PDU ManUal Table of ConTenTs WhaT are PDUs?
Transcription
PDU ManUal Table of ConTenTs WhaT are PDUs?
PDU Manual Table of Contents What Are PDUs? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 How Do I Use This Manual? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Timeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 PDU Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6–30 Eligibility and Program Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . 6–7 Guided Timeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-9 PDU Planning Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-20 Data Collection Planning Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Accessing the Google Drive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Meeting Log Template . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 PD/Research Reflection Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Individual Reflection Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 PDU Scoring Rubric . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26-29 AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT What are PDUs? What are PDUs? What is AISD REACH? AISD REACH, the Austin Independent School District’s strategic compensation initiative to support and reward teachers based on classroom success, is a forward-thinking effort developed and designed to advance the District’s efforts to recruit and retain the very best teachers and principals for Austin’s schools. Professional Development Units (PDUs) are one component of the program, and the focus of this manual. For further details on other components of the REACH initiative, please go to http://www.austinisd.org/reach. PDUs are an optional component of REACH, where self-selected teams develop a professional development plan based on the needs of the teachers in the group and the students they teach. PDUs document the application and impact of their PD on teaching and learning in the classroom. They are designed to be a rigorous long-term study, in which teachers utilize a repeating cycle of engagement in PD/research, implementation in the classroom, data collection and evaluation. PDUs culminate with an end of the year presentation where all team members summarize the process and results. Team members must work closely together and devote time in and out of the classroom in order to successfully complete the process. To be eligible for the PDU stipend, all team members must successfully complete the SLO process. In addition to the information in this manual, there are videos and other supporting documents available at http://www.austinisd.org/reach/development-units. Research indicates that the most successful teacher professional development activities are those that extend over time and encourage the development of learning communities. By collaborating on PDUs, teachers can increase their instructional expertise, develop practices that contribute to student learning, and develop content area expertise. What are the financial incentives? How long is the PDU Study? PDUs should last at least 4 months over the course of the year. Team members are expected to attend PD beyond what is required by the campus/department/district. Team meetings should be primarily about the study and spread evenly over the course of the study. Data that is presented at the end of year presentation is to be collected throughout the duration of the study. PDU Process PDU stipends are paid for successfully submitting a proposal that provides evidence that teachers have implemented new learning strategies that are used repeatedly over an extended period of time. Teams hold meetings throughout the duration of the study to discuss strategies, implementation, effectiveness, and data. Professional development beyond what is expected at the campus/department/district level serves as the basis for the implementation of the new learning strategies. Over the course of the study, data is measured in multiple forms and then presented at the end of the study to a panel of scorers using the PDU rubric. Stipends are paid for PDUs that meet all rubric requirements for collaboration, implementation, impact on student learning, and electronic documentation in the amount of $1500. Team leaders can earn an additional $500 for leading the PDU group, Take One! leaders can earn an additional $1000. No, PDUs are an optional component of REACH. Teams can consist of 3-7 professionals, including teachers, coaches, counselors, librarians, and administrators. Guided Timeline Why collaborate on PDUs? Are PDUs required for all campus staff? Support PDUs come in two varieties: self-selected teams who follow the process described above, or teams of individuals that complete Take One!. Take One! is a unique offering from the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards where teachers prepare and submit one pre-selected video portfolio entry from one of the current certificate areas of National Board Certification. FAQs How Howdo do Iuse I use this this manual? man- What are REACH Professional Development Units? What Are PDUs? 2 What are PDUs? PDUs? How do I use this Manual? ... and why is it so big? HowdoIusethismanual? The REACH Professional Development Unit manual is designed to be a single resource for the entire PDU process. Since PDUs are written across all subject areas and grade levels by teachers, instructional coaches, counselors, librarians and assistant principals, you will find a wide range of sample documents throughout the guide. We therefore recommend sparing a tree and not printing the entire manual, unless it is for shared use. In order to effectively identify and access the information you need, we suggest the following: • Take note of the PDU Rubric and the guidelines listed for each step within the PDU process.These requirements and guidelines provide details that are imperative in ensuring your PDUs meet standards for collaboration, implementation, impact on student