Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS)

Transcription

Navy Enlisted Advancement System (NEAS)
Navy Enlisted Advancement
System (NEAS)
Last update: December 2007
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
1
Presentation Topics
‹ Purpose
‹ Exams
‹ Final
development and administration
Multiple Score Factors
‹ Profile
‹ What
of advancement exams
sheet - What does it mean?
you should do to prepare for advancement
‹ Recent
and future changes
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
2
Questions
‹ What
five factors make up the Final Multiple
Score (FMS) for E-4 to E-6 candidates?
‹ Is the FMS different for E-7 candidates?
‹ What percentage of E-7 candidates are selected
to be board eligible?
‹ What factor has the largest percentage of the
FMS for E-4 to E-6 candidates?
‹ What number of occupational & PMK questions
are on each exam?
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
3
Purpose of
Advancement Examinations
The advancement-in-rate examination is a
tool used, as part of the Final Multiple
Score, to help rank order qualified
candidates on the basis of rating and
professional military knowledge at the
next higher rate.
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
4
Qualifying to Take the Exam
‹ CO
recommendation
‹ Meet minimum time in rate (TIR) requirement
‹ Proper
Path of Advancement
‹ Requirements
‹
must be met for STRIKERS/GENDETS
- Meet minimum requirements for rating (i.e. citizenship,
security clearance, and training)
‹
- Counseled by their Career Development Team (CDT) after
the CREO/REGA message is released (about 60 days prior
to exam)
‹
- Must receive approval by the ECM, if required by the
CREO/REGA message, prior to the date of examination.
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
5
“What do you mean, there is
a discrepancy?”
https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil/nac/exams/discrepancy.asp
‹
Discrepancies:
‹Examples:
‹
Errors can lead to:
–
An error on a worksheet –
Missing or incorrect PMA
–
Delayed results or
advancements
–
An error on an answer
sheet
Overwriting bar-coded
information with incorrect answer
sheet bubbling
–
Improper processing
–
LOSING OUT ON
ADVANCEMENT
–
Or
–
information that does
not match the Enlisted
Master File
3 February 2003
–
Improper path of advancement
–
Not meeting special rating
requirements
–
Incorrect SSN
–
Name on Answer Sheet not
matching EMF
–
Insufficient Time-in-Rate
–
Recording exam rate incorrectly
(MM
vice
MMN entered
on answer
Navy
Advancement
Center
sheet)
6
Exam Development Facts
‹
Written by CPOs (E-7 to E-9) – NETPDTC hosts an
Advancement Exam Development Conference for each rating on a 2year cycle. At least 6 Fleet SMEs from the respective rating are
invited to attend.
– Recent fleet experience
– From ratings (BM, SH, etc.) or
– From rating communities (EMN, AWA, etc.)
‹
Advancement exams are designed to test rating
and professional military experience and
knowledge
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
7
Exam Development Facts
‹
Exams consist of 200 questions
Occupational +
E7
E6
E5
E4
3 February 2003
100
115
135
150
Professional Military
Knowledge (PMK)
100
85
65
50
Navy Advancement Center
8
More Exam Development Facts
‹
Advancement exams test on occupational (rate) and
professional military knowledge (PMK) information
– Exams test the most important topics for the rate
– Every question must be supported by a reference
– Occupational Standards, Naval Standards, or Competencies
pertaining to the rating are used to validate questions
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
9
Advancement Exam
Development Conference
‹
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
EVERY ONE TO TWO YEARS
Review Scope of the Rating
Verify Master Reference List
Update, edit, and improve exam banks and
graphics
Build 14 examinations (2 years)
Post new Advancement Exam Strategy Guide
(AESG)
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
10
Exam Scoring
‹ Approaches
to exam scoring:
– Criterion-referenced (schoolhouses)
– Norm-referenced (Navy advancement exams)
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
11
Standard Score Example
Raw Score
0
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Standard Score
3 February 2003
200
‹
Raw score: 0 to 200
‹
Raw scores are converted to
standard scores
‹
Standard score: 20 to 80
‹
Average of all raw scores is
assigned standard score 50
Navy Advancement Center
12
Myth
‹
MYTH: Scoring the maximum 80 points on the
exams means you “aced” the exam.
