How to Best Utilize your QE/QE Plus Peptide Quantitation Tara Schroeder
Transcription
How to Best Utilize your QE/QE Plus Peptide Quantitation Tara Schroeder
How to Best Utilize your QE/QE Plus for Maximum Peptides IDs and for Peptide Quantitation Tara Schroeder Josh Nicklay Scott Peterman Yue Xuan Part 1: Bottom Up Proteomics Key Elements to Bottom Up Proteomics • Reliable HPLC • Sensitive column • Stable spray • Clean samples • Optimized instrument method • Fast and accurate data processing software We will focus here! 3 QE Method Editor Import Tune File Parameters to be optimized with nano source: S-lens, capillary temperature, and spray voltage Screen shot from Tune page 4 QE Method Editor 5 QE Method Editor 6 QE Method Editor 50 ms Advanced Options: 1. In-source CID 2. Spectrum Data Type 3. Microscans 4. MSX (multiplexing) 5. Stepped NCE 7 Chromatographic Peak Width Setting • Chromatographic peak width setting dictates how often an AGC prescan is collected • Example: If you have narrow peak widths it is a critical for the instrument to take more frequent prescans based on the dramatic changes in ion flux 8 Resolution Settings Recommendation: Full MS1: 70K, dd-MS2: 17.5K Note: For tryptic digests, 17.5K resolution is usually an adequate setting for MS2 since the spectra are less complex and fragment ions are mostly +1 ions 9 Resolution and Transient Length Resolving Power at m/z 200 Resolving Power at m/z 400 Transient length Approximate scan (ms) speed (Hz) 17,500 12,500 64 13 35,000 25,000 128 7 70,000 50,000 256 3 140,000 100,000 512 1.5 280,000* 200,000 1024 <1 *Resolution setting available with Enhanced Resolution Mode on QE Plus Important things to note… • Higher resolution setting does not always result in better mass accuracy • Higher resolution increases your ability to distinguish between m/z ions • There is always a trade off between higher resolution and time 10 Example: MS2 Scan at 17.5K Resolution VFSDEVQQQAQLSTIR m/z: 924.9746+2 (1.7ppm) Xcorr: 4.83 11 Proteome Discoverer Screen Shots Fragment Ion Mass Error (ppm) Parallel Filling and Scanning Total Cycle Time ~1 sec Full Scan 70K 64 ms HCD 1 HCD 2 HCD 3 HCD 4 HCD 5 HCD 6 HCD 7 HCD 8 HCD 9 Fill Detection 256 ms Represents varying fill times with a max IT of 50 ms to match the 17.5K resolution setting for the MS2 scan • Orbitrap is scanning while C-trap filling • A longer fill time then the scan time is “wasted” time 12 HCD 10 Suggested Max Fill Time Resolving Power Approximate scan Transient length Suggested Max Fill at m/z 200 speed (Hz) (ms) Time (ms) 17,500 13 64 50 35,000 7 128 110 70,000 3 256 240 140,000 1.5 512 500 • Balance the max fill time with the transient scan time for the resolution to make the most effective use of the parallel fill and detect capabilities of the QE 13 Parallel Filling and Scanning (Raw Data) RT: 22.374 - 22.436 Relative Abundance 100 10909 22.395 10898 22.378 10920 22.412 10931 22.429 80 60 Cycle Time 1.02 s 1.02 s 1.02 s Full Scan 70K 40 20 0 100 10903 22.387 10905 10902 22.390 22.386 60 40 20 10896 22.375 10908 22.394 10901 10899 22.385 22.382 10932 NL: 1.88E6 22.434 Base Peak F: FTMS + p NSI d Full ms2 MS Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5 Iso_5e4_1perc_30sDyn_1 10925 22.422 10914 22.405 80 10910 22.399 10924 22.421 10913 22.403 10917 22.409 10919 22.411 10912 22.402 10922 22.418 10921 22.416 10929 22.427 10927 22.424 MS2 17.5K 10930 22.428 0 22.38 22.39 22.40 22.41 Time (min) Scan # RT 14 NL: 2.19E8 Base Peak F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] MS Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5 Iso_5e4_1perc_30sDyn_1 Top 10 HCD 22.42 22.43 Target Values and Maximum Injection Time Example Settings: • Full MS1 • AGC Target: 1e6 • Max IT: 30 ms • dd-MS2 • AGC Target: 5e4 • Max IT: 50 ms 15 Target Values and Maximum Injection Time Complex Mixture High Load >100ng Complex Mixture Low Load <100ng Simple Mixture MS1 Target Value 1e6 1e6 5e5 MS1 Max IT (ms) 50 50 50 MS2 Target Value 5e4 1e5 1e5 MS2 Max IT (ms) 50 110 110 Parameter • Complex Mixture (High Load): Ion selected for MS2 are mid to high abundance. Set a lower MS2 target value (5e4 or 2e4) to maximize scan speed and increase number of MS2 scans acquired • Complex Mixture (Low Load): Ion selected for MS2 are low intensity, therefore increasing your MS2 target value (1e5) and max injection time can result in higher quality spectra for low level ions 16 Top N and Isolation Window Recommendations: Loop Count: 10 Isolation Window: 2 Da Tip: Set the isolation window to 1.5 Da on the QE Plus 17 NCE (Normalized Collision Energy) Recommendation NCE: 27 Note: Applied voltage (eV) depends on NCE, m/z and charge state factor 18 Peptide Match Recommendation: Peptide Match Preferred 19 Peptide Match • Definition: • Enables the QE to select ions with peptide-like isotopic distributions for Data Dependent scanning. • It recognizes the monoisotopic mass of an isotopic distribution by comparing isotopic intensity ratios to typical peptide-like distributions. • 3 Options: • On: will only select ions for dd-MS2 if recognized as having a peptide-like isotopic distribution • “–”: isotopic pattern will have no affect on MS2 selection • Preferred: ions with peptide isotopic pattern are triggered with preference to ions without peptide match. However, after it selects all ions that have “peptide match” it will continue to select other ions for dd-MS2 Tip: When analyzing a complex mixture, setting peptide match to preferred relative to on will maximize the number of MS2 scans collected 20 Tip: When analyzing a simple mixture, consider turning Peptide Match “off” Intensity Threshold • Intensity threshold is the minimum precursor intensity to trigger a MS2 • The MS2 target value, maximum injection time and underfill ratio ALL determine the threshold 21 Intensity Threshold (Examples) Recommended Settings MS2 Target Value 5e4 1e5 1e5 5e4 Max IT (ms) 50 110 50 50 UnderFill (%) 1 1 1 10 1.0e4 1.0e4 2.0e4 1.0e5 Intensity Threshold Complex Mixture <100ng Complex Mixture >100ng • Important to Note: If you have peptide match set “on” or “preferred”, having a very low threshold is arbitrary 22 Dynamic Exclusion and Exclude Isotopes Recommendations: • Exclude Isotopes: ON • Dynamic Exclusion (s): “Specific to peak width” Tip: In complex mixtures, increase dynamic exclusion to reduce repeat sampling and maximize number of unique peptides 23 Example: Isotope Exclusion On, 30 sec Dyn Ex. Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30... 2/25/2014 10:33:32 PM RT: 48.30 - 55.49 SM: 7G 100 Relative Abundance 50 50.03 899.4587 48.70 939.9348 50.54 829.4296 0 53.12 764.0651 51.83 868.1370 100 XIC: 868.1370 Peptide 1 50 0 51.93 868.4183 100 XIC: 868.4183 Peptide 2 50 0 49 50 51 52 Time (min) 53 54 NL: 2.78E8 Base Peak F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] MS Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s Dyn_1 NL: 3.44E6 m/z= 868.1327-868.1413 F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] MS Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s Dyn_1 NL: 2.34E6 m/z= 868.4140-868.4226 F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] MS Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s Dyn_1 55 Relative Abundance Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30sDyn_1 #28748-28829 RT: 51.81-51.96 AV: 10 NL: 1.07E7 T: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] 828.1119 z=3 100 774.7285 z=3 445.1198 80 z=1 1072.8177 z=3 60 40 519.1388 z=1 20 Full MS 70K 900.4505 z=3 657.8395 z=2 604.3362 z=3 1011.2833 z=4 1161.5900 z=2 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 m/z 24 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Example: Isotope Exclusion On, 30 sec Dyn Ex. Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30... RT: 48.30 - 55.49 SM: 7G 100 50 2/25/2014 10:33:32 PM NL: 2.78E8 Dynamic Exclusion of +/- 10 ppm allows for ID of Base Peak F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms 50.54 [400.00-2000.00] MS 53.12 829.4296 Overlapping Isotope Patterns Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s 764.0651 50.03 899.4587 48.70 939.9348 Peptide 1 Peptide 2 Relative Abundance Relative Abundance Relative Abundance Dyn_1 Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30sDyn_1 #28747-28838 RT: 51.81-51.96 AV: 10 NL: 2.30E6 NL: 3.44E6 51.83 T: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] 868.1370 m/z= 868.1327-868.1413 F: FTMS + p NSI 868.1370 100 Fullfor ms [400.00-2000.00] MS Selected MS2 z=3 100 Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s 50 Dyn_1 0 90 IsotopesNL:Excluded 2.34E6 51.93 868.4183 868.4183 868.4711 m/z= 868.4140-868.4226 F: FTMS + p NSI 100 80 867.8027 z=3 Full ms [400.00-2000.00] MS z=3 z=3 Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30s 50 70 Dyn_1 868.7526 0 z=3 49 51 52 53 54 55 60 50 Time (min) 868.8046 868.0837 50 Hela2_60min_64ms_1pt5Iso_5e4_1perc_30sDyn_1 #28748-28829 RT: 51.81-51.96 AV: 10 NL: 1.07E7 z=3 z=3 T: FTMS + p NSI Full ms [400.00-2000.00] 869.0861 40 828.1119 z=3 z=3 100 30 774.7285 z=3 869.1383 869.4204 445.1198 20 80 z=3 z=1 z=3 1072.8177 0 Full MS 70K z=3 10 60 0 40 519.1388 z=1 20 657.8395 z=2 604.3362 z=3 900.4505 z=3 868.5 868.0 869.0 m/z 1011.2833 z=4 869.5 1161.5900 z=2 0 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 m/z 25 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 Example: Isotope Exclusion On, 30 sec Dyn Ex. Peptide 1 Peptide 2 26 EPLGNVLFSPIcLSTSLSLAQVGAK 867.8027+3 (<1 ppm) Xcorr: 5.51 GNFTLPEVAEcFDEITYVELQK 867.8037+3 (<1 ppm) Xcorr: 5.09 Quick Guide to a Few Scenarios 1. I want to increase the number of MS2 scans identified • Click through your raw data and evaluate if you have high quality of HCD scans. Are you seeing rich spectra? • Are you reaching maximum injection on most MS2 scans? If YES, increase your MS2 max IT. If NO, increase your target value • Also, try increasing your threshold by increasing your underfill ratio 2. I want to increase the number of MS2 scans acquired • If you are analyzing a complex mixture, reduce the MS2 target value to 2e4. You will reach the target value faster, shorten cycle time and therefore increase the number of MS2 scan acquired 3. I want to increase the number of “unique” peptide identifications 27 • In your search results, evaluate the “# of PSMs” per identified peptide • If it’s high (i.e. avg >3), increase your dynamic exclusion time to decrease repeat sampling • TIP: divide “peptide groups/PSMs” to give you a percent uniqueness Part 2: Peptide Quantitation Define the Experiment • What are your goals? • Are you trying to quantitate 1000 peptides? • Is absolute quantitation of 5 targets your priority? • There will always be a sacrifice within the targeted experiment • If you want extreme breadth, then you will sacrifice depth • If you want extreme depth, then you will need to decrease the number of your targets 29 Keys to a Successful Quantitation Experiment • Reproducibility!! • Reproducibility in retention time • Reproducibility in overall signal within replicates • Obtaining adequate scans across the peak • This is critical for accurate quantitation • Tip: 10 scans across the peak for a middle level target will result in enough scans across the peak at your limit of detection • Sample complexity • Interferences will dictate your limit of detection 30 Questions Before Starting Analysis • How many targets do you have? • How wide are your chromatographic peaks? • What is the complexity of your sample? The answers to these simple questions will greatly impact the design of your targeted instrument method 31 Always Think About Total Cycle Time! Resolving Power Approximate scan Transient length Suggested Max Fill at m/z 200 speed (Hz) (ms) Time (ms) 32 17,500 13 64 50 35,000 7 128 110 70,000 3 256 240 140,000 1.5 512 500 Always Think About Total Cycle Time! Total Cycle Time ~1 sec HCD 1 HCD 2 HCD 3 HCD 4 HCD 5 HCD 6 HCD 7 HCD 8 Fill Detection 128 ms Represents varying fill times with a max IT of 110 ms to match the selected 35K resolution setting • Total Cycle time is the length of time it takes to cycle through your entire target list • This determines how many scans across the peak are obtained • Sufficient amount of data points defines the peak to increase quantitative reproducibility 33 Timed or Untimed? • How many targets do you have? • 10 or less: Can be run untimed • 10 or more: Most likely needs to be timed • How wide are your chromatographic peaks? • Example: 20 sec wide peaks • Want 10 scans across peak. Total cycle time should not exceed 2 sec. • For tMS2 method, using 35K (~8Hz), target at most 16 ions at a given time. • For SIM method, using 140K (~2Hz), target at most 4 ions at a given time • Example: 10 sec wide peaks • Want 10 scans across peak. Total cycle time should not exceed 1 sec. • For tMS2 method, using 35K (~8Hz), target at most 8 ions at a given time • For SIM method, using 140K (~2Hz), target at most 2 ions at a given time 34 Different Scan Mode Options • Quantitation by… • Full MS • SIM (Single Ion Monitoring) • tMS2 (Targeted MS2) • All Scan modes utilize high resolution/accurate mass (HR/AM) • Extract ions with narrow mass window (<5ppm) • 2 Major questions that will dictate what is the best scan mode for your experiment… • Is your priority depth or breadth? • How complex is your sample? 35 Global Quantitation: Full MS • Priority: Breadth (Very high number of targets) • Complexity: High charge density (AGC 1e6 to 3e6) • High resolution across dynamic range (140K) • Option of acquiring confirmatory MS2 • Qualitative Attributes: RT, accurate mass, and isotopic distribution • Quantitative Attribute: Peak areas of precursor isotopes 36 Absolute Quantitation: SIM or tMS2? • Priority: Sensitivity! • What is the complexity of your sample? • Simple mixture: SIM will most likely result in highest sensitivity • Peptide stays intact, achieve intense signal • Complex mixture: tMS2 is usually the best choice. • When targeting low level ions, SIM experiments in a complex mixture is likely limited by interferences from the matrix • Problem: Co-eluting ion in your isolation window • Symptom: Trap will fill faster with the interference relative to your target • Result: Decreased sensitivity of your target • tMS2 increases selectivity and overall improves sensitivity in the presence of co-eluting ions − Quantitation of fragment ions is more selective! 37 Scan Mode: SIM • Use the highest resolution setting to resolve your target from co-eluting species in the isolation window • Select number of isotopes for quantitation post acquisition • Option of multiplexing (MSX) to maximize cycle time • Qualitative Attributes: RT, accurate mass, and isotopic distribution • Quantitative Attribute: Peak areas of precursor isotopes 38 SIM Method 39 SIM Method • These parameters are a good starting point! • Highest resolution setting (140K), balanced Max IT (500 ms), 1e5 AGC Target • Note: 10 targets are “timed” with ≤ 2 peptides/ time segment. At 140K resolution, that is ~2 scans/sec Tip: Reaching max IT is your goal! 40 MSX Functionality and Parallel C-Trap Filling Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition AGC AGC Standard Operation Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition Inject to C-Trap Inject to C-Trap Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition Inject to Inject to Inject to C-Trap C-Trap C-Trap AGC AGC Spectrum Multiplexing Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition Inject to Inject to Inject to C-Trap C-Trap C-Trap Multiplexing Maximizes the Cycle Time of the Q Exactive 41 MSX Functionality and Parallel C-Trap Filling Things to consider… • When multiplexing, the AGC setting and max IT is for each fill event. • Higher order multiplexing require lower max IT • (max IT)/(multiplex count) = per target max IT • Target Value Recommendations for SIM (140K Resolution)… • Targeting without multiplexing (Target Value: 1e5-2e5) • Multiplexing 2-5 Targets (Target Value: 1e5) • Multiplexing 5-10 Targets: (Not recommended due to fill time/scan time relationship) Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition Inject to Inject to Inject to C-Trap C-Trap C-Trap AGC AGC Spectrum Multiplexing Orbitrap FTMS Acquisition Inject to Inject to Inject to C-Trap C-Trap C-Trap Multiplexing Maximizes the Cycle Time of the Q Exactive 42 tMS2 • Generates high resolution full mass range MS2 spectra • Parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) • Flexibility to choose the specific fragment ions for quantitation post acquisition • Since it is a high resolution scan, you can extract your ion with a narrow ppm mass window achieving high selectivity • Qualitative Attribute: RT, fragment accurate mass, and fragment ion ratios • Quantitative Attribute: Peak areas of selected fragment ions 43 tMS2 Method Note: The charge state in the table will affect the applied eV and the high end of the scan range 44 tMS2 Method • These parameters are a good starting point! • 35K resolution with balanced Max IT (110 ms), 1e5 AGC Target • Note: 10 targets are “untimed”. At 35K resolution, 1.3s cycle time will generate ~10 scans across a 10 sec FWHM peak 45 Example: Qual/Quan Workflow dd-MS2 Screen Relative Abundance RT: 0.7413 - 7.3979 100 80 Basepeak • Identified peptide list from search engine results 60 • Select protein of interest 40 20 • Import list (library) into PinPointTM Software 0 1 2 4 5 Time (min) 6 tMS2 723.3663 80 Relative Abundance 7 375.6712 100 90 3 70 60 419.6975 50 PinPointTM • Build your target list and import in QE method 40 30 666.3446 20 • Select peptides of interest that are both sensitive and selective • This process is very streamline within PinPoint! 10 0 200 400 600 800 m/z http://portal.thermo-brims.com/ 46 Example: tMS2 C:\Thermo\...\QE_5ulmin_PlasmaCurve_4_2 Acclaim PepMap 300umx5cm, 5ul/min RT: 0.0000 - 18.1642 SM: 5G 9/25/2013 5:28:02 AM NL: 1.82E5 m/z= 551.3171-551.3205+ 666.3437-666.3477+723.3650-723.3694 F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms2 [email protected] [150.00-875.00] MS Genesis QE_5ulmin_PlasmaCurve_4_2 RT: 6.7261 AA: 1292684 100 Relative Abundance AD 25amol/ul, Trainer 1fmol/ul, Plasma 50ng/ul IGDYAGIK Extracted Ion Chromatogram: 551.3188, 666.3457, 723.3672 (6 ppm window) 80 60 40 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Time (min) 12 14 16 18 Relative Abundance QE_5ulmin_PlasmaCurve_4_2 #1322 RT: 6.71 AV: 1 NL: 2.26E5 F: FTMS + p NSI Full ms2 [email protected] [150.00-875.00] 375.6709 z=? 100 80 tMS2: 418.7292 40 0 150 47 723.3656 z=1 397.6841 z=? 60 20 y7 185.1647 z=? 200 258.1444 291.0884 z=? z=? 250 300 366.6656 z=? 350 551.3176 z=1 419.6972 z=? 448.5667 z=3 400 450 m/z y6 y5 519.5727 551.3183 599.3749 z=3 z=1 z=1 500 550 600 705.8019 z=2 666.3445 z=1 650 700 736.8602 z=? 750 PinPoint: Detailed Data Analysis 48 PinPoint: Detailed Data Analysis R2=0.999 49 PinPoint: Detailed Data Analysis 50 Guide to “How to Design an Optimized Quan Method?” and Troubleshooting Tips Method Selection Flowchart Background Complexity Low High SIM MS2 Peak Width Peak Width 20s 5s 5s 10s 10s Max # of Simultaneous Scan Events 1 target @ 140k 2 targets @ 70k 2 target @ 140k 4 targets @ 70k 4 target @ 140k 8 targets @ 70k Max # of Simultaneous Scan Events 4 targets @ 35k 8 targets @ 17.5k Multiplex and/or time as needed for # of targets 52 20s 8 targets @ 35k 16 targets @ 17.5k 16 targets @ 35k 32 targets @ 17.5k Remember to balance max inject time(s) to transient lengths! Method Optimization Are you reaching max IT @ apex? No Yes Is your target low level? Yes No Yes Do you have ≥10 scans across your peak? No 53 No Did you detect your target? Yes No Adjust timing or increase msx Did you detect your target? All is well! Troubleshoot for low level target Yes Do you have ≥10 scans across your peak? Troubleshoot interference Increase AGC if <2E5 and/or troubleshoot interference All is well! Yes No Decrease max IT or AGC if >1E5 Method Troubleshooting • Interference in your isolation window? • Decrease isolation width • Switch from SIM to tMS2 • Adjust gradient conditions • Target is low level and close to limit of detection? • If you are reaching target value, increase target to 2e5 • If you are not reaching target, then increase max IT as high as peak width allows • Play close attention to the timing of your targets. If you have very reproducible RT, then try to narrow your time segments which can allow you to increase you max IT. 54