Syllabus "Educational Inequality in Comparative
Transcription
Syllabus "Educational Inequality in Comparative
NOTE: This is a translation of the original German syllabus University of Zurich, Sociological Institute Lecture: Educational Inequality in International Comparison (2605) Wednesdays, 4.15pm - 6pm, Room AND3.06, starts March 21st 2007 Lecturer: Fabian Pfeffer Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Wednesdays, 3pm - 5pm, by apppointment Course Content In many nations, the „PISA shock“ - that is, the public outcry in reaction to the results from of the “Program for International Student Assessment” - arose not only from the documented poor average achievement of students but also the drastic social inequalities in education as reported by the OECD. As the introductory session of this seminar shows, unequal educational outcomes of students from different backgrounds have been the topic of public debate decades before PISA and have been the object of sociological research for a long time. This seminar therefore provides a sociological approach to critically assess new results of international, comparative education research, drawing on empirical data such as, but not exclusively, the PISA study. Since these data have also sparked much new research in this area, this seminar also draws on ongoing research project wherever useful. The lecture begins with a compressed theoretical and methodological introduction to the study of educational inequality and a brief overview of some basic empirical findings. Thereafter, the focus is on a sociological analysis of the association between institutional structures and the degree of inequality in educational opportunities. Finally, we discuss the potentials and limits of educational policy in reducing inequality in education. In sum, this lecture shall give answers to the following questions: - How do Western countries differ in terms of educational opportunities? - How can we explain these national differences? - How and to which degree can policies contribute to the reduction of educational inequalities? Course Requirements Students are expected to do the weekly readings, attend every class, and actively participate. Introductory readings are marked with a star (). They provide a basic introduction to the topic of each session and reading them will make it much easier to follow the lecture. In an effort to increase student interaction and active participation, starting with week three each lecture contains an interactive component, such as structured group discussions, guest lectures, conference calls, film presentations and discussion. You are required to prepare for the interactive elements by consulting the material marked with the symbol (). Stand: 12.04.2007 Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 2 At the beginning of each session, brief lecture notes will be distributed, which list the session content in bullet points and may contain important figures or tables. These lecture notes serve as an orientation and shall merely facilitate your note taking. They may also support your follow-up work after each session. The lecture notes also contain further references to literature, which can be used for a more in-depth study of each session’s topic. Additionally, the following literature is recommended for further reading (books are available in the course reserve of the institute’s library): Sadovnik, Alan R. 2007. Sociology of Education. A Critical Reader. London / New York. Routledge Becker, Rolf. 2006. Dauerhafte Bildungsungleichheiten als unerwartete Folge der Bildungsexpansion? S. 27-62 in: Hadjar, Andreas / Becker, Rolf. Die Bildungsexpansion. Erwartete und unerwartete Folgen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Becker, Rolf, and Wolfgang Lauterbach (Eds.). 2004. Bildung als Privileg? Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Berger, Peter A. / Kahlert, Heike (Hrsg). 2005. Institutionalisierte Ungleichheiten. Wie das Bildungssystem Chancen blockiert. Weinheim / München: Juventus Verlag Georg, Werner (Hrsg). 2006. Soziale Ungleichheit im Bildungssystem. Eine empirisch-theoretische Bestandsaufnahme. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft. The introductory literature, preparation material for the interactive elements, and the lecture notes are available on the password-protected course homepage: www.ssc.wisc.edu/~fpfeffer/teaching_en.html Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 3 Schedule of Topics Introduction 21.03.2007 From Picht to PISA Public debate about stark inequalities in educational opportunities in German speaking countries is currently extensive and yet far from new. We trace the origins of this debate and investigate whether there has been any progress in the equalization of educational opportunities since then. Dahrendorf (1966): Bildung ist Bürgerrecht Theoretical and Methodological Foundations 28.03.2007 Theoretical