3. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues around Partnership

3. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues around Partnership

3. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues around Partnership
and Parenting (in other languages than Dutch)
assembled by Kees Waaldijk (www.emmeijers.nl/waaldijk)
(summer 2001)
See also:
1. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues around Partnership and Parenting (materials
in Dutch)
2. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues in General (materials in Dutch)
3. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues around Partnership and Parenting (in other
languages than Dutch)
4. Some Literature on Same-Sex Law Issues in General (in other languages than Dutch)
3* Agell 1990
A. Agell, Die schwedische Gesetzgebung über nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften, in: 37
Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1990, 817-822.
3* Anderson 2000
T.G. Anderson, 'Models of registered partnership and their rationale. The British Columbia Law
Institute's proposed Domestic Partner Act', Canadian Journal of Family Law 2000, p. 89-113.
3* Bach-Ignasse 1994
Gérard Bach-Ignasse, `Le couple homosexuel face au bailleur, aux créanciers, à la sécurité
sociale et à l'administration fiscale', Actes du colloque `Homosexualité, droit et libertés' tenua à
l'Assemblée Nationale le 22 octobre 1993, Les Petites Affiches (no 95) 10 août 1994, 29-32.
3* Bainham 1996
A. Bainham (ed.), The International Survey of Family Law, Published on behalf of the
International Society of Family Law, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1996.
3* Bala 2000
N. Bala, 'Alternatives for extending spousal status in Canada', Canadian Journal of Family Law
2000, p. 167-199.
3* Barlow & Probert 1999
A. Barlow & R. Probert, ?Features. Reforming the rights of cohabitants. Lessons from across the
channel?, Family Law 1999, p. 477-479.
3* Barlow 1992
A. Barlow, Living together, ..... 1992.
3* Bartlett 1999
Philip L. Bartlett, ?Recent legislation. Same-sex marriage?, Harvard Journal on Legislation 1999,
p. 581-590.
3* Barton 1990a
Chris Barton, Recognition of homosexual marriage: a case?, in: Family Law 1990, p. 209.
3* Barton 1990b
Chris Barton, Cohabitation and Scottish law: another country moves ahead?, in: Family Law 1990,
p. 405.
3* Barton 1992
Chris Barton, Pre-nuptial and cohabitation contracts: in at the birth?, in: Family Law 1992, 47049.
3* Bates 1999
F. Bates, 'Same-Sex Marriages, Conflict of Laws and Public Policy - A Modern Commentary', 21
Liverpool L. Rev. 49, 1999.
3* Battes 1983
R. Battes, Nichteheliche ..., Köln: 1983.
3* Bernet-Gravereaux 1983
C. Bernet-Gravereaux, L'union libre, Paris: 1983.
3* Birsan 1992
Corneliu Birsan, Union Libre - Adoption, Rapport Général, in: Le droit de la famille en Europe Son évolution depuis l'antiquité jusqu'a nos jours, R. Ganghofer (réd.), Strasbourg: Presses
Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1992, 861-867.
3* Boeles en Kuijer 1993
P. Boeles en A. Kuijer, Harmonization of family reunification, in: A new immigration law for
Europe? The 1992 London, and 1993 Copenhagen Rules on Immigration, H. Meijers, P. Boeles
e.a., Utrecht: Nederlands Centrum Buitenlanders / Standing Committee of experts in international
immigration, refugee and criminal law, 1993, 25-34.
3* Bolte 1998
Angela Bolte, ?Do wedding dresses come in lavender? The prospects and implications of samesex marriage?, Social Theory and Practice 1998, p. 111-132.
3* Bonauto, Murray & Robinson 1999
Mary Bonauto, Susan M. Murray & Beth Robinson, ?The freedom to marry for same-sex couples.
The opening appellate brief of plaintiffs Stan Baker et al. in Baker et al. v. State of Vermont?,
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 1999, p. 409.
3* Borillo & Pitois 1998
Daniel Borrillo & Thierry Pitois, ?Adoption et homosexualité: analyse critique de l?arrêt du Conseil
d?État du 9 octobre 1996?, in: D. Borrillo (ed.), Homosexualités et droit. De la tolérance sociale à
la reconnassance juridique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France 1998, p. 139-150.
3* Borrillo 1997
Daniel Borrillo, `Les nouvelles formes de conjugalité: l'union des gais et lesbiennes en Espagne',
paper Paris-Nanterre, 1997.
3* Bosch 1991
F.W. Bosch, Bundesverfassungsgericht und nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft, in: 38 Zeitschrift
für das gesamte Familienrecht 1991, 1-8.
3* Boswell 1994
John Boswell, Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe, New York: Villard, 1994.
3* Bowler e.a. 1994
J. Bowler e.a., Living Together Precedents, second edition, Sweet & Maxwell, 1994.
3* Bradley 1986
D. Bradley, The development of a legal status for unmarried cohabitation in Sweden, in: 18
Anglo-American Law Review 1986, 322-334.
3* Bradley 1987
D. Bradley, Homosexuality and child custody in English law, in: 1 International Journal of Law and
the Family 1987, 155-205.
3* Bradley 1999
D. Bradley, ?Convergence in family law. Mirrors, transplants and political economy?, MJ 1999, p.
127-150.
3* Brown 1995
Jennifer G. Brown, Competitive Federalism and the Legislative Incentives to Recognize SameSex Marriages, 68 Southern California Law Review 1995, 745-839.
3* Brown 1996
Jennifer Gerarda Brown, ?Extraterritorial Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage: When Theory
Confronts Praxis?, 16 QLR 1 (1996).
3* Brudermüller 1994
Gerd Brudermüller, Wohnungszuweisung bei Beendigung einer nichtehelichen
Lebensgemeinschaft?, in: 41 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1994, 207-216.
3* Bruns 1996
Manfred Bruns, `Art. 6 I GG und gesetzliche Regelungen für gleichgeschlechtliche
Lebensgemeinschaften', 29 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1996, 6-10.
3* Bull 1986
K.S. Bull, Non-marital Cohabitation in Norway, in: 30 Scandinavian Studies in Law 1986, 29-48.
3* Burnette 1999
Brian Burnette, ?Hawaii's reciprocal beneficiaries act. An effective step in resolving the
controversy surrounding same-sex marriage?, Brandeis Journal of Family Law 1999, p. 81-96.
3* Burton 1995
Anne Burton, `Gay Marriage - a Modern Proposal: Applying Baehr v Lewin to the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rigths', 3 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 1995, 177-207.
3* Butler 1998
Charles J. Butler, ?The defense of marriage act. Congress use of narrative in the debate over
same-sex marriage?, New York University Law Review 1998, p. 841-879.
3* Butler 1998/9
Andrew Butler, 'Same-sex marriage and freedom from discrimination in New Zealand', Public Law
1998/9, p. 396-406.
3* Calais-Auloy 1988
Marie-Thérèse Calais-Auloy, Pour un mariage aux effets limités, in: 87 Revue trimestrielle du
droit civil 1988, 255-266.
