Q S M

Transcription

Q S M

d
OILFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL & COMPLIANCE, INC. (OEC)
lle
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL
Revision 18 – JULY 2014
tro
Locations Covered
Administrative Offices &
Volatile Organics Department
2010 Preisker Lane, Suite F
Santa Maria, CA 93454
on
Main Laboratory &
Sample Receiving
307 Roemer Way
Santa Maria, CA 93454
(805) 922-4772
nc
Julius Carstens
Laboratory Director & Vice President
U
Lisa Race
Technical Director
Taft
Field Services Office
101 Adkisson Way
Taft, CA 93268
(661) 762-9143
Laboratory Quality System Authority
Mary Ann Long
Operations Director
Carrie McCrillis
Quality Director
(Includes ‘Quality System Authority’ above) Laboratory Signature Authority
Meredith Sprister
Project Manager
Marissa Censullo
Project Manager
This Quality System Manual governs the quality program for all operating units of the laboratory, as
shown on the organization chart presented in the manual.
Quality System Manual
Page 2 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
E N V I R O N M E N T A L
&
C O M P L I A N C E,
I N C.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
4
4
4
4
3.8
3.9
Reference Materials
Handling and Storage of Reference Standards and Materials
Labeling & Documentation of Reference Standards, Reagents, and Materials
on
3.7.1
3.7.2
3.7.3
tro
SECTION 3 – QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONS
3.1
Quality Policy & Objectives
3.2
Change Management
3.3
Document and Record Management
3.4
Corrective & Preventive Action (CAPA)
3.5
Control of Non-Conforming Work
3.6
Method Validation
3.7
Measurement Traceability
lle
SECTION 2 – PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1
Responsibility and Lines of Authority
FIGURE 2A –Organization Chart
2.2
Job Descriptions
2.3
Data Integrity, Ethics & General Training
d
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
Scope of Testing
1.3
Glossary & Acronyms
Audits
Management Review
8
8
9
9
12
14
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
20
21
21
22
23
24
24
24
24
25
25
SECTION 5 – LABORATORY FUNCTIONS
5.1
Accommodations & Environmental Conditions
Figure 5A – Preisker Location
Figure 5B – Roemer Location
5.2
Purchasing Services and Supplies
5.3
Sample Management
5.4
Equipment
5.5
References for Analytical Methods
5.6
Quality of Test Results
Table 5C Essential Quality Control Elements
27
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
32
34
U
nc
SECTION 4 – CLIENT SERVICE FUNCTIONS
4.1
Client Confidentiality
4.2
Review of Requests, Tenders and Contracts
4.3
Complaints
4.4
Subcontracting of Tests
4.5
Reporting of Results
307 ROEMER WAY | SANTA MARIA | CA 93454 | (805)922 -4772 | FAX (805)925-3376 | oecusa.com
Page 3 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
37
38
40
42
44
47
48
49
50
51
53
55
56
APPENDIX B – STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (SOP)
57
tro
APPENDIX C – OEC EQUIPMENT LIST
lle
d
APPENDIX A – CONTACT & QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL
Julius Carstens
Laboratory Director
Mary Ann Long
Operations Director
Carrie McCrillis
Quality Director & Human Resources Representative
Lisa Race
Technical Director & Safety Officer
Meredith Sprister
Project Manager (Lead)
Marissa Censullo,
Project Manager
Kristie Mikel
Department Manager, Microbiology, Bioassay & Wet Chemistry
Drew Miller
Department Manager, Volatile Organics
Parwinder Parmar
Department Manager, Metals & Instrumental Inorganics
Dwain Zsadanyi
Department Manager, Semi-Volatile Organics
Pete Alcocer
Oil Production Operations Consultant
Brandon Ganster
Oil Production Taft Operations Supervisor
62
75
APPENDIX E – DATA CAPABILITY TABLES
INORGANICS
METALS
TPH ORGANICS
VOLATILE ORGANICS
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS
76
76
77
78
78
83
on
APPENDIX D – SAMPLE TREATMENT: HOLDING TIMES & CONTAINERS
86
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
U
nc
APPENDIX F – QC DATA EVALUATION FLOWCHARTS
Evaluation of Initial Calibration
Evaluation of Continuing Calibration
Evaluation of Method Blank and Instrument Blank Results
Evaluation of Sample Results for Inorganics Analytes
Evaluation of Sample Results for Organic Analyses
Evaluation of Surrogate Compound Recoveries
Evaluation of Laboratory Control Sample & Duplicate (LCS/LCSD)
Evaluation of Matrix Spike & Duplicate (MS/MSD) Recoveries
Evaluation of Duplicate Sample (DUP) and/or MS Duplicate (MSD) Precision
Page 4 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION
QUALITY SYSTEM MANUAL
The objective of the OEC Quality System Manual is to outline the quality organization for the
laboratory. The Quality System Manual sets the standard under which all laboratory operations
are performed including the laboratory's organization, objectives, and operating philosophy.
The Quality System Manual defines the policies, procedures, and documentation required to
meet the objectives of sampling and analytical services provided.
lle
1.1
d
OILFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL & COMPLIANCE INC. (OEC) is an analytical laboratory and field support
company located in Santa Maria, California. It is operated as a commercial environmental laboratory,
specializing in the analytical testing of solids, liquids, air, and product matrices. It is the goal of OEC to
provide clients with data that is valid, defensible and reproducible while meeting their specific needs.
tro
The Quality Director ensures that OEC policies and objectives for quality are documented by
reference or inclusion in the Quality System Manual. The Quality System Manual is
communicated to, understood by, and implemented by all personnel concerned. Where the
Quality System Manual does not document laboratory requirements, a separate SOP will do so.
on
In the following sections, detailed information will be given on OEC procedures for personnel
qualifications, sample collection, CoC documentation, sample handling, storage and disposition,
equipment calibrations and maintenance, reagents, SOPs, quality control procedures and data
reduction, validation and verification.
SCOPE OF TESTING
The laboratory scope of analytical testing services includes those listed in Appendices D & E.
1.3
GLOSSARY & ACRONYMS
Refer to the SOP [GEN-DEFIN], Acronyms & Definitions for a complete listing of laboratory terms
and acronyms.
Acceptance criteria – Criteria often applied to data drawn from existing sources
(“secondary “ data) addressing the adequacy of existing information.
Accuracy – The average of results of same sample compared to amount of known analyte in
sample.
Audit – A systematic and independent examination to determine whether quality activities and
related results comply with planned arrangements and whether these arrangements are
implemented effectively and are suitable to achieve objectives.
Bias – The systematic or persistent distortion of a measurement process that causes errors in
one direction.
Blank – A sample containing none of the analytes of interest subjected to the usual analytical
process to establish a zero baseline. It is used to detect contamination during sample
handling preparation and/or analysis.
Chain-of-custody (CoC) – An unbroken trail of accountability that ensures the physical security
of samples, data and records.
U
nc
1.2
Page 5 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
U
nc
on
tro
lle
d
Comparability – A measure of the confidence with which a method or set of data can be
compared to another.
Conformance – an affirmative indication or judgment that a product or service comply with the
relevant specification, contract or regulation.
Continuing Calibration Verification (CCV) – The protocol to check the calibration curve on a
batch basis to verify that it is still valid. The normal check is to test one of the original midlevel calibration standards and verify that the RPD is within the acceptance range of the
method.
Corrective action – Any measures taken to rectify conditions adverse to quality and where
possible, to prevent recurrence.
Data quality – A measure of the degree of acceptability or use of data for a particular purpose.
Data reduction – The process of transforming the number of data items by arithmetic
or
statistical calculations, standard curves and concentration factors and assemble them into a
more useful form.
Data validation – An analyte-/sample-specific process that extends the evaluation of data
beyond method, procedural or contractual compliance to determine the analytical quality of
a specific data set.
Data verification – The process of evaluating the completeness, correctness and
conformance/compliance of a specific data set against the method, procedural, or
contractual specifications.
Detection limit – The lowest concentration or amount of the target analyte that can be
determined to be different from zero by a single measurement at a stated level of
probability. Used to distinguish samples that do not contain a specific analyte from samples
that contain low concentration of the analyte.
Duplicates – For each batch analyzed, a sample duplicate, laboratory control duplicate and a
matrix duplicate will be added for quality control purposes to demonstrate precision in
performing the analysis.
Field blank – A clean analyte-free sample which is carried to the sampling site and then exposed
to sampling conditions, returned to laboratory and treated as an environmental sample. It is
used to provide information about contaminants that may be introduced during sample
collection, storage and transport.
Holding time (HT) – The period of time a sample may be stored before analysis.
Initial Calibration Verification (ICV) – Immediate analysis of standards from a different
manufacturer than that of the calibration standards to check suitability of a calibration
curve.
Internal Standard (IS) – Compounds added to the sample after sample preparation for
qualitative and quantitative analysis. The compounds serve to give a standard of retention
time and instrument response.
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) – A sample made with reagent water and known amounts of
target analytes. It is analyzed with a batch to serve as quality control on the sample
preparation process.
Matrix spike sample (MS) – A sample prepared by adding a known amount of the target analyte
to a specified amount of a matrix. It is used to determine the effect of the matrix on a
method’s recovery efficiency.
Method – A body of procedures and techniques for performing an activity, systematically
presented in the order in which they are to be executed.
Page 6 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
tro
lle
d
Method blank (MB) – A blank prepared and analyzed exactly like the sample to indicate if a bias
has been introduced into the analytical procedure.
Method Limit (ML) or Method Detection Limits (MDL) – Minimum level of a target analyte that
can be determined with 99% confidence.
Reporting Limit (RL) or Practical Quantitation Levels (PQL) – The lowest level that can be
reliably achieved during routine laboratory operating conditions within specified limits of
precision and accuracy. The number given is selected by multiplying the standard deviation
results from the MDL procedure.
Precision – A measure of agreement among repeated measurements of the same property
under identical conditions. It is generally expressed in terms of the standard deviation.
Quality assurance – The sum of all quality control performed, the reporting of the data and
improvement made to ensure that processes are of the quality needed.
Quality control – Procedure to evaluate a single aspect of an analyte or test.
Spike – A substance that is added to an environmental sample to increase the concentration of
the target analyte by a known amount. It is used to measure accuracy. Spike duplicates are
used to assess measurement precision.
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) – A document that details the method for an operation,
analysis or action with thoroughly prescribed techniques and steps to be followed. It is
officially approved as the method for performing certain tasks.
SI Prefix
Abbreviation
Value
M
k
d
c
m
μ
n
10
3
10
-1
10
-2
10
-3
10
-6
10
-9
10
p
10
nc
Mega
Kilo
Deci
Centi
Milli
Micro
Nano
on
Units – All units used to qualify any incoming samples must be properly identifiable. The
laboratory utilizes SI and additional units in our measuring systems. Listed below are
common industry units of measure.
SI Units (NIST)
Pico
6
SI Parameter
Base Unit
Abbreviation
Mass
Length
Time
Temperature
Amount of Substance
Electric Current
Luminous Intensity
Gram
Meter
Second
Kelvin
Mole
Ampere
Candela
g
m
s
K
mol
A
cd
-12
U
Additional common industry units
L – Liter (volume parameter accepted for use with SI) Hence:
mL – milliliter (0.001 L)
μL – microliter (0.000001 L)
Ω = Ohm: V=IR (used for DI water purity measurement)
ºC = Centigrade:
ºC = K – 273.15
ºF = Fahrenheit:
ºF = 9/5(ºC) + 32
ppb – parts per billion (normally μg/L for aqueous samples or μg/kg for solid samples)
ppm – parts per million (normally mg/L for aqueous samples or mg/kg for solid samples)
ACRONYMS not otherwise defined
Blk
–
Blank
°C
–
degrees Celsius
Page 7 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
lle
Corrective Action & Preventive Action
calibration
Chain of custody
Dissolved oxygen
Demonstration of Competency
Environmental Protection Agency
grams per liter
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry
Initial calibration verification
Initial Demonstration of Capability
Pound per Square Inch
Laboratory Control Sample
Laboratory Fortified Blank
Milligrams per Kilogram
Milligrams per Liter
Matrix Spike
Matrix Spike Duplicate
Oilfield Environmental and Compliance, Inc.
Practical Quantitation Limit
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Reporting Limit
Relative Percent Difference
Relative Standard Deviation
Standard Operating Procedures
Spike
Standard
Micrograms per Liter
Ultraviolet
Volatile Organic Compound
Whole Effluent Toxicity
I N C.
d
tro
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
&
U
nc
CAPA
cal
COC
DO
DOC
EPA
g/L
GC/MS
ICP-MS
ICV
IDoC
lb/in2
LCS
LFB
mg/Kg
mg/L
MS
MSD
OEC
PQL
QA
QC
QSM
RL
RPD
RSD
SOPs
spk
std
µg/L
UV
VOC
WET
on
O I L F I E L D
Page 8 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
SECTION 2 – PERSONNEL, ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
lle
d
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) is a legally identifiable organization located in Santa
Maria, California. Through application of the policies and procedures outlined in this chapter, the
laboratory assures that it is impartial and that personnel are free from undue commercial, financial, or
other pressures that might influence their technical judgment. The laboratory is responsible for carrying
out testing activities that meet the requirements of the relevant standards and that meet the needs of
the client.
2.1
tro
OEC management is committed to quality and to the quality system as stated in the Quality Policy,
which is upheld through the application of related policies and procedures. A complete training program
is administered to new employees prior to their handling client samples. Through proper training new
employees are made aware of causes of unethical or illegal actions during analysis. The use of operating
procedures specifying appropriate and inappropriate instrument and system manipulation practices,
comprehensive system audits, a corrective action program, electronic and hard copy post-analysis data
audits, and external performance evaluations contribute to quality workmanship from OEC employees.
RESPONSIBILITY AND LINES OF AUTHORITY
on
OEC “SENIOR MANAGEMENT” includes the titles Laboratory Director, Technical Director,
Operations Director and Quality Director. The term “MANAGEMENT” additionally includes the
titles Project Managers and Department Managers. Approved signatories for the laboratory
include the Senior Management and Project Managers.
The Laboratory Director has overall responsibility for the technical operations and establishment
of total laboratory policies, including the required quality of laboratory operations.
nc
OEC senior management is responsible for the policies, procedures, changes and delegation of
responsibilities related to the Quality System. OEC management assumes specific responsibility
for maintenance of the Quality System. This includes defining roles and responsibilities to
personnel, approving documents, providing required training, providing a procedure for
confidential reporting of data integrity issues, and periodically reviewing data, procedures, and
documentation. Management also ensures that audit findings and corrective actions are
completed within required schedules.
U
The Laboratory Director appoints designated alternates during the absence of any laboratory
Management as defined above.
The Laboratory Director is responsible for defining the minimal level of education, qualifications,
experience, and skills necessary for all positions in the laboratory and that technical staff have
demonstrated capabilities in their tasks. Training is kept up to date as described in this manual
by periodic review of training records and through employee performance review.
The Department Managers ensure technical competence of personnel operating equipment,
performing tests, or evaluating results, and limits authority to perform laboratory functions to
those appropriately trained and/or supervised.
Page 9 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
nc
on
tro
lle
d
FIGURE 2A –ORGANIZATION CHART
Refer to Appendix A for contact information and resumes of key personnel
2.2
JOB DESCRIPTIONS
U
Job descriptions are available for all positions that manage, perform, or verify work affecting data
quality. Job descriptions include the specific tasks for each position.
2.2.1
Laboratory Director
Has full authority through the President, is ultimately responsible for all laboratory activities,
and is the highest-level manager. The laboratory director is responsible for overall laboratory
operations and management compliance with the Quality System defined in this Quality
Manual.
 Supervises all laboratory activities including staffing, training, procurement, safety,
productivity and quality assurance.
Page 10 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014


I N C.
Defines the minimum qualification level of education and training for all laboratory
positions to properly carry out the duties assigned to them;
Ensures that personnel are free from any commercial, financial and other undue
pressures which might adversely affect the quality of their work;
Supervises all laboratory certification and accreditation processes;
Acts as technical consultant for clients as necessary.
Acts as technical consultant for laboratory operations as necessary.
Responsible for appointing alternates for critical laboratory positions when necessary.
Operations Director
The Operations Director manages and directs the analytical production departments of the
laboratory. Reports directly to the Laboratory Director and assists in determining the most
efficient instrument utilization.
 Continuously assess and improve the production throughput of departments;
 Continuously assess production capacity and improves capacity utilization;
 Continuously assess turnaround time and addresses any problems that may hinder
meeting the required and committed turnaround time from the various departments;
 Oversees that sufficient instrumentation, personnel and supplies are available to realize
production goals;
 Oversees that scheduled instrument maintenance is completed;
 Evaluates utilization of supplies for efficiency improvements;
 Ensures all production departments are adhering to all relevant aspects of the quality
system;
 Oversees that all quality parameters related to projects are within method and client
specified requirements;
 Responsible for the validity of analytical data and overall legal defensibility of data;
 Monitors the level of internal/external non-conformances for all production
departments and implements preventive or corrective action when necessary.
 Monitors and improves the training of all production personnel in cooperation with the
Department Managers;
 Acts as technical consultant for clients as necessary.
nc
on
tro
2.2.2
&
lle




d
O I L F I E L D
Quality Director
The Quality Director designs and oversees the Quality System and Quality Assurance Program,
and maintains any certifications thereto. Reports directly to the Laboratory Director and has full
authority in aspects of laboratory activities related to quality.
 Responsible for acquisition and maintenance of laboratory certification;
 Maintains and updates the Quality System Manual;
 Designs, maintains and monitors all other components of the Quality System, including,
but not limited to:
o Corrective & Preventive Action System (CAPA);
o Document Control System;
o Demonstration of Capability for methods, equipment and personnel;
o Control Chart evaluation and Control Limit Updates;
o Orientation & Training Program;
U
2.2.3
Page 11 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014




I N C.
o Management Review;
o Change Management System;
o Proficiency Testing;
o Internal Auditing;
o Continual Improvement.
Responsible for all laboratory and analytical QA/QC requirements & procedures;
Ensures laboratory Quality System requirements correlate with regulatory and client
requirements;
Responsible for external audit responses and defines or acts as a consulting resource for
required corrective actions;
Notifies laboratory management of deficiencies;
Serves as a technical resource for QA matters;
Trains personnel in quality procedures.
Technical Director
The Technical Director is responsible for all technical aspects of laboratory function, including
instrumentation, analytical production, method development, improvements, regulatory and
project compliance issues.
 Investigation of equipment technology and regularly reports/recommends to upper
management laboratory apparatus status and needed improvements or updates;
 Determines the need for new production services and researches available methods.
Determines the equipment and personnel needed to perform development.
 Oversees development and installation of new laboratory methods and equipment;
 Responsible for content maintenance of the LIMS system;
 Serves as a technical resource for current and future client base, and for major projects,
as necessary;
 Ensures the laboratory remains current with relevant testing regulations and provides
any technical training as required;
 Attends client or industry meetings where a laboratory technical representative is
beneficial;
 Works with Business Development as a technical resource for the preparation of
contract and bid proposals, as necessary;
 Reviews all aspects of SAPs, QAPPs, work plans, contracts and bids to provide feedback,
alternative solutions as necessary, and communicates with Operations and Quality as
needed to ensure project/client specific requirements are met;
 Supports Quality and Operations by providing technical solutions and input as
appropriate for laboratory procedures, data quality issues, data validation, corrective
actions and continuous improvement;
U
nc
on
tro
2.2.4
&
d


lle
O I L F I E L D
2.2.5
Project Manager
 Responsible for the final review of sample results and related quality control;
 Ensures that all quality parameters related to projects are within method and client
specified requirements;
 Compiles result packages and approves analytical reports issued by the laboratory;
Page 12 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D


