Quantitative proteome and transcriptome changes
Transcription
Quantitative proteome and transcriptome changes
Max-Planck-Institut fϋr Immunobiologie Abteilung fϋr Zelluläre und Molekulare Immunologie Freiburg im Breisgau Quantitative proteome and transcriptome changes studied in an in vitro erythroid differentiation system Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät fϋr Biologie der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im Breisgau Vorgelegt 2009 Von Ravi Kumar Krovvidi Geboren in Hyderabad, Indien Dekan der Fakultät: Promotionsvorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Ad Aertsen Prof. Dr. Eberhard Schäfer Betreuer der Arbeit: Referent: Dr. Gerhard Mittler Prof. Dr. Rudolf Grosschedl Datum: 08 October 2009 Manuscript in preparation: Krovvidi, R., Li, Y., Nerz, G. and Mittler, G. SILAC-based quantitative proteomic study of erythroid differentiation in an in vitro cellular model system. With all due respect to my parents & All competent teachers in my life Abbreviations Abbreviations aa BFU (E) CFU-E DMSO EDTA FACS FCS Fig FDR H1 HMBA kDa LC MS MS Me2SO MEL min mRNA M Me2SO MGF OD PAGE PCR PBS RT RT-PCR RPLC SDS SFFV TMB µM Amino acid Burst-forming unit (erythrocyte) Colony forming unit erythrocyte Dimethyl Sulfoxide Ethylenediamine-tetraacetate Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting Fetal Calf Serum Figure False discovery rate Histone 1 Hexamethylene bisacetamide Kilo Dalton Liquid Chromatography coupled Mass Spectrometry Mass Spectrometry Dimethyl Sulfoxide Murine erythroleukemia minutes messenger RNA molar Dimethyl Sulfoxide Mascot Generic File Optical Density Poly Acryl amide Gel Electrophoresis Polymerase Chain Reaction Phosphate buffered saline Reverse transcriptase reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction Reverse-Phase Liquid Chromatography Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Spleen focus forming virus Tetramethyl Benzidine micromolar Contents Contents 1. Summary .................................................................................... ........ 1 2. Introduction 1. 0 Erythrocyte Differentiation 1.0.1 Erythroleukemia ...................................................................... 3 1.0.2 Red blood cell development in mice........................................ 3 1.0.3 Human Erythropoiesis.............................................................. 4 1.1 MEL cell system 1.1.1 Introduction............................................................................. 5 1.1.2 MEL cell maintenance and differentiation................................. 6 1.1.3 MEL cell differentiation.............................................................. 7 1.2 Quantitative Proteomics 1.2.1 Relevance of quantitative proteomics............................................... 8 1.2.2 Overview of quantitative proteomics methods........................ .9 1.2.3 SILAC based quantitative proteomics..................................... 12 1.2.4 Principle of SILAC................................................................... 12 1.2.5 Advantages of SILAC labeling ................................................. 14 1.2.6 Limitations of SILAC................................................................ 14 1.3 Mass spectrometry 1.3.1 MS based Proteomics.............................................................. 14 1.3.2 Mass spectrometers and Hybrid MS FTICR............................ 15 1.3.3 Linear-ion-trap-Fourier transform-ion cyclotron mass spectrometer............................................................................ 16 1.3.4 3D ion traps……………………………………………………………… 17 1.3.5 2D ion traps (Finnigan LTQ)……………………………………... 19 1.3.6 Principle of FTICR-MS……………………………………………. 21 1.3.7 Strengths of FTICR-MS in proteomics applications…………… 22 1.4 Sample preparation for proteomics analysis 1.4.1 Ingel GeLC-MS…………………………………………………….. 23 1.4.2 Peptide IEF…………………………………………………………..23 1.4.2.1 Ettan TM IPGPhor TM 3 IEF……………………………………...23 1.4.2.2 OFFGEL Fractionation………………………………………….25 Contents 1.4.3 Insolution protein digestions……………………………………….26 1.4.4 Stage Tips: stop-and-go-extraction tips…………………………………26 1.5 Bioinformatics analysis / Tools 1.5.1 Peak list generation……………………………………………. 27 1.5.2 MGF file redactor……………………………………………….. 27 1.5.3 Mascot search engine ………………………….………………28 1.5.4 MSQuant…………………………………………………………. 28 1.5.5 Max Quant……………………………………………………….. 29 3. Aim of studies …………………………………………………………………31 4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Chemicals…………………………………………………………….. 32 4.2 Technical equipments……………………………………………….. 34 4.3 Cell Culture Reagents………………………………………………..36 4.4 Kits……………………………………………………………………. 36 4.5 Real-time PCR primers and probes……………………………….. 36 4.6 SDS-PAGE and Western…………………………………………….37 4.7 Peptide OFFGel Fractionation……………………………………… 38 Methods 4.8 Cell Culture…………………………………………………………… 39 4.9 TMB assay: Tetramethyl Benzidine assay………………………..39 5.0 Quantification of DNA and RNA……………………………………. 39 5.1 Preparation of total RNA and reverse transcription ………………39 5.2 Quantitative real time PCR…………………………………………..40 5.3 SDS-PAGE…………………………………………………………….41 5.4 Coomassie staining…………………………………………………...41 5.5 Silver staining………………………………………………………….41 5.6 Western blot and immunodetection………………………………....42 5.7 SDS-PAGE protein separation and In-Gel…………….……. ….....42 digestion of MEL Protein 5.8 Sub Cellular Fractionations 5.8.2 Mitochondrial Fractionation………………………………………. 43 5.8.3 Cytosol Fractionation……………………………………………………44 Contents 5.8.4 Membrane Fractionation………………………………………………..44 5.9 Peptide OffGel Separation………………………………………………45 6.0 Nanoflow LC-MS/MS……………………………………………………….46 6.1 MitoTracker ® staining………………………………………………........47 6.2 FACS Staining for Mitochondria…………………………………………47 6.3 Peak list generation………………………………………………………..48 6.4 MGF Combiner………………………………………………………………..48 6.5 Mascot search engine………………………………………………………..48 6.6 MSQuant………………………………………………………………………48 6.7 MaxQuant……………………………………………………………………..50 Results 6. 0 Results: 6.1.0 MEL cells as an in vitro model system for Murine…...................53 Erythroleukemia study 6.1.1 Maintenance of MEL cell lines……………………………………..54 6.1.2 DMSO Induction of erythroid differentiation of MEL cells ………54 6.1.3 SILAC labelling of MEL cells ………………………………………55 6.1.4 Assessment of SILAC labeling compatibility for MEL cell ………57 differentiation 6.1.5 RT-PCR analysis ………… ………………………………………...60 6.1.6 Forward and reverse SILAC labeling of MEL cells ………………61 6.1.7 Trimethyl Benzidine assay for estimating hemoglobin levels …...62 6.1.8 Subcellular fractionation of MEL cell proteome…………………..62 6.1.9 Mitochondrial protein analysis in MEL cell differentiation ………65 6.1.10 FACS analysis of mitotracker dye………………………………… 66 6.1.11 Mitochondrial staining using the Mitotracker dye of DMSO……. 67 induced MEL cells 6.1.12 Mitochondrial fractionation………………………………………… 68 6.1.12 (a) Building and Visualizing Pathways with Pathway Studio…………….. 70 6.1.13 Cytosol fractionation…………………………………………………73 6.1.14 Nuclear fractionation………………………………………………...75 6.1.15 Membrane fractionation……………………………………………..77 6.1.16 MEL proteome combined Dataset Quantified.……………………79 Contents 6.1.17 Comparision of nano-LC MS against 2D-Gel …………………….83 6.1.18 Histone modulations during MEL cell differentiation……………..84 6.1.19 Studies on DNA changes during the induction of erythroid …….85 differentiation by DMSO in MEL cells 6.1.20 Quantile based clustering and enrichment analysis ……………..86 6.1.21 Gene expression analysis…………………………………………...93 6.1.22 MEL Proteome Versus Transcriptome analysis…………………..95 7.0 Discussion 7.1 An overview of various protein quantification labeling strategies…...101 7.2 SILAC labeling to study global protein changes during MEL………..102 Differentiation 7.3 MEL Proteome Versus transcriptome analysis………………………..107 8.0 References……………………………………………………………….109 9.0 Acknowledgements………………………………………………………..113 10.0 Curriculum Vitae…………………………………………………………..115 Summary Summary Erythropoiesis epitomizes highly specialized cellular differentiation and gene regulation. It is regulated by the concerted actions of cytokine signaling pathways and transcription factors that function as master regulators. Posttranscriptional regulatory events have been discussed to play a significant role at the later stages of erythroid development (Weiss and dos Santos 2009). MEL (murine erythroleukemia) cells represent the most common cellular model system for dissecting the molecular processes involved in red blood cell maturation. They recapitulate part of the erythroid differentiation programme by differentiating into non-dividing hemoglobin rich cells, a stage just before the formation of reticulocytes. In the present study we used microarray analysis along with SILAC (stable isotope labeling of aminoacids in cell culture) for the quantitative encoding of the MEL cell proteome in order to monitor the changes in global gene and protein expression levels associated with red blood cell maturation (in vitro). Our combined dataset represents the first comprehensive description of the differentiation-induced-switch in the MEL-cell-gene-expression programme, both at the mRNA and protein levels. For our in-depth proteome analysis we employed subcellular fractionation along with prefractionation techniques like peptide isoelectric focusing and 1D-SDS-PAGE, in order to reduce sample complexity for the subsequent nanoscale LC-MS analysis. High mass accuracy data acquisition using a linear ion trap ion-cyclotron-resonance FT hybrid mass spectrometer (LTQFTUltra) resulted in confident identification and quantification of 3774 proteins (minimum 2 peptides matching, 1%FDR) which included known erythroid differentiation and heme biosynthesis markers. We identified 49 novel proteins that could play a potential role in erythroid differentiation among them the histone methyltransferase SUV4-20H2 that is strongly upregulated during differentiation. Proteome versus transcriptome analysis revealed 320 proteins exclusively regulated post-transcriptionally at the protein but not at the mRNA level. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis demonstrates these proteins to be mainly involved in heme-binding, transport function (mitochondria), lipid and sterol biosynthesis. GO based hierarchial clustering analysis of the quantitative proteome and transcriptome data indicated a strong correlation between proteome and 1 1 Summary transcriptome changes for several pathways, namely poryphyrin metabolism, SNARE interaction (vesicular transport), ubiquitin mediated processes, mTOR signaling and OXPHOS. 2 2 Introduction 1.0.1 Erythroleukemia Erythroleukemia is a neoplastic proliferation of erythroid and myeloid precursors of the bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. It was initially reported by Di Guglielmo in 1917 as a syndrome composed of an association of immature erythroid and myeloid elements and a disease characterized by a pure normoblastic proliferation. The new WHO classification subdivides acute erythroid-leukemias into erythroleukemia (erythroid/myeloid) and pure erythroleukemia. In simple words it can as well be defined as a cancer of the bloodforming tissues in which large numbers of immature, abnormal red blood cells are found in the blood and bone marrow. Acute erythroleukemia accounts for 3-5% of all de novo AMLs and 20-30% of secondary leukemias. It is observed to have a very rare occurrence in children. 1.0.2 Red blood cell development in mice. Hematopoiesis is a developmentally regulated and tissue-specific process. It is well established early in embryonic development and functions throughout fetal and adult life to provide a continuous supply of mature blood cells to the embryo, the fetus and adult. The primary sites of blood cell production change throughout the development in most of the vertebrates. The spleen and marrow are subsequently seeded with liver-derived cells in both mice and humans. Bone marrow hematopoiesis is sustained throughout life, with the marrow being a major blood-forming organ. The spleen functions as a lymphoid organ in humans but remains as an active site of hematopoiesis in mice throughout adulthood. The first visible sign of hematopoietic activity in the mouse embryo is the appearance of blood islands in the developing yolk sac at approximately day 7.5 of gestation. (Russell 1979). The erythroid cells within the blood islands are known as embryonic or primitive erythrocytes and differ from those found in the fetal liver and adult bone marrow in that they are large, nucleated, and produce the embryonic forms of globin. Primitive-hematopoiesis refers to erythropoiesis in the yolk sac. All lineages other than primitive erythroid and early macrophage belong to the definitive hematopoietic system. There are striking differences in the developmental 3 3 Introduction progression of the definitive erythroid lineage in the yolk sac and fetal liver. In the yolk sac, early stage precursors (BFU-E) can be detected before those representing later stages of development (CFU-E), a sequence that suggests that the lineage is establishing from an immature cell. Human Erythropoiesis Human erythropoiesis is a complex multistep process that involves the differentiation of early erythroid progenitors to mature erythrocytes. Mammalian erythropoiesis is a complex process that involves many steps, including the differentiation of early erythroid progenitors (burst-forming unitserythroid, BFU-E) via late erythroid progenitors (colony-forming unitserythroid, CFU-E), and finally morphologically recognizable erythroid precursors. Nuclear condensation is a key event in the late stages of erythropoiesis, and enucleation is the terminal step in the development of mature-erythrocytes. 4 4 Introduction 1.1 MEL cell system 1.1.1 Introduction MEL cells are obtained from mice infected with Friend retrovirus complex that includes the defective SFFV and a helper friend murine leukemia virus transformed (Ben-David, Giddens et al. 1991) blocked in the development at a stage comparable to that of erythroid-colony forming cell, the CFU-e stage Figure 1, these transformed cells are strongly impaired for erythroid cell differentiation. Friend virus consists of a complex of two retro-viruses: (1) replicative-defective spleen–focus forming virus (SFFV) and (2) a replicationcompetent, helper friend leukemia virus. These cells are characterized by two significant genetic events, inactivation of p53 and SFFV proviral insertions at the spi-1 locus which encodes the PU.1 transcription factor. They grow in suspension culture and are used to study erythroid growth and cellular differentiation mechanisms, as they retain the potential for the expression of differentiated erythroid phenotype along with indefinite cell culture passage cycles (Gauss, Kalkum et al. 1999) Figure 1: Erythroid lineage developmental stages Figure show the stages of erythroid development, hematopoietic stem cells, common myeloid progenitors, colony forming units-erythroid, early proerythroblasts that are developing into mature erythroblasts (source : Marks 1987). Red dotted box includes developments stages from CFU-E to orthochromatophilic normoblasts 5 5 Introduction 1.1.2 MEL cell maintenance and differentiation MEL cells serve as an established means of studying leukemogenesis and the regulation of erythroid gene expression. MEL cells are also helpful in predicting the effectiveness of hybrid polar compounds in inducing the differentiation of transformed cell lines and fresh human tumor cells (Rifkind, Richon et al. 1996). SAHA, suberoylanilide-hydroxamic-acid (vorinostat (Zolinza)), is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that reacts with and blocks the catalytic site of these enzymes. The discovery of SAHA emerged out from the studies carried out on DMSO induced MEL cell differentiation. SAHA has many protein targets whose structure and function are altered by acetylation, including chromatin-associated histones, nonhistone gene transcription factors and proteins involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, migration and death. In clinical trials, SAHA has shown significant anticancer activity against both hematological and solid tumors at doses well tolerated by patients. A new drug application was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for vorinostat for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (Marks and Breslow 2007) MEL cells closely mimic the molecular regulatory processes of normal red blood cell maturation and hence serve as a good model system. They recapitulate the cellular erythroid differentiation programme by differentiating into nondividing hemoglobin-rich cells of late erythroblast stage, when exposed to Me2SO or a number of other inducers (Marks, P et al 1978). 1.1.3 MEL Cell differentiation Chemically induced differentiation of MEL cells leads initially to the production of cells that are not overtly differentiated but that are irreversibly committed to differentiate and these committed cells do not essentially require a continuous exposure to these inducing agents, they work as triggering agents of cellular differentiation. Once the cells get into the commitment phase they are destined to differentiate towards the erythroid lineage and the reversal mechanisms are shutoff (Gusella and Housman 1976). Once the cells are committed to differentiate they continue proliferating for about 5-6 cell divisions before arresting in G1 stage, similar to the proliferative capacity of 6 6 Introduction normal proerythroblasts (Housman 1976). Induction is triggered at the level of the cell plasma membrane via a ca2+-mediated process and ends up at the transcriptional level in the nucleus presumably via signaling mechanisms. Induction of differentiation reduces or abrogates the cellular proliferation potential. Inducers like DMSO, HMBA trigger a multi-step process involving the activation of p21, a CDK inhibitor, and hyperphosphorylation of RB, resulting in G1 arrest in MEL cells (Macleod, Sherry et al. 1995; Zhuo, Fan et al. 1995). Induced and transformed MEL cells acquire a phenotype characterized by morphological changes like reduction in cell size, nuclear condensation, disappearance of nucleoli(Tsiftsoglou and Wong 1985), but are nonenucleated. Changes are also observed in the gene expression, protein synthesis, and metabolism. Protein synthesis is dramatically decreased. Transport of iron, synthesis of hemoglobin chains are up-regulated along with gradual cease of DNA replication, ribosome-synthesis, and overall protein production(Tsiftsoglou, Pappas et al. 2003). Heme synthetic enzymes, erythroid specific membrane proteins, suppression of rRNA synthesis occur in a coordinated manner. Heme-biosynthetic pathway in animals comprises of eight nuclear encoded enzymes, distributed over two cellular compartments including the cytosol and mitochondria. MEL differentiation involves in vitro cell cycle withdrawl followed by differentiation resulting in the expression of erythroid markers including hemoglobin and other hemoproteins. Reinitiation of MEL cell terminal differentiation appears to be controlled by an ordered program of turning off several proto-oncogene’s. MEL cells are marked in having a dysregulated expression of the proto-oncogene Spi-1/PU.1 and characterized by a loss of p53 function leading to a dysregulatoin of cell-cycle control. PU.1 is known to physically interact and antagonize the erythroid differentiation activity of the erythroid-specific transcription factor GATA-1 (Rekhtman, Radparvar et al. 1999; Stopka, Amanatullah et al. 2005). A decrease in invitro GATA-1 DNA-binding activity is reported in the extracts of MEL cells over-expressing PU.1 (Yamada, Kihara-Negishi et al. 1998). It was reported that an established co-repressor, pRB, binds to a small acidic domain in the N-terminal region of PU.1 and cooperates with PU.1 in mediating repression 7 7 Introduction of GATA-1 leading to the inhibition of erythroid differentiation (Rekhtman, Choe et al. 2003). The chemical inducers cause the down regulation of PU.1 levels leading to the release of GATA-1 repression and result in the onset of differentiation programme. Erythroid lineage commitment and differentiation is a complex process not fully understood, though several proteins like GATA-1, EKLF, CDK’s, Myc, Myb, p27, p21, transforming growth factor-β, Smad-1, Smad-4, and histone acetyl transferases have been identified and known to be critical in driving the cellular differentiation. Murine erythroleukemia serves as an excellent model system to study the cellular differentiation mechanism. Here we use SILAC based approach to quantify the global cellular proteome changes during the MEL cell differentiation programme. 