Development of an Irradiated Rodent Model to Study Flap Revascularization

Transcription

Development of an Irradiated Rodent Model to Study Flap Revascularization
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Development of an Irradiated Rodent Model
to Study Flap Revascularization
Patrick C. Angelos, MD; Kate E. McCarn, MD; Shelley R. Winn, PhD; Tamer Ghanem, MD;
Darryl S. Kaurin, PhD; John Holland, MD; Mark K. Wax, MD
Objective: To develop a reproducible free-flap animal
model to study the effects of irradiation on flap revascularization.
Design: After institutional animal care and use committee review and approval, 16 Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to either 23- or 40-Gy electron beam irradiation to
their ventral abdominal wall. After a recovery period, the
animals then underwent a ventral fasciocutaneous flap
pedicled on the inferior epigastric vessels with subsequent pedicle ligation at 10 days. An additional 16 rats were
subjected to 40 Gy of irradiation and underwent pedicle
ligation at 8 or 14 days postoperatively to determine if time
to pedicle ligation affected percentage of flap viability.
40 Gy of irradiation had a significantly lower average percentage of flap viability (56.9%) than animals receiving
23 Gy (90.9%) (P ⬍.001). Furthermore, the longer duration until pedicle ligation after 40 Gy of irradiation led
to significant increases in flap viability (P⬍.001 for analysis of variance).
Conclusions: This animal model establishes that external beam irradiation at a total dose of 40 Gy leads to significantly delayed flap revascularization over time compared with 23-Gy irradiation. This model will allow future
investigators to study novel therapies to improve healing and flap revascularization.
Results: Rats receiving 23 Gy of irradiation had the same
viability as rats undergoing no radiation. Rats receiving
H
Author Affiliations:
Departments of
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck
Surgery (Drs Angelos, McCarn,
Winn, Ghanem, and Wax) and
Radiation Oncology
(Drs Kaurin and Holland),
Oregon Health & Science
University, Portland.
Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12(2):119-122
EAD AND NECK CANCERS
affect critical physiologic structures, and
given the vital functions
of these structures and
the resultant morbidity of surgery, organ
preservation treatment strategies have been
devised. These treatments are based on primary irradiation or a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Unfortunately, salvage surgery after irradiation
failure in advanced cancers may be fraught
with complications. These complications
may be due to the effect of irradiation on
the host microvasculature, which ultimately affects wound healing. The effects
of radiation therapy on the skin have been
well described and are related to blood vessel changes, which can be observed clinically as pallor and telangiectasia and pathologically as a decrease in capillary density
and diameter.1
While free flaps or pedicled flaps may
have adequate blood supply to survive, the
irradiation effects on the host wound bed
may delay flap incorporation and revascularization between the flap and host tis-
(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 12 (NO. 2), MAR/APR 2010
119
sue. Although free tissue transfer techniques offer a high success rate, wound
complications often occur due to this delay in healing between the flap and its bed.
Therefore, to study the effects of irradiation on host tissues, it is imperative that
animal models of irradiated tissue(s) are
established in a clinically relevant model
to devise treatment strategies to improve
wound healing in an irradiated field. Researchers have extensively investigated the
rat ventral fasciocutaneous flap model.2-5
The blood supply to this fasciocutaneous
flap is based on the inferior epigastric artery and vein as shown in Figure 1. The
objective of this study was to use the rat
ventral fasciocutaneous flap model to study
the effects of irradiation on wound healing and flap revascularization.
METHODS
After institutional animal care and use committee review and approval,16 male SpragueDawley rats were subjected to either 23- or
40-Gy (8 animals at each dose) electron beam
irradiation to their ventral abdominal wall. (To
WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/ on 10/28/2014
A
B
Rat acclimation, 7 days
(N = 32)
C
Radiation treatment,
total dose, 23 Gy
Radiation treatment,
total dose, 40 Gy
Recovery, 28 days
Recovery, 28 days
Flap procedure and
2-hour ischemia time
Flap procedure and
2-hour ischemia time
Pedicle ligation procedure
at postflap day noted
Pedicle ligation procedure
at postflap day noted
D
Day 10
(N = 8)
Day 8
(N = 8)
Animals killed on post–ligation
procedure day 5 followed by
revascularization assessment
Day 10
(N = 8)
Day 14
(N = 8)
Animals killed on post–ligation
procedure day 5 followed by
revascularization assessment
Figure 2. Study procedures overview.