&
I N C.
Works with Business Development as a resource for the preparation of bid proposals, as
necessary;
Acts as primary contact and in-house advocate for clients.
Department Manager
 Responsible for the daily laboratory operation and adherence to quality standards;
 Supervises and trains chemists and other personnel within the analytical group;
 Verifies chain-of-custody and assures that appropriate analyses are performed within
required ‘holding’ and ‘turn-around’ times;
 Responsible for secondary review and approval of analytical raw data;
 Reports any QC problems and performs necessary corrective actions to restore quality
control. Submits systematic corrective action reports to the Quality Director;
 Prepares and maintains logbooks and documentation of department activities;
 Responsible for the content and accuracy of department documents;
 Schedules and performs instrument validation, calibration and preventive maintenance;
 Monitors and evaluates performance of preventive and corrective maintenance on
analytical and support equipment. Instructs personnel in proper procedures for
maintenance and related documentation as necessary.
2.3
DATA INTEGRITY, ETHICS & GENERAL TRAINING
2.3.1
ORIENTATION TRAINING – New employees are given an orientation upon arrival. Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the laboratory Health and Safety Plan, Data Integrity and
Ethics, Client Confidentiality, and Corrective Action Preventive Action (CAPA) are included in this
orientation. All SOPs have training verification forms as part of the document, and these forms
are filled out and maintained in the employee’s training file.
on
tro
lle
d
2.2.6
nc
DATA INTEGRITY is the result of the processes that together assure valid data of known and
documented quality. OEC management emphasizes integrity procedures by providing ethical
and complete training for a position before allowing any employee to handle client samples.
U
It is necessary that employees understand that any infractions of the laboratory data integrity
procedures will result in an investigation that could lead to very serious consequences such as
immediate termination, or civil/criminal prosecution. New employees are required to read the
Data Integrity and Ethics procedures and complete the associated Training Verification Form(s).
Signatures on these forms are used to document the employee’s understanding and obligation
to data integrity. Training records regarding data integrity and ethics are signed and dated by
senior management. Data integrity procedures and evidence of inappropriate actions are
reviewed annually through regularly scheduled internal audits or periodically through in-depth
data or records review and are updated by management.
2.3.2
REPORTING INFRACTIONS – Employees can confidentially report ethic and data integrity issues
by having (1) unrestricted access to senior management, (2) the assurance not to be treated
unfairly for reporting ethics and data integrity breaches, and (3) anonymous reporting.
Page 13 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
Any potential data integrity issue is handled confidentially until a follow-up evaluation, full
investigation, or other appropriate actions have been completed and the issues clarified.
Inappropriate activities are documented, including disciplinary actions, corrective actions, and
notifications of clients, if applicable. These documents are maintained for a minimum of 5 years.
ANALYTICAL TRAINING – Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. allows only trained
personnel to perform specific tasks in the laboratory. Proper training documentation includes a
completed training form and a completed Initial Demonstration of Capability (IDoC). All
employees are properly trained before they are assigned tasks that can affect data quality.
IDoCs must be performed whenever there is a new analyst or a significant change in the
analytical instrumentations. Proficiency is demonstrated by preparing and analyzing four
replicates of Quality Control Check with recovery results within 70-130% or current laboratory
defined control limits and RPD ≤ 20%. Management assumes the responsibility to assure
personnel are trained and necessary records of training are kept on-file.
tro
2.3.3
lle
Senior Management will determine the need for an investigation of data integrity issues.
Allegations will remain confidential to the extent necessary. All documentation for
investigations of an inappropriate data integrity activity shall include notifications of clients,
corrective actions taken, and any disciplinary actions involved.
on
Upon completion of orientation, the supervisor of the new employee will oversee the training of
specific tasks in the laboratory.
U
nc
The initial training for a new task will contain the following steps:
a) All documentation involved with a new and unfamiliar task will be read and understood
by the trainee.
b) Instruction in the proper use of all equipment utilized in the task the trainee is learning.
c) Instruction in the location of all necessary reagents required and proper techniques for
measuring and preparing these reagents.
d) Instruction in the proper procedure for tasks assigned including any prep work, if
needed.
e) Instruction for all quality control procedures for the task assigned.
f) Instruction in all safety procedures for the task assigned.
g) Training will be under the direct supervision of the supervisor or senior analyst. During
the training period, the trainee may sign laboratory notebooks or logbooks, but the
senior analyst or supervisor that is responsible for the data generated must cosign these
records.
h) The trainee will demonstrate proficiency in the new task before they can operate
independently. This demonstration for a test method is accomplished by the completion
of a demonstration of capability. Additionally the supervisor or senior analyst must sign
the training form to show approval of competency.
i) Each step of the training process is documented.
j) Management will determine on-going training by assessment of the company’s need for
training for new equipment or new positions or for cross training for existing positions.
Page 14 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
SECTION 3 – QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONS
d
The Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) Quality System is documented in this Quality
System Manual and associated quality system documents. Together they describe the policies,
objectives, principles, responsibilities, accountability, and implementation plan of the organization for
ensuring quality in its work processes and services.
lle
3.1
QUALITY POLICY & OBJECTIVES
The quality policy is signed and dated as a component of this manual, and is issued under the authority
of the highest level of laboratory management, which demonstrates management’s commitment to
integrity, ethics, the quality system and associated standards. All of the OEC objectives and policies are
documented and the laboratory personnel are required to know and implement them in their work.
tro
Quality Policy – At Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) the purpose of the quality control
program is to produce data of known quality that meets the requirements of standard analytical
methods and client needs. The objective of the quality assurance activities is to provide a system of
evaluation of analytical data throughout operations, and to have quality control data that will define
analytical results in terms of accuracy, precision, completeness and defensibility. Our policy is a
dedication to provide quality environmental testing by upholding the highest quality standards in a
professional and ethical manner. This dedication requires ongoing commitment and continually
improves the quality of our work.
on
Quality Objectives – Objectives are achieved by performing quality assurance with every group of
samples analyzed. The quality assurance is verified by checking sample duplicates, spikes, spike
duplicates, laboratory control samples and blanks. In addition, surrogate recoveries are measured if
applicable to the method. The quality control data generated with the samples is usually supplied to the
client with standard analytical reports. The quality of data generated is confirmed by its assessment
against the following objective parameters:
nc
Accurate – The degree of accuracy is determined by the agreement between an observed value and
an accepted reference or true value. Accuracy is ensured by the adherence to quality handling
protocols and use of dual source certified reference materials for all possible methodologies.
Accuracy is monitored through the performance of quality control check samples, matrix spikes,
laboratory quality control spikes, and surrogate/internal standard spikes.
U
Precise – The degree of precision is determined by the difference in resultant value of two
identically prepared items. Precision is ensured by adherence to protocols for replicate analyses.
Precision is monitored by the performance of sample and/or field duplicates, matrix spike and
control spike duplicates, and the subsequent calculation of relative standard deviation (RSD) or
relative percent difference (RPD).
Representative – The degree of representation is expressed by how accurately and precisely a point
defines the mean characteristics of a population, parameter variations at a specific sampling point,
or an environmental condition within a defined boundary. Proper representation is ensured by
adherence to proper sample treatment protocol including EPA approved methodologies, adherence
to holding times and analysis of field duplicate samples.
Page 15 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
Complete – The degree of completion is determined by the amount of valid data returned from any
sampling set compared to the expected amount under normal conditions. Completeness is ensured
by adherence to all quality protocols for every sample received. OEC makes a concerted effort to
provide the most complete resultant data possible for every sampling set.
lle
Comparable – The degree of comparability is determined by the precision of one data set to
another. Comparability is ensured by adherence to standard operating procedures and consistent
detection levels. Detection levels are evaluated annually to provide documented proof of limit
appropriateness. External comparability is ensured by the use of common reporting units and
general reporting protocols.
3.2
CHANGE MANAGEMENT
tro
Defensible – The degree of defensibility of a specific data set is measured by the completeness of
documentation and traceability to certified standards for comparison. OEC strives to provide the
best quality for our clients and as such, all samples are documented and treated as if their results
will be scrutinized for legal purposes.
on
OEC maintains a change control system that encompasses all critical processes to the laboratory. This
includes new entries or changes to LIMS, equipment, staff, documents (forms & records), methods
(external documents), or Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). The SOP for Change Management
defines the change procedures for each type of laboratory critical function.
nc
All changes made within the laboratory are performed in such a manner as to fully document all
components of the change, fully train all affected personnel before a change is put into effect, and verify
all necessary approvals prior to making changes. Obsolete documents or references are removed as
soon as a change goes into effect to minimize the possibility for error or confusion.
3.3
DOCUMENT AND RECORD MANAGEMENT
U
To demonstrate that quality has been achieved, OEC maintains a document management system that
includes distributing, reviewing, modifying and controlling all text. This management system includes
both current and obsolete documents.
3.3.1
Controlled Documents are uniquely identified, issued, tracked and kept current as part of quality
management. Many of the controlled documents are also approved documents which means
they need to be signed and dated. All controlled documents are identified by such methods as
issued date, revision number, page number, total number of pages or a mark indicating the end
of document and signature of approving authority. Approved copies of documents are available
in the appropriate areas of the laboratory. Controlled documents are distributed by the Quality
Director or Department Managers.
Page 16 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
3.3.1.1 OEC retains documents that are both internal and external. A master list of controlled
internal and external documents is maintained by the Quality Director. The list is
updated periodically.
lle
d
a) Internal documents include SOPs, QC files, Client folders, logbooks, forms,
safety manuals and the Quality System Manual.
b) External documents include reference methods and standards, instrument user
manuals, certificates of analysis and certificates of traceability.
tro
3.3.1.2 Changes may be performed by handwritten modification to a hard copy document, on a
temporary basis, with a date and identifier (initials) accompanying the change. When
changes are necessary, the obsolete documents are removed. Changes made to
electronic documents must be accompanied by a change tracking function.
Amendments to documents are incorporated into a new revision and reissued as soon
as practicable.
Obsolete Documents – All invalid or obsolete documents are removed, and except for the
archived copy, destroyed. This will prevent unintended use. Obsolete documents retained for
legal use or historical knowledge preservation are appropriately marked and stored in the OEC
storage area and kept for a period of ten years.
3.3.3
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are documents that give a detailed description of how
laboratory processes may be accurately reproduced. They are used to ensure consistency of
application of common procedures. There are two types: 1) test method SOPs, which have
specifically required details, and 2) general use SOPs that document the more general
organizational procedures. Copies of all SOPs are accessible to all personnel. Each SOP indicates
the effective date, the revision number, and the signature(s) of the Laboratory Director, the
Quality Director and when applicable the Department Manager and method reference. A list of
representative OEC SOPs can be found in Appendix B.
nc
on
3.3.2
Records are a subset of documents. Records may be on any form of media, including electronic
and hard copy. Records allow for the historical reconstruction of laboratory activities related to
sample handling and analysis. Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) maintains a
record system appropriate to its needs, records all laboratory activities, and complies with
applicable standards or regulations as required.
U
3.3.4
3.3.4.1 Records of all procedures to which a sample is subjected while in the possession of the
laboratory are kept for a period of ten years. OEC retains all original observations,
calculations and derived data, calibration records, and a copy of the test report for a
minimum of ten years. The laboratory maintains a record management system for
control of laboratory notebooks, instrument logbooks, standards logbooks, and records
for data reduction, validation, storage and reporting.
3.3.4.2 Records, including electronic records, are easy to retrieve, legible, and protected from
deterioration or damage; held secure and in confidence; and are available to accrediting
Page 17 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
authorities for a minimum of ten years. All electronic records are backed-up and placed
off site. Access to protected records is limited to laboratory management or their
designees to prevent unauthorized access or amendment.
d
3.3.4.3 In the event that the OEC transfers ownership or goes out of business, records are
maintained or transferred according to the clients’ instructions.
CORRECTIVE & PREVENTIVE ACTION (CAPA)
3.4.1
PREVENTIVE ACTION – At OEC, preventive action eliminates or minimizes non-conformances
and incorrect data through scheduled preventive maintenance on equipment and through the
review process.
lle
3.4
tro
Preventive action includes, but is not limited to, review of QC data to identify quality trends,
regularly scheduled staff quality meetings, annual budget reviews, managerial reviews, and
other actions taken to prevent problems.
All employees have the authority to recommend preventive action procedures, however
management is responsible for implementing preventive action.
CORRECTIVE ACTION is the action taken to eliminate the causes of an existing nonconformity,
defect, or other undesirable situation in order to prevent recurrence (NELAC, 2003).
on
3.4.2
nc
3.4.2.1 POLICY – All deficiencies that occur in the OEC laboratory are considered serious and
remedial action is taken immediately. This includes data quality, systematic problems,
instrument failures or safety practices. Corrective action taken is appropriate for the
magnitude of the problem and the degree of risk.
U
3.4.2.2 PROCEDURE – The individual that is initially aware of a problem is responsible for
initiating corrective action. All deficiencies are investigated and a corrective action plan
developed and implemented if determined necessary.
a) Selection and Implementation of Corrective Actions – Once a non-conformance
is noted, the first action is an investigation to determine the origin of the
problem. A Corrective Action Report (CAR) is initiated (See SOP-Corrective
Action Preventive Action [GEN-CAPA]) listing cause of problem and possible
solution. It is then submitted to the Quality Director to receive a unique
number and recorded in the CAPA system. The Quality Director and
Department Manager will determine the corrective action to be taken, and the
Department Manager will implement the corrective action.
b) Monitoring of Corrective Action – The Department Managers will monitor
implementation and results of the corrective action. The Quality Director will
track, catalog and review the corrective action to assess effectiveness.
Page 18 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
3.4.2.3 TECHNICAL CORRECTIVE ACTION – Sample data associated with a failed quality control is
evaluated for the need to be reanalyzed or qualified. When quality control results are
unacceptable, all pertinent information is documented on a CAR and submitted with
raw data for review.
lle
a) The analyst is responsible for initiating and recommending corrective actions.
Analysts routinely implement corrective actions for data with unacceptable QC
measures. First level correction may include re-analysis for obvious cause
without further assessment. If the test method SOPs addresses the specific
actions to take, they are followed. Otherwise, corrective actions start with
assessment of the cause of the problem.
tro
b) The Department Manager will review corrective action reports and suggest
improvements, alternative approaches, and procedures where needed.
c) If the data reported are affected adversely by the nonconformance, the client is
notified in writing. The discovery of a non-conformance for results that have
already been reported to the client must be immediately evaluated for
significance of the non-conformance, its acceptability to the client, and
determination of the appropriate corrective action.
nc
on
3.4.2.4 POLICY FOR EXCEPTIONALLY PERMITTING DEPARTURES FROM DOCUMENTED POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES – OEC allows the release of non-conforming data only with approval
on a case-by-case basis by the appropriate Department & Project Manager. Where
additional expertise is required, approval may be necessary from Senior Management.
Planned departures from procedures or policies do not require audits or investigations.
Examples of exceptions would be insufficient sample volume, expired holding time, or
sample data not affected by the results. Permitted departures for non-conformances
are fully documented and the reason for the departure along with qualification for
acceptance is included with report data given to the client.
CONTROL OF NON-CONFORMING WORK
NON-CONFORMING WORK is work that does not meet acceptance criteria or requirements.
Non-conformances can include unacceptable quality control results departures from standard
operating procedures or test methods. Requests for departures from laboratory procedures are
approved by the Laboratory Director and documented.
U
3.5
3.5.1
OEC policy for control of non-conforming work is to identify the non-conformance, determine if
it will be permitted, and take appropriate action. All employees have the authority to stop work
on samples when any aspect of the process does not conform to laboratory requirements.
3.5.2
The procedure for investigating and taking corrective action of non-conforming work is
described in Section 3.4.2 Corrective Action. Employees should immediately notify their
Page 19 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
Department Manager of any non-conformance. The Department Manager evaluates the
significance of the nonconforming work and takes corrective action immediately. The client is
notified if their data has been impacted. The Department Manager authorizes the resumption
of analysis on all non-conformance work.
METHOD VALIDATION
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) ensures the quality of its analysis by using test
methods approved by EPA and other industry-recognized analytical methods. OEC also
guarantees quality analysis by having all analysts demonstrate capability of performing the test
methods that they are assigned and that all methods are validated before being put to use.
Refer to Section 5.5 (References for Analytical Methods) for a source listing of reference
methods.
3.6.1
Demonstration of Competency (DoC), Initial & Continuing – OEC confirms that it is capable of
generating data of acceptable accuracy and precision on all methods before employing them.
This is accomplished by having all analysts complete a Demonstration of Competency to
establish ability to perform the methods.
tro
lle
3.6
Initial Test Method Evaluation – For chemical analyses, the Initial Test method evaluation
involves the determination of the Method Detection Limits (MDL), confirmation of the Reporting
Limit (RL, also known as PQL: Practical Quantitation Limits), an evaluation of precision and bias,
and an evaluation of the selectivity of the method. Additional studies may be required
dependent on the specific instrumentation and method. The SOP for Equipment Validation,
Calibration & Maintenance [GEN-EVCM] describes this process in detail.
nc
3.6.2
on
A DoC is performed for each analyte whenever the method, analysts, analytes, or instrument
type is changed. The DoC is documented for each SOP (test method) and matrix performed.
These records are maintained in the training files for each analyst. The Department Manager
certifies that staff members in their area of expertise are trained and authorized to perform all
tests for which we are accredited by signing the SOP training form.
U
3.6.2.1 MDL – The method detection limit (MDL) is the minimum concentration of a target
analyte that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence that the value is above
zero. MDLs must be updated on an annual basis and the studies are kept on file in the
laboratory. Analytical reports requiring ‘J’ flag reporting will display the MDL value for a
particular analyte with values between the MDL and RL provided as estimates.
3.6.2.2 RL & PQL – After the MDL is determined, a reporting limit (RL), or practical quantitation
limit (PQL), must be established. The RL calculation may vary depending on the type
and sensitivity of a particular method. An example of a standard RL calculation is as
follows:
RL = standard deviation of 7 replicates * 10.
The lowest calibration standard is equal to the RL. The RL will always be greater than the
MDL.
Page 20 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Precision and Accuracy – The OEC objective for precision and accuracy is to equal or exceeds the
precision and accuracy defined by the analytical methods on similar samples. Data quality
objectives for accuracy and precision are method specific, and are defined in the SOP for each
method.
d
3.6.3
lle
PRECISION is the degree to which a set of observations or measurements of the same property,
obtained under similar conditions, conform to themselves. Precision is usually expressed as
standard deviation, variance, or range, in either absolute or relative terms. Laboratory control
limits are established for measurements of laboratory duplicates, duplicate laboratory control
samples and matrix spike duplicates for quantitative tests when applicable.
3.7
MEASUREMENT TRACEABILITY
tro
For ACCURACY, the laboratory control limits are established for measurements of external
standards, laboratory control samples, matrix spike samples and internal performance
evaluation check samples for quantitative tests. Accuracy is ensured for all possible methods
using two separate standard sources. When these sources differ in exceedance of method
specification a third source must be obtained to act as the decisive reference.
nc
on
Measurement quality assurance comes in part from traceability of standards to certified materials. In
general, calibration is performed with at least five levels of concentration to cover the working range. All
equipment used that affects the quality of test results are calibrated (1) prior to equipment being put
into service, (2) annually or more frequently if specified by the method, (3) if the analytical response has
changed beyond method tolerance, (4) whenever there is a significant modification of the instrument or
the method. The calibration standards are traceable to national standards of measurement or
manufacturers’ certification.
U
Measurements from laboratory equipment provide the uncertainty required by test method or client. If
traceability of measurements to SI units is not possible or not relevant, evidence for correlation of
results through inter-laboratory comparisons, proficiency testing, or independent analysis is provided.
All equipment that affects the quality of test results are calibrated according to the minimum frequency
suggested by the manufacturer, by regulation, by method, or as needed. Clients can verify that required
uncertainty is achieved by reviewing the internal quality control data, if requested.
3.7.1 Reference Materials
where commercially available, reference materials are traceable to national standards of measurement,
or to Certified Reference Materials, usually by a Certificate of Analysis. Internal reference materials,
such as working standards or intermediate stock solutions, are checked as far as technically and
economically possible.
a) Stock standard solutions are prepared from neat substances or purchased from vendors
with certified analyte concentrations. New stock standard solutions are verified against
existing standards prior to use.
Page 21 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
b) Standard preparation is documented in analyst logbooks. Results are stored with
calibration data for the method.
lle
d
c) Working standards are verified against certified standards from a second vendor, a
different lot or a different preparation from neat substances. Working standards are
prepared from stock standard solutions by volumetric dilution with method-specific
solvents. When these sources differ in exceedance of method specification a third
source must be obtained to act as the decisive reference.
d) Specific working standard concentrations and diluents are documented in laboratory
SOPs for each method.
Handling and Storage of Reference Standards and Materials
The laboratory manages and transports reference standards and materials in a way that
protects their integrity. Reference standard and material integrity is protected from
incompatible materials by being kept in separate areas. The integrity is also protected by
minimizing exposure to degrading environments or materials. Reference standards and
materials are stored according to manufacturer’s recommendations and separately from
working standards or samples.
3.7.3
Labeling & Documentation of Reference Standards, Reagents, and Materials
Reference standards and materials are tracked from purchase, receipt, and storage through
disposal. Expiration dates are the date on the bottle or six months from date bottle is opened,
whichever comes first.
on
tro
3.7.2
U
nc
3.7.3.1 Records for all standards, reagents, reference materials, and media include:
a) manufacturer/vendor name (or traceability to purchased stocks or neat
compounds)
b) manufacturer’s Certificate of Analysis or purity
c) date of receipt
d) reference to the method of preparation
e) date of preparation
f) recommended storage conditions
g) expiration date after which the laboratory shall not use.
h) preparer’s initials (if prepared)
3.7.3.2 In methods where the purity of reagents is not specified, analytical reagent grade is
used. If the purity is specified, that is the minimum acceptable grade.
3.7.3.3 All containers of standards, reagents, or materials, whether original or prepared, are
labeled with an expiration date.
3.7.3.4 All containers of prepared standards and reference materials have a unique identifier,
preparation name, expiration date, preparer’s name and preparation date.
Page 22 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
3.8
d
3.7.3.5 Standard preparation records are kept in the LIMS system and provide traceability to
purchased stocks or neat compounds, reference to the method of preparation, date of
preparation, expiration date, and preparer's initials.
AUDITS
Internal Audits – At OEC the review of the appropriateness and adequacy of the Quality
Assurance Program is ongoing. To identify and contain problems with the Quality Program,
reviews may be done monthly, quarterly and at the least, annually. Personnel may not audit
their own activities except when it can be demonstrated that an effective audit will be carried
out.
tro
3.8.1
lle
AUDITS measure laboratory performance and verify compliance with accreditation/ certification and
project requirements. Audits specifically provide management with an on-going assessment of the
quality system. They are also instrumental in identifying areas where improvement in the quality system
will increase the reliability of data. OEC is subject to both internal and external audits.
on
3.8.1.1 Annually, the laboratory prepares a schedule of internal audits to be performed during
the year. These audits verify compliance with the requirements of the quality system,
including analytical methods, SOPs, ethics policies, and other laboratory policies. The
Quality Director (or other members of Laboratory Management) will plan and execute
the scheduled audits and reviews. All audits, audit findings and any corrective action
taken as a result of an audit will be documented.
3.8.1.2 Notification of clients for events that cast doubt on the validity of the results is
completed within 24 hours.
nc
3.8.1.3 Review of the auditing process is done to ensure that corrective actions that were
needed were implemented and effective.
3.8.2
External Audits – It is OEC’s policy to cooperate and assist with all external audits, whether
performed by clients or an accrediting authority. All external audits are fully documented and
tracked to closure.
U
3.8.2.1 Management ensures that all areas of the laboratory are accessible to auditors as
applicable and that appropriate personnel are available to assist in conducting the audit.
3.8.2.2 Any findings related to an external audit follow corrective action procedures.
3.8.2.3 Management ensures that corrective actions are carried out within the timeframe
specified by the auditor(s).
Page 23 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
3.9
&
I N C.