1.2 Quantitative Proteomics 1.2.1 Relevance of quantitative proteomics Proteins are considered to be the working horses in cellular machinery processes. Functional genomics (using the DNA chips) based approaches are designed in high-through put manner and they decipher the information at the transcriptome level, yet most of the biological processes are controlled at the protein level. Measuring the mRNA is merely a proxy for determining the protein abundance as the steady-state levels of mature gene products are subjected to additional levels of control, therefore mRNA and protein levels are not always correlated. Animal microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression by inhibiting translation and/or by inducing degradation of target messenger RNAs, single miRNA can repress the production of hundreds of proteins (Selbach, Schwanhausser et al. 2008). Many factors apart from mRNA abundance determine the levels and activities of proteins, including regulated destruction of proteins, translational and post translational modifications. Quantitative proteomics has the potential to provide a more accurate picture of protein-directed biological processes than the information obtained by measuring the mRNA levels. Unfortunately it’s more challenging to encode the proteome than the genome. Mass spectrometry has increasingly become the method of choice for the proteome analysis. 8 8 Introduction The aim of quantitative proteomics is to obtain quantitative information about all proteins in a sample rather than just providing lists of proteins identified in a certain sample. Quantitative proteomic studies yield information about differences between samples, for example to compare samples from control and experimental states. 1.2.2 Overview of quantitative proteomics methods Intact protein quantification has been carried out for over 25 years by approaches based on 1D or more mature 2D gel electrophoresis. The approaches though “old fashioned” improvised by including more sensitive staining methods (Rabilloud 2002), large format high resolving gels (Gauss, Kalkum et al. 1999) and sample fractionation prior to 2DE, thereby offering significant advantages in resolving and investigating the abundance of several thousand proteins in a single sample. Systemic studies of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerivisae indeed revealed that typically only the most abundant proteins can be observed by this method (Gygi, Corthals et al. 2000), suggesting the limited dynamic range of 2DE-based proteomics. Liquid-chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LC-MS) approaches are used extensively in shotgun proteomics for the identification of proteins from a variety of biological systems. The information is harnessed for protein identifications and subsequent quantifications. Technical challenges associated with LC elutions and MS scan-speed limit the extent of protein quantification and currently is an unmet technical challenge Fig 2 (Bantscheff, Schirle et al. 2007) 9 9 Introduction Figure 2 Schematic representation of the extent of protein quantitation by MS based quantitative proteomics. source (Bantscheff, Schirle et al. 2007) Figure shows the schematic representation of the fraction of a proteome that can be identified or quantified by mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Cellular proteins span a wide range of expression and current mass spectrometric technologies typically sample only a fraction of all the proteins present in a sample. Due to limited data quality, only a fraction of all identified proteins can also be reliably quantified. Quantitative proteomics is multifaceted and with the rapidly developing technological advancements gives a wide variety of options for quantifications as shown in Figure 3a.Quantitative strategies involve labeling the biological sample, Figure 3b outlines the stages of sample mixing after labeling. 10 10 Introduction Figure 3a : Quantification strategies used in proteomics experiments Figure represents various quantitative proteomics approaches along with their salient features 11 11 Introduction Figure 3 b: Outline of various stages of stable isotope labels in quantitative labeling approaches (Bantscheff, Schirle et al. 2007) Figure shows the common quantitative mass spectrometry workflows. Boxes in blue and yellow represent two experimental conditions. Horizontal lines indicate when samples are combined. Dashed lines indicate points at which experimental variation and thus quantification errors can occur. 1.2.3 SILAC based quantitative proteomics SILAC (stable isotope labeling of aminoacids in cell culture) is a versatile labelling tool which involves growing two populations of cells, one in a medium that contains a ‘light’ (normal) aminoacid and other in a medium containing a ‘heavy’ amino acid. The heavy aminoacid contains 2H instead of H, 13C instead of 12C, or 15N instead of 14N. 1.2.4 Principle of SILAC Cells differentially labeled by growing them in light medium with normal lysine (Lysine-0, green color) or medium with heavy lysine (Lysine-6, red color). Figure 4. Complete metabolic incorporation of the labeled amino acids into the 12 12 Introduction proteins takes place after five cell doublings. The labeled amino acids are stable during the metabolic cycles and do not interfere with biological processes but are “encoded into the proteome”. Arginine when present at high levels in the media is known to convert to proline and this is overcome by monitoring the levels of L-proline to render complete MS compatibility (Bendall, Hughes et al. 2008). SILAC labelling results in a mass shift between the labelled and non-labelled peptides. This mass shift can be detected by a mass spectrometer as indicated by the depicted mass spectra. When both samples are combined, the ratio of peak intensities in the mass spectrum reflects the relative protein abundance. Figure 4 SILAC based experiment schematics (source Ong, S.E., and Mann, M) Figure shows SILAC experiment design, light dish indicating in green color represents the cells cultured in light lysine and the cells in red colored dish are cultured in labeld lysine. After 5 cell passages the cells are mixed 1:1, subjected to proteolytic digestion and analysed by LC MS/MS 13 13 Introduction 1.2.5 Advantages of SILAC labeling SILAC labeling does not involve chemical reactions or affinity purification methods and so is compatible to primary cells as well. SILAC labeling does not involve any peptide labeling steps unlike in ICAT or iTRAQ. Cells once cycled for five passages, results up to approximately 99% label incorporation. The labeling of cells is completely uniform and this gives the advantage of comparing several peptides from the same protein to ensure the extent of protein regulation. In contrast to ICAT non cysteine containing proteins can also be quantified. The essential pre-requisite is the addition of dialysed serum to avoid nonspecific incorporation of non-labeled aminoacids. Usage of small amounts of dialysed serum does not significantly influence the quantitation (Gehrmann, Hathout et al. 2004) 1.2.6 Limitations of SILAC labeling The basic requirement of SILAC labeling is the auxotrophic condition of the cellular system for at least one abundant amino acid to achieve an approximate 60 % quantification of all peptides (Dreisbach, Otto et al. 2008). SILAC-labeling of tissue samples though not possible. SILAC labeled mouse was recently reported (Kruger, Moser et al. 2008), the mouse labeled with a diet containing either the natural or the (13)C(6)-substituted version of lysine over four generations and the subsequent F2 generation was found to be completely labeled in all organs tested 1.3 Mass Spectrometry 1.3.1 MS based Proteomics Mass spectrometry offers a quick and high-through put choice for the analysis of complex protein samples. The notable discovery and development of protein ionization methods, by John Fenn the winner of 2002 nobel prize in chemistry and the availability of gene and genome sequence databases and technical and conceptual advances altogether built the necessary foundation for the MS biological applications to analyse protein samples from complex mixtures. Today MS based proteomics is considered to be a rapidly developing and an open ended endeavor. Mass spectrometry approach involves 14 14 Introduction a) Liquid chromatographic separation of the protein/peptide sample b) Ionization of the analytes (proteins or peptides) by ESI or MALDI source c) Mass analyzer that measures the m/z of the ionized analytes. d) Detector to register the number of ions at each m/z value. e) Bioinformatics data evaluation and scoring strategies. Figure 5 (Aebersold and Mann 2003) outlines the various instrument configurations and the ion sources used in various MS based proteomics experiments Figure 5: Experiment configurations and ion sources (Source Aebersold and Mann 2003) Sample ionization and introduction upon electro spray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) upper panel cartoons. Various instrumental configurations (a–f) with their typical ion source. a, In reflector time-of-flight (TOF) instruments, pulsed ions travel along a flight tube as a result of their different velocities. Ion reflectron located at the end of TOF tube compensates difference in flight times of the same m/z ions of slightly different kinetic energies, resulting in focusing the ion packets in space and time at the detector b, The TOF-TOF introduces a collision cell between the two TOF tubes. Ions of interest are selected in the first TOF section, fragmented in the collision cell, and the masses of the fragments are separated in the second TOF section. c, Quadrupole mass spectrometers consist of four rods called quadrupoles, that enable in specific ion selection of defined m/z in (Q1), followed by fragmentation in a collision cell (q2), and the fragments separated in Q3. In the linear ion trap, ions are captured in a quadruple 15 15 Introduction section, depicted by the red dot in Q3. They are then excited via resonant electric field and the fragments are scanned out, creating the tandem mass spectrum. d, The quadrupole TOF instrument is a combined assembly of having triple quadruple with a reflector TOF section. e, The (three-dimensional) ion trap captures the ions as in the case of the linear ion trap, fragments ions of a particular m/z, and then scans out the fragments to generate the tandem mass spectrum. f, The FT-MS instrument trap ions under a strong magnetic field. The figure shows the combination of hybrid FT-MS configuration having the linear ion trap for efficient isolation, fragmentation and fragment detection in the FT-MS section. 1.3.2 Linear ion trap- Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance - mass spectrometer (FTICR-MS) We used LTQ-FTICR (Ultra) hybrid mass spectrometer for all the proteomics measurements. Till date it’s the most advanced mass spectrometer which is capable of providing highest mass resolution, mass accuracy, sensitivity and dynamic range. These mentioned qualities are critical for resolving individual peptides from complex samples, and Ultra LTQFT-ICR gives a maximum mass deviation–MMD (Zubarev and Mann 2007) of upto 0.5 ppm and a resolution of more than 100,000 fwhm at m/z of 400 with a target ion capacity of 1 million in the ICR cell. Space-charge effects are observed at higher fill capacities. . Figure 6: Linear ion trap-FTMS cross-section view Figure shows the schematics of hybrid mass spectrometer (LTQFT-ICR), showing 2D ion trap and ICR mass analyzer. Hybrid MS consists of LTQ linear iontrap mass analyser followed by ICR mass analyzer at the rear side. ICR is surrounded by a 7 Tesla magnet indicated in grez colour (Source Thermo Electron Corporation) 16 16 Introduction 1.3.3 Ion trap mass spectrometer There are two landmarks in the history of quadrupole ion trap. First is the invention of the ion trap in 1953 by Wolfgang Paul and Hans Steinwedel. This was recognized by the award of the 1989 nobel prize in physics. The second is the discovery, announced in 1983, of the mass selective instability scan by George S. Stafford, Jr. On these two major landmarks rests the entire filed of ion trap mass spectrometry. Ion trap is a device that uses an oscillating electric field to store ions in two or three dimensions. Ion traps can be classified into two types: 3D ion traps or 2D ion traps. 1.3.4 3D ion traps Historically, the first ion traps were 3D ion traps having a circular electrode, with two ellipsoid caps on the top and the bottom that creates a 3D quadrupolar field, to trap ions in a small volume. The paul trap (3D trap) is designed to create a saddle-shaped field to trap a charged ion, but with a quadrupole, this saddle-shaped electric field cannot be rotated about an ion in the centre. It can only 'flap' the field up and down for this reason, the motions of a single ion in the trap are described by the Mathieu Equations.The advantages of the ion-trap mass spectrometer include compact size and the ability to trap and accumulate ions to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of a measurement. 17 17 Introduction Figure 7: LCQ 3D-Ion trap cross-section view Figure shows the schematic view of LCQ 3D ion trap, indicating the location of ring electrodes and end caps (Source Thermo Electron Corporation) Figure 8: Longitudinal cross section of iontrap Figure represents the ion trap with its ring electrodes and end cap electrodes with ion packets held in-between the 3D trap. Figure 8a: RF Voltage schematics in ion trap Figure represents the RF voltage generating a quadrupole field that maintains the ions in stable trajectories with the ion trap 18 18 Introduction 1.3.5 2D ion traps (Finnigan LTQ) The LTQ-2D trap is the most advanced ion traps used for performing proteomics analysis. They can hold more ions than the linear 2D ion traps due to the linear design of the trap, it is known for reduced space-charge repulsions and reduced shielding effects on the mass resolution. In the 2D trap the RF field is perpendicular to the ion entrance axis which reduces the problems associated with ion injection in the 3D trap. This gives high value to the 2D traps as they have a 10-15 fold improvement in ion trapping efficiencies, faster scan speed 16.7amu/sec, higher sensitivity and higher confidence in protein identifications. Figure 9a shows a comparative ion storage capacity of 3D and 2D ion traps. In 2D iontrap, ions are loaded axially and scanned or ejected out radially Figure 9a Schematics of 3D and 2D ion traps with ion storage capacity Figure represents the 3D-trap with ion packets held in-between the ring electrodes and the modern 2D-traps have higher ion holding capabilities due to the RF field acting perpendicular to the ion entrance axis. 19 19 Introduction Figure 9b Schematics of ion entry and exit in a linear iontrap Figure represents the schematics of linear ion trap, ions entry into the LIT is represented with colored circles and the ions are ejected radially towards the detectors Figure 9c Linear ion trap specifications (Thermo Electron Corporation) Figure represents the linear ion trap specifications in the X, Y, Z dimensions 20 20 Introduction Figure 9d Linear ion trap mass spectrometer specifications (Thermo Electron Corporation) Figure represents the linear ion trap, values above the red arrows indicate the sequential vacuum levels. Electrospray ionization results in ion packets that enter into the mass spectrometer. Ions are guided through a series of lenses to finally enter into the iontrap. 1.3.6 Principle of FTICR-MS In a LTQFT-ICR MS instrument, ions that are generated from the ESI source enter into the ion trap mass analyzer and are transferred to ICR (Ion cyclotron resonance) cell located in the middle of a magnetic field (7 Tesla super conducting magnet). The injected ions move in a circular orbit in a plane perpendicular to the magnetic field Figure 10, and are constrained to a region by a set of trapping plates placed perpendicular to the magnetic field axis, to which a voltage is applied. As the ions spin, they move about the centre of the magnetic field with a rotational frequency inversely proportional to the ion’s mass-to-charge-ratio, lighter ions spin faster than heavier ions of the same charge. Ions are excited by sweeping a radio frequency (RF) pulse across a set of excitation plates parallel to the magnetic field axis. Ions of specific mass-to-charge-ratio will absorb radio frequencies that resonate with their cyclotron frequency (the frequency at which they spin around the centre of magnetic field). This accelerates them to a larger radius. When the ions pass the detector plates, the ions generate an image current that can be detected and measured. The resulting spectrum is a superimposition of every 21 21 Introduction m/z signal, which can be deconvoluted by fourier transform to produce a frequency spectrum, and then calibrated to produce a mass spectrum. Figure 10: FT schematics and mass spectrum generation upon Fourier transformation Figure represents the FT signal processing and mass spectrum generation 1.3.7 Strengths of FTICR-MS in proteomics applications FTICR is a powerful technology for addressing important challenges currently faced in biology, biochemistry, and medicine. Gain in selectivity and sensitivity due to the highest possible MMA (Mass measurement accuracy) of 1 ppm is observed with FTICR MS. Significant strengths of this hybrid mass spectrometer are high magnetic field (7-Tesla), large penning trap diameter, ultra cell for reduced space charge effects, digital quadrature heterodyne detection, extended ion cooling by step wise reduction of the cell trapping potential, low cell pressure, selected waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT) for the isolation of a narrow m/z range and multi spectra summation and automatic gain control (AGC) 1.4 Sample preparation for proteomics analysis 1.4.1 Ingel GeLC-MS Samples are separated on SDS-PAGE based on the molecular weight of proteins. The resolved proteins are visualized using different staining methods like coomassie Brilliant blue which has a sensitivity range of 0.1 – 1.0 µg of 22 22 Introduction protein. Silver staining is also routinely used and it gives a sensitivity in the range of 0.1-0.4 ng of protein detection and the modern fluorescent dyes like SYPRO red, orange have lower detection limits. The resolved protein bands are excised and subjected to proteolytic cleavage using trypsin enzyme (most commonly used). The tryptic peptides are extracted from the gel pieces and desalted using the offline purification (StageTips) step which employs C18 chromatographic material. The desalted peptides are gradient separated using the RPLC and introduced into the mass spectrometer. This approach is commonly referred to as GeLC-MS 1.4.2 Peptide IEF Peptide IPG isoelectric focusing involves the separation of proteins or peptides based on their isoelectric points. IPG-IEF with immobilized pI strips serves as an alternative fractionation technique to in-gel protein digestion in bottom-up proteomics (Hubner, Ren et al. 2008), the higher resolving separation power of peptide IEF allows the separation of higher abundant peptide molecules from lower abundant ones, and allow the lower abundant peptides to be identified by the mass spectrometer. It has an advantage of enhancing the sensitivity of peptide detection. Peptide IEF is carried out in two modes, 1.4.2.1 Ettan TM IPGPhor TM 3 IEF GE-IPG Phor Figure 10a system uses onstrip peptide separation. Peptide solution is overlaid on to an IPG strip and allowed to be absorbed into the gel matrix in a rehydration mode. The presence of a filter paper wick at the anode allows peptides outside the isoelectric point (pI) range of the strip to exit. This significantly improves the quality of the data obtained at the basic end of the strip, especially in narrow range (one pI unit) separations. The overall strategy of IPG-IEF is represented in Figure 10 (1a) source (Cargile, Sevinsky et al. 2005). Focused peptides from the IPG strip are extracted and analysed via nano-LC MS/MS. 23 23 Introduction Figure 10 a: Ettan TM IPGPhor TM 3 IEF System Figure shows IPG fractionating unit used for carrying out peptide IEF, IPG strips are loaded with peptide solution and are focussed to stabilize on IPG strips at their iso-electric points. It is a common prefractionation tool used for identifying low abundant peptides/proteins Figure 10 (1a): IPG-IEF work flow Figure represents the work flow of IPG-IEF based shotgun approach, proteolytic peptides are loaded onto the IPG strips and the focused peptides from the IPG strip are extracted. Peptides are analysed in a data dependent using the LC MS/MS and database searched 1.4.2.2 OFFGEL Fractionation 24 24 Introduction OFFGEL Fractionator from Agilent technologies Figure 10 b focuses peptides in solution phase using a fractionation chamber having 24 wells Figure10 (2b). Peptide solution is loaded into the sample chambers placed over the IPG strip. Peptides start to migrate under the influence of the applied voltage across the wells and stabilize at a ph position where the peptide molecule surface carries no net electrical charge i.e. the isoelectric point. Figure 10 b: OFFGEL Fractionator Figure shows OFFGEL Fractionator used for peptide IEF, as a prefractionation tool. Peptides are focussed insolution lodged over the IPG strip. It is a common prefractionation tool used for identifying low abundant peptides/proteins Figure10 (2b): OFFGEL fractionation chamber Figure represents OFFGEL fractionation chamber placed over the IPG strip. Peptides migrate under the applied voltage in the solution across the chambers until they reach their isoelectric points . They further stabilize in the wells, resolved peptides can be processed for MS analysis. 