‹
FACT: It simply means you performed better than
all or almost all of the other candidates taking the
same exam.
FACT: 80 “represents” the highest standard score
attained for a group of candidates taking the same
examination (the best raw score may have been a
175).
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
13
‹
Final Multiple Score (FMS)
The Final Multiple Score (FMS) method
looks at the “whole person”
‹
‹
E-4/5/6
– Performance
– Experience ( service in paygrade, awards, and PNA
points)
– Exam Score (standard score)
E-7
– Performance
– Exam Score (standard score)
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
14
Old FMS Chart
FACTOR
Performance
Mark Average
(PMA)
Standard Score
(SS)
Passed Not
Advanced
(PNA) Points
Service in
Paygrade
(SIPG)
EXAM
PAYGRADE
E-4/5
PMA X 60 – 156
E-6
PMA X 60 – 130
ALL
SS
MAX PTS AND %
E-4/5
E-6
84
(36%)
110
(41.5%)
80
(34%)
80
(30%)
30
(13%)
30
(11%)
30
(13%)
34
(13%)
10
(4%)
12
(4.5%)
234
(100%)
266
(100%)
2 X PNA Pts
E-4/5/6
E-4/5
E-6
Awards
(AWD)
E4/5/6
Max FMS
Possible
ALL
3 February 2003
COMPUTATION
From Last 5
Exam Cycles
2 X SIPG + 15
2 X SIPG + 19
Values in
Advancement
Manual
Navy Advancement Center
15
Contribution to Variance
FMS Factors (E-6 USN/R)
70%
CONTRIBUTION TO FMS
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
-10%
41
39
37
35
33
31
29
27
25
23
21
19
17
15
13
11
9
7
5
3
1
CYCLES
PMA
SS
LOS
SIPG
AWD
PNA
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
Note: FMS formula change at Cycle 155; FMS formula change at Cycle 168.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
108
111
112
115
116
119
120
123
124
127
128
131
132
135
136
139
140
143
144
147
148
151
152
155
156
159
160
163
164
167
168
171
172
175
176
179
180
183
184
187
188
191
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
SEP
MAR
16
85
86
86
87
87
88
88
89
89
90
90
91
91
92
92
93
93
94
94
95
95
96
96
97
97
98
98
99
99
00
00 *
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
Changes for August/September 2007
‹
Increase Performance Mark Average (PMA)
‹
Reduce Service in Paygrade and Pass Not Advanced Factors by One Half
– Maintain experience (SIPG) at a reduced number of factor points
– Maintain sustained superior performance (PNA) at a reduced number of factor points
CURRENT
FMS
E-4/5 MAX
ELEMENT
‹Performance
Mark Average
PTS
%
INCREASE PMA and HALF SIPG & PNA
E-6 MAX
PTS
%
E-4/5 MAX
PTS
%
E-6 MAX
DELTA
PTS
%
DELTA
84
36%
110
41.5%
90
43%
7%
116
48.5%
7%
80
34%
80
30%
80
38%
4%
80
33.5%
3.5%
30
13%
34
13%
15
7%
-6%
17
7%
-6%
30
13%
30
11%
15
7%
-6%
15
6%
-5%
10
4%
12
4.5%
10
5%
1%
12
5%
0.5%
234
100%
266
100%
210
100%
240
100%
(Performance/CO’s Recommendation)
‹Standard
‹Service
Score (Knowledge)
in Paygrade (Career Rating
Experience)
‹Pass
Not Advanced Points
(Sustained Superior Performance)