learning, and electronic documentation. • Many sections have additional information placed in the boxes to the right of the main text. Examples include: Frequently asked questions (red) and PDU expectations (blue). • Use the Quick Link tabs located on the right hand side of each page to quickly access the major sections of the manual without using the Table of Contents. • Use the “Find” feature in Adobe Acrobat. If the information you are looking for is not easily found in the TOC, searching for a term can provide a quick way view every page that it is used. What if I can’t find the information I need in the manual, or I still have questions? You can look on our website, additionally, each PDU team has a team leader who will serve as a liason to the REACH Office. Additionally, members of the REACH PDU team are always available by both phone and email. Guided Timeline • Use the embedded hotlinks. All underlined blue text links to an external webpage or document, while all text in blue without an underline links to another location within the PDU manual. FAQs Support • Use the manual electronically to locate relevant information and print the page(s) you need. The features available to effectively navigate the manual are available when viewing it in Adobe Acrobat or in Preview. PDU Process How Do I Use This Manual? 3 What are PDus? PDUs? Support In order to fully support PDU teams throughout the study process, there are a number of resources available including written documents, videos, email, phone calls and face-to-face feedback. Please note that although personal communication is valuable for answering specific questions, it is not a substitute for reviewing and understanding the requirements around the PDU process. HowdoIusethismanual? PDU Manual and Website • The PDU manual is designed to be a single point of reference for answering most questions. • Demonstration videos, the PDU Manual and additional documents can be found on our website at http://www.austinisd.org/reach/development-units • Information regarding other elements of AISD REACH can be found at http://www.austinisd.org/reach Campus-Based Support and Training Support Every PDU team has a team leader for the group. Team leaders will agree to all requirements in the PDU Statement of Understanding or Take One! Statement of Understanding. Additionally, all team leaders will be organized, effective communicators, and responsive to email. For their work on PDUs team leaders will receive a stipend (if you have led a PDU in the previous year, you will not be permitted to take the lead this year). Core Team Support and Training Guided Timeline The REACH PDU team is devoted to making the PDU process relevant and clear. There will be a mandatory meeting for all team leaders after the application deadline to review requirements and responsibilities. Several dates will be offered, with attendance at one of the meetings being required for PDU participation. Each meeting will cover electronic binder requirements, review of requirements for sending meeting invitations, reviewing the meeting log template and signing the statement of understanding. We are also always available to answer your questions or hear your concerns. Trish Jarrott Senior Associate, Student Learning [email protected] 512.414.9590 PDU Process Support 4 What are PDUs? PDU Timeline 2014–2015 The following is an abbreviated timeline for the PDU study. Deadlines are labeled and highlighted. Click here for a sample guided timeline. August 19 PDU Application is available online September Determine PDU focus, application, assign roles, find resources September 30-Oct 2 PDU Team Leader Meeting (choose 1 date to attend) October Discuss strategies, finalize data collection, discuss implementation NovemberReveiw data collected in implementation, reflect on strategies/resources DecemberReflect on data, review additional resources, plan for the second semester January Identify new strategies/changes for 2nd semester, adjust data collection FebruaryReflect on new strategies MarchResource/personal reflections, organiza data for final presentation AprilFinalize electronic documentation, outline presentation May Attendance at PDU team meetings is an expectation of the program. Contact your PDU team leader and let them know about the circumstance and see what your team can arrange to accommodate your needs. Attendance requirements are addressed in the PDU rubric. Support APRIL 13ELECTRONIC BINDER DUE What if a special circumstance arises and I am going to miss a PDU meeting? HowdoIusethismanual? SEPTEMBER 19 PDU APPLICATIONS DUE FAQs Practice Presentations PDU ons ctati Expe PDU application available: August 19, 2014 PDU applicaitons dues: September 19, 2013 PDU Team Leader Meeting Guided Timeline Deadlines for Professional Development Units Individual teams will often set deadlines and/or have special instructions for completing specific steps in the process. If you are unclear on the expectations for your PDU team, please contact your PDU team leader. September 30-October 2 (select one date to attend) PDU E-binder due: April 13, 2014 PDU Process PDu PDU End of Year Presentations May 1-21, 2014 Guided Timeline 5 What are PDUs? PDU Process — Eligibility and Program Requirements Who is on a PDU team? Teams must be made up of between 3-7 teachers/administrators in REACH-eligible positions who can engage in the entire 4 month study, have access to students in order to implement the strategies, and who can commit to the time required to meet and plan collaboratively. Each team will self-select one Team Leader who will coordinate meeting times, keep and post meeting logs, and be the primary liaison between the PDU Team and the REACH office. PDU Requirements and Core Guidelines Team Collaboration • Read and respond to all email within 5 business days, and ensure that all team members receive all email correspondence. • Create and include agendas in all meeting invitations. Send meeting invites to principal