25 25 Introduction Peptide solution from the wells are processed for MS analysis. OFFGEL fractionator differs from IPGPhor IPG-IEF in peptide extraction steps. Peptides from IPGPhor IPG strips need to be extracted using rigorous extraction steps, while the OFFGEL fractionates peptides in-solution phase avoiding the harsh extraction steps. 1.4.3 Insolution protein digestions Protein solutions for mass spectrometry analysis are routinely subjected to insolution protein digestions using dual enzyme digestion approach. Proteins in the solution phase are cleaved using the Lys C, which cleaves the polypeptide chains at the lysine residues giving longer peptides under denaturing conditions e.g. 8M urea. The peptides are further subjected to trypsin enzyme that cleaves at lysine and arginine positions of the peptides. The resulting tryptic peptides are fractionated using the LC separation and analyzed on MS/MS. 1.4.4 Stage Tips : stop-and-go-extraction tips The peptide mixtures need to be cleaned and concentrated. Millipore offers commercial ZipTips having the C18 material for desalting purpose. New developments in the area of proteomics include (StageTips) (Rappsilber, Mann et al. 2007). Stop-and-go-extraction tips (StageTips) StageTips are efficient, economical and easy to make. They can be made out of ordinary pipette tips that are packed with circular teflon disks containing copolymerized silica beads . Each circular disk can be loaded upto 20µg of protein digest. The fixed nature of the beads allows flexible combination of 26 26 Introduction disks with different surfaces to obtain multi-functional tips. Figure 11: Stage-Tip vertical section overview Figure represents the cross section of the stage-tip, tips are loaded with circular disks of C18 and sample is loaded from top, with the help of a syringe pressure is applied to the sample making it to pass through the C18 column. Peptides bound to the column are washed and eluted for further analysis. Desalted and extracted peptides are introduced into the mass spectrometer through a LC separation. (Rappsilber, Mann et al. 2007) 1.5 Bioinformatics analysis / Tools 1.5.1 Peak list generation Spectral raw files are processed using the DTA supercharge. It is an application for converting one or more Finnigan. RAW files to mascot search input files in a format suitable for use with MSQuant. 1.5.2 MGF combiner The individual peak list files generated are concatenated using the MGF (Mascot Generic File) combiner, resulting in a mascot search input file 27 27 Introduction 1.5.3 Mascot search engine The peak list is submitted to mascot protein search engine. It is a powerful search engine that uses mass spectrometry data to identify proteins from primary sequence databases. (Perkins, Pappin et al. 1999). It takes protein modifications into consideration. It incorporates probability-based scoring, supporting peptide mass finger print, sequence query and MS/MS ions search and efficient decoy filter options. It is well supported to Microsoft Windows NT, SGI Irix, Sun Solaris and DEC Unix. Snapshot of a sample result is shown in the Figure 11 a1. Figure 11 a1. Screenshot of mascot result page Figure represents the snapshot of a mascot result page (html file) reported from ms/ms ions returning with a search of 21 peptides from an in-gel tryptic digest of a complex protein mixture. Peptides are searched against the mouse-IPI database. Labeled amino acid modifications are indicated to the side of peptide lists. 1.5.4 MSQuant MSQuant is used to process the raw MS spectra files to get the quantitative information from the identified peptides. It is though automated, is flexible and 28 28 Introduction allows scope for manual inspection of the quantified peptides. Dataprocessing with the MS Quant is highly time consuming and is associated with high virtual memory occupancy on the computer. Its main purpose is to make quantitation of proteins and peptides possible in the area of mass spectrometry/proteomics. MSQuant is written in Microsoft’s .NET and thus can only run on Windows computers that have the .NET runtime installed. MS Quant is publicly available and can be downloaded from the following web link http://msquant.sourceforge.net/. 1.5.5 Max Quant MaxQuant is a quantitative proteomics software package developed by Jurgen Cox and Mathias Mann at the Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried (Cox and Mann 2008) . 29 29 Introduction Figure 11 a2: Overview of the computational work flow( Source (Cox, Matic et al. 2009) It consists of five steps: the first step—data acquisition—is performed by the vendor software of the mass spectrometer used; in the second step, the ‘Quant.exe’ module of MaxQuant detects peak features and quantifies peptides; in the third step, a search engine (here Mascot) associates fragment spectra with amino acid sequences; in the fourth step, the ‘Identify.exe’ module of MaxQuant validates and scores peptide identifications, assembles them to protein identifications and determines protein ratios; and in the fifth step, downstream bioinformatic analysis is performed by general purpose software (spreadsheets), statistical packages or bioinformatic packages. 30 30 Introduction 3. Aim of studies MEL (murine erythroleukemia) cell differentiation has been studied extensively for more than three decades documented by more than 600 publications listed in Pubmed. However, no systems biology based studies were carried out so far that would unravel global changes associated with cell fate switching. MEL cells are transformed erythroid precursors that are arrested in an immature and proliferating state. These leukemic cells can be propagated in cell culture and induced to terminal erythroid differentiation by treatment with specific polar chemical inducer such as DMSO (dimethyl-sulfoxide). MEL cells then re-enter their original erythroid programme and differentiate into nondividing hemoglobin-rich cells resembling orthochromatophilic normoblasts. To deepen our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying erythroid differentiation we aimed to establish a powerful and robust proteomic platform that could monitor changes in protein expression levels for thousands of proteins in a quantitative manner. We decided to employ SILAC-labeling of MEL cells for accurate MS-based quantification of proteome changes occurring during DMSO-induced MEL cell differentiation. Since massive hemoglobin induction takes place in the later stages of the MEL cell differentiation programme we decided to compare undifferentiated against fully differentiated cells that were kept in culture for 120 hours after DMSO induction. To maximize proteome coverage we aimed to conduct simple one-step sub-cellular fractionation experiments resulting in sub-proteomes enriched for mitochondrial, nuclear, membrane and cytosolic proteins. Apart from GeLC-MS we aimed to establish peptide isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative pre-fractionation approach reducing sample complexity at the peptide level. This is important to overcome the well-known undersampling problem inherent to the current state-of-the art MStechnologies. In order to be able to uncover post-transcriptional regulatory events that might be critical for differentiation we aimed to study the extent of correlation between the transcriptome and proteome expression level changes. Therefore, we carried out Affymetrix microarray analysis experiments. 31 31 Materials and Methods 4. Materials and Methods 4.1 Chemicals 4.2 Technical equipments 4.3 Cell culture reagents 4.4 Kits 4.5 Real-time PCR primers and probes 4.6 Antibodies 4.6 SDS-PAGE and Western 4.8 Cell Culture 4.9 TMB assay: Tetramethyl Benzidine assay 5.0 Quantification of DNA and RNA 5.1 Preparation of total RNA and reverse transcription 5.2 Quantitative real time PCR 5.3 SDS-PAGE 5.4 Coomassie staining 5.5 Silver staining 5.6 Western blot and immunodetection 5.7 One-dimensional SDS-PAGE Protein Separation and In-Gel Digest of MEL Proteins 5.8 Peptide OffGel Separation 5.9 Nanoflow LC-MS/MS 4.1 Chemicals Acetone Merck Acetonitrile Fluka Acrylamide BioRad Acrylamide-/Bisacrylamidlösung 40% (Rotiphorese Gel 40) Roth Acrylamide-/Bisacrylamidlösung 30% (Rotiphorese Gel 30) Roth Acrylamide 30% (Rotiphorese Gel A) Roth Actinomycine D Sigma Ammoniumsulfate Merck Ampicilline Roth 32 32 Materials and Methods Aprotinine Roche Agarose Gibco BRL Ammoniumchloride Merck Ammonium-bi-carbonate Sigma Agarose Sigma Acetonitrile JT Baker Acetic acid Sigma Acrylamide solutions Sigma Ammonium per oxodisulfate (APS) Merck Bovine serum albumin Sigma Bradford protein assay solution Bromophenol blue Sigma Benzonase N-Butanol Merck Coomassie brilliant blue G250 Sigma Dimethyl Sulfoxide Sigma Dithiothreitol (DTT) Sigma Ethidium bromide solution Sigma C18 beads Dr.Maisch GmbH Ethanol JT Baker Ethylendinitrilotetraessigsäure (EDTA) Merck Ethylenglycol-bis-(2-aminoethyl)-tetraessigsäure (EGTA) Merck Formaldehyde solution 37% Sigma Glycerol JT Baker Glycine JT Baker Hyderogenperoxide Sigma Hepes Sigma Iodoacetamide Sigma IPG Strips Lys C GE Healthcare Wako Leupeptin Roche Methanol JT Baker 33 33 Materials and Methods MOPS Sigma PMSF (phenylmethansolfonylfluoride) Roche Pepstatin A Roche Protein standard (SDS-PAGE) Fermentas Phenol Sigma Sucrose Sigma Sodium Dodecyl sulfate Sigma Sodium carbonate Sigma Sodium fluoride Sigma Silver nitrate Sigma Sodiumthio sulfate Sigma Thiourea Tris base (Trizma) GE Healthcare Sigma Triton X-100 Sigma Trizol Sigma TEMED Sigma Trypsin Promega Trimethyl Benzidine Sigma Urea GE Healthcare 4.2 Technical equipments Pressure bomb Proxeon Reverse phase columns New Objectives Vortex Heidolph Mixer Heidolph Speed vac drier Eppendorf LTQFT MS ThermoFisher HPLC GE Healthcare Electrophoresis unit Invitrogen Ettan IPGphor 3 Isoelectric Focusing Unit GE Healthcare 3100 OFFGEL Fractionator Agilent SDS-PAGE Gel electrophoresis Biorad Protean 34 34 Materials and Methods Semi-Dry Western blot chamber Biorad TransBlot PCR-Thermoblock: T3 Thermocycler, Biometra Mastercycler, eppendorf Thermoblock Thermomixer comfort, Eppendorf pH meter: pH 766, calimatic Shaker Rocky 37 0 C Incubator Thermocenter, Salvis Developer (Western-Blot): Classic E.O.S., Agfa Centrifuges and Rotors: Beckmann OptimaTM LE-80K Beckmann Avanti J-26Xp Beckman Ultra TLA 100.3 Beckman HB-6 rotor Eppendorf 5417R Eppendorf 5424 Photometers: eppendorf BioPhotometer NanoDrop®, ND1000 FACS FACS Calibur I BD FACS AriaTM Mass spectrometer nanoscale-LC (MDLC nanoflow system) coupled with 7-Tesla l Linear ion-trap Fouriertransform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (LTQ-FT, Thermo Electron, Germany) equipped with a nanoelectrospray source (Proxeon, Denmark) Sonicator Sonics vibracell ABIPrism 7500 fast real-time Applied Biosystems Semi-Dry Transfer Blot SD BioRad Microscope Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 with ApoTome slider 35 35 Materials and Methods FACSCalibur TM BD 4.3 Cell Culture Reagents Mitotracker ® Red CMXRos Invitrogen DMEM PAA FCS Dialysed PAA SILAC labeled aminoacids Sigma Non Labeled aminoacids Sigma Antibiotics Sigma VectaShield Vector Labs 4.4 Kits 3100 OFFGEL Fractionator Kit (5188-8013) Agilent VersoTM cDNA kit Thermo Qproteome TM Mitochondria isolation kit Quiagen Nuclei isolation kit (Nuclei Pure Prep NUC-201) Sigma MitoTracker ® Probes Invitrogen 4.5 Real-time PCR primers and probes mGAPDH Probe: #45 forward reverse 5'-CCAAAACATCATCCCATCGT-3' 5'-AACTGACACGTTTGGGGTTG-3' Globin–β Probe: #66 forward 5'-CCGATGAAGTTGGTGGTGA-3' reverse 5'-GCTGGGTCCAAGGGTAGAC-3' forward 5'-TGGGTGAACTTGTACACCAACT-3' reverse 5'-TCTGTCATGGCCCTGTCTT-3' ERAF 36 Probe: #32 36 Materials and Methods m β-Actin Probe: #63 forward 5'-GGATGCAGAAGGAGATTACTGC-3' reverse 5'-CCACCGATCCACACAGAGTA-3' 4.6 SDS-PAGE and Western Separating gel buffer 1.5 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.8 0.4% SDS (w/v) Stacking gel buffer 0.5 M Tris/HCl, pH 6.8 0.4% SDS (w/v) SDS-PAGE loading buffer (2x) 150 mM Tris/HCl, pH 6.8 20% glycerol (v/v) 4% SDS (w/v) 100 mM DTT 0.001 g/mL bromphenol blue SDS-PAGE running buffer 25 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.3 250 mM glycine 0.1% SDS (w/v) Coomassie staining buffer 0.625 g/L Coomassie R250 90% Methanol (v/v) 10% acetic acid (v/v) Destaining buffer 45% Methanol (v/v) 10% acetic acid (v/v) Transfer buffer (semi-dry) 48 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.3 20% Methanol (v/v) 39 mM glycine 0.037% SDS (w/v) Blocking solution PBS-T + 5% dry milk power (w/v) Antibodies Hexim 1 AHSP Cdk-9 (C-20) Aml/Runx-1 Pu.1 (T-21) 37 Ab-25388 SC-484 39000 SC-352 Abcam Courtesy M.J. Weiss Santa Cruz Biotechnology Active Motif Santa Cruz Biotechnology 37 Materials and Methods 4.7 Peptide OFFGel Fractionation Peptide OFFGEL stock solution (1.25X) Glycerol Solution 6 mL + OFFGEL Buffer 600 μL ampholytes pH 3-10 (Volume adjusted to 50ml with Millipore water) Peptide IPG Strip Rehydration Solution Peptide OFFGEL Stock Solution (1.25X) 0.48 mL + dH20 120 μL Methods 4.8 Cell Culture 4.9 TMB assay: Tetramethyl Benzidine assay 5.0 Quantification of DNA and RNA 5.1 Preparation of total RNA and reverse transcription 5.2 Quantitative real time PCR 5.3 SDS-PAGE 5.4 Coomassie staining 5.5 Silver staining 5.6 Western blot and immunodetection 5.7 One-dimensional SDS-PAGE Protein Separation and In - Gel digestion of MEL Proteins 5.8 Sub-Cellular Fractionations 5.8.1 Nuclear Fractionation 5.8.2 Mitochondrial Fractionation 5.8.3 Cytosol Fractionation 5.8.4 Membrane Fractionation 5.9 Peptide OffGel Separation 6.0 Nanoflow LC-MS/MS 6.1 MitoTracker ® staining 6.2 FACS Staining for Mitochondria 38 38 Materials and Methods 4.8 Cell Culture MEL cells were cultured in normal and labeled DMEM medium (with 10% dialyzed FBS) containing 13 C6-arginine and 2H4-lysine plus antibiotics and the latter cell population was stimulated to differentiate by addition of 2% (v/v) Me2SO for 120 hours. Cells were maintained at 370 C and 5 % CO2. 4.9 TMB assay: Tetramethyl Benzidine assay 2% DMSO induced and ctrl cell pellets were washed once with PBS, and lysed in NLS (N-Lauryl sarcosine buffer), benzonase treated and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 12000 rpm. Supernatant collected and measured for Hemoglobin induction levels. Standard Hemoglobin curve was plotted using freshly made hemoglobin powder (Sigma H4131 -1G) and BSA standard curve was plotted from BCA assay to normalize the hemoglobin induction per mg of protein content. 5.0 Quantification of DNA and RNA DNA and RNA were quantified measuring the OD260 with the NanoDrop, ND1000 Spectrophotometer. The relation OD260/OD280 was used to judge the purity of the sample. 5.1 Preparation of total RNA and reverse transcription To isolate RNA from cell culture cells, the Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Abgene) was used. Approximately 1 x 106 cells were centrifuged (1200 rpm, 5 min, RT). The cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of cold RNA isolation reagent. After 5 minutes incubation at 4 0 C. 200 µl chloroform was added. The mixture was vigorously vortexed and stored for 5 min at 40 C. After centrifugation (14000 rpm, 10 min, 40 C) the upper aqueous phase, containing the RNA, was transferred into a new eppendorf tube. The RNA was precipitated by addition of 750 µl 2-propanol and cooled for 5 min at 40 C. After centrifugation (14000 rpm, 10 min, 40 C) the pellet was washed one time with 70 % ethanol. The pellet was shortly air-dried and then redissolved with 10-20 µl RNase free TE buffer. 0.5 - 1 µg of total RNA was reversed transcribed using M-MuLV reverse transcriptase. The RNA was first incubated 39 39 Materials and Methods with 0.5 µl random hexamers or Oligo (dT) (200ng/ µl) as primers in 12 µl for 5 min at 720 C to relax the RNA. After cooling down to 370 C, which allows the binding of the primers, a 8 µl reaction-mixture (4 µl 5 x buffer, 10 mM dNTPs, 5 mM DTT, 1 µl reverse transcriptase, ad 8 µl H2O) was added to start the reverse transcription. The reaction went for 50 min at 370 C and was stopped by increasing the temperature to 720 C for 5 min. RNase inhibitors were only used, if the mRNA amount did not exceed 0.2 µg. The gained cDNA solution was diluted 1:1 and usually 0.5 µl was used in quantitative real-time PCR. 5.2 Quantitative real time PCR Quantitative real time PCR was used to measure mRNA levels. In this study, the PCR-amplification was detected by using double-dye oligonucleotides as probe. These oligonucleotides containing a fluorophore (6-FAM) at 5' end and a quencher (TAMRA) at the 3' end. Due to FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) the quencher reduces the fluorescence emitted by the fluorophore. If the oligo binds specific to the amplified DNA then the exonuclease activity of the Taq-polymerase is able to release the fluorophore, which leads to increased fluorescence. The combination of specific primers with a specific probe increases the specificity of the amplification signal. The primers for the PCR amplification and the appropriate probe were selected by using the Roche Universal Probe Library Assay Design Center. One PCR reaction was set up in the following way: 0.5 µl Sample 5 µl Master Mix (2x Applied Biosystems) 4.2 µl H2O 0.1 µl Primer 1 (100 pmol/ µl) 0.1 µl Primer 2 (100 pmol/ µl) 0.1 µl Probe (10 µM) The PCR reaction was run in ABIPrism 7500 machine (Applied Biosystems) with following program: 500 C 2 min 95 0 C 15 min 950 C 15 s 600 C 1 min 40x 40 40 Materials and Methods The analysis was done with the 7500 Fast System Software. 5.3 SDS-PAGE Proteins were separated using the discontinuous SDS-PAGE after Laemmli (Laemmli, 1970). A 10 % separating gel was made with 5 mL 30% acrylamide, 3.75 mL separating gel buffer, 6.25 mL H2O, 50 µl 10% APS (ammoniumpersulfate) and 10 µl TEMED. This solution was poured into the prepared gel chamber and covered with butanol. The butanol was removed when the gel became solid. The stacking gel was made with 0.65 mL 30% acrylamide, 1.25 mL stacking gel buffer, 3.05 mL H2O, 25 µl APS and 5 µl TEMED. The gel was placed in a SDS-PAGE apparatus containing SDSPAGE running buffer and was run with 130 V for 1.5 hours. The protein samples were denatured for 5 min at 950 C in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. The separated proteins were analyzed by coomassie staining, silver staining or Western blotting. 