‹Awards
‹Total
(Experience/Performance)
Points
‹ Note: Does not reflect E-7 FMS change
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
17
New FMS Chart
FACTOR
Performance
Mark Average
(PMA)
Standard Score
(SS)
Pass Not
Advanced
(PNA)
Service In
Paygrade
(SIPG)
EXAM
PAYGRADE
E-4/5
PMA X 80 – 230
E-6
PMA X 80 – 204
ALL
SS
MAX PTS AND %
E-4/5
E-6
90
(43%)
116
(48.5%)
80
(38%)
80
(33.5%)
15
(7%)
15
(6%)
15
(7%)
17
(7%)
10
(5%)
12
(5%)
210
(100%)
240
(100%)
PNA Pts
E-4/5/6
E-4/5
E-6
Awards
(AWD)
E4/5/6
Max FMS
Possible
ALL
‹ Note:
COMPUTATION
From Last 5
Exam Cycles
SIPG + 7.5
SIPG + 9.5
Values in
Advancement
Manual
Note: Does not reflect E-7 FMS change
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
18
Study Results
• Rank ordering from Mar 06 rating exams
• Note differences in rank ordering for Sailors with high PMA
• Most Sailors with high PMA increased in ranking compared to the
current ranking
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
19
Rankings for SH1
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
340 CANDIDATES 37 SELECTEES (9 Candidates W/ 4.0 PMA not shown)
20
Changes (Cont’d)
‹
Change in PMA Formula:
– from current: (12 pt difference between EP & MP or MP & P)
™
E-4/5 = (PMA x 60) - 156
™
E-6 = (PMA x 60) – 130
– to new: (16 pt difference between EP & MP or MP & P)
™
E-4/5 = (PMA x 80) - 230
™
E-6 = (PMA x 80) – 204
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
21
Old E-7 FMS
(Maximum possible points)
‹
‹
Examination standard score:
80
60%
Performance:
52
40%
132
100%
Total Possible
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
22
New E-7 50/50 FMS
Increases the difference between an EP and MP
or MP and P from 2.6 pts to 10 points.
PMA
CURRENT PTS
PROPOSED PTS
4.00 (EP)
52.0
80.0
3.80 (MP)
49.4
70.0
3.60 (P)
46.8
60.0
3.40 (PR)
44.2
50.0
2.00 (SP)
26.0
0.0
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
23
E-7 50/50 FMS Computations
FACTOR
OLD
COMPUTATION
MAX PTS
AND %
NEW
COMPUTATION
MAX PTS
AND %
Performance
Mark Average
(PMA)
PMA x 13
52
(40%)
PMA x 50 - 120
80
(50%)
Standard Score
(SS)
SS
80
(60%)
SS
80
(50%)
Max FMS
Possible
3 February 2003
132
(100%)
Navy Advancement Center
160
(100%)
24
E-7 50/50 Rankings For BUC
FMS RANK
CURRENT PROPOSED
1
4
13
15
16
20
47
52
57
62
91
120
131
136
152
170
227
228
243
17
113
144
2
6
30
53
61
63
71
72
73
81
103
110
137
153
154
155
162
163
171
191
239
268
282
229
272
5
9
21
22
1
3
7
8
9
10
27
31
35
36
51
66
73
79
83
98
160
161
183
12
76
95
2
4
17
40
48
49
54
55
56
60
72
77
96
107
108
109
119
120
126
143
203
227
248
189
233
5
11
15
16
FMS RANK
SS
80.00
71.73
65.39
64.48
64.48
63.58
57.24
56.33
55.43
54.52
51.80
49.08
48.18
47.27
46.37
44.55
38.21
38.21
35.70
64.48
49.99
47.27
80.00
70.83
62.67
57.24
55.43
55.43
54.52
54.52
54.52
53.61
51.80
50.90