3* Cantero 1989/90
Gabriel Garcia Cantero, Spain: Artificial insemination and other matters, in: 28 Journal of Family
Law 1989/90, 614-618.
3* Cantero 1991/92
G.G. Cantero, Spain: discrimination, status and choice, in: 30 Journal of Family Law 1991/92,
403-407.
3* Chambers 1996
David L. Chambers, What if? The legal consequences of marriage and the legal needs of lesbian
and gay male couples, 95 Michigan Law Review 1996, p. 447-491.
3* Chambers 1997
David L. Chambers, ?Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage?, 26 Hofstra L. Rev. 53 (Fall 1997).
3* Christensen 1998
Craig W. Christensen, 'If Not Marriage? On Securing Gay and Lesbian Family Values by a
"Simulacrum of Marriage"', 66 Fordham Law Review 1998, p. 1699.
3* Coester-Waltjen 1988
Dagmar Coester-Waltjen, Die Lebensgemeinschaft - Strapazierung des Parteiwillens oder
staatliche Bevormundung?, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 1988, 2085-2090.
3* Cox 1996
Barbara J. Cox, ?Same-Sex Marriage and the Public Policy Exception in Choice-of-Law: Does It
Really Exist??, 16 QLR 61 (1996).
3* D'Amato 1995
Anthony Dominic D'Amato, Conflict of Laws Rules and the Interstate Recognition of Same-Sex
Marriages, in: University of Illinois Law Review 1995, 911.
3* Daniel 1990
Michael Daniel, Spouses, cohabitees, their home and lenders, in: Family Law 1990, 445-447.
3* Diederichsen 1988
Uwe Diederichsen, Rechtsprobleme der nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft, in: 35 Zeitschrift für
das gesamte Familienrecht 1988, 889-897.
3* Dijk Van 1992
P. van Dijk, Free movement of persons: towards European Citizenship, Netherlands Report on
Theme 3 of the 15th FIDE Colloquium, in: SEW 1992, 277-307.
3* Dimski 1995
Andrea Dimski, `Gleichberechtigung für homosexuelle Eltern?', Zeitschrift für Europäisches
Privatrecht 1995, 465-481.
3* Duffy 2000
S.P. Duffy, 'Pushing the states on gay unions: Vermont law will lead to suits elsewhere,
advocates say', Nat'l L. J.,december 4, 2000, p. 1.
3* Dumon 1990
W. Dumon, Family policy in the EEC countries: a general overview, in: Family policy in EEC
countries, W. Dumon (ed.), Office for Official Publications of the EC, Luxemburg 1990, p. 351369.
3* Dupuis 1995
Martin D. Dupuis, `The Impact of Culture, Society and History on the Legal Process: an Analysis
of the Legal Status of Same-Sex Relationships in the United States and Denmark', 9 International
Journal of Law and the Family 1995, 86.
3* Eckols 1999
Linda S. Eckols, ?The marriage mirage. The personal and social identity implications of samegender matrimony?, Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 1999, p. 353.
3* Eekelaar & Nhlapo 1999
J. Eekelaar & T. Nhlapo (eds.), The changing family. Family forms and family law, Oxford: Hart
Publishing 1999.
3* Eekelaar 1998
John Eekelaar, 'In practice. Registered same-sex partnerships and marriages. A statistical
comparison?, Family Law 1998, p. 561.
3* Ehmann 1988
K. Ehmann, Die nichteheliche Lebensgemeinscahft, Heidelberg: 1988.
3* Eichler 2000
M. Eichler, 'Contemporary and historical diversity in families. Comment on Turcotte's and Smart's
papers', Canadian Journal of Family Law 2000, p. 54-61.
3* Elman 2000
R.A. Elman, ?The Limits of Citizenship: Migration, Sex Discrimination and Same-Sex Partners in
EU Law?, J. Common Market Studies 729, december 2000.
3* Enkelaar & Rood-de Boer 1987
C.C.M. Enkelaar & M. Rood-de Boer, 'Family relations and modern medicine', in: P.H.M. Gerver,
E.H. Hondius and G.J.W. Steenhof (eds.), Netherlands reports to the twelfth international
congress of comparative law, Sydney-Melbourne 1986, The Hague 1987, T.M.C. Asser Instituut,
p. 137-158.
3* Eskridge & Calhoun 1998
William N. Eskridge Jr & Cheshire Calhoun, ?The case for same-sex marriage. From sexual
liberty to civilized commitment?, Journal of Homosexuality 1998, p. 102-106.
3* Eskridge 2000
W.N. Eskridge, 'Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate: A Step-by-Step Approach
Toward State Recognition', 31 McGeorge L. Rev. 641, 2000.
3* Estin 1997
Ann Laquer Estin, When Baehr Meets Romer: Family Law Issues After Amendment 2, 68
University of Colorado Law Review 1997, 349.
3* Estin 1997
Ann Laquer Estin, When Baehr Meets Romer: Family Law Issues After Amendment 2, 68
University of Colorado Law Review 1997, 349.
3* Estrada Alonso 1986
E. Estrada Alonso, Las uniones extra-matrimoniales en el derecho civil español, Madrid: 1986.
3* Eyrich 1990
H. Eyrich, Nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft - eine Aufgabe für den Gesetzgeber?, in: Zeitschrift
für Rechtspolitik 1990, 139-143.
3* Fajer 1997
Marc A. Fajer, ?Toward respectful representation. Some thoughts on selling same-sex marriage?,
Yale Law & Policy Review 1997, p. 599-628.
3* Fawcett 1990
M. Fawcett, Taking the Middle Path: Recent Swedish Legislation Grants Minimal Property Rights
to Unmarried Cohabitants, in: 24 Family Law Quarterly 1990, 179-202
3* Fineman 1995
Martha A. Fineman, The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century
tragedies, New York/London: Routledge, 1995.
3* Florand 1994
Jean-Marc Florand, `Les conséquences de l'homosexualité en matière de divorce et d'attribution
de l'autorité parentale', Actes du colloque `Homosexualité, droit et libertés' tenua à l'Assemblée
Nationale le 22 octobre 1993, Les Petites Affiches (no 95) 10 août 1994, 17-20.
3* Forder 1995
Caroline J. Forder, Legal Establishment of the Parent-Child Relationship: Constitutional Principles,
diss. Maastricht, (eigen beheer) 1995.
3* Forder 1998
C. Forder, 'The Anti-discrimination Principle as a Instrument of Change in Family Law'.
Netherlands International Law Review 1998/1, p. 29-64.
3* Forder 1999
C. Forder, Civil Law Aspects of Emerging Forms of Registered Partnerships, Den Haag:
Ministerie van Justitie 1999.
3* Forder 2000
C. Forder, '(R)evolution in Family Law Relationships', MJ 2000, p. 1-9.
3* Frank & McEneaney 1999
David John Frank & Elizabeth H. McEneaney, ?The individualization of society and the
liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984-1995?, Social Forces 1999, p.
