Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS)
Transcription
Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS)
Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS) Last update: December 2007 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 1 Presentation Topics Purpose Exams Final development and administration Multiple Score Factors Profile What of advancement exams sheet - What does it mean? you should do to prepare for advancement Recent and future changes 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 2 Questions What five factors make up the Final Multiple Score (FMS) for E-4 to E-6 candidates? Is the FMS different for E-7 candidates? What percentage of E-7 candidates are selected to be board eligible? What factor has the largest percentage of the FMS for E-4 to E-6 candidates? What number of occupational & PMK questions are on each exam? 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 3 Purpose of Advancement Examinations The advancement-in-rate examination is a tool used, as part of the Final Multiple Score, to help rank order qualified candidates on the basis of rating and professional military knowledge at the next higher rate. 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 4 Qualifying to Take the Exam CO recommendation Meet minimum time in rate (TIR) requirement Proper Path of Advancement Requirements must be met for STRIKERS/GENDETS - Meet minimum requirements for rating (i.e. citizenship, security clearance, and training) - Counseled by their Career Development Team (CDT) after the CREO/REGA message is released (about 60 days prior to exam) - Must receive approval by the ECM, if required by the CREO/REGA message, prior to the date of examination. 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 5 “What do you mean, there is a discrepancy?” https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil/nac/exams/discrepancy.asp Discrepancies: Examples: Errors can lead to: – An error on a worksheet – Missing or incorrect PMA – Delayed results or advancements – An error on an answer sheet Overwriting bar-coded information with incorrect answer sheet bubbling – Improper processing – LOSING OUT ON ADVANCEMENT – Or – information that does not match the Enlisted Master File 3 February 2003 – Improper path of advancement – Not meeting special rating requirements – Incorrect SSN – Name on Answer Sheet not matching EMF – Insufficient Time-in-Rate – Recording exam rate incorrectly (MM vice MMN entered on answer Navy Advancement Center sheet) 6 Exam Development Facts Written by CPOs (E-7 to E-9) – NETPDTC hosts an Advancement Exam Development Conference for each rating on a 2year cycle. At least 6 Fleet SMEs from the respective rating are invited to attend. – Recent fleet experience – From ratings (BM, SH, etc.) or – From rating communities (EMN, AWA, etc.) Advancement exams are designed to test rating and professional military experience and knowledge 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 7 Exam Development Facts Exams consist of 200 questions Occupational + E7 E6 E5 E4 3 February 2003 100 115 135 150 Professional Military Knowledge (PMK) 100 85 65 50 Navy Advancement Center 8 More Exam Development Facts Advancement exams test on occupational (rate) and professional military knowledge (PMK) information – Exams test the most important topics for the rate – Every question must be supported by a reference – Occupational Standards, Naval Standards, or Competencies pertaining to the rating are used to validate questions 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 9 Advancement Exam Development Conference 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. EVERY ONE TO TWO YEARS Review Scope of the Rating Verify Master Reference List Update, edit, and improve exam banks and graphics Build 14 examinations (2 years) Post new Advancement Exam Strategy Guide (AESG) 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 10 Exam