48.18
47.27
47.27
47.27
46.37
46.37
45.46
43.65
37.31
33.68
29.15
39.12
32.78
71.73
67.20
64.48
64.48
PMA
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.92
3.92
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
CURRENT PROPOSED
25
26
31
32
33
34
36
37
48
49
54
74
75
83
84
104
111
123
124
133
140
141
142
173
174
182
183
200
201
210
230
249
259
266
273
287
23
27
38
39
41
55
58
59
66
77
88
98
107
116
117
18
19
24
25
26
30
33
34
43
44
47
64
65
70
71
81
91
93
94
104
115
116
117
137
138
149
150
166
167
172
201
221
225
230
238
263
23
29
38
39
41
59
62
63
69
75
80
88
92
102
103
FMS RANK
SS
63.58
63.58
62.67
62.67
62.67
61.77
60.86
60.86
58.14
58.14
57.24
54.52
54.52
53.61
53.61
51.80
50.90
49.99
49.99
49.08
48.18
48.18
48.18
45.46
45.46
44.55
44.55
42.74
42.74
41.84
39.12
36.40
35.50
34.59
32.78
28.25
64.48
63.58
60.86
60.86
59.95
57.24
56.33
56.33
55.43
54.52
53.61
52.71
51.80
50.90
50.90
PMA
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
CURRENT PROPOSED
126
130
146
166
167
177
193
203
205
217
224
234
238
253
92
121
122
132
207
208
235
8
40
44
45
93
94
138
179
180
192
198
219
220
283
7
10
11
12
14
19
29
42
43
50
51
56
67
68
69
70
113
114
130
147
148
157
170
176
177
199
207
215
219
229
82
105
106
118
181
182
217
13
42
45
46
89
90
131
164
165
171
179
208
209
268
14
20
21
22
28
32
37
57
58
67
68
74
84
85
86
87
FMS RANK
SS
49.99
49.99
48.18
46.37
46.37
45.46
43.65
42.74
42.74
40.93
40.02
39.12
38.21
36.40
53.61
50.90
50.90
49.99
42.74
42.74
39.12
68.11
60.86
59.95
59.95
53.61
53.61
49.08
45.46
45.46
44.55
43.65
40.93
40.93
30.06
69.92
68.11
68.11
68.11
67.20
66.30
64.48
60.86
60.86
59.05
59.05
58.14
56.33
56.33
56.33
56.33
PMA
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
FMS RANK
CURRENT PROPOSED
SS
PMA
86
99
54.52
168
178
185
187
188
168
175
184
185
186
47.27
46.37
45.46
45.46
45.46
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
165
112
125
211
221
231
274
184
3
28
35
46
60
78
79
80
87
99
108
109
148
149
169
186
189
214
223
245
254
255
256
280
246
24
82
95
96
97
139
178
142
151
222
232
235
269
211
6
50
61
78
97
121
122
123
127
133
144
145
173
174
192
213
214
228
236
249
253
254
255
273
251
53
132
139
140
141
180
48.18
52.71
51.80
43.65
41.84
40.93
34.59
46.37
80.00
65.39
63.58
60.86
58.14
56.33
56.33
56.33
55.43
54.52
53.61
53.61
49.99
49.99
48.18
46.37
46.37
43.65
41.84
39.12
38.21
38.21
38.21
33.68
39.12
66.30
56.33
55.43
55.43
55.43
50.90
3.76
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.75
3.74
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.72
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.80
CURRENT PROPOSED
.
.
.
.
.
.
291 CANDIDATES
176 60/40 SBE
177 50/50 (1 TIE)
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement
Center
(NOTE: GOLD indicates SBE and … indicates data not shown.)