5.4 Coomassie staining SDS-PAGE gels were incubated for at least 4 hours with the Coomassie staining solution and then destained by replacing the staining solution by destaining solution. If necessary, the destaining solution was replaced several times until a good signal to noise ratio was obtained. The gel was conserved on Whatman paper by vacuum drying. 5.5 Silver staining For more sensitive protein detection silver staining was performed. The gel was first fixed for 1 hour (50% methanol (v/v), 0.01% formaldehyde (v/v), 12% acidic acid (v/v)) then washed for 3 time 20 min with 50% ethanol (v/v). The gel was pretreated with 0.02% Na2S2O3 (w/v) for 1 min. The gel was washed 3 times for 20 sec with H2O. The gel was now impregnated (0.2% AgNO3 (w/v), 0.02775 formaldehyde (v/v)) for 20 min. After additional 3 washing steps with H2O for each 20 seconds, the gel was developed (6% Na2CO3 (w/v), 0.0185% formaldehyde (v/v), 0.005% Na2S2O3 (w/v)) until the protein 41 41 Materials and Methods bands were visible. To prevent over-development the reaction was stopped (50% methanol (v/v), 12% acidic acid (v/v)). Silver stained gels were scanned for documentation. 5.6 Western blot and immunodetection Proteins were transferred from the SDS-PAGE gel to a PVDF membrane by semi-dry blotting using the Biorad TransBlot ® SD Cell. The set up was from anode to cathode blotting paper, PVDF membrane, gel, blotting paper. Blotting papers and PVDF membrane were moistened with transfer buffer. The transfer took place with 125 mA per blot for 1 h and 15 min. For Western blotting, prestained protein markers were used in the SDS-PAGE. PVDF membranes were blocked for one hour at room temperature in PBS-T supplemented with 5 % nonfat dry milk powder for at least 1 hour. The membrane was washed two times with PBS-T and incubated for 2 hours with the primary antibody in the appropriate dilution. The membrane was then washed several times with PBS-T and incubated with a suitable secondary antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. After the secondary antibody, the membrane was washed again several times with PBS-T. Finally, the membrane was incubated with ECL solution and the chemiluminescence was detected with a light sensitive film. 5.7 One-dimensional SDS-PAGE Protein Separation and In-Gel digestion of MEL Proteins Protein concentration of the MEL cell lysate was determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and 100 µg of protein was applied on a 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Novex; Invitrogen). After staining by colloidal Coomassie (Invitrogen), the entire gel lane was cut into 10 pieces of equal size and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion. Briefly, the gel pieces were destained and washed, and, after dithiothreitol reduction and iodoacetamide alkylation, the proteins were digested with porcine trypsin (modified sequencing grade; Promega, Madison, WI) overnight at 37 °C. The resulting tryptic peptides were extracted from the gel pieces with 30% acetonitrile, 0.3% trifluoroacetic acid, 42 42 Materials and Methods evaporation in a vacuum centrifuge to remove organic solvent, then desalted and concentrated on reversed-phase C18 StageTips. 5.8 Sub Cellular Fractionations 5.8.1 Nuclear Fractionation (Nuclear fractionation is performed using the Sigma Nuclei pure prep isolation kit NUC-201 protocol) SILAC K4R6 labeled stimulated and unlabeled K0R0 ctrl having equal cell counts (1 x 107 cells) are mixed and were 1X PBS washed. Combined cell pellets were lysed in ice cold lysis buffer of 1ml volume containing 1% protease inhibitors. Additional 9ml of lysis buffer is added and incubated at 4 0 C on an end-over-end shaker for 10 minutes. Nuclei are purified through 1.8 M sucrose cushion solution. 18ml of 1.8M sucrose cushion solution is mixed with 10 ml of sample solution. In a 40 ml ultracentrifuge tube (cat # 344058) add 10 ml of ice cold 1.8M sucrose cushion solution and layer the 28 ml of sample solution, gently. Avoid disturbing the cushion layer. Spin the sample at 12,700 rpm (HB-6 rotor) for 1.15 minutes at 4 0 C. Supernatant contains cytosol and other proteins. Pellet containing the Nuclei are cleaned with 200 µl of nuclei clean storage buffer, spin at 500 rpm for 5 minutes at 4 0 C. Nuclei are lysed in 40 µl of NLS buffer, followed by Benzonase treatment and Sonication. Proteins are separated on NuPage gel, coomassie stained and ingel digested with trypsin. Peptides are stage Tip cleaned and analysed over LC MS/MS. 5.8.2 Mitochondrial Fractionation (Mitochondrial fractionation is performed using the Quiagen Mitokit protocol) SILAC K4R6 labeled stimulated and unlabeled K0R0 ctrl having equal cell counts (1 x 107 cells) are mixed and were 1X PBS washed. Combined cell pellets were lysed in ice cold lysis buffer of 2ml volume containing 1% protease inhibitors. Cell lysis was performed by pipeting up and down using a 1ml pipette tip. Incubate for 10 min at 4 0 C on an end-over-end shaker. Lysate is centrifuged at 1000 X g for 10 min at 4 0 C and the supernant contains the cytosol proteins. The pellet is resuspended in 500µl ice-cold disruption buffer containing protease inhibitors by pipeting up and down with a 43 43 Materials and Methods 1ml pipette tip. Blunt-ended needle and a syringe are used to ensure complete cell lysis and is centrifuged at 1000 X g for 10 min at 4 0 C, supernatant contains cytosol proteins and is pooled with the supernatant obtained in the former step. Centrifuge at 6000 X g for 10 min at 4 Supernatant contains microsomal proteins and the pellets 0 C. contains mitochondrial proteins. Wash the pellet with 1 ml of mitochondrial storage buffer and spin at 6000 X g for 10 min at 4 0 C. Pellet containing mitochondrial proteins is dissolved in 40 µl of NuPage buffer and proteins are separated on NuPage SDS page, coomassie stained and ingel digested with trypsin. Peptides are stage Tip cleaned and analysed over LC MS/MS. 5.8.3 Cytosol Fractionation SILAC K4R6 labeled stimulated and unlabeled K0R0 ctrl having equal cell counts (1 x 107 cells) are mixed and were 1X PBS washed. Combined cell pellets were lysed in ice cold lysis buffer of 2ml volume containing 1% protease inhibitors. Cell lysis was performed by pipeting up and down using a 1ml pipette tip. Incubate for 10 min at 4 0 C on an end-over-end shaker. Lysate is centrifuged at 1000 X g for 10 min at 4 0 C and the supernant contains the cytosol proteins. 5.8.4 Membrane Fractionation SILAC K4R6 labeled ctrl and unlabeled K0R0 stimulated having equal cell counts (1 x 107 cells) are mixed and were 1X PBS washed. Combined cell pellets were resuspended in ice-cold sucrose buffer (255mM sucrose, 20Mm Hepes Ph7.9, 1Mm EDTA) of 2ml volume supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), transferred to a pre-chilled dounce homogenizer and disrupted with tight pistil. Cell lysates are clarified by centrifugation at 24,223 rpm for 10 minutes, transferred to ultracentrifuge tubes and the membranes were peletted by centrifugation at 245,000 rcf for 2 hours. Membrane pellet was resuspended in ice-cold 100mM Na2CO3, incubated on ice for 30 minutes with occasional vortexing, and membranes were peletted again by centrifugation at 70,000 rcf (using the TLA 100.3 rotor) for 30 minutes. The membrane pellet was eluted with 50 µl of 500 mM Na2CO3 and once with µl 50mM Na2CO3. 40 µl of the sample is separated on NuPage SDS 44 44 Materials and Methods page, coomassie stained and ingel digested with trypsin. Peptides are stage Tip cleaned and analysed over LC MS/MS. 5.9 Peptide OffGel Separation For pI-based peptide separation, the 3100 OFFGEL Fractionator and the OFFGEL Kit pH 3–10 (both Agilent Technologies) with a 24-well setup was used. 200 µg of protein digest is stagetip cleaned and resuspended upto 720 µl of Millipore water and is added to 2.88 ml of Peptide OFFGEL stock solution (1.25X) and vortexed gently. IPG strips (GE Biosciences) 24 cms with 3-10 pI are thawed to room temp for 30 minutes and the protective backing is gently removed from the IPG strip, placed in the IPG focusing tray with the gel side up. A 24 well frame is placed on the IPG strip, 20μL of IPG strip IPG strip rehydration buffer is added to swell the gel for 15 minutes. Wetted electrode pads are placed at the extreme ends of the IPG strip gel surface. After allowing 15 minutes for reswelling of the gel load 150μL of prepared (Peptide) OFFGEL sample (OFFGEL stock solution + sample)into each well: 24 cm strip 24 well frame: 150μL X 24 wells = 3600μL . Place the cover seal over the frame and press down gently on each well to secure proper fit. Reapply 10μL of dH20 onto the electrode pads at each of the IPG gel ends. Place the tray on the instrument platform. Pipette cover fluid (mineral oil) onto the gel strip ends in several steps indicated as follows. When pipeting cover fluid, use caution not to move the electrode pads. Pipette 200μL cover fluid onto the anode end (fixed electrode) of the IPG strip. Pipette 400μL cover fluid at the cathode side (movable electrode). After 1 minute, reapply an additional 200μL cover fluid to both ends of the IPG strip. After 3 minutes add an additional 200μL cover fluid onto the anode end (fixed electrode) of the IPG strip. (The cover fluid should not extend higher than 1/2 the height of the tray grooves). Select the fixed electrode and place the two tabs on the electrode into the slots on the left side of the tray. Rotate the fixed electrode down into position over the electrode pad (insert). Push down until the fixed electrode clicks into place. Slide the tray without lifting it at the anode connector. Close the lid and start fractionation. The sample was focused with a maximum power of 200 mW, maximum current of 50 µA and typical voltages ranging from 500 to 4500 V until 50 kVh was reached after 24 h. Peptide fractions were acidified by 45 45 Materials and Methods adding 10% of a solution containing 30% acetonitrile, 10% trifluoroacetic acid and 5% acetic acid prior to Stage Tipping and MS-analysis. Peptides were twice eluted from StageTips using 20μL 80% acetonitrile, 0.5% acetic acid, the volume reduced to 5μL in the speed vac and acidified with 5μL of 2% acetonitrile, 1% trifluoroacetic acid. 6.0 Nanoflow LC-MS/MS All nanoflow LC-MS/MS experiments were done on a 7-Tesla Finnigan LTQFT mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Proxeon Biosystems, Odense, Denmark). The liquid chromatography (LC) part of the analytical system consisted of MDLC GE Biosciences comprising a solvent degasser, a nanoflow pump, and a thermostat micro-autosampler. Chromatographic separation of the peptides took place in a 20-cm fused silica emitter (75µm inner diameter; Proxeon Biosystems) packed in-house with methanol slurry of reverse-phase ReproSil-Pur C18-AQ 3µm resin (Dr. Maisch GmbH, Ammerbuch-Entringen, Germany) at a constant pressure (50 bar) of helium. Then 4µl of the tryptic peptide mixtures were autosampled onto the packed emitter with a flow of 500 nl/min for 30 min and then eluted with a 90-min gradient from 4–40% acetonitrile (MeCN) in 0.5% acetic acid (AcOH) at a constant flow of 200 nl/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in the data-dependent mode to automatically switch between MS and MS/MS acquisition. Full MS spectra (from m/z 300–1500) were acquired in the FTICR with r=100,000 at m/z 300 (after accumulation to a target value of 10,000,000).The five most intense ions were sequentially isolated for fragmentation in the linear ion trap by collisioninduced dissociation followed by accurate mass measurements in the FTICR. Former target ions selected for MS/MS were dynamically excluded for 60s. The general mass spectrometric conditions were: spray voltage, 2.3 kV, no sheath and auxiliary gas flow, ion transfer tube temperature 120 0 C, collision gas pressure , 1.3 millitors, normalized collision energy using wide band activation mode , 30% for MS2, ion selection thresholds for MS2 was 1000 counts. 46 46 Materials and Methods 6.1 MitoTracker ® staining Mitotracker ® (CMXRos) stock solution of 1mM concentration is prepared and eth working conc 250nM is used for labeling the mitochondria of the cell. DMSO 120hrs induced and controls MEL Cells are gently peletted and resuspended in DMEM solution containing the dye and incubated Cells were maintained at 370 C, 5 % CO2. for 30 minutes. Cells are peletted, 1X PBS washed and fixed onto slides with 3.5% formaldehyde solution. Cells are rinsed with 1X PBS three times 10 min each and nuclei were stained with DAPI using the Vectashield mounting medium. Cells were visualized at 550nm on the Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope along with ApoTome slider. Magnification was 63 X 1.4 (Plan Apochromat objective), ApoTome slider having 7.5 lines and is precalibrated. Camera used was Axiocam MRm in black and white for capturing the pictures. AxioVision 4.6 software was used for acquiring the images in ZVI file format and exported as TIFF files for further processing. Filters used are DAPI-Filter set 49 (Excitation G365, Beam Splitter FT395, emission BP 445/50). For Mitotracker red Filter set 43HE (Excitation BP 500/25, Beam splitter FT570 AND Emission BP 605/70) were used. 6.2 FACS Staining for Mitochondria Mitotracker ® (CMXRos) stock solution of 1mM concentration is prepared and the working conc 250nM is used for labeling the mitochondria of the cell. DMSO 120hrs induced and control MEL Cells are gently peletted and resuspended in DMEM solution containing the dye and incubated Cells were maintained at 370 C, 5 % CO2. for 30 minutes. Cells are peletted, 1X PBS washed. FACS analysis was carried out on FACSCalibur TM from SD in the green channel and standard instrument setting were used. Cell-Quest software 47 was used for image processing. 47 Materials and Methods 6.3 Peak list generation Raw mass spectral files generated from the LTQ FT-Ultra mass spectrometer are submitted to DTA supercharge for peak list generation. Screenshot Figure 11b shows the parameter settings used in DTASupercharge Figure 11.b DTASuperCharge Figure shows the DTASuperCharge, raw file is up-loaded with the browse button, precursor tolerance of 0.1 Thompson of the DTA supercharge v 1.01 indicating the selected parameters for peak-list processing is shown. The output file called “mgf file” consists of peak-list of peptides along with the peptide charge states. 6.4 MGF Combiner The individual MGF (Mascot generic Format file) generated from DTA supercharge are concatenated using “MGF-combiner” software to give single MGF file. 6.5 Mascot search engine Combined peak list is searched against the mascot search engine (version 2.1.04, Matrix science, London, UK) against a concatenated database combining 53.236 proteins from International Protein Index mouse protein database version 3.24, 27 commonly observed contaminants (forward database) and the reversed sequence of all proteins (reverse database). 48 48 Materials and Methods Carbamidomethylation was set as fixed modification Figure 11 c. Variable modifications included oxidation (M), N-acetylation (protein), Deamidated (NQ), Lysine (D4) (K) & Arginine-13C6 (R-13C6(R). Enzyme specificity was set to trypsin, allowing for cleavage N-terminal to proline and between aspartic acid and proline (Olsen, Ong et al. 2004) Figure 11c: Mascot search engine Figure shows the various options selected in mascot search query Up to two missed cleavages and two labeled amino acids were allowed used. Initial mass deviation of precursor ion and the fragment ions were up to 10 ppm and 0.5 Da respectively. 6.6 MS-Quant Identified peptides are quantified using the MS-Quant (Version14a2.9) quantification tool. Selected MS-Quant are as follows, sequence length range 5 amino acids, charge range 2 -5, mascot range 10 to 2000, mgf generator DTASuperCharge (LTQ-FT), raw file type LTQ-FT file raw, Quantification mode LysD4, Arg 13C6. Figure 11 d 49 49 Materials and Methods Figure 11d: MSQuant page parameter settings Figure shows parameter settings used in MSQuant data processing 6.7 MaxQuant MaxQuant was used for automated peak-list generation and protein quantification. The following parameters were used in the Quant.exe module. a)Instrument: Orbitrap/FT Ultra b)SILAC doublets Lys4 and Arg6. c) Carbamidomethylation is set as fixed modification. Variable modifications include Oxidation (M), Pyro(N-term C), Pyro(N-term Q). Database mouse, enzyme trypsin /P+DP, MS/MS tolerance 0.5 Da, maximum msm file size set to 350 MB, maximum missed cleavage 2 and top MS/MS peaks per 100 Da set to 6. Processed raw files result in .par/.msm files. The sil0.par file contains the SILAC state ‘light’, and no SILAC label modifications are used. Sil1.par contains the SILAC state ‘heavy’ in this the heavy SILAC label are treated as fixed modifications. The iso.par file contains MS/MS data from the single isotope patterns and SILAC labels are treated as variable modifications. The par files with its corresponding msm file are submitted to mascot search using the mascot daemon. Mascot searched .dat files are 50 50 Materials and Methods imported into the local folder (combine folder) and further processed using the identify.exe. A screen shot of the parameters used in the identify.exe can be seen in Figure 11 e Figure 11e: Identify.exe parameter settings Figure shows the parameters used for processing the mascot result (dat) files 6.9 Gene Ontology and KEGG Enrichment Analysis-based Hierarchical clustering In the control against 2% Me2SOstimulated and control MEL cell study the quantified proteome was divided into six quantiles corresponding to percentage cutoffs of 0- 15%, 15-35%, 35-50%, 50-75% 75- 85%, and 85100%. The enrichment analysis for gene ontology (GO) biological process and cellular component were done using the KEGG pathways. For 51 51 Materials and Methods hierarchical clustering we first collated all the categories obtained after enrichment along with their p values and then filtered for those categories which were at least enriched in one of the quantiles with p value > 0.05. Categories which did not have a p value after collation in any quantile were provided a very conservative p value of 1. This filtered p value matrix was transformed by the function x = -log10 (p-value). Finally these x values were transformed to z-score for each GO category by using the transformation [xmean(x)]/sd(x). These z-scores were then clustered by one-way hierarchical clustering using “Euclidean distance” as distance function using the TIGR MultiExperiment Viewer MeV -TM4. 52 52 Results 6.1.0 MEL cells as an in vitro model system for Murine erythroleukemia study Murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cell lines are erythroid progenitor cells derived from the spleen of susceptible mice infected with the Friend virus complex SFFV (Friend, C et al 1975). The transformed cells are arrested at the proerythroblast stage of development manifesting their leukemic potential and can be maintained in cell culture indefinitely (Rifkind, R et al 1974). Depending on the culture conditions 1% of MEL cell population is known to undergo spontaneous erythroid differentiation from pronormoblasts to mature orthochromatic normoblasts. SFFV transformed MEL cells serve as an established model system for studying the erythroid growth and differentiation process. In the erythroleukemic stage of SFFV infected cells, over-expression of Spi-1/PU.1 protein is a common hallmark (Ochoa, S 1982) PU.1 is an important regulator which activates and interacts with transcription factors like c-JUN, GATA-1, GATA-2,C/EBP and RUNX-1 (Oikawa et al. 1999 ), (Singh H et al 1999) and over expression of the ETS protein Spi-1/Pu.1 Spi-1 has also been shown to immortalize erythroblasts in long-term bone marrow cultures (Schuetze, S et al 1993). Tight control of PU.1 expression is essential for cellular differentiation towards erythroid lineage and in preventing cells from assuming leukemic fate (Alex Bukrinsky et al 2009). MEL cells undergo terminal erythroid differentiation when exposed to inducers like Me2SO or Hexamethylene-bisacetamide (HMBA) (Marks, P et al 1978), via receptormediated processes or signal transduction pathways. Differentiation period is usually 4 to 5 days and marked by high hemoglobin expression levels giving a characteristic red color to the cell pellet. MEL cells recapitulate the erythroid differentiation process Results 6.1.1 Maintenance of MEL cell lines In order to investigate the erythroid differentiation programme murine erythroleukemia cells (MEL) were grown in suspension culture in DMEM medium and differentiation was induced by the addition of 2% Me2SO to cells that were grown to a density of 2.5 x 105 cells/mL. Higher or lower cell counts did not favor the cellular differentiation programme. 