Operating A CNC Powered Machine Shop

Transcription

Operating A CNC Powered Machine Shop
Operating A CNC Powered Machine Shop
A Road Map for Efficient Manufacturing
By
Tim Markoski
Senior Member - Society of Manufacturing Engineers
January 9, 2012
As someone who has spent most of my adult life working in manufacturing related fields, it occurred to me that
all too often I would end up witnessing companies making the same mistakes, over and over again, when it
came to efficient operation of their CNC powered machine shops.
CNC Machine Tools
One of the most important parts of any business plan for a CNC based Machine Shop is planning the Capital
Equipment purchases. Choosing the right CNC Machine Tools is not something that should be taken lightly.
Choose the right ones for your business and you’re one step closer to an efficient operation.
Choose the wrong ones and you’ll be out of business quickly.
Believe it or not, cost should not be the primary consideration when determining which type of CNC one should
purchase. Obviously cost is important but it needs to be placed in the proper context. We will discuss that later
but for now let’s continue.
The first criteria for determining what CNCs to purchase is the type of work to be machined.
Will it need to be Milled or Turned or a combination or both? Will it need Wire EDM?
What are the sizes of the work-pieces to be machined? What are the materials to be machined?
What are the tolerances required? All of these points need to be considered.
The next point to consider is the production quantity.
How many of your work pieces do you need to produce every month?
This is important because the whole point of your endeavor is producing and selling your parts.
If you aren’t purchasing enough machines to support the endeavor then your effort and money will be wasted.
Whatever machine(s) you purchase, make sure it provides slightly more capability than you’ll currently need.
You’ll want some room for growth to be accounted for by whatever machine(s) you put into service.
OK, You’ve done your homework and now you’re ready to select your CNC Machine Tools.
Now let’s deal with the issue of cost.
Part of any business plan has to be sufficient financial capitalization to support the endeavor.
To that end, the cost of the desired CNC Machine Tool is not the only cost that should be considered.
Along with any CNC Machine Tool purchase, there is a fair amount of additional equipment needed to properly
support that machine as it is put into service. This additional equipment has a significant cost.
That cost should be planned for and taken into account when any CNC Machine Tool purchase is made.
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve gone into shops that had purchased $500,000.00 worth of CNC Machines
but wouldn’t allocate funds for additional support equipment. They essential paid for expensive boat anchors.
It makes no sense to buy a new CNC and then not purchase tooling and equipment to maximize the efficient use
of the equipment. The Rule of Thumb that I use with clients is to budget 30% of the base cost of the machine
for support tooling and equipment.
Let’s lay out a quick hypothetical example.
A shop owner is getting ready to purchase a $250K Horizontal Machining Center.
Using our 30% rule for additional equipment, the shop owner will need approximately $75K for supporting
equipment. Now let’s take a practical look at what he will need to support the machine.
$250K Horizontal Machining Center , 630mm Pallet, 40 Tool Carousel CAT-50 – Supporting Equipment
 8 Additional Tombstones - $38,000
$4000.00 ea
o 2 - 4-sided –Blank
$4000.00 ea
o 2 - 2-sided –Blank – Window Frame
$5000.00 ea
o 2 - 2-sided - Window Frame-Modular
$6000.00 ea
o 2 - 4-sided -Multi-purpose-Modular
 80 CAT-50 Tool Holders -
$12,000.00
Let’s take a moment and look at the above.
We have just started tallying our required equipment and we’ve already used up approximately 2/3 of our
budgeted $75K for additional equipment! We haven’t even accounted for the actual cutting tools yet!
As one can plainly see, there are additional costs associated with any CNC Machine Tools purchased and those
costs need to be accounted for. It’s been said many times, “The Devil is in the Details.”.
The next important part of the CNC Machine Tool selection process is a question.
How will the machine be programmed?
The question is somewhat rhetorical as there is really only one correct answer – with a CAM system!
At first blush, that claim may shock some. Allow me to explain why.
CNC machine time is the most expensive time in any machine shop. There’s an old saying that “if the spindle
isn’t running, you’re not making money.” Meaning, your machine must have the highest spindle utilization
possible. While that may sound simplistic to some, it’s absolutely true.
If you are programming at the machine control, the spindle isn’t running and the machine isn’t making a part.
While it is true, there are conversational programming systems built into certain CNC controls, it is foolish to
expect these systems to handle all of your work in an efficient manner.
Again, as obvious as this may seem in hindsight, it never ceases to amaze me that I consistently come across
shops that don’t understand this. There is still a mindset amongst certain managers that a CNC
Machine Tool is essentially a “Magic Box” that is no more complex to operate than a television set.
Nothing could be further from the truth. A CNC Machine Tool is just that, a tool. It is an inanimate object.
It is only useful in the hands of qualified CNC Programmers and Operators.
This leads us into a discussion of both CAD and CAM. While these are separate and distinct disciplines,
there are unified systems that can do both. There are systems that offer elements of both. These are referred to
as CAD/CAM Systems. Generally speaking, any CAD/CAM system will have weaknesses in several areas
compared to either dedicated CAD or CAM systems. These systems have a significant cost that must also be
accounted for.
However, before we can discuss CAM, we really need to discuss CAD as a separate entity.
CAD lays the foundation for what we ultimately need to do with CAM.
CAD – Computer Aided Design
Part design is generally the purview of “Engineering”.
Because of this, there is a tendency, especially in the US, for managers to view Design Engineering and
Manufacturing as two separate, distinct and mutually exclusive areas. Because of this, there is generally poor
communication between Design Engineering and Manufacturing.
This should be avoided at all costs. Without open communication between Engineering and Manufacturing
departments, along with a bi-directional feedback loop, companies will find themselves constantly re-inventing
the wheel. To avoid this, engineering departments need to embrace the concept of “Design for Manufacturing”.
Simply put, the concept of DFM (Design for Manufacturing) takes into account the manufacturing processes
as well as part functionality, when designing a part. Too often, engineers deal with the theoretical and ignore
the practical. Some examples of this would be sharp internal corners in areas that must be machined or sharp
corners in high stress or load bearing areas. When it comes to drawings, over-tolerancing and inconsistent data
relationships are among the most egregious and problematic errors in the use of CAD for manufacturing.
To help eliminate these errors in the use of CAD for DFM, consider implementing the following rules as part of
a guideline for overall CAD implementation.
1.) Standardize all 3-D models and 2-D drawings.
The importance of standardization cannot be understated. When more than one engineer is involved in a part
model and drawing, documented methods and procedures for modeling and drafting can ensure that
manufacturing maintains both design intent as well as a benchmark for quality. Simply put, it is impossible
to measure and quantify data against a moving goalpost.
The one overriding rule that should never be violated is that drafting dimensions must always reflect the
values of the geometric entities dimensioned at the scale shown. It should never be permissible to manually
change a dimension value without also changing the actual geometric entity dimensioned.
The importance of adhering to this rule becomes clear as manufacturing uses the CAD file data provided by
engineering.
2.) Use Part Configurations for Families of Parts
It is quite common for part designs to be used multiple times with minor changes. The basic part design will
be the same across all members of the part family. The differences will be in the values of certain
dimensions and features. These types of parts are called Families of Parts. All modern 3D Mechanical
Modeling Software applications have a tool for managing these types of parts called Configurations.
Configurations allow for all iterations of a given part to be handled within a single 3D CAD model. This is
done by specifying the specific parameters of a given part iteration in a specific grouping. Configurations
are the specific grouping of the defining parameters. Part configurations are the 3D equivalent of 2D
Tabulated Drawings. Part configurations have the added benefit to manufacturing in that they allow
manufacturing to create a single process for handling them.
3.) Use a PDM/PLM (Product Data Management/Product Lifecycle Management) system to manage the
CAD file data. (Document Control)
While it may be tempting for some managers to attempt to manage CAD files manually with an ad-hoc, fly
by the seat of your pants approach, this temptation should be avoided. Inevitably, version control becomes
essentially non-existent because there are simply too many copies of a given file “in the wild”.
This lack of control inevitably leads to errors in manufacturing and an associated NCR (Non-Conformance
Report). PDM/PLM systems eliminate this problem as all data is in a “Vault”.
There is only one copy of a given CAD file, at a given revision number, stored in the vault and its status can
be viewed at any time. Assembly structures and Bills of Materials can be viewed and maintained directly
through PDM/PLM. Manufacturing can instantly view that a part is currently in an ECN (Engineering
Change Notice) state before starting work.
4.) Make sure Manufacturing has access to all CAD data through the PDM/PLM system.
All modern CAM systems have the ability to use the native CAD data from the system that created it.
If CAD data exists then it should be shared with manufacturing. As self-evident as that statement may be, I
have seen time and time again where engineering refuses to share CAD models and drawings with
manufacturing. There is simply no logical reason to keep CAD data from manufacturing. Doing so
essentially forces manufacturing to reinvent the wheel. Forcing manufacturing engineers and CNC
programmers to re-model or re-draw parts in order to program them is introducing risk and a likely failure
point into the manufacturing process.
Now that we have established a basic guideline for CAD, we are ready to discuss the subject of CAM.
CAM – Computer Aided Manufacturing
While the use of CAM software has become ubiquitous in today’s manufacturing, too often the selection of a
CAM system is done without proper consideration of the practical applications of its use. This problem is then
exacerbated by poor deployment and implementation of a given CAM system within a manufacturing
department.
When selecting a CAM system for use in a manufacturing facility, several key elements must be considered.
As I’ve previously stated, cost is important, but it needs to be placed in the proper context. It should also be
noted that many of the selection criteria for choosing a CNC Machine Tool will also apply to the selection of a
CAM system for generating NC programs.
First and foremost, any CAM system you select must be capable of generating the required tool path operations
as well as the required NC code for the CNC machines being used in production. As a starting point, any system
chosen should be able to handle CNC Programming for both Milling & Turning operations. If a given system
doesn’t support both Milling and Turning independently, then it will be worthless to consider it if you have
intentions to ultimately move into Multi-task Machining (Mill/Turn).
The second most important criteria for selecting a CAM system deals with product support. The company that
actually develops the CAM software should also have a Users Technical Support Forum for end-users to share
and help each other. The company should also have a mechanism for users to report bugs directly.
Any CAM system selected should have both technical support and training available in your region through a
VAR (Value Added Reseller). Ideally, both technical support and training should be available locally but that
may be impractical, based on the location of your specific manufacturing facility. Additionally, one must also
consider the pool of qualified labor available for any given CAM system.
Another factor that should be considered when selecting a CAM system is the ability of end-users to automate
specific CNC programming tasks. This may be possible via a proprietary Macro Language, integrated CAD
Feature Recognition (commonly referred to as FBM - Feature Based Machining), or via an API (Application
Programming Interface). A CAM system API allows users to develop custom software applications that
integrate with and operate directly within the CAM system. These may range from relatively simple automation
routines using a language like VB Script to essentially full-blown, professionally developed, independent
applications that simply use the CAM system as the engine or host.
This brings us to the subject of cost.
Selecting a CAM system, based solely on cost, is a recipe for failure.
The question to be asked is “What value or benefit does this system provide, at the price offered?”
Before committing to purchasing any CAM system, make sure that a detailed Cost/Benefit analysis has been
performed. This is the only way to get a true measure of the value that a particular CAM system brings to you
as a manufacturer.
When you are ready to actually submit the purchase order for the CAM system, the next two points are critical
to a successful deployment and implementation.
1.) It is critical that your selected CAM system vendor is capable of creating Post-Processors for each
machine you will be supporting with the system.
The Post-Processor is the last link in the chain. It takes what is done in the CAM software and creates the
specifically formatted NC code to drive the CNC Machines as required.
Any CAM system that cannot provide a Post-Processor capable of generating edit-free NC code is, for all
intents and purposes, worthless. Post-Processor requirements MUST be included in a purchase order as
a condition of the purchase.
2.) Get all commitments from your CAM vendor IN WRITING and make them part of the P.O.
requirements.
Do your homework and don’t get buffaloed by a flashy demo and vague promises.
Make sure your P.O. has clearly defined terms as well as clearly defined penalties for non-conformance.
As much as I hate to say it, if you do not get commitments in writing, you will end up spending more
than is necessary to have the system properly deployed and implemented. Any ethical vendor will not have
an issue with making commitments and guarantees in writing.
Once you’ve made the purchase commitment for a given CAM system, you’ll want to prepare for a successful
implementation.
CAM Implementation
1.) Standardize and document all CNC Programming methods, procedures and NC Code output.
Companies will have changes in personnel over time. It is critical that these changes in personnel do not
create an impediment to production. Standardization helps eliminate mistakes based on assumptions,
ignorance or lack of experience. By standardizing things as mundane as screen background color, layer
names and entity colors, new users will become productive much more quickly.
Standardization of things like Tool Path Lead-In/Lead-Out with CRC (Cutter Radius Compensation) ensure
that, if needed, users are able to generate NC code for a complete different CNC Control by simply selecting
a different Post-Processor.
Make it easier for machine operators to read the NC code by standardizing the output from the CAM PostProcessors. By using consistent methods for Tool Change Sequences, Commenting, Rotary Positioning, etc.,
machine operators will become accustomed to a single, unified output style.
A Post-processor should NEVER create tool path coordinates, in the NC code, that do not exist in the CAM
file itself. I actually had an experience with a major energy company doing just that. Their CNC Supervisor
modified all of their Post-Processors because he didn’t understand how to properly apply CRC (Cutter
Radius Compensation) on a Fanuc Control. Needless to say this led to scrapped parts and machine crashes.
Post-processor modifications should only be made by qualified personnel and load- tested before
deployment!
2.) An important part of CAM Standardization is Tooling Standardization.
This determines how many different cutting tools are required for machining a given part.
Standardization of tooling brings huge benefits in the practical operation of a machine shop as well as
significant cost savings. A short tooling standardization outline is as follows:





Analyze and document the current tooling being used.
Using the 80/20 rule, Prioritize their usage and determine the tools that perform 80% of the work.
Communicate with your machine shop management and tool suppliers to determine tooling preferences.
Link your common tool selection with common part selection to standardize manufacturing processes.
Create tooling libraries for each CNC Machine based on the common tool selection.
3.) Use Templates to speed up dedicated CAM based CNC Programming.
Simply put, CAM templates are the basic skeletons of a CAM file. They establish and contain the basic
requirements for each new part to be programmed. A sample of a CAM template could be a file that
contains all the required fixtures and tooling for a given HMC (Horizontal Machining Center). It might even
include all the basic Work Coordinate Systems and Work Planes for a typical 4-sided Tombstone.
4.) Automate tasks within CAM whenever possible.
Use the power of your CAM system API (Application Programming Interface) to handle the repetitive tasks
that are part or your manufacturing. This could be as simple as automating the creation of your setup sheets
or as complex as integrating into a company MRP/ERP system.
5.) Provide documentation for all CNC Programming work product provided to your machine shop.
Make sure that your documentation includes all the necessary directions and information for the machine
operator to begin the fixture setup, set the tools, establish work offsets, load the program and run the parts.
Providing detailed documentation helps eliminate mistakes based on assumptions or inexperience.
6.) Make sure that CAM Files, Post-Processors and NC Code files are all managed by the same
PDM/PLM system that you use to manage your CAD data. By keeping the manufacturing data linked to
the engineering design data, part revisions can be handled more efficiently. There is an ancillary benefit in
that this keeps open communication between manufacturing and engineering.
The ideas presented here are simply my thoughts based on my experiences over the years.
They are meant to give the reader insights into processes and methods that allow a shop run efficiently.
All the areas discussed overlap and are interdependent. Meaning, one can’t deal with one area without being
aware of the consequences and effects that area has on another.
By no means are these to be taken as the only definitive and correct methods.
These are provided to assist the reader in avoiding the pratfalls that they otherwise might not see.
By being aware of these points, readers will have additional information to assist them in the pursuit of
continuous improvement.
About the Author:
Tim Markoski
CNC & CAD/CAM Applications Professional ( 25+ Years)
Senior Member - Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Certified Mastercam Instructor
Original Developer of the Machinist ToolBox™ utility software.
http://twitter.com/MTBSoftware
http://www.linkedin.com/in/timmarkoski