SPECIAL REPORTS AND REVIEWS Pathophysiology and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia
Transcription
SPECIAL REPORTS AND REVIEWS Pathophysiology and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2004;127:1239 –1255 SPECIAL REPORTS AND REVIEWS Pathophysiology and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia JAN TACK, RAF BISSCHOPS, and GIOVANNI SARNELLI Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium yspeptic symptoms, defined as discomfort or pain in the upper part of the abdomen, occur very commonly in the general population. Epidemiologic surveys suggest that 15%–20% of the general population in Western countries experience dyspepsia over the course of 1 year.1,2 Despite the fact that only about 1 in 4 people with dyspeptic symptoms choose to consult a physician,1 dyspepsia is a clinical problem of considerable magnitude for the health care system due to the high prevalence and the chronic or recurrent nature of symptoms.3 Most of these patients have no identifiable cause of dyspepsia by standard diagnostic tests,4 which is referred to as functional dyspepsia. According to international consensus, the definition of functional dyspepsia is persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen without evidence of organic disease likely to explain the symptoms (Table 1).5 Discomfort refers to unpleasant sensations that the subject does not interpret as pain and may be characterized by upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloating, belching, or nausea. Furthermore, there is no relation between dyspeptic symptoms and bowel movements (i.e., irritable bowel syndrome does not explain the symptoms), and patients with predominant heartburn should be excluded.5 D The Dyspepsia Symptom Complex The symptom complex includes epigastric pain, bloating, early satiety, fullness, epigastric burning, belching, nausea, and vomiting. Although often chronic, the symptoms in functional dyspepsia are frequently intermittent, even during a period with marked symptoms.6 In patients with functional dyspepsia seen at a tertiary referral center, the most prevalent symptoms were postprandial fullness and bloating, followed by epigastric pain, early satiety, nausea, and belching.7–11 However, there is considerable heterogeneity as shown, for instance, in the number of symptoms that patients are reporting (Figure 1). In the general population, the most prevalent dyspeptic symptoms are postprandial fullness, early satiety, upper abdominal pain, and nausea.12,13 Attempts have been made to simplify the intricate heterogeneity of the dyspepsia symptom complex. The Rome II committee proposed a subdivision according to the predominant symptom of either pain or discomfort (Table 1). Studies have shown correlations between this subdivision and the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection or delayed gastric emptying14 and between this subdivision and response to acid-suppressive therapy.15 However, the subdivision has also been criticized because of the significant overlap between the symptom subgroupings, the considerable number of patients who do not fit into one of the subgroups, and, above all, the lack of adequate value in predicting underlying organic disease.2,16 A factor analysis of dyspeptic symptoms in tertiary care patients did not support the existence of functional dyspepsia as a homogeneous (unidimensional) condition. A 4-factor model (nausea/vomiting/satiety/weight loss, bloating/ fullness, pain/burning, and belching) was found to be valid, with differential distribution within the patient population according to cluster analysis.17 In the general population, factor analysis identified 2 factors (early satiety/fullness/pain and nausea/vomiting), with differential distribution within the population according to cluster analysis.13 These studies confirm the heterogeneity of the dyspepsia symptom complex, but there is no proof that these provide a clinically meaningful subdivision of the syndrome. Dyspeptic symptoms are often aggravated by food ingestion. Studies using questionnaires showed that ⬎75% of dyspeptic patients report a relationship between aggravation of symptoms and ingestion of a meal.18,19 Registration of symptoms before and after ingestion of a standardized meal showed that dyspeptic symptoms increase with meal ingestion in ⬎90% of dyspeptic patients and that maximum symptom severity Abbreviations used in this paper: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. © 2004 by the American Gastroenterological Association 0016-5085/04/$30.00 doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.030 1240 TACK ET AL. Table 1. Definition of Functional Dyspepsia and Subgroups According to the Rome II Working Committee5 Definition of functional dyspepsia, according to the Rome II working team: At least 12 weeks (which need not be consecutive), within the preceding 12 months, of the following: Persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen; No evidence of organic disease (including upper endoscopy) that is likely to explain the symptoms; and No evidence that the dyspepsia is exclusively relieved by defecation or associated with the onset of a change in stool frequency or stool form (i.e., not irritable bowel syndrome) Dyspepsia subgroups based on the predominant or most bothersome symptoms, according to the Rome II working team: Ulcer-like dyspepsia Pain centered in the upper abdomen is the predominant (most bothersome) symptom Dysmotility-like dyspepsia An unpleasant or troublesome nonpainful sensation (discomfort) centerd in the upper abdomen is the predominant symptom; this sensation may be characterized by or associated with upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloating, belching, or nausea Unspecified dyspepsia Cannot be classified as above GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 Delayed Gastric Emptying Delayed gastric emptying is traditionally considered a major pathophysiologic mechanism underlying symptoms in functional dyspepsia and idiopathic gastroparesis.7,11,20 –29 Several studies have investigated the relationship between delayed gastric emptying and symptom pattern and severity. Depending on the study, the percentage of dyspeptic patients with delayed gastric emptying ranges from 20% to 50%.7,11,20 –29 In a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 868 dyspeptic patients and 397 controls, significant delay of solid gastric emptying was present in almost 40% of patients with functional dyspepsia.23 However, most of the studies were performed in small groups of patients and small control groups. In the largest studies, gastric emptying of solids was delayed in about 30% of the patients with functional dyspepsia.7,11,27–29 Most studies failed to find a convincing relationship between delayed gastric emptying and symptom pattern.20 –22 More recently, 3 large-scale single-center studies showed that patients with delayed gastric emptying for occurs between 45 and 90 minutes after ingestion of a standardized 250-kcal meal.18,19 Weight loss is traditionally considered an alarm symptom, pointing toward diagnoses other than functional dyspepsia. Recent studies in tertiary care patients reported the presence of weight loss as a symptom associated with functional dyspepsia,8 –11 but this was considered to reflect the situation in tertiary care only. However, more recent, preliminary observations in the general population also report an association between dyspeptic symptoms and weight loss.13 Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Their Relation to Symptom Pattern Several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been suggested to underlie dyspeptic symptoms. These include delayed gastric emptying, impaired gastric accommodation to a meal, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, H. pylori infection, altered response to duodenal lipids or acid, abnormal duodenojejunal motility, or central nervous system dysfunction (Figure 2). At present, the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia is only partially elucidated. However, there is growing evidence that functional dyspepsia is in fact a very heterogeneous disorder and different subgroups can be identified based on different demographic, clinical, and pathophysiologic features.7–11 Figure 1. Symptom pattern in patients with functional dyspepsia seen at a tertiary referral center. (A) Percentage of dyspeptic symptoms rated as moderate or severe (scores 2 and 3 on a scale of 0 –3) in 640 patients with functional dyspepsia seen at a tertiary referral center. (B) Prevalence of the number of symptoms that are rated as moderate or severe (scores 2 and 3 on a scale of 0 –3) in 640 patients with functional dyspepsia seen at a tertiary referral center. October 2004 Figure 2. Normal fasting and postprandial gastric function; pathophysiologic mechanisms putatively involved in functional dyspepsia. solids are more likely to report postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting,7,11,28 although a large multicenter study failed to find any association29 (Table 2). Almost all studies focused on solid emptying rate only. A recent large-scale study suggested an association between delayed emptying for liquids and symptoms of postprandial fullness.11 Impaired Gastric Accommodation to a Meal The motor functions of the proximal and distal stomach differ remarkably. Whereas the distal stomach regulates gastric emptying of solids by grinding and sieving the content until the particles are small enough to pass the pylorus, the proximal stomach serves mainly as a reservoir. Accommodation of the stomach to a meal consists of a relaxation of the proximal stomach, providing the meal with a reservoir and enabling an increase in volume without an increase in pressure. Scintigraphic and ultrasonographic studies have shown an abnormal intragastric distribution of food in patients with functional dyspepsia, with preferential accumulation in the distal stomach.22,30 –33 These findings suggest defective postprandial accommodation of the proximal stomach. Consistently, studies using a gastric barostat have shown reduced proximal gastric relaxation in response to a meal in patients with functional dyspepsia.8,34 Insufficient accommodation of the proximal stomach during and after the ingestion of a meal may be accompanied by increased intragastric pressure and activation of mechanoreceptors in the gastric wall, thus inducing symptoms. Using a gastric barostat in 40 consecutive dyspeptic patients, we showed that impaired gastric accommodation was present in 40% of the patients and that this impairment was associated with symptoms of early satiety and weight loss.8 The relation between impaired FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1241 gastric accommodation and early satiety was also apparent from the correlation between the amplitude of the meal-induced relaxation and the amount of calories ingested at maximum satiety in patients with early satiety.8 Others, using single-photon emission computed tomography, scintigraphy, or barostat studies of the proximal stomach, have confirmed the prevalence of impaired accommodation in approximately 40% of dyspeptic patients, but the relationship with symptom pattern has been found to be less consistent (Table 3).35–37 An unsolved issue is the site of symptom generation in patients with impaired accommodation. When the