and Trish Jarrott ([email protected]). • Participate in professional development that goes beyond what is required by the campus/department/district. • Maintain an electronic binder on the Google drive as part of the required documentation for the PDU (including meeting logs, individual reflections and professional development reflections) within a week after each meeting. • Develop, implement and measure new teaching strategies, the results of which will be presented live at the end of the year PDU presentation. • Ensure that the selected strategies are implemented repeatedly over the course of the study, by all team members, and collect multiple forms of data at multiple times during the study. • Preparation and presentation of the PDU end of year presentation. Who scores the PDU End of Year Presentations? At the end of the year, teams will present a 20-25 minute summary of their PDU to a panel consisting of members of The Office of Educator Quality, REACH and the campus principal. Each member of the panel will score the PDU presentation on a rubric. Scores will be averaged to create a final score, which will be used to determine if the team receives their stipend. The rubric can be found here. (continued) PDU Process — Eligibility and Program Requirements 6 PDU Process • All team members must complete the SLO process to be eligible for PDU stipends. FAQs Guided Timeline • Agree that all strategies agreed upon are new learning for each member of the team. In order to align PDUs to larger campus goals, individual teams will sometimes set expectations in addition to REACH program requirements. These might include (but are not limited to) targeting a specific student population, targeting specific academic needs, assessments and growth targets, and deadlines. Please see your PDU team leader if you are not sure about your PDU team expectations. Support PDU Teams will: PDU ons ctati e p x E HowdoIusethismanual? Please read this section carefully before you begin planning your PDUs. Knowledge of the PDU program requirements is not only vital to ensuring that PDUs are a meaningful part of your year, but will also help to avoid frustration caused by not collecting enough data, or collecting unrelated data during the study. (continued) Terms of Team Leaders Team leaders will: • Not lead a PDU two years in a row. • Organize necessary documentation for the final PDU presentation. • Be responsive to email and ensure that all team members receive all correspondence. Interested in the National Board’s Take One! Opportunity? Call: Support A word on PDU strategies PDUs are not class projects; rather, they are the development, implementation and measurement of new teaching strategies. It’s not just about making a few changes around the room; it’s about how those things are used, instructionally speaking. All strategies that are implemented in the study must be new learning for all team members and must be implemented repeatedly over an extended period of time. Most forms of data should be collected multiple times throughout the study (pre- and post-tests would be an exception, but should never be the only data collected. All participants in the group must be able to implement the strategies. Additionally, professional development for the PDU must go beyond what is expected at the department/campus/district level. Examine the expected outcomes of the strategies and determine which data to collect to best measure student success. The intent is that PDUs will be ongoing professional development, where teachers decide on strategies to implement, practice those strategies in class, reflect on the outcomes and make revisions to their teaching to improve student performance. HowdoI HowdoIuse usethis thismanu manual? al? • Be a great communicator and have a positive rapport with all team members. Qs FA Discuss with your team the concerns you have and try to brainstorm a solution to your problem. Remember that participation in PDUs is optional, so if your team decides to cease the study there is no penalty. What are PDUs? PDU Process — Eligibility and Program Requirements What if my team cannot fulfill the requirements of the PDU after we have begun the process? Mary Tijerina [email protected] 512.414.9560 Guided Timeline Professional Learning Specialist PDU Process PDU Process — Eligibility and Program Requirements 7 PDU Guided Timeline Sample 2013-14 September- 2 Meetings What are PDUs? August 19 PDU Application is available online Discuss teacher needs/hopes and finalize PDU subject. Discuss possible resources Meeting 1 Suggested Agenda Review application Homework: Review resources and determine possible strategies and data collection Meeting 2 Suggested Agenda Assign roles and responsibilities Review team leader responsibilities Homework: Begin reading books/articles/attend PD, etc. September 19 PDU application due October- 1 Meeting Discuss resources and begin brainstorming initial strategies to implement Finalize data that will be collected to measure each strategy (see Data Collection Planning Sheet) Suggested Agenda HowdoIusethismanual? Complete application Using information from your resources, brainstorm and discuss methods for successful implementation Support Homework: Collect BOY data before implementing strategies Begin implementation strategies If data will be taken daily, or if you expect an immediate outcome after implementation, begin collecting data on effectiveness immediately. November- 1 Meeting Review “pre” data Suggested Agenda Review outcomes of any data collected following implementation Determine if other resources will help improve implementation Homework – Continue implementing strategies and collecting data Guided Timeline Discuss successes and challenges with implementation of chosen strategies December- 1 Meeting Review and discuss data for implementation successes and struggles Determine any additional resources not yet used, or what will be needed for second semester Homework – Read/study any