Figure 1. The rat ventral fasciocutaneous flap model, with blood supply
based on the inferior epigastric artery and vein. A, A 3 ⫻ 6-cm ventral
fasciocutaneous flap is outlined. B, Flap raised, demonstrating inferior
epigastric pedicle. C, Vascular clip occluding inferior epigastric pedicle.
D, flap inset and closure.
convert grays to rads, multiply by 100.) After a ventral fasciocutaneous flap procedure, pedicle ligation was performed 10
days postoperatively. Based on preliminary data, 10 days was
believed to be an adequate time frame to capture the revascularization process. An additional 16 animals were subjected to
40 Gy of irradiation and underwent pedicle ligation at 8 or 14
days to determine if time to pedicle ligation affects percentage
of flap viability (Figure 2).
IRRADIATION PROTOCOL
All animals underwent general anesthesia using isoflurane inhalation during irradiation. Once adequacy of anesthesia was
confirmed, rats were placed in the supine position on the irradiation table. A lead shield was placed to isolate the templated flap region. A 6-MeV electron beam accelerator (Varian
Clinac 2100EX; Varian Medical Systems Inc, Palo Alto, California) was used to irradiate the animals. A bolus material of 2
cm on top of the abdomen was used to improve radiation dose
distribution. For animals receiving 23 Gy, irradiation was administered in 3 divided doses of 766 cGy over 5 days. For animals receiving 40 Gy, irradiation was administered in 5 divided doses of 800 cGy over 10 days.
VENTRAL FASCIOCUTANEOUS
FLAP PROCEDURE
After a recovery period of 28 days post irradiation, the animals
underwent a ventral fasciocutaneous flap procedure. A ventral 3⫻6-cm fasciocutaneous flap was raised, based on the in-
ferior epigastric artery and vein (Figure 1B). Following elevation of the flap, a 20-g Heifitz clip was applied to the vascular
pedicle for 2 hours to simulate ischemic time during freetissue transfer (Figure 1C). During this ischemic time, the flap
was inset, and the animals were awakened from anesthesia
(Figure 1D). At the end of the 2-hour period of ischemia, the
animals were briefly re-anesthetized, the corner of the flap elevated, the occluding clip removed, and the wound reapproximated. The animals were monitored daily for signs of pain and
discomfort and treated with analgesics as needed. They then
underwent ligation of the inferior epigastric vein and artery at
the study intervals.
EVALUATION OF
FLAP REVASCULARIZATION
Percentage of flap viability was evaluated on postligation procedure day 5 as a marker for flap revascularization. Viable flap
area was characterized by warm, pink, hair-bearing skin. Nonviable flap area was characterized by dry, hard, hairless eschar. Animals were placed under general anesthesia, and standardized digital photographs of the ventral flap were taken. Three
qualified blinded observers were used to delineate viable and
nonviable areas by tracing template etchings. Then cutouts of
viable tissue from the template were weighed to express a percentage of the total template weight, effectively giving the area
percentage of viable flap tissue. Animals were excluded for evaluation if they developed a clinically significant hematoma, seroma, or infection.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
For establishing and reproducing the irradiated rat ventral flap
fasciocutaneous model, a power analysis was performed using
our preliminary data and indicated that a minimum of 7 animals for each group would be required to complete a meaningful statistical analysis of flap viability to obtain a P value of
⬍.05 of significance using an analysis of variance. Analysis of
variance with Tukey post hoc tests of significance for multiple
(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 12 (NO. 2), MAR/APR 2010
120
WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/ on 10/28/2014
100
80
23 Gy at day 10
40 Gy at day 8
40 Gy at day 10
40 Gy at day 14
91 (10.2)
90
73.1
70
Flap Survival, Mean %
73 (21.7)
70
57 (18.1)
60
50
39 (18.5)
40
Flap Viability, Mean %
60
80
56.9
50
40
39.2
30
20
30
10
20
0
0
2
4
10
0
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pedicle Ligation Day
N=8
N=8
N=7
N=7
Study Group
Figure 3. Mean (SD) percentages of flap viability by group. The numbers
placed inside the tops of the bars are the standard deviations.
comparisons were used to analyze the difference in percentage of flap viability between groups.