6.1.2 Me2SO Induction of erythroid differentiation of MEL cells Prolonged culture (120 hours) of MEL cells with 2% Me2SO induction resulted in an irreversible commitment of erythroid differentiation and >95% of cell population were committed for irreversible differentiation. This could be initially confirmed from the cell count by 48 hours between the control and 2% Me2SO induced MEL cell population. Once the MEL tumor cells reenter the erythroid differentiation programme, they continue proliferating, but the cell cycles are limited to 5-6 divisions which are then followed by arrest in G1 phase (Gusella et al 1976). The induced cells differentiation was evident from the phenotype in having smaller and fewer cells when compared to their counterparts, as they have limited proliferation potential upon induction. At the completion of the day 5 the induced cell pellet phenotype is marked by a red colored cell pellet due to high amounts of hemoglobin accumulation. The control cell pellet, which appears as a beige colored pellet as indicated in Figure_R1 while the induced cell pellet is red colored due to hemoglobin accumalation 54 54 Results (a) (b) Figure_R1. Phenotype of MEL cell pellets (a) Ctrl and (b) Me2SO induced Figure shows the cells pellets with and with out DMSO induction. Non-induced cell pellet (a) is beige colored and larger size. Induced cell pellet (b) is red colored to hemoglobin accumulation and has a smaller volume. 6.1.3 SILAC labelling of MEL cells Stable Isotope labeling of Amino acids in Cell culture (SILAC) is a straightforward labelling strategy for quantifying global protein expression changes at the proteome level. SILAC based encoding of proteomes is discussed elsewhere (Ong et al 2002). Briefly, SILAC-encoding results in metabolic labeling of the entire proteome by heavy, non-radioactive isotopic variants of natural amino acids, thus making labeled proteins (and therefore tryptic peptides derived from them) distinguishable by MS analysis. The SILAC-labeled cell populations can be mixed and analysed in one MS experiment that allows accurate quantification of proteins from the different cellular states (Blagoev and Mann 2006). Figure_R2 provides a schematic overview of the experimental work followed in our experiments. Murine erythroleukemia cells were grown in medium containing 13C6-arginine and 2H4lysine (in the presence of 10% dialyzed FCS) for upto 5 passages for complete incorporation of the labeled amino acids. Cell growth was slightly reduced when compared to normal non-SILAC medium, likely due to the removal of very low molecular weight components from the dialysed serum. The latter effect of the SILAC media affects both populations equally and is 55 55 Results therefore not influencing quantification. Cells were subjected to five passages in SILAC medium to ensure complete metabolic labeling, which was further evaluated by MS analysis (virtual absence of non labeled peaks”; data not shown). The cells were additionally supplemented with 1% non-dialysed serum and MEM non-essential amino acids since the former contains minor traces of differentiation promoting factors, whereas the latter suppresses arginine to proline conversion (Bendall, Hughes et al. 2008). One population of cells was stimulated with 2% Me2SO, for 120 hours and the other noninduced one served as a control. After 120 hours equal no of cells were collected from the control and stimulated groups and lysed with 2 % boiling SDS. After protein estimation from cell lysates (BCA assay) equal amounts of total protein were mixed for further analysis. Figure_R2. SILAC Experiment schematic: MEL cells are adapted to SILAC media for complete incorporation in light AA and heavy AA for 5 passages. Heavy labeled cells (indicated red colored plate) are 2% DMSO stimulated, equal no. of cells are mixed, prefractionated and the SILAC pairs are resolved over FT-MS .Acquired data is subjected to bioinformatics analysis using the mascot protein search engine and Max-Quant quantification software. 56 56 Results 6.1.4 Assessment of SILAC labeling compatibility for MEL cell differentiation To evaluate the compatibility of MEL cell differentiation with SILAC we inspected the quantified proteome for known marker proteins that are involved in MEL cell differentiation. We carried out western blot analysis Figure_R3. We found the ETS transcription factor PU.1 levels to rapidly decline upon MEL cell differentiation and it’s reported that enforced expression of PU.1 blocks erythroid differentiation in cultured cells and in embryos (Delgado et.al 1998, Quang, C.T et.al 1995, Rao, G, N et.al 1997, Rekhtman, N et.al. 1999, Schuetze et.al 1992). Other transcription factors Ikaros, Runx 1and Prp4 levels declined during MEL differentiation indicating the cells to be less proliferating (data not shown here). Hexim-1 protein (protein found to be induced upon Hexamethylene bis-acetamide in MEL cells) and in differentiating neuroblastoma cells upon retinoic acid treatment (Turano, Napolitano et al. 2006). CDK9-L form was found up-regulated upon differentiation and the same has been reported for MEL cell and monocyte to macrophage differentiation (Liu and Herrmann 2005). Chemical induction of MEL cells leads to a massive expression of alpha and beta globin. Since accumulation of non-heme bound globins could lead to aggregation (observed in some inherited blood disorders; beta thalassemia (Bank 2007)) the globin chaperone alpha-hemoglobin stabilizing protein (AHSP), which represents an erythroid-specific molecular chaperone for alpha-globin (Otsuka, Ito et al. 2008), was found to be up-regulated upon DMSO induction. This has been recently published during this work was still in progress. AHSP is a small protein specifically binding to free α-globin, thereby stabilizing its structure and limiting its toxic effects (as a monomer). Weiss and colleagues showed that AHSP is also critical to the formation and stabilization of normal amounts of hemoglobin. Role of AHSP is represented in the Figure_R3.a (source Journal of clinical investigation Volume 117, No 7) From the above results we could draw a preliminary conclusion that SILAC labeling did not interfere with the MEL cell differentiation programme, so we further designed a reverse SILAC labeling strategy Figure_R4 to minimize for any systemic errors encountered during our MS based quantification workflow. 57 57 Results 58 58 Results Figure_R3.a (Source: Journal of clinical investigation Volume 117, No 7) Hb formation with and without AHSP (A) In normal cells, the α-globin locus on chromosome 16 and β-globin locus on chromosome 11 produce α- and β–globin mRNA and α- and β–globin polypeptides, respectively, which combine with the heme moiety to form Hb dimmers (HB αβ). Two αβ dimmers combine and form the Hb tetramer HbA. AHSP stabilizes and solubulizes newly formed and excess α- globin chains as apo- α- globin and αHb. The absence of AHSP normally leads to a mild anemia dute to precipitated unstabilized α- chains(not shown). (B) In β–thalassemia, there is excess α- globin due to the decreased or absent β–globin production. The excess α-globin precipitates in the cells and on membranes and leads to ineffective erythropoiesis in nucleated red cells in the bone marrow and red cell hemolysis in circulating blood cells. In the absence of AHSP, the anemia is worse because of the further destabilizing of the excess α- globin (not shown). (C) Excess of β–globin chains due to a deficiency of αglobin, and mild anemia. In α-thalassemia in the absence of AHSP, β–globin precipitates in red cell membranes, presumably because the α–globin-AHSP complex is a required intermediate for optimal HbA formation Figure_R3. Western blot analysis of MEL proteome Lysates from the control and 2% DMSO induced (120 hours) MEL cells were analysed for hemebiosynthesis markers, lysates were separated on SDS-PAGE blotted, and probed with antibodies as indicated. 59 59 Results 6.1.5 RT-PCR analysis Real time PCR analysis for β- globin and AHSP mRNA abundance was performed in 2% Me2SO stimulated and ctrl cells. We observed β-globin expression to be initially induced after 24 hours and robustly increased over time until 120 hours. AHSP a molecular chaperone described earlier, its mRNA levels are increased upon β-globin induction Figure_R3.b indicating the erythroid differentiation process. Cycle numbers were normalized to actin. Underneath the graph, time points are represented. Globin: RT-PCR 40 35 30 25 St im 20 Unst im 15 10 5 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 H ou r s AHSP: RT-PCR 35 30 25 20 Stim 15 Unstim 10 Fig 22.5 RT-PCR analysis 0 0 24 48 72 96 120 Hours Figure_R3.b RT-PCR of globin and AHSP: RT-PCR analysis of the genes, globin and AHSP with or without DMSO. Total RNA was collected at the indicated time points after 2% DMSO induction. Total RNA was subjected to RT-PCR analysis. 60 60 Results 6.1.6 Forward and reverse SILAC labeling of MEL cells We performed the forward and reverse labeling strategy, by stimulating the SILAC labeled MEL cells in one group and stimulating the ctrl cells in the other group with 2% Me2SO Figure_R4. Figure_R4. Forward and reverse labeling schematic: MEL cells are SILAC labeled as described in Figure_R2.For reverse labeling the un-labeled MEL cells are 2% DMSO stimulated for 120 hours and equal no. of cells are mixed, lysed and prefractionated. The SILAC pairs are resolved over FT-MS .Acquired data is subjected to bioinformatics analysis using the mascot protein search engine and Max-Quant quantification software. Equal cells are mixed, 2% SDS lysed, BCA protein estimated. Proteins were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and peptide isoelectric focusing. For OFFGEL peptide isoelectric focusing, insolution digestion was sequentially performed using the endoproteinase Lys-C and trypsin, resulting peptides are fractionated using OFFGEL peptide isoelectric focusing approach. The peptides were extracted sequentially from the IPG strip and analyzed on nano-LC-MS. SDS-PAGE fractionated protein lane is cut into 14 pieces, each piece was in-gel digested using trypsin. The resulting tryptic peptides were loaded on self made C18 stageTips (Rappsilber et al 2003) for desalting and subsequently analyzed using nano-LC-MS to quantify the proteins from the resulting peptide pairs. 61 61 Results 6.1.7 Tetramethyl Benzidine assay for estimating hemoglobin levels Induction of hemoglobin is estimated by Tetramethylbenzidine staining. TMB is employed in the calorimetric assay for estimating the amount of hemoglobin (Standefer and Vanderjagt 1977) in plasma. The chemical reaction leads to the formation of hematin which catalyses the conversion of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen. In this conversion benzidine is oxidized to a chromogenic product, the intensity of the resulting color is used as an index of hemoglobin concentration. DMSO induced MEL cells showed a 10 fold induction of hemoglobin Figure_R5 TMB ASSAY FOR TOTAL HEMOGLOBIN LEVELS 10 9 8 Hb [µg/µl] 7 6 TMB ASSAY 5 4 3 2 1 0 Mel Control Mel 2% DMSO Figure_R5: TMB assay: Hemoglobin content is calculated and normalized against total protein concentration of the cell pellet. Me2SO induced MEL cells showed higher levels of Hb content due to the accumulation of hemoglobin compared to the uninduced cells. 6.1.8 Subcellular fractionation of MEL cell proteome To get a deeper insight of protein changes during erythroid differentiation of MEL proteome, we adopted a reductionist approach thereby reducing the sample complexity and performed subcellular fractionation. We aimed at enriching low abundant proteins and signaling complexes, henceforth isolated mitochondrial, cytosol, nuclear and membrane fractions, quantified the resulting proteins. The sub fractionations all together yielded a proteomics dataset consisting of 3774 quantified proteins Figure_R6. Proteins were included only after passing through stringent selection criteria like (a) Minimum of two peptides per protein (2) Mass accuracy below 5 ppm (3) Decoy filtered and (4) common contaminants like human keratins, BSA and trypsin were excluded. Data set revealed 26% of the quantified MEL proteome has cytoplasmic components, 37% nuclear components and 24% mitochondrial and 13% membrane components Figure_R7. 62 62 Results Max Quant-MEL proteome (3774) MaxQuant profile of MEL 2 % Dmso stimulated proteome 8 LOG 2/1 MS quant 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 IPI Mouse Figure_R6: MEL proteome MAX Quant processed dataset: 3374 quantified proteins from the MEL proteome are log2 represented; X-axis represents the IPI entries and log2 values on the y-axis. MEL Proteome SubCellular Fractionation 26% 13% 24% 37% CytoFractionation MitoFractionation NuclearFractionation Mem braneFractionation Figure_R7 Subcellular fractionation of MEL proteome: Pie chart represents the percentage of proteins obtained from the MEL proteome enriched in mitochondria, nucleus, cytosol and membrane fractions. Corresponding enrichment values are represented in the figure. 63 63 Results As a measure of quality check we primarily evaluated the quantified proteome for the presence of markers known to be elevated during heme biosynthesis. Figure_R8 represents the marker protein expression represented as Log2 fold changes, we later correlated these proteome changes against the corresponding mRNA fold changes. T Figure_R8 Hemebiosynthesis, enzymes identified using the Proteome and Transcriptome analysis Figure represents enzymes involved in hemebiosynthesis, log2 expression values of marker proteins are indicated adjacent to green boxes having the proteomics observed fold changes and the transcriptome log2 values are indicated in yellow boxes. Proteomics data is obtained from SILAC labeled MEL proteomic analysis and transcriptome data from mRNA expression analysis using the Affymetrix Gene 1.0 ST mouse array. The indication for successful MEL differentiation is further marked by the presence of hemoglobin subunit beta-1 (20 fold up-regulated), Hemoglobin subunit beta-2 (8.7 fold up-regulated), Hba-a2 hemoglobin alpha (15.4 fold up-regulated). The presence of hemebiosynthesis markers in the SILAC MEL 64 64 Results proteome suggests SILAC labeled MEL cells possess the potential to undergo cellular differentiation. 6.1.9 Mitochondrial protein analysis in MEL cell differentiation Mitochondrial proteins Mitochondria are dynamic organelles essential for cellular life, death and differentiation. Mitochondria are best known for ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), they house myriad of other biochemical pathways and are centres for apoptosis and ion homeostasis. Enzymatic machinery regulating hemebiosynthesis is known to take place inside the mitochondria Figure_R9. Figure_R9: Source ACS Chemical biology Vol1 No 10 65 65 Results 6.1.10 FACS analysis of Mitotracker dye We used the mitotracker dye to assess the mitochondrial changes during 2% Me2SO induced MEL cell differentiation. Mitotracker dye upon intake by actively respiring cells gets oxidized and binds to the thiol groups of proteins and peptides as represented Figure_R10 a Figure_R10a Mitotracker dye Mitotracker is a new fixable mitochondrion-selective dye. Mitotracker probe contains a thiolreactive chloromethyl moiety. Upon intake, is sequestered in the mitochondria and reacts with the accessible thiol groups on peptides and proteins to form an aldehyde-fixable conjugate FACS analysis Figure_R10 b revealed the 2% Me2SO induced MEL cells had an increase in the no of mitochondria indicating a role in erythroid differentiation 2% Contro Figure_R10 b: FACS analysis of DMSO induced and ctrl MEL cells: 66 66 Results Mitotracker dye 250 nM working concentration is used for labeling the control and induced MEL cells. Incubated at 370 C for 30 minutes, PBS washed and FACS analysed. Colour coding of the peaks is indicated in the left corner We further evaluated the mitochondrial abundance using the Apotome microscopy Figure_R10c, and counted the mitochondrial dots. The mitodot counting Figure_R10d from the 2% Me2SO and control cells indicated a 3 fold increment of mitochondria in the induced population of MEL cell population 6.1.11 Mitochondrial staining using the Mitotracker dye of DMSO induced MEL cells Figure_R10c Mitotracker dye stained MEL cells Control and induced MEL cells are stained with mitotracker-red and DAPI, fixed on slides and visualized at 550 nm on the Zeiss Axio imager Z1 microscope along with ApoTome slider. Red colored dots indicating the mitochondria can be observed. Induced cells have smaller cell volume and more mitochondria indicated by mitodots compared to the ctrl cells having fewer dots and larger cell volume 67 67 Results Mitochondrial count using the mitotracker dye 45 40 No. Of Mitochondria 35 30 25 2% 20 Ctrl 15 10 5 0 2% Ctrl Figure_R10d Mitotracker dye staining analysis of the mitodots: Mitodots counting from the induced and control MEL cells visualized at 550nm on the Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope along with ApoTome slider. Data is obtained by counting 50 single MEL cells from induced and control population. 6.1.12 Mitochondrial fractionation: We carried out subcellular fractionation to study the role of mitochondrial proteins in MEL cell differentiation. Mitochondrial crude fractionation approach enabled quantification of 1500 proteins and proteins are binned indicating the fold changes Figure_R11 a. The quantified proteins were subjected to pathway studio analysis and generated a cellular protein network Figure_R11. Proteins were found to be concentrated in the mitochondria and directly interacting with cytoplasmic proteins and to a lower extent with the nuclear proteins. Additional proteins were also observed on the cell membrane and endoplasmic reticulum having direct interactions. The pathway is built considering the “find common targets” algorithm. 