ABAKADA Spring 2011
Transcription
ABAKADA Spring 2011
BABAYLAN ODENSE A fabulous Induction ball! Prepared by: BDO Officers Jessica and Suzette Lyn from the “Dark Orchid Band “ with our two emcees Mary Rose Pajigal and Rhoda Jørgensen. BDO officers being inducted by: Filomenita Høgsholm & Judy Jover. It took place last April 02, 2011 in Munkebjerg Skole, Odense. Yes, finally Babaylan-Denmark/Odense is now officially a chapter! All officers have now committed themselves to the vision and mission of BabaylanDenmark. The empowerment of Filipina women has just begun here in Funen. Our very own local talented singer here in Funen, Rhoda Jørgensen. She has a family background of music and went to sing with some choirs and other musical activities when she was young. After some years she worked with other bands where they performed in Batangas City, Manila, China and she even performed in the Middle East together with her band. After having years off to have a family, she is now ready to meet new challenges in her life. The Founding Chair of Babaylan-Denmark, Filomenita Høgsholm came as our guest speaker and most of the Babaylan-Denmark officers were there tpp to witness the event .It was a great honor to see them. The program was not perfect, still some of our guests enjoyed themselves, and stayed long. BDO`s efficiency, enthusiasm and courage made this event successful! The BDO & BD officers (left) Luz Hansen, Milagros San Jose, Zeny Lundkvist, Sheila Jensen, Emily Emanuelsen, Marlene M. Andersen, Virginia Engholm, Victoria Ellehauge, Ana Lindenhann, Judy Jover and Filomenita Høgsholm By this element of Filipino friendships, many came to join and celebrate with us our induction ball. There were more than 150 guests who attended this day. It was amazing! We had guests from different towns and cities from Jutland to Sjaelland! It seems like we are already well known. Distance has not been a hindrance at all. It was a wonderful experience. We had some games, lotteries and entertainments. Some of our local talented entertainers gave us special numbers. Even the two young ladies from Jutland, Jessica and Suzette Lyn from the “Dark Orchid Band” came just to render us some of their newly- composed songs. We are very grateful for that. The pinay beauties getting ready for Filipina gown “Fashion Show” We would like to thank all our sponsors for their donations, to our beloved families and great helpers who supported us. Thank you to all our guests, their friends and families for participating at this event. Mabuhay po tayong lahat! We hope to see you again soon. n ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 10 How do REMITTANCES MANILA, Philippines — A study recently released by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) provides an informative and substantially probing picture of how families of overseas Filipino workers spend their remittance money. Families Spend remittance money? By Jun Burgos INQUIRER.net The study, entitled “Remittances and Household Behavior in the Philippines,” was conducted and written by Filipino Alvin Ang, Indian Shikha Jha, and Indonesian Guntur Sugiyarto based on their analysis of data from the 2000, 2003, and 2006 Family Income and Expenditures Survey (FIES) reports of the National Statistics Office (NSO). The authors noted that some 18.05 percent of all Filipino households received cash from abroad in the year 2000, and this rose to 20.72 percent in 2003 and then to 23.3 percent in 2006. From the data, the authors observed that more families of OFWs were spending less on food and more on health, with the percentage share of expenditures of migrant households on food down slightly from 44.9 percent in 2000 to 43.3 percent in 2006, while expenditures on health increased from 2.3 percent in 2000 to 3 percent. Allocations for durables, they said, were found to be steady at 2.2 percent from 2000 to 2006, while fairly stable were those for education (4.5 percent in 2000 to 4.4 percent in 2006), and for housing operations (2.0 percent in 2000 to 2.1 percent in 2006). They noted though that spending of OFW families for transportation and communication (including cellphone expenses) increased from 6.2 percent in 2000 to 7.2 percent in 2006. The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has reported that remittance According to the BSP, the percentage of households that allotted portions of remittances to savings increased to 40 percent in the first quarter of 2009, compared with only 35.8 percent in the fourth quarter 2008 survey. The bank added that there was also a slight increase in the number of OFW families that set aside money for investments, from 4.7 percent in the previous quarter to 5.9 percent in 2009. inflows to the Philippines in 2009 reached $17.348 billion, equivalent to some 11-12 percent of the gross domestic product, with the country being the third biggest recipient of workers’ remittances. In its 2008 and 2009 reports, the BSP noted increasing savings and investments by OFW families largely in banks, other financial instruments and real estate — an observation regarded as a big improvement from earlier reports describing OFW families as using a large part of their money on “unproductive expenses.” ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 BSP Deputy Governor Diwa Guinigundo has said, “In a sense, the greater proportion of remittances recipients’ saving and investing is good for the economy because the multiplier effects can be significant in the future…. savings and investments increase the pool of resources available to both households and corporate borrowers for their credit needs. That helps sustain economic activity.” The billions of dollars of annual OFW remittances have greatly contributed to our country’s economy and have actually been credited for “saving” it in many instances already, especially during hard times. It is best for the government as well as the private sector to expand their service to the OFWs and their families in terms of assisting them on how to make the most benefits out of their hard-earned money. n 11 MIGRANT WOMEN & IWD Migrant Women & International Rights by Filomenita Mongaya Høgsholm* History Entwined If it were not for immigrant women, we might not be celebrating the 8th of March as International Women’s Day (IWD) where we honour and recognize women’s contributions, and also protect their rights. Although IWD has been observed since the early 1900’s when the world then, in a cataclysmic state, owing to industrial expansion and booming population growth, witnessed impassioned women campaigning for change. It made headlines when15 000 women, probably immigrant women among them, marched in 1908 through New York City demanding shorter hours, better pay and voting rights. The Past.... At the 1910 International Conference of Working Women in Copenhagen, Clara Zetkin, working for the German Social Democratic Party, first tabled the idea of an International Women’s Day before more than 100 women from 17 countries, among them members of political parties and working women’s clubs, including the first 3 Finnish women parliamentarians. Zetkin’s suggestion was unanimously approved at the meeting. Thus was IWD celebrated for the first time in Austria, Denmark, Germany and Switzerland on 19 March 1911 with more than one million women and men attending. Less than a week later on 25 March, however, the ‘Triangle Fire’ in New York City occurred, taking the lives of 146 garment workers, mostly Italian and Eastern European -Jewish- women immigrants. The tragedy underscored the dangerous working conditions of immigrant women workers in New York’s sweatshops .It became a turning point when American labour laws changed thereafter. The present... From then on, the meaning of the tragic event would later be incorporated into the empowerment thrust commemorated on March 8th, now known as International Women’s Day, IWD, with special stress on women workers. That was exactly a century ago on March 8 this year in 2011. A whole century of struggle for rights has certainly brought significant changes to women workers lives but in many parts of the world, women’s work continues to be under valued, underpaid, or unremunerated and every single day in the calendar, women and girls in the Global South, following their dreams of a better life, leave home to find jobs to secure their future by moving to the developed world of the North/West. They cross borders –they migrate- to connects and cultures far from home. Feminisation of Migration According to I.O.M (International Office for Migration)’s bi-annual World Migration Report in 2010, 3% of the world’s population or 214 million people were on the move, and 49% of these international migrants were women or girls, the portion of females reaching 51% in more developed regions. About 50% of migrant workers in Asia, Africa and Latin America are now women heads of households who see it as their duty to work abroad so as to support their families’ well being, often aiming for better education of their children. Yet there are no guarantees that women can migrate safely and protected. On the contrary, the area of protection has been marginalised, women migrants subjected to multiple discrimination, and the incidence of irregularity and of trafficking rising. But even without the criminal twist, women workers still pay the social costs of migration since they suffer psychologically and emotionally from the separation from their families, lowering quality of life. extra hands that female immigrants provide. Yet employers, governments and society in receiving countries fail to value migrant women’s work, which is