INDEX, Original research papers presented in these continuing
Transcription
INDEX, Original research papers presented in these continuing
INDEX, Original research papers presented in these continuing medical education conferences The laboratory testing taught at these conferences is not “urinary neurotransmitter testing”, that model has been discredited in several peer‐reviewed papers listed below. The transporters which move neurotransmitters along with their precursors in and out of cells are responsible for the ultimate concentrations of neurotransmitters. This approach teaches Organic Cation Transporter Type‐2 (OCT‐2) functional status optimization. Once transporter function is optimized neurotransmitter levels and clinical results are optimal. Click on any of the links below to access the paper The effects of 5‐HTP and tyrosine on urinary serotonin and dopamine The dual gate lumen transporter model The invalidity of urinary serotonin and dopamine testing Differentiation of bipolar depression from major affective disorder with amino acids Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease, a case study Amino acids with ADHD The invalidity of urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine testing Parkinson’s disease a case study The invalidity of the “urinary neurotransmitter testing model” Prolotherapy, a case study The Apical Regulatory Super System (APRESS) Neurotransmitter depletion by reuptake inhibitors (drug induced relative nutritional deficiency) Discrediting the monoamine hypothesis Relative nutritional deficiencies related to centrally acting monoamines and their precursors 5‐HTP efficacy and contraindications Administration of tyrosine with phenelzine The L‐dopa pill stop in the competitive inhibition state The paper that linked carbidopa to the increasing Parkinson’s death rate. Carbidopa induced dyskinesia and its need in the management of L‐dopa nausea Melanin steal induced dopamine and clinical fluctuations The depression chapter from the Ingrid Kolstadt, MD book. Return to index ORIGINAL RESEARCH Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population George J Trachte 1 Thomas Uncini 2 Marty Hinz 3 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of MN Medical School Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA; 2 Chief Medical Examiner, St. Louis County, Hibbing, MN, USA; 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Duluth, MN, USA 1 Abstract: Amino acid precursors of dopamine and serotonin have been administered for decades to treat a variety of clinical conditions including depression, anxiety, insomnia, obesity, and a host of other illnesses. Dietary administration of these amino acids is designed to increase dopamine and serotonin levels within the body, particularly the brain. Convincing evidence exists that these precursors normally elevate dopamine and serotonin levels within critical brain tissues and other organs. However, their effects on urinary excretion of neurotransmitters are described in few studies and the results appear equivocal. The purpose of this study was to define, as precisely as possible, the influence of both 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and tyrosine on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population consuming both 5-HTP and tyrosine. Curiously, only 5-HTP exhibited a marginal stimulatory influence on urinary serotonin excretion when 5-HTP doses were compared to urinary serotonin excretion; however, a robust relationship was observed when alterations in 5-HTP dose were compared to alterations in urinary serotonin excretion in individual patients. The data indicate three statistically discernible components to 5-HTP responses, including inverse, direct, and no relationships between urinary serotonin excretion and 5-HTP doses. The response to tyrosine was more consistent but primarily yielded an unexpected reduction in urinary dopamine excretion. These data indicate that the urinary excretion pattern of neurotransmitters after consumption of their precursors is far more complex than previously appreciated. These data on urinary neurotransmitter excretion might be relevant to understanding the effects of the precursors in other organs. Keywords: dopamine, serotonin, depression, urinary neurotransmitters excretion Introduction Correspondence: George J Trachte Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of MN Medical School Duluth, 1035 University Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA Tel +1 218 726 8975 Fax +1 218 726 7906 Email [email protected] Two critical neurotransmitters, serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) and dopamine, are synthesized from the amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine, respectively.1,2 Serotonin synthesis in vivo is accomplished by a two-step process converting tryptophan to 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), facilitated by the enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase, and 5-HTP is then decarboxylated by dihydroxyphenalanine (DOPA) decarboxylase to form serotonin. Tyrosine is converted to dopamine by the combined action of tyrosine hydroxylase to form DOPA and DOPA decarboxylase to form dopamine. The synthesis of serotonin is commonly stimulated by dietary delivery of L-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)3 and dopamine synthesis is stimulated by dietary administration of either tyrosine or L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA).4 Protein-containing foods such as meat and dairy products are good natural sources of both tyrosine and tryptophan. Both 5-HTP and tyrosine are available in the United States as dietary supplements. These agents are utilized as natural supplements to augment brain levels of either serotonin Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 227–235 227 © 2009 Trachte et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. Trachte et al or dopamine. This study investigates the effects of 5-HTP and tyrosine ingestion on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large sample of humans ingesting 5-HTP and tyrosine. Curiously, the urinary excretion of these compounds after ingestion of 5-HTP or tyrosine has only been reported in human trials involving very small patient cohorts and the results involve anomalous responses.5–7 Therefore, this study was designed to critically test the hypothesis that increased ingestion of 5-HTP or tyrosine elevates urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine, respectively. The purpose of the study was to determine if urinary excretion of serotonin or dopamine reflect the adequacy of supplementation with 5 HTP or tyrosine. Methodology The study included 824 individuals ingesting 5-HTP, tyrosine, both 5-HTP and tyrosine, or neither. Multiple urine samples were obtained from all of these individuals and most received multiple doses of supplements to enable comparisons between doses of supplements and urinary excretion of mature neurotransmitters, as well as the relationship between changes in doses and changes in urinary neurotransmitter excretion. The primary rationale for using the dietary supplements was weight loss although a significant number of patients were treated for diseases other than obesity that were caused by, or associated with, serotonin and/or dopamine dysfunction. The participants resided throughout the United States. The dose range for 5-HTP ranged from 0 to 2700 mg per day. Tyrosine was taken in doses of 0 to 17,000 mg per day. The supplements were taken in divided doses two, three, or four times a day depending on the dosing of amino acid precursors administered. Urine samples were collected six hours prior to bedtime with 4:00 PM being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were obtained in 6 N HCl to preserve dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of one week at a specific dose of the precursor being consumed. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN, USA) under the direction of one of the authors (Dr Thomas Uncini, a hospital-based dual board certified laboratory pathologist). Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527; Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The DBS Laboratories are accredited as a high complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) to perform these assays. Statistical evaluations utilized either two-way ANOVA to compare dose-response curves or regression analyses to establish correlations between precursor doses and urinary 228 excretion of serotonin and dopamine. We also correlated changes in precursor doses with changes in urinary neurotransmitter levels. These regression analyses were conducted to determine if a statistically definable relationship existed between dose of precursor and excretion of the resulting neurotransmitter. Comparison of mean values was performed using Student’s t test. Data are presented as individual data points or as means ± SE. A p value ⱕ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Data were evaluated further by subdividing responses into the following: 1) those representing inverse relationships between dietary supplement intake and urinary excretion of neurotransmitter, deemed phase 1; 2) those exhibiting no relationship between dietary supplement intake and neurotransmitter excretion, deemed phase 2; and 3) those exhibiting a direct relationship between dietary supplement consumption and neurotransmitter excretion in the urine (phase 3). These groups were identified by dividing alterations in neurotransmitter excretion by alterations in supplement dose to obtain the slope of the relationship. Phases 1, 2, and 3 had negative, 0, and positive slopes, respectively. These curves were compared by two-way ANOVA. They also were compared with daily fluctuations in urinary neurotransmitter efflux in the absence of supplement ingestion (ie, phase 0). This analysis was performed to determine if the alterations in serotonin or dopamine excretion in phases 1, 2, or 3 could be accounted for by circadian rhythms and/or daily fluctuations in neurotransmitter excretion resulting from stress or other factors. The latter comparison involved the Students t test comparing the absolute value of deviations in neurotransmitter excretion in all groups. The conversion to absolute values was necessary because samples contained both positive and negative alterations in neurotransmitter excretion that conformed to the appropriate response for a specific phase. For instance, a reduction in precursor dose in phase 3 resulted in a reduction in neurotransmitter excretion. Although the change in neurotransmitter excretion was negative in this example, it represented the appropriate directional change for samples in phase 3. This study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review at the University of Minnesota because it was a retrospective study of deidentified data. Results The dose response to 5-HTP on urinary serotonin excretion is shown in Figure 1. The correlation between 5 HTP doses and Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan urinary sertotonin excretion was not statistically significant (r = 0.040; p = 0.09). All of these individuals also were consuming tyrosine, therefore we sought an interaction with tyrosine as well, but there was none (p = 0.50). Surprisingly, the data from these experiments indicate only a marginal relationship between administration of a serotonin precursor and urinary excretion of serotonin. We then sought a more convincing relationship by analyzing the effect of 5-HTP dosing alterations on changes in urinary serotonin excretion in individual patients. These experiments were conceived to ascertain whether individuals exhibited dramatically different basal levels of urinary serotonin excretion but consistently responded to changes in precursor administration with increased excretion of the serotonin. Figure 2 depicts a statistically significant relationship between changes in 5-HTP administration and alterations in urinary efflux of serotonin (p ⬍ 0.0001; r = 0.145). These data indicate a relationship between ingested 5-HTP and urinary serotonin excretion, but this effect remains modest based on the regression coefficient. Further examination of the data in Figure 2 indicated that, of the 1671 individual data points, 390 demonstrated an inverse relationship between changes in urinary serotonin excretion and 5-HTP administration, 375 showed virtually no change in urinary serotonin excretion (ie, an alteration of less than 2000 μg/g creatinine) after altering the 5-HTP dose and 860 experienced the anticipated direct relationship between changes in urinary serotonin excretion and 5-HTP dose. Furthermore, 46 samples represented the random variation in urinary serotonin excretion when no 5-HTP or tyrosine dosing occurred. Thus the relationship between alterations in 5-HTP dose and urinary serotonin excretion demonstrated in Figure 2 appears to derive from three distinct responses being summed in the data presented. The average value of each of these three different responses, plus the random daily fluctuation in the absence of precursors, is shown in Figure 3. The results in the absence of any alteration in 5-HTP dose (ie, normal circadian rhythms or other disturbances) are compared to those representing the three different responses when 5-HTP dosing was varied. This comparison was necessary to determine if there is a de facto statistical difference between the different patterns of responses and whether the responses are distinctly different than random fluctuations in serotonin excretion. The data are presented as absolute values of changes in serotonin excretion because the magnitude of the change in serotonin excretion is the critical variable. 1,000,000 Urinary 5-HT (μg/g Creatinine) y = 15161 + 5.7629x R = 0.04 N = 1671 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 0 1000 2000 3000 5-HTP (mg/day) Figure 1 Relationship between 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) dose and urinary serotonin (5-HT) excretion.All data represent individual values from patients providing multiple samples over time. N represents the total number of samples and the regression coefficient was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 229 Trachte et al Change in urinary 5-HT (μg/g Creatinine) 1,000,000 y = – 907 + 31.09 (² 5-HTP) R = 0.15 N = 1671 500,000 0 –500,000 –1,000,000 –2000 –1000 0 1000 2000 Change in 5-HTP dose (mg/day) Absolute change in urinary 5-HT (μg/g Creatinine) Figure 2 Relationship between change in 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) dose and change in urinary serotonin (5-HT) excretion. All values are individual points obtained from patients providing multiple samples over time. A statistically significant relationship was identified by linear regression (p ⬍ 0.0001). The equation describing the linear regression is provided in the figure. *** 40,000 *** 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 46 390 *** 860 0 1 2 3 Phase Figure 3 Absolute change in serotonin (5-HT) excretion when responses are segregated by change in urinary serotonin excretion as follows: no 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) dose (phase 0); inverse responses of urinary serotonin excretion to changes in 5-HTP (phase 1); no change in urinary serotonin excretion in response to changes in 5-HTP dose (phase 2); and direct correlation between changes in urinary serotonin excretion and changes in 5-HTP dose (phase 3). All values are means + SE. Values in both phases 1 and 3 were greater than phases 0 (random fluctuation) or 2 (***p ⬍ 0.0001). Phase 2 responses were less than phase 0 (***p ⬍ 0.001) and the N was 375. 230 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan As shown in Figure 3, both phase 1 (inverse correlation between altered 5-HTP dosing and serotonin excretion) and phase 3 (direct correlation between altered 5-HTP dosing and serotonin excretion) had much larger, statistically significant variations in comparison to the values representing random fluctuation of serotonin excretion (indicated as phase 0) (p ⬍ 0.0001 both phases). Phase 2 responses (ie, indicative of virtually no change in serotonin excretion in response to a change in 5-HTP administration) also were statistically different from either phases 0, 1, or 3 (p ⬍ 0.0001). The dose-response curves for 5-HTP vs. urinary serotonin excretion for the three phases are shown in Figure 4. The 5-HTP suppressed urinary serotonin excretion in the phase 1 samples and augmented excretion in the phase 3 samples. The phase 0 and phase 2 samples had extremely low urinary serotonin levels and the concentrations did not fluctuate in response to alterations in 5-HTP dosing. Phase 2 values were significantly lower than urinary serotonin levels in either phase 1 or phase 3 samples (p ⬍ 0.0001) and the slopes of the curves for phases 1, 2, and 3 differed significantly (p ⱕ 0.0022). Urinary serotonin excretion in the absence of 5-HTP dosing was statistically higher in the phase 1 samples than any of the other groups. This finding is consistent with the phase 1 group demonstrating large declines in urinary serotonin levels in response to increased administration of 5-HTP. The stimulatory effect of 5-HTP Phase 1 (390) Phase 2 (375) Phase 3 (860) 50,000 Urinary 5-HT (μg/g Creatinine) observed in phase 3 samples occurred primarily in the dose range of 150 to 900 mg 5-HTP. A maximal effect appeared to be achieved at the 900 mg 5-HTP dose and no further increment in urinary serotonin concentrations was observed at higher 5-HTP doses. Tyrosine ingestion produced a scenario starkly different from the 5-HTP data. Tyrosine consistently produced a paradoxical effect to reduce urinary dopamine excretion. The effect of tyrosine is shown in Figure 5. The inhibitory effect of tyrosine was statistically significant and yielded a concentration-dependent effect based on linear regression analysis (p ⬍ 0.0001, R = 0.086). As with the relationship between 5-HTP consumption and serotonin excretion, the tyrosine effect on urinary dopamine excretion represented a summation of responses exhibiting one of the following: an inverse correlation; no effect; or a direct correlation. These data are shown in Figure 6. Consistent with the data shown in Figure 5, the fluctuations in dopamine excretion were smaller in samples obtained from patients ingesting incrementally greater amounts of tyrosine; and this difference for the combined phases 1, 2, and 3 reached a high level of statistical significance (p ⬍ 0.0001) when compared to phase 0 samples. The fluctuations in the phase 2 samples were less than any other phase (p ⱕ 0.005). The levels in phase 1 and 3 samples were not statistically different from levels in phase 0 samples (p = 0.09 for both). 40,000 30,000 *** 20,000 *** 10,000 0 0 500 1000 1500 5-HTP (mg/day) Figure 4 Influence of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) dose on urinary excretion of serotonin (5-HT). All values are means ± SE. The number of samples in each phase is indicated in parentheses. The slopes of the curves differed statistically for phases 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.0022). Urinary serotonin levels for both phases 1 and 3 were significantly greater than phase 2 by analyses of variance (***p ⬍ 0.0001), but did not differ from each other. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 231 Trachte et al 4000 Urinary dopamine (μg/g Creatinine) y = 249.56 – 0.0047 (Tyr) R = 0.12 N = 2154 3000 2000 1000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 Tyrosine (mg/day) Figure 5 Effect of tyrosine on urinary dopamine excretion. All values are individual data points from patients ingesting tyrosine. Tyrosine significantly suppressed urinary dopamine excretion, resulting in a statistically significant regression (p ⬍ 0.0001). These data add support to the surprising observation that tyrosine ingestion suppresses urinary dopamine excretion. The relationship between tyrosine doses and urinary dopamine excretion in the three response phases is shown in Figure 7. These data were presented as mean data with standard errors for clarity necessitated by substantial overlap of raw data points. Phase 1 responses were characterized by decreasing excretion of dopamine as tyrosine doses increased. The slope of this curve was negative and statistically different from the curves representing phases 2 or 3 (p ⬍ 0.0001). Phase 2 and 3 did not exhibit statistically discernable slopes (p = 0.32), but the urinary dopamine levels were statistically greater in phase 3 samples (p = 0.0007). Discussion The data presented in this study indicate that consumption of specific dietary precursors of serotonin or dopamine only increases the urinary excretion of these neurotransmitters approximately 50% of the time. Probably the most surprising finding of this study is that 20% to 40% of these same individuals respond to the precursors with an unexpected reduction in excretion of the neurotransmitters, particularly dopamine. These observations indicate that the simplistic expectation that increased ingestion of neurotransmitter precursors will increase excretion of the mature neurotransmitters in the urine 232 is frequently not observed. In fact, the prominent response to tyrosine was a suppression of dopamine excretion. The uncoupling of neurotransmitter excretion from the ingestion of precursors for the neurotransmitter is most likely caused by the degradation of blood-borne neurotransmitter in the kidney.8,9 Most of the serotonin or dopamine found in the urine is synthesized in the kidney.9–12 Therefore, the excreted neurotransmitters must be synthesized in the kidneys and escape reabsorption into the blood in order to be excreted in the urine. Most of the serotonin formed by the kidneys is typically catabolized2 or reabsorbed and not excreted in the urine.8,11,13 Alternatively, dopamine synthesized in the kidney is secreted across the apical surface into the urine14 probably by an organic cation transporter9,15 resulting in greater urinary than interstitial dopamine concentrations.12,13 Larger doses of tyrosine and 5-HTP have been observed to increase both urinary dopamine and serotonin excretion.16–18 The array of catabolic and reabsorptive events probably accounts for the far more complex responses than expected to 5-HTP or tyrosine ingestion observed in this study. In spite of the complex sequence of renal events accounting for the appearance of neurotransmitter in urine, the presence of opposing responses (ie, phases 1 and 3) does not seem possible without a direct effect of either the precursors or the formed neurotransmitters to cause an aberration in the series Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 Absolute change in urinary dopamine (µg/g Creatinine) Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan 300 200 100 0 46 874 ** 0 1 2 1047 3 Phase Figure 6 The average change in urinary dopamine excretion from baseline in the different phases including random fluctuation of dopamine excretion (phase 0). All values are means + SE with the number of samples per group indicated except for phase 2 (N = 187). The fluctuation in phase 2 was significantly less than daily fluctuations in the control (phase 0) group, as well as phases 1 and 3 (p ⬍ 0.001). of events leading to the presence of urinary neurotransmitters. Based on a large volume of studies in the literature, it is likely that administration of 5-HTP increases the synthesis of serotonin within the kidney.2,3,8 Transporters for serotonin then transfer it into the blood stream to prevent it from being excreted in the urine. The phase 1 response we observed for serotonin could be explained by either a neurotransmitterinduced allosteric alteration of a reabsorptive transporter to increase activity or an induction of the synthesis of the transporter. Increased transport of the neurotransmitters out of the region of the nephron would theoretically reduce urinary excretion of the neurotransmitter, as observed in phase 1. If the alteration or induction were great enough, essentially all of the neurotransmitter would be reabsorbed and little or none would appear in the urine, as observed in phase 2. A conversion to phase 3 would be possible if the supply of neurotransmitter eventually increased enough to saturate the transport process and result in spillage of neurotransmitter into the urine. All three phases have been observed in the same individual and the three phases could represent different stages of renal processing of 5-HTP. We currently have no evidence explaining the different phases and the potential for increased activity or induction of neurotransmitter transporters merely appears to be the most likely possibility explaining these observations at this point in time. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 The response to tyrosine was dominated by suppressed urinary dopamine excretion. This scenario probably necessitates either an inhibition of dopamine secretion into the nephron lumen or a reduction in renal dopamine synthesis. Two reports indicate that newly synthesized dopamine is normally secreted into the nephron,12,13 thus an inhibition of this secretion could account for the inhibitory effect. It is likely that tyrosine could interfere with the secretion of dopamine into the lumen of the nephron but we are unaware of any reports supporting this site of action. Tyrosine appears to be an unlikely inhibitor of renal dopamine synthesis because it is widely recognized as a dopamine precursor. However, tyrosine suppresses L-DOPA uptake into proximal tubule cells14,19 and L-DOPA uptake is required for renal dopamine synthesis.20 L-DOPA is the immediate precursor to dopamine in the synthetic pathway; therefore, inhibition of its uptake could impair dopamine synthesis. Proximal tubule cells accumulate tyrosine14 but the kidney lacks extraneuronal tyrosine hydroxylase1,21,22 and cannot convert it to dopamine. Thus, tyrosine could have a paradoxical inhibition of dopamine synthesis in the kidney by suppressing L-DOPA uptake into proximal tubule cells. This scenario represents a potential mechanism accounting for phase 1 responses to tyrosine. An alternative scenario potentially accounting for phase 3 responses to tyrosine 233 Trachte et al Urinary dopamine (µg/g creatinine) 900 800 700 Phase 1 (520) Phase 2 (117) Phase 3 (638) 600 500 400 300 200 *** 100 0 0 5000 10000 15000 Tyrosine (mg/day) Figure 7 The relationship between tyrosine administration and urinary dopamine excretion for the different phases of dopamine excretion.The number of samples per group is indicated in parentheses. All values are means ± SE. The slope for phase 1 differed significantly from slopes for phases 2 or 3 (***p ⬍ 0.0001). involves the peripheral conversion of tyrosine to L-DOPA in neuronal tissue. The L-DOPA entering the kidney could serve as a precursor to dopamine and result in increased dopamine secretion observed in phase 3. The observation of the inhibitory (ie, phase 1) response to tyrosine has not been reported previously. A plethora of reports indicate that phase 3 stimulatory effects of tyrosine on urinary dopamine excretion is the predominant response in most studies in rats4,22,23 and protein has been widely used as a tyrosine source to increase dopamine excretion in humans.24 It is possible that the phase 1 response to tyrosine in humans has not been noted previously because of the limited number of studies specifically investigating tyrosine effects on human dopamine excretion. The novel observations noted in this study include a somewhat variable relationship between ingested 5-HTP and urinary serotonin excretion and the unexpected inf luence of tyrosine to reduce urinary dopamine excretion. The description of the three phases demonstrating the relationship between 5-HTP and urinary serotonin excretion is also novel and probably is a reflection of serotonin reabsorption in the kidney. The consistent and statistically discernable ability of tyrosine to dampen fluctuations in urinary dopamine excretion is also noteworthy. These processes might be 234 ref lective of similar processes occurring in other organs and suggest that urine sampling for neurotransmitters requires multiple samples to determine the direction of the response and, potentially, the adequacy of dosing. Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Blaschko H. The activity of L(-)-DOPA decarboxylase. J Physiol. 1942;101:337–349. 2. Udenfriend S, Titus E, Weissbach H, Peterson RE. Biogenesis and metabolism of 5-hydroxyindole compounds. J Biol Chem. 1956;219:335–344. 3. Udenfriend S, Weissbach H, Bogdanski DF. Increase in tissue serotonin following administration of its precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan. J Biol Chem. 1957;224:803–810. 4. Agharanya JC, Wurtman RJ. Studies on the mechanism by which tyrosine reaises urinary catecholamines. Biochem Pharmacol. 1982;31:3577–3580. 5. Arterberry JD, Conley MP. Urinary excretion of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) and related indoles in normal subjects. Clin Chim Acta. 1967;17:431–440. 6. Takahashi S, Takahashi R, Masumura I, Milke A. Measurement of 5-Hydroxyindole compounds during L-5-HTP treatment in depressed patients. Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn. 1976;30:463–473. 7. Kema IP, Schellings AMJ, Hoppenbrouwers CJM, Rutgers HM, de Vries EGE, Muskiet FAJ. High performance liquid chromatorgraphic profiling of tryptophan and related indoles in body fluids and tissues of carcinoid patients. Clin Chim Acta. 1993;221:143–158. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan 8. Davidson J, Sjoerdsma A, Loomis LN, Udenfriend S. Studies with the serotonin precursor, 5-hydroxytryptophan, in experimental animals and man. J Clin Invest. 1957;36:1594–1599. 9. Graefe K-H, Friedgen B, Wolfel R, Bossle F, Russ H, Schomig E. 1,1’-Diisopropyl-2,4’-cyanine (disprocynium24), a potent uptake2 blocker, inhibits the renal excretion of catecholamines. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997;356:115–125. 10. Wa TCLK, Burns NJT, Williams BC, Freestone S, Lee MR. Blood and urine 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine levels after administration of two 5-hydroxytryptamine precursors in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;39:327–329. 11. Stier CT, Brewer TF, Dick LB, Wynn N, Itskovitz HD. Formation of biogenic amines by isolated kidneys of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Life Sci. 1986;38:7–14. 12. Wang Z-Q, Siragy HM, Felder RA, Carey RM. Intrarenal dopamine production and distribution in the rat. Hypertension. 1997;29(1 Pt 2): 228–234. 13. Berndt TJ, Liang M, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Intrarenal serotonin, dopamine and phosphate handling in remnant kidneys. Kidney Int. 2001;59:625–630. 14. Chan YL. Cellular mechanisms of renal tubular transport of L-DOPA and its derivative in the rat: microperfusion studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976;199:17–24. 15. Gründemann D, Köster S, Kiefer N, et al. Transport of monoamine transmitters by the organic cation transporter type 2, OCT2. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:30915–30920. 16. Baines AD, Craan A, Morgunov N. Tubular secretion and metabolism of dopamine, norepinephrine, methoxtyramine and normetanephrine by the rat kidney. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979;208:144–147. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2009:5 17. Wa TCLK, Freestone S, Samson RR, Johnston NR, Lee MR. A comparison of the effects of two putative 5-hydroxytryptamine renal prodrugs in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;36:19–23. 18. Agharanya JC, Alonso R, Wurtman RJ. Changes in catecholamine excretion after short-term tyrosine ingestion in normally fed human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34:82–87. 19. Soares-da-Silva P, Serrao MP, Pinho MJ, Vonifacio MJ. Cloning an gene silencing of LAT2, the L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) transporter, in pig renal LLC-PK1 epithelial cells. FASEB J. 2004;18: 1489–1498. 20. Soares-da-Silva P, Fernandes H. Sodium-dependence and oubain sensitivity of the synthesis of dopamine in renal tissues of the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105:811–816. 21. Nagatsu T, Rust LA, DeQuattro V. The activity of tyrosine hydroxylase and related enzymes of catecholamine biosynthesis and metabolism in dog kidney. Effects of denervation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1969;18: 1441–1446. 22. Muhlbauer B, Gleiter CH, Gies C, Luippold G, Loschmann P-A. Renal response to infusion of dopamine precursors in anaesthetized rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1997;356:838–845. 23. Muhlbauer B, Mickeler C, Schenk F. Protein-induced increase in urinary dopamine in normal and diabetic rats: role of catecholamine precursors. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:F80–R85. 24. Williams M, Young JB, Rosa RM, Gunn S, Epstein FH, Landsberg L. Effect of protein ingestion on urinary dopamine excretion. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:1687–1693. 235 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index O r i g i nal R e s e a r c h The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2 July 2010 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. Cape Coral, Florida, USA; 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, Florida, USA; 3 DBS Labs, Duluth, Minnesota, USA 1 Abstract: The three-phase response of urinary serotonin and dopamine in subjects simultaneously taking amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine has been defined.1,2 No model exists regarding the renal etiology of the three-phase response. This writing outlines a model explaining the origin of the three-phase response of urinary serotonin and dopamine. A “dual-gate lumen transporter model” for the basolateral monoamine transporters of the kidneys is proposed as being the etiology of the three-phase urinary serotonin and dopamine responses. Purpose: The purpose of this writing is to document the internal renal function model that has evolved in research during large-scale assay with phase interpretation of urinary serotonin and dopamine. Patients and methods: In excess of 75,000 urinary monoamine assays from more than 7,500 patients were analyzed. The serotonin and the dopamine phase were determined for specimens submitted in the competitive inhibition state. The phase determination findings were then correlated with peer-reviewed literature. Results: The correlation between the three-phase response of urinary serotonin and dopamine with internal renal processes of the bilateral monoamine transporter and the apical monoamine transporter of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells is defined. Conclusion: The phase of urinary serotonin and dopamine is dependent on the status of the serotonin gate, dopamine gate, and lumen of the basolateral monoamine transporter while in the competitive inhibition state. Keywords: serotonin, dopamine, basolateral, apical, kidney, proximal Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr., Cape Coral, Florida 33904 Tel +1 218 310 0730 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 11704 The first step in development of the model was validation of peer-reviewed literature. Scientific knowledge of the monoamines (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) has grown significantly since 1990. Along with this growth in knowledge, some of the science originally thought to be correct has been discredited. In contrast to earlier writings it is now known that monoamines do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Monoamines are not simply filtered at the glomerulous then excreted into the urine. Urinary monoamine levels are not a direct assay of the peripheral or central nervous system monoamine levels. Interpretation of urinary monoamine assays is more complex than simply determining if urinary serotonin and dopamine levels found on assay are high or low. Under normal conditions, significant amounts of serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulous do not make it to the final urine. Serotonin and dopamine (herein referred to as “monoamines”) found in the final urine are newly synthesized in the kidneys.1,2 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 387–392 © 2010 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 387 Dovepress Hinz et al The monoamines and their amino acid precursors are filtered at the glomerulous then enter the proximal tubules of the kidneys. They are transported by organic cation transporters out of the proximal tubules into the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells. The monoamines filtered at the glomerulous are metabolized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells. Very little of these monoamines filtered at the glomerulous are found in the final urine of normal subjects. Monoamine amino acid precursors filtered at the glomerulous are synthesized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells into new monoamines, which are then detected in the final urine.2 Serotonin and dopamine exist in two states: the “endogenous state” found when no additional amino acid precursors are being administered, and the “competitive inhibition state” found when the amino acid precursors of both serotonin and dopamine are being administered.3 Prior to discussing the dual-gate lumen model, the following discussion of the three-phase urinary response is put forth based on previous peer reviewed literature.2 Literature notes: “Urinary monoamine neurotransmitter testing prior to initiation of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors is of no value. There is no correlation between PHASE 2 PHASE 3 Urinary neurotransmitter levels PHASE 1 baseline testing and urinary neurotransmitter phases once the patient is taking amino acid precursors. It is not necessary or even useful to measure baseline urinary neurotransmitters in treatment”.2,4 Urinary monoamine neurotransmitters are neurotransmitters that are synthesized by the kidneys and excreted into the urine or secreted into the system via the renal veins.1,2,5 With simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, three phases of urinary neurotransmitter response have been identified on laboratory assay of the urine (Figures 1 and 2). The three phases of response apply to both serotonin and dopamine. In all the life forms tested that have kidneys along with serotonin and catecholamine systems, the three phases of urinary neurotransmitter response exist.40 In reviewing the literature, it would appear that the three phases of urinary response to neurotransmitters were present in previous writings but were not identified as such. For example, a 1999 article notes that administration of L-dopa can increase urinary dopamine levels (phase 3) and decrease urinary serotonin levels (phase 1).2,6 To determine the phase of serotonin and dopamine with certainty requires two urinary monoamine neurotransmitter Increasing the daily balanced amino acid dosing Figure 1 The three phases of urinary neurotransmitter excretion in response to amino acid dosing. The horizontal axis is not labeled with specific amounts; it reflects the general trend seen in the population. Amino acid dosing needs are highly individualized. The dosing level needed to inflect into the next level varies greatly throughout the general population. For example, some patients inflect into phase 3 on 37.5 mg of 5-HTP per day, while others need as high as 3,000 mg per day (source: DBS Labs database). 