resources not yet used or new resources as needed 8 PDU Process Suggested Agenda January- 1 Meeting Suggested Agenda Determine any new strategies or changes to be implemented in second semester Adjust data collection as needed Homework – Begin implementation of all additional strategies and collect “pre” data. February- 1 Meeting Homework – Continue implementation and data collection. Bring all data to next meeting. March-1 Meeting Discuss any final changes to strategies Discuss requirements for resource reflections and determine which team member(s) will write for which resource (1 reflection per resource – not per teammate per resource) Suggested Agenda HowdoIusethismanual? Suggested Agenda Discuss successes and challenges with new strategies. How are they working with what you implemented in the fall? Have they been successful? What final changes do you want to make? Are there any additional resources that can help? Etc. What are PDUs? Discuss resources read for homework Discuss requirements for personal reflections Compile data and begin thinking about how to organize it for presentation. April- 2 Meetings Finalize electronic documentation Support Homework – Write resource reflections and personal reflections o Submit both individual reflections and resource reflections to Google Drive Meeting 1 Suggested Agenda o Ensure that all meeting logs and sign-in sheets are included April 13 Guided Timeline Create outline of presentation Homework – Split up responsibilities for presentation and complete Meeting 2 Suggested Agenda PDU E-Binder is due! Finalize presentation Homework – Practice May- 1 Meeting May 1-21 Suggested Agenda Practice presentation PDU End of Year Presentations PDU Process 9 PDU Process — PDU Team Members: Teacher needs: Possible resources: HowdoIusethismanual? PDU Team Leader: Team meeting dates: What are PDUs? Austin ISD Professional Development Unit 2014-15 Overview Planning Sheet (each page corresponds to one suggested meeting time) Support Guided Timeline Application and Statement of Understanding reviewed by all team members _____ PDU Process HOMEWORK: PDU Process — Overview Planning Sheets 10 What are PDUs? Application complete and submitted _____ 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. Guided Timeline 1. Support Responsibilities: HowdoIusethismanual? Team roles and who is responsible: Team leader responsibilities reviewed ____ HOMEWORK: PDU Process 11 What are PDUs? Resource #1: HowdoIusethismanual? Brainstorm strategies from resource #1: Support How could this be implemented? Resource #2: Guided Timeline Brainstorm strategies from resource #2: PDU Process HOMEWORK: 12 What are PDUs? Review of pre-data ____ Strategy #1: Successes: Challenges: HowdoIusethismanual? Strategy #2: Successes: Challenges: Support Strategy #3: Successes: Challenges: Guided Timeline Outcomes of data collected: Are other respources needed for implementation? List them here: PDU Process HOMEWORK: 13 What are PDUs? Review and discuss data strategy #1: Successes: Struggles: HowdoIusethismanual? Review and discuss data strategy #2: Successes: Struggles: Support Review and discuss data strategy #3: Successes: Struggles: Guided Timeline Resources not yet used: Second semester needs? PDU Process HOMEWORK: 14 What are PDUs? Discuss resources read for homework ____ New strategies or changes to be implemented in the second semester: HowdoIusethismanual? Support Guided Timeline DO NOT FORGET TO ADJUST DATA COLLECTION STRATEGIES AS NEEDED. HOMEWORK: PDU Process 15 What are PDUs? Discuss successes and challenges by responding to the questions below: HowdoIusethismanual? How are the strategies working, considering what you implemented in the fall? Have the strategies been successful? Why/why not? Support What final changes do you want to make? Guided Timeline Are there any additional resources that can help? PDU Process HOMEWORK: 16 What are PDUs? Discuss final changes to strategies: Resource Reflections- who will contribute (one reflection per resource, not per person per source)?: HowdoIusethismanual? Resource #1 reflection: Resource #2 reflection: Support Resource #3 reflection: Guided Timeline Discuss requirements for personal reflections ____ Compile and organize all data. Describe below your ideas for how it will be presented in the presentation: PDU Process HOMEWORK: 17 What are PDUs? Finalize electronic documentation: 1. Submit individual reflections to Google Drive. 2. Submit 3 resource reflections to Google Drive. HowdoIusethismanual? 3. Ensure that all meeting logs and sign in sheets are submitted to the Google Drive. Use the space below to outline your PDU presentation. Who is responsible for each part? Support Guided Timeline PDU Process HOMEWORK: 18 What are PDUs? Final presentation notes: HowdoIusethismanual? Support Guided Timeline HOMEWORK: PDU Process 19 What are PDUs? Practice presentation notes: HowdoIusethismanual? Support Guided Timeline HOMEWORK: PDU Process 20 What are PDUs? HowdoIusethismanual? Support Austin ISD Professional Development Unit How could this be Measured? Instructional Strategy: Forms of Data to Collect Guided Timeline --------------> 2014-15 Planning Sheet for Data Collection Instructional Strategy # _____ Expected Outcome(s) How will you know it has happened? PDU Team Members: What do you expect to happen? PDU Process Consider these questions… Which outcomes are most important to the team? Does it directly measure those outcomes (i.e., test scores measure an overall academic success, but usually not a particular skill)? Can the data be collected multiple times over an extended interval? Does it minimize variable that cannot be controlled for? 21 PDU Process How to Access the Google Drive 1. In your drive, select “Shared with Me” from the left side list 2. Find the Folder with your team leader’s name. 3. Access any team documents that have been uploaded. HowdoIusethismanual? 1. Log in using your AISD credentials for user name and password. 