Explanations of Educational Inequality The sociology of education supplies an impressively wide range of different theories that can help us understand why educational inequality exists. A review of all of these could easily take up an entire semester. Instead, we focus on developing a classification of different theoretical approaches that will be useful for the remainder of the semester. Erikson/Jonsson 1996: Explaining Class Inequality in Education 04.04.2007 The Statistical Tool Box of Sociology of Education In order to understand empirical research - such as that presented in the sessions to follow - knowledge of appropriate statistical methods is indispensable. The basics of two widely used statistical models are discussed: logistic transition models and multilevel models. A guest lecture illustrates the latter method with a research project from the United States. Luke, Douglas A. (2004): Multilevel Modeling Some First Findings from International Comparisons 11.04.2007 Sociological Studies At least since the 1990s, research on the association between students’ social background and their educational outcomes has frequently taken a comparative approach. A contribution by Shavit and Blossfeld - by now somewhat of a classic of the field - provides the starting point for our investigation of how educational inequality has developed over time. We explore how their basic findings have been replicated and extended over the last couple of years. Bloßfeld, Hans-Peter / Shavit, Yossi (1993): Dauerhafte Ungleichheiten Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 4 18.04.2007 International Student Assessments The topic of inequality in education has come back to the center stage of public attention and policy debate mainly thanks to the PISA studies. In this session, results from PISA and other international student assessment studies are summarized and critically discussed. Hereafter, we discuss the general potentials and limits of international student assessments on the basis of the inaugural lecture of Dr. Urs Moser (Institute for Educational Evaluation, University of Zurich). OECD (2001): Lernen für das Leben Moser, Urs (2006): PISA: Bildungsforschung zur Unterhaltung? 25.04.2007 Ethnic Inequality In most cases, the educational outcomes of immigrant students lag behind those of their native counterparts. We first investigate the immigrant gap in education from a theoretical perspective and then examine in which countries this gap is greatest. In the framework of a conference call with Dr. Hyunjoon Park (University of Pennsylvania) we discuss possible explanations for these national differences. Diefenbach, Heike (2004): Bildungschancen und Bildungs(miss)erfolg von ausländischen Schülern aus Migrantenfamilien im System schulischer Bildung Park, Hyonjoon / Sandefur, Garry D. (2007): The Educational Gaps between Immigrant and Native Students in Europe Macrosociological Explanations 02.05.2007 Institutional Theory A relatively new branch of theory that has been developed in sociology and neighboring fields, called New Institutionalism, is of particular relevance for the topic of this seminar. We study the origins, basic assumptions, and general significance of New Institutionalist theory for the social sciences in general, and sociology of education in particular. To wrap up, these theoretical explorations are connected to practical examples taken from a film presentation. Meyer, Heinz-Dieter / Brian Rowan (2006): The New Institutionalism in Education Protocols of additional interviews with educational particioners (not part of the film sequence shown) 09.05.2007 Methods of Comparison The empirical application of an institutionalist perspective discussed in the preceding section profits from international comparisons. Therefore, this session provides an introduction into the most fundamental methods of comparative research. A further follow-up to the preceding session is provided in a guest lecture by Prof. Dr. Tröhler, director of the Institute for the History of Education at the University of Zurich. With him, we discuss the challenges to institutionalist theory brought forward by a historical account of educational systems. Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 5 Goldthorpe, John (2000): Current Issues in Comparative Macrosociology Tröhler, Daniel (2007): Neo-Institutionalismus und neo-calvinistische Erlösungsvisionen. Das lokal verwobene Bildungssystem in der Interpretation weltgeschichtlicher Entwicklungen 16.05.2007 Classifications of National Education Systems Lazarsfeld’s contributions to the philosophy of social sciences provide some guidance to the construction of sociological classifications. Early attempts to construct such classifications for educational systems occured in the 1960s. Only recently, these attempts have been revived in the work of von Below. Here, we will discuss her latest project - extending her classification of German federal states to the international case - in a conference call with Dr. Susanne von Below (University of Frankfurt). This conference call shall also instill some motivation for a take-home exercise on the cantonal specificities of the Swiss educational system Lazarsfeld, Paul F. (1937 / 1993): Some Remarks on Typological Procedures in Social Research Below, Susanne von (2007): Institutional Contexts and Social Selectivity 23.05.2007 Educational Inequality and Institutional Characteristics In contrast to a ‘holistic’ understanding of education systems, one can also study single institutional features of the organization of education separately. This session demonstrates which institutional characteristics are associated with educational inequality and for his purpose again draws on current research projects. At the end of the session, we will collect the results of the take-home exercise and analyze the cantonal differences in the Swiss education system in working groups. Kerckhoff, Alan C. (1995): Institutional Arrangements and Stratification Processes in Industrial Societies Instructions and templates for the assessment of cantonal differences 30.05.2007 Educational Inequality and its Macro-Economic Context The distribution of educational opportunities is not only affected by the institutional structure of education system but may also interact with other societal features. In this session, we focus on the macro-economic context of educational inequality. Some of the macro-economic features that may influence educational inequality to be discussed are a country’s stage of economic development, degree of industrialization, social inequality in society at large, and the level of educational expenditures. The influence of specific educational ideologies is also discussed and illustrated in a short documentary on Cuban education. Jencks, Christopher (1973): Chancengleichheit Kozol, Jonathan (1978): Children of the Revolution Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 6 Educational Policy 06.06.2007 Big Tradeoffs? A common objection to the equalization of educational opportunities is that it may come at the cost of educational quality on the one side and individual freedom and family values on the other side. The first of these assumed trade-offs is subjected to an empirical test and additionally complemented by a discussion of the meaning of educational credentials. The second assumed trade-off can only be addressed by drawing on moral philosophy. The central value conflict between educational equality and the family will be elaborated in reference to early childhood education and further illustrated with selected film material Collins, Randal (1979): The Credential Society Kreyenfeld, Michaela (2004): Soziale Ungleichheit und Kinderbetreuung 13.06.2007 Educational Policy and Social Policy At the backdrop of the theories and empirical findings discussed earlier in the semester, this session demonstrates the potential and limits of educational policy in reducing educational inequality. We take a detailed look at the relationship between educational and social policy. In a final conference call with Dr. Stephanie Arnett (European University Institute, Florence), we also discuss concrete results of existing educational policies. Allmendinger, Jutta / Leibfried, Stephan (2005): Bildungsarmut Arnett, Stephanie (2007): Influences of National Education Policies on the Academic Achievement of High- and Low-Social Status Students 20.06.2007 Summary and Discussion The content of the semester is summarized, critically assessed, and additional questions are addressed. In a final group discussion, you will be given guidance for your own research projects on the topic of education. Educational Inequality in International Comparison, Pfeffer, Seite 7 Overview Date Topic Interactive Element Theoretical and Methodological Foundations 21.03.2007 Introduction 28.03.2007 Theoretical Explanations of Educational Inequality 04.04.2007 The statistical toolbox of sociology of education Guest lecture by Steven E. Alvarado (University of Wisconsin-Madison) Some First Findings from International Comparisons 11.04.2007 Sociological Studies 18.04.2007 International Student Assessments Group Discussion: inaugural lecture by Dr. Moser 25.04.2007 Ethnic Inequality Webconference with Dr. Hyunjoon Park (University of Pennsylvania) Macrosociological Explanations 02.05.2007 Institutionalist Theory Film: Wie Schulen gelingen 09.05.2007 Methods of Comparison Guest Lecture Prof. Dr. Daniel Tröhler (Universität Zürich) 16.05.2007 Classification of National Education Systems Webconference with Dr. Susanne von Below (Universität Frankfurt) 23.05.2007 Educational Inequality and Institutional Characteristics Working Groups: Canotanl Differences 30.05.2007 Educational Inequality and its Macro-economic Context Film: Bildungsideologie am Beispiel Kubas Educational Policy 06.06.2007 „Big Tradeoffs“? Discussion Session: Early Childhood Education 13.06.2007 Educational Policy and Social Policy Webconference with Dr. Stephanie Arnett (European University Institute, Florence) 20.06.2007 Summary Final Group Discussion NOTE: Summary of distributed reference list from lecture notes of each session Introduction (21.03.2007) Cooley, Charles C. 1926. Heredity or Environment. Journal of Applied Sociology; Picht, Georg. 