The joys of analyzing aggregate linguistic data

The joys of analyzing aggregate linguistic data

The joys of analyzing aggregate linguistic data
Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, University of Freiburg
<[email protected]>
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Analytic vs synthetic coding of grammatical information: text-type variability
4. Corpus-based dialectometry
5. Probabilistic grammars in aggregate comparison
6. Conclusion
References
Software
RuG/L04: software for dialectometrics and cartography. Peter Kleiweg. Available online at:
http://www.let.rug.nl/~kleiweg/L04/.
SplitsTree4. Daniel Huson and David Bryant. Available online at: http://www.splitstree.org/.
Secondary Sources
Biber, Douglas. 2003. Compressed noun-phrase structure in newspaper discourse: the competing demands of
popularization vs. economy. In New Media Language, eds. J. Aitchison and D.M. Lewis, 169-181. London/New
York: Longman.
Danchev, Andrei. 1992. The evidence for analytic and synthetic developments in English. In History of Englishes: New
Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, eds. Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen
and Irma Taavitsainen, 25-41. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goebl, Hans. 1982. Dialektometrie: Prinzipien und Methoden des Einsatzes der Numerischen Taxonomie im Bereich der
Dialektgeographie. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1960. A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of language. International Journal of
American Linguistics 26:178-194.
Hernández, Nuria. 2006. User's Guide to FRED. Available online: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/248.
Freiburg: English Dialects Research Group.
Hinrichs, Lars, and Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English
genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11:437–
474.
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1836. Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die
geistige Entwicklung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: Dümmler.
Kruskal, Joseph B., and Wish, Myron. 1978. Multidimensional Scaling: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences.
Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation, and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Nerbonne, John. 2006. Identifying Linguistic Structure in Aggregate Comparison. Literary and Linguistic Computing
21:463-475.
Pampel, Fred. 2000. Logistic Regression. A Primer: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
Schlegel, August Wilhelm von. 1846. Oevres de M. Auguste Guillaume de Schlegel écrites en français. Leipzig:
Weidmann.
Séguy, Jean. 1971. La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Revue de Linguistique Romane 35:335357.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. Submitted. “Typological parameters of intralingual variability: grammatical analyticity vs.
syntheticity in varieties of English”. Available online: http://omnibus.uni-freiburg.de/~szmrecsa/omnibuslit/
Szmrecsanyi_submitted_AnaSyn.pdf.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Hernández, Nuria. 2007. Manual of Information to accompany the Freiburg Corpus of
English Dialects Sampler ("FRED-S"). Available online: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/2859.
Freiburg: English Dialects Research Group.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Hinrichs, Lars. 2008. Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written
English: a multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres. In The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation:
Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, eds. Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta and
Minna Korhonen. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Trudgill, Peter. The Dialects of England. Cambridge, MA, Oxford: Blackwell