388 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Dovepress The dual-gate lumen model Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys Urine Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys System Urine Phase 1 Response Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys System Phase 2 Response Urine System Phase 3 Response Figure 2 The three phases of urinary response to amino acid dosing (Two urinary neurotransmitter tests are required to determine the phase with certainty). PHASE 1: In phase 1, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine decreases or increases respectively. In phase 1, there is inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine instead of the system where they are needed. PHASE 2: In phase 2, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine is low (,80 µg/g creatinine for serotonin or ,300 µg/g creatinine for dopamine). In phase 2, there is no inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine. The neurotransmitters are being excreted appropriately into the system and the urine. PHASE 3: In phase 3, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine increases or decreases respectively. In phase 3, there are adequate systemic serotonin and dopamine levels. The excess serotonin and dopamine are appropriately excreted into the urine. assays to be performed with the subject simultaneously taking a different amino acid dosing of dopamine and/or serotonin amino acid precursors on each test and comparing the results.1,2 In phase 1, monoamine neurotransmitters synthesized by the kidneys are excreted into the urine instead of being secreted into the system via the renal vein where they are needed (Figures 1 and 2). Increasing the amino acid dose in phase 1 will correct the problem of urinary monoamine excretion into the urine at the expense of secretion into the system. The amino acid precursor dosing of serotonin and dopamine, where the individual patient is in phase 1 varies widely in the population. The level at which the urinary serotonin is no longer in phase 1 ranges from 37.5 mg of 5-HTP per day to 3,000 mg of 5-HTP per day. The level at which the urinary dopamine is no longer in phase 1 ranges from no L-dopa (with the use of L-tyrosine only in some subjects) to 540 mg of L-dopa per day in the subjects not under treatment for Parkinsonism or Restless Leg Syndrome.1,2 By increasing the amino acid dosing of serotonin and dopamine precursors above the dosing of phase 1, the phase 2 response is observed (Figures 1 and 2). In phase 2, urinary monoamine levels are low (,475 micrograms dopamine per gram of creatinine or ,80 micrograms serotonin per gram of creatinine, the neurotransmitter – creatinine ratio compensates for dilution of the urine), and the inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine has ceased. When in phase 2, serotonin and/or dopamine is being primarily secreted into the system and not excreted into the urine. The model used to explain phase 2 is, “inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters has now ceased as the amino acid precursor dosing is increased and systemic levels are not increasing appropriately.”1,2 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 As serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are increased above the phase 1 and the phase 2 levels, all subjects enter the phase 3 response (Figures 1 and 2). Further increases in the amino acid dosing lead to increases in urinary dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter levels if they are in phase 3. Phase 3 represents appropriate secretion into the system and appropriate excretion of excess neurotransmitters synthesized by the kidneys into the urine.1,2 Material and methods Prior to this writing there has been no peer-reviewed publication setting forth an internal renal model to explain the etiology of the three-phase response of urinary serotonin and dopamine. This model is based on analysis of in excess of 75,000 monoamine assays (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) from more than 7,500 human subjects with samples obtained either in the endogenous state or the competitive inhibition state under conditions covered in previous writings on the three-phase response.1,2 The urinary phase of serotonin and dopamine was determined for assay samples obtained in the competitive inhibition state. Knowledge gained through large-scale phase interpretation in correlation with peer-reviewed renal literature is the basis for the model. Urine samples were collected 6 hours prior to bedtime with 4:00 PM being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were obtained in 6 N HCl to preserve dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of one week at a specific dose of the precursor being consumed. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN, USA) under the direction of one of the authors (Dr T Uncini, hospital-based dual board certified laboratory pathologist). Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 389 Dovepress Hinz et al utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527, both from Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by CLIA to perform these assays. Results When in the three-phase response, the two systems become completely intertwined to the point that changes in one system will affect not just that system but the other system as well.2 With administration of the dopamine precursor L-dopa and the serotonin precursor 5-HTP there is no biochemical feedback regulation in the synthesis of dopamine and/or serotonin, respectively. There is a direct proportion between the amount of L-dopa and 5-HTP administered and the amount of dopamine and serotonin synthesized.1,2 The three-phase response occurs only in the competitive inhibition state. It is the response of the newly synthesized renal serotonin and dopamine found in the urine to the manipulation of serotonin and/or dopamine amino acid precursor dosing. With each simultaneous urinary assay of serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state, a three-phase model for serotonin and dopamine must be independently conceptualized. Serotonin and dopamine may be in any one of the three phases simultaneously, with one exception. Urinary serotonin and dopamine are never found in phase 1 simultaneously.1,2 In Figure 1, increasing or decreasing one or both amino acid precursors of serotonin or dopamine in the competitive inhibition state allows for determination of the urinary phase of both serotonin and dopamine.1,2 The following renal model is the basis for conceptualization of the dual-gate lumen model. While numerous transport and cell wall crossing mechanisms exit in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells, primary transport out of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells for the newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine is via the organic cation transporters (OCT). Newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine exit the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells primarily by one of two routes. They are either transported across the basolateral membrane via the basolateral transporter (an OCT transporter) or transported across the apical membrane via the apical transporter (an OCT transporter).7,8 For the purpose of this model, the basolateral membrane transporter (OCT) is deemed as being dominant. Newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine, not transported across the dominant basolateral membrane, are transported out of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells by the apical transporters and detected 390 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress in the final urine as waste. In reviewing urinary assays of serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state, the interpreter is viewing monoamines not transported by the basolateral monoamine transporters (organic cation transporters). While numerous other renal functions and interactions have been described, these forces are viewed as minor to insignificant in comparison to the dominating force of the basolateral and apical transport on the newly synthesized monoamines. Discussion Models of organic cation transporters of serotonin and dopamine have been defined in the past. One such model was the “gate-lumen-gate model”.9–13 The gate-lumen-gate model and other models do not explain the phenomenon observed under the three-phase urinary response when both serotonin and dopamine are in the competitive inhibition state. It is purposed that the basolateral monoamine transporter is a “dual-gate lumen transporter” (Figure 3). The transporter has a serotonin gate and a dopamine gate at the transporter entrance, which function independently of each other. Primary forces affecting transport through the basolateral monoamine transporter and the apical monoamine transporter are the status of the basolateral monoamine transporter serotonin and dopamine gates, and lumen saturation. The serotonin and dopamine gates at the entrance of the basolateral monoamine transporters can be either partially closed (impeding transporter lumen access by the monoamines) or open (with no impedance). The status of the basolateral monoamine transporter lumen is either saturated or not saturated. Correlations of the three-phase model and dual-gate lumen model considerations are as follows. In phase 1 the monoamine gate is partially closed impeding access to the transporter lumen. In phase 2 and phase 3 the monoamine gate is open giving full access of the monoamine to the transporter lumen. In phase 1 and phase 2 basolateral monoamine transport through the lumen is not saturated. In phase 3 the basolateral monoamine transport through the lumen is saturated. Opening and closing of a gate is not solely dependent on changes in associated monoamine levels. The opening and closing of the gates is dependent on the total amount of serotonin and dopamine presenting at the transporter. In the competitive inhibition state, a serotonin gate or a dopamine gate in phase 1 (partially closed) can be opened or closed by adding or subtracting the total amount of amino acid precursors administered. This causes an increase or decrease in the total amount of serotonin and dopamine Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Dovepress The dual-gate lumen model Dopamine phase 2 or 3 at the transporter. Competitive inhibition in place Gate open To the urine OCT gate-lumen regulation Basolateral monoamine transporter lumen Serotonin phase I at the transporter. Gate regulation in place To the urine Gate partially closed Figure 3 The dual-gate lumen model. The basolateral monoamine transporters contain three key components: a serotonin gate, a dopamine gate, and a lumen. presenting at the transporter. As the gate opens, more monoamine has access to the transporter and is transported, causing a drop in the amount of monoamine transported by the apical transporter and found in the final urine. In phase 2 the gate is open with full access to the transporter by monoamine. The transporter effectively transports most of the monoamine through the lumen leading to a very small amount of monoamine being transported by the apical transporter and found in the final urine. In phase 3 the gate is open and the transporter is saturated. Increases or decreases in the total amount of the monoamine presenting at the transporter will lead to an increase or decrease in the amount of monoamine found in the final urine. When both serotonin and dopamine are in phase 3, increasing the amino acid precursor dosing of one monoamine will cause increased transport of the associated monoamine at both the basolateral and apical transporters. Due to competitive inhibition, transport of the other monoamine will decrease at the basolateral transporter and increase at the apical transporter. Administration of one amino acid precursor with both Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 s erotonin and dopamine in phase 3 leads to an increase in apical transport of both monoamines with associated increase of urinary levels of both on assay. Conclusion Assay of the urinary monoamines, serotonin and dopamine, in the competitive inhibition state is an assay of the newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine of the kidneys not transported by the basolateral monoamine transport. The two primary forces affecting transport across the basolateral membrane and responsible for the three-phase response are the status of the basolateral monoamine transporter gates and the saturation of the lumen. Proper assay interpretation in the competitive inhibition state is a determination of the states of serotonin and dopamine phases relative to the basolateral monoamine transporter status. It is not the intent of this writing to explore all known aspects of the basolateral monoamine transporter, apical monoamine transporter properties, or renal properties in the context of the threephase response. The model presented here is intended to submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 391 Dovepress Hinz et al be used as a foundation and reference point for continuing discussion, further studies, refinement of the model, and future investigation of renal and urinary serotonin and dopamine response to amino acid manipulation in the competitive inhibition state. Acknowledgment/disclosure Marty Hinz and Thomas Uncini are owner and medical director of DBS Labs Duluth, Minnesota. Alvin Stein reports no disclosure. References 1. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:228–235. 2. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. CRC Press; 2009;465–481. 3. Soares-da-Silva P, Pinto-do-O PC. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117(6):1187–1192. 4. DBS Labs neurotransmitter data base, Tom Uncini, MD hospital base dual board certified laboratory pathologist, medical director 8723 Falcon St Duluth, MN 55808. 5. Ball SG, Gunn IG, Douglas IH. Renal handling of dopa, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1982; 242(1):F56–F62. 6. Garcia NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(5 Pt 2):R1476–R1480. 7. Wang Y, Berndt TJ, Gross JM, Peterson MA, So MJ, Knox FG. Effect of inhibition of MAO and COMT on intrarenal dopamine and serotonin and on renal function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;280(1):R248–R254. 8. Vieira-Coelhe M, Soares-Da-Silva P. Apical and basal uptake of L-dopa and L-5-HTP and their corresponding amines, dopamine and 5-HT, in OK cells. Institute of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, 4200 Porto, Portugal. 9. Schmitt B, Koepsell H. Alkali cation binding and permeation in the rat organic cation transporter rOCT2. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(26): 24481–24490. 10. Lester H, Cao Y, Mager S. Listening to neurotransmitter transporters. Neuron. 1996;17(5):979–990. 11. Sole M, Madapallimattam A, Baines A. An active pathway for serotonin synthesis by renal proximal tubules. Kidney Int. 1986;29(3):689–694. 12. Cao Y, Mager M, Lester H. Amino acid residues that control pH modulation of transport-associated current in mammalian serotonin transporters. J Neurosci. 1998;18(19):7739–7749. 13. Pietig G, Mehrens T, Hirsch J, Etinkaya I, Piechota H, Schlatter E. Properties and regulation of organic cation transport in freshly isolated human proximal tubules. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(36):33741–33746. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peerreviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal 392 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Open Access Journal of Urology Dovepress Return to index open access to scientific and medical research O r i g i n al R e s e a r c h Open Access Full Text Article Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Open Access Journal of Urology 6 October 2010 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 George Trachte 3 Thomas Uncini 4 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Medical School, MN, USA; 4DBS Labs, Duluth, MI, USA 1 Abstract: This paper analyzes the statistical correlation of urinary serotonin and dopamine data in subjects not suffering from monoamine-secreting tumors such as pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome. Peer-reviewed literature and statistical analyses were searched and monoamine (serotonin and dopamine) assays defined in order to facilitate their proper interpretation. Many research findings in the literature are novel. Baseline assays completed with no monoamine precursors differ from baseline assays performed on a different day in the same subject. There is currently no scientific basis, value, or predictability in obtaining baseline monoamine assays. Urinary assays performed while taking precursors can demonstrate a lack of correlation or unexpected correlations such as inverse relationships. The only valid model for interpretation of urinary monoamine assays is the “three-phase model” which leads to predictability between monoamine assays and precursor administration in varied amounts. Purpose: This paper reviews the basic science of urinary monoamine assays. Results of statistical analysis correlating baseline and nonbaseline assays are reported and provide valid methods for interpretation of urinary serotonin and dopamine results. Patients and methods: Key scientific claims promoting the validity of the urinary neurotransmitter testing (UNT) model applications are discussed. Many of these claims were not supported by the scientific literature. Matched-pairs t-tests were performed on several groupings. Results of all statistical tests were compared with peer-reviewed literature. Results: The statistical analysis failed to support the UNT model. Peer-reviewed literature search failed to verify scientific clams made in support of applications of the UNT model in many cases. Keywords: serotonin, dopamine, urinary neurotransmitter testing Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/OAJU.S13370 Three applications have evolved with regard to urinary monoamine assays. The first is one of the older applications used in medicine. This is the use of monoamine assays for screening and diagnosing tumors that secrete serotonin or dopamine (herein referred to as the “tumor model”), such as pheochromocytoma (a catecholamine-secreting tumor) and carcinoid syndrome (a serotonin-secreting tumor).1,2 The validity of this type of monoamine testing application is well established in the scientific literature. The second application is the use of monoamine assays for renal organic cation transporter functional status determination (ie, the OCT model). Even though this model is relatively new, having been developed in 2003, this approach and the urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine applications developed according to this model are Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 177–183 © 2010 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 177 Dovepress Hinz et al supported by the scientific literature, having been discussed and documented in several articles since February 2009.3–5 The basis for the OCT model requires two or more serial urinary serotonin and dopamine (ie, monoamine) assays while taking varied amino acid precursor daily dosing amounts. The results are then compared in order to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in response to changes in dosing. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value less than 80 or 475 µg of monoamine per g of creatinine, respectively, indicates a Phase II response. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value greater than 80 or 475 µg of monoamine per g of creatinine, respectively, is interpreted as being in Phase I or Phase III. Differentiation of Phase I from Phase III is as follows. If a direct correlation is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is referred to as a Phase III response. An inverse correlation is referred to as a Phase I response.3–5 Unexpected results with matched-pairs t-test analysis revealed no significant difference when comparing baseline monoamine assays with assays performed while taking supplemental amino acid precursors in the same subject. Peer-reviewed scientific publications discussing urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine phase analysis according to the OCT model were first published in 20093,4 and 2010.5 These publications outlined the mechanics of the three-phase model in connection with urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine under a novel renal transporter model. This transporter model potentially describes the etiology of the three-phase response of monoamine assays during the administration of varied amino acid precursor daily dosing values.12 The third approach defining applications for the use of monoamine assays is the urinary neurotransmitter testing (UNT) model. This paper discusses the UNT model in depth because it is the only model of the three that lacks valid scientific literature discussing the model or supporting the monoamine assay applications that are being promoted. The goal of this writing is to assess monoamine assay applications statistically and define the validity of monoamine assays in the absence or presence of supplemental amino acid precursors. The premise of the UNT model is that baseline monoamine assays correlate with and are a good predictor of the peripheral and central nervous system neurotransmitter functional status. The basic assumption for this assertion is that serotonin and dopamine cross the blood–brain barrier6–8 and are then filtered at the glomerulus and enter the urine without further interaction with the kidneys.6,8 This argument is used on the basis of the UNT model to justify the conclusion that monoamine assays, in 178 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress the presence and absence of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, correlate with central nervous system and peripheral neurotransmitter functional status. It also asserts that baseline testing is the best approach to determine the neurotransmitter functional status of the central and peripheral nervous systems.7,8,10 Other conclusions made in support of utilizing monoamine assays under the urinary neurotransmitter testing model are as follows: • Administration of amino acid precursors directly impacts urinary monoamine levels; therefore, the results of monoamine assays merely need to be interpreted as being either high or low values8,9,11 • Baseline testing of urinary monoamines prior to starting supplemental amino acid precursors is required in order to define the amino acid precursor starting dose needed in treatment8–11 • Baseline monoamine assays in the absence of supplemental amino acid precursors are required to diagnose and define the serotonin and dopamine imbalance in the central and peripheral nervous systems6,10 • Baseline monoamine assays can serve as a reference point to gauge treatment effectiveness after amino acid precursors are started6,11 • Baseline monoamine assays can be used to reduce the risk of side effects when amino acid precursor treatment is started.10 Materials and methods Statistical analysis was performed for each analyzed grouping considered. The statistical analysis involved the matched-pairs t-test. After initiation of supplemental amino acid precursor administration or a change in daily dosing levels was maintained constant, a minimum period of seven days without missing one or more doses was required for data to be considered valid. This time period allows the amino acid precursors and the urinary monoamines to achieve equilibrium in order to ensure that valid urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine test results are obtained. A P value #0.05 was considered statistically significant. JMP software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used to perform the statistical analysis. Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected six hours prior to bedtime, with 4 pm being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve urinary dopamine and urinary serotonin. The urine samples were Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 Dovepress collected after a minimum of one week, during which time the patient was taking a specific daily dose of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories. Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527; Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments to perform these assays. Results Two approaches to analyze the validity of the UNT model were undertaken. The first approach was a literature search intended to test claims made in support of applications for monoamine assays under the UNT model. After an exhaustive search, no indepth valid peer-reviewed studies were found documenting the UNT model. In most cases, the claims justifying use of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assays according to the UNT model were contrary to the identified scientific literature. The second approach was the statistical analysis of baseline monoamine assays in the presence or absence of supplemental amino acid precursors in order to assess the UNT model critically. Five significant divergences from the UNT model from the existing scientific literature were identified. Specifically, divergences were noted from the established science, ie, serotonin and dopamine do not cross the blood–brain barrier3,5,12,13 and peripheral serotonin and dopamine are filtered at the glomerulus and then enter the proximal tubules.5 They are then actively transported into the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells where they are essentially completely metabolized.5 Due to the high efficiency of this metabolic process, significant amounts of serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulus do not reach the urine in patients not suffering from a tumor secreting serotonin or dopamine.3,5 From a practical standpoint, urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine represent serotonin and dopamine that have not previously been in the central or peripheral nervous system.3,5 The literature notes that urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine are monoamines that are newly synthesized from serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors by the kidneys in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells.3,5 These newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine molecules are then either transported out of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells across the basolateral membrane and then into the peripheral system via the renal vein or across the apical membrane and then into the urine.3–5,14,15 It is noted that there are many other renal interactions that exist between synthesis of Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 Neurotransmitter testing of the urine serotonin and dopamine transported across the basolateral membrane and the apical membrane prior to arriving at the final destination of the renal vein or urine, respectively. These interactions appear small in comparison with the effects of the basolateral monoamine transporter and the apical monoamine transporter under the three-phase model.5 There is also no correlation between urinary serotonin and dopamine levels and the serotonin or dopamine levels within the central and peripheral nervous systems.3–5 The renal interaction of urinary serotonin, urinary dopamine, and their amino acid precursors is counterintuitive. It is expected that when serotonin and/or dopamine amino acid precursors are administered, levels of the associated urinary serotonin or urinary dopamine will increase or decrease with increases or decreases in the amino acid precursor daily dosing levels, ie, a direct relationship. The literature reveals that this is not the predominant response. Outcomes are not intuitive because the process is complex, and there is no simple, dominant, direct relationship between serotonin and dopamine amino acid dosing and monoamine assays. Instead, a complex interaction is found, giving rise to the three-phase model, as we have previously proposed.3–5 Furthermore, there is no significant statistical difference between baseline monoamine levels in the urine and those resulting from administration of monoamine precursors. Given that support for this is not found in the literature, the following statistical analysis is put forth. The data for the following analysis was obtained from the DBS Laboratories monoamine assay database. The database was assembled according to the criteria discussed in the Materials and methods section. By definition, the laboratory baseline reference range for a given assay is calculated by taking all baseline data generated for that assay, then defining the group of values that are within two SDs from the mean. This grouping size represents approximately 95% of the initial group data generated. In the following reports of statistical analysis, when use of the reference range values is referred to, the following values were used. A laboratory promoting the UNT model has defined the urinary serotonin reference range as 150–300 µg of serotonin per g of creatinine. The same laboratory defined the urinary dopamine reference range as 150–300 µg of dopamine per g of creatinine.9 Urinary serotonin at baseline versus while taking 5-hydroxytryptophan Matched-pairs groupings were queried from the database as follows. Two urinary serotonin samples from the same subject were obtained, one sample while taking no supplemental amino acid precursors and the other sample while taking submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 179 Dovepress Hinz et al 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), and these were match-paired together. A group of these matched-pairs samples were then defined for analysis, revealing a group of n = 167. The serotonin reference range values as reported above were used to query the baseline urinary matched-pairs serotonin group of n = 167 further, revealing a group of n = 103. The group taking 5-HTP was then queried from the group of n = 103 using the parameter 5-HTP , 301 mg per day, to give a final matched-pairs group of n = 78 for analysis. The final matched-pairs group was then analyzed using a t-test, and a P value of 0.0809 was found, indicating lack of a significant statistical difference between baseline urinary serotonin levels and serotonin levels when taking less than 301 mg of 5-HTP per day. Urinary dopamine at baseline versus while taking levodopa Matched-pairs groups were queried from the database as follows. Two samples from each subject, one sample taking no supplemental amino acid precursors and the other sample taking levodopa, were paired together. This revealed a group of n = 617. The baseline assay portion of the entire matchedpairs group was queried with the dopamine reference range values reported earlier, to give a population size of n = 230. The group taking levodopa was then queried to find only subjects taking less than 361 mg of levodopa per day, leading to a final population size of n = 166. This matched-pairs group was then analyzed using a matched-pairs t-test, and a P value of 0.0742 was found, indicating no significant statistical difference between baseline dopamine assays and dopamine assays performed while taking less then 361 mg of levodopa per day. Baseline serotonin assays from different days in the same subject Data were analyzed in the following manner, with the following numbers reported in µg of serotonin per g of creatinine. From a matched-pairs group of n = 146, the mean (SD) for both baseline serotonin urinary assay groups was determined. For Group 1, the mean serotonin value was found to be 239.0 (±2282.8). For Group 2 (baseline testing performed on a different day after the first assay) the mean serotonin value was found to be 273.2 (±8214.51). All data greater than the value found in calculating the sum of two SDs plus the mean were removed from consideration, revealing a group of n = 134. The matched-pairs grouping was then analyzed using the matched-pairs t-test. The baseline urinary serotonin assay grouping analysis revealed 180 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress a P value of 0.0080. These findings indicate that baseline urinary levels do differ in a statistically significant manner when baseline assays are performed on different days for the same subject and are not uniform or reproducible from day to day. Baseline dopamine assays from different days in the same subject Data were analyzed in the following manner, with numbers reported in µg of dopamine per g of creatinine. From a matched-pairs group of n = 146, the mean SD for both baseline serotonin urinary assay groups was determined. For Group 1, the mean dopamine value was found to be 144.0 (±286.9). For Group 2 (baseline testing performed on a different day after the first assay), the mean dopamine value was found to be 198.6 (±484.8). All data greater than the value found in calculating the sum of two SD plus the mean were removed from consideration, revealing a group of n = 138. The matched-pairs grouping was then analyzed using the matched-pairs t-test. The baseline urinary serotonin assay grouping analysis revealed a P value of 0.0049. These findings indicate that baseline urinary dopamine levels do differ in a statistically significant manner when baseline assays are performed on different days in the same subject, and are not uniform or reproducible from day to day. Discussion The focus of this research is the applications of urinary serotonin and dopamine assays, whereby three distinctly different application models of monoamine assays are being promoted. The basis of the tumor model is screening for a monoaminesecreting tumor. This methodology is well founded. The OCT model is a relatively new application of monoamine assays, but its validity is supported by the literature.3–5 The third application model for monoamine assays, the urinary neurotransmitter testing model, has no indepth, valid, peerreviewed scientific literature to support its use. The UNT model distinguishes itself from the two other approaches by requiring use of baseline urinary monoamine assays, and advocates a direct relationship between urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine when the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor daily dosing levels are varied. The following is a consolidation of the findings and scientific concepts discussed in this paper with the claims and approach for use of monoamine assay applications under the UNT model. Significant challenges to the urinary neurotransmitter testing model include the widely recognized finding that serotonin and dopamine do not cross the blood–brain barrier.16–19 Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 Dovepress In support of applications for urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assays, the UNT model claims that serotonin and dopamine do cross the blood–brain barrier.6–8 This assertion is widely known to be untrue.16–19 No significant amount of serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulus reaches the urine. Serotonin and dopamine found in the urine are newly synthesized in the kidneys, and their levels are a function of the interaction between the basolateral monoamine transporters and the apical monoamine transporters of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells.19 The UNT model claims that serotonin and dopamine are merely filtered at the glomerulus, and then enter the urine without further renal interactions.6 This assertion is not supported by review of the relevant science. Urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine found in the urine have no correlation with brain or peripheral serotonin and dopamine levels. Significant levels of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine molecules assayed in the urine have never been shown in the brain or peripheral nervous system.3,5 The UNT model, based on assertions that serotonin and dopamine cross the blood–brain barrier and are then simply filtered at the glomerulus and enter the urine, claims that urinary monoamine assays represent the functional neurotransmitter status of the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and urine.1 This assertion again is not supported by the relevant science. There is no consistent direct relationship between serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor daily dosing levels and the amount of serotonin and dopamine that appears in the urine on monoamine assays.3–5 The peer-reviewed literature notes that there is no relationship between administration of the serotonin precursor, 5-HTP, in varied doses and subsequent urinary serotonin levels.4 The literature also notes that there is a correlation between administration of L-tyrosine and urinary dopamine levels, but this is an inverse relationship,4 and not the direct relationship predicted by the UNT model.6,7 The UNT model advocates that there is a dominant direct correlation between amino acid doses and urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine found on assay.6,7 This leads to the assertion under the UNT model that simply determining whether the urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine levels found on assay are high or low is the focal point of proper monoamine assay interpretation.6,7 This assertion is not supported on review of the science involved. Statistical analysis of baseline monoamine assays reveals that these assays do not predict the response to precursor therapy. They differ significantly with subsequent baseline assays undertaken on different days from the same subject, Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 Neurotransmitter testing of the urine and no significant difference exists with assays performed when amino acid precursors are taken. These findings are contrary to the assertions of the UNT model.6–8,11 The UNT model claims that baseline monoamine assays obtained prior to ingestion of supplemental amino acid precursors can identify neurotransmitter imbalance in the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and urine.6–8 Due to the statistical difference in baseline monoamine assays in the same subject from day to day, an unlimited number of different neurotransmitter imbalances might theoretically be diagnosed with serial assays performed on many different days from the same subject. There is a statistical difference between baseline urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assays in subjects not harboring a monoaminesecreting tumor. The assertion that baseline monoamine assays can diagnose central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and urinary neurotransmitter dysfunction is not supported on review of the scientific literature. The UNT model also claims that baseline assays of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine are required prior to starting serotonin and/or dopamine amino acid precursors to assist in selecting the optimal daily serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor doses.8–10 Using any laboratory criteria to diagnose serotonin and dopamine imbalance prior to selecting the starting point of amino acid dosing gives results that differ statistically from day to day and are not reproducible. The assertion on the part of the UNT model that baseline monoamine assays are needed to determine a starting point for serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor treatment is not supported. The UNT model claims that baseline assays are required to minimize side effects when treatment with amino acid precursors is started. The results of baseline assays obtained from the same subject on different days vary statistically, and are not reproducible relative to the first baseline assay obtained. The ability to minimize side effects claimed on the basis of the UNT model is not supported by the reported science. The UNT model incorrectly asserts that baseline monoamine assays can serve as a reference point during treatment to gauge effectiveness of treatment when serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are started.8,10 As noted already, there is a significant statistical difference between values found with baseline monoamine assays and baseline assays performed on a different day in the same subject, leading to a host of different reference points being generated when baseline assays are obtained on multiple days. The baseline assays cannot be used as a reference point to measure treatment progress or indicate results of treatment. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 181 Dovepress Hinz et al The only valid correlation that exists between monoamine assays performed with and without administration of amino acid precursors in subjects not suffering from a monoaminesecreting tumor is the three-phase model described in the literature. When the three-phase model is applied correctly to urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assay results, it leads to a predictable course of outcomes with urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assay interpretation. The three-phase model is based on the interaction between the newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine by the kidneys with the basolateral monoamine (serotonin and dopamine) transporters and the apical monoamine (serotonin and dopamine) transporters of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys, leading to the serotonin and dopamine that is found in the urine on assay.3–5 Conclusion The application and interpretation of baseline monoamine assays according to the urinary neurotransmitter testing model is not a valid approach because there is a significant statistical difference between baseline monoamine assays and monoamine assays obtained on a different day from the same subject and no significant statistical difference in subsequent monoamine assays performed while taking amino acid precursors. The UNT model has no ability to diagnose central or peripheral nervous system serotonin and dopamine imbalance using baseline monoamine assays in subjects not suffering from monoamine-secreting tumors. Urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine assays are not assays of serotonin and dopamine that have been in the central nervous system. Serotonin and dopamine do not cross the blood–brain barrier. Significant amounts of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine found on assay have not been in the brain or in the peripheral system. Urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine are filtered at the glomerulus and are then metabolized in the kidneys, with no significant amounts of serotonin or dopamine filtered at the glomerulus being found in the urine. Levels of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine found on assay are newly synthesized in the kidneys, and are a function of the interaction between the basolateral monoamine transporters and apical monoamine transporters of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells. A simple direct relationship between the daily dosing levels of amino acid precursors and monoamine assays does not exist in most cases. Due to complex renal physiologic interactions between serotonin and dopamine newly synthesized by the kidneys, a complex relationship is observed that 182 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress is defined by the three-phase model described in the already published peer-reviewed literature. The goal of this paper is to spark interest, research, awareness, and scrutiny of the topics discussed. A laboratory assay is only valid if properly interpreted. Correct interpretation of monoamine assays while taking amino acid precursors is complex, and not a direct linear relationship as predicted by the UNT model. Disclosure TU and MH are director and owner of DBS Laboratories, Duluth, Minnesota respectively. AS and GT have no conflicts of interest to report in this work. References 1. Oates JA, Sjoerdsma A. A unique syndrome associated with secretion of 5-hydroxytryptophan by metastatic gastric carcinoids. Am J Med. 1962;32:333–342. 2. Szakacs JE, Cannon AL. Noreprinephrine myocarditis. Am J Clin Pathol. 1958;30:425–434. 3. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. CRC Press; 2009. 4. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 6. Alts J, Alts D, Bull M. Urinary Neurotransmitter Testing: Myths and Misconceptions. Osceola, WI: NeuroScience, Inc.; 2007. 7. Watkins R. Validity of urinary neurotransmitter testing with clinical applications of CSM (Communication System Management) model. Asheville, NC: Sanesco International; 2009. Available at: http://www.neurolaboratory.net/lab/neurolab%20pdf%20files/2009%20 Urinary%20NT%20White%20Paper.pdf. Accessed 2010 Aug 4. 8. Theirl S. Clinical relevance of neurotransmitter testing. The Original Internist. Dec 2009. Available at: http://www.clintpublication.com/ documents/Dec_OI_2009.pdf. Accessed 2010 Aug 4. 9. Sanesco. Neurolab baseline sample repor t. Available at: http://sanesco.net/images/files/resourcelibrary/baseline_sample_report. pdf Accessed 2010 Jul 2. 1 0. Neuroscience. Assessing nutritional imbalances. Available at: https://www.neurorelief.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view& id=131&Itemid=48. Accessed 2010 Jul 2. 11. Kellermann G, Bull M, Ailts J, et al. Understanding diurnal variation. Technical Bulletin Issue 4. Osceola, WI: NeuroScience, Inc.; 2004: Jan 9. Available at: https://www.neurorelief.com/index.php?option = com_co ntent&task=view&id=224&Itemid=48. Accessed 2010 Jul 2. 12. Carley C, Radulovacki M. Role of peripheral serotonin in the regulation of central sleep apneas in rats. Chest. 1999;115:1397–1401. 13. Volkow N, Fowler JS, Gatley J, et al. PET evaluation of the dopamine system of the human brain. J Nucl Med. 1996;37: 1242–1256. 14. Wang Y, Berndt T, Gross T, Peterson M, So M, Know F. Effect of inhibition of MAO and COMT on intrarenal dopamine and serotonin and on renal function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;280:R248–R254. 15. Vieira-Coelho MA, Soares-Da-Silva P. Apical and basal uptake of L-dopa and L-5-HTP and their corresponding amines, dopamine and 5-HT, in OK cells. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(5 Pt 2):F632–F639. Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 Dovepress 16. Pyle AC, Argyropoulos SV, Nutt DJ. The role of serotonin in panic: Evidence from tryptophan depletion studies. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2004;16:79–84. 17. Verde G, Oppizzi G, Colussi G, et al. Effect of dopamine infusion on plasma levels of growth hormone in normal subjects and in agromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1976;5:419–423. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine 18. Gozzi A, Ceolin L, Schwarz A, et al. A multimodality investigation of cerebral hemodynamics and autoregulation in pharmacological MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:826–833. 19. Ziegler MG, Aung M, Kennedy B. Sources of human urinary epinephrine. Kidney Int. 1997;51:324–327. Dovepress Open Access Journal of Urology Publish your work in this journal The Open Access Journal of Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease; Investigation and treatment of urological disease; Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/open-access-journal-of-urology-journal Open Access Journal of Urology 2010:2 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 183 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index O r i g i nal R e s e a r c h A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 8 November 2010 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA 1 Correspondence: Marty Hinz Clinical Research, Neuro Research Clinics, Inc., 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 310 0730 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S14353 Purpose: A novel method for differentiating and treating bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole from patients who are suffering a major depressive episode is explored in this work. To confirm the diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 bipolar disorder, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria require that at least one manic or hypomanic episode be identified. History of one or more manic or hypomanic episodes may be impossible to obtain, representing a potential blind spot in the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Many bipolar patients who cycle primarily on the depressive side for many years carry a misdiagnosis of recurrent major depression, leading to treatment with antidepressants that achieve little or no relief of symptoms. This article discusses a novel approach for diagnosing and treating patients with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole versus patients with recurrent major depression. Patients and methods: Patients involved in this study were formally diagnosed with recurrent major depression under DSM-IV criteria and had no medical history of mania or hypomania to support the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. All patients had suffered multiple depression treatment failures in the past, when evaluated under DSM-IV guidelines, secondary to administration of antidepressant drugs and/or serotonin with dopamine amino acid precursors. Results: This study contained 1600 patients who were diagnosed with recurrent major depression under the DSM-IV criteria. All patients had no medical history of mania or hypomania. All patients experienced no relief of depression symptoms on level 3 amino acid dosing values of the amino acid precursor dosing protocol. Of 1600 patients studied, 117 (7.3%) nonresponder patients were identified who experienced no relief of depression symptoms when the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor dosing values were adjusted to establish urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine levels in the Phase III therapeutic ranges. All of the 117 nonresponders who achieved no relief of depression symptoms were continued on this amino acid dosing value, and a mood-stabilizing drug was started. At this point, complete relief of depression symptoms, under evaluation with DSM-IV criteria, was noted in 114 patients within 1–5 days. With further dose adjustment of the mood-stabilizing drug, the remaining three nonresponders achieved relief of depression symptoms. Conclusion: Resolution of depression symptoms with the addition of a mood-stabilizing drug in combination with proper levels of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors was the basis for a clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Keywords: depression, bipolar, serotonin, dopamine, mania, hypomania Introduction In order to make the diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 bipolar disorder under Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) guidelines, the patient’s medical Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 741–747 © 2010 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 741 Dovepress Hinz et al h istory must include one or more manic or hypomanic episodes, respectively.1 The history of mania or hypomania may be obscure or nonexistent. For example, the bipolar patient may be cycling heavily on the depressive pole with the last manic or hypomanic episode having occurred many years ago. This episode may have lasted for only 2 weeks, during which time neither the patient nor others around the patient ever appreciated its presence. This obscured medical history represents a potential blind spot in the DSM-IV criteria for diagnosing bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. It is not uncommon in patients with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole, while looking for relief of depression symptoms, to get caught in a seemingly endless cycle of shopping for health care providers. These physicians may have prescribed most or all of the antidepressants medically available for treatment without getting complete relief of depression symptoms. This potential blind spot in the DSM-IV criteria leads to a misdiagnosis of recurrent major depression. The novel approach described in this writing requires the administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors with cofactors to reach the Phase III therapeutic ranges (herein referred to as the target ranges) as guided by the use of urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine organic cation transporter (OCT) functional status determination (herein referred to as ‘OCT assay interpretation’).2–5 The basis for the OCT assay interpretation model requires two or more serial urinary serotonin and dopamine assays while taking varied amino acid precursor daily dosing values. Results of two or more assays are then compared in order to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in response to the change in dosing. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value ,80 or 475 µg of monoamine per gram of creatinine, respectively, indicates Phase II responses. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value .80 or 475 µg of monoamine per gram of creatinine, respectively, is interpreted as being in Phase I or Phase III. Differentiation of Phase I from phase III is a follows. If a direct correlation is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is referred to as a Phase III response. An inverse correlation is referred to as a Phase I response. The Phase III therapeutic range for urinary serotonin is defined as 80–240 µg of serotonin per gram of creatinine. The Phase III therapeutic range for urinary dopamine is defined as 475–1100 µg of dopamine per gram of creatinine.2–5 Peer-reviewed scientific publications discussing urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine phase analysis under the 742 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress OCT model were published in 20092,4 and 2010.3,5 These publications outlined the mechanisms of the ‘three-phase model’ in connection with urinary serotonin and urinary dopamine under a novel renal transporter model. This transporter model potentially describes the etiology of the ‘three-phase response’ in monoamine assays during the administration of varied amino acid precursor daily dosing values.3 Urinary serotonin and dopamine levels are primarily dependent upon the interaction of the basolateral monoamine transporters with the apical monoamine transporters of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys.3 Most notable with this novel approach is the ability to differentiate patients with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole from patients suffering from recurrent major depression, and then implement effective treatment. Material and methods Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected 6 h prior to bedtime with 4:00 PM being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve urinary dopamine and urinary serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of 1 week during which the patient was taking a specific daily dosing of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine where no doses were missed. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN), which is operated under the direction of one of the authors (Thomas Uncini, MD, hospital-based pathologist, dual board certified in laboratory medicine and forensic pathology). Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527; Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments to perform these assays.3,6 The protocol The protocol for treatment of depression consisted of the amino acid dosing values found in Table 1. This protocol was covered in previous peer-reviewed literature.2 The initial step of the protocol was the administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors with no OCT assay interpretation. Three dosing levels were available as noted in Table 1. At the first visit, patients were started on level 1 amino acid dosing. Patients were then seen weekly for follow-up clinic visits. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Dovepress Differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole Milligrams 5-HTP/Milligrams L-Tyrosine AM NOON 4 PM 7 PM 150/1,500 ----- 150/1,500 ----- Level 1 300/1,000 300/1,000 ----300/1,000 Level 2 Level 3 150/1,500 150/1,500 150/1,500 150/1,500 Table 1 Amino acid precursor dosing protocol. Subjects also received the following daily dosing values of cofactors: 1) 1000 mg vitamin C, 2) 220 mg calcium citrate, 3) 75 mg vitamin B6, and 4) 400 µg folate. Copyright © 2009, CRC Press. Adapted with permission from Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. The question to be answered in evaluating patients after 1 week of taking a specific amino acid dosing value was ‘What was the status of the depression symptoms yesterday?’ Since it takes up to 5 days for the maximum benefit of an amino acid dosing change to be seen, secondary to equilibration of the amino acids, results from the day before the visit were found to be more reliable than inquiring about the status of depression symptom for the entire week. Since the maximum benefit of any dosing change occurs within 5 days, there is no purpose in waiting longer than 1 week to see if an amino acid dosing change achieved additional relief of symptoms. This only increases the amount of time needed to find the proper dose leading to resolution of the symptoms.7 If there was no relief of depression symptoms at the weekly visit, the amino acid dosing was adjusted upward to the next dosing level (level 2 or level 3). The goal was to obtain relief of depression symptoms or reach level 3 amino acid dosing with no relief of symptoms, whichever occurred first.2 At the initial visit, all prescription drugs were continued. Prescription antidepressant drugs were continued until full relief of depression symptoms was obtained, and then tapered to a stop, at the option of the caregiver. It was noted that drugs may require being stopped sooner if drug side effects emerge. As neurotransmitter levels increase with amino acid precursor administration, drug side effects may occur in ∼5% of patients. The emergence of drug side effects may be a source of confusion for the caregiver. Since the last thing changed in the patient’s treatment plan was the amino acid dosing, there is a tendency to focus on the amino acids as the source of side effects that were actually due to prescription drug toxic side effects. Failure to achieve relief of depression symptoms, on evaluation with DSM-IV guidelines, after 1 week of taking level 3 amino acid dosing of Table 1 was the indication for initiation of OCT assay interpretation studies to guide further amino acid precursor dosing value changes. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Subsequent to the interpretation of each urine sample collected, the amino acid dosing was adjusted in response to OCT assay interpretation findings. This was focused on achieving both the urinary serotonin and dopamine in the Phase III therapeutic ranges (the target ranges). The end point of collecting samples for OCT assay interpretation was whichever came first of the following: i) resolution of depression symptoms, ii) obtaining both the urinary serotonin and dopamine in the target ranges, or iii) the patient dropping out of treatment. If no relief of depression symptoms was observed with the urinary serotonin and dopamine in the target ranges, the amino acids were continued at that dosing value and a mood-stabilizing drug was added. The choice of mood-stabilizing drug was either lithium carbonate 300 mg twice a day or divalprex sodium 250 mg 3 times a day at the caregiver’s discretion. l-Dopa and l-tyrosine have an ability to deplete sulfur amino acids. Based on previous experience and peerreviewed literature, l-cysteine was added to the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors in the amounts of 4500 mg/day in adults in divided doses.2 Selenium 400 mcg/day was administered with the l-cysteine to address concerns raised in the literature regarding l-cysteine facilitating neurotoxic insult by methylmercury.8 Other literature notes that selenium irreversibly binds to methylmercury rendering it nontoxic.9 Results Patients selected had been formally diagnosed with depression under DSM-IV criteria and carried no previous diagnosis or medical history supporting bipolar disorder. The group studied consisted of 1600 patients diagnosed with recurrent major depression who failed to respond to treatment with amino acid precursors at the level 3 dosing (outlined in Table 1) on evaluation under DSM-IV guidelines. These 1600 patients had urine samples collected, and OCT submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 743 Dovepress Hinz et al assay interpretation was performed with amino acid dosing adjustments focused on achieving urinary serotonin and dopamine in the target ranges. The status of depression symptoms was evaluated with the DSM-IV criteria at each visit. Of the 1600 patients starting the OCT assay interpretation, the following three groupings of patients ultimately were defined: i) patients who achieved relief of symptoms in response to amino acid precursor dosing value adjustment guided by OCT assay interpretation, ii) patients who achieved no relief of symptoms with the amino acid precursor dosing required for achieving urinary serotonin and dopamine in the target ranges, and iii) patients who dropped out of treatment. Patients achieving relief of symptoms with amino acid dose adjustment and patients dropping out were not tracked in this study. The goal of the study was to define a group of patients who were nonresponders with urinary serotonin and dopamine in the target ranges. Of the initial starting group of N = 1600, a group of N = 117 (7.3%) was determined to be nonresponders. Demographics of the 117 nonresponders were as follows. There were 73 females in the nonresponder group (62.4%). There were 44 males in the nonresponder group (37.6%). The age range for the entire nonresponder group was 18.3–82.9 with a mean age of 55.2 and a standard deviation of 13.2 years. The age range for the female nonresponder group (N = 73) was 18.3–75.3 with a mean of 53.8 and a standard deviation of 11.9 years. The age range for the male nonresponder group (N = 44) was 25.0–82.9 with a mean of 55.2 and a standard deviation of 13.2 years. Nonresponders were continued on the amino acid dosing values needed to achieve the target ranges and a mood-stabilizing drug was started. The choice and dose of the mood-stabilizing drugs were lithium carbonate 300 mg twice a day or divalprex sodium 250 mg 3 times a day, at the caregiver’s discretion. Of the 117 patients started on a mood-stabilizing drug in combination with the amino acid dosing needed to establish the target ranges, 114 achieved full relief of depression symptoms within 1–5 days of starting the drug. Of the three patients who did not respond when the initial dose of the mood-stabilizing drug was added, further adjustment of the mood-stabilizing drug was guided by serum assays of the drug levels with the goal of establishing lithium or valproic acid serum levels in the therapeutic range. During the process of serum-guided adjustment of the mood-stabilizing drug, relief of depression symptoms was obtained in the 744 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress final three patients. A positive response to adding the moodstabilizing drug to the amino acid dosing of the target ranges was the basis for a clinical diagnosis of bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. The type was considered undifferentiated since no history of mania or hypomania existed. The conclusion was that 100% of patients in whom a mood-stabilizing drug was administered in conjunction with amino acid precursors were clinically diagnosed with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole, while experiencing complete relief of depression symptoms. A significant point is the dramatic response of these patients to the starting dose of the mood-stabilizing drug. Up until initiation of the mood-stabilizing drug, none of the patients had experienced any relief or improvement of depression symptoms. The starting dose of the mood-stabilizing drugs was well tolerated with no reported start-up problems. The choice of which mood-stabilizing drug to prescribe was at the discretion of the caregiver; 71% of patients were treated with lithium carbonate, and 29% of patients were treated with divalprex sodium. Analysis of results revealed no significant difference in outcomes with the mood-stabilizing drug selected. Both mood-stabilizing drugs appear to be equally effective with all patients achieving relief of depression symptoms due to bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Review of group amino acid dosing values, where both the urinary serotonin and dopamine were in the target ranges, revealed daily dosing values were highly individualized with no standard dosing apparent. In the group of 117 nonresponders to amino acids alone, the group amino acid dosing values in the target ranges were as follows. The group 5-HTP dosing range was 37.5–1800 mg/day with a mean of 300 mg/day and a standard deviation of 380.5 mg/day. l -Tyrosine group dosing range was 2500–13,000 mg/day with a mean of 7000 mg/day and a standard deviation of 2148.5 mg/day. l-Dopa group dosing range was 0–2940 mg/day with a mean of 240 mg/day and a standard deviation of 285.8 mg/day.6 Treatment time to stabilization was as follows. All patients at the start of the study had undergone 3 weeks of treatment utilizing the amino acid dosing value adjustment under the protocol of Table 1. Time to achieve urinary serotonin and dopamine in the Phase III therapeutic ranges beyond level 3 dosing was 2–12 weeks with a mean of 6 weeks and a standard deviation of 2.23 weeks. In 114 of the patients started on a mood-stabilizing drug, one additional week of treatment time was required to achieve relief of symptoms. The average Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Dovepress Differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole time of treatment from start of the amino acids in Table 1 to relief of symptoms with the mood-stabilizing drugs was 10 weeks with a range of 6–16 weeks. Physicians involved in this study reported no relapse of depression symptoms as long as patients were compliant with treatment prescribed. The longest follow-up period for a patient in this study is currently 8 years. Discussion The clinical diagnosis of depression was made in the primary care setting. It was indicated that the diagnosis of depression had been made under DSM-IV criteria. There were no reports of structure interviews being performed in these practices which may represent a limitation of this depression care. While the approach of administering l-tyrosine with l-dopa may seem counterintuitive, the rationale for its use is supported by the literature and the research experience leading up to this article. Peer-reviewed literature notes administering l-dopa without proper levels of l-tyrosine can lead to significant fluctuations in urinary dopamine levels. Dopamine fluctuations interfere with OCT assay interpretation, leading to inconsistent results. Dopamine fluctuations can also decrease the efficacy of l-dopa, as the clinical response fluctuates.4 It is also known that administration of l-dopa can lead to depletion of l-tyrosine.10 The effects of mood-stabilizing drugs (lithium carbonate or divalprex sodium) used in this study appear to be potentiated by the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor in dosing values needed to establish the target ranges. There appears to be a synergy. The mechanism of this potential synergy is unknown. In this pilot study, patients who were diagnosed with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole experienced no relief of symptoms in the past although mood-stabilizing drugs were administered at various dosing values including levels verified as therapeutic by serum assays. In this study, they obtained relief of symptoms predominantly on the starting dose of drug when added to amino acid precursors at dosing values required to establish the target ranges. The following patient profile exists for those patients newly diagnosed in this study with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole under this protocol. The typical patient has a history of being treated with antidepressants for recurrent major depression for many years without relief of depression symptoms. Once symptoms of depression are under control, with the addition of a Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 mood-stabilizing drug, it is not uncommon for patients to report that their symptoms have been present since high school or earlier in life. Patient reports of suffering since high school are common and even more impressive when it is realized that 80% of the patients in this study ranged from 40 to 65 years of age, meaning years of suffering without effective treatment. Over the years, these patients have seen many physicians while looking for relief of depression symptoms and have taken most or all of the antidepressants available without complete relief of symptoms.2 It is suggested that future studies of this protocol which differentiates bipolar depression from recurrent major depression should incorporate the following screening in order to generate a group with a higher percentage of previously undiagnosed bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. i) A history of depression for over 10 years. ii) A history of having seen five or more caregivers for treatment of depression. iii) A history of having taken five or more antidepressant drugs in the past without full relief of symptoms. It is also suggested that in patients who meet this criteria, the amino acid dosing simply be started on level 1 dosing of Table 1 and then a urine sample be obtained in 1 week and submitted for OCT assay interpretation. This will decrease the time of treatment by 3 weeks. As noted previously, when this protocol was initiated, any prescription drugs being taken were continued. Once the patient with bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole achieves relief of depression symptoms and the diagnosis of bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole is made, any antidepressants, which are not indicated for monotherapy for treatment with bipolar depression under US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, should be stopped.6,7,11,12 However, it was found that many of these patients, finally symptom free for the first time in years, are hesitant or even highly resistant to giving up anything in their treatment plan that has finally gotten them relief of symptoms, including the antidepressants. These feelings on the part of the patient may be exceptionally strong. An effective approach to eliminating the antidepressants that are not indicated for monotherapy in bipolar depression from the treatment plan, in the face of strong patient resistance, is to simply wait 2–3 months after relief of symptoms and then revisit the issue of slowly tapering the antidepressants to a stop. Implementation of this protocol is time intensive. The amino acid dosing value OCT assay interpretation cycle is 2 weeks. When the amino acid dosing value is submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 745 Dovepress Hinz et al changed, it takes 1 week before urine can be collected in the steady state, and then it takes another week to get the test results of OCT assay interpretation reported back to the physician in order to prescribe the next amino acid dosing value. Patients at initial visit orientation and on follow-up visits need to be prepared for the longest treatment time possible (2–4 months), although some patients may find relief of symptoms in 1–2 weeks. This is done to prevent patients from dropping out of treatment due to perceived lack of results after several weeks. Response time under this approach varies greatly. Since there is no way of predicting at which point in this process the patient will achieve relief of symptoms, all patients need to be properly oriented at the first visit to the indeterminate length of time with reinforcement of this orientation at subsequent visits. While weekly visits over a 4-month period may seem like a long time to get relief of symptoms, in fact, most bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole have suffered with disease symptoms for 20–40 years or longer and the time investment is relatively small compared to the prolonged length of suffering and the cost due to ineffectiveness of previous medical care. As treatment under this protocol progresses, most patients report no relief of depression symptoms until the proper amino acid dosing or amino acid dosing with mood-stabilizer dosing has been implemented. It was relatively rare for patients to achieve gradual relief of symptoms from visit to visit. Resolution of symptoms in patients can be and often is dramatic and abrupt, analogous to a light switch being either off (with symptoms) or on (without symptoms). It was not uncommon for a patient who had been under treatment for many weeks to return for a clinic visit and report the exact day that relief of depression symptoms occurred. Waiting for this dramatic effect to occur without the patient understanding the process involved may lead to an increased drop-out rate of patients prior to relief of symptoms. For example, the patient who has been under treatment for many weeks, with no improvement of depression, may contemplate dropping out of treatment when, in fact, they are on the doorstep of dramatic improvement. Conclusion The novel approach of this pilot study clinically differentiates recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Although this approach appears to be effective in treatment of bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole, more studies are needed. 746 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole is frequently misdiagnosed by caregivers. One of the primary stumbling blocks is the inability to elicit a proper medical history of one or more manic or hypomanic episodes in the patient’s past in order to satisfy the DSM-IV criteria. This potential blind spot in the DSM-IV criteria leads to antidepressants being prescribed to patients with bipolar depression, a practice that is specifically not indicated as monotherapy under FDA guidelines.6,7,11,12 The protocol of this study has been in use since 2004 with no reported failures in the treatment of bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole when the protocol was followed properly. This is a pilot study. The intent of this article is to disseminate some of the knowledge gained in this research, spark interest leading to more research, refine the protocol with more studies, and elicit scrutiny of these observations. Disclosure Marty Hinz and Thomas Uncini are owner and medical director of DBS Labs, respectively, Duluth, MN, USA. Alvin Stein reports no disclosures. References 1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder IV (DSM IV). 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association;1994:327–352. 2. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 2009:465–481. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6(1):387–392. 4. Trachte GJ, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Comprehensive analysis of urinary neurotransmitter testing. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010; In press. 6. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Effexor XR(r) (velafaxine hydrochloride) Extended-Release Capsules. Prescribing information. July 2009. Philadelphia, PA: Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Available from: http://www.wyeth.com/content/showlabeling.asp?id=100. Accessed 2010 May 12. 7. Forest Labs. Lexapro(r) (escitalopram oxalate) prescribing information. Jan 2009. St. Louis, MO: Forest Labs. Available from: http://www.frx. com/pi/lexapro_pi.pdf. Accessed 2010 Jun 2. 8. Spindle A, Matsumoto N. Enhancement of methylmercury toxicity by L-cystine in cultured mouse blastocysts. Reprod Toxicol. 1987–1988;1(4):279–284. 9. Fair PH, Dougherty WJ, Braddon SA. Methyl mercury and selenium interaction in relation to mouse kidney gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, ultrastructure, and function. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985;80(1): 78–96. 10. Karobath M, Diaz JL, Huttunen MO. The effect of L-dopa on the concentrations of tryptophan, tyrosine, and serotonin in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;14(4):393–396. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 Dovepress Differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole 11. GlaxoSmithKline. Wellbutrin XL(r) (bupropion hydrochloride extended-release tablets). Dec 2008. Research Triangle Park, NC: Glaxo SmithKline. Available from: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/ us_wellbutrinXL.pdf. Accessed 2010 Jun 2. 12. Eli Lilly and Company. Prozac (fluoxetine hydrochloride) prescribing information. Oct 2009. Indianapolis (IN): Eli Lilly and Company. Available from: http://pi.lilly.com/us/prozac.pdf. Accessed 2010 Jun 2. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peerreviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2010:6 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 747 Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index C ase r epo r t Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 6 December 2010 Number of times this article has been viewed Alvin Stein 1 Marty Hinz 2 Thomas Uncini 3 1 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 2Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 3Laboratory, Fairview Regional Medical Center-Mesabi, Hibbing, MN, USA Purpose: This paper reviews the clinical course of a case of severe Crohn’s disease and discusses the scientific ramifications of a novel treatment approach. Patients and methods: A case study of a 37-year-old male with a 22-year history of Crohn’s disease whose clinical course had experienced no sustained remissions. The patient was treated with a protocol that utilized serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors administered under the guidance of organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Results: Within 5 days of achieving the necessary balance of serotonin and dopamine, the patient experienced remission of symptoms. This remission has been sustained without the use of any Crohn’s disease medications. Conclusion: In Crohn’s disease, it is known that there is an increase of both synthesis and tissue levels of serotonin in specific locations. It is asserted that this is prima facie evidence of a significant imbalance in the serotonin–dopamine system, leading to serotonin toxicity. The hypothesis formulated is that improperly balanced serotonin and dopamine transport, synthesis, and metabolism is a primary defect contributing to the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease. Keywords: serotonin, dopamine, organic cation transporters, OCT Introduction Correspondence: Alvin Stein 6766 W Sunrise Blvd, Suite 100A, Plantation, Florida 33313, USA Tel +1 954 581 8585 Fax +1 954 316 4969 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/CEG.S15340 Symptoms of Crohn’s disease in patients range on a spectrum from mild to very severe. Symptoms include diarrhea, abdominal pain, intermittent fever, rectal bleeding, loss of appetite, significant weight loss, arthralgias, fatigue, malaise, and headaches. Involvement of other organ systems beyond the intestinal tract, such as eyes, skin, and liver, may be present.1 As there is currently no known cure, treatment is focused on symptom control. Complications secondary to medications prescribed for symptom control may occur. When the disease fails to respond to the milder medications, more aggressive medications are prescribed. Medication complications can be severe, including infections, serum sickness, drug-induced lupus, diabetes, cancers, and even death.2 This paper documents a case study of a patient with severe Crohn’s disease. The patient had suffered with Crohn’s disease of progressing severity for 22 years, during which time no sustained remission of symptoms was noted. The patient suffered profound complications from infliximab, 6-mercaptopurine, and prednisone. He experienced no sustained response from mesalamine, low-dose naltrexone, or dietary modification. The patient’s clinical course was complicated by steroid-induced insulindependent diabetes. He also suffered from severe weight loss, depression, fatigue, mal- Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 171–177 © 2010 Stein et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 171 Dovepress Stein et al aise, headaches, purulent-mucinous diarrhea, rectal bleeding, bilious vomiting, and diffuse arthralgias. Complaints of back pain resulted in back surgery with negative operative findings and no relief of symptoms. Exploratory gallbladder surgery was done in response to abdominal pain. The pathologist’s report of tissue submitted from the gallbladder surgery was negative for any pathology. In February 2004, the patient had progressed to the most severe state of his disease, losing 25% of his body weight. The patient was fully disabled and unable to work. He experienced constant symptoms of Crohn’s disease despite attempts at medication alteration. At all times from his first confirmed attack of Crohn’s disease in 1990 at age 19 years, he was on one or more prescription drugs to try to control the disease symptoms. The patient achieved full remission of symptoms in a matter of days once the proper orally administered serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor dosing values were established with the guidance of urinary organic cation transporter (OCT) functional status determination (herein referred to as OCT assay interpretation). Material and methods The patient was treated with a novel treatment protocol developed by NeuroResearch Clinics (Duluth, Minnesota, MN, USA). Peer-reviewed publications from 20093,4 and 20105–7 outlined a novel “three-phase model” of OCT response to simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors in significant amounts, which is the basis for OCT assay interpretation. Outlined in this paper is a proposed novel OCT model that potentially describes the etiology of the “three-phase response” of serotonin and dopamine during simultaneous administration of their amino acid precursors in varied daily dosing values.5 The protocol Serotonin and dopamine exist in two states. The endogenous state is found when no amino acid precursors are being administered. The competitive inhibition state is found when significant amounts of amino acid precursors of both serotonin and dopamine are administered simultaneously. This novel approach places serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state and then optimizes their transport in proper balance through the OCTs with OCT analysis interpretation. The approach was developed by medical research that started in 1997. Peer-reviewed research covering methodology, applications, and the scientific foundation of this novel approach was published in 20093,4 and 2010.5–7 Optimization of the serotonin–dopamine system has applications in any condition 172 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress where an imbalance between serotonin and dopamine in transport, synthesis, or metabolism is present. The potential scope of applications is far-reaching. The protocol utilized for treatment of Crohn’s disease consisted of the amino acid dosing values listed in Table 1. This protocol has been covered in previous peer-reviewed research.3,7 The initial step of the protocol is the simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors with no OCT functional status determination in order to place the system into a competitive inhibition state. Three dosing levels were available, as noted in Table 1. At the first visit, the patient was started on level 1 amino acid dosing. The patient was then followed weekly for evaluation of response to the start or change in amino acid dosing levels. As described in the results section of this paper, dosing was implemented as per Table 1. The patients took the amino acid dosing values of each level at the times indicated in Table 1. If the patient failed to achieve full relief of symptoms on level 3 dosing, a urine sample was collected and submitted for urinary serotonin and dopamine laboratory assay. This was followed by OCT assay interpretation. Based on OCT assay interpretation, the amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine were adjusted in an effort to achieve full relief of symptoms or a balance of urinary serotonin and dopamine in the Phase 3 therapeutic range, whichever came first.3,7 OCT assay interpretation The serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulous are metabolized by the kidneys, and significant amounts do not make it to the final urine. Serotonin and dopamine found in the urine are monoamines synthesized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells and have never been found in the central nervous system or peripheral system. Serotonin and dopamine that are newly synthesized by the kidneys meet one of two fates. Urinary serotonin and dopamine levels are primarily dependent on the interaction of the basolateral monoamine transporters (OCT2s) and the apical monoamine transporters (OCTN2s) of the proximal convoluted Table 1 Individual dosing value: milligrams of L-tyrosine/milligrams of 5-hydroxytryptophan* Level AM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 1500/150 1500/150 1500/150 Noon 4 PM 7 PM 1500/150 1500/150 1500/150 1000/300 1000/300 1000/300 Note: *The patient also received the following daily dosing values: 1000 mg of vitamin C, 220 mg of calcium citrate, 75 mg of vitamin B6, 400 μg of folate, 4500 mg L-cysteine, and 400 μg of selenium. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 Dovepress Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease renal tubule cells of the kidneys.5,8 The OCTN2s8 of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells transport serotonin and dopamine that is not transported by the OCT2.5 While in the competitive inhibition state, serotonin and dopamine not transported by the OCT2s are found in the final urine as waste.6 Although there are numerous other forces that interact with the newly synthesized renal monoamines, they are small compared with the effects of these transporters.5 Proper interpretation of urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in the competitive inhibition state determines the functional status of the OCT2s of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys, known as OCT assay interpretation. The OCT2s exist in three different phases dependent on the status of the entrance gate and lumen saturation.3–7 Table 2 outlines the correlation between entrance gate status and lumen saturation. The basis for OCT assay interpretation requires that the system be placed into the competitive inhibition state and then two or more urinary serotonin and dopamine assays performed while taking serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors at significantly varied dosing values. The results are then compared in order to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in response to the change in amino acid precursor dosing values.3–7 Urinary serotonin and dopamine values found on assay were reported in micrograms of monoamine per gram of creatinine in order to compensate for fluctuations in urinaryspecific gravity. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value less than 80 or 475 µg of monoamine per 1 g of creatinine, respectively, is defined as a Phase 2 response. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value greater than 80 or 475 µg of monoamine per 1 g of creatinine, respectively, is interpreted as being in Phase 1 or Phase 3. Differentiation of Phase 1 from Phase 3 is a follows. If a direct relationship is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is referred to as a Phase 3 response. An inverse relationship is referred Table 2 The following considerations exist with regard to the basolateral monoamine organic cation transporters of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells* Serotonin or dopamine transporter entrance gates Transporter lumen saturation Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Partially closed Open Open Unsaturated Unsaturated Saturated Note: *In Phase 1, the serotonin and dopamine gates are partially closed, restricting access to the transporter. In Phases 2 and 3, the gates are open, allowing full access to the transporter by serotonin and dopamine. In Phases 1 and 2, the lumen of the transporter is not saturated with serotonin and dopamine. In Phase 3, the lumen of the transporter is saturated with serotonin or dopamine.5 Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 to as a Phase 1 response. The Phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary serotonin is defined as 80–240 µg of serotonin per 1 g of creatinine. The Phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary dopamine is defined as 475–1100 µg of dopamine per 1 g of creatinine.3,5–7 Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected 6 hours prior to bedtime with 4:00 PM being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N hydrochloric acid to preserve the dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of 1 week, during which the patient was taking a specific daily dosing of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine. No doses were missed. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN). Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527, both from Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments as a high-complexity laboratory. OCT assay interpretation was performed. Results were reported in micrograms of monoamine per gram of creatinine to compensate for specific gravity variances in the urine. Results An endoscopy examination, prior to treatment with amino acids while the disease was active, was performed in September 2005. Results revealed several apthous ulcers in the terminal ileum. Tissue biopsy confirmed this diagnosis. At the initiation of the amino acid protocol, the patient was still taking mesalamine, low-dose naltrexone, and escitalopram. The patient reported no relief of symptoms after any of these drugs were started. The escitalopram was discontinued at the start of amino acid treatment, and the mesalamine and low-dose naltrexone were continued. At the first visit, the patient was started on level 1 amino acid dosing as per Table 1. One week later there was no change in symptoms, and the patient’s amino acid dosing values were increased to level 2 (see Table 1). The patient achieved lessening of the symptoms when he was on level 2 amino acid dosing. At that point, the patient revealed that he felt that this approach was the best treatment he had experienced during the course of his 22-year illness. The amino acids were increased to level 3 dosing (see Table 1), with no further change in symptoms. After 1 week of level 3 dosing, a urine sample was obtained and analyzed. The reported values were then submitted for OCT assay interpretation. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 173 Dovepress Stein et al When the first urine sample was collected for OCT assay interpretation, the patient was taking level 3 dosing: 900 mg 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), 5000 mg L-tyrosine, and 4500 mg L-cysteine with cofactors. The first urinary assay revealed serotonin to be in Phase 3 (Table 2) with a reported value of 5150.7 µg of serotonin per 1 g of creatinine, and a dopamine in Phase 2 (Table 2) with a reported value of 206.4 µg of dopamine per 1 g of creatinine. After the first OCT assay interpretation, the patient’s daily amino acid dosing was increased by 1000 mg of L-tyrosine and 240 mg of L-dopa. At that point, the patient was taking the following in divided daily doses: 900 mg 5-HTP, 6000 mg L-tyrosine, 240 mg L-dopa, and 4500 mg L-cysteine with cofactors. After 1 week taking these new amino acid dosing values, there was no change in the patient’s symptoms. A second urine sample was submitted for analysis, followed by OCT assay interpretation. This revealed that the patient’s urinary serotonin was in Phase 3 (Table 2) at 12,611.1 µg of serotonin per 1 g of creatinine, and his dopamine was in Phase 3 (Table 2) at 741.3 µg of dopamine per 1 g of creatinine. The recommendation was to decrease the daily 5-HTP dosing by 300 mg per day, increase L-tyrosine by 1000 mg per day, and continue other amino acids as before. The patient was then taking the following in divided daily doses: 600 mg 5-HTP, 7000 mg L-tyrosine, 240 mg L-dopa, and 4500 mg L-cysteine with cofactors.5 Within 1 week of this dosing value change, the patient became asymptomatic, indicating that adequate OCT balance of the serotonin–dopamine system had occurred. The patient’s response and remission with amino acid treatment was very impressive and relatively abrupt compared with the 22-year course of his disease. This profound resolution of symptoms was achieved within 6 weeks of the first clinic visit. The patient noted the return of solid stools, no further vomiting, restored energy, increased motivation, and resolution of depression symptoms. All prescription medications that the patient had been taking since the start of amino acid treatment were discontinued after 6 weeks of amino acid treatment, including mesalamine and naltrexone, with no return of symptoms. The amino acid dosing values that had induced relief of symptoms were continued. Following remission of symptoms, the patient’s sedimentation rate returned to the normal range. His weight stabilized at approximately 20 pounds above the lowest weight attained while disease symptoms were present. The patient reported that he was very comfortable at that weight. The 174 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress patient found that if he missed a dose of the amino acids, some of the Crohn’s disease symptoms would return. A third OCT assay interpretation was obtained 5 months later with amino acid dosing values that induced relief of symptoms. Urinary serotonin was reported as 9019.5 µg of serotonin per 1 g of creatinine and urinary dopamine was 604.3 µg of dopamine per 1 g of creatinine; both were in Phase 3 (Table 2). At this point, the patient was still asymptomatic. The recommendation was to decrease the daily 5-HTP dosage to 300 mg, decrease L-tyrosine dosing by 1000 mg per day, and continue other amino acids as before. After this dosing value change, the patient was then taking the following in divided daily doses: 300 mg 5-HTP, 6000 mg L-tyrosine, 240 mg L-dopa, and 4500 mg L-cysteine with cofactors. Following this change in amino acid dosing values, the patient continued to be asymptomatic, a state that exists to this day as long as he is compliant with the prescribed amino acid dosing values. Endoscopy subsequent to remission of symptoms was performed in March 2010. This was 26 months after starting the amino acid protocol guided by OCT assay interpretation and 24 months after achieving relief of symptoms. This endoscopy was performed by the same gastroenterologist that performed endoscopy prior to remission of symptoms. At this endoscopy, the patient was taking his amino acids daily with no prescription medications. He was taking no insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents, and his HbA1c had returned to normal. There were no signs of diabetes or other illnesses. He had returned to full-time gainful employment, after a period of over 4 years during which he was fully disabled. The gastroenterologist reported that for the first time in 10 years of caring for the patient, the Crohn’s disease was in complete remission. This finding was verified by the pathologist after review of tissue samples submitted. As of the time of writing this paper, the patient continues to do well with no infections or adverse reactions. He is gainfully employed and living a normal life. All follow-up testing, including sedimentation rates, have been normal. Discussion Scientific basis The authors have documented a number of patients with Crohn’s disease who experienced similar remission of symptoms with this approach. This case was selected for this paper due to the severity of disease in the patient. Serotonin and dopamine levels inside and outside of the cell structures containing them are primarily a function of Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 Dovepress transporter status.5 The question raised is how OCT assay interpretation of renal transporters relates to the OCTs of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The hypothesis is that performing OCT assay interpretation on one set of OCTs will give insight into transport of serotonin, dopamine, and their precursors at other OCTs throughout the body. Within 3–5 days of starting or changing amino acid precursor dosing values, serotonin, dopamine, and their precursors reach equilibrium throughout the body.3,5–7 At equilibrium, amino acid precursors, serotonin, and dopamine exert similar effects at cation transporters throughout the body. In the competitive inhibition state, the serotonin and dopamine systems function as one system in transport, synthesis, and metabolism. Affecting change to one system will affect both systems in their functions. Serotonin, dopamine, and their amino acid precursors compete for transport at the OCTs. Significant increases in one monoamine will decrease monoamine and precursor transport of the other system through competitive inhibition. Transport of precursors into the cells is required in order to place them in an environment where synthesis takes place. The same enzyme, the L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase enzyme (AAAD), is responsible for synthesis of serotonin and dopamine. Creating an environment where precursors of one system are significantly increased without significantly increasing the precursors of the other system leads to decreased access to the AAAD by precursors of the other system, with associated decreased synthesis or depletion due to competitive inhibition. Both serotonin and dopamine are metabolized by