Scoring Approaches to exam scoring: – Criterion-referenced (schoolhouses) – Norm-referenced (Navy advancement exams) 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 11 Standard Score Example Raw Score 0 100 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Standard Score 3 February 2003 200 Raw score: 0 to 200 Raw scores are converted to standard scores Standard score: 20 to 80 Average of all raw scores is assigned standard score 50 Navy Advancement Center 12 Myth MYTH: Scoring the maximum 80 points on the exams means you “aced” the exam. FACT: It simply means you performed better than all or almost all of the other candidates taking the same exam. FACT: 80 “represents” the highest standard score attained for a group of candidates taking the same examination (the best raw score may have been a 175). 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 13 Final Multiple Score (FMS) The Final Multiple Score (FMS) method looks at the “whole person” E-4/5/6 – Performance – Experience ( service in paygrade, awards, and PNA points) – Exam Score (standard score) E-7 – Performance – Exam Score (standard score) 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 14 Old FMS Chart FACTOR Performance Mark Average (PMA) Standard Score (SS) Passed Not Advanced (PNA) Points Service in Paygrade (SIPG) EXAM PAYGRADE E-4/5 PMA X 60 – 156 E-6 PMA X 60 – 130 ALL SS MAX PTS AND % E-4/5 E-6 84 (36%) 110 (41.5%) 80 (34%) 80 (30%) 30 (13%) 30 (11%) 30 (13%) 34 (13%) 10 (4%) 12 (4.5%) 234 (100%) 266 (100%) 2 X PNA Pts E-4/5/6 E-4/5 E-6 Awards (AWD) E4/5/6 Max FMS Possible ALL 3 February 2003 COMPUTATION From Last 5 Exam Cycles 2 X SIPG + 15 2 X SIPG + 19 Values in Advancement Manual Navy Advancement Center 15 Contribution to Variance FMS Factors (E-6 USN/R) 70% CONTRIBUTION TO FMS 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% 41 39 37 35 33 31 29 27 25 23 21 19 17 15 13 11 9 7 5 3 1 CYCLES PMA SS LOS SIPG AWD PNA 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center Note: FMS formula change at Cycle 155; FMS formula change at Cycle 168. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 108 111 112 115 116 119 120 123 124 127 128 131 132 135 136 139 140 143 144 147 148 151 152 155 156 159 160 163 164 167 168 171 172 175 176 179 180 183 184 187 188 191 SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR SEP MAR 16 85 86 86 87 87 88 88 89 89 90 90 91 91 92 92 93 93 94 94 95 95 96 96 97 97 98 98 99 99 00 00 * 01 01 02 02 03 03 04 04 05 05 06 Changes for August/September 2007 Increase Performance Mark Average (PMA) Reduce Service in Paygrade and Pass Not Advanced Factors by One Half – Maintain experience (SIPG) at a reduced number of factor points – Maintain sustained superior performance (PNA) at a reduced number of factor points CURRENT FMS E-4/5 MAX ELEMENT Performance Mark Average PTS % INCREASE PMA and HALF SIPG & PNA E-6 MAX PTS % E-4/5 MAX PTS % E-6 MAX DELTA PTS % DELTA 84 36% 110 41.5% 90 43% 7% 116 48.5% 7% 80 34% 80 30% 80 38% 4% 80 33.5% 3.5% 30 13% 34 13% 15 7% -6% 17 7% -6% 30 13% 30 11% 15 7% -6% 15 6% -5% 10 4% 12 4.5% 10 5% 1% 12 5% 0.5% 234 100% 266 100% 210 100% 240 100% (Performance/CO’s Recommendation) Standard Service Score (Knowledge) in Paygrade (Career Rating Experience) Pass Not Advanced Points (Sustained Superior Performance) Awards Total (Experience/Performance) Points Note: Does not reflect E-7 FMS change 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 17 New FMS Chart FACTOR Performance Mark Average (PMA) Standard Score (SS) Pass Not Advanced (PNA) Service In Paygrade (SIPG) EXAM PAYGRADE E-4/5 PMA X 80 – 230 E-6 PMA X 80 – 204 ALL SS MAX PTS AND % E-4/5 E-6 90 (43%) 116 (48.5%) 80 (38%) 80 (33.5%) 15 (7%) 15 (6%) 15 (7%) 17 (7%) 10 (5%) 12 (5%) 210 (100%) 240 (100%) PNA Pts E-4/5/6 E-4/5 E-6 Awards (AWD) E4/5/6 Max FMS Possible ALL Note: COMPUTATION From Last 5 Exam Cycles SIPG + 7.5 SIPG + 9.5 Values in Advancement Manual Note: Does not reflect E-7 