Downloadable PPT - Research To Practice
Transcription
Downloadable PPT - Research To Practice
Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Background AKT is a critical signaling node in multiple myeloma (MM) and other hematologic cancers. Afuresertib (GSK2110183) is a potent pan-AKT inhibitor that demonstrated synergy with bortezomib in preclinical models of MM and single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated disease in a Phase I, first-in-human study (Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 1856). Study objective: To evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of afuresertib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MM. Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. PKB115125: Phase IB Study Design Part 1: Dose escalation • Modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation design • Cycles 1-8 induction - Bortezomib IV/SC d1, 4, 8, 11 - Dexamethasone PO d1, 4, 8, 11 - Afuresertib PO d1-21 • Cycle 9 and beyond - Afuresertib monotherapy daily • PK/PD cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) (n = 10) Primary objective: Safety, tolerability, MTD Part 2: Safety expansion Eligibility (n = 81) Bortezomib + dexamethasone + afuresertib (8 cycles) R/R MM Bortezomib naïve or sensitive Afuresertib (Cycle 9 onward) Two-stage design (stop for futility): Stage 1 (n = 15): <5 PR = stop, ≥5 = expand Stage 2: Expand for efficacy (n = 40 total) Primary objective: Safety, tolerability, response rate Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Key Eligibility Criteria ECOG PS 0 to 2 Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 x 109/L, hemoglobin count ≥8.0 g/dL, platelet count ≥50 x 109/L Creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min Total bilirubin/AST/ALT ≤1.5 x ULN Grade <2 peripheral neuropathy ≥1 prior line of therapy Part 1: Bortezomib naïve or R/R Part 2: Bortezomib naïve or relapsed Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Clinical Activity Dose cohort Part 1 (n = 34) Part 2 (n = 37) PK/PD (n = 10) Overall response rate (ORR) 50% 65% 40% Clinical benefit rate (CBR) 56% 73% 40% Best unconfirmed response Clinical activity (ORR) by prior bortezomib exposure Bortezomib exposure Naïve (n = 13) Relapsed (n = 44) Refractory (n = 23) Unknown (n = 1) Part 1 Part 2 PK/PD Total 2/3 (67%) 6/10 (60%) NA 62% 10/18 (56%) 17/26 (65%) NA 61% 5/13 (38%) 1/1 (100%) 4/9 (44%) 43% — — — 0/1 (0%) PK = pharmacokinetics; PD = pharmacodynamics Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Afuresertib Bortezomib Dexamethasone n DLT* Comment 75 mg 1.0 mg/m2 20 mg 4 None — 100 mg 1.3 mg/m2 20 mg 6 1/6 ALT increase (Grade 2) 125 mg 1.3 mg/m2 20 mg 6 1/6 Erythema multiforme (Grade 3) 150 mg 1.3 mg/m2 20 mg 6 None — Patient 1: Rash 175 mg 1.3 mg/m2 20 mg 6 2/6 Patient 2: Rash, diarrhea thrombocytopenia (all were Grade 3) 150 mg 1.3 mg/m2 40 mg 6 NA — * All DLTs were reversible MTD/recommended Phase II dose Afuresertib 150 mg PO daily Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV or SC on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 Dexamethasone 40 mg PO on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Adverse Events (AEs) Nonhematologic All grades Grade ≥3 Fatigue 51% 2% Diarrhea 49% 14% Nausea 37% 1% Constipation 33% 2% Dyspepsia 32% 1% Hyperglycemia 28% 7% Vomiting 27% 2% Peripheral neuropathy 22% 0% Insomnia 20% 0% Rash 20% 7% Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Serious AEs Recorded in 31 pts • Infection • Acute renal injury • Skin disorders • Gastrointestinal • Bone-related events • Vascular events • 1 death: septic shock (F, age 61 years) • Rate of discontinuation for AEs = 23% Adverse Events (continued) Hematologic All grades Grade ≥3 Thrombocytopenia 38% 27% Anemia 22% 10% Neutropenia 11% 7% 2% 1% Febrile neutropenia Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Author Conclusions Afuresertib can be administered safely in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone: – GI and dermatologic AEs were common but manageable. Afuresertib’s PK profile is not affected by bortezomib or dexmethasone (data not shown). Bortezomib’s PK profile is not affected by afuresertib, but dexamethasone exposure is increased by 30% to 50% with afuresertib (data not shown). Afuresertib leads to increased phospho-AKT levels in MM cells, demonstrating achievement of target inhibition at the 150-mg daily dose (data not shown). Afuresertib shows promising clinical activity in combination with bortezomib/dexamethasone: – Responses in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease suggest that afuresertib might overcome bortezomib resistance in some cases. Further studies are planned to confirm the clinical efficacy of afuresertib in combination with other active agents in MM. Voorhees PM et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 283. Investigator Commentary: Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Patients with R/R MM A strong rationale exists for why AKT may be important in the biology of MM, and single-agent activity has been reported with the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in MM (Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 1856). The current study used a Phase I dose-escalation regimen followed by a Phase II expansion to evaluate afuresertib in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the R/R setting. In total, 81 patients received treatment based on demographic descriptions that are standard for this patient population. The trial also included a subset of patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. The Phase II ORR was 65%, and the CBR was 73%. Regarding DLTs, it is important to note some instances of rash. Other noted side effects included Grade ≥3 diarrhea, which was observed in 14% of patients, and hematologic toxicities. We will need to dissect what’s observed because of afuresertib, the new compound, versus what may be an effect of bortezomib. (Continued) How to position new molecules in combination with bortezomib in MM is a fiercely competitive world, but this particular molecule has singleagent activity and now appears to show clear evidence of activity in combination. It will have to be tested in larger studies but shows good proof of concept for future investigation. Interview with Rafael Fonseca, MD, February 14, 2014