopischen bei Bloch,
Adorno, Habermas, Berlin, Akademie Verlag, 1997.
Nagy R.L., Diversity, deliberation and agonistic politics, an Arendtian critique of Habermas’
discourse theory, Ottawa, Carleton University, 1997.
Nielsen K., Habermas and Foucault: How to Carry Out the Enlightenment Project, in
«Journal of Value Inquiry», XXXI, 1, 1997, pp. 5-21.
Nieminen H., Communication and democracy: Habermas, Williams and the British case,
Saarijärvi, Gummerus Kiriapaino Oy, 1997.
Nieto Blanco C., La conciencia lingüística de la filosofía: Ensayo de una críticade la razón
lingüística, Madrid, Trotta, 1997.
Niznik J., Sanders J. , Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski, in «Philosophy in Review», XV, 4,1997.
Noys B., Communicative Unreason: Bataille and Habermas, in «Theory, Culture & Society», XIV, 1, 1997, pp. 59-76.
O’Neill S., Impartiality in Context: Grounding Justice in a Pluralist World, Albany
Ortiz de Landázuri C., La sociedad civil ante la ciencia, in «Anuario Filosofico»,
XXX, 3, 1997, pp. 627-658.
Panneerselvam S., Genuine Communication: A Habermasian Approach, in «Indian
Philosophical Quarterly», XXIV, 3, 1997, pp. 373-382.
Papastephanou M., Communicative Action and Philosophical Foundations: Comments on
the Apel-Habermas Debate, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIII, 4, 1997, pp.
41-69.
Paré J., Religion, myth, and rationality: some of Habermas’ views on religion, Montréal,
3510.
3511.
3512.
3513.
3514.
3515.
3516.
3517.
3518.
3519.
3520.
3521.
3522.
3523.
3524.
3525.
3526.
3527.
217
Penner P., Schwierigkeiten mit dem Begriff der Verantwortung: Zum Verhältnis von materialem und formalem Moment in Enrique Dussels Befreiungsethik, in «Concordia: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 31, 1997, pp. 19-36.
Pereppaden J., Habermas’ Philosophy of Liberation, in «Journal of Dharma», XXII, 1,
1997, pp. 74-85.
Petrucciani S., Sul rapporto tra morale e diritto in “Fatti e norme” di Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XX, 2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J. Habermas), 1997, pp. 21-26.
Philipsen H., Stevens F.C.J., Modernization, Rationality and Continuity of Care: Theoretical Concepts and Empirical Findings, in «Sociological Focus», 30, 2, 1997, pp. 189-204.
Phillips K.R., The Past as Future, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Rhetoric Society Quarterly», XXVII, 1, 1997, pp. 94-96
Pickard D., Nietzsche vs. Habermas: Emancipation, Truth, and Ethics, in «New Nietzsche Studies», II, 1-2, 1997, pp. 85-109.
Pippin R.B., Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations, New York, Cambridge
Pius Silier H., Das Unbewältigbare ausdrücklich machen. Zu einer Pragmatik des Geheimnisses; Personenregister, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube.
Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn,
1997, pp. 179-198.
Plevin A., Green Guilt: An Effective Rhetoric or Rhetoric in Transition?, in «Technical
Communication Quarterly», 6, 2, 1997, pp. 125-139.
Poltier H., Morale et bonheur: une conciliation impossible?, in «Studia Philosophica», 56,
1997, pp. 65-81.
Privitera W., Il confronto fra culture: tra fatti e norme, in «Fenomenologia e Società»,
XX, 2 (Diritti umani, democrazia e culture: discutendo con J. Habermas), 1997, pp. 21-26.
Quermonne J.-L., Citoyenneté et nationalité dans l’Union européenne, in Magnette P.
(ed.), De l’étranger au citoyen: construire la citoyenneté européenne, Bruxelles, De Boeck,
1997, pp. 21-31.
Ransom J.S., Forget Vitalism: Foucault and Lebensphilosophie, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIII, 1, 1997, pp. 33-47.
Rehg W.S.J., Legitimacy and Deliberation in Epistemic Conceptions of Democracy: Between
Habermas and Estlund, in «Modern Schoolman», LXXIV, 4, 1997, pp. 355-374.
Rehg W.S.J., Reason and Rhetoric in Habermas’s Theory of Argumentation, in Jost W.,
Hyde M. (eds.), Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time, New Haven, Yale University
Press, 1997, pp. 358-377.
Reigadas M.C., La teoría crítica habermasiana ante el debate liberal/comunitarista, in
«Cuadernos de Etica», 2324, 1997, pp. 43-63.
Reitemeyer U., Zur praktischen Funktion der öffentlichen Bildung: Humboldt, Fichte, Habermas, in «Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Pädagogik», LXXIII, 1, 1997,
pp. 76-89.
Restorff M., Die politische Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, Tectum Verlag, Marburg
1997.
218
3528.
3529.
3530.
3531.
3532.
3533.
3534.
3535.
3536.
3537.
3538.
3539.
3540.
3541.
3542.
3543.
3544.
Riklin A., Politische Ethik, in Kramer H. (ed.), Politische Theorie und Ideengeschichte im
Gespräch, Wien, 1997, pp. 81-104.
Rodríguez Fouz M., La emancipación abreviada: límites en la teoría social de Jürgen
Habermas, in «Política y sociedad», 24, 1997, pp. 61-76.
Rosati M., Il problema dell’integrazione nelle società moderne e complesse, in Trapanese
E.V. (ed.), Sociologia e modernità. Problemi di storia del pensiero sociologico, Roma, Carocci,
1997, pp. 121-143.
Rozahegy M., Habermas and Historical Materialism: An Investigation into the Role of Architecture and Print Technology in the Constitution of the Bourgeois Public Sphere, in «Arachne: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Humanities», 4, 1, 1997, pp. 101-122.
Sáez Rueda L., Lo indisponible y el discurso. El legado de Heidegger en la polémica
modernidad-postmodernidad, in «Revista de Filosofia», 10, 8, 1997, pp. 133-158.
Salter M., Habermas’s New Contribution to Legal Scholarship: Between Facts and
Norms (Factizitat und Geltung), by Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal of Law and Society», XXIV, 2, 1997, pp. 285-305
Savelsberg J.J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory
of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «American Journal of Sociology»,
CII, 6, 1997, pp. 1737-1739
Schelkshorn H., Zwischen Postmoderne und Neoliberalismus: Vorüberlegungen zu einer
Kritischen Theorie der globalen sozialen Frage, in «Dialektik: Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie», 2, 1997, pp. 115-134.
Scheuerman W., Review of Simone Chambers, Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse, in «American Political Science Review», 91,
1997.
Schöttler P., Wer hat Angst vor dem “linguistic turn”?, in «Geschichte und Gesellschaft», XXIII, 1, 1997, pp. 134-151.
Schuon K.Th., Theorie deliberativer Demokratie. Zur Grundstruktur ei–ner modernen
Theorie politischer Institutionen, in Schlüter-Knauer C. (ed.), Die Demokratie überdenken.
Festschrift für Wilfried Röhrich, Berlin, 1997, pp. 75-89.
Sciacca F., Habermas, Jürgen: ‘Vom sinnlichen Eindruck zum symbolischen Ausdruck.
Philosophische Essays’, in «Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto», LXXIV, 2,
1997, pp. 375-377.
Seel M., Well-Being: On a Fundamental Concept of Practical Philosophy, in «European
Journal of Philosophy», V, 1, 1997, pp. 39-49.
Sheppard D., Colonisation du monde vécu chez Habermas, esquisse d’une reproblématisation
des nouveaux mouvements sociaux dans l’œuvre de Habermas, Ville de Québec, Université
Laval, 1997.
Simard S., Les fondements normatifs de la théorie de l’agir communicationnel, le désaccord
entre Jürgen Habermas et Karl-Otto Apel, Ottawa, Université d’Ottawa, 1997.
Skirbekk G., The Discourse Principle and Those Affected, in «Inquiry», XL, 1, 1997, pp.
63-71.
Smith N.H., Strong Hermeneutics: Contingency and Moral Identity, London-New York,
3545.
3546.
3547.
3548.
3549.
3550.
3551.
3552.
3553.
3554.
3555.
3556.
3557.
3558.
3559.
3560.
3561.
219
Sosoé V.A., Critique de la critique habermasienne du droit naturel: Del’impossibilité de la
fondation communicationnelle des droits del’homme sans le droit natural, in «De Philosophia»,
XIII, 1, 1997, pp. 91-115.
Sotelo Martínez I., El pensamiento político de Jürgen Habermas, in Gimbernat Ordeig
J.A. (ed.), La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen Habermas, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva,
1997, pp. 143-197.
Souza J., Patologias da modernidade: um diálogo entre Habermas e Weber, São Paulo,
Annablume, 1997.
Stevenson N., The European Public Sphere: National Culture, Identity and Cultural Citizenship, in «European Studies Journal», XIV, 1, 1997, pp. 47-61.
Sutter H., Bildungsprozesse des Subjekts. Eine Rekonstruktion von Ulrich Oevermanns
Theorie- und Forschungsprogramm, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997.
Sweetman B., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory
of Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Review of Metaphysics», LI, 1,
1997, pp. 153-155.
Swindal J.C., Reflection Revisited. J. Habermas’ Discourse Theory of Truth, New York,
Fordham University Press, 1997.
Tate J.W., Kant, Habermas, and the ‘Philosophical Legitimation’ of Modernity, in «Journal
of European Studies», XXVII, 3, 1997, pp. 281-322.
Terry P.R., Habermas and education: knowledge, communication, discourse, in «Curriculum Studies», 5, 3, 1997, pp. 269-279.
Theobald Ch., Glauben im modus conversationis. Zum Ansatz einer theologischen Theorie
der Moderne, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997, pp.
33-70.
Thielemann U., Die Differenz von Diskurs- und Vertragsethik und die kategorialen Voraussetzungen ideologiekritischer Wirtschaftsethik, “25 Jahre Diskursethik: Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Politik und Wirtschaft”, Luxembourg, Centre Universitaire de Luxembourg, 10-12.12.1993; in Harpes J.-P., Kuhlmann W. (eds.),
Zur Relevanz der Diskursethik. Anwendungsprobleme der Diskursethik in Wirtschaft und Politik, Münster, LIT Verlag, 1997, pp. 271-312.
Tönnies S., Der westliche Universalismus: eine Verteidigung klassischer Positionen, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1997.
Truran M.M., Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and the Relationship between Law and
Religion, in «Capital University Law Review», 26, 1997, pp. 461-481.
Tuomela R., Kommunikatives Handeln und kooperative Ziele, in «Analyse und Kritik»,
XIX, 2, 1997, pp. 153-172.
Turner Ch., Civil Society or Constitutional Patriotism?, in «Democratization», IV, 1,
1997, pp. 115-131; repr. in Fine R., Rai Sh. (eds.), Civil Society: Democratic Perspectives,
New York, Routledge, 1997, pp. 115-131.
van Reijen W., Zerreissprobe: die Postmoderne in der Moderne, in «Zeitschrift für kritische Theorie», 5, 1997, pp. 101-116.
Varoufakis Y., Moral Rhetoric in the Face of Strategic Weakness: Experimental Cluesfor an
220
3562.
3563.
3564.
3565.
3566.
3567.
3568.
3569.
3570.
3571.
3572.
3573.
3574.
3575.
3576.
3577.
Ancient Puzzle, in «Erkenntnis», XLVI, 1, 1997, pp. 87-110.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Ayer y hoy del cosmopolitismo kantiano, in «Isegoría», 16, 1997,
pp. 91-117.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Entre derecho y moral [Microforma]: una reconstrucción del
tratamiento habermasiano de la racionalidad práctica, Madrid, Universidad Autónoma de
Madrid, 1997.
Vetlesen A.J., Worlds Apart? Habermas and Levinas, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIII, 1, 1997, pp. 1-20.
Vijverberg A., Rationalisering, Dissertation PhD, Wageningen University, 1997.
Vitale E., Habermas e le teorie della democrazia, in «Paradigmi», XLIII, 1997, pp. 141155.
Vogel S.M., Jürgen Habermas and Environmental Ethics, University of Maine (Orono), 30.1.1997.
Wagner G., The End of Luhmann’s Social Systems Theory, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXVII, 4, 1997, pp. 387-409.
Walker M.B., A Short Story about Reason: The Strange Case of Habermas and Poe, in
«Philosophy Today», XLI, 3, 1997, pp. 432-445.
Waschkuhn A., Art. zu Habermas, ‘Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit’ und ‘Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns’, in Stammen T., Riescher G., Hofmann W. (eds.), Hauptwerke der politischen Theorie, Stuttgart, 1997, pp. 167-175.
Weinstein M., Decentering and Reasoning, in «Philosophy of Education», 1997, pp.
178-181.
Wellmer A., “Autonomía del significado” y “Principle of charity” desde un punto de vista de
la pragmática del lenguaje, in Gimbernat Ordeig J.A. (ed)., La filosofía moral y política de
Jürgen Habermas, Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 1997, pp. 225-238.
Wessely A., Habermas: Die Einbeziehung des Anderen, in «Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», XLIX, 4, 1997, pp. 799-801.
Wingert L., Idea de una fundamentación comunicativa de la moral desde el punto de vista
pragmático, in Gimbernat Ordeig J.A. (ed)., La filosofía moral y política de Jürgen
Wohlmuth J., Bilderverbot. Theologische Ästhetik und die Theorie des kommunikativen
Handelns, in Arens E. (ed.), Kommunikatives Handeln und christlicher Glaube. Ein theologischer Diskurs mit Jürgen Habermas, Paderborn, Schöningh, Paderborn, 1997, pp. 97118.
Woodiwiss A., Against ‘modernity’: a dissident rant, in «Economy and Society», 26, 1,
1997, pp. 1-21
Young I.M., Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and EnlargedThought,
in «Constellations», III, 3, 1997, pp. 340-363.
1998
3578.
Abbinnett R., Politics and enlightenment: Kant and Derrida on cosmopolitan responsibility,
3579.
3580.
3581.
3582.
3583.
3584.
3585.
3586.
3587.
3588.
3589.
3590.
3591.
3592.
3593.
3594.
3595.
221
in «Citizenship Studies», 2, 2, 1998, pp. 197-222.
Afrasiabi Kavel L., Communicative Theory and Theology: A Reconsideration, in «The
Harvard Theological Review», XCI, 1, 1998, pp. 75-87.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Raison critique ou Raison herméneutique? Une analyse de la controverse
entre Habermas et Gadamer, Paris, Ed. du Cerf, 1998.
Alvarez Yágüez J., Bellum versus agora, in «Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica», 12, 1998, pp. 153-176.
Anderson J.C., Sentimental Bodies: Sex, Gender, and Citizenship in the Early Republic,
Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998.
Apel K.O., Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des Transzendentalpragmatischen Ansatzes, Frankfurt a.M. 1998.
Arens E., Vom Kult zum Konsens: das Religionsverständnis der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, in Tyrell H., Krech V., Knoblauch H. (eds.), Religion als Kommunikation, Würzburg, Ergon Verlag, 1998, pp. 241-272.
Ashenden S., Pluralism within the Limits of Reason Alone? Habermas and the Discursive
Negotiation of Consensus, in «Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy», I, 3, 1998, pp. 117-136.
Baert P., The Spread of Reason: Habermas’s Critical Theory and Beyond, in Id., Social
Theory in the Twentieth Century, New York, New York University Press, 1998, pp.
134-152; tr. it. Il dilagare della ragione. La teoria critica di Habermas e oltre, in Id., La teoria
sociale contemporanea, Bologna, il Mulino, 2002.
Barša P., Fiala P., Civil Disobedience in Contemporary Political Theory. Rawls, Dworkin,
Arendt, Habermas, Brno, Masarykova Universita, 1998.
Baynes K., Comment on Steven Hendley, “Constitutional Patriotism: Habermas’s Conception of a Liberal Political Culture, Eastern APA Meetings, Washington, DC, 2.1998.
Baynes K., Habermas Jürgen, in Craig E. (ed.), The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1998, pp. 193-200.
Bender Ch., Macht – eine von Habermas und Luhmann vergessene Kategorie?, in «Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie», XXIII, 1, pp. 3-19.
Benhabib, S., Habermas: A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, in «Nation»,
CCLXV, 22, 1998.
Berciano Villalibre M., Debate en Torno a la Posmodernidad, Madrid, Ed Síntesis,
1998.
Berlant L., Warner M., Sex in Public, in «Critical Inquiry», XXIV, 2, 1998, pp. 54766.
Bernstein R.J., Faire la part de ce qui sépare Rorty et Habermas et se situer dans l’entredeux, in Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R. (eds.), De Rorty à Jürgen Habermas:
La Modernité en Question, France, Centre culturel international de Cerisy-la-Salle,
1998.
Bianchin M., Ragioni per interpretare. Davidson, Habermas e il liberalismo politico, Seminario di teoria critica, Università di Urbino (PS), 27-28.06.1998; in Costa P., Rosati
M., Testa I. (eds.), Ragionevoli dubbi. La critica sociale tra universalismo e scepsi, Carocci,
222
3596.
3597.
3598.
3599.
3600.
3601.
3602.
3603.
3604.
3605.
3606.
3607.
3608.
3609.
Roma, 2001, pp. 109-124.
Bidet J., La contradiction performative d’une politique sans principe, in Bidet J., Lachaud
J.M. (eds.), Habermas: une politique délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 137-165.
Biondo F., Note a margine della critica di Habermas alla concezione “minima” della democrazia di Bobbio, in «Ragion Pratica», VI, 11, 1998, pp. 219-235.
Bohman J., The Globalization of the Public Sphere, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXIV, 2-3, 1998, pp. 199-216.
Bonacker Th., Die Zweideutigkeit der Demokratie: zur Macht- und Herrschaftsproblematik
bei Jürgen Habermas und Jean-Francois Lyotard, in Imbusch P. (ed.), Macht und Herrschaft: sozialwissenschaftliche Konzeptionen und Theorien, Opladen, Leske & Budrich,
1998, pp. 199-219.
Bonacker Th., Kommunikation zwischen Konsens und Konflikt. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen gesellschaftlicher Rationalität bei Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann, Oldenburg,
BIS-Verlag, 1998.
Bouchindhomme C., Autour d’un «malentendu», in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une politique délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp.
11-30.
Brooke J.L., Reason and Passion in the Public Sphere: Habermas and the Cultural Historians: Civil Tongues and Polite Letters in British America, by David S. Shields; In the
Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making of American Nationalism, by David Waldstreicher; Parades and Politics of the Streets: Festive Culture in the Early Republic,
by Simon P. Newman; Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City
during the Nineteenth Century, by Mary P. Ryan; Arguing about Slavery: The Great
Battle in the United State Congress, by William Lee Miller, in «The Journal of Interdisciplinary History», XXIX, 1, 1998, pp. 43-67
Brunkhorst H., Paradigm-Core and Theory Dynamics in Critical Social Theory, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXIV, 6, 1998, pp. 67-110.
Calhoun C., Explanation in Historical Sociology: Narrative, General Theory, and Historically Specific Theory, in «The American Journal of Sociology», CIV, 3, 1998, pp. 846871.
Cannon R., Rethinking the normative content of critical theory: Marx, Habermas and beyond, London, Middlesex University, 1998; repr. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan,
2001.
Carnell R.K., Feminism and the Public Sphere in Anne Bronte’s The Tenant of Wildfell
Hall, in «Nineteenth-Century Literature», 53, 1, 1998, pp. 1-24.
Casarett D., Daskal F., Lantos J., The Authority of the Clinical Ethicist, in «Hastings
Center Report», 28, 6, 1998, pp. 6-11.
Catania A., Diritto naturale e diritto positivo nella tradizione occidentale. Costituzione e diritti
umani, in «Ragion Pratica», 11, 1998, pp. 123-134.
Ceppa L., Disincantamento e trascendenza, in «Paradigmi», XVI, 48, 1998, pp. 515534.
3610.
3611.
3612.
3613.
3614.
3615.
3616.
3617.
3618.
3619.
3620.
3621.
3622.
3623.
3624.
3625.
3626.
3627.
3628.
3629.
223
Ceppa L., Giustizia come decostruzione: Teubner versus Derrida e Habermas, in «Teoria
politica», XIV, 2, 1998, pp. 89-103.
Ceppa L., Politica deliberativa e globalizzazione democratica, in «Teoria politica», XIV, 3,
1998, pp. 185-192.
Cerroni U., Lo stato democratico di diritto. Modernità e politica, Philos, Roma, 1998.
Chambers S., Contract or Conversation: Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional Crisis, in «Politics and Society», XXVI, 1, 1998, pp. 143-172.
Chmielewki Ph., Responsibility within civil society and range of urban poverty, in «Forum
for Social Economics», 28, 1, 1998, pp. 35-44.
Chriss J.J., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Theory and Society», XXVII, 3, 1998,
pp. 417-425.
Closa C., European Union citizenship and supranational democracy, in Weale A.P.,
Nentwich M. (eds.), Political theory and the European union. Legitimacy, constitutional choice
and citizenship, Routledge, London, 1998, pp. 171-186.
Collier J., Theorising the Ethical Organization, in «Business Ethics Quarterly», VIII, 4,
1998, pp. 621-654.
Colomer Viadel J.L., El análisis del neoconservadurismo en la teoría crítica de J. Habermas,
in «Quaderns de Filosofia i Ciencia», 27, 1998, pp. 109-120.
Constantinides H., Jürgen Habermas, “What is Universal Pragmatics’?, in «Ieee Transactions On Professional Communication», XLI, 2, 1998.
Cooke M., Introduction, in Habermas J., On the Pragmatics of Communication, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 1998, pp. 216-255.
Côté J.F., L’opposition entre système et monde vécu dans la sociologie de Jürgen Habermas et
la médiation idéologique de la communication dans la société contemporaine, in «Carrefour:
Revue de reflexion interdisciplinare», XX, 1, 1998, pp. 37-55.
Cviklová L., Seyla Benhabib and Her Concept of Feminist Communicative Ethics (in
Czech) , in «Filosofický časopis», XLVI, 6, 1998, pp. 1001-1008.
Dahms H.F., Beyond the Carousel of Reification, in «Current Perspectives in Social
Theory», 18, 1998, pp. 3-62.
Dahms H.F., Theory in Weberian Marxism: Patterns of Critical Social Theory in Lukacs
and Habermas, in «Sociological Theory», XV, 3, 1998.
De Roest H., Communicative Identity: Habermas’ Perspectives of Discourse as a Support for
Practical Theology, Kampen, Kok, 1998.
Deflem M., The Boundaries of Abortion Law: Systems Theory from Parsons to Luhmann
and Habermas, in «Social Forces», LXXVI, 3, 1998, pp. 775-818.
DeSouza N., Models of Moral Philosophy: Charles Taylor’s Critique of Jürgen Habermas,
in «Eidos: The Canadian Graduate Journal of Philosophy», XV, 1, 1998, pp. 5578.
Díez Rodríguez S. F., La redefinición del ámbito objetual de la Sociología de Jürgen
Habermas, IV Euskal Soziologia Kongresua, Bilbao, 26-28.2.1998.
Doody J., Fichte, Habermas, and Luc Ferry, in Langsdorf L. (ed.), Reinterpreting the
224
3630.
3631.
3632.
3633.
3634.
3635.
3636.
3637.
3638.
3639.
3640.
3641.
3642.
3643.
3644.
3645.
3646.
3647.
Political: Continental Philosophy and Political Theory, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 1998,
pp.141-54.
Dussel Ambrossini E., Etica Material, Formal y Crítica, in «Utopia y Praxis
Latinoamericana», III, 4, 1998, pp. 7-32.
Dutra D.J.V., O mundo vivido em Habermas, in Pizzi J., Kammer M. (eds.), Ética,
economia e liberalismo, Pelotas, Educat, 1998, pp. 99-112.
Elizabeth S., De Moraes M., Normative universalism as vision in Brazilian International
Schools, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», 30, 5, 1998, pp. 577-592.
Engels E.M., Das universale System der Personalpronomina. Das Fundament für Habermas’ normative Begründung der menschliche Vernunft?, Bern, Lang, 1998.
Eze E.C., Out of Africa: Communication Theory and Cultural Hegemony, in «Telos: A
Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 111, 1998, pp. 139-161.
Fernández S.P., Habermas y la teoría crítica de la sociedad: legado y diferencias en teoría de
la comunicación, in «Cinta de Moebio», 1, 1997.
Fleming M., Habermas’s Reconstruction of Historical Materialism, in Northeast Political
Science Association, Boston, 10.1998.
Fleming M., The Gender Dimensions of Habermas’s Understanding of Social Labor, in
Canadian Philosophical Association, Ottawa, 5.1998.
Flyvbjerg B., Empowering Civil Society: Habermas, Foucault, and the Question of conflict,
in Douglass M., Friedmann J. (eds.), Cities for Citizens: Planning and the Rise of Civil Society in a Global Age, New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1998, pp. 185-211.
Flyvbjerg B., Habermas and Foucault: thinkers for civil society?, in «British Journal of
Sociology», XLIX, 2, 1998, pp. 210-233; tr. es. Habermas y Foucault. ¿Pensadores de la
Socidad Civil?, in «Estudios Sociológicos», XIX, 2, 2001, pp. 295-324.
Forbath W.E., Habermas’s Constitution: A History, Guide, and Critique, in «Law and
Social Inquiry», XXIII, 4, 1998.
Forbath W.E., Habermas’s Constitution: A History, Guide, and Critique: Between
Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy,
by Jürgen Habermas, in «Law & Social Inquiry», XXIII, 4, 1998, pp. 969-1016.
French W., Allbright D., Resolving a Moral Conflict Through Discourse, in «Journal of
Business Ethics», XVII, 2, 1998, pp. 177-194.
Füllsack M., Geltungsansprüche und Beobachtungen zweiter Ordnung: wie nahe kommen sich
Diskurs- und Systemtheorie?, in «Soziale Systeme», IV, 1, 1998, pp. 185-198.
Fultner B., The Politics of Vulnerability: On the Role of Idealization in Butler and Habermas, in «Philosophy Today», XLII, 1998, pp. 94-103.
Gaon S., Pluralizing Universal ‘Man’: The Legacy of Transcendentalism and Teleology in
Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in «The Review of Politics», LX, 4, 1998, pp. 685-718.
Garcia Marza V.D., La dimensio moral de la democracia en ‘Faktizitat und Geltung’ de J.
Habermas, in Casaban Moya E. (ed.), Diputacio Valencia, XII Congres Valencia de
Filosofia, Valencia, 1998.
García Sánchez Á., Apuntes para una crítica ilustrada a Niklas Luhmann, in «Endoxa:
Series Filosoficas», XI, 1998, pp. 271-295.
3648.
3649.
3650.
3651.
3652.
3653.
3654.
3655.
3656.
3657.
3658.
3659.
3660.
3661.
3662.
3663.
3664.
3665.
225
Gerhards J., Konzeptionen von Öffentlichkeit unter heutigen Medienbedingungen, in Jarren
O., Krotz F. (eds.), Öffentlichkeit unter Viel-Kanal-Bedingungen, Baden-Baden, Nomos
Verl.-Ges., 1998, pp. 25-48.
Gimmler A., Institution und Individuum: Zur Institutionstheorie von Max Weber und Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1998.
Giovagnoli R., Significato e sfondo della teoria dell’agire comunicativo di Jürgen Habermas,
in Di Francesco M., Marconi D., Parrini P. (eds.), Filosofia analitica 1996-1998: prospettive teoriche e revisioni storiografiche, Milano, Guerini, 1998, pp. 418-427.
Giri A.K., Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action: From Discourse Ethics toSpiritual Transformation, in «History of the Human Sciences», XI, 3, 1998, pp. 87-113.
Givsan H., Habermas, in Id., Eine bestürzende Geschichte: Warum Philosophen sich durch
den ‘Fall Heidegger’ korrumpieren lassen, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1998,
pp. 18-53.
Gómez Sánchez C., Disidencia ética y desobediencia civil, in «Endoxa: Series
Filosoficas», 10, 1998, pp. 387-409.
Gosepath S., Das Verhältnis von Demokratie und Menschenrecht, in Brunkhorst H.
(ed.), Demokratischer Experimentalismus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 201240.
Gosselin C., Emotion: An Embodied Ethic for Literacy, in «Philosophy of Education», 1998, pp. 436-438.
Greppi A., Sulla critica di Habermas alla concezione liberale della democrazia, in «Teoria
politica», XIV, 2, 1998, pp. 105-120.
Gril P., Die Möglichkeit praktischer Erkenntineis aus Sicht der Disckursheorie. Eine Untershchung zu J. Habermas und R. Alexy, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1998.
Grondin J., Les débuts de la philosophie allemande au Canada français: Contexte et raisons,
in Klibansky R., Boulab-Ayoub J. (eds.), La pensée philosophique d’expression française
au Canada. Le rayonnement du Québec, Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 1998, p.
207-229.
Grosswiler P., McLuhan, Habermas, and the mediated shape of the public sphere, Congress of the Social Sciences and Humanities, Ottawa, University of Ottawa, 1998.
Guerra M. J., Mujer, identidad y reconocimiento, Sta. Cruz de Tenerife, Centro de
Estudios de la mujer, Universidad de La Laguna, 1998.
Günther K., Jürgen Habermas, Ronald Dworkin, ¿Impera el derecho sobre la política?, in
«La Política: Revista de estudios sobre el estado y la sociedad», 4, 1998, pp. 5-22.
Haber S., Habermas et la sociologie, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1998.
Han S.-.J, What does a Critique of Ideology Mean Today?, in Han S.-J. (ed.), Habermas
and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National University Press,
1998, pp. 19-46.
Han S.-J., Four Critical Issues of the Korean Unification : An Extrapolation of Habermas’Lecture, in Han S.-J. (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul,
Seoul Seoul National University Press, 1998, pp. 138-158.
Han S.-J., Habermas’ Critical Theory and Discursive Social Science, in Han S.-J. (ed.),
226
3666.
3667.
3668.
3669.
3670.
3671.
3672.
3673.
3674.
3675.
3676.
3677.
3678.
3679.
3680.
3681.
3682.
Habermas and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National University Press, 1998, pp. 216-241.
Han S.J., Three Tasks of Critical Theory and Korean Development, in Id., (ed.) Habermas
and the Korean Debate, Seoul, Seoul National University Press, 1998, pp. 289-315.
Han S.-J., Three Tasks of Critical Theory and Korean Development, in Han S.-J.
(ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National
Harkin J., In Defance of the Modernist Project in Education, in «British Journal of Educational Studies», XLVI, 4, 1998, pp. 428-439.
Harrington A., Habermas’ Concept of the Lifeworld: A Defense, in Yeager H., (ed),
Technology, Morality and Social Policy, Lewiston, Mellen Press, 1998.
Harrington A., Understanding as dialogue and critique: Juergen Habermas and the philosophy of the human sciences, Oxford, University of Oxford, 1998.
Heath J., What Is a Validity Claim?, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIV,
4, 1998, pp. 23-41.
Hennig E., Das Ausklammern des Sozialen und der Einbezug des Anderen: Jürgen Habermas über Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Staatsbürgerschaft, in «Vorgänge», XXXVII, 1, 1998,
pp. 73-80.
Henriques K.A., Habermas, democracy, rights, and European supranational integration,
observations for North American critical theorists, Toronto, York University, 1998.
Herrera Líma M., En torno al problema del sujeto en Jürgen Habermas, in Aguilar M.
(ed.), Crítica del sujeto, México, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, 1998, pp.
213-226.
Heysse T., Freedom, Transparency and the Public Sphere, in «Javnost - The Public», 5,
4, 1998, pp. 5-18.
Hoffmann S., A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Foreign Affairs», LXXVII, 3, 1998, p. 142.
Hohmann H., Rhetoric in the public sphere and the discourse of law and democracy, in
«Quarterly Journal of Speech», 84, 3, 1998, pp. 358-370.
Horowitz A., Like a Tangled Mobile: Reason and Reification in the Quasi-Dialectical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIV, 1, 1998, pp. 123.
Horster D., Zwei Philosophen, die sich dreißig Jahre lang aneinander rieben. Detlef Horster
führt Jürgen Habermas und Niklas Luhmann zu einem virtuellen Gespräch zusammen, in
«Frankfurter Rundschau», 271, 21.11.1998.
Hutchinson J.N., Ethics and the Not Entirely, in «Philosophy of Education», 1998,
pp. 250-253.
Huttunen R., Heikkinen H.L.T., Between facts and norms: action research in the light of
Jürgen Habermas’s theory of communicative action and discourse theory of justice, in «Curriculum Studies», VI, 3, 1998, pp. 307-322.
Hwang T.-Y., Habermas’ Critical Theory and Another Marx Unveiled: A Confrontation
with Habermas’ Communicative ‘Critical Theory of Society’, in Han S.-J. (ed.), Habermas and
3683.
3684.
3685.
3686.
3687.
3688.
3689.
3690.
3691.
3692.
3693.
3694.
3695.
3696.
3697.
3698.
3699.
3700.
3701.
3702.
227
the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National University Press,
1998, pp. 82-103.
Innes J.E., Information in Communicative Planning, in «Journal of the American Planning Association», 64, 1, March 1998, pp. 52-63.
Ipperciel D., L’idée de pathologie de la société chez Habermas, in «Dialogue: Canadian
Philosophical Review», XXXVII, 3, 1998, pp. 523-544.
Itamar Borges B., Ethos e estado moderno no último Habermas, in «Educacao e
Filosofia», XII, 23, 1998, pp. 75-88.
Jiménez Benítez D., La Reformulación de la crítica de la crítica de la cosificación por J.
Habermas, Cádiz, Universidad de Cádiz, 1998; Barcelona, ETD, 1998.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Facticidad y validez, Madrid,
Trotta, 1998, pp. 9-55.
Jiménez Redondo M., Introducción, in J. Habermas, Mas allá del Estado nacional,
Ciudad de México, Fondo De Cultura Económica, 1998, pp. 7-39.
Johnson P., Carl Schmitt, Jürgen Habermas, and the Crisis of Politics, in «The European
Legacy: Toward New Paradigms», III, 6, 1998, pp. 15-32.
Junker-Kenny M., Argumentationsethik und christliches Handeln: eine praktischtheologische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas, Stuttgart, Verlag W. Kohlhammer,
1998.
Kachur J.L., Habermas’s “Theory of Communicative Action” and Siebren Miedema, Part
Two: An Ideology Critique of Intellectual Appropriation, in «Interchange», XXIX, 3, 1998.
Kavoulakos K., Nature, Science and Technology in Habermas, in «Democracy and Nature», IV, 10, 1998, pp. 112-145.
Kemmis S., System and lifeworld, and the conditions of learning in late modernity, in «Curriculum Studies», 6, 3, 1998, pp. 269-305.
Knell S., Dreifache Kontexttranszendenz. Variationen über ein universalistisches Motiv, in
«Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLVI, 4, 1998, pp. 563-581.
Koller P., Jürgen Habermas über Moral, Staat und Politik, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», LII, 2, 1998, pp. 257-267.
Krasnoff L., Consensus, Stability, and Normativity in Rawls’s Political Liberalism, in
«Journal of Philosophy», 95, 6, 1998, pp. 269-292.
Kraushaar W., Frankfurter Schule und Studenterbewegung, Hamburg, 1998.
Ladmiral J.R., Jürgen Habermas – ou: le changenment de signe de la Théorie critique, in
«Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 43-56.
Lara M.P., Moral textures: feminist narratives in the public sphere, Berkeley-Los Angeles,
University California Press, 1998.
Leet M., Habermas and Critique: Theoretical Bases of a Radical Social Democratic Politics,
St Lucia (QLD), University of Queensland, 1998
Leet M., Jürgen Habermas and Deliberative Democracy, in Carter A., Stokes G. (eds.),
Liberal Democracy and Its Critics, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1998, pp. 77-97.
Lewis W.S., Of Bonding and Bondage, in «International Studies in Philosophy»,
XXX, 2, 1998, pp. 109-115.
228
3703.
3704.
3705.
3706.
3707.
3708.
3709.
3710.
3711.
3712.
3713.
3714.
3715.
3716.
3717.
3718.
3719.
3720.
Lin C.J., A Study on Jürgen Habermas’ Critical Hermeneutics and Its Implication for Comparative Education, Department of Comparative Education, National Chi Nan University, 1998.
Lohmann G., Kritische Gesellschaftstheorie ohne Geschichtsphilosophie? Zu Jürgen Habermas’ verabschiedeter und uneingestandener Geschichtsphilosophie, in Weisenbacher U., Welz
F. (eds.), Soziologie und Geschichte, Opladen, Westdeutschen Verlag, 1998, pp. 197217.
López de la Vieja M.T., El utilitarismo y la Filosofía de J. Habermas: diferencias y algunas
analogías, in «Telos: Revista Iberoamerica de Estudios Utilitaristas», VII, 1, 1998,
pp. 61-84.
López de la Vieja M.T., Etica y validez normativa, in García Castillo P., Trabajos y
días salmantinos, Salamanca, Ed. Anthema, 1998, pp. 285-297.
Löwy M., Habermas et Weber, in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une politique délibérative, in
«Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 105-114.
Luckner A., Ethik- oder Moralprimat? Ein Universalienstreit, in «Philosophische
Rundschau», XLV, 2, 1998, pp. 113-128.
Magatti, M., J. Habermas, “La nuova oscurità. Crisi dello stato sociale e esaurimento delle
utopie”, in «La rivista della cooperazione», 3-4, 1998, pp. 154-155.
Manfred F., Geltungsansprüche und Beobachtungen zweiter Ordnung. Wie nahe kommen
sich Diskurs- und Systemtheorie?, in: «Soziale Systeme», IV, 1, 1998, pp. 185-198.
Mantecón Movellán T.A., Cultura política popular; honor y arbitraje de los conflictos en la
Cantabria rural del antiguo régimen, in «Historia agraria», 16, 1998, pp. 121-151.
Mardones J.M., El Discurso religioso de la modernidad: Habermas y la religión,
Barcelona, AnthroposMéxico, Universidad Iberoamericana, 1998.
Margarito D., Ermeneutica e sociologia: Betti, Gadamer e Habermas, in «Quaderni del
Dipartimento di Scienza dei Sistemi Sociali e della Comunicazione», 4, 1998, pp.
189-211.
Marsh J.L., Toward a Critique of Habermas’s Philosophy of Law, in «Concordia: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 34, pp. 49-60, 1998.
Marzocchi V., La democrazia discorsiva. Inclusione comunicativa, privatezza giuridica e confini statali, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XXI, 3, 1998, pp. 37-58.
McAfee N.C., Subjectivity and Citizenship: Habermas and Kristeva on Agency in the Public
Sphere, Dissertation Abstracts International. Section A: The Humanities and Social
Sciences, LIX, 6, 1998.
McCarthy Th., Habermas, in Critchley S., Schroeder W.R. (eds.), A Companion to
Continental Philosophy, Oxford, Blackwell, 1998, pp. 397-406.
Meynell H., Redirecting Philosophy: Reflections on the Nature of Knowledge from Plato to
Lonergan, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1998.
Middleton P., Recovering Ethical Life – Habermas J. and the future of Critical-Theory –
Bernstein J., in «Textual practice», XII, 1, 1998, pp. 148-163.
Mitchell C., Women’s (Community) Radio as a Feminist Public Sphere, in «Javnost - The
Public», 5, 2, 1998, pp. 73-85.
3721.
3722.
3723.
3724.
3725.
3726.
3727.
3728.
3729.
3730.
3731.
3732.
3733.
3734.
3735.
3736.
3737.
3738.
3739.
3740.
229
Mitchell T., Nationalism, imperialism, economism – a comment on Habermas, in «Public
culture», X, 2, 1998, pp. 417-424.
Moreno Pestaña J.L., Foucault, Habermas y el problema de acción comunicativa,in
Catellanos Ruiz A., Víñez Sánchez A., Sáez Durán J. (eds.), Retórica y texto, Cádiz,
Universidad de Cádiz, 1998, pp. 401-403.
Morris M., Capitalist Society and Its Real Abstractions: The Critique of Reification in Habermas’s Social Theory, in «Rethinking Marxism», 10, 2, 1998, pp. 27-50.
Münster A., Le principe ‘discussion’. Habermas ou le tournant langagier et communicationnel
de la théorie critique, Paris, Éditions Kimé, 1998.
Murphy W.J., Autonomy and Solidarity, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Studies in East
European Thought», L, 2, 1998, pp. 156-157.
Nebreda Requejo J.J., El pensar y la historia, in «Gazeta de antropología», 14, 1998.
Neira H.R., Lo público, lo privado y lo doméstico en el Capitalismo tardío, in «Revista de
Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica», XXXVI, 90, 1998, pp. 601-611.
Niehaus M., Das bessere Argument. Eine Anmerkung zur Logik des Argumentierens bei
Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», CV, 2, 1998.
Nielsen G., La question du Québec, le lien social et la théorie communicationnelle de la démocratie, in «Carrefour», XX, 1, 1998, pp. 109-130.
Niznik J., Sanders J.T. Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski, in «Teaching Philosophy», 21, 4, 1998.
Noguera Ferrer J.A., La transformación del concepto de trabajo en la teoría social. La
aportación de las tradiciones marxistas, Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,
1998.
Nordquist J., Social Theory: A Bibliographic Series, 49 – Jürgen Habermas (III): A Bibliography, Santa Cruz, Reference & Research, 1998.
Nussbaum Ch., Habermas on Speech Acts: A Naturalistic Critique, in «Philosophy
Today», XLII, 2, 1998, pp. 126-145.
Nuyen, A T., The Politics of Emancipation: From Self to Society, in «Human Studies»,
XXI, 1, 1998, pp. 27-43.
Ollig H.L., Habermas und das Religionsproblem: Bemerkungen zu zwei neuen Sammelbänden, in «Theologie und Philosophie: Vierteljahresschrift», LXXIII, 4, 1998, pp.
558-577.
Olson K., Democratic Inequalities: The Problem of Equal Citizenship in Habermas’s Democratic Theory, in «Constellations», V, 2, 1998, pp. 215-233.
Ordaz E., Rogelio G., Implicaciones educativas: teoría de la acción comunicativa en Jürgen
Habermas, Monterrey, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, 1998.
Owen D.S., Habermas’s Developmental Logic Thesis Universal or Eurocentric?, in «Philosophy Today», XLII, 1998, pp. 104-111.
Paik N.-Ch., Habermas on National Unification in Germany and Korea, in Han S.-J.
(ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National
Palti E.J., Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory
230
3741.
3742.
3743.
3744.
3745.
3746.
3747.
3748.
3749.
3750.
3751.
3752.
3753.
3754.
3755.
3756.
3757.
3758.
of Law and Democracy, in «Thesis Eleven», 54, 1998.
Palti E.J., Patroklos’s Funeral and Habermas’s Sentence: Between Facts and Norms:
Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, by Habermas Jürgen,
in «Law & Social Inquiry», XXIII, 4, 1998, pp. 1017-1044
Paré J., Religion, myth, and rationality some of Habermas’ views on religion, Montréal,
Park Y.-D., Insights and Deficiency of Habermas’ Discursive Grammar of Critique : For a
Stronger Dialectic of Critique, in Han S.-J. (ed.), Habermas and the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National University Press, 1998, pp. 47-80.
Pellizzoni L., Conoscenza, deliberazione e cooperazione, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», 4, 1998, pp. 577-620.
Pensky M., The Limits of Solidarity. Habermas, Levinas, and the Moral Point of View, in
NascimentoA. (ed.), A Matter of Discourse: Community and Communication in Contemporary Philosophies, London, Avebury Press, 1998, pp. 129-150.
Petrucciani S., La Dialettica dell’illuminismo cinquant’anni dopo. Note sulla ricezione italiana, in «Nuova Corrente», 121-122, 1998, pp. 133-154.
Pharo P., The limits to social agreement. A look at the Habermas-Rawls debate on political
justice, in «Revue Française de Sociologie», XXXIX, 3, 1998.
Piazza M., Generi e testi: Sul letterario e il filosofico, in «Iride», XI, 25, 1998, pp. 595605.
Pont i Vidal J., La concepsció dels moviments socials en la teoria de Jürgen Habermas, in
«Revista catalana de sociología», 7, 1998, pp. 117-133.
Possenti V., Nove tesi sul pensiero postmetafisico: J. Habermas, in Id., Nichilismo e metafisica: terza navigazione, Roma, Armando, 1998, pp. 203-217; 20042, pp. 217-238.
Pourtois H., Le point de vue moral et le principe d’universalisation. De Kant à Habermas,
Louvain, Société philosophique de Louvain, 25.3.1998, pp. 1-19.
Preuß U.K., Citizenship in the European Union: a Paradigm for Transnational Democracy?, in Archibugi D., Held D., Köhler M. (eds), Re-imagining Political Community,
Privitera W., Democrazia e razionalizzazione del mondo della vita sociale. Una postilla, in
«Fenomenologia e società», XXI, 3, 1998.
Quiniou Y., Morale, étique et politique chez Habermas, in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une
politique délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp.
69-81.
Radl Ph.R., La teoría del actuar comunicativo de Jürgen Habermas: un marco para el análisis
de las condiciones socializadoras en las sociedades modernas, in «Papers: revista de sociología», 56, 1998, pp. 103-123.
Rajchman J., Habermas’s Complaint: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, by
Jürgen Habermas, in «New German Critique», 45, 1988, pp. 163-191
Rasmussen A.M., Kierkegaard und die Subjektivitätstheorien der Gegenwart, in «Kierkegaard Studies: Yearbook», 1998, pp. 345-357.
Raulet G., Néo-communautarisme et cityenneté, in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une politique
3759.
3760.
3761.
3762.
3763.
3764.
3765.
3766.
3767.
3768.
3769.
3770.
3771.
3772.
3773.
3774.
231
délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 57-69.
Reichelt H., Thèses sur la théorie des media dans Théorie de l’agir communicationnel rapportéè à al théorie du droit dans Droit et démocratie, in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une politique
délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 115136.
Renyer i Alimbau J., Aproximació a les tesis de Jürgen Habermas sobre el futur de l’estat
nacional, in «Revista de Catalunya», 135, 1998.
Roberts I., Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociology»,
XXXII, 2, 1998, pp. 413-415
Rochlitz R., Marx, Habermas et la démocratie radicale, in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une
politique délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas, une politique délibérative), 1998, pp.
31- 42.
Rodríguez Fouz M., La opinión pública tras el Estado de Bienestar: Acercamiento al
diagnóstico de Jürgen Habermas, in IV Euskal Soziologia Kongresua, Bilbao, 2628.2.1998, pp. 462-467.
Rodríguez Fouz M., Más allá del Estado nacional by Jürgen Habermas, in «Reis:
Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas», LXXXI, 1, 1998, pp. 212-217.
Rodríguez Fouz M., Memoria y nacionalismo: Una lectura de la construcción de la
identidad nacional en Habermas bajo claves, IV Euskal Soziologia Kongresua, Bilbao,
26-28.2.1998, pp. 915-920.
Rosenfeld M., A Pluralist Critique of Contractarian Proceduralism, in «Ratio Juris», XI,
4, 1998, pp. 291-319.
Rosenfeld M., Overcoming Interpretation through Dialogue: A Critical if Habermas’s Proceduralist Conception of Justice , Id., Just Interpretations: Law between Ethics and Politics,
Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998, pp. 114-149.
Rössler B., The Ache beneath the Smile Literarische Texte und philosophische Imagination,
in «Studia Philosophica», 57, 1998, pp. 133-160.
Rostbøll Ch.F., Human Rights, Popular Sovereignty and Freedom, Copenhagen, Copenhagen Political Studies Press, 1998.
Ryan J., Critical leadership for education in a postmodern world: emancipation, resistance and
communal action, in «International Journal of Leadership in Education», 1, 3, 1998,
pp. 257-278.
Ryu H., Justifying Discourse Ethics in the Public Sphere, in Han S.-J. (ed.), Habermas and
the Korean Debate on Critical Theory, Seoul, Seoul Seoul National University Press,
1998, pp. 242-270.
Sáez Rueda L., Das Unverfügbare und der Diskurs: Heideggers Vermächtnis im Streit von
Moderne und Postmoderne, in «Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie», 30, 1998, pp. 191214.