FMS change 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 18 Study Results • Rank ordering from Mar 06 rating exams • Note differences in rank ordering for Sailors with high PMA • Most Sailors with high PMA increased in ranking compared to the current ranking 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 19 Rankings for SH1 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 340 CANDIDATES 37 SELECTEES (9 Candidates W/ 4.0 PMA not shown) 20 Changes (Cont’d) Change in PMA Formula: – from current: (12 pt difference between EP & MP or MP & P) E-4/5 = (PMA x 60) - 156 E-6 = (PMA x 60) – 130 – to new: (16 pt difference between EP & MP or MP & P) E-4/5 = (PMA x 80) - 230 E-6 = (PMA x 80) – 204 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 21 Old E-7 FMS (Maximum possible points) Examination standard score: 80 60% Performance: 52 40% 132 100% Total Possible 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 22 New E-7 50/50 FMS Increases the difference between an EP and MP or MP and P from 2.6 pts to 10 points. PMA CURRENT PTS PROPOSED PTS 4.00 (EP) 52.0 80.0 3.80 (MP) 49.4 70.0 3.60 (P) 46.8 60.0 3.40 (PR) 44.2 50.0 2.00 (SP) 26.0 0.0 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 23 E-7 50/50 FMS Computations FACTOR OLD COMPUTATION MAX PTS AND % NEW COMPUTATION MAX PTS AND % Performance Mark Average (PMA) PMA x 13 52 (40%) PMA x 50 - 120 80 (50%) Standard Score (SS) SS 80 (60%) SS 80 (50%) Max FMS Possible 3 February 2003 132 (100%) Navy Advancement Center 160 (100%) 24 E-7 50/50 Rankings For BUC FMS RANK CURRENT PROPOSED 1 4 13 15 16 20 47 52 57 62 91 120 131 136 152 170 227 228 243 17 113 144 2 6 30 53 61 63 71 72 73 81 103 110 137 153 154 155 162 163 171 191 239 268 282 229 272 5 9 21 22 1 3 7 8 9 10 27 31 35 36 51 66 73 79 83 98 160 161 183 12 76 95 2 4 17 40 48 49 54 55 56 60 72 77 96 107 108 109 119 120 126 143 203 227 248 189 233 5 11 15 16 FMS RANK SS 80.00 71.73 65.39 64.48 64.48 63.58 57.24 56.33 55.43 54.52 51.80 49.08 48.18 47.27 46.37 44.55 38.21 38.21 35.70 64.48 49.99 47.27 80.00 70.83 62.67 57.24 55.43 55.43 54.52 54.52 54.52 53.61 51.80 50.90 48.18 47.27 47.27 47.27 46.37 46.37 45.46 43.65 37.31 33.68 29.15 39.12 32.78 71.73 67.20 64.48 64.48 PMA 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.92 3.92 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 CURRENT PROPOSED 25 26 31 32 33 34 36 37 48 49 54 74 75 83 84 104 111 123 124 133 140 141 142 173 174 182 183 200 201 210 230 249 259 266 273 287 23 27 38 39 41 55 58 59 66 77 88 98 107 116 117 18 19 24 25 26 30 33 34 43 44 47 64 65 70 71 81 91 93 94 104 115 116 117 137 138 149 150 166 167 172 201 221 225 230 238 263 23 29 38 39 41 59 62 63 69 75 80 88 92 102 103 FMS RANK SS 63.58 63.58 62.67 62.67 62.67 61.77 60.86 60.86 58.14 58.14 57.24 54.52 54.52 53.61 53.61 51.80 50.90 49.99 49.99 49.08 48.18 48.18 48.18 45.46 45.46 44.55 44.55 42.74 42.74 41.84 39.12 36.40 35.50 34.59 32.78 28.25 64.48 63.58 60.86 60.86 59.95 57.24 56.33 56.33 55.43 54.52 53.61 52.71 51.80 50.90 50.90 PMA 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 CURRENT PROPOSED 126 130 146 166 167 177 193 203 205 217 224 234 238 253 92 121 122 132 207 208 235 8 40 44 45 93 94 138 179 180 192 198 219 220 283 7 10 11 12 14 19 29 42 43 50 51 56 67 68 69 70 113 114 130 147 148 157 170 176 177 199 207 215 219 229 82 105 106 118 181 182 217 13 42 45 46 89 90 131 164 165 171 179 208 209 268 14 20 21 22 28 32 37 57 58 67 68 74 84 85 86 87 FMS RANK SS 49.99 49.99 48.18 46.37 46.37 45.46 43.65 42.74 42.74 40.93 40.02 39.12 38.21 36.40 53.61 50.90 50.90 49.99 42.74 42.74 39.12 68.11 60.86 59.95 59.95 53.61 53.61 49.08 45.46 45.46 44.55 43.65 40.93 40.93 30.06 69.92 68.11 68.11 68.11 67.20 66.30 64.48 60.86 60.86 59.05 59.05 58.14 56.33 56.33 56.33 56.33 PMA 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 FMS RANK CURRENT PROPOSED SS PMA 86 99 54.52 168 178 185 187 188 168 175 184 185 186 47.27 46.37 45.46 45.46 45.46 