proximal stomach is not relaxing properly, ingestion of a meal may be accompanied by activation of tension mechanoreceptors in the proximal stomach wall and generation of symptoms. On the other hand, insufficient accommodation of the proximal stomach may force the meal into the distal stomach, thereby creating a distended antrum. Studies on the induction of symptoms during proximal and distal gastric distention in humans have shown conflicting results38 – 40 that are at least partly attributable to technical and methodological differences. The gold standard for assessment of gastric sensitivity to distentions is currently the gastric barostat; however, instead of dual barostat distentions, these studies used ultrasound measurements or single water-filled or barostat balloons. In a recent study using a double gastric barostat assembly, we showed that symptom profiles induced by gastric distention did not differ between Table 2. Prevalence of Delayed Emptying and Relationship With Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia in Literature Studies n Prevalence of delayed emptying (%) Wegener et al., 198920 Jian et al., 198921 Talley et al., 198922 Waldron et al., 199123 Klauser et al., 199324 Scott et al., 199325 Stanghellini et al., 19967 43 28 32 50 69 75 343 30 59 30 42 35 28 34 Maes et al., 199727 Perri et al., 199828 344 304 30 33 Sarnelli et al., 200311 392 23 Talley et al., 200129 551 24 Study Correlation No correlation No correlation No correlation No correlation No correlation No correlation Associated with female sex, postprandial fullness, vomiting Not studied Associated with postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting Associated with postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting No correlation 1242 TACK ET AL. GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 Table 3. Prevalence of Impaired Accommodation and Relationship With Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia in Literature Studies n Technique Tack et al., 19988 Kim et al., 200135 Study 40 32 Boeckxstaens et al., 200236 Piessevaux et al., 200337 44 40 Barostat Single-photon emission computed tomography Barostat Scintigraphy aThe Prevalence of impaired accommodation (%) Correlation 40 40 Early satiety, weight loss Weight lossa 40 50 No correlation Early satiety symptom of early satiety was not assessed in this study. proximal and distal gastric distention and that mechanoreceptors from both sites may contribute to symptoms.41 However, because the distal gastric wall is less compliant than the proximal gastric wall, the distal stomach may produce greater symptoms in response to the same volume of distention.41 Hypersensitivity to Gastric Distention Physiologic stimuli during the digestive process are not normally perceived but in some circumstances may induce conscious sensations. During the past decade, it has been suggested that patients with functional gastrointestinal diseases may have a sensory dysfunction of the gut, so that physiologic stimuli would induce symptoms.42 Several studies have clearly established that, as a group, patients with functional dyspepsia have enhanced sensitivity to gastric distention.9,36,43– 46 However, in these studies, different approaches to calculate sensitivity to gastric distention and to determine the range of normality have been used. A systematic analysis in a large group of controls and patients indicated that the increase in the intra-balloon pressure over intra-abdominal pressure needed to induce discomfort or pain is the most appropriate expression of sensitivity to gastric distention.9 According to that study, gastric hypersensitivity was associated with symptoms of postprandial pain, belching, and weight loss. So far, other, smaller-scale studies have failed to find an association between hypersensitivity and symptom pattern (Table 4).36,47 Perception of gastric distention requires the activation of mechanoreceptors, and studies in healthy volunteers have suggested involvement of “in series” mechanoreceptors that respond to increases in tension within the stomach wall.48,49 By analyzing the relationship between changes in perception and increases in pressure in an isovolumetric balloon in the proximal stomach, we were able to show that dyspeptic patients with hypersensitivity to gastric distention perceive isovolumetric phasic contractions of the proximal stomach.50 Fundus-relaxing drugs decrease sensitivity to gastric distention and de- crease meal-induced symptoms in these patients.50 These findings are compatible with involvement of tension mechanoreceptors in the symptom generation in dyspeptic patients with visceral hypersensitivity. Because patients with hypersensitivity to gastric distention have more prevalent symptoms of epigastric pain9,17 and because they experience pain during gastric balloon distention at levels of distention that are normally not painful, these patients have visceral hyperalgesia.43– 45 According to the neurophysiologic theory of pain, pain can be encoded by activation of high-threshold nociceptive pathways or by intense stimulation of lowthreshold multimodal pathways.51 To determine whether gastric hypersensitivity in functional dyspepsia reflects a selective sensitization for painful sensations or whether the sensitivity for nonpainful stimuli is also enhanced in patients with visceral hypersensitivity, we analyzed the relationship between intensity scores for pain and nonpainful sensations during gastric balloon distention in dyspepsia.52 In both normosensitive and hypersensitive dyspeptic patients, the elevation of intensity scores for pain paralleled the elevation of intensity scores for the nonpainful sensations of nausea, satiety, and fullness. These findings are compatible with up-regulation of multimodal afferent pathways and argue against isolated up-regulation of pain-specific afferent pathways in functional dyspepsia with visceral hyperalgesia. Table 4. Prevalence of Hypersensitivity to Gastric Distention and Relationship With Symptoms in Functional Dyspepsia in Literature Studies n Prevalence of hypersensitivity (%) 46 Mertz et al., 1998 Rhee et al., 200047 Tack et al., 20019 24 64 160 66 50 34 Boeckxstaens et al., 200236 44 48 Study Correlation No correlation No correlation Pain, belching, weight loss No correlation October 2004 FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1243 Table 5. Literature Studies on Duodenal Hypersensitivity in Functional Dyspepsia Study 68 Barbera et al., 1995 Barbera et al., 199567 Samsom et al., 199971 Feinle et al., 200166 n Technique Conclusion 10 patients 10 controls 9 patients 9 controls Duodenal lipid infusion, duodenal saline infusion, gastric balloon distention Duodenal lipid infusion, duodenal glucose infusion, gastric balloon distention Duodenal acid infusion, duodenal manometry and pH monitoring Duodenal lipid infusion, gastric balloon distention, CCK-A antagonist Duodenal lipids sensitize the stomach to distention in patients with dyspepsia but not in controls Duodenal lipids but not glucose sensitize the stomach to distention in dyspepsia 12 patients 10 controls 12 patients Acid clearance is decreased in dyspepsia; hypersensitivity to duodenal acid induces nausea CCK-A receptors are involved in sensitization by duodenal lipids CCK, cholecystokinin. Dyspeptic symptoms are usually triggered or aggravated by meal ingestion, suggesting that sensitivity to gastric distention in the postprandial period might be involved in symptom generation. In a preliminary study, we showed that postprandial sensitivity to gastric distention, but not fasting sensitivity, was indeed related to the severity of meal-related symptoms in functional dyspepsia.53 H. pylori Infection Soon after the discovery of H. pylori, a causal relationship between H. pylori infection and the occurrence of duodenal and gastric ulcers was established.51 In functional dyspepsia, the role of H. pylori is less clear. A recent systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence on a relationship between H. pylori infection and functional dyspepsia found no evidence for a strong association. However, according to the investigators, many of the studies had important weaknesses in design and execution and there was not enough evidence to rule out a modest association.55 Several studies have investigated the association between H. pylori infection and dyspeptic symptoms or pathophysiologic mechanisms.28,56 – 61 However, no consistent differences in the prevalence and severity of individual dyspeptic symptoms, gastric emptying rate, gastric relaxation after a meal, and sensitivity to gastric distention were found between H. pylori–positive and H. pylori–negative subjects. Initial studies reported associations between H. pylori infection and epigastric pain or burning,56 delayed gastric emptying,57 or impaired accommodation.58 However, more recent and larger-scale studies failed to find any of these correlations.59 – 61 Altered Duodenal Sensitivity to Lipids or Acid Dyspeptic symptoms in functional dyspepsia are commonly exacerbated by meals rich in fat.62 Studies in health have shown that duodenal infusion of lipids, but not glucose, induces a relaxation of the proximal stomach and enhances the sensitivity to proximal stomach disten- tion.63,64 These influences of duodenal lipid infusion require lipid digestion and subsequent release of cholecystokinin,64,65 and they can be blocked by administration of a lipase inhibitor or a cholecystokinin-A receptor antagonist.64 – 66 It was reported that increased sensitivity to duodenal lipid infusion may be a relevant pathophysiologic mechanism in functional dyspepsia.67,68 However, the numbers of patients studied in this manner remained small, and it is unclear whether this affects a subgroup of dyspeptic patients or all dyspeptic patients (Table 5). Furthermore, all of these studies used intraduodenal mode administration, and recent data have shown that observations derived from intraduodenally administered lipids do not necessarily apply to orally ingested lipid-containing meals.69,70 Duodenal infusion of hydrochloric acid was found to induce nausea in a small group of patients with functional dyspepsia but not in healthy controls, suggesting duodenal hypersensitivity to acid. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that the duodenal motor response to acid was decreased in patients with functional dyspepsia, resulting in reduced clearance of exogenous duodenal acid.71 We confirmed that spontaneous duodenal acid exposure to endogenous acid was increased in patients with functional dyspepsia who displayed delayed clearance of exogenous duodenal acid.72 Patients with functional dyspepsia with duodenal acid exposure above the normal range had higher severity scores of several dyspeptic symptoms. However, the severity of individual symptoms was weakly correlated to duodenal pH and brief duodenal acid infusion did not affect any symptoms, suggesting that duodenal acid exposure is poorly related to symptom severity.72 Altered Antroduodenojejunal Motility Manometry studies in functional dyspepsia have shown antral hypomotility to be a common feature.73 It is presently unclear whether this reflects true hypomotility or a poor registration of contractions in a dilated antrum in patients with impaired accommodation, be- 1244 TACK ET AL. cause manometry only registers lumen-obliterating contractions.8,30 –32,73 Small bowel motor alterations, usually hypermotility with burst activity or clusters, and an increased proportion of duodenal retrograde contractions have been reported.74,75 No clear correlation with symptoms has been found.74,75 Abnormalities of Gastric Electrical Rhythm There is also evidence that abnormalities in the underlying gastric myoelectrical activity, as measured by cutaneous electrogastrography, are found in up to two thirds of patients with functional dyspepsia.76,77 The relevance of this finding for gastric emptying and symptom patterns remains to be established. No correlation was found between dyspeptic symptom pattern and the presence of findings on electrogastrography. A good correlation between the presence of delayed gastric emptying and abnormalities of gastric electrical rhythm has been reported.76,77 Unsuppressed Postprandial Phasic Contractility in the Proximal Stomach Besides the relaxatory response of the proximal stomach after a meal, other motor aspects of the proximal stomach have not been particularly frequently addressed in the literature. With the barostat technique, it is also possible to detect phasic volume fluctuations from the baseline volumes (“volume waves”), reflecting contractions superimposed on the background state of contractility or tone.78 These contractions occur at a frequency that differs from antral contraction waves.59,78,79 One study suggested the occurrence of increased phasic volume events in the postprandial period in patients with functional dyspepsia.59 In a recent study, we observed that, compared with healthy controls, a small subset (15%) of dyspeptic patients displayed unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractility of the proximal stomach.79 Persistence of postprandial phasic contractions of the proximal stomach was associated with H. pylori infection and relevant or severe bloating, but also with the absence of nausea. The abnormality is of potential relevance because phasic fundic contractions induce transient increases in gastric wall tension, which can be perceived in functional dyspepsia.50 Autonomic Nervous System/Central Nervous System Dysregulation Abnormalities within the autonomic nervous system have been suggested to be of importance in some patients with functional dyspepsia. More specifically, an efferent vagal dysfunction has been observed in several studies80,81 and has been proposed to be a possible mech- GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 anism underlying impaired accommodation to a meal82 and antral hypomotility.80 Furthermore, there is evidence of an association between psychopathology and functional dyspepsia83 and between psychological factors and gastric functioning and symptoms in functional dyspepsia, for which low vagal activity was proposed to be the mediating mechanism.84,85 In a recent factor analysis of dyspeptic symptoms and their relationship with physiopathology and psychopathology, the heterogeneity and complexity of these interactions was clearly shown. Factor analysis identified 4 separate symptom factors within functional dyspepsia, each of which was associated with a measurable abnormality of gastric function, and of which 2 were associated with specific psychosocial characteristics.17 The factor that consists of nausea, vomiting, early satiety, and weight loss was associated with female sex and physician visits and sickness leave, and the factor that consists of epigastric pain was associated with several psychosocial dimensions, including medically unexplained symptoms and conditions, and with low health-related quality of life.17 Relevance of Putative Pathophysiologic Mechanisms to Symptom Generation Although several pathophysiologic abnormalities are related to the dyspepsia symptom pattern and severity, as summarized in the previous section, this does not establish causality. It is conceivable that both simply coexist or that both depend on a presently unspecified causal mechanism. A close correlation between presence and severity of a certain pathophysiologic abnormality and presence and severity of certain symptoms adds strength to the association between both. A very strong case is made when induction of a pathophysiologic abnormality in healthy subjects also induces dyspeptic symptoms. Delayed Gastric Emptying The studies investigating the relationship between delayed emptying and symptom pattern generally used questionnaires that assessed symptom severity over a time frame of weeks to months, whereas the emptying test reflects the situation at a single point in time. Several studies have shown that gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia has large intraindividual variability.19,86 Attempts have been made to find a better correlation between symptoms and emptying rate by assessing symptom severity during the measurement of the emptying rate of a standardized meal.18,19 However, this did not result in a better correlation between symptoms and emptying rate. October 2004 FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1245 Table 6. Summary of Reported Associations Between Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Symptom Pattern in Functional Dyspepsia Mechanism Associated symptoms References Delayed gastric emptying Hypersensitivity to gastric distention Impaired accommodation H. pylori infection Duodenal lipid hypersensitivity Duodenal acid hypersensitivity Unsuppressed phasic contractility Atypical nonerosive reflux disease Postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting Epigastric pain, belching, weight loss Early satiety, weight loss Epigastric pain Nausea Nausea Bloating, absence of nausea Epigastric pain 7, 11, 17, 36 9, 17 8, 10, 35, 36 14, 28, 56 66, 67, 68 71 79 111 Furthermore, induction of delayed gastric emptying in healthy subjects by pharmacologic or dietary interventions is not associated with the occurrence of dyspeptic symptoms.87 These observations question the relevance of delayed emptying as a mechanism underlying dyspeptic symptoms. Impaired Accommodation A close correlation exists between impairment of gastric accommodation, severity of early satiety, and the amount of liquid meal ingested at maximum satiety during a slow satiety drinking test.88 Erythromycin and motilin induce a contraction of the proximal stomach.89,90 When these agonists are administered at the time of meal ingestion, this results in impaired accommodation and is associated with early satiety.88,91 Relaxation of the proximal stomach can be activated by duodenal distention or nutrient infusion via a vagovagal reflex pathway,92,93 and it requires activation of intrinsic nitrergic neurons in the stomach.94 Administration of a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor induces impaired accommodation in humans, and this is associated with early satiety.95 These observations add further support to the hypothesis that impaired accommodation is the mechanism underlying the symptom of early satiety. Hypersensitivity to Gastric Distention One study found an association between hypersensitivity to gastric distention, as determined by a gastric barostat study, and symptoms of pain and belching.9 However, this apparent association could be influenced by a bias to report pain. In keeping with this possibility, a significant association was found between symptoms of pain, hypersensitivity to gastric distention, and several psychopathologic mechanisms, including neuroticism, somatization, a history of abuse, and health-related quality of life dimensions. Attempts to induce hypersensitivity in healthy subjects using a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor were not successful.95,96 Recent data showed that the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan sensitized the stomach to distention in the absence of an effect on gastric compliance.97 However, this drug is not very selective, and it is unclear whether this constitutes a valid model of visceral hypersensitivity and whether pretreatment with an N-methylD-aspartate antagonist induces dyspepsia-like symptoms after ingestion of a meal. Other Mechanisms Acute H. pylori infection induces dyspepsia-like symptoms, but these are transient.98 Nausea induced by vestibular stimulation is also associated with abnormalities of gastric electrical rhythm, suggesting that this may be a secondary phenomenon accompanying nausea rather than a primary mechanism.99 These observations question the direct pathophysiologic relevance of H. pylori and gastric electrical dysrhythmias. In healthy subjects, duodenal acid infusion sensitizes the proximal stomach and the duodenum to distention and is able to induce dyspepsia-like symptoms.100,101 Administration of the cholinesterase inhibitor neostigmine before a meal induces unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractions in healthy subjects, and this is associated with increased scores for several dyspeptic symptoms.102 These observations suggest that increased duodenal acid exposure and unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractility of the proximal stomach are mechanisms potentially involved in the pathogenesis of dyspeptic symptoms. Table 6 summarizes the reported associations between symptom patterns and pathophysiologic mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Pathogenesis The pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia is obscure, but a postinfectious or inflammatory origin has been suggested for irritable bowel syndrome.103 Moreover, gastroparesis has been reported after a viral infection.104 Using a questionnaire in 400 consecutive patients with functional dyspepsia, we found that 17% had a history with acute onset, suggestive of a postinfectious origin.10 These patients had a particularly high preva- 1246 TACK ET AL. lence of impaired accommodation. Because the proximal stomach in these patients relaxed to administration of a nitric oxide donor but did not respond to sumatriptan, which releases nitric oxide through activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1 receptors on nitrergic neurones, the abnormality is attributable to a dysfunction at the level of gastric nitrergic neurons.10 As previously mentioned, whether psychological factors have a pathogenetic role in functional dyspepsia, especially in patients with hypersensitivity to gastric distention, or whether they are disease modulators determining health care seeking, perception of symptoms, and the outcome of the disorder is not known. There are several sources of evidence for a role of the central nervous system in visceral hypersensitivity. Studies in experimental animals indicate that acute psychological stress facilitates increased sensitivity to visceral stimuli.105 In line with such a finding, rats genetically predisposed to anxiety have been shown to display an increased visceral sensitivity.106 Similarly, in humans, the perception of gut distention has been found to be reduced during periods of distraction and increased during periods of attentiveness or during mental stress associated with anxiety.107 However, the role of central factors and stress in visceral hypersensitivity and symptom generation in functional dyspepsia remains to be established. Finally, an association between dyspeptic symptoms and a functional polymorphism in a G-protein subunit was reported.108 It remains to be established whether this genotype is associated with any specific pathophysiologic mechanism, the likelihood of postinfectious functional disorders, or altered psychosocial features. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis Patients with predominant heartburn or acid regurgitation should, according to the Rome II criteria, not be included in the dyspeptic spectrum but should be referred to as having gastroesophageal reflux disease because the management differs substantially.5 It has been proposed that a substantial number of patients with predominant discomfort or pain centered in the upper abdomen actually have atypical reflux disease.109 However, by using a simple questionnaire to screen for reflux symptoms,110 only a minority of patients with predominant dyspeptic symptoms have pathologic reflux as shown by 24-hour pH measurement.111 The use of these questionnaires in clinical practice may prove useful to detect patients who actually have reflux disease, with a higher likelihood of being responders to treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 There is also a huge overlap between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome.2 For instance, in a referral center, 46% of patients with functional dyspepsia proved to have concomitant irritable bowel syndrome, and these patients were more likely to be female, have gastric hypersensitivity, and have more severe symptoms in general.112 Furthermore, many subjects change from predominant dyspeptic symptoms to bowel-related symptoms, indicating irritable bowel syndrome, or the opposite during a 1-year follow-up period.2 When a patient presents with dyspeptic symptoms, careful clinical evaluation and history taking are essential features to make a correct diagnosis of dyspepsia and to distinguish it from gastroesophageal reflux disease and irritable bowel syndrome. Routine biochemistry is usually included in the diagnostic workup, but the clinical value of this has not been formally validated. So-called alarm symptoms (prominent weight loss, recurrent vomiting, bleeding, anemia, dysphagia, jaundice, palpable mass) should be looked for with great care and, if present, require additional diagnostic investigation. If there are no sinister symptoms and the patient is young (younger than 45–50 years) and does not take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, upper endoscopy is rarely needed in the first line. However, early endoscopy is of course the gold standard in the diagnostic workup of dyspeptic patients with more severe symptoms and may be associated with greater patient satisfaction,113 but it is not possible to perform this procedure in all patients because of financial, practical, and patient-related factors and other factors such as availability. Instead, other strategies can be considered, namely initial empirical therapy114 –116 or a “test and treat” approach.54 The American Gastroenterological Association presented a medical position statement regarding the evaluation of dyspepsia in 1998 and recommended the “test and treat” strategy,117 meaning initial testing for the presence of H. pylori infection and, if present, eradication therapy. H. pylori–negative patients should be offered empirical antisecretory or prokinetic therapy. Based on the existing studies on the effect of H. pylori eradication on functional dyspepsia,55 it can be assumed that most patients will still be symptomatic after treatment of H. pylori and should in that case be offered endoscopy. These guidelines were recently questioned by Spiegel et al., who by using a so-called decision analysis found empirical PPI therapy to be more cost effective, either as a first step or following a “test and treat” approach, when the patient has not responded favorably to eradication therapy.118 Moreover, these decision analyses cannot be extrapolated to every country because of major differences in the prevalence of H. pylori infection, prevalence of ulcers, accessibility of endoscopy, and cost of endoscopy. October 2004 FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1247 Psychological symptoms are also common in patients with functional dyspepsia as compared with patients with organic causes of dyspepsia, such as duodenal ulcer.83 This may be more related to being a patient seeking health care for dyspepsia than related to dyspepsia per se. A review found several psychosocial factors such as life event stress, psychological morbidity, personality, abuse history, and abnormal illness behavior and beliefs to be important factors in the process that determines who will seek medical attention.120 The presence of psychosocial factors in these patients should be addressed carefully but should not be overemphasized because a causal role has not been established so far. Treatment General Measures Figure 3. A clinical management algorithm based on currently available management guidelines and clinical experience. A head-to-head comparison of these strategies is needed, but in the meantime both strategies may be used and have support in the literature. Although often used in clinical practice, the empirical prokinetic therapy has been less well studied. An in-depth analysis of clinical management steps in dyspepsia was recently published in GASTROENTEROLOGY.119 In general practice, the initial empirical therapy is probably still the most widely used approach. A clinical management algorithm based on currently available management guidelines and clinical experience is summarized in Figure 3. Other investigations that might be considered in the workup are, for instance, upper abdominal ultrasonography or computed tomography, small bowel radiography, duodenal biopsy to exclude celiac disease, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and manometric studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract. These investigations should not be performed in all patients but instead should be based on the clinical picture, severity of symptoms, and refractoriness of the patient. Reassurance and education is of primary importance in patients with functional dyspepsia. It has been shown in irritable bowel syndrome that a positive physician-patient interaction can reduce health care seeking, and these findings are probably also valid for functional dyspepsia.121 Lifestyle and dietary measures are usually prescribed, although they have not been systematically studied. It seems logical to have patients eat more frequent, smaller meals and desirable to avoid food that aggravates symptoms. Because the presence of lipids in the duodenum enhances the mechanosensitivity of the stomach, avoiding meals with a high fat content might be advisable.67,68 Coffee and spicy foods containing capsaicin are usually discouraged, although there is no evidence to link these food components to symptoms.122,123 In some patients, pharmacologic therapy will be considered. The pharmacologic treatments available to date for the management of functional dyspepsia have only been shown to be of limited efficacy. It seems logical that directing therapeutic approaches toward the underlying pathophysiologic disturbances should increase the efficacy,124 but this has not been proven. Acid-Suppressive Drugs In patients with gastroesophageal reflux, a trial of antisecretory therapy has both therapeutic and diagnostic value. Several studies have evaluated the use of H2receptor antagonists in functional dyspepsia, and a recent meta-analysis showed superiority over placebo in improvement of pain but not for overall symptom improvement.125 PPIs have proven to be more effective than H2-receptor antagonists and antacid-alginate in relieving symptoms of uninvestigated dyspepsia (comparable to the initial empirical PPI treatment previously mentioned).114 –116 Of course, these studies not only included 1248 TACK ET AL. patients with functional dyspepsia but also patients with peptic ulcer disease and with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Large and well-controlled studies in functional dyspepsia have shown that treatment with omeprazole was approximately 10%–15% better than placebo in patients with functional dyspepsia.15 However, this positive effect was restricted to patients with reflux-like dyspepsia, a subgroup that actually is no longer considered to belong to functional dyspepsia, and to a lesser degree in patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia. In patients with dysmotility-like dyspepsia, no effect could be observed.15 In a recent study in consecutive patients with functional dyspepsia without dominant symptoms of heartburn, pathologic esophageal acid exposure was present in a subset of patients who were characterized by a higher prevalence of epigastric pain.111 This finding suggests that patients with ulcer-like dyspepsia who respond to acid-suppressive therapy may actually have gastroesophageal reflux disease. On the other hand, recent studies have suggested a role for increased duodenal acid exposure and duodenal acid hypersensitivity in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia.71,72 Treatment with PPIs tended to decrease duodenal acid hypersensitivity, but so far no symptomatic benefit in this group of patients has been shown.126 Prokinetic Agents Prokinetic agents, including metoclopramide, domperidone, and cisapride, are widely used in functional dyspepsia. The rationale is to use prokinetic drugs in patients with delayed gastric emptying, in which they should improve symptoms of postprandial fullness, nausea, and vomiting. However, studies available so far fail to prove this hypothesis, and evidence that the symptomatic improvement is related to enhancement of gastric emptying is lacking.127–130 Metoclopramide and domperidone are dopamine receptor agonists with a stimulatory effect on upper gastrointestinal motility. Unlike metoclopramide, domperidone does not cross the blood-brain barrier. Cisapride facilitates the release of acetylcholine in the myenteric plexus via 5-HT4 receptor agonism and accelerates gastric emptying.127–130 The availability of cisapride is restricted due to cardiac safety issues. Recently, tegaserod, a partial 5-HT4 agonist, was found to accelerate gastric emptying, indicating its possibility as a prokinetic agent.131 Recent reviews suggest that prokinetics, especially domperidone and cisapride, are more effective than placebo, but the trials were often of poor quality with significant heterogeneity between studies.127–130 However, the gastroprokinetic effects of these drugs are limited, and the finding of the strong gastrokinetic actions of erythromycin, a macro- GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 lide antibiotic that acts as a motilin receptor agonist, was met with great enthusiasm.132 Several short-term studies reported beneficial effects of treatment with erythromycin in gastroparesis.132–134 Different macrolide prokinetics, devoid of antibiotic properties, were developed and one of these, ABT-229, was studied in large clinical trials.135 However, the outcomes of clinical trials with ABT-229 were unequivocally disappointing with regard to symptom improvement, both in dyspeptic patients with and without delayed emptying. It has been argued that the negative outcomes of the studies with ABT-229 show that acceleration of gastric emptying is not the correct therapeutic target in functional dyspepsia,135 but there are also strong indications of tachyphylaxis with macrolide prokinetics.136,137 Furthermore, it is well established that