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
lle
the suitability of policies and procedures;
reports from managerial and supervisory personnel;
the outcome of recent internal audits;
corrective and preventive actions;
assessments by external bodies;
the results of inter-laboratory comparisons or proficiency tests;
changes in the volume and type of the work;
client feedback;
complaints; and,
other relevant factors, such as quality control activities, resources and staff training.
tro
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
d
In accordance with a predetermined schedule and procedure described herein, the laboratory
management periodically and at least annually conducts a review of the laboratory's quality system and
environmental testing activities to ensure their continuing suitability and effectiveness, and to introduce
necessary changes or improvements. The review shall take account of the following:
Findings from management reviews and the actions or findings that arise from them are
recorded in the minutes and CAPA system as necessary. The management ensures that those
actions are carried out within an appropriate and agreed timeframe. Laboratory management
evaluates actions from previous reviews in each meeting and maintains records of any further
findings or actions as necessary.
3.9.2
MANAGEMENT REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
on
3.9.1
nc
3.9.2.1 Review Input – The input to management review shall include information on
a) results of audits,
b) customer feedback,
c) process performance and product conformity,
d) status of preventive and corrective actions,
e) follow-up actions from previous management reviews,
f) changes that could affect the quality management system, and
g) recommendations for improvement.
U
3.9.2.2 Review Output – The output from the management review shall include any decisions
and actions related to
a) improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its
processes,
b) improvement of product related to customer requirements,
c) resource needs, and
d) new findings and actions, as necessary
Page 24 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
SECTION 4 – CLIENT SERVICE FUNCTIONS
4.1
CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY
lle
d
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) works in partnership with clients to monitor the
laboratory’s performance in executing the client’s requests. Each request is reviewed to determine the
nature of the request and the laboratory's ability to comply with the request within the confines of
prevailing statutes and/or regulations without risk to the confidentiality of other clients.
The laboratory confidentiality policy is to not divulge or release any information to a third party without
proper authorization.
All electronic data (storage or transmissions) are kept confidential, based on technology and laboratory
limits, as required by client or regulation.
4.2
tro
For further details, refer to the SOP for Client Interaction, Confidentiality & Complaint Handling [ADMClient].
REVIEW OF REQUESTS, TENDERS AND CONTRACTS
on
Senior Management and specifically the Technical Director are responsible for the review of all new
work for Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC). The Technical Director determines if it has
the necessary accreditations and resources, including schedules, equipment, deliverables, and personnel
to meet the work request. By using the review process, the management is able to determine if it has
adequate resources to meet the requirements of the client. The contract will specify clearly defined
requirements and test methods.
nc
The client is informed of the results of the review.
Business Development or Management will inform the client of any deviation from the contract
including the test method or sample handling processes. All differences between the request and the
final contract are resolved and recorded before any work begins. It is necessary that the contract be
acceptable to both the laboratory and the client.
U
When the client needs amendments to the original contract, the review process is repeated. The
participating personnel are given copies of the amendments.
4.3
COMPLAINTS
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. values its customers and provides them with high-quality
analytical testing with the shortest possible turn-around time. OEC reviews all complaints and
Page 25 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
determines appropriate action as quickly as possible to assure the customer that complaints are
addressed and corrected. This includes requests to verify results or analytical data.
4.4
lle
d
All customer complaints are documented by the person receiving the complaint and referred to the
appropriate Management and Quality Director to be addressed. If it is determined that a complaint is
without merit, it is documented, and the client is contacted. If it is determined that the complaint has
merit, a corrective action is initiated. See Section 3.4.2 of this manual or the SOP for corrective actions
for procedure details.
SUBCONTRACTING OF TESTS
tro
A SUBCONTRACT LABORATORY is defined as a laboratory external to Oilfield Environmental &
Compliance, Inc. (OEC) that performs analyses for this laboratory. When subcontracting analytical
services, OEC assures work requiring accreditation is placed with a state of California accredited
laboratory or one that meets applicable statutory and regulatory requirements for performing the tests.
A list of subcontractors and their test methods with certifications is maintained.
on
OEC notifies the client of the intent to subcontract the work when presenting the contract by stating
what methods the laboratory does not perform and need to be subcontracted. When possible, the
laboratory gains the approval of the client to subcontract their work prior to implementation of a
specific work order, customarily through electronic mail.
nc
The laboratory performing the subcontracted work is identified in the final report. OEC assumes
responsibility to the client for the subcontractor’s work, except in the case where a client or a regulating
authority specified which subcontractor is to be used.
4.5
REPORTING OF RESULTS
The result of each test carried out at Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. is reported accurately,
clearly, unambiguously, objectively and complies with all specific instructions contained in the test
method.
U
The laboratory report should contain all necessary information that is pertinent, including but not
limited to:
a) all results from analyses performed.
b) any discrepancies that may have occurred.
4.5.1
Analytical Reports – Each test report generated contains the following information (unless not
required by the client):
a) a title
b) the name and address of the laboratory
c) the name and address of the client if applicable
Page 26 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
&
I N C.
the identification of the test method used
an unambiguous identification of the sample(s), including the client identification code
the date of sample receipt
the test results with failures identified and units of measurement
the name, function, and signature of the person authorizing the test report, and the
date of issue
at the laboratory’s discretion, a statement that the report shall not be reproduced
except in full without written approval of the laboratory
qualification of results with values outside the working range
lle
j)
d
O I L F I E L D
Quality Control Report – A QC report is generated with each sample delivery group, when
applicable or desired by client, and contains the following:
a) Method Blank Report which includes results of analyte found in the MB and detection
limit for the analyte
b) Laboratory Control Sample Report that includes percent recovery of analyte in the LCS,
relative percent difference of LCS/LCSD and control limits for percent recovery and RPD.
c) Matrix Spike Report that includes percent recovery of analyte in the MS, relative
percent difference of MS/MSD, and control limits for percent recovery and RPD.
d) Duplicate Report that includes results of analyte found in the sample duplicate, the
dilution factor and detection limit for analyte.
4.5.3
Case Narrative – A case narrative with a full explanation and all the necessary documentation
will be included in the report where necessary, unless excluded from client reporting
requirements. Examples narration prompts include, but are not limited to:
a) the chain-of-custody has not been properly administered
b) the sample cannot be analyzed because of interference
c) quality control results are in nonconformance
4.5.4
Electronic Transmission of Results – All test results transmitted by telephone, fax, telex, e-mail,
or other electronic means comply with the requirements of this Quality System Manual and
associated procedures to protect the confidentiality and proprietary rights of the client.
nc
on
tro
4.5.2
Amendments to Test Reports – Amended test reports may be handled in two ways:
a) if the correction is for anything except actual test results, the report will look the same
as the original; a note will be included explaining the correction.
b) if a new report is issued because of new test results than the new report will be titled
“Revised”.
U
4.5.5
Page 27 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
SECTION 5 – LABORATORY FUNCTIONS
5.1
ACCOMMODATIONS & ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
lle
d
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. (OEC) operates a commercial environmental analytical
laboratory that provides high-quality analytical testing services with a minimum turn-around time.
Access to environmental test areas is limited to OEC personnel. Laboratory workspace is arranged to
prevent contamination of samples and is kept organized and clean to support environmental testing.
Interference from environmental conditions will result in testing being stopped or reanalyzed to assure
quality data results.
tro
OEC laboratory and administrative areas occupy 16,670 square feet of industrial space. The space is
divided with separate rooms for administrative offices, sample receiving and storage, volatile analysis,
semi-volatile analysis, semi-volatile preparation, metals analysis, metals preparation, oil and gas analysis
and wet chemistry to ensure non-contamination of samples. In addition, sensitive laboratory areas are
arranged so the flow of a positive-pressure secured air supply helps minimize contamination.
U
nc
on
FIGURE 5A – PREISKER LOCATION
Page 28 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
U
nc
on
tro
lle
d
FIGURE 5B – ROEMER LOCATION
5.2
PURCHASING SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
Oilfield Environmental & Compliance’s (OEC) suppliers for all their reagents and supplies are worldrenowned companies that include companies that are ISO certified. The laboratory has procedures in
place for purchasing, receiving, and storage of supplies that affect the quality of environmental tests.
Page 29 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Management reviews and approves the supplier of services and supplies and approves technical
content of purchasing documents prior to ordering.
5.2.2
OEC purchases reagents and chemical standards for all its tests that conform to the
specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of the American Chemical Society. Other
grades may be used, provided it is first ascertained that the reagent is of sufficient purity to
permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determination. Upon receipt, bottles are
checked for breakage, leakage and expiration date. The certificate of analysis that accompanies
the chemical is maintained on file and the chemical stored according to manufacturer’s
specifications or for the test method SOP that the reagent will be used.
5.2.3
The purchase of services is primarily limited to annual calibration and maintenance of support
equipment and is performed by representatives of the companies where the equipment was
purchased.
5.3
SAMPLE MANAGEMENT
tro
lle
d
5.2.1
on
Laboratory analyses are performed to produce data representative of conditions when the sample was
obtained. To ensure integrity, each sample processed at OEC is checked upon receipt, uniquely
identified, stored and disposed of properly, and all relevant information is recorded.
The laboratory has a sample acceptance policy that specifies the conditions of a sample upon receipt.
The client is immediately notified if these conditions are not met.
nc
When samples are received at the laboratory, their condition is documented, they are given unique
identifiers, and they are logged into the sample tracking system. The laboratory controls and monitors
sample movement and usage between laboratory departments utilizing an Internal Chain-of-Custody
(ICoC) system. The procedures for preservation checks, sample identification, sample logging, sample
dispersal, and sample storage and disposal is found in the SOPs for SAMPLE LOGIN [GEN-LOGIN] &
SAMPLE DISPOSAL [GEN-DISPOSAL].
EQUIPMENT
U
5.4
5.4.1
(Refer to Appendix B for equipment list)
General Equipment Requirements – Oilfield Environmental and Compliance employees operate
and maintain a wide variety of analytical equipment for the performance of a variety of
chemical analysis. All instruments are subject to preventive maintenance procedures per
manufacturer instruction to minimize the occurrence of instrument failure or malfunction. All
maintenance is documented in the appropriate laboratory record.
5.4.1.1 Only OEC personnel who are trained and have completed an IDoC are allowed to
operate equipment.
Page 30 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
5.4.1.2 All equipment is calibrated or checked before being placed into use to ensure that it
meets laboratory specifications and the relevant standard specifications.
d
5.4.1.3 Instructions and manufacturers manuals are available to laboratory staff to indicate the
proper use and maintenance of equipment.
lle
5.4.1.4 Equipment that is defective or outside specifications is clearly labeled as being out of
service. Small support equipment such as thermometers would be immediately
discarded.
Support Equipment – Support equipment includes devices for weighing, measuring, heating or
cooling standards or samples. These are also purchased from reputable companies and
calibration and functionality are verified at the time of receipt. All support equipment is
maintained in proper working order and records are kept of all repair and maintenance
activities, including service calls. For further details refer to the OEC SOP: Small InstrumentSupport Equipment Calibration & Monitoring
5.4.3
Analytical Equipment – All equipment at OEC is properly maintained, inspected, and cleaned.
Maintenance of analytical instruments and other equipment may include regularly scheduled
preventive maintenance or maintenance on an as-needed basis due to instrument malfunction
and is documented in Instrument Maintenance Logs, which become part of the laboratory’s
permanent records. Initial and Continuing Calibration of each instrument is performed
according to the test method SOP being carried out.
5.5
REFERENCES FOR ANALYTICAL METHODS
5.5.1
Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, SW-846, Third Edition (September 1986), Final Update I (July 1992), Final
Updates II and IIA (September 1994), Final Update IIB (January 1995), and Final Update III
(December 1996).
nc
on
tro
5.4.2
Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health
Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation, 18th
Edition, 1992; 19th Edition 1995; 20th Edition 1999.
U
5.5.2
5.5.3
Laboratory Procedures, Stationary Source Test Methods & Vapor Recovery Test Procedures;
California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board (CA-EPA ARB).
5.5.4
TPH & LUFT Manuals and Guidance
5.5.4.1 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank & Site Mitigation Unit Manual, Santa Barbara County
Fire Department, Fire Prevention Division, January 2007.
Page 31 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
5.5.4.2 Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Guidance Manual, California State Water Resources
Control Board, September 2012.
d
5.5.4.3 Draft Method for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Total Organic Lead, Hazardous
Materials Laboratory, California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, CA, February,
1988.
Criteria for Identification of Hazardous and Extremely Hazardous Wastes, California Code of
Regulations (CCR), Title 22, Division 4.5
5.5.6
HAZCAT: A System of Field Identification and Classification of Commonly Spill Materials, State of
California, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Industrial Relations,
September, 1986.
5.5.7
Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in Ambient Air,
Center for Environmental Research and Development Office of Research Development US EPA;
TO-14 & TO-15.
5.5.8
Clean Water Act (CWA) Analytical Test Methods, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40 Part
136.
5.5.9
ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States.
on
tro
lle
5.5.5
5.5.10 Gas Processors Association (GPA) Standards; 6526 East 60th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145,
United States.
5.5.11 HACH Methods approved/accepted by the USEPA
nc
5.5.12 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Methods, Applied Science &
Technology Division, Laboratory Services Branch.
5.5.13 Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
U
5.5.14 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water (4303T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20460
5.5.15 STATIC ACUTE BIOASSAY PROCEDURES FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES, Polisini & Miller,
California Department of Fish and Game, Water Pollution Control Laboratory.
5.5.16 Standard Test Methods, NACE International, 1440 South Creek Drive, Houston, Texas 77084.
5.5.17 Test Method for Vapor Pressure of Reactive Organic Compounds in Heavy Crude Oil Using Gas
Chromatography; David Littlejohn and Donald Lucas, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
Berkeley, California; May 28,2002
Page 32 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS
5.6.1
Essential Quality Control Procedures – All essential quality control elements are collected and
assessed on a continuing basis. The qualities of test results are recorded in such a way that
trends are detectable, and where practicable, are statistically evaluated. There is a Standard
Operation Procedure (SOP) for each test method that OEC uses. Each SOP has a section
dedicated to the Quality Control criteria. This is often supplemented with quick-reference
criteria in a table format.
lle
d
5.6
tro
All laboratory personnel follow the quality control procedures specified in test methods. The
most stringent of control procedures is used in cases where multiple controls are offered. If it is
not clear which is the most stringent, the control mandated by test method or regulation is
followed.
on
5.6.1.1 To monitor the validity of environmental tests performed, review includes any one or
combination of the techniques below:
a) Utilizing certified reference materials and/or internal quality control using
secondary reference materials;
b) participation in proficiency testing (PT) programs;
c) replicate testing using the same or different methods;
d) retesting of retained samples;
e) correlation of results for different characteristics of a sample.
U
nc
5.6.1.2 Written procedures to monitor quality controls, including acceptance criteria, are
located in the test method SOPs, except where noted, and include such procedures as:
a) use of laboratory control samples and blanks to serve as positive and negative
controls for chemistry methods;
b) use of laboratory control samples to monitor test variability of laboratory
results;
c) use of calibrations, continuing calibrations, certified reference materials and/or
PT samples to monitor accuracy of the test method;
d) measures to monitor test method capability, such as limit of detection, limit of
quantitation, and/or range of test applicability, such as linearity;
e) use of regression analysis, internal/external standards, or statistical analysis to
reduce raw data to final results;
f) use of reagents and standards of appropriate quality;
g) procedures to ensure the selectivity of the test method;
5.6.2
Internal Quality Control Practices – Analytical data generated with QC samples that fall within
prescribed acceptance limits indicate the test method is IN CONTROL. QC samples that fall
outside QC limits indicate the test method is OUT OF CONTROL (non-conforming) and that
corrective action is required or that the data be qualified. OEC QC procedures and QC limits are
Page 33 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
included in test method standard operating procedures (SOPs), or where unspecified in the
SOPs, are detailed elsewhere. All QC measures are assessed and evaluated on an on-going
basis, so that trends are detected. Please refer to Appendix F, QC Data Evaluation Flowcharts
for a more detailed description of general standard corrective actions followed by the
laboratory.
1. Positive and Negative Controls such as:
a) Blanks (negative)
b) Laboratory control sample (positive)
c) Reference Toxicants (positive)
lle
5.6.2.1 The following general controls are used:
tro
2. Selectivity is assured through:
a) absolute and relative retention times in chromatographic analyses
b) two-column confirmation when using non-specific detectors
c) two different GC detectors
d) use of acceptance criteria for mass-spectral tuning (found in test method SOPs);
e) use of the correct method according to its scope assessed during method
validation;
U
nc
on
3. Consistency, Variability, Repeatability, and Accuracy are assured through:
a) proper installation and operation of instruments according to manufacturer’s
recommendations or according to the processes used during method validation
b) monitoring and controlling environmental conditions (temperature, access,
proximity to potential contaminants)
c) selection and use of reagents and standards of appropriate quality
d) cleaning glassware appropriate to the level required by the analysis. Cleaning
procedures are provided in test method SOPs
e) following SOPs and documenting any deviation, assessing for impact, and
treating data appropriately
f) testing to define the variability and/or repeatability of the laboratory results,
such as replicates
g) use of measures to assure the accuracy of the test method, including calibration
and/or continuing calibrations, use of certified reference materials, proficiency
test samples, or other measures
5.6.2.2 Acceptance or rejection criteria are created according to laboratory policy where no
method or regulatory criteria exist. Acceptance criteria define the boundary for the
appropriate response from laboratory personnel, such as corrective action, reporting
with qualifiers, reanalysis, review, and others.
1. Test Method Capability is assured through:
a) establishment of the method detection limits where appropriate
b) establishment of the practical quantitation limits or reporting level
c) establishment of the range of applicability such as linearity
Page 34 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
d
2. Data reduction is assured to be accurate by:
a) selection of appropriate formulae to reduce raw data to final results such as
regression
b) periodic review of data reduction processes to assure applicability
Item
Method Blank (MB)
[Negative Control]
Lab Control Sample (LCS) or Blank Spike (BS) &
Duplicate (LCSD or BSD)
[Positive Control, Accuracy & Precision(DUP)]
Matrix Spike & Duplicate (MS/MSD)
[Positive Control, Accuracy & Precision(MSD)]
Sample Duplicate (DUP)
[Precision]
Surrogate spikes
Frequency
1/batch
Continuing Calibration Verification
Method specific or determined by laboratory
Per method requirement
Method specific or determined by the
laboratory
on
Initial calibration Verification
Acceptance Criteria
Method specific or reporting limit
tro
1/batch
lle
5.6.2.3 The following table summarizes the key elements of a quality control system for a
laboratory performing chemical analyses. In addition to any instrument criteria, the
essential validation for any sample batch includes a demonstration of Positive Control,
Negative Control, Accuracy & Precision. Refer to Appendix F for assessment of each QC
item and appropriate corrective actions.
TABLE 5C
ESSENTIAL QUALITY CONTROL ELEMENTS
Start of each analytical run
U
nc
5.6.2.3.1
Method Blanks (MB) – A reagent or MB is prepared and analyzed with
each batch of 20 or fewer samples of the same matrix. Sample batches may not
exceed 24 hours. The volume of the blank should be approximately equal to the
sample. Analysis of the blank verifies that method interferences caused by
contaminants in solvents, reagents and equipment are known and minimized.
Target analyte should be non-detected in a method blank, providing evidence of
negative control for the batch.
5.6.2.3.2
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) – Standard reference materials or LCS
from an independent source are introduced periodically (at least once per batch
during testing activity) into the testing scheme to evaluate testing procedure.
Duplicate LCS (LCSD) may be analyzed in lieu of MS/MSD if necessary. The LCS
provides evidence to evaluate laboratory positive control (detectable spike
result), accuracy (spike recovery), and if an LCSD is performed, precision
(relative percent difference between duplicates).
5.6.2.3.3
Matrix Spikes and Matrix Spike Duplicates (MS/MSD) – One sample in
every batch (20 or fewer samples of similar matrix) is spiked in duplicate at a
level, which provides a final concentration greater than or similar to the original
concentration before dilution. This provides evidence to evaluate laboratory
Page 35 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
accuracy (spike recovery) and precision (relative percent difference between
duplicates).
d
5.6.2.3.4
Sample Duplicate (DUP) – One sample in every batch (20 or fewer
samples of similar matrix) is analyzed in duplicate. This provides evidence to
evaluate laboratory precision (relative percent difference between duplicates).
Data Review – Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. reviews all data generated in the
laboratory for compliance with method, regulatory, laboratory and, where appropriate, client
requirements.
tro
5.6.3
lle
5.6.2.3.5
Surrogate Spikes – SURROGATES are substances with chemical
properties and behaviors similar to the analytes of interest used to assess
method performance in individual samples. Surrogates are added to all samples
(in test methods where surrogate use is appropriate) prior to sample
preparation or extraction. Surrogate recovery results are compared to the
acceptance criteria as published in the mandated test method.
on
The analyst should perform primary data review by compiling the results of the above validation
samples onto the appropriate laboratory records and LIMS system. The analyst electronically
signs his work in LIMS and should sign and date his own records. Any handwritten correction
must be crossed out with a single line and be dated and initialed. All method QC parameters are
verified either on the instrument data system or in LIMS, and documented on a Data Review
Checklist (DRCL) where appropriate. If the batch contains any QC issues, a corrective action
report should be completed and submitted to the Department Manager with the raw data.
nc
The Department Manager or a qualified peer should perform secondary review by examining
the raw data, verifying the QC compliance of each data set and approving the preliminary
sample and QC results in the raw data file and LIMS. The reviewer should counter-sign and date
(may be electronic or hard-copy) the logbooks and the raw data. Any QC problems should be
noted in the batch case narrative or as a corrective action report.
U
Any corrective action or narrative must be reviewed and related samples validated as necessary
by the Department Manager or Quality Director prior to Project Management review. Project
Management performs the tertiary project-level review of all results and generates client
reports.
5.6.4
Control of Data – All pertinent data that are subject to transcription, calculation, or other
manual manipulation is checked in a systematic manner. All commercial software used at OEC is
in an application range that is considered sufficiently validated for use in the laboratory, and is
verified internally before use.
OEC’s procedure to ensure that reported data is free from transcription and calculation errors,
and all quality data has been calculated correctly, is to have all quality control data reviewed by
the Analyst, Department Manager and Project Manager before being released to the client.
Computers and software used for processing or storage are protected, maintained, and secured
Page 36 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
through measures such as multiple backups, document controls, locked access, and control of
the laboratory environment.
U
nc
on
tro
lle
d
ACKNOWLEDGMENT:
This manual was created with help from the INELA Template ver.1
Page 37 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX A – CONTACT & QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL
To contact your desired party, dial the OEC main number at (805) 922-4772 and either ask for
them by name or if prompted for an extension, use as listed:
Title
Email
Julius Carstens
Laboratory Director
[email protected]
Mary Ann Long
Operations Director
[email protected]
Carrie McCrillis
Quality Director &
Human Resources Rep.
[email protected]
x1101
Lisa Race
Technical Director &
Safety Officer
[email protected]
x1310
Direct: (805) 354-7302
Marissa Censullo
Project Manager
[email protected]
x1111
Direct: (805) 354-7303
Meredith Sprister
Project Manager
[email protected]
x1112
Direct: (805) 354-7304
Kristie Mikel
Department Manager,
Microbiology, Bioassay &
Wet Chemistry
[email protected]
x1320
x1100
Direct: (805) 354-7301
x1201
lle
tro
on
Drew Miller
Phone
d
Name
Department Manager,
Volatile Organics
[email protected]
x1701
Department Manager,
Metals &
Instrumental Inorganics
[email protected]
x1300
Department Manager,
Semi-Volatile Organics
[email protected]
x1501
Pete Alcocer
Oil Production
Operations Consultant
[email protected]
x1401
Brandon Ganster
Oil Production – TAFT
Operations Supervisor
[email protected]
Gracie Venegas*
Client Services
[email protected]
x1301
Direct: (805) 354-7305
Cynthia Crawford*
Accounting Coordinator
[email protected]
x1102
Danna Whiteaker*
Accounting
[email protected]
X1103
Kevin Calcagno*
Sales & Contracts Rep.
[email protected]
Direct: (805) 354-7306
John Hatzman*
Sales & Contracts Rep.
[email protected]
Direct: (805) 354-7307
Parwinder Parmar
U
nc
Dwain Zsadanyi
Direct: (661) 847-8098
* Included for contact reference information only, qualifications not included
Page 38 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Julius Carstens
Laboratory Director
(Page 1of 2)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Carstens has been the owner and primary operator of OEC since 1997. Prior to that, he acquired
extensive experience in the environmental and oil production analytical fields through education and
hands-on experience in both a laboratory and field environment.
EDUCATION & CERTIFICATIONS
tro
B. S. Biochemistry, 1995, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
B. S. Soil Science, 1995, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Registered Environmental Assessor (California Environmental Protection Agency. REA # 06476)
OSHA HAZWOPER 8-hour Supervisor & 40-hour Trained (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120)
SECORP Industries Safety Class for H2S
California Water Environment Association (Laboratory Analyst # 311)
on