1964. Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Olten: Walter-Verlag; Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1966. Bildung ist Bürgerrecht. Plädoyer für eine aktive Bildungspolitik. Hamburg: Nannen Theoretical Approaches (28.03.2007) Boudon, Raymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality; Bidwell/Friedkin. 1988. "The Sociology of Education." in Handbook of Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelse; Herrnstein, Richard/Charles Murray, 1994: The Bell Curve. Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life; Fischer, Claude S. et al., 1996: Inequality by Design; Hauser, Robert M./Min-Hsiung Huang, 1997: Verbal Ability and Socioeconomic Success: A Trend Analysis. In: Social Science Research 26, 331376 ; Bourdieu, Pierre/Jean-Claude Passeron, 1971: Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit. Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Bildungswesens am Beispiel Frankreichs; Lareau, Annette, 2003: Unequal Childhoods. Class, race, and family life; Breen, Richard/John H. Goldthorpe, 1997: Explaining Educational Differentials. Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. In: Rationality and Society 9, 275-305; Becker, Rolf, 2000: Klassenlage und Bildungsentscheidungen. Eine empirische Anwendung der Wert-Erwartungstheorie. In: Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 52, 450-474; - Coleman, James S., 1988: Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. In: American Journal of Sociology 94, S95-S120; Morgan, Stephen L./Aage B. Sørensen, 1999: Parental Networks, Social Closure, and Mathematics Learning. A Test of Coleman's Social Capital Explanation of School Effects. In: American Sociological Review 64, 661-681; Heyns, Barbara, 1978: Summer Learning and the Effects of Schooling. New York / San Francisco / London: Academic Press; Downey, Douglas B./Paul T. von Hippel/Beckett A. Broh, 2004: Are Schools the Great Equalizer? Cognitive Inequality during the Summer Months and the School Year. In: American Sociological Review 69, 613-635; Baker, David P./David L. Stevenson, 1986: Mothers' Strategies for Children's School Achievement. Managing the Transition to High School. In: Sociology of Education 59, 156-166 Methods (04.04.2007) Mare, Robert. 1981. "Change and Stability in Educational Stratification." American Sociological Review 46:72-87; Breen, Richard, and Jan O. Jonsson. 2000. "Analyzing Educational Careers. A Multinomial Transition Model." American Sociological Review 65:754-772; Hauser, Robert M., and Megan Andrew. 2006. "Another Look at the Stratification of Educational Transitions. The logistic response model with partial proportionality contraints." Sociological Methodology 36:1-26; Hout, Michael. forthcoming. "Maximally Maintained Inequality Revisited. Irish Educational Mobility in Comparative Perspective." in Changing Ireland, 1989-2003, edited by Maire NicGhiolla Phadraig and Elizabeth Hilliard; Cameron, Stephen V., and James J. Heckman. 1998. "Life Cycle Schooling and Dynamic Selection Bias. Models and Evidence for Five Cohorts of American Males." Journal of Political Economy 106:262-333; Raudenbush, Stephen W., and Anthony S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks / London / New Delhi: Sage Publications. Sociological Studies (11.04.2007) Burzan, Nicole. 2004. Soziale Ungleichheit. Eine Einführung in die zentralen Theorien. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Wright, Erik Olin (Ed.). 2005. Approaches to Class Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Treiman, Donald J. 1977. Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press; Duncan, Otis Dudley. 1961. "A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations." Pp. 109-138 in Occupations and Social Status, edited by Albert J. Reiss. New York: Free Press; Hauser/Warren. 1997. "Socioeconomic Indexes of Occupational Status. A Review, Update, and Critique." Sociological Methodology:177-298; Treiman, Donald J. 1970. "Industrialization and Social Stratification." Pp. 207-234 in Social Stratification. Research and Theory for the 1970s, edited by Edward O. Laumann. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill; Meulemann, Heiner. 1992. "Expansion ohne Folgen? Bildungschancen und sozialer Wandel in der Bundesrepublik." Pp. 123-157 in Entwicklungstendenzen der Sozialstruktur, edited by Wolfgang Glatzer. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag; Breen/Luijkx/Müller/Pollak. 