considered of low status. Care, esp, when it is expended within the domestic sphere is invisible. And not valued. Additionally, women workers are denied their right to fair wages and humane working conditions. When they come into contact with the law, they are deprived of their right to due process, the right to be protected against inhuman and degrading treatment, the right to be heard and to air grievances, without the threat of verbal abuse or withholding of salary. These are everyday happenings for migrant women in many parts of the world, even in Europe. And often have no access to counseling, legal and social services. Domestic workers including the new arrivals, the au pairs who no longer come from other European countries but from the South (Asia, Africa and Latin America) as well as the former Soviet republics. Found in increasing numbers in northern Europe, they can be deprived of their rights and their maybe exposed to forms of violence, including sexual harassment and rape. Trafficking and smuggling for labour and the sex industry mainly involving women and children is a much more lucrative business than the drug trade. With the financial crisis still raging, unscrupulous elements in the migration and criminality nexus will ply their trade vigorously to get ill-gotten incomes. Factors at play According to the same IOM report, the trend of female migration will continue owing to the demographic factor of an ageing population in the developed world –the North- thereby requiring the ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 12 MIGRANT WOMEN & IWD MDGs and Migrant Women: “Empowering Women to End Poverty by 2015” The UN Migrant Workers Convention and International Migrants Day In 2000, the world’s leaders who on a global agenda of cooperation to fight poverty by formulating 8 specific goals, the Millennium Development Goals or MDGs. Not one of the 8 however was on international migration, inspite of the role of remittances and diaspora communities as agents of change in home countries. Indeed, migration is a crosscutting phenomenon, rather like gender equality which is one of the MDGs, ie. Goal 3. 20 years has passed since the UN attempted in 1990 to enshrine migrant workers rights in a Convention adequately entitled the UN Convention for Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, UNMWC for short. It first entered into force in 2003 but already in 1997, Filipino migrants began to celebrate the 18th of December to commemorate international migrant’s solidarity day. And finally on Dec.4th 2000, it was decided by the UN that there ought to be an International Migrants Day to remind member states, intergovernmental actors as well as NGOs of their obligations to ratify the Convention as well as to disseminate information on the human rights of migrants, recognizing their contributions to the well being of host societies. Inspite there being one specific goal on gender equality, without progress towards the empowerment of women, including migrant women, none of the other goals will be achieved. Women disproportionately experience the burden of poverty as victims of discrimination, and yet they put their lives at risk for example every time they become pregnant because more often than not, they have no access to basic health services nor reproductive rights orientation, showing an interplay of several unfulfilled MDGs. Last year’s UN MDG Summit in New York in September 2010 concluded with the adoption of a global action plan to achieve the eight anti-poverty goals by their 2015 target date. The announcement of major new commitments for women’s and children’s health and other initiatives against poverty, hunger and disease should add optimism but there are no guarantees esp. in the midst of an unresolved financial global crisis. The UNMWC is the only Human Rights instrument that specifically addresses the rights of migrants but unfortunately it is also the least ratified...Not one European or North American state has taken the step of ratification. As of last count, only 44 nations have ratified the Convention, and all are from the Global South. There are further some 15 more signatories to the Convention, again none from the so-called developed nations. The ILO Domestic Workers Convention The ILO (International Labour Organization) has passed a number of Conventions thru the ‘80s and ‘90s, all of them relevant to migrant workers but none seems to cater directly to women migrants. In 2011, a new Convention will likely be passed and this will be on domestic workers’ rights. Considering domestic workers are mostly women, the demographic deficit in the North such as in Eu rope will require more care provided by the Global South, and such a Convention might secure aspects to this grey or unprotected labour area but might not address ALL women’s