6 Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis Luigi Fedele *

Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 333–339, 2008
doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.07.006
available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com
6
Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis
Luigi Fedele *
MD
Professor, Head of Department
Stefano Bianchi
MD
Assistant Professor
Giada Frontino
MD
Resident
Fondazione Policlinico, Mangiagalli e Regina Elena, Clinica Ostetrica e Ginecologica II, Universita` di Milano,
Istituto Luigi Mangiagalli, Via della Commenda 12, 20122 Milano, Italy
Like endometriosis and uterine myomas, adenomyosis presents the typical characteristics of
oestrogen-dependent diseases. The medical treatment of adenomyosis is based on the hormonal
dependency of the disease and its strongly debated similarities with endometriosis. Infact, despite
the evident differences between the two conditions, the therapies that treat endometriosis effectively have also been successful for the treatment of adenomyosis. Although the two diseases
have distinct epidemiological features, they have the same ‘target tissue’ for hormonal therapy,
namely ectopic endometrium. Recognized approaches are systemic hormonal treatments, which
are generally used for endometriosis and are capable of suppressing the oestrogenic induction of
the disease, and local hormonal treatment that targets the ectopic endometrium directly.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, danazol and intrauterine levonorgestrel- or
danazol-releasing devices have been used in the treatment of adenomyosis. Despite the solid
rational basis for its hormonal treatment, few studies have been performed on medical therapy
for adenomyosis.
Key words: adenomyosis; medical therapy; levonorgestrel-IUD; pelvic pain; menorrhagia.
Adenomyosis is characterized by the presence of endometrial glands and stroma
within the myometrium. The ectopic endometrium is typically surrounded by reactive,
hypertrophic and hyperplastic myometrium.1 The disease can range from small microscopical isolated endometrial islands within the myometrium to extensive infiltration
of uterine walls, or grossly visible nodules without a capsule, allowing clear distinction
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ39 02 55032318; Fax: þ39 02 50320252.
E-mail address: [email protected] (L. Fedele).
1521-6934/$ - see front matter ª 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
334 L. Fedele et al
from normal myometrium.2 The former situation is more common and is referred to
as ‘diffuse adenomyosis’, while the latter case describes nodular adenomyosis (also
called ‘adenomyomas’) which is relatively rare. There are many uncertainties regarding
the true incidence of the disease and the correlation with its commonly associated
symptoms, namely metrorrhagia and pelvic pain.3 These doubts are due to the fact
that it is impossible to confirm or exclude the presence of adenomyosis without
prior adequate pathological assessment of the uterus, and there is no consensus regarding which histological diagnostic criteria should be applied for diagnosis of the
disease.1,4–7 Study populations have invariably been constituted by women undergoing
hysterectomy for menorrhagia and an enlarged uterus, especially in the fifth decade of
life, so it should not be surprising that adenomyosis is commonly believed to be prevalent in women between 40 and 50 years of age. In fact, there are insufficient data, i.e.
hysterectomies, regarding younger women. From the literature, it can be estimated
that adenomyosis is present in approximately 20–30% of women who undergo hysterectomy3, and that, at least in the more severe forms of endometrial infiltration, there
is a causal relationship between the disease, metrorrhagia and dysmenorrhoea.8,9 The
relationship between adenomyosis, metrorrhagia and pelvic pain is less clear in the
more limited forms, and the correlation between adenomyosis and infertility, which
is strongly maintained by some authors10,11, needs to be confirmed. With the exception of some nodular lesions, conservative surgical treatment is impracticable as it is
not possible to isolate the adenomyotic tissue distinctly, so hysterectomy is the only
rational and complete procedure. Recently, imaging studies for the diagnosis of adenomyosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasound have shown
these methods to be accurate and reliable.12–16 The definition of imaging diagnostic
criteria for adenomyosis has allowed effective assessment of the medical treatments
and of new conservative operative techniques, i.e. uterine artery embolization and
MRI-focused ultrasound surgery.17
The medical treatment of adenomyosis is based on the hormonal dependency of
the disease and its strongly debated similarities with endometriosis. Despite the evident differences between the two conditions, the therapies that treat endometriosis
effectively have also been successful for the treatment of adenomyosis. Although
the two diseases have distinct epidemiological features, they have the same ‘target
tissue’ in common for hormonal therapy–ectopic endometrium.