Salmerón F., The Origins of Analytic Moral Philosophy and Other Essays, Amsterdam,
Rodopi, 1998.
Sanabria J.R., Una Mirada a la ética en este fin de milenio, in «Revista de Filosofia»,
XXXI, 91, 1998, pp. 63-94.
232
3775.
3776.
3777.
3778.
3779.
3780.
3781.
3782.
3783.
3784.
3785.
3786.
3787.
3788.
3789.
3790.
3791.
3792.
3793.
Sanchez A.M., En torno a um libro de J. Habermas, in «Revista de Estúdios
Políticos», 59, 1988, pp. 253-267.
Sarcinelli U., Repräsentation oder Diskurs, in «Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft»,
VIII, 2, 1998, pp. 547-567.
Scambler G., Theorizing modernity: Luhmann, Habermas, Elias and new perspectives on
health and healing, in «Critical Public Health», 8, 3, 1998, pp. 237-244.
Schelkshorn H., Diskursethik und Befreiungsethik heute, in «Concordia: Internationale
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 34, 1998, pp. 15-38.
Schmidt Th.M., Kurzbiographien über Bloch, Gadamer, Habermas, Hegel, Jaspers, Scheler,
Schelling und Wittgenstein in Greschat M. (ed.), Personenlexikon Religion und Theologie,
Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.
Schüle C., Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei Carl Schmitt und Jürgen Habermas,
Neuried, Ars Una, 1998.
Schwinn T., False connections: Systems and action theories in neofunctionalism and in Jürgen
Habermas, in «Sociological Theory», XVI, 1, 1998, pp. 75-95.
Schwinn T., Systems and Action Theories, in «Sociological Theory», XVI, 1, 1998,
pp. 75-95.
Sevilla S., La transformación del espacio de lo político, in «Revista Internacional de
Filosofia Politica», 11, 1998, pp. 79-101.
Shabani A.O.P., Are All Critiques of Reason Irrational?, in «Contemporary Philosophy», XX, 1-2, 1998, pp. 19-30.
Singer B.C. J., Habermas et l’idéologie: Requiem (et plaidoyer) pour un concept, in «Carrefour: Revue de reflexion interdisciplinare», XX, 1, 1998, pp. 11-36.
Sintomer Y., Aux limites du pouvoir démocratique: désobéissance civile et droit à la résistance,
in Bidet J. (ed.), Habermas: une politique délibérative, in «Actuel Marx», 24 (Habermas,
une politique délibérative), 1998, pp. 82-104.
Sintomer Y., La démocratie entre idéal philosophique et réalisme sociologique. La théorie politique de Jürgen Habermas, in Id., La démocratie impossible? Politique et modernité chez Weber
et Habermas, Paris, La Découverte & Syros, 1999, pp. 158-162.
Sitton J., Disembodied Capitalism: Habermas’s Conception of the Economy, in «Sociological Forum», XIII, 1, 1998, pp. 61-83.
Skollerhorn E., Habermas and Nature: The Theory of Communicative Action for Studying
Environmental Policy, in «Journal of Environmental Planning and Management», 41,
5, 1998, pp. 555-573.
Soriano L.M.M., ¿Qué discurso para la moral? Sobre la distinción entre aplicación y
justificación em la teoria del discurso práctico general, in «Cuadernos de Filosofia Del
Derecho», XXI, 1, 1998, pp. 193-208.
Stark T., The Dignity of the Particular: Adorno on Kant’s Aesthetics, in «Philosophy and
Social Criticism», XXIV, 2-3, 1998, pp. 61-83.
Sudarsan P., Habermas and Critical Social Theory, in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XXV, 2, 1998, pp. 253-266.
Swindal J.C., Reconstructing the Enlightenment Project: David Rasmussen’s Immanent Cri-
3794.
3795.
3796.
3797.
3798.
3799.
3800.
3801.
3802.
3803.
3804.
3805.
3806.
3807.
3808.
3809.
233
tique of Aesthetics, Modernity and Law, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIV, 23, 1998, pp. 5-24.
Telman D.A.J., Review of Habermas, Juergen, A Berlin Republic: Writings on Germany, in «H-Net Reviews», 9.1998.
Tepedino Nelson, La ética dialógica de Jürgen Habermas (Paradoja de una idea de
racionalidad) , in «Lógoi», 1, 1998, pp. 105-122.
Tétreault M.A:, Spheres of liberty, conflict and power: The public lives of private persons, in
«Citizenship Studies», 2, 2, 1998, pp. 273-289.
Tewdwr J.M., Allmendinger P., Deconstructing Communicative Rationality: A Critique
of Habermasian Collaborative Planning, in «Environment and Planning», XXX, 11,
1998, pp. 1975-1989.
Thumfart A., Waschkuhn A., Das ambivalente Staatsverständnis in den Gesellschaftstheorien von Jürgen Habermas, in «IfS-Nachrichten», 8, 1998.
Tiwari, D N, Possibility of Disinterested Knowledge-A Bhartrharian Approach, in «Journal
of Indian Council of Philosophical Research», XV, 3, 1998, pp. 47-67.
Torres C.A., Morrow R.A., Paulo Freire, Jürgen Habermas, and critical pedagogy: Implications for comparative education, in «Melbourne Studies in Education», 39, 2, 1998, pp.
1-20.
Underwood R.L., Ozanne J.L., Is your package an effective communicator? A normative
framework for increasing the communicative competence of packaging, in «Journal of Marketing Communications», 4, 4, 1998, pp. 207-220.
Valadier, P., Comptes rendus. J. Habermas, Droit et démocratie. Entre faits et normes, in
«Archives de Philosophie», LXI, 3, 1998.
Vallespín Oña F., Introducción. Una disputa de familia: el debate Rawls-Habermas, in J.
Habermas, J. Rawls, Debate sobre el liberalismo político, Barcelona, Paidós, 1998, pp. 937.
Vallespín Oña F., Pluralismo social y sistema democrático: sobre “Die Einbezichung des
Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie” de Jürgen Habermas, in «Saber leer», 109, 1997,
pp. 10-11.
Vandenberghe F., La théorie critique de Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Une histoire critique de
la sociologie allemande. Tome II : Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, Habermas, Paris, La Découverte & Syros, 1998, pp. 163-296; tr. en. The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas: third
intermediate reflections, in Id., A philosophical history of German sociology, New York,
Routledge, 2009, pp. 207-280.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., El reconocimiento de las minorías. De la política de la diferencia a la
democracia delibertiva, in «Sistema», 142, 1998, pp. 63-85.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Politische Dissidenz und partizipative Demokratie. Zur Rolle des
zivilen Ungehorsams heute, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», LXXXIV,
1, 1998, pp. 87-104.
Verra V., Modernità, in Enciclopedia del Novecento, Vol. XI, Supp. II, Roma, Ist.
Enciclopedia Italiana, 1998.
Vessy D., On the Incompleteness of George Herbert Mead’s Theory of the Social Self as an
Account of Intersubjectivity: Re-reading Henrich after Habermas, Society for PhenomenolLuca Corchia, Department of Political Science, University of Pisa, March 2016
234
3810.
3811.
3812.
3813.
3814.
3815.
3816.
3817.
3818.
3819.
3820.
3821.
3822.
3823.
3824.
3825.
3826.
3827.
ogy and Existential Philosophy, Denver, 1998.
Vitale E., Comunitarismo e democrazia sono compatibili?, in «Ragion pratica», 10, 1998,
pp. 97-113.
Vitale E., Habermas e il diritto natuale, in «Filosofia e questioni pubbliche», IV, 1,
1998, pp. 97-118.
von Schomberg R., Reading Habermas’ Recent Philosophy of Justice, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1998.
von Soosten J., Kommunikation und Religion: Obsoleszenz und Affirmation von Religion
in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, in: hrsg. von Tyrell H., Krech V., Knoblauch H.
(eds.), Religion als Kommunikation, Würzburg, Ergon Verlag, 1998, pp. 273-300.
Wallace A., Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», CVIII, 3, 1998, pp. 622-625.
Waschkuhn A., Demokratietheorien. Politiktheoretische und ideengeschichtliche Grundzüge,
München-Wien, 1998.
Wellmer A., Menschenrechte und Demokratie, in Lohman G., Gosepath S. (eds.), Philosophie der Menschenrechte, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1998, pp. 265-291; tr. en. Democracy, human rights, and the problem of a worldwide civil society, in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp.
359-374.
Westphal M., Commanded Love and Moral Autonomy: The Kierkegaard-Habermas Debate, in «Kierkegaard Studies. Yearbook», 1998, pp. 1-22.
Willke H., Im kalten Frieden der Moderne. Jürgen Habermas über die Chancen der Politik
in der “postnationalen Konstellation”, in «Die Zeit», 42, 8.10.1998, p. 51.
Wolfenstein E.V., Wolfenstein E.V., Reply to Curtis and Kalyvas, in «Political Theory», XXVI, 6, 1998, pp. 825-829.
Wright A., Hermeneutics and Religious Understanding Part Two: towards a critical theory for
religious education, in «Journal of Beliefs & Values», 19, 1, 1998, pp. 59-70.
Wüstehube A., Rationalität und Hermeneutik: Diskursethik, pragmatischer Idealismus,
philosophische Hermeneutik, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 1998
Zimmerli W.Ch., Minek még filozófiatörténet? (Legitimációs problémák mint kiindulópontok a filozófiatörténet egy elméletéhez), in «Magyar Filozofiai Szemle», 456, 1998, pp.
579-606.
Zimmermann R.E., Jürgen Habermas, Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur
politischen Theorie in «Widerspruch», 31, 1998, pp. 137-142.
Zinkin M., Habermas on Intelligibility, in «Southern Journal of Philosophy»,
XXXVI, 3, 1998, pp. 453-472.
Zolo D., I signori della pace. Una critica del globalismo giuridico, Roma, Carocci, 1998.
Zolo D., Il cosmopolitismo kantiano di Jürgen Habermas, in «Ragion Pratica», 10, 1998,
pp. 161-174.
Zurbrugg N., Habermas… Burroughs. Beckett... Foreman, in «Performance Research», 3, 1, 1998, pp. 58-67.
235
1999
3828.
3829.
3830.
3831.
3832.
3833.
3834.
3835.
3836.
3837.
3838.
3839.
3840.
3841.
3842.
3843.
3844.
3845.
Aboulafia M., Law professors read Habermas, in «Denver University Law Review»,
76, 4, 1999, pp. 943-953.
Adams N., Niznik, Jozef and Sanders, John T. (eds.) 1996. Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski, in «Studies in World Christianity», V,
1999, pp. 285-286.
Albrecht C., Behrmann G.C., Bock M., Homann H., Tenbruck F.H., Die Intellektuelle Gründung der Bundesrepublik: eine Wirkungsgeschichte der Frankfurter Schule, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1999.
Alexy R., The Special Case Thesis, in «Ratio Juris», XII, 1999, pp. 374-384.
Allen D.S., Merging law and ethics: Discourse legal theory and freedom of expression in Hurley, in «Communication Law and Policy», 4, 4, 1999, pp. 403-430.
Alway J., No body there: Habermas and feminism, in «Current Perspectives in Social
Theory», 19, 1999, pp. 117-141.
Andolfi F., La riflessione sull’individuo nella filosofia sociale, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale,
27-28.11.1999.
Apel K.O., Zum Verhältnis von Moral, Recht und Demokratie, in Siller P., Keller B.
(eds.), Rechtsphilosophische Kontroverse der Gegenwart, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 1999, pp.
27-40.
Ashenden S., Owen D., Introduction: Foucault, Habermas and the Politics of Critique,
Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 1-20.
Ashenden S., Questions of Criticism: Habermas and Foucault on Civil Society and Resistance, Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue
between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 143-165.
Atkinson G., What is the Frankfurt School?, in «CDR USN», 01-8-1999.
Avila R., Razón, Virtud, Felicidad: La crisis de la metafísica como crisis de la razón y de la
fe, in «Revista de Filosofia», XII, 22, 1999, pp. 43-76.
Avitabile L., Il terzo giudice tra gratuità e funzione. Commenti e traduzioni di V. Jankelevitch, J.P. Satre, J. Habermas, Giappichelli 1999.
Baeten E.M., Rethinking the Socially Constituted Self As the Subject of Ethical Communication, in «Journal of Speculative Philosophy: A Quarterly Journal of History, Criticism, and Imagination», XIII, 1, 1999, pp. 1-18.
Balistreri M., Jürgen Habermas e la clonazione umana, in «Iride: Filosofia e Discussione Pubblica», XII, 28, 1999, pp. 585-601.
Barros do Valle L.H., Avaliação institucional emancipatória: contribuição de Jürgen
Habermas, São Paulo, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 1999.
Barša P., Political Theory of Multiculturalism, Brno, CDK, Czech, 1999.
Baynes K., A Critical Theory Perspective on Civil Society and the State, in Conference on
Civil Society and Government, The Ethikon Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 1.1999.
236
3846.
3847.
3848.
3849.
3850.
3851.
3852.
3853.
3854.
3855.
3856.
3857.
3858.
3859.
3860.
3861.
3862.
3863.
3864.
Beer R., Zwischen Aufklärung und Optimismus: Vernunftbegriff und Gesellschaftstheorie bei
Jürgen Habermas, Wiesbaden, Dt. Univ.-Verl., 1999.
Bégin L., Droits, démocratie et figures du tiers impartila, in «Carrefour: Revue de reflexion interdisciplinaire», XXI, 2, 1999, pp. 53-68.
Bertin A., Il nichilismo e la tradizione democratica occidentale, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XXII, 1999, pp. 22-45.
Biesta G.J.J., Radical Intersubjectivity: Reflections on the Different Foundation of Education,
in «Studies in Philosophy and Education», XVIII, 4, 1999, pp. 203-220.
Blanke Th., Recht und Moral im Kosovo-Krieg: eine Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas, in «Kritische Justiz», XXXII, 3, 1999, pp. 410-425.
Blaug R., Democracy, real and ideal: discourse ethics and radical politics, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1999.
Blindenbacher R., The task dilemma in human service organizations and its impact on efficacy A possible solution developed out of the theory of society of Jürgen Habermas, in «European Journal of Social Work», 2, 2, 1999, pp. 131-138.
Bohman J., Citizenship and Norms of Publicity, in «Political Theory», XXVII, 2,
1999, pp. 176-202.
Bohman J.F., J. Habermas, Marxism and Social Theory: The Case for Pluralism in Critical
Social Science, in von Dews P. (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 53-86.
Bohman J.F., Politics, Anti-Politics, and Principles: Two Forms of Continental Political
Philosophy, in «The Monist 82», 1999, pp. 235-252.
Bookman M., Still facing “the dilemma of the fact”: Gilligan and Habermas (re)visited, in
«Denver University Law Review», LXXVI, 4, 1999, pp. 977-987.
Bouretz P., Raisons et horizons de la democratie. Jürgen Habermas face a la question politique, in «Debat», CIV, 2, 1999, pp. 20-34.
Bowie A., German Philophy Today: Between Idealism, Romanticism and Pragmatism, in
O’Hear A. (ed.), German Philosophy since Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 1999, pp. 357-398.
Briey L.D., Critical reason or hermeneutical reason? An analysis of the controversy between
Habermas and Gadamer, in «Revue Philosophique De Louvain», XCVII, 2, 1999, pp.
385–391.
Brown C.J., Comunicación y política educativa, in «Revista latinoamericana de estudios
educativos», 29, 3-4, 1999, pp. 63-131.
Brunkhorst H., Jürgen Habermas, in Volpi F. (ed.), Grosses Werklexikon der Philosophie, 1, Stuttgart, Kröner, 1999, pp. 603-610.
Buee J.M., Thinking modernity: Essay on Heidegger, Habermas and Eric Weil, in «Revue
Philosophique de Louvain», XCVII, 1, 1999, pp. 166-168.
Calloni M., Filosofie sociali a confronto: il modello analitico e il paradigma continentale, in
Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società:
l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Campbell M.M., Critical Theory and Liberation Theology: A Comparison of the Initial
3865.
3866.
3867.
3868.
3869.
3870.
3871.
3872.
3873.
3874.
3875.
3876.
3877.
3878.
3879.
3880.
3881.
3882.
3883.
237
Work of Jürgen Habermas and Gustavo Gutierrez, New York, Peter Lang, 1999.
Canestrini K., I diritti umani nelle relazioni internazionali tra gli Stati. Analisi comparata
della posizione di Jürgen Habermas, in «Pubblicazioni Centro Studi per la Pace»,
26.5.1999.
Ceppa L., Postfazione, in Habermas J., La costellazione postnazionale. Mercato globale,
nazioni e democrazia (PnK), Milano, Feltrinelli, 1999, pp. 125-134.
Challe E., Jürgen Habermas et le fondement communicationnel du droit, in «Le Philosophoire», IX, 3, 1999, pp. 175-199.
Chambers S., Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse, in
«Review of Metaphysics», LII, 3, 1999.
Chiste K.B., Habermas, modernity and law, in «International Journal of Comparative
Sociology», XL, 2, 1999, pp. 293-295.
Clemente G.B., La Scuola di Francoforte in Italia (1954-1999), in «La Création sociale», 1999.
Cody L.F., The Politics of Reproduction: From Midwives’ Alternative Public Sphere to the
Public Spectacle of Man-Midwirery, in «Eighteenth-Century Studies», 32, 4, 1999, pp.
477-495.
Cohen J., Reflections on Habermas on Democracy, in «Ratio Juris», XII, 4, 1999, pp.
385-416; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas.
Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 325-354.
Coll J.M., Fichte i les ètiques del discurs, in «Comprendre: Revista Catalana de Filosofia», I, 1, 1999, pp. 71-87.
Conway D.W., Pas de deux; Habermas and Foucault in Genealogical Communication,
Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 60-89.
Cooke M., A Space of One’s Own – Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXV, 1, 1999, pp. 22-53.
Cooke M., Habermas, Feminism and the Question of Autonomy, in von Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 178-210.
Cooke M., Kritische Theorie und Religion, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
XLVII, 5, 1999, pp. 709-734.
Cortella L., Dialettica dell’eticità moderna, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Courtois S., Les disciplines herméneutiques et la théorie critique sont-elles des formes de la
rationalité scientifique?, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXVIII, 2,
1999, pp. 297-326.
Cowans J., Habermas and French History: The Public Sphere and the Problem of Political
Legitimacy, in «French History», 13, 2, 1999.
D’Amico R., Contemporary Continental Philosophy, Boulder, Westview Press, 1999.
David C., Kienzler D., Towards an emancipatory pedagogy in service courses and user departments, in «Technical Communication Quarterly», 8, 3, 1999, pp. 269-283.
Davies C., No-mas-Habermas, or ... rethinking Cuban cinema in the 1990s – Reply to John
238
3884.
3885.
3886.
3887.
3888.
3889.
3890.
3891.
3892.
3893.
3894.
3895.
3896.
3897.
3898.
3899.
3900.
3901.
3902.
Hess, in «Screen», XL, 2, 1999, pp. 208-211.
De Angelis G., Die Vernunft der Kommunikation und das Problem einer diskursiven
Ethik: Ueberlegungen über Vernunft, Kommunikation und Ethik in kritischem Anschluss an
die Diskursethik von Juergen Habermas, Dissertation, Heidelberg, 1999.
De Mul J., Romantic Desire in (Post)Modern Art and Philosophy, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 1999.
De Oliveira N.F., Mundo da vida: a apropriaçao habermasiana de Husserl e Wittgenstein,
in «Veritas: Revista de Filosofia», XLIV, 1, 1999, pp. 133-145.
Dean M., Normalising Democracy: Foucault and Habermas on Democracy and Law, Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 166-194.
Delanty G., Self, Other and World: Discourses of Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism, in
«Journal for Cultural Research», III, 3, 1999, pp. 365-375.
Demmerling,Ch., Die Transzendentalpragmatik in der Diskussion, in «Philosophische
Rundschau», XLVI, 3, 1999, pp. 193-204.
Descombes V., Le contrat social de Jürgen Habermas, in «Debat», 104, 1999, pp. 3556.
Devenney M., Critical theory and radical democracy, Essex, University of Essex, 1999.
Dillon M., The Authority of the Hoy Revisited: Habermas, Religion, and Emancipatory
Possibilities, in «Sociological Theory», XVII, 3, 1999, pp. 290-306.
Dreyfus H.L., Kierkegaard on the Internet: Anonymity vs. Commitment in the Present Age,
in «Kierkegaard Studies: Yearbook», 1999, pp. 96-109.
Düringer H., Universale Vernunft und Partikularer Glaube. Eine Theologische Auswertung
des Werkes von Jürgen Habermas, Leuven, Peeters Publishers, 1999.
Dutra D.J.V., Dos fundamentos da ética discursiva: a questão dos argumentos transcendentais
em Habermas, in «Kriterion», XL, 99, 1999, pp. 80-106.
Duvenage P., The Politics of Memory and Forgetting after Auschwitz and Apartheid, in
«Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXV, 3, 1999, pp. 1-28.
Eckersley R., The Discourse Ethic and the Problem of Representing Nature, in «Environmental Politics», VIII, 2, 1999, pp. 24-49.
Ehrenreich N., Fifth Annual Legal Theory Symposium: Exploring Habermas on law and
democracy – Foreword, in «Denver University Law Review», LXXVI, 4, 1999, pp.
927-936.
Eriksen E.O., Weigård J., Kommunikativ handling og deliberativt demokrati. Jürgen Habermas teori om politikk og samfunn, Bergen, Bokforlaget, 1999.
Eriksson E.O., A generic communication model based on Habermas and Searle’s versions of
Speech act Theory, in Proceedings of the fourth International Workshop on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP99), Copenhagen,
Jönköping International Business School, 1999, pp. 43-58.
Estevez J.V., La Concepción de Democracia Participativa en Habermas, in «Revista
Ciencia Politica», XX, 1, 1999, pp. 208-219.
Fadini U., Verso un’antropologia dell’artificiale, Milano, Mimesis, 1999.
3903.
3904.
3905.
3906.
3907.
3908.
3909.
3910.
3911.
3912.
3913.
3914.
3915.
3916.
3917.
3918.
3919.
239
Fairfield P., Deliberative Democracy Jürgen Habermas: The Inclusion of the Other, in «The
Review of Politics», LXI, 3, 1999, pp. 541-543.
Fairfield P., Deliberative Democracy: The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Review of Politics», LXI, 3, 1999, pp.
541-543.
Ferrara A., Il progetto di una filosofia sociale, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Ferrara A., Jürgen Habermas, in Pasquino G. (ed.), Il pensiero politico: idee, teorie, dottrine. Vol. 3. Ottocento e Novecento, Tomo 2, Torino, UTET, 1999, pp. 485-508.
Finlayson G.J., Does Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral Theory Apply to Discourse Ethics?,
in von Dews P. (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp.
29-52.
Finnis J., Natural Law and the Ethics of Discourse, in «Ratio Juris», XII, 4, 1999, pp.
354-373.
Fornari F., Habermas e la sociologia della conoscenza, Working Papers del Dipartimento Istituzioni e Società, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, 1999.
Forst R., Die Rechtfertigung der Gerechtigkeit. Rawls’ Politischer Liberalismus und Habermas’ Diskurstheorie in der Diskussion, in Brunkhorst H., Niesen P. (eds.), Das Recht der
Republik. Festschrift für Ingeborg Maus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 1999, pp. 105-168.
Forst R., Liberalismus/Kommunitarismus, in Sandkühler H.J., (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie, Hamburg, Felix Meiner Verlag, 1999, pp. 780-784.
Forst R., Praktische Vernunft und rechtfertigende Gründe. Zur Begründung der Moral, in
Gosepath S. (ed.), Motive, Gründe, Zwecke. Theorien praktischer Rationalität, Frankfurt
a.M., Fischer, 1999, pp. 168-205.
Forst R., Toleranz, in Sandkühler H.J., (ed.), Enzyklopädie Philosophie, Hamburg,
Felix Meiner Verlag, 1999, pp. 1627-1632.
García Haza D., Etica de la democracia en K-O. Apel: la arquitectura de la ética discursiva
y su contribución a la teoría democrática, in «Anthropos», 183, 1999, pp. 95-99.
García Palacios E.M., Consideraciones teóricas y análisis crítico de la gestión pública de la
ciencia y la tecnología, Velarde J. (ed.), Studia Philosophica, Oviedo, Universidad de
Oviedo, 1999.
García R., ¿Hemos de renunciar a Hegel?, in «Isegoria», 20, 1999, pp. 159-188.
Gaspar C.M., The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the
Rationalization of Society. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Philippine Studies», XLVII, 3, 1999, pp. 407-425.
Gimeno P., La Teoría Crítica de Habermas y la educación: hacia una didáctica críticocomunicativa, in «Conciencia social: anuario de didáctica de la geografía, la historia y
las ciencias sociales», 3, 1999, pp. 13-41.
Gimmler A., Deliberative Demokratie und das Internet, in Drossou O., van Haaren
K., Hensche D., Kubicek H., Mönig-Raane M., Rilling R., Schmiede R., Wötzel
U., Wolf F.O. (eds.), Bund demokratischer Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler e.V.,
in «Machtfragen der Informationsgesellschaft», 1999, pp. 63-69.
240
3920.
3921.
3922.
3923.
3924.
3925.
3926.
3927.
3928.
3929.
3930.
3931.
3932.
3933.
3934.
3935.
3936.
3937.
3938.
Goode L., Politics and the public sphere: the social-political theory of Jürgen Habermas, Nottingham, Nottingham Trent University, 1999.
Gozzi G., Jürgen Habermas e Robert Alexy: morale, diritto e democrazia discorsiva, in Zanetti G. (ed.), Filosofi del diritto contemporanei, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 1999, pp.
287-314.
Greve J., Sprache, Kommunikation und Strategie in der Theorie von Jürgen Habermas, in
«Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», LI, 2, 1999, pp. 232259.
Gröbl-Steinbach E., Habermas’ pargmatische Wende, in «Wiener Jahrbuch für Philosophie», 31, 1999, pp. 257-278.
Guerra Palmero M. J., La disuputa sobre la comunidad o la deriva antifundamentalista del
Continente habermasiano, in «Isegoria», 20, 1999, pp. 67-88.
Guerra Palmero M.J., Mujer, identidad y espacio público, in «Contrastes: Revista
Interdisciplinar de Filosofia», 4, 1999, pp. 45-64.
Günther K., Diskurs, Demokratie und Rechtswirklichkeit, in Siller P., Keller B. (eds.),
Rechtsphilosophische Kontroversen der Gegenwart, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 55-60.
Haas Ch., Materializing Public and Private: The Spatialization of Conceptual Categories in
Discourses of Abortion, in Selzer J., Crowley Sh. (eds.), Rhetorical Bodies, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1999, pp. 218-238.
Haber S., Habermas: les voies de la democratie radicale, in «Magazine Litteraire», 380,
1999.
Haber S., Sociologie critique et éthique de la discussion chez Habermas: vers un rééquilibrage?,
in «Cahiers internationaux de sociologie», 107, 1999.
Harrington A., Some Problems with Gadamer’s and Habermas’ Dialogical Model of Sociological Understanding, in «Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour», XXIX, 4,
1999, pp. 371-**.
Heider P.B., Jürgen Habermas und Dieter Henrich: neue Perspektiven auf Identität und
Wirklichkeit, Freiburg im Breisgau, Alber, 1999.
Hess J., No-mas-Habermas, or ... rethinking Cuban cinema in the 1990s, in «Screen»,
XL, 2, 1999, pp. 203-207.
Hicks D., Langsdorf L., Proceduralist Theories of Public Deliberation: Implications for the
Production of Citizens, in «Argumentation», XIII, 2, 1999, pp. 139-161.
Honneth A., Jürgen Habermas, in Kaessler D. (ed.), Klassiker der Soziologie, Band 2,
München, Beck 1999, pp. 230-251.
Honneth A., Rezension zu Jürgen Habermas, ‘Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung’, in
«DIE ZEIT», 50, 9.12.1999, p. 35.
Horrell D.G., Restructuring human relationships – Paul’s Corinthian letters and Habermas’s discourse ethics, in «Expository Times», CX, 10, 1999, pp. 321–325.
Horster D., Gesellschaftsanalyse oder Gesellschaftsveränderung. Die Habermas-LuhmannDebatte, in «Die Neue Gesellschaft/Frankfurter Hefte», XLVI, 2, 1999, pp. 432435.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas zum 70. Geburtstag, in «Zeitschrift für Philosophie», II,
3939.
3940.
3941.
3942.
3943.
3944.
3945.
3946.
3947.
3948.
3949.
3950.
3951.
3952.
3953.
3954.
3955.
241
3, 1999, pp. 48-55.
Horster D., Jürgen Habermas. Zur Einführung, Hamburg, Junius, 1999.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Apel vs. Habermas: afinando la ética discorsiva, in «Anthropos:
Huellas del conocimiento», 183, 1999, pp. 64-70.
Incenzo A., Thinking of modernity. An essay on Heidegger, Habermas and Eric Weil, in
«Belfagor», LIV, 3, 1999, pp.372-375.
Ingravalle F., Filosofia e globalizzazione, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XXII, 1999,
pp. 3-21.
Jackson N., The council tenants’ forum: A liminal public space between lifeworld and system?,
in «Urban Studies», XXXVI, 1, 1999, pp. 43–59.
Joas H., Combining Value Pluralism with Moral Universalism. Isaiah Berlin and Beyond,
in «The Responsive Community», 9, 1999, pp. 17-29.
Jones M.T., Romancing antiquity: German critique of the enlightenment from Weber to Habermas, in «Journal of The History of The Behavioral Sciences», XXXV, 3, 1999,
pp. 314-315.
Joppke C., Jürgen Habermas: Die postnationale Konstellation. Politische Essays, in «Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», LI, 3, 1999.
Kaufman C., The unforced force of the more familiar argument – A critique of Habermas’theory of communicative rationality, in «Philosophy Today», XLIII, 4, 1999, pp. 348360.
Kavoulakos K., Constitutional State and Democracy: On Jürgen Habermas’s Between Facts
and Norms, in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 96, 1999, pp. 33-41.
Kemp C., Habermas among the Americans: Some reflections on the common law, in «Denver University Law Review», LXXVI, 4, 1999, pp. 961-975.
Kieserling A., Zwischen Soziologie und Philosophie: Jürgen Habermas zum Siebzigsten, in
«Soziale Systeme», V, 2, 1999, pp. 239-250; in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse
an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”,
Klüver J., Schmidt J., Social differentiation as the unfolding of dimensions of social systems,
in «The Journal of Mathematical Sociology», 23, 4, 1999, pp. 309-325.
Kneer G., Struktur und Ereignis bei Jürgen Habermas und Michel Foucault: ein Theorievergleich, in Greshoff R., Kneer G. (eds.), Struktur und Ereignis in theorievergleichender Perspektive: ein diskursives Buchprojekt, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1999.
Knell S., Wahrheitsanspruch und Idealisierung, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», LIII, 2, 1999, pp. 214-235.
Knoche M., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit nicht weiter nach dem Konzentrationsprinzip,
in Wilke J. (ed.), Massenmedien und Zeitgeschichte, Kostanz, UVK Medien, 1999, pp.
731-745.
Koczanowicz L., The Choice of Tradition and the Tradition of Choice: Habermas’ and
Rorty’s Interpretation of Pragmatism, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXV, 1,
1999, pp. 55-70.
242
3956.
3957.
3958.
3959.
3960.
3961.
3962.
3963.
3964.
3965.
3966.
3967.
3968.
3969.
3970.
3971.
3972.
3973.
3974.
Kohler G., Was ist Öffentlichkeit? Zur Bestimmung eines unübersichtlichen Wortfeldes, in
«Studia Philosophica», 58, 1999, pp. 197-217.
Lacoste J., Modernity in questions: From Richard Rorty to Jürgen Habermas, in
«Quinzaine Litteraire», 757, 1999, pp. 19-20.
Ladeira da Costa C., A fundamentação do princípio filosófico de legitimidade jurídica em
Jürgen Habermas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2000.
Lafont C., The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT
Press, 1999.
Lalonde M.P. Critical Theology and the Challenge of Jürgen Habermas: Toward a Critical
Theory of Religious Insight, New York, Peter Lang, 1999.
Lessnoff M.H., Political Philosophers of the Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Blackwell,
1999.
Link J., Diskursive Ereignisse, Diskurse, Interdiskurse: Sieben Thesen zur Operativität der
Diskursanalyse, am Beispiel des Normalismus, in Bublitz H., Bührmann A.D., Hanke
C., Seier A. (eds.), Das Wuchern der Diskurse: Perspektiven der Diskursanalyse Foucaults,
Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 1999, pp. 148-161.
López de la Vieja de la Torre M.T., Argumentos densos, in «Enrahonar», 30, 1999,
pp. 45-55.
Luchi J.P., A superação da filosofia da consciência em J. Habermas: a questão do sujeito na
formação da teoria comunicativa da sociedade, Pontifícia Universitas Gregoriana, Roma,
1999.
Luchi J.P., Superação da filosofia da cosciência em J. Habermas. A questão do sujeito na formação da teoria comunicativa da sociedade, Roma, Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 1999.
Maar W.L., Habermas e a Questão do Trabalho Social, in «Lua Nova», XLVIII, 1,
1999, pp. 33-61.
Mahoney J., Axel Honneth’s Ethical Theory of Recognition, in «International Studies in
Philosophy», XXXI, 1, 1999, pp. 97-110.
Mardones J.M., El discurso religioso de la modernidad: Habermas y la religión, in «Telos:
Revista Iberoamerica de Estudios Utilitaristas», VIII, 1, 1999.
Mardones J.M., El discurso religioso de la modernidad: Habermas y la religión, in «Paideia:
Revista de Filosofia y Didactica Filosofica», XX, 50, 1999.
Marzocchi V., Esiste un punto di vista normativo nella filosofia sociale? , in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Marzocchi V., Le ragioni della critica, in «Filosofia e Questioni Pubbliche», 1, 1999.
Marzocchi V., Per una lettura critica di “Fatti e norme” [su Faktizität und Geltung di
Habermas], in AA.VV., La democrazia discorsiva di J. Habermas. Studi su Fatti e norme,
Roma, Carocci, 1999.
Mathews M.T., The persistence of religious meaning in the critical theory of Jürgen Habermas,
in «Soundings», LXXXII, 3-4, 1999, pp. 383-399.
Matuštík M.J.B., Existence and the Communicatively Competent Self, in «Philosophy and
3975.
3976.
3977.
3978.
3979.
3980.
3981.
3982.
3983.
3984.
3985.
3986.
3987.
3988.
3989.
3990.
243
Social Criticism», XXV, 3, 1999, pp. 93-120.
Maus I., Habermas - zur Rezeption von Theorie, in «Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik», 44, 1999, pp. 727-731.
McCarthy Th., On Reconciling Cosmopolitan Unity and National Diversity, in «Public
Culture», XI, 1, 1999, pp. 175-208; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Melkevik B., Le droit cosmopolitique : la reformulation habermasienne, in «Universitas
Iuris», XXI, 1999, pp. 66-77; repr. in Melkevik B., Rawls ou Habermas. Une question
de philosophie du droit, Ville de Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2002, pp. 135152.
Merten K., Öffentlichkeit in systemtheoretischer Perspektive, in Szyszka P. (ed.), Öffentlichkeit: Diskurs zu einem Schlüsselbegriff der Organisationskommunikation, Opladen,
Michaud Y., Critique et espace public chez Habermas: de la démocratie éclairée a la démocratie radicale, in «Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger», CXXIV, 2,
1999, pp. 211-232.
Michelman F.I., Bedürfen Menschenrechte demokratischer Legitimation?, in Brunkhorst
H., Lutz-Bachmann M. (eds.), Recht auf Menschenrechte, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
1999.
Michelman F.I., Morality, Identity, and “Constitutional Patriotism”, in «Denver University Law Review», 76, 1999, pp. 1009-1028.
Mills J., Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in modern philosophy and psychoanalysis: A study of
Sartre, Binswanger, Lacan, and Habermas, in «Contemporary Psychoanalysis», XXXV,
2, 1999, pp. 342-347.
Mitrović L., New Social Paradigm: Habermas’s Theory Of Communicative Action, in
«Facta Universitatis», 6, 1999, pp. 217-223.
Morales E., La Acción Comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas: Modelo Teórico y Proyecto
Emancipador, in «Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de
Filosofia Iberoamericana y teoria Social», IV, 6, 1999, pp. 67-81.
Moreira L., Fundamentação do direito em Habermas, Belo Horizonte,
Mandamentos/Fortlivros, 1999.
Morgade Salgado M., Influencia de la escuela fenomenológica sobre las actuales teorías del
desarrollo de las capacidades interpersonales, in «Revista de historia de la psicología», XX,
3-4, 1999, pp. 281-290.
Niquet, Marcel, The Logical Relationship between the Spheres of Morals and Law According to Habermasian Discourse Ethics and Critical Sociology: Some ‘Revisionary’ Remarks Concerning Theses in ‘Faktizität und Geltung’ , in «Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia», XL, 99,
1999, pp. 64-79.
Niznik J., Sanders J., Debating the State of Philosophy: Habermas, Rorty and Kolakowski,
in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXVIII, 4, 1999.
Noguera J.A., Adelantado Gimeno J., Reflexionando sobre las relaciones entre política
social y estructura social, in «Papers: revista de sociología», 59, 1999, pp. 71-77.
O’Donnell D., Habermas, critical theory and selves-directed learning, in «Journal of EuLuca Corchia, Department of Political Science, University of Pisa, March 2016
244
3991.
3992.
3993.
3994.
3995.
3996.
3997.
3998.
3999.
4000.
4001.
4002.
4003.
4004.
4005.
4006.
ropean Industrial Training», XXIII, 4-5, 1999.
Oriani R., Habermas: meglio costruire il diritto che fare del bene, in «CaffèEuropa», 33,
1999.
Ortega F.J.G., Habermas versus Foucault. Apontamentos para um debate impossível, in
«Síntese Nova Fase», XXVI, 85, 1999, pp. 239-248.
Ostinelli M., Filosofia sociale e teoria dell’educazione, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’
di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 2728.11.1999.
Owen D., Critical Spirituality: On Ethics and Politics in the Later Foucault, Ashenden
S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and
critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 21-44.
Paltrinieri A., Linguaggio e azione nella teoria dell’agire comunicativo di Jürgen Habermas, in
Belardinelli S. (ed.), Teorie sociologiche dell’azione sociale, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 1999,
pp. 247-291.
Pedroni V., Ragione e comunicazione. Pensiero e linguaggio nella filosofia di Karl-Otto Apel e
Jürgen Habermas, Milano, Guerini e Associati, 1999.
Pensky M., Jürgen Habermas and the Antinomies of the Intellectual, in von Dews P.
(ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York, Blackwell, 1999, pp. 211-238.
Pensky M., Truth and Interest: On Habermas’s ‘Afterword’ to Nietzsche’s Theory of
Knowledge, in Babich B.E. (ed.), Nietzsche’s Epistemological Writings and the Philosophy of
Science. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1999, pp. 265273; repr. in Babich B.E. (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche, and Critical Theory, New York,
Amherst, 2004, pp. 69-80.
Pérez Gállego C., Ideología y actuación en Habermas, in «Mar oceana», 3, 1999, pp.
115-126.
Petrucciani S., Il posto della filosofia sociale nella ricerca filosofica, in Istituto filosofico
‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Petrucciani S., Morale, diritto e democrazia nella teoria politica di Habermas, in «La Cultura», XXXVII, 1, 1999, pp. 65-89.
Privitera W., Società civile e democratizzazione: un approccio di filosofia sociale, in Istituto
filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di
filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Pulcini E., Il Sé mimetico e il falso riconoscimento, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società: l’idea di filosofia sociale, 2728.11.1999.
Rahmanian A., Debating the state of philosophy: Habermas, Rorty, and Kolakowski, in
«Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXVIII, 4, 1999, pp. 890-893.
Rasmussen D., Accomodating Republicanism, in «Denver University Law Review»,
76, 1999, pp. 955-960.
Reed D., Stakeholder Management Theory: A Critical Theory Perspective, in «Business
Ethics Quarterly», IX, 3, 1999, pp. 453-483.
4007.
4008.
4009.
4010.
4011.
4012.
4013.
4014.
4015.
4016.
4017.
4018.
4019.
4020.
4021.
4022.
4023.
4024.
4025.
245
Rehg W., Intractable Conflicts and Moral Objectivity: A Dialogical, Problem-Based Approach, in «Inquiry», XLII, 2, 1999, pp. 229-257.
Rehg W.S.J., Habermas on Law and Democracy, in Gray C.B. (ed.), Philosophy of Law:
An Encyclopedia. Vol 1, New York, Garland, 1999, pp. 341-342.
Reichenbach R., Demokratisches Selbst und Dilettantisches Subjekt. Demokratische Bildung und Erziehung in der Spätmoderne, Freiburg, Freiburg Universität, 1999.
Reichenbach R., Postmodern Knowledge, Modern Beliefs, and the Curriculum, in «Educational Philosophy and Theory», XXXI, 2, 1999, pp. 237-244.
Reis Wanderley F., Racionalidade não discursiva?, in «Revista Brasileira De Ciências
Sociais», XIV, 39, 1999, pp. 177-178.
Renaut A., Les transformations de la philosophie allemande, in Id. (ed.), Les philosophies
politiques contemporaines, Paris, Calmann-Levy, 1999, pp. 129-148.
Richter H., Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas, in Brodocz A.,
Schaal G.S. (eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 1999,
pp. 69-93.
Rodríguez Espinosa G., Habermas y Rorty en torno al universalismo, in «Laguna», 1,
1999, pp. 183-192.
Rodríguez Fouz M., Materiales de la historia. El Guernica, Habermas y algunos apuntes
sobre el simbolizar electivo, in Gatti G., Martínez de Albeniz I. (eds.), Las astucias de la
identidad. Figuras, territorios y estrategias de lo social contemporáneo, Bilbao, Universidad del
País Vasco, 1999, pp. 215-229.
Rollet J., L’intégration Républicaine by Jürgen Habermas, in «Esprit», 8-9, 255-256,
1999, pp. 222-225.
Rosati M., Figure del sacro: l’idea di solidarietà tra teoria sociale classica e filosofia sociale, in
Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, X Incontro di studi – Pensare la società:
l’idea di filosofia sociale, 27-28.11.1999.
Rosati M., Habermas e le radici prelinguistiche della solidarietà: il nucleo durkheimiano della
teoria dell’agire comunicativo, in Working Papers del Seminario di Teoria sociale, 2, Facoltà di
scienze politiche, Università di Perugia, 1999.
Rosen M., Utopia in Frankfurt, in «Times Literary Supplement», 8.10.1999, pp. 34.
Rustin C., Habermas, discourse ethics, and international justice, in «Alternatives-Social
Transformation And Humane Governance», XXIV, 2, 1999, pp. 167-192.
Ryan Ph., Discourse, Democracy (and Socialism?): A Reading of Habermas’s Between Facts
and Norms, in «Studies in Political Economy», 60, 1999, pp. 121-138.
Salter M., Neo-Fascist Legal Theory on Trial: An Interpretation of Carl Schmitt’s Defence
at Nuremberg from the Perspective of Franz Neumann’s Critical Theory of Law, in «Res Publica: A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy»,V, 2, 1999, pp. 161-194.
Santana Pérez J.M., Pérez Rodríguez A.M., Habermas y Foucault: modernidad,
postmodernidad y teoría de la Historia, in «Vegueta», 4, 1999, pp. 103-116.
Sartea C., Né uguali né diversi: cittadini. Una riflessione sull’ultimo Habermas, in «Rivista
internazionale di filosofia del diritto», LXXVI, 3, 1999, pp. 467-486.
Schaal Gary S., Strecker D., Die politische Theorie der Deliberation: Jürgen Habermas, in
246
4026.
4027.
4028.
4029.
4030.
4031.
4032.
4033.
4034.
4035.
4036.
4037.
4038.
4039.
4040.
4041.
Brodocz A., Schaal G.S. (eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart I, Opladen, UTB
Verlag, 1999, pp. 69-93.
Scheuerman W., Between Radicalism and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Habermas’s
Between Fact and Norms, in von Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, Oxford,
Blackwell, 1999, pp. 153-177; repr. in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 61-85.
Scheunemann E., Vom Denken der Natur. Natur und Gesellschaft bei Habermas,
Münster-Hamburg-London, Lit, 1999.
Schmalz-Bruns R., Deliberativer Supranationalismus. Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des
Nationalstaats, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», VI, 2, 1999, pp. 185244.
Schmidt Th.M., Vernünftige Moral und kritische Gesellschaftstheorie - Zur Philosophie von
Jürgen Habermas’, in «Forschung Frankfurt», 3, 1999, pp. 44-51.
Schutz A., Moss P.A., Habermas, Arendt, and the Tension between Authority and Democracy in Educational Standards: The Case of Teaching Reform, in «Philosophy of Education», 1999, pp. 266-275.
Seel M., Ein Entfesselungskünstler (zum 70. Geburtstag von Jürgen Habermas), in
«Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung», 18.6.1999, p. 54.
Sequeira J.F., Hermeneutic understanding as a discipline of dialogue: the philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer and his polemics with Jürgen Habermas, Roma, Pontificia
Universitas S.Thomae in Urbe, 1999.
Shaw B.J., Habermas and religious inclusion – Lessons from Kant’s moral theology, in «Political Theory», XXVII, 5, 1999, pp. 634-666.
Singh R.P., Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas: A Critique of Enlightenment Rationality,
in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XXVI, 3, 1999, pp. 381-394.
Sintomer Y., De Weber à Habermas, modernité et démocratie, Paris, La Découverte,
1999.
Sloterdijk P., Die Kritische Theorie ist tot. Offener Brief an Thomas Assheuer und Jürgen
Habermas, in «Die Zeit», 9.9.1999; tr. en. Critical theory is dead (Open letter to Jürgen Habermas, part 2), in «Revista de Occidente», 228, 2000, pp. 93-100.
Šmausová G., Komunikatívní jednání a komunikatívní racionalita v díle J. Habermase, in
«Filosofický časopis», XLVII, 3, 1999, pp. 473-485.
Stables A., Scott W., Environmental Education and the Discourses of Humanist Modernity: Redefining Critical Environmental Literacy, in «Educational Philosophy and Theory»,
XXXI, 2, 1999, pp. 145-155.
Stephens C., Cobb A., A Habermasian approach to justice in organizational change: Synthesizing the technical and philosophical perspectives, in «Journal of Organizational Change
Management», XII, 1, 1999, pp. 21-31.
Steuerman E., The Bounds of Reason. Habermas, Lyotard and Melanie Klein on rationality, London-New York, Routledge, 1999.
Stojanov K., Personal Identity and Social Change: Toward a Post-Traditional Lifeworld, in
«Philosophy in the Contemporary World», VI, 1, 1999, pp. 55-60.
4042.
4043.
4044.
4045.
4046.
4047.
4048.
4049.
4050.
4051.
4052.
4053.
4054.
4055.
4056.
4057.
4058.
247
Stolorow R.D., Orange D.M., Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in modern philosophy and
psychoanalysis: A study of Sartre, Binswanger, Lacan, and Habermas, in «Journal of The
American Psychoanalytic Association», XLVII, 2, 1999, pp. 605-609.
Strydom P., Review: The Contemporary Habermas - Towards Triple Contingency?, in «European Journal of Social Theory», II, 2, 1999, pp. 253-263.
Strydom P., Triple Contingency: The Theoretical Problem of the Public in Communication
Societies, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXV, 2, 1999, pp. 1-25.
Sudarsan P., The Logistics of Argumentation: Habermas and Nyaya (A Comparison), in
«Indian Philosophical Quarterly », XXVI, 3, 1999, pp. 355-368.
Susa O., Lifeworld, metaphysics and the ethics of nature in Habermas – Commentary, in
«Filosofický časopis», XLVII, 2, 1999, pp. 293-298.
Swindal J., Reflection Revisited: Jürgen Habermas’s Discursive Theory of Truth, New York,
Fordham University Press, 1999.