68 68 Results Figure_R11a: Mitochondrial proteins fold change Histogram of mitochondrial proteins binned indicating the fold change and no of proteins per bin 69 69 Results 6.1.12 (a) Building and Visualizing Pathways with Pathway Studio Pathway Studio is a windows-based application that allows researchers to visually build pathways using a variety of methods. The software has a built-in resource named RasNet, a database of molecular interactions based on natural language processing of scientific abstracts in pubMed (Nikitin, Egorov et al. 2003). Using the RasNet, a researcher can simply drag his favorite gene product onto a new pathway diagram, and build pathway using well-known interactions discussed in existing literature. Data input is accepted in tabdelimited format. Pathway showing the protein interactions is constructed automatically. We evaluated the cellular distribution of the identified proteins using the pathway studio software Figure_R12a, showing the cellular connectivity and distribution of the identified proteins. Figure_R12a Mitokit01 Pathway Studio profile Figure represents the mitochondrial protein distribution, pink circles represent the proteins located in mitochondria and cytoplasm. Pink lines indicate binding and blue lines with squared boxes indicate the expression pattern. Cellular organelles like mitochondria, nucleus and endoplsmatic reticulum can also be seen. 70 70 Results GO analysis of the isolated mitochondrial proteins Figure_R12b represents 52% mitochondrial proteins, 32% nuclear proteins and 12% proteins from the endoplasmatic reticulum, golgi and cytoplasm. We primarily aimed at incrementing the proteome identifications and compromised with a medium mitochondrial preparation that contained proteins from other organelles due to high sensitivity of the modern MS methods (Graumann, Hubner et al. 2008). Figure_R12b: Cellular Components of Mitochondrial proteins: A pie chart of GO based subcellular localization of mitochondrial protein fractionation is shown We analysed the mitochondrial proteome for the enriched biological processes using the Ariadne Pathway studio 6.0 and observed the upregulated proteins to be significantly enriching the cellular processes associated with cell cycle arrest, hemebiosynthesis, and erythrocyte differentiation Figure_R12c. The down-regulated proteins were found to enrich the cellular processes associated with lipid biosynthesis, steroid biosynthesis related 71 biological processes Figure_R12d. 71 Results Enriched Biological processes : Upregulated Entries 5% 5% 13% 59% 18% Hemoglobin Bisynthesis Tetrapyrrole biosynthetic process Hemebiosynthesis Erythrocyte differentiation cell cycle arrest Figure_R12c: Enriched biological processes of up-regulated mitochondrial proteins A pie chart of GO based enriched biological process is shown Down regulated Biological Procesess: Downregulated Entries 1% 9% 3% negative regulation of megakaryocyte differentiation negative regulation of T cell proliferation 52% tRNA modification 35% steroid biosynthesis lipid biosynthesis Figure_R12d: Enriched biological processes of down-regulated mitochondrial proteins A pie chart of GO based enriched biological process is shown 72 72 Results 6.1.13 Cytosol fractionation Cytosol proteins Cytosol fraction obtained from Mitokit processed SILAC labeled cells, resulted in the quantitation of1600 proteins. Fractionation is performed taking equal cell counts from the control and 2% Me2SO stimulated cell population. Quantitative data obtained is normalized against the total protein content. A three fold change in total protein concentration variation is observed from the normal and stimulated cell pellets. Max-Quant profile of the quantified proteins is represented in Figure-R13 a. CytoFractionation_MaxQuant 100 lOG Scale 10 1 1 93 185 277 369 461 553 645 737 829 921 1013 1105 1197 1289 1381 1473 1565 0.1 IPI Figure_R13a: MaxQuant profile of Cytoproteins A histogram plot representing 1600 quantified proteins obtained from cytosolic fractionation, x-axis represents the IPI entries with log2 expression represented on y-axis GO analysis of the cytosolic proteins Figure_R13 b indicated the major fraction to contain the cytosolic proteins and additional proteins from nuclear and mitochondrial compartments were observed 73 73 Results Cellular components CytoFractionation proteasome core complex (sensu Eukaryota) eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 complex perinuclear region chaperonin-containing Tcomplex membrane coat mitochondrial matrix Arp2-3 protein complex heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex signalosome complex ribosome mitochondrion soluble fraction proteasome complex (sensu Eukaryota) cytoplasm nucleus ribonucleoprotein complex protein complex spliceosome complex Figure_R13b: Cellular Components of Cytoproteins A pie chart of GO based subcellular localization of cytosol protein fractionation is shown 74 74 Results 6.1.14 Nuclear Fractionation Nuclear proteins Nuclear fractionation was carried out from SILAC labeled 2% Me2SO stimulated MEL cell population. Nuclear fractionation resulted in the identification and quantification of 881 proteins Figure_R14a and the binned representation Figure_R14b. Fractionation is performed taking equal cell counts from the control and 2% Me2SO stimulated cell population. Quantitative data obtained is normalized against the total protein content. A three fold change in total protein concentration variation is observed from the normal and stimulated cell pellets. Proteins up-regulated include transcriptional activator protein Pur-alpha protein up-regulated by 2.2 fold. Pur alpha mediates induction of the CD11c beta 2 integrin gene promoter in monocytic cell line U937 ((Shelley, Teodoridis et al. 2002). Transcription factor BTF3 is upregulated to 5 fold. Chromodomain-helicase-DNA-binding protein is 2 fold down regulated, erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 levels are 1.6 fold upregulated, prothymosin alpha is modestly down-regulated Ratio H/L Normalized 100 Log Scale 10 1 1 82 163 244 325 406 487 568 649 730 811 892 973 1054 1135 1216 1297 1378 1459 1540 1621 1702 1783 1864 1945 2026 2107 0.1 0.01 0.001 IPI Figure_R14a: Nuclear protein Max Quant profile A histogram plot representing 881 quantified proteins obtained from nuclear fractionation, xaxis represents the IPI entries with log2 expression represented on y-axis Gem-associated protein 7 is down-regulated to 4.8 fold. GO analysis of the nuclear fraction represents Figure_R14c nuclear and other cellular compartments like ER, ribosomal, cytosolic and membrane related proteins 75 75 Results Nuclear Proteins (p < 0.0012) 25 20 15 10 5 0 -80 -50 -35 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 -2 5 10 15 25 50 75 Fold Change Figure_R14b Nuclear proteins Figure shows the binning of nuclear proteins based on the fold change. X-axis represents fold change and y-axis represents bins Figure_R14c: Nuclear protein Max Quant profile A pie chart of GO based subcellular localization of nuclear protein fractionation is shown 76 76 Results 6.1.15 Membrane Fractionation: Membrane proteins Membrane fractionation enabled in the identification of 757 proteins. fractionation is performed taking equal cell counts from the control and 2% Me2SO stimulated cell population. In-solution digestion is performed using Lys-C and trypsin. Peptides are OFFGel fractionated and analyzed on nanoLC MS. Quantitative data obtained is normalized against the total protein content. Geneset enrichment analysis of membrane proteins endoplasmic reticulum lumen integral to plasma membrane proton-transporting twosector ATPase complex Golgi stack Genesets Enriched membrane fraction Golgi membrane melanosome endoplasmic reticulum membrane extracellular space nucleosome Golgi apparatus membrane endoplasmic reticulum integral to membrane 0.00E+00 1.00E-03 2.00E-03 3.00E-03 4.00E-03 5.00E-03 6.00E-03 7.00E-03 p - Values Figure_R15: GSEA of membrane proteins Max Quant profile Figure represent enriched pathways, IPI entries are analysed using Ariadne Pathway Studio. 77 77 Results Geneset enrichment analysis was carried out using the Ariadne pathway studio Figure_R15, it indicated endoplsmatic reticulum, golgi membrane, integral to plasma membrane components to be significantly enriched We observed Tetraspanin-33 a known erythrocyte marker elevated to 11 fold. HEM-2 a bcl2-Homolog involved in the remodeling of cytoskeleton induced to 6 fold. Erythrocyte membrane band 4.1, a 80-kD structural component of the red blood cell (RBC) cytoskeleton. It is critical for the formation of the spectrin/actin/protein 4.1 junctional complex (Baklouti, Huang et al. 1996), is up-regulated to 2.7 fold. Platelet membrane glycoprotein II b, a known erythrocyte 78 marker levels were found up-regulated to 5 fold 78 Results 6.1.16 MEL proteome combined dataset Quantified: MEL proteome dataset obtained from the subcellular fractionations and complete cellular lysate experiments yielded a total number of 3774 quantified proteins. These were quantified using the Max-Quant software and the log 2 plot of the quantified proteins is represented in Figure_R16a and Figure_R16b shows the log2-transformed protein ratios. Protein ratios have a median of 0 on the log scale (dotted red line) as expected for a 1:1 mixture and cluster tightly around the median. MEL-Max Quant Profile 8.00 Fold Change Log 2 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 -2.00 1 189 377 565 753 941 1129 1317 1505 1693 1881 2069 2257 2445 2633 2821 3009 3197 3385 3573 3761 -4.00 -6.00 -8.00 IPI Figure_R16a: MEL complete proteome dataset Max Quant profile A histogram plot representing 3774 quantified proteins obtained from MEL proteome, x-axis represents the IPI entries with log2 expression represented on y-axis The quantified proteins were probed for enriched pathways using the Ariadne pathway studio analysis Figure_R16c and the cellular components enrichment Figure_R16c indicated in majority nuclear, cytosolic, membrane and mitochondrial proteins along with ribosomal, splicesome complex, ER and other soluble fraction related proteins. 79 79 Results Figure_R16b: Quantification of MEL proteome. The figure shows the log2–transformed protein ratios. Protein ratios have a median of -0.05 on the log scale (dotted colored line) as expected for a 1:1 mixture and cluster tightly around the median. 80 80 Results Figure_R16c: MEL complete proteome dataset enriched pathways Max-Quant profile Figure shows the pathways enriched and p-value represented in log2 scale, several erythroid related pathways, mitochondria and cytoskeletal remodeling pathways are found enriched 81 81 Results nucleus Cellular Components 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 4% cytoplasm 22% 2% Mitochondria 3% endoplasmic reticulum Ribosomal endoplasmic reticulum membrane soluble fraction 18% ribonucleoprotein complex protein complex 20% nucleolus spliceosome complex 5% outer membrane 18% respiratory chain complex I (sensu Eukaryota) Figure_R16d: MEL complete proteome dataset Enriched Pathways Max Quant profile A pie chart of GO based subcellular localization of quantified MEL proteome is shown 3774 quantified proteins were binned and it indicated the down regulated proteins were more than the up-regulated proteins in total, suggesting the cell to be gearing for autophagy process. 82 82 Results 6.1.17 Comparision of nano-LC MS against 2D-Gel We then evaluated the nanoLC-MS approach against the classical 2D-Gel approach. A virtual 2D map Figure_R16 is constructed computing the theoretical molecular weight and isoelectric point values of the identified proteins using the ExPASy-compute pI/Mw tool. Dotted red box indicates the practical boundaries of the standard 2D-gel proteomics approach and the green box represents the complete dataset of quantified proteins by nano-LC MS MEL Virtual 2D Map 180000 160000 140000 Molecular Weight 120000 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 pI Values Figure_R16: Virtual: 2D map : 83 83 Results It was plotted by calculating the theoretical pI and molecular weight of the IPI entries using the M. Musculus database, swissprot expasy tools. The practical boundaries of standard 2D-gel based proteomics approach is indicated by red box and proteins identified from the nano-LC MS approach are indicated in green box. approach. This clearly indicates the nanoLC-MS to excel in identifying the proteins with basic pI when compared to the classical 2D-Gel approaches. Under representation of low and high molecular weight proteins on a 2D-map is a well known limitation. 6.1.18 Histone modulations during MEL cell differentiation Differentiation of metazoan cells involves dramatic changes in gene expression patterns and proliferative capacity driven primarily by epigenetic mechanisms (Yellajoshyula and Brown 2006). During the DMSO induced terminal differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells in vitro, changes in accumulation and modification of chromatin proteins have previously been observed (Grove and Zweidler 1984). In our study using the SILAC approach we report the linker histones to be significantly up-regulating and the core histone variant proportions to be modestly altered. The results are all indicated in the table below. IPI Histone Variant IPI00467914 Histone H1.0 Fold Change 5.14 Reference (Boix and Ruiz-Carrillo 1992) IPI00282848 Histone H3.2 2.25 (Lopez-Fernandez, Lopez-Alanon et al. 1997) IPI00623776 Histone H4 1.89 IPI00230264 H2A.X 2.15 IPI00221463 Histone H2A type-3 1.50 IPI00874492 Histone H2B type-1 1.89 (Grove and Zweidler and Zweidler 1984) (Grove 1984) 84 84 Results Figure.H.1: Schematic representation of the assembly of core histones into the nucleosome (Resource Wikipedia). H3-H4 form dimmers, tetramers and H2A-H2B dimerise, H2A-H2B along with the H3-H4 tetramers form the Histone octamer. Linker histones implicated in the formation of higher orders of chromatin structure and gene repression. The proposed location of linker Histone H1 is not known from the x-ray crystal structure Linker histone H1.0 levels were significantly up-regulated indicating chromatin compaction stage and underlying DNA is not subjected to transcription activation. This suggests the cells to limit their proliferation potential. We found moderate changes in the other Histone Variant levels and needs to be further probed. The core Histones H3, H4 and H2A, H2B levels were modestly elevated and need to be further probed. 6.1.19 Studies on DNA changes during the induction of erythroid differentiation by DMSO in MEL cells DNA & Histone Levels Acid ext r act ed pr ot eins Ct r l Acid ext r act ed pr ot eins 2 %DMSO Ct r l: DNA 2%: DNA 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 ug/ ul C onc Figure_R17b: DNA content in DMSO stimulated and control MEL cells: Equal cell no was used for DNA extraction from the DMSO induced and control MEL cells. DNA amount was estimated using the nanodrop spectrophotometer. Total histone content from acid extraction of equal cell no and quantified with BCA assay. Data shown is derived from duplicate experiments 85 85 Results We estimated the total DNA content in the 2% (v/v) Me2SO induced and control MEL cells to confirm the genome stability upon cellular differentiation process. DNA extraction is performed from equal cell counts of DMSO induced and non induced MEL cells. Proteins were acid extracted and quantified. DNA content was found to be constant and it serves as a control. Acid extracted proteins were quantified using the Bradford assay. DNA content is found to be unchanged in both induced and control cells Figure_R17b. 6.1.20 Quantile based distribution of MEL proteome: To further understand the modulating proteomic events during the cellular differentiation we distributed the entire quantified proteome into six quantiles according the relative protein expression levels Figure_R18. Each quantile was examined for the enriched pathways, GO based cellular components using the DAVID-GO tool. This approach integrates the strength of statistical testing (taking p value as input for clustering) with the intuitive simplicity of hierarchial clustering by automatically classifying related processes and pathways based on the up or down-regulated protein measurements, it provides an unbiased global portrait of representative biological functions. (Pan, Kumar et al. 2009). Proteins significantly enriched having a fold change of log > 2.3 on quantile based analysis using the KEGG pathways showed enrichment of, Poryphyrin metabolism (p < 1.5E-2) resulting from the proteins ALAD, HMBS, ALAS2 in the quantile 95-100% indicate marking of erythroid maturation with accumulation of hemoglobin and the hemebiosynthesis markers mentioned earlier. We also observed the enrichment of Oxidative phosphorylation pathways (p < 8.0E-3) represented by the mitochondrial proteins like cytochrome c oxidase indicating the role of mitochondria in hematopoietic cell homeostasis as described by (Fontenay, Cathelin et al. 2006) through oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial transport proteins for eg ABC-mitochondrial erythroid proteins 1, 2, 3, 7 and 10 are all found upregulated indicating strong role in the transport functions during hemebiosynthesis. Glycosphingolipid biosynthesis are enriched in the quantile 75-95% having up-regulated proteins upon DMSO stimulation, glycosphingolipid and glycoproteins play pivotal roles in the complex series of 86 86 Results events governing cell adhesion, signal transduction (Tringali, Anastasia et al. 2007) and playing a key role in cellular phenomena like cell proliferation and differentiation. Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis pathways enrichment, indicates the global cellular reorganization during the reticulocyte stage of erythroid differentiation accomplished partly through programmed protein degradation (Wefes, Mastrandrea et al. 1995) for cellular clearance of nuclei, mitochondria and cytoskeletal proteins. We additionally observed the down regulated protein entries in the lower quantile 0-15% representing the enrichment of pathways related chronic myeloid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, indicating the non-transformed state of the differentiating MEL cells, and representing the induced cells being directed specifically towards erythroid lineage development from proliferation state. Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis pathways were observed in the lower quantile of 0-15% suggesting the cells to have lowered their proliferation potential and thereby minimize the glucose metabolism. SNARE interactions in vesicular transport pathway is found enriched in the quantile 75-95%, suggesting the morphological changes resulting from the sequestration of excess hemoglobin into the protrusion along with the microfilaments (Hunt and Marshall 1981) and the cell could be preparing for the terminal erythroid stages by clearing the nucleus and other organelles by autophagy process. Poryphyrin metabolism Fig 20 and Oxidative phosphorylation pathways Fig 20 b enriched with DAVID KEGG analysis are represented along with the proteins found in the corresponding quantiles. 87 87 Results Figure_R18 Quantile based Pathway Hierarchical clustering analysis of MEL proteome. Figure shows the quantiles resulting from quantitative proteome comparision were separately analysed for enriched KEGG pathways and clustered for the z-transformed p values. The annotation on the top represents the z-transformation groups of the quantiles. The distribution 88 88 Results is divided into six quantiles and represented as z1=0-15%, z2=15-35%, z3=35-50%, z4=5075%, z5=75-95% and z6=95-100%. Quantile z6 contains proteins upregulated > 2fold. The quantile based hierarchial clustering of GO cellular components Figure_R19 contains the proteins distributed into 6 quantiles from 0-15%, 15- 35%, 35-50%, 50-75%, 75-95% and 95-100% in the order of incrementing protein up-regulation from lowest to the highest quantiles. The hierarchial clustering indicated significant enrichment of components like Tetrapyrrole biosynthetic (p < 4.7e-007) process, hexaosaminidase activity (p < 7.19e006), heme biosynthesis (p < 1.30e-005) which indicate the erythroid nature of the differentiated cells. Mitochondrial matrix components are found in the quantile 5, containing proteins have 2 fold up-regulation suggesting the mitochondrial enrichment. Down-regulated quantile includes gluconeogenesis, glycolysis and are concurrent to the pathway downregulation as in fig 18. Proteins representing the mitochondrial matrix, GTP binding, fatty acid beta oxidation and mitochondrial electron transport chain are found in the quantile 75-95% indicating the mitochondrial proteins to be essential for hemebiosynthesis. 89 89 Results 90 90 Results Figure_R19 Quantile based GO-CC, hierarchical clustering analysis of MEL proteome. Figure shows the quantiles resulting from quantitative proteome comparision analysed for enriched GO cellular components and clustered for the z-transformed p values. The annotation on the top represents the z-transformation groups of the quantiles. The distribution is divided into six quantiles and represented as z1=0-15%, z2=15-35%, z3=35-50%, z4=5075%, z5=75-95% and z6=95-100%. Quantile z6 contains proteins upregulated > 2fold. Figure_R20a : Quantile based KEGG Pathway analysis Figure represents KEGG porphyrin metabolism pathway, red colour stars indicate enriched proteins found in the corresponding quantiles. Enymes like Porphobilinogen, 91 91 Results Hydroxymethylbilane, coprophyrinohen III, protoporyphyrinogen IX, Coproporphyrinogen IX, protoporphyrin IX and Hemoglobin are identified 92 92 Results Figure-R20b: Quantile based KEGG Pathway analysis: Oxidative Phosphorylation Figure represents KEGG oxidative phosphorylation pathway, stars indicate enriched proteins in the quantiles. Enzymes NADH, Flavo protein, Cytochrome bc1 complex, cytochrome c reductase, COX 6A, 8, 4 & ATP synthase are identified. 