157
158
164
172
181
199
209
215
236
237
240
247
248
258
269
278
284
18
134
145
176
212
242
285
156
64
65
76
85
114
115
213
216
222
232
233
260
261
267
270
275
276
289
291
175
286
143
257
241
244
290
190
191
202
212
216
226
231
234
246
247
252
258
259
264
271
274
281
52
188
200
220
237
262
284
210
155
156
163
169
197
198
250
257
261
266
267
275
276
277
279
282
283
285
286
270
287
280
288
289
290
291
SS
49.99
49.99
49.08
48.18
47.27
45.46
44.55
43.65
40.93
40.93
40.02
39.12
39.12
38.21
36.40
34.59
31.87
68.11
51.80
50.90
48.18
44.55
40.02
31.87
50.90
59.05
59.05
58.14
57.24
54.52
54.52
45.46
44.55
43.65
42.74
42.74
39.12
39.12
38.21
37.31
36.40
36.40
28.25
26.64
51.80
36.40
57.24
46.37
49.08
50.90
39.12
PMA
25
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.70
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.65
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.40
3.30
3.20
3.10
3.00
2.83
2.67
E-7 50/50 Rankings For DCC
FMS RANK
CURRENT PROPOSED
2
9
25
36
37
42
47
55
64
138
190
191
204
220
259
320
359
421
456
465
35
54
74
187
228
319
358
3
15
16
20
27
28
38
82
83
90
91
103
104
113
125
126
149
173
174
193
205
231
232
241
1
3
12
16
17
19
24
30
33
55
80
81
95
102
136
197
224
294
370
398
25
36
40
104
139
217
243
2
9
10
14
20
21
29
48
49
52
53
58
59
64
72
73
90
112
113
123
134
160
161
171
FMS RANK
SS
75.75
72.13
63.44
61.27
61.27
60.54
59.82
58.37
57.65
52.58
49.68
49.68
48.96
48.23
46.06
42.44
40.26
35.19
30.12
27.95
61.99
59.09
57.65
50.40
48.23
43.16
40.99
75.75
67.06
67.06
65.61
63.44
63.44
61.99
56.92
56.92
56.20
56.20
55.47
55.47
54.75
54.02
54.02
52.58
51.13
51.13
50.40
49.68
48.23
48.23
47.51
PMA
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.95
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
CURRENT PROPOSED
242
243
271
336
337
362
363
364
392
409
445
8
13
23
24
45
52
62
81
99
158
159
170
171
213
214
215
249
294
304
305
381
388
395
404
432
433
436
442
447
458
192
333
17
29
30
56
92
93
114
115
172
173
194
241
242
258
259
260
292
322
381
4
11
22
23
38
41
43
54
65
114
115
124
125
162
163
164
195
222
230
231
293
309
324
331
368
369
382
388
396
415
155
262
15
31
32
50
74
75
91
92
FMS RANK
SS
47.51
47.51
46.06
42.44
42.44
40.99
40.99
40.99
38.82
37.37
33.02
73.58
68.51
64.89
64.89
61.27
59.82
59.09
57.65
56.20
52.58
52.58
51.85
51.85
49.68
49.68
49.68
47.51
45.33
44.61
44.61
40.26
39.54
38.82
38.09
35.19
35.19
34.47
33.75
33.02
30.85
51.13
43.16
67.79
64.16
64.16
59.82
56.92
56.92
55.47
55.47
PMA
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.93
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.90
3.88
3.88
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
CURRENT PROPOSED
116
117
127
128
140
141
142
150
151
152
153
163
175
176
177
194
206
207
222
223
233
236
262
272
287
288
325
348
374
396
438
462
473
49
75
76
107
165
196
245
34
98
157
185
201
210
211
212
225
226
248
93
94
100
101
117
118
119
126
127
128
129
135
149
150
151
165
174
175
183
184
196
200
211
223
232
233
261
281
310
345
397
435
452
44
60
61
84
141
169
209
39
82
138
167
176
186
187
188
198
199
216
FMS RANK
SS
55.47
55.47
54.75
54.75
54.02
54.02
54.02
53.30
53.30
53.30
53.30
52.58
51.85
51.85
51.85
51.13
50.40
50.40
49.68
49.68
48.96
48.58
47.51
46.78
46.06
46.06
43.89
42.44
40.99
38.82
34.47
30.85
25.78
60.54
58.37
58.37
56.20
52.58
51.13
48.23
63.44
56.92
53.30
51.85
51.13
50.40
50.40
50.40
49.68
49.68
48.23
PMA
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.87
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.86
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
3.85
FMS RANK
CURRENT PROPOSED
SS
PMA
280
345
354
235
284
297
46.78
43.16
42.44
451
145
237
4
416
137
212
5
33.02
54.02
48.96
77.20
3.85
3.84
3.84
3.80
279
290
291
292
293
299
300
301
302
303
310
311
257
265
266
267
268
276
277
278
279
280
289
290
47.51
46.78
46.78
46.78
46.78
46.06
46.06
46.06
46.06
46.06
45.33
45.33
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
3.80
254
267
268
281
282
283
295
274
285
286
300
301
302
313
49.68
48.96
48.96
48.23
48.23
48.23
47.51
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
3.73
218
229
238
255
256
257
258
284
296
275
288
305
314
315
316
317
341
349
52.58
51.85
51.13
50.40
50.40
50.40
50.40
48.96
48.23
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
3.67
453
454
35.19
3.67
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3.85
3.85
3.85
CURRENT PROPOSED
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
477
CANDIDATES
SBE
3 February 2003
Navy
Advancement 284
Center
(NOTE: GOLD indicates SBE and … indicates data not shown.)