Tamanaha B.Z., The view of Habermas from below: Doubts about the centrality of law and
the legitimation enterprise, in «Denver University Law Review», LXXVI, 4, 1999, pp.
989-1008.
Taylor C., Comment on Jürgen Habermas’ “From Kant to Hegel and Back Again”, in
«European Journal of Philosophy», VII, 2, 1999, pp. 158-163; in Ungureanu C.,
Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011,
pp. 193-199.
Terra R.R., Notas sobre sistema e modernidade – Kant e Habermas, in «Revista de
Filosofia Política», 1999, pp. 58-64.
Thompson S., The Agony and the Ecstasy: Foucault, Habermas and the Problem of Recognition, Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 195-210.
Tully J., To Think and Act Differently: Foucault’s Four Reciprocal Objections to Habermas’
Theory, Ashenden S., Owen D. (eds.), Foucault contra Habermas: recasting the dialogue between genealogy and critical theory, London, Sage, 1999, pp. 90-142.
Twardella J., Experiments in the hothouse of modern literature. Attempting an analysis of
Goethe’s’ Wahlverwandtschaften’ based on Habermas’ theory of communication, in «Neophilologus», LXXXIII, 3, 1999, pp. 445-460.
Unzueta Alberdi I., Evaluación y calidad educativa desde el enfoque crítico de J. Habermas,
in «Inguruak: Soziologia eta zientzia politikoaren euskal aldizkaria», 23, 1999, pp.
115-156.
Vallespín F., Introducción, in Habermas J., Rawls J., Debate sobre el liberalismo político,
Barcelona, Paidós, 1998.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., De la fascinación jurídica a la obsesión democrática, in «Revista de
Libros», 25, 1.1999, pp. 22-23
Velasco Arroyo J.C., El lugar de la razón práctica en los discursos de aplicación de normas
jurídicas, in «Isegoria», 21, 1999, pp. 49-68.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., Orientar la acción. La significación política de la obra de Habermas,
in J. Habermas, La inclusión del otro. Estudios de teoría política, Barcelona, Paidós, 1999,
pp. 11-22.
248
4059.
4060.
4061.
4062.
4063.
4064.
4065.
4066.
4067.
4068.
4069.
4070.
4071.
4072.
Velek J., Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for civil society? Comment, in «Filosofický
časopis», XLVII, 6, 1999, pp. 973-**.
Villoria C., Historia, acción, razón: Teoría de la evolución social e historia en el pensamiento
de J. Habermas, in AA.VV., Hermenéutica y acción, Valladolid, Ed. Junta de CyL, 1999,
pp. 61-13.
von Dews P., Introduction, in Id. (ed.), Habermas: A Critical Reader, New York,
Blackwell, 1999, pp. 1-25.
von Dews P., Lifeworld, metaphysics and the ethics of nature in Habermas, in «Filosofický
časopis», XLVII, 2, 1999, pp. 277-293.
Wagner P.A., Re-Engineering the Teaching Profession, in «Philosophy of Education»,
1999, pp. 276-280.
Wegierski M., Reasonable democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the politics of discourse, in
«Review of Metaphysics», LII, 3, 1999, pp. 667-668.
Weinberger O., Legal Validity, Acceptance of Law, Legitimacy, in «Ratio Juris», XII, 4,
1999, pp.336-353.
Weinert F., Habermas, Science and Modernity, in O’Hear A. (ed.), German Philosophy
since Kant, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 329-235.
Wellmer A., Die Wahrheit über die Wahrheit. Gibt es einen Wirklichkeitsbezug, der allen
Menschen gemeinsam ist? Über das neue Buch von Jürgen Habermas, in «Die Zeit», L, 9-121999.
Williams H., Kant, Rawls, Habermas and the Metaphysics of Justice, in «Kantian Review», 3, 1999, pp. 1-17.
Wood N., Public Memory and Postconventional Identity, in Id., Vectors of Memory: Legacies of Trauma in Postwar Europe, Oxford, Berg, 1999, pp. 39-60.
Zolo D., A Cosmopolitan Philosophy of International Law? A Realist Approach, in «Ratio Juris», XII, 4, 1999, pp. 429-444.
Zolo D., La “filosofia della guerra umanitaria” da Kant ad Habermas, in «Iride», XII,
27, 1999, pp. 249-253.
Zurn Ch.F., Lingering Paternalism in Habermas’s ‘Purely Procedural’ Account of Judicial
Review, 7th Annual Critical Theory Roundtable, University of Toronto, 23.10.1999.
2000
4073.
4074.
4075.
4076.
Aguirre Oraa J.M., Pensar con Gadamer y Habermas, in «Revista Portuguesa de
Filosofia», LVI, 3-4, 2000, pp. 489-507.
Ahearn D.O., Urban Empowerment As Public Participation: The Atlanta-Project and
Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action, in «Annual of The Society of Christian Ethics», 20, 2000, pp. 349-368.
Allen A., Reconstruction or Deconstruction? A Reply to Johanna Meehan, in «Philosophy
and Social Criticism», XXVI, 2000, pp. 53-60.
Anderson J., The “Third Generation” of the Frankfurt School, in «Intellectual History
Newsletter», XXII, 2000.
4077.
4078.
4079.
4080.
4081.
4082.
4083.
4084.
4085.
4086.
4087.
4088.
4089.
4090.
4091.
4092.
4093.
4094.
4095.
249
Andrews C.W., Revisiting Guerreiro Ramos’s the New Science of Organizations through
Habermasian Lenses: A Critical Tribute, in «Administrative Theory & Praxis», XXII,
2, 2000, pp. 246-272.
Arato A., Rosenfeld M., Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, in
«Ethics», CX, 3, 2000.
Arens E., Junker-Kenny M., Argumentationsethik und christliches Handeln. Eine
praktisch-theologische Auseinandersetzung mit Jürgen Habermas, in «International Journal of Practical Theology», 4, 2000, p. 154.
Avio K., Scarcity, Discourses of Implementation, and Habermasian Law and Democracy, in
«Ratio Juris», XIII, 2, 2000, pp. 148-161.
Badie B., Vers la responsabilité cosmopolitique? À propos de Habermas, Après l’Etatnation, in «Temps Modernes», LV, 610, 2000, pp. 95-104.
Bartholini I., Jürgen Habermas: quando la razionalità comunicativa fonda le regole dell’ethos,
in Guarnieri G. (ed.), Abitare la società: etica e sociologia, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2000,
pp. 374-411.
Bartholini I., Jürgen Habermas: quando la razionalità comunicativa fonda le regole dell’ethos,
in Porcu S. (ed.), Ritratti d’autore: un’introduzione interdisciplinare alla sociologia, Milano,
FrancoAngeli, 2000, pp. 449-507.
Bartlett S.R., Discursive Democracy and a Democratic Way of Life, in Hahn L.E. (ed.),
Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 367-386.
Bartlett S.R., Habermas and Dewey on Democracy, in «The Southwest Philosophy
Review», XVII, 1, 2000, pp. 145-152.
Bartlett S.R., Pluralism, procedure, and participation: A Deweyan critique of Habermas’
discursive democracy, Southern Illinois University of Carbondale, 2000.
Baynes K., Jürgen Habermas: il paradigma dell’agire comunicativo, in «Political Theory»,
XXVIII, 4, 2000, pp. 451-466.
Beilharz P., On the Pragmatics of Communication, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXIX, 5, 2000, pp. 758-759
Berry H., An Early Coffee House Periodical and its Readers: the Athenian Mercury, 1691–
1697, in «The London Journal», 25, 1, 2000, pp. 14-33.
Bertland A., Habermas and Vico on Mythical Thoughts, in Hahn L. (ed.), Perspectives on
Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 71-87.
Bhattachary D.P., Critical reflections for environmental decision making: Habermas, participation and rationality, London, University College London, 2000.
Blanke Th., Theorie und Praxis. Der Philosoph im Handgemenge, in Müller-Doohm S.
(ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 486-521.
Blaug R., Citizenship and Political Judgment: Between Discourse Ethics and Phronesis, in
«Res Publica», VI, 2, 2000, pp. 179-198.
Bloch L.-R., Setting the Public Sphere in Motion: The Rhetoric of Political Bumper Stickers
in Israel, in «Political Communication», 17, 4, 2000, pp. 433-456.
Bohman J.F., Demokratischer und methodologischer Pluralismus. Eine pragmatische Interpretation der kritischen Forschung, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft:
250
4096.
4097.
4098.
4099.
4100.
4101.
4102.
4103.
4104.
4105.
4106.
4107.
4108.
4109.
4110.
Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 299-327.
Bohman J.F., Distorted Communication: Formal Pragmatics as a Critical Theory, in Hahn
L. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 3-20.
Bohman J.F., Habermas, in Audi R. (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Bohman J.F., The Division of Labor in Democratic Discourse: Media, Experts and Deliberative Democracy, in Costain A., Chambers S. (eds.), Deliberation, Democracy and the
Media, Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, 2000, pp. 47-64.
Bohnen A., Handlungsprinzipien oder Systemgesetze: über Traditionen und Tendenzen theoretischer Sozialerkenntnis, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2000.
Boisvert D., Le concept husserlien de monde vécu intersubjectif dans la théorie des systèmes de
Niklas Luhmann et dans la théorie de l’agir communicationnel de Jürgen Habermas, Ville de
Québec, Université Laval, 2000.
Boito M.E., El pensamiento de Nietzche como crítica de racionalidad y de cultura en la
Teoría de la Acción Comunicativade Jürgen Habermas, in «Portal: producciones en estudios
sociales», 1, 2000, pp. 101-122.
Bonacker T., Ungewißheit und Unbedingtheit. Zu den Möglichkeitsbedingungen des Normativen, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von
Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp.
107-143.
Brandom R., Facts, norms, and normative facts: A reply to Habermas ‘From Kant to Hegel:
On Robert Brandom’s Pragmatic Philosophy of Language’, in «European Journal of Philosophy», VIII, 3, 2000, pp. 356-374; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther
K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2001, pp. 19-38.
Brown T., Roberts L., Memories are Made of This: Temporality and practitioner research,
in «British Educational Research Journal», 26, 5, 2000, pp. 649-659.
Buee J.M., Thinking modernity. Essay on Heidegger, Habermas, and Eric Weil, in «Critique», LVI, 636, 2000, pp. 389-402.
Calloni M., A che serve la filosofia? Recensione di J. Habermas: Profili Politico-Filosofici, in
«Reset», 62, 2000, pp. 94-95.
Calloni M., Rawls, Dworkin and Habermas in answer to feminist critique, in LSE, Seminar on Social Justice and Cultures, London, 29.2.2000; tr. it. Liberali e democratici di fronte
alle critiche di genere: le risposte di Rawls, Dworkin e Habermas, in Gessa-Kurotschka V.,
Ferrara A., Maffettone S. (eds.), Etica individuale e giustizia, Napoli, Liguori, 2000,
pp. 189-210.
Cameron, W.S.K, Fallibilism, Rational Reconstruction, and the Distinction between Moral
Theory and Ethical Life, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open
Court Press, 2000, pp. 175-194.
Canestrini N., Legittimità tramite legalità. Il nesso tra diritto e democrazia nella teoria discorsiva di Jürgen Habermas, Ferrara, Università degli Studi di Ferrara, 2000.
Carabante Muntada J.M., Las grandes categorías conceptuales de la teoría de la sociedad de
4111.
4112.
4113.
4114.
4115.
4116.
4117.
4118.
4119.
4120.
4121.
4122.
4123.
4124.
4125.
251
Jürgen Habermas, Madrid, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2010.
Carr A., Critical theory and the management of change in organizations, in «Journal of Organizational Change Management», XIII, 3, 2000, pp. 208-220.
Casamitjana M., Puigvert L., Soler M., Tortajada I., Investigar y transformar: CREA,
Centro de Investigación Social y Educativa, in «Cultura y Educación», 12, 1-2, 2000, pp.
117-128.
Cepeda M., El otro, el permanente excluido en los procedimientos de justificación de
Habermas y de Rawls, in Cortés Rodas F., Monsalve Solórzano A. (eds.),
Multiculturalismo: los derechos de las minorías culturales, Murcia, Res Pública, 2000, pp.
259-276.
Ceppa L., Movimentismo versus cittadinanza, in «Teoria politica», XVI, 2, 2000, pp.
180-184; repr. as Postfazione: Movimentismo versus cittadinanza: due modelli radicali di democrazia, in Id., Dispense habermasiane. Sommari da «Fatti e norme», Torino, Trauben,
2009, pp. 123-**.
Ceppa L., Postfazione, in Habermas J., Profili politico-filosofici (PPP), Milano, Guerini
e Associati, 2000, pp. 285-292.
Clarke E., Virtuous Vice: Homoeroticism and the Public Sphere, Durham, Duke University Press, 2000.
Cloete M., Is Habermas a transcendental thinker? The question of the possibility of rationality as a philosophical theory, in «South African Journal of Philosophy», XIX, 2, 2000,
pp. 95-117.
Cobben P.G., Hegel and Habermas on Rights: A Critical Comparison of Their Basic Conceptions, in «Synthesis Philosophica», XV, 1-2, 2000, pp. 227-251.
Coles R., Of Democracy, Discourse, and Dirt Virtue: Developments in Recent Critical
Theory Endgames: The Irreconcilable Nature of Modernity. Essays and Lectures,
by Albrecht Wellmer; Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, by
Michel Rosenfeld; The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, by Jürgen
Habermas; On the Pragmatics of Communication, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Political
Theory», XXVIII, 4, 2000, pp. 540-564
Compton J., Communicative Politics and Public Journalism, in «Journalism Studies, I, 3,
2000, pp. 449-467.
Cooke M., Critical Theory and Religion, in Phillips Z.D., Tessin T. (eds.), Philosophy of
Religion in the Twenty-First Century, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000, pp. 211243.
Cooke M., Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy, in «Political Studies», XLVIII,
5, 2000, pp. 947-969.
Cooren F., Toward another ideal speech situation: A critique of habermas’ reinterpretation of
speech act theory, in «Quarterly Journal of Speech», LXXXVI, 3, 2000, pp. 295-317.
Costa Granell V.J., El lugar de la tradición en la sociología contemporánea: Archer,
Habermas y Giddens, Universitat de València, 2000.
Critchley S., Remarks on Derrida and Habermas, in «Constellations», VII, 4, 2000,
pp. 455-465; repr. as Frankfurt Impromptu – Remarks on Derrida and Habermas, in
Thomassen L.A. (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader, Edinburgh University Press,
2006, pp. 98-110; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I,
252
4126.
4127.
4128.
4129.
4130.
4131.
4132.
4133.
4134.
4135.
4136.
4137.
4138.
4139.
4140.
4141.
4142.
4143.
London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Crowley J., Jürgen Habermas, L’intégration républicaine. Essais de théorie politique, in «Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research», 13, 2, 2000, pp. 207211.
Champeau C., Habermas et le libéralisme, in «Commentaire», XCI, 3, 2000, pp. 577586.
Chan A.K.L., Confucian Ethics and the Critique of Ideology, in «Asian Philosophy», 10,
3, 2000, pp. 245-261.
Chavagneux Ch., Après l’Etat-nation, une nouvelle constellation du politique,
Jürgen Habermas, in «Alternatives Economiques», 180, 2000.
Cheng C.Y., Confucian Reflections on Habermasian Approaches: Moral Rationality and
Inter-Humanity, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court
Press, 2000, pp. 195-234.
Chevigny P.G., Law and Politics in “Between Facts and Norms”, in Hahn L.E. (ed.),
Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 309-322.
da Cunha Pinent C.E., A racionalidade fragmentada e a proposta de Habermas, in
«Educaçao», XXIII, 40, 2000.
de Oliveira N.F., Critique of Public Reason Revisited: Kant as Arbiter between Rawls and
Habermas, in «Veritas: Revista de Filosofia», XLV, 4, 2000, pp. 583-605.
de Vos L., Jürgen Habermas and Dieter Henrich. New perspectives on identity and reality, in
«Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie», LXII, 3, 2000, pp. 607–609.
de Weck R., Kulturkampf (Günter Grass, Jürgen HAbermas y sus antagonistas), in
«Revista de Occidente», 228, 2000, pp. 108-112.
Delanty G., Modernity and postmodernity: knowledge, power and the self, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 2000.
Detel W., System und Lebenswelt bei Habermas, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 175-200.
Detmer D., Habermas and Husserl on Positivism and the Philosophy of Science, in Hahn
L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 515-530.
Dews P., Die Entsublimierung der Vernunft als Habermas’ Leitgedanke, in MüllerDoohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 144-174.
Dryzek J.S., Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford,
Oxford University Press, 2000.
Dussel E., The Formal Thought of Jürgen Habermas from the Perspective of a Universal
Material Ethics, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court
Press, 2000, pp. 235-255.
Englund, T., Rethinking democracy and education: towards an education of deliberative citizens, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXXII, 2, 2000, pp. 305–313.
Esmark A., Offentlighed eller system? Hvilken rolle har den politiske journalistik i demokratiet?, in Pedersen O.K. et. al. (eds.), Politisk Journalistik, Center for Journalistik og
Efteruddannelse, Danmarks Journalisthøjskole, Ajour, 2000, pp. 60-86.
4144.
4145.
4146.
4147.
4148.
4149.
4150.
4151.
4152.
4153.
4154.
4155.
4156.
4157.
4158.
4159.
4160.
253
Farmer L., Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, in «Social & Legal
Studies», IX, 4, 2000, pp.583–586.
Ferrara A., Giustizia e giudizio, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2000.
Ferry J.-M., La loi de l’argument meilleur peut-elle valoir comme loi morale?, in «Divinatio», 11 (Dossier Jürgen Habermas, médiations et tensions entre factualité et normativité), 2000.
Ferry J.M., La question de l’Etat européen, Paris, Gallimard, 2000.
Finke S.R.S., Habermas and Kant: Judgment and Communicative Experience, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVI, 6, 2000, pp. 21-45.
Finlayson J.G., Modernity and morality in Habermas’s discourse ethics, in «Inquiry»,
XLIII, 3, 2000, pp. 319-340; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II.
Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Finlayson J.G., What are ‘Universalizable Interests’?, in «Journal of Political Philosophy», VIII, 4, 2000, pp. 456-469; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Fleming M., Communicative Action and Social Labor, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on
Flyvbjerg B., Ideal Theory, Real Rationality: Habermas Versus Foucault and Nietzsche,
Political Studies Association’s 50th Annual Conference, The Challenges for Democracy
in the 21st Century, London School of Economics and Political Science, 1013.4.2000.
Fraga M.L., A empresa produtiva e a racionalidade substantiva: a teoria da ação comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas no ambiente organizacional interativo, Porto Alegre, Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2000.
Freundlieb D., Naturalismus und Realismus nach der sprachpragmatischen Wende: Habermas’ Rückkehr zur theoretischen Philosophie, in «Prima Philosophia», XIII, 3, 2000,
pp. 267-277.
Freundlieb D., Why Subjectivity Matters: Critical Theory and the Philosophy of the Subject,
in «Critical Horizons», 1, 2, 2000, pp. 229-245.
Gabaude J.M., Modernity in questions. From Richard Rorty to Jürgen Habermas, in «Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger», CXXV, 4, 2000, pp. 522-523.
Gaillard F., Poulain J., Schusterman R., La modernité en questions: De Richard Rorty à
Jürgen Habermas, in «Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger», CXC, 4,
2000.
Garvey T.G., The value of opacity: A Bakhtinian analysis of Habermas’s discourse ethics, in
«Philosophy and Rhetoric», XXXIII, 4, 2000, pp. 370-390.
Garz D., Kritik, Hermeneutik, Rekonstruktion. Über den Stellenwert der Methode bei Jürgen Habermas, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das
2000, pp. 201-217.
Giegel H.J., Normative Orientierungen und sozialwissenschaftliche Erkenntnis. Rückblick
auf Erkenntnis und Interesse, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M.,
254
4161.
4162.
4163.
4164.
4165.
4166.
4167.
4168.
4169.
4170.
4171.
4172.
4173.
4174.
4175.
4176.
4177.
4178.
Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 42-70.
Giesen K.G.,The post-national constellation – Jürgen Habermas and second modernity, in
«Temps Modernes», LV, 610, 2000, pp. 105-119.
Gillan G., Communicative Action Theory and the Possibility of Theology, in Hahn L.E.
(ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 113-122.
Giovagnoli R., Habermas: agire comunicativo e Lebenswelt, Milano, Carocci, 2000.
Gosling D., Using Habermas to Evaluate Two Approaches to Negotiated Assessment, in
«Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education», 25, 3, 2000, pp. 293-304.
Gottschalk-Mazouz N., Diskursethik: Theorien, Entwicklungen, Perspektiven, Berlin,
Akademie Verlag, 2000.
Graham P., The transcendence of a border: How West German intellectuals debated reunification, in «Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics», 16, 4, 2000, pp.
21-44.
Grant C.B., Discursive democracy as the political taming of globalisation?: On recent political
essays by Jürgen Habermas, in «Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe», 8, 2, 2000, pp. 133-148.
Grönert P., Habermas über Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung, in «Dialektik. Zeitschrift
für Kulturphilosophie», 1, 2000, pp. 175-180.
Guerra Palmero M.J., Una apuesta por el feminismo global, in «Leviatán: Revista de
hechos e ideas», 80, 2000, pp. 101-116.
Gueye S.P., Public space and deliberative democracy – Rethinking policies in a socialist society
with help from Jürgen Habermas, in «Pensée», 321, 2000, pp. 71-81.
Gunnarsson L., Discoursing About Discourse, in Id., Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 109-126;
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Gunnarsson L., Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier, Cambridge,
Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Günther K., Verantwortlichkeit in der Zivilgesellschaft, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das
Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und
Haas T.J., Towards a Democratically Viable Conception of Publicness: The Case of Public
Journalism, Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: The Humanities and
Social Sciences, LXI, 1, 2000.
Haber S., Critical reason or hermeneutical reason? An analysis of the controversy between
Habermas and Gadamer, in «Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger»,
CXXV, 4, 2000, pp. 517-518.
Hands J.N., Postmodernism, reason and truth: an investigation into the legitimation crisis,
Manchester, Manchester Metropolitan University, 2000.
Hannen M., Marx, Habermas, and democratic theory, in «International Studies In Philosophy», XXXII, 1, 2000, pp. 99-111.
Harrington A., Objectivism in hermeneutics? Gadamer, Habermas, Dilthey, in «Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXX, 4, 2000, pp. 491-507.
4179.
4180.
4181.
4182.
4183.
4184.
4185.
4186.
4187.
4188.
4189.
4190.
4191.
4192.
255
Heck J.N., As Recepções de Tugendhat e Habermas da doutrina kantiana do direito, in
«Síntese Nova Fase», XXVII, 89, 2000, pp. 349-374.
Heming R., Systemdynamiken, Lebenswelt und Zivilgesellschaft - Zeitdiagnostische Aspekte
der Gesellschaftstheorie von Jürgen Habermas, in Schimank U., Volkmann U. (eds.), Soziologische Gegenwartsdiagnosen 1: eine Bestandsaufnahme, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 2000,
pp. 57-73.
Hendley S., From Communicative Action to the Face of the Other: Levinas and Habermas
on language, obligation, and community, in Hendley S., Lanham Md., Lexington Books,
2000.
Hennis W., Replik auf Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Politikwissenschaft und politisches Denken, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck Verlag, 2000, pp. 289-296.
Henry P.M., Language, and Habermasian Rationality: Another Africana Contribution, in
Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 89112.
Hewitt M.A., Reasons without Consolation: The Misappropriation of the Discourse Theory
of Jürgen Habermas and Their Implications for the Study of Religion, in Jensen T., Rothstein
M. (eds.), Secular Theories on Religion: A Selection of Recent Academic Perspectives, Copenhagen, Museum Tusculanum Press, 2000, pp. 33-50.
Hickman L.A., Habermas’s Unresolved Dualism: “Zweckrationalität” As “Idée Fixe”, in
Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp.
501-514.
Höffe O., Between Facts and Norms, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Mind», CIX, 435,
2000, pp. 608-614
Høibraaten H., Der Begriff der Macht bei Jürgen Habermas, mit einem Seitenblick auf
Hannah Arendt, Arendt-Symposiums vom Herbst 2000; in Frank M., Mahrdt H.,
Neumann B. (eds.), The Angel of History Is Looking Back, Würzburg, Königshausen
& Neumann, 2001.
Horowitz A., How can Anyone be Called Guilty? Speech, responsibility, and the social relation in Habermas and Levinas, in «Philosophy Today» XLIV, 3, 2000, pp. 295-317;
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Huff T.E., The Internet and the Public Sphere: Technologies of Control or Liberation and
Development, in «Hybridity: Journal of Cultures, Texts and Identities», I, 1, 2000, pp.
2-16.
Ingram D., Individual Freedom and Social Equality: Habermas’s Democratic Revolution in
the Social Contractarian Justification of Law, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas,
Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 289-308; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther
K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 375388.
Innamorati M., La posizione di Habermas e le critiche di Grünbaum, in Id., Psicoanalisi e
filosofia della scienza. Critiche epistemologiche alla psicoanalisi, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2000,
pp. 43-52.
Jaffrelot Ch., Habermas (Jürgen). Après l’État-nation. Une nouvelle constellation
politique, in «Critique internationale», VII, 1, 2000, pp. 74-75.
256
4193.
4194.
4195.
4196.
4197.
4198.
4199.
4200.
4201.
4202.
4203.
4204.
4205.
4206.
4207.
4208.
4209.
Jakobi T., Ansätze der Theorie deliberativer Demokratie, Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, 2000.
Jiménez Redondo M., El pensamiento ético de J. Habermas, Valencia, Episteme,
2000.
Johnson J., The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The American Political Science Review», XCIV, 2, 2000, pp. 448-449.
Johnson P., Discourse Ethics and the Normative Justification of Tolerance, in «Critical
Horizons», 1, 2, 2000, pp. 281-305.
Kaghan W., Invention, Innovation, and Emancipation: Research Worlds and Trajectories of
Social Change, in «Technology Analysis & Strategic Management», 12, 3, 2000, pp.
343-347.
Kalyvas A., The politics of autonomy and the challenge of deliberation: Cornelius Castoriadis
versus Jürgen Habermas, in «Temps Modernes», LV, 609, 2000, pp. 71-103.
Kauppinen A.M., Ethics in the Second Person - Habermas and the Sources of Normativity,
Helsinki, University of Helsinki, 2000.
Keller B., Im Taumel der Freiheit: Demokratie und Reprasentation bei Jürgen Habermas, in
«Der Staat», XXXIX, 2, 2000, pp. 185-208.
Keller R., Poferl A., Habermas fightin’ waste. Problems of alternative dispute resolution in
the risk society, in «Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning», II, 1, 2000, pp.
55-67.
Kellner D., Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention, in
259-288.
Kelly E., Habermas on Moral Justification, in «Social Theory and Practice», XXVI, 2,
2000, pp. 223-249.
Keulartz F.W.J., Jürgen Habermas, in Doorman M., Pot H. (eds.), Filosofen van deze
tijd, Amsterdam, Bert Bakker, 2000, pp. 230-247.
Kim S.-E., Communication, culture and the Korean public sphere, Sussex, University of
Sussex, 2000.
Ku A.S., Revisiting the Notion of “Public” in Habermas’s theory – Toward a theory of politics of public credibility, in «Sociological Theory», XVIII, 2, 2000, pp. 216-240.
Ladeur K.H., Discursive Ethics as Constitutional Theory. Neglecting the Creative Role of
Economic Liberties?, in «Ratio Juris», XIII, 1, 2000, pp. 95-116.
Lafont C., How Cognitivist is Discourse Ethics?, in International Conference on Discourse Ethics: New Developments and Applications, Universidad Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 28-31.8.2000; in Niquet M., Herrero F., Hanke M.
(eds.), Diskursethik. Grundlegungen und Anwendungen, Würzburg, Königshausen &
Neumann, 2001, pp. 135-144.
Lafont C., Procedural Justice? Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse
Ethics, in VIII Critical Theory Roundtable, University of Kentucky, 27-29.10.2000;
in 45th Annual Congress of the Canadian Philosophical Association, Université
Laval, Ville de Québec, 24-27.5.2001; repr. in «Philosophy and Social Criticism»,
XXIX, 2, 2003, pp. 167-185; repr in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch.
4210.
4211.
4212.
4213.
4214.
4215.
4216.
4217.
4218.
4219.
4220.
4221.
4222.
4223.
4224.
4225.
4226.
4227.
257
Lafuente Guantes M.I., Comprensión y autorreflexión. Dos términos de la recepción de
Husserl por Habermas, in. Actas del V Congreso de Fenomenología: Signo, intencionalidad,
verdad. 100 años de Fenomenología, Sevilla, 6-10.11.2000, Sociedad Española de
Fenomenología & Departamento de Metafísica y Corrientes Actuales de la
Filosofía, Etica y Filosofía Política, y la Facultad de Filosofía de la Universidad de
Sevilla & Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 2005, pp.
455-464.
Lajoie N., Le débat entre Jürgen Habermas et John Rawls, une analyse des divergences entre
la théorie discursive et le libéralisme politique, Ville de Québec, Université Laval, 2000.
Lakeland P.F., Critical theology and the challenge of Jürgen Habermas: Toward a critical
theory of religious insight, in «Theological Studies», LXI, 2, 2000, pp. 392-393.
Langsdorf L., The Real Conditions for the Possibility of Communicative Action, in Hahn
L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 21-50.
Larmore Ch., Habermas und der Pragmatismus, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 328-343.
Lassman P., Enlightenment, Cultural Crisis, and Politics: The Role of the Intellectuals from
Kant to Habermas, in «The European Legacy», 5, 6, 2000, pp. 815-828.
Latiolais C., Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, in «Ethics», CX, 3,
2000, pp. 602-605.
Latiolais Ch., The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, by Jürgen.
Habermas, in «Ethics», CX, 4, 2000, pp. 834-838
Lavine Th.Z., Philosophy and the Dialectic of Modernity, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives
on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 139-156.
Lemaitre C., El Fallah-Seghrouchni A., A Multiagent Systems Theory of Meaning
Based on the Habermas/Buhler Communicative Action Theory, in «Lecture notes in computer science», 1952, 2000.
Leydesdorff L., Luhmann, Habermas and the theory of communication, in «Systems Research and Behavioral Science», XVII, 3, 2000, pp. 273-288.
Lima H.P., O conceito de razão em Habermas, in «Revista Symposium», 4, 2000, pp.
22-33.
Maar W.L., O primeiro Habermas: Trabalho e interação na evolução emancipatória da
humanidade, in «Trans/Form/ Ação: Revista de Filosofia», 23, 2000, pp. 69-95.
Macey D., The Penguin dictionary of critical theory, London, Penguin, 2000.
MacKendrick K., The Moral Imaginary of Discourse Ethics, in «Critical Horizons», 1,
2, 2000, pp. 247-269.
MacKenzie I., Beyond the communicative turn in political philosophy, in «Critical Review
of International Social and Political Philosophy», 3, 4, 2000, pp. 1-24.
Madison G.B., Critical Theory and Hermeneutics: Some Outstanding Issues in the Debate,
in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp.
463-486.
Maguire M., The state regulation of United Kingdom teacher education in the nineteenth cen-
258
4228.
4229.
4230.
4231.
4232.
4233.
4234.
4235.
4236.
4237.
4238.
4239.
4240.
4241.
4242.
4243.
4244.
4245.
tury: The interplay of ‘value’ and ‘sense’, in «International Studies in Sociology of Education», 10, 3, 2000, pp. 227-242.
Mah H., Phantasies of the public sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of historians, in «Journal
of Modern History», LXXII, 1, 2000, pp. 153-182.
Marazzi B., Comunicare il sacro: Religione e postmodernità in Jürgen Habermas, in «Studia
patavina», XLVII, 3, 2000, pp. 657-678.
Markell, Making Affect Safe for Democracy? On “Constitutional Patriotism”, in «Political
Theory», XXVIII, 1, 2000, pp. 38-58.
Marsh J.L., What’s Critical about Critical Theory?, in Hahn L. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Indianapolis, Open Court, 2000, pp. 555-567.
Martin B., Eurocentrically Distorted Communication, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on
Marzocchi V., Per un’etica pubblica. Giustificare la democrazia, Napoli, Liguori, 2000.
Maturo A., L’equivoco della comunicazione, in Cipolla C. (ed.), Principi di sociologia, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2000, pp. 117-153.
Matuštík M.B., The Critical Theorist as Witness: Habermas and the Holocaust, IAPL –
International Association of Philosophy and Literature, the State University of
New York at Stony Brook, 10.5.2000; repr. in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 339-366.
McAfee N., Habermas, Kristeva, and Citizenship, in «Journal of Speculative Philosophy», 17, 2, 2000.
McBride W.L, Habermas and the Marxian Tradition, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives
McCumber J., Centrality as a Challenge to Ousia in Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Philosophy
and Freedom: Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault, Bloomington, Indiana University
Press, 2000, pp. 75-90; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I,
McCumber J., Philosophy and Freedom: Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault, Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 2000.
Mcmahon C., Discourse and Morality, in «Ethics», 110, 2000, pp. 514-536.
Meehan J., Feminism and Habermas’ Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVI, 3, 2000, pp. 39-52.
Meehan J., Feminism and Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy Social Criticism», XXVI, 3, 2000, pp. 39-52; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Mendieta E., Modernity’s Religion: Habermas and the Linguistification of the Sacred, in
123-138
Metsaars, J., Communicatief handelen in niet-moderne samenlevingen: een vergelijking van
Jürgen Habermas’ visie met enkele cultureel-antropologische benaderingen, Tilburg, University
of Tilburg, 2000.
Mills J., Tsamenyi M., Communicative Action and the Accounting/Marketing Interface in
Industry, in «Journal of Applied Management Studies», 9, 2, 2000, pp. 257-273.
4246.
4247.
4248.
4249.
4250.
4251.
4252.
4253.
4254.
4255.
4256.
4257.
4258.
4259.
4260.
4261.
4262.
4263.
259
Moellendorf D., Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in
«South African Journal of Philosophy», XIX, 2, 2000, pp. 65-74.
Molina F., Apuntes para una sociología de la educación intercultural, in «Cultura y
Educación», 12, 1-2, 2000, pp. 167-179.
Mouffe Ch., Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism, in «Reihe Politikwissenschaft», 72, 2000, pp. 1-27.
Mouffe Ch., For an Agonistic Model of Democracy, in Id., The Democratic Paradox,
London, Verso, 2000, pp. 80-107; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Müller J.-W., Another Country: German Intellectuals, Unification and National Identity,
London, Yale University Press, 2000.
Müller-Doohm S. Kritik in kritischen Theorien. Oder: Wie kritisches Denken selber zu
rechtfertigen sei, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse der Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das
2000, pp. 71-106.
Murphy M., Fleming T., Between Common and College Knowledge: Exploring the boundaries between adult and higher education, in «Studies in Continuing Education», XXII, 1,
2000, pp. 77-93.
Murray P., Enlightenment Roots of Habermas’ Critique of Marx, in Meikle S. (ed.), The
Modern Schoolman, Vol. LVII, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2000, pp. 1-24.
Nanz P., L’Europa a più voci: una concezione dialogica della sfera pubblica, in «il Mulino»,
4, 2000, pp. 641-652.
Neves M., From consent to dissent: the democratic constitutional state beyond Habermas, in
Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury,
Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Neves M., Zwischen Themis und Leviathan: eine schwierige Beziehung: eine Rekonstruktion
des demokratischen Rechtsstaates in Auseinandersetzung mit Luhmann und Habermas, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verl.-Ges., 2000.
Nullmeier F., Sozialstaat und soziale Wertschtzung, in Id., Politische Theorie des Sozialstaats, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 2000, pp. 322-420.
O’Neill S., Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, in «Political Studies»,
XLVIII, 3, 2000, pp. 576–578.
O’Neill S., The Politics of Inclusive Agreements: Towards a Critical Discourse Theory of
Democracy, in «Political Studies», XLVIII, 3, 2000, pp. 503-521.
Oelschlagaer M., Habermas in the “Wild, Wild West”, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives
Oevermann U., Das Verhältnis von Theorie und Praxis im theoretischen Denken von Jürgen Habermas - Einheit oder kategoriale Differenz?, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 411-464.
Outhwaite W., Jürgen Habermas, in Ritzer G. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Major
Social Theorists, Oxford, Blackwell, 2000, pp. 651-669.
Outhwaite W., Rekonstruktion und methodologischer Dualismus, in Müller-Doohm S.
260
4264.
4265.
4266.
4267.
4268.
4269.
4270.
4271.
4272.
4273.
4274.
4275.
4276.
4277.
4278.
4279.
4280.
(ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 218-241; tr. en. Reconstructive Science and Methodological Dualism in the Work of Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophical Inquiry», XXXVIII, 1-2, 2014, pp. 2-18.
Palerm J.R., An Empirical-Theoretical Analysis Framework for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment, in «Journal of Environmental Planning and Management», 43, 5, 2000, pp. 581-600.
Palmer R.E., Habermas Versus Gadamer? Some Remarks, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 487-499.
Pensky M., Cosmopolitanism and the Solidarity Problem: Habermas on National and Cultural Identities, in «Constellations», VII, 1, 2000, pp. 64-79; repr. in Rasmussen
D.M., Swindal J. (eds.), Critical Theory, New York, Sage Publications, 2003.
Pereda C., Assertions, Truth, and Argumentation, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on
Perona Á.J., Ruptura de relaciones y exceso de demandas: La polémica Gadamer-Habermas,
in «Logos», 2, 2000, pp. 253-275.
Peters B., Normative Theorien und soziale Empirie, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das
Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und
Petrucciani S., Introduzione a Habermas, Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2000.
Pinzani A., Diskurs und Menschenrechte: Habermas’ Theorie der Rechte im Vergleich,
Hamburg, Kovaè, 2000.
Pisarello G., Las afinidades constitucionales de Habermas, in «Jueces para la democracia», 39, 2000, pp. 50-56.
Pleasants N., Winch and Wittgenstein on Understanding Ourselves Critically: Descriptive
not Metaphysical, in «Inquiry», 43, 3, 2000, pp. 289-317.
Portillo Sánchez M., Opinión pública y democracia. Dos miradas: el modelo normativo de
Habermas y el modelo psicosocial de Noelle-Neumann, in «Razón y palabra», 18, 2000.
Possenti V., Metafisica, problema della verità, pragmatica trascendentale, in Id., Il problema
della metafisica. Annuario di filosofia 2000, Milano, Mondadori, 2000.
Poupeau F., Reasons for domination, Bourdieu versus Habermas, in Fowler B. (ed.),
Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, Oxford, Blackwell, 2000, pp. 69-87.
Power M., Habermas und das Problem der transzendentalen Argumentation. Eine Neubewertung, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk
von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000,
pp. 242-273.
Preyer G., Lebenswelt – System – Gesellschaft . Konstruktionsprobleme der “Theorie des
kommunikativen Handelns” von Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Verlag Humanities
Online, 2000.
Puig-Samper Mulero M.A., Alejandro de Humboldt en el mundo hispánico: las polémicas
abiertas, in «Debate y perspectivas», 1, 2000.
Rahbari M., Modernity and morality, a study on the moral foundations of modern societies in
the works of Durkheim, Weber, Foucault, Habermas and Kant, Toronto, York University,
4281.
4282.
4283.
4284.
4285.
4286.
4287.
4288.
4289.
4290.
4291.
4292.
4293.
4294.
4295.
4296.
4297.
4298.
261
2000.
Rasor P., Intersubjective Communication and the Self in Wieman and Habermas, in
«American Journal of Theology and Philosophy», XXI, 3, 2000, pp. 269-287.
Rehg W.S.J., Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who’s Afraid of SSK?, in
«Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXX, 2000, pp. 33-48.
Richter H., Zwischen Sitte und Sittlichkeit: Elemente der Bildungskritik und pädagogischen
Handlungstheorie in Jürgen Habermas’ kommunikativer Vernunfttheorie, Saarbrücken, Logos-Verlag, 2000.
Risse Th., Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics, in «International Organization», 54, 1, 2000, pp. 1-39.
Rodríguez Fouz, M., Espacio público europeo y patriotismo constitucional en Habermas, in
«Cuadernos de Alzatez», 22, 2000, pp. 65-94.
Rodríguez González M.L., Narración y conocimiento: el caso del psicoanálisis hermenéutico,
in «Revista de filosofía», XXIV, 2000, pp. 139-168.
Rodríguez R.A., El problema de la comprensión de las categorías de racionalidad y de cultura
en la Teoría de la Acción Comunicativade Jürgen Habermas, in «Portal: producciones en
estudios sociales», 1, 2000, pp. 93-100.
Rodríguez R.M., El rito de iniciación en cuatro novelas neorrealistas españolas, in «Revista
de filosofía», XXIV, 2000, pp. 259-274.
Rojas Parada P., La ética del lenguaje: Habermas y Levinas, in «Revista de Filosofia»,
XIII, 23, 2000, pp. 35-60.
Rorty R., Universality and Truth, and Response to Jürgen Habermas, in Brandom R.
(ed.), Rorty and his Critics, Oxford, Blackwell, 2000, pp. 1-30, 56-64; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 39-78.
Rosati M., A Solidarity and the sacred: Habermas’s idea of solidarity in a durkheimian horizon, in «Durkheimian studies», VI, 2000, pp. 93-110; repr. in «Durkheimian Studies», 1, 2001, pp. 233-261.
Rusconi G.E., Come se Dio non ci fosse, Torino, Einaudi, 2000.
Salter L., Foucault contra Habermas, in «Political Studies», XLVIII, 3, 2000, pp. 581582.
Santacruz Iñaki, Medina i Cambrón A., Cap a una metodologia comunicativa en ciències
socials, in «Revista catalana de sociología», 11, 2000, pp. 153-166.
Sartea C., Verso un nuovo cosmopolitismo: la teoria della cittadinanza tra H. Arendt e J.
Habermas, in Della Torre G., D’Agostino F. (eds.), La cittadinanza: problemi e dinamiche in una società pluralista, Torino, Giappichelli, 2000, pp. 273-314.
Schauffele S., Baptiste I., Appealing to the soul: towards a Judeo-Christian theory of learning, in «International Journal of Lifelong Education», 19, 5, 2000, pp. 448-458.
Scheibler I., Gadamer: between Heidegger and Habermas, Lanham-Oxford, Rowman
& Littlefield, 2000.
Scheyli M., Politische Öffentlichkeit und deliberative Demokratie nach Habermas: institutionelle Gestaltung durch direktdemokratische Beteiligungsformen?, Baden-Baden, Nomos
Verl.-Ges, 2000.
262
4299.
4300.
4301.
4302.
4303.
4304.
4305.
4306.
4307.
4308.
4309.
4310.
4311.
4312.
4313.
4314.
4315.
Schnebel E., Values in decision-making processes: Systematic Structures of J. Habermas and
N. Luhmann For The Appreciation of Responsibility in Leadership, in «Journal of Business
Ethics», XXVII, 1-2, 2000, pp. 79-88.
Schoop M., Kethers S., Habermas and Searle in University: Teaching the LanguageAction Perspective to Undergraduates, Fifth International Workshop on the LanguageAction Perspective on Communication Modelling, Aachen, Germany, 1416.9.2000.
Schülein J.A., Von der Kritik am “szientistischen Selbstmißverständnis”. Zum Verständnis
psychoanalytischer Theorieprobleme, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft:
Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 376-410.
Seeman B.N., Peirce, Habermas and Moral Absolutes, in «Journal of Interdisciplinary
Studies», XI, 1-2, 2000.
Seemann A., The relevance of disagreement: a critique of Jürgen Habermas’ notion of a ‘rational consensus’, London, London School of Economics and Political Science, 2000.
Serrano Marín V., Nihilismo y fin de la historia: Una mirada sobre la cuestión de la
(pos)modernidad, in «Revista de filosofía», XXIV, 2000, pp. 5-44.
Simons J., Ideology, imagology, and critical thought: The impoverishment of politics, in «Journal of Political Ideologies», 5, 1, 2000, pp. 81-103.
Simons J., Modernist misapprehensions of Foucault’s aesthetics, in «Cultural Values», 4, 1,
2000, pp. 40-57.
Simpson L.C., On Habermas and Difference: Critical Theory and the ‘Politics of Recognition’, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas, Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000,
pp. 323-338.
Singer B.J., Toward a Pragmatics of Artistic Utterance, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on
Snedeker G., Defending the Enlightenment: Jürgen Habermas and the Theory of Communicative Reason, in «Dialectical Anthropology», XXV, 3, 2000.
Sozio M. Habermas Jürgen; ‘La costellazione postnazionale. Mercato globale, nazioni e democrazia’, in «Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto», LXXVII, 3, 2000, pp.
421-424.
Stenberg M.E., Expanding Public Theology: Insights Provoked by the Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas, Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: The Humanities and
Social Sciences, LX, 12, 2000.
Steuerman E., The bounds of reason: Habermas, Lyotard, and Melanie Klein on rationality,
Stevenson M.C., Habermas and Lyotard on truth and justice, London (ON), The University of Western Ontario, 2000.
Stryker S.D., Communicative Action in History, in «European Journal of Social Theory», III, 2, 2000, pp. 215-234.
Sukale M., Jürgen Habermas und Max Weber. Eine Studie über Wert und Rationalität, in
Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen
Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 344-
4316.
4317.
4318.
4319.
4320.
4321.
4322.
4323.
4324.
4325.
4326.
4327.
4328.
4329.
4330.
4331.
4332.
263
375.
Sumner J., Serving the System: A critical history of distance education, in «Open Learning:
The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning», 15, 3, 2000, pp. 267-285.
Thomassen L.A., From the Modern to the Post-Modern: Deconstructing Habermas, in
Angermüller J., Bunzmann K., Rauch C. (eds), Hybrid Spaces: Theory, Culture, Economy, Münster, Lit Verlag, 2000, pp. 73-83.
Thomassen L.A., On the Pragmatics of Communication, by Jürgen Habermas; The
Inclusion of the Other, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociology», XXXIV, 4, 2000, pp.
821-823.
Thyen A., Über Erkenntnis und Interesse oder: Die Erneuerung der Lehre vom Faktum der
rein praktischen Vernunft, in Müller-Doohm S. (ed.), Das Interesse an Vernunft: Rückblicke auf das Werk von Jürgen Haber-mas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 2000, pp. 522-540.
Tine A., Jürgen Habermas. Entre pluralisme et consensus. La réinvention de la modernità?,
in «Éthiopiques. Revue négro-africaine de littérature et de philosophie», 64-65,
2000, pp. 194-215.
Vallespín Oña F., La crisis del espacio público, in «Revista española de ciencia política», 3, 2000, pp. 77-95.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., La teoría discursiva del derecho: sistema jurídico y democracia en
Habermas, Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 2000.
Villalba de Tablón M., El discurso no consensuado de Jürgen Habermas, in «Sapientia»,
LV, 208, 2000, pp. 431-485.
Villari L., Habermas un maestro dei diritti, in «la Repubblica», 6.3.2000, p. 32.
Vlachos G., “La tentative de reconstruction de l’ordre politico-juridique” par Jürgen Habermas, in «La Revue Administrative», LIII, 318, 2000, pp. 566-575; repr. in «Jahrbuch
des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart», 48, pp. 149-167.
Wales C.A., Deliberative democracy: toward active citizenship, Nottingham, Nottingham
Trent University, 2000.
Warnke G., Feminism and democratic deliberation, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism»,
XXVI, 3, 2000, pp. 61-74; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II.
Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Weck R.D., Kulturkampf (Gunter Grass, Jürgen Habermas and their opponents), in «Revista de Occidente», 228, 2000, pp. 108-112.
Whitworth A., Communication with the Environment? Non-human Nature in the Theories
of Jürgen Habermas position of non-human nature in the theories of Habermas, and discusses the
idea of advocacy as a possible method of resolving certain difficulties in this area, in «Politics»,
XX, 3, 2000.
Wood D.K., Reason, Self, and the Good in the Philosophies of Charles Taylor and Jürgen
Habermas, Madison (NJ), Drew University, 2000.