RESULTS
Rats receiving a 40-Gy total dose of irradiation had a significantly lower average flap viability (56.9%) than animals receiving 23 Gy (90.9%) when pedicle ligation was
performed 10 days postoperatively (P⬍.001) (Figure 3).
However, we found that longer duration between pedicle
ligation and 40-Gy total dose of irradiation led to significant increases in flap viability (Figure 4). The percentages of flap alive at 8, 10, and 14 days were 39.25%,
56.9%, and 73.1%, respectively (P ⬍.001 for analysis of
variance). Two animals had seromas and were excluded
from analysis, each from the 40-Gy group, one at day 10,
the other at day 14.
COMMENT
Reconstruction after salvage surgery for failed radiation
or chemoradiation therapy is a difficult challenge with a
high rate of postoperative complications. Long-term viability and healing of a reconstructive flap is not only dependent on the vascular pedicle but also on revascularization from the surrounding host tissue. It has been shown
that previous radiation therapy leads to microvascular compromise in the host tissue manifesting as excessive fibrosis, endothelial cell damage, and reduced cellular turnover.6,7 Therefore, for a reconstructive flap to incorporate
with the host tissue, revascularization must occur from the
wound bed and surrounding tissue. This process must also
occur from the flap tissue into the host tissue, effectively
re-establishing improved microvasculature throughout the
previously compromised wound bed.
The present project was undertaken to develop an animal model to study the effects of irradiation on wound
healing and flap revascularization. In a previous study,
animals receiving a total dose of 23 Gy of irradiation did
Figure 4. Percentage of flap viability with increasing time to pedicle ligation.
not have a significant difference in average flap revascularization compared with nonirradiated animals.8 To better mimic the clinical situation of radiation effects on host
tissue, we evaluated an increased radiation dose to a total
of 40 Gy. In the present study, we showed that external
beam irradiation at a total dose of 40 Gy leads to significantly reduced revascularization compared with a dose
of 23 Gy. This correlates with previous studies that have
shown that irradiation to a total dose of 30 to 40 Gy was
adequate to produce a compromised host bed mimicking the clinical situation.9,10
Furthermore, we demonstrated that increasing the duration until pedicle ligation from 8 to 10 to 14 days after
administration of 40-Gy irradiation led to significant increases in revascularization. We hypothesize that this observed phenomenon correlates with revascularization from
the surrounding tissue. Tsur et al11 studied neovascularization of axial skin flaps in rats and found that pedicle ligation beyond 6 days did not produce total flap necrosis.
They found that adequate neovascularization for flap survival was demonstrated as arising from both the wound
edges and the bed, although those from the bed appeared
to be of greater importance. Previous studies of the effects
of celecoxib by Jorgensen et al3 and Wax et al5 did not demonstrate a significant difference in flap viability prior to 8
days of pedicle ligation. However, in a study by Clarke et
al12 of delayed neovascularization in free skin flap transfer
to irradiated beds in rats, significantly less tissue survived
the loss of the complete vascular pedicle at the second to
fourth days following flap creation in rats with an irradiated bed. Later survival was not different from controls.
In clinical correlation, there have been case reports
describing survival of free tissue transfer grafts after pedicle
ligation as early as 8 to 12 days.13-15 Enajat et al14 set out
to answer the question of how long fasciocutaneous flaps
are dependent on their vascular pedicles. The researchers reported a unique case in which the pedicle of a superficial inferior epigastric artery flap for breast reconstruction was avulsed 11 days postoperatively, with the
flap surviving on its inferior wound edge alone. In a retrospective review, Salgado et al15 studied the effects of
late loss of arterial inflow on free-flap survival. They concluded that the timing of late loss of arterial inflow does
(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 12 (NO. 2), MAR/APR 2010
121
WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/ on 10/28/2014
not appear to be the primary determinant of free-tissue
survival. The condition and quality of the recipient site
plays a large role in survival of these flaps. Ischemic, irradiated, and scarred beds are inadequate to provide late
flap neovascularization compared with healthy recipient sites.
The limitations of this study include the small number of animals, just above the threshold to be powered.
Other limitations are centered on mimicking the clinical situation. The time between irradiation and surgery
may vary in clinical practice and may be much longer than
a month, which may have an effect on outcomes. Also it
is rare that the graft and host tissue are both irradiated,
as was this case in this model, which may affect the revascularization potential of the flap. Despite these limitations, we believe that this irradiated rat flap model is
well suited to allow further study of novel therapies to
improve wound healing, flap revascularization, and overall flap viability and survival with or without disruption
of the vascular pedicle.
