Add text, IBC 717.5.2, Exception 3

Transcription

Add text, IBC 717.5.2, Exception 3
DENVER AMEN
NDMENT PROPOSSAL 2015 INTER
RNATIONAL CODES UPD ATED DEAD
DLINE: JANUA
ARY 9, 2015
5 ed Denver ame
endment to th
he Internationaal Codes must be justified. In
n order to be NOTE:: Each propose
consid
dered, the ame
endment prop
posal must add
dress climate, cclarity and/or cost. 1) Submiitter Informatiion me: Markk Jelinske, P.E.. Nam
Orga
anization (if Cator, Rumaa, and Associattes
appliicable): Phon
ne: 303‐462‐8475 E‐mail address:
Datee:
Januaary 9, 2015
[email protected]
2) *Signature: *
* I hereby grant and assig
gn to City and County of Denver all rrights in copyright I may have in anyy authorship contriibutions I make to
o City and and that I will havee no rights in any CCity and County off Denver publicatio
ons that use County of Denver in conneection with this prroposal. I understa
ntributions in the fform submitted byy me or another similar form and ceertify that such conntributions are nott protected by the copyright of such con
any other person or entityy. Note: electronicc signatures are accceptable. 3) Indica
ate which Interrnational Code
e (I‐Code) you propose to am
mend (please u
use acronym): _IBC________________ If yourr code proposaal requires an aamendment to
o another I‐Codde, please indiccate which oth
her I‐Code and section(s) is impacted, and pro
ovide the necesssary language
e within the prooposal form. ection below fo
or list of namess and acronyms for the Internnational Codess. See se
4) Be surre to format yo
our proposal aand include all information aas indicated on
n pages 2‐3 of this form. 5) Send yyour proposal to Communityy Planning and
d Developmen t (CPD), attenttion: Jill Jennin
ngs Golich, viaa email at jill.jen
nningsgolich@d
denvergov.orgg. An e‐mail submittal shouldd include an eleectronic versio
on saved with aa file name as follows: 2015_public_amendme
ent_proposal_C
Codname_SecttionReferencee, where name_SectionReference’ is rreplaced using the code and ssection being p
proposed (for instance ‘Coden
‘2015_
_public_amend
dmnet_propossal_IBC_Section312’). The onnly formatting n
OLDING, STRIK
KEOUT necessary is BO
AND U
UNDERLINING. Please do not provide additiional formattinng such as this will be done b
by CPD. Please
e use a separatte form for eacch proposal sub
bmitted unlesss as allowed in 3) above. wledgment, an
nt proposals re
eceived will recceive an acknow
nd will be postted on the Building Code Note: All amendmen
e public review. websitte to allow the
e check here if a separate graaphic file is pro
ovided. √ Please
Acronyym DBC‐AP IBC IECC IEBC IFC IFGC IMC Co
ode Name Denver Building Cod
de–Administrative
e Prrovisions Intternational Buildin
ng Code Intternational Energyy Conservation Code Intternational Existin
ng Building Code Intternational Fire Co
ode Intternational Fuel Gas Code Intternational Mechaanical Code Acronym
A
IPPC IR
RC N
NEC AMEN
NDMENT PR
ROPOSAL Code Name International P
Plumbing Code International R
Residential Code National Electrrical Code Please provide all of the following items in your amendment proposal. Your proposal may be entered on the following form, or you may attach a separate file. However, please read the instructions for each part of the amendment proposal. Code Sections/Tables/Figures Proposed for Revision:
IBC 717.5.2, Exception 3 Proposal: •Add new text as follows 3. Such walls are penetrated by ducted HVAC systems, have a required fire-resistance rating of 1hour or less, are in
areas of other than Group H and are in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance
with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2. For the purposes of this exception, a ducted HVAC system shall be a duct system
for conveying supply, return or exhaust air as part of the structure’s HVAC system. Such a duct system shall be
constructed of sheet steel not less than No. 26 gage thickness and shall be continuous from the air-handling appliance or
equipment to the air outlet and inlet terminals. The use of UL 181 listed and labeled Class 0 or Class 1 flexible air
ducts for the final run-out to the individual air terminals, or a non-metallic duct vibration isolation joint shall not negate
this exception, as long as the duct penetrating the Fire Barrier is constructed of sheet steel not less than No. 26 gage
thickness. Supporting Information: Purpose: This is to clarify the intent of the exception. Reasons: It could be interpreted that the use of flexible duct or vibration isolator anywhere in a duct system negates the use of exception 3, therby requiring fire dampers in all duct penetrations. Substantiation: The un‐amended exception clearly allows a steel duct to penetrate a Fire Barrier without a fire damper even if there are duct openings or grilles on either side, as long as the duct is continuous to the equipment. There is no logical or data driven justification to think that simply adding a flex duct runout to those openings would increase the risk to Fire/Life Safety. Note that this proposal limits the type of flexible duct to UL 181 Class 0 or Class 1 flexible air ducts. This is a higher standard than a UL 181 flexible air connector which is allowed. Note also that the use of flexible air duct is limited to the final runout to an individual air device and not an extensive use as the main air distribution. Bibliography: Not Applicable Referenced Standards: UL 181 is already listed in IMC Ch. 15. Impact: The proposal documents a logical interpretation of a “ducted HVAC system”, prevents the design and installation of unnecessary fire dampers, and maintains the same level of Fire/Life Safety as steel duct penetrations with openings on either side. Effect of the proposed amendment on the cost of design:
Increase
Reduce No Effect
Effect of the proposed amendment on the cost of construction:
Increase
Reduce No Effect
Is the amendment proposal more or less restrictive than the I‐Codes?
More
Less Same
Departmental Impact: To be filled out by CPD/DFD Note: The department shall indicate one of the following regarding the impact of the amendment proposal: Effect of the proposed amendment on the time to review:
Increase Reduce No Effect
Effect of the proposed amendment on the cost of enforcement/inspection:
Increase Reduce No Effect
“For the purposes of this exception, a ducted HVAC system shall be a duct
system for conveying supply, return or exhaust air as part of the structure’s
HVAC system. Such a duct system shall be constructed of sheet steel not less
than No. 26 gage thickness and shall be continuous from the air-handling
appliance or equipment to the air outlet and inlet terminals.”
NOT ALLOWED?