Young R, Habermas and Education, in Hahn L.E. (ed.), Perspectives on Habermas,
Chicago, Open Court Press, 2000, pp. 531-551.
Zuidervaart L., Creative Border Crossing in New Public Culture, in Gallagher S., Walhout M.D. (eds.), Literature and the Renewal of the Public Sphere, Basingstoke–New
264
York, Macmillan, 2000, pp. 206-224.
2001
4333.
4334.
4335.
4336.
4337.
4338.
4339.
4340.
4341.
4342.
4343.
4344.
4345.
4346.
4347.
Alegre L.J.R., Concepciones institucionalistas del lenguaje en la perspectiva pragmática
contemporánea, Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, 2011.
Alvarez J., Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughter’s Liberal Theory, in
«European Journal of International Law», 12, 2001, pp. 183–246.
Amado Juan A.G., Habermas y el derecho, in García Amado J.A. (ed.), El derecho en
la teoría social: diálogo con catorce propuestas sociales actuales, Madrid, Dykinson 2001, pp.
357-398.
Amato P., Habermas’s Other Legitimation Crisis: Critical-Philosophical Dimensions, in
«Radical Philosophy Review», IV, 1-2, 2001, pp. 205-228.
Amdam R., Empowering New Regional Political Institutions: A Norwegian Case, in
«Planning Theory & Practice», 2, 2, 2001, pp. 169-185.
Andersen D., Hegel after Habermas: reflections on Hegel’s conception of and the critical scope
to the speculative dialectics, Essex, University of Essex, 2001.
Apel K.O., The relationship between morality, law and democracy. Jugen Habermas’s philosophy of law from the point of view of a transcendental pragmatism, in «Etudes
Philosophiques», 1, 2001, pp. 67-80; as Regarding the Relationship of Morality, Law and
Democracy. On Habermas’s philosophy of law from a transcendental-pragmatism point of view,
in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, LondonNew York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 17-30.
Arantes O.B.F., Arantes P.E., The Neo-Enlightenment Aesthetics of Jürgen Habermas,
in «Cultural Critique», 49, 2001, pp. 43-57.
Araújo L.A., A teoria da ação comunicativa e a educação, Dissertação, Mestrado em
Educação, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, 2001.
Aujard M.-F., Genèse du consensus comme retour et interaction culturelle chez Habermas,
Ville de Québec, Université Laval, 2001.
Baert P., Jürgen Habermas, in Elliott A., Turner B.S. (eds.), Contemporary Social Theory, Londo, Sage, 2001, pp. 84-93.
Barbero J.M., Reconfiguraciones comunicativas de lo público, in «Anàlisi: Quaderns de
comunicació i cultura», 26, 2001, pp. 71-88.
Baynes K., A Critical Theory Perspective on Civil Society and the State, in Rosenblum
N., Post R. (eds.), Civil Society and Government, Princeton, Princeton University
Press, 2001, pp. 123-145.
Baynes K., Deliberative Politics, The Public Sphere, and Global Democracy, in Jones
R.W., Tooze R. (eds.), Critical Theory and World Politics, Boulder, Lynne Rienner,
2001, pp. 161-170.
Baynes K., Freedom and Recognition in Hegel and Habermas, University at Binghamton, 4.2001; in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVIII, 1, 2002, pp. 1-17;
4348.
4349.
4350.
4351.
4352.
4353.
4354.
4355.
4356.
4357.
4358.
4359.
4360.
4361.
4362.
265
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Baynes K., Practical Reason, the ‘Space of Reasons’ and Public Reason, in Rehg W.,
Bohman J. (eds.), Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory,
Bidet J., Habermas en deçà de Marx, in Bidet J., Kouvélakis E. (eds.), Dictionnaire
Marx Contemporain, Pris, Presse Universitaire de France, 2001, pp. 473-478.
Boladeras Cucurella M., La opinión pública en Habermas, in «Anàlisi: Quaderns de
comunicació i cultura», 26, 2001, pp. 51-70.
Bookman M., Forming Competence: Habermas on Reconstructing Worlds and ContextTranscendent Reason, in Annual conference of Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Baltimore (MD), 10.2001; in in Aboulafia M., Bookman M.,
Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 2002, pp. 65-81.
Bordum A., Diskursetik og den positive selvreference: Jürgen Habermas, Frederiksberg,
Samfundslitteratur, 2001.
Boyle M., Legal Legitimacy and the Principles of Private and Public Autonomy, in Id., Towards justice and validity, an investigation into Habermas’ theory of legitimacy, Ottawa, Carleton University, 2001, pp. 6-45.
Brandom R., Objektivität und die normative Feinstruktur der Rationalität, in Günther
K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit.
Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 126-150.
Brown César J., Notas sobre un modelo de comunicación para el ámbito de la educación, in
«Revista latinoamericana de estudios educativos», XXXI, 4, 2001, pp. 19-54.
Brown R., Goodman D., Jürgen Hagerman’s Theory of Communicative Action: An incomplete project, in Ritzier G., Smart B. (eds.), Handbook of Social Theory, Thousand
Oaks, California, 2001.
Brunkhorst H., Globale Solidarität: Inklusionsprobleme der modernen Gesellschaft, in
Wingert L., Günther K. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 605626.
Buchwalter A., Law, Culture, and Constitutionalism: Remarks on Hegel and Habermas,
in Williams R.R., Beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism: Studies in Hegel’s Philosophy
of Right, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2001, pp. 207-228.
Busacchi V., Il Freud di Jürgen Habermas, in «Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia», XIX, LVI, 2001, pp. 249-276.
Calloni M., Filosofie sociali ed eredità del Moderno. Paradigmi teorici e tradizioni nazionali a
confronto, in Calloni M., Ferrara A., Petrucciani S. (eds.), Pensare la società. L’idea di una
filosofia sociale, Roma, Carocci, 2001, pp. 63-85.
Cao W., Communicative Rationality and Inter-Culturality: A Symposium with Jürgen Habermas, in «Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy», I, 1, 2001, pp. 73-79.
Cárcova C.M., Habermas: la validez come construcción discursive, in «Anuario de
Filosofia Jurídica y Social», 21, 2001, pp. 73-89.
266
4363.
4364.
4365.
4366.
4367.
4368.
4369.
4370.
4371.
4372.
4373.
4374.
4375.
4376.
4377.
4378.
4379.
4380.
Carter B., Un-winching Wittgenstein, in «Pedagogy, Culture & Society», 9, 1, 2001,
pp. 111-117.
Castrucci E., Retorica dell’universale: una critica a Habermas, in «Filosofia politica»,
XV, 1, 2001, pp. 121-138.
Ceppa L., Dispense habermasiane. Sommari da “Fatti e norme”, Torino, Trauben, 2001.
Ceppa L., I contenuti etici della democrazia habermasiana, in «Teoria politica», XVII, 1,
2001, pp. 47-63; repr. in Id., Il diritto della modernità. Saggi habermasiani, Torino, Trauben, 2009, 20112, pp. 13-38.
Chanial Ph., Discussion publique et intérêt général De l’École de Francfort à Jürgen Habermas, in Caillé A., Lazzeri Ch., Senellart M. (eds.), Histoire raisonnée de la philosophie morale et politique, Paris, La Découverte, 2001, pp. 696-708.
Cisneros Espinosa J., Comunicación y democracia: la participación actual y potencial de las
organizaciones civiles en las radiodifusoras del municipio de Puebla, Tesis doctoral dirigida,
Universidad de La Laguna, 2001.
Conle C., The Rationality of Narrative Inquiry in Research and Professional Development,
in «European Journal of Teacher Education», 24, 1, 2001, pp. 21-33.
Cook D., Habermas on Reason and Revolution, in «Continental Philosophy Review»,
XXXIV, 3, 2001, pp. 321-338.
Cook D., The Talking Cure in Habermas’s Republic, in «New Left Review», XII, 6,
2001, pp. 135-151.
Cook D., The two faces of liberal democracy in Habermas, in «Philosophy Today», XLV,
1, 2001, pp. 95-104.
Cooke M., An Evil Heart. Moral Evil and Moral Identity, in Lara M.P. (ed.), Rethinking evil: contemporary perspectives, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001, pp.
113-130; tr. it. Un animo malvagio. Male e identità morale, in Lara M.P. (ed.), Ripensare il
male: prospettive contemporanee, Roma, Meltemi, 2003, pp. 200-320.
Cooke M., Meaning and truth in Habermas’s pragmatics, in «European Journal of Philosophy», IX, 1, 2001, pp. 1-23.
Cooke M., Socio-Cultural Learning As a ‘Transcendental Fact’: Habermas’s Postmetaphysical Perspective, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», IX, 1, 2001, pp.
63-83.
Coulter D., Teaching as communicative action: Habermas and education, in Richardson V.
(ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, Washington DC, American Educational Research Association, 2001, pp. 90-98.
Cusset Y., Habermas. L’espoir de la discussion, Paris, Michalon, 2001.
da Silva F.C., Habermas e a esfera pública: reconstruindo a história de uma ideia, in
«Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas», 35, 2001, pp. 117-138.
Dahlberg L., The Habermasian public sphere encounters cyber-reality, in «The Public»,
VIII, 3, 2001, pp. 83-96.
Dahlberg L., The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online
Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere, in «Information, Communication &
Society», 4, 4, 2001, pp. 615-633.
4381.
4382.
4383.
4384.
4385.
4386.
4387.
4388.
4389.
4390.
4391.
4392.
4393.
4394.
4395.
267
Dalberg-Larsen J., A Sociological Perspective on Environmental Law, in «Rettid», 2,
2001, pp. 1-14; repr. mod. as On the Relevance of Habermas and Theories of Legal Pluralism for the Study of Environmental Law, in Himma K.E. (ed.), Law, Morality and Legal
Pluralism. Proceedings of the 21st World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR), Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 2004, pp. 167174.
Dean J., Cybersalons and Civil Society: Rethinking the Public Sphere in Transnational Technoculture, in «Public Culture», XIII, 2, 2001, pp. 243-65.
Dews P., “Radical Finitude” and the Problem of Evil Critical Comments on Wellmer’s
Reading of Jonas, in Lara M.P. (ed.), Rethinking evil: contemporary perspectives, Berkeley,
University of California Press, 2001, pp. 46-52; tr. it. “Finitezza radicale” e problema
del male. Commenti critici alla lettura di Jones da parte di Wellmer, in Lara M.P. (ed.), Ripensare il male: prospettive contemporanee, Roma, Meltemi, 2003, pp. 83-94.
Dews P., Schwerpunkt- Naturalismus und Naturgeschichte - Naturalismus und AntiNaturolismus bei Habermas, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», XLIX, 6,
2001, pp. 861-872.
Dufour F.G., Patriotisme constitutionnel et nationalisme sur Habermas, Montréal, Liber,
2001.
Eleftheriadis P., The European Constitution and Cosmopolitan Ideals, in «King’s Law
Journal», 12, 1, 2001, pp. 17-38.
Embacher S., Normativität der Öffentlichkeit – Jürgen Habermas und die Kritik öffentlicher
Diskurse, in Id., Selbstverschuldete Unmündigkeit. Überlegungen zu den normativen Grundlagen einer Kritik der Öffentlichkeit, Dissertation, Berlin, Freien Universität Berlin, 2001,
pp. 94-157.
Esad-Djon M., Öffentlichkeit. Ansätze im Überblick: Habermas und Noelle-Neumann,
Leipzig, Universität Leipzig, 2001.
Ferrara A., Of boats and principles – Reflections on Habermas’s “Constitutional Democracy”, in «Political Theory», XXIX, 6, 2001, pp. 782-791.
Finke S., Concepts and Intuitions: Adorno After the Linguistic Turn, in «Inquiry», 44, 2,
2001, pp. 171-200.
Flecha García J.R., Racismo moderno y postmoderno en Europa: enfoque dialógico y
pedagogías antirracistas, in «Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas», 94,
2001, pp. 79-103.
Flyvbjerg B., Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can
Succeed Again, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Forst R., Ethik und Moral, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der
Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 344-371.
Forst R., The Rule of Reasons. Three Models of Deliberative Democracy, in «Ratio Juris»,
XIV, 2001, pp. 345-378; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.),
Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 291-324.
Forst R., Towards a critical theory of Transnational Justice, in Pogge Th. (ed.), Global
Justice, Oxford, Blackwell, 2001, 169-187; repr. in «Metaphilosophy», XXXII, 1-2,
268
4396.
4397.
4398.
4399.
4400.
4401.
4402.
4403.
4404.
4405.
4406.
4407.
4408.
4409.
4410.
2003, pp. 160-179; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen
Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Frank M., Selbstbewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis oder über einige Schwierigkeiten bei der Reduktion von Subjektivität, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 217-242.
Frankenberg G., Die Rückkehr des Vertrages. Überlegungen zur Verfassung der Europäischen Union, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die
Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp,
2001, pp. 507-538.
Fraser A., A Marx for the managerial revolution: Habermas on Law And Democracy, in
«Journal of Law And Society», XXVIII, 3, 2001, pp. 361-383.
Freundlieb D., Nachmetaphysisches Denken oder pragmatische Problemverkürzung? Zu
Habermas’ Analogisierung von Richtigkeit und Wahrheit, in «Prima Philosophia», XIV, 3,
2001, pp. 219-236.
Friedland L.A., Communication, Community, and Democracy: Toward a Theory of the
Communicatively Integrated, in «Community Communication Research», 28, 2001, pp.
358-391.
Fuchs P., Soziale Zukunft: heute. (Re)Visite bei Habermas, in «Merkur», LV, 630,
2001, pp. 835-846.
Fultner B., Intelligibility and Conflict Resolution in the Lifeworld, in «Continental Philosophy Review», XXXIV, 4, 2001, pp. 419-436.
Gimmler A., Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet, in «Philosophy
& Social Criticism», XXVII, 4, 2001, pp. 21-39.
Giovagnoli R., On Normative Pragmatics: A Comparison between Brandom and Habermas, in « Teorema: Revista Internacional de Filosofía », XX, 3, 2001, pp. 51-68.
Gosepath S., Über den Zusammenhang von Gerechtigkeit und Gleichheit, in Günther K.,
Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 403-433.
Gould M., The generalized media of communication and the logic of cultural intelligibility:
macro and micro analyses in Luhmann, Habermas and Parsons in Pollini G., Sciortino G.
(eds.), Parsons’ The structure of social action and contemporary debates, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2001, pp. 119-146.
Greve J., Jürgen Habermas: Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsatze, in
«Kolner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie», LIII, 1, 2001.
Grewal S.S., The Paradox of Integration: Habermas and the Unfinished Project of European
Union, in «Politics», XXI, 2, 2001.
Grimm D., Bedingungen demokratischer Rechtssetzung, in Günther K., Wingert L.
(eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 489-506.
Grosswiler P., Jürgen Habermas: Media Ecologist?, in Proceedings of the Media Ecology
Association, Vol. II, New York, New York University, 2001, pp. 22-31.
4411.
4412.
4413.
4414.
4415.
4416.
4417.
4418.
4419.
4420.
4421.
4422.
4423.
4424.
4425.
269
Günther K., Rechtspluralismus und universaler Code der Legalität: Globalisierung als rechtstheoretisches Problem, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft
und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 539-567; tr. en. Legal pluralism and the universal code of legality: globalisation as challenge to legal theory, in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen
Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**; tr. it. Pluralismo giuridico e codice
universale della legalità, in Günther K., Pluralismo giuridico e codice universale della legalità,
Torino, Trauben, 2010, pp. 83-114.
Gurciullo S., Making Modern Identity: Charles Taylor’s Retrieval of Moral Sources, in
«Critical Horizons», 2, 1, 2001, pp. 93-125.
Haber S., Habermas, a deliberative politics, in «Revue philosophique de la France et
de l’etranger», CXXVI, 1, 2001, pp. 87-89.
Haber S., Jürgen Habermas, une introduction, Pocket, La Découverte, Paris, 2001.
Harrington A., Hermeneutical Dialogue and Social Science. A Critique of Gadamer and
Habermas, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001.
Hashem M., Friends or Foes? Luhmann and Habermas on the Theory of Law, in Annual
Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, California, 1821.8.2001.
Heath J., Communicative Action and Rational Choice, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press,
2001.
Heslep R.D., Habermas on Communication in Teaching, in «Educational Theory», LI,
2, 2001, pp. 191-207.
Heyndels R., Public Speech, Agoraphobia and the Aporia of “Lying Truly”, in «Javnost The Public», 8, 3, 2001, pp. 73-82.
Higgs P., Rees Jones I., Finite resources and infinite demand: public participation in health
care rationing, , in Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, LondonNew York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001, pp. 143-162.
Høibraaten H., Kommunikative und sanktionsgestützte Macht bei Jürgen Habernas, in
Neumann B. et. al. (eds.), The Angel of History is Looking Back: Hannah Arendts Werk
unter politischem, ästhetischem und historischem Aspekt, Würzburg, Königshausen &
Neumann, 2001, pp. 153-193.
Holzinger K., Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in den Internationalen Beziehungen, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», VIII, 2, 2001, pp. 243-286.
Honig B., Dead rights, live futures – A reply to Habermas’s “Constitutional Democracy”, in
«Political Theory», XXIX, 6, 2001, pp. 792-805; repr. as Dead Rights, Live Futures:
On Habermas’s Attempt to Reconcile Constitutionalism and Democracy, in Thomassen L.A.
(ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, pp. 161-175.
Honneth A., Zwischen Hermeneutik und Hegelianismus. John McDowell und die Herausforderung des moralischen Realismus, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit
der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 372-402.
Horster D., Der Tagwächter. Der Philosoph Jürgen Habermas wird am Sonntag mit dem
Frie-denspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels ausgezeichnet, in «Hannoversche Allgemeine
270
4426.
4427.
4428.
4429.
4430.
4431.
4432.
4433.
4434.
4435.
4436.
4437.
4438.
4439.
4440.
4441.
4442.
4443.
Zeitung», 235, 9.10.2001.
How A.R., Habermas, history and social evolution: Moral learning and the trial of Louis
XVI, in «Sociology», XXXV, 1, 2001, pp. 177-194.
Hoyos Vásquez G., La filosofía política de Jürgen Habermas, in «Ideas y Valores», 116,
2001, pp. 132-144.
Ipperciel D., Habermas, Taylor et le nationalisme québécois, in «Dialogue», XL, 3, 2001,
pp. 529-544.
Jacobson Th.L., Jang Y., Rights, Culture, and Cosmopolitan Democracy, in «Communication Theory», XI, 4, 2001, pp. 434-453.
Jacobson, Th.L., Habermas, Dewey, and Pragmatism, in «American Pragmatism and
Communication Research», 2001, pp. 225-240.
Jaffro L., Habermas et le sujet de la discussion, in «Cités», V, 1, 2001, pp. 71-85.
Jahn B., The Postnational Constellation. Political Essays by Jürgen Habermas, in «Democratization», VIII, 4, 2001.
Jiménez Redondo M., Filosofía y ciencias sociales en la obra Habermas, in «Pasajes», 56, 2001, pp. 93-115.
Jiménez Sánchez J.J., Democracia y derechos humanos, in «Anales de la Cátedra
Francisco Suárez», 35, 2001, pp. 189-212.
Johnson P., Distorted Communications: Feminism’s Dispute with Habermas, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVII, 1, 2001, pp. 39-62.
Johnson P., Habermas’s Search for the Public Sphere, in «European Journal of Social
Theory», IV, 2001, pp. 215-236.
Kaube J., Habermas für Kinder. Vom richtigen privaten Gebrauch der Diskursethik: Eine
ziemlich nützliche Übung, in «Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung», 41,
14.10.2001.
Kelleher D., New social movements in the health domain, , in Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001,
pp. 119-142.
Kleinstuber, HJ., Habermas and the public sphere: From a German to a European perspective, in «Javnost-The Public», VIII, 1, 2001, pp. 95-108.
Koch A.M., What Is Still Critical In The Work of Jürgen Habermas?, in «Politics &
Policy», 29, 1, 2001, pp. 69-89.
Kohn C., Astorga O., El liberalismo y la solidaridad: ¿son conmensurables?, in «Revista
internacional de filosofía política», 18, 2001, pp. 139-154.
Kuhlmann A., Wider die Verdinglichung des Menschen - Habermas warnt vor dem Verlust
der Freiheit durch Eingriffe der Biomedizin, in «Die Zeit», 20.9.2001, p. 55.
Lafont C., Kann Objektivität perspektivistisch sein? Ein Vergleich der Objektivitätskonzeptionen von Habermas und Brandom, Ist Objektivität perspektivisch?, in Günther K.,
Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 192-216; tr. en. Is
Objectivity Perspectival? Reflections on Brandom’s and Habermas’s Pragmatist Conceptions of
Objectivity, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism,
4444.
4445.
4446.
4447.
4448.
4449.
4450.
4451.
4452.
4453.
4454.
4455.
4456.
4457.
4458.
271
London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 185-209; in Rasmussen
D., Swindal S. (eds.), Critical Theory. Vol. 3, London, Sage Publications, 2004, pp.
50-72.
Lagerspetz O., Wittgenstein and the idea of a critical social theory. A critique of Giddens,
Habermas and Bhaskar, in «Philosophical Investigations», XXIV, 2, 2001, pp. 207211.
Langlois L., Discours moral, discours éthique et situation pratique: Remarques sur la ‘Diskursethik’ de J. Habermas, in «Symposium», V, 1, 2001, pp. 67-82.
Lara M.P., Narrating Evil. A Postmetaphysical Theory of Reflective Judgment, in Id. (ed.),
Rethinking evil: contemporary perspectives, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001,
pp. 239-250; tr. it. Raccontare il male. Una teoria post-metafisica del giudizio riflettente, Lara
M.P. (ed.), Ripensare il male: prospettive contemporanee, Roma, Meltemi, 2003, pp. 414434.
Larmore Ch., Der Zwang des besseren Agruments, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.),
Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 106-125.
Larocque B., Habermas et les problèmes de la légitimation de l’état moderne, in «Aspects
sociologiques», VIII, 1-2, 2001, pp. 16-22.
Llanque M., Carl Schmitts dekonstruktion af demokratibegrebet, in «Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory», 2, 2, 2001, pp. 53-69.
Lohmann G., Unparteilichkeit in der Moral, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die
Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 434-455.
Løvlie L., Rereading Jürgen Habermas’ „Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, in «Zeitschrift für qualitative Bildungs- Beratungs- und Sozialforschung», 2, 2001, pp. 223240.
Luckmann Th., Einige Bemerkungen zum Problem der Legitimation, in Bohn C., Willems H. (eds.), Sinngeneratoren: Fremd- und Selbstthematisierung in soziologisch-historischer
Perspektive, Konstanz, UVK Verl.-Ges., 2001, pp. 339-345.
Maesschalck M., The reduction of the context in the works of Bourdieu and Habermas, in
«Revue Philosophique de Louvain», XCIX, 2, 2001, pp. 254-290.
Maffettone S., Il vincolo etico e la politica: Habermas e Rawls, in Tundo L., (ed.), Etica e
società di giustizia, Bari, Edizioni Dedalo, 2001, pp. 159-182.
Mahoney J., Rights without Dignity? Some Critical Reflections on Habermas’s Procedural
Model of Law and Democracy, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVII, 3, 2001,
pp. 21-40.
March J.L., Unjust Legality: A Critique of Habermas’s Philosophy of Law, Boulden,
Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Markl H., Erwiderung auf Jürgen Habermas. Das Christentum darf die Gesellschaft nicht
dominieren, in «Der Tagesspiegel», 15.11.2001, p. 36
Markman E., Coffee-Women, The Spectator and the Public Sphere in the Early Eighteenth Century, in Eger E., Grant Ch., Ó Gallchoir C., Warburton P. (eds.), Women,
Writing and the Public Sphere, 1700-1830, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
272
4459.
4460.
4461.
4462.
4463.
4464.
4465.
4466.
4467.
4468.
4469.
4470.
4471.
4472.
4473.
4474.
4475.
2001, pp. 27-52.
Marramao G., La passione del presente, in «Micromega. Almanacco di filosofia», 5,
2001, pp. 17-25.
Marzocchi V., Esiste un punto di vista normativo per la filosofia sociale?, in Calloni M.,
Ferrara A., Petrucciani S. (eds.), Pensare la società. L’idea di una filosofia sociale, Roma,
Carocci, 2001, pp. 87-102.
Marzocchi V., Per una lettura critica di “Fatti e norme” di J. Habermas, in «La Cultura»,
XXXIX, 3, 2001, pp. 465-504.
Marzocchi V., Ragione come discorso, Napoli, Liguori, 2001.
Matar, A Habermas and Dummett: Beyond dogmatism and scepticism, in «International
Journal of Philosophical Studies», IX, 3, 2001, pp. 417-430; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Mathelet S.L., Perception et normes sociales: une alternative à l’intellectualisme contemporain,
Louvain-Montréal, Université Catholique de Louvain-Université du Québec à
Montréal, 2011.
Matuštík M.B., Habermas’s Response to Fundamentalism, in American Academy of
Religion, Kierkegaard section, panel on Kierkegaard and Postnationalism, Denver,
17.11.2001.
Matuštík M.B., Jürgen Habermas. A Philosophical-Political Profile, Boulden, Rowman
& Littlefield, 2001.
McBurney P., Parsons S., Intelligent Systems to Support Deliberative Democracy in Environmental Regulation, in «Information & Communications Technology Law», 10, 1,
2001, pp. 79-89.
McCarthy G., Objectivity and the Silence of Reason: Weber, Habermas, and the Methodological Disputes in German Sociology, New Brunswick, Transaction Pub, 2001.
McCarthy Th., Die politische Philosophie und das Problem der Rasse, in Günther K.,
Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 627-654.
McCarthy Th., Habermas: A critical reader, in «European Journal of Philosophy»,
IX, 2, 2001, pp. 247-254.
McGee M.C., Phronesis in the Habermas vs. Gadamer Debate, Iowa City (IA), The
University of Iowa, 2001.
McMurtry J., The Life-Ground, the Civil Commons and the Corporate Male Gang, in
«Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement», XXII, 4, 2001, pp. 819-854.
Mejia Quintana O., Teoría de la acción comunicativa, ética del discurso y soberanía popular.
Moral, política y derecho en el pensamiento de Jürgen Habermas, in Peña B., Etica y Bioética,
Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2001, pp. 43-86.
Mendieta E., Introducción: La lingüistificación de lo sagrado como catalizador de la
modernidad, in J. Habermas, Israel o Atenas. Ensayos sobre religión, teología y racionalidad,
Madrid, Trotta, 2001, pp. 11-50.
Mertens Th.J.M., Van “Zum ewigen Frieden” naar “The law of peoples” : Kant, Haber-
4476.
4477.
4478.
4479.
4480.
4481.
4482.
4483.
4484.
4485.
4486.
4487.
4488.
4489.
4490.
4491.
273
mas en Rawls over internationale verhoudingen, in «Nederlands tijdschrift voor rechtsfilosofie en rechtstheorie», XXX, 2001 pp. 117-132.
Myerson G., Heidegger, Habermas and the Mobil Phone, Icon Books, Duxford, 2001.
Michelman F., Morality, Identity, and ‘Constitutional Patriotism’, in «Ratio Juris», XIV,
3, 2001, pp. 253-271; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III,
Milagros Bolseguí G.S., El rol de la investigación acción en la construcción de una reforma
curricular para el tercer milenio, in «Sapiens: Revista Universitaria de Investigación», II,
1, 2001, pp. 99-108.
Miller M., Kant, Hegel, and Habermas: Does Hegel’s Critique of Kant Apply to Discourse
Ethics?, in «Auslegung: A Journal of Philosophy», XXV, 1, 2001, pp. 63-85.
Miras Boronat Núria S., Discusió al voltant dels fonaments epistemològics i normatius del
liberalisme polític: la disputa de família entre Rawls i Habermas, in Bermudo Avila J.M.,
Lavado Fau M. (eds.), Retos de la razón práctica, III Congreso Internacional de la
Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas, Barcelona, 8-10.10.2001, pp.
75-83.
Molendijk A.L., A Challenge to Philosophy of Religion, in «Ars Disputandi», 1, 1,
2001, pp. 31-43.
Moore S.A., Technology, Place, and the Nonmodern Thesis, in «Journal of Architectural
Education», 54, 3, 2001, pp. 130-139.
Morris M., Rethinking the Communicative Turn: Adorno, Habermas, and the Problem of
Communicative Freedom, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2001.
Müller H., International Relations as Communicative Action, in Fierke K., Jørgensen
K.E. (eds.), Constructing International Relations, M.E. Sharpe, 2001, pp. 160-178.
Murray J.W., Toward a post-Habermasian discourse ethics: The acknowledgment of the other,
in «New Jersey Journal of Communication», 9, 1, 2001, pp. 1-19.
Niesen P., Volk von Teufeln-Republikanismus. Zur Frage nach den moralischen Ressourcen
der liberalen Demokratie, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 568-604.
Nørager T., Habermas, hjerte, homiletik, homoseksualitet, in Bach-Nielsen C., Lindhardt J. (eds.) Kirke og Kristendom, København, 2001, pp. 59-**.
Nunner-Winkler G., Moralische Bildung, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas,
O’Neill S., Constitutional Reason and Political Identity, in «Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy», IV, 3, 2001, pp. 1-26.
O’Neill S., Constitutional reason and political identity, in «Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy», 4, 3, 2001, pp. 1-26.
Offe C., Wessen Wohl ist das Gemeinwohl?, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die
Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 459-488.
274
4492.
4493.
4494.
4495.
4496.
4497.
4498.
4499.
4500.
4501.
4502.
4503.
4504.
4505.
4506.
4507.
4508.
4509.
4510.
Ophir A., How to Take Aim at the Heart of the Present and Remain Analytic, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», 9, 3, 2001, pp. 401-415.
Orden Jimenez R.V., Communication, ethics and politics. Habermas and his critics, in
«Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e información filosófica», LVII, 218, 2001,
pp. 350-**.
Ott W., Mathis K., Die Rechtstheorie von Jürgen Habermas: Die Witchtigsten Thesen
Überblick, in «Zeitschrift für Schweizerisches Recht», 120, 5, 2001.
Paetzelt U., Kunst und Kulturindustrie bei Adorno und Habermas. Perspektiven kritischer Theorie, Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitäts Verlag, 2001.
Pagotto Marsola M., Subjetividade e ética de Habermas a Foucault, Dissertação
Mestrado em Filosofia, Universidade de São Paulo, 2001.
Pellizzoni L., The Myth of the Best Argument: Power, Deliberation and Reason, in «British Journal of Sociology», LII, 1, 2001, pp. 59-86.
Pensky M., Habermas and Power, in Scott A., Nash K. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology, Oxford, Blackwell, 2001, pp. 49-60.
Pensky M., Introduction, in Habermas J., The Postnational Constellation. Political Essays,
Cambridge, Polity, 2001, pp. VII-XVIII.
Peters B., Deliberative Öffentlichkeit, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas,
Petrucciani S., Legittimità e ambiti della filosofia sociale, in Calloni M., Ferrara A., Petrucciani S. (eds.), Pensare la società. L’idea di una filosofia sociale, Roma, Carocci, 2001,
pp. 41-62.
Pinzani A., A teoria jurídica de Jürgen Habermas: entre funcionalismo e normativismo, in
«Veritas: revista da Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», VIL,
1, 2001, pp. 19-28.
Pizzi J., Habermas y la religion, Algunas consideraciones, in «Recerca: Revista de
pensament i analisi», 2001, pp. 53-68.
Plinio W.P., Juegos de lenguaje y teoría de la comunicación, notas sobre Wittgenstein y
Habermas, in «Teoría política y comunicación», 2001, pp. 179-199.
Privitera W., Sfera pubblica e democratizzazione, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2001.
Privitera W., Sfere pubbliche, discorsività e critica sociale, in «Quaderni di teoria sociale»,
1, 2001.
Privitera W., Società civile, cultura politica e democratizzazione: un approccio di filosofia sociale, in Calloni M., Ferrara A., Petrucciani S. (eds.), Pensare la società. L’idea di una filosofia sociale, Roma, Carocci, 2001, pp. 181-196.
Putnam H., Werte und Normen, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit
der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 280-313.
Raia S., Teoria critica e ragione comunicativa: J. Habermas, in «Sociologia della comunicazione», 15, 2001.
Rasheed S., Gendered Ethical Discourse and the “Impartiality of Justice”, in Bröstl A.,
4511.
4512.
4513.
4514.
4515.
4516.
4517.
4518.
4519.
4520.
4521.
4522.
4523.
4524.
4525.
4526.
275
Pavcnik M. (eds.), Human Rights, Minority Rights, Women’s Rights, Archiv für Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 78, 2001.
Raulet G., La theorie critique de l’école de Francfort. Du néo-marxisme au post-marxisme, in
Bidet J., Kouvélakis E. (eds.), Dictionnaire Marx Contemporain, Pris, Presse Universitaire de France, 2001.
Reemtsma J.Ph., Laudatio, Friedenspreis des Deutschen Buchhandels, 2001 Jürgen
Habermas, Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels, Frankfurt a.M., 2001, pp. 28; repr. in Habermas J. (ed.), Glauben und Wissen, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001,
pp. 35-57.
Rees Jones I., Habermas or Foucault or Habermas and Foucault?: the implications of a
shifting debate for medical sociology, , in Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and
Health, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001, pp. 163-181.
Rees Jones I., Health care decision making and the politics of health, , in Scambler G.
(ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 2001, pp. 68-85.
Reese-Schäfer W., Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Reihe Campus-Einführungen,
2001.
Rehg W.S.J., “Democratic Debate” and “Solidarity”, in Clarke P.B., Foweraker J.
(eds.), Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought, London, Routledge, 2001.
Rehg W.S.J., Bohman J., Editors’ Introduction, in Id. (eds.), Pluralism and the Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory, Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 2001.
Rocha Cavalcante A., A racionalidade comunicativa de Jürgen Habermas, in «Educacao
e Filosofia», XV, 29, 2001, pp. 225-257.
Rodríguez Jaramillo A., La ontología del presente. M. Foucault lector de Kant, Habermas
lector de Foucault, in «Praxis Filosofica», 13, 2001, pp. 9-26.
Rosati M., La solidarietà nelle società complesse, in Crespi F., Moscovici S. (eds.), La
solidarietà in questione, Roma, Meltemi, 2001, pp. 16-81.
Rosati M., Solidarietà e sacro tra teoria sociale classica e filosofia sociale contemporanea, in
Calloni M., Ferrara A., Petrucciani S. (eds.), Pensare la società. L’idea di una filosofia sociale, Roma, Carocci, 2001, pp. 161-180.
Rosen M., The Role of Rules, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies»,
IX, 3, 2001, pp. 369-384; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II.
Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Roşioru M., Traduire l’allemand Habermas du français en roumain. Une analyse terminologique, in «Studii de gramatică contrastive», 15, 2001, pp. 104-109.
Scambler G., Britten N., System, lifeworld and doctor–patient interaction: issues of trust in
a changing world, , in Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, LondonNew York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001, pp. 45-67.
Scambler G., Class, power and the durability of health inequalities, , in Scambler G. (ed.),
Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul,
2001, pp. 86-118.
Scambler G., Introduction: unfolding themes of an incomplete project, , in Scambler G.
(ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
276
4527.
4528.
4529.
4530.
4531.
4532.
4533.
4534.
4535.
4536.
4537.
4538.
4539.
4540.
4541.
4542.
Paul, 2001, pp. 1-24.
Scambler G., Martin L., Civil society, the public sphere and deliberative democracy, , in
Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York,
Schnädelbach H., Phänomenologie und Sprachanalyse, in Günther K., Wingert L.
(eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 243-267.
Schneider H.J., Universale Sprachstrukturen? Zu R. Brandoms “expressiver Deduktion”
des Gegenstand-Begriff-Struktur, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der
Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt
a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 151-191.
Schoolman M., Reason and horror: critical theory, democracy, and aesthetic individuality,
Statius P., Positions politiques et perspective cosmopolitique chez Habermas, in «Le Télémaque», XIX, 1, 2001, pp. 57-66.
Steinhoff U., Kritik der kommunikativen Rationalität: Eine Gesamtdarstellung und Analyse der kommunikationstheoretischen jüngeren Kritischen Theorie, Marsberg, Die Deutsche
Bibliothek, 2001, pp. 333-343.
Strydom P., The problem of triple contingency in Habermas, in «Sociological Theory»,
XIX, 2, 2001, pp. 165-186.
Sulkin T., Simon A.F., Habermas in the Lab: A study of deliberation in an experimental
setting, in «Political Psychology», XXII, 4, 2001, pp. 809-826.
Sunstein C., Das Fernsehen und die Öffentlichkeit, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.),
Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 678-701
Taylor Ch., Abschied von einer Theorie der indirekten Erkenntnis, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift
für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 53-76.
Testa I., Cantù P., Dalla Nuova retorica alla Nuova dialettica. Il dialogo tra logica e teoria
dell’argomentazione, in «Problemata», 1, 2001, pp. 123-173.
Testa I., Riconoscimento naturalizzato. Una soluzione scettica al dibattito sull’autocoscienza
tra Henrich, Tugendhat e Habermas, in Costa P., Rosati M., Testa I. (eds.), Ragionevoli
dubbi. La critica sociale tra universalismo e scepsi, Carocci, Roma, 2001, pp. 67-90.
Thornton A.L., Does the internet create democracy?, in «Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies», XXII, 2, 2001, pp. 126-147.
Tong S., Habermas and the Chinese Discourse of Modernity, in «Dao: A Journal of
Comparative Philosophy», I, 1, 2001, pp. 81-104.
Torres Muro I., Habermas jurista: Una lectura de “facticidad y validez”, in Morodo
Leoncio R., de Vega P., Estudios de teoría del Estado y derecho constitucional en honor de
Pablo Lucas Verdú, Madrid, Ed. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2001, pp. 511-544.
Underhill M.A., From Adorno to Habermas: the paradigm shift in critical theory, Sussex,
University of Sussex, 2001.
4543.
4544.
4545.
4546.
4547.
4548.
4549.
4550.
4551.
4552.
4553.
4554.
4555.
4556.
4557.
4558.
4559.
4560.
277
Unzueta F., The Nineteenth-Century Novel: Toward a Public Sphere or a Mass Media?, in
Paz-Soldán E., Castillo D.A. (eds.), Latin American Literature and Mass Media, New
York, Garland, 2001, pp. 21-40.
Uw’Imana J., Reason as a basis of consensus in interaction: a study based on the critical theory
of Jürgen Habermas, Roma, Pontificia Universitas Urbaniana, 2001.
Vaki F., Marx and Habermas on the paradigm of production: towards a re-interpretation of
the normative foundations of critical theory, Essex, University of Essex, 2001.
Vallespín Oña F., Habermas en doce mil palabras, in «Claves de Razón Práctica»,
114, 2001.
Vallespín Oña F., Teoría del discurso y acción comunicativa en Jürgen Habermas, in
«Teorías políticas contemporáneas», 2001, pp. 137-164.
Vandevelde P., Communication and Rational Justification: A Phenomenological Stance, in
«Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXVII, 6, 2001, pp. 55-79; repr. in Rasmussen
D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Velasco M., Ética do discurso: Apel ou Habermas?, Rio de Janeiro, FAPERJ, 2001.
Velthoven P. van, Het gematigde credo van Jürgen Habermas, in «Haagsche Courant»,
35910, 10.2001, p. 11.
Vidal Capó A.A., L’assumpció del pluralisme, tres propostes: Rawls, Habermas i Rorty, in
Bermudo Avila J.M., Lavado Fau M., Retos de la razón práctica, III Congreso
Internacional de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Estudios Utilitaristas, Barcelona,
8-10.10.2001, pp. 159-166.
Villiers C., Disclosure Obligations in Company Law: Bringing Communication Theory into
the Fold, in «Journal of Corporate Law Studies», 1, 1, 2001, pp. 181-209.
von Dews P., Habermas: A Critical Reader, in «European Journal of Philosophy»,
IX, 2, 2001.
von Dews. P., Naturalismus und Anti-Naturalismus bei Habermas, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», IL, 6, 2001, pp. 861-871.
Warburton P., Theorising Public Opinion: Elizabeth Hamilton’s Model of Self, Sympathy
and Society, in Eger E., Grant Ch., Ó Gallchoir C., Warburton P. (eds.), Women,
Writing and the Public Sphere, 1700-1830, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press,
2001, pp. 257-73.
Wellmer A., Gibt es eine Wahrheit jenseits der Aussagenwahrheit?, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift
Welton M., Civil Society and the public sphere: Habermas’s recent learning theory, in «Studies in the Education of Adults», XXXIII, 1, 2001, pp. 20-34.
West P., Postmodernism and Holocaust Denial/Lyotard and the Inhuman/Heidegger, Habermas and the Mobile Phone, in «TLS – The Times Literary Supplement», 5125, 2001,
p. 33.
Wheeler B.R., Law and Legitimacy in the Work of Jürgen Habermas and Carl Schmitt, in
«Ethics and International Affairs», XV, 1, 2001, pp. 173-183.
Whitworth A., Ethics and Reality in Environmental Discourses, in «Environmental
Politics», 10, 2, 2001, pp. 22-42.
278
4561.
4562.
4563.
4564.
4565.
4566.
4567.
4568.
Williams G., Popay J., Lay health knowledge and the concept of the lifeworld, , in Scambler G. (ed.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Health, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 2001, pp. 25-44.
Wingert L., Epistemisch nützliche Konfrontationen mit der Welt?, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift
Wingert L., Vorwort, in Günther K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M.,
Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 7-10.
Wolf U., Worin sich die Platonische und die Aristotelische Ethik unterscheiden, in Günther
K., Wingert L. (eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit.
Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2001, pp. 271-279.
Yi-huah J., Between Modern and Postmodern. A Reading of Arendt’s Political Theory in the
1990’s, Ritsumeikan University, Kyoto, 2001.
Young I.M., Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy, in «Political Theory»,
XXIX, 5, 2001, pp. 670-690; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch.
Zanchetta P.L., Lo Stato-Nazione tra multiculturalismo e globalizzazione. Analisi e proposte di Jürgen Habermas, in «Diritto, immigrazione e cittadinanza», 1, 2001.
Zimmermann J., Confusion of Horizons: Gadamer and the Christian logos, in «Journal of
Beliefs & Values», XXII, 1, 2001, pp. 87-98.
2002
4569.
4570.
4571.
4572.
4573.
4574.
4575.
4576.
Abel C.F., Sementelli A., Power, Emancipation and the Administrative State, in «Administrative Theory & Praxis», 24, 2, 2002, pp. 253-278.
Aboulafia M., Introduction, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 1-13.
Adam A., Exploring the gender question in critical information systems, in «Journal of Information Technology», 17, 2, 2002, pp. 59-67.
Allen A., Power, Subjectivity, and Agency: Between Arendt and Foucault, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», 10, 2, 2002, pp. 131-149.
Allen D.S., Jürgen Habermas and the Search for Democratic Principles, in Bracci S.L.,
Christians C.G. (eds.), Moral Engagement in Public Life: Theorists for Contemporary Ethics, New York, Peter Lang, 2002, pp. 97-122.
Arce Carrascoso J.L., De la hermenéutica a la acción comunicativa: Entre la experiencia de
la nada y la experiencia del tú, in «Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica», 35,
2002, pp. 241-272.
Audard C., Le principe de légitimité démocratique et le débat Rawls-Habermas, in Rochlitz
R. (ed.), Habermas. L’Usage public de la raison, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France,
2002, pp. 95-132.
Avio K.L., Three Problems of Social Organisation: Institutional Law and Economics Meets
4577.
4578.
4579.
4580.
4581.
4582.
4583.
4584.
4585.
4586.
4587.
4588.
4589.
4590.
4591.
4592.
4593.
4594.
4595.
279
Habermasian Law and Democracy, in «Cambridge Journal of Economics», 26, 2002,
pp. 501-520.
Bacchini F., I dadi genetic i... e quelli della vita, in «L’Unità», 28.9.2002, p. 31.
Baklien B., Jürgen Habermas’ kommunikative rasjonalitetsteori og handlingsteori, Oslo,
University of Oslo, 2002.
Bannwart C.J. Jr., Moral pos-convencional em Habermas, Campinas, Universidade
Basden A., The critical theory of Herman Dooyeweerd?, in «Journal of Information
Technology», 17, 4, 2002, pp. 257-269.
Baxter H., Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, in «Buffalo Law Review», 205, 2002.
Baynes K., Brandom and Habermas on the Sources of Normativity, in Critical Theory
Round Table, Saint Louis University, 10.2002.
Baynes K., Communicative Action and the Deliberative Stance, in University of Montreal, 11.2002.
Baynes K., Habermas, Boucher D., Kelly P. (eds.), Political Thinkers: Socrates to the
Present, New York, Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 476-491.
Berciano Villalibre M., Postmodernidad: Estado de la cuestión, in «Diálogo filosófico»,
LII, 2002, pp. 4-42.
Bhaskar R., Reflections on MetaReality: Transcendence, Emancipation and Everyday Life,
New Delhi, Sage, 2002.
Bifulco M., Habermas: an Interpretation, in «Synchronicities», II, 1, 2002, pp. 37-43.
Binz R., Die Rolle des Sports im europäischen Integrationskonzept von Jürgen Habermas, in
The Annual of CESH European Committee for the History of Sport, Hoya, 2002,
pp. 81-94.
Birnbacher D., Habermas’ ehrgeiziges Beweisziel – erreicht oder verfehlt?, in «Deutsche
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1 (Symposium zu: „Jürgen Habermas: Die Zukunft
der menschlichen Natur”), 2002, pp. 121-126.
Bohman J.F., Critical Theory as Practical Knowledge, in Roth P., Turner S., Blackwell
Companion to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Blackwell, 2002, pp. 91-109.
Bohman J.F., Critical Theory, in Smelser N., Baltes P. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier Science, 2002, pp. 2986-2990.
Bolton R.E., A Regional Economist Reads Habermas, Meeting of Western Regional
Science Association, Monterey, California, 2.2002.
Bolzan J., Racionalidade comunicativa e educação: um estudo sobre o pensamento de Jürgen
Habermas enfatizando a formação da competência interativa como aprendizado da razão comunicacional, Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2002.
Bonacker Th., Die Rekonstruktion der soziologischen Vernunft: zur Rezeption soziologischer Klassiker in der Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns von Jürgen Habermas, in Institut für Soziologie und Sozialforschung der Carl von Ossietzky-Universität Oldenburg (ed.), Der soziologische Blick: vergangene Positionen und gegenwärtige Perspektiven, Opladen, Leske & Budrich, 2002, pp. 207-228.
Botero Bernal A., Aproximación al pensar iusfilosófico de Habermas, in «Revista
280
4596.
4597.
4598.
4599.
4600.
4601.
4602.
4603.
4604.
4605.
4606.
4607.
4608.
4609.
4610.
4611.
4612.
4613.
telemática de filosofía del derecho», 5, 2001-2002, pp. 7-36.
Bouchindhomme C., Le vocabulaire de Habermas, Ellipse, Paris, 2002.
Bouchindhomme C., Une querelle de famille. Aux sources de la controverse entre Apel et
Habermas, in Rochlitz R. (ed.), Habermas. L’Usage public de la raison, Paris, Presse
Universitaire de France, 2002, pp. 31-66.
Braiden M.K., Immanuel Kant, John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on the problem of the
possibility of perpetual peace, Montréal, Concordia University, 2002.
Braiden M.K., Immanuel Kant, John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on the Problem of the
Possibility of Perpetual Peace, Montreal, Concordia University, 2002.
Brandt R., Habermas und Kant, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1
(Schwerpunkt: „Zur Moralphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas”), 2002, pp. 53-68.
Brooke C., What does it mean to be ‘critical’ in IS research?, in «Journal of Information
Technology», 17, 2, 2002, pp. 49-57.
Brulle R.J., Habermas and Green Political Thought: Two Roads Converging, in «Environmental Politics», XI, 4, 2002, pp. 1-20.
Brunkhorst H., Rawls and Habermas, in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 153-161.
Brunkhorst H., Solidarität. Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft,
Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2002.
Buchwalter A., Habermas, Hegel, and the Concept of Law, in von Schomberg R.,
Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and Norms,
Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002 pp. 153-161.