rights. The new convention was passed at the ILO’s meeting in Geneva last June 2-18, 2010 and was attended by more than 2,500 delegates from member countries, trade unions and employer’s confederations. This new DWC will tackle freedom of association. Eg. to form or belong to labour unions, fair terms of employment and decent living conditions, access to dispute settlement processes , regulation of employment agencies and the protection of migrant domestic workers. This last part - protection- will require hard bargaining since it includes protection from abuse, wage regulation, fair and decent conditions of work and social security for domestic workers - migrant, live-in and other categories of this extremely vast, unregulated and unprotected workforce. The ILO also called for state parties to hold consultations with stakeholders and provide comments on the proposed convention to set fair labour standards in domestic work. This year 2011, both international and domestic laws are expected to be put in place on this important subject. It is problematic that domestic work often is carried out in the home of the employer and not in the public space where the right to privacy of employers is put forward as contradictory to the rights of the domestic worker in regulated employment. Also, the aforementioned rapid rise in cross border trafficking calls for special protection for the mostly female migrant domestic workers, many of whom cross international borders without proper documentation. The new Convention must also address the important issue of reintegration/return after end of contracts, a time when the women workers are particularly at risk. Domestic workers are also especially vulnerable to sexual harassment and sexual assault, and often find it impossible to access the criminal justice system. Protection must be offered to workers in this vulnerable sector against assaults of sexual nature, which is more relevant to certain areas in the world than in others. ILO in the Middle East The ILO is also encouraging the drafting of labour legislation to provide foreign domestic workers (FDWs) in the Middle East with legal protection. turn to page 14 ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 13 from page 13... MIGRANT WOMEN ... After a workshop in Beirut, Lebanon last November 2010, Arab trade unions agreed on a statement of principles, including the right to decent wages and union representation for FDWs, This phenomenon [FDW] has grown in recent years as families need help with care for elderly parents, people with disabilities and children. Only Jordan has comprehensive labour legislation covering FDWs in a region that employs 22 million domestic workers, a third of whom are women, mainly from Asian and African countries, including Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Ethiopia. According to Human Rights Watch (April 2010), FDWs who are especially widespread in the Middle East face a wide range of abuses and poor working conditions, such as needing permission to leave the house, a lack of leave days, or having their passports taken away and, in some cases, physical and emotional abuse. The report also noted that access to justice was limited. Experts say the recruitment system – kafala – in which a family sponsors the domestic worker, is the first issue to tackle. Also advocacy for the rights of domestic workers is weak and language is a barrier. Awareness literature, hotlines for FDWs, communal housing that would offer domestic workers alternative to living in the employer’s home, and recruitment by public/governmental rather than private agencies are initiatives being worked out by the ILO working with governments., trade unions, and other civil society organizations in both the countries of origin and destinations. Private agencies are making huge profits from the social care needs of households when such needs should be part of social policies of governments, rather than being left to private households. Conventions aimed specifically at Women “We work with women before they depart to train them in their rights as workers, their employment responsibilities and basic information about contracts. We work with women once they arrive in the country to ensure they have safe housing, legitimate contracts and workplace rights. We also work with women who are returning to their families after periods of being away and supporting them to re-enter their family life.” MIGRANT WOMEN & IWD (UNIFEM) CEDAW CEDAW, Convention for the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women is an international treaty that can also be invoked to address women migrants’ issues. With 178 ratifications by countries of origin, transit and destination, CEDAW is one of the most widely ratified of conventions, ranking second only to the Convention on the Rights of