EXPERIENCE
1997-Present
U
nc
Laboratory Director- Mr. Carstens manages operations for the analytical laboratory and field service
firm. He has over 20 years laboratory experience in the analysis of environmental samples and has
worked on numerous field sampling projects during this time. Mr. Carstens has extensive experience in
the areas of air, gas, soil/water, and petroleum analysis, EPA protocols, and field sampling. He is
responsible for overall management of technical operations, technical consulting functions, personnel
development and business operations including the direction of the financial and marketing
departments. Mr. Carstens’ consulting responsibilities include advising clients of the appropriate
sampling and analytical protocols primarily related to, air and oil testing. He is integrally involved in data
interpretation with the clients on such projects. He has also participated in the development of new
sampling and analysis protocols for the measurement of gas and petroleum characteristics.
1993-1997
Cirrus Environmental, Santa Maria, CA
Soil & Chemist/Project Coordinator - Responsible as project coordinator for laboratory based projects.
Performed chemical analysis for laboratory and coordinated specific organic and inorganic analyses.
Provided client consultation to determine the analytical methods most appropriate for their project.
Page 39 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Julius Carstens
1990-1993
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
(Page 2of 2)
d
Laboratory Director
I N C.
lle
Worked as a laboratory technician to determine the change in cation exchange of soils amended with
synthetic organic polymers. Also worked on the bio-degradation rate of diesel fuel, gasoline, and motor
oil, using in situ bacteria CO2 respiration rates.
MONITORING PROJECTS - Limited scope of monitoring projects that Mr. Carstens has performed:
tro
Venoco Inc., South Ellwood Oil & Gas Facility, Santa Barbara, CA
He performed sample design, equipment selection, and analytical methods, for the determination of
petroleum and H2S odor being emitted by the loading of a petroleum barge. Sampling points and
interval of sampling was determined while on the barge for a 48-hour period. This remote site was
tested on two separate occasions during the loading of 75,000 barrels of crude oil. Over 60 samples
were taken during each loading event. Results of C1-C6 hydrocarbons, fixed gases, and hydrogen
sulfide, were available to the client within a 3-day period.
nc
on
Torch Operating Co. HS&P Facility, Lompoc, CA
Worked with Torch staff and Santa Barbara APCD to determine the accuracy of Del Mar Testing Unit
located at HS&P. OEC provided a staff of technicians to gather 45 minute interval sampling from a
produced gas stream. This sampling event ran continuously for 72 hours. All samples were analyzed for
hydrogen sulfide. The data from these tests assisted Torch in proper equipment replacement of the Del
Mar unit. With the installation of a new gas processing system, OEC was asked to conduct weekly
sampling and analysis of HS&P waste gas for hydrogen sulfide and mercaptans. OEC is also on call for
the analysis of butane & propane mix, being produced by the HS&P facility. Analysis consists of field
sampling, field-testing, and laboratory testing.
U
Dole Dried Fruit Co. Raisin Facility, Fresno, CA
While working for Cirrus Environmental, Inc., Mr. Carstens designed and implemented a two-week study
of PM 10 emissions. The objective of the test program was to determine the PM 10 emissions from
raisin dust, and determine if this facility was operating within their APCD permit. Four high volume
samples were located around the perimeter of the testing facility. The method used during this test
program was 40CFR Part 50 App. B PM10 High Volume Method.
Page 40 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Mary Ann Long
Operations Director
(Page 1 of 2)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Ms. Long has over 18 years hands-on experience as a chemist, supervisor and laboratory manager in the
environmental field.
EDUCATION & CERTIFICATION
B.S., Biology, California State University, San Bernardino, 1979
Laboratory Analyst Grade 3 by CWEA
Certified Manager by Institute of Certified Professional Managers
First Aid and CPR
tro