467
6
32
139
239
221
323
324
26
67
112
148
162
230
240
261
269
270
285
286
308
322
335
360
361
373
391
408
422
423
434
444
449
454
457
459
460
461
470
471
472
476
147
186
209
289
129
375
452
181
435
466
18
83
226
312
296
383
384
105
189
236
263
269
333
347
354
362
363
372
373
389
402
407
417
418
428
440
445
449
450
453
455
456
459
461
463
464
465
469
470
471
475
295
401
434
458
439
473
476
474
477
SS
30.85
77.92
66.34
56.92
51.13
52.58
46.78
46.78
67.79
62.72
59.09
56.92
56.20
52.58
51.85
51.13
50.40
50.40
49.68
49.68
48.23
47.51
46.78
45.33
45.33
44.61
43.16
41.71
40.26
40.26
38.82
37.37
36.64
35.92
35.19
34.47
34.47
34.47
30.85
30.85
30.12
24.33
57.65
57.65
56.92
54.02
63.44
49.68
43.16
65.61
52.58
PMA
26
3.67
3.66
3.66
3.66
3.66
3.65
3.65
3.65
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.60
3.55
3.40
3.35
3.25
3.20
3.20
3.07
2.80
2.53
Performance Mark Average (PMA)
Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate
PMA Frequency Distribution
‹ Promotion
values
6000
Early Promote
Must Promote
Promotable
Progressing
Significant Problems
5500
5000
CANDIDATES = 8173
PMA 3.80 ACCOUNTS FOR
25.3% OF THE TOTAL
CANDIDATES
4000
3500
3000
2500
=
=
=
=
=
4.00
3.80
3.60
3.40
2.00
2000
1500
‹ Time-in-rate
1000
500
PMA based on:
3 yrs of averaged evals for E-6
1 yr of averaged evals for E-4/5
3 February 2003
4.00
3.95
3.90
3.85
3.80
3.75
3.70
3.65
3.60
3.55
3.50
3.45
3.40
3.35
3.30
3.25
3.20
3.15
3.10
3.05
3.00
2.95
2.90
2.85
2.80
0
< 2.75
CANDIDATES
4500
recommendation point
E-3 to E-4
E-4 to E-5
E-5 to E-6
E-6 to E-7
Navy Advancement Center
requirements
6 mos in E-3
12 mos in E-4
36 mos in E-5
36 mos in E-6
27
How is PMA calculated?
Example for PO2 participating in PO1 exam:
Evaluation ending
02 March 15
01 March 15
00 March 15
Block 45 mark
EP = 4.00
MP = 3.80
MP = 3.80
Add 4.00 + 3.80 + 3.80 = 11.6, divide by 3 = 3.866
Round up to 3.87
Final PMA is 3.87
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
28
Performance Mark Average
Contribution to Final Multiple Score
Performance
Mark Average
4.00
3.80
3.60
3.40
FMS Points
E4/5 E6
E7
90.0
74.0
58.0
42.0
116.0
100.0
84.0
68.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
*These values are based on individual’s average over the
cumulative reporting periods.