6.1.21 Gene expression analysis Microarray profiling was performed to monitor the gene changes during the DMSO induced erythroid differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells. Microarray was performed by KFB Regensburg using the Affymetrix GeneCHIP ® mouse whole transcript (WT) Sense Target Labeling Assay. The analysis revealed 28816 gene expression levels to be modulating. Extensive study to compare the MEL transcriptome and proteome has not been done so far and we aimed to compare the proteome data with the mRNA transcript levels during the MEL cell differentiation. We used the quantile approach (Pan, Kumar et al. 2009)and the 22474 expressed genes were distributed into six quantiles 0-10%, 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, 90-100% in incrementing orders of gene expression log2 values. Hierarchial clustering analysis revealed the enrichment of poryphyrin metabolism in the quantile 90-100% indicating the up-regulation of erythroid specific genes like ALAD, ALAS-2. Autophagy regulation genes Ulk2, Atg12, Becn1, Ifna14, Ifna6 are found in the quantile having up-regulated genes indicates the cells to be preparing for cellular clearance by autophagy process. Genes related cell cycle, Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Ccnh, Cdkn1c, Bub1b, Cdk6, Ccna2, Chek2, Hdac2, Cdc25a, Cdc14b, Cdkn1b, Ccnb1, Dbf4, Cdc7, Bub1, Ccnb2, Cdc6, Atm, Chek1, Cdc20, are enriched in the quantile 0-15% having down-regulated gene entries indicating the switch from erythroleukemic stage to erythroid differentiation pathway. 93 93 Results 94 94 Results Figure_R21 Quantile based KEGG Pathway analysis of MEL transcriptome The quantiles resulting from quantitative proteome comparision were separately analysed for enriched GO pathways and clustered according to z-transformed p values. The annotation on the top represents the z-transformation groups of the quantiles. 22474 expressed genes were distributed into six quantiles 0-10%, 10-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, 75-90%, 90-100%. Erythroid specific genes were found enriched in the quantile z6 (indicated as upregulated in the figure) 6.1.22 MEL Proteome Vs Transcriptome analysis We next aimed to compare the proteome changes against the transcriptome changes since it would give an additional insight. Linear correlation analysis showed a moderate correlation of (r = 0.508) Figure_R22 between the log2 transcriptome and the log2 proteomic data, as post-transcriptional events could alter the presence of transcript. The standard deviation of the residual values (difference between the observed and the fitted values from the linear regression model) was calculated. Protein expression results from the complex interplay of regulation on the transcriptional, translational and post-translational levels due to which there is no direct stoichometric relationship between the protein and gene expression 95 95 Results levels. 3373 Figure_R22: Transcriptome Vs Proteome comparision Linear regression plot of Log2 microarray signal ratio Vs Log2 SILAC H/L ratios mRNA is an intermediate in the process of protein synthesis and changes in mRNA levels do not reflect absolute or relative protein level changes in protein levels. It is not unprecedented to find a concurrence between mRNA and protein levels using both proteomics and microarray platforms (Lu, Vogel et al. 2007) (Futcher, Latter et al. 1999; Greenbaum, Jansen et al. 2002; Ghaemmaghami, Huh et al. 2003; Greenbaum, Colangelo et al. 2003; Yin, Tao et al. 2007). There is indeed a inherent technical, bioinformatic, and biological difficulty in assigning correlations between mRNA and protein expression, (Unwin and Whetton 2006). 96 96 Results Figure_R22.a: Inliers Transcriptome Vs Proteome comparision Figure represents log2 representation of inliers of transcriptome and proteome expression. Inliers include a high correlation between protein and mRNA expression pattern. Proteome to transcriptome analyses resulted in two groups a) Genes with log2 proteome ratios <1 std dev were arbitrarily assigned as “Inliers”, Figure_R22.a they showed a better correlation, r = 0.348 with 60 % correlation between the transcriptome and the proteome data. b) Genes with log2 proteome ratios >2 std dev were arbitrarily assigned as “Outliers”, Figure_R22.b they showed a weaker correlation, r = 0.348 with 9% correlation between the transcriptome and the proteome data. 97 97 Results Figure_R22.b: Inliers Transcriptome Vs Proteome comparision Figure represents log2 representation of outliers of transcriptome and proteome expression. Inliers include a weak correlation between protein and mRNA expression pattern. The weaker correlation could add additional biological information, a) Probably due to the rates of protein degradation are higher than the rate of mRNA degradation as these genes/transcripts are switched off b) Translational rate fluctuation during erythroid differentiation. It would thus help us to understand if mRNA microarray technology can predict the majority of changes in the proteome of erythroid differentiation against the proteomic approach. To identify the characteristics of these outlier groups, we carried out gene ontology enrichment analysis Figure-R22.c and found the outlier proteins were enriched in biological processes like lipid metabolic process, sterol 98 98 Results biosynthetic process, iron ion transport, aminoacid catabolic process and mitochondrial electron transport are enriched and cellular protein metabolic process, cellular process and translation related processes were suppressed. Gene ontology enrichment analysis Figure_R22.d of molecular functions showed organelle inner membrane, mitochondrial membrane, and mitochondrial inner membrane and intrinsic to membrane are enriched and ribonucleoprotein complex, ribosome, intracellular and cell cortex associated cellular components are suppressed. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of molecular function Figure_R22.e indicated a significant enrichment of heme binding, protein transmembrane transporter activity. Figure_R22.c: GO term enrichment analysis of biological processes Figure represents a Histogram of GO based enrichment of biological processes of outlier dataset 99 99 Results Figure_R22.d: GO term enrichment analysis of cellular components Figure represents a histogram of GO based enrichment of cellular components of outlier dataset Figure_R22.e: GO term enrichment analysis of molecular functions Figure represents a histogram of GO based enrichment of molecular functions of outlier dataset 100 100 Discussion Discussion 7.1 An overview of various protein quantification labeling strategies In quantitative-proteomics based studies involving stable isotope labeling methods there are alternative approaches to introduce the chemically identical but mass-differentiated stable isotope tags in proteins (7, 21), broadly classified into two groups based on the tag incorporation(a) biological incorporation where labeling of the protein/peptide is achieved by growing cells in media enriched in stable isotope-containing compounds as done in the present SILAC approach ((Ong, Blagoev et al. 2002)) and (b) chemical incorporation, which relies on the use of a derivatization agent for chemical modification of proteins in a site-specific manner after harvesting of the proteins, such as in the ICAT and ITRAQ (isobaric tagging reagents) approaches ( (Gygi, Rist et al. 1999), (Ross, Huang et al. 2004) (DeSouza, Diehl et al. 2005)). ICAT is relatively a new technology for relative protein quantification, it involves cysteine labeling of proteins with the ICAT reagent , followed by proteolytic digestion and SCX fractionation followed by MS analysis. It does not require gel separation and thus may seem a less laborious alternative compared with SILAC. Additionally ICAT can be applied to any cells or even body fluids and tissue. However, the SILAC approach offers the earliest time point to introduce isotope labels without the need of any in vitro derivatization steps, which may induce experimental variation. In contrast to chemical incorporation methods, e.g. the ICAT approach ((Gygi, Rist et al. 1999)), no significant reduction in sample complexity is required in SILAC. Therefore, using metabolic labeling potentially higher protein coverage can be Discussion achieved, and the number of peptide pairs used for quantification per protein will generally be higher. iTRAQ is a novel MS based approach for the relative quantification of proteins, it relies on the derivatization of primary amino groups in the intact proteins using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation. The isobaric mass design of the iTRAQ reagents enables the peptides to have uniform mass, resulting in the proteolytic peptides to appear as single peaks in MS scans. The MS/MS spectra contains the quantitative information from the reporter ions. The iTRAQ reagent contains a reporter group, a balance group and an amino-active group, which modifies the Ntermini and the lysine side chains of the peptides and upon collision induced dissociation charged reporter group can be generated. The reporter product ions are used to quantify their respective modified samples. Bernhard Kuster et al have accurately quantified at 100amol level, by carefully optimizing instrument parameters such as collision energy, activation Q, delay time, ion isolation width, number of microscans, and number of trapped ions generated a low m/z fragment ion intensities. (Bantscheff, Boesche et al. 2008) 7.2 SILAC labeling to study global protein changes during MEL differentiation In this study we used SILAC labeling to identify the global proteome changes during the 2% (v/v) Me2SO induced MEL cell differentiation. SILAC labeling protocol was slightly modified, (having 1% non-dialysed serum containing minor traces of differentiation inducing factors). The modification of using nondilaysed serum did not interfere with the label incorporation and quantification. We used MEM to significantly suppress the arginine 13 13 C6 to Proline C5-conversion.(Bendall, Hughes et al. 2008). Since arginine is a metabolic precursor of proline biosynthesis Figure_R23. 102 102 Discussion Figure_R23. Metabolic conversion of isotope-coded arginine to proline: Source .(Bendall, Hughes et al. 2008) The unpredictable conversion of isotopic arginine to proline creates inaccuracy in SILACbased quantitative proteomic experiments. a, a conceptual mass spectra of a non-proline containing peptide ion from a 1:1 mixture of light and heavy labeled samples. Here the expected Light and Heavy peptide ions have an equivalent signal. b, a spectra from a proline containing peptide where arginine to proline conversion has occurred in the same 1:1 mixture. The resulting heavy proline peptide signal (red) has been subtracted from the expected ‘heavy’ peptide ion signal. c, metabolic pathway outlining the inter-conversion of arginine and proline. Isotope-coded arginine with carbon 13 (red) and nitrogen 15 (green) when used as a synthetic precursor increases the expected mass of proline. We aimed at identifying and quantifying the proteome changes at an in-depth scale using a combination of subcellular fractionations, mitochondrial, nuclear, cytoplasmic and membrane, followed by separation techniques like SDS- PAGE, peptide IEF and further analysed over LC-MS/MS. SILAC based quantitative proteomics approach is proven to be significantly helpful in comparing the expression levels of thousands of proteins in two or more cellular states (Cox and Mann 2007; Graumann, Hubner et al. 2008), we for the first time compared the DMSO induced proteomic changes during the MEL cell differentiation using the SILAC approach. 2D-Gel based approaches in the 103 103 Discussion past reported (Petrak, Myslivcova et al. 2007) 700 protein spots and were able to identify 27proteins to be differentially expressed. Classic 2D-gels face a major limitation in identifying the very basic proteins and also low and high molecular weight proteins. Undersampling is the major bottle neck in shotgun proteomics approach, to overcome this we used subcellular fractionation and peptide OFFGEL prefractionation approaches. Peptide OFFGEL fractionation approach was published to be promising in terms of identifying low abundant proteins from complex proteome mixtures (Graumann, Hubner et al. 2008). This approach allowed us to probe deeper into the global proteome changes and we could quantify 3774 proteins along with all known hemebiosynthesis markers and additionally identified 47 novel proteins. We conclude that the combination of 1D gel electrophoresis, OFFGEL-peptide fractionation, nanoLC-MS/MS and SILAC is an excellent method in quantifying the global proteomics changes. Our MEL proteome dataset represents a deeper global proteome coverage so far We performed quantile based protein distribution and observed proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation, poryphyrin metabolism were upregulated, oxidative phosphorylation occurs at the inner mitochondrial membrane (generation of proton-motive force and ATP synthesis). The involvement of mitochondria towards cell differentiation emerges from the study of Smith et al. demonstrating the dependence of differentiation of rat glial oligodendrocytes precursors on redox status of cells. Shift of redox systems to higher oxidation degree provoked differentiation of these cell precursors into oligodendrocytes or astrocytes, whereas high reduction state 104 104 Discussion maintained cells in the undifferentiated state. Poryphyrin metabolism is the key metabolic process involved in the formation of heme as the main endproduct. It includes the late mitochondrial enzymes like protoporyphyrinogen oxidase and frrochelatase. We observed down regulation of pathways related to AML, CML since the MEL cells upon DMSO induction loose proliferative potential resulting in down-regulation of these cancer related pathways. Glycolysis the source of cellular ATP and down-regulation of this biological process indicates the cells being inactive (non-proliferative) and also delaying the apoptotic process, Smac/DIABLO enzymes facilitate caspase activation by neutralizing IAP (Inhibitors of apoptosis) that inhibit caspase-3,-7 and -9 (Du, Fang et al. 2000) (Verhagen, Ekert et al. 2000). Proteomic analysis could prove more beneficial since the microarray probe sets are fixed (Figure_R23). The probe sets on a microarray tend to be targeted towards the 3' end of a transcript (thus potentially failing to identify truncated or alternatively spliced forms of that transcript) they do define known sequences and, since the complete sequencing of several genomes, probe sets can be well characterized in terms of their target binding and crossreactivity. 105 105 Discussion Figure_R23. Comparision of data generated by proteomics vs transcriptomics: Source ((Unwin and Whetton 2006) Comparison of the data generated by proteomics vs. transcriptomics (A) Transcriptomics methods tend to have probes focused in fixed locations towards the 3’ end of the mRNA. In the case illustrated, this technique would fail to detect the presence of the splice variant. In addition, one of the probe sets lies in an untranslated region of the mRNA, so any change in the level of this probe set is unlikely to result in a change in protein level. In the case of proteomics, the peptides may be identified anywhere along the protein. Here, the presence of a splice variant is detected by the two peptides marked ‘a’ which are specific to the long form of the protein, and the peptide ‘b’ which is specific to the short form. By just using the labeled peptides, the relative quantities of both the long and short variant are quantified, with data from the ‘shared’ peptides being unreliable and discounted. Clearly, if no peptide ‘b’ had been identified, then evidence of this form would be lost and the proteomics would just assay the long form, as does the transcriptomics. (B) Transcriptomics does not detect post translationally modified forms of proteins. In proteomics, the presence of either the modified or unmodified form of a peptide (marked ‘c’) informs on the relative amount of modification, if the ratio of this peptide is different to the ratios of other peptides from this protein. To get added insight we studied the global mRNA patterns and performed microarray analysis. Linear regression analysis of proteomics and transcriptome expression indicated a correlation value of r = 0.50, indicating a low correlation. The common pathways up-regulated both in the proteomics and transcriptome data include (1) Poryphyrin metabolism (2) SNARE interaction in vesicular transport (3) Ubiquitin mediated pathways (5)mTOR signaling pathway (6) Glycan degradation (7) OXPHOS Down-regulated pathways include (a) CML (b) AML (c) Glycolysis.(d) Purine metabolism (e) cell cycle (f) leukocyte trans endothelial migration 106 106 Discussion 7.3 MEL Proteome Vs Transcriptome analysis We further looked at the overlap between gene and protein expression levels, since the presence of protein is dependent on the presence of mRNA. It could also be true that mRNA being an intermediate molecule in protein production be subjected to modifications altering its stability, rate of translation, posttranslational modification etc that eventually influences the protein stability. Its poorly understood as how many protein changes take place with out alteration in the mRNA levels. We looked at a global level to see the extent of correlation between the two datasets of mRNA and protein expressions. We mapped the transcriptome transcript ID and the proteomic IPI ID to gene symbols. Finally we got 3374 genes representing both transcriptome and proteomic datasets. Linear correlation analysis showed a moderate correlation between the log2 transcriptome and the log2 proteomic data, r=0.5086. The standard deviation (SD) of the residual values (difference between the observed and the fitted values from the linear regression model) was calculated. Genes with log2 proteome ratios greater than two standard deviation were arbitrarily assigned as “outliers” and genes with log2 proteome ratios less than one standard deviation were assigned as “inliers”. “Inliers” showed a better correlation between the transcriptome and proteomic datasets, with r=0.8027, while “Outliers” showed a weaker correlation, having r=0.3480. ‘Inliers’ dataset had a very high correlation between the protein/mRNA abundance (66%), while the ‘outliers’ subgroup was comparably smaller (9%) and showed a weak correlation. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis of the outlier group indicated several proteins involved in lipid metabolic process, sterol metabolic process, iron ion transport, mitochondrial electron transport, indicating that these functions have a high degree of post-transcriptional and/or post-translational regulation. Combining the proteomic and transcriptome data will help us to expand the identification of proteins, for e.g. we observe lipid metabolism pathway involvement which includes fatty acid biosynthesis, fatty acid elongation in mitochondria, fatty acid metabolism, steroid biosynthesis, glycerolipid biosynthesis, sphingolipid metabolism, arachidonic acid metabolism etc. By 107 107 Discussion using directed approach of inclusion list based analysis (Jaffe, Keshishian et al. 2008) identify the proteins involved in the above listed pathways Outlook Proteomics based studies reveal a valuable source of information on a large scale and could potentially be used for hypothesis based approaches. We consider our proteomics dataset as a novel data source that will enhance the characterization of future proteomics based MEL cell differentiation studies, would like to validate potential novel candidate proteins using Zebrafish model system, to get a deeper insight into the erythroid differentiation programme. 