erythromycin and related compounds impair gastric accommodation to a meal,89 –91 thereby enhancing sensitivity to gastric distention,48 which may have contributed to the overall poor symptomatic effect. Cisapride and tegaserod were shown to enhance gastric accommodation to a meal138,139 and are therefore less likely to worsen or induce symptoms related to impaired accommodation. In addition, in preliminary studies, we showed a tendency for tegaserod to improve upper gastrointestinal symptoms in female patients with functional dyspepsia with normal gastric emptying, suggesting that it may affect pathophysiologic mechanisms other than delayed gastric emptying.140 Eradication of H. pylori The 4 largest published randomized trials on the effect of H. pylori eradication on symptoms in functional dyspepsia show somewhat conflicting results. A singlecenter trial suggested a small superiority of eradication treatment versus PPI treatment alone,141 but 3 multicenter trials had negative findings.142–144 Taken together, these 4 large studies suggest that the potential symptomatic benefit of H. pylori treatment in functional dyspepsia is probably of limited importance. Other arguments in favor of the use of eradication therapy are protection against peptic ulcer, putative protection against gastric cancer, and the short-term nature of the treatment.145 Antidepressants There is some evidence that tricyclic antidepressants are effective in treating patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, including functional dyspepsia.146,147 Generally, lower doses are used than for treatment of depression. Mianserin, at a high dose, was also shown to be superior to placebo in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, including dyspepsia.148 The mechanism behind the positive effect has been proposed to be due to an effect on gastric sensitivity, but October 2004 this could not be confirmed in the study by Mertz et al.147 In clinical practice, it seems that the positive effect is not clearly related to the presence or absence of depression. It is unclear whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are also effective treatment alternatives for functional gastrointestinal disorders. These drugs increase the availability of synaptically released 5-HT not only in the central nervous system but also at the level of the enteric nervous system. Pretreatment with the SSRI paroxetine strongly enhanced the meal-induced relaxation of the proximal stomach in healthy subjects.149 This observation suggests involvement of 5-HT in the gastric accommodation reflex in humans as well as a potential beneficial effect of SSRIs in dyspeptic patients with impaired accommodation. In an open-label study in dyspeptic patients with abnormalities on electrogastrography, only patients with coexisting depression improved and gastric myoelectrical activity did not improve.150 Fundus-Relaxing Drugs It seems logical that restoring gastric accommodation in patients with impaired accommodation is likely to improve symptoms of early satiety. Short-term studies have shown some benefit of nitrates,151 but prolonged use is generally associated with undesirable vascular side effects due to the lack of specificity. Sildenafil blocks phosphodiesterase type 5, which degrades nitric oxide–stimulated guanosine 3=,5=-cyclic monophosphate, thereby relaxing smooth muscle in various organs. Pretreatment with sildenafil also relaxes the proximal stomach,152 and trials evaluating phosphodiesterase inhibitors in functional dyspepsia seem warranted. Similar to the central nervous system, serotonin reuptake in the enteric nervous system is also inhibited by SSRIs.153 The enhancement of gastric accommodation by pretreatment with the SSRI paroxetine suggests involvement of 5-HT in the control of the accommodation reflex in humans.149 The 5-HT receptor involved has not been identified, but both 5-HT1 and 5-HT4 receptors can mediate enhanced postprandial gastric relaxation. Pretreatment with the 5-HT4 receptor agonists cisapride and tegaserod enhances gastric accommodation in healthy subjects.138,139 Administration of sumatriptan, a 5-HT1 receptor agonist used in the treatment of migraine, relaxes the proximal stomach in healthy subjects.154 In short-term studies, subcutaneous administration of sumatriptan was shown to restore meal-induced relaxation in patients with impaired gastric accommodation and to increase the amount of calories ingested at maximum satiety in patients with early satiety.8 Due to its pharmacologic properties, cost, and mode of administration, subcutaneous FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1249 sumatriptan is not suitable for long-term treatment of functional dyspepsia. A nasal-spray formulation of sumatriptan had no significant effect on proximal stomach function.155 Buspirone is a nonselective 5-HT1 receptor agonist used in the treatment of panic attacks. In a placebo-controlled study in patients with functional dyspepsia, we confirmed that buspirone was superior to placebo in alleviating dyspeptic symptoms and that this was associated with an enhancement of the accommodation to a meal.156 Clonidine, an ␣2 receptor agonist, also relaxes the stomach and reduces gastric sensation.157 Short-term administration of clonidine was found to decrease meal-induced symptoms in functional dyspepsia.50 Other Drugs Dose-finding studies with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist alosetron showed potential benefit in functional dyspepsia.158 The mechanisms behind its effect are at present unclear. No effect on gastric sensitivity in healthy volunteers has been shown,159 but 5-HT3 receptor antagonism reduces duodenal lipid sensitivity.63 Alosetron was on the U.S. market for approximately 6 months for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, but its use is now restricted due to safety issues.160 Cholecystokinin receptor antagonists also reduce duodenal lipid sensitivity and are currently under evaluation.64,66 The opioid agonist fedotozine decreases gastric sensitivity to distentions,161 and it showed superiority over placebo in a placebo-controlled study in patients with functional dyspepsia.162 However, development of this drug has not continued. Asimadoline, another opioid agonist that was shown to decrease satiation and meal-induced fullness,163 is currently still under evaluation. A recent study showed that long-term administration of red pepper was more effective than placebo in decreasing the intensity of dyspeptic symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia.123 Such a contradictory result might be explained by the finding that capsaicin initially produces sensitization but repeated stimulation of the capsaicin receptor on capsaicinsensitive primary afferents leads to desensitization.164 Studies of the effect of capsaicin on gastric sensitivity in humans, which showed acute sensitization followed by decreased perception of epigastric symptoms,165 are in keeping with this mechanism of action. In a controlled trial in patients with functional dyspepsia, artichoke leaf extract was significantly better than placebo in alleviating symptoms and in improving quality of life.166 The basis for this improvement remains to be identified. 1250 TACK ET AL. Psychological Interventions Psychological factors are considered important contributors to symptom severity in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders, including functional dyspepsia.8,167 This suggests that psychological treatment alternatives might be useful in these patients. A review of clinical trials of psychological interventions for functional dyspepsia showed potential benefits in the treatment of functional dyspepsia.168 However, several studies did not control for additional time and attention the patients received in the psychological intervention arms, making it difficult to exclude a contribution of nonspecific factors. Another study controlled for this factor compared psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy with supportive therapy in 95 consecutive patients with functional dyspepsia who had failed to respond to conventional pharmacologic treatments.169 At the end of treatment, patients receiving psychotherapy had a significantly better outcome than those receiving supportive therapy. One year after treatment, the symptom scores were similar in both groups, but a post hoc analysis excluding patients with severe heartburn also showed a positive effect of psychotherapy at 1 year. Hypnotherapy was also shown to be useful in functional dyspepsia in a randomized study compared with supportive or medical therapy.170 In a follow-up of 1 year, the effect was maintained. Hence, assessing psychosocial issues and intervening at this level in patients with functional dyspepsia seems to be a reasonable approach. However, in clinical practice, this approach is usually reserved for those with severe and extensive symptomatology or refractory disease. Conclusions Functional dyspepsia is one of the most common disorders seen in general practice and by gastroenterologists. Functional dyspepsia seems to be a heterogenous disorder in which different pathophysiologic disturbances are associated with different symptom profiles. The available options for the treatment of functional dyspepsia are of limited efficacy, which probably reflects the incomplete understanding of the nature of this disorder. Current knowledge is in support of empirical treatment with acid-suppressive agents and prokinetics as well as identification and treatment of H. pylori infection. Refractory patients may benefit from treatment with antidepressants or psychological interventions. More effective approaches are badly needed, and this will probably GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 require ongoing efforts to elucidate underlying pathophysiology. References 1. Talley NJ, Zinsmeister AR, Schleck CD, Melton LJ III. Dyspepsia and dyspepsia subgroups: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 1992;102:1259 –1268. 2. Agreus L, Svardsudd K, Nyren O, Tibblin G. Irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia in the general population: overlap and lack of stability over time. Gastroenterology 1995;109:671– 680. 3. Penston JG, Pounder RE. A survey of dyspepsia in Great Britain. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996;10:83– 89. 4. Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Knesewitsch PA, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. What is behind dyspepsia? Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:147–154. 5. Talley NJ, Stanghellini V, Heading RC, Koch KL, Malagelada JR, Tytgat GNJ. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gut 1999; 45(suppl II):37– 42. 6. Agreus L. Natural history of dyspepsia. Gut 2002;50(suppl 4): iv2–9. 7. Stanghellini V, Tosetti C, Paternico A, Barbara G, Morselli-Labate AM, Monetti N, Marengo M, Corinaldesi R. Risk indicators of delayed gastric emptying of solids in patients with functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1036 –1042. 8. Tack J, Piessevaux H, Coulie B, Caenepeel P, Janssens J. Role of impaired gastric accommodation to a meal in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1346 –1352. 9. Tack J, Caenepeel P, Fischler B, Piessevaux H, Janssens J. Symptoms associated with hypersensitivity to gastric distention in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2001;121:526 –535. 