the Child Adopted by the UN General Assembly on 18 December 1979, it is one of the most comprehensive international human rights treaties for the promotion of women’s rights. It looks at women’s civil rights, legal status, reproductive rights, but also cultural factors influencing women’s position in society and the enjoyment of these rights. At some point, the UN CEDAW Committee, affirming that migrant women, like all women, should not be discriminated against in any sphere of their life, decided to issue a General Recommendation on some categories of women migrant workers in these words: Recognizing that migrant women may be classified into various categories and that these categories remain fluid and overlapping, the scope of the general recommendation is limited to addressing the situations of migrant women who, as workers, are in low-paid jobs, may be at high risk of abuse and discrimination and who may never acquire eligibility for permanent stay or citizenship, unlike professional migrant workers in the country of employment. These categories of migrant women are: (a) women migrant workers who migrate independently; (b) women migrant workers who join their spouses or other members of their families who are also workers; and(c) undocumented women migrant workers who may fall into any of the above categories. General Recommendation 27, also known as GR 27 during the 32nd Session in January 2005 elaborates on the circumstances that contribute to the specific vulnerability of women migrant workers and their experiences of sex- and gender-based discrimination as a cause and consequence of the violations of their human rights. (http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/ cedaw/comments.htm.) ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 CEDAW: the view from Europe Together with a couple of other related organizations, UNIFEM organised a Roundtable on the CEDAW and Migrant Women during its 30th anniversary in Geneva in November 2009, where two migrant women advocates were invited from Europe -one representing WIDE/KULU/Babaylan and the other from the European Network of Migrant Women- to share experiences from the ground regarding human rights challenges and the forms of multiple discrimination women migrant workers are facing in Europe. Bilateral agreements between countries to protect migrant workers are generally lacking, and many migrant women do not have papers or contracts, as a result of trafficking or their illegal status, and therefore have no place to go for protection, nor for services such as health care. Migrant women in Europe also often lack access to social benefits (e.g. pensions), and might therefore face poverty at old age. A further complication is that many migrant women that do domestic work are not protected, for example regarding domestic violence, as the ‘home’ by law is not seen as an official workplace, but as a private area. One of the difficulties to protect migrant workers arises from the fact that the women leave on their own initiative and do not go through official organizations or networks, nor do they seek advice with State institutions. This makes it very difficult for States to provide these migrant workers with support. Other issues raised during the discussion ranged from good practices in training and education of migrant workers, which nowadays is primarily a task taken up by civil society and which many said should also become the responsibility of States, so is the protection of families, domestic migration and national streamlining of migration policy among various ministries. Concluding perspective IWD is a global celebration to focus on the economic, political and social achievements of all women without regard for differences among them. Maybe with the newly established United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women -or for short UN Women - now finally functioning, the UN can now help member states to “accelerate progress towards their goals on gender equality and the empowerment of women.” And put power and meaning into the celebration of International Women’s Day and other gender highlights and milestones, hopefully for generations to come. n 14 MIGRANT WOMEN & IWD Verschlungene Geschichten Internationaler Frauentag und Frauenrechte von Migrantinnen Die 15.000 Frauen – unter denen vermutlich auch Migrantinnen waren –, die 1908 durch New York marschierten und kürzere Arbeitszeit, bessere Bezahlung und Wahlrecht verlangten, machten Schlagzeilen. Hätte es diese Migrantinnen nicht gegeben, würden wir vielleicht auch den 8. März nicht als „Internationalen“ Frauentag feiern. Filomenita Mongaya-Høgsholm ______________________ 1910 , bei der Internationalen Konferenz von Arbeiterinnen in Kopenhagen, brachte Clara Zetkin den Vorschlag für einen Internationalen Frauentag vor mehr als 100 