Journal of Science and Technology 1 (2), 2007, 319
Transcription
Journal of Science and Technology 1 (2), 2007, 319
Journal of Science and Technology 1 (2), 2007, 319-326 ©BEYKENT UNIVERSITY MORPHOLOGICAL AND ANATOMICAL STUDY ON ROMULEA LINARESII PARL. SUBSP. GRAECA BEG. (IRIDACEAE) Canan ÖZDEMİR1, Pelin BARAN1 and Yurdanur AKYOL2 1 Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Manisa / Turkey, [email protected], [email protected] 2 Ege University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, İzmir / Turkey ABSTRACT In this study, the morphological and anatomical properties of Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. have been investigated. In the morphological part of the study, features of various organs of the plant such as corm, scape, leaf and flower were determined and illustrated. It has been found out that colour of filament was dark purple and this feature was characteristic for Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. In anatomical studies, crosssections of root, scape and leaf of the plant were examined. Most of the anatomical properties were similar to the other members of Iridaceae family. Keywords: Romulea linaresii, morphology, anatomy. ÖZET Bu çalışmada, Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. alttürünün morfolojik ve anatomik özellikleri araştırılmıştır. Morfolojik olarak, bitkinin korm, skapus, yaprak ve çiçek gibi çeşitli organlarının özellikleri belirlenerek çizimle gösterilmiştir. Filament renginin koyu mor olduğu ve bu özelliğin Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. için tipik bir özellik olduğu bulunmuştur. Anatomik araştırmalarda ise, bitkinin kök, skapus ve yaprak enine kesitleri incelenmiştir. Bitkinin anatomik özelliklerinin büyük bir kısmı Iridaceae familyasının diğer üyeleri ile benzerlik göstermiştir. Anahtar kelimeler: Romulea linaresii, morfoloji, anatomi. 1. INTRODUCTION Ixioideae, with over 800 species and about 30 genera, is the largest subfamily of Iridaceae. It occurs mainly in Sub-Saharan Africa, but three genera, Crocus, 319 Morphological And Anatomical Study On Romulea Linaresu Pari. Subsp. Graeca Beg. (Iridaceae) Gladiolus and Romulea occur also in the Mediterranean basin [6]. Ixioideae is also a very coherent subfamily in terms of both morphological and anatomical characters [14]. The genus Romulea comprises about 90 species in SubSaharan Africa, The Mediterranean and Near East. The center of diversity of the genus lies in the winter rainfall region of Southern Africa, where 73 species are currently recognized [7]. Two new species of Romulea which are described in Northern Cape raised the number of species in Southern Africa to 76 [8]. The genus Romulea Maratti has been represented by 5 species in Turkey. One of the most prominent properties of this genus is the frequent occurence of gynodioecism. The sexuality may be related to flower size and intensity of colour [2]. There are several reports on the morphology and anatomy of this genus [6,14]. None of the study on the anatomy of Romulea linaresii has been found except for the description in the "Flora of Turkey" [2]. 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS Plant specimens were taken from Maldan region near Muradiye town which is situated in the western part of Turkey. Taxonomical description of the subspecies was made according to Davis [2]. For anatomical studies plant specimens were fixed in 70 % alcohol. An olympus microscope was used to draw the anatomical sections after staining with Sartur reactive [1]. 3. RESULTS 3.1. MORPHOLOGICAL PROPERTIES Leaves of Romulea linaresii subsp. graeca were 3-5 in number, 4-15 cm in length and 0.5-1.5 mm in width. The leaf was mostly recurved and adpressed to soil. Pedicels were short. Bracts were 9-17 mm in length, herbaceous with membranous margins sometimes tinged purple. Bracteols with broad membranous margins were speckled red-brown. Perianth was violet-purple with darker centre in colour, and 1-2.1 cm in length. Perianth tube was 3-8 mm. Perianth segments of which outer side was greenish at base were acute. Filaments were dark purple while anthers were pale yellow. Stamens were reaching up to 1/3 of perianth. Stamens were exceeding stigmas (Fig 1). 