on
AFFILIATIONS
California Water Environment Association (CWEA); Tri-Counties Regional Section of CWEA
EXPERIENCE
nc
2011–Current
Operations Director (2014-Current) – Responsible for oversight of all department function and
optimization of all production processes for the laboratory.
U
Volatile Organics Department Manager (2011-2013) – Responsible for the scheduling, maintenance, and
verifying QA/QC parameters were met for all data from the Volatile Organics Laboratory. She was
primarily responsible for any new method development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples,
analysis of MDL / RL / DoCs for all supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within
this department.
Page 41 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Mary Ann Long
Operations Director
(Page 2 of 2)
Colorado State University, Center for Environmental Management of Military Lands –
Camp Roberts, CA
d
2011
I N C.
1996–2010
tro
lle
Environmental Technician – Assisted in the preparation of environmental documents according to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
requirements. Included the tracking of NEPA documents on the Share Point database. Reviewed and
commented on environmental reports, technical documents, sampling data and Environmental
Condition of Property (ECOP) documents. Assisted in site visits to activities and tenants on Camp
Roberts to review environmental requirements and ensure compliance with laws and regulations.
Provided contractor oversight for environmental projects. Oversaw the collection, management, and
disposal of hazardous waste through satellite accumulation sites and the central accumulation points.
Creek Environmental Laboratory/Centauri Labs – San Luis Obispo, CA
on
2000-2010 Laboratory Manager – Managed every aspect of the laboratory operations from setting goals
to organizing, leading, and monitoring for the production of defensible data. Conducted the hiring,
training and review of laboratory staff. Responsible for implementation and reporting of State
Performance Evaluation Program. Involved with meeting criteria to maintain the Laboratories State
Certification. Performed detailed second party review of analytical data. Used the Laboratory
Information System (LIMS-Promium) extensively to monitor work flow in the laboratory. Maintained
adequate supplies for the smooth functioning of the laboratory.
U
nc
1996-2000 Inorganic Chemist – Principal analyst for the determination of metals by Inductively Coupled
Plasma (ICP), Atomic Absorption (AA), and mercury by cold-vapor AA. Performed the chemical and
physical analysis of drinking water, wastewater, and solid samples performed according to EPA methods
and Standard Methods. Used the LIMS system for sample status and reporting. Maintained laboratory
equipment for peak performance.
Page 42 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Carrie McCrillis
&
Quality Director &
Human Resources Representative
(Page 1of 2)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
tro
lle
Ms. McCrillis has over 15 years of experience in the environmental laboratory and quality-system
management field. Environmental laboratory experience includes performing as an analyst, Quality
Manager, safety officer, project manager and laboratory director. Proficient in environmental contract
review and data package compilation, EPA methodology and quality control systems, national and state
regulatory agency requirements (NELAP/ELAP), ISO QMS, CLP & GLP protocols for data verification and
validation.
EDUCATION
B.S., Chemistry, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 1999
OSHA 40-Hour Hazmat Training Certificate + Refreshers
ISO Internal Auditor Training, 2006 (ASQ certified)
AFFILIATIONS
American Chemical Society (ACS)
American Society for Quality (ASQ)
nc


on



EXPERIENCE
2008-Present
U
Quality Director – Responsibilities include maintenance of OEC Quality Systems, including maintenance
of state certification and all documentation related thereto. Including, but not limited to, maintaining
and updating all standard operating procedures, Quality System Manual, and the statement of
qualifications. Maintenance of quality documentation and organization as necessary related to
instrument controls, employee training, corrective & preventive action, performance evaluations, and
laboratory audits.
Page 43 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
Carrie McCrillis
2006-2008
&
Quality Director &
Human Resources Representative
Celite, World Minerals Inc., Imerys – Lompoc, CA
I N C.
(Page 2of 2)
d
O I L F I E L D
ZymaX envirotechnology, inc. – San Luis Obispo, CA
tro
2002 – 2005
lle
Quality System Specialist – Responsible for the maintenance of the site ISO certification and monitoring
of quality system protocols, training, documentation, and internal audits. Performed general
supervision and payroll processing for QC laboratory personnel. Participated in implementation and
training for multiple enterprise-level software systems including IFS/THERMO-LIMS (ERP), Kronos
(Payroll & Timekeeping), & Intelex (quality management software).
on
2002-2005 Quality Assurance Officer – Responsibilities include management and revision of the QA
Program including maintenance of state certification and all documentation related thereto. Including,
but not limited to, all administrative and laboratory standard operating procedures, control
documentation for all laboratory instruments, documentation of technical and analytical training for all
analysts, documentation and monitoring of laboratory corrective actions, and organization of all
performance evaluations and audits. Additionally responsible for the compilation of CLP and contractdesign data packages.
nc
2003-2005 Safety Officer – Responsibilities include organization and maintenance of all safety-related
hardware, consumables & documentation for the laboratory. Primary contact for any city, county, fire
department or OSHA inspections. Responsible for overall employee safety awareness including annual
training refreshers.
1999-2002
Cirrus Environmental, Inc. – Santa Maria, CA
U
2001-2002 Laboratory Director – Oversaw laboratory operation and supervised all chemists, laboratory
technicians and field technicians. Administered the Quality Assurance Program and was responsible for
overall laboratory data quality as the primary signatory. Provided guidance for all analytical
methodology and procedures. Responsible for the maintenance of laboratory certification through
California ELAP. Acted as project manager and technical contact for all clients.
1999-2001 Quality Assurance / Quality Control Officer – Reviewed all analytical data to meet quality
control objectives prior to report generation. Responsible for all analytical report generation, including
samples, QC and data packages. Responsible for maintenance and revision of the laboratory Quality
Assurance Program and any internal or external audits. Maintenance of all laboratory quality
documentation and state certification.
Former positions held at Cirrus include organic & inorganic analytical chemist and extraction technician.
Page 44 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Lisa Race
&
Technical Director &
Safety Officer
(Page 1of 3)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Ms. Race has over 25 years of experience using organic, inorganic and air toxic methodologies. She
brings to OEC a strong working knowledge of applicable regulations regarding air, water, wastewater
and hazardous waste testing and disposal.
Additionally she brings several years of experience
performing all aspects of Environmental Health and Safety function.
B.S. Biochemistry, 1984, University of Wyoming
Certificate in Hazardous Materials Management (partial)
Certificate in D.O.T. shipping and handling
Certificate in Fundamental Ergonomics
Certificate in Leadership and Management Training (multiple certificates)
EXPERIENCE
on





tro
EDUCATION
2008-Present
nc
Technical Director (2014-Present) – Responsible for overall Technical Compliance of the Laboratory.
Includes adherence to regulatory requirements, and research and development for improvement or
new methodology.
U
Laboratory Manager (2008-2014) – Responsible for daily laboratory function and management. Her
extensive laboratory experience was utilized to maximize laboratory function and efficiency, and served
as a client resource for projects and data consultation.
Page 45 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
Lisa Race
2001-2008
&
Technical Director
& Safety Officer
TEST AMERICA Inc., Morgan Hill, CA
I N C.
(Page 2of 3)
d
O I L F I E L D
lle
Senior Project Manager- Coordinated with clients, laboratory personnel and subcontract laboratories to
track and report results for projects. Responsible for all aspects of managing 3 of the top 10 clients
including creating quotes, adding or updating bids in the LIMs system, reviewing SOWs and ensuring all
project requirements were met. Responsible for creating invoices, EDDs, geotracker EDFs and PDF
reports. Responsible for reviewing CLP data packages and training personnel on how to create the final
CLP packages using the raw data and the final reports.
Cirrus Environmental Inc., Santa Maria, CA
on
2000-2001
tro
Volatiles Department Manager- Responsible for interviewing, hiring and training new personnel for the
department. Set up the 8260 full list, 524 and 624 methods and streamlined the 8015/8021 analyses.
Increased productivity by 500%. Set up all new instrumentation and instructed analysts in how to use
them. Responsible for scheduling sample analyses and personnel to ensure samples were analyzed
within holding time and met TAT.
nc
Laboratory Director- Oversaw all aspects of the laboratory including certification, training, quality
control, sample analysis, field sampling, project management and client contact. Coordinated all
subcontract work. Assisted the marketing director in preparing quotes and evaluating and bidding on
specific projects.
1994-2001
Environmental Analytical Service Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA
U
Laboratory Supervisor- Managed the laboratory by creating a smooth flow of information, sample
distribution, sample analysis, data reduction and data review and ensured that project specifications
were met. Coordinated the flow of information between the laboratory and administration by
establishing standard procedures for the dissemination of information and establishing routine meetings
between laboratory and administrative staff to discuss current or potential problems. Modified
laboratory procedures to reduce the standard sample turnaround time from 20 working days to less
than 14 working days. Instituted method modifications which decreased gas usage and resulted in
reducing the laboratory gas budget by forty percent. Set up a “rewards” program to improve employee
morale.
Page 46 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Lisa Race
Technical Director
& Safety Officer
I N C.
(Page 3of 3)
Coast to Coast Analytical Services, San Luis Obispo, CA;Tempe, AZ
d
1991-1994
&
1987-1991
tro
lle
Mobile Laboratory Manager- Managed mobile laboratory projects including on and off site client
contact, analyzed samples, reviewed data and generated reports. Set up the Los Angeles site long term
mobile lab project which resulted in generating a profit rather than a loss for Mobile Lab #2.
Responsible for setting up the Arizona mobile laboratory including obtaining all necessary permits and
certifications in order to meet Arizona state regulatory requirements. Implemented and audited quality
assurance/quality control guidelines. Created and/or updated mobile laboratory Standard Operating
Procedures documents. Trained and supervised employees in mobile laboratory procedures.
Enseco-CRL, Santa Maria, CA
on
Environmental Chemist: Organics- Headed and performed all organic operations within 1 year of initial
training. Trained and supervised back-up analysts on all organic analyses.
Environmental Chemist: Inorganics- Planned and implemented the set-up of the inorganic laboratory by
modifying and customizing methodologies, allowing efficient use of available resources while offering a
greater variety of services to the customer. Trained and supervised all aspects of the inorganics
laboratory. Acted as a back-up analyst for inorganics after moving to organics.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Coordinator- Assumed the major responsibility for responding to
quality control questions from clients. Reviewed all data to ensure that it met all quality assurance
guidelines prior to release to customers.
nc
Environmental Health and Safety Coordinator- Conducted hazardous communications training for new
and current employees. Managed facility hazardous and non-hazardous waste disposal and recycling
per all applicable regulations. Completed required reports on facility emissions per applicable
regulations. Trained employees in proper handling and shipping techniques, including dangerous goods
shipping. Tracked and updated current chemical inventory.
U
Program Administration- Gathered information specific to the size and scope of projects including any
specific quality assurance/quality control and reporting requirements. Tracked project status from
acceptance of samples to release of report, notifying clients of any problems that would affect project
specifics. Reviewed final reports prior to release to ensure they met all project specifics.
1984-1987
Wyoming Department of Agriculture-Division of Laboratories, Laramie
Analyzed private and municipal waters and wastewaters for all inorganic parameters required.
Extracted pesticide residues in foliage samples. Analyzed tissue samples for strychnine using liquid
chromatography.
Page 47 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Meredith Sprister
Project Manager (Lead)
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Ms. Sprister has several years of experience in the environmental laboratory industry. She has a strong
working knowledge of applicable methods and regulations regarding air, water, wastewater and
hazardous waste testing and disposal. She has an analytical background with environmental methods
and instrumentation.
EDUCATION
B.A. Environmental Studies, Minor in Music, 2008, University of California, Santa Barbara
tro

EXPERIENCE
2010-Present
Creek Environmental Laboratories, San Luis Obispo, CA
nc
2009-2010
on
Ms. Sprister is responsible for final laboratory data review, report generation and dissemination. She
serves as primary client contact for laboratory and project activity. Other responsibilities include
creating invoices, EDDs, Geotracker EDFs and loading data to client-specific databases. Ms. Sprister is
also the primary contact for the compilation of CLP data packages. Previous responsibilities include
performance of extractions and analyses in the Wet Chemistry & Inorganics Department.
U
Inorganics & Wet Chemist / Laboratory Technician – Prepared and analyzed soil, drinking water and
aqueous samples on laboratory machinery including ICP-MS, ICP-OES, Mercury by Cold Vapor AA and
Flame AA. Performed STLC and TCLP extractions and analyses. Performed wet chemistry tests including
Ferrous Iron, Orthophosphate, Fluoride by ISE, Hexavalent Chromium in water and soil, MBAS and
Chemical Oxygen Demand. Performed short holding time tests including pH, turbidity, EC, color, odor
and salinity. Proficient at all EPA Metals digestion methods including 3050, 3060, 3005, 200.7/.8 and
3010. Performed instrument maintenance.
2006-Present
Drive Customs, San Luis Obispo, CA
Website Manager & Bookkeeper – Development and maintenance of a fully functional website including
photos, services and contact information. Bill paying, invoice preparation, basic accounting and
reconciliation using QuickBooks. Internet promotion, business card and logo design. Preparation of
lease paperwork, dealer agreements and other technical documents.
Page 48 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Marissa Censullo
Project Manager
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
tro
lle
Ms. Censullo has several years of experience in the environmental laboratory industry. She has a strong
working knowledge of applicable methods and regulations regarding air, water, wastewater and
hazardous waste testing and disposal. She has an analytical background with environmental methods
and instrumentation.
EDUCATION
B.S. Environmental Science and Policy, 2010, Concentration in Environmental Science, University
of South Florida, St. Petersburg FL
EXPERIENCE
on

2011-Present
U
nc
Ms. Censullo is responsible for final laboratory data review, report generation and dissemination. She
serves as primary client contact for laboratory and project activity. Other responsibilities include
creating invoices, EDDs, Geotracker EDFs and loading data to client-specific databases. Previous
responsibilities include performance of extractions and analyses in the Wet Chemistry & Inorganics
Department.
Jun-Dec 2010
U.S.G.S. Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL
INTERNSHIP – Retrieved, organized, and analyzed environmental data that had been collected on
physical, chemical and nutrient variables for waters in Florida Bay and Biscayne National Park. Used
ArcGIS software to produce digital products including shapefiles overlain on an interactive map, and a
series of graphs linked to shapefiles.
Page 49 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Kristie Mikel
&
Department Manager,
Microbiology, Bioassay & Wet Chemistry
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Ms. Mikel has several years of experience in the environmental laboratory industry. She has a strong
working knowledge of applicable methods and regulations regarding water, wastewater and hazardous
waste testing and disposal. She has an analytical background with environmental methods and
instrumentation.
EDUCATION
B.S. Microbiology with Minor in Psychology, 2001, Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
CPR Certified
Licensed Real Estate Broker
tro



EXPERIENCE
on
2013-Present
Ms. Mikel is responsible for the scheduling, maintenance, and verifying QA/QC parameters are met for
all data from the Microbiology, Bioassay and Wet Chemistry Department. She is primarily responsible
for any new method development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples, analysis of MDL / RL /
DoCs for all supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within this department.
Abalone Coast Analytical – San Luis Obispo, CA
nc
2011-2013
Laboratory Manager – Bacteriology, Microbiology & Chemistry; Responsibilities included: Media Prep,
QA/QC, Reports and Testing, and management of lab personnel.
U
2001-Present
1998-2008
Independent Real Estate Broker – San Luis Obispo, CA
Tom Mel Beauty Center
– San Luis Obispo, CA
Manager – Managed a high-end boutique plus a full-service salon with 16 hairstylists, 2 estheticians and
a manicurist/pedicurist. Resulting from salon growth and strong product sales, bought a building in
downtown San Luis Obispo and later expanded in 2005. Helped develop and customize a computerized
client management, product inventory, and sales tracking system – more than doubling company profit
margin.
Page 50 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Drew Miller
&
Department Manager,
Volatile Organics
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Miller over 5 years of experience in the environmental laboratory field including working as a
principal chemist for the inorganics department, performing method development, instrument
troubleshooting, maintenance, and repair, and supervision.

tro
EDUCATION
B.S., Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 2008
on
EXPERIENCE
2008–Present
nc
Volatile Organics Department Manager (2014-Present) – Responsible for the scheduling, maintenance,
and verifying QA/QC parameters are met for all data from the Volatile Organics Laboratory. He is
primarily responsible for any new method development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples,
analysis of MDL / RL / DoCs for all supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within
this department.
U
Inorganics Department Manager (2012-2014) – Mr. Miller was responsible for the scheduling,
maintenance, and verifying QA/QC parameters are met for all data from the Wet Chemistry and Metals
laboratories. He was primarily responsible for any new method development, the analysis of proficiency
testing (PT) samples, analysis of MDL / RL / DoCs for all supervised personnel, and training of technicians
and analysts within these laboratories.
Inorganics Analyst & Principal Chemist (2008-2011) – Mr. Miller scheduled, maintained consumable
inventory, performed instrument maintenance, method development, and assisted with training for all
wet chemistry and metals methodologies. Additionally, he performed as the primary contact for
external auditors of the department.
Page 51 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Parwinder Pal Parmar
&
Department Manager,
Metals & Instrumental Inorganics
(Page 1 of 2)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Parmar has over 15 years of hands-on experience as a chemist and supervisor in the metals analysis
of solids and liquids using EPA methodologies. His experience also includes analytical work in the wet
chemistry and wine industry methodologies.

B.Sc., Biology and Chemistry, Punjabi University, Patiala (India), 1996
M.Sc., (Microbial and Food Technology) – Dept. of Biotechnology, Punjabi University, Patiala
(India), 1998
PhD., Dept. of Biotechnology, Punjabi University, Patiala (India), 2003
EXPERIENCE
on


tro
EDUCATION & CERTIFICATION
2012–Present
nc
Mr. Parmar is responsible for the scheduling, maintenance, and verifying QA/QC parameters are met for
all data from the Metals & Instrumental Inorganics Department. He is primarily responsible for any new
method development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples, analysis of MDL / RL / DoCs for all
supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within this department.
2005-2012
BC Laboratories Inc. Bakersfield, CA
U
Metals Department Supervisor - Mr. Parmar was responsible for the scheduling, maintenance, and
verifying QA/QC parameters were met for all data from the Metals Department. He was primarily
responsible for any new method development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples, analysis
of MDL / RL / DoCs for all supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within this
department.
Page 52 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
Parwinder Pal Parmar
2001-2005
&
Department Manager,
Metals & Instrumental Inorganics
Curtis & Tompkins Ltd., Berkley, CA
I N C.
(Page 2 of 2)
d
O I L F I E L D
Master Winery, India
tro
1998-2000
lle
Chemist - Mr. Parmar was responsible for the digestion and analysis of soil and water samples for metals
analysis using ICP/ICP-MS, Hydra AA Mercury analyzer and Flame AA. He also performed wet chemistry
analyses for the Wet Chemistry department as requested.
U
nc
on
Chemist - Mr. Parmar was responsible for the chemical analysis, monitoring of fermentation and
handling of the microbial work associated with producing wine. He was also responsible for entering
the data associated with the work into a database.
Page 53 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Dwain Zsadanyi
&
Department Manager,
(Page 1of 2)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Zsadanyi has over 30 years hands-on experience as analyst and department manager running
GC/MS for trace analysis of priority pollutants, hazardous substance list compounds, fuels in soil and
water. Interpretation of mass spectra. Maintenance and cleaning of HP GC/MC’s, autosamplers and
purge-and-trap units. Training of new analysts. Method development and data interpretation.

B.S., Chemistry, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 1982
Teaching Credential in Physical Science, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo,
1986
OSHA 40 Hour HazWoper Certificate + Refreshers
AFFILIATIONS

on


tro
EDUCATION
American Chemical Society
nc
EXPERIENCE
2006–Present
U
Mr. Zsadanyi is responsible for the scheduling, maintenance, and verifying QA/QC parameters are met
for all data from the Semi-Volatile Organic Laboratory. He is primarily responsible for any new method
development, the analysis of proficiency testing (PT) samples, analysis of MDL / RL / DoCs for all
supervised personnel, and training of technicians and analysts within this department.
2005–2006
Creek Environmental Laboratory – San Luis Obispo, CA
Project Manager – Provided technical client services & project coordination. Performed data review,
provided result interpretation, and performed analyses as necessary.
Page 54 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
Dwain Zsadanyi
1994–2005
&
Department Manager,
ZymaX envirotechnology, inc. – San Luis Obispo, CA
I N C.
(Page 2of 2)
d
O I L F I E L D
lle
2001–2005, Project Manager – Responsible for data review, interpretation of analytical results and
providing technical advice to clients. In charge of research and method development.
1990 – 1994
tro
1994–2001, Semi-Volatile Laboratory Manager – Responsible for operation of Semi-Volatile Organics
GC/MS group. Primary duties included critical review of all data, final report generation, method
development, staffing and scheduling. Additional duties included sample preparation, analysis, data
interpretation, and instrument calibration and maintenance.
Coast to Coast Analytical Services – San Jose and San Luis Obispo, CA
1984–1986
on
Organics GC/MS Chemist – Performed volatile and semi-volatile methods. Sample preparation, analysis,
data reduction and processing. Method development for new procedures/analysis (including low DL
SIM analysis). Maintenance and repair of analytical equipment. Review and approval of reports.
Organizing and scheduling workload and personnel. Purchasing/acquisition of supplies.
California Polytechnic State University – San Luis Obispo, CA
nc
Laboratory Instructor – Plan, conduct and evaluate lessons. Record keeping and report writing of
student performance.
1986–1990
Teacher – Various California School Districts
1969–1972
Food Inspector – U.S. Army
U
Analysis and inspection of food for army procurement. Site inspection of vendor facilities. Analysis for
wholesomeness and specification requirements. Random sampling and sample preparation for QC
reporting of consignments.
Page 55 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Pete Alcocer
&
Oil Production
Operations Consultant
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Alcocer has been involved in using bioremediation techniques in the field such as microbial bacteria
remediation, vapor extraction, and excavation. In performing soil, water, gas, and oil sampling in
accordance with EPA and ASTM guidelines, Mr. Alcocer has gained experience and expertise in using
such field analyzers as the vapor probe, OVA-128, PID, LEL, Oxygen sensor, and Draeger type reagent
tubes.

U.S. Marine Corps, 1975-1978, Field Communications Training
Environmental Hazardous Materials Technology Certificate, 1993, Allan Hancock College, Santa
Maria, CA
OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hourTrained (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120)
EXPERIENCE
on



tro
EDUCATION
1984-Present
nc
Mr. Alcocer is involved in the majority of OEC’s field sampling program, providing independent
field analyses of crude and refined gas/oil product for central California oil production companies. Field
tests have included on-site tank testing for Reid vapor pressure, LPG/gasoline, specific gravity, moisture
content, corrosivity, and various air monitoring analyses.
Mr. Alcocer’s laboratory responsibilities include GC analysis of hydrocarbons in gases and liquids
by FID and TCD per ASTM methods, and hydrogen sulfide by FPD. He provides comprehensive crude oil
profiles, which include API gravity, kinematic viscosity, total sulfur content, salt content, flashpoint, and
quantitative distillation.
U
1983–1984
RMR Contractors, Santa Maria, CA
Welder/Independent Contractor- Mr. Alcocer worked as a pipeline welder, certified under ASME B31-3.
He performed construction and repair of oil, gas, and steam pipelines.
1980-1982
D & R Contractors
Welder- Mr. Alcocer’s duties included oilfield pipeline construction and pipefitting, including major
structural welding.
Page 56 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
Brandon Ganster
&
Oil Production
Taft Operations Supervisor
(Page 1of 1)
d
QUALIFICATIONS
I N C.
lle
Mr. Ganster has several years of experience in the environmental laboratory industry. In performing
soil, water, gas, and oil sampling in accordance with EPA and ASTM guidelines, Mr. Ganster has gained
experience and expertise in using multiple types of field analyzers. He has a scientific background with
environmental and oilfield methods.
B.S., Biology, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 2008
OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hour Trained (OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120)
EXPERIENCE
on