RATIONAL BASIS OF HORMONAL MEDICAL THERAPY
Like endometriosis and uterine myomas, adenomyosis presents the typical characteristics of oestrogen-dependent diseases. In fact, it is absent before menarche and
regresses rapidly after menopause. Studies on hormone–ligand binding in adenomyosis
report that oestrogen receptors are always present, whereas progesterone receptors
are found less frequently.18 Androgen receptors have also been encountered in
adenomyotic tisssue. The first studies in adenomyosis demonstrated that the levels
of receptors for sex steroids were generally lower than those present in the endometrium, although this was disclaimed recently.19 Aromatase is an enzyme that converts
androgens to oestrogens, i.e. D4-androstenedione in oestrone, and can be found
in adenomyotic tissue.20,21 The enzyme oestrone sulphatase is also present21,22, and
converts oestrone-3-sulphate, the most prevalent circulating oestrogen, into 17boestradiol. The combined activity of aromatase and oestrone sulphatase increases
the local oestrogenic activity that, along with the circulating oestrogens, stimulates
Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis 335
the growth of adenomyotic tissue through interaction with oestrogen receptors. The
apoptosis suppressor gene product, blc-2, is also expressed constantly during the
cycle.19 Blc-2 is normally expressed in a cyclic fashion, with peak levels during the proliferative phase.23 The local hyper-oestrogenic metabolic state, together with the
anomalous expression of blc-2, may contribute to promote the ‘invasive’ and
diffusive process of adenomyosis in the myometrium.
MEDICAL THERAPY
While medical therapy for endometriosis has always been of great interest and has
been widely studied and applied in clinical practice, the same is not true for adenomyosis. Undoubtedly, the different age range of patients and the higher tendency towards
definitive surgery, as well as the fact that it is impossible to obtain a pre-operative
diagnosis, have all played an important role. However, even since the establishment
of reliable instrumental diagnostic criteria, there has not been particular interest in
medical treatment for adenomyosis. In this setting, an effective and well-tolerated
medical therapy for its symptoms could allow a major reduction in surgical
intervention.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, danazol and intrauterine
levonorgestrel- or danazol-releasing devices have been used in the treatment of adenomyosis. Recognized approaches are systemic hormonal treatments, which are generally used for endometriosis and are capable of suppressing the oestrogenic induction
of the disease, and local hormonal treatment that targets the ectopic endometrium
directly.
GnRH agonists
GnRH agonists were the first drugs used in the treatment of adenomyosis. In 1991,
Grow and Filer24 reported a case of symptomatic adenomyosis in which treatment
with a GnRH agonist resulted in a reduction in uterine volume and resolution of symptoms. Other reports of small numbers of cases confirmed these findings.25,26 At the
end of treatment, some patients conceived immediately24–29, while other patients experienced a progressive increase in uterine size and recurrence of symptoms. Similarly
to endometriosis, in adenomyosis, interruption of suppressive hormonal therapy is
followed by relapse of the disease and correlated symptoms within 6 months. These
data suggest that therapy should be continued for longer periods of time, but prolonged treatment with GnRH agonists causes hypo-oestrogenism-related side-effects
such as vaginal dryness, hot flushes and mood swings, and can lead to a significant
reduction in bone mineral density. Such inconvenience may be limited by associating
an add-back therapy, although specific studies on this therapeutic regime for the
treatment of adenomyosis are lacking.