Calloni M., Diritti, sviluppo e capacità umane, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, XIII Incontro di studi – Globalizzazione, riconoscimento, diritti umani e ragione
pubblica, 16-17.11.2002.
Campato R.F., A Gênese Teórica da Concepção Habermasiana de Esfera Pública, São
Carlos, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2002.
Camps Cervera M.V., ¿Qué hay de malo en la eugenesia?, in «Isegoría», 27, 2002, pp.
55-72.
Capilla Díaz de Lope Díaz R., La cuestión del relativismo cultural, in «Fuentes», 4,
2002, pp. 259-274.
Carlsson B., Jürgen Habermas and the Sociology of Law, in Banakar R., Travers M.
(eds.), An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, Oxford-Portland, Hart Publishing,
2002, pp. 77-96.
Ceppa L., La revisione di Habermas, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 2, 2002, pp. 175178; repr. as La revisione di Habermas nella prefazione del 1990, in Id., Il diritto della modernità. Saggi habermasiani, Torino, Trauben, 2009, 20112, pp. 117-126.
Ceppa L., Rilanciare l’utopia repubblicana, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 3, 2002, pp.
177-183.
Ceppa L., Un saggio di Habermas su Löwith, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 1, 2002, pp.
95-106; repr. in Id., Il diritto della modernità. Saggi habermasiani, Torino, Trauben,
2009, 20112, pp. 39-58.
4614.
4615.
4616.
4617.
4618.
4619.
4620.
4621.
4622.
4623.
4624.
4625.
4626.
4627.
4628.
4629.
4630.
4631.
281
Cernilo D., The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: the theory of
generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas, in «British Journal of Sociology», LIII, 3, 2002, pp. 431–449.
Chambers S., A Critical Theory of Civil Society, in Chambers S., Kymlicka W. (eds.),
Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2002,
pp. 90-110.
Chelius Stark J., Ethics and ecotourism: Connections and conflicts, in «Philosophy & Geography», V, 1, 2002, pp. 101-113.
Chernilo D., The Theorization of Social Co-ordinations in Differentiated Societies: The Theory of Generalized Symbolic Media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas, in «The British
Journal of Sociology», LIII, 3, 2002, pp. 431-449.
Cisneros J., El concepto de la comunicación: El cristal con que se mira, in «Ambitos:
Revista internacional de comunicación», 7-8, 2002.
Cochran M., A Democratic Critique of Cosmopolitan Democracy: Pragmatism from the
Bottom-up, in «European Journal of International Relations», VIII, 4, 2002, pp. 517548.
Colliot-Thélène C., Habermas et Weber : la rationalisation du droit, in Kervégan J.-F.
(ed.), Crise et pensée de la crise en droit. Weimar, sa République et ses juristes, Lyon, ENS
Éditions, 2002, pp. 195-216.
Cometti J.-P. , Jürgen Habermas et le pragmatisme, in Rochlitz R. (ed.), Habermas.
L’Usage public de la raison, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, 2002, pp. 67-94.
Cook D., Adorno and Habermas on the Human Condition, in «Journal of the British
Society for Phenomenology», XXXIII, 3, 2002, pp. 236-259; repr. in Rasmussen
D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Cook D., Communication in Constellation: Adorno and Habermas on Comunicative Practices Under Late Capitalism, in «Philosophy Today», XLVI, 1, 2002, pp. 41-59.
Cooke M., Argumentation and Transformation, in «Argumentation», XVI, 1, 2002,
pp. 81-110.
Cooke M., Die Stellung der Religion bei Jürgen Habermas, in Dethloff K., Nagl L.,
Wolfram F. (eds.), Religion, Moderne, Postmoderne, Berlin, Parerga, 2002, pp. 99-119.
Cooke M., Jürgen Habermas: A Philosophical Political Profile by Martin Beck
Matustík, in «Philosophy in Review», XXII, 6, 2002, pp. 344-346.
Correale G., Il piano inclinato dell’eugenetica, Milano, Fondazione Bassetti, 7.2.2002.
Cortina Orts A., Ética de las biotecnologías, in «Isegoría », XXVII, 2002, pp. 73-90.
Coulter D., Creating common and uncommon worlds: Using discourse ethics to decide public
and private in classrooms, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXXIV, 1, 2002, pp.
25-42.
Courtois S., Le patriotisme constitutionnel de J. Habermas face au nationalisme québécois: sa
portée, ses limites, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XLI, 4, 2002, pp.
765-794.
Cubitt S., The Liberating Power of Symbols: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas; The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Leonardo», XXXV, 3, 2002, pp. 334-335
282
4632.
4633.
4634.
4635.
4636.
4637.
4638.
4639.
4640.
4641.
4642.
4643.
4644.
4645.
4646.
4647.
4648.
Cummings L., Why We Need to Avoid Theorizing about Rationality: A Putnamian Criticism of Habermas’s Epistemology, in «Social Epistemology», XVI, 2, 2002, pp. 117-131.
Dal Canton I., Conflitto e comunicazione. Per una critica di Jürgen Habermas, Milano,
Edizioni Ghibli, 2002.
Daniel U., How Bourgeois Was the Public Sphere of the Eighteenth Century? Or: Why It Is
Important to Historicize Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in «DasAchtzehnte Jahrhundert», XXVI, 1, 2002, pp. 9-17.
Day R.B., History, Reason and Hope: A Comparative Study of Kant, Hayek and Habermas, in «Humanitas», XV, 2, 2002, pp. 4-24.
De Greiff P., Habermas on Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism, in «Ratio Juris», XV, 4,
2002, pp. 418-438.
Decker K., Habermas on Human Rights and Cloning: A Pragmatist Response, in «Essays
in Philosophy», III, 2, 2002, pp. 1-28.
Deege M., Hegels Deutung der Technik im Kontext der Arbeit. Zur geistesgeschichtlichen
Wirkung Hegels auf Marx und Habermas, in «Prima Philosophia», XV, 3, 2002, pp.
273-288.
Domínguez Bilbao R., La apropiación liberal, radical y ética de la obra de Jürgen
Habermas en la contabilidad social, in «Studia carande», VII, 2, 2002, pp. 427-442.
Dutra D.J.V., Da função da sociedade civil em Hegel e Habermas, in «Filosofia prépublicações», VII, 55, 2002.
Dutra D.J.V., Kant e Habermas: a reformulação discursiva da moral kantiana, Porto
Alegre, EDIPUCRS, 2002.
Elboj Saso C., Puigvert Mallart L., No se puede hacer sociología desde la postmodernidad:
diferencias entre las perspectivas postmoderna y sociológica, in «Acciones e investigaciones
sociales», 14, 2002, pp. 255-269.
Eley G., Politics, Culture, and the Public Sphere, in «Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique», X, 1, 2002, pp. 219-236; tr. it. ‘Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica’ di Jürgen Habermas. Politica, cultura e sfera pubblica, in «Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’’800
et del ‘900», VIII, 2, 2005, pp. 337-345.
Elósegui M. Intercultural Republicanism: Searching for Shared Values, in Smith P.,
Commanduci P. (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Theoretical Examinations and
Practical Application Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of the International Association
for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy IVR New York, June 24-30, 1999, Stuttgart,
Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002, pp. 49-88.
Eriksen E.O., Fossum J.E., Democracy through Strong Publics in the European Union?,
in «Journal of Common Market Studies», XL, 3, 2002, pp. 401-423.
Ferrada Tores D., La intersubjetividad como eje de la concepción comunicativa del curriculum, in «REXE: Revista de estudios y experiencias en educación», I, 1, 2002, pp.
21-40.
Ferrada Tores D., La Teoría de la Comunicación: confluencia de los pensamientos de Freire
y Habermas, in «Revista Praxis», 1, 2002, pp. 27-40.
Ferrara A., Il ragionevole e l’esemplare: ovvero della normatività della ragione pubblica, in
Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, XIII Incontro di studi – Globalizzazio-
4649.
4650.
4651.
4652.
4653.
4654.
4655.
4656.
4657.
4658.
4659.
4660.
4661.
4662.
4663.
4664.
283
ne, riconoscimento, diritti umani e ragione pubblica, 16-17.11.2002.
Fornero G., Dalla riabilitazione della filosofia pratica all’etica del discorso: Habermas e
Apel, in Fornero G., Tassinari S., Le filosofie del novecento. Vol. II, Milano, Bruno
Mondadori, 2002, pp. 1225-1279.
Forst R., Politische Moral, in Greiffenhagen M., Greiffenhagen S. (eds.), Handwörterbuch zur politischen Kultur der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher
Verlag, 2002, pp. 401-407.
Fox Ch.J., Forum: What Do We Mean When We Say “Rationality” in Public Affairs?, in
«Administrative Theory & Praxis», 24, 2, 2002, pp. 347-354.
Frank M., Self-consciousness and Self-knowledge: on Some Difficulties with the Reduction of
Subjectivity, in «Constellations», IX, 3, 2002, pp. 390-408; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Freundlieb D., The Return to Subjectivity as a Challenge to Critical Theory, in «Idealistic
Studies», XXXII, 2, 2002, pp. 171-189; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.),
Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Friedman J., Attraction to Distraction: Live Television and the Public Sphere, in Id., (ed.),
Reality Squared: Televisual Discourse on the Real, New Brunswick-New York, Rutgers
Fritzman J. M., Why I Hardly Read Althusser: Reading Habermas Hardly Reading Althusser, in «Philosophy in the Contemporary World», IX, 1, 2002, pp. 47-59.
Fultner B., Inferentialism and Communicative Action: Robust Conceptions of Intersubjectivity, in «Philosophical Studies», CVIII, 1-2, 2002, pp. 121-131; repr. in Rasmussen
D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Gallino L., Sociologia e teoria critica della società, in «Quaderni di sociologia», XLVI,
29, 2002, pp. 73-90.
García Serrano M., Verdad y racionalidad moral (a propósito del antirrealismo moral del
“último Habermas”), in «Pensamiento: Revista de investigación e Información
filosófica», LVIII, 222, 2002, pp. 411-435.
Gerhards J., Das Öffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU im Horizont normativer Öffentlichkeitstheorien, in Kaelble H., Kirsch M., Schmidt-Gernig A. (eds.), Transnationale Öffentlichkeiten und Identitäten im 20. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt a.M., Campus, 2002, pp. 135-158.
Gill G., Landscape as Symbolic Form: Remembering Thick Place in Deep Time, in «Critical Horizons», 3, 2, 2002, pp. 177-199.
Gómez Sánchez C., La Escuela de Frankfurt: crítica de la razón y ética en J. Habermas,
in Allendesalazar M., Gonzalez Garcia M., (eds.), Filosofía y cultura, Madrid, Siglo
XXI, 2002, pp. 565-580.
Gonzaga de Souza D., Jürgen Habermas recebe o Prêmio da Paz, in «Veritas: revista da
Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», ILVII, 4, 2002.
Görtzen R., Habermas’ Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Eine bibliographische
Auswahl , in Honneth A., Joas H. (eds.), Kommunikatives Handeln: Beiträge zu Jürgen
Habermas’ ‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns’, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 20022,
pp. 455-518.
Gottschalk-Mazouz N., Diskursethische Varianten, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für
284
4665.
4666.
4667.
4668.
4669.
4670.
4671.
4672.
4673.
4674.
4675.
4676.
4677.
4678.
4679.
4680.
4681.
4682.
Philosophie», L, 1 (Schwerpunkt: „Zur Moralphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas”),
2002, pp. 87-104.
Gunnarsson L., Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier Utilitas, in «A
Journal of Utilitarian Studies», XIV, 1, 2002.
Hahn L.E., Perspectives on Habermas, in «Journal of the History of Philosophy»,
XL, 2, 2002.
Harste G., Habermas, Modtryk, Udgivet år, 2002.
Harvey C., The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«Fortnight», 397, 2001, pp. 27-28
Haucke K., Das Unverfügbare und die Unantastbarkeit der Würde. Habermas, die Bioethik und Plessners philosophische Anthropologie, in «Philosophische Rundschau», XLIX,
2, 2002, pp. 165-177.
Heider P.B., Die Übersetzung des Religiösen? Jürgen Habermas und die problematische Rettung einer verlorenen Semantik: Überlegungen zur “Friedenspreis-Rede”, in «Salzburger Jahrbuch für Philosophie», 46-47, 2001-2002, pp. 71-83.
Hill J., The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays by Jürgen Habermas, in «Canadian
journal of communication», XXVII, 4, 2002.
Hindrichs G.,Habermas und die neuzeitliche Subjektivität, in «Allgemeine Zeitschrift
für Philosophie», XXVII, 1, 2002, pp. 67-82.
Hitzel-Cassagnes T., Warten auf Godot. Anmerkungen zur Konzeptualisierung von Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen»,
IX, 1, 2002, pp. 139-154.
Hodge S.M., Rethinking power and intersubjectivity in Habermas’s theory of communicative
action: an application of the theory to a case study of user involvement in mental health policy
making, Bristol, University of Bristol, 2002.
Honneth A., Schwerpunkt: Zur Moralphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas, in «Deutsche
Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1, 2002, p. 38.
Houston S., Re-thinking a systemic approach to child welfare: A critical response to the
framework for the assessment of children in need and their families, in «European Journal of
Social Work», 5, 3, 2002, pp. 301-312.
Hunt L., Principle and Prejudice: Burke, Kant and Habermas on the Conditions of Practical
Reason, in «History of Political Thought», XXIII, 1, 2002, pp. 117-140.
Huster S., Die Ethische Neutralität des Staates: eine liberale Interpretation der Verfassung,
Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2002.
Ikenberry G.J., The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Foreign Affairs», LXXXI, 2, 2002, pp. 177-178
Ingram D., The Sirens of Pragmatism versus the Prophets of Proceduralism. Habermas and
American legal realism, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and
Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 83-112.
Iser M., Riskante Moderne. Zur Gegenwartsdiagnose bei Ulrich Beck, Jürgen Habermas und
Axel Honneth, in «Ästhetik & Kommunikation», XXXIII, 116, 2002, pp. 27-34.
Jiménez Redondo M., Filosofía, sociología y análisis de la actualidad en Jürgen Habermas,
in «Laguna: Revista de Filosofia», 11, 2002, pp. 93-122.
4683.
4684.
4685.
4686.
4687.
4688.
4689.
4690.
4691.
4692.
4693.
4694.
4695.
4696.
4697.
4698.
4699.
285
Karcher S., Habermas und Rawls im Vergleich: Legitimation und Realität, München,
GRIN Verlag, 2002.
Kastoryano R., Citizenship and Belonging: Beyond Blood and Soil, in Hedetoft U.,
Hjort M. (eds.), The Postnational Self: Belonging and Identity, Minneapolis, University of
Minnesota Press, 2002, pp. 120-136.
Kenneth B., Deliberative Democracy and the Limits of Liberalism, in von Schomberg
R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and
Norms, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 15-30.
Keul H.-K., Subjektivität und Intersubjektivität. Zum Freiheits-begriff bei Kant und Habermas, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1 (Schwerpunkt: „Zur Moralphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas”), 2002, pp. 69-86.
Ku A.S., On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the
Theory of Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXXI, 1, 2002, pp. 98-100.
Lacroix J., For a European Constitutional Patriotism, in «Political Studies», L, 5, 2002,
pp. 944-958.
Lacroix J., Patriotisme constitutionnel et identité postnationale chez Jürgen Habermas, in Rochlitz R. (ed.), Habermas. L’Usage public de la raison, Paris, Presse Universitaire de
France, 2002, pp. 133-160.
Lafont C., Continental philosophy of language, in International Encyclopedia of Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 3 Philosophy, Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd., 2002, pp. 8329-8336.
Lafont C., Realismus und Konstruktivismus in der kantianischen Moralphilosophie -- das
Beispiel der Diskursethik, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1 (Schwerpunkt: „Zur Moralphilosophie von Jürgen Habermas”), 2002, pp. 39-52.
Laino D., Reflexiones Psicosociales a partir del Pensamiento de J. Habermas, in «Cinta de
Moebio», 15, 2002.
Laminias C., Structural determination of pupils’ distinct communicative forms and the potentialities of interaction, in «Pedagogy, Culture & Society», 10, 3, 2002, pp. 449-466.
Langelier R.E., La liberté d’expression et l’administration de la justice. Le choc de deux paradigmes, Montréal, Université de Montréal, 2002.
Langman L., Rethinking the Normative Content of Critical Theory: Marx, Habermas, and Beyond by Bob Cannon, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXXI, 6, 2002,
pp. 794-796.
Langsdorf L., Reconstructing the fourth dimension: A Deweyan critique of Habermas’ conception of communicative action, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 141164.
Leet M., Aftereffects of Knowledge: Dogmatic Retreats and Sceptical Adventures, in «Critical
Horizons», 3, 2, 2002, pp. 201-223.
Leet M., The Politics of Suffering: Progress, Modernity and the Adolescent Crisis, in «Australian Journal of Political Science», 37, 1, 2002, pp. 7-20.
Leite Araújo L.B., Raisons morales et justification politique: ébauche d’une nouvelle réponse
de Rawls à Habermas, Colloque “Habermas et ses interlocuteurs: débats et conver-
286
4700.
4701.
4702.
4703.
4704.
4705.
4706.
4707.
4708.
4709.
4710.
4711.
4712.
4713.
4714.
4715.
4716.
gences”, Congrès de l’Association Canadienne de Philosophie, Toronto,
28.5.2002.
Leocata F., Modernidad e Ilustración en Jürgen Habermas, in «Sapientia», LVII, 211,
2002, pp. 235-270.
Lin Y.H., Kang T.L., The critical theory of Habermas’ tech-ideology and its influence for
organizational commitment in Taiwan, in «World Transactions on Engineering and
Technology Education», I, 2, 2002.
Lipscomb M., The Theory of Communicative Action and the Aesthetic Moment: Jürgen
Habermas and the (neo)Nietzschean Challenge, in «New German Critique», 86, 2002, pp.
135-158.
Lohmann G., Die Herausforderung der Ethik durch Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin,
manoscritto, 2002.
López Molina A.M., Autorreflexión e interés emancipatorio en J. Habermas, in «Vida,
pasión y razón en grandes filósofos», 2002, pp. 355-387.
Lynch M., Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement, in «European Journal of International Relations», VIII, 2, 2002, pp. 187-230.
Maar W.L., A perspectiva dialética em Adorno e a controvérsia com Habermas, in
«Trans/Form/ Ação: Revista de Filosofia», 25, 2002, pp. 87-105.
MacKenzie I., On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in
the Theory of Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Theoria: A Journal
of Social and Political Theory», 98, 2001, pp. 104-105
Madarasz N., Intentionalism Contra Intersubjectivism: The Apel-Habermas, and Searle
Debite, in «International Studies in Philosophy», XXXIV, 1, 2002, pp. 113-126.
Mahoney J., Proceduralism and Justification in Habermas’s Discourse Ethics, in «Philosophy Today», XLVI, 3, 2002, pp. 300-312.
Margolis J., Vicissitudes of transcendental reason, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M.,
Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 2002, pp. 31-46.
Marsh J.L., Jürgen Habermas, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», 42, 4,
2002.
Martins C.A., Apontamentos sobre alguns riscos do pensamento habermasiano, in
«Fragmentos de Cultura, Goiânia», 12, 2002, pp. 53-68.
Marzocchi V., Globalizzazione normativa? Per una giustificazione dei diritti umani, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, XIII Incontro di studi – Globalizzazione, riconoscimento, diritti umani e ragione pubblica, 16-17.11.2002.
Marzocchi V., I diritti umani dalla prospettiva dell’etica del discorso, in «La Cultura», 2,
2002, pp. 313-322.
Matuštík M.B., Existential Social Theory After the Poststructuralist and Communication
Turns, in Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, Denver,
8.10.1998; in «Human Studies», XXV, 2002, pp. 146-164.
Matuštík M.B., Writing Habermas’s Intellectual Biography, in Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, 13.3.2002 & St. Louis University, 25.10.2002; as Jürgen Habermas: A Philosophical-Political Profile, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», IIL,
4717.
4718.
4719.
4720.
4721.
4722.
4723.
4724.
4725.
4726.
4727.
4728.
4729.
4730.
4731.
4732.
4733.
287
4, 2002.
McCormick J.P., Confronting Mass Democracy and Industrial Technology: Political and
Social Theory from Nietzsche to Habermas, Duke University Press, 2002.
McMahon Ch., Why there is no issue between Habermas and Rawls, in «Journal of Philosophy», XCIX, 3, 2002, pp. 111-129; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.),
Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
McNabb D., ¿Hasta dóde llegan los signos? Peirce y Habermas, in «Analogia Filosofica:
Revista de Filosofia», XVI, 2, 2002, pp. 41-52.
Mendieta E., El debate sobre el futuro de la especie humana: Habermas critica la eugenesia
liberal, in «Isegoria», XXVII, 2002, pp. 91-114.
Mertens T., From “Perpetual Peace” to ‘The Law of Peoples’: Kant, Habermas and Rawls
on International Relations, in «Kantian Review», 6, 2002, pp. 60-84.
Mesbah A., Religion, rationality, and language: a critical analysis of Jürgen Habermas’ theory
of communicative action, Montréal, McGill University, 2002.
Michelman F.I., The problem of constitutional interpretive disagreement: can “discourses of
application” help?, in Aboulafia M., Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and
Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 113-163.
Milley P., Imagining Good Organizations: Moral Orders or Moral Communities?, in «Educational Management Administration and Leadership», XXX, 1, 2002, pp. 47-64.
Moreira L., Legitimation des Rechts bei Habermas, in «Aufklärung & Kritik», IX, 1,
2002.
Morris M., Rethinking the Communicative Turn: Adorno, Habermas and the Problem of
Communicative Freedom, in «Philosophy in Review», XXII, 6, 2002.
Morrow R.A., Torres C.A., Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical Pedagogy and Transformative Change, New York, Columbia University, 2002.
Munnichs G., Rational Politics? An Exploration of the Fruitfulness of the Discursive Concept of Democracy, in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas Between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002 pp.
185-200.
Navarro A.J., Habermas Jürgen. El futur de la naturalesa humana, in «Ars Brevis», 8,
2002.
Niesen P., Legitimität ohne Moralität. Habermas und Maus über das Verhältnis zwischen
Recht und Moral, in von Schomberg R., Niesen P. (eds.), Zwischen Recht und Moral.
Neuere Ansätze der Rechts- und Demokratietheorie, Hamburg-Munster, LIT Verlag,
2002, pp. 16-60; tr. en. Legitimacy without morality. Habermas and Maus on the relationship between law and morality, in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen
Habermas. Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 123-146.
Noguera J.A., El concepto de trabajo y la teoría social crítica, in «Papers: revista de
sociología», 68, 2002, pp. 141-168.
Nusser K.H., Expansive Demokratietheorien bei Charles Taylor, Michael Walzer und Jürgen Habermas, in «Zeitschrift für Politik», 49, 2002.
O’Donnell D., Henriksen L.B., Philosophical foundations for a critical evaluation of the
social impact of ICT, in «Journal of Information Technology», 17, 2, 2002, pp. 89-99.
288
4734.
4735.
4736.
4737.
4738.
4739.
4740.
4741.
4742.
4743.
4744.
4745.
4746.
4747.
4748.
O’Neil M.L., Youth Curfews in the United States: The Creation of Public Spheres for Some
Young People, in «Journal of Youth Studies», 5, 1, 2002, pp. 49-67.
Oliveira M.A. de., Para além da fragmentação: pressupostos e objeções da raconalidade
dialética contemporânea, São Paulo, Loyola, 2002, pp. 59-78.
Ollig H.-L., Habermas und das religiöse Erbe, in «Stimmen der Zeit», 4, 2002, pp.
219-231.
Oquendo A.R., Deliberative Democracy in Habermas and Nino, in «Oxford Journal of
Legal Studies», XXII, 2, 2002.
Owen D.S., Between Reason and History: Habermas and the Idea of Progress, Albany
Palazzo G., Die Mitte der Demokratie. Über die Theorie deliberativer Demokratie von Jürgen Habermas, Baden Baden, Nomos Verlag, 2002.
Panneerselvam S., Habermas on Presuppositions of Communicative Rationality, in «Indian Philosophical Quarterly», XXIX, 1, 2002, pp. 1-15.
Parker B., Into the Light? Critical Theory and Social Change in South Africa: Beyond
Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture and Agency, by Elliot L. Jurist; The
Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas; Pluralism and the
Pragmatic Turn: The Transformation of Critical Theory. Essays in Honor of
Thomas McCarthy, by William Rehg, in «Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political
Theory», 100, 2002, pp. 95-107
Pavlakos G., On the Normative Groundwork of Discourse-Ethics. A Critique of the Habermasian Proceduralist Paradigm of Rightness in Law and Morality, in Smith P., Commanduci P. (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Theoretical Examinations and Practical Application Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy IVR New York, June 24-30, 1999, Stuttgart, Franz
Steiner Verlag, 2002, pp. 27-32.
Payrow Shabani O.A., Law and Legitimacy in Habermas’ Discourse Ethics, in Smith P.,
Commanduci P. (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Theoretical Examinations and
Practical Application. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of the International Association
for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy IVR New York, June 24-30, 1999, Stuttgart,
Franz Steiner Verlag, 2002, pp. 33-48.
Petrucciani S., Diritti umani e democrazia: argomenti razionali e sfide globali, in «La Cultura», 2, 2002, pp. 285-298.
Pineda Garfias R., La Democracia Deliberativa, in «Ius et Praxis», VIII, 2, 2002, pp.
605-637.
Pizzi J., Las críticas de Habermas a la filosofía de la conciencia, Valencià, Enric Casaban
Moya, 2002, pp. 263-275.
Portilla Contreras G., La influencia de las ciencias sociales en e derecho penal: las teorías
funcionalistas y el discurso ético de Habermas en relación con la selección de los intereses penales,
in del Real Alcalá J.A., López García J.A., Ruiz R., (eds.), La democracia a debate,
Madrid, Dykinson, 2002, pp. 207-228.
Portilla Contreras G., Relación entre algunas tendencias actuales de la filosofía y sociología y
el derecho penal: la influencia de las teorías funcionalistas y el discurso ético de Habermas en la
4749.
4750.
4751.
4752.
4753.
4754.
4755.
4756.
4757.
4758.
4759.
4760.
4761.
4762.
4763.
289
selección de los valores penales, in Díez Ripollés J.L. (ed.), La ciencia del derecho penal ante el
nuevo siglo : libro homenaje al profesor doctor don José Cerezo Mir, Madrid, Editorial
Tecnos, 2002, pp. 135-146.
Preterossi G., Legittimità e crisi dell’universalismo giuridico moderno. Appunti sul rapporto
tra giustificazione e sfera del “politico” a partire dal paradigma habermasiano, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 3, 2002, pp. 161-175.
Putnam H., Values and Norms, in Id., The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and
Other Essays, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press, 2002, pp. 111-134,
171-188; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas.
Vol. 1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 161-192; tr. de. Antwort auf Jürgen Habermas, in
Raters M.L., Willaschek M. (eds.), Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des americanishen
Pragmatismus, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2002, pp. 306-321.
Rasmussen P., Education for everyone: secondary education and social inclusion in Denmark,
in «Journal of Education Policy», 17, 6, 2002, pp. 627-642.
Reader J., The problem of faith and reason after Habermas and Derrida, Newport, University of Wales, 2002.
Redondo M.J., Filosofía, sociología y análisis de la actualidad en Jürgen Habermas, in
«Laguna», 11, 2002, pp. 93-122.
Rehg W.S.J., Bohman J.F., Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of
Legitimacy in Between Fact and Norms, in von Schomberg R., Baynes K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas between Facts and Norms, Albany (N.Y.),
SUNY Press, 2002, pp. 31-60.
Rehg W.S.J., The Argumentation Theorist in Deliberative Democracy, in «Controversia»,
I, 1, 2002, pp. 18-42.
Rehg W.S.J., The Critical Potential of Discourse Ethics: Reply to Meehan and Chambers, in
«Human Studies», XXV, 2002, pp. 407-412.
Rochlitz R., Introduction: Raison et rationalité, in Id. (ed.), Habermas. L’Usage public de
la raison, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, 2002, pp. 7-30.
Rochlitz R., Philosophie politique et sociologie chez J. Habermas, in Rochlitz R. (ed.), Habermas. L’Usage public de la raison, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, 2002, pp.
161-197.
Rockmore T., The epistemological promise of pragmatism, in Aboulafia M., Bookman
M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 47-64.
Rohden V., Kant e Habermas. A reformulação discursiva da moral kantiana, in
«Ethic@», 1, 1, 2002, pp. 97-100.
Rosati M., Solidarietà e sacro. Secolarizzazione e persistenza della religione nel discorso sociologico della modernità, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2002.
Rosenthal S., Habermas, Dewey and the Democratic Self, in Aboulafia M., Bookman
M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York, Routledge &
Kegan Paul, 2002, pp. 210-222.
Sáez Rueda L., ¿Es posible una razón crítica sin recurso a Ideas Regulativas?: El nexo entre
las dimensiones reflexiva y existencial de la crítica de patologías, in «Isegoría», 26, 2002, pp.
257-276.
290
4764.
4765.
4766.
4767.
4768.
4769.
4770.
4771.
4772.
4773.
4774.
4775.
4776.
4777.
4778.
4779.
4780.
4781.
Salis P., Rorty e Habermas: un confronto sulla ragione comunicativa, in «Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Cagliari», XX, 57, 2002, pp. 265-288.
Scheuerman W., Unsolved Paradoxes. Conservative Political Thought in Adenauer’s Germany, in McCormick J.P. (ed.), Confronting Mass Democracy and Industrial Technology:
German Political and Social Thought from Nietzsche to Habermas, Durham, Duke University Press, 2002.
Schlesinger Ph., Media and Belonging: The Changing Shape of Political Communication in
the European Union, in Hedetoft U., Hjort M. (eds.), The Postnational Self: Belonging and
Identity, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2002, pp. 35-52.
Schuartz L.F., Die Hoffnung auf radikale Demokratie: Fragen an die Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Frankfurt a.M., Lang, 2002.
Schusterman R., Habermas, pragmatism, and the problem of aesthetics, in Aboulafia M.,
Bookman M., Kemp C. (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism, London-New York,
Serrano M.G., Verdad y racionalidad moral (a propósito del antirrealismo moral del último
Habermas), in «Pensamiento. Revista de investigación e información filosófica»,
LVIII, 222, 2002, pp. 411-435.
Shabani O.A.P., Who’s Afraid of Constitutional Patriotism? The Binding Source of Citizenship in Constitutional States, in «Social Theory and Practice», 28, 2002.
Siebert R.J., Christianity as Absolute or Relative Religion: From Hegel To Horkheimer,
Benjamin, Adorno and Habermas, in Arndt A., Bal K., Ottmnann H. (eds), Hegel –
Jahrbuch 2002. Phäanomenologie des Geistes. Zweiter Teil, Jena, Academie Verlag, 2002,
pp. 108-130.
Siep L., Moral und Gattungsethik, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», L, 1
(Symposium zu: „Jürgen Habermas: Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur”), 2002,
pp. 111-120.
Sørensen J., Estetiske erfaringers subjektivitet : Habermas’ benjaminianske resepsjonsbegrep
og Alfords kritikk av dets overindividuelle oppbygning, Oslo, University of Oslo, 2002.
Sozio M., Pubblicità e diritto in J. Habermas, Bari, Adriatica, 2002.
Spaemann R., Habermas über Bioethik, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie»,
L, 1 (Symposium zu: „Jürgen Habermas: Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur”),
2002, pp. 105-110.
Sparti D., Difficili convivenze: una nota su Habermas e il multiculturalismo, in «Quaderni
di sociologia», VIL, 29, 2002, pp. 121-141.
Stark J., Objectivity and the Silence of Reason: Weber, Habermas, and the Methodological
Disputes in German Sociology, in «Contemporary Sociology», XXXI, 5, 2002.
Stein E., A filosofia de Jürgen Habermas, in «Veritas», VIIL, 4, 2002.
Steinhoff U., Habermas’ relativistische und dezisionistische Wende, in «Aufklärung &
Kritik», 9, 2, 2002.
Tibi B., Habermas and the Return of the Sacred. Is it a religious Renaissance?, in «Religion,
Staat, Gesellschaft», III, 2, 2002, pp. 265-296.
Torres Morales M., Systemtheorie, Diskurstheorie und das Recht der Transzendentalphilosophie: Kant - Luhmann - Habermas, Würzburg, Königshausen u. Neumann, 2002.
4782.
4783.
4784.
4785.
4786.
4787.
4788.
4789.
4790.
4791.
4792.
4793.
4794.
291
Torres Muro I., Una revisión del Habermas jurídico, in «Revista española de derecho
constitucional», XXII, 66, 2002, pp. 241-248.
Tribe J., Education for Ethical Tourism Action, in «Journal of Sustainable Tourism»,
10, 4, 2002, pp. 309-324.
Valls Carol M.R., Educación permanente y sociedad de la información, in «Tabanque», 16,
2001-2002, pp. 19-33.
Varey R.J., Wood-Harper T., Wood B., A theoretical review of management and information systems using a critical communications theory, in «Journal of Information Technology», 17, 4, 2002, pp. 229-239.
Velasco Arroyo J.C., La teoría discursiva del derecho: Sistema jurídico y democracia en
Habermas, in «Isegoria», 26, 2002.
Viehöver W., Kern Th., Kritische Theorie als Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Jürgen Habermas, in Stark C., Lahusen C. (eds.), Theorien der Gesellschaft : Einführung in
zentrale Paradigmen der soziologischen Gegenwartsanalyse, München, Oldenbourg, 2002,
pp. 127-162.
von Dews P., Law, Solidarity and Tasks of Philosophy, in von Schomberg R., Baynes
K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Habermas between Facts and Norms, Albany
(N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2002 pp. 165-184.
Wahl Jorgensen K., Understanding the Conditions for Public Discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor, in «Journalism Studies», 3, 1, 2002, pp. 69-81
Weisser Ch.R., Olson G.A., Moving Beyond Academic Discourse: Composition Studies
and the Public Sphere, Carbondale, IL, Southern Illinois University Press, 2002.
Wingert L., Jürgen Habermas “Faktizität und Geltung” - Der Prozess des Rechts in den
Satzungen der Macht, in Brandt R., Sturm Th. (eds.), Klassische Werke der Philosophie,
Stuttgart, Reclam, 2002, pp. 345-378.
Wolsing P., Is Reason Communicative? Some critical remarks on Habermas, in «Danish
Yearbook of Philosophy», 37, 2002, pp. 103-112.
Zolo D., Una crítica realista del globalismo jurídico desde Kant a Kelsen y Habermas, in
«Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez», 36, 2002, pp. 197-218.
Zurn Ch., Deliberative Democracy and Constitutional Review, in Law and Philosophy,
XXI, 4-5, 2002, pp 467-542; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II.
Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
2003
4795.
4796.
4797.
Abbas A., McLean M., Communicative Competence and the Improvement of University
Teaching: Insights from the Field, in «British Journal of Sociology of Education»,
XXIV, 1, 2003, pp. 69-81.
Abignente A., Legittimazione, discorso, diritto. Il proceduralismo di Jürgen Habermas, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica, 2003.
Albert H., Jürgen Habermas und das Problem der Letztbegründung. Notizen zum Begründungsprogramm der Diskursethik, in Id., Kritik des transzendentalen Denkens. Von der Begründung des Wissens zur Analyse der Erkenntnispraxis, Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2003,
292
4798.
4799.
4800.
4801.
4802.
4803.
4804.
4805.
4806.
4807.
4808.
4809.
4810.
4811.
4812.
4813.
4814.
4815.
4816.
pp. 176-182.
Alexy R., Constitutional Rights, Balancing, and Rationality, in «Ratio Juris», XVI, 2,
2003, pp. 131-140; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III,
Allen A., Foucault and Enlightenment: A critical reappraisal, in «Constellations», X, 2,
2003, pp. 180-198; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I,
Andreoli M., Jürgen Habermas, El futuro de la naturaleza humana, in «Actio 2.1»,
10.2003, pp. 121-133.
Andrews Ch.W., Jürgen Habermas: Sobre Revolução e “Fim da História”, in «Margem»,
17, 2003, pp. 129-146.
Araújo L.B.L., Moral, direito e política: sobre a teoria do discurso de Habermas, in Id.,
Filosofia Política Contemporânea, Petrópolis, Vozes, 2003, pp. 214-235.
Ardigò A., Mondi vitali intersoggettivi ed oggettività macrosistemica: continuità e discontinuità,
in Lazzari F., Merler A. (eds.), La sociologia delle solidarietà. Scritti in onore di Giuliano
Giorio, Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2003.
Arenas L., ¿El fin del hombre o el hombre como fin?, crónica de la polémica SloterdijkHabermas, in «Pasajes», 12, 2003.
Armour L., Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques
Derrida, in «Library Journal», CXXVIII, 10, 2003.
Bain-Selbo E., Religion and Rationality, in «Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory», V, 1, 2003, pp. 139-143.
Baird Jackson J., On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in
the Theory of Communicative Action, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Language»,
LXXVIII, 78, No. 2, 2002, p. 384
Barbieri Durao A., La interpretación de Habermas sobre la tensión entre derechos humanos
y soberanía popular en el pensamiento de Kant, in «Doxa: Cuadernos de Filosofía del
Derecho», 26, 2003.
Barbosa R., Habermas and the Specificity of the Aesthetic, in «Symposium», VII, 1,
2003, pp. 87-98.
Barraza Macías A., Habermas y la Educación, in «Contexto educativo», 27, 2003.
Barrio Maestre J.M., La aporía fundamental del llamado “debate” bioético, in
«Cuadernos de bioética», XIV, 51-52, 2003, pp. 229-240.
Baumeister A., Habermas. Discourse and Cultural Diversity, in «Political Studies», 51,
2003, pp. 740–758.
Becker H., Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei C. Schmitt und J. Habermas, Berlin,
Duncker & Humblot, 2003.
Bedmar Moreno M., Los imperativos de la educación social, in «Rexe: Revista De
Estudios Y Experiencias En Educación», II, 3, 2003, pp. 55-66.
Belvedere C., El mundo de la vida como artilugio reduccionista Schutz en la lectura de
Gurwitsch y Habermas, in «Enfoques», XV, 1, 2003, pp. 51-72.
Benhabib S., Renverser la dialectique de la raison: le réenchantement du monde, in Renault
E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp.
4817.
4818.
4819.
4820.
4821.
4822.
4823.
4824.
4825.
4826.
4827.
4828.
4829.
4830.
4831.
4832.
4833.
4834.
4835.
4836.
293
75-92.
Billouet P., L’appropriation: Habermas face à l’eugénisme libéral?, in «Critique», 679,
2003, pp. 930-945.
Bobadilla Rodriguez F., El futuro de la naturaleza humana. ¿Hacia una eugenesia
liberal?, in «Revista de Comunicacion», 1, 2003, 147-149.
Bohman J.F., Deliberative Toleration, in «Political Theory», XXXI, 6, 2003, pp. 757779.
Bohman J.F., Public Deliberation, Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXIX, 1, 2003, pp. 85-105.
Bohman J.F., Reflexive Toleration in a Deliberative Democracy, in Catisglione D.,
McKinnon C. (eds.), The Culture of Toleration in Diverse Societies, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2003, pp. 111-131.
Bolz N., Habermas: el filósofo de la República Federal, in «Revista de Occidente», 270,
2003, pp. 51-58.
Borradori G., Terrorism and the Legacy of the Enlightenment - Habermas and Derrida, in
Id., Philosophy in a Time of Terror, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2003, pp. 122; tr. it. Il terrorismo e l’eredità dell’iluminismo, in Id., Filosofia del terrore. Dialoghi con J.
Habermas e J. Derrida, Roma-Bari, Laterza, 2003, pp. 3-26.
Brekke O.A., Høstaker R., Sirnes T., Dimensjonar i moderne sosialteori: Bourdieu, Habermas, Latour og Luhmann, Oslo, Det Norske Samlaget, 2003.
Bühl A., Die Habermas-Foucault-Debatte neu gelesen, in «Prokla», 130, 33, 1, 2003, pp.
159-182.
Calloni M., Habermas e Fukujama dicono di no, in «Reset», 76, 2003, pp. 81-84.
Calore A., «Guerra giusta»? Le metamorfosi di un concetto antico, Milano, Giuffrè, 2003.
Caputo F., Scienza pedagogica comunicativa: Jürgen Habermas, Cosenza, Pellegrini Editore, 2003.
Cárdenas R., Miguel E., Acerca del vínculo entre derecho, el estado y la democracia. A
propósito de Habermas y su aporte a la metodología de la interpretación y aplicación del derecho,
in «Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana», VIII, 20, 2003, pp. 81-104.
Ceppa L., Rawls e Habermas: una discussione in famiglia, in «Teoria politica», XVII, 23, 2003, pp. 299-308.
Chandler E., Giving Ground: Exploring Non-Coercive Politics. A Dissertation, Miami
University, The Graduate School, 2003.
Cohen J.L., Nancy Fraser: une critique feministe d’Habermas, in «Problemes politiques
et sociaux», 888, 2003.
Cook D., Legitimacy and Political Violence: A Habermasian Perspective, in «Social Justice», 30, 2003.
Cooke E.F., On the Possibility of a Pragmatic Discourse Bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and
the Normative Logic of Bioethical Inquiry, in «Journal of Medicine and Philosophy»,
XXVIII, 5-6, 2003, pp. 635-653.
Cooke M., The Weaknesses of Strong Intersubjectivism: Habermas’s Conception of Justice, in
«European Journal of Political Theory», 2, 2003, pp. 281-305.
Cortella L., Etica del discorso ed etica del riconoscimento, in Vigna C. (ed.), Libertà, giusti-
294
4837.
4838.
4839.
4840.
4841.
4842.
4843.
4844.
4845.
4846.
4847.
4848.
4849.
4850.
4851.
4852.
zia e bene in una società plurale, Milano, Vita e pensiero, 2003, pp. 225-248.
Cortella L., Il riconoscimento come paradigma, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di
Gallarate, XIV Incontro di studi – Riconoscimento, identità e solidarietà, 15-16.11.2003.
Cronin C.P., Democracy and Collective Identity: In Defence of Constitutional Patriotism, in
«European Journal of Philosophy», XI, 1, 2003, pp. 1-28.
Cusset Y., Habermas/Foucault : pouvoirs du langage et langages du pouvoir, Colloque
“Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques”, Université de
Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; as Ce que parler veut dire…et peut faire : Pouvoirs du
langage et langages du pouvoir chez Habermas et Foucault, in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.),
Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions,
2006, pp. 137-154.
Cusset Y., Habermas: L’espoir de la discussion, in «Revue Philosophique de la France
et de l’Etranger», CXCIV, 4, 2003.
Cusset Y., Sommes-nous encore intéressés à l’émancipation? Pour une lecture critique des principes normatifs de l’État de droit démocratique chez Habermas, in «Archives de Philosophie», LXVI, 4, 2003, pp. 585-602.
Cutler R.Ch., Theorizing European citizenship: discursive democracy and the work of Jürgen
Habermas, Liverpool, University of Liverpool, 2003.
De Greiff P., Habermas on Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism, in «Ratio Juris», XVI, 4,
2003.
de Oliveira A.A. A., A competência comunicativa como um telos para o agir pedagógico,
Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2003.
Dean J., Why the Net in not a Public Sphere, in «Constellations», X, 1, 2003, pp. 95112.
Debru C., Nouvel P., Conclusion. L’avenir de la nature humaine à partir de Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Id., Le possible et les biotechnologies. Essai de philosophie dans les sciences, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2003, pp. 411-426.
Delatte A.E., De la grammaire du temps. Theodor Fontane, Heinrich von Kleist, Anna
Wilde, G-E Lessing, Jürgen Habermas, Heiner Müller, Paris-Budapest-Torino,
l’Harmattan, 2003.
Demirovic A., Demokratie, Politik und Staat in der transformistischen Gesellschaft: vergleichende Anmerkungen zu den Gesellschaftstheorien Niklas Luhmanns und Jürgen Habermas’,
in Hellmann K.U., Fischer K., Bluhm H. (eds.), Das System der Politik: Niklas
Luhmanns politische Theorie, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003, pp. 336-357.
Denvir J., The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in
«The Review of Metaphysics», LVI, 2, 2002, pp. 421-423.
Donaggio E., Cronaca di una morte annunciata? Jürgen Habermas legge Adorno, “Theodor Wiesengrund Adorno: la ricezione di un maestro conteso”, Loveno di Menaggio (CO), Villa Vigoni, 2-3.4.2003; in Ferrari M., Venturelli A. (eds.), Adorno. Storia
della ricezione di un maestro conteso, Olschki, Firenze, 2005, pp. 211-226.
Doughty H.A., Jürgen Habermas’ Concept of Universal Pragmatics: A Practical Approach
to Ethics and Innovation, in «The Innovation Journal», VIII, 3, 2003.
Dubiel H., Gehäuse oder Membran?: zur kritischen Theorie im neuen Kapitalismus, in
4853.
4854.
4855.
4856.
4857.
4858.
4859.
4860.
4861.
4862.
4863.
4864.
4865.
4866.
4867.
4868.
4869.
4870.
295
«Merkur», LVII, 653-654, 2003, pp. 861-871.
Dumitru S., Liberté de procréation et manipulation génétique. Pour une critique d’Habermas,
in Raisons politiques, XII, 4, 2003, pp. 31-54.
Durand-Gasselin, J.-M., La modernité et son ouverture : une confrontation Foucault/Habermas, Colloque “Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations
critiques”, Université de Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; in Cusset Y., Haber S.
(eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 97-114.
Duvenage P., Habermas and Aesthetics: The Limits of Communicative Reason, in «South
African Journal of Philosophy», XXIII, 3, 2003.
Dyzenhaus D., The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics», CXIII, 1, 2002, pp. 154-157
Elveton R., Jürgen Habermas, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, in «Journal of Value Inquiry», XXXVII, 1, 2003, pp 131-136.
Embree L., Husserl as Trunk of the American Continental Tree, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», 11, 2, 2003, pp. 177-190.
Eriksen E.O., Weigård J., Communicative design, in Eriksen E.O., Weigård J. (ds.),
Understanding Habermas. Communicative action and deliberative democracy, London-New
York, Continuum Books, 2003, pp. 199-231.
Ferrara A., Two Notions of Humanity and the Judgment Argument for Human Rights, in
«Political Theory», XXXI, 3, 2003, pp. 392-420; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J.
(eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Ferrarese E., Les renversements du concept de compromis. Des ambiguïtés de l’intérêt particulier dans la théorie de Jürgen Habermas, in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la
théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 153-166.
Feteris E.T., The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas’s Discourse Theory, in «Informal Logic», XXII, 2, 2003.
Fields S., The Liberating Power of Symbols: Philosophical Essays, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Review of Metaphysics», LVI, 3, 2003, pp. 650-651.
Fiig Ch., A Feminist Public Sphere. An Analysis of the Habermasian Public Sphere in a
Danish Gender Political Context, Ph.D-thesis, Aalborg, Aalborg University, 2003.
Fine R., Smith W., Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Cosmopolitanism, in «Constellations»,
X, 4, 2003, pp. 469-487.
Flynn J., Habermas on Human Rights: Law, Morality, and Intercultural Dialogue, in «Social Theory and Practice», XXIX, 3, 2003, pp. 431-457.
Forst R., Toleranz im Konflikt: Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2003.
Froomkin A.M., Habermas@ Discourse Net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace, in
«Harvard Law Review», CXVI, 3, 2003, pp. 749-873.
Fultner B., Translator’s Introduction, in Habermas J., Truth and Justification (WuR),
Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press, 2003, pp. VII-XXII.
Gabilondo J., Posnacionalismo y biopolítica: para una crítica multiculturista del estado y su
soberanía en Europa y el País Vasco (notas sobre Habermas y Agamben), in «Inguruak:
296
4871.
4872.
4873.
4874.
4875.
4876.
4877.
4878.
4879.
4880.
4881.
4882.
4883.
4884.
4885.
4886.
4887.
Revista de sociología», 37, 2003, pp. 15-34.
García Ruiz M.E., Combinando Metodologías, in «Anales de economía y
administración de empresas», 10-11, 2002-2003, pp. 245-263.