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
29
Passed Not Advanced (PNA) Points
Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate
PNA Frequency Distribution
•
Sustained Superior Performance
•
Awarded to those who pass the exam but are not
advanced due to quota limitations
•
Points awarded each exam cycle based on
combination of Performance Mark Average
(PMA) and Exam Standard Score (SS)
•
Up to 3.0 PNA points awarded per exam cycle up
to 5 cycles (1.5 points max each for PMA and SS)
12,000
10,000
‹PMA
(max 1.5 points per cycle) awarded based
on ranking relative to peers:
Top 25%
= 1.5 PNA Points
Next 25%
= 1.0 PNA Points
Next 25%
= 0.5 PNA Points
Bottom 25%
= 0 PNA Points
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
•
SS (max 1.5 points per cycle) awarded based on
exam score:
57.01- 80.00
= 1.5 PNA points
50.01- 57.00
= 1.0 PNA points
42.01- 50.00
= 0.5 PNA points
< 42.01 = 0 PNA points
•
Maximum total weight 7% (E-4/E-5); 6% (E-6)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
12.0
12.5
13.0
13.5
14.0
14.5
15.0
CANDIDATES
8,000
Rarely maxed to 15 Pts
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
30
Awards (AWD) Points
Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate
AWD Frequency Distribution
AWARD
Rarely maxed to 10 Pts for E-4/5
6,000
5,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
• Experience / Performance
• Not proposed for reduction / elimination
• Points awarded as per chart below
• Maximum point awarded 10 (E4/E5) 12 (E6)
3 February
2003 5% (E4/E5/E6)
• Maximum
total weight
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
CANDIDATES
4,000
PTS/AWDS
Medal of Honor
Navy Cross
Distinguished Service Medal or Cross
Silver Star Medal
Legion of Merit
Distinguished Flying Cross
Navy and Marine Corps Medal
Soldier’s Medal
Bronze Star Medal
Purple Heart
Defense Meritorious Service Medal
Meritorious Service Medal
Gold Life Saving Medal
Joint Service Commendation Medal
Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medal
Executive Letter of Commendation
Joint Service Achievement Medal
Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal
Combat Action Ribbon
Good Conduct Medal (Navy or Marine Corps)
Naval Reserve Meritorious Service Medal
Individual Augmentee (IA) Tour
Aviation Aircrew Insignia
Navy Fleet Marine Force Ribbon
Air Medal (Strike/Flight)
T-AFS Tour
Recruiter Duty
Letter of Commendation (Flag/Senior Executive Service)
10
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2 (max 1)
2
2
2
2 (max 5)
2 (max 5)
2
2
2
3
1
1
1 (max 2)
Awards that were changed
Navy AdvancementAwards
Centerthat were deleted
31
Service in Paygrade (SIPG)
Representation of a Typical E-6 Candidate
SIPG Frequency Distribution
8,000
•
Rating Experience
7,000
•
Up to 7.5 years awarded (E4/E5/E6)
•
Maximum total weight 7% (E4/E5/E6)
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0706
0703
0700
0609
0606
0603
0600
0509
0506
0503
0500
0409
0406
0403
0400
0309
0306
0303
0300
0209
0206
0203
0200
0109
0106
0103
0100
0009
0
0006
CANDIDATES
6,000
SIPG (YYMM)
Rarely maxed to 7.5 yrs at E-4/5
NOTE: At E-6, candidates can get a 1 year EP waiver.
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
32
Maximum Factor Counts and Highest FMS
Number of Candidates with Maximum Factor (Averaged for 3.5 YRS)
PG
E-4
E-5
E-6
PMAFAC
SIPGFAC
AWDFAC
TOTAL
SS
E-4/5 MAX=84 E-4/5 MAX=30 E-4/5 MAX=10 PNAFAC
CAND
MAX=80 E-6 MAX=110 E-6 MAX=34 E-6 MAX=12 MAX=30
30,163
51
5,235
0
7
0
46,689
80
8,265
51
189
1
31,295
92
3,015
2,383
4,432
1
Highest FMS Across All Ratings Over a
3.5 YR Period
PG
FMSMAX
FMS SCORE
E-4
234.00
203.52
E-5
234.00
223.00
E-6
266.00
256.00
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
NOTE: Inval and Change of Rate Candidates are not included in Total Candidate count.
33
Now, let’s talk about the
Profile Information Sheet…
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
34
Final Multiple
Score
Breakdown
PNA
Point
Breakdown
Exam
Score
by Section
Breakdown
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
35
Initial
Profile
Sheet
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
36
Post
Board
Profile
Sheet
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
37
…another Q & A
‹
QUESTION: I missed making rate by less than 1
point. What should I do?