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 165 112 125 211 221 231 274 184 3 28 35 46 60 78 79 80 87 99 108 109 148 149 169 186 189 214 223 245 254 255 256 280 246 24 82 95 96 97 139 178 142 151 222 232 235 269 211 6 50 61 78 97 121 122 123 127 133 144 145 173 174 192 213 214 228 236 249 253 254 255 273 251 53 132 139 140 141 180 48.18 52.71 51.80 43.65 41.84 40.93 34.59 46.37 80.00 65.39 63.58 60.86 58.14 56.33 56.33 56.33 55.43 54.52 53.61 53.61 49.99 49.99 48.18 46.37 46.37 43.65 41.84 39.12 38.21 38.21 38.21 33.68 39.12 66.30 56.33 55.43 55.43 55.43 50.90 3.76 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.74 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.72 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.80 CURRENT PROPOSED . . . . . . 291 CANDIDATES 176 60/40 SBE 177 50/50 (1 TIE) 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center (NOTE: GOLD indicates SBE and … indicates data not shown.) 157 158 164 172 181 199 209 215 236 237 240 247 248 258 269 278 284 18 134 145 176 212 242 285 156 64 65 76 85 114 115 213 216 222 232 233 260 261 267 270 275 276 289 291 175 286 143 257 241 244 290 190 191 202 212 216 226 231 234 246 247 252 258 259 264 271 274 281 52 188 200 220 237 262 284 210 155 156 163 169 197 198 250 257 261 266 267 275 276 277 279 282 283 285 286 270 287 280 288 289 290 291 SS 49.99 49.99 49.08 48.18 47.27 45.46 44.55 43.65 40.93 40.93 40.02 39.12 39.12 38.21 36.40 34.59 31.87 68.11 51.80 50.90 48.18 44.55 40.02 31.87 50.90 59.05 59.05 58.14 57.24 54.52 54.52 45.46 44.55 43.65 42.74 42.74 39.12 39.12 38.21 37.31 36.40 36.40 28.25 26.64 51.80 36.40 57.24 46.37 49.08 50.90 39.12 PMA 25 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.65 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.40 3.30 3.20 3.10 3.00 2.83 2.67 E-7 50/50 Rankings For DCC FMS RANK CURRENT PROPOSED 2 9 25 36 37 42 47 55 64 138 190 191 204 220 259 320 359 421 456 465 35 54 74 187 228 319 358 3 15 16 20 27 28 38 82 83 90 91 103 104 113 125 126 149 173 174 193 205 231 232 241 1 3 12 16 17 19 24 30 33 55 80 81 95 102 136 197 224 294 370 398 25 36 40 104 139 217 243 2 9 10 14 20 21 29 48 49 52 53 58 59 64 72 73 90 112 113 123 134 160 161 171 FMS RANK SS 75.75 72.13 63.44 61.27 61.27 60.54 59.82 58.37 57.65 52.58 49.68 49.68 48.96 48.23 46.06 42.44 40.26 35.19 30.12 27.95 61.99 59.09 57.65 50.40 48.23 43.16 40.99 75.75 67.06 67.06 65.61 63.44 63.44 61.99 56.92 56.92 56.20 56.20 55.47 55.47 54.75 54.02 54.02 52.58 51.13 51.13 50.40 49.68 48.23 48.23 47.51 PMA 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.95 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 CURRENT PROPOSED 242 243 271 336 337 362 363 364 392 409 445 8 13 23 24 45 52 62 81 99 158 159 170 171 213 214 215 249 294 304 305 381 388 395 404 432 433 436 442 447 458 192 333 17 29 30 56 92 93 114 115 172 173 194 241 242 258 259 260 292 322 381 4 11 22 23 38 41 43 54 65 114 115 124 125 162 163 164 195 222 230 231 293 309 324 331 368 369 382 388 396 415 155 262 15 31 32 50 74 75 91 92 FMS RANK SS 47.51 47.51 46.06 42.44 42.44 40.99 40.99 40.99 38.82 37.37 33.02 73.58 68.51 64.89 64.89 61.27 59.82 59.09 57.65 56.20 52.58 52.58 51.85 51.85 49.68 49.68 49.68 47.51 45.33 44.61 44.61 40.26 39.54 38.82 38.09 35.19 35.19 34.47 33.75 33.02 30.85 51.13 43.16 67.79 64.16 64.16 59.82 56.92 56.92 55.47 55.47 PMA 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.93 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.90 3.88 3.88 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 CURRENT PROPOSED 116 117 127 128 140 141 142 150 151 152 153 163 175 176 177 194 206 207 222 223 233 236 262 272 287 288 325 348 374 396 438 462 473 49 75 76 107 165 196 245 34 98 157 185 201 210 211 212 225 226 248 93 94 100 101 117 118 119 126 127 128 129 135 149 150 151 165 174 175 183 184 196 200 211 223 232 233 261 281 310 345 397 435 452 44 60 61 84 141 169 209 39 82 138 167 176 186 187 188 198 199 216 FMS RANK SS 55.47 55.47 54.75 