effects of various modifications on petroleum coke gasification
Transcription
effects of various modifications on petroleum coke gasification
CHEMICAL AND THERMAL MODIFICATION OF PETROLEUM COKE M. Malekshahian and Josephine M. Hill Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, N.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada. T2N 1N4 Abstract: The influence of different pre-treatment methods, including devolatilization, chemical, and thermal pre-treatment methods, on the properties of petroleum coke (petcoke) samples has been investigated using N2 and CO2 adsorption, XRD, and FTIR techniques. After characterization, a portion of each sample was impregnated with potassium. The effects of both the pretreatments and the presence of K as a catalyst were investigated by testing the reactivity of petcoke in air at 900 ºC using a thermogravimetric analysis instrument. Characterization methods reveal that the modification methods influence the physical properties, the crystal structure, and the surface functional groups of the petcoke samples. In turn, the reactivity measurements show that modification of physical and chemical properties of petcoke surface, as well as the presence of potassium enhances the reactivity of the samples. Keywords: petroleum coke, chemical pre-treatment, thermal pre-treatment, gasification, catalyst 1. INTRODUCTION The production of petroleum coke (petcoke) is increasing as a by-product of heavy oil upgrading units. While some of the produced petcoke in Canada is burnt in the boilers to produce steam and electricity, its economic utilization is limited due to substantial sulphur concentration, unreactive forms of carbon, and relatively large quantities of transition metals (Watkinson, et al. 1989). Since large quantities of petcoke are being stockpiled at plant sites due to these constraints, petcoke has been considered as an attractive feedstock for gasification. The gasification reactivity of petcoke, however, is low and high carbon conversions are only obtained at high temperatures and long residence times (Furimsky 1985). Therefore, the addition of catalysts may be expedient to enhance the gasification rate at lower temperatures (Zekel 2003). Using catalysts in gasification also significantly affects the product distribution and product gas quality. The main difficulty with adding catalysts to petcoke arises from the fact that petcoke has a low surface area such that there are insufficient anchoring sites for the active metal catalyst. Fortunately, factors affecting metal sorption, including the surface area, acidic functional groups, and crystalline structure, can be modified with various pre-treatment processes (Bautista-Toledo, et al. 1994; Ochoa, et al. 2001; Chingombe, et al. 2005). The objective of the present research is to investigate the effects of various pre-treatment methods on the physical and chemical structure of petcoke using nitrogen and carbon monoxide adsorption, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform Infrared spectroscopy. After characterization, the modified petcoke samples were reacted in a thermogravimetric unit initially in an air atmosphere. 2. EXPERIMENTAL 2.1. Preparation of petcoke samples Petcoke, supplied by Suncor Energy, was ground and sieved to particle sizes smaller than 90 µm. The obtained powder, referred to as raw petcoke, was used as the precursor for the various pre-treatment methods. The first modified sample, referred to as char, was devolatilized at 800 ºC in flowing nitrogen to drive off volatile species. The next two samples, referred to as chemically pretreated petcoke and thermally pretreated petcoke, were modified with chemical and thermal pre-treatments, respectively, as follows. The chemical pre-treatment was performed by placing a portion of the ground petcoke in a solution of HNO3 (20 v/v %) for 15 h at 90 ºC followed by washing with distilled water (Strelko and Malik 2002). The sample was then dried at 110 ºC overnight. The thermal pretreatment was achieved by heating a portion of the ground petcoke to 450 ºC under flowing nitrogen in a fixed bed reactor. The sample was kept at this temperature for 10 h with a flow of nitrogen in air (3:1 v/v) before being cooled to room temperature in nitrogen (150 mL/min) (Serp 1999). The catalyst potassium (K) was loaded on raw and modified petcoke samples using an impregnation method. Impregnated catalyst samples were prepared by wetting the sample with an aqueous solution of potassium carbonate, stirring until the complete evaporation of solvent, and oven drying at 110 ºC for 12 h. The catalyst target loading was 4 wt %. 