Whatever Happened to Behavior, Anyway?

Transcription

Whatever Happened to Behavior, Anyway?
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Whatever Happened to Behavior, Anyway?
W. J. Wilson, Psychology
March 16, 2015
Occasion Setting
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
How Long is Learning Retained?
0.7
160
1 day
60 days
140
0.6
Suppression Index
120
Licks
100
80
60
40
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
20
0
B
BX
0
0.5
1
Intensity of the US (mA)
2
0
1
1 Day
2
35 Days
• Hendersen (1985): CS+ effect seems not to fade
• Hendersen (1978): CI effect seems to fade
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Causes of “Forgetting”
• Trace decay?
• Interference?
• Retrieval failure (context)?
Suppression ratio
0.5
Ext-A
Ext-B
NE
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Two-trial blocks
1
2
3
4
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Context and Extinction
US
CS
Context
• Renewal effect
• Spontaneous recovery?
• Rapid reacquisition?
• Relapse after therapy for phobia?
• Latent inhibition?
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Occasion Setting
• One stimulus can indicate whether or not another stimulus
will be followed by the US.
• L→ T+
TFeature-positive discrimination
• L→ TT+
Feature-negative discrimination
• Rescorla-Wagner model predicts different learning than does
occasion setting.
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Occasion Setting
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Occasion Setting
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Occasion Setting
• L→ T+
T-
Head Jerk
•
T-
Rearing
LT+
• How do L and T differ in the two procedures (besides timing)?
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Occasion Setting
• SALIENCE!
• Less salient stimulus will serve as occasion setter for more
salient stimulus.
• If equally salient. “Rescorla-Wagner rules” apply.
“Forgetting”
Context & Extinction
Occasion Setting
Stimulus Substitution
• Pavlov: CS comes to substitute for the US (e.g., dog thinks of
bell as food).
• This led to the erroneous conclusion that CR will be small
version of UR.
• Siegel’s compensatory CRs contradict stimulus substitution.
• Timberlake & Grant. . .