2. Once you are at the Cloud Desktop, find the Google Drive icon and select it. 3. Once in the drive, select PDU E-binders. 5. In the PDU E-binder folder, you can find samples, Statements of Understanding, PDU Rubric, PDU Plan ing Guide, and a Sample Timeline. You can access any of these by selecting the file you want. 6. To view any document, with appropriate formatting, select “File” and choose “Download as” to open the file in your selected format. To Access your Folder: What are PDUs? You may access the Google drive at any time from your campus by logging into the AISD Cloud, found as an icon on your desktop. To Open a File/Document: To Upload a Document: 1. Select your team folder. 2. Once in your team folder, find the upload button on the left side of the screen, next to the create button. 3. Click on the upload button and choose the file to upload. 4. Once the document is uploaded, chooses the “share” link from the pop-up screen. 5. Set the share settings to private, so that only the members of your team with appropriate log in acess can view your files. Be sure to include Trish Jarrott ([email protected]) as a member of your team to allow access to view documents. Guided Timeline To access the AISD Cloud off campus, go to: http://my.austinisd.org for access. Follow the instructions above to view, edit and upload documents. Support PDU Process 22 Members Present Support PDU Meeting Log 1. Summarize and highlight chapter 2 (How will we use this in our practice? 4. Classroom observation and feedback to teacher 3. Summarize and highlight items from Ch. 2 2. Discuss progress of Reader’s response notebooks Guided Timeline Meeting Minutes PDU Process 1. Explicit Instruction and Genre Study (Ch. 2)- Highlighted the chapters and decided on next steps. In Explicit Instruction we looked at importance of scholars knowing why they have to learn what they are learning and teachers stating it to scholars, lesson plan cycle (step by step), p.257 offers suggestions for potential problems. Genre Study- planned on sharing with staff on January 6. 2. Continue planning for presentation 1. Summarize and highlight chapter 2 (Explicit Instruction, Genre Study) How will we use this in our practice? Next steps: Monday, December 9, at 9:15-10:15 V. Sharp observed 5th grade teacher implementing explicit instruction in phonics. 4. Feedback to teacher: A. Garcia met with teacher regarding scholar work that demonstrated that he was reading the same story with many entries. 3. Continue with Chapter 2 at next meeting. 2. Sanchez scholar reader’s response journal sample shared with Brown teacher (5th). Scholars are continuing to write in their reader’s response journals and receive written feedback. Have a plan for continued growth and expansion on the subject with the campus. Spoke about plan for presentation using the strands as headings on power point (see rubric page26-29) 1. Review PDU expectations and assess 1.Reviewed PD/ Research one page reflection and what it entails. Reviewed rubric for progress. presentation in the Spring. Documentation due April 14th (one page reflection, individual reflection) Meeting Topics PDU Title: Brown Aztecs Reading Achievers HowdoIusethismanual? Time What are PDUs? Date Veronica Sharp V.Sharp Azucena Garcia 3:30-4:15 9:30-11:00 12/4/13 12/9/13 A. Garcia 2. Continue planning for presentation 2. Took more time to discuss ways to implement what we’ve learned. We will continue with planning for presentation at next meeting. PDU Process 23 Professional Development/Research One Pagers What are PDUs? A minimum of 3 PD and/or research selections must be used and reflected on by all team members during the study. Create a one-page summary and reflection for each of the resources used by the team during the PDU. HowdoIusethismanual? For each resource: 1. Provide all relevant identifying information a. For live PD (face to face PD, live webinar, video conference) provide: i. Title ii. Date of presentation iii. Location iv. Name of presenter(s) v. Focus of the PD vi. Who from the PDU team attended (not all team members need to attend PD sessions) b. For written resources (texts, articles, books, journals, websites, video) provide: i. Title ii. Location (be specific so the resource can easily be found i.e., ISBN numbers for books, isue number for periodicals, web addresses, etc.) iii. Author iv. Focus v. All PDU team members should read all written resources 2. Use the following guidelines and guiding questions to complete the reflection: a. Summarize the content. b. Why did you select this particular resource? c. How was the resource applied in your classroom? d. How did you measure the effectiveness of your implementation? e. Was the resource valuable (did it impact teachers and students)? Support Beth Tousek, Govalle ES Title: Phonics Lessons Letters, Words, and How They Work: Grade K (ISBN 978-0-325-00407-5) Author: Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell Focus: Initial Sound Identification The resource was applied in the classroom during whole group, small group, and independent work time. We did beginning consonant sorts with the group, then allowed students to work on similar sorts independently at their seats or with pairs. When particular students had difficulties completing the sorts, we worked on the sorts in small groups during the word work portion of our guided reading time. PDU Process We measured effectiveness of our implementation through progress monitoring assessments. Students were given two words that started with the same beginning sound and asked to articulate the beginning sound. After each progress monitoring session, we met as a team and discussed results, as well as ways to help improve the skill in students who had not reached mastery. We increased the number of initial sound activities in intervention groups, worked one-on-one with students, and paired students who had not yet mastered the skill with a student who had mastered the skill to help. We found this source to be very valuable