911-944.
3* Freeman 1998
Michael Freeman, ?How should an English court respond to a same-sex union??, International
Family Law 1998, p. 99.
3* Gallanis 1999
T.P. Gallanis, 'Default Rules, Mandatory Rules, and the Movement for Same-Sex Equality', 60
Ohio St. L. J. 1513 (1999).
3* Gautier 1991
Pierre-Yves Gautier, Les couples internationaux de concubins, in: 80 Revue critique du droit
international privé 1991, 525-539.
3* Gautier 1992
Pierre-Yves Gautier, L'union libre en droit international privé, in: Le droit de la famille en Europe Son évolution depuis l'antiquité jusqu'a nos jours, R. Ganghofer (réd.), Strasbourg: Presses
Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1992, 773-781.
3* Gavigan 1998
Shelley Gavigan, 'Legal form, family norms, gender norms: What is a spouse?', paper for
conference 'Gender, sexuality and law', Keele, 19-21 June 1998.
3* Goldberg-Hiller 1998
Jon Goldberg-Hiller, 'The status of status: Reciprocal beneficiaries, domestic partnership, and
alternatives to same-sex marriage', paper for conference 'Gender, sexuality and law', Keele, 1921 June 1998.
3* Grant 1996
Brenda Grant, `Homosexual Marriage and the Constitution', 12 South African Journal of Human
Rights 1996, 568.
3* Graupner 1995
Helmut Graupner, On the Right to Love - Gay and Lesbian Legal Studies, paper for the
conference `Identity and Future of Gay and Lesbian Studies, Zeist, 3-5 July 1995.
3* Graversen 1987/88
J. Graversen, Denmark: Legislation on surrogat maternity and other developments, in: 26
Journal of Family Law 1987/88, 59-67.
3* Graycar & Millbanks 2000
R. Graycar & J. Millbanks, 'The bride wore pink? to the Property (Relationships) Legislation
Amendment Act 1999. Relationships law reform in New South Wales', Canadian Journal of
Family Law 2000, p. 227-282.
3* Green 1995
L. Green, `Why liberals should support same-sex marriage', Journal of Social Philosophy 1995,
winte
3* Grib 1996
Susanne Grib, Die gleichgeschlechtliche Partnerschaft im nordischen und deutschen Recht, Diss.
Kiel, Neuried: Ars Una, 1996.
3* Gridel 1995
Jean Pierre Gridel, `Est necessairement contraire à l'ordre public la pretention de soustraire un
enfant aux effets legaux de sa filiation etablie' (arrêt 9 mars 1994), Receuil Dalloz Sirey de
doctrine, de jurisprudence et de legislation 1995, 275-277.
3* Griffin 1997
Andrew Griffin, ?Another Case, Another Clause ? Same-sex Marriage, Full Faith and Credit and
the U.S. Supreme Court?s Evolving Gay Rights Agenda?, Public Law 1997, p. 315-327.
3* Grosse 1991
M.C. Grosse, Freie römische Ehe und nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft, ....: Pfaffenweiler, 1991.
UvA
3* Grziwotz 1992
Herbert Grziwotz, Praktische Rechtsfragen des nichtehelichen Zusammenlebens, München: C.H.
Beck, 1992.
3* Grziwotz 1992
H. Grziwotz, Partnerschaftsvergrag für die nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft, München: 1992.
3* Haddock & Polsby 1996
David D. Haddock & Daniel D. Polsby, `Family As a Rational Classification', 74 Washington
University Law Quarterly 1996, 15-373 p. nlg 140 [economic arguments for same-sex marriage]
3* Halvorsen 1998
R. Halvorsen, ?The ambiguity of lesbian and gay marriages. Change and continuity in the
symbolic order?, Journal of Homosexuality 1998, p. 207-231.
3* Halvorsen & Prieur 1996
Rune Sander Halvorsen & Annick Prieur, `Le Droit à l'indifférence: le mariage homosexuel', Actes
de la recherche en sciences sociales (no. 113) juin 1996, 6-15.
3* Hamilton and Standley 1994
Carolyn Hamilton and Kate Standley, Family Law in Europe, Butterworths, London 1994.
(isbn 0406 01308 x - GBP 75)
3* Hamilton and Standley 1995
Family Law in Europe, C. Hamilton and K. Standley (eds.), London: Butterworth, 1995.
(isbn 0406 01308 x - GBP 75), 452 p.
3* Hansen & Jørgensen 1993
Bent Hansen & Henning Jørgensen, The Danish Partnership Law: Political decision making in
Denmark and the National Danish Organization for Gays and Lesbians, in: A. Hendriks, R.
Tielman and E. van der Veen (eds.), The Third Pink Book, Buffalo, New York: Promotheus Books,
1993, 86-99.
3* Hansen 1972
T.L. Hansen, Domestic relations -- Minnesota marriage statute does not permit marriage between
two persons of the same sex and does not violate constitutionally protected rights, in: 22 Drake
Law Review (1972) 206-212. [Discussion of Baker v. Nelson, 291 Minn. 310, 191 N.W.2d 185
(1971). Appellants, applicants for a marriage license, were denied their request that a license be
issued to them on the sole ground that they were of the same sex (male). The court held that the
statute does not offend the first, eighth, ninth, or fourteenth amendments]
3* Hansen & Jørgensen 1992
Bent Hansen & Henning Jørgensen, The law providing for partnership for gay men and
lesbians in Denmark. Political decision making in Denmark and the National Danish
Organization for Gays and Lesbians ("LBL"), paper 19 November 1992.
3* Harper and Clifton 1973
J.W. Harper and G.W. Clifton, Heterosexuality; a prerequisite to marriage in Texas? Examines
the validity of a marriage entered into by persons of the same sex, viz, a homosexual marriage,
under state and federal constitutional and statutory provisions, discusses whether the right to
marry be denied solely because the parties are of the same sex, surveys existing laws on the
validity of a homosexual marriage, in: 14 South Texas Law Journal (1973) 220-277.
3* Harvard Law Review 1996
`In sickness and in health, in Hawaii and where else?: Conflict of laws and recognition of samesex marriages', Editorial, 109 Harvard Law Review 1996, 2038-2055.
3* Haskey and Kiernan 1990
John Haskey and Kathleen Kiernan, Cohabitation: some demographic statistics, in: Family Law
1990, 442-444.
3* Hausmann 1989
R. Hausmann, Nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften und Vermögensausgleich, München: 1989.
3* Hayton 1998
D. Hayton, European Succession Laws, Jordans 1998. (399 p.)
3* Heide-Jørgensen 1996
Lise Heide-Jørgensen, `An Expansion of Fundamental Rights or an Erosion of Traditional Values?
A Review Essay' (about B. Verschraegen, Gleichgeschlechtliche `Ehen'), 3 Maastricht Journal of
European and Comparative Law 1996, 184-202.