3.2. ANATOMICAL PROPERTIES 3.2.1. Root Anatomy: Single layered epidermis was present in the outer most of cross section of the root. Epidermis cells were thin walled and prismatical. Cortex was 8-12 layered and it consisted of ovoidal, thin walled, 320 C. Özdemir, P. Baran and Y.Akyol parenchymatic cells. Endodermis was present at the outer part of vascular cylinder. The single layered endodermis consisted of thick walled cells of which 3 sides were thickened. The thickened walls of endodermis cells were adjacent to the pericycle. The pericycle was single layered and thin walled. Single metaxylem was present at the median part of the vascular cylinder. 8-12 xylem strands which did not reach the pericycle were present at the periphery of the vascular cylinder. The phloem region between these xylem strands was very small (Fig 2 A). 3.2.2. Scape Anatomy: The cross section of scape showed orbicular shape being sinuous. Epidermis was single layered and consisted of prismatical cells. A thick cuticle was present on the outer part of epidermal cells. Cortex was 615 layered and parenchymatic. Vascular bundles were arranged so as to form a single ring. There were a few small sclerenchyma groups between vascular bundles. Vascular bundles were surrounded by sclerenchymatic cells. There were a pith space in the centre of scape (Fig 2 B-C). 3.2.3. Leaf Anatomy: In the cross section of the leaf of Romulea linaresii subsp. graeca, it has been observed that thick cuticle was present on abaxial and adaxial surface. The outer walls of epidermis cells 4-sided were straight except those at the groove part of leaf surface. Epidermis cells at the groove part had walls with papilla. Sclerenchyma groups were located at the corners of the cross sections. Major vascular bundles were present at the margins of the cross sections. There were sclerenchyma cells on the vascular bundles. The center of leaf was filled with large parenchymatic cells that lack chloroplasts and were broken down so as to form an air space. Stoma cells were in sunken position between epidermis cells with papilla. It was difficult to distinguish the cells of palisade parenchyma in the mesophyll of the leaf (Fig 3). Table 1. Anatomical Measurements of Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. Width (^m) min Root Epidermis cell Cortex Endodermis Pericycle Metaxylem Scape Cuticle Outer epidermis cell Inner epidermis cell Parenchyma Leaf Cuticle Epidermis Parenchyma Length (^m) max 15 19.1 8.2 5.5 40.9 21,6 54.5 27.3 13.6 68.2 4.1 10.9 5.5 13.6 5.5 27.3 13.6 27.3 4.1 8.2 8.2 5.5 19.1 27.3 321 min Max 9 13,5 13.6 4.1 21.8 8.2 9.6 1.4 16.4 6,8 5.5 13.6 13.6 46.4 Morphological And Anatomical Study On Romulea Lınaresıı Pari. Subsp. Graeca Beg. (Irıdaceae) Figure 1. General Appearance and Some Parts of Romulea linaresii Pari. subsp. graeca Beg. A,B. Whole plant C. Bract D. Tepal E. Stamen F. Style G. Capsule A:x1.6; C:x3.5; D:x4.4; E:x9.1; F:x6.2; G:x1.8 322 C. Özdemir, P. Baran and Y.Akyol 30|Jm Figure 2. Cross sections of root and scape of Romulea linaresii Parl. subsp. graeca Beg. A. Cross section of the root B,C. Cross section of the scape e: epidermis c: cortex en: endodermis m:metaxylem v: vascular bundle cu: cuticle oe: outer epidermis ie: inner epidermis p: parenchyma s: sclerenchyma group 323 Morphological And Anatomical Study On Romulea Lınaresıı Pari. Subsp. Graeca Beg. (Irıdaceae) Figure 3. Cross sections of leaf (A,B) of Romulea linaresii Pari. subsp. graeca Beg. e: epidermis me: mesophyll s: sclerenchyma group ph: phloem x: xylem v: vascular bundle p: parenchyma 324 C. Özdemir, P. Baran and Y.Akyol 4. DISCUSSION None of the study on Romulea linaressi subsp. graeca that is the subject of this study has been found except for the description in the "Flora of Turkey" [2]. For this reason, Romulea linaressi subsp. graeca was investigated in point of morphology and anatomy. In this study, it has been detected that Romulea linaressi subsp. graeca had some different morphological characteristics than the other species of Romulea such as dark purple filaments. This feature is taxonomical