GnRH agonists are highly effective in the reduction of uterine volume and alleviation of symptoms associated with adenomyosis, although their use for long periods
of time is impracticable due to hypo-oestrogenic side-effects. Based on the scanty
data published in the literature, treatment with a GnRH agonist for 3–6 months can
be followed by a viable pregnancy. This therapy may therefore be indicated for women
with diffuse adenomyosis seeking a pregnancy.29,30 Another indication may be preoperative therapy in cases of nodular adenomyosis. This specific approach lacks
specific studies and although surgery may be facilitated due to reduced volume and
336 L. Fedele et al
vascularization, the demarcation between normal tissue and the adenomyoma could
be indistinct, thus increasing the risk of incomplete excision and early relapse.
Oral contraceptives
Various studies have shown that treatment with oral oestroprogestin contraceptives,
especially when administered in a continuous modality, can effectively control the
symptoms of endometriosis and limit disease progression.31 Unfortunately, no studies
have evaluated this therapeutic approach in patients with adenomyosis. The administration of a cyclic oral contraceptive following therapy with a GnRH agonist has not
been shown to prevent recurrence of pelvic pain and menorrhagia.25
Danazol
There is limited experience in the literature regarding the use of systemic therapy with
danazol in patients with adenomyosis. Danazol may exert its effect on adenomyosis as
it does on endometriosis, i.e. through induction of a hypogonadic state, as well as its
direct interaction with endometrial receptors for androgens and progesterone. As
a consequence of this double effect, the endometrium undergoes hypo-atrophy.
Ueki et al19 demonstrated that during systemic treatment with danazol, oestrogen
receptor and bcl-2 protein concentrations were reduced in glands and stromal cells
of adenomyosis, and were associated with an increase in apoptotic cell necrosis.
This effect was markedly increased with danazol compared with leuprolide acetate, although, even after 6 months of therapy with danazol, menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea
recurred within a few cycles of treatment suspension.
Intra-uterine devices
The insertion of an intrauterine device releasing 20 mg of levonorgestrel (Lng-IUD)
daily has been demonstrated to induce marked atrophy of the endometrial glands
and stromal decidualization.32 This device was originally studied for contraceptive
purposes, but has been used successfully in many women with idiopathic menorrhagia
and is deemed to be a therapeutic approach of choice for this condition.33
In some studies, the Lng-IUD has demonstrated effectiveness in women with
adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia. Fedele et al34 assessed the Lng-IUD in 25
women between 38 and 45 years of age, with recurrent menorrhagia for at least 6
months and with a blood loss of >80 mL, as estimated by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC). Adenomyosis was diagnosed through transvaginal ultrasound and
confirmed on MRI in nine cases. The treatment was predicted to last for at least 12
months. Three months after Lng-IUD insertion, none of the patients reported persistence of menorrhagia and the PBAC score had decreased from 211 61 to 48 17.
Although most of the patients had persistent spotting in the first months of treatment,
by the end of the first year, 16 patients had regular cycles, three had oligomenorrhoea,
two had amenorrhoea and only two had spotting. Two patients had discontinued treatment prematurely; one due to IUD expulsion after 2 months, and the other due to
persistent irregular bleeding. All the other patients showed an important increase in
haemoglobin levels, serum iron and ferritin without concomitant modifications in lipid
metabolism and the coagulation asset. A moderate but significant decrease in uterine
volume, measured at transvaginal ultrasound, was reported during treatment.
Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis 337
In one case report, the insertion of an Lng-IUD in a woman with a grossly enlarged
uterus with adenomyosis associated with dysmenorrhoea and menorrhagia resulted in
a marked decrease in uterine size and resolution of the symptoms after 12 months.35
More recently, a short-term study confirmed the efficacy of the Lng-IUD in women
with symptomatic adenomyosis. After 3 months, marked reduction in menstrual blood
loss and resolution of dysmenorrhoea were observed, along with a significant reduction in uterine volume.36 The Lng-IUD has also been used in the postoperative treatment of patients after endometrial ablation for adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia.
In a randomized study, Maia et al37 assigned 95 women who underwent endometrial
ablation for symptomatic adenomyosis to Lng-IUD therapy or no further treatment.