the monoamine oxidase (MAO) enzyme system. A significant increase in levels of one system will increase MAO activity, leading to increased metabolism and depletion of the other system.2,5,6 In the intestinal tract of Crohn’s patients there is excessive synthesis with associated increased tissue levels of serotonin.8,9 In Crohn’s disease, high levels of serotonin dominate synthesis, metabolism, and transport, leading to dopamine and catecholamine levels that are low relative to the balance needed to function properly with the serotonin levels present.3,5 OCT assay interpretation As noted in previous peer-reviewed research by the authors, OCT phase determination defines the status of the serotonin and dopamine gates at the entrance to the basolateral monoamine OCT (open or partially closed) of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys and the status of serotonin and dopamine saturation in these transporters (see Table 2).5 Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease Proper interpretation of the findings requires the following explanation. Serotonin and dopamine both need to be in the competitive inhibition state when OCT assay interpretation is performed. This means that significant dosing values of both serotonin and dopamine need to be administered simultaneously. When in the competitive inhibition state, serotonin and dopamine are in full competition for transport, synthesis, and metabolism.3,5 Testing of the urine is only done after amino acid precursors of the monoamines are started in accordance with the protocol, placing the serotonin–dopamine system in the competitive inhibition state. Baseline testing in the endogenous state prior to administration of amino acid precursors is of no value, as these assay levels correlate with nothing. As noted in previous peer-reviewed literature, baseline testing of urinary serotonin and dopamine does not correlate with baseline assays performed on subsequent days in the same individual.6 Simply giving the patient one or more amino acid precursors is not the key to optimal outcomes. The OCT needs to be challenged with serotonin and dopamine precursors in significant amounts to place transport in the competitive inhibition state so that proper OCT assay interpretation can be realized.5 The OCTN There is a known genetic defect of OCTN1 and OCTN2 in the colon of patients suffering from Crohn’s diease.9 All OCT and OCTN transporters are capable of transporting organic cations, including serotonin, dopamine, and their precursors.8 In Crohn’s disease, the serotonin content of the mucosa and submucosa of the proximal and distal colon is increased.10 Increased synthesis of serotonin is known to be associated with Crohn’s disease.11 No reasonable explanation of the etiology of serotonin elevation in the colon tissue of Crohn’s disease patients has been put forth previously. It is postulated that the known OCTN1 and OCTN2 genetic deficit may be tied to the increased synthesis and tissue levels of serotonin seen with Crohn’s disease. Based on OCT assay interpretation, it appears that a severe imbalance between serotonin and dopamine transport, synthesis, and metabolism is at the heart of Crohn’s disease. An imbalance of the serotonin–dopamine transport system has been linked to numerous diseases.3,5–7 It is proposed that much of the clinical constellation found with Crohn’s disease may be induced by a serotonin toxicity of the colon exacerbated by relatively low levels of dopamine resulting from defective OCTN transport. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 175 Dovepress Stein et al In the GI tract, serotonin is contained primarily in the enteroendocrine cells (ECs). The serotonin–dopamine transporter balance of the ECs controls paracrine–autocrine and/or endocrine mediators that modulate GI function.12 It is asserted that proper treatment needs to include correct management of the serotonin and dopamine imbalance in transport, synthesis, and metabolism. The only definitive way to address these problems optimally is with OCT analysis interpretation in the competitive inhibition state that is established with proper amino acid precursor administration. It is postulated that the patient’s Crohn’s disease was impacted in a positive manner as follows. It is known that there is increased synthesis of serotonin with increased serotonin levels in the proximal and distal colon.11 Levels of the serotonin–dopamine system are impacted primarily by synthesis, uptake, and metabolism. For serotonin and dopamine to be synthesized, their amino acid precursors need to be transported into the structures where this occurs. There appears to be a defect in transport of serotonin precursors of the colon. Serotonin precursors are transported preferentially at the exclusion of dopamine precursors, leading to high levels of synthesis, high levels of serotonin in portions of the colon, and compromise of catecholamine synthesis. Properly balancing the serotonin and dopamine precursor transport leads to a decrease in serotonin synthesis, less serotonin in the tissue of the proximal and distal colon, and an increase in synthesis of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. Increased serotonin levels of Crohn’s disease lead to increased MAO activity, which without reciprocal increases of the catecholamines leads to increased metabolism of the catecholamines, further exacerbating the imbalance. Other implications With a case study such as this there is always the possibility that remission was coincidental to treatment. This patient had a 22-year history of progressively worsening Crohn’s with no remissions and has been free of Crohn’s disease symptoms clinically and on biopsy for 2.5 years since the appropriate dosing values of serotonin and dopamine amino acids were established. We leave it to the reader to speculate as to the odds of this being a spontaneous coincidental remission versus a response to properly balanced amino acids. One other aspect of the patient’s treatment needs to be discussed. The patient was suffering from depression. Previously published peer-reviewed literature by the authors indicates that this same approach with OCT assay interpretation for treatment of depression is effective.3,7 In this case study, the patient’s depression resolved when the serotonin 176 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress and dopamine were balanced to the degree needed for relief of Crohn’s disease symptoms. It is asserted that it was no coincidence that the patient’s depression resolved simultaneously with the resolution of the symptoms of Crohn’s disease. Conclusion In recent years, a genetic defect of the OCTN1 and OCTN2 of the colon has been identified in patients with Crohn’s disease. The OCTN1 and OCTN2 are responsible for transport of cations, including the monoamines of the serotonin–dopamine system and their precursors. It is known with Crohn’s disease patients that there is a marked increased in serotonin levels of the proximal and distal colon associated with a defect in serotonin synthesis. It remains to be proven whether a transport problem exists in the serotonin–dopamine system induced by the OCTN1 and OCTN2 genetic defect found in Crohn’s disease. For now, these observations cannot be overlooked. Clearly, further studies relating to OCT analysis interpretation and the OCTN transporters of the colon as they relate to other abnormal findings associated with Crohn’s disease are indicated. This paper potentially opens the door to a new area of treatment and study in Crohn’s disease patients. The goal of the paper is to stimulate further interest in these findings in order to duplicate, confirm, and invite scrutiny of these results. Disclosure Dr Marty Hinz is President of Clinical Research, Neuro Research Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, Florida, USA. Dr Thomas Uncini is Medical Director of DBS Labs, Duluth, Minnesota, USA. Dr Alvin Stein reports no disclosures. References 1. Greenstein AJ, Janowitz HD, Sachar DB. The extra-intestinal complications of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: a study of 700 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1976;55(5):401–412. 2. Present DH, Meltzer SJ, Krumholz MP, Wolke A, Korelitz BI. 6-Mercaptopurine in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: short- and long-term toxicity. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:641–649. 3. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. FL: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. 4. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine, a comprehensive analysis. Open Access J Urol. In press 2010. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. NeuroPsychiatr Dis Treat. In press 2010. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 Dovepress 8. Koepsell H, Schmitt B, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. 9. Sartor RB. Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3(7): 390–407. 10. Oshima S, Fujimura M, Fujimiya M. Changes in number of serotonincontaining cells and serotonin levels in the intestinal mucosa of rats with colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate. Histochem Cell Biol. 1999;112:257–263. Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease 11. Minderhoud I, Oldenburg B, Schipper M, Ter Linde J, Samson M. Serotonin synthesis and uptake in symptomatic patients with Crohn’s disease in remission. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:714–720. 12. O’Hara J, Ho W, Linden D, Mawe G, Sharkey K. Enteroendocrine cells and 5-HT availability are altered in mucosa of guinea pigs with TNBS ileitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287(5): G998–G1007. Dovepress Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Publish your work in this journal Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology is an international, peerreviewed, open access journal, publishing all aspects of gastroenterology in the clinic and laboratory, including: Pathology, pathophysiology of gastrointestinal disease; Investigation and treatment of gastointestinal disease; Pharmacology of drugs used in the alimentary tract; Immunology/genetics/genomics related to gastrointestinal disease. This journal is indexed on CAS. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/clinical-and-experimental-gastroenterology-journal Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010:3 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 177 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index O r i g i nal R e s e a r c h Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 25 January 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Robert Neff 3 Robert Weinberg 4 Thomas Uncini 5 NeuroResearch Clinics Inc, Cape Coral, FL; 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL; 3Mental Training Inc, Dallas, TX; 4Department of Kinesiology and Health, Miami University, Oxford, OH; 5Laboratory, Fairview Regional Medical CenterMesabi, Hibbing, MN, USA 1 Background: This paper documents a retrospective pilot study of a novel approach for treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine in conjunction with urinary monoamine assays subjected to organic cation transporter (OCT) functional status determination. The goal of this research was to document the findings and related considerations of a retrospective chart review study designed to identify issues and areas of concern that will define parameters for a prospective controlled study. Methods: This study included 85 patients, aged 4–18 years, who were treated with a novel amino acid precursor protocol. Their clinical course during the first 8–10 weeks of treatment was analyzed retrospectively. The study team consisted of PhD clinical psychologists, individuals compiling clinical data from records, and a statistician. The patients had been treated with a predefined protocol for administering amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine, along with OCT assay interpretation as indicated. Results: In total, 67% of participants achieved significant improvement with only amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine. In patients who achieved no significant relief of symptoms with only amino acid precursors, OCT assay interpretation was utilized. In this subgroup, 30.3% achieved significant relief following two or three urine assays and dosage changes as recommended by the assay results. The total percentage of patients showing significant improvement was 77%. Conclusion: The efficacy of this novel protocol appears superior to some ADHD prescription drugs, and therefore indicates a need for further studies to verify this observation. The findings of this study justify initiation of further prospective controlled studies in order to evaluate more formally the observed benefits of this novel approach in the treatment of ADHD. Keywords: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, 5-hydroxytryptophan, tyrosine, L-dopa, organic cation transporter assay interpretation Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 363904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S16270 A large meta-analysis (n = 171,756) published in 2007 involving the review of 303 literature articles placed the worldwide pooled incidence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) at 5.29%. However, this review suggested that geographic location plays only a limited role in the reasons for the large variability of ADHD/ hyperactivity disorder prevalence estimates worldwide.1 This paper documents the results of a retrospective chart review relating to a novel serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor treatment approach to ADHD which integrates organic cation transporter (OCT) assay interpretation.2–7 Our hypothesis was that this novel approach of adminNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 31–38 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 31 Dovepress Hinz et al istering amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine with OCT assay interpretation when indicated may have efficacy that is superior to some of the prescription drugs currently used in the treatment of ADHD. The diagnosis of ADHD is dependent upon meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria in the areas of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity which negatively affect performance in school and work, as well as in relationships with others.8 It is a generally accepted premise that a primary factor in development of ADHD is the status of the monoamine system to include serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. In response, the pharmaceutical industry has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), that certain drugs that impact the monoamine systems meet FDA efficacy standards. Examples of these drugs include neutral sulfate salts of dextroamphetamine and amphetamine,9 methylphenidate,10 dexmethylphenidate,11 atomextine,12 and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate.13 Side effects and adverse reactions associated with ADHD prescription medications are significant, serious, and potentially life-threatening. The following is a limited list of these events associated with the ADHD group of drugs as a whole, which include, but are not limited to:9–13 • Black box warning of increased risk of suicidal ideation • Severe liver injury • Sudden death in cases with pre-existing structural cardiac abnormalities or other serious heart problems • Risk of stroke and myocardial infarction • Exacerbation of symptoms of behavior disturbance and thought disorder in patients with a pre-existing psychotic disorder • Induction of mixed/manic episodes • Treatment by stimulants at usual doses can cause emergent psychotic or manic symptoms, eg, hallucinations, delusional thinking, or mania in children and adolescents without prior history of psychotic illness or mania • Amphetamines may impair the ability of the patient to engage in potentially hazardous activities such as operating machinery or vehicles • Higher incidence of infection, photosensitivity reaction, constipation, tooth disorders, emotional liability, decreased libido, somnolence, speech disorder, palpitation, twitching, dyspnea, sweating, dysmenorrhea, and impotence • Integument disorders including, but not limited to, urticaria, rash, and hypersensitivity reactions, including 32 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress angioedema and anaphylaxis; serious skin rashes, including Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis • Lowering of seizure threshold • Increased aggression and hostility • Contraindicated in patients with marked anxiety, tension, and agitation, because the drugs may aggravate these symptoms • Risk of drug dependence • Development of leukopenia and/or anemia. These drugs do not increase the total number of neurotransmitter molecules in the central nervous system. Their primary mechanism of action is thought to be reuptake inhibition which sets up conditions that move neurotransmitters from one place to another.4–8 However, previous writings suggest that the process of reuptake inhibition may deplete neurotransmitters throughout the body.4,14–19 The administration of amphetamine stimulants creates another potential area of concern relating to neurotoxicity.20–22 There has been no previous peer-reviewed literature published addressing the efficacy of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine simultaneously administered in the treatment of ADHD. The immediate amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine are 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa), respectively. They freely cross the blood-brain barrier and are then synthesized into serotonin and dopamine without biochemical feedback inhibition. L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine are immediate precursors of 5-HTP and L-dopa, respectively. L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine have the ability to be synthesized into serotonin and dopamine, respectively. They are actively transported across the blood–brain barrier in competition with other amino acids. Synthesis of serotonin and dopamine from L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine, respectively, is regulated by biochemical feedback. Under the approach of this pilot study, optimal results are dependent upon achieving a proper balance between the administered serotonin and dopamine precursors. 2–7 This study reviews the effects of a novel method of treatment involving the use of monoamine amino acid precursors that do what drugs are unable to do. This novel approach has the ability to increase the total number of neurotransmitter molecules in the central nervous system,3–7 leading to efficacy observations that appear greater than those of prescription drugs without the potential for neurotransmitter depletion, neurotoxicity issues, and severe potentially life-threatening drug side effects associated with prescription drugs. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress ADHD treatment with monoamine amino acid precursors Material and methods Table 2 Adult protocol for patients 17 years of age and older The study included 85 children aged 4–18 years who had been diagnosed as having ADHD under the DSM-IV criteria by a licensed PhD clinical psychologist. The patients were then treated by a clinical psychologist. The medical charts and treatment results were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were evaluated twice during treatment with the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS).17 Other variables assessed via a questionnaire included: taking/not taking ADHD medicine; previous history of taking stimulant drugs; gender; age; perceived amