Effect of Cryopreservation on Semen Sample Lt Col SK Rath

Effect of Cryopreservation on Semen Sample
Lt Col SK Rath*, Surg Capt (Mrs) P Tarneja (Retd)+, Maj S Man Singh#
Abstract
There are varied indications of preserving a semen sample for utilization at a later day. However, the freeze-thaw cycle is bound
to impart deleterious effect on the fertilizing potential of the sample. 60 semen samples divided into three groups were preserved
in this study. On subsequent thawing, after three months it was seen that the yield varied between 66% to 72%. The post thaw
percent yield bears a linear relationship with the pre-freeze quality. 5 pregnancies were achieved in the study testifying the
preservation of fertilizing ability of the thawed samples. Sub normal semen samples which might be otherwise acceptable in a
therapeutic insemination, do not withstand freezing.
MJAFI 2004; 60 : 42-44
Key Words : Cryopreservation, Semen
Introduction
n 1866, Montegazza from Italy predicted that scientists
of future will be able to improve breeds of horses and
cattle without having to spend enormous sums of money
in transporting thorough bred stallions and bulls. It will
be possible to carry out insemination with frozen sperm
sent from one place to another. It should be possible for
a soldier dying in the battle field to have legitimate children
long after. This vision about freezing semen while
retaining its fertilizing potential must have been
remarkable considering lack of supporting experimental
evidence at his time.
The life pattern in recent times has led to an increase
in infertility related problems. The quality of semen
samples has shown a downward trend. Migration to
greener pastures has led to the unique problem of spouse
not being available at the fertile phase. In Armed Forces,
separation is also compounded by stress and strain in a
hard terrain. Some of these problems can be resolved
by the use of the technique of cryopreservation of the
semen for patients enrolled in the infertility clinic.
Donor insemination is the commonest indication for
cryopreservation. Donor insemination for achieving a
pregnancy has become an accepted means of therapy.
However, recognition of the risk of transmission of HIV,
Hepatitis B and other diseases associated with use of
fresh donor semen is an unacceptable risk. Hence, it is
essential that sequential screening of donors is continued
pending release of cryopreserved semen for therapeutic
use [1].
Though the above advantage is convincing enough to
use cryopreserved semen sample in donor insemination
programme, it may not be possible to preserve all
available samples. It is necessary to look at the yield
I
*
after thawing in one’s own laboratory. The over all
percent variation between pre-freeze and post thaw
parameter can give an idea about setting the qualitative
requirement of a sample which would be acceptable for
preservation. With this background, it was decided to
study the effect of cryopreservation on semen
parameters at our infertility centre so that the resources
could be optimally utilized.
Material and Methods
20 males from each of the following group were recruited
for the study.
Males with proven fertility willing to be donor (Group A)
Male partners of infertile couples with normal semen
parameters (Group B)
Male partners of infertile couples with subnormal semen
parameters (Group C)
Semen was collected after masturbation directly into sterile
specimen beakers made of nontoxic plastic ware (Cryogenic
India). The semen samples were kept at room temperature for
liquefaction to occur. On completion of liquefaction the sample
was mixed well and a small quantity was taken for microscopic
examination in Makler sperm counting chamber (Sefi, Israel).
A single observer evaluated all samples to avoid interobserver variation in the study. The parameters assessed
were total volume, colour, viscosity, liquefaction time, count,
motility, morphology and pus cells. The motility was assessed
as per the WHO classification i.e. rapid progressive motility,
slow or sluggish motility, non progressive motility and
immotile spermatozoa.
The cryoprotectant used was a buffered solution of
glycerol 5% along with egg yolk as extender and gentamycin
as antibiotic. This was added to the ejaculate slowly in a
drop wise fashion to avoid the damaging effects due to volume
changes in the spermatozoon. The cryoprotectant was added
in 1:1 ratio and left for a minimum period of 10 minutes to
Classified Specialist (Obstetrics and Gynaecology), 151 Base Hospital, C/o 99 APO, +Ex- Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune - 411 040, #Graded Specialist (Obstetrics and Gynaecology), 92 Base Hospital,
C/o 56 APO.