3* Henaghan 1998
Mark Henaghan, ?Same-Sex Marriages in the Court of Appeal?, New Zealand Law Journal 1998,
p. 40?
3* Henson 1993
D.M. Henson, Comparative analysis of same-sex partnership protections: recommendations for
American reform, in: 7 International Journal of Law and the Family 1993, 282-313.
3* Hertz 1998
Frederick Hertz, Legal affairs. Essential advice for same-sex couples, New York: Henry Holt & Co.
1998.
3* Hervey 1995
Tamara K. Hervey, A gendered perspective on the right to family life in European Community Law,
in: The European Union and Human Rights, N.A. Neuwahl and A. Rosas (eds.), The
Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1995, 221-234.
3* Hervey 19xx
Tamara K. Hervey, ?Migrant workers and their families in the European Union?, in J. Shaw an G.
Mare (eds.) New Legal Dynamics of European Union, isbn 0-19-825980-8
3* Hickman 1999
Larry A. Hickman, ?Symposium. Making the family functional. The case for legalized same-sex
domestic partnerships?, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1999, p. 231-247.
3* Hixson 1997
Thomas S. Hixson, ?Public and private recognition of the families of lesbians and gay men?, 5
American University Journal of Gender & the Law 1997, p. ?.
3* Holland 2000
W. Holland, 'Intimate relationships in the new millennium. The assimilation of marriage and
cohabitation?', Canadian Journal of Family Law 2000, p. 114-168.
3* Houlgate 1998
Laurence D. Houlgate, 'Must the Personal be Political? Family Law and the Concept of Family',
12 International Journal of Law, Policy & the Family 1998, p. 107.
3* Hovermill 1994
Joseph W. Hovermill, A conflict of laws and morals: the choice of law implications of Hawaii's
recognition of same-sex marriages, in: 53 Maryland Law Review 1994, 4503* Howard-Hassmann 2001
R.E. Howard-Hassmann, ?Gay Rights and the Right to a family: Conflicts Between Liberal and
Illiberal Belief Systems?, Human Rights Quarterly 2001, no. 1, p. 73-95.
3* Hughes 1998
Heather Lauren Hughes, ?Same-sex marriage and simulacra. Exploring conceptions of equality?,
Harvard Civil Rights 1998, p. 237-252.
3* Ihara/Warner/Dzierma 1990
T. Ihara, R. Warner, M. Dzierma, Ehe ohne Trauschein - Ein Rechtsratgeber, .... BRD 1990.
3* Jackson 1990
Jacqui Jackson, People who live together should put their affairs in order, in: Family Law 1990,
439-441
3* Jackson 1991
Jacqui Jackson, Reform of the law relating to cohabitation, in: Family Law 1991, 294-295.
3* Jacobs 1996
Daniel J. Jacobs, `Same-Sex Marriages: A Selective Bibliography of Legal and Social Aspects',
51 Record of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York 1996, 6873* Jagert 1989
U. Jagert, Deliktsrechtliche Betrachtungen zur nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft aus der Sicht
des deutschen und des italienitschen Rechts, in: 53 Rabelszeitschrift 1989, 718-728.
3* Jamieson 1995
G. Jamieson, Parental responsibilities and rights, ....: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995.
isbn 0414010930
373 p.
nlg 140
3* Jayme 1990
E. Jayme, `Dänische Partnerschaftsgesetz und Internationales Privatrecht', IPrax 1990, 197
3* Jessurun d'Oliveira 2000
Hans Ulrich Jessurun d'Oliveira, 'Freedom of Movement of Spouses and Registered Partners in
the European Union', in: Jürgen Basedow et al., Private Law in the International Arena. From
National Conflict Rules Towards Harmonization and Unification. Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr,
T.M.C. Asser Press 2000, p. 527-543.
3* Johnson & Robbennolt 1998
Monica K. Johnson & Jennifer K. Robbennolt, ?Using social science to inform the law of intestacy.
The case of unmarried committed partners?, Law & Human Behavior 1998, p. 479.
3* Käser 1990
H.-M. Käser, Die nichteheliche ..., Tübingen: 1990.
3* Kingdom 1990
E. Kingdom, Cohabitation Contracts and Equality, in: 18 International Journal of the Sociology of
Law 1990, 287-298.
3* Knoche 1987
J. Knoche, Die Partner einer nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaf als `Familienangehörige',
München: 1987.
3* Knoche 1988
J. Knoche, Sind nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften im Privatrecht wie "Familien" zu
behandeln?, in: Monatschrift .... Deutsches Recht 1988, 743-745.
3* Knoche 1989
J. Knoche, Nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften im rechtlichen Vergleich mit "Familien", in: Das
Standesamt 1989, 40-45
3* Koppelman 1996
Andrew Koppelman, ?Same-Sex Marriage and Public Policy: The Miscegenation Precedents?, 16
QLR 105 (1996).
3* Koppelman 1998
Andrew Koppelman, ?Same-sex marriage, choice of law, and public policy?, Texas Law Review
1998, p. 921-1002.
3* Kramer 1996
Larry Kramer, ?The Public Policy Exception and the Problem of Extra-Territorial Recognition of
Same-Sex Marriage?, 16 QLR 153 (1996).
3* Kramer 1997
L. Kramer, ?Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy
exception?, The Yale Law Journal 1997, p. 1965-2008.
3* Krause 2000
H.D. Krause, 'Marriage for the New Millennium: Heterosexual, Same Sex - or Not at All?', 34
Fam.L.Q. 271 (Summer 2000).
3* Kreimer 1996
Seth F. Kreimer, ?Territoriality and Moral Dissensus: Thoughts on Abortion, Slavery, Gay
Marriage and Family Values?, 16 QLR 161 (1996).
3* Leonard 1994
Arthur S. Leonard, Lesbian and Gay Families and the law: A Progress Report, in: 21 Fordham
Urban Law Journal 1994, 9273* Leonard 1997
Arthur S. Leonard, ?Going for the Brass Ring: The Case for Same-Sex Marriage?, 82 Cornell L.
Rev. 572 (March 1997) (Review of Eskridge, The Case for Same-Sex Marriage).
3* Leonhardt 1990
P. Leonhardt, Die nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft in Rumänien, in: Das Standesamt 1990, 6167.
3* Lind 1995
Craig Lind, Sexual Orientation, Family Law and the Transnational Constitution, in: 112 South
African Law Journal 1995, 481-.....
3* Lindström 1996
Lindström, ..... 10, International Journal of Law and the Family 1996.
[about parenthood and migration]
3* Lødrup 1995
Peter Lødrup, Family law in Norway, in: Family Law in Europe, C. Hamilton and K. Standley
(eds.), London: Butterworth, 1995, ....
3* Luckey 1991
A. Luckey, Eheähnliche und sonstige Wohn- und Wirtschaftgemeinschaften im Recht der Sozialund Arbeitslosenhilfe, Neuwied, Berlin: Krittel.... 1991
3* Lund-Andersen 1990
I. Lund-Andersen, Moving towards an individual principle in Danish law, 4 International Journal of
Law and the Family 1990, 328-342.