After 1 year of follow-up, the rate of amenorrhoea was higher in patients treated
with the Lng-IUD. A second surgical procedure was required in 19% of patients in
the expectant management group and in none of the patients treated with the
Lng-IUD. Since adenomyosis is extremely difficult to resect completely through
hysteroscopic ablation, and in consideration of the results obtained with Lng-IUD
treatment, it should be discussed whether combined hysteroscopic–medical treatment
may actually yield better results than medical treatment alone.
In 2000, Igarashi et al38 described the effects of insertion of an IUD containing
danazol in 14 women with symptomatic adenomyosis that had relapsed after previous
systemic treatments with a GnRH agonist and/or danazol. During treatment, there was
complete resolution of dysmenorrhea in nine patients, a reduction in four patients and
no improvement in one patient. Excessive menstrual blood loss was abolished in 12
women, whereas no modification was observed in two women. The efficacy of this
treatment was seen from the first cycle after insertion. Three of the four infertile
women conceived after removal of the IUD. Of note, serum levels of danazol during
treatment were below the limit of detection, and the typical side-effects associated
with systemic administration were not reported. Ovulation and menstruation both occurred as in pretreatment cycles. No data are available regarding prolonged treatment
or the contraceptive effectiveness of this device, which must be considered due to the
potential teratogenicity of danazol.
Aromatase inhibitors
No studies on the use of aromatase inhibitors in patients with adenomyosis have been
published. This treatment has its rational basis on the presence of aromatase P450 in
eutopic and ectopic endometrium of patients with adenomyosis.39 This enzyme is typically found in the endometrium of women with endometriosis, adenomyosis and leiomyomas, but not in that of healthy women. The inhibition of this enzyme could
decrease the synthesis of local oestrogens, thus constituting an important mechanism
that is essential for development of the disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the solid rational basis for its hormonal treatment, few studies have been
performed on the medical therapy for adenomyosis. This lack of interest probably derives from the difficulty in achieving a pre-operative diagnosis and from the traditional
demolitive approach that the clinician has maintained in regards to symptomatic patients with a suspected diagnosis of adenomyosis. A reversible medical alternative
to hysterectomy does now exist– the Lng-IUD. This IUD has been widely assessed
338 L. Fedele et al
in terms of contraceptive efficacy and in idiopathic menorrhagia, and has been shown
to be extremely effective in resolving the symptoms associated with adenomyosis.
Moreover, the side-effects are characterized mainly by irregular bleeding and amenorrhoea, while its metabolic impact seems modest
Practice points
An effective and well-tolerated medical therapy for symptomatic adenomyosis
could allow a major reduction in surgical intervention.
Systemic hormonal treatments have been used successfully in the treatment of
symptomatic adenomyosis.
The Lng-IUD is a reversible medical alternative to hysterectomy in these
patients.
Research agenda
Despite the solid rational basis for its hormonal treatment, few studies have
been performed on the medical therapy for adenomyosis.
.
REFERENCES
1. Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998; 4: 312–322.
*2. Bergeron C, Amant F & Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin
Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 20: 511–521.
3. Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E et al. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2006; 20: 465–477.
4. Matalliotakis IM, Kourtis AI & Panidis DK. Adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003; 30: 63–82.
5. Sanberg EG & Cohn F. Adenomyosis in the gravid uterus at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 84:
1457–1465.
6. Zaloudek C & Norris HJ. Mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. In Kurman RJ (ed.). Blaustein’s Pathology of
the Female Genital Tract. 3rd edn. New York: Springer Verlag, 1987, pp. 374–528.
7. Hendrickson MR & Kempson RL. Non-neoplastic conditions of the myometrium and uterine serosa. In
Fox H (ed.). Obstetrical and Gynaecological Pathology. 3rd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp.
405–407.
8. Levgur M, Abadi MA & Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 688–691.
9. Sammour A, Pirwany I, Usubutun A et al. Correlations between extent and spread of adenomyosis and
clinical symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002; 54: 213–216.
10. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P et al. Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod
2000; 15: 76–82.
11. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P et al. Adenomyosis in endometriosis: prevalence and impact on fertility.
Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2309–2316.
*12. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M et al. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis.
Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 94–97.
Hormonal treatments for adenomyosis 339
13. Uduwela AS, Perera MA, Aiqing L et al. Endometrial–myometrial interface: relationship to adenomyosis
and changes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000; 55: 390–400.
*14. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ et al. The nonsurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol
1995; 86: 461–465.
15. Ascher SM, Jha RC & Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top
Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 14: 281–304.
*16. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG et al. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis
uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 471–474.
*17. Rabinovici J & Stewart EA. New interventional techniques for adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2006; 20: 617–636.
18. Tamaya T, Motoyama T, Ohono Y et al. Steroid receptor levels and histology of endometriosis and
adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 396–400.
19. Ueki K, Kumagai K, Yamashita H et al. Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in adenomyotic uteri
treated with danazol and GnRH agonists. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 248–258.
20. Urabe M, Yamamoto T, Kitawaki J et al. Estrogen biosynthesis in human uterine adenomyosis. Acta
Endocrinol (Copenh) 1989; 121: 259–264.
21. Yamamoto T, Noguchi T, Tamura T et al. Evidence for estrogen synthesis in adenomyotic tissues.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 734–738.
22. Ezaki K, Motoyama H & Sasaki H. Immunohistologic localization of estrone sulfatase in uterine endometrium and adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 815–819.
23. Otsuki Y, Misaki O, Sugimoto O et al. Cyclic bcl-2 gene expression in human uterine endometrium
during menstrual cycle. Lancet 1994; 344: 28–29.
24. Grow DR & Filer RB. Treatment of adenomyosis with long-term GnRH analogues: a case report. Obstet
Gynecol 1991; 78: 538–539.
25. Nelson JR & Corson SL. Long-term management of adenomyosis with a gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonist: a case report. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 441–443.
26. Huang FJ, Kung FT, Chang SY et al. Effects of short-course buserelin therapy on adenomyosis. A report
of two cases. J Reprod Med 1999; 44: 741–744.
27. Hirata JD, Moghissi KS & Ginsburg KA. Pregnancy after medical therapy of adenomyosis with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 444–445.
28. Silva PD, Perkins HE & Schauberger CW. Live birth after treatment of severe adenomyosis with a
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 171–172.
29. Lin J, Sun C & Zheng H. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and laparoscopy in the treatment of
adenomyosis with infertility. Chin Med J (Engl) 2000; 113: 442–445.
30. Huang W-S, Ynag T-S & Yuan C-C. Successful pregnancy after treatment of deep adenomyosis with
cytoreductive surgery and subsequent gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist: a case report. Chin
Med J (Engl) 1998; 61: 726–729.
*31. Edelman AB, Gallo MF, Jensen JT et al. Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined oral
contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 20: CD004695.
*32. Critchley HO, Wang H, Jones RL et al. Morphological and functional features of endometrial decidualization following long-term intrauterine levonorgestrel delivery. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1218–1224.
*33. Varma R, Sinha D & Gupta K. Non-contraceptive uses of levonorgestrel-releasing hormone system
(Lng-IUS). A systematic enquiry and overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125: 9–28.
34. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R et al. Treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 1997; 68: 426–429.
35. Fong YF & Singh K. Medical treatment of a grossly enlarged adenomyotic uterus with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 1999; 60: 173–175.
36. He SM, Wei MX, Han YH et al. Effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment
of adenomyosis. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2005; 40: 536–538.
37. Maia Jr. H, Maltez A, Coelho G et al. Insertion of Mirena after endometrial resection in patients with
adenomyosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003; 10: 512–516.
*38. Igarashi M, Abe Y, Fukuda M et al. Novel conservative medical therapy for uterine adenomyosis with
a danazol-loaded intrauterine device. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 412–413.
*39. Farquhar C & Brosens I. Medical and surgical management of adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol 2006; 20: 603–616.