tro
EDUCATION
2011-Present
nc
Mr. Ganster is responsible for the overall operations in the Taft offices of OEC. Included are any field
activities originating from this location. This includes staff management for, or performance of, any field
services or operations for the collection or analysis of samples.
2002-2011
Bravo Pizza Plus, Atascadero, CA
U
Store Manager: Managed 12 employees, hiring and terminating, overseeing restaurant bills, bank
deposits, payroll, customer/employee satisfaction, quality control, inventory/ordering, advertisement,
meetings with potential large clients, establishment of new restaurant.
Page 57 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Document ID
Title
ADM
Administrative Procedures
ADM-BILLING
ADM-CHANGE
Project Billing & Accounting Practices
Change Management
ADM-CLIENT
Client Confidentiality, Complaint Handling
ADM-ETHICS
Ethics Training & Policies
ADM-HSP
Health & Safety Plan
ADM-Management
Employee Management
ADM-OEM
OEC Employment Manual
ADM-Purch
Material Procurement
ADM-SOP
Standard Operating Procedures
ADM-Training
ADM-Vehicle
Orientation & Training Program
OEC Vehicle Procedures
GEN
General Laboratory Procedures
GEN-Audit
Internal Audit Program
GEN-CAPA
Corrective & Preventive Action
GEN-Defin
GEN-DISPOSAL
GEN-DOC
d
lle
tro
Data Reduction, Validation & Reporting
Acronyms & Definitions
Sample & Waste Disposal
Document Control
Electronic Data Generation & Record Retention
nc
GEN-EDATA
on
GEN-Data
rev 06/13/2014
Equipment Validation, Calibration & Maintenance
GEN-EXTR-CALWET
California Waste Extraction Test (CALWET)
GEN-EXTR-TCLP
TCLP Extraction - EPA 1311
GEN-INT
Manual Integration
GEN-LOGIN
Sample Login & Dispersal
GEN-POWER
Power Shutdown & Startup Guide
GEN-SECM
Small Instrument - Support Equipment Calibration & Monitoring
F
Field Operations Procedures
F-AirMonitor
Air Monitoring & Sampling Procedures
F-AUGER
F-GasVaporProbe
Manual Hand Auger Field Sampling
Gas Vapor Probe Installation & Sampling
F-GEOPROBE
Geoprobe System Instructions
U
GEN-EVCM
Page 58 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Document ID
Title
F-GOR GWR
GOR & GWR Sampling Protocol
F-GWMonitor
Groundwater Monitoring Field Sampling
F-HOST
HOST Vapor Pressure Sampling Method
F-NG
Natural Gas Cylinder Sampling
F-NGL
Natural Gas Liquid Cylinder Sampling
F-SAMPLING
General Field Sampling Operations
F-SRB
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria Field Sampling
F-SurfaceWater
Surface Water Sampling
F-Tedlar
Tedlar Bag Gas Sampling
FA-Dew Point Draeger
FA-Freeze Valve
Dew Point testing by Draeger Tube (Gas Detector Tube)
Water Vapor Content of Gaseous Fuels by Measurement of Dew Point
Temperature
Freeze Valve Method
FA-H2S Draeger
Hydrogen Sulfide testing by Draeger Tube (Gas Detector Tube)
FA-H2S HACH
Field Analysis of H2S in Water using HACH
FA-pH
Field Analysis of pH
FC-Guadalupe
IN-ME
IN-Hardness
IN-Hg
d
lle
tro
Site-Specific Courier Instructions: Guadalupe
Inorganics – Metals Department Procedures
Calcium & Total Hardness by Calculation
Mercury Analysis by CVAA
Mercury Digestion for CVAA Analysis
Metals Preparation by EPA 200.2
nc
IN-Hg-DIGEST
IN-ME-PREP-200
on
FA-Dew Point
rev 06/13/2014
Metals Preparation by EPA 3000 Series Methods
IN-ME-ICP
Metals Analysis by ICP
IN-ME-ICPMS
Metals Analysis by ICPMS
U
IN-ME-PREP-3000
IN-WC
Inorganics – Wet Chemistry Department Procedures
IN-AB#
Acid and Base Number by Color-Indicator Titration
IN-Alkalinity
Total Alkalinity (SM2320B)
IN-Ammonia
Ammonia as Nitrogen by Ion Selective Electrode (EPA 350.3 & SM4500NH3)
IN-Chlorophyll
Chlorophyll-a by Spectrophtometry
IN-COD
Chemical Oxygen Demand
IN-Conductivity
Specific Conductance (SM2510B)
Page 59 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Document ID
Title
IN-CrVI
Hexavalent Chromium by Colorimetry
IN-Cyanide
Total Cyanide
IN-Fe
Ferrous Iron
IN-FP
Ignitability / Flashpoint (EPA 1010)
IN-IC(Anions)
Anions by Ion Chromatography (EPA 300.0)
IN-MBAS
Anionic Surfactants as MBAS
IN-O&G
Hexane Extractable Oil & Grease
IN-pH
pH Measurement
IN-Phenol
Total Phenolics
IN-PoP
Total Phosphorus & Ortho Phosphate by Ascorbic Acid Colorimetry
IN-RXCNS
Reactive Cyanide & Sulfide
IN-S
Total Sulfide
IN-SETT
Settleable Solids
IN-TDS
IN-TKN
Total Dissolved Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
IN-TOC
Total & Dissolved Organic Carbon
IN-TSS
IN-Turbidity
d
lle
tro
Total Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Nephelometric Turbidity
Volatile Solids
nc
IN-VS
on
IN-TS
rev 06/13/2014
Microbiology & Bioassay Department Procedures
MB-Bioassay
Acute Bioassay for Hazardous Waste
MB-BOD
Biological Oxygen Demand
MB-Cl
Residual Chlorine
MB-DO
Dissolved Oxygen
MB-Hardness
Hardness by EDTA Titration
MB-HUB
Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria
MB-SRB
Sulfate Reducing Bacteria
OG
Oil & Gas Production Analysis Department Procedures
OG-ADA
Determination of ADA in Water
OG-API
API Gravity of Petroleum (Hydrometer Method)
OG-BS&W
Determination of Water and Sediment in Crude Oil By Centrifuge Method
U
MB
Page 60 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Document ID
Title
OG-BTU (NATGAS)
Natural Gas Analysis by GC/TCD
OG-COHSE
Crude Oil Headsapce Extraction
OG-CORR
Corrosion Inhibitor
OG-DISSGAS
Dissolved Compounds in Gas Extracts
OG-DIST
Distillation of Petroleum Products
OG-DMETER
Specific Gravity (Relative Density) by Density Meter
OG-GOR-EXTR
Gas-Oil Ratio Extraction
OG-GWR-EXTR
Gas-Water Ratio Extraction
OG-H2S
Hydrogen Sulfide in Gaseous Fuels (Lead Acetate Reaction Rate Method)
OG-H2SMER
H2S and Mercaptans in Oil and Sludge
OG-HOST
Vapor Pressure of ROC in Heavy Crude Oil by GC
OG-HYDROMETER
Specific Gravity by Hydrometer
OG-oPO4
Orthophosphate by Colorimetry
OG-P
Total Phosphorus by Colorimetry
OG-PSIMPLE
Peak Simple Chromatography Software
OG-RATIO
Gas Oil Ratio
OG-RVPTVP
OG-S(XRF)
OG-SCAQMD
d
lle
tro
Reid Vapor Pressure
Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) to True Vapor Pressure (TVP)
Sulfur in Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence
Spectroscopy
SCAQMD METHOD 307-91 Determination of Sulfur in a Gaseous Matrix
Determination of Water and Sediment in Crude Oil By Centrifuge
nc
OG-SEDIMENT
on
OG-RVP
rev 06/13/2014
Shrinkage Factor
OG-TCDA
TCDA Analysis by GC
OG-TRS
TRS from Stationary Sources by GC/SCD
OG-V
Vanadium
OG-VISC
Kinematic Viscosity of Liquids
U
OG-SHRINK
SV
Semi-Volatile Organics Department Procedures
SV-CLEAN-GPC
Gel Permeation Chromatography
SV-CLEAN-SAC
Sulfuric Acid Cleanup - EPA 3665A
SV-CLEAN-SGC
Silica Gel Cleanup - EPA 3630C
SV-CLEAN-SC
Sulfur Cleanup - EPA 3660B
SV-EXTR-AQ
Extraction of Aqueous - EPA3510C
Page 61 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Document ID
Title
SV-EXTR-Fractionation
Fractionation of Extracts
SV-EXTR-PROD
Extraction of Products
SV-EXTR-SO
Ultrasonic Extraction of Solids - EPA 3550B
SV-DIOXANE
1,4-Dioxane by GC/MS
SV-GLYCOL
Glycol Analysis by GC/FID
SV-Methanol
Methanol Analysis by GC/FID
SV-PCB
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by GC/(ECD)2
SV-PEST
Organochlorine Pesticides by GC/(ECD)2
SV-PNASIM
PNA Analysis by GC/MS in SIM Mode
SV-SARA
SARA Fractionation & Analysis
SV-D2887
Simulated Distillation by ASTM D2887
SV-SVOC
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
SV-TPH(FID)
Semi-Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID
SV-TPH(GCMS)
Semi-Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/MS
SV-TPH(LGVOL)
Semi-Volatile TPH Determination by Large Volume Injection & GC/FID
VO-524.2
VO-624
VO-GRO(FID)
d
lle
tro
Volatile Organics Department Procedures
Volatile Organic Analysis of Drinking Water
Volatile Organic Analysis by EPA 624
GRO-TPH Determination by GC/FID (LUFT & EPA 8015B)
Aromatic Volatile Organics by GC/PID
nc
VO-PID
on
VO
rev 06/13/2014
TPH & Related VOC Determination by GC/MS
VO-VOC
Volatile Organic Analysis (EPA 8260B)
VO-AIR
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air
U
VO-TPH&VOC
Page 62 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Burrell Wrist Action Shaker
Igloo 2.8 Cu. Ft. Fridge
Mettler 5GO Portable DO Meter
Mettler Toledo pH Meter with Probe
Pentair Fleck 5800 LXT Water Softener
Precision Low Temp 815 BOD Incubator
Precision Thelco Model 6 Incubator
Precision Thelco Model 6 Incubator
Stir Plate, Small Benchtop
Thermolyne Mirak Stir Plate
YSI 5100 DO Meter
Detector, wavelength analyses
Digi Block A
Digi Block A Controller
Digi Block B
Digi Block B Controller
Hood air monitor (ALNOR) Hood #3
Hood,#3
Hood,#4
Metals reduction, acid/heat (Block C, in
hood #3)
Metals reduction, acid/heat (Block D, in
hood #3)
Metals reductor keypad (in hood #3)
Metals reductor keypad (in hood #3)
Safety Shower/eye wash station
Scale – Balance, Top-Loading
Stir Plate
Auto Sampler (ICP1)
Auto Sampler (ICPMS)
Autosampler (ICP2)
Computer HG2
ICP1 (ICAP 6300 DUO)
ICP1 Computer
ICP2 (Perkin Elmer)
ICP2 Computer
ICPMS (not in service)
ICPMS
ICPMS Computer
Mercury Analyzer (Quick Trace)
Mercury Autosampler
Mercury Peristaltic Pump
Peristaltic Pump (ICP2)
Peristaltic Pump (ICPMS)
Rotators –#1
Rotators –#2
Computer R-OEC1 (KC laptop)
Computer R-OEC3 (RD laptop)
Computer R-OEC4 (JH laptop)
Air Compressor (Coleman)
Air Compressor (Coleman) motor
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
MB Room
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
1439
26355
none
B319308057
B312145455
none
lle
none
Fisher Sci 14-493-1205
sp72725
5100-115v
Thermo Spectronic
Vendor CPI
George T. Hall Co. Inc.
Vendor CPI
George T. Hall Co. Inc.
AirGard 200
Genie
Genie
105N0911
727990000000
SCP 'DigiPrep MS'
MSX0307400469
SCP 'DigiPrep MS'
2110040031
'DigiPrep MS keypad
'DigiPrep MS keypad
HAWS
Mettler HF-400
1205
Elemental Scientific
CETAC ASX-520
Perkin Elmer S10
Dell Inc. OptiPlex GX520
Thermo Scientific
Dell Inc. OptiPlex 960
Optima 3300DV
HP Pavilion 9000
PE Sciex Elan 6100
Perkin Elmer Elan 9000
CETAC (M-6100)
CETAC (ASX-400)
CETAC
Gelson Mini Plus3
Environmental Express
LARS LANDE Rotary Extractor
KPX0407400972
KP30050506
None
12843372
C1685108816350
X2DXS-HS-TSP-16-121011
020605A520
102S7125004
1V4RHB1
20095011
960QVK1
069N9122701
MXP402040B
939907
AJ12510809
GCJ8481
090602QT6
090603ASX-4
100608-DMP
610M1006
610M6007
None
None
Dell Inc. Latitude E5520
BR8RKQ1
Premium Plus
A.O.Smith 'Century'
B28410964
BY07-16
U
nc
on
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Prep
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
ME Room
Offsite
Offsite
Offsite
OG Closet
OG Closet
fl-ply-548-450-s01
tro
ME Prep
FG4
LE438
d
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
ME Prep
I N C.
3SGE170004
S1125602.5
S1125602.7
TSS 81362
none
none
Page 63 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Generator, zero air (in Samp closet)
Generator, zero air GAUGE (in closet)
Mass flow controller (sample closet)
Pressure Filter
Pressure Filter
Pressure Filter
Pressure Filter (in Sample Closet)
Pressure Filter (in Sample Closet)
Helium Detector Portable
Typewriter
Atmospheric pressure regulator
Bomb Ignition Unit, Para
Bomb, Cylinder, (Oxy calorimeter)
Bomb, Oxygen, calorimeter
Centrifuge
Centrifuge 2
Chromatography Data System
Computer GAS1
Computer GAS10
Computer GAS11
Computer GAS4
Computer GAS5
Computer GAS8
Computer GAS9
Controller, Interface SCD
Density meter, AP PAAR
Density meter, keypad
Field Equipment - Hand Auger
Field Equipment - Hoe
Field Equipment - Shovel #1
Field Equipment - Shovel #2
Flash Point machine
Gas Chromatograph (GAS1)(TCD1)
Gas Chromatograph (GAS2)(TCD2)
Gas Chromatograph (GAS3)(SCD1)
Gas Chromatograph (GAS4)(FID1)
Gas Chromatograph (GAS5)(SCD2)
Gas Chromatograph (GC) (not in use)
Gas Chromatograph (GC) (not in use)
Gas Chromatograph (GC)(SCD2)
HACH - Hydrogen Sulfide Test Kit
HACH - Hydrogen Sulfide Test Kit
Heater box
Heating Chauffage (Heizung)
Hood,#15
Hood,#16
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Closet
OG Office
OG Office
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Nitrox 'UHP-352A'
PMR1-010972
GFC 17
none
none
none
Millipore 142mm dia
Millipore
Model (969-4650)
IBM 'Wheelwriter 5'
NuTech
L-K Industries Inc.
Peak Simple 202, 4ch
037A0089
99232-17
not available-in use
none
none
none
YT30-142-HW
none
205556
3 sets on bottom
9004
2901 EB Lot 0793
101A19940C20092988
L341EB
03240E
201358
N1148W
N1341W
N4397
7H2ZTR1
3VCF7V1
7H2YTR1
7H2XTR1
Hydrometer - API (-1-11)
OG Room
nc
lle
on
tro
Para
Para
d
U
I N C.
Sievers 355
DMA 48
DMA 48
4KXJ7V1
1220
190091
107136559520
GCA/Precision Sci
HP 5890
HP 5890
HP 5890
HP 5890
Agilent 5890 Series II
Agilent 7890A (G3440A)
HACH (HS-WR)
HACH (HS-C)
Thermolyne 45500
Type F4391
Hamilton/ SafeAire
Hamilton/ SafeAire
none
none
none
2443A04188
2750A19263
2843A19402
CN10847057
3336A56889
multiple
Lot A2241A
Lot A2198A
4550020104955
77066
FH-414C-A
FH-414D-A
116317, 116314, 16602,
116316
Page 64 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
Model #
Hydrometer - API (15-21)
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
multiple
multiple
multiple
multiple
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
tro
multiple
multiple
multiple
multiple
on
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Hydrometer - SG (1.0-1.22)
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
multiple
OG Room
OG Room
multiple
nc
Hydrometer - Baum Scale (0-12)
Hydrometer - Salometer (0-100)
Hydrometer - Salometer (0-27)
U
SERIAL #
multiple
multiple
multiple
975047, 77-1023, 77-1017,
77-1026, 19714, 19764, 771019, 974997
73529, FH740, 57-2002,
226908, 260732, 149420,
274002, 273998, 19318,
273996, 274003, 273988,
537001
52465, 52850
14-1227, 14.1257
MA-131, 52271
52773, 52456
87804
60783
16519, 63546
65972, 65977, P51160,
P51176, 1006
65813
P56884, A651, 76776, 76783
A18054
196480, 8823, 87804, 87807,
8828
87575
982399
NONE
274018, 247008, 274009,
274010, 274013, 274012,
274016, 8799
1264300-326
758612
5111026
85230, 85233
K56558
54765
A65256
96341, 24348
K55741
L94448
57566, 130311
C54071
M10426
A69162
A79015
95494, 28137, 28573,
280227, 57568, 37803
K66286
K67476
28566, 28781, 28671, 87240
28575, 28242, 18853,
162307, 39283
19546, 51199
70976
d
LOCATION
lle
I N C.
Page 65 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Hydrometer Bases - Brass - 11
Hydrometer Bases - Glass - 21
Imersion Circulator Isotemp
Imersion Circulator Isotemp
Motor (attached to Oxy calorimeter)
Muffle Furnace
NACE - FUEL Sampling Kit
Oil Bath, MGW 'Lauda'
Oven, heating (in hood #16)
Oven, heating, 'Turkey' (in hood #16)
Oxygen analyzer, portable
Power Supply, electrothermal
Pressure Gauge (0-100 psi) glycerin
Pressure Gauge (0-100 psi) Non glycerin
Pressure Gauge (0-1000 psi) Non
glycerin
Pressure Gauge (0-200 psi) non
glycerin
Pressure Gauge (0-200 psi) non glycerin
Pressure Gauge (0-30 psi)
Pressure Gauge (0-300 psi) non
glycerin
Printer
Printer - Fax,Scan,Copy
Printer - Fax,Scan,Copy
Pump #1 - Sampling - Intrinsically Safe
Pump #2 - Sampling - Intrinsically Safe
Refractometer - Portable
Refrigerator #7, products (O&G)
Regulator, temperature
Reid Vapor Pressure Bath
Reid Vapor Pressure Gauge (0-100psi)
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Fisher 730
Cole Parmer Model#1266-02
Para
Thermo FB1415M
Millipore Cat# xx6403730
T-1
Neycraft
General Electric
Teledyne 320A-B
MC242X1
Wika Gauge
LR
NONE
None
404363
891040
A50MEB
1257090730460
008603P
A14045
168962
90200
10586765
OEC-G-011
OEC-G-010
OG Room
Wika Gauge
OEC-G-002
Wika Gauge
OEC-G-001
US Gauge
OEC-G-012
BR
BR
Matheson
Ashcroft
Wika Gauge
LR
Wika Gauge
OEC-G-005
OEC-G-006
OEC-G-007
OEC-G-008
OEC-G-016
OEC-G-009
OEC-G-013
OG Room
Wika Gauge
OEC-G-014
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Wika Gauge
Wika Gauge
Wika Gauge
HP Laser Jet P2035
Brother (MFC-8680DN)
Brother (MFC-7460DN)
Xtech Instr. Inc.
Xtech Instr. Inc.
Extech RF40
none
Resistotherm
Koehler #K11450
Koehler
OG Room
Koehler (multiple)
OG Room
Koehler (multiple)
OG Room
Koehler
Reid Vapor Pressure Vapor Chamber
OG Room
Koehler
Rough Pump - SCD2
OG Room
Edwards-RV3
U
nc
lle
on
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
tro
OG Room
d
OG Room
I N C.
OEC-G-004
OEC-60-002
OEC-G-003
OEC-G-015
VNB3226003
U62341M0J605348
U62701A3N978631
3128
3392
none
R82640314-N
OEC-100
F7524-01-1P, F7524-01-1B,
F1596-01-1I, F1596-01-1M,
F7524-01-10
F6419-01-1P, F0877-01-1C,
F6419-01-1F
LOGO-60-3
1B:4055, 1B:5541, 1B:5542,
1B:5543
Worn Off
Page 66 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Rough Pump - SCD3
Safety Shower/eye wash station
Sulfur Analyzer, X-RAY Fluor.
Sulfur Detector, Chemiluminescence
(SCD1)
(SCD2)
(SCD3) (not in use)
Syringe Pump #1
Syringe Pump #2
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Edwards-RV3
SPEAKMAN
ASOMA 200
666134788
None
4093
OG Room
Sievers 350B
none
OG Room
Sievers SCD 350B
OG Room
Agilent Model G6644A
OG Room
OG Room
KD Scientific #LEGATO 200
KD Scientific #LEGATO 200
Thermometer
OG Room
multiple
Thermometer - Field - PA
Thermometer - GOR#2
Thermometer - Infrared
Thermometer - Infrared Field - BG
Thermometer - Infrared Field - PA
Thermometer - Lisa Office
Thermometer - Pete Alcocer
Torque Wrench Preset 20ft/lbs-40ft/lbs
(Static Proof)
Vacuum Pump
Vacuum Pump
Vacuum Pump
Vacuum Pump (not in use)
Water Bath Rubbermaid 10 gal - GOR#1
Water Bath Rubbermaid 10 gal - GOR#2
Water Bath, GCA
Water Bath, Stainless Steel GOR#1
Water Bath, Stainless Steel GOR#2
X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer,
energy dispersive
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Computer OECSVR3
Computer oec-t1
Laboratory Information Management
System (LIMS)
Computer OEC13
Computer OEC20
Computer OEC29
Computer OEC6
0393-378
US10849005
lle
tro
on
Koehler
Fisher - IR
Fisher - IR
Fisher - IR
Koehler
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
OG Room
Ever Safe
Reieke Corp. (Model
W01685PT03)
Edwards RV3
OGT DDA-P184-AA
General Electric
Edwards
Rubbermaid
Rubbermaid
Cat # 76000
Precision 183
Precision 181
OG Room
AMTEK ASOMA Phoenix II
Preisker Computer
Room
Preisker Computer
Room
Preisker Computer
Room
Preisker Computer
Room
Preisker Office
Preisker Office
Preisker Office
Preisker Office
Rackable Systems Inc.
#S5000PSL
Dell Computer Corporation
PowerEdge 840
nc
U
Computer OEC-P1
d
OG Room
I N C.
700605
D200012
A67129, 161512, 87174,
310794, 261568, M88749,
AC13831, 207209, M88621,
4C3253, 541002, 540983,
541005, 502950, 310780,
745122, ASTM 10F, 741289,
1458
M88536
745203
130379810
130544019
130544023
763389
2299
2302
211030
None
27475964
none
1218
none
none
14AN/2
9512-360
601111160
15151
A0072ABB
GP4MJH1
Dell Inc. PowerEdge T110 II
8C1FLS1
Promium, Element
ver.6.07:2016
G5NQXH1
5525ZQ1
2YT8YV1
9VQRML1
Page 67 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
&
Preisker Office
Preisker Office
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Preisker Storage
Prep Room
Prep Room
Prep Room
Prep Room
Prep Room
Prep Room-Hd7
Prep Room-Hd7
Prep Room-Storage
Prep Room-Storage
Prep Room-Storage
Prep Room-WC
Prep Room-WC
Prep Room-WC
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Computer
Closet
Roemer Front Office
Roemer Outside Cage
Roemer Project
Managers
Roemer Project
Managers
Roemer Project
Managers
Roemer Project
Managers
Roemer Storage
Roemer Storage
Computer OEC-R1
Computer OECR-DMZ
SERIAL #
Dell Inc. Vostro 230
VWR R429GA14
F09X4P1
H5NQXH1
B9D30G1
8XLF4F1
FF56CP1
HVX3PL1
9WHQML1
5524ZQ1
J5NQXH1
N31S-617753-05
Presto-Tilt'Ndrain Big Griddle
Presto-Tilt'Ndrain Big Griddle
GCA/Precision Sci
TP-Link-TL-WA901ND
Westco-114-8400-01
Westco-114-8301-01/02
6795-400D
6795-400D
PC100
Metrohm-831
Metrohm-728
Metrohm-832
2012 645
5011 155
Dell Inc. PowerEdge T300
GV0XJK1
Dell Inc. PowerEdge 1900
B1MDGD1
PowerConnect 2324
CNOP4194282984C70155
Compaq Pro UPS500
5278201J91Y0HY
FDY2CP1
8BWNZQ1
D09X4P1
3VCG7V1
HVX3PL1
COMBI/PAL
Branson Max Booster
123099
Neslab CFT-75
199218069
on
Computer OEC10
Model #
lle
LOCATION
Computer OEC7
Computer OEC8
Computer LAB03
Computer Lab05
Computer LAB06
Computer LAB10
Computer LAB14
Computer OEC14
Computer OEC21
Computer OEC5
Refrigerator #2
VGL Dolly
Computer Workstation-LAB11
Electric Skillet, Evaporaor
Electric Skillet, Evaporaor
Flashpoint Unit-FulKontrol
Router, Wireless-N
Easy Distillation Controller
Easy Distillation Heating Unit (Hotblock)
Hotplate, Corning
Hotplate, Corning
Hotplate, Corning
Karl Fischer Coulometer 831
Karl Fischer Stirrer 728
Karl Fischer Thermoprep 832
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
tro
nc
Computer R-OEC2 (SCRAP Laptop)
Power Connector, Dell
Power supply, UPS
Computer OEC18
Cylinder Dolly
U
Computer OEC11
Computer OEC26
Computer OEC28
Computer OEC30
Auto Sampler CTC Liquid
Branson cage, sonicator
Chiller, Neslab 208/230V 9.7 AMP (not
in service)
Roemer Storage
I N C.
d
O I L F I E L D
13513003314
1463
1463
143312290126
143312290136
none
1247
none
5156
Page 68 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
&
Computer OEC1
Computer OEC22
Computer OEC23
Model #
SERIAL #
Roemer Storage
Neslab CFT-75
694279212
Roemer Storage
Neslab Thermo Flex 900
R100050038
Roemer Storage
Neslab Merlin 1175
Roemer Storage
Roemer Storage
Roemer Supervisor
Office
Roemer Supervisor
Office
Roemer Supervisor
Office
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SAMPLE Rec.
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
HP 59822B
5972
nc
U
10515 2009
4465
3435A01885
16NQXH1
8BWPZQ1
JGQZKS1
2YMGCG1
253.165021
AirGard 200
Genie Scientific
CU2026MA-1A
WB70426086
TSS 81352
none
14011320015191
Cobra II
Cobra II
Cobra II
Cobra II
Agilent 6850 (G2880A)
G2614A
G2614A
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
Massey MF-4
SP48-216C (1)
HP7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 6890 Plus
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
COB167102508
1130-0605
1147-0905
COB180070510
CN30520433
CN44631260
CN84651351
3306A31363
3205A28236
3331A32853
2731A27823
3138A27453
3201A27823
on
Brother Printer
Computer LAB7
Copier
Freezer, Kenmore
Hood, #2
Ice System, Scotsman
Refrigerator #8 (Large Walk-in)
Auto Sampler (CobraII) (GC3)
Auto Sampler (CobraII) (GCMS2)
Auto Sampler (GCMS10)
Auto Sampler Carousel
Auto Sampler Carousel
Auto Sampler Controller
Auto Sampler Controller (GC8)
Auto Sampler Controller (GCMS6)
Auto Sampler Controller (not in service)
Auto Sampler Fan (GC5)
Auto Sampler Fan (GC8)
Auto Sampler Injector (GC1)
Auto Sampler Injector (GCMS1)
Auto Sampler Injector (GCMS6)
Auto Sampler Tower (not in service)
Auto Sampler Tower (not in service)
Auto Sampler Tray
Auto Sampler Tray (GC1)
Auto Sampler Tray (GCMS1)
Auto Sampler Tray (GCMS6)
LOCATION
lle
Chiller, Neslab 208/230V 9.7AMP (not
in service)
Chiller, Thermo Fisher 115V, 11.1 AMP
(ICP)
Chiller, Thermo Scientific 208/230V,
10.1 AMP (ICPMS)
Ionization Gauge Controller
Mass Selective Detector
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
tro
I N C.
d
O I L F I E L D
HP 7673B
HP 7673B
2950A20230
GT031710A
US44910092
US00024473
3429A39421
3009A21046
3242A32714
3704A09238
3328A32563
3342A33539
3221A28664
CN84651351
2942A20870
3506A37974
Page 69 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Auto Sampler Tray (not in service)
Auto SamplerTower (not in service)
Computer Gas2
Computer GC1
Computer GC3
Computer GC5
Computer GC6
Computer GC8
Computer GC9
Computer GCMS10
Computer GCMS2
Computer GCMS6
Computer GCMS7
Computer LAB2
Computer OEC 33
Computer OEC 34
Fan GC1
Fan GC3
Gas Chromatograph (GC) (MS10)
Gas Chromatograph (GC)(MS1)
Gas Chromatograph (GC1)
Gas Chromatograph (GC9) – Large
Volume Injection
Glass case, sonicator (hood #3)
Hood air monitor (TEL) Hood #1
Hood, #5
Hood,#1
Mass Selective Detector (MS10)
Mass Selective Detector (not in service)
Modular Accelerated Column Heater
(MACH) (not in service)
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
HP 7673A
HP 7673A
HP 7673B
HP 7673A
HP 7673B
HP7673B
OptiPlex330
Compaq Evo D510 SFF
Honeywell HT 808
Massey MF-4
Agilent 6890A
HP 5890 GC Series II
HP 5890 Series II
Agilent 6890N
HP 5890
HP 5890 Series II
HP 5890 Series II
HP 5890 Series II
HP 5890 Series II
HP 5890 Series II
2718A08788
2718A08839
2942A20870
3246A30420
3342A3539
3224A31065
BQLS4H1
FJK3NN1
FJM2NN1
FJK2NN1
HVX4PL1
FJM1NN1
8XLF4F1
6X32KN9XA030
FJM3NN1
FJN1NN1
99D30G1
79D30G1
G5NQXH1
CQ4CGX1
no SN
no SN
US00002632
US00042238
3118A35482
3235A46821
CN10445037
3223A43525
3223A42509
2623A08375
3133A37065
3019A28656
3235A44680
lle
tro
on
nc
d
U
I N C.
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
AirGard 200
TEL AFA50
Genie Scientific
Labconco
HP 59822B
HP 59822B
HP 59822B
Agilent 5973N/6890
5971
5971
Agilent 5973N
5971
SV Room
LTM A58/A68PS
US00024443
TS 81351
none
None
7520
2432
6392
US30945080
US62510092/US00028725
3118A02486
3114A02129
US44647056
2919A00438
1225
Page 70 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Model #
SERIAL #
SV Room
LTM A58/A68PS
1145
SV Room
LTM A58/A68PS
1191
SV Room
LTM A58/A68PS
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
SV Room
TAFT
VWR Scientific-Revco
Danby 'Designer'
Emerson OR300A
unknown
unknown
unknown
unknown
Nitrox
Dell Optiplex 390
TAFT
1017
lle
1196070021003920
63426502
240-980093
none
none
3165524-28003
Hedy 211
Dell Inspiron 3521
TAFT
TAFT
TAFT
TAFT
TAFT
Taft - Main Area
RV12
HP5890
202
350B
SCD355
96-2034907
Taft - Main Area
MRT15CPEWO
LA63409474
Taft - Main Area
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
Xitech
Varian
OI Analytical
Varian
Varian
EST Model 8100
EST Model 8100
EST Model 8100
Entech 7016D
Entec Model 3100A
003392
13485
14117
14056
15123
14103
14032
13985
1391
1325
FJL1NN1
FJL3NN1
Hewlett-Packard Compaq
dc7800 Small Form Factor
Dell Inc. Optiplex 330
G9KMZY1
C9D30G1
FF53CP1
3YMGCG1
Kenmore 253.280…
WB22349282
nc
U
d
LOCATION
on
(MACH) (not in service)
(MACH) 6890 – GC1
(MACH) 6890 – GC3
Refrigerator, #5 (8081/8062 Stds.)
Refrigerator, #6 (8015/8270 Stds.)
Refrigerator, Emerson (small)(Stds)
TCLP Extracation Vessels (N0.1)
Zero Air Generator
Computer Workstation - LH-OEC1
Computer Workstation - LH-OEC1
(Laptop)
Edwards Pump
Gas Chromatograph (OG GC03)
Peak Simple SRI
SCD Sievers
Sievers Interface Controller
Computer Workstation - T-OEC1
TAFT Sample Storage Refrigerator:
White-Westinghouse
Vacuum Pump
Auto Sampler Archon (51 Pos) (GC4)
Auto Sampler Archon (51 Pos) (GC7)
Auto Sampler Archon (51 Pos) (MS9)
Auto Sampler Tree (MS8)
Canister Cleaner Entec Model 3100A
Computer GC4
Computer GC7
Computer GCMS11
Computer GCMS5
Computer GCMS8
Computer GCMS9
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
tro
Computer LAB02
VO Room
Computer LAB05
Computer LAB12
Computer MS13
Computer OEC9
Computer Spare GCMSXX
Cylinder Dolly
Freezer (soil samples)
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
I N C.
1220
0590-100
1220
JBC5LS1
2UA8150D55
4KXJ7V1
FJL2NN1
Page 71 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Freezer, Kenmore (Stds)
Gas Leak Detector
Helium Detector
Hood Air Flow Monitor
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
Hood, #17
VO Room
Hot Plate (near Hood #17)
Ionization Gauge Controller (GCMS8)
Ionization Gauge Controller (MS11)
Ionization Gauge Controller (Not Used)
Lamp Power Supply (GC4)
Lamp Power Supply (GC7)
Oven for Entec 3100A
Oven, Drying
Power Supply, GCMS8 computer
Power Supply, MS8 Entech instruments
Preconcentrator, GCMS8
Purge unit, coupled ports (out of svc)
Purge unit, coupled ports (MS11)
Purge unit, coupled ports (out of svc)
Purge Unit, Tekmar/DOHRMANN (GC4)
Purge Unit, Tekmar/DOHRMANN (GC7)
Purge Unit, Tekmar/DOHRMANN (out
of svc)
Refrigerator #3 (Aqueous samples)
Refrigerator, small (stds)
Rotators – Vol #3
Rotators – Vol #4
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
nc
U
WB24445575
WB0326162
US10309009
US00035756
US00022331
US10145036
US10250006
CN10820018
2950A26689
2938A24839
E583001
205556
d
VO Room
SERIAL #
Frigidaire Model #
FKFH21F7HWD
253.267321
Agilent 6850N (G2630A)
Agilent 6890 Plus+
Agilent 6890 Plus+
Agilent 6890N (G1530N)
Agilent 6890N
Agilent 6850N (G2630A)
HP 5890 Series II
HP 5890 Series II
GOW-MAC 21-150
Varian 9694650
Tel-UK AFA 500
Fisher Science 'Contempra
Fume'
Corning “PC-400D”
Agilent 59864B
Agilent 59864B
HP 59864A
HP 59864A
Agilent 59864B
Model 4430
Model 4430
Agilent 5973N
HP 5973
Agilent 5973 Netcore
Agilent 5973N
Agilent 5973N
Agilent 5975C
Thermo Sci 3513ET
Quincy Lab Model: 40GC
APC Back-Ups XS 1500
APC Back-Ups XS 1500
Entech 7200
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
(EST) Encon
Velocity XPT 14-8900-OOT
Velocity XPT 14-8900-OOT
on