3* Marnierre De la 1988
E.S. de la Marnierre, Un choix? Mariage ou concubinage, in: La Semaine Juridique 1988, nr.
3326.
3* Martiny 1998
Martiny, ??family law??, in: Towards a European civil code, Ars Aequi Libri: Nijmegen 1998;
Kluwer Law International: Den Haag 1998, tweede druk.
3* Maxwell 2000
N. Maxwell, Opening Civil Marriage to Same-Gender Couples: A Netherlands-United States
Comparison, vol 4.3 ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW, (November 2000),
http://law.kub.nl/ejcl/43/art43-1.html
3* Maxwell 2001
Nancy G. Maxwell, 'Taking the Side Exit in the United States' (Reflections on Frieda van Vliet's
'Side Exit to No Man's Land?'), Nemesis 2001 nr. 1, p. 14-22.
3* Maxwell, Mattijsen & Smith 1999
N.G. Maxwell, A. Mattijsen & C. Smith, ?Legal protection for all the children. Dutch-American
comparison of lesbian and gay parent adoptions?, vol 3.1 ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF
COMPARATIVE LAW, (August 1999), http://law.kub.nl/ejcl/31/art31-2.html
3* Mazaud-Lueder 1987
D. Mazaud-Lueder, Le concubinage d A à Z, Héricy: 1987.
3* McClain 1998
Linda C. McClain, ?Deliberative democracy, overlapping consensus, and same-sex marriage?,
Fordham Law Review 1998, p. 1241-1252.
3* Melton 1990/91
Rebecca L. Melton, Legal Rights of Unmarried Heterosexual and Homosexual Couples and
Evolving Definitions of `Family', Note, in: Journal of Family Law 1990/91, 497-517.
3* Meulders 1992
Marie-Thérèse Meulders, L'évolution du mariage et le sens de l'histoire: de l'institution au contrat,
et au-delà, in: Le droit de la famille en Europe - Son évolution depuis l'antiquité jusqu'a nos jours,
R. Ganghofer (réd.), Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1992, 215-23
3* Millbank 2000
J. Millbank & K. Sant, 'A Bride In Her Every-Day Clothes: Same Sex Relationship Recognition in
NSW', 22 Sydney L. Rev.181, juni 2000.
3* Miller 1998
D.H. Miller, Freedom to differ. The shaping of the gay and lesbian struggle for civil rights, New
York: New York University Press 1998.
3* Morgan 1993
Shaugn Morgan, Legal recognition of gay and lesbian relationships, in: Australasian Gay and
Lesbian Law Journal 3 (1993), p. 57-....
3* Mosikatsana 1996
Tshepo L. Mosikatsana, `The Definitional Exclusion of Gays and Lesbians from Family Status', 12
South African Journal of Human Rights 1996, 549.
3* Mossuz-Lavau 1991
J. Mossuz-Lavau, Les lois de l'amour, Paris: 1991.
UvA
3* Müller-Freinenfels 1987
W. Müller-Freinenfels, Cohabitation and marriage law - a comparative study, 1 International
Journal of Law and the Family 1987, 259-294
3* Münch 1991
E.M. von Münch, Zusammenleben ohne Trauschein, 4. Auflage, München: 1991.
3* Münch Von 1988
E.M. von Münch, Für eine gesetzliche Regelung rechtlicher Fragen nichtehelicher
Lebensgemeinschaften, in: Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1988, 327-330
3* Naegele 1987
W. Naegele, Lebensgemeinschaft ohne Trauschein, München: Planegg 1987.
3* Nielsen 1990
L. Nielsen, `Family rights and the "registered partnership" in Denmark', 4 International Journal of
Law and the Family 1990, 297-30
3* Nielsen 1992/93
Linda Nielsen, Denmark: New rules regarding marriage contracts and reform considerations
concerning children, in: 31 Journal of Family Law 1992/93, 309-317
3* Nordhues 1991
H.-G. Nordhues, `Ehe und Heterosexualität? Gedanken anläßlich des dänischen Gesetzes über
die Registrierung homosexueller Partnerschaften', DRiZ 1991, 1363* Nozari 1989
F. Nozari, The 1987 Swedish family law reform, in: 17 International Journal of Legal Information
1989, 219-232
3* Oberto 1993
G. Oberto, Partnerverträge in rechtsvergleichender Sicht unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des
italienischen Rechts, in: 40 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1993, 1-12
3* Oliveira d' 2000
D'Oliveira, 'Registered Partnerships, Pacses and Private International Law. Some reflections',
Riv.dir.int.priv.e.proc. 2000, p. 293-322. (verwijzing uit NJB 2001 nr 5, p. 209)
3* Pace 1996
Mark-Anthony Pace, `Sexual orientation in the process of European integration' and `Same-sex
marriage - a desirable option?', werkstukken UvA, Amsterdam 1996.
3* Pantazis 1997
Angelo Pantazis, ?An Argument for the Legal Recognition of Gay and Lesbian Marriage?, 114 S.
African L.J. pt. 3, 556 (1997).
3* Parry 1993
M.L. Parry, The law relating to cohabitation, Third Edition, London: 1993.
3* Paust 1992
S. Paust, Vermögensrechtliche Beziehungen der Partner einer nichtehelichen
Lebensgemeinschaft im spanischen, portugiesischen und latein-amerikanischen Recht, diss.
Regensburg 1991, Baden-Baden: Löw & Vorderwülbecke, 1992
3* Pedersen 1991/92
Marianne Hojgaard Pedersen, Denmark: Homosexual Marriages and New Rules Regarding
Separation and Divorce, 30 Journal of Family Law 1991/92, 289-293
3* Pierce 1995
Christine Pierce, Gay Marriage, in: 26 Journal of Social Philosophy 1995, .... (Fall)
3* Polikoff 1986
Nancy D. Polikoff, `Lesbian mothers, lesbian families: legal obstacles, legal challenges', 14 NYU
Review of Law and Social Change 1986, 907-91
3* Polikoff 1990
Nancy D. Polikoff, `This child does have two mothers: Redefining parenthood to meet the needs
of children in lesbian-mother and other nontraditional families', 78 Georgetown Law Journal 1990,
459-575
3* Polikoff 1991
Nancy D. Polikoff, `Educating judges about lesbian and gay parenting: a simulation', 1 Law &
Sexuality (A Review of Lesbian and Gay Legal Issues 1991, 173-237
3* Polikoff 1993
Nancy D. Polikoff, `We will get what we ask for: why legalizing gay and lesbian marriage will not
"dismantle the legal structure of gender in every marriage"', 79 Virginia Law Review 1993, 1535155
3* Polikoff 1996
Nancy D. Polikoff, `Breaking the link between biology and parental rights in planned lesbian and
gay families', paper, 1996
3* Polikoff 1996
Nancy D. Polikoff, `The deliberate construction of families without fathers: is it an option for
lesbian and heterosexual mothers', 36 Santa Clara Law Review 1996, 375-3
3* Polikoff 1996
Nancy D. Polikoff, `The social construction of parenthood in one planned lesbian family' (about
Thomas S. v. Robin Y), 22 NYU Review of Law and Social Change 1996, 203-21
3* Poll 1993
J. Poll, Die vermögensrechteliche Auseinandersetzung der nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft,
in: 40 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1993, 266-271.