‹
ANSWER: Contact PSD/ESO to make sure all
possible FMS points were submitted
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
38
“How can YOU help YOUR
Sailors to be prepared for
Advancement?”
‹
Make sure they meet all eligibility requirements
‹
Make sure they understand sustained superior performance is the key
‹
Provide useful guidance in their evaluations and mid-term counseling
‹
Ensure they know about the tools to help them succeed (Bibliography,
References, AESG, schools, OJT, etc.)
‹
Use the Advancement Exam Strategy Guide (AESG) to help focus their
study plan.
‹
START EARLY--don’t wait until the last minute!
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
39
Bibliography for
Advancement Study (Bibs)
‹
Bibs are available ONLY in electronic form – available at
https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil
‹
Bibs list the source references for each rating exam
‹
Always study the most recent version of any reference!
‹
The Advancement Exam Strategy Guide (AESG) for each rating links
the references used in advancement exams to the Topic and
Subtopics tested
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
40
Bibliography Web Posting
For Advancement Exams
‹
ACTIVE DUTY BIBS
EXAM CYCLE
JANUARY
MARCH
SEPTEMBER
‹
E-7 EXAM
E-4/5/6 EXAM
E-4/5/6 EXAM
POST DATE
JULY
OCTOBER
APRIL
RESERVES BIBS
EXAM CYCLE
FEBRUARY
FEBRUARY
AUGUST
3 February 2003
E-7 EXAM
E-4/5/6 EXAM
E-4/5/6 EXAM
Navy Advancement Center
POST DATE
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
MARCH
41
Advancement Exam
Strategy Guide
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
42
Recent Changes to Enlisted
Advancement
‹
Effective June 2007 (NAVADMIN 141/07) - Two advancement
points (the same as for receipt of Navy Achievement Medal) will
be awarded to Sailors who successfully complete a tour greater
than 90 consecutive days in a designated combat zone (Iraq,
Afghanistan, Horn of Africa, Kuwait, GTMO, Joint Task Force
515 (USPACOM) or Joint Force Special Task Force- Philippines
(USPACOM)
‹
Effective May 2007 (NAVADMIN 139/07) – IAs serving
designated combat areas have an expanded window in which to
take an advancement exam
‹
Effective May 2007 (NAVADMIN 139/07) – IAs serving in
designated combat areas (Iraq, Afghanistan, and HOA), during
specific dates, who were previously SBE and meet the eligibility
requirements are waived from the advancement exam
requirement
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
43
Future Changes to Enlisted
Advancement
‹
College Incentive Points – Effective August/September 2008 points will
be given to E-4 to E-6 candidates for receiving a degree from an
accredited college and documented by Navy College (2 pts for
Associates, 4 pts for Bachelors)
‹
Alternate FMS (AFMS) - SEAL/SWCC community in conjunction with
NETPDTC will be analyzing an AFMS for all E-7 candidates
– 3 year study
– All E-7 candidates will be board eligible
– Factors include:
™ Advancement Exam
™ Evaluations
™ Deployments
™ Certifications & Qualifications
™ Awards
™ Ethos
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
44
Summary
‹
Purpose of advancement exams
‹
Exams development and administration
‹
Final Multiple Score Factors
‹
Profile sheet - What does it mean?
‹
What you should do to prepare for advancement
‹
Recent and future changes
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
45
‹
For general NEAS information or to download
information:
– Home page: https://www.advancement.cnet.navy.mil
– Specific questions:
™
Command Master Chief
– EMCM(SS) Robert McCombs
– DSN 922-1305 or 922-1572
– COMM: (850) 452-1305 or 922-1572
Exam Development:
Kirk Schultz
DSN: 922-1001, ext 2141
COMM: (850) 452-1001, ext 2141
Exam Administration:
– Jim Hawthorne
– DSN 922-1001, ext 1531
– COMM: (850) 452-1001, ext 1531
™
Exam discrepancies:
– DSN: 922-1252
– 2003
COMM: (850) 452-1252
3 February
Navy Advancement Center
46
3 February 2003
Navy Advancement Center
47

Similar documents