USDA beef quality grade changes

Transcription

USDA beef quality grade changes
ANSC 627
Recent Changes in USDA beef grading
J.W. Savell
USDA, 1965 grade standards
Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade
Degrees of
Marbling
Maturity
A**
B
C
D
E
Degrees of
Marbling
Abundant
Abundant
Moderately
Abundant
Moderately
Abundant
Slightly
Abundant
Slightly
Abundant
Moderate
Moderate
Modest
Modest
Small
Small
Slight
Slight
Traces
Traces
Practically
Devoid
Practically
Devoid
*
**
Maturity increases from left to right (A through E).
The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses.
Represents midpoint of Prime and Commercial grades.
Updated: April 12, 2015
1
USDA, 1975 – Flattening the lines
Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade*
Degrees of
Marbling
Slightly
Abundant
Maturity**
A***
C
D
E
Slightly
Abundant
Prime
Commercial
Moderate
Modest
B
Moderate
Choice
Modest
Small
Slight
Traces
Degrees of
Marbling
Small
Utility
Good
Slight
Cutter
Standard
Practically
Devoid
Traces
Practically
Devoid
* Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.”
** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E).
*** The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses.
The chart above represents the changes in the USDA grade standards set forth by USDA in 1975. The
major features of this grade change include:
•
A leveling of the slope in A maturity for marbling requirements for the minimum of the Prime,
Choice, and Standard grades. This was based on research that showed that that there were no
differences in palatability in beef between maturity groups from the minimum versus the
maximum maturity of A maturity.
•
An increase in minimum marbling requirements for the Good grade from Traces 50 to Slight 00.
•
Reduced the maximum maturity permitted for steer, heifer, and cow beef in the Good and
Standard grades to be the same as permitted in the Prime and Choice grades. This along with the
increase in minimum marbling requirements for the Good grade was done to narrow the variation
in expected eating quality and to help make it a more restrictive, leaner grade than Choice, which
may help to make it more widely used than the previous Good.
•
Conformation was eliminated as a quality grade factor, which was based on research that showed
that variations in conformation were unrelated to differences in palatability. In addition, yield
grades were a better indicator of the yield of retail cuts than conformation.
These grade standards were set to become effective on April 14, 1975, but because of a couple of court
actions, they were not implemented until February 23, 1976. This is why in some publications there will
be references to “USDA (1975)” and “USDA (1976)” for the same grade standards—one date based on
initial scheduled release and the other date based on the actual date of implementation by the government
after litigation was ended.
Updated: April 12, 2015
2
USDA, 1987 – Select grade change
Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade*
Degrees of
Marbling
Slightly
Abundant
A***
B
D
C
E
Slightly
Abundant
Prime
Commercial
Moderate
Modest
Degrees of
Marbling
Maturity**
Moderate
Choice
Modest
Small
Small
Slight
Select
Traces
Standard
Utility
Slight
Cutter
Practically
Devoid
*
**
***
Traces
Practically
Devoid
Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.”
Maturity increases from left to right (A through E).
The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses.
USDA, 1997 – B maturity grade change
Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade*
Degrees of
Marbling
Slightly
Abundant
Maturity**
A***
C
D
E
Slightly
Abundant
Prime
Commercial
Moderate
Modest
B
Moderate
Choice
Modest
Small
Slight
Traces
Degrees of
Marbling
Small
Utility
Select
Slight
Cutter
Standard
Practically
Devoid
Traces
Practically
Devoid
* Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.”
** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E).
*** The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses.
Updated: April 12, 2015
3