2005. "Non-Persistent Inequality in Educational Attainment. Evidence from eight European Countries." in Meeting of Research Committee 28 (ISA). Los Angeles; Rafter/Hout. 1993. "Maximally Maintained Inequality. Expansion, Reform, and Opportunity in Irish Education 1921-75." Sociology of Education 66:41-62; Hout, Michael. forthcoming. "Maximally Maintained Inequality Revisited. Irish Educational Mobility in Comparative Perspective." in Changing Ireland, 1989-2003, edited by Maire NicGhiolla Phadraig and Elizabeth Hilliard; Lucas, Samuel R. 2001. "Effectively Maintained Inequality. Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects." American Journal of Sociology 106:1642-1690; Shavit/Arum/Gamoran (Eds.). forthcoming. Stratification in Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Stanford: Stanford University Press. International Comparisons (18.04.2007) Allmendinger, Jutta / Hans Dietrich. 2004. "PISA und die soziologische Bildungsforschung." Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 7:201-210; Jahnke, Thomas / Wolfram Meyerhöfer. 2006. PISA&Co. Kritik eines Programms; UNICEF. 2002. A league table of educational disadvantage in rich nations. Innocenti Report Card No.4, Florence: Innocenti Research Centre; Brown, Giorgina / John Micklewright. 2004: Using International Surveys of Achievement and Literacy. A view from the outside. UNESCO, Institute for Statistics; IBrown, Giorgina et al. 2005: Cross-National Surveys of Learning Achievement. How Robust are the Findings? Southhampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, Applications & Policy Working Paper A05/05; Publikationen des Schweizer PISAKonsortiums http://www.bi.zh.ch/internet/bi/de/publikationen/schulleistungsstudien.html; Ramseier/Brühwiler. 2003: Herkunft, Leistung und Bildungschancen im gegliederten Bildungssystem. Vertiefte PISA-Analyse unter Einbezug de kognitiven Grundfähigkeiten. Revue suisse des sciences de l‘educacion 25 (1) Ethnic Inequalities (25.04.2007) OECD (2006): Where immigrant students succeed. A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003; Auernheimer, Georg (2006): Schieflagen im Bildungssystem. Die Benachteiligung der Migrantenkinder. Vs Verlag; Stanat, Petra (2006): Schulleistung von Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund. Die Rolle der Zusammensetzung der Schülerschaft. In: Baumert / Stanat / Watermann (Hrsg.): Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; Buchmann, Claudia / Emilio A. Parrado (2006): Educational Achievement of Immigrant-Origin and Native Students. A Comparative Analysis informed by institutional theory. In: Baker, David P. / Alex Wiseman: The Impact of Comparative Education Research on Institutional Theory; Vellacott / Hollenweger/ Nicolet / Wolter (2003): Soziale Integration und Leistungsförderung. Bildungsmonitoring Schweiz; Heath, Anthony / Yael Brinbaum (im Erscheinen): Special issue of Ethnicities (Explaining ethnic inequalities in educational attainment); Marks, Gary N. (2005): Accounting for immigrant non-immigrant differences in reading and mathematics in twenty countries. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(5), 925-946; Dronkers / Levels / Kraaykamp (2006): Scholastic Achievement Differences of Immigrants in Western Countries. A Cross-National Study on Origin, Destination, and Community Effects. Discussion Paper EF2006-7/7, European University Institute; TIES: “The Integration of the European Second Generation” (aktueller internationaler Forschungsschwerpunkt, siehe http://www.imiscoe.org/ties/) Institutionalism (02.05.2007) Berger, Peter / Thomas Luckmann (1970): Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit . Frankfurt: S. Fischer ; Esser, Hartmut (2000): Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 5: Institutionen. Frankfurt: Campus; Brinton, Mary / Victor Nee (1998): The New Institutionalism in Sociology. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; Jepperson, Ronald (2002): The Development and Application of Sociological Neoinstitutionalism. In: Berger, Joseph / Morris Zelditch: New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; Meyer, John (1977): The Effects of Education as an Institution. American Journal of Sociology 83: 55-77; Meyer, Heinz-Dieter / Brian Rowan (2006): The New Institutionalism in Education. New York: State University of New York Press; Baker, David / Alexander Wiseman (2006): The Impact of Comparative Education Research on Institutional Theory. Elsevier; Hillmert, Steffen (2004): Soziale Ungleichheit im Bildungsverlauf: zum Verhältnis von Bildungsinstitutionen und Entscheidungen. In: Becker, Rolf / Wolfgang Lauterbach: Bildungs als Privileg? Wiesbaden: VS Verlag Methods of Comparison (09.05.2007) Brochmann/Engelstad/Kalleberg/Leira/Mjøset (1997). Methodological Issues in Comparative Social Science. Greenwich / London: JAI Press; Kenworthy, Lane (2007). Toward improved use of regression in macro-comparative analysis. Comparative Social Research 24:343-350; Ragin, Charles C (1987). The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkley: University of California Press; Ragin, Charles C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press; Lieberson, Stanley (1991). Small N's and Big Conclusions. An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Case. Social Forces 70:307-320; Sica, Alan (Ed.). 