108 108 References References Aebersold, R. and M. Mann (2003). "Mass spectrometry-based proteomics." Nature 422(6928): 198-207. Baklouti, F., S. C. Huang, et al. (1996). "Asynchronous regulation of splicing events within protein 4.1 pre-mRNA during erythroid differentiation." Blood 87(9): 3934-41. Bank, A. (2007). "AHSP: a novel hemoglobin helper." J Clin Invest 117(7): 1746-9. Bantscheff, M., M. Boesche, et al. (2008). "Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer." Mol Cell Proteomics 7(9): 1702-13. Bantscheff, M., M. Schirle, et al. (2007). "Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review." Anal Bioanal Chem 389(4): 1017-31. Ben-David, Y., E. B. Giddens, et al. (1991). "Erythroleukemia induction by Friend murine leukemia virus: insertional activation of a new member of the ets gene family, Fli-1, closely linked to c-ets-1." Genes Dev 5(6): 908-18. Bendall, S. C., C. Hughes, et al. (2008). "Prevention of amino acid conversion in SILAC experiments with embryonic stem cells." Mol Cell Proteomics 7(9): 1587-97. Blagoev, B. and M. Mann (2006). "Quantitative proteomics to study mitogenactivated protein kinases." Methods 40(3): 243-50. Boix, J. and A. Ruiz-Carrillo (1992). "Increased histone H1(0) expression in differentiating mouse erythroleukemia cells is related to decreased cell proliferation." Exp Cell Res 201(2): 531-4. Cargile, B. J., J. R. Sevinsky, et al. (2005). "Immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing as a first-dimension separation in shotgun proteomics." J Biomol Tech 16(3): 181-9. Cox, J. and M. Mann (2007). "Is proteomics the new genomics?" Cell 130(3): 395-8. Cox, J. and M. Mann (2008). "MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification." Nat Biotechnol 26(12): 1367-72. Cox, J., I. Matic, et al. (2009). "A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics." Nat Protoc 4(5): 698-705. DeSouza, L., G. Diehl, et al. (2005). "Search for cancer markers from endometrial tissues using differentially labeled tags iTRAQ and cICAT with multidimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry." J Proteome Res 4(2): 377-86. Dreisbach, A., A. Otto, et al. (2008). "Monitoring of changes in the membrane proteome during stationary phase adaptation of Bacillus subtilis using in vivo labeling techniques." Proteomics 8(10): 2062-76. Du, C., M. Fang, et al. (2000). "Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition." Cell 102(1): 33-42. Fontenay, M., S. Cathelin, et al. (2006). "Mitochondria in hematopoiesis and hematological diseases." Oncogene 25(34): 4757-67. Futcher, B., G. I. Latter, et al. (1999). "A sampling of the yeast proteome." Mol Cell Biol 19(11): 7357-68. Gauss, C., M. Kalkum, et al. (1999). "Analysis of the mouse proteome. (I) Brain proteins: separation by two-dimensional electrophoresis and identification by mass spectrometry and genetic variation." Electrophoresis 20(3): 575-600. References Gehrmann, M. L., Y. Hathout, et al. (2004). "Evaluation of metabolic labeling for comparative proteomics in breast cancer cells." J Proteome Res 3(5): 1063-8. Ghaemmaghami, S., W. K. Huh, et al. (2003). "Global analysis of protein expression in yeast." Nature 425(6959): 737-41. Graumann, J., N. C. Hubner, et al. (2008). "Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and proteome quantitation of mouse embryonic stem cells to a depth of 5,111 proteins." Mol Cell Proteomics 7(4): 672-83. Greenbaum, D., C. Colangelo, et al. (2003). "Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale." Genome Biol 4(9): 117. Greenbaum, D., R. Jansen, et al. (2002). "Analysis of mRNA expression and protein abundance data: an approach for the comparison of the enrichment of features in the cellular population of proteins and transcripts." Bioinformatics 18(4): 585-96. Grove, G. W. and A. Zweidler (1984). "Regulation of nucleosomal core histone variant levels in differentiating murine erythroleukemia cells." Biochemistry 23(19): 4436-43. Gusella, J. F. and D. Housman (1976). "Induction of erythroid differentiation in vitro by purines and purine analogues." Cell 8(2): 263-9. Gygi, S. P., G. L. Corthals, et al. (2000). "Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis-based proteome analysis technology." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(17): 9390-5. Gygi, S. P., B. Rist, et al. (1999). "Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags." Nat Biotechnol 17(10): 994-9. Hubner, N. C., S. Ren, et al. (2008). "Peptide separation with immobilized pI strips is an attractive alternative to in-gel protein digestion for proteome analysis." Proteomics 8(23-24): 4862-72. Hunt, R. C. and L. M. Marshall (1981). "Membrane protein redistribution during differentiation of cultured human erythroleukemic cells." Mol Cell Biol 1(12): 1150-62. Jaffe, J. D., H. Keshishian, et al. (2008). "Accurate inclusion mass screening: a bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification." Mol Cell Proteomics 7(10): 1952-62. Kruger, M., M. Moser, et al. (2008). "SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function." Cell 134(2): 353-64. Liu, H. and C. H. Herrmann (2005). "Differential localization and expression of the Cdk9 42k and 55k isoforms." J Cell Physiol 203(1): 251-60. Lopez-Fernandez, L. A., D. M. Lopez-Alanon, et al. (1997). "Developmental expression of H3.3A variant histone mRNA in mouse." Int J Dev Biol 41(5): 699-703. Lu, P., C. Vogel, et al. (2007). "Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation." Nat Biotechnol 25(1): 117-24. Macleod, K. F., N. Sherry, et al. (1995). "p53-dependent and independent expression of p21 during cell growth, differentiation, and DNA damage." Genes Dev 9(8): 935-44. Marks, P. A. and R. Breslow (2007). "Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug." Nat Biotechnol 25(1): 84-90. Nikitin, A., S. Egorov, et al. (2003). "Pathway studio--the analysis and navigation of molecular networks." Bioinformatics 19(16): 2155-7. 110 110 References Olsen, J. V., S. E. Ong, et al. (2004). "Trypsin cleaves exclusively C-terminal to arginine and lysine residues." Mol Cell Proteomics 3(6): 608-14. Ong, S. E., B. Blagoev, et al. (2002). "Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics." Mol Cell Proteomics 1(5): 376-86. Otsuka, Y., D. Ito, et al. (2008). "Expression of alpha-hemoglobin stabilizing protein and cellular prion protein in a subclone of murine erythroleukemia cell line MEL." Jpn J Vet Res 56(2): 75-84. Pan, C., C. Kumar, et al. (2009). "Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions." Mol Cell Proteomics 8(3): 443-50. Perkins, D. N., D. J. Pappin, et al. (1999). "Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data." Electrophoresis 20(18): 3551-67. Petrak, J., D. Myslivcova, et al. (2007). "Proteomic analysis of erythroid differentiation induced by hexamethylene bisacetamide in murine erythroleukemia cells." Exp Hematol 35(2): 193-202. Rabilloud, T. (2002). "Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: old, old fashioned, but it still climbs up the mountains." Proteomics 2(1): 3-10. Rappsilber, J., M. Mann, et al. (2007). "Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips." Nat Protoc 2(8): 1896-906. Rekhtman, N., K. S. Choe, et al. (2003). "PU.1 and pRB interact and cooperate to repress GATA-1 and block erythroid differentiation." Mol Cell Biol 23(21): 7460-74. Rekhtman, N., F. Radparvar, et al. (1999). "Direct interaction of hematopoietic transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1: functional antagonism in erythroid cells." Genes Dev 13(11): 1398-411. Rifkind, R. A., V. M. Richon, et al. (1996). "Induced differentiation, the cell cycle, and the treatment of cancer." Pharmacol Ther 69(2): 97-102. Ross, P. L., Y. N. Huang, et al. (2004). "Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents." Mol Cell Proteomics 3(12): 1154-69. Russell, E. S. (1979). "Hereditary anemias of the mouse: a review for geneticists." Adv Genet 20: 357-459. Selbach, M., B. Schwanhausser, et al. (2008). "Widespread changes in protein synthesis induced by microRNAs." Nature 455(7209): 58-63. Shelley, C. S., J. M. Teodoridis, et al. (2002). "During differentiation of the monocytic cell line U937, Pur alpha mediates induction of the CD11c beta 2 integrin gene promoter." J Immunol 168(8): 3887-93. Standefer, J. C. and D. Vanderjagt (1977). "Use of tetramethylbenzidine in plasma hemoglobin assay." Clin Chem 23(4): 749-51. Stopka, T., D. F. Amanatullah, et al. (2005). "PU.1 inhibits the erythroid program by binding to GATA-1 on DNA and creating a repressive chromatin structure." EMBO J 24(21): 3712-23. Tringali, C., L. Anastasia, et al. (2007). "Modification of sialidase levels and sialoglycoconjugate pattern during erythroid and erytroleukemic cell differentiation." Glycoconj J 24(1): 67-79. Tsiftsoglou, A. S., I. S. Pappas, et al. (2003). "The developmental program of murine erythroleukemia cells." Oncol Res 13(6-10): 339-46. 111 111 References Tsiftsoglou, A. S. and W. Wong (1985). "Molecular and cellular mechanisms of leukemic hemopoietic cell differentiation: an analysis of the Friend system." Anticancer Res 5(1): 81-99. Turano, M., G. Napolitano, et al. (2006). "Increased HEXIM1 expression during erythroleukemia and neuroblastoma cell differentiation." J Cell Physiol 206(3): 603-10. Unwin, R. D. and A. D. Whetton (2006). "Systematic proteome and transcriptome analysis of stem cell populations." Cell Cycle 5(15): 1587-91. Verhagen, A. M., P. G. Ekert, et al. (2000). "Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins." Cell 102(1): 43-53. Wefes, I., L. D. Mastrandrea, et al. (1995). "Induction of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes during terminal erythroid differentiation." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92(11): 4982-6. Weiss, M. J. and C. O. dos Santos (2009). "Chaperoning erythropoiesis." Blood 113(10): 2136-44. Yamada, T., F. Kihara-Negishi, et al. (1998). "Reduction of DNA binding activity of the GATA-1 transcription factor in the apoptotic process induced by overexpression of PU.1 in murine erythroleukemia cells." Exp Cell Res 245(1): 186-94. Yellajoshyula, D. and D. T. Brown (2006). "Global modulation of chromatin dynamics mediated by dephosphorylation of linker histone H1 is necessary for erythroid differentiation." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(49): 18568-73. Yin, L., Y. Tao, et al. (2007). "Proteomic and transcriptomic analysis of rice mature seed-derived callus differentiation." Proteomics 7(5): 755-68. Zhuo, S., S. Fan, et al. (1995). "Study of the role of retinoblastoma protein in terminal differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells." Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92(10): 4234-8. Zubarev, R. and M. Mann (2007). "On the proper use of mass accuracy in proteomics." Mol Cell Proteomics 6(3): 377-81. 112 112 Acknowledgements 8.0 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Gerhard Mittler for giving me this great opportunity to work in his lab. I am highly inspired by his scientific enthusiasm, he has always been highly informative, supportive, and maintained an encouraging work atmosphere. I consider working in his lab to be one of the most significant career developments so far. The finest qualities which I would carry from him are highly organized work style, clarity in mind, novel thinking, maintaining the laboratory standards in-par with the latest developments, perseverance, and cool mindedness. He is my scientific mentor. I next would like to thank Prof. Rudolf Grosschedl for all the support and the useful critical discussions about my project. I am inspired by his pro-active approach in discussion initiation and scientific suggestions during all the presentation sessions at the MPI. I sincerely thank Gabi Nerz who was very helpful in contributing to the success of the whole project. I would like to thank all my lab members, Rudi Engelke, Trung Ngo, Sina Pleiner for the active scientific discussions and maintaining a good work atmosphere. Rudi Engelke was very helpful in sharing his thoughts regarding bioinformatics data analysis and friendly suggestions. I would like to thank my co-supervisors Dr. Robert Schneider and Dr. Wolfgang Schamel for their valuable scientific suggestions and periodic discussions. I would like to thank Chanchal kumar of Mathias Mann lab, for his inputs on bioinformatic analysis Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. T. Brogreffe for the helpful discussions about microarray experiments I would like to thank our collaborator Dr. Yong Li from the FRISYS centre, for all his support and giving me an opportunity to work with Ariadne Pathway Studio analysis software 114 114 CV Curriculum vitae Ravi Kumar Krovvidi Ph.D student (Completion early 2009) Max Planck Institute of Immunobiolgy, Department of Molecular and Cellular Immunology Proteomics Division Freiburg, Germany. Phone (O):0049-761 5108 751 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of Birth: 13 Jan 1974 Marital status: Married Place of Birth: Hyderabad, India CV Current work: Project A. Small molecule kinase inhibitor investigation using SILAC and LTQFT MS. Project involves identification of potential off-targets against a small molecule inhibitor targeting Cdk9. Cells are cultured in normal and labeled medium containing [13C6]-arginine, and [2H4]-lysine and the labeled cell lysates are loaded onto the inhibitor matrix having the chromatographic beads coupled to the small molecule inhibitor. The chromatography matrix without inhibitor coupling serves as a control column. After extensive washing and combination of the resins, the bound proteins are eluted with SDS sample buffer, separated by 1D SDS-PAGE, and the resolved protein bands are subjected to in-gel digestion with trypsin. Resulting tryptic peptides are separated by nanoLC (MDLC) directly coupled online to a 7-Tesla linear iontrap Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (LTQFT Ultra, Thermo fisher). Protein identification is performed using Mascot database searching and quantification by MS Quant. Project B. Quantitative proteome investigation of Erythroid differentiation using Peptide IEF prefractionation and LTQFT mass spectrometry. Study involves a quantitative proteomics approach to identify proteins differentially expressed during the erythroid differentiation programme in a cell culture model system, using SILAC labeling. Peptide-isoelectric focusing is employed as a prefractionation method along with GeLC-MS. Murine erythroid leukemia (MEL) cells are cultured in normal and labeled DMEM medium (with 10% dialyzed FBS) containing [13C6]-arginine, and [2H4]-lysine and the latter cell population is stimulated to differentiate by addition of 2% (v/v) DMSO for 120 hours. Equal amounts of cells are mixed and lysed in 2% (w/v) SDS. Following protein precipitation, proteins are sequentially digested with LysC and trypsin under denaturing conditions and the resulting peptides are prefractionated by peptide-IEF on 18 cm IPG strips (pH 3-10). Peptides extracted from 24 sections of the strips are analyzed by nanoLC (MDLC) FTICR (LTQFT Ultra) mass spectrometry. Alternatively, GeLC-MS is also used for prefractionation. Data dependent spectral acquisition, Mascot database searching and MSQuant software are used for protein identification and quantification. Work and academic history: 2006 Onwards: (Pursuing Ph.D programme in proteomics and mass spectrometry at Max Planck Institute of Immunobiolgy, Freiburg, Germany) 2002 to 2006: Worked as a Scientist in Proteomics/Mass spectrometry facility at Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, a leading drug discovery based pharmaceutical company in India, Hyderabad. 116 116 CV 2001 to 2002: Worked as Project Assistant in Proteomics Core Facility in Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology CCMB, Hyderabad, India. Project details: (2001 to 2002) Project A: National cancer research project, India Biomarker identification in oral cancer of the indian population Project B: Biomarker identification in Gliomas of the Indian Population Projects summary: (2002 to 2006) Project Rheumatoid Arthritis Results Annotated the rat serum proteome, Identified 10 differentially expressed key marker proteins playing a major role during the Proteomics from rat inflammation stages of arthritis progression. Serum Breast cancer Annotated the human breast proteome. Identified 36 differentially Proteomics from expressed proteins known to be playing a major role in breast human breast tissue cancer from a sample size of 100 patients of different stages of cancer progression. Some of the potential proteins were taken up further validation for biomarker development (as potential therapeutic candidates) Rat hepatocytes Generated a protein database of rat hepatocytes, completely annotated the hepatocyte proteome using the in-house and public proteome domain protein search engines. Generated a protein database of toxicity related proteins for the specific concentrations of the orally administered acetaminophen toxicity treated rats Toxico Proteomics Liver Assessment Impurity Profiling Small Profiling Molecule Analysis of small molecules (organic compounds of mass less than 500 Da) by MALDI-TOF. Work involved the characterization of several small molecules by MS and PSD fragment spectra Metabolite Profiling 117 Employment of MALDI-TOF as an analytical tool in quantifying the impurities present in a compound batch. Screening of Metabolites generated upon drug treatment in the serum/plasma using MALDI-TOF 117 CV Technical Expertise • • • • • • • • • Experience in protein sample preparation from human serum and in vitro cell culture systems. Nuclear protein extraction from HeLa and Jurkat cells. Experience in peptide prefractionation using Peptide Isoelectric focusing on IPG phor (GE Biosciences) and OFFGEL (Agilent) peptide fractionation devices. Biological Mass Spectrometry and Liquid chromatography. Working regularly with MDLC (GE Biosciences) and LTQFT mass spectrometer (Thermo fisher). Packing in-house C18 RPLC columns using Proxeon pressure bomb. Instrument maintenance (regular calibration of the ion trap and FT-MS, handling liquid refrigerants liquid nitrogen & helium refilling for the 7 Tesla magnet). Experienced in peptide sample preparation Experience in running MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers (Micromass and ABI MALDI-TOF, Bruker and SCIEX TOF-TOF for MS/MS analysis). Bioinformatics expertise: Mascot search engine, MS Quant. Protein database Blast searching, Go annotation tools. Undergone training and certified level II professional in Protein Molecular Modeling of Accelrys Inc USA. Protein 2D gel separations, DIGE basic skills, 2D gel visualization and differential analysis using Decodon and Biorad PDQuest software. Label free quantification: DeCyder MS software Remote desktop communication (VNC SOFTWARE) Academic Profile: • M.Sc Environmental sciences 1997 73% Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded, Maharashtra • B.Sc. Microbiology 1995 58% Osmania University, Hyderabad, A.P, India • Intermediate 1991 70% AP Board of intermediate, Hyderabad AP • S.S.C 1989 74% Board of Secondary Education, Andhra Pradesh, India Scientific Meetings attended: • 118 Presented a poster at the ASMS 2008 conference on “Quantitative proteome changes during differentiation of murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells assessed by SILAC labeling and nanoLC-MS ” 118 CV • • Presented a poster at the ASMS 2007 conference on “Peptide isoelectric focusing as a first dimension separation prior to nanoLC-MS is a powerful alternative to GeLC-MS for SILAC based quantitative proteomics” Presented a poster at the International Conference on Proteomics: “Bridging the Gap between Gene Expression and Biological Function" organized by the Gabriel Lippmann group in Luxembourg Publications: 1. Evidence for the association of synaptotagmin with Glutathione Stransferases: Implications for a novel function in human breast cancer S. Sreenatha†, K. Ravi Kumara, G. V. Reddya, B. Sridevi, D. Praveena, S.Monikaa,S.Sudhab, M. GopalReddyc and P. Reddanna. Clinical Biochemistry, 2005, 38:436-43. 2. Characterization of calcineurin-dependent response element binding protein and its involvement in copper- metallothionein gene expression in Neurospora. Kumar KS, Ravi Kumar, Siddavattam D, Subramanyam C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006, 345:1010-3. 3. Biodegradation of methyl parathion and p-nitrophenol: Evidence to show Pnitrophenol 2–hydroxylase in a Gram- negative Serratia sp. strain DS001 Pnitrophenol 2–hydroxylase in a Gram-negative Serratia sp. strain DS001 Suresh B. Pakala, Purushotam Gorla, Aleem Basha P, Ravikumar K Rajasekhar B, Mahesh Y, Mike Merrick and Dayananda Siddavatam Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Jan;73 (6):1452-62. 119 119 CV References: 1. Dr. Gerhard Mittler Group Leader Department of Cellular & Molecular Immunology Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology Freiburg, Germany Email: [email protected] 2. Dr. Robert Schneider Group Leader, Spemann Laboratory, Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology Freiburg, Germany Email: [email protected] 3. Dr. Wolfgang Schamel Group Leader, Department of Molecular Immunology Max-Planck Institute of Immunobiology Freiburg, Germany Email: [email protected] Yours Sincerely Ravi Kumar Krovvidi 120 120