54.75 54.02 54.02 54.02 53.30 53.30 53.30 53.30 52.58 51.85 51.85 51.85 51.13 50.40 50.40 49.68 49.68 48.96 48.58 47.51 46.78 46.06 46.06 43.89 42.44 40.99 38.82 34.47 30.85 25.78 60.54 58.37 58.37 56.20 52.58 51.13 48.23 63.44 56.92 53.30 51.85 51.13 50.40 50.40 50.40 49.68 49.68 48.23 PMA 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.87 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.86 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 FMS RANK CURRENT PROPOSED SS PMA 280 345 354 235 284 297 46.78 43.16 42.44 451 145 237 4 416 137 212 5 33.02 54.02 48.96 77.20 3.85 3.84 3.84 3.80 279 290 291 292 293 299 300 301 302 303 310 311 257 265 266 267 268 276 277 278 279 280 289 290 47.51 46.78 46.78 46.78 46.78 46.06 46.06 46.06 46.06 46.06 45.33 45.33 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 254 267 268 281 282 283 295 274 285 286 300 301 302 313 49.68 48.96 48.96 48.23 48.23 48.23 47.51 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 3.73 218 229 238 255 256 257 258 284 296 275 288 305 314 315 316 317 341 349 52.58 51.85 51.13 50.40 50.40 50.40 50.40 48.96 48.23 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 453 454 35.19 3.67 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.85 3.85 3.85 CURRENT PROPOSED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 477 CANDIDATES SBE 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement 284 Center (NOTE: GOLD indicates SBE and … indicates data not shown.) 467 6 32 139 239 221 323 324 26 67 112 148 162 230 240 261 269 270 285 286 308 322 335 360 361 373 391 408 422 423 434 444 449 454 457 459 460 461 470 471 472 476 147 186 209 289 129 375 452 181 435 466 18 83 226 312 296 383 384 105 189 236 263 269 333 347 354 362 363 372 373 389 402 407 417 418 428 440 445 449 450 453 455 456 459 461 463 464 465 469 470 471 475 295 401 434 458 439 473 476 474 477 SS 30.85 77.92 66.34 56.92 51.13 52.58 46.78 46.78 67.79 62.72 59.09 56.92 56.20 52.58 51.85 51.13 50.40 50.40 49.68 49.68 48.23 47.51 46.78 45.33 45.33 44.61 43.16 41.71 40.26 40.26 38.82 37.37 36.64 35.92 35.19 34.47 34.47 34.47 30.85 30.85 30.12 24.33 57.65 57.65 56.92 54.02 63.44 49.68 43.16 65.61 52.58 PMA 26 3.67 3.66 3.66 3.66 3.66 3.65 3.65 3.65 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.55 3.40 3.35 3.25 3.20 3.20 3.07 2.80 2.53 Performance Mark Average (PMA) Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate PMA Frequency Distribution Promotion values 6000 Early Promote Must Promote Promotable Progressing Significant Problems 5500 5000 CANDIDATES = 8173 PMA 3.80 ACCOUNTS FOR 25.3% OF THE TOTAL CANDIDATES 4000 3500 3000 2500 = = = = = 4.00 3.80 3.60 3.40 2.00 2000 1500 Time-in-rate 1000 500 PMA based on: 3 yrs of averaged evals for E-6 1 yr of averaged evals for E-4/5 3 February 2003 4.00 3.95 3.90 3.85 3.80 3.75 3.70 3.65 3.60 3.55 3.50 3.45 3.40 3.35 3.30 3.25 3.20 3.15 3.10 3.05 3.00 2.95 2.90 2.85 2.80 0 < 2.75 CANDIDATES 4500 recommendation point E-3 to E-4 E-4 to E-5 E-5 to E-6 E-6 to E-7 Navy Advancement Center requirements 6 mos in E-3 12 mos in E-4 36 mos in E-5 36 mos in E-6 27 How is PMA calculated? Example for PO2 participating in PO1 exam: Evaluation ending 02 March 15 01 March 15 00 March 15 Block 45 mark EP = 4.00 MP = 3.80 MP = 3.80 Add 4.00 + 3.80 + 3.80 = 11.6, divide by 3 = 3.866 Round up to 3.87 Final PMA is 3.87 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 28 Performance Mark Average Contribution to Final Multiple Score Performance Mark Average 4.00 3.80 3.60 3.40 FMS Points E4/5 E6 E7 90.0 74.0 58.0 42.0 116.0 100.0 84.0 68.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 *These values are based on individual’s average over the cumulative reporting periods. 