Frauen aus 17 Ländern ein. Zetkins Vorschlag wurde einstimmig angenommen. Der Internationale Frauentag wurde zum ersten Mal in Österreich, Dänemark, Deutschland und der Schweiz am 19. März 1911 von mehr als einer Million Frauen und Männern gefeiert. Aber nicht einmal eine Woche später, am 25. März 1911, brach das Triangle Fire in New York aus, bei dem 146 TextilarbeiterInnen ums Leben kamen, es waren größtenteils MigrantInnen. Diese Tragödie unterstrich die gefährlichen Arbeitsbedingungen von migrantischen ArbeiterInnen in New York. Dies war ein Wendepunkt und änderte die US-amerikanischen Arbeitsrechte. Später wurde dieses tragische Ereignis mit dem Empowerment von Frauen verbunden, und am 8. März wird dessen gedacht. Das ganze 20. Jahrhundert über verbesserte sich zwar die Situation für Arbeiterinnen, aber in vielen Teilen der Welt wird Frauenarbeit noch immer gering geschätzt und nicht gerecht entlohnt. Tag für Tag verlassen Frauen ihr Zuhause, um in der Fremde Jobs und eine gesicherte Zukunft zu suchen. Feminisierung von Migration Laut dem IOM-Welt-Migrationsbericht migrierten 2010 214 Mio. Menschen. 49 % davon waren Frauen. Migrantinnen sind noch immer Diskriminierungen, Menschenhandel und Verstößen ausgesetzt. Aber auch ohne diese kriminellen Verflechtungen bei weiblicher Migration zahlen Arbeiterin- nen die sozialen Kosten von Migration, weil sie psychisch und emotional aufgrund der Trennung von ihrer Familie und ihren Kindern leiden. Im selben Bericht wird festgestellt, dass der Trend von weiblicher Migration weitergehen wird. Aufgrund der Bevölkerungsalterung in der westlichen Welt wird die Unterstützung durch Migrantinnen, die Pflegearbeit leisten, gefragter sein denn je. Bislang wird von ArbeitgeberInnen, Regierungen und Gesellschaften die Arbeit migrantischer Frauen wenig geschätzt. Außerdem werden ihnen Rechte wie faire Löhne und humane Arbeitsbedingungen abgesprochen. Da es vor allem Haus- und Pflegearbeit ist, in der die weibliche migrantische Arbeitskraft Verwendung findet, brauchen Migrantinnen Zugang zu Beratung über rechtliche und soziale Leistungen und Hilfe bei sexuellem Missbrauch und physischer Gewalt. M i l l e n n i u m s - E n t w i ck l u n g sziele (MDGs) und MigrantInnen Im Jahr 2000 wurden die MDGs festgelegt, um in einer globalen Kooperation der Staaten Armut zu bekämpfen. Es wurden acht Ziele formuliert, aber nicht eines dieser Ziele zu internationaler Migration, trotz der unübersehbaren Geldrücküberweisungen der Migrantinnen, die für die finanzielle Sicherheit einer Unzahl von Familien – ja ganzer Volkswirtschaften – in so vielen Ländern zuständig sind. UN-Arbeitsrechtekonvention zu MigrantInnen und der Internationale MigrantInnentag 1990 versuchte die UN die migrantischen Arbeitsrechte in eine Konvention mit dem Titel „Internationale Konvention zum Schutz der Rechte aller Wanderarbeitnehmer und ihrer Familienangehörigen“ (UNMWC) zu verankern. Diese wurde erst 2003 in Kraft gesetzt. Auf Druck von MigrantInnen wurde am 4. Dezember 2000 von der UN der Beschluss zu einem Internationalen MigrantInnentag gefasst, um Mitgliedsländer, RegierungsakteurInnen und NGOs daran zu erinnern, dass sie eine Pflicht gegenüber MigrantInnen haben, und die bereits 1990 vorgeschlagene Konvention zu ratifizieren und Informationen über Men schenrechte von MigrantInnen zu verbreiten und deren Beitrag anzuerkennen. Turn to page 16 ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 15 MIGRANT WOMEN & IWD From page 15 VERSCHLUNGENE... Die UNMWC ist das einzige Menschenrechtsinstrument, das speziell die Rechte von MigrantInnen behandelt, aber es ist auch das letzte, das ratifiziert wurde. Nicht ein europäisches oder nordamerikanisches Land hat sich dezidiert dafür eingesetzt. Zuletzt haben nur 44 Staaten die Konvention ratifiziert – alle aus dem globalen Süden. ILO HausarbeiterInnen-Konvention In den 1980er und 1990er Jahren verabschiedete die ILO viele Konventionen, alle beinhalten Punkte, die für migrantische ArbeiterInnen relevant sind, aber keine bezieht sich direkt auf MigrantInnen. Für 2011 ist eine neue Konvention zu HausarbeiterInnenrechten vorgesehen. HausarbeiterInnen sind überwiegend Frauen und MigrantInnen. Diese Konvention strebt deren Schutz vor Ausbeutung an, aber sie behandelt nicht alle Rechte für MigrantInnen. Es geht dabei um faire und menschenwürdige Arbeits- und Lebensbedingungen, um einfachen Zugang zu Streitschlichtungsverfahren, um Bestimmungen der ArbeitgeberInnenagenturen und um die Absicherung für migrantische HausarbeiterInnen. Dieses Jahr wird es sich zeigen, ob sich diesbezüglich internationale und innerstaatliche Gesetze tatsächlich ändern. CEDAW und Migrantinnen Das Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) ist ein internationales Abkommen, das auch Bereiche umfasst, die Migrantinnen betreffen. Mit 178 Ratifizierungen