10. Tack J, Demedts I, Dehondt G, Caenepeel P, Fischler B, Zandecki M, Janssens J. Clinical and pathophysiological characteristics of acute-onset functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1738 –1747. 11. Sarnelli G, Caenepeel P, Geypens B, Janssens J, Tack J. Symptoms associated with impaired gastric emptying of solids and liquids in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98: 783–788. 12. Tougas G, Chen Y, Hwang P, Liu MM, Eggleston A. Prevalence and impact of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in the Canadian population: findings from the DIGEST study. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2845–2854. 13. Jones MP, Talley NJ, Coulie B, Dubois D, Tack J. Clustering of weight loss with symptoms of functional dyspepsia: a population-based study (abstr). Gastroenterology 2003;124:A390. 14. Stanghellini V, Tosetti C, Paternico A, De Giorgio R, Barbara G, Salvioli B, Corinaldesi R. Predominant symptoms identify different subgroups in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2080 –2085. 15. Talley NJ, Meineche-Schmidt V, Pare P, Duckworth M, Raisanen P, Pap A, Kordecki H, Schmid V. Efficacy of omeprazole in functional dyspepsia: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (the Bond and Opera studies). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:1055–1065. 16. Talley NJ, Weaver AL, Tesmer DL, Zinsmeister AR. Lack of discriminant value of dyspepsia subgroups in patients referred for upper endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1993;105:1378 –1386. 17. Fischler B, Vandenberghe J, Persoons P, De Gucht V, Broekaert D, Luyckx K, Tack J. Evidence-based subtypes in functional dyspepsia with confirmatory factor analysis: psychosocial and physiopathological correlates. Gastroenterology 2001;120:268–276. 18. Bisschops R, Geypens B, Ghoos I, Tack J. Timing of symptoms in relation to the meal in pain-predominant versus discomfort-predominant dyspepsia (abstr). Gastroenterology 2000;118:2544. 19. Arts J, Caenepeel P, Demedts I, Verbeke K, Tack J. Influence of erythromycin on gastric emptying and meal-related symptoms in October 2004 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. functional dyspepsia with delayed gastric emptying. Gut (in press) Wegener M, Borsch G, Schaffstein J, Reuter C, Leverkus F. Frequency of idiopathic gastric stasis and intestinal transit disorders in essential dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989;11:163–168. Jian R, Ducrot F, Ruskone A, Chaussade S, Rambaud JC, Modigliani R, Rain JD, Bernier JJ. Symptomatic, radionuclide and therapeutic assessment of chronic idiopathic dyspepsia. A double-blind placebo-controlled evaluation of cisapride. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:657– 664. Talley NJ, Shuter B, McCrudden G, Jones M, Hoschl R, Piper DW. Lack of association between gastric emptying of solids and symptoms in nonulcer dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989;11: 625– 630. Waldron B, Cullen PT, Kumar R, Smith D, Jankowskik J, Hopwood D, Sutton D, Kennedy N, Campbell FC. Evidence for hypomotility in non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prospective multifactorial study. Gut 1991;32:246 –251. Klauser AG, Voderholzer WA, Knesewitsch PA, Schindlbeck NE, Muller-Lissner SA. What is behind dyspepsia? Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:47–54. Scott AM, Kellow JE, Shuter B, Cowan H, Corbett AM, Riley JW, Lunzer MR, Eckstein RP, Hoschl R, Lam SK, et al. Intragastric distribution and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in functional dyspepsia. Lack of influence of symptom subgroups and H. pylori-associated gastritis. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:2247–2254. Quartero AO, de Wit NJ, Lodder AC, Numans ME, Smout AJ, Hoes AW. Disturbed solid-phase gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:2028 –2033. Maes BD, Ghoos YF, Hiele MI, Rutgeerts PJ. Gastric emptying rate of solids in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:1158 –1162. Perri F, Clemente R, Festa V, Annese V, Quitadamo M, Rutgeerts P, Andriulli A. Patterns of symptoms in functional dyspepsia: role of Helicobacter pylori infection and delayed gastric emptying. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:2082–2088. Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Jones M. Can symptoms discriminate among those with delayed or normal gastric emptying in dysmotility-like dyspepsia? Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1422–1428. Ricci R, Bontempo I, La Bella A, De Tschudy A, Corazziari E. Dyspeptic symptoms and gastric antrum distribution. An ultrasonographic study. Ital J Gastroenterol 1987;19:215–217. Hausken T, Berstad A. Wide gastric antrum in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Effect of cisapride. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:427– 432. Troncon LEA, Bennett RJM, Ahluwalia NK, Thompson DG. Abnormal distribution of food during gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia patients. Gut 1994;35:327–332. Gilja OH, Hausken T, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A. Impaired accommodation of proximal stomach to a meal in functional dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:689 – 696. Salet GAM, Samsom M, Roelofs JMM, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM, Akkermans LMA. Responses to gastric distention in functional dyspepsia. Gut 1998;42:823– 829. Kim DY, Delgado-Aros S, Camilleri M, Samsom M, Murray JA, O’Connor MK, Brinkmann BH, Stephens DA, Lighvani SS, Burton DD. Noninvasive measurement of gastric accommodation in patients with idiopathic nonulcer dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:3099 –3105. Boeckxstaens GE, Hirsch DP, Kuiken SD, Heisterkamp SH, Tytgat GN. The proximal stomach and postprandial symptoms in functional dyspeptics. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:40 – 48. Piessevaux H, Tack J, Walrand S, Pauwels S, Geubel A. Intragastric distribution of a standardized meal in health and functional dyspepsia: correlation with specific symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003;15:447– 455. FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1251 38. Ladabaum U, Koshy SS, Woods ML, Hooper FG, Owyang C, Hasler WL. Differential symptomatic and electrogastrographic effects of distal and proximal human gastric distension. Am J Physiol 1998;275:G418 –G424. 39. Marzio L, Falcucci M, Grossi L, Ciccaglione FA, Malatesta MG, Castellano A, Ballone E. Proximal and distal gastric distension in normal subjects and H. pylori-positive and -negative dyspeptic patients and correlation with symptoms. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43: 2757–2763. 40. Caldarella MP, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Antro-fundic dysfunctions in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1220–1229. 41. Lee KJ, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Differences in the sensorimotor response to distension between the proximal and distal stomach in humans. Gut 2004;53:938 –943. 42. Camilleri M, Coulie B, Tack J. Visceral hypersensitivity: facts, speculations and challenges. Gut 2001;48:125–131. 43. Lemann M, Dederding JP, Flourie B, Franchisseur C, Rambaud JC, Jian R. Abnormal perception of visceral pain in response to gastric distension in chronic idiopathic dyspepsia. The irritable stomach syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 1991;36:1249 –1254. 44. Bradette M, Pare P, Douville P, Morin A. Visceral perception in health and functional dyspepsia. Crossover study of gastric distensions with placebo and domperidone. Dig Dis Sci 1991; 36:52–58. 45. Mearin F, Cucala M, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. The origin of symptoms on the brain-gut axis in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1991;101:999 –1006. 46. Mertz H, Fullerton S, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. Symptoms and visceral perception in severe functional and organic dyspepsia. Gut 1998;42:814 – 822. 47. Rhee PL, Kim YH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Koh KC, Paik SW, Rhee JC, Choi KW. Evaluation of individual symptoms cannot predict presence of gastric hypersensitivity in functional dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 2000;45:1680 –1684. 48. Piessevaux H, Tack J, Wilmer A, Coulie B, Geubel A, Janssens J. Perception of changes in wall tension of the proximal stomach in humans. Gut 2001;49:203–208. 49. Distrutti E, Azpiroz F, Soldevilla A, Malagelada JR. Gastric wall tension determines perception of gastric distension. Gastroenterology 1999;116:1035–1042. 50. Tack J, Caenepeel P, Corsetti M, Janssens J. Role of tension receptors in dyspeptic patients with hypersensitivity to gastric distention. Gastroenterology 2004;127:1058 –1066. 51. Cervero F. Sensory innervation of the viscera: peripheral basis of visceral pain. Physiol Rev 1994;74:95–138. 52. Vandenberghe J, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Visceral hyperalgesia in functional dyspepsia (FD): Pain-specific or multimodal afferent pathways? Gastroenterology 2002;122(Suppl. 1):A34. 53. Tack J, Bisschops R, Caenepeel P, Vos R, Janssens J. Pathophysiological relevance of fasting versus postprandial sensitivity testing in functional dyspepsia (abstr). Gastroenterology 2002;122:A301. 54. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Hungin AP, Jones R, Axon A, Graham DY, Tytgat G. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus Report. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:167–180. 55. Danesh J, Lawrence M, Murphy M, Roberts S, Collins R. Systematic review of the epidemiological evidence on Helicobacter pylori infection and nonulcer or uninvestigated dyspepsia. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1192–1198. 56. Tucci A, Corinaldesi R, Stanghellini V, Tosetti C, Di Febo G, Paparo GF, Varoli O, Paganelli GM, Labate AM, Masci C, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric function in patients with chronic idiopathic dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1992;103:768–774. 57. Mearin F, de Ribot X, Balboa A, Salas A, Varas MJ, Cucala M, Bartolome R, Armengol JR, Malagelada JR. Does Helicobacter 1252 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. TACK ET AL. pylori infection increase gastric sensitivity in functional dyspepsia? Gut 1995;37:47–51. Saslow SB, Thumshirn M, Camilleri M, Locke GR III, Thomforde GM, Burton DD, Hanson RB. Influence of H. pylori infection on gastric motor and sensory function in asymptomatic volunteers. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43:258 –264. Thumshirn M, Camilleri M, Saslow SB, Williams DE, Burton DD, Hanson RB. Gastric accommodation in non-ulcer dyspepsia and the roles of Helicobacter pylori infection and vagal function. Gut 1999;44:55– 64. Rhee PL, Kim YH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Koh KC, Paik SW, Rhee JC, Choi KW. Lack of association of Helicobacter pylori infection with gastric hypersensitivity or delayed gastric emptying in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:3165–3169. Sarnelli G, Janssens J, Tack J. Helicobacter pylori is not associated with symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms of functional dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:2229 –2236. Houghton LA, Mangnall YF, Dwivedi A, Read N. Increased nutrient sensitivity in a subgroup of patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD). Gut 1990;31:A1185. Feinle C, Read NW. Ondansetron reduces nausea induced by gastroduodenal stimulation without changing gastric motility. Am J Physiol 1996;271:G591–G597. Feinle C, D’Amato M, Read NW. Cholecystokinin-A receptors modulate gastric sensory and motor responses to gastric distension and duodenal lipid. Gastroenterology 1996;110:1379–1385. Feinle C, Rades T, Otto B, Fried M. Fat digestion modulates gastrointestinal sensations induced by gastric distention and duodenal lipid in humans. Gastroenterology 2001;120:1100–1107. Feinle C, Meier O, Otto B, D’Amato M, Fried M. Role of duodenal lipid and cholecystokinin A receptors in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia. Gut 2001;48:347–355. Barbera R, Feinle C, Read NW. Nutrient-specific modulation of gastric mechanosensitivity in patients with functional dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1636 –1641. Barbera R, Feinle C, Read NW. Abnormal sensitivity to duodenal lipid infusion in patients with functional dyspepsia. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1995;7:1051–1057. Zerbib F, Bruley Des Varannes S, Scarpignato C, Leray V, D’Amato M, Roze C, Galmiche JP. Endogenous cholecystokinin in postprandial lower esophageal sphincter function and fundic tone in humans. Am J Physiol 1998;275:G1266 –G1273. DeMarchi B, Vos R, Deprez P, Janssens J, Tack J. Influence of a lipase inhibitor on gastric sensitivity and accommodation to an orally ingested meal. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:1261– 1268. Samsom M, Verhagen MA, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM. Abnormal clearance of exogenous acid and increased acid sensitivity of the proximal duodenum in dyspeptic patients. Gastroenterology 1999;116:515–520. Lee K, Demarchi B, Demedts I, Sifrim D, Raeymaekers P, Tack J. A pilot study on duodenal acid exposure and its relationship to symptoms in functional dyspepsia with prominent nausea. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1765–1773. Camilleri M, Brown ML, Malagelada JR. Relationship between impaired gastric emptying and abnormal gastrointestinal motility. Gastroenterology 1986;91:94 –99. Jebbink HJ, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Akkermans LM, Smout AJ. Small intestinal motor abnormalities in patients with functional dyspepsia demonstrated by ambulatory manometry. Gut 1996;38:694 –700. Wilmer A, Van Cutsem E, Andrioli A, Tack J, Coremans G, Janssens J. Ambulatory gastrojejunal manometry in severe motility-like dyspepsia: lack of correlation between dysmotility, symptoms, and gastric emptying. Gut 1998;42:235–242. GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 76. Lin W, Eaker EY, Sarosiek I, McCallum RW. Gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2384 –2389. 77. Parkman HP, Miller MA, Trate D, Knight LC, Urbain JL, Maurer AH, Fisher RS. Electrogastrography and gastric emptying scintigraphy are complementary for assessment of dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1997;24:214 –219. 78. Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Gastric tone measured by an electronic barostat in health and postsurgical gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 1987;92:934 –943. 79. Simren M, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Unsuppressed postprandial phasic contractility in the proximal stomach in functional dyspepsia: relevance to symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98:2169 –2175. 80. Hausken T, Svebak S, Wilhelmsen I, Haug TT, Olafsen K, Pettersson E, Hveem K, Berstad A. Low vagal tone and antral dysmotility in patients with functional dyspepsia. Psychosom Med 1993;55:12–22. 81. Holtmann G, Goebell H, Jockenhoevel F, Talley NJ. Altered vagal and intestinal mechanosensory function in chronic unexplained dyspepsia. Gut 1998;42:501–506. 82. Troncon LE, Thompson DG, Ahluwalia NK, Barlow J, Heggie L. Relations between upper abdominal symptoms and gastric distension abnormalities in dysmotility like functional dyspepsia and after vagotomy. Gut 1995;37:17–22. 83. Wilhelmsen I, Haug TT, Ursin H, Berstad A. Discriminant analysis of factors distinguishing patients with functional dyspepsia from patients with duodenal ulcer. Significance of somatization. Dig Dis Sci 1995;40:1105–1111. 84. Bennett EJ, Kellow JE, Cowan H, Scott AM, Shuter B, Langeluddecke PM, Hoschl R, Jones MP, Tennant CC. Suppression of anger and gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol 1992;27:869 – 874. 85. Haug TT, Svebak S, Hausken T, Wilhelmsen I, Berstad A, Ursin H. Low vagal activity as mediating mechanism for the relationship between personality factors and gastric symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Psychosom Med 1994;56:181–186. 86. Tougas G, Chen Y, Luo D, Salter J, D’Elia T, Earnest DL. Tegaserod improves gastric emptying in patients with gastroparesis and dyspeptic symptoms (abstr). Gastroenterology 2003;124:A54. 87. Coulie B, Tack J, Maes B, et al. Sumatriptan delays gastric emptying of a solid/meal without induction of epigastric symptoms (abstr). Gastroenterology 1996;110:A651. 88. Tack J, Caenepeel P, Piessevaux H, Cuomo R, Janssens J. Assessment of meal-induced gastric accommodation by a satiety drinking test in health and in severe functional dyspepsia. Gut 2003;52:1271–1277. 89. Bruley des Varannes S, Parys V, Ropert A, Chayvialle JA, Roze C, Galmiche JP. Erythromycin enhances fasting and postprandial proximal gastric tone in humans. Gastroenterology 1995;109:32–39. 90. Kamerling I, Van Haarst A, Burggraaf J, Schoemaker RC, Biemond I, Heinwerling H, Jones R, Cohen AF, Masclee AA. Motilin effects on the proximal stomach in patients with functional dyspepsia and healthy volunteers. Am J Physiol 2003; 284:G776 –G781. 91. Coulie B, Vandaele P, Tack J, Peeters T, Janssens J. Motilin increases gastric fundus tone in man via activation of a cholinergic pathway. Gastroenterology 1997;112(Suppl.):A1140. 92. Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Vagally mediated gastric relaxation induced by intestinal nutrients in the dog. Am J Physiol 1986; 251:G727–G735. 93. De Ponti F, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Reflex gastric relaxation in response to distention of the duodenum. Am J Physiol 1987; 252:G595–G601. 94. Desai KM, Sessa WC, Vane JR. Involvement of nitric oxide in the reflex relaxation of the stomach to accommodate food or fluid. Nature 1991;35:477– 479. October 2004 95. Tack J, Demedts I, Meulemans A, Schuurkes J, Janssens J. Role of nitric oxide in the gastric accommodation reflex and in meal induced satiety in humans. Gut 2002;51:219 –224. 96. Kuiken SD, Vergeer M, Heisterkamp SH, Tytgat GN, Boeckxstaens GE. Role of nitric oxide in gastric motor and sensory functions in healthy subjects. Gut 2002;51:212–218. 97. Kuiken SD, Lei A, Tytgat GN, Holman R, Boeckxstaens GE. Effect of the low-affinity, non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on visceral perception in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1955–1962. 98. Sobala GM, Crabtree JE, Dixon MF, Schorah CJ, Taylor JD, Rathbone BJ, Heatley RV, Axon AT. Acute Helicobacter pylori infection: clinical features, local and systemic immune response, gastric mucosal histology and gastric juice ascorbic acid concentrations. Gut 1991;32:1415–1418. 99. Kim MS, Chey WD, Owyang C, Hasler WL. Role of plasma vasopressin as a mediator of nausea and gastric slow wave dysrhythmias in motion sickness. Am J Physiol 1997;272:G853–G862. 100. Lee KJ, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Influence of duodenal acidification on the sensorimotor function of the proximal stomach in humans. Am J Physiol 2004;286:G278 –G284. 101. Di Stefano M, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Effect of acid perfusion of the duodenum on induction of dyspeptic symptoms in healthy volunteers (abstr). Gastroenterology 2003;124:A80. 102. Di Stefano M, Vos R, Janssens J, Tack J. Neostigmine-induced increase of proximal stomach contraction and dyspeptic symptoms in healthy volunteers (abstr). Gastroenterology 2003;124: A225. 103. Gwee KA, Graham JC, McKendrick MW, Collins SM, Marshall JS, Read NW. Psychometric scores and persistence of irritable bowel after infectious diarrhea. Lancet 1996;347:150 –153. 104. Bityutskiy LP, Soykan I, McCallum RW. Viral gastroparesis: a subgroup of idiopathic gastroparesis. Clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:1501– 1504. 105. Gue M, Del Rio-Lacheze C, Eutamene H, Theodorou V, Fioramonti J, Bueno L. Stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity to rectal distension in rats: role of CRF and mast cells. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1997;9:271–279. 106. Gunter WD, Shepard JD, Foreman RD, Myers DA, GreenwoodVan Meerveld B. Evidence for visceral hypersensitivity in highanxiety rats. Physiol Behav 2000;69:379 –382. 107. Accarino AM, Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Attention and distraction: effects on gut perception. Gastroenterology 1997;113: 415– 422. 108. Holtmann G, Siffert W, Haag S, Mueller N, Langkafel M, Senf W, Zotz R, Talley NJ. G-protein beta 3 subunit 825 CC genotype is associated with unexplained (functional) dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2004;126:971–979. 109. Bytzer P, Talley NJ. Dyspepsia. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:815– 822. 110. Johnsson F, Roth Y, Damgaard Pedersen NE, Joelsson B. Cimetidine improves GERD symptoms in patients selected by a validated GERD questionnaire. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993; 7:81– 86. 111. Tack J, Lee K, Sifrim D, Janssens J. Prevalence and symptomatic impact of non-erosive reflux disease in functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2002;122(Suppl. 1):786. 112. Corsetti M, Caenepeel P, Fischler B, Janssens J, Tack J. Impact of coexisting irritable bowel syndrome on symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1152–1159. 113. Bytzer P, Hansen JM, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Empirical H2-blocker therapy or prompt endoscopy in management of dyspepsia. Lancet 1994;343:811– 816. 114. Goves J, Oldring JK, Kerr D, Dallara RG, Roffe EJ, Powell JA, Taylor MD. First line treatment with omeprazole provides an FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 115. 116. 117. 118. 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 1253 effective and superior alternative strategy in the management of dyspepsia compared to antacid/alginate liquid: a multicentre study in general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12: 147–157. Jones RH, Baxter G. Lansoprazole 30 mg daily versus ranitidine 150 mg b.d. in the treatment of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997;11:541–546. Mason I, Millar LJ, Sheikh RR, Evans WM, Todd PL, Turbitt ML, Taylor MD. The management of acid-related dyspepsia in general practice: a comparison of an omeprazole versus an antacidalginate/ranitidine management strategy. Compete Research Group. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:263–271. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: evaluation of dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1998; 114:579 –581. Spiegel BM, Vakil NB, Ofman JJ. Dyspepsia management in primary care: a decision analysis of competing strategies. Gastroenterology 2002;122:1270 –1285. Talley NJ. Clinical management. Dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2003;125:1219 –1226. Koloski NA, Talley NJ, Boyce PM. Predictors of health care seeking for irritable bowel syndrome and nonulcer dyspepsia: a critical review of the literature on symptom and psychosocial factors. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1340 –1349. Owens DM, Nelson DK, Talley NJ. The irritable bowel syndrome: long-term prognosis and the physician-patient interaction. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:107–112. Boekema PJ, Samsom M, Roelofs JMM, Smout AJPM. Effect of coffee on motor and sensory function of proximal stomach. Dig Dis Sci 2001;46:945–951. Bortolotti M, Coccia G, Grossi G, Miglioli M. The treatment of functional dyspepsia with red pepper. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2002;16:1075–1082. Talley NJ. Functional dyspepsia: should treatment be targeted on disturbed physiology? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1995;9:107– 115. Redstone HA, Barrowman N, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten SJ. H2receptor antagonists in the treatment of functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1291–1299. Schwarz MP, Samsom M, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Smout AJPM. Effect of inhibition of gastric acid secretion on antropyloroduodenal motor activity and duodenal acid hypersensitivity in functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1921– 1928. Corinaldesi R, Stanghellini V, Raiti C, Rea E, Salgemini R, Barbara L. Effect of chronic administration of cisapride on gastric emptying of a solid meal and on dyspeptic symptoms in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis. Gut 1987;28:300 –305. Finney JS, Kinnersley N, Hughes M, O’Bryan-Tear CG, Lothian J. Meta-analysis of antisecretory and gastrokinetic compounds in functional dyspepsia. J Clin Gastroenterol 1998;26:312–320. Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Jones MJ, Verlinden M, Talley NJ. Efficacy of cisapride and domperidone in functional dyspepsia: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:689 – 696. Sturm A, Holtmann G, Goebell H, Gerken G. Prokinetics in patients with gastroparesis: a systematic analysis. Digestion 1999;60:422– 427. Degen L, Matzinger D, Merz M, Appel-Dingemanse S, Osborne S, Luchinger S, Bertold R, Maecke H, Beglinger C. Tegaserod, a 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, accelerates gastric emptying and gastrointestinal transit in healthy male subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1745–1751. Janssens J, Peeters TL, Vantrappen G, Tack J, Urbain JL, De Roo M, Muls E, Bouillon R. Improvement of gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis by erythromycin. N Engl J Med 1990; 332:1028 –1031. 1254 TACK ET AL. 133. Richards RD, Davenport K, McCallum RW. The treatment of idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis with acute intravenous and chronic oral erythromycin. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88: 203–207. 134. DiBaise JK, Quigley EM. Efficacy of prolonged administration of intravenous erythromycin in an ambulatory setting as treatment of severe gastroparesis: one center’s experience. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999;28:131–134. 135. Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Snape W, Beker JA, Ducrotte P, Dettmer A, Brinkhoff H, Eaker E, Ohning G, Miner PB, Mathias JR, Fumagalli I, Staessen D, Mack RJ. Failure of a motilin receptor agonist (ABT-229) to relieve the symptoms of functional dyspepsia in patients with and without delayed gastric emptying: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000;14:1653–1661. 136. Verhagen MA, Samsom M, Maes B, Geypens BJ, Ghoos YF, Smout AJ. Effects of a new motilide, ABT-229, on gastric emptying and postprandial antroduodenal motility in healthy volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997;11:1077–1086. 137. Tack J, Peeters T. What comes after macrolides and other motilin stimulants? Gut 2001;49:317–318. 138. Tack J, Broeckaert D, Coulie B, Janssens J. The influence of cisapride on gastric tone and the perception of gastric distension. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:761–766. 139. Tack J, Vos R, Janssens J, Salter J, Jauffret S, Vandeplassche G. Influence of tegaserod on proximal gastric tone and on the perception of gastric distention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18:1–7. 140. Tack J, Delia T, Ligozio G, Sue S, Lefkowitz M, Vandeplassche G. A phase II placebo controlled randomized trial with tegaserod in functional dyspepsia patients with normal gastric emptying (abstr). Gastroenterology 2002;122:A154. 141. McColl K, Murray L, El-Omar E, Dickson A, El-Nujumi A, Wirz A, Kelman A, Penny C, Knill-Jones R, Hilditch T. Symptomatic benefit from eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 1998;339: 1869 –1874. 142. Blum AL, Talley NJ, O’Morain C, van Zanten SV, Labenz J, Stolte M, Louw JA, Stubberod A, Theodors A, Sundin M, BollingSternevald E, Junghard O. Lack of effect of treating Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. Omeprazole plus Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin Effect One Year after Treatment (OCAY) Study Group [see comments]. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:1875–1881. 143. Talley NJ, Janssens J, Lauritsen K, Racz I, Bolling-Sternevald E. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in functional dyspepsia: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial with 12 months’ follow up. The Optimal Regimen Cures Helicobacter Induced Dyspepsia (ORCHID) Study Group. BMJ 1999;318: 833– 837. 144. Talley NJ, Vakil N, Ballard ED II, Fennerty MB. Absence of benefit of eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1106 –1111. 145. McColl KE. Protagonist: should we eradicate Helicobacter pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia? Gut 2001;48:759 –761. 146. Clouse RE. Antidepressants for functional gastrointestinal syndromes. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:2352–2363. 147. Mertz H, Fass R, Kodner A, Yan-Go F, Fullerton S, Mayer EA. Effect of amitriptyline on symptoms, sleep, and visceral perception in patients with functional dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:160 –165. 148. Tanum L, Malt UF. A new pharmacologic treatment of functional gastrointestinal disorder. A double-blind placebo-controlled study with mianserin. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:318 – 325. 149. Tack J, Broeckaert D, Coulie B, Fischler B, Janssens J. Influence of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, paroxetine, on GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 127, No. 4 150. 151. 152. 153. 154. 155. 156. 157. 158. 159. 160. 161. 162. 163. 164. 165. 166. gastric sensorimotor function in man. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:603– 608. Wu CY, Chou LT, Chen HP, Chang CS, Wong PG, Chen GH. Effect of fluoxetine on symptoms and gastric dysrhythmia in patients with functional dyspepsia. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50: 278 –283. Gilja OH, Hausken T, Bang CJ, Berstad A. Effect of glyceryl trinitrate on gastric accommodation and symptoms in functional dyspepsia. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:2124 –2131. Sarnelli G, Sifrim D, Janssens J, Tack J. Influence of sildenafil on gastric sensorimotor function in man. Am J Physiol 2004 (in press). Gershon MD, Jonakait GM. Uptake and release of 5-hydroxytryptamine by enteric 5-hydroxytryptaminergic neurons: effects of fluoxetine (Lilley 110140) and chlorimipramine. Br J Pharmacol 1979;66:7–9. Tack J, Coulie B, Wilmer A, Andrioli A, Janssens J. Effect of sumatriptan on gastric fundus tone and on the perception of gastric distension in man. Gut 2000;46:468 – 473. Sarnelli G, Janssens J, Tack J. Effect of intranasal sumatriptan on gastric tone and sensitivity to distension. Dig Dis Sci 2001; 46:1591–1595. Tack J, Piessevaux H, Coulie B, Fischler B, De Gucht V, Janssens J. A placebo-controlled trial of buspirone, a fundus-relaxing drug in functional dyspepsia: effect on symptoms and gastric sensory and motor function (abstr G1423). Gastroenterology 1999;116:A325. Thumshirn M, Camilleri M, Choi MG, Zinsmeister AR. Modulation of gastric sensory and motor functions by nitrergic and alpha2-adrenergic agents in humans. Gastroenterology 1999; 116:573–585. Talley NJ, Van Zanten SV, Saez LR, Dukes G, Perschyt T, Heath M, Kleoudis C, Mangel AW. A dose-ranging, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of alosetron in patients with functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:525–537. Zerbib F, Bruley des Varannes S, Oriola RC, McDonald J, Isal JP, Galmiche JP. Alosetron does not affect the visceral perception of gastric distension in healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1994;8:403– 407. Thompson CA. Alosetron withdrawn from market. Am J HealthSyst Pharm 2001;58:13. Coffin B, Bouhassira D, Chollet R, Fraitag B, De Meynard C, Geneve J, Lemann M, Willer JC, Jian R. Effect of the kappa agonist fedotozine on perception of gastric distension in healthy humans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1996;10:919 –925. Read NW, Abitbol JL, Bardhan KD, Whorwell PJ, Fraitag B. Efficacy and safety of the peripheral kappa agonist fedotozine versus placebo in the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Gut 1997;41:664 – 668. Delgado-Aros S, Hial HJ, Cremonini F, Ferber I, McKinzie S, Burton DD, Camilleri M. Effects of asimadoline, a kappa-opioid agonist, on satiation and postprandial symptoms in health. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18:507–514. Biro T, Acs G, Acs P, Modarres S, Blumberg PM. Recent advances in understanding of vanilloid receptors: a therapeutic target for treatment of pain and inflammation in skin. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 1997;2:56 – 60. Lee KJ, Vos R, Tack J. Effects of capsaicin on the sensorimotor function of the proximal stomach in humans. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19:415– 425. Holtmann G, Adam B, Haag S, Collet W, Grunewald E, Windeck T. Efficacy of artichoke leaf extract in the treatment of patients with functional dyspepsia: a six-week placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18: 1099 –1105. October 2004 167. Bennett EJ, Piesse C, Palmer K, Badcock CA, Tennant CC, Kellow JE. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: psychological, social, and somatic features. Gut 1998;42:414 – 420. 168. Soo S, Moayyedi P, Deeks J, Delaney B, Lewis M, Forman D. Psychological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;4:CD002301. 169. Hamilton J, Guthrie E, Creed F, Thompson D, Tomenson B, Bennett R, Moriarty K, Stephens W, Liston R. A randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy in patients with chronic functional dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 2000;119:661– 669. FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA 1255 170. Calvert EL, Houghton LA, Cooper P, Whorwell P. Long-term improvement in functional dyspepsia using hypnotherapy. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1778 –1785. Received November 20, 2003. Accepted May 6, 2004. Address requests for reprints to: Jan Tack, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. e-mail: [email protected]; fax: (32) 16-34-44-19.