USDA beef quality grade changes
Transcription
USDA beef quality grade changes
ANSC 627 Recent Changes in USDA beef grading J.W. Savell USDA, 1965 grade standards Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade Degrees of Marbling Maturity A** B C D E Degrees of Marbling Abundant Abundant Moderately Abundant Moderately Abundant Slightly Abundant Slightly Abundant Moderate Moderate Modest Modest Small Small Slight Slight Traces Traces Practically Devoid Practically Devoid * ** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E). The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses. Represents midpoint of Prime and Commercial grades. Updated: April 12, 2015 1 USDA, 1975 – Flattening the lines Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade* Degrees of Marbling Slightly Abundant Maturity** A*** C D E Slightly Abundant Prime Commercial Moderate Modest B Moderate Choice Modest Small Slight Traces Degrees of Marbling Small Utility Good Slight Cutter Standard Practically Devoid Traces Practically Devoid * Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.” ** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E). *** The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses. The chart above represents the changes in the USDA grade standards set forth by USDA in 1975. The major features of this grade change include: • A leveling of the slope in A maturity for marbling requirements for the minimum of the Prime, Choice, and Standard grades. This was based on research that showed that that there were no differences in palatability in beef between maturity groups from the minimum versus the maximum maturity of A maturity. • An increase in minimum marbling requirements for the Good grade from Traces 50 to Slight 00. • Reduced the maximum maturity permitted for steer, heifer, and cow beef in the Good and Standard grades to be the same as permitted in the Prime and Choice grades. This along with the increase in minimum marbling requirements for the Good grade was done to narrow the variation in expected eating quality and to help make it a more restrictive, leaner grade than Choice, which may help to make it more widely used than the previous Good. • Conformation was eliminated as a quality grade factor, which was based on research that showed that variations in conformation were unrelated to differences in palatability. In addition, yield grades were a better indicator of the yield of retail cuts than conformation. These grade standards were set to become effective on April 14, 1975, but because of a couple of court actions, they were not implemented until February 23, 1976. This is why in some publications there will be references to “USDA (1975)” and “USDA (1976)” for the same grade standards—one date based on initial scheduled release and the other date based on the actual date of implementation by the government after litigation was ended. Updated: April 12, 2015 2 USDA, 1987 – Select grade change Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade* Degrees of Marbling Slightly Abundant A*** B D C E Slightly Abundant Prime Commercial Moderate Modest Degrees of Marbling Maturity** Moderate Choice Modest Small Small Slight Select Traces Standard Utility Slight Cutter Practically Devoid * ** *** Traces Practically Devoid Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.” Maturity increases from left to right (A through E). The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses. USDA, 1997 – B maturity grade change Relationship Between Marbling, Maturity, and Carcass Quality Grade* Degrees of Marbling Slightly Abundant Maturity** A*** C D E Slightly Abundant Prime Commercial Moderate Modest B Moderate Choice Modest Small Slight Traces Degrees of Marbling Small Utility Select Slight Cutter Standard Practically Devoid Traces Practically Devoid * Assumes that firmness of lean is comparably developed with the degree of marbling and that the carcass is not a “dark cutter.” ** Maturity increases from left to right (A through E). *** The A maturity portion of the Figure is the only portion applicable to bullock carcasses. Updated: April 12, 2015 3