to our students because it gave them a way to develop sound discrimination and identification of beginning sound in an active way. They enjoyed working on the picture sorts. As a team, we plan to further implement sorts through working on word sorts. We will take this strategy to the next level by adding letters and words. Guided Timeline The main purpose of reading Phonics Lessons Letters, Words, and How They Work: Grade K, was to gain a better understanding of how to best teach students to hear and identify beginning sound in words. As a group, we chose teaching beginning sounds as one of our strategies because of the importance of sound discrimination. Sound discrimination is an early skill that helps students to read and write words. Some students are able to identify the beginning sounds in words after hearing this skill modeled, however many students need direct instruction and guided practice to allow them to master this skill. This resource helped us teach beginning sounds due to its large number of hands on picture sorts and whole group activities. We used this particular resource because it was written by two of the most well-known and highly regarded experts in the field of early literacy, Irene Fountas and Gay Su Pinnell. 24 Individual Reflections 1. How did the overall PDU process work? What did you like about the process, and what did you not like about the processfrom start to finish? 2. What did you learn through your participation in the PDU? Were the strategies that you researched worth researching and how will they impact your teaching in the future? 3. If you were to repeat the process again, what would you do differently? What advice would you give to teachers considering participation in the PDU process next year? HowdoIusethismanual? Rhonda Barton Eastside Memorial High School Teacher/Science Department Chair/Instructional Coach What are PDUs? Please, take a moment to reflect upon the PDU process by addressing the questions below. Be thoughtful and constructive in your reflections, but please limit them to three pages maximum. Each member of the PDU team will complete a reflection. PDU Individual Reflection How did the PDU process work? What did you like and not like? Our team had six members, three administrators and three instructional coaches. This was the first year that Eastside implemented part-time instructional coaches in the four core content areas. It was helpful working together with administration because it allowed me to better understand their expectations for teachers and support staff. We would meet officially at least monthly but we also met informally on several occasions to discuss different aspects of the PDU. Support We had a general idea of what we wanted to focus on based on our Campus Improvement Plan and Campus Initiatives (presented to all staff at our beginning of year, August professional development). The real work started when we were trying to figure out how to help our teams meet the challenges presented (increased engagement, rigor and relevance, literacy). We went back and forth about resources and best practice strategies/practical application of resources. We finally settled on six resources. We then decided each instructional coach would provide professional development to their teams that was reflective of all three PDU goals utilizing the various resources. There would be pre-observations and post professional development observations. Our control groups would be those teams/teachers that did not receive the professional development (math, ELA). As mentioned above I enjoyed the opportunity to collaborate with administrators in regards to strategies and professional development. It gave me direction towards leading effective PLCs. My PLCs were definitely more structured and teachers appeared to be much more engaged compared to last year. What I found difficult was narrowing all the strategies presented in resources down to a list that teachers could tackle and not feel overwhelmed with. Next time I would probably try and focus on three or four great resources as opposed to six. Guided Timeline What did you learn? Were the strategies that you researched worth researching and how will they impact your teaching in the future? I learned that structured PLCs, that have a practical instructional focus, are more engaging for teachers. Teachers really do want to do their best in the classrooms; sometimes they just need the tools and resources to be successful. Figuring out exactly where they are in their “process” and then giving them specific strategies they can try out in classrooms was rewarding for me. When I see them connect with a strategy and feel successful with students, I feel successful as a coach. I have one teacher who did not buy into the professional development as much as the rest of the team, so I will need to continue to work on figuring out how I can help him move forward with his practice in a way that seems meaningful to him. PDU Process If I had to pick the top three resources out of the six, I would choose the Jensen conference, the presentation by Terrine Rodriguez, and the Making Thinking Visible Book. I liked all the movement and brain breaks that the Jensen conference presented. I liked the strategy of presenting a concept in three or four different ways that Terrine’s presentation suggested. This aligned well with the SWRL (speaking, writing, reading, listening). I like the idea of having students listen and write, read, and then speak about a topic. Etc... 25 What are PDUs? HowdoIusethismanual? Support Guided Timeline PDU Process The PDU rubric is made up of 10 strands in 4 domains: Collaboration, Implementation/Impact on instruction, Impact on Student Learning and Electronic Documentation. The first three domains are scored during an end of year presentation. The final domain is scored using your team e-Binder. PDUs will be evaluated and scored using this rubric and the following criteria: PDU presentations must be