Accepted for Publication: September 21, 2009.
Correspondence: Patrick C. Angelos, MD, Department
of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon
Health & Science University, Mail Code PV01, 3181 SW
Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 29239 (angelosp
@ohsu.edu).
Author Contributions: Study concept and design: Angelos, Winn, Ghanem, Kaurin, Holland, and Wax. Acquisition of data: Angelos, McCarn, Winn, Ghanem, Kaurin, and Holland. Analysis and interpretation of data:
Angelos, Kaurin, and Wax. Drafting of the manuscript: Angelos. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Angelos, McCarn, Winn, Ghanem, Kaurin, Holland, and Wax. Statistical analysis: Angelos.
Obtained funding: Angelos and Wax. Administrative, technical, and material support: Angelos, McCarn, Winn, Kaurin, and Wax. Study supervision: Winn, Ghanem, Holland, and Wax.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
REFERENCES
1. Doll C, Durand R, Grulkey W, Sayer S, Olivotto I. Functional assessment of cutaneous microvasculature after radiation. Radiother Oncol. 1999;51(1):6770.
2. Belmont MJ, Marabelle N, Mang TS, Hall R, Wax MK. Effect of photodynamic
therapy on revascularization of fasciocutaneous flaps. Laryngoscope. 2000;
110(6):942-945.
3. Jorgensen S, Bascom DA, Partsafas A, Wax MK. The effect of 2 sealants (FloSeal
and Tisseel) on fasciocutaneous flap revascularization. Arch Facial Plast Surg.
2003;5(5):399-402.
4. McKnight CD, Winn SR, Gong X, Hansen JE, Wax MK. Revascularization of rat
fasciocutaneous flap using CROSSEAL with VEGF protein or plasmid DNA expressing VEGF. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(2):245-249.
5. Wax MK, Reh DD, Levack MM. Effect of celecoxib on fasciocutaneous flap survival and revascularization. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(2):120-124.
6. Denham JW, Hauer-Jensen M. The radiotherapeutic injury: a complex “wound.”
Radiother Oncol. 2002;63(2):129-145.
7. Dormand EL, Banwell PE, Goodacre TE. Radiotherapy and wound healing. Int
Wound J. 2005;2(2):112-127.
8. McCarn KE. A rodent model to study the effects of tissue irradiation on flap survival and revascularization. Paper presented at: the American Academy of Facial
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Annual Meeting; September 18-21, 2008; Chicago, Illinois.
9. Richter GT, Bowen T III, Boerma M, Fan CY, Hauer-Jensen M, Vural E. Impact of
vascular endothelial growth factor on skin graft survival in irradiated rats. Arch
Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(2):110-113.
10. Schultze-Mosgau S, Wehrhan F, Rödel F, Amann K, Radespiel-Tröger M, Grabenbauer GG. Improved free vascular graft survival in an irradiated surgical site
following topical application of rVEGF. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57
(3):803-812.
11. Tsur H, Daniller A, Strauch B. Neovascularization of skin flaps: route and timing.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980;66(1):85-90.
12. Clarke HM, Howard CR, Pynn BR, McKee NH. Delayed neovascularization in free
skin flap transfer to irradiated beds in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(4):
560-564.
13. Bonawitz S, Gosain AK, Matloub HS, Larson DL. Revascularization of free mandibular reconstruction after early emergency arterial ligation. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;
33(5):552-556.
14. Enajat M, Rozen WM, Whitaker IS, Audolfsson T, Acosta R. How long are fasciocutaneous flaps dependant on their vascular pedicle: a unique case of SIEA
flap survival [published online May 13, 2009]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg.
doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.03.009.
15. Salgado CJ, Smith A, Kim S, et al. Effects of late loss of arterial inflow on free
flap survival. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;18(7):579-584.
Announcement
Visit www.archfacial.com. As an individual subscriber
you can organize articles you want to bookmark using
My Folder and personalize the organization of My Folder
using folders you create. You also can save searches for
easy updating. You can use My Folder to organize links
to articles from all 10 JAMA & Archives Journals.
(REPRINTED) ARCH FACIAL PLAST SURG/ VOL 12 (NO. 2), MAR/APR 2010
122
WWW.ARCHFACIAL.COM
©2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Downloaded From: http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/ on 10/28/2014