durch Ursprungs-, Transit- und Zielländer von Migrantinnen ist CEDAW eine von den meistbestätigten Konventionen. Diese Konvention wurde von der UN-Generalversammlung am 18. Dezember 1979 verabschiedet. Darin werden Zivilrechte von Frauen, deren rechtlicher Status und reproduktive Rechte, aber auch kulturelle Fak- toren zur gesellschaftlichen Rolle von Frauen geregelt. CEDAW bestätigte, dass Migrantinnen, wie alle Frauen, nicht diskriminiert werden sollen. Es wurde beschlossen, eine General Recommendation zu erlassen. Die General Recommendation 27 (GR 27), die im Jänner 2005 veröffentlicht wurde, beabsichtigt die Hintergründe, die dazu beitragen, dass viele migrantische Arbeiterinnen verletzbar sind und Erfahrungen mit sexueller und geschlechtsspezifischer Diskriminierung haben, ausfindig zu machen. Bei dem von UNIFEM und anderen Organisationen veranstalteten Runden Tisch zum Thema CEDAW und Migrantinnen im November 2009 in Genf sprachen zwei Migrantinnen über Menschenrechtsherausforderungen in Europa und die Form von multipler Diskriminierung, der sie ausgesetzt sind. Bilaterale Abkommen zwischen Ziel- und Herkunftsländern, die migrantische Arbeiterinnen über die Grenzen hinweg schützen, fehlen zumeist. Migrantinnen in Europa mangelt es oft an sozialen Unterstützungen. Der Internationale Frauentag ist eine globale Feier, um auf ökonomische, politische und soziale Errungenschaften von allen Frauen aufmerksam zu machen. Vielleicht kann das 2010 neu entstandene UN Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women (ehemals UN-Frauen) helfen, die Entwicklungen der Mitgliedsstaaten hin zu den Zielen Gendergleichheit und Empowerment von Frauen zu beschleunigen. n Internettipp: www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cedaw/comments.htm Zur Autorin: Filomenita Mongaya-Høgsholm ist Vorsitzende und Gründungsmitglied des phillipinischen Migrantinnennetzwerkes BabaylanDänemark und Vorstandsmitglied bei Babaylan-Europa sowie Mitglied im Steuerungsausschuss von WIDE (Women in Development Europe). Sie lebt in Humlebaek bei Kopenhagen. Übersetzung aus dem Englischen: Claudia Dal-Bianco Reprinted with the permission of Frauensolidarität, Vienna. SOCIAL SECURITY First Round of Social Security Agreement Negotiations Between the Philippines and Denmark A Resounding Success The first round of negotiations for a Social Security Agreement (SSA) between the Republic of the Philippines and the Kingdom of Denmark was concluded successfully, a half-day earlier than previously scheduled, on 01 February 2011, with both parties agreeing to meet in Manila at the soonest time possible in order to finalize and sign the muchawaited agreement. The Philippine Delegation (PhilDel), headed by Philippine Social Security System President and CEO Emilio S. de Quiros, Jr., met with its Danish coun- terparts at the premises of the Danish Ministry of Employment from 31 January to 01 February 2011 fully prepared for the negotiations which were held in a cordial, professional and cooperative atmosphere. The SSA, once signed, will guarantee, among other things, the portability of pensions of qualified Filipino and Danish nationals, taking into consideration applicable Philippine and Danish laws, legislations and guidelines. Meanwhile, both parties agreed to finalize the required Administrative Arrangements and other applicable forms through electronic communication as soon as possible. Some few remaining areas of clarification in the draft SSA will be tackled during the final meeting in Manila prior to its signing. On 30 January, the Philippine Delegation also met with leaders of the Filipino Community in Denmark at the residence of Philippine Honorary Con. Gen Poul Krogh to brief them on the said negotiations and to receive feedback from the latter regarding the subject matter. Discussions were lively and the meeting was concluded on a positive note with the Filipino community leaders expressing happiness and gratitude for this much-awaited SSA. Government-to-government talks were ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 initiated by the Philippine Government as far back as 1999 and again in 2006 when a precedent to harmonize some aspects of the pension or social security systems between the Philippines and Denmark was made possible by an SSA between the governments of Denmark and the US. Mr. de Quiros and his Danish counterpart, Ms. Lone Henriksen, expressed satisfaction with the outcome of the negotiations and looked forward to its signing in Manila within the year. Other members of the Philippine delegation were: 1.Ms. Judy Frances A. See, Senior Vice President, Program Management Group, Social Security System. 2.Ms. Consuelo D. Manansala, Executive Vice President for Operations, Government Service Insurance System. 3.Atty. Grace M. Tan, Labor Arbiter, Department of Labor and Employment. 