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 29 Passed Not Advanced (PNA) Points Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate PNA Frequency Distribution • Sustained Superior Performance • Awarded to those who pass the exam but are not advanced due to quota limitations • Points awarded each exam cycle based on combination of Performance Mark Average (PMA) and Exam Standard Score (SS) • Up to 3.0 PNA points awarded per exam cycle up to 5 cycles (1.5 points max each for PMA and SS) 12,000 10,000 PMA (max 1.5 points per cycle) awarded based on ranking relative to peers: Top 25% = 1.5 PNA Points Next 25% = 1.0 PNA Points Next 25% = 0.5 PNA Points Bottom 25% = 0 PNA Points 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 • SS (max 1.5 points per cycle) awarded based on exam score: 57.01- 80.00 = 1.5 PNA points 50.01- 57.00 = 1.0 PNA points 42.01- 50.00 = 0.5 PNA points < 42.01 = 0 PNA points • Maximum total weight 7% (E-4/E-5); 6% (E-6) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 CANDIDATES 8,000 Rarely maxed to 15 Pts 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 30 Awards (AWD) Points Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate AWD Frequency Distribution AWARD Rarely maxed to 10 Pts for E-4/5 6,000 5,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 • Experience / Performance • Not proposed for reduction / elimination • Points awarded as per chart below • Maximum point awarded 10 (E4/E5) 12 (E6) 3 February 2003 5% (E4/E5/E6) • Maximum total weight 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 CANDIDATES 4,000 PTS/AWDS Medal of Honor Navy Cross Distinguished Service Medal or Cross Silver Star Medal Legion of Merit Distinguished Flying Cross Navy and Marine Corps Medal Soldier’s Medal Bronze Star Medal Purple Heart Defense Meritorious Service Medal Meritorious Service Medal Gold Life Saving Medal Joint Service Commendation Medal Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal Executive Letter of Commendation Joint Service Achievement Medal Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal Combat Action Ribbon Good Conduct Medal (Navy or Marine Corps) Naval Reserve Meritorious Service Medal Individual Augmentee (IA) Tour Aviation Aircrew Insignia Navy Fleet Marine Force Ribbon Air Medal (Strike/Flight) T-AFS Tour Recruiter Duty Letter of Commendation (Flag/Senior Executive Service) 10 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 (max 1) 2 2 2 2 (max 5) 2 (max 5) 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 (max 2) Awards that were changed Navy AdvancementAwards Centerthat were deleted 31 Service in Paygrade (SIPG) Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate SIPG Frequency Distribution 8,000 • Rating Experience 7,000 • Up to 7.5 years awarded (E4/E5/E6) • Maximum total weight 7% (E4/E5/E6) 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0706 0703 0700 0609 0606 0603 0600 0509 0506 0503 0500 0409 0406 0403 0400 0309 0306 0303 0300 0209 0206 0203 0200 0109 0106 0103 0100 0009 0 0006 CANDIDATES 6,000 SIPG (YYMM) Rarely maxed to 7.5 yrs at E-4/5 NOTE: At E-6, candidates can get a 1 year EP waiver. 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 32 Maximum Factor Counts and Highest FMS Number of Candidates with Maximum Factor (Averaged for 3.5 YRS) PG E-4 E-5 E-6 PMAFAC SIPGFAC AWDFAC TOTAL SS E-4/5 MAX=84 E-4/5 MAX=30 E-4/5 MAX=10 PNAFAC CAND MAX=80 E-6 MAX=110 E-6 MAX=34 E-6 MAX=12 MAX=30 30,163 51 5,235 0 7 0 46,689 80 8,265 51 189 1 31,295 92 3,015 2,383 4,432 1 Highest FMS Across All Ratings Over a 3.5 YR Period PG FMSMAX FMS SCORE E-4 234.00 203.52 E-5 234.00 223.00 E-6 266.00 256.00 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center NOTE: Inval and Change of Rate Candidates are not included in Total Candidate count. 