Transcription
pdf
IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4): 2035-2041 ISSN: 2277–4998 A COMPARISON REVIEW OF ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY OF TECHNIQUES TO MEASURE MARGINAL ADAPTATION RESTORATIONS IN DENTISTRY SANAM FANIHANIFEH1, ZEINAB BAHRANI2, ROJMAN NOSRATPOUR2* AND EZZEDIN SADEGHKHANI1 1: Postgraduate student of Prosthodontics- School of Dentistry- Islamic Azad UniversityTehran- Iran 2: Postgraduate student of Prosthodontics-school of Dentistry- Tehran University of medical Sciences *Correspondence Author E Mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The most important factor for long-term success of full-coverage restorations is marginal adaptation. The terminology describing “fit” and the techniques used for measuring fit vary considerably in the literature. Although fit can be most easily defined in terms of “misfit,” there are many different locations between a tooth and a restoration where the measurements can be made. The measurements of misfit at different locations are geometrically related to each other and defined as internal and marginal gaps, vertical marginal and horizontal marginal discrepancies, overextended and under extended margins, absolute marginal and seating discrepancy. Preparation design is one of the important factors influencing the marginal integrity. In this paper we compared the accuracy and reliability of techniques to measure marginal adaptation restorations. Key Words: Marginal adaptation; Restoration, Teeth INTRODUCTION New technologies introduced in the fixed [1]. Achieving esthetically and functionally prosthodontics in dentistry during past ideal restorations has been the goal of dental decades but controversial reports exist for clinicians, success and/or usefulness of these technics manufacturers throughout the history of prosthodontists and 2035 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article dentistry [2]. Three main factors esthetic uncomfortable for the patient because of the value, resistance to fracture, and marginal retraction adaptation are responsible for success of a anesthesia. Subsequently, time is required dental restoration [3]. Inadequate fit leads to by the dental laboratory technician for plaque accumulation which increases the careful pouring of the stone die or cast from risk of carious lesions and can cause micro the impression, preparation of the cast, then leakage and endodontic inflammation [4] fabrication of the wax pattern, investing, and periodontal and casting. Considering the lower unit cost diseases such with sub gingival margins [5]. of base metal alloys, a more economical Misfit dental laboratory technique finally could terminates to contribute to cement procedure and need would for be dissolution, so, obtain the best technique helpful to replace the previously described minimize subsequent abnormalities. In this technique for preparing cast restorations [6]. paper we compared accuracy and reliability Laser sintering of available techniques to measure marginal The dental computer aided design-computer adaptation restorations in dentistry. aided manufacturing (system was developed Lost-wax as an alternative to the traditional lost wax Lost-wax is the traditional technique for technique and casting method to produce fabricating the metal substructure is the lost- more effective and standardized fixed dental wax technique and using various metal prostheses (FDPs) [1]. Laser sintering is a alloys for casting [6]. Conventionally, wax novel technology which may replace casting patterns were fabricated with wax and of the base metal alloys. Briefly in this waxing instruments for example the popular system, a high-power laser can quickly fuse PKT instruments. Wax is used to make the small particles on the surface of a powder patterns because it can be conveniently bed of the base metal alloy into a mass manipulated, precisely shaped and can also representing the desired three-dimensional be completely eliminated from the mold by object by scanning cross-sections generated heating. The fabrication of the wax pattern from a 3 dimensional digital description of is the most critical and labor-intensive step the part. This can be done from a CAD file in making the porcelain fused-metal crown or another file created from scanned data. [7]. To fabricate a restoration prepared After each cross-section is scanned, the using the lost-wax technique, the dentist thickness of the powder bed of the base must first make an impression and the metal alloy is lowered by one layer, and a impression new layer of base metal alloy is applied on appointment may be 2036 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article top. This process is repeated until the part is the acceptable standard, the exposed soluble completed. The physical process involved dental with the laser sintering can be full melting, Cariogenic microorganisms accumulate in partial melting or liquid-phase sintering and the void and cause caries development up to a hundred percent density can be under the crown [10, 11]. Fixed dental achieved [8]. restorations mainly aim to restore function Selective laser sintering and esthetics of lost intraoral structures Selective laser