3* Porter 2000
N.B. Porter, 'Marital Status Discrimination: A Proposal for Title VII Protection', 46 Wayne L. Rev.1
(spring 2000)
3* Pouliquen 1994
J.-P. Pouliquen, Contract d'union civile, le dossier: ou la volonté de faire aboutir le Contract
d'union civile, Paris: Humoeurs, 1994.
239 p.
3* Radau 1989
U. Radau, Die Gesetzgebung zu nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft in Schweden, in:
Monatschrift .... Deutsches Recht 1989, 703-706.
3* Rains 2000
R.E. Rains, 'The Evolving Status of Same-Sex Unions in Hawaii, Alaska, Vermont and
Throughout the United States', 1 Contemp. Issues in L. 71, 2000.
3* Reece 2000
H. Reece, 'The Development of Family Law in the Twentieth Century: Informed Reform or
Campaigns and Compromises?', 63 Modern L. Rev. 608, 2000.
3* Ritter 1979
G.P. Ritter Property Rights of a Same-sex Couple: The outlook after Marvin, in: 12 Loyola of Los
Angeles Law Review (1979) 409-423
3* Roberts 1992
Nicholas Roberts, Will drafting and property ownership - Bearing in mind cohabitees and lesbian
and gay couples, in: Family Law 1992, 77-80
3* Rubellin-Devichi 1988/89
Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi, France: More equality, more solidarity in family relationships, in: 27
Journal of Family Law 1988/89, 143-151.
3* Rubellin-Devichi 1989/90
Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi, France: The new principles of family law - liberty, equality, and
fraternity, in: 28 Journal of Family Law 1989/90, 491-494.
3* Rubellin-Devichi 1990/91
Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi, France: The child first and foremost and other family law
developments, in: 29 Journal of Family Law 1990/91, 359-369.
3* Rubellin-Devichi 1994
Jacqueline Rubellin-Devichi, `Les concubinages: mise à jour', Mélanges Huet-Weiller .... 1994,
389-414.
3* Saldeen 1987/88
A. Saldeen, Sweden: Reforms of marriage, inheritance and cohabitation proposed, in: 26 Journal
of Family Law 1987/88, 197-20
3* Saldeen 1988/89
A. Saldeen, Sweden: More rights for children and homosexuals, in: 27 Journal of Family Law
1988/89, 295-304
3* Schimmel ....
Roland Schimmel, Eheschliesungen gleichgeschlechtlich Paare, .....
3* Schopp 1990
H. Schopp, Nichteheliche Gemeinschaft und Moral, in: Monatschrift .... Deutsches Recht 1990,
99-102
3* Schuhmann 1993
H. Schuhmann, Die nichteheliche ..., Wiesbaden: 1993.
3* Schuijt 1998
G. Schuijt, ?Tolerantie gevraagd?, MediaForum 1998, p. 317.
3* Schweiwe 1994
Schweiwe, EC Law's Unequal Treatment of the Family: The Case-Law of the European Court of
Justice on Rules Prohibiting Discrimination on Grounds of Sex and Nationality, in Social and
Legal Studies 1994, 243-265.
A109
3* Schwenzer 1988
I. Schwenzer, Gesetzliche Regelung der Rechtsprobleme nichtehelicher Lebensgemeinschaften?,
in: Juristen Zeitung 1988, 781-789.
3* Schwimann 1987
M. Schwimann, Zur nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft im Österischen Zivilrecht, in: Das
Standesamt 1987, 309-310
3* Sharpe 1997
Andrew Neville Sharpe, ?The Transsexual and Marriage: Law?s Contradictory Desires?, 7
Australasian G. & Les. L. J. 1 (1997).
3* Shettle-Sutton 1995
A. Shettle-Sutton, `Immigration discrimination against lesbians', 15 ILIS Newsletter 1995, nr. 2, p.
10-11.
3* Silver 1996
Bradley Silver, `'Til Deportation Do Us Part: The Extension of Spousal Recognition to Same-Sex
Partnerships', South African Journal of Human Rights, 1996, p. 575-58
3* Silverman 1996
Linda J. Silverman, ?Can the Island of Hawaii Bind the World? A Comment on Same-Sex
Marriage and Federalism Values?, 16 QLR 191 (1996).
3* Silverstein 1972/73
Arthur J. Silverstein, Constitutional aspects of the homosexual's right to a marriage license, in: 12
Journal of Family Law 1972/73, 607-634.
3* Smart 2000
C. Smart, 'Stories of family life. Cohabitation, marriage and social change', Canadian Journal of
Family Law 2000, p. 20-53.
3* Spackman 1997
Paul L. Spackman, ?Grant v. South-West Trains: Equality for Same-Sex Partners in the
European Community?, 12 Am. U. J. Int?l. L. & Pol. 1063 (1997).
3* Sparkes 1989
Peter Sparkes, The Language of Cohabitation, in Family Law 1989, 328-329.
3* Spencer 1990
M. Spencer, 1992 and all that. Civil Liberties in the Balance, The Civil Liberties Trust, London
1990.
3* Stab 1988
U. Stab, Was ist eine nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft?, in: Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 1988,
355-35.
3* Steffen 1991
Th. Steffen, Nichteheliche ... in England und Deutschland, Mainz: 1991.
3* Stojanowska 1988/89
Wanda Stojanowska, Poland: Cohabitation, in: 27 Journal of Family Law 1988/89, 275-280.
3* Storey 1990
Storey, The Right to Family Life and Immigration Case-Law at Strasbourg, in: 38 International
and Comparative Law Quarterly 1990, 328 - 344.
3* Strasser 1997
Mark Strasser, ?Statutory Construction, Equal Protection, and the Amendment Process: On
Romer, Hunter, and Efforts to Tame Baehr?, 45 Buffalo L. Rev. 739 (Fall 1997).
3* Strasser 1998
Mark Strasser, ?Natural law and same-sex marriage?, DePaul Law Review 1998, p. 51.
3* Strasser 2000
M. Strasser, ?The Privileges of National Citizenship: On Saenz, Same-Sex Couples, and the
Right to Travel?, Rutgers L. Rev. 553, (Winter 2000).
3* Strasser 2000
M. Strasser, 'Loving in the New Millennium: On Equal Protection and the Right to Marry', 7 U. Chi.
L. Sch. Roundtable 61, 2000.
3* Strasser 2000
M. Strasser, 'Loving, Baehr, and the Rights to Marry: On Legal Argumentation and Sophistical
Rhetoric', 24 Nova L. Rev. 769, (Spring 2000).
