Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients.
Transcription
Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients.
This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Refer to a center with both pediatric oncology and orthopedic surgery is essential. CLINICAL EVALUATION History and Physical CBC, differential, platelets, total protein, albumin, calcium, total bilirubin, alkaline Phosphatase, LDH, AST, Phosphate, sodium, potassium, chloride, CO2, and coagulation battery. Plain films of primary MRI of primary Bone Scan CXR CT Scan of chest PET scan Biopsy (open vs. needle) Histology review by Bone Tumor Pathologist EKG or ECHO CVC Pregnancy Test if clinically indicated Discuss fertility *Excluding Head and Neck and Low Grade Osteosarcoma ADJUVANT TREATMENT PRIMARY TREATMENT See page 2 Yes Consider local treatment options for Primary disease Yes High Dose Ifosfamide for 4-8 cycles2 Surgery (amputation)3 Yes Metastasis? Pulmonary Metastasis? No Is Primary Tumor resectable? Yes Is there a treatment response? Repeat CT of chest Yes Assess Treatment Response Reimage and clinical exam of Primary Tumor High Dose Ifosfamide for 4-8 cycles2 No No Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy1 for 5-6 weeks Progressive disease of Primary site? No Is Primary Tumor resectable? Resume Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for 5 – 6 weeks Yes Surgery: (limb salvage vs. amputation) Pathological response? No Consider individualized surveillance treatment regimen based on clinical indications Local palliative treatment for Primary Tumor and ● Consider management of metastatic disease ● No Greater than or equal to 90% Necrosis Adjuvant Chemotherapy 2-4 weeks after surgery for approximately 27-31 weeks4 Less than 90% Necrosis Continue Adjuvant Chemotherapy and consider Ifosfamide5 See page 2 for management based on metastatic disease 1 DOXOrubicin plus CISplatin, High-Dose MethoTREXate plus Dexrazoxane for cardioprotection 2 High-dose Ifosfamide /Mesna plus or minus Etoposide; monitor and take into consideration renal function for continuation of chemotherapy regimen 4 DOXOrubicin + CISplatin, High-dose MethoTREXate with or without Ifosfamide plus or minus Etoposide (MAPIE) plus Dexrazoxane for cardioprotection Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SURVEILLANCE 3 5 Consider amputation, especially if an extremity lesion High-dose Ifosfamide /Mesna plus or minus Etoposide See page 3 for Surveillance Department of Clinical Effectiveness V2 Department ClinicalStaff Effectiveness Approved by Executive Committee of theofMedical 03/27/2012V2 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 03/27/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Refer to a center with both pediatric oncology and orthopedic surgery is essential. *Excluding Head and Neck and Low Grade Osteosarcoma SURVEILLANCE ADJUVANT TREATMENT PRIMARY TREATMENT Metastasis Consider individualized treatment based on clinical indications ● Palliative Care ● Consider Supportive Care ● Yes DOXOrubicin, CISplatin, High dose MethoTREXate for 4-6 weeks6 Restage to assess for progression Is there tumor progression? No Continue same Chemotherapy for 6 to 8 weeks Re-image Primary and Metastasis Is there tumor progression? No Yes Yes ● Local control of 32 Is there a plateau of response? Yes No 6 7 DOXOrubicin + CISplatin, High-Dose MethoTREXate plus Dexrazoxane for cardioprotection Primary Tumor ● Continue chemotherapy ● Consider local therapies of other disease sites Continue same chemotherapy for 6 to 8 weeks Reassess for treatment response Is there disease progression? No See pg 3 for Surveillance Consider local therapies of all sites 7 ● Monitor for treatment response ● Monitor for progression after 2-3 months of chemotherapy for approximately one year of treatment. If no progression of disease following completion of chemotherapy regimen then move patient to surveillance (page 3). Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V2 Department ClinicalStaff Effectiveness Approved by Executive Committee of theofMedical 03/27/2012V2 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 03/27/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Refer to a center with both pediatric oncology and orthopedic surgery is essential. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center *Excluding Head and Neck and Low Grade Osteosarcoma Department of Clinical Effectiveness V2 Department ClinicalStaff Effectiveness Approved by Executive Committee of theofMedical 03/27/2012V2 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 03/27/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Refer to a center with both pediatric oncology and orthopedic surgery is essential. *Excluding Head and Neck and Low Grade Osteosarcoma SUGGESTED READINGS 1. Children’s Oncology Group Protocols: CCG7921 and COG AOST 0331 2. Anderson PM and Salazar-Abshire M. Improving outcomes in difficult bone cancers using multimodality therapy including radiation: physician and nursing perspectives. Current Oncology 8:415-422, 2006. 3. Anderson P, Aguilera D, Pearson M, WooS. Outpatient chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in sarcomas: improving cancer control with radiosensitizing agents. Cancer Control 15;38-46, 2008. PMID: 18094659 4. Mahajan A, Woo S, Kornguth DG, Hughes D, Huh W, Chang EL, Herzog CE, Peloski CE, Anderson PM. Multimodality treatment of osteosarcoma: Radiation in a high-risk cohort. Pediatric Blood and Cancer. 50:976-982, 2008. PMID: 18213710. 5. Anderson P, Kornguth D, Ahrar K, Hughes D, Phan P, Huh W, Cornelius, K, Mahajan A. Recurrent, refractory, metastatic, and/or unresectable pediatric sarcomas: treatment options for young people that are off the roadmap. Pediatric Health 2:605-615, 2008. 6. Hamayun Imran, Felicity Enders, Mark Krailo, Franklin Sim, Scott Okuno, Douglas Hawkins, Joseph Neglia, R. Lor Randall, Richard Womer, Leo Mascarenhas, and Carola A.S. Arndt Effect of Time to Resumption of Chemotherapy After Definitive Surgery on Prognosis for Non-Metastatic Osteosarcoma J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., Mar 2009; 91: 604 - 612. Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V2 Department ClinicalStaff Effectiveness Approved by Executive Committee of theofMedical 03/27/2012V2 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 03/27/2012 This practice algorithm has been specifically developed for M. D. Anderson using a multidisciplinary approach and taking into consideration circumstances particular to M. D. Anderson, including the following: M. D. Anderson’s specific patient population; M. D. Anderson’s services and structure; and M. D. Anderson’s clinical information. Moreover, this algorithm is not intended to replace the independent medical or professional judgment of physicians or other health care providers. This algorithm should not be used to treat pregnant women. Note: Consider Clinical Trials as treatment options for eligible patients. Refer to a center with both pediatric oncology and orthopedic surgery is essential. *Excluding Head and Neck and Low Grade Osteosarcoma DEVELOPMENT CREDITS Pete Anderson, M.D., Ph.D. Ŧ Valerae Lewis, M.D. Ŧ Anita Mahajan, M.D. Ŧ Dennis Hughes, M.D., Ph.D. Janie Rutledge, RN, MS, ANP, OCN Stephanie Fulton, MS Bryan Moon, M.D. Mary McAleer, M.D., Ph.D. Shiao Woo, M.D. Patrick Lin, M.D. Eugenie Kleinerman, M.D. Ŧ Core Development Team Copyright 2012 The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Department of Clinical Effectiveness V2 Department ClinicalStaff Effectiveness Approved by Executive Committee of theofMedical 03/27/2012V2 Approved by Executive Committee of the Medical Staff 03/27/2012