2.2. Characterization The characterization techniques used were physisorption, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and Xray diffraction (XRD). Although nitrogen (N2) adsorption is a traditional technique for the characterization of porous materials, CO2 adsorption has also been extensively used for microporous materials particularly carbonaceous adsorbents because of the slow diffusion of N2 in small (< 2 nm) pores at 77 K (Marsh 1987; Mahajan 1991). As such, nitrogen adsorption isotherms along with the CO2 adsorption isotherms yield helpful information about the surface area and the pore structure of adsorbents. Nitrogen adsorption at 77 K and CO2 adsorption at 273 K were performed with a Micromeritics micropore analyzer (Tristar 3000) to determine surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution. The Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) method was used to calculate the surface area. FTIR spectra were measured by transmission FTIR spectroscopy (Nicolet Avator 360) to determine the presence of functional groups on the surface of the petcoke samples. For the FTIR analysis, a measured amount of sample was added to KBr for a concentration of 1 wt%. The finely ground material was then massed and pressed into 25 mm diameter disks. Spectra were recorded by co-adding 34 scans at a resolution of 4 cm-1 with the automatic baseline correction. The XRD analysis (Rigaku Multiflex X-ray diffractometer) was conducted to investigate the structural parameters of raw and modified petcoke. Cu/Kα1 radiation (λ= 1.54056 Å) at a 40 kV tube voltage and a 40 mA tube current with a scanning speed of 2° /min was used. 2.3. Thermogravimetric analysis Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Reactivity measurements were conducted using a TherMax500 thermogravimetric system. In each experiment approximately 2-3 mg of sample was placed in a crucible inside the furnace and heated under a N2 atmosphere up to 900 ºC with the heating rate of 20 ºC/min. When the reaction temperature was reached, N2 was replaced by air (100 ml/min) and the mass loss recorded. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1. Pre-treatment effects on the petcoke characterization The surface areas of the petcoke samples are listed in Table 1. After devolatilization, the surface area based on CO2 adsorption decreased while the surface area based on N2 adsorption increased. Since CO2 and N2 are appropriate probe molecules to investigate microporosity and mesoporosity, respectively, it is likely that mesopores are created after devolatilization. The significant increase in the surface area obtained by N2 and CO2 adsorption suggests that the thermal pre-treatment method enhanced both mesoporosity and microporosity. Modification of the petcoke using the chemical pre-treatment resulted in relatively minor changes to the physical properties. Table 1. Surface area of petcoke samples as measured by N2 and CO2 adsorption. Material Raw petcoke Char Thermally pretreated petcoke Chemically pretreated petcoke BET specific surface area (m2/g) N2 CO2 2.7 93 3.6 28 57 176 2.9 107 The surface functional groups of the samples were identified by FTIR. Fig. 1 shows the FTIR spectra of the raw and modified petcoke samples. The spectrum of raw petcoke was characterized by 1. asymmetric and symmetric –C–H stretching vibrations in aliphatic fragments such as –CH3, =CH3, and –CH2CH3 (2914 cm-1 and 1377 cm-1), 2. – C=C– aromatic bonds phenolic groups (1442 cm-1), 3. bending vibration of –C–H of aromatic rings (3044 cm-1), and 4. –O–H stretching vibration mode of hydroxyl functional groups (3450 cm-1) (Lee and Choi 2000; Jiang, et al. 2008). The FTIR spectra of chemically pretreated petcoke had a weak band appearing at 1720 cm-1, which can be ascribed to the stretching vibrations of carboxyl groups. In addition, the alkyl group band at approximately 2900 cm-1 disappeared. Fig. 1 also illustrates the disappearance of IR bands in char samples, which suggests noticeable reduction of surface functional groups after devolatilization. 