Cryopreservation
43
Table 1
Mean value of various semen parameters
Group
A
B
C
Mean
volume
in ml
3.525
3.325
3.4
Count in
million/ml
Mean
120
84
14.75
SD
22.606
19.574
5.003
Motility in %
Pre freeze
Post thaw
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Normal morphology in%
Pre freeze
Post thaw
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
66.25
66
48.75
71.5
70
50.75
7.232
5.982
11.22
allow the spermatozoon to complete the volume changes.
All samples that were to be cryo preserved were kept in vials
in aliquots of one ml and numbered uniquely for identification
at a later date without any ambiguity. The vials were held in
vial holders which in turn were kept in a canister. The canister
was lowered in two stages into liquid nitrogen kept in cryocan
(Fig 1). Initially they were suspended in the liquid nitrogen
vapours for 15 minutes to allow initial slow rate freezing.
Then they were dipped into liquid nitrogen. After 24 hrs one
of the ampoules was checked for cryosurvivability and only
if the first thawed sample contained motile sperms it was
accepted. Otherwise all the samples of the batch were
discarded.
The donor was always tested for HIV, HBsAg and VDRL
and the sperm samples were kept under quarantine in the
sperm bank for a period of 3 months. The donor was again
tested for HIV, HBsAg and VDRL. If the second test was
negative, the stored samples were released for intra-uterine
insemination (IUI) programmes. All treatment cycles for this
study had been stimulated with Clomiphene Citrate 100mg
OD from day 2 to day 5 of the cycle. The cycles were
48.25
46.5
32.25
7.31
6.71
8.65
4.89
5.12
7.82
64
58.25
38.25
4.167
4.941
8.925
monitored with trans vaginal sonography. For IUI, the desired
ampoule was removed and thawed by keeping at room
temperature for 15-20 minutes. After this the sample was
incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. The post thaw parameters
of motility, viability and morphology were checked and the
results were entered in the proforma. The parameters of pre
freeze and post thaw samples were compared. This was
followed by usual swim up techniques of preparation for
insemination. In case of a missed period following IUI, urine
was tested for pregnancy.
Results
60 samples were frozen in the study, 20 samples each from
the group A, B and C. At the first check for viability 24 hours
after freeze, 2 samples from group C were discarded. No case
tested positive for HIV, HBs Ag or VDRL after the quarantine
period. 17 samples from group A, 15 from group B and 10
from group C were used as and when indicated. The mean
value of the important parameters of pre freeze and post thaw
after 3 months of preservation that would determine the
fertilizing potential are given in Table 1.
The percent variation and yield percent of motility/
morphology was calculated from the following formulae and
summarized in Table 2.
% variation =
Pre freeze value -Post thaw value X 100
Pre freeze value
Yield% = Post thaw value X 100
Pre freeze value
3 pregnancies with Group A samples and 2 pregnancies
with group B samples were achieved. There were no
pregnancies with Group C samples.
Fig. 1 : Equipment for cryopreservation-cryocan, semen beaker,
cryovial and cannister
MJAFI, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2004
Discussion
The British Andrology Society recommends screening
semen donor for sexually transmitted infections to
minimize the risk of pathogen transmission to the mother
and fetus. The American Fertility Society and the
Centers for Disease Control USA, have recommended
the use of only cryopreserved, quarantined donor semen
for therapeutic insemination, in order to safeguard against
possibility of transmission of infectious diseases [2,3].