manufacturing sintering (SLS) technology is a recently cement will dissolve rapidly. without jeopardizing the oral or general health of patients [12]. introduced in dentistry. SLS, is one of the Accuracy of techniques fast prototyping production techniques, uses Several systems have been introduced for a high-temperature laser to beam selectively the fabrication of nonmetallic ceramic substructure metal powder based on the crowns. All ceramic materials are widely CAD data with the FDP design. A thin layer used in dentistry for restoring anterior and of the beamed area becomes burnt and the posterior teeth to provide a metal-free FDP is completed by laminating these thin structure and esthetic appearance [13, 14]. layers. The metal-ceramic crown is formerly Ceramic crowns/copings can be made from one of the most commonly used FDPs and different high-strength ceramic materials, the lower core is mostly produced by the and various manufacturing processes can be lost wax technique and casting method. used. Today stronger and tougher ceramic However, SLS system has several benefits materials are available, such as a lithium such as material, time and expenses saving disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic [13]. was well as the production is simpler All compared to the existing methods [9]. requirements for strength and precision of Marginal gap is the critical point for marginal fit for clinical success [15]. accuracy of techniques Marginal fit is one of the most important Marginal integrity is a critical factor in the criteria for the long-term success of all success or failure of a cast porcelain-fused- ceramic to-metal If discrepancies expose the luting material to margins are not managed appropriately, they the oral environment, thus leading to cement may contribute to the cause of many clinical dissolution and micro leakage [10]. The problems. If the gap between the prepared cement seal becomes weak, permits the tooth and the crown margins is more than percolation of bacteria, and can cause veneer crown restoration. ceramic restorations crowns. must Increased ensure marginal 2037 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article inflammation of the vital pulp [13, 16]. In- What constitutes an adequate fit has not vivo studies have provided evidence that a been satisfactorily resolved in the literature, large marginal discrepancy in a fixed and each study attempting to evaluate fit restoration correlates with a higher plaque must establish its own definitions then index and reduced periodontal conditions. attempt to draw conclusions based on those Types definitions. The choice of terminology and of finish lines and ceramic manufacturing technique are the factors that definitions have been investigated for all-ceramic unavoidably introduces the bias of the crowns. Heavy chamfers and rounded investigator. shoulder finish lines have been advocated terminology and definitions of fit in the for all-ceramic crowns, as well [13]. The fit literature of crowns is influenced by the quality of the difficulty in dealing with this subject [17]. investment material and the metal, the Lost-wax Vs. SLS casting conditions, the firing of porcelain, Metal ceramic is the common material for and the polishing. Fabrication procedures fabricating complete coverage crowns and are also directly related to the skill of the fixed partial dentures where is considered as technician the standard treatment in dentistry. Lost- [7]. Studies have reported measurement of fit relative to marginal wax adaptation, technique internal adaptation, vertical seating, radiographic appearance clinical adaptability as judged is often The subjective wide demonstrates technique for is and variety the the of inherent old-fashioned fabricating the metal and substructure and using various metal alloys by for casting. Lost-wax used to make the experienced practitioners. Two common patterns techniques are measurement of embedded conveniently manipulated, precisely shaped and sectioned specimens and measurement and completely eliminated from the mold by of specimens (or their replicas) by direct heating [18]. The fabrication of the wax visualization. Mechanical devices, such as pattern is the most critical and labor- the tracing jig to measure relative distortion intensive step in making the porcelain at the margin during porcelain firing cycles, fused-metal crown. Disadvantages of this have also been used frequently. Studies system includes: time consumption, quality concerning preparation design, marginal of wax–up’s is dependent on the skilled configuration, and labor of the individual. Also, because of the cement thickness must ultimately address wax pattern’s color and glossy surface, the question of fit to reach conclusions. small defects cannot easily identify [7]. marginal finishing, for many reason such as 2038 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article Owing to the increased demand for safe and inappropriate esthetically pleasing dental materials, new gingival inflammation and reports the most high strength ceramic materials have been important factor in periodontal disease recently introduced as materials for dental prevalence is an unsuitable marginal