cable installation & trenching challenges in offshore wind farms
Transcription
cable installation & trenching challenges in offshore wind farms
NORTH OF ENGLAND EVENING MEETING March 18th 2015 http://www.sut.org/ CABLE INSTALLATION & TRENCHING CHALLENGES IN OFFSHORE WIND FARMS Patrick Smyth 1 AGENDA • Offshore Wind in UK • Offshore Wind Farm Layout • Offshore Substations • Wind Turbine Generators • OWF Cables • Cable Protection Systems • Installation and Trenching Challenges • Crew Transfer • Summary & Conclusions P.2 OFFSHORE WIND IN UK Offshore Wind in UK: • The UK is the world leader in Offshore Wind • The 1st Offshore Wind Farm (OWF) in the UK was in Blyth Harbour (2000) • OWF developed with a series of licensing ‘Rounds’ co‐ordinated by the Crown Estate • Round 1 (2001) ‐ 18 sites in England and Wales • Round 2 (2003) ‐ further offshore and in deeper waters • Round 3 (2010) ‐ nine zones across the UK P.3 OFFSHORE WIND IN UK Source: The Crown Estate P.4 OWF FIELD LAYOUT Typical field layout: • Wind Turbine Generators (WTG) • Inter‐Array Cables • Offshore Substation(s) • Export Cables Source: RWE Innogy P.5 OFFSHORE SUBSTATION Offshore Substation (OSS) / Offshore Substation Platform (OSP) Source: 4C Offshore P.6 OSP PULL‐IN ‐ CHALLENGES ● Upper decks in place ● Headroom on hang‐off deck ● Deck loading ● Landing area ● Space availability ● Pull‐in Winch Location ● J‐tube #/Location/Configuration ● Cable Routing ● Cable over‐pull lengths ● Termination Location P.7 WIND TURBINE GENERATOR (WTG) / MP Wind Turbine Generator (WTG): 1. Blades 2. Nacelle 3. Tower 4. Transition Piece (TP) + Monopile (MP) 5. Inter‐array Cable + Cable Protection System (CPS) Source: GLID P.8 WIND TURBINE GENERATOR STRUCTURES • Jacket • Tripod Source: Areva Source: BARD Group Source: Power Technology P.9 FLOATING WIND TURBINE GENERATOR • Tripod • Jacket • Floating Source: Wind Float Pacific P.10 WTG PULL‐IN ‐ CHALLENGES • • • • • • • • • • • J‐tube/I‐tube/Aperture Height above seabed / Vertical pull‐in angle Scour / Scour Protection WTG towers/nacelles in place TP covers in place Marine growth around bell mouth or apertures WTG Landing / Deck Loading Pull‐in Points Over‐pull Length Dragging cable on seabed Protection of Cable MBR P.11 SECOND END PULL‐IN Typical 2nd end cable pull‐in options: • Pull‐in cable bight along seabed • Use Sliding Quadrant from vessel • Lay cable on seabed and engage with quadrant subsea P.12 OWF CABLES OWF Cables: • Export Cables • Inter‐Link Cables • Inter‐Array Cables NE England Cable/Umbilicala Mfg • JDR Cables • Technip P.13 Other Mfg: • ABB • Nexans • NKT • NSW • Prysmian/Draka OWF CABLES Key Parameters (for installation) Typical Value Minimum Bend Radii (MBR) < 5m Specific Gravity > 1.7 Weight / metre (Air / Water) c. 100 kg/m / c. 40 kg/m Max. Pull‐in Force > 3 tonne P.14 CABLE PROTECTION SYSTEMS (CPS) • • • • • Bend Stiffeners Bend Restrictors/Limiters Seals Centralisers Cable Protection Ducting NE England CPS Mfg • Pipeline Engineering Other Mfg: • Balmoral • BMP • Pipex px • Trelleborg • Subsea Energy Solutions • Tekmar Energy P.15 • • • • Blue Ocean CNPL Seaproof Vos Prodect CABLE PROTECTION Other Methods • Concrete Mattress • Rock Dump • Rock Filled Filter Units Source: Windpower Offshore Source: Jan De Nul P.16 Source: Marske Site Services CPS ‐ CHALLENGES • • • • • • • • Cost Pre‐installed Onshore / Installed offshore Installation time Reliability Sealing Corrosion Foundation Interface Handling & Storage P.17 EXAMPLE OF CABLE LAY & BURIAL OPERATIONS • Free Lay • Pre Cut Trench • Simultaneous Lay & Burial • Post Burial P.18 OWF CABLE BURIAL • Protection against: • Environmental conditions • Trawl damage • Anchor damage • Dropped objects • Reduction of Freespan • Cable Design P.19 Source: Lloyds INSTALLATION & BURIAL CHALLENGES Parameter Typical Value Working Environment Water depth (below LAT) 5m to 35m Tidal range 1m to 10m Current up to 4kts Subsea visibility zero to 10m Environmental (wind / waves) up to 50kts / Hsig up to ~6m Seabed Soil type: clays (cohesive) 3kPa ‐ 1000kPa Soil type: sands (granular) Loose, coarse to dense, fine Seabed bathymetry up to 30° (usually on sand waves) Boulders; other cables / wires / debris; wrecks; UXO 0.5m to 3.0m / 0m to 2.5m Obstacles Target Depth of Lowering / Depth of Cover Infrastructure & Hardware Foundation configuration WTG in place (majority) Scour protection Cable Protection System (CPS) Configuration Sealed or unsealed Outside Diameter ø500mm Centraliser Latch Tension 1Te to 4Te Minimum bend radius 2.5m Inter Array Cables (IAC's) Cable Design P.20 CREW TRANSFER ‐ CHALLENGES CTV Transfer Motion Compensated Systems: • Houlder TAS (Turbine Access System) • OSBIT Power MaXccess Access Systems Source: Houlder Ltd Source: Siemens • Ampelmann • Uptime Source: Ampelmann P.21 Source: Uptime SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS Summary: ● Significant challenges associated with the OWF cable installation and burial ● Reduce offshore operations and worktime ● Reduce weather dependent operations ● Increase limits for operations ● Identify and share best practices ● Involve all parties at the earliest possible stage ● Adhere to industry guidelines ● Examine innovative solutions ● NE England Companies are work leaders P.22 THANK YOU NORTH OF ENGLAND EVENING MEETING March 18th 2015 http://www.sut.org/ INSTALLATION CHALLENGES IN OFFSHORE RENEWABLES Patrick Smyth 23