2006. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences (sehr umfassendes Nachschlagewerk in 4 Bänden); Ebbinghaus, Bernhard (2005). When Less is More. Selection Problems in Large- N and Small- N Cross-National Comparisons. International Sociology 20:133-152 Classification of National Education Systems (16.06.2007) Turner, Ralph T. (1960). Sponsored and Contest Mobility and the School System. American Sociological Review 25:855-867; Hopper, Earl I. (1968). A Typology for the Classification of Educational Systems. Sociology 2:29-46; Below, Susanne von (2002). Bildungssysteme und soziale Ungleichheit. Das Beispiel der neuen Bundesländer. Opladen: Leske + Budrich Institutional Effects (23.05.2007 & 06.06.2007) Buchmann, Claudia, and Ben Dalton. 2002. "Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries. The importance of institutional context." Sociology of Education 75:99-122; Buchmann, Claudia, and Hyunjoon Park. 2005. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Educational and Occupational Expectations. A Comparative Study of 12 Countries." in Meeting of the Research Committee on Stratification (RC28) of the International Sociological Association. Los Angeles; Pfeffer, Fabian T. 2007. Intergenerational Mobility in Comparative Perspective. CDE Working Paper No. 2007-09; Gorard/ Smith (2004): An international comparison of equity in education systems. Comparative Education 40:15-28; Hanushek/Wößmann (2006): Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Economic Journal 116: C63-C76; Vandenberghe (2005): Achievement Effectiveness and Equity. The role of Tracking, Grade Repetition and Inter-school Segregation. Applied Economics Letters; Ammermüller (2005): Educational Opportunities and the Role of Institutions, ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 05-44; Brunello/Checchi (2006): Does School Tracking Affect Equality of Opportunity? New International Evidence. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2348; Oakes (2005): Kepping Track. How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press; Gamoran/Mare (1989): Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality. Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality? American Journal of Sociology, 94(5); Gamoran (1992): The Variable Effects of High School Tracking. American Sociological Review 57 (6); Gamoran (1995): Curriculum Standardization and Equality of Opportunity in Scottish Secondary Education: 1984-90. Sociology of Education 69(1); FOR YOUR OWN RESEARCH PROJECT: Eurydice. Database on Education Systems in Europe: http://www.eurydice.org; OECD. Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD; Postlethwaite, T. Neville (Ed.). 1995. International encyclopedia of national systems of education. Oxford / New York: Pergamon; Robitaille, David F. 1997. National Contexts for Mathematics and Science Education. An Encyclopedia of the Education Systems Participating in TIMSS. Cantonal Comparison (06.06.2007) Forschungsgemeinschaft PISA (2005): PISA 2003. Kompetenzen für die Zukunft. Zweiter Nationaler Bericht; Forschungsgemeinschaft PISA (2005). PISA 2003. Analysen für Deutschschweizer Kantone und das Fürstentum Liechtenstein; Bauer/Riphahn (2006): Timing of School Tracking as a determinant of intergenerational transmission of education. Economics Letters 91: 90-97; Holzer, Thomas (2005): PISA 2003. Einflußfaktoren auf die kantonalen Ergebnisse. Bundestamt für Statistik / BFS Aktuell 15 Macro-Economic Context (06.06.2007) Treiman (1970): Industrialization and Social Stratification. In: Laumann (Hrsg.): Social Stratification. Research and Theory for the 1970s; Treiman/Yip (1989): Educational and Occupational Attainment in 21 Countries. In: Kohn (Hrsg.): Cross-National Research in Sociology; Müller/Karle (1993): Social Selection in Educational Systems in Europe. European Sociological Review 9:1-23; Jencks et al. (1972): Inequality. A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Basic Books; Hega/Hokenmaier (2002): The Welfare State and Education. A Comparison of Social and Educational Policy in Advanced Industrial Societies. German Policy Studies 2: 1-29; Kozol (1978): Children of the Revolution. A Yankee Teacher in the Cuban Schools. New York: Delacorte Press; Bowles/Gintis (1976): Schooling in Capitalist America. Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. New York: Basic Books; Brighouse (2000): School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford University Press; Henig (1994): Rethinking School Choice. Limits of the Market Metaphor.