character that is used to determine the species. In the anatomical studies, it has been determined that root of the taxon was typical of monocotyledone root and the thickening was clear on the walls of endodermal cells of the root of Romulea linaressi subsp. graeca. The same results in the literature have been observed at the root of Crocus aerius Herb., Crocus fleischen Gay and Crocus danfordiae Maw [12,11], while it has not been seen in the root of Crocuspulchellus Hebert and Romulea columnae Seb. and Mauri subsp. columnae [10,6]. Protoxylem groups are reported to be polyarch [3] since the number of them is 8-12 in the root. The same result has been observed in the root of Romulea columnae subsp. columnae [6]. According to the results in the present study, vascular bundles in the scape were arranged in a singe ring. The same feature was seen at the scape of Crocus aerius [12], while vascular bundles were located in both peripheral and central part of scape of Romulea columnae subsp. columnae [6]. It has been stated by the researchers that palisade and spongy cells are not distinguishable in the leaf of Leucosum aestivum L. and Lilium ciliatum P.H. Davis [5,9]. We found the same properties in our research. The researchers have pointed out that the characteristic of several rows of papilla was present on each epidermal cell of the leaf in an apomorphy that occured only in a few species of Geissorhiza, Romulea and Crocus thus emphasizing the possible link between these three genera [4,13]. The similar feature has been observed at the groove part of the leaf of Romulea linaresii subsp. graeca. Finally, we have pointed out that anatomical structure of Romulea linaresii subsp. graeca was very similar to the other Iridaceae family. 325 Morphological And Anatomical Study On Romulea Lınaresıı Pari. Subsp. Graeca Beg. (Irıdaceae) REFERENCES 1. Çelebioğlu, S., and Baytop, T.; Bitkisel Tuzların Tetkiki için Yeni Bir Reaktif. Farmakognazi Enstitüsü Yayınları, No. 10, Farmakolog, 19 (1949), 301. 2. Davis, P.H.; Flora of Turkey and the East Aegeon Islands. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Edinburgh, Vol. 8, (1984). 3. Fahn, A.; Plant Anatomy. Third Edition, Permagon Press, Oxford (1982). 4. Goldblatt, P.; Cytological and Morphological Studies in The Southern African Iridaceae. J. S. Afr. Bot. 37 (1971), 317-460. 5. Kutbay, H.G., Kılınç, M., and Karaer, F.; Leucojum aestivum L. (Amaryllidaceae)'nin morfoloji ve anatomisi üzerine bir araştırma. Doğa Tr. J. Bot., 17 (1993), 215-219. 6. Kutbay, H.G., Özdemir, C., and Keskin, M.; An Anatomical Study on Romulea columnae Seb.and Mauri subsp. columnae. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. Additional Series 19 (2001), 79-86. 7. Manning, J., and Goldblatt, P.; A synaptic review of Romulea (Iridaceae: Crocoidae) in Sub-Saharan Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Socotra including new species, biological notes and a new infrageneric classification. Adansonia, 23 (2001), 59-108. 8. Manning, J., and Goldblatt, P.; Two new species of Romulea (Iridaceae: Crocoidae) from the western Karoo, Northern Cape and notes on infrageneric classification and range extensions. Botholia, 34 (2004), 17-22. 9. Özdemir, C.; The Morphological, Anatomical and Cytological Properties of Endemic Lilium ciliatum P.H. Davis (Liliaceae) in Turkey. Pak. J. Bot. 35 (2003), 99-110. 10. Özdemir, C., and Akyol, Y.; The Morphological and Anatomical Studies on Crocus pulchellus Herbert (Iridaceae) in Turkey. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 28 (2004), 55-64. 11. Özdemir, C., Akyol, Y., and Alçıtepe, E.; Morphological and Anatomical Studies on Endemic Two Crocus Species of Turkey Area. Pak. J. Bot. 36 (2004), 103-113. 12. Özyurt, S.; Palandöken Dağları ve Çevresinin Liliaceae ve Iridaceae Familyasına ait Bazı Geofitleri Üzerinde Morfolojik ve Ekolojik İncelemeler. Atatürk Üniv. Basımevi. (1978). 13. Rudall, P., and Mathew, B.; Leaf anatomy in Crocus (Iridaceae). Kew Bull. 45 (1990), 535-545. 14. Rudall, F.L.S., and Goldblatt, P.; Leaf anatomy and phylogeny of Ixioideae (Iridaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 106 (1991), 329-345. 326