3* Strätz 1988
H.-W.Strätz, Ein italienischer Gesetzesvorschlag zur Regelung des nichtehelichen
Zusammenlebens, in: 35 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1988, 897-902.
3* Sullivan 1996
Andrew Sullivan, ?Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage?, 16 QLR 13 (1996).
3* Sullivan 1997
Andrew Sullivan (ed.), Same-sex Marriage: Pro and Con. A Reader, New York: Vintage, 1997.
3* Sutton 1980
S.A. Sutton, The Lesbian Family: Rights in conflict under the California Uniform Parentage Act, in:
10 Golden Gate University Law Review (1980) 1007-1041.
3* Szl_zak 1991
A. Szl_zak, Cohabitation without marriage in Poland, in: 5 International Journal of Law and the
Family 1991, 1-12.
3* Tasker and Golombok 1991
F.L. Tasker and S. Golombok, Children Raised by Lesbian Mothers. The Empirical Evidence, in:
Family Law 1991, p. 184-187.
3* Tegge 1983
A. Tegge, Die nichteheliche ... im Mietrecht, Göttingen: 1983.
3* Vaskovics e.a. 1990
L.A. Vaskovics e.a., Optionen der Elternschaft under der Lebensgestaltung in nichtehelichen
Lebensgemeinschaften, Bamberg: Universität, 1990.
3* Veitch 1976
.. Veitch, The Essence of Marriage - A Comment on the Homosexual Challenge, in: AngloAm.L.Rev. 1976, 41.
3* Verschraegen 1994
Bea Verschraegen, Gleichgeschlechtliche `Ehen', Wien: Medien und Recht Verlags, 1994.
3* Vlaardingerbroek 1999
P. Vlaardingerbroek, ?Changing family forms and the law of succession?, Tilburg Foreign Law
Review 1999, p. 347.
3* VosDe 1997
Pierre de Vos, Same-sex marriage, the right to equality, and the South African Constitution, 11
SA Publiekreg/Public Law 1997, 355-382.
3* Waaldijk 1998
Kees Waaldijk, Towards full equality in Dutch law for same-sex partners and their children, COC
Information Brochure 6, Amsterdam: Dutch Association for the Integration of Homosexuality COC
1998 (4 p.).
3* Waaldijk 2000
K. Waaldijk, 'Civil developments. Patterns of reform in the legal position of same-sex partners in
Europe', Canadian Journal of Family Law 2000, p. 62-88.
3* Waaldijk 2001
K. Waaldijk, 'Small Change: How the Road to Same-Sex Marriage Got Paved in the Netherlands',
in: Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenæs (eds.), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnership. A
Study of National, European and International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2001, p. 437-464
(see: http://www.hart.oxi.net/bookdetails.asp?id=223&bnd=1).
3* Waaldijk 2001
K. Waaldijk, 'Towards the Recognition of Same-Sex Partners in European Union Law:
Expectations Based on Trends in National Law', in: Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenæs (eds.),
Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnership. A Study of National, European and International
Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2001, p. 635-651 (see:
http://www.hart.oxi.net/bookdetails.asp?id=223&bnd=1).
3* Waaldijk 1999
?Towards equality in the freedom of movement of persons?, in: K. Krickler (ed.), After Amsterdam:
Sexual Orientation and the European Union. A Guide, Brussels: ILGA-Europe (the European
Region of the International Lesbian and Gay Association) 1999, p. 40-49
(http://www.steff.suite.dk/Amsterdam_english.pdf).
3* Waaldijk 1999
'Vers l'égalité en matière de libre circulation des personnes', in: K. Krickler (dir.). L'après
Amsterdam: l'Union européenne et l'orientation sexuelle. Guide, Bruxelles: ILGA-Europe (la
régionale européenne de l'International Lesbian and Gay Association) 1999, p. 45-55
(http://www.steff.suite.dk/Amsterdam_french.pdf).
3* Waaldijk 1999
'Gleichstellung beim freien Personenverkehr', in: K. Krickler (Hrsg.), Nach Amsterdam: Sexuelle
Orientierung und die Europäische Union. Ein Leitfaden, Brüssel: ILGA-Europa (Europäische
Regionalverband der International Lesbian and Gay Association) 1999, p. 45-56
(http://www.steff.suite.dk/Amsterdam_german.pdf).
3* Waaldijk 1999
'Hacia la igualdad en la libre circulación de personas', in: K. Krickler (ed.), La orientación sexual y
la Unión Europea tras el Tratado de Amsterdam. Guía, Bruselas: ILGA-Europa (la región europea
de la Asociación Internacional de Gais y Lesbianas) 1999, p. 45-55
(http://www.steff.suite.dk/Amsterdam_spanish.pdf).
3* Waaldijk 1998/1999
?La libre circulation des partenaires de même sexe?, in: D. Borrillo (dir.) Homosexualités et droit.
De la tolérance sociale à la reconnaissance juridique, Paris: Presses Universitaire de France
1998, p. 205-226; idem, 2me édition 1999, p. 210-230.
3* Waaldijk 1996
?Free Movement of Same-Sex Partners?, 3 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative
Law 1996, p. 271-285.
3* Wacke 1990
A. Wacke, Die Registrierung homosexueller Partnerschaften in Dänemark, in: 37 Zeitschrift für
das gesamte Familienrecht 1990, 347-351.
3* Wakkary 2000
A. Wakkary, 'Assessing the impact of changing marital rights and obligations. Practical
considerations', Canadian Journal of Family Law 2000, p. 200-226.
3* Wardle 1996a
Lynn D. Wardle, `International Marriage Recognition: A World Dilemma', in: N. Lowe and G.
Douglas (eds.), Families Across Frontiers, The International Society of Family Law (Cardiff
conference 1994), The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996, p. 75-8.
3* Wardle 1996b
Lynn D. Wardle, A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for Same-Sex Marriage, Brigham
Young University Law Review 1996, 1-101
[extensive bibliography].
3* Wedgwood 1997
Ralph Wedgwood, `Same-Sex Marriage: A philosphical defence', IAP lectures, January 1997,
notes.
3* Wellington 1995
Adrian A. Wellington, Why Liberals Should Support Same Sex Marriage, in: 26 Journal of Social
Philosophy 1995, .... (Winter).
3* Wiggins 2000
J. Wiggins, 'Marriage Law and Family Law: Autonomy, Interdependence and Couples of the
Same Gender', 61 Boston Coll. L. Rev. 265 (March 2000).
3* Wilker 1989
M. Wilker, Die vertragliche Gestaltung nichtehelichen Zusammenlebens durch
`Parnervereinbarung', diss. Bielefeld: 1989.
3* Wintemute 1994
Robert Wintemute, Sexual Orientation Discrimination as Sex Discrimination: Same-Sex Couples
and the Charter in Mossop, Egan and Layland, in: 39 McGill Law Journal 1994, 429-478.