Cryopreservation of semen can be done by
conventional method used in this study which achieves
approximately a reduction of temperature of -10°C/
minute in the vapour phase. Other methods include rapid
freezing at 37°C/minute by holding the ampoules on a
44
Rath, Tarneja and Singh
Table 2
Variation and yield in post thaw sample
Group
A
B
C
Motility
% variation
% yield
27.17
29.55
33.75
72.83
70.45
66.15
Morphology
% variation
% yield
10.49
16.78
24.63
89.51
83.22
75.37
platform 3 cm above the liquid phase [4]. In programmed
freezing, the temperature is reduced from ambient
temperature at the rate of -1°C/minute upto 5°C followed
by -10°C/minute till - 85°C. After this the straws are
plunged into liquid nitrogen at -196°C. Semi programmed
freezing techniques are also in use. The cryopreservation
and subsequent thawing invariably decreases the sperm
motility during these procedures [5]. The phase transition
encountered by the plasma membrane during the freeze
thaw cycle makes the membrane more prone to early
fracture at stress points [6]. Programmed freezing
techniques are said to be less variable and expose the
samples to a uniform rate. The yield after thawing such
samples is better as compared to two stage freezing
used in this study [7]. However, the cost of equipment
for vapour freezing technique used in this study is
cheaper.
The percent variation and yield for Group A and B
are close to each other and comparable to the results
obtained by other workers [8]. However, the report by
Mossad showed that the percent variation is significantly
more between two such groups [9]. It is worth noting
in this context that the yield rates were generally lower
in their study and could be method related. Our results
are also comparable with that of Trummer who worked
with similar sample size [10].
An interesting feature of that study is the influence
of cryopreservation temperature. They found that
though the optimum cryopreservation temperature is 196°C, 28% motility can be preserved even at - 70°C.
The conception rate of 17.5% and 13% obtained with
single insemination with group A & B respectively in
our study is acceptable. When the semen sample is
subnormal the deleterious effects are more pronounced,
as shown by a poor yield and higher variation in post
thaw samples of Group C. 10 samples were used from
this group for insemination of those couples who did not
wish to exercise the option of donor insemination.
However, no pregnancy resulted. Pooling of samples
to increase the sperm concentration for such cases has
been reported by Kobayashi [11]. It can be concluded
that the post thaw yield in cryopreservation is directly
proportional to the initial sperm concentration and
discretion has to be exercised in accepting a sample for
freezing.
References
1. Craig JM, Barratt CL, Kinghorn GR. Semen donors and STD
screening. Genitourin Med 1997,73(4):280-3.
2. American Fertility Society. Revised new guidelines for the use
of semen in donor insemination. Fertility and Sterility
1988;49:211-2.
3. American Fertility Society. Ethical considerations of the new
reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 1990;53(Suppl
2):1-87.
4. Kaneka S, Lee H, Kobayashi T, Oda T, Izuka R. Cryo
preservation of washed and concentrated human sperm and its
application to AIH. Journal of Fertilization and Implantation
1990;7:120-3.
5. Sharma R, Vemulapalli S, Kohn S, Agarwal A. Effect of
centrifuge speed refrigeration medium and sperm washing
medium on cryopreserved semen quality after thawing. Arch
Androl 1997;39(1):33-8.
6. Alvarez JG, Storey BT. Evidence that membrane stress
contribute more than lipid peroxidation to cryodamage during
preservation of human sperm. J Androl 1993;14:199-209.
7. Check ML, Check DJ, Katsoff D, Check JK. Improved results
of thawed sperm cryo preserved with slow stage cooling with
a cellevator. Arch Androl 1996;37(1): 61-4.
8. Polaez TE, Stronk J, Xiong C, Jones EE, Olive DL, Huszar G.
Optimal utilization of human semen for assisted reproduction
: recovery and maintenace of sperm motility and viability. J
Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15(8):504-12.
9. Mossad H, Morsedi M, Toner JP, Oehninger S. Impact of
cryopreservation on spermatozoa from infertile men,
implication for artificial inseminaiton. Arch Androl
1994;33(1):51-7.
10. Trummer H, Tucker K, Young C, Kaul N, Mcacham RB. Effect
of storage temperature on sperm cryopreservation. Fertil Steril
1998;70(6):1162-4.
11. Kobayashi T, Kaneko S, Hara I, Park YJ, Sato H. Concentrating
human sperm before cryopreservation. Andrologia
1991;23(1):25-8.
Outside of a dog, a book is man’s best friend. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read.
MJAFI, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2004