33 Now, let’s talk about the Profile Information Sheet… 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 34 Final Multiple Score Breakdown PNA Point Breakdown Exam Score by Section Breakdown 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 35 Initial Profile Sheet 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 36 Post Board Profile Sheet 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 37 …another Q & A QUESTION: I missed making rate by less than 1 point. What should I do? ANSWER: Contact PSD/ESO to make sure all possible FMS points were submitted 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 38 “How can YOU help YOUR Sailors to be prepared for Advancement?” Make sure they meet all eligibility requirements Make sure they understand sustained superior performance is the key Provide useful guidance in their evaluations and mid-term counseling Ensure they know about the tools to help them succeed (Bibliography, References, AESG, schools, OJT, etc.) Use the Advancement Exam Strategy Guide (AESG) to help focus their study plan. START EARLY--don’t wait until the last minute! 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 39 Bibliography for Advancement Study (Bibs) Bibs are available ONLY in electronic form – available at https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil Bibs list the source references for each rating exam Always study the most recent version of any reference! The Advancement Exam Strategy Guide (AESG) for each rating links the references used in advancement exams to the Topic and Subtopics tested 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 40 Bibliography Web Posting For Advancement Exams ACTIVE DUTY BIBS EXAM CYCLE JANUARY MARCH SEPTEMBER E-7 EXAM E-4/5/6 EXAM E-4/5/6 EXAM POST DATE JULY OCTOBER APRIL RESERVES BIBS EXAM CYCLE FEBRUARY FEBRUARY AUGUST 3 February 2003 E-7 EXAM E-4/5/6 EXAM E-4/5/6 EXAM Navy Advancement Center POST DATE AUGUST SEPTEMBER MARCH 41 Advancement Exam Strategy Guide 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 42 Recent Changes to Enlisted Advancement Effective June 2007 (NAVADMIN 141/07) - Two advancement points (the same as for receipt of Navy Achievement Medal) will be awarded to Sailors who successfully complete a tour greater than 90 consecutive days in a designated combat zone (Iraq, Afghanistan, Horn of Africa, Kuwait, GTMO, Joint Task Force 515 (USPACOM) or Joint Force Special Task Force- Philippines (USPACOM) Effective May 2007 (NAVADMIN 139/07) – IAs serving designated combat areas have an expanded window in which to take an advancement exam Effective May 2007 (NAVADMIN 139/07) – IAs serving in designated combat areas (Iraq, Afghanistan, and HOA), during specific dates, who were previously SBE and meet the eligibility requirements are waived from the advancement exam requirement 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 43 Future Changes to Enlisted Advancement College Incentive Points – Effective August/September 2008 points will be given to E-4 to E-6 candidates for receiving a degree from an accredited college and documented by Navy College (2 pts for Associates, 4 pts for Bachelors) Alternate FMS (AFMS) - SEAL/SWCC community in conjunction with NETPDTC will be analyzing an AFMS for all E-7 candidates – 3 year study – All E-7 candidates will be board eligible – Factors include: Advancement Exam Evaluations Deployments Certifications & Qualifications Awards Ethos 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 44 Summary Purpose of advancement exams Exams development and administration Final Multiple Score Factors Profile sheet - What does it mean? What you should do to prepare for advancement Recent and future changes 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 45 For general NEAS information or to download information: – Home page: https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil – Specific questions: Command Master Chief – EMCM(SS) Robert McCombs – DSN 922-1305 or 922-1572 – COMM: (850) 452-1305 or 922-1572 Exam Development: Kirk Schultz DSN: 922-1001, ext 2141 COMM: (850) 452-1001, ext 2141 Exam Administration: – Jim Hawthorne – DSN 922-1001, ext 1531 – COMM: (850) 452-1001, ext 1531 Exam discrepancies: – DSN: 922-1252 – 2003 COMM: (850) 452-1252 3 February Navy Advancement Center 46 3 February 2003 Navy Advancement Center 47