05-08-15 - NC Sheriffs` Association
Transcription
05-08-15 - NC Sheriffs` Association
Weekly Legislative Report May 8, 2015 The House budget writers are working diligently to finalize the House version of the State Budget Bill so that it can be sent to the Senate for their consideration. This week it was announced that the available revenues would include a significant surplus for this year. While it is good news that there is a revenue surplus, that merely increases the competition for available revenues. The appropriations subcommittees are scheduled to finalize their individual sections of the budget next week so that their proposals can be submitted as a part of the full House proposed budget. The House leadership proposes to have the full budget available for consideration during the week of May 18th with plans to hold a final vote on the House version of the budget on Thursday, May 21st. Last week was hectic at the General Assembly with the bill crossover deadline. However, this week has proceeded at a much more normal pace. A few House and Senate committees met and some legislation has been considered, but all in all it has been a rather quiet week at the General Assembly. The House and Senate adjourned on Thursday and will reconvene on Monday evening. BILL STATUS HOUSE BILL 91, Study Misuse of Handicapped Parking Placards, has been approved by the General Assembly and sent to Governor Pat McCrory for his signature. HOUSE BILL 102, Utility Vehicles/Move-Over Changes, has passed the Senate Transportation Committee with amendments, and has been reassigned to the Senate Committee on Transportation. This bill was amended to provide that vehicles that are being used in the collection of refuse, solid waste, or recycling would be included in the definition of a “public service vehicle” for purposes of the “move-over” law. The move-over law requires that when an authorized emergency vehicle or any public service vehicle is parked or standing within 12 feet of a roadway and is giving a warning signal by appropriate light, the driver of every approaching vehicle would have to either move their vehicle out of the lane closest to the emergency or public service vehicle or would have to slow their vehicle until completely past the emergency or public service vehicle. HOUSE BILL 299, Occ.Lic./Private Protective Svcs. Act Changes-AB, has passed the House Judiciary III Committee with amendments, and has been reassigned to the House Committee on Weekly Legislative Report North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association May 8, 2015 Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House. This bill was amended to expand the powers of the Private Protective Services Board (Board) to conduct investigations into allegations of unlicensed activity of the type regulated by the Board (such as allegations of unlicensed persons acting as private investigators) and also to allow the Board to acquire and deal with real property just as any private person or corporation could. Additionally, the bill would grant authority to the Alarm Systems Licensing Board to acquire and deal with real property in the same manner as a private person or corporation. HOUSE BILL 562, Second Amendment Affirmation Act, has been reassigned to the House Committee on Appropriations. House Bill 562 has been amended several times since its original introduction. The most recent edition of this bill [Edition 3] would make a number of changes to North Carolina's firearms laws that would impact criminal justice agencies. These changes include the following: 1. A district attorney with a valid concealed handgun permit would be permitted to carry a concealed weapon while in a courtroom. 2. Any person employed by the Department of Public Safety who has a concealed handgun permit, and has been designated by the Secretary of the Department, would be able to carry a concealed weapon anywhere in North Carolina that sworn law enforcement officers could carry a concealed weapon. 3. An administrative law judge would be able to carry a concealed weapon anywhere in North Carolina that sworn law enforcement officers could carry a concealed weapon. 4. A concealed handgun permittee would be able to possess a concealed handgun on his/her person while in a vehicle on school property so long as the person remains in a locked vehicle and only unlocks the vehicle to allow the entrance or exit of another person. Currently, the concealed handgun of a permittee would have to be kept in a closed or locked container within the vehicle. 5. It would be lawful for a concealed handgun permittee to remove a handgun from a vehicle on school property if done so in response to a threatening situation in which deadly force was justified. 6. The Commissioner of Agriculture would be authorized to prohibit the carrying of firearms on the State Fairgrounds during the State Fair. Individuals with valid concealed handgun permits would however be allowed to secure their handguns in their locked vehicles in the parking lot of the fairgrounds. The Department of Agriculture, in consultation with the Department of Public Safety and the North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association, would be required to study the best method to allow persons with concealed handgun permits to carry concealed handguns from the parking lot to the entrance of the State Fairgrounds and secure those handguns near the entrance to the State Fair. Page 2 of 5 Weekly Legislative Report North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association May 8, 2015 7. A person who owns or operates a recreational shooting range in North Carolina would not be able to be prosecuted criminally or sued civilly in any lawsuit related to noise or noise pollution resulting from the use of the shooting range, so long as the range was being operated in compliance with noise control laws in effect at the time the range began operating. These protections would apply to any recreational shooting range, irrespective of when it began operating. Currently, this protection from criminal prosecution or civil lawsuits only applies to shooting ranges that were in operation for at least three years prior to 1997. 8. Convicted felons, whose firearms rights are restored by a district court judge, would have the ability to possess handguns, shotguns, rifles, or weapons of mass death and destruction (for example, suppressors and short barreled rifles or short barreled shotguns). These felons, whose firearms rights are restored, would not however be able to possess automatic weapons. Currently, convicted felons whose rights have been restored by a district court judge can possess any firearm, weapon of mass death and destruction, or automatic weapon. 