0.7 char Absorbance ( Arbitrary units) 0.6 C=O 0.5 chemically pretreated petcoke thermally pretreated petcoke 0.4 C=C (ar) 0.3 0.2 0.1 O-H C-H (al) C-H (ar) C-H (al) raw petcoke 0 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Wavenumber (cm-1) Fig. 1. FTIR spectra of the raw and pretreated petcoke samples. XRD analysis of the raw and modified petcoke samples was performed to investigate the crystal structure of the samples. Table 2 lists the interlayer spacing, d002, and crystallite size, Lc, of the samples, calculated by the Bragg and Scherer equations. The crystallite size decreased while the value of interlayer spacing increased after pre-treatments. These values imply that disordered structures were produced. This result is consistent with observations reported elsewhere (Chunlan, et al. 2005; Jiang, et al. 2008) in which petcoke was modified by chemical pre-treatment and pre-carbonization to produce activated carbon. Table 2. Microcrystalline structural parameters of the raw and pretreated petcoke samples Sample Raw petcoke Char Chemically pretreated coke Thermally pretreated coke Lc (nm) 18.0 14.4 13.6 8.9 D002 (nm) 0.342 0.343 0.355 0.348 3.2. Reactivity test The conversion trends for the raw and pretreated petcoke samples as a function of time are shown in Fig. 2. By definition, the observed rate (R) and conversion (X) of the reactant are calculated, respectively, by: R X 1 W0 W0 W0 dW dt W W final (1) ( 2) where W0 is the initial weight of the raw or pretreated petcoke sample, dW is the instantaneous weight loss rate, dt W is the weight at time t, and Wfinal is the weight at the end of the reaction. The conversion of petcoke increased with the addition of catalyst either with or without pre-treatment. However, the addition of catalyst on the chemically and thermally pretreated petcoke samples enhanced the reactivity more than on the raw petcoke and char. The reaction rates of raw petcoke, char, chemically pretreated coke, and thermally pretreated coke increased from 0.016, 0.015, 0.024, and 0.019 mg/mg.min to 0.019, 0.018, 0.037, and 0.026 mg/mg.min, respectively, in the presence of K. In addition, chemical and thermal pre-treatment enhances the reactivity even with no catalyst. These results suggest that the effectiveness of pre-treatment methods is related to their effects on physical, chemical and crystal characteristics of petcoke. Further analysis and reactivity tests in different atmospheres are underway. 100 chemically pretreated petcoke+K 90 raw petcoke+K 80 char+K Carbon conversion, % 70 thermally pretreated petcoke+K raw petcoke 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 5 15 25 35 45 55 Time, min Fig. 2. Conversion of the petcoke samples modified with potassium as a function of time at 900 ºC. 4. CONCLUSIONS The reactivity tests indicated, as expected, that the pre-treatment process used to modify the petcoke enhanced the reactivity. The increase in reactivity due to the addition of a potassium catalyst is higher for chemically and thermally pretreated samples than for raw petcoke and char. The characterization of the petcoke samples suggested that these methods are effective because they enhance the concentration of anchoring sites (such as carboxylic acid groups), increase the surface area, and increase the interlayer spacings within petcoke. REFERENCES Bautista-Toledo, I., J. Rivera-Utrilla, et al. (1994). "Influence of the oxygen surface complexes of activated carbons on the adsorption of chromium ions from aqueous solutions: Effect of sodium chloride and humic acid." Carbon 32(1): 93. Chingombe, P., B. Saha, et al. (2005). "Surface modification and characterisation of a coal-based activated carbon." Carbon 43(15): 3132. Chunlan, L., X. Shaoping, et al. (2005). "Effect of pre-carbonization of petroleum cokes on chemical activation process with KOH." Carbon 43(11): 2295. Furimsky, E. (1985). "Gasification reactivities of cokes derived from athabasca bitumen." Fuel Process Technol 11(2): 167. Jiang, B., Y. Zhang, et al. (2008). "Effects of chemical modification of petroleum cokes on the properties of the resulting activated carbon." Fuel 87(10-11): 1844. Lee, S. H. and C. S. Choi (2000). "Chemical activation of high sulfur petroleum cokes by alkali metal compounds." Fuel Process Technol 64(1-3): 141. Mahajan, O. P. (1991). "CO2 surface area of coals: The 25-year paradox." Carbon 29(6): 735. Marsh, H. (1987). "Adsorption methods to study microporosity in coals and carbons--a critique." Carbon 25(1): 49. Ochoa, J., P. R. Bonelli, et al. (2001). "Effect of Thermal and Acid Treatments on Properties of Argentinean Low Rank Coals." Energy Sources 23(4): 383. Serp, P., Hierso,J-C., Feurer, R., Kihn, Y., Kalck, Ph. (1999). "Single- step preparation of activated carbon supported platinum catalysts by fluidized bed organometallic chemical vapor deposition." Carbon 37(3): 527. Strelko, V. and D. J. Malik (2002). "Characterization and Metal Sorptive Properties of Oxidized Active Carbon." J Colloid Interf Sci 250(1): 213. Watkinson, A. P., G. Cheng, et al. (1989). "Gasification of oil sand coke." Fuel 68(1): 4. Zekel, L. A. K., N. V. (2003). "Effect of catalytic additions on coke gasification." Solid Fuel Chem 37(6): 54-59.