fit devices. When we started research and [11]. Marginal fit is one of the most development in the1980s, the design and important criteria for the long-term success processing of using of all ceramic crowns. This paper is heading CAD/CAM technology generally of our recent research which based on that believed to be simpler and easier than for we want to compare effects of lost-wax and industrial products [19]. The SLS has SLS using sloping shoulder and a shoulder several advantages which are impressed in bevel on marginal integrity of metal- section 3. So to avoid repetition we avoided ceramic crowns. So, we are trying to list of benefits for this system here. This introduce new methods instead of old time paper is part of our incoming research consuming and costly methods which have which based on that we want to compare been effects of lost-wax and SLS using sloping restorations in dentistry. shoulder and a shoulder bevel on marginal REFERENCES dental devices was used marginal in integrity marginal and adaptation integrity of metal-ceramic crowns. So, using [1] Kim, K, Kim, J, Kim, W, Kim, H, the literature review of current paper, we Kim, J, Evaluation of the marginal started or incoming research project which and internal gap of metal-ceramic the results will publish in recent future. crown fabricated with a selective CONCLUSION laser sintering technology: two- and Food, debris, and by-products of three dimensional replica techniques. microorganism activity in various regions J Adv Prosthodont., 5, 2013, 179-86. have the ability to provoke the vital pulp. [2] Contrepois, M, Soenen, A, Bartala, Poor marginal integrity can cause an M, Laviole, O, Marginal adaptation increase in microbial plaque, changes in the of ceramic crowns: A systematic sub gingival flora, gingival inflammation review. J Prosthet Dent., 110, 2013, and color changes in the marginal gingival. 447-45. In severe cases an increase in pocket depth [3] Hunter, AJ, Hunter, AR, Gingival and loss of attached gingiva may occur margins for crowns: a review and several clinical reports support this theory. discussion. Part II: discrepancies and Researches confirm the relation between 2039 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article configurations. J Prosthet Dent., 64, dental alloys to porcelain. Dent 1990, 636-42. Mater., 24, 2008, 1400-4. [4] Behrend, DA, Crown margins and [10] Jacobs, MS, Windeler, AS, An gingival health. Ann R Australas investigation Coll Dent Surg., 8, 1984, 138-45. cement solubility as a function of [5] Karlsson, S, A clinical evaluation of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent., fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil., 13, 1986, 423-32. of dental luting 65(3), 1991, 436-42. [11] Jalalian, E, Jannati, H, Mirzaei, M, Evaluating the Effect of a Sloping [6] Ucar, Y, Akova, T, Akyil, MS, Shoulder and a Shoulder Bevel on Brantley, WA, Internal fit evaluation the Marginal Integrity of Porcelain- of crowns prepared using a new Fused-to-Metal dental crown fabrication technique: Crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract., Laser-sintered (9)2, 2008, 17-24. Co-Cr crowns. J Prosthet Dent., 102, 2009, 253-259. [7] Vojdani, M, Torabi, K, Farjood, E, Khaledi, AAR, Comparison the (PFM) Veneer [12] Nawafleh, NA, Mack, F, Evans, J, Mackay, J, Accuracy Hatamleh, and Reliability Methods copings cast from wax patterns Adaptation of Crowns and FDPs: A fabricated Literature Review. J Prosthodont., CAD/CAM and conventional wax up techniques. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci Sept., 14(3), 2013, 118-129. Measure of marginal and internal fit of metal by to MM, Marginal 22, 2013, 419–428. [13] Subasi, G, Ozturk, N, Inan, O, Bozogullari, N, Evaluation of [8] Wang, XC, Laoui, T, Bonse, J, marginal fit of two allceramic Kruth, JP, Lauwers, B, Froyen, B, copings with two finish lines. Eur J Direct selective laser sintering of Dent., 2012, 6, 163-168. hard metal powders: experimental [14] Bindl, A, Mormann, WH, An up to study and simulation. Int J Adv 5-year Manuf Technol., 5, 2002, 351-7. posterior in-ceram CAD/CAM core [9] Akova, T, Ucar, Y, Tukay, A, crowns. Int J Prosthodont ., 15, Balkaya, MC, Brantley, WA, clinical evaluation of 2002, 451-456. Comparison of the bond strength of [15] Schwartz, laser-sintered and cast base metal Berry, NL, TG, Whitsett, LD, Stewart, JL, 2040 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4) Rojman Nosratpour et al Research Article Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span [18] Abduo, J, Lyons, K, Swain, M, Fit and of zirconia fixed partial denture: a causes for loss of serviceability. J systematic review. J Oral Rehabil., Am Dent Assoc., 81, 1970, 1395- 37, 2010, 866-876. 1401. [19] Miyazaki, T, Hotta, Y, Kunii, J, [16] Goldman, P, Kuriyama, S, Tamaki, Y, Review of full dental CAD/CAM: current status crowns and the dental pulp. J and future perspectives from 20 Endod., 18, 1982, 473-475. years of experience. Dent Mat J., White, M, RR, Laosonthorn, Microleakage [17] Holmes, JR, Bayne, SC, Holland, GA, et al., Considerations 28(1), 2009, 44-56. in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent., 62, 1989, 405-408. [20] 2041 IJBPAS, April, 2015, 4(4)