Freezer (soil samples) (frost free)
Model #
lle
LOCATION
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
tro
I N C.
none
33307993520
US6017416
US60111438
1191
1466
US6018823
C131530155
11488-1-952
US21884505
US92522749
US03340488
US10441770
US10442515
US81819247
1482080191829
G4-005254
1098
334011404E & 165092601P
313011404E and P
165092601 E&334011404P
31701403E & P
31601403E & P
286072103 E&P
US04260003
US03248004
VO Room
Velocity XPT 14-8900-OET
US04350002
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
Beverage-Air'
Black & Decker
OHAUS – Scout Pro
8045920
None
None
7123260661
Page 72 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Scale-Balance, Top loading (#14)
Sonicator, cleaning (in hood #17)
Stirrer (in hood, Vols. #17)
Three wheel bike w/basket, Blue
Three wheel bike w/basket, Red
Torr Meter/Support
Two Wheel Bike
Universal Gas Flowmeter
Vacuum Pump (MS11)
Vacuum Pump (MS12)
Vacuum Pump (MS5)
Vacuum Pump (MS5)
Vacuum Pump (MS8)
Vacuum Pump (MS8)
Vacuum Pump (out of svc)
Vacuum Pump (Spare)
Vacuum Pump, Entech Preconcentrator
Vacuum Pump, Rough for Entec 3100A
VGL Dolly
Zero Air Generator
Zero Headspace Extractor
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room
VO Room - Outside
cage
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Instrument Room
WC Storage
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
OHAUS – Scout Pro
Ohaus SP202
Fisher FS 30
Corning “PC-400D”
7123260277
B224021293
33307993520
lle
120911002
US12C53096
996165850
76221154
46280950
16934709
16981995
982180770
Ingersoll Rand
1203564
35900E
1100 Series-G1313A
1100 Series-G1312A
1100 Series-G1316A
HP Pro 30000 MT
1100 Series-G1379A
SEDEX75
HP Pro Curve-J409OA
Emerson OR300
Shimadzu (TOC-5000A)
Shimadzu (ASI-5000A)
LQ-590
FisherSci-14-493-1205
Shimadzu (ASI-5000A)
BottleBuret 50
BottleBuret 50
Harrier15/80
Beckman 356529
IEC
HACH-16500-16
CN00006756
US72102135
US72100948
4592102402
MXL024295D
JP40719711
0170588D
TW328NZOUT
63426502
36N01407A
36902235
FSQY168939
1685060538998
36902235
DB C5528
10 0 1833
MSE-9696/08/1d
7L003
428-22363
870108633
tro
Agilent ADM1000
Edwards RV3
Edwards RV3
Edwards RV3
Edwards RV3
Edwards RV3
Edwards RV3
GAST DDA-P704-AA
Edwards RV3
VACUBRAND ME1
VACUBRAND MZ2
Saf-T-Cart
Parker HPZA-30000
Millipore #1
Millipore #4
Millipore #5
Millipore #C
Millipore #13
Millipore #14
on
nc
HPLC-Agilent Interface
HPLC-ALS
HPLC-Bin Pump
HPLC-Col Comp
HPLC-Computer Workstation
HPLC-Degasser
HPLC-SEDEX75
LAN/HUB, HP ProCurve
Refrigerator, Floor Unit
TOC (Total Organic Carbon) Analyzer
TOC Auto Sampler
TOC Printer
Stir Plate, Small Benchtop
Auto Sampler for TOC
Buret, Bottletop (Hood 7)
Buret, Bottletop (Hood 7)
Cenrifuge, Benchtop Model
Centrifuge, Floor model
Centrifuge, Table Model
COD-Hotblock
Computer LAB11
U
Cole Parmer Model# 68801-03
d
Air Compressor
I N C.
36144613
30770001
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
Page 73 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
Computer Workstation-OEC22
Condensor/vaporizer (#1) - Hood 13
Conductivity meter
Dessicator, glass (round)
Dessicator, plastic cabinet, (Square)
Dessicator, plastic cabinet, (Square)
Dismembrator, sonic (HOOD #10)
Distillation - Ammonia
Distillation - Cyanide
Distillation - Phenol
Distillation – TKN
Flashpoint (Automated)
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
Dell Opiplex 3010
Dell Opiplex 3010
Optiplex 380
Caliper TurboVap II
Caliper TurboVap II
Caliper TurboVap II
Caliper TurboVap II
Myron L
none
Fisher Scientific
Sanko
Fisher Sci 500
Fisher Sci 500
Fisher Sci 500
Easy Distillation
Easy Distillation
Easy Distillation
Easy Distillation
Tanaka APM-7
WC/SV Prep Room
J2 Scientific AccuPrep MPS
PLH-1097-1.0
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
AirGard 200
Genie 5' Single Sash
Genie 8' Double Sash
none
Genie
SafeAire
SafeAire
St. Charles
Genie
Metrohm 819
Metrohm 819
Metrohm 788
Metrohm 788
Metrohm 830
Metrohm 830
Metrohm 833
Metrohm 833
Metrohm 818
Metrohm 818
Metrohm 820
Metrohm 820
Custom
Vulcan A1750 Delonghi
SafeHeat
Blue M'
Isotemp 650G 13-246-506G
TSS 81360
None
U
SERIAL #
Muffle Furnace
WC/SV Prep Room
Oven
Oven #1 (Fisher Sci)
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
d
42946185601
18134347033
TV0553N12804
TV0445N12717
TV0730N3880
TV0842N14837
172519
none
none
lle
tro
nc
on
Gel Permeation Cleanup Instr. (Hood
#6)
Hood air monitor (ALNOR) (Hood#11)
Hood, #10
Hood, #10
Hood, #6
Hood, #7
Hood, #8
Hood,#11
Hood,#12
Hood,#13
Hood,#14
Hood,#9
IC Detector 1
IC Detector 2
IC Filtration Sample Processor 1
IC Filtration Sample Processor 2
IC Interface unit 1
IC Interface unit 2
IC Liquid Handling Unit 1
IC Liquid Handling Unit 2
IC Pump 1
IC Pump 2
IC Separation Center 1
IC Separation Center 2
IC1 Computer Workstation
IC2 Computer Workstation
I N C.
BCK09035896A
BBW04112875
BCK08054855A
Control Unit: 20531
Test Unit: 23271
None
none
None
81360
PP22E-3
OP22A-9
PA-3-8
None
1819001003198
1819001006114
1788001006141
1788001007106
1830002003158
1830002006117
1833001002200
1833001008123
1818011003129
1818011005207
1820022003126
1820023005180
HQLS4H1
DCL0613104
12A-1631
103N0065
Page 74 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
Rev 06/30/2014 - CM
LOCATION
Model #
SERIAL #
Oven, drying
Oven, drying, ThermoSci
Oven, drying, ThermoSci
pH Meter, VWR
pH Meter, VWR
Pipet, Automatic: 0.5-10uL
Pipettor, 100-1000uL
Pipettor, 10-100uL
Pipettor, 20-200uL
Pipettor, 20-200uL
Pipettor, 500-5000uL
Printer
Printer
Refrigerated Recirculator
Refrigerator, Floor Unit
Sep. Funnel Shaker, Floor model
Spectrophotometer – SPEC 20
Spectrophotometer – SPEC 20
Stir Plate, Small Benchtop (Hood 8)
Stirrer
Stirrer Hotplate, Cole-Parmer
Stirrer Hotplate, Cole-Parmer
Stirrer, Fisher Sci
Thermometer, Electric
Turbidimeter, HF Scientific
Turbidimeter, HF Scientific
Turbidimeter, LciMOTTE
Vacuum Pump
Vacuum Pump
Vortex Mixer
WILKS Infra Cal TOG/TPH Analyzer
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
WC/SV Prep Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Weigh Room
Thermo Scientific Precision
Precision-51221126
Precision-51221126
'SR601C' sympHony
‘SB90M5 sympHony’
Eppenorf Research 10
Eppenorf Research Plus 1000
ThermoLabSystems 4500
Eppenorf Research Plus 5000
Bother-MFC-7460DN
HP Lasejet P2035
Cordley
SANYO-SR-360X
Ohaus PA214
OHAUS – CS-200
Glas-Col 099A VS5504
4001/4
4001/4
FisherSci-14-511-01
Corning 'PC-410'
HS19C-P
HS19C-P
'Thermix 120S'
FisherSci-15-077-29
FisherSci-15-077-29
FisherSci-15-077-29
FisherSci-15-077-29
FisherSci-15-077-29
Micro 100 Series-20001
Micro 100 Series-20001
LciMOTTE '2020'
DOA-P704-AA
DOA-P704-AA
FisherSci-02215365
HATR-T2
A&D – HF-400
OHAUS – Scout Pro (SP) 202
OHAUS – AS200
OHAUS – AV313
OHAUS – SP202
OHAUS – SP202
OHAUS – SP601
604171
604171
600091525
4406
D04628
2388848
N262313
U13540
3605278
Q24320B
R2606613
U62701L3N261757
VNB3B67021
951073348
8329230036
89562
473480
3SGL297001
3SGE170004
C1685100816369
C1685100816351
106N1036
C1685100816337
105NO819
105NO822
7G3
350401113803
10210906
3161107
105NO822
91173791
101605096
2902013918
24020134
72498811
406180
20848
1156-1699
1008622631
308608627
8009018
12702
12843372
7123260283
2741
8028041093
B224021292
B224021299
B211775945
lle
tro
on
nc
d
U
I N C.
Page 75 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX D – SAMPLE TREATMENT: HOLDING TIMES & CONTAINERS
8015 mod./LUFT by
GC or LUFT by GC/MS
GC (8015,8021)
GC/MS (8260)
Volatile Organic Compounds
TPH diesel, diluent, crude,
motor oil, (TEPH), C10-C40
PNA, BNA, PNA-SIM or
Pesticides/PCBs
TCLP Volatiles
TCLP Semivolatiles
Oil & Grease
(HEM) or (SGT-HEM)
Inorganic Analyte Analysis
Mercury
STLC or DI WET or
TCLP extraction
Anions by IC
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
524.2*/624/8260B
aq
soil
8015 mod./LUFT by
aq
GC or LUFT by GC/MS soil
625/8270C
aq
8081 / 8082
soil
aq
8260
soil
aq
8270
soil
2 VOAs
4 oz jar or tube
3 VOAs
4 oz jar or tube
3 VOAs
3 VOAs
4 oz jar
1 L amber
4 oz jar
1 L amber
4 oz jar
1 L amber
8 oz jar
1 L amber
8 oz jar
HCl
4 ± 2⁰C
HCl
4 ± 2⁰C
pH<2, HCl
4 ± 2⁰C
4 ± 2⁰C
1664A
aq
1 L amber
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
soil
aq
aq
aq
soil
aq
aq
aq
soil
aq
aq
250 mL poly
HNO3
6 mo.
4 oz jar
4 ± 2⁰C
6 mo.
250 mL poly
HNO3
28 days
4 oz jar
4 ± 2⁰C
28 days
1 L amber glass
6 mo.
6 mo.
4 ± 2⁰C
4 oz jar
Hg 28 days Hg 28 days
250 mL poly
Br, Cl, F, SO4: 28 days
4 ± 2⁰C
NO2, NO3, PO4: 48 hr
4 oz jar
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
14 days
4 oz jar
1 L poly
NaOH;4±2⁰C
14d/24hr if S- present
4 oz jar
4 ± 2⁰C
14 days
500 mL am poly
NaOH;Zn(C2O2H3)2;4±2⁰C 7 days
4 oz jar
4 ± 2⁰C
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
ASAP
4 oz jar
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
28 days
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
14 days
500 mL poly
H2SO4;4±2⁰C
28 days
4 oz jar
4 ± 2⁰C
250 mL am glass HCl; 4±2⁰C
28 days
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
48 hr
500 mL glass
4 ± 2⁰C
n/a
4 oz jar
250 mL poly
4 ± 2⁰C
7 days
1 L poly
4 ± 2⁰C
48 hr
*Contact OEC for complete sampling instructions
200.7 / 200.8
6010B / 6020
7470
7471
CAL WET/DIWET
1311
300.0
SW-846: 7.3.3.2
& 7.3.4.2
4500CN-C/E
9014
nc
Reactive Cyanide &
Reactive Sulfide
Preserve
Cyanide, Total/Amenable/Free
Sulfides, Total
9030B & 9034
Conductivity
Alkalinity
4500-H+ B/9040B
9045C
2510B
2320B
Ammonia or TKN
4500NH3-D
Total Organic Carbon
Turbidity
5310B
2130B
Flashpoint/Ignitability
1010
Residues, Total, TDS, TSS, TVS
Residue, Settleable
2540B, C, D
2540F
U
pH
4 ± 2⁰C
4 ± 2⁰C
4 ± 2⁰C
4 ± 2⁰C
HCl (prefer)or
H2SO4
28 days incl. extraction
on
Metals by ICP or ICP/MS
Analytical Extraction
Hold Time Hold Time
14 days
n/a
14 days
n/a
14 days
n/a
14 days
n/a
14 days
n/a
7 days or 1 day (524.2)
14 days
n/a
40 days
7 days
40 days
14 days
40 days
7 days
40 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
40 days
14 days
14 days
14 days
Container
d
TPH gasoline (TVPH),
C4-C10 or C4-C12
BTEX / MtBE / Oxygenates
Matrix
lle
Method
tro
Organic Analyte Analysis
Page 76 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX E – DATA CAPABILITY TABLES
EPA Method
Matrix & Reporting Limit
DW (mg/L)
AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
Bromide
0.05
0.4
5
Chloride
0.4
0.4
5
Fluoride
0.1
0.4
5
Nitrate or Nitrite as N
0.4
0.4
5
Orthophosphate as P
0.05
0.4
5
Sulfate
0.4
0.4
5
Alkalinity
10
--Ammonia as N
0.1
5
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
0.25
20
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)
4
--& Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
20
--Chlorine, Total & Free
0.1
0.1
--Conductivity
2 μmhos/cm
--Cyanide, Total / Amenable
0.04 / 0.02
0.4
Flashpoint (Ignitability)
1 ⁰F
1 ⁰F
MBAS
0.05
0.05
--Analyte
SM2320B
SM 4500-NH3 D
SM5210B
on
EPA 410.4 / SM 5220D
SM4500-Cl G
EPA 120.1 / SM2510B
SM 4500CN-C,E / 9014
EPA 1010
SM 5540C
EPA 1664A / 1664A
SGC
WILKS Screen
SM4500-O G
EPA 9040B/9045
SM5530 & EPA 420.1
tro
EPA 300.0
lle
d
INORGANICS
nc
Oil & Grease / TRPH
Oil & Grease / TRPH
Oxygen, Dissolved
pH (Corrosivity)
Phenolics, Total
Reactive Cyanide
Reactive Sulfide
Salinity
Solids, Settleable (SETT)
Solids, Total / % Moisture
Solids, Total Dissolved (TDS)
Solids, Total Suspended (TSS)
Solids, Volatile (VS)
EPA SW-846 7.3
U
SM2520B
SM2540F
SM2540B
SM2540C
SM2540D
SM2540G
SM4500-S= E /
EPA 9034 & 376.1
SM 5310B
EPA 180.1 / SM2130B
Sulfide, Total
Total & Dissolved Organic Carbon
Turbidity
5
10
1
0.1 unit
0.05
0.1
0.4
1
0.1
10
10
10
10
100
----0.1 unit
--0.5
2
----0.5%
-------
2
---
0.5
0.5 NTU
1
---
Page 77 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX E – DATA CAPABILITY TABLES (continued)
DW / AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.2
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.1
0.005
0.2
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.01
0.025
0.05
0.01
--0.005
0.005
0.05
1
0.05
0.1
0.01
1
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.05
10
2.5
1
1
0.5
5
0.25
10
0.5
0.5
1
2.5
0.5
5
2.5
0.5
--0.5
0.25
2.5
25
2
--0.5
25
0.5
1
2.5
2.5
2.5
1
1
on
nc
U
ICP Methods
EPA 200.7 & 6010B
DW
(mg/L)
0.05
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.001
0.025
0.001
0.1
0.003
0.001
0.002
0.05
0.001
0.001
0.1
0.002
0.0002
0.001
0.003
0.05
0.1
0.002
0.05
0.001
0.2
0.02
0.001
0.001
0.02
--0.005
0.005
ICP/MS Methods
EPA 200.8 & 6020
AQ
SO (mg/kg)
(mg/L)
0.1
20
0.004
1
0.005
0.5
0.004
1
0.002
0.5
0.05
10
0.002
0.5
0.2
25
0.006
1
0.002
0.5
0.004
1
0.1
20
0.002
0.5
0.002
0.5
0.2
25
0.004
1
--0.5
0.002
1
0.006
20
0.1
25
0.2
1
0.004
20
0.01
--0.002
0.5
0.4
50
0.04
5
0.002
0.5
0.002
4
0.04
5
----0.01
2
0.01
2
tro
Analyte
d
Chromium, Hexavalent
Hardness, Total
Hardness, Total
Iron, Ferrous
Mercury
Phosphorus, Total & o-PO4
Matrix & Reporting Limits
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Boron
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Lithium
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Molybdenum
Nickel
Phosphorus
Potassium
Selenium
Silicon
Silver
Sodium
Strontium
Thallium
Tin
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zinc
Matrix & Reporting Limits
AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.01
2.5
10
--2
--0.050
--0.0002
0.1
0.025
---
Analyte
lle
Method
METALS
SM 3500 Cr-B & 7196A
SM2340B
SM2340C
SM 3500 Fe-B
245.1 /7470/7471
EPA 365.3 / SM 4500-P E
Page 78 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Analyte
TPH ORGANICS
Volatile LUFT
EPA 8015 & GCMS
SO (mg/kg)
50
0.5
TPH-Gasoline
from TPH-Motor Oil
TPH-Gasoline
50
10
10
50
50
50
0.5
tro
TO-15
0.1
0.05
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.5
lle
TPH-Crude Oil
TPH-Diesel
TPH-Diluent
TPH-Mineral Oil
TPH-Motor Oil
TPH-Crude Oil
Semi-Volatile
EPA 8015 / LUFT
Semi-Volatile
GCMS / LUFT
(where different
8015)
AQ (μg/L)
d
EPA Method
50
AIR (ppbv)
200
TPH-Gasoline
U
524.2 / 624 / 8260B
DW (μg/L)
Methanol
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes (total)
Methyl-t-butyl ether (MtBE)
nc
EPA 8021
Analyte
on
EPA Method
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Volatile LUFT
EPA 8015 & GCMS
EPA 8015
Total THM
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
n-Butylbenzene
sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
AQ (μg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
50
0.5
1000
5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
Page 79 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
AQ (μg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
1
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
0.5
0.005
d
Chloromethane
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
Dibromomethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,1-Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,3-Dichloropropene (Total)
Ethylbenzene
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
4-Isopropyl Toluene
Methylene chloride
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene (TCE)
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
Vinyl chloride
DW (μg/L)
0.5
0.5
0.5
lle
Analyte
U
nc
on
tro
EPA Method
VOLATILE ORGANICS
524.2 / 624 / 8260B
(continued)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
Page 80 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
t-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)
t-Butyl alcohol (TBA)
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
Ethanol (EtOH)
Ethyl t-Butyl Ether (EtBE)
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Allyl Chloride
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon Disulfide
Chloroprene
Ethyl Methacrylate
2-Hexanone
Iodomethane
Isobutyl Alcohol
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)
Methyl Methacrylate
2-Propanol
Propionitrile
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoromethane
(Freon 113)
Vinyl Acetate
AQ (μg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.5
0.5
5
0.5
AQ (μg/L)
0.5
10
0.5
500
0.5
0.5
0.005
SO (mg/kg)
0.005
0.025
0.005
5
0.005
0.005
5
100
10
10
10
10
2
20
10
10
5
100
10
30
10
150
0.05
10
5
0.5
5
1
2
20
0.1
0.005
0.1
1
2
0.5
0.005
2
0.005
U
nc
on
tro
Appendix & Specialty
m,p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Xylenes (Total)
DW (μg/L)
0.5
0.5
0.5
DW (μg/L)
0.5
2
0.5
d
6 Oxygenates (8260)
Analyte
lle
EPA Method
VOLATILE ORGANICS
524.2 / 624 / 8260B
(continued)
Page 81 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Gasoline (C4 – C12)
Acetone
Benzene
Benzyl chloride
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
1,3-Butadiene
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Cyclohexane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)
1,1-Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoroethane
(Freon 114)
Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)
1,4-Dioxane
Ethanol
Ethyl Acetate
Ethylbenzene
Ethyl t-Butyl Ether (EtBE)
4-Ethyltoluene
Heptane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexane
2-Hexanone
Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)
Methylene chloride
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
U
nc
on
tro
lle
TO-15 Full List
AIR (ppbv)
200
Analyte
d
EPA Method
VOLATILE ORGANICS
TPH
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Page 82 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)
Naphthalene
Propylene
Styrene
t-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)
t-Butyl alcohol (TBA)
Tetrachloroethene (PCE)
Tetrahydrofuran
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA)
Trichloroethene (TCE)
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon
113)
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
AIR (ppbv)
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
d
Analyte
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
U
nc
on
tro
lle
EPA Method
VOLATILE ORGANICS
TO-15 Full List
(continued)
Page 83 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Aniline
Anthracene
Azobenzene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Benzoic acid
Benzyl alcohol
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Butyl benzyl phthalate
4-Chloroaniline
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butyl phthalate
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
d
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
10
10
5
5
10
10
10
10
U
nc
on
tro
EPA 625 / 8270C
AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.1
50
0.05
10
0.02
10
0.1
50
0.1
50
0.5
50
0.5
50
lle
EPA Method
Analyte
TPH-Crude Oil
TPH-Diesel
EPA 8015 / LUFT
TPH-Diluent
TPH-Mineral Oil
TPH-Motor Oil
GCMS / LUFT
TPH-Crude Oil
(where different from 8015) TPH-Motor Oil
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Page 84 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
lle
d
AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
10
0.1
5
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.25
10
0.1
5
0.1
5
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
5
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
0.1
10
10
U
nc
on
tro
EPA Method
Analyte
EPA 625 / 8270C
Hexachlorobutadiene
(continued)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
Naphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Carbazole
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2-Methylphenol
3 & 4-Methylphenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Specialty 8270
Creosote
PNA-SIM
EPA 8270M
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
Benzo (a) pyrene
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
Chrysene
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.005
0.01
Page 85 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
1,4-Dioxane
Analyte
Pesticides
608 / 8081A
alpha-BHC
alpha-Chlordane
Aldrin
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Endrin Ketone
gamma-BHC
gamma-Chlordane
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Methoxychlor
Chlordane, Technical
Toxaphene
nc
on
tro
EPA Method
lle
EPA 1625M
AQ (mg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.005
0.1
0.005
AQ (μg/L)
1
AQ (μg/L)
SO (mg/kg)
Prod (mg/kg)
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.1
0.003
0.9
0.5
0.02
6
0.5
0.02
6
d
EPA Method
Analyte
PNA-SIM (continued)
Fluoranthene
EPA 8270M
Fluorene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
U
PCBs
608 / 8082
PCB-1016
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1242
PCB-1248
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Page 86 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX F – QC DATA EVALUATION FLOWCHARTS
Evaluation of Initial Calibration
EVALUATION OF INITIAL CALIBRATION
lle
d
Analyze calibration blank and
calibration standards
tro
Calculate either the correlation
coefficients or the average
response factors for each
analyte.
Does the correlation coefficient
or the average response factor
meet method specified limits?
Isolate and correct the source of
the non-linearity.
on
Yes
No
nc
Analyze initial calibration
verification (ICV) standard and
calculate % recoveries or %D of
average response factors for
each analyte.
U
Is the % recovery or %D data
within method specified limits?
No
No
Yes
Isolate and correct ICV recovery
problem then reanalyze ICV.
Yes
Begin analysis of method blanks,
samples and QC spikes
Page 87 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
APPENDIX F – QC DATA EVALUATION FLOWCHARTS (CONT.)
Evaluation of Continuing
Calibration
EVALUATION
OF CONTINUING CALIBRATION
on
Yes
the problem.
Yes
Reanalyze the CCV and
each analyte.
No
Reanalyze CCV and/or
reanalyze calibration standards
to generate a new calibration
curve. Then reanalyze ICV.
U
nc
Continue sample analysis.
lle
No
tro
d
Analyze continuing calibration
verification (CCV) standard and
each analyte.
Page 88 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation of Method Blank and Instrument Blank Results
EVALUATION OF METHOD BLANK AND INSTRUMENT BLANK RESULTS
d
Are method blank and/or
instrument blank results less
than the RL (Reporting Limit) for
a target analyte?
lle
Reanalyze blanks and samples
as appropriate.
Yes
No
tro
Isolate and remove the source of
the contamination.
on
Yes
Has this contamination affected
the sample results? (Is the
blank response >5% of any
related sample response?)
Report blank results with an
appropriate footnote.
U
nc
Report blank results as ND (not
detected).
No
Page 89 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation of Sample
Results for
Analytes
EVALUATION
OF SInorganic
AMPLE RESULTS
FOR INORGANICS ANALYTES
lle
d
Is the appearance of the sample
or the prepared sample normal?
No
Is the sample result within
the calibration range?
No
Is the precision of the
duplicate analysis within
method-specified limits?
nc
Yes
Is the matrix spike
recovery within method
specified limits?
Yes
U
Dilute sample to midrange and re-analyze.
on
Yes
tro
Consider filtering or diluting the
sample before analysis. (If diluted,
raise the RL appropriately.)
Yes
Report the results.
No
Reanalyze the sample
and the sample duplicate.
No
Is the post-digestion MS
recovery within methodspecified limits?
Yes
Report the results, but
qualified due to matrix
interference.
No
Consider qualifying the
sample(s) using the
method of standard
additions.
Page 90 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation of Sample
Results for Organic
Analyses
EVALUATION
OF SAMPLE
RESULTS FOR ORGANIC ANALYSES
For GC/MS analyses, are
samples analyzed within the
12-Hour Tune window?
Reanalyze outlying samples.
d
No
Review peak integration and
retention limits.
No
No
Yes
Correct problem and
reanalyze appropriate
samples.
No
Yes
Correct problem and
reanalyze appropriate
samples.
Has this change affected
sample results?
tro
Are retention times consistent
and within retention time
windows (0.06 RRT units for
GC/MS methods?
lle
Yes
Are internal standard areas
within method-specified limits?
Yes
on
Are surrogate recoveries within
method-specified or laboratoryestablished control limits?
No
Refer to flowchart for
evaluation of surrogate
recoveries.
Yes
nc
Are target analyte
concentrations within the initial
calibration range?
U
Report the results.
Dilute samples to mid-range
and reanalyze.
Yes
Are obvious matrix
interferences present?
Yes
Cleanup the sample using the
appropriate technique(s) and
reanalyze using the same or
modified procedure.
No
If there are positive results,
are they confirmed in the
conformational analysis?
(Req’d for GC/PID/ECD only;
MS is considered
confirmatory.)
Yes
No
Adjust RL values to reflect any
changes (dilutions, etc.) in the
modified analytical procedure.
No
Report the negative confirmation
results as Not Detected (ND).
Page 91 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation of Surrogate Compound Recoveries
EVALUATION OF SURROGATE COMPOUND RECOVERIES
Yes
Report the results.
Yes
Reanalyze the affected samples
to confirm the interference.
No
No
tro
Is there matrix interference
present for any analyte?
lle
Are the surrogate % recoveries
within method-specifies or labestablished control limits?
d
Calculate surrogate % recoveries
for each sample batch.
Yes
on
Are all the surrogate recoveries
above the upper limit and the
sample result(s) all ND?
No
Did the sample produce an
emulsion, or did a precipitate
form during the extraction step?
Yes
Report the results qualified with
appropriate footnote.
nc
No
U
Reanalyze the sample(s) and
calculate the surrogate
%recoveries.
Are the surrogate % recoveries
within method-specifies or labestablished control limits?
No
Report the results from the
second analysis.
Page 92 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
EVALUATION OF LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & DUPLICATE (LCS/LCSD)
Analyze LCS (& LCSD as
appropriate).
Yes
No
No
on
Are RPD values within methodspecified or laboratoryestablished control limits?
Yes
No
Are % recovery & RPD values
within method-specified or
laboratory-established control
limits?
Yes
Reanalyze (or re-extract &
reanalyze) all associated
samples.
U
nc
Report LCS results.
the problem. Reanalyze
LCS/LCSD.
tro
Are % recovery data within
method-specified or laboratoryestablished control limits?
lle
d
Evaluation of Laboratory Quality Control Sample & Duplicate
Page 93 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation of Matrix Spike Recoveries
EVALUATION OF MATRIX SPIKE & DUPLICATE (MS/MSD) RECOVERIES
Yes
Report the results.
Report results with a qualifier
indicating that native sample
analyte levels are too high to
reflect any degree of accuracy.
tro
No
lle
Is the matrix spike % recovery
data within method-specified or
lab-established control limits?
d
Calculate % recoveries of all
matrix spike analytes in the MS
& MSD samples.
Is the matrix spike level at least
five times the level of a spike
analyte found in the un-spiked
sample?
No
Yes
Yes
Reanalyze the sample
and its MS/MSD.
Are any of the matrix-spiked
analytes positive detections
(above RL) in the samples?
on
Subtract related
sample contribution.
nc
No
U
Are there matrix interferences
present?
Dilute if necessary and
reanalyze.
Yes
Report the results with a
qualifier indicating that matrix
interference is present.
No
Are the results for the associated
LCS within control limits?
or
Yes
Report the results qualified
with an appropriate footnote.
No
Reanalyze all the samples and
the matrix spiked sample in the
batch.
Page 94 of 94
Rev 18 – JULY 2014
O I L F I E L D
&
I N C.
Evaluation
ofUPLICATE
Duplicate
Sample(DUP)
and/orAND
Matrix
Results PRECISION
EVALUATION
OF D
SAMPLE
/OR Spike
MS DDuplicate
UPLICATE (MSD)
No
Is the sample homogenous?
No
on
Yes
lle
Yes
Report the results.
tro
Is the RPD data within methodspecified or lab-established
control limits?
d
Calculate the relative
%difference (RPD) for duplicate
sample results or for duplicate
matrix spike results.
Are the sample results less than
five times the RL?
Yes
qualifier concerning the nonhomogenous nature of the
sample.
footnote indicating that the high
RPD is due to the results being
near the PQL.
No
U
nc
Reanalyze the duplicates or
duplicate matrix spikes.
If reanalysis also produces
similar out-of-control results,
report the results qualified with
an appropriate footnote.

Q S M

Transcription

Similar documents

a folding CD cover, with complete notes and images.

Nivaldo Tro Professor of Chemistry Westmont College, Santa

No. 5 - five years of living on Santa Maria Island

10x10 Oct 11 Newsline Ad Santa`s Arrival

1947

Student`s Worksheet Christmas One

AWESOME VILLA IN SANTA PONSA

www.hetronic.com Radio Remote Control Systems for Industrial

Prep School magazine

La Fonda on the Plaza