9. An applicant for a North Carolina-issued concealed handgun permit would no longer be disqualified from receiving a permit based on convictions for any misdemeanor assault offense, if three years had passed since the assault conviction. A concealed handgun permit applicant would however be permanently barred from getting a concealed handgun permit if the applicant had been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence or assault on a law enforcement officer or other emergency services personnel. 10. Hunting would be allowed with short barreled rifles (rifles with a barrel length of less than 16 inches or an overall length of less than 26 inches) in addition to hunting with suppressors. 11. The punishment for a concealed handgun permittee carrying a concealed handgun into an area that had been posted as prohibiting the carrying of concealed handguns would be reduced from a Class 1 misdemeanor to an infraction and may be punishable by a fine of up to $500. 12. The requirement to have a pistol purchase permit for the purchase or transfer of a handgun would be abolished in North Carolina. The North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association supports maintaining North Carolina's pistol purchase permit system. 13. Clerks of superior court would transmit court orders and findings to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) within 48 hours of the entry of such an order or finding, if the order or finding would be a basis to prevent an individual from possessing firearms under federal law. Clerks would send this information only if NICS requested such information and the data could be sent in an acceptable format to NICS. Page 3 of 5 Weekly Legislative Report North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association May 8, 2015 14. The Administrative Office of the Courts, in consultation with the State Bureau of Investigation, would be required to work with the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) to determine the feasibility of reporting additional information to NICS that would be grounds to disqualify an individual from possession of firearms under federal law. 15. Any person adversely affected by a city or county ordinance that unlawfully regulates the possession, transfer, sale, taxation, manufacture, transportation, or registration of firearms would be allowed to bring a lawsuit against the city or county for damages the person suffered as a result of the ordinance. The court would be able to give the winning party to the lawsuit reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs. 16. Sheriffs would be required to either issue or deny an application for a concealed handgun permit within 90 calendar days from the date that the application was submitted, regardless of whether the required records on the mental health or capacity of the applicant had been received. Currently, sheriffs have 45 days after receipt of all requested documents to either issue or deny the permit. 17. Would define the term “chief law enforcement officer” (CLEO) to be any official designated as such by the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) who would be eligible to provide any required certification on federal paperwork for the transfer or making of a firearm (for example, the transfer of an automatic weapon or suppressor). Therefore, if designated by the BATFE, a chief of police or other official could sign any necessary federal paperwork for the transfer of a weapon. Currently, these certification duties may be performed only by the sheriff. Under this bill, the CLEO would have to provide the certification within 15 days of the request if the applicant is not otherwise prohibited by State or federal law from receiving or possessing the firearm. Any denial by the CLEO could be appealed to the district court of the district where the request for certification was made. 18. Health care providers would be prohibited from soliciting or maintaining records from patients concerning their possession of firearms or ammunition. 19. Any individual adversely affected by a city or county ordinance unlawfully restricting the person's ability to carry a concealed handgun would be able to bring a lawsuit against the city or county for actual damages suffered by the person. The court would be able to give the winning party in such a lawsuit reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs. HOUSE BILL 760, Regulatory Reform Act of 2015, has passed the House and has been sent to the Senate for their consideration. This bill was amended to make clarifying changes regarding the authority of law enforcement officers, protectors, and inspectors (officers) to inspect weapons, equipment, fish, or wildlife. It would be unlawful to refuse to allow officers to inspect Page 4 of 5 Weekly Legislative Report North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association May 8, 2015 weapons or equipment if the officer reasonably believes the items are possessed incident to an activity that is regulated by law and the officer has a reasonable suspicion that a violation has been committed. The officer would be allowed to inspect: 1) a shotgun without a reasonable suspicion that a violation has been committed, to confirm whether the shotgun is plugged or unplugged; and 2) equipment left unattended as part of the normal operation of the equipment in the absence of an individual in apparent control of the item, to include traps, trot lines, crab pots, and fox pens. The bill would also make it unlawful to refuse to permit officers to inspect fish or wildlife for the purpose of determining compliance with bag and size limits. The requirement that the Wildlife Resources Commission conduct a study as to whether, and under what circumstances, reasonable suspicion that a violation has been committed should be required before an officer would be able to inspect weapons, equipment, fish or wildlife was removed from the bill. SENATE BILL 445, Burt's Law, has passed the House Judiciary II Committee with amendments, and is scheduled to be considered by the House on Tuesday, May 12, 2015. The Weekly Legislative Report is provided at no charge as a service to the sheriffs, criminal justice community and citizens of North Carolina. North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association, Inc. Proudly Serving the Sheriffs and Citizens of North Carolina Since 1922 www.ncsheriffs.org Page 5 of 5