Dr.Hasan Arman
Transcription
Dr.Hasan Arman
SOME STRENGTH TESTS ON THE GABBROIC ROCKS FROM THE NORTH HATTA AREA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES Hasan Arman, Mohamed El Tokhi and Bahaa Eldin Mahmoud Amin United Arab Emirates University 30 March- 1April, 2015 The Third International Forum for Industrial Rocks & Mining, Expo, Emirates of Fujairah, United Arab Emirate Outline of the Presentation INTRODUCTION GEOLOGICAL SETTING FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES RESULTS CONCLUSIONS & DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION The study area is located in North Hatta Shear Zone, at the border between the United Arab Emirates and Oman. It is about 95 km north of Al-Ain city and 60 km southeast of Dubai. It is located between longitude 24°50'N - 24°60'N and latitude 55°60'E - 56°17'E (Figure 1). INTRODUCTION Figure 1. Simplified geologic map for the study area INTRODUCTION The geological features of the proposed region was restudied through the available literature and field observations. During the study, sample locations were identified and marked on the map (see Figure 1). INTRODUCTION Number of rock samples having different size of at least 0.30x0.30x0.30 m were collected from selected sample locations and taken to the laboratory. Those rock samples were used to prepare rock samples for different strength types. These are: o o o o The unconfined compressive strength (UCS), Brazilian strength (BRS), Point load strength index (PLSI) and Schmidt hammer hardness (SHH) INTRODUCTION Those tests were carried out either on the selected rock block samples or core samples according to suggested standards. The main objective of this study is to investigate and report the strength properties of the gabbroic rocks, which are important parameters in geology and engineering applications on/and in rock mass, from North Hatta area, through in-situ and experimental studies and discuss their probable influences as foundation and construction materials. GEOLOGICAL SETTING Field observation revealed that the rock units exposed in the Hatta zone structurally below the Semail ophiolite, include platform slope carbonates (Sumeini Group), base of slope re-deposited sediments (Hamrat Dom Group), and more distal, deep-sea sediments (Hawasina), volcanics and metamorphic rocks of the ophiolite sole (Haybi Complex). GEOLOGICAL SETTING Moreover, Wadi (valley) Hatta consists of highly deformed imbricate thrust sheets, (allochthonous unit) which are intact and unconformably overlained by Maastrichtian sedimentary cover in Jabel (mountain) AlRouda. The rocks of Hatta area consist predominantly of mafic and ultramafic rocks, which are considered as units of the ophiolitic succession. GEOLOGICAL SETTING Hatta area comprises of highly deformed imbricated thrust sheets of ultramafic rocks. The ophiolite complex dominates the area around Wadi Hatta as are relatively continuous belt covering more than 2/3 area. Mafic and ultramafic rocks are considered as the major units of the ophiolitic succession represented by peridotites, pyroxenites and gabbros (see Figure 1). GEOLOGICAL SETTING Figure 1. Simplified geologic map for the study area GEOLOGICAL SETTING The gabbroic rocks in the study area form rugged mountains and rest with tectonic contact against the underlying mantle sequence. They occur as faulted blocks to the east and north of the study area being bounded to the NE and NW by thrust faults, which have emplaced them over tectonized peridotite. The gabbros comprise troctolite, olivine gabbro, gabbronorite, and normal gabbros. FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES Number of Schmidt hammer hardness tests were performed in-situ (approimately1000 readings). About 40-rock block samples, at least 0.30x0.30x0.30 m in size, were collected from the field, and were used to prepare rock samples for different strength tests. FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES o The unconfined compressive strength (UCS), o Brazilian strength (BRS), o point load strength index (PLSI) and o Schmidt hammer hardness (SHH) Those tests were carried out either on the selected rock block samples or core samples according to suggested standards. FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES All UCS test specimens had a length of diameter ratio of approximately 2:1. Both samples ends of the test specimen were kept perpendicular to the long axis as possible as (ASTM D4543, 04.02, 1986). The ASTM standard was used to define UCS of rock samples (30 core samples) and a constant loading rate was applied to the test specimen (ASTM D2938, 04.08, 1995). In general, diagonal shear failure was commonly observed. FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES The ITS test samples (37 circular cylinder samples) were accomplished with reference to procedure described by Bieniawski and Hawkes (1978) and tested following to the ISRM procedure (ISRM Suggested methods, 1981). The PLI tests (24 core samples) were performed following the procedure described by ASTM (ASTM D5731, 04.0., 1995). FIELD & LABORATORY STUDIES The SHH of the gabbroic rocks was defined by the rock hammer test (about 1000 readings in the field and 300 readings in the laboratory). The testing procedure as recommended by ASTM was followed (ASTM D5873, 04.08., 1996). RESULTS SHH UCS (MPa) ITS (MPa) PLI (MPa) Min. 115 5 5 14 34 Max. 340 19 18 49 49 Mean 209 9 11 36 43 SD* 54 3 3 7 3 Field Test Laboratory Tests CONCLUSIONS & DISCUSSION The UCS of gabbroic rocks in the study area ranges from high to very high strength with most being high strength according to Deere and Miller, 1966 . The ITS was determined by Brazilian and point load index tests. The strength value obtained by Brazilian test were more or less same to the strength value obtained with the point load index test. The SHH test exhibits quite scattering. This may be due to rock surface roughness characteristics. CONCLUSIONS & DISCUSSION The strength properties of the Gabbroic rocks are important parameters in geology and engineering applications on/and in rock mass. Nevertheless, generalizing the mechanical properties of the gabbroic rocks is unreliable due to changes in their structure, texture and even mineralogical composition. Therefore, engineers should take extreme precaution when they use these values in foundation design and as construction materials. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was financially supported by the Research Affairs at the UAE University under a contract #COS/122/156. The authors grateful to the Department of Geology for encouragements and support, which led to finalize this research work. Thanks The Third International Forum for Industrial Rocks & Mining, Expo, Emirates of Fujairah, United Arab Emirate, 30 March- 1April, 2015