4.Ms. Lenna Eilleen C. de Dios-Sison, Third Secretary & Vice Consul of the Philippine Embassy in Oslo, Norway. 5.Mr. Poul Krogh, Philippine Honorary Consul General, Philippine Honorary Consulate General, Copenhagen, Denmark Source: Philippine Embassy, Oslo, Norway Published Feb 2011 http://www.philembassy.no 16 MIGRATION NEWS UN OHCHR /Statement on the situation of migrant workers and members of their families in Libya The Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, acting under its mandate to monitor the implementation of the Convention, released a statement expressing its alarm on the armed conflict and on the violent response to the popular uprising in the Libya since February 2011. The Committee stated that it is deeply concerned about the recurrence of violations of the right to life, acts of violence, including sexual violence, as well as acts of discrimination and arbitrary detentions victimizing migrant workers and members of their families in Libya, in particular migrants from sub-Saharan Africa.. Source: OHCHR, 8 April 2011 EUROPE New European Union Agenda on the Integration of Migrants The European Commission is preparing a Communication for a New European Agenda on Integration to be published end of May 2011. The purpose of this Agenda is to supplement the Stockholm Programme of 2009, which focuses predominantly on tackling terrorism, organised crime and irregular immigration, with a chapter on integration. Source: Intercultural Europe, April 2011 Council of Europe\s Convention establishes legal framework to protect women from violence, regardless of their status. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe adopted a landmark new Convention to prevent and combat violence against women and domestic violence on 7 April 2011. This Convention is the first legally binding instrument in the world creating a comprehensive legal framework to prevent violence, to protect victims and to end the impunity of perpetrators. Article 4 of the Convention affirms its provisions apply to all women regardless of migrant status. While Article 59 on “Residence Status” addresses the situation of those on a spouse dependent visa and the issuance of renewable residence permits to victims. The official guidance note makes specific reference to undocumented migrant women, highlighting that while they have a different legal status to asylum seekers, they share an increased risk of experiencing violence. To view press-release and access all background documents visit Women Against Violence Europe (WAVE). Source: Council of EUrope, 7 April 2011 COUNCIL OF EUROPE / Hammarberg: Europe must make migration policies more humane Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Thomas Hammarberg, in presenting the conclusions of the seminar on the human rights dimensions of migration in Europe organised in Istanbul in February on 14 April, said that as illustrated by the current crisis in North Africa, Europe needs to establish more humane migration management and improve the treatment reserved for migrants. The European Union and the Council of Europe should co-operate more closely on this, ensuring that any EU policy abides fully by human rights standards. More information, visit the Council of Europe website. Source: NCDAC, News 14 April 2011 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AGENCY / The situation of irregular migrants in Greece On 8 March 2011? the Fundamental Rights Agency of the EU (FRA) published its thematic situation report “Coping with fundamental rights emergency: the situation of persons crossing the Greek land border in an irregular manner” where the agency strongly criticises the Greek government’s response to address the conditions in detention centres despite the availability of EU funds. Access the report, here. Sources: MPG, Migration News Sheet April 2011 Undocumented Women ISRAEL / High Court halts automatic deportation for pregnant migrant workers The Israeli High Court has ruled that the country’s “pregnant worker regulation” policy is unconstitutional, and must be abolished. The regulation entails deporting female migrant workers once they have given birth and only allowing their re-entry only if they leave their child behind. The move followed a petition filed to the court by a coalition of Israeli NGOs in 2005 which includes PICUM member, Kav LaOved. In order to discourage migrant workers from overstaying, Israel’s Interior Ministry introduced harsh procedures in 2005 to disallow any form of family reunification or procreation by migrant workers. Currently migrant workers cannot enter Israel if any immediate relatives are already working there, and work permits are cancelled in cases of child birth, marriage and intimate relationships. n Source: The Jerusalem Post, 14 April 2011 ABAKADA, SPRING 2011 17