3* Wintemute 1995
Robert Wintemute, Discrimination Against Same-Sex Couples: Sections 15(1) and 1 of the
Charter: Egan v. Canada, in: 74 The Canadian Bar Review 1995, 682-713.
3* Wolfson 1996
Evan Wolfson, ?The Freedom to Marry: Our Struggle for the Map of the Country?, 16 QLR 209
(1996).
3* Zevkliler 1989
A. Zevkliler, Nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaft nach deutschen und türkischen Recht,
Würzburg/Altenberg: 1989.
Vredespaleis 260 I 35
3* Zicklin 1995
Gilbert Zicklin, Deconstructing Legal Rationality: The Case of Lesbian and Gay Family
Relationships, in: 21 Marriage & Family Review 1995, 55-7.
3< Empfiehlt es sich, die rechtlichen Fragen der nichtehelichen Lebensgemeinschaft gesetzlich
zu regeln?, Verhandlungen des 57. Deutschen Juristentages, Band 2, T.I.
3* Lengsfeld (Hrsg.) 1987
W. Lengsfeld (Hrsg.), Nichteheliche Lebensgemeinschaften, Wiesbaden: 1987.
3* Blaurock (Hrsg.) 1989
U. Blaurock (Hrsg), Entwicklungen im Recht der Familie und der außerehelichen
Lebensgemeinschaft, Frankfurt a.M.: 1989.
(in bezug auf Schweden und Deutschland)
3* Limbach (Hrsg.) 1988
J. Limbach (Hrsg.) Familie ohne Ehe, Frankfurt a.M./München: 1988.
3= The legality of homosexual marriage 1973
Comment: The legality of homosexual marriage, in: 82 Yale Law Journal (1973) 573-589.
[Examines the constitutionality of restricting marriage licenses to heterosexual pairs under the
equal protection doctrine.]
3= "Homosexuals"right to marry" 1979
`Homosexuals' right to marry: a constitutional test and a legislative solution', 128 University of
Pennsylvania Law Review 1979, 193-216.
[advocating a `quasi-marital status']
3= Anonymus 1980
Developments - The Family, in: 93 Harvard Law Review (1980) 1159.
[p. 1283-1289: Homosexual Marriage]
3= Anonymus 1980
Homosexual Marriage, paragraph IV.C.3(a) of "Developments - The Family", in: 93 Harvard Law
Review 1980, 1283-1289.
3= Anonymus 1983
Immigration - Aliens - The Invalidation of a Homosexual Marriage for Immigration Purposes,
Adams v. Howerton, 673 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir. 1982) in: 7 Suffolk Transnational Law Journal
(1983) 267.
[marriage between two men, but later by judge declared illegal]
3= Concubinages dans le monde 1990
Des concubinages dans le monde, Paris: 1990.
3= Concubinages en Europe 1989
Les conbubinages en Europe. Aspects socio-juridiques, J. Rubellin-Devichi (réd.), Paris: 1989.
3= Evolution des politiques familiales
Evolution des politiques familiales dans les Etas membres de l'Union Européenne, W. Dumon
(ed.), Louvain/Bruxelles: Observatoir Européen des Politques Familiales Nationales /
Commission des Communautés Européennes, DG V, 1994.
3= Family Law 1992
Family Law, Volume II: Cohabitation, Marriage and Divorce, H.D. Krause (ed.), The International
Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing company, 1992.
3= Family policy in EEC countries
Family policy in EEC countries, W. Dumon (ed.), Office for Official Publications of the EC,
Luxemburg 1990.
isbn 92 826 0340 7
3= Homosexual "Marriage"in Scandinavia 1993
Homosexual `Marriage' in Scandinavia, in: 22 Planned Parenthood in Europe 1993, 1, p. 14-15.
3= Intercountry Adoptions 1994
Intercountry Adopitons - Laws and Perspectives of `Sending' Countries, Eliezer D. Jaffe (ed.),
The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994.
3= Kolloquium Europäische Familien-Charta 1987
Kolloquium europäische Familien-Charta, Dokumentation, 4.-5. November 1987, Europarat Strassburg, veranstaltet von der Europäischen Region der IUFO mit Unterstützung des
Europarates, z.p. z.j.
3= Law and the politics of marriage 1998
?Symposium. Law and the politics of marriage: Loving v. Virginia after thirty years?, Howard Law
Journal, no. 2, 1998.
3= Lesben - Schwulen - Standesamt 1991
Lesben. Schwule. Standesamt. Die Debatte um die Homoehe, Klaus Laabs (Hrsg.), Berlin: 1991.
3= Living Together? 1994
Living Together? Spell your rights, London: Justice, 1994.
3= Priciples of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations
Philadelphia: American Law Institute 2000.
3= Schwule Väter 1988
Schwule Väter - Erfahrungen, Polemiken, Ratschläge, Gerd Büntzly (Hrsg.), .... BRD 1988.
3= Sexual and Reproductive Rights in International Law 1998
Sexual and Reproductive Rights in International Law, Symposium, 67 Nordic Journal of
International Law 1998, p.1
3= Should the Government Recognize Same-Sex Marriage? 2000
Session One: Social, Cultural and Philosophical Issues, with the following participants: Rev.
Gregory Dell, Dwight Duncan, Hannah Garber-Paul, Martha Nussbaum, Vincent Samar and
Rabbi Arnold Wolf, and Session Two: Legal, Equitable and Political Issues, with the following
participants: Teresa Stanton Collett, David Orgon Coolidge, George Dent, Andrew Koppelman,
Mark Strasser and Cass Sunstein, University of Chicago Law School Roundtable, vol. 7 2000, 132 & 33-60.
Zie over dit symposium ook M.Strasser, Loving in the New Millennium: On Equal Protection and
the Right to Marry, 7 U. Chi. L. Sch. Roundtable 61, 2000.
3= Single Parent Families 1995
Single Parent Families, Proceedings of the conference single parent families Amsterdam 1994, A.
van der Avoort e.a. (ed.), The Hague: Netherlands Family Council, 1995.
3= The definition of marriage precludes permitting marriage of same-sex couples 1974
Comment: The definition of marriage precludes permitting marriage of same-sex couples, in: 10
Gonzaga Law Review (1974) 292-297.
[Discussion of Singer v. Hara, 11 Wash.App. 247, 522 P.2d 1187 (1974). Homosexual marriages,
both males, are not authorized by either Washington marriage statute, the Washington ERA, or
the eighth, ninth or fourteenth amendments.]
3= The definition of marriage precludes permitting marriage of same sex couples 1974
The definition of marriage precludes permitting marriage of same-sex couples, in: 10 Gonzaga
Law Review 1974, 292-297.
3= The invalidation of a Homosexual Marriage for Immigration Purposes 1983
`Immigration - Aliens - The invalidation of a homosexual marriage for immigration purposes,
Adams v. Howerton, 673 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir. 1982)', 7 Suffolk Transnational Law Journal 1983,
267....