live (not pre-recorded) and be between 20 and 25 minutes in length Presentations will be rated by a panel of at least three people including your principal, members of the REACH team and/or the Office of Educator Quality. When multiple bulleted descriptors are listed within a strand, each will be scored separately, then averaged and rounded to determine the overall score for that strand. Scores from each strand will be totaled to create a final score from each rater Scores from each rater will be averaged to determine the final score To receive the $1,500 stipend, teams must have a final score of at least 33 (average of 3 in each strand), and score no “1”s on any single strand (averaged across raters). PDU Appeal Process: Notify Trish Jarrott, video taped presentation is viewed by 2 additional raters, new ratings will be averaged with previous ratings for a new PDU score (final appealed score may be higher or lower than the original score). mention of connection to SLO, CIP or other campus needs · Presentation is limited in development and lacks clarity, focus and/or direction · No · No evidence or description of how PDU study improved teamwork and collaboration 1 — Standards not Observed · PDU goal, process and results are communicated, but lack clarity · Presentation is somewhat developed but is ineffective in engaging the audience (e.g., reading slides) and lacks clarity, focus and/or direction · PDU is loosely aligned to SLO, CIP or other campus needs · Limited description and/or evidence of how PDU study improved teamwork and collaboration among team 2 — Approaching Standards · New links formed between teachers and/or administrators outside of the PDU group, and collaboration extended beyond normal meeting times 4 — Exceeding Standards · Evidence provided (ex: meeting notes) in the presentation that PDU meetings were used to share ideas, resources and data amongst all team members · All team members demonstrate mastery of the course content, show collegiality and participate equally in the presentation · Presentation clearly communicates goal, process and results of PDU study and how the study will influence future PD and instruction · Presentation captivates the audience and uses a variety of elements (video, audio, role playing, etc.) that enhance the content · Evidence provided that PDU is fully aligned to multiple campus needs/ initiatives is engaging, organized, and coherent team members take an active role in presentation · All · Presentation clearly communicates the goal, process and results of PDU study · Presentation · Evidence provided that PDU goals align to SLO, CIP or other campus needs 3 — Meeting Standards To present your PDU, and thus be eligible for the $1,500 stipend, each team must complete their electronic documentation by April 13, 2015 (subject to change). Presentations are currently planned for May 1-15, though those dates may also be modified depending on the number of teams. Strand Teamwork Presentation · PDU goal, process and/or results are not communicated · Most team members demonstrate a lack of understanding and/or do not participate in the presentation · Some team members demonstrate a lack of understanding and/or do not take an active role in the presentation PDU Process 26 HowdoIusethismanual? · No evidence that evaluation of instructional resources and strategies were driven by data · Unclear how teacher practice has improved as a result of the study · Plan for continued implementation and/or sharing PDU with larger group is unclear or unspecified PDU Process 4 — Exceeding Standards · Plan for continued implementation and sharing PDU with larger group is clear, specific and principal approved · Strategies used require significant extension of practice for all members of the team and the team has developed a plan for continued growth and expansion on the subject with the campus · Evidence of strategies being implemented in other content areas, class periods, student groups, or teacher groups · Theory behind each strategy is clearly explained, tied to resources used, and suggestions of future use of resources are made · At least three resources used throughout the study and Resources include outside speakers or other external experts · Expected outcomes from each strategy are clear and specific and impact multiple areas of instruction · Strategies used were adjusted based on teacher learning, student data, or student need · More than three specific instructional strategies implemented repeatedly over an extended instructional interval by all members of the PDU team Guided Timeline 3 — Meeting Standards outcomes from each strategy are clear and specific · Plan for continued implementation beyond the current year is clear and specific · Strategies used require significant extension of practice for all members of the team · Evidence provided that selection of resources and instructional strategies were driven by data and needs of both students and teachers · Theory behind each strategy is clearly explained and tied to resources used. · At least three resources used throughout the study · Expected · Similar strategies were implemented repeatedly and consistently over course of study by all members of the team (adjusted for population) · At least three specific instructional strategies implemented repeatedly over an extended instructional interval Support 2 — Approaching Standards · Two instructional strategies and/or techniques used by some or all members of the team · Expected outcomes from each strategy are not clear and unspecific · Strategies were implemented inconsistently over the course of the study · Expected outcomes from each strategy are not provided · One to two resources used throughout the study resources used throughout the study · Theory behind each strategy is not explained nor is it tied to resources used. · Reevaluation of instructional resources and strategies did not occur · No mention of how teacher practice has improved as a result of the study · Theory behind each strategy is vaguely explained and somewhat tied to resources used. · No · Strategies were not implemented over the course of the study · One instructional strategy and/or technique was used by some or all members of the team 1 — Standards not Observed What are PDUs? Strand Application of Study Use of Resources Teacher Development · No mention of a plan for continued implementation and/or sharing PDU with larger group PDU Process 27 HowdoIusethismanual? Support PDU Process · Evidence provided that data was used to drive changes repeatedly throughout the study · Data is presented, with artifacts, from large student populations (at least one entire class from each teacher in the study) · Data collected and presented demonstrates a direct causation between student growth and the study (includes control groups and controlling for variables) · Uses 3 or more measures directly aligned to expected outcomes to demonstrate student growth · Outcomes greatly affect student academic performance in a positive manner · Demonstrates outstanding student improvement in the expected outcomes identified by the team 4 — Exceeding Standards Guided Timeline · Demonstrates clear student improvement in the expected outcomes identified by the team 3 — Meeting Standards · Demonstrates limited student improvement in the expected outcomes identified by the team · Outcomes positively affect student academic performance 2 — Approaching Standards · Outcomes have no affect student academic performance · Data presented is from large student populations (sample size may be determined by content studied… e.g., dyslexia, ELL, etc.) · Data collected and presented directly measure the expected outcomes for each implemented strategy · Uses 2 measures directly aligned to expected outcomes to demonstrate student growth · Data collected and presented is loosely connected to the study (i.e., test scores only) · Uses 1 measures directly aligned to expected outcomes to demonstrate student growth · Data collected and presented is not related to the study · Data presented does not demonstrate effectiveness of the strategy researched in the study presented is on small student populations · Data collected is on isolated students only · Data · Does not use measures directly aligned to expected outcomes to demonstrate student growth · Outcomes negatively affect student academic performance · Does not demonstrate improved student performance in the expected outcomes identified by the team 1 — Standards not Observed What are PDUs? Component Student Growth (Score x 2) Data Quality and Use · Data was not used to examine effectiveness of strategies · Evidence provided that data was used to measure effectiveness of new strategies throughout the study PDU Process 28 · Meeting logs are absent for at least one team meeting · Invitations to meetings were sent sporadically/late and/or did not include all team members, principal and REACH contact · Meeting logs are incomplete for at least one team meeting. PDU Process 4 — Exceeding Standards duration is greater than four months team attendance (by all team members combined) is at least 95% · Meet all criteria for a “3” and include a personal plan from each team member for extending the PDU beyond your team · Invitations with agendas were sent at least one week in advance to all team members, principal and REACH contact prior to each meeting · Meeting logs are complete, include in depth notes on all discussions/next steps and are neat, organized and easy to comprehend · Average · Evidence of more than five face-toface team meetings focused primarily on PD and implementation (i.e., not on documentation) · Study · Summary and reflections are provided for all resources with complete and thoughtful responses to all guiding questions, along with suggestions for further implementation of researched strategies · Resource summary clearly identifies more than the three required sources and provides additional links and information when possible Guided Timeline 3 — Meeting Standards duration is four months · All team members complete a maximum 3 page reflection with detailed and thoughtful answers to all guiding questions · Invitations with agendas were sent to all team members, principal and REACH contact prior to each meeting · Meeting logs are complete and include required details (attendance, topics, conclusions, next steps) · Minimum of 80% attendance from each team member · Evidence of five face-to-face team meetings focused primarily on PD and implementation (i.e., not on documentation) · Study · Summary and reflections are provided for all resources with complete and thoughtful responses to all guiding questions · Resource summary clearly identifies each of the three sources and provides additional links and information when possible Support · Resource summary identifies two of the three sources and provides additional links and information when possible 2 — Approaching Standards HowdoIusethismanual? summary or reflections provided · Summary and reflections provided, but are incomplete or lack clarity duration is two to three months · Study · Evidence of three to four face-to-face team meetings throughout study duration is fewer than two months · Evidence of two or fewer face-to-face team meetings throughout the study · Invitations to meeting were not sent throughout the year to all team members, principals and REACH contact · All team members complete a reflection, but not all questions are answered completely attendance from any team member · 50-79% · One or more team member did not complete a reflection by the e-binder due date attendance or less from any team member · 49% · Study · No · Resource summary identifies no more than one source and provides additional links and information when possible 1 — Standards not Observed What are PDUs? Strand PD Resources Meeting Logs and Time Teacher Reflections PDU Process 29 What are PDUs? HowdoIusethismanual? Support Guided Timeline PDU Process PDU Process 30