Gegner M., Die Entmaterialisierung der Öffentlichkeit. Über die Verengung eines dialektischen Konzepts und den Gebrauch in neoliberalen Zeiten, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue
Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg,
VSA-Verl. 2003, pp. 58-88.
Goffi J.-Y., La théorie critique à la lumière de l’éthique de l’environnement, in Renault E.,
Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 235249.
Gómez P.P., La unidad de la razón en la multiplicidad de sus voces (La filosofía según
Jürgen Habermas) , in «Praxis Filosofica», 17, 2003, pp. 23-36.
Gonthier F., Jürgen Habermas, L’Avenir d ela nature humaine. Vers un eugénisme libéral?,
in «Hermès cognition, comunication, politique», 36, 2003.
Goodnight G.T., Predicaments of Communication, Arguments and Power, in «Informal
Logic», XXIII, 2, 2003.
Gosepath S., Gleichheit in Habermas’ und Dworkins Theorien der Gerechligheit, in PauerStuder H., Nagl-Docekal H. (eds.), Freiheit, Gleichheit und Autonomie, München,
Oldenbourg, 2003, pp. 94-116.
Greenholtz J., Socratic Teachers and Confucian Learners: Examining the Benefits and Pitfalls of a Year Abroad, in «Language and Intercultural Communication», 3, 2, 2003,
pp. 122-130.
Gunnarsson L., Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier, in «Mind»,
CXII, 445, 2003.
Haber S., Éthique de la discussion et réconciliation avec la nature, in Renault E., Sintomer
Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 219-233.
Haber S., Savoir émancipateur et sciences humaines chez Foucault et Habermas, Colloque
Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; as Sciences humaines et savoir émancipateur chez Foucault
et Habermas, in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 183-210.
Halas E., Social Symbolism – Forms and Functions, Murcia, 6th ESA Conference,
2003.
Hartmuth B., Die Parlamentarismuskritik bei Carl Schmitt und Jürgen Habermas, Lieferbar, Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 2003.
Hedberg P., Discursive Conditions and Contextual Pre-Suppositions: Habermas versus
Apel, in «SATS: Nordic Journal of Philosophy», IV, 2, 2003, pp. 67-92.
Hedberg P., Freedom, Reason and History: The Hegelian heritage in Gadamer and Habermas, in «Parabel», VI, 1, 2003, pp. 19-43.
Heller A., Der Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und das Entstehen der Witzkultur , in
Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl. 2003, pp. 196-212.
Heng M.S.H., de Moor A., From Habermas’s communicative theory to practice on the in-
4888.
4889.
4890.
4891.
4892.
4893.
4894.
4895.
4896.
4897.
4898.
4899.
4900.
4901.
4902.
4903.
4904.
4905.
297
ternet, in «Info Systems», 13, 2003, pp. 331-352.
Henrik Haahr J., The provocation of plaiting palm leaves: Habermas, Foucault and media
presentations of education in Danish television, in «Journalism», IV, 2, 2003.
Herrera Gómez M., Lenguaje y acción en la teoría de la acción comunicativa de Jürgen
Habermas, in «Revista de estudios políticos», 121, 2003, pp. 31-70.
Honneth A., Halbierte Rationalität, in Fischer J., Joas H. (eds.), Kunst, Macht und
Institutionen, Frankfurt a.M., 2003, pp. 58-74.
Honneth A., La critique comme mise à jour. La Dialectique de la raison et les controverses
actuelles sur la critique sociale, in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 59-73.
How A., Overcoming the Impasse: Habermas’s Reconstruction of Critical Theory Critical
Theory, in Id., Critical Theory, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 115-142.
Howard D., Habermas’s Reorientation of Critical Theory. Toward Democratic Theory, in
Id., The specter of democracy, New York, Columbia University Press, 2003, pp. 51-62.
Humrich Ch., Kritische Theorie, in Schieder S., Spindler M. (eds.), Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen, Opladen, UTB Verlag, 2003, pp. 421-448.
Hurri S., What of Tomorrow’s Citizenship? Universal and Politics in Hannah Arendt and
Jürgen Habermas, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 89, 2003.
Ingram D., Between Political Liberalism and Postnational Cosmopolitanism: Toward an
alternative theory of human rights, in «Political Theory», XXXI, 3, 2003, pp. 359-391;
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Ingram D., Jürgen Habermas and Hans-Georg Gadamer, in Solomon R., Sherman D.
(eds.), Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy, London, Blackwell, 2003, pp. 219244.
Ipperciel D., Habermas : le penseur engagé, Ville de Québec, Presses de l’Université
de Laval, 2003.
Jäger W., Baltes-Schmitt M., Jürgen Habermas: Einführung in die Theorie der Gesellschaft, Wiesbaden, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003.
Jeong D.S., Von der Subjektivität zur Intersubjektivität : die Auseinandersetzung von Habermas mit der Subjektivitätsphilosophie, Bochum, Ruhr Universität Bochum, 2003.
Jeong D.S., Von der Subjektivität zur Intersubjektivität. Die Auseinandersetzung von Habermas mit der Subjektivitätsphilosophie, Bochum, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 6.2003.
Kantner C., Tietz U., Dialektik, Dialog und Institutionenkritik. Zum Institutionenverständnis der Kritischen Theorie, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu
Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl. 2003, pp.
105-129.
Kervégan J.-F., Quel est le sens de «l’autonomie du droit»? À propos du débat Habermas/Luhmann, in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La
Découverte, 2003, pp.135-152.
Keulartz F.W.J., De jonge Habermas over techniek, in «Filosofie», XIII, 6, 2003, pp.
31-36.
Kevin Scharp, Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the Ha-
298
4906.
4907.
4908.
4909.
4910.
4911.
4912.
4913.
4914.
4915.
4916.
4917.
4918.
4919.
bermas-Brandom Debate, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», 11, 1,
2003, pp. 43-61.
Kirkpatrick G., Evolution Or Progress? A (Critical) Defence Of Habermas’s Theory of
Social Development, in «Thesis Eleven», LXXII, 1, 2003.
Korthals M., Habermas, in Bor J. (ed.), 25 eeuwen Westerse Filosofie, AmsterdamMeppel, Boom, 2003, pp. 502-508.
Kozoll R., Margery Osborne & Georgia Earnest García, Migrant worker children: Conceptions of homelessness and implications for education, in «International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education», 16, 4, 2003, pp. 567-585.
Kraushaar W. (ed.), Frankfurter Schule und Studentenbewegung. Von der Flaschenpost
zum Molotowcocktail 1946 bis 1995, Hamburg, Hamburger Edition, HIS Verlag,
2003.
Laberenz L., Die Rationalität des Bürgertums. Nation und Nationalismus als blinder Fleck
im Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl.
2003, pp. 130-170.
Laberenz L., Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit? Anmerkungen zu Herrschaft und Öffentlichkeit
unter dem Vorzeichen des Neoliberalismus, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit:
Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl.
2003, pp. 11-57.
Lafont C., Justice and Legitimacy, in The Critical Theory Roundtable, SUNY at
Stony Brook, New York, 10.2003; in The Conference Razones de la Justicia.
Homenaje a Thomas McCarthy, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas (UNAM),
Mexico D.F., 5.2004; tr. es. Justicia y legitimidad. La intricada relación entre la política y la
moral, in Herrera M., De Greiff P. (eds.), Razones de la Justicia. Homenaje a Thomas
McCarthy, México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, 2005, pp. 93124.
Lafont C., Remarks on Habermas’s The Future of Human Nature, in «APA Newsletter
on Philosophy and Medicine», III, 1, 2003, pp. 157-160; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Lamnias C., A sociological analysis of the internal differentiation of pedagogic (scientific)
knowledge, in «Pedagogy, Culture & Society», 11, 2, 2003, pp. 241-259.
Lang S., Der geschlechterdemokratische Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Jürgen Habermas
in der feministischen Debatte, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu
Jürgen Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl. 2003, pp.
89-104.
Langlois L., Habermas et la question de la vérité, in «Archives de Philosophie», LXVI,
4, 2003, pp. 563-583.
Lavagno C., Rekonstruktion der Moderne: Eine Studie zu Habermas und Foucault,
Münster, Lit, 2003.
Lebeck C., The Post-National Constellation, in «Australasian Journal of Philosophy»,
81, 1, 2003, pp. 146-147.
Leet M., Democracy and the Individual: Deliberative and existential negotiations, in «Phi-
4920.
4921.
4922.
4923.
4924.
4925.
4926.
4927.
4928.
4929.
4930.
4931.
4932.
4933.
4934.
4935.
299
losophy and Social Criticism», XXIX, 6, 2003, pp. 681-702; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Leite Araújo L.B., Raisons morales et justification politique: ébauche d’une nouvelle réponse
de Rawls à Habermas, in «Symposium», VII, 1, 2003, pp. 47-66.
Lenoble J., Maesschalck M., Toward a Theory of Governance. The Action of Norms,
The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2003.
Lipp A., Liberating clinical effectiveness: A model for consideration, in «Contemporary
Nurse», 15, 1-2, 2003, pp. 70-80.
Ljunggren C., The Public Has to Define Itself: Dewey, Habermas, and Rorty on Democracy
and Individuality, in «Studies in Philosophy and Education», XXII, 5, 2003, pp. 351370.
Llanque M., Räsonnement und Deliberation. Zu einem Grundproblem öffentlicher Kommunikation bei Habermas, in Laberenz L. (ed.), Schöne neue Öffentlichkeit: Beiträge zu Jürgen
Habermas’ “Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit”, Hamburg, VSA-Verl. 2003, pp. 171195.
López de la Vieja de la Torre M.T., Política cosmopolita, cultura europea, in «Daimon»,
29, 2003, pp. 101-112.
Lourme L., Qu’est-ce qu’une Europe européenne? Introduction à la conception habermassienne de la construction européenne, Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux III, 2003.
Luisetti F., Habermas lettore di Calvino, in «Italian Culture», XXI, 1, 2003, pp. 117131.
Maar W.L., O prisma materialista da dialética:ética e trabalho na reprodução social efetiva, in
Boito A., Toledo C. (eds), Marxismo e Ciências Humanas, São Paulo, Xamã, 2003,
pp. 280-296.
Marsh J., Unjust Legality: A Critique of Habermas’s Philosophy of Law, in «Mind»,
CXII, 448, 2003.
Matuštík M.B., Between Hope and Terror: Derrida and Habermas Plead for the
Im/Possible, in Conference on the new shape of the European Union, the Czech
Academy of Science, Prague 26.11.2003; repr. in «Epoche», IX, 1, 2004, pp. 1-18;
in Thomassen L.A. (ed.), The Derrida-Habermas Reader, Edinburgh University Press,
2006, pp. 278-296.
McCormick J.P., Habermas’ reconstruction of West German post-war law and the Sozialstaat controversy, in Müller J.-W. (ed.), German Ideologies Since 1945. Studies in the Political Thought and Culture of the Bonn Republic, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp.
61-75; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol.
1, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 201-216.
McCumber J., Philosophy and Freedom: Derrida, Rorty, Habermas, Foucault, in «Revue
Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger», CXCIII, 2, 2003.
Mcluskie E., Reading Humboldt Through the Theory of Communicative Action: The Democratic Potential of Symbolic Interaction, in «Javnost - The Public», 10, 2, 2003, pp. 25-44.
Mejía Quintana O., La desobediencia civil: un concepto problemático, in «Revista de
estudios sociales», 14, 2003, pp. 76-87.
Mendieta E., We Have Never Been Human or, How We Lost Our Humanity: Derrida
300
4936.
4937.
4938.
4939.
4940.
4941.
4942.
4943.
4944.
4945.
4946.
4947.
4948.
4949.
4950.
4951.
4952.
and Habermas on Cloning, in «Philosophy Today», XLVII, 5, 2003, pp. 168-175.
Mennell S., Eating in the Public Sphere in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Jacobs
M., Scholliers P. (eds.), Eating Out in Europe: Picnics, Gourmet Dining, and Snacks since
the Late Eighteenth Century, Oxford–Berg, International Commission for Research
into European Food History, 2003, pp. 245-260
Micheletti G., Recensione a Jürgen Habermas, Il futuro della natura umana, in «Dialegesthai. Rivista telematica di filosofia», V, 2003.
Mitchell G.R., Did Habermas Cede Nature to the Positivists?, in «Philosophy and
Rhetoric», XXXVI, 1, 2003, pp. 1-21.
Monod J.-C., La Réforme comme événement constitutif : modernité, subjectivité, actualité,
Colloque “Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques”,
Université de Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006,
pp. 85-96.
Moon J.D., Rawls and Habermas on public reason: human rights and global justice, in
«Annual Review of Political Science», 6, 2003, pp. 257-274.
Morgan G., Hayek, Habermas, and European integration, in «Critical Review», 15, 1-2,
2003, pp. 1-22.
Morgan G.H., Hayek, Habermas, and European Integration, in «Critical Review: An
Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics and Society», XV, 1-2, 2003, pp. 1-22.
Morrison K., Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Metaphors and Models for Partnership Consultancy, in «Evaluation & Research in Education», 17, 1, 2003,
pp. 31-44.
Morrow R.A., Torres C.A. Reading Freire and Habermas: Critical Pedagogy and Transformative Social Change, in «Philosophy in Review», XXIII, 4, 2003.
Nau J.Y., De l’urgence de lire Habermas, in «Medecine et Hygiene», 2430, 2003.
Nilson A.A., Language and Communication in Wittgenstein and Habermas, Rio de Janeiro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2003.
Nobre M., Habermas e a teoria crítica da sociedade: sobre o sentido da introdução da categoria do direito no quadro da Teoria da ação comunicativa, in Oliveira N.F., Souza D.G.
(eds.), Justiça e política: homenagem a Otfried Höffe, Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 2003, pp.
**-**.
O Meara G.J., Habermas, Violence and the Ultimate Reality and Meaning of Law: A Further Contribution to URAM Habermas Studies, in «Ultimate Reality and Meaning: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Philosophy of Understanding», XXVI, 3, 2003.
Olivetti M.M., Le mani di Voltaire sull’Europa, in «L’Avvenire», 2.7.2003.
Olsaretti S., Making Moral Sense: Beyond Habermas and Gauthier, in «Mind», CXII,
445, 2003.
Olson K., Do Rights Have a Formal Basis? Habermas’ Legal Theory and the Normative
Foundations of the Law, in «Journal of Political Philosophy», XI, 3, 2003, pp. 273294.
Olson K., Do Rights Have a Formal Basis? Habermas’s legal theory and the normative
4953.
4954.
4955.
4956.
4957.
4958.
4959.
4960.
4961.
4962.
4963.
4964.
4965.
4966.
4967.
4968.
4969.
301
foundations of the law, in «Journal of Political Philosophy», XI, 3, 2003, pp. 273-294;
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Oncina Coves F., Historia conceptual y hermenéutica, in «Azafea», 5, 2003, pp. 161190.
Ortiz de Landázuri C., Universalismo deliberativo o complementariedad participativa: Karlotto Apel y Jürgen Habermas, in «Anuario filosófico», 36, 75-76, 2003, pp. 409-440.
Pagani P., L’etica del discorso in Habermas: un’analisi di struttura, in Vigna C. (a cura
di), Libertà, giustizia e bene in una società plurale, Milano, Vita e pensiero, 2003, pp.
249-326.
Pérez Tapias J.A., Una alternativa desde Habermas: Estado solitario frente a Estado
mínimo, in «Revista de fomento social», LVIII, 231, 2003, pp. 435-468.
Petrucciani S., Modelli di filosofia politica, Torino, Einaudi, 2003.
Pfetsch F.R. , Jürgen Habermas (1929-), in Id., Theoretiker der Politik: von Platon bis
Habermas, Wilhelm Fink Verlag GmbH & Co KG, Paderborn, 2003, pp. 629-660.
Phillie P., Pour «La fin de l’humanité ?», in «Spirale: arts • lettres • sciences humaines», 193, 2003, pp. 39-40.
Piché C., Habermas et la mission de l’université contemporaine, in «Symposium: Journal
of the Canadian Society for Hermeneutics and Postmodern Thought», VII, 1,
2003, pp. 5-20.
Piras M., L’analisi del rapporto tra sacro e norme in Durkheim e Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e Società», XXVI, 2, 2003, pp. 136-152.
Pöppel H., Literatura y comunicación: un intento de pensar la historia de la Literatura desde
Jauss, Habermas y Welsh, in «Literatura: teoría, historia y crítica», 5, 2003, pp. 11-40.
Porter R., Porter K.-A., Habermas and the pragmatics of communication: a Deleuze–
Guattarian critique, in «Social Semiotics», 13, 2, 2003, pp. 129-145.
Portilla Contreras G., La influencia de las ciencias sociales en el derecho penal: la defensa del
modelo ideólogico neoliberal en las teorías funcionalistas y en el discurso ético de Habermas sobre
elección de intereses penales, in Arroyo Zapatero L.A., Nieto Martín A., Neumann U.
(eds.), Crítica y justificación del derecho penal en el cambio de siglo: el análisis crítico de la
Escuela de Frankfurt, 2003, pp. 99-124.
Posada Gómez P., La unidad de la razón en la multiplicidad de sus voces (La filosofía
según Jürgen Habermas), in «Praxis Filosofica», 17, 2003, pp. 23-36.
Puri S.K., Sahay S., Participation through communicative action: A case study of GIS for
addressing land/water development in India, in «Information Technology for Development», 10, 3, 2003, pp. 179-199.
Quong T.E., School leadership and cognitive interests: the development of a leadership framework based on Habermas’ theory of knowledge-constitutive interests, Toowoomba, University
of Southern Queensland, 2003.
Raulet G., Jürgen Habermas, in Encyclopaedia universalis, 2003.
Raulet G.., L’aporie de la théorie critique. Les stratégies de renouvellement du noyau théorique,
in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte,
2003, pp. 33-58.
302
4970.
4971.
4972.
4973.
4974.
4975.
4976.
4977.
4978.
4979.
4980.
4981.
4982.
4983.
4984.
4985.
4986.
Rehg W., Grasping the force of the better argument: McMahon versus discourse ethics, in
«Inquiry», XLVI, 1, 2003, pp. 113-133; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges
Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. I, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. 81-100.
Rehg W.S.J., Critical Argumentation Theory and Democracy: Lessons of Past Debates over
Technoscience, in «Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia», LIX, 2003, pp. 113-138.
Rehg W.S.J., Discourse Ethics, in McKenny G.P., Wyschogrod E. (eds.), The Ethical, New York-London, Blackwell, 2003, pp. 83-100.
Rehg W.S.J., Habermas, Argumentation Theory, and Science Studies: Toward Interdisciplinary Cooperation, in «Informal Logic», XXIII, 2, 2003, pp. 161-182; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Rehg W.S.J., Introduction to special issue on Habermas and Argumentation Theory, in «Informal Logic», XXIII, 2003, pp. 115-117.
Renault E., Entre libéralisme et communautarisme : une troisième voie?, in Renault E.,
Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 251268.
Renault E., Foucault et l’Ecole de Francfort, Colloque “Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques”, Université de Franche-Comté, 2021.11.2003; in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés,
confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 55-68.
Renault E., Sintomer Y., Introduction, in Renault E., Sintomer Y. (eds.), Où en est la
théorie critique?, Paris, La Découverte, 2003, pp. 7-30.
Repoês M.F.S., Habermas e a desobediência civil, Belo Horizonte, Mandamentos,
2003.
Ribeiro C.E., Reflexão habermasiana sobre o papel da razão a partir da modernidade,
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2003.
Rincón de Villalobos B., Propuesta de aplicación de modelo de investigación de Argyris en
la formación del rol de investigador en los docentes, Tesis doctoral, Universitat Rovira i
Virgili, 2003.
Roberto J.A., Elementos para una sociolingüística de la solidaridad en la Comunidad
Menonita de Bogotá, in «Fundamentos en humanidades», 7-8, 2003, pp. 173-221.
Rocheleau J., Hughes Ch, Wong J., Communication, Recognition and Politics: Reconciling the Critical Theories of Honneth and Habermas, in «Social Philosophy Today», 17,
2003, pp. 253-263.
Rödel B., Klaus Mollenhauer in diskurs-philosophischer Perspektive, Köln, Universität
Köln, 2003.
Rodríguez R.A., Notas sobre concepto de “autoreflexión” en Jürgen Habermas, in «Portal:
producciones en estudios sociales», 2, 2003, pp. 161-170.
Rodríguez Ramírez C.A., La alteridad en las reflexiones éticas de Jürgen Habermas y
Hans Jonas, in «Revista de Filosofia de la Universidad de Costa Rica», 41, 103,
2003, pp. 79-86.
Rorty M.V., Habermas, Jürgen, The Future of Human Nature, in «Notre Dame
Philosophical Reviews», 2.12.2003.
4987.
4988.
4989.
4990.
4991.
4992.
4993.
4994.
4995.
4996.
4997.
4998.
4999.
5000.
5001.
5002.
303
Rosati M., Poter-essere-sé-stessi e essere soggetti morali. J. Habermas tra Kierkegaard e Kant,
in «Rassegna italiana di sociologia», XLIV, 4, 2003, pp. 493-513.
Rosati M., The Marking and Representing of Society: Religion, the Sacred and Solidarity
among Strangers in a Durkheimian Perspective, in «Journal of Classical Sociology», 3, 2,
2003, pp. 173-196.
Rosati M., Tradurre la tradizione. Ethos post-convenzionale e solidarietà tra estranei, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, XIV Incontro di studi – Riconoscimento,
identità e solidarietà, 15-16.11.2003; repr. in «Fenomenologia e Società», 2, 2005, pp.
40-57.
Ruoppo A.P, Moralizzazione della natura umana o riforma genetica dell’umanità? Habermas in risposta a Sloterdijk sui rischi di una genetica liberale, in «Archivio di Storia della
Cultura», 16, 2003, pp. 333-359.
Russill Ch., On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of
Communicative Action by Jürgen Habermas, in «Canadian journal of communication»,
XXVIII, 1, 2003.
Sahuí A., Razón y espacio público: Arendt, Habermas y Rawls, in «Signos Filosoficos»,
10, 2003.
Salam R., Habermas vs. Weber on democracy, in «Critical Review», 15, 1-2, 2003, pp.
59-85.
Salam R., Habermas vs. Weber on Democracy, in «Critical Review», 15, 1-2, 2003, pp.
59-85.
Salter L., New social movements and the Internet: A Habermasian analysis, in Ayers M.,
McCaughey M. (eds.), Cyberactivism: Critical practices and theories of online activism, New
York, Routledge, 2003, pp.117-144.
Salter L., The communicative structures of journalism and public relations, in «Journalism:
Criticism, Theory and Practice», VI, 1, 2005, pp. 90-106.
Salvatore I., La giustizia distributiva come paradigma, in Istituto filosofico ‘Aloisianum’ di Gallarate, XIV Incontro di studi – Riconoscimento, identità e solidarietà, 1516.11.2003.
Sancho C., Un modelo diferente de Democracia: la Democracia Deliberativa. Una
aproximación a los modelos de J. Cohen y J. Habermas, in «Revista de estudios políticos»,
122, 2003, pp. 201-232.
Santos J.M. A complexidade do mundo. Sobre o debate Habermas/Luhmann (1971),
Covilhã, Universidade da Beira Interior, 2003.
Scharp K., Communication and Content: Circumstances and Consequences of the HabermasBrandom Debite, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», XI, 1, 2003, pp.
43-61; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage,
2009, pp. **-**.
Schmidtke M., Der Aufbruch der jungen Intelligenz: Die 68er-Jahre in der Bundesrepublik
und den USA, Frankfurt a.M., Campus Verlag, 2003.
Schneider W.L., Kommunikatives Handeln oder Kommunikation?: Anmerkung zu einer
aktuellen Differenzlinie in der soziologischen Diskussion des Kommunikationsbegriffs, in Richter H., Schmitz H.W. (eds.), Kommunikation - ein Schlüsselbegriff der Humanwissenschaf-
304
5003.
5004.
5005.
5006.
5007.
5008.
5009.
5010.
5011.
5012.
5013.
5014.
5015.
5016.
5017.
5018.
5019.
5020.
5021.
ten?, Münster, Nodus Publ., 2003, pp. 289-313.
Schoeman M., Nietzsche: Perspektivisme, agonistiese pluralisme, en die wil tot mag, in
«South African Journal of Philosophy», 22, 4, 2003, pp. 348-360.
Schwinn Th., Nichtintendierte Folgen als Struktur oder System: Konstruktionsprobleme im
Neofunktionalismus und bei Jürgen Habermas, in Greshoff R., Kneer G., Schimank U.
(eds.), Die Transintentionalität des Sozialen: eine vergleichende Betrachtung klassischer und moderner Sozialtheorien, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 2003, pp.
278-302.
Scuccimarra L., La trasparenza del politico. Habermas e il paradigma della sfera pubblica,
in «Giornale di storia costituzionale», VI, II semestre, 2003, pp. 35-59.
Scuccimarra L., Dialettica del progressismo. Habermas e la crisi di legittimazione del tardocapitalismo, Urbino, Università degli Studi di Urbino, 2003.
Shabani O.A.P., Democracy, Power, and Legitimacy: The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2003.
Sherlock R., The Future of Human Nature, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Politics and
the Life Sciences», XXII, 1, 2003, pp. 87-89.
Shorten R., The impact of totalitarianism in twentieth-century political thought: from Hannah
Arendt to Jürgen Habermas, Birmingham, University of Birmingham, 2003.
Siebeneichler F.B., Jürgen Habermas: razão comunicativa e emancipação, Rio de Janeiro,
Tempo Brasileiro, 2003.
Sitton J.F., Habermas and contemporary society, Houndmills, Macmillan, 2003.
Soldevilla Pérez L.C., Los efectos perversos de la comunicación, in «Nómadas: revista
crítica de ciencias sociales y jurídicas», 8, 2003.
Stables A., Target Language Teaching and the ISS: why Robert Young was wrong about
questioning genres, in «Westminster Studies in Education», 26, 2, 2003, pp. 99-105.
Stam H.J., Addressing oneself as another: Dialogue and the self in Habermas and Butler, in
«Pragmatics and Beyond New Series», 116, 2003.
Steffek J., The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach, in «European Journal of International Relations», IX, 2, 2003, pp. 249-275.
Stevenson N., Cultural Citizenship in the ‘Cultural’ Society: A Cosmopolitan Approach,
in «Citizenship Studies», 7, 3, 2003, pp. 331-348.
Stroud S.R., Critical Theory and Textual Arguments: Expanding Habermas’s Analysis of
Literary Claims, in «Studies in Social and Political Thought», 8, 1, 2003, pp. 84-100.
Swindal J., Discourse, reflection and commitment, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism»,
XXIX, 2003, pp. 147-161.
Swindal J., Habermas’ ‘Unconditional Meaning without God’: Pragmatism, Phenomenology,
and Ultimate Meaning, in «Ultimate Reality and Meaning», XXVI, 2, 2003, pp. 126149.
Thomassen L.A., Democracy, inclusion and exclusion: Habermas, Laclau and Mouffe on
the limits of democracy, Essex, University of Essex, 2003.
Tomberg F., Habermas und der Marxismus: Zur Aktualität einer Rekonstruktion des
historischen Materialismus, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2003.
5022.
5023.
5024.
5025.
5026.
5027.
5028.
5029.
5030.
5031.
5032.
5033.
5034.
5035.
5036.
5037.
305
Touboul H., Pensée postmétaphysique et pensée postmarxiste chez Foucault et Habermas,
Colloque “Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques”,
Université de Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; as Foucault et Habermas: pensées postmétaphysiques, pensées postmarxistes, in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault.
Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 69-84.
Urban G., The Norms of Answerability: Social Theory Between Bakhtin and Habermas, in
«Contemporary Sociology», XXXII, 5, 2003.
Usclat P., L’éclairage de la discussion à visée philosophique par Habermas, in «L’Agora.
Revue internazionale de didactique de la philosophie», 2003.
Valladolid Bueno T., Democracia y pensamiento judío: de Habermas a Benjamin: caminos
de intencionalidad práctica, Universidad de Huelva, 2003.
Vandenabeele B., Lyotard, Intercultural Communication and the Quest for ‘Real People’,
in «Language and Intercultural Communication», 3, 1, 2003, pp. 20-35.
Vega Rodríguez M., Actos de habla y pragmática universal en Habermas, in «Espéculo:
Revista de Estudios Literarios», 24, 2003.
Velasco J.C., Para leer a Habermas, Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 2003.
Vigo R., Balance de la teoría jurídica discusiva de Robert Alexy, in «Doxa: Cuadernos de
Filosofía del Derecho», 26, 2003, pp. 203-224.
Voirol O., Critique généalogique et critique normative : Foucault et Habermas, Colloque
Franche-Comté, 20-21.11.2003; as Critique généalogique et critique normative, in Cusset
Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris,
CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 117-136.
Voirol O., L’espace public et les luttes pour la reconnaissance: De Habermas à Honneth, in
Barril C., Carrel M., Guerrero J.-C., Márquez A. (eds.), Le public en action: Usages et
limites de la notion d’espace public en sciences sociales, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2003, pp. 117137
Wallace A., Reason, Society, and Religion: Reflections on 11 September from a Habermasian
perspective, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXIX, 5, 2003, pp. 491-515; repr. in
Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. ****.
Warner M., Castronovo R., The Mass Public and the Mass Subject, in Elliott M.A.,
Stokes C. (eds.), American Literary Studies: A Methodological Reader, New York, New
York University Press, 2003, pp. 243-263.
Wearmouth J., The use of a narrative approach to illuminate an individual learning need:
implications for teachers’ professional development, in «Journal of In-Service Education»,
29, 2, 2003, pp. 255-276.
Weinshall M., Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas’s Theory of Democracy, in
«Critical Review», XV, 1-2, 2003, pp. 23-58.
Wellmer A., The Debate About Truth: Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas, in «Critical
Horizons», 4, 1, 2003, pp. 29-54
Wenzel U.J., Zumutungen der Toleranz. Ein Vortrag von Jürgen Habermas, in «Neue
Zürcher Zeitung», 19.6.2003.
306
5038.
5039.
5040.
Werner M., Diskursethik als Maximenethik. Von der Prinzipienbegründung zur Handlungsorientierung, Würzburg, 2003.
Wolsing P., Is Reason Communicative? Some Critical Remarks on Habermas, in «Danish
Yearbook of Philosophy», 37, 2003, pp. 103-114.
Zolo D., Fondamentalismo umanitario, in «Jura Gentium», 2003.
2004
5041.
5042.
5043.
5044.
5045.
5046.
5047.
5048.
5049.
5050.
5051.
5052.
5053.
5054.
Abdel-Nour F., Farewell to Justification: Habermas, Human Rights, and Universalist Morality, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXX, 1, 2004, pp. 73-96.
Aguirre M.V., Solo aquellos que no tienen esperanzas nos dan esperanza, in
«emancipação», IV, 1, 2004, pp. 191-2004.
Aleixandre M.P.J., La catástrofe del Prestige: la nacionalidad crítica versus racionalidad
instrumental, in «C&E: Cultura y educación», XVI, 3, 2004, pp. 305-322.
Alútiz J.S., Los estadios morales de la evolución social, in «Papers» 74, 2004, pp. 11-44.
Antonio R., ¿Disolución de la ética del discurso? Acerca de la diferenciación del discurso en la
obra de Habermas Facticidad y validez, in Id., Apel versus Habermas. Elementos para un
debate, Comares, Granada, 2004, pp. 121-246.
Antonio R., ¿Se puede fundamentar normativamente la “teoría crítica” recurriendo a la
eticidad del mundo de la vida? Ensayo pragmático-trascendental para pensar con Habermas en
contra de Habermas, in Id., Apel versus Habermas. Elementos para un debate, Comares,
Granada, 2004, pp. 33-91
Arens E., Die Kraft der Kommunikation. Zum 75. Geburtstag von Jürgen Habermas, in
«Orientierung», 68, 2004, pp. 121-124.
Babich B.E. Habermas, Nietzsche, and the Future of Critical Theory: Irra- tionality, The
Will to Power and War, in Id. (ed.), Habermas, Nietzsche and Critical Theory, New
York, Humanity Books, 2004, pp. 13-40.
Barber M.D., A Moment of Unconditional Validity? Schutz and the Habermas/Rorty, in
«Human Studies», XXVII, 1, 2004, pp. 51-67; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J.
(eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Baynes K., Practical Reason and Public Reason, in Workshop on Mind, Art and Morality, Madrid, 3.2004.
Baynes K., The Transcendental Turn: Habermas’s Kantian Pragmatism, in Rush F. (ed.),
The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University
Press, 2004, pp. 194-218; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II.
Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Benson R., Bringing the Sociology of Media Back In, in «Political Communication»,
XXI, 3, 2004, pp. 275-292.
Berumen Campos A., La ética del discurso jurídico, in «Revista de la Facultad de
Derecho de México», 242, 2004, pp. 33-48.
Biebricher Th., Selbstkritik der Moderne: Foucault und Habermas im Vergleich, Frank-
5055.
5056.
5057.
5058.
5059.
5060.
5061.
5062.
5063.
5064.
5065.
5066.
5067.
5068.
5069.
5070.
307
furt a.M. Campus Verlag, 2004, 2005.
Bodei R., Un mondo di mondi. Tra William James, Alfred Schütz e Jürgen Habermas, in
Melchiorre V. (ed.), Forme di mondo, Milano, Vita e Pensiero, 2004, pp. 287-303.
Bohman J., Expanding Dialogue: the Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy, in «The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 131-155.
Bohman J.F., A Critical Theory of Globalization, in «Concepts and Transformation»,
IX, 2, 2004, pp. 121-147.
Bohman J.F., Constitution Making and Institutional Innovation: The European Union and
Transnational Governance, in «European Journal of Political Theory», III, 3, 2004, pp.
315-337.
Bohman J.F., Decentering Democracy: Democracy, Justice and Dynamic Inclusion, in «The
Good Society», XIII, 2, 2004/2005, pp. 49-56.
Bohman J.F., Discourse Theory, in Gaus G., Kundras N. (eds.), Handbook for Political
Theory, Albany (N.Y.), SUNY Press, 2004, pp. 67-92.
Bohman J.F., Expanding Dialogue: The Public Sphere, the Internet and Transnational
Democracy, in Roberts J., Crossley N. (eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the Public
Sphere, London, Blackwell, 2004, pp. 131-155.
Bohman J.F., Expanding Dialogue: The Public Sphere, the Internet and Transnational
Democracy, in Roberts J., Crossley N. (eds.), After Habermas: Perspectives on the Public
Sphere, London, Blackwell, 2004, pp. 131-155.
Bohman J.F., Realizing Deliberative Democracy as a Mode of Inquiry: A Pragmatic Account of Social Facts and Democratic Norms, in «Journal of Speculative Philosophy»,
XVIII, 1, 2004, pp. 23-43.
Bohman J.F., Republican Cosmopolitanism, in «The Journal of Political Philosophy»,
XII, 3, 2004, pp. 336-352.
Bongiovanni G., Palombella G., Frank I. Michelman e il significato della democrazia
costituzionale, in Michelman F.I., La democrazia e il potere giudiziario. Il dilemma costituzionale e il giudice Brennan, Bari, Dedalo, 2004, pp. 5-46.
Bookman M., Habermas and McDowell in a Post-Traditional World, in Annual Conference of Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (SPEP), Memphis (TN), 10.2004; in «Philosophy Today», XLIX, 5, 2005, pp. 74-81; repr. in
Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. ****.
Bouvier A., En quoi le marxisme n’oriente plus l’action collective. Analyse comparée de
l’évolution convergente de deux courants du marxisme contemporain, in «Revue Philosophique de Louvain», CII, 2, 2004.
Bowie A., Schleiermacher and Post-Metaphysical Thinking, in «Critical Horizons», 5, 1,
2004, pp. 165-200.
Brady. J.S., No Contest? Assessing the Agonistic Critiques of Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of
the Public Sphere, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXX, 3, 2004, pp. 331-354.
Calabi L., Tra Darwin e Habermas. Sul caso e l’«indisponibilità» dell’individuo, in Giovanetti M. (ed.), Ai confini tra scienza e filosofia, Pisa, Plus – Pisa University Press, 2004.
308
5071.
5072.
5073.
5074.
5075.
5076.
5077.
5078.
5079.
5080.
5081.
5082.
5083.
5084.
5085.
5086.
5087.
5088.
5089.
Carsten Stahl B., Elbeltagi I., Cultural Universality Versus Particularity in CMC, in
«Journal of Global Information Technology Management», 7, 4, 2004, pp. 47-65.
Casonato C., Diritto, diritti ed eugenetica: prime considerazioni su un discorso giuridico altamente problematico, in «Humanitas», LIX, 4, 2004.
Castignone S., Rischi o vantaggi di una genetica liberale?: riflessioni su di un recente saggio di
Habermas, in «Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica», XXXIV, 1, 2004, pp.
239-244.
Ceppa L., Il dibattito Denninger-Habermas sulla costituzione, in «Teoria politica»,
XVIII, 1, 2004, pp. 133-143; repr. in Id., Il diritto della modernità. Saggi habermasiani,
Torino, Trauben, 2009, 20112, pp. 59-76.
Ceppa L., Naturalismo e normativismo in Habermas, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 2,
2004, pp. 161-163.
Ceppa L., Occidente diviso e cosmopolitismo, in «Teoria politica», XVIII, 3, 2004, pp.
193-200.
Chambers S., Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation, in
«Journal of Political Philosophy», XII, 4, 2004, pp. 389-410.
Chambers S., Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy, in «Constellations», XI, 2, 2004, pp. 153-173.
Cisneros J., Radiodifusión y Democracia. Diagnóstico y Prospectiva del uso Civil de Espacios:
Informativos en Radiodifusoras Comerciales, in «Razón y palabra», 37, 2004.
Coldiron, A.E.B., Public Sphere/Contact Zone: Habermas, Early Print, and Verse Translation, in «Criticism», XLVI, 2, 2004, pp. 207-222.
Cook D., Adorno, Habermas, and the Search for a Rational Society, London-New York,
Cooke M., Between ‘Objectivism’ and ‘Contextualism’: The Normative Foundations of Social Philosophy, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after
Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 35-76.
Corradi M., L’Europa cristiana di Habermas, in «L’Avvenire», 10.11.2004.
Courtois S., Habermas’s Epistemic Conception of Democracy: Some Reactions to McCarthy’s Objections, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXX, 7, 2004, pp. 842-866.
Cowan B., Mr. Spectator and the Coffeehouse Public Sphere, in «Eighteenth-Century
Studies», XXXVII, 3, 2004, pp. 345-366.
Crespi F., A Back to Adorno and beyond Habermas social action and critical theory, in «International review of sociology», XIV, 1, 2004, pp. 3-10.
Crossley N., On Systematically Distorted Communication: Bourdieu and the Socio-Analysis
of Publics, in «The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the
Public Sphere, eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 88-112.
Crossley N., Roberts J.M., Introduction, in «The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After
Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp.
1-27.
Dahlberg L., Net-Public Sphere Research: Beyond The “First Phase”, in «Javnost - The
Public», 11, 1, 2004, pp. 27-43.
5090.
5091.
5092.
5093.
5094.
5095.
5096.
5097.
5098.
5099.
5100.
5101.
5102.
5103.
5104.
5105.
5106.
5107.
309
Dahlberg L., The Habermasian Public Sphere: A Specification of the Idealized Conditions of
Democratic Communication, in «Studies in Social and Political Thought», 10, 2004, pp.
2-18.
De Simone A., Comunicazione, morale, diritto e solidarità tra estranei. Transiti nella teoria
critica, nella filosofia politica e nell’etica sociale di Jürgen Habermas, in De Simone A.,
D’Andrea F., Pirni A., L’Io ulteriore. Identità, alterità e dialettica del riconoscimento, Perugia, Morlacchi, 2004, pp. 165-264.
Dean J., Secrecy since 11, in «Interventions», 6, 3, 2004, pp. 362-380.
del Rey Morató J., Adorno y la Crítica de la cultura de masas, in «Cuadernos de
información y comunicación», 9, 2004, pp. 41-67.
Deppe F. Habermas’ Manifesto for a European Renaissance: A Critique, in «Socialist
Register», 2004.
Domingues J.M., Review of Jürgen Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, in
«European Journal of Social Theory», VII, 3, 2004, 405-410.
Douglas P., Habermas, Schelling and Nature, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell
J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston
Brill, 2004, pp. 155-180.
Dürr D., Diskursive Theorie über das Recht versus Theorie eines diskursiven Rechts, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 94, 2004.
Düsing K., Ethik: Kants Ethik in der Philosophie der Gegenwart, in Heidemann D.H.,
Engelhard K. (eds), Warum Kant heute? Systematische Bedeutung und Rezeption seiner Philosophie in der Gegenwart, Berlin–New York, De Gruyter, 2004, pp. 231-263.
Dutra D.J.V., Da Fundamentalidade dos direitos sociais e ecológicos na filosofia do direito de
Habermas, in Ética, Política e Linguagem: confluências, Londrina, CEFIL, 2004, pp. 2647.
Dutra D.J.V., Da problemática na aplicação do direito: a recepção habermasiana da teoria da
aplicação do direito de Dworkin, in XI Encontro Nacional de Filosofia da ANPOF,
Salvador, EDUFBA, 2004, pp. 123-123.
Dutra D.J.V., Direito, Poder e Violência: Habermas X Derrida, in «Dissertatio», 19-20,
2004, pp. 137-262.
Edwards G., Habermas and Social Movements – What’s New?, in «The Sociological
Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, eds. Roberts J.,
Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 113-130
Eriksen E.O., Weisgard J., Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy, London-New York, Continuum Books, 2004.
Esteban I., Libertad y sentido en la sociedades democráticas: Habermas frente a Weber,
Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 2004.
Estrada J.A., Por una ética sin teología: Habermas como filósofo de la religión, Trotta, 2004.
Ewbank M., Truth and Justification, by Jürgen Habermas, in «The Review of Metaphysics», LVIII, 2, 2004, pp. 438-440.
Fabris A., Aporie dell’etica della comunicazione, in «Giornale di Metafisica», XXVI, 2,
2004, pp. 249-269.
310
5108.
5109.
5110.
5111.
5112.
5113.
5114.
5115.
5116.
5117.
5118.
5119.
5120.
5121.
5122.
5123.
5124.
5125.
Fabrizio E.M., A proposito dell’individualità. Nota su Habermas, in Cesarone V., Fabrizio E.M., Rizzo G., Scarafile G. (eds.), Saperi in dialogo. Dieci anni di ricerca, Napoli,
Liguori, 2004, pp. 21-34.
Fendler L., Praxis and Agency in Foucault’s Historiography, in «Studies in Philosophy
and Education», XXIII, 5-6, 2004, pp. 445-466.
Fenner D., Glück oder Moral? Zur Verhältnisbestimmung von Individual- und Sozialethik,
in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», LVIII, 3, 2004, pp. 428-446.
Figuier R., J. Derrida, J. Habermas le «Concept» du 11 Septembre, in «Quinzaine Litteraire», 871, 2004.
Finnegan Z.A., Kang J., “Sighting” the public: iconoclasm and public sphere theory, in
«Quarterly Journal of Speech», 90, 4, 2004, pp. 377-402.
Flynn J., Communicative power in Habermas’s theory of democracy, in «European Journal
of Political Theory», III, 4, 2004, pp. 433-454.
Fornari E., Globalità, cultura e fine della modernità. Il caso dei «valori asiatici», in «Iride»,
XVII, 41, 2004, pp. 163-176.
Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. Reasoning, Language and Intersubjectivity, in
Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 1-34.
Freundlieb D., Why Subjectivity Matters: Critical Theory and thePhilosophy of the Subject,
in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston. Brill, 2004, pp. 212-258.
Frydman B., Habermas et la société civile contemporaine, in Id. (ed.), La société civile et ses
droits, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2004, pp. 123-144.
Fuschetto C., Eugenetica liberale “versus” liberalismo: la critica di Habermas, in Id., Fabbricare l’uomo: l’eugenetica tra biologia e ideologia, Roma, Armando, 2004, pp. 145-155.
Galletti M., Le trasformazioni della natura umana: Jürgen Habermas su eugenetica positiva e
clonazione, in «Kykéion: semestrale di idee in discussione», 11, 2004, pp. 89-100.
Gandesha S., Marcuse, Habermas and the Critique of Technology, in Abromeit J., Cobb
W.M. (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A critical reader, New York, Routledge, 2004, pp. 188208.
Gaon S., Judging justice: The strange responsibility of deconstruction, in «Philosophy &
Social Criticism», XXX, 1, 2004, pp. 97-114.
Gaon S., Renovating Critical Theory. Review of Democracy, Power, and Legitimacy:
The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, by O. Payrow Shabani, in «Review of Politics», LXVI, 2, 2004, pp. 342-345.
Gardiner M.E., Wild Publics and Grotesque Symposiums: Habermas and Bahktin on Dialogue, Everyday Life and the Public Sphere, in «The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After
Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp.
28-48.
Garrigan S., Beyond Ritual: Sacramental Theology After Habermas, Aldershot, Ashgate,
2004.
Gerhardt V., Geworden oder gemacht? Jürgen Habermas und die Gentechnologie, in Kett-
5126.
5127.
5128.
5129.
5130.
5131.
5132.
5133.
5134.
5135.
5136.
5137.
5138.
5139.
5140.
5141.
5142.
311
ner M. (ed.), Biomedizin und Menschenwürde, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2004, pp.
272-291.
Giesen K.G., The Post-National Constellation: Habermas and The Second Modernity, in
«Res Publica: A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy», 10, 1, 2004, pp. 1-13.
Gil Martín F.J., Depositarios de las intuiciones morales: el entramado personal de la moral
intersubjetiva, según la ética del discurso de J. Habermas, in Murillo I. (ed.), Filosofía práctica
y persona humana, 2004, pp. 369-380.
Ginev D., The Pluralistic Public Sphere from an OntologicalPoint of View, in Freundlieb
D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 77-103.
Giri A.K., Knowledge and Human Liberation Jürgen Habermas, Sri Aurobibndo and Beyond, in «European Journal of Social Theory», VII, 1, 2004, pp. 85-103.
Gitlin T., Jürgen Habermas: The Sage of Reason, in «Time», CLXIII, 17, 2004.
Gloy K., Metaphysik--ein notwendiges oder verzichtbares Projekt?, in «Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung», LVIII, 1, 2004, pp. 104-128.
Gorshkov B.B., Democratizing Habermas: Peasant Public Sphere in Pre-Reform Russia,
in «Russian History», XXXI, 4, 2004, p. 373.
Graefe S., Der “Postmetaphysiker” Habermas und seine “explosiven Erfahrungsgehalte des
Außeralltäglichen”, in Gloy K. (ed.), Unser Zeitalter - ein postmetaphysisches?, Würzburg,
Königshausen & Neumann, 2004, pp. 385-394.
Greer S., “Balancing” and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the
Habermas-Alexy Debate, in «Cambridge Law Journal», LXIII, 2, 2004.
Greig M., Habermas and the Holy Grail of Reason. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity between Theatre and Theory, in «Social Semiotics», XIV, 2, 2004, pp. 215-232.
Grueso D.I., La justicia en Kant y su vigencia, in «Praxis Filosofica», 19, 2004, pp. 2339.
Guilfoyle C., The Future of Human Nature, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Philosophy»,
LXXIX, 309, 2004, pp. 483-486
Haas T., The Public Sphere as a Sphere of Publics: Rethinking Habermas’s Theory of the
Public Sphere, in «The Journal of Communication», 54, 1, 2004, pp. 178-184.
Hanzel I., Jürgen Habermas’ construction and Deconstruction of the World, in Ryder J.,
Wilkoszewska K. (eds.), The Central European Pragmatist Forum, Rodopi, 2004, pp.
177-190.
Heath J., Liberalization, Modernization, Westernization, in «Philosophy and Social
Criticism», XXX, 5-6, 2004, pp. 665-690; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.),
Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Hebeisen M.W., Recht und Staat als Objektivationen des Geistes in der Geschichte. Vol. 3.
Eine Grundlegung von Jurisprudenz und Staatslehre als Geisteswissenschaften, Biel, BoD,
2004.
Hendley D., Speech and Sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the Constitution of the Moral Point of View, in «Continental Philosophy Review», XXXVII, 2, 2004, pp. 153173; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage,
312
5143.
5144.
5145.
5146.
5147.
5148.
5149.
5150.
5151.
5152.
5153.
5154.
5155.
5156.
5157.
5158.
5159.
2009, pp. **-**.
Henrich D., Subjectivity as Philosophical Principle, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W.,
Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, LeidenBoston, Brill, 2004, pp. 233-258.
Hirschkop K., Justice and Drama: On Bakhtin as a Complement to Habermas, in «The
Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, eds.
Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 449-66.
Hoelzl M., Recognizing the Sacrificial Victim: The Problem of Solidarity for Critical Social
Theory, in «Journal of Cultural and Religious Theory», VI, 1, 2004, pp. 45-64.
Hroch J., American Pragmatism and Neo-Pragmatism in Their Affinities with European
Philosophical Hermeneutics, in Ryder J., Višnovský E. (eds.), Pragmatism and Values. The
Central European Pragmatist Forum, 1, Amsterdam-New York, 2004.
Hrubec M., Introduction, in Id. (ed.), Habermasova politická a právní teorie, in
«Filosofický časopis», LII, 2, 2004.
Hu C.-k., Die Zähmung der Zweckrationalität in der deutschen Soziologie des 20. Jahrhunderts : die Rationalisierungsproblematik bei Weber, Horkheimer/Adorno, Habermas und Beck,
Freiburg, Universität Freiburg, 2004.
Hudson N., In and Out of Hegemony: Academic Conferences and the ‘Public Sphere’, in
«Literature Compass», I, 1, 2004.
Hudson W., Postreligious Aesthetics and Critical Theory, in Freundlieb D., Hudson
W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 133-154.
Hunyadi M., Je est un clone. L’éthique à l’épreuve des biotechnologies, Paris, Seuil, 2004.
Igrek A.Z, Violence and Heterogeneity: A Response to Habermas’ “Between Eroticism and
General Economics: Georges Bataille, in «Janus Head», VII, 2, 2004, pp. 404-428.
Igwe U.T., Communicative Rationality and Deliberative Democracy of Jürgen Habermas:
Toward Consolidation of Democracy in Africa, Münster, LIT Verlag Münster, 2004.
Ingram D., The Complementarity of Economic and Cultural Rights: Rawls and Habermas
on International Justice for Individuals and Groups, in Semour M. (ed.), The Fate of the Nation State, McGill-Queens University Press, 2004, pp. 131-152.
Jacobson T.L., Development Communication and Participation: Applying Habermas to a
Case Study of Population Programs in Nepal, in «Communication Theory», XIV, 2,
2004.
Jamal T.B., Everett J., Resisting Rationalisation in the Natural and Academic Life-world:
Critical Tourism Research or Hermeneutic Charity?, in «Current Issues in Tourism», 7, 1,
2004, pp. 1-19.
Jeannot Th.M., A Reply to James Swindal’s ‘Habermas’ Unconditional Meaning without
God’: Pragmatism, in «Ultimate Reality and Meaning», XXVII, 3, 2004, pp. 243-249.
Jiménez-Aleixandre M.-P., La catástrofe del Prestige: racionalidad crítica versus
racionalidad instrumental, in «Cultura y Educación», 16, 3, 2004, pp. 305-319.
Joas H., Religion post-säkular? Zu einer Begriffsprägung von Jürgen Habermas, in Id.,
Braucht der Mensch Religion? Über Erfahrungen der Selbsttranszendenz, Freiburg, Herder
5160.
5161.
5162.
5163.
5164.
5165.
5166.
5167.
5168.
5169.
5170.
5171.
5172.
5173.
5174.
5175.
5176.
313
Verlag, 2004, pp. 122-128.
Johnson P., Are Our Utopian Energies Exhausted? Habermas’s Radical Reformism, in
«European Journal of Political Theory», III, 3, 2004, pp. 267-291.
Johnson P., Irreconcilable Differences? Habermas and Feminism, in Freundlieb D.,
Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston. Brill, 2004, pp. 104-132.
Joldersma C.W., Response: Habermas, Generalization, and State Interests in Scientific Educational Research, in «Philosophy of Education Yearbook» 2004, pp. 280-283.
Jørgensen B., Subjektivitet, kultur og handling : Vilkår for felles forståelse og rasjonalitet i
terapeutiske samtaler belyst gjennom begreper fra Habermas`og Bourdieu`s ulike handlingsteorier,
Oslo, University of Oslo, 2004.
Kapoor I., Deliberative democracy and the WTO, in «Review of International Political
Economy», 11, 3, 2004, pp. 522-541.
Kavoulakos K., Ruptured Formalism: The Challenge of Bioethics and the Limits of Moral
Formalism, in «Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy», 125, 2004, pp. 37-45.
Kelly T., Unlocking The Iron Cage Public Administration in the Deliberative Democratic
Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in «Administration & Society», XXXVI, 1, 2004, pp. 3861.
Kennedy C., ‘Womanish epistles?’ Martha McTier, female epistolarity and late eighteenthcentury Irish radicalism, in «Women’s History Review», 13, 4, 2004, pp. 649-667.
Kerz M., Un nuevo umbral para el estado moderno. Reflexiones sobre la teoría de Jürgen
Habermas, in «Colección», X, 15, 2004, pp. 125-151.
Kirchgässner G., Wertfreiheit und Objektivität in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Mythos
oder Realität?, St. Gallen, University of St. Gallen, 2004.
Kleinsteuber H.J., Strukturwandel der europäischen Öffentlichkeit?: der Öffentlichkeitsbegriff von Jürgen Habermas und die European Public Sphere, in Lutz H.M. (ed.), Europäische
Union und mediale Öffentlichkeit: theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde zur Rolle
der Medien im europäischen Einigungsprozess, Köln, Halem, 2004, pp. 29-46.
Koczanowicz L., Sources of Solidarity: Is Non-Foundational Ethics Irrational?, in Ryder
J., Wilkoszewska K. (eds.), The Central European Pragmatist Forum, Rodopi, 2004, pp.
69-80.
Lacroix J., L’Europe en procès. Quel patriotisme au-delà des nationalismes?, Paris, Cerf,
2004.
Lacroix J., Le «patriotisme constitutionnel» selon Habermas, in «Problemes politiques et
sociaux», 901, 2004.
Lafont C., Acuerdo discursivo y corrección moral en la ética del discurso, in Universidad
Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 12.2004; in Universidad de Granada, 5.2005.
Lafont C., Habermas: La ética del discurso, in the Societat Catalana de Filosofía,
Barcelona, Spain, 12.2004.
Lafont C., Moral Objectivity and Reasonable Agreement: Can Realism Be Reconciled with
Kantian Constructivism?, in «Ratio Juris», XVII, 1, 2004, pp. 27-51; repr. in Rasmus-
314
5177.
5178.
5179.
5180.
5181.
5182.
5183.
5184.
5185.
5186.
5187.
5188.
5189.
5190.
5191.
5192.
5193.
5194.
sen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Lafont C., Universalization or Threat Advantage: The Difficult Dialogue between Discourse
Ethics and The Theory of Rational Choice, in Symposium on J. Heath’s book Communicative Action and Rational Choice, Annual meeting of the CPA, Winnipeg, 5.2004;
repr. in «Dialogue», 44, 2005, pp. 373-82.
Langguth G., Alte, neue Ressentiments: Habermas, die deutschen Intellektuellen und der
Antiamerikanismus, in «Internationale Politik», LIX, 2, 2004, pp. 67-77.
Laso S., La importancia de la teoría crítica en las ciencias sociales, in «Espacio Abierto»,
XIII, 3, 2004, pp. 435-455.
Lecis P.L., Cultura, mente, società. Habermas, Popper e le strutture dell’universo culturale,
Milano, FrancoAngeli, 2004.
Lenguita P., Los contrasentidos del carácter cultural de la tecnología: aportes al debate entre
Marcuse y Habermas sobre la mediación instrumental, in «Argumentos de razón técnica»,
7, 2004, pp. 149-172.
Lloyd-Jones D., Technical Cosmopolitanism: Systems, Critical Theory and International
Relations, Leeds, University of Leeds, 2004.
Loewenstein J., Stevens P., When Is a Public Sphere?, in «Criticism», XLVI, 2, 2004,
pp. 201-277.
Lösch B., Deliberative Politik. Öffentlichkeit, Demokratie und politische Partizipation, dissertation, Hamburger Universität für Wirtschaft und Politik, 2004.
Lösch B., Deliberative Politik. Öffentlichkeit, Demokratie und politischer Partizipation,
Hamburger, Hamburger Universität, 2004.
MacKendrick K., The Moral Imaginary of Discourse Ethics, in Freundlieb D., Hudson
W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 280-306.
Maclure J., Democracy, Power, and Legitimacy. The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in
«Canadian Journal of Political Science», XXXVII, 2, 2004.
Maldonado-Torres N., The topology of being and the geopolitics of knowledge, in «City», 8,
1, 2004, pp. 29-56.
Marti U., Diskursethische Legitimation und soziale Funktion des Rechts. Überlegungen zu J.
Habermas’ Diskurstheorie des Rechts und der Demokratie, in «Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie», 94, 2004.
Martínez de Velasco L., ¿Qué significa pensar moralmente? Dos maneras actuales de
entender a Kant: Robert B. Brandom y Jürgen Habermas, in «Isegoría», 30, 2004, pp. 177202.
Martins C.A., Esfera pública em Habermas, in Müller M.C., Cenci E.M. (eds), Ética,
política e linguagem– confluências, Londrina, CEFIL, 2004, pp. 226-243.
Marzocchi V., Il senso di una comune impresa filosofico-scientifica, in «www.filosofia.it»,
2004, pp. 15-19.
Matuštík M.B., Jürgen Habermas: A Philosophical-Political Profile: A Critical Appraisal of
the Biographical Argument, in Filosofický časopis, LII, 2, 2004, pp. 207-29.
Mcafee N., Three Models of Democratic Deliberation, in «The Journal of Speculative
5195.
5196.
5197.
5198.
5199.
5200.
5201.
5202.
5203.
5204.
5205.
5206.
5207.
5208.
5209.
5210.
5211.
5212.
315
Philosophy», XVIII, 1, 2004, pp. 44-59.
McGuigan J., Review of After Habermas – New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, in
«The Sociological Review», LII, 4, 2004, pp. 599-601.
McKeon M., Parsing Habermas’s ‘Bourgeois Public Sphere’, in «Criticism», XLVI, 2,
2004, pp. 273-277.
McLaughlin L., Feminism and the Political Economy of Transnational Public Space, in «
The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere,
eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 156-176.
Medaglia R., Comunicazione, potere e sistemi sociali in Jürgen Habermas: per una traduzione
comunicativa dell’agire politico contemporaneo, in «Idee», 56-57, 2004, pp. 151-179.
Melkevik B., Legislación democrática y «sujectos creatores-destinatarios» del derecho en el
pensamiento de Habermas, in «Anuario de Filosofia Jurídica y Social», XXIV, 2004,
pp. 209-221.
Mendieta E., Habermas on human cloning: The debate on the future of the species, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXX, 2004, pp. 721-743; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Mendieta E., Jürgen Habermas: sobre la guerra, la paz y el papel de Europa, in «Claves de
razón práctica», 140, 2004, pp. 48-53.
Meyer W.J., Jürgen Habermas, Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God,
and Modernity, in «The Journal of Religion», LXXXIV, 1, 2004, pp. 128-129.
Micheloni A., L’etica del discorso e le sue possibilità in funzione di una sociologia etica. a
partire da Habermas, in «Segni e comprensione», XVIII, 51, 2004, pp. 44-64.
Moland L., Fornuftens estetiske dimensjon: Adorno versus Habermas og Wellmer, Oslo,
University of Oslo, 2004.
Moreira L., Direito, procedimento e racionalidade, in Id. (eds.), Com Habermas, contra
Habermas: Direito, discurso e democracia, São Paulo, Landy Editora, 2004, pp. 177-200.
Moreira L., Fundamentação do direito em Habermas, Belo Horizonte, Mandamentos,
2004.
Moreira L., Introdução à edição brasileira, in J. Habermas, Teoria da argumentação no
direito e na moral: justificação e aplicação, São Paulo, Landy Editora, 2004, pp.9-18.
Morris M., Rethinking the Communicative Turn: Adorno, Habermas and the Problem of
Communicative Freedom, in «Political Theory», XXXII, 2, 2004.
Moshe M., Between national and constitutional patriotism: framing financial patriotic discourse, in «Journalism Studies», 5, 4, 2004, pp. 497-509.
Mucci G., Jürgen Habermas: La linea di confine tra religione e filosofia, in «La Civiltà cattolica», 15.05.2004.
Mudhai O.F., Researching the impact of ICTs as change catalysts in Africa, in «Ecquid
Novi: African Journalism Studies», 25, 2, 2004, pp. 313-335.
Muguerza Carpintier J., Del yo (¿trascendental?) al nosotros (¿intrascendente?): la lectura de
Kant en el neokantismo contemporáneo, in «Daimon», 33, 2004, pp. 135-156.
316
5213.
5214.
5215.
5216.
5217.
5218.
5219.
5220.
5221.
5222.
5223.
5224.
5225.
5226.
5227.
5228.
5229.
5230.
Müller H., Arguing, Bargaining and all that: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory
and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations, in «European Journal of International Relations», X, 3, 2004, pp. 395-435.
Nassehi A., Jürgen Habermas, in Mayer-Tasch P.C., Mayerhofer B. (eds.), Porträtgalerie der politischen Denker, Stämpfli, Bern, 2004, pp. 311-316.
Nault F., L’otage ou l’instance theologique du litteraire. En marge du debat: Habermas, Rorty, Lyotard, in «Revue Des Sciences Religieuses», LXXVIII, 2, 2004.
Nicoletti M., Etica, religione e stato liberale. Presentazione, in «Umanitas», N.S., LIX, 2,
2004, pp. 232-235.
Niemann A., Between communicative action and strategic action: the Article 113 Committee
and the negotiations on the WTO Basic Telecommunications Services Agreement, in «Journal
of European Public Policy», 11, 3, 2004, pp. 379-407.
Noonan J., Need Satisfaction and Group Conflict: Beyond a Rights-Based Approach, in
«Social Theory and Practice», XXX, 2, 2004, pp. 175-192.
Norbrook D., Women, the Republic of Letters, and the Public Sphere in the MidSeventeenth Century, in «Criticism: A Quarterly for Literature and the Arts», XLVI, 2,
2004, pp. 223-240.
Okshevsky W., On the Epistemic Grounds of Moral Discourse and Moral Education: An
Examination of Jürgen Habermas’s “Discourse Ethics”, in «Philosophy of Education
Yearbook», 2004, pp. 174-182.
Oliveira M.A., Moral, direito e democracia: o debate Apel versus Habermas no contexto de
uma concepção procedimental da filosofia prática, in Oliveira M.A., Moreira L. (eds.), Com
Habermas, contra Habermas: Direito, discurso e democracia, São Paulo, Landy Editora,
2004, pp. 145-176.
Orjiako C.L., Habermas and the Project of Discourse Theory of Law, The London Press,
2004.
Palumbo G., Prendere misura dall’indisponibile. Habermas e il futuro della natura umana,
in «Annali del Dipartimento di Filosofia, Storia e Critica dei saperi», Università degli studi di Palermo, 1, 2004, pp. 207-224.
Panagia D., The Force of Political Argument, in «Political Theory», XXXII, 6, 2004,
pp. 825-848.
Papastephanou M., On Language, Meaning, and Validity: Philosophy of Education and
the Universal Pragmatics of Habermas, in «Interchange», XXXV, 1, 2004, pp. 1-29.
Parge M., Steuerung durch Verständigung: zur Bedeutung ‘kommunikativen Handelns’ in
neuen Arbeitsformen, Berlin, Ed. Sigma 2004.
Pask K., The Bourgeois Public Sphere and the Concept of Literature, in «Criticism: A
Quarterly for Literature and the Arts», XLVI, 2, 2004, pp. 241-256.
Péjout N., The communication of communication. An illustration: the South African rhetorical promotion of ICTS, in «Politikon», 31, 2, 2004, pp. 185-199.
Pensky M., Natural History: the Life and Afterlife of a Concept in Adorno, in «Critical
Horizons», 5, 1, 2004, pp. 227-258.
Perkins R.L., Habermas and Kierkegaard: Religious Subjectivity, Multiculturalism, and
5231.
5232.
5233.
5234.
5235.
5236.
5237.
5238.
5239.
5240.
5241.
5242.
5243.
5244.
5245.
5246.
5247.
5248.
317
Historical Revisionism, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», 444, CLXXVI,
2004, pp. 481-496.
Persch D., A controvérsia entre J. Habermas e E. Tugendhat, São Carlos, Universidade
Federal de São Carlos, 2004.
Piercey R., Ricoeur’s Account of Tradition and the Gadamer-Habermas Debate, in «Human Studies», XXVII, 3, 2004, pp. 259-280.
Pinter A., Proceduralizem in Integrativnost V Javnem Razpravljanju, in «Javnost - The
Public», 11, Supplement 1, 2004, pp. 47-60; tr. en. Public Sphere and History: Historians’ Response to Habermas on the “Worth” of the Past, in «Journal of Communication
Inquiry», XXVIII, 3, 2004, pp. 217-232.
Piras M., La vita buona. Una critica a Habermas, in «Teoria politica», XX, 1, 2004,
pp. 145-160.
Prodomo R., Habermas e la natura umana, in «Filosofia e questioni pubbliche», IX,
2, 2004, pp. 95-101.
Protti M., A Sapere e vita quotidiana: tra credenze e ideologie (da Alfred Schütz a Jürgen
Habermas), in «Quaderni di teoria sociale», IV, 2004, pp. 67-83.
Quiniou Y., Études matérialistes sur la morale: Nietzsche, Darwin, Marx, Habermas, in
«Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger», CXCIV, 3, 2004.
Ray L., Pragmatism and Critical Theory, in «European Journal of Social Theory»,
VII, 3, 2004, pp. 307-321.
Reale M., La risorsa scarsa che è il “senso”, in «www.filosofia.it», 2004, pp. 9-14.
Rehg W.S.J., Discourse Ethics and Individual Conscience, in Gottschalk-Mazouz N.
(ed.), Perspektiven der Diskursethik, Wuerzburg, Koenigshausen and Neumann, 2004,
pp. 26-40.
Reitzig J., Zwischen Selbstorganisation, Deliberation und Regulation: Theorien über den Prozess gesellschaftlicher Zivilisierung im postfordistischen Kapitalismus, Hamburg 2004.
Repa L., A transformação da filosofia em Jürgen Habermas: os papéis de reconstrução,
interpretação e crítica, São Paulo, USP, 2004.
Risse Th., Global Governance and Communicative Action, in «Government and Opposition», XXXIX, 2, 2004, pp. 288-313.
Roberts J.M., John Stuart Mill, Free Speech and the Public Sphere: A Bakhtinian Critique,
in « The Sociological Review», LII, 1 (After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public
Sphere, eds. Roberts J., Crossley N.), 2004, pp. 67-87.
Roberts J.M., The Stylistics of Competent Speaking: A Bakhtinian Exploration of Some
Habermasian Themes, in «Theory, Culture and Society», XXI, 6, 2004, pp. 91-114.
Rodríguez Fouz M., Los retos de la identidad: Jürgen Habermas y la memoria del
“Guernica”, Madrid, Siglo XXI de España, 2004.
Rorty R., Universalist Grandeur, Romantic Depth, Pragmatist Cunning, in «Diogenes»,
LI, 2, 2004, pp. 129-140; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol.
II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Rosario Jr. T.G., Tempering the Rational Culture: Part 2, in «Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy», XXXIII, 2, 2004, pp. 109-124.
318
5249.
5250.
5251.
5252.
5253.
5254.
5255.
5256.
5257.
5258.
5259.
5260.
5261.
5262.
5263.
5264.
5265.
5266.
Rule P., Dialogic spaces: adult education projects and social engagement, in «International
Journal of Lifelong Education», 23, 4, 2004, pp. 319-334.
Rundell J., Imaginary Turns in Critical Theory: ImaginingSubjects in Tension, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters
and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 307-344.
Sartor G., Dialoghi e ragionamento giuridico, in Comanducci P., Guastini R. (eds.),
Analisi e diritto,Torino, Giappichelli, 2004, pp. 193-214.
Schnädelbach H., Habermas in der Höhle des Löwen, in «Information Philosophie»,
XXXI, 2, 2004, pp. 129-131.
Schneiderman D., Habermas, market-friendly human rights, and the revisibility of economic
globalization, in «Citizenship Studies», 8, 4, 2004, pp. 419-436.
Schuller F., Vorwort, in J. Habermas, J. Ratzinger, Dialektik der Säkularisierung.
Über Vernunft und Religion, Freiburg, Herder Verlag, 2005, pp. 7-14; tr. it. Etica, religione e stato liberale. Premessa, in «Umanitas», N.S., LIX, 2, 2004, pp. 236-238.
Schützeichel R., Soziologische Kommunikationstheorien, Konstanz, UVK Verl.-Ges.,
2004.
Seemann A., Lifeworld, Discourse, and Realism: On Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Truth,
in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXX, 4, 2004, pp. 503-514; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Shih Ch.-S., Gerechtigkeit bei Rawls und Habermas. Eine vergleichende Darstellung, Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, 2004.
Shook J.R., Moral Pluralism: Dewey vs. Rawls and Habermas, in Ryder J., Wilkoszewska K. (eds.), The Central European Pragmatist Forum, Rodopi, 2004, pp. 31-42.
Smith J.D., A Précis of a Communicative Theory of the Firm, in «Business Ethics: A
European Review», XIII, 4, 2004, pp. 317-331.
Smith W., Democracy, deliberation and disobedience, in «Res Publica», 10, 2004, pp.
353-377.
Smith W., Fine R., Kantian Cosmopolitanism today: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on
Immanuel Kant’s Foedus Pacificum, in «King’s College Law Journal», XV, 1, 2004, pp.
5-22
Sørensen L.V., Moralfilosofi Hos Jürgen Habermas og John Rawls, Roskilde, Roskilde
University, 2004.
Staats J.L., Habermas and Democratic Theory: The Threat to Democracy of Unchecked Corporate Power, in «Political Research Quarterly», LVII, 4, 2004.
Steiner R., Der politische Funktionsträger und die politische Verantwortung. Unter den Bedingungen der politischen Systeme Österreichs, des Vereinigten Königreiches und der Europäischen
Union, Hagen, FernUniversität Hagen, 2004.
Tabet C., Normatività e secolarizzazione. Sul concetto habermasiano di obbligazione pratica,
in «Intersezioni.», 1, 2004, pp. 109-134.
Thompson P.B., Pragmatism, Practical and Discourse Ethics, in Ryder J.,
Wilkoszewska K. (eds.), The Central European Pragmatist Forum, Rodopi, 2004, pp.
81-88.
5267.
5268.
5269.
5270.
5271.
5272.
5273.
5274.
5275.
5276.
5277.
5278.
5279.
5280.
5281.
5282.
5283.
5284.
5285.
5286.
5287.
319
Thorup M., ‘Hvorledes globaliseringen af Europa overvinder barbariet’: den liberale brug af
globaliseringsbegrebet til afpolitisering af nation og stat, in «Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory», 5, 1, 2004, pp. 113-128.
Tipton S.M., Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity,
by Jürgen Habermas, in «Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion», XLIII, 1, 2004,
p. 153.
Torralba Roselló F., Els valors de la tecnologia, in «Sostenible?», 6, 2004, pp. 39-51.
Torralba Roselló F., Jürgen Habermas versus Peter Sloterdijk, in «Nexus», 33, 2004.
Trautsch A., Glauben und Wissen : Jürgen Habermas zum Verhältnis von Philosophie und
Religion, in «Philosophisches Jahrbuch», CXI, 2004, pp. 180-198.
Trautsch A., Glauben und Wissen. Jürgen Habermas zum Verhaltnis von Philosophie und
Religion, in «Philosophisches», CXI, 2, 2004.
Trincia F.S., Glauben und Wissen, e “ground zero”, in «www.filosofia.it», 2004, pp. 39.
Turan O., The Triangle of Publicness, Communication and Democracy in Habermas’s
Thought, Ankara, Middle East Technical University, 2004.
Turner Ch., Jürgen Habermas: European or German?, in «European Journal of Political Theory», 3, 2004, pp. 293-314.
Vázquez Anderson A.A., Más allá de Habermas: la realidad de los medios de
comunicación, in «Comunicación y sociedad», 2, 2004, pp. 247-273
Velasco J. C., Para leer a Habermas, in «Paideia: Revista de Filosofia y Didactica
Filosofica», 25, 67, 2004.
Velek J., Jürgen Habermas a utopie věčného míru, in Hrubec M. (ed.), Habermasova
politická a právní teorie, in «Filosofický časopis», LII, 2, 2004, pp. 231-253.
Viano C.A. Antiche ragioni per nuove paure: Habermas e la genetica, in «Rivista di Filosofia», XCV, 2, 2004, pp. 277-296.
Victor M., La filosofía del derecho de Immanuel Kant, in «Rojas Amandi», 242, 2004,
pp. 165-198.
Volkers A., Normabweichung und kommunikative Rationalität, Berlin, Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, 2004.
Volpato Dutra D.J., A legalidade como forma do Estado de direito, in «Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia», XLV, 109, 2004, pp. 57-80.
Waizbort R., Objectivity in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory, in
«Philosophy of the Social Sciences», XXXIV, 1, 2004, pp. 151-162.
Wegerif R., Towards an Account of Teaching General Thinking Skills That Is Compatible
with the Assumptions of Sociocultural Theory, in «Theory and Research in Education»,
II, 2, 2004, pp. 143-159.
Wellmer A., The Debate About Truth: Pragmatism without Regulative Ideas, in Freundlieb D., Hudson W., Rundell J.F. (eds.), Critical Theory after Habermas: Encounters
and Departures, Leiden-Boston, Brill, 2004, pp. 181-211.
Wiggershaus R., Jürgen Habermas, Rowohlt Tagenbuch Verlag, 2004.
Wright Ch.W., Particularity and Perspective Taking: on Feminism and Habermas’s Dis-
320
5288.
5289.
5290.
course Theory of Morality in «Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy», XIX, 4,
2004, pp. 49-74.
Yassour-Borochowitz D., Reflections on the Researcher-Participant Relationship and the
Ethics of Dialogue, in «Ethics & Behavior», 14, 2, 2004, pp. 175-186.
Zimmermann Ch., Öffentlichkeit, Kommunikation, Rationalität: Jürgen Habermas, in
Id., Kulturphilosophie und Öffentlichkeit: eine kulturphilosophische Untersuchung der Öffentlichkeit der Politischen Philosophie, Würzburg, Königshausen & Neumann, 2004, pp.
129-194.
Zuidervaart L., Imaginative Disclosure: Adorno, Habermas, and artistic truth, in Symposium, VIII, 3, 2004, pp. 519-548; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
2005
5291.
5292.
5293.
5294.
5295.
5296.
5297.
5298.
5299.
5300.
5301.
5302.
Aguado T., Memory, Politics, and Post-national Citizenship in Jorge Semprún’s L’Écriture
ou la vie, in «Hispanic Research Journal», 6, 3, 2005, pp. 237-251.
Alarcón Ferrari C., Teorías de la ciudadanía y proyecto de Constitución Europea: una
lectura en perspectiva del pensamiento filosófico y político de Maquiavelo, Hobbes, Kant, Rawls y
Habermas, Santiago, Universidad de Chile, 2005.
Anderson J., The Future of Human Nature, by Jürgen Habermas, in «Ethics»,
CXV, 4, 2005, pp. 816-821.
Antonio R.J., Max Weber in the Post-World War II US and After, in «Etica & Politica», VII, 2, 2005, pp. 1-94.
Araújo L.A., Linguagem e moralidade na constituição do eu, Bauru, Universidade
Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, 2005.
Arden C.H., Danaher P.A., Tyler M.A., Struggling for Purchase? What Shape Does a
Vocational Education and Training Agenda Take Within a Contemporary University Education Faculty?, in «International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning», 1, 1, 2005, pp.
32-47.
Ardilli D., Il dominio della vita tra sacralizzazione e disincanto, in «Etica & Politica»,
VII, 2, 2005, pp. 1-35.
Bächtiger A., Steiner J., Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Democracy, in «Two special issues of Acta Politica», XL, 2-3, 2005.
Baecke P., Cultural plurality in constitutional democracies: exploring Habermas’ deliberative
politics, Tilburg, University of Tilburg, 2005.
Baynes K., Two Models of Autonomy, in XIIIth Critical Theory Roundtable, Dartmouth University, 2005.
Behnke A., “Ich misstraue allen Systematikern und gehe ihnen aus dem Weg”. Eine Erwiderung auf meine Kritiker, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», XII, 2, 2005,
pp. 407-145.
Beilharz P., Jürgen Habermas – A Philosophical-Political Profile, in «Thesis Eleven», 83,
5303.
5304.
5305.
5306.
5307.
5308.
5309.
5310.
5311.
5312.
5313.
5314.
5315.
5316.
5317.
5318.
321
2005.
Bernstein J.M., Suffering Injustice: Misrecognition as moral injury in critical theory, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», XIII, 3, 2005, pp. 303-324; repr. in
Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. ****.
Bettine de Almeida M.A., O lazer na reclusão: construção de novos modelos teóricos a partir
da estruturação histórico-teórica do lazer, in «Lecturas: Educación física y deportes», 83,
2005.
Beyer M., Making Abbé Sieyès and Jürgen Habermas Meet: Constitution-Making in the
Supranational Setting, Maastricht, European Institute of Public Administration,
2005.
Biebricher Th., Habermas, Foucault and Nietzsche: A Double Misunderstanding, in
«Foucault Studies», 3, 2005 pp. 1-26; as Governmentality and deliberative politics – Foucault’s analytics of the state and Habermas’s theory of democracy, in Ungureanu C., Günther
K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Biebricher Th., Selbstkritik der Moderne: Foucault und Habermas im Vergleich, Frankfurt a.M.-New York, Campus Verlag, 2005.
Bindi E., Criticare la società. Sul superamento della filosofia del soggetto nella teoria critica di
Habermas, in «Kykéion: semestrale di idee in discussione», 12, 2005, pp. 1-23.
Bjola C., Legitimating the Use of Force in International Politics: A Communicative Action
Perspective, in «European Journal of International Relations», XI, 2, 2005, pp. 266303.
Bodei R., Kant nel regno delle differenze, in «Il sole 24 ore», 13.2.2005.
Bohman J., From Dêmos to Dêmoi: Democracy across Borders, in «Ratio Juris», XVIII,
3, 2005, pp. 293-314; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. III,
Bohman J.F., Human Rights, Democracy, and Global Justice, in «Journal of Global
Ethics», II, 1, 2005, pp. 8-17.
Bohman J.F., Is Democracy a Means to Global Justice? Human Rights and the Democratic
Minimum, in «Ethics and International Affairs», XIX, 1, 2005, pp. 101-116.
Bohman J.F., Transforming the Public Sphere: the Internet and the Normative Presuppositions of Democracy, in van den Hoven J., Weckert J., Moral Philosophy and Information
Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Bolton R., Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action and the Theory of Social Capital,
Association of American Geographers, Denver, Colorado, 4.2005.
Bongiovanni G., Principi come valori o come norme: interpretazione, bilanciamento e giurisdizione costituzionale in Alexy e Habermas, in «Ars interpretandi», X, 2005, pp. 177198.
Bordum A., Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas, and the Categorical Imperative, in «Philosophy Social Criticism» XXXI, 7, 2005, pp. 851-874; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Bosetti G., Idee per una convergenza «postsecolare», in Habermas J., Ratzinger J., Ragione e fede in dialogo, Venezia, Marsilio, 2005, pp. 7-38.
322
5319.
5320.
5321.
5322.
5323.
5324.
5325.
5326.
5327.
5328.
5329.
5330.
5331.
5332.
5333.
5334.
5335.
5336.
5337.
5338.
Boyle M., Sartre’s Circular Dialectic and the Empires of Abstract Space: A History of Space
and Place in Ballymun, Dublin, in «Annals of the Association of American Geographers», 95, 1, 2005, pp. 181-201.
Bozzetti M., Habermas crìtico della teoria metafisica di Dieter Henrich, in «Hermeneutica», 2005, pp. 247-258.
Brena G.L., Le ragioni del bene e l’ultimo Habermas, in Botturi F. (ed.), Le ragioni
dell’etica. Natura del bene e problema fondativo, Milano, Vita e pensiero, 2005, pp. 137156.
Brena G.L., Metafisica o post-metafisica. La questione del realismo a partire da Habermas,
in «Hermeneutica», 2005, pp. 259-275.
Bronzini G., Nella guerra perpetua senza principio, in «Il manifesto», 06-3-2005.
Brookfield S., Learning Democratic Reason: The Adult Education Project of Jürgen Habermas, in «Teachers College Record», CVII, 6, 2005, pp. 1127–1168.
Browne C., Hope, Critique, and Utopia, in «Critical Horizons», 6, 1, 2005, pp. 63-86.
Brumlik M., Die politische Form der globalisierten Welt: Jürgen Habermas zum 75. Geburtstag, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXXI, 6, 2005, pp. 675-681.
Brunkhorst H., Hard Times for Democracy, in AA.VV., Religion in the public sphere,
The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 92-109.
Brunkhorst H., Jürgen Habermas. Die rächende Gewalt der kommunikativen Vernunft, in
Henningfeld J., Jansohn H. (eds.), Philosophen der Gegenwart, Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2005, pp. 198-215.
Bude H., Erbschaft des schuldigen Denkens. Jürgen Habermas und Jacques Derrida als
Denker der Nachkriegszeit, in «Merkur», LIX, 671, 2005, pp. 193-206.
Burke P., Reflexiones sobre los medios de comunicación de masas en la Europa moderna, in
«Manuscrits: Revista d’història moderna», 23, 2005, pp. 21-30.
Cabello A.M., Tradición y memoria popular: los museos militares y la recreación de la
historia, in «Revista de investigaciones políticas y sociológicas», IV, 2, 2005, pp.
153-166.
Caglioti D.L., ‘Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica’ di Jürgen Habermas. Il pubblico e il
privato. Habermas e la sfera pubblica femminile in un dibattito americano, in «Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’’800 et del ‘900», VIII, 2, 2005, pp. 352-358
Calhoun C., Religion, Secularism, and Public Reason, in AA.VV., Religion in the public
spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 64-79.
Castillo Ermoso J.M., Kommunikatives Handeln und Soziale Entwicklung, Grandada,
Editorial de la Universidad de Granada, 2005.
Ceppa L., Habermas: le fonti della legittimità, in «Teoria politica», XIX, 1, 2005, pp.
176-180.
Cerutti F., Filosofia politica. Un’introduzione, dispense, Università di Firenze, 2005.
Chernilo D., Mascareño A., Universalismo, particularismo y sociedad mundial: Obstáculos
y perspectivas de la sociología en América Latina, in «Persona y Sociedad», XIX, 3, 2005,
pp. 17-45.
Chilton S., Wyant Cuzzo M.S., Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Action as a Theo-
5339.
5340.
5341.
5342.
5343.
5344.
5345.
5346.
5347.
5348.
5349.
5350.
5351.
5352.
5353.
5354.
5355.
5356.
323
retical Framework for Mediation Practice, in «Conflict Resolution Quarterly», XXII, 3,
2005, pp. 325-348.
Civile G., ‘Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica’ di Jürgen Habermas. Con Habermas, oltre
Habermas, in «Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’’800 et del ‘900», VIII, 2, 2005,
pp. 345-351.
Cooke M., Avoiding Authoritarianism: On the Problem of Justification in Contemporary
Critical Social Theory, in «International Journal of Philosophical Studies», XIII, 2005,
pp. 379-404.
Corbellini G., Liberi grazie alla genetica, in «Il sole 24 ore», 23.1.2005.
Corchia L., Jürgen Habermas. L’analisi dell’opera secondo le scienze sociali, Pisa, University of Pisa, 2005.
Cruz Sobrinho S., Direitos humanos e democracia em Jürgen Habermas, Porto Alegre,
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, 2005.
Dahlberg L., The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?, in «Theory
and Society», XXXIV, 2, 2005, pp. 111-136.
Dahlgren P., The Internet Public Spheres and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation, in «Political Communication», 22, 2005, pp. 147-162.
de la Vega Bisbal M., Consecuencias filosóficas y políticas derivadas de la razón comunicativa, in «Philosophica», 28, 2005, pp. 47-60.
de la Vega Bisbal M., Habermas versus Nietzsche: La estética como paradigma versus el
paradigma del entendimiento como acción comunicativa, in «Filosofía: revista del postgrado
de Filosofía de la Universidad de los Andes», 15-16, 2004-2005, pp. 117-127.
de Sales Coelho A., Contribuições da teoria do agir comunicativo de Habermas para a
consolidação de uma educação crítica e reflexiva diante da sociedade da comunicação e informação,
Pontifícia Prado Velho Curitiba, Universidade Católica do Paraná, 2005.
Deitelhoff N., Muller H., Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas,
in «Review of International Studies», XXXI, 1, 2005, pp. 167-179.
Delanty G., The Idea of a Cosmopolitan Europe: On the Cultural Significance of Europeanization, in «International Review of Sociology», 15, 3, 2005, pp. 405-421.
Deranty J.-Ph., The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy. Rereading Mead
with Merleau-Ponty, in «Critical Horizons», 6, 1, 2005, pp. 153-181.
Dews P., Disenchantment and the Persistence of Evil: Habermas, Jonas, Badiou, in Schrift
A.D. (ed.), Modernity and the Problem of Evil, Bloomington, Indiana University Press,
2005, pp. 51-65; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Di Fiore D., L’Occidente diviso di Jürgen Habermas, in «Giano», L, 2005, pp. 161-169.
Diez T., Steans J., A useful dialogue? Habermas and International Relations, in «Review
of International Studies», XXXI, 1, 2005, pp. 127–140.
Driver J.C., Wittgenstein and Habermas on performance rationality, London, Birkbeck,
2005.
Duffy M., Jürgen Habermas and Communicative Action, in Id., How Language, Ritual
and Sacraments Work: According to John Austin, Jürgen Habermas and Louis-Marie Chau-
324
5357.
5358.
5359.
5360.
5361.
5362.
5363.
5364.
5365.
5366.
5367.
5368.
5369.
5370.
5371.
5372.
5373.
5374.
vet, Roma, Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2005, pp. 79-128.
Dupeyrix A., La conception de la citoyenneté chez Jürgen Habermas, Lyon, Univeristé
Lyon II - Lumières, 2005.
Dupeyrix A.R.G., La conception de la citoyenneté chez Jürgen Habermas une éthique e la
responsabilité?, Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, 2005.
Dutra D.J.V., Natureza e liberdade ou das implicações éticas da biotecnologia: os argumentos
de Habermas contra Dworkin, in «Síntese», XXXII, 102, 2005, pp. 105-129.
Dutra D.J.V., Razão e Consenso em Habermas: A Teoria Discursiva da Verdade, da Moral, do Direito e da Biotecnologia, Florianópolis, Editora da UFSC, 2005.
Duvenage P., Habermas, the public sphere and beyond: communication, cultural and media
studies, in «Communicatio: South African Journal of Communication», XXXI, 1,
2005, pp. 1-12.
Eberl O., Herborth B., Steenbock R., Intersubjektivität und internationale Politik. Ein
Tagungsbericht, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», XII, 2, 2005, pp.
417-428
Edgar A., The philosophy of Habermas, Dublin, Acumen Press, 2005.
Eley G., Civile G., Caglioti D.L., Ryan M.P., Guilhaumou J., Storia e critica
dell’opinione pubblica, di Jϋrgen Habermas, in «Contemporanea», 2, 2005, pp. 337370.
Elizalde L.H., Sociedad postsecular y escenario público: funciones sociales y políticas de la
“verdad” en el debate entre Ratzinger y Habermas, in «Studia politicae», 6, 2005, pp. 9-40.
Elliott J., Becoming critical: the failure to connect, in «Educational Action Research», 13,
3, 2005, pp. 359-374.
Eriksen E.O., An emerging European public sphere, in «European Journal of Social
Theory», VIII, 3, 2005, pp. 341-363; repr. in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges
Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Eriksen E.O., Weigård J., Understanding Habermas: Communicative Action and Deliberative Democracy, in «Contemporary Political Theory», 4, 1, 2005.
Erman E., Human Rights and Democracy: Discourse Theory and Global Rights Institutions,
Aldershot, Ashgate, 2005.
Fávero A.M., Por uma pedagogia da autonomia moral : as conexões entre as teorias da
moralidade de Piaget e Habermas, Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul, 2005.
Feldman S.M., The Problem of Critique: Triangulating Habermas, Derrida, and Gadamer
Within Metamodernism, in «Contemporary Political Theory», IV, 3, 2005.
Finlayson G.J., Habermas. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, Oxford University
Press, 2005.
Finlayson G.J., Habermas’s Moral Cognitivism and the Frege-Geach Challenge, in «European Journal of Philosophy», XIII, 3, 2005, pp. 319-345; repr. in Rasmussen D.,
Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Flügel O., Geis A., Begrenzte Grenzüberschreitung. Eine Replik auf Andreas Behnke, in
«Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», XII, 2, 2005, pp. 391-405.
5375.
5376.
5377.
5378.
5379.
5380.
5381.
5382.
5383.
5384.
5385.
5386.
5387.
5388.
5389.
5390.
5391.
5392.
5393.
325
Fornari E., Modernità fuori luogo. Democrazia globale e “valori asiatici” in Jürgen Habermas e Amartya K. Sen, Torino, Nino Aragno Editore, 2005.
Gauthier J., Bibliography: Feminist Accounts of Critical Theory, in «APA Newsletters»,
IV, 2, 2005, pp. 21-24.
Gauthier J., Feminism and Critical Theory, in «APA Newsletters», IV, 2, 2005, pp.
15-21.
Genus A., Coles A.-M., On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment, in «Technology Analysis & Strategic Management», 17, 4, 2005, pp. 433-443.
Ghiraldelli J.P., Neopragmatismo e verdade: Rorty em conversação com Habermas, in
«Utopia y Práxis Latinoamericana», X, 29, 2005, pp. 67-78.
Gil Martín F.J., Tecnología y esfera pública en Jürgen Habermas, in «CTS: Revista
iberoamericana de ciencia, tecnología y sociedad», II, 5, 2005, pp. 141-152.
Gilabert P., A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics, in «International Journal of
Philosophical Studies», XIII, 3, 2005, pp. 405-37; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal
J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Gilabert P., Should Discourse Ethics Do Without a Principle of Universalization?, in
«Philosophical Forum», XXXVI, 2, 2005,183-191; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal
J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. II, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Gilabert P., The Substantive Dimension of Deliberative Practical Rationality, in «Philosophy and Social Criticism», XXXI, 2, 2005, pp. 185-210.
Gomes L.R., O consenso na teoria do agir comunicativo de Habermas e suas implicações para
a educação, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2005.
González Soriano J.A., La teoría crítica sobre la racionalización como testimonio de un
eclipse civilizatorio, in «Revista de filosofía», XXX, 2, 2005, pp. 165-191.
Goode L., Jürgen Habermas: Democracy and the public sphere, London, Pluto Press,
2005.
Gottfried P., The Habermasian Moment, in «Journal of Libertarian Studies», XIX, 2,
2005, pp. 51-65.
Greven M.Th., Politik als Ursprung theoretischen Denkens: zur intellektuellen Grundintuition von Jürgen Habermas, in «Vorgänge», XLIV, 3-4, 2005, pp. . 152-165.
Grewal S.S., A cosmopolitan Europe by constitutional means? Assessing the theoretical foundations of Habermas’ political prescriptions, in «Journal of European Integration»,
XXVII, 2, 2005, pp. 191-215.
Grodnick S., Rediscovering Radical Democracy in Habermas’s between Facts and Norms, in
«Constellation», XII, 3, 2005, pp. 392-408.
Große Kracht K., Die zankende Zunft: Historische Kontroversen in Deutschland nach
1945, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, 2005.
Grumley J., Hegel, Habermas and the Spirit of Critical Theory, in «Critical Horizons»,
6, 1, 2005, pp. 87-99.
Guarino Th.G., Foundations of Systematic Theology, New York, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2005.
326
5394.
5395.
5396.
5397.
5398.
5399.
5400.
5401.
5402.
5403.
5404.
5405.
5406.
5407.
5408.
5409.
5410.
Guèye S.P., Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy: Rethinking Politics, in Perez
A.F., Yang F., Guèye S.P. (eds.), Civil Society as Democratic Pratice, Washington, The
Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 2005, pp. 119-138.
Guibentif P., Légitimité des mouvements sociaux. Un exercice conceptuel dans le prolongement
de Habermas et Luhmann, in Coutu M., Rocher G. (eds.), La légitimité de l’État et du
droit. Autour de Max Weber, Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2005, pp. 259298.
Guilhaumou J., ‘Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica’ di Jürgen Habermas. Habermas e la
Rivoluzione francese: dall’opinione pubblica alla visibilità sociale, in «Contemporanea. Rivista di storia dell’’800 et del ‘900», VIII, 2, 2005, pp. 365-369p
Günther K., Schuld und Kommunikative Freiheit, Frankfurt-Main, 2005.
Haacke J., The Frankfurt School and International Relations’ on the centrality of recognition,
in «Review of International Studies», 31, 2005, pp. 181–194.
Haber S., Socialisation de la nature, naturalisation de l’activité. Autour de Habermas, in Id.,
Critique de l’antinaturalisme. Études sur Foucault, Butler, Habermas, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2005, pp. 127-255.
Hansen E., The Foucault-Habermas Debate, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical Thought», 130, 2005, pp, 63-83.
Harper T., Assessing the critical capacities of democracy through the work of Hannah Arendt
and Jürgen Habermas: the occlusion of public space and the rise of homo spectaculorum, Murdoch, Murdoch University, 2005.
Heath J., Habermas, in Shook J., Margolis J. (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Pragmatism, Oxford, Blackwell, 2005.
Heath J., Response to Critics, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review»,
XXXIV, 2, 2005, pp. 391-398.
Heffernan M., The End of Atlanticism: Habermas, Derrida and the Meaning of Europe in
the Twenty-first Century, in «Geopolitics», 10, 3, 2005, pp. 570-575.
Hellesnes J., On Artificially Moralising the Morally Irrelevant, in AA.VV., Religion in the
public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 90-91.
Hendley S., From the Second to the Third Person and Back Again: Habermas and Brandom on Discursive Practice, in «Journal of Philosophical Research», XXX, 2005, pp.
169-188.
Henrich D.C., Metaphysische Implikationen in der Diskursethik von Jürgen Habermas?
Zwischen Bewusstseinsphilosophie und Naturalismus, Frankfurt a.M., Johann Wolfgang
Goethe Universität, 2005.
Herborth B., Zur Politik der Grenzziehung. Eine Replik auf Andreas Behnke, in «Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen», XII, 2, 2005, pp. 383-390.
Herrera Gómez M., Trinidad Requena A., La teoría de la acción comunicativa de Jürgen
Habermas, in Herrera Gómez M., Iglesias de Ussellenguaje J. (eds.), Lenguaje y acción,
Teorías sociológicas de la acción, Madrid, Editorial Tecnos, 2005, pp. 195-224.
Høibraaten H., Post-metaphysical thought, religion and secular society, in AA.VV., Religion
in the public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 52-63.
5411.
5412.
5413.
5414.
5415.
5416.
5417.
5418.
5419.
5420.
5421.
5422.
5423.
5424.
5425.
5426.
5427.
5428.
327
Holst C., Secular Worries, in AA.VV., Religion in the public spere, The Holberg Prize
Seminar, 2005, pp. 48-51.
Hooper K., Novas cartografías nos estudos galegos. Nacionalismos literario, literatura
nacional, lecturas posnacionais, in «Anuario de estudos literarios galegos», 2005, pp. 6473.
Hoyos Vásquez G., Joseph Ratzinger y Jürgen Habermas en la cueva del león, in «Revista
Javeriana», 716, 2005, pp. 52-59.
Hüller Th., Deliberative Öffentlichkeit, Institut für Interkulturelle und Internationale
Studien, Universität Bremen, InIIS-Arbeitspapier, 32, 2005.
Humphries M., Grant S., Social Enterprise and Re-Civilization of Human Endeavors:
Re-Socializing the Market Metaphor or Encroaching Colonization of the Lifeworld?, in «Current Issues in Comparative Education», VIII,1, 2005, pp. 41-50.
Hutchings K., Speaking and hearing: Habermasian discourse ethics, feminism and IR, in
«Review of International Studies», XXXI, 1, 2005, pp. 155-165.
Huttunen R., Jürgen Habermas ja julkisuuden rakennemuutos, in «Niin & Näin», XII,
4, 2005, pp. 89-95.
Ingram D., Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Democracy, in «Human Studies»,
XXVIII, 2, 2005.
Izzo A., Sociologia, teoria critica ed ermeneutica: Jürgen Habermas, in Id., Storia del pensiero
sociologico. Vol. III. I contemporanei, Bologna, Il Mulino, 2005, pp. 137-150.
Jackson D., Musgrave L.R., Special Cluster on Feminist Critical Theory: Introduction, in
«APA Newsletters», IV, 2, 2005, pp. 2-3.
Janssen D., Kies R., Online forums and deliberative democracy, in «Acta Politica», XL,
2005, pp. 317-335; in Ungureanu C., Günther K., Joerges Ch. (eds.), Jürgen Habermas. Vol. 2, Avebury, Ashgate, 2011, pp. **-**.
Jiménez Redondo M., El segundo Habermas: teorías de la acción comunicativa, in Arenas
L., Garrido M., Valdés L. (eds.), El legado filosófico y científico del siglo XX, Madrid,
Ediciones Catedra SA, 2005, pp. 503-518.
Joas H., Die Religion der Moderne. Rezension Jürgen Habermas, Zwischen Naturalismus
und Religion, in «Die Zeit», 13.10.2005, p. 74.
Johnson P., Habermas: A Reasonable Utopian?, in «Critical Horizons», VI, 1, 2005,
pp. 101-118.
José A., La teoría crítica sobre la racionalización como testimonio de un eclipse civilizatorio, in
«Revista de filosofía», XXX, 2, 2005, pp. 165-191.
Kaszynska P., Habermas and Aesthetics: The Limits of Communicative Reason, in «British Journal of Aesthetics», XLV, 3, 2005.
Kavoulakos K., From Habermas to Horkheimer’s Early Work: Directions for a materialist reconstruction of communicative critical theory, in «Telos: A Quarterly Journal of Critical
Thought», 130, 2005, pp. 39-62; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas
II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Kemmis S., Knowing practice: searching for saliences, in «Pedagogy, Culture & Society»,
13, 3, 2005, pp. 391-426.
328
5429.
5430.
5431.
5432.
5433.
5434.
5435.
5436.
5437.
5438.
5439.
5440.
5441.
5442.
5443.
5444.
Khan G.A., The subject and politics in Habermas and post-structuralism, Nottingham
Nottingham Trent University, 2005.
Kögler H.-H., Constructing a Cosmopolitan Public Sphere: Hermeneutic Capabilities and
Universal Values, in «European Journal of Social Theory», VIII, 3, 2005, pp. 297320.
Krause S., Desiring Justice: Motivation and Justification in Rawls and Habermas, in «Contemporary Political Theory», IV, 4, 2005, pp. pp. 363–385.
Kunneman H., Munnichs G., van Gelder F., Jürgen Habermas, in Achterhuis, H.
(ed.), Denkers van Nu, Utrecht, Diemen, Veen Magazines, 2005, pp. 182-205.
Lafont C., Communicative Action and Rational Choice, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXXI, 2005, pp. 253-263.
Lafont C., Is the Ideal of a Deliberative Democracy Coherent?, in The 22nd World Congress of Philosophy of Law, Granada, 5.2005.
Lafont C., Rightness and Truth in Moral Discourses, in Conference A teoria discursiva
do direito e a reabilitação da racionalidade prática, Pontifícia Universida de Católica do
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 7-9.9.2005.
Lafont C., The Burdens of the Public Use of Reason, in Seminar in honor of the Holberg International Memorial Prize 2005 laureate J. Habermas, The University of
Bergen, Norway, 29-30.11.2005; in AA.VV., Religion in the public sphere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 32-47.
Lafont C., The Linguistic Turn in Perspective, in Coloquio Diánoia, Mexican Institute
for philosophical Research (UNAM), 23-24.6.2005; tr. es. El giro lingüístico hoy, in
«Diánoia», LVI, 2006, pp. 19-31.
Lafont C., Universalization or Threat Advantage? The Difficult Dialogue between Discourse
Ethics and the Theory of Rational Choice, in «Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review», XXXIV, 2, 2005, pp. 373-382.
Lalli P., Répresentations sociales et communication, in «Hermès», 41, 2005.
Leidenberger G., Habermas en el Zócalo: la “transformación de la esfera pública” y la
política del transporte público en la ciudad de México, 1900-1947, in Sacristán C., Picato P.
(eds.), Actores, espacios y debates en la historia de la esfera pública en la ciudad de México,
ciudad de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas/Instituto Mora, 2005,
pp. 179-198.
Leite Araujo L.B., A Decade of Debate: Discourse Theory versus Political Liberalism,
XXII World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, Granada, 2429.5.2005
Leite R.B., Hermenêutica constitucional como processo político comunicativo: a crítica de Jürgen
Habermas às concepções liberal e comunitarista, in Id., Justiça e democracia: entre o universalismo e o comunitarismo, São Paulo, Landy Editora, 2005, pp. 197-230.
Li V., Rationality and Loss: Habermas and the Recovery of the Pre-modern Other, in «Parallax», 11, 3, 2005, pp. 72-86.
Lindemann G., Beobachtung der Hirnforschung, in «Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie», 53, 5, 2005, pp. 761-781.
5445.
5446.
5447.
5448.
5449.
5450.
5451.
5452.
5453.
5454.
5455.
5456.
5457.
5458.
5459.
5460.
5461.
5462.
329
Lindholm T., Challenging Habermas on the Moral Legitimacy of Religious Voices in Democratic Politics, in AA.VV., Religion in the public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005,
pp. 110-117.
Linklater A., Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process, in «Review of International
Studies», 31, 2005, pp. 141-154.
Lipp A., An exploration of Taylor’s reflective framework, in «Contemporary Nurse», 19,
1-2, 2005, pp. 88-95.
Llanque M., Eigentum in der Kritischen Theorie, in Eckl A., Bernd L. (eds.), Was ist
Eigentum?: philosophische Eigentumstheorien von Platon bis Habermas, München, Beck,
2005, pp. 205-216.
Lloyd G., Providence Lost: ‘11’ and the History of Evil, in «Critical Horizons», 6, 1,
2005, pp. 23-43.
Longhi A.J., A ação educativa na perspectiva da teoria do agir comunicativo de Jürgen
Habermas: uma abordagem reflexiva, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas,
2005.
López de Lizaga J.L., Walter Benjamin y los dos paradigmas de la Teoría Crítica, in
«Nexo. Revista de Filosofía», 3, 2005, pp. 11-31.
López Melero M., Para saber más, in «Cuadernos de pedagogía», 346, 2005, pp.
80-81.
López Moreno A., La teoría de la acción en Weber. Parsons y Habermas: algunas
consideraciones críticas, in «Foro: Revista de ciencias jurídicas y sociales», 1, 2005, pp.
179-201.
Lumsden S., Introduction to German Philosophy: From Kant to Habermas, in «International Philosophical Quarterly», XLII, 2, 2005.
Lupel A., Tasks of a Global Civil Society: Held, Habermas and Democratic Legitimacy
beyond the Nation-State, in «Globalizations», II, 1, 2005, pp. 117-133.
Lynch M., Transnational Dialogue in an Age of Terror, in «Global Society», 19, 1,
2005, pp. 5-28.
Maly S., Die Rolle der Religion in der postsekulären Gesellschaft, in «Theologie und Philosophie», 80, 2005, pp. 546–565.
Mansilla H.C.F., Las debilidades de la democracia contemporánea frente a la cultura popular.
Una visión heterodoxa desde el Tercer Mundo, in «Reflexión política», VII, 14, 2005, pp.
40-53.
Marcantonio J.H., Rawls, Habermas e os novos caminhos da filosofia moral, São Paulo,
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2005.
Marinopoulou A., The concept of the political in Max Horkheimer and Jürgen Habermas,
Sussex, University of Sussex, 2005.
Martin R.W.T., Between Consensus and Conflict: Habermas, Post-Modern Agonism and the
Early American Public Sphere, in «Polity», XXXVII, 3, 2005, pp. 365-388.
Martins C.A., A teoria do discurso na filosofia do direito de Habermas, in Dutra V.D.,
Pinzani A. (eds), Habermas em discussão, Florianópolis, Editora Nefipo, 2005, pp.
69-79.
330
Matuštík M.B., Singular Existence and Critical Theory, in «Radical Philosophy Review», VIII, 2, 2005, pp. 211-223.
Maupoil E., Il Futuro della natura umana. I rischi di una genetica liberale, in «Iustitia»,
5464.
LVIII, 2, 2005, p. 181.
Medina i Cambrón A., D’una objectivitat professional a una ètica universal, in
5465.
«Trípodos: Revista digital de comunicació», 16, 2005, pp. 141-153.
Mehl D., The public on the television screen: towards a public sphere of exhibition, in «Jour5466.
nal of Media Practice», 6, 1, 2005, pp. 19-28.
Melissaris E., The Limits of Institutionalised Legal Discourse, in «Ratio Juris», XVIII, 4,
5467.
2005, pp. 464-483.
Melo R.S., O uso público da razão como procedimento: pluralismo, discurso e democracia em
5468.
Habermas, São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, 2005.
Mendieta E., Communicative Freedom, Citizenship and Political Justice in the Age of Glob5469.
alization, in «Philosophy & Social Criticism», XXXI, 2005, pp. 739-752.
Mendieta E., Introduction. Religione as Critique: Theology as Social Critique and Enlight5470.
ened Reason, in Id. (ed.), The Frankfurt School on Religion: Key Writings by the Major
Thinkers, New York, Routledge, 2005, pp. 1-20.
Menéndez Ureña E., Kant y Habermas: la razón ilustrada ayer y hoy, in «Cuadernos
5471.
salmantinos de filosofía», XXXII, 2005, pp. 309-320.
Menke B., Die politische Theorie von John Rawls: Grundkonstanten, Grundsätze und die
5472.
Kritik von Jürgen Habermas, München, GRIN Verlag, 2005.
Miller G.D., Mimesis in communicative action: Habermas and the affective bond of under5473.
standing, Washington, University of Washington, 2005.
Milovic M., Freud, Habermas y la cuestión de la política, in «Revista de Humanidades
5474.
y Ciências Sociales», 1, 2005, pp. 165-180; repr. in «El Genio Maligno», 1, 2007.
Mitzen J., Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public
5475.
Spheres, in «American Political Science Review», XCIX, 3, 2005, pp. 401-417.
Moon S., Selbstpraktik, Anerkennung und kommunikative Rationalität: Versuch zur
5476.
Vermittlung von Foucault, Honneth und Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Lang, 2005.
Mora Malo E., Mejor argumento, acción comunicativa y clases sociales. Una crítica de la
5477.
propuesta de Habermas, in «Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación
social», 7, 2005, pp. 16-39.
Müller-Doohm S., Theodor W. Adorno and Jürgen Habermas – Two Ways of Being a
5478.
Public Intellectual. Sociological Observations Concerning the Transformation of a Social Figure of
Modernity, in «European Journal of Social Theory», VIII, 4, 2005, pp. 269-280; tr.
en. Theodor W. Adorno und Jürgen Habermas - zwei Spielarten des öffentlichen Intellektuellen:
soziologische Betrachtungen zum Wandel einer Sozialfigur der Moderne, in Gebhardt W.,
Hitzler R. (eds.), Nomaden, Flaneure, Vagabunden: Wissensformen und Denkstile der Gegenwart, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, pp. 23-36.
Murphy M., Between facts, norms and a post-national constellation: Habermas, law and Eu5479.
ropean social policy, in «Journal of European Public Policy», XII, 1, 2005, pp. 143156.
5463.
5480.
5481.
5482.
5483.
5484.
5485.
5486.
5487.
5488.
5489.
5490.
5491.
5492.
5493.
5494.
5495.
5496.
5497.
331
Muyard F., Political Modernity: the Coming Challenge for Contemporary China’s Modernization, in International Conference “Political Reflections on Modernity”, RCHSS,
Academia Sinica, Taipei, 6-8.12.2005.
Neri D., Habermas, la genetica e i referendum, in «L’Unità», 14.1.2005
Nichols R.L., Expanding the Boundaries of Critical Theory, in «Political Theory: An
International Journal of Political Philosophy», XXXIII, 1, 2005, pp. 121-124.
Niemi J.I. Jürgen Habermas’s Theory of Communicative Rationality: The Foundational Distinction Between Communicative and Strategic Action, in «Social Theory & Practice»,
XXXI, 4, 2005.
Niemi J.I., Habermas and validity claims, in «International Journal of Philosophical
Studies», XIII, 2, 2005, pp. 227-244; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Niro M., Manipolazione e giornalismo: un approccio analitico habermasiano, in «Quaderni
di teoria sociale», V, 2005, pp. 421-450.
Noonan J., Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas’s
Democratic Theory, in «Res Publica», XI, 2, 2005.
Numberger S., Rennhak C., The Future of B2C E-Commerce, in «Electronic Markets», 15, 3, 2005, pp. 269-282.
Oliveri F., L’Occidente diviso, in «Jura Gentium. Centro di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale», 2005.
Onida L., Il problema del consenso nelle analisi di tre filosofi contemporanei: Hannah Arendt,
Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, Sassari, Università degli Studi di Sassari, 2005.
Parkins J.R., Mitchell R.E., Public Participation as Public Debate: A Deliberative Turn in
Natural Resource Management, in «Society & Natural Resources», 18, 6, 2005, pp.
529-540.
Pasdermajian P., Rationalization, legitimation, and domination in modern industrial societies: the alternative perspectives of Max Weber and Jürgen Habermas, Montréal, Concordia
University, 2005.
Pellizzoni L., Che cosa significa deliberare? Promesse e problemi della democrazia deliberativa,
in Pellizzoni L. (ed.), La deliberazione pubblica, Meltemi, Roma 2005, pp. 7-50.
Pensky M., Habermas’s Political Profile: A Review and Critique of Matustik, in «Radical
Philosophy Review», Spring-Summer 2005.
Pensky M., Jürgen Habermas: Existential Hero?, in «Radical Philosophy», VIII, 2,
2005, pp. 197-209.
Perri M.L., Democrazia e bene comune da Karl Jaspers a Jürgen Habermas, in «Verifiche»,
XXXIV, 1-2, 2005, pags. 91-126.
Pettigrove G., Rights, Reasons, and Religious Conflict: Habermas and Scanlon on the Role
of Religion in Public Debate, in «Social Philosophy Today», XXI, 2005, pp. 81-95;
repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009,
pp. **-**.
Pietilä K., Habermasin tiedonintressinajatuksen käyttö ja intressi, in «Niin & Näin», XII,
4, 2005.
332
5498.
5499.
5500.
5501.
5502.
5503.
5504.
5505.
5506.
5507.
5508.
5509.
5510.
5511.
5512.
5513.
5514.
5515.
5516.
Prandini R., La “costituzione” del diritto nell’epoca della globalizzazione. Struttura della
società-mondo e cultura del diritto nell’opera di Gunther Teubner, in Teubner G. (ed.), La
cultura del diritto nell’epoca della globalizzazione, Roma, Armando, 2005, pp. 191-224.
Prusak B., Rethinking “Liberal Eugenics”: Reflections and Questions on Habermas on Bioethics, in «Hastings Center Report», XXXV, 6, 2005, pp. 31-42; repr. in Rasmussen
D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Prusak B.G., Rethinking “Liberal Eugenics”: Reflections and Questions on Habermas on
Bioethics, in «Hastings Center Report», 35, 6, 2005, pp. 31-42.
Rahm C., Recht und Demokratie bei Jürgen Habermas und Ronald Dworkin, Frankfurt
a.M., Lang, 2005.
Rambour M., References and Uses of Postnationalism in French and British Debates on
Europe, in Workshop: National Identity and Euroscepticism: A Comparison Between France
and the United Kingdom, Oxford, Department of Politics and International Relations,
University of Oxford, 13.2.2005.
Reiner H., The Conceptual Common Denominator Between Bellah, Giddens, and Habermas
and its Significance, in «Current Perspectives In Social Theory», 23, 2005.
Renault E., Radical Democracy and an Abolitionist Concept of Justice. A Critique of Habermas’ Theory of Justice, in «Critical Horizons», VI, 1, 2005, pp. 137–152.
Requejo Coll F., Rawls, Habermas and multinational democracies. Some analytical remarks, in Montabes Pereira J. (ed.), Instituciones y procesos políticos: homenaje al José
Cazorla, Madrid, Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 2005, pp. 159-168.
Richardt Olsen E., Moral i moderniteten – belyst gennem Zygmunt Bauman og Jürgen Habermas, Roskilde, Roskilde University, 2005.
Ripalda Crespo J.M., Habermas y Europa, in «Mientras tanto», 96, 2005, pp. 17-22.
Rosati M., Critica del dogmatismo liberale. La laicità da ideologia a pratica cooperativa, in
«Parole chiave», 33, 2005, pp. 81-101
Rosati M., Ferrara A., Affreschi della modernità. Crocevia della teoria sociale, Roma, Carocci, 2005.
Rosati M., Postfazione. Prove di dialogo (asimmetrico), in Habermas J., Ratzinger J.; tr.
it. Ragione e fede in dialogo, Venezia, Marsilio, 2005, pp. 85-93.
Ross S., Beyond Ritual: Sacramental Theology After Habermas, in «Ars Disputandi», 5,
1, 2005, pp. 148-150.
Rossi P., Il pontefice e i filosofi devoti, in «Nuova informazione bibliografica», 4, 2005,
pp. 625-634.
Rouse P.H., The experience of rational reflection: Adorno contra Habermas, Essex, University of Essex, 2005.
Rusconi G.E., La legge sulla fecondazione. Un’occasione mancata di democrazia laica, in «il
Mulino», 2, 2005, pp. 221-230.
Russill Ch., The Road Not Taken: William James’s Radical Empiricism and Communication Theory, in «The Communication Review», 8, 3, 2005, pp. 277-305.
Ryan M.P., ‘Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica’ di Jürgen Habermas. Sfera pubblica: un
vaso di Pandora. Genere, sesso e democrazia in America, in «Contemporanea. Rivista di
5517.
5518.
5519.
5520.
5521.
5522.
5523.
5524.
5525.
5526.
5527.
5528.
5529.
5530.
5531.
5532.
5533.
5534.
5535.
333
storia dell’’800 et del ‘900», VIII, 2, 2005, pp. 358-365.
Salomon D., “Weltinnenpolitik” als “neuer Konstitutionalismus”?: Jürgen Habermas und
die Rolle des Rechts im “globalisierten Kapitalismus”, in Badziura A., Müller B., Speckmann G., Weißbach C. (eds.), Hegemonie - Krise - Krieg: Widersprüche der Globalisierung
in verschiedenen Weltregionen, Hamburg, VSA-Verlag, 2005, pp. 60-75.
Salonia M., “Dialettica della libertà”: la Frankfurter Adorno-Konferenz 2003, in «Iride»,
1, 2005, pp. 165-174.
Scatizza A., The relationship between the political public sphere and the democratic process of
legislation in Jürgen Habermas, Macerata, Edizioni Simple, 2005.
Schecter D., Liberalism and the Limits of Legal Legitimacy: Kant and Habermas, in
«King’s Law Journal», 16, 1, 2005, pp. 99-119.
Schmidt T.E., Das Volkerrecht soll’s richten. Wie Jürgen Habermas den gespaltenen Westen
therapiert, in «Merkur», 669, 2005.
Schmidt Th. M., The Discourse of Religion in the Post-Secular Society, in AA.VV., Religion in the public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 80-89.
Schmidt Th.E., Das Völkerrecht soll’s richten. Wie Jürgen Habermas den gespaltenen Westen therapiert, in «Merkur», 669, 1.2005, pp. 70-75.
Shabani O.A.P., Democracy, Power, and Legitimacy: The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, in «Political Theory», XXXIII, 1, 2005.
Simpson K., Daly P., Citizenship Education and Post-16 Students: A Habermasian Perspective, in «Citizenship Studies», 9, 1, 2005, pp. 73-88.
Singh A., Indian Administrative Theory: Context and Epistemology, in «Administrative
Theory & Praxis», 27, 1, 2005, pp. 51-80.
Skidelsky E., Habermas vs the Pope, in «Prospect», 116, 2005.
Skirbekk G., The Critically Ambiguous Idea of a ‘Modernization of (Religious) Consciousness’, in AA.VV., Religion in the public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 2731.
Small N., Mannion R., A hermeneutic science: health economics and Habermas, in «Journal
of health, organisation and management», 19, 3, 2005.
Sousa Alves M.A., Habermas crítico de Davidson: hermenêutica vs. objetivismo, in Dutra
L.H. e Mortari C. (eds.), Epistemologia. Anais do IV Simpósio Internacional Principia,
Florianópolis, UFSC, NEL, 2005, pp. 191-211.
Soutou G.H., Habermas est-il le penseur indepassable de notre temps?, in «Geopolitique»,
91, 2005.
Souza J.C. de., Introdução aos debates Rorty & Habermas: filosofia, pragmatismo e
democracia, in Id., Filosofia, racionalidade, democracia: debates Rorty & Habermas, São
Paulo, Editora Unesp, 2005, pp. 13-49.
Steele M., Hiding from History: Habermas’s Elision of Public Imagination, in «Constellations», XII, 3, 2005, pp. 409–436.
Steiger T., Die Hermeneutik des sozialen Selbst. Bausteine einer Kritik des partikularistischen Individualismus, Frankfurt a.M., Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, 2005.
Strauss D.F.M., The ontic uniqueness and irreducibility of language and communicative ac-
334
5536.
5537.
5538.
5539.
5540.
5541.
5542.
5543.
5544.
5545.
5546.
5547.
5548.
5549.
5550.
5551.
5552.
5553.
5554.
tions, in «Communicatio», 31, 2, 2005, pp. 211-227.
Talbott W.J., Which Rights Should Be Universal?, Oxford, Oxford University Press,
2005.
Thomassen L.A., Habermas og Derrida: filosofien i ei kritisk tid, in «Syn & Segn», 4,
2005, pp. 22-34.
Toens K., Janning F., In Defence of Communicative Reason: Habermas on Truth, Religion
and Bioethics, in «European Journal of Political Theory», IV, 2, 2005.
Tuori K., Liberaalista poliittisesta julkisuudesta deliberatiiviseen demokratiaan, in «Niin &
Näin», XII, 4, 2005, pp. 97-103.
Vaki F., Adorno Contra Habermas and the Claims of Critical Theory as Immanent Critique, in «Historical materialism», 13, 4, 2005.
Valdivé Fernández C.M., Experiencia en investigación-acción técnica. El paso del infinito
potencial al infinito “como un todo” para aprender la construcción de los conjuntos infinitos, in
«EquisAngulo: revista electrónica iberoamericana de Educación Matemática», 1,
2005.
Valleriani A., Ermeneutica della differenza, in «Revista de ciencias de la educación»,
202, 2005, pp. 241-254.
Vargova M., Democratic Deficits of a Dualist Deliberative Constitutionalism: Bruce Ackerman and Jürgen Habermas, in «Ratio Juris», XVIII, 3, 2005, pp. 365–386.
Veca S., I problemi di una teoria della giustizia globale, in «Politeia», XXI, 79, 2005, pp.
3-8.
Vélez Cuartas G.J., Semiótica y acción comunicativa: Una ruta entre Pierce, Apel y
Habermas, in «Andamios: revista de investigación social», 2, 2005, pp. 173-196.
Vetlesen A.J., Faith in religion. Habermas’s post-secular search for Meaning and Solidarity,
in AA.VV., Religion in the public spere, The Holberg Prize Seminar, 2005, pp. 22-26.
Villalobos Alpízar I., Kant y Habermas. Reflexiones sobre la razón política, in «Revista
de Filosofía de la Universidad de Costa Rica», XLIV, 108, 2005, pp. 167-172.
Walker N., Making a World of Difference? Habermas, Cosmopolitanism and the Constitutionalization of International Law, Firenze, European University Institute, 2005.
Waller M., Marcos S., Dialogue and difference: feminisms challenge globalization,
Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Weber M., The critical social theory of the Frankfurt School, and the ‘social turn’ in IR, in
«Review of International Studies», 31, 2005, pp. 195–209.
Wenzel U.J., Jürgen Habermas und der Verfassungspatriotismus der Bonner Republik, in
«Sowi : das Journal für Geschichte, Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur», XXXIV, 1,
2005, pp. 39-47.
Wernecke A., Rechtsphilosophische Probleme der weltweiten Durchsetzung von Menschenrechten : eine Untersuchung zu I. Kant, J. Rawls und J. Habermas, Frankfurt a.M., Lang, 2005.
Wiklund H., In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a Habermasian review of environmental assessment, in «Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal», 23, 4, 2005, pp.
281-292.
Wolin R., Jürgen Habermas and Post-Secular Societies, in «Chronicle of Higher Educa-
5555.
5556.
5557.
335
tion», LII, 2, 2005, pp. 16-17.
Wong D., Foucault Contra Habermas: Enlightenment, Power, And Critique, in «Philosophy today», XLIX, 1, 2005, pp. 55-69; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.),
Habermas II. Vol. I, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Zavediuk N., Consensus between discourse ethics and democracy: Habermas on compromise,
Montréal, Concordia University, 2005.
Zurriaráin R.G., El concepto de vida personal en el futuro de la naturaleza humana de J.
Habermas, in «Cuadernos de bioética», XVI, 56, pp. 43-50.
2006
5558.
5559.
5560.
5561.
5562.
5563.
5564.
5565.
5566.
5567.
5568.
5569.
Adams N., Habermas and theology, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press,
2006; repr. part. as Habermas in Dialogue with Theologians, in Rasmussen D., Swindal
J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Ameln L., Öffentlichkeit und öffentliche Meinung bei Habermas, München, GRIN Verlag, 2008.
Anderson J., Introduction: Free will, neuroscience, and the participant perspective, in School
of Law, New York, New York University, 12.10.2006; in «Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action», X, 1,
3.2007, pp. 3-11.
Andress D., The Micro-physics of Öffentlichkeit? Habermas, Foucault, and the Administration of Democratic Space in the Palais-Royal, 1789–1790, in «Cultural and Social History», III, 2, 2006, pp. 145-166.
Araújo de Oliveira M., Moral, derecho y democracia: el debate Apel versus Habermas, in
«Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía», XXXIII, 2006, pp. 439-462.
Arroyas Langa E., Los blogs: perspectivas individuales en el espacio público, in «Global
media journal», III, 6, 2006.
Ayuste A., Las contribuciones de Habermas y Freire a una teoría de la educación democrática
centrada en la deliberación racional y el diálogo, in Id. (ed.), Educación, ciudadanía y
democracia, 2006, pp. 65-102.
Azkarraga J., Modernitate kapitalistari kritica: Weber, Frankfurteko Eskola, Habermas,
Bilbo, Udako Euskal Unibertsitatea, 2006.
Babissagana E.N., La justification habermassienne de l’interdiction de la torture et ses problèmes, in Id., L’interdit de la torture en procès, Bruxelles, Facultés Universitaires SaintLouis, 2006, pp. 67-88 .
Baccelli L., J. Habermas, L’occidente diviso, in «Filosofia politica», 2, 2006, pp.
287-290.
Baynes K., Progress in the Public Use of Reason?, Symposium on Public Philosophy,
Binghamton, Binghamton University, 4.2006.
Becker G., Reason, Faith, and Secularization: Jürgen Habermas meets Joseph Cardinal
Ratzinger, in «Prajna Vihara: Journal of Philosophy and Religion». VII, 1, 2006, pp.
18-43; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London,
336
5570.
5571.
5572.
5573.
5574.
5575.
5576.
5577.
5578.
5579.
5580.
5581.
5582.
5583.
5584.
5585.
5586.
5587.
Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Beemer J.K., Breaching the Theoretical Divide: Reassessing the Ordinary and Everyday in
Habermas and Garfinkel, in «Sociological Theory», 24, 1, 2006.
Berthier A.E., Jürgen Habermas; El Giro Lingüístico de la sociología y la Teoría
Consensual de la Verdad, in «Observaciones filosóficas», 3, 2006.
Biebricher Th., Technik und Wissenschaft als ,Ideologie’, in Honneth A. (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der Kritischen Theorie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, pp.
181-184
Blesa Aledo P.S., Medios de comunicación y democracia: ¿El poder de los medios o los medios
al poder?, in «Sphera publica: revista de ciencias sociales y de la comunicación», 6,
2006, pp. 87-106.
Bohman J.F., Beyond the Democratic Peace: An Instrumental Argument for Transnational
Democracy, in «Journal of Social Philosophy», XXXVII, 1, 2006, pp. 127-138.
Bohman J.F., Institutional Reform and Democratic Legitimacy: Deliberative Democracy and
the Aims of Transnational Constitutionalism, in Besson S., Marti Marmol J.M. (eds.), Deliberative Democracy and Its Discontents, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2006, pp. 181-215.
Boman Y., The struggle between conflicting beliefs: on the promise of education, in «Journal
of Curriculum Studies», XXXVIII, 5, 2006, pp. 545-568.
Bornedal P., On the Beginnings of Theory: Deconstructing Broken Logic in Grice, Habermas, and Stuart Mill, University Press of America, 2006.
Bray R.T., Jürgen Habermas: a esfera pública no processo democrático de legitimação do
direito, Piracicaba, Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba, 2006.
Brettschneider C., The Value Theory of Democracy, in «Politics, Philosophy, and
Economics», V, 3, 2006, pp. 259-278.
Brunkhorst H., Contemporary German social theory, in Delanty G. (ed.), Handbook of
Contemporary European Social Theory, New York, Routledge, 2006, pp. 51-68.
Brunkhorst H., Habermas. Grundwissen Philosophie, Leipzig, Reclam, 2006, 20112; tr.
it. Habermas, Firenze, Firenze University Press, 2008.
Burns R., van der Will W., Intellectuals as cultural agenda-setters in the federal republic?, in
«International Journal of Cultural Policy», XII, 3, 2006, pp. 291-322.
Calado V., Lógicas de mediatização subjacentes à cobertura jornalística dos eventos partidários
na imprensa portuguesa, in Ledo Andión M. (ed.), Comunicación local: da pesquisa á
producción, Actas do Congreso Internacional Lusocom, Santiago de Compostela,
21-22.4.2006, pp. 972-991.
Campbell H., Marshall R., Towards justice in planning: A reappraisal, in «European
Planning Studies», XIV, 2, 2006, pp. 239-252.
Cansino C., Rawls y Habermas, in «Estudios de Política y Sociedad», 1, 2006, pp. 711.
Carabante Muntada J.M., ¿Qué aporta la religión al Estado de Derecho?: comentario sobre
el encuentro de Benedicto XVI con Jürgen Habermas, in «Foro: Revista de ciencias
jurídicas y sociales», 4, 2006, pp. 221-228.
Carleheden M., Habermas and Contemporary Society, in «Acta Sociologica», XLIX, 1,
5588.
5589.
5590.
5591.
5592.
5593.
5594.
5595.
5596.
5597.
5598.
5599.
5600.
5601.
5602.
5603.
337
2006.
Carleheden M., Towards democratic foundations: a Habermasian perspective on the politics
of education, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXXVIII, 5, 2006, pp. 521-543.
Carretero A., Jürgen Habermas y la Primera Teoría Crítica: Encuentros y Desencuentros, in
«Cinta de Moebio: Revista Electrónica de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales», 27,
2006.
Catarzi M., Proprietà e preesistenza: considerazioni su Il Futuro della natura umana di Jürgen Habermas, in «Archivio di storia della cultura», XIX, 2006, pp. 413-459.
Celikates R., Pollmann A., Baustellen der Vernunft. 25 Jahre “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”, in «WestEnd», III, 2, 2006, pp. 97-113.
Cenci A.V., A controvérsia entre Habermas e Apel acerca da relação entre moral e razão
prática na ética do discurso, Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2006.
Ceppa L., Lotte di riconoscimento tra diritto pubblico e diritto privato, in «Rivista critica
del diritto privato», XXIV, 2, 2006, pp. 367-375; repr. as Lotte di riconoscimento nella
società democratica, in Id., Il diritto della modernità. Saggi habermasiani, Torino, Trauben,
2009, 20112, pp. 101-116.
Chan Ch.Ch., Theological Competence of Going Public in Modernity by Meeting the Challenge of Jürgen Habermas, Hong Kong, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006.
Christensen T.M.V., Kommunikationen mellem EU og Borgerne - ud fra Habermas’ teori
om den kommunikative handlen, Roskilde, Roskilde University, 2006.
Clarke R., The Appearance of Freedom, in School of Law, New York, New York
University, 12.10.2006; in «Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal
for the Philosophy of Mind and Action», X, 1, 3.2007, pp. 51-57.
Claudino F.I.F., Protagonismo sociopolítico e religioso: uma análise do Movimento dos
Focolares na cidade do Recife através da “teoria da ação comunicativa” de Jürgen Habermas,
Recife, Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2007.
Cook D., Critical Theory After Habermas: Encounters and Departures. Edited by Dieter
Freundlieb, in «Journal of Critical Realism», V, 1, 2006, pp. 183-187.
Cook D., Staying Alive: Adorno and Habermas on Self-Preservation under Late Capitalism, in «Rethinking Marxism», XVIII, 3, 2006, pp. 433-447.
Cooke M., Salvaging and Secularizing the Semantic Contents of Religion: The Limitations of
Habermas’s Postmetaphysical Proposal, in «International Journal for Philosophy of Religion», LX, 1-3, 2006, pp. 187-207; repr. in Long E.Th. (ed.), Self and Other: Essays
in Continental Philosophy of Religion, Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, pp. 403-433; repr. in
Rasmussen D., Swindal J. (eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. ****.
Cooper B., Broadfoot P., Beyond description and prescription: towards conducive assessment
in social work education, in «International Studies in Sociology of Education», XVI, 2,
2006, pp. 139-157.
Cotroneo G., Le avventure del concetto di Stato. Per gli ottant’anni di Nicola Matteucci, in
«Filosofia politica», 2, 2006, pp. 181-196.
Cronin C.P., Editor’s Preface, in Habermas J., The Divided West, Cambridge (Mass.),
Polity Press, 2006, pp. VII-XX.
338
5604.
5605.
5606.
5607.
5608.
5609.
5610.
5611.
5612.
5613.
5614.
5615.
5616.
5617.
5618.
5619.
5620.
5621.
Cronin C.P., Editor’s Preface, in Habermas J., Time of Transitions (ZÜ KPS IX),
Cambridge, Polity Press, 2006, pp. VII-XIV.
Cronin C.P., On the Possibility of a Democratic Constitutional Founding: Habermas and
Michelman in Dialogue, in «Ratio Juris», XIX, 3, 2006, pp. 343–369.
Cruz Á.R. de Souza, Habermas e o direito brasileiro, Rio de Janeiro, Lumen Juris,
2006.
Cuillerai M., L’irréconcilié: l’histoire critique aux marges de l’amnistie, in «L’Homme et la
société», 159, 1, 2006, pp. 25-50.
Cusset Y., Haber S., Introduction : les coordonnées du débat entre Foucault et Habermas, in
Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques,
Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 9-28.
da Rosa Mendes S., Esfera pública e direitos humanos fundamentais: um estudo das rádios
comunitárias, segundo J. Habermas, Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul, 2006.
da Silva Scarpi V., Habermas and the Republic: a Debate about Law, Democracy and
Freedom, Rio de Janeiro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2006.
Dahlberg L., Jürgen Habermas: Democracy and the public sphere, by Goode, in
«New Zealand Sociology», XXI, 2, 2006, pp. 295-301.
Davis C.A. Jr., Fonseca F., Considerations from the development of a local spatial data
infrastructure, in «Information Technology for Development», XII, 4, 2006, pp. 273290.
De Briey L., Le conflit des paradigmes. Habermas, Renaut : deux stratégies de renouvellement du projet moderne, Bruxelles, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2006.
de Oliveira M.A.C., Poder constituinte e patriotismo constitucional: o projeto constituinte do
estado democrático de direito na teoria discursiva de Jürgen Habermas, Belo Horizonte,
Mandamentos, 2006.
De Simone A., Conoscenza, comprensione, comunicazione. Filosofia, ermeneutica e teoria
critica: tragitti da Dilthey, Gadamer e Habermas, in De Simone A., Di Clemente F.,
D’Andrea F. (eds.), Tra Dilthey e Habermas. Esercizi di pensiero su filosofia e scienze umane, Perugia, Morlacchi, 2006, pp. 1-350.
De Simone A., Oltre il disincanto. Etica, diritto e comunicazione tra Simmel, Weber e Habermas, Lecce, Pensa Multimedia, 2006.
de Souza J.A., Direito, Moral e Democracia: reflexões sobre a concepção de Direito de Jürgen
Habermas a partir de considerações críticas de Karl Otto-Apel, Brasília, Universidade de
Brasília, 2006.
Deitelhoff N., Überzeugung in der Politik. Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie internationalen
Regierens, Frankfurt a.M., Suhrkamp, 2006.
Delanty G., Modernity and the escape from Eurocentrism, in Id. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory, New York, Routledge, 2006, pp. 266-278.
Deng Z., Gopinathan S., The complicity of medium-of-instruction policies: functions and
hidden agendas, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXXVIII, 5, 2006, pp. 609-622.
Deranty J.-Ph. Droit et démocratie entre dissolution biopolitique et reconstruction normativiste
5622.
5623.
5624.
5625.
5626.
5627.
5628.
5629.
5630.
5631.
5632.
5633.
5634.
5635.
5636.
5637.
5638.
339
: Agamben, Foucault, Habermas, Honneth, in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et
Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 211226.
Deranty J.-Ph., Adorno’s Other Son: Derrida and the Future of Critical Theory, in «Social
Semiotics», XVI, 3, 2006, pp. 421-433.
Deranty J.-Ph., Repressed Materiality: Retrieving the Materialism in Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition, in «Critical Horizons», VII, 1, 2006, pp. 113-140.
Donoso Romo A., Identidades nacionales y postnacionales en América Latina. Aportes y
preguntas desde las comprensiones de Jürgen Habermas, in «Sociedad Hoy», 10, 2006, pp.
73-83
Dos Remedios Silva Amorin V., La posibilidad de criterios universales en la ética
discursiva en Jünger Habermas, in «Lógoi», 10, 2006.
Durango Álvarez G., El principio discursivo y los derechos fundamentales en la teoría
habermasiana, in «Opinión Jurídica», V, 9, 2006, pp. 13-32.
Dutra D.J.V., A teoria discursiva da aplicaçao do Direito: o modelo de Habermas, in
«Veritas: revista da Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», LI, 1,
2006.
Dutra D.J.V., Da funçao da sociedade civil em Hegel y Habermas, in «Utopía y praxis
latinoamericana», 35, 2006, pp. 55-65.
Eberl O., Niesen P., Demokratischer Positivismus: Habermas/Maus, in Buckel S.,
Christensen R., Fischer-Lescano A. (eds.), Neue Theorien des Rechts, Stuttgart, Lucius
& Lucius, 2006, pp. 3-28.
Eder K., Making sense of the public sphere, in Delanty G. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory, New York, Routledge, 2006, pp. 333-346.
Edgar A., Habermas. The Key Concepts, London-New York, Routledge & Kegan
Paul, 2006.
Emmerich Z., Toward a Needs-Based Conception of Intersubjectivity, in «South African
Journal of Philosophy», XXV, 3, 2006, pp. 249-257.
Englund T., Deliberative communication: a pragmatist proposal, in «Journal of Curriculum Studies», XXXVIII, 5, 2006, pp. 503-520.
Erman W., Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition, in «Philosophy & Social
Criticism», XXXII, 3, 2006 pp. 377-400.
Fabrino Mendonça R., Rousiley C.M.M., Jornal comunitário e interações discursivas:
entre desigualdades deliberativas e luta por reconhecimento, in Ledo Andión M. (ed.),
Comunicación local: da pesquisa á producción, Actas do Congreso Internacional
Lusocom, 2006, Santiago de Compostela, 21-22.04.2006, pp. 2299-2324.
Fenton E., Liberal Eugenics & Human Nature Against Habermas, in «Hastings Center Report», XXXVI, 6, 2006, pp. 181-190.
Fenton E., Liberal Eugenics and Human Nature. Against Habermas, in «Hastings
Center Report», XXXVI, 6, 2006, pp. 181-190; repr. in Rasmussen D., Swindal J.
(eds.), Habermas II. Vol. IV, London, Sage, 2009, pp. **-**.
Ferrarese E., La société et la constitution de soi chez Foucault et Habermas : besoins, inter-
340
5639.
5640.
5641.
5642.
5643.
5644.
5645.
5646.
5647.
5648.
5649.
5650.
5651.
5652.
5653.
5654.
subjectivité, pouvoir, in Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés,
confrontations critiques, Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 155-166.
Ferreira Ruiz M.J., A ação comunicativa na práxis pedagógica : um estudo a partir de
Habermas, Londrina, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, 2006.
Ferro L., Da Habermas a Habermas: la centralità e l’attualità del dibattito sulla sfera pubblica, in «Metis», XIII, 1, 2006, pp. 197-220.
Ferry J.-M., Habermas face à Kant, in Twa-Po-Une L. (ed.), Questions d’éthique contemporaine, Paris, Stock, 2006, pp. 937-969.
Fiig Ch., Det vigtigste er debatten – Feministiske stemmer i den danske offentlighed, in Borchorst A., Christensen A.D. (ed.), Kønsrefleksioner – om magt og mangfoldighed. Festskrift
til Birte Siim, Aalborg, Aalborg Universitetsforlag, 1996.
Fine R., Cosmopolitanism. A social science research agenda, in Delanty G. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary European Social Theory, New York, Routledge, 2006, pp. 242253
Fischbach F., De la théorie critique aux luttes sociales, in «Nouvelles FondationS», II,
2, 2006, pp. 89-99.
Fleming M., On Habermas’s Concept of Communicative Rationality, in Department of
Philosophy, Florida State University, 20.1.2006.
Floresta S., Poiêsis e praxis. Aristotele nella filosofia di Jürgen Habermas, in «Fenomenologia e società», XXIX, 2006, pp. 69-83.
Fornari F., Epistemologia e sociologia della conoscenza, in De Simone A., Di Clemente
F., D’Andrea F. (eds.), Tra Dilthey e Habermas. Esercizi di pensiero su filosofia e scienze
umane, Perugia, Morlacchi, 2006, pp. 603-694.
Forti S., La ricostruzione di una ricezione, in Id., Hannah Arendt tra filosofia e politica,
Milano, Bruno Mondadori, 2006, pp. 9-28.
Friedland L.A., Hove Th., Rojas H., The Networked Public Sphere, in «Javnost - The
Public», XIII, 4, 2006, pp. 5-26.
Fultner B., Jürgen Habermas, in Wintle J. (ed.), The New Makers of Modern Culture,
Gandesha, S. The Nature of the Future Human: Review of Habermas’s The Future of
Human Nature, in «Theory, Culture and Society», XXIII, 5, 2006, pp. 151-154.
García G., Antonio J., La estructura filosófica de los modelos procedimentalistas de justicia:
Los modelos de “ ëtica discursiva “ de Jürgen Habermas y de Karl-Otto Apel, in «Anales De
La Catedra Francisco Suarez», 40, 2006.
Garcia Guadarrama J.L., El debate Gadamer-Habermas: interpretar o trasformar el
mundo, in «Coatepec», 10, 2006, pp. 11-21.
George R.P., Restricting Reasons; Attenuating Discourse: Rawls, Habermas, and the Catholic Problem, in Robinson D.N., Sweeney G.M., Gill R., Human Nature and Its Wholeness, Washington (D.C.), Catholic University of America Press, 2006, pp. 80-95;
repr. with abridgements and additions as Public Morality, Public Reason, in «First
Things», 167, 2006, pp. 21-26; tr. it. Rawls, Habermas e la ragione pubblica, in
«Civiltà europea», II, 2, 2009, pp. 101-117.
5655.
5656.
5657.
5658.
5659.
5660.
5661.
5662.
5663.
5664.
5665.
5666.
5667.
5668.
5669.
5670.
5671.
5672.
341
Gil Martín F.J., Más allá del desafío transhumanista; Habermas y el peligro de la eugenesia
liberal, in «Observaciones filosóficas», 3, 2006.
Gil Martín F.J., Racionalización de la esfera pública: El contenido normativo de la razón en
la obra de Jürgen Habermas, in «Tópicos», 30, 2006, pp. 9-54.
Gilabert P., Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories of Kant
and Habermas, in «Kant-Studien», XCVII, 2, 2006, pp. 210-227.
Gleeson B., Desocializing space: the decline of the public realm in Western Sydney, in «Social & Cultural Geography», VII, 1, 2006, pp. 19-34.
Grewal Sh.S. A cosmopolitan Europe by constitutional means: assessing the theoretical foundations of Haberma’s political prescriptions, Essex, University of Essex, 2006.
Griggs Th., Democracia Contemporánea. El modelo procedimiental de Dahl y la crítica
normativa de Habermas, in «Documentos de Apoyo Docente (DAD)», 13, 2006.
Gross A.G., Habermas, Systematically Distorted Communication, and the Public Sphere, in
«Rhetoric Society Quarterly», XXXVI, 3, 2006, pp. 309-330.
Gunson D., On the Philosophical Credentials of the Discourse Society, in «Atlantic Journal of Communication», 14, 1-2, 2006, pp. 97-117.
Günther K., Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, in Honneth A. (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der Kritischen Theorie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, pp. 199-204.
Günther K., Grundsätze für ein neues Hochschulrecht, in Honneth A. (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der Kritischen Theorie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, pp.
137-140.
Günther K., Politik des Kompromisses: Dissensmanagement in pluralistischen Demokratien,
Wiesbaden, VS Verl. für Sozialwissenschaft, 2006.
Haber S., Discourse Ethics and the Problem of Nature, in «Critical Horizons», VII, 1,
2006, pp. 141-158.
Haber S., Foucault et Habermas: deux commencements philosophiques contemporains, in
Cusset Y., Haber S. (eds.), Habermas et Foucault. Parcours croisés, confrontations critiques,
Paris, CNRS éditions, 2006, pp. 31-54.
Hands J., Civil society, cosmopolitics and the net: The legacy of 15 February 2003, in «Information, Communication & Society», IX, 2, 2006, pp. 225-243.
Hartmann M., Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus, in Honneth A. (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der Kritischen Theorie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006,
pp. 185-187
Hartmann M., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit, in Honneth A. (ed.), Schlüsseltexte der
Kritischen Theorie, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006, pp. 168172
Heck J.N., Eugenia negativa/positiva: o suposto colapso da natureza em J. Habermas, in
«Veritas: revista da Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sul», LI, 1,
2006, pp. 42-55.
Hedberg P., Justification: R

Jürgen Habermas.

Transcription

Similar documents

Liebe, Selbstliebe und die Sehnsucht nach einem sinnvollen Leben

Volle Kraft zurück zum Urquell

4. Der Stellenwert der klassischen `Gottesbeweise` im Rahmen der

III. Zur Geschichte der Kunstphilosophie B. Die Kunstphilosophie

Merkmale guter psychiatrischer Pflege und Betreuung

Full text

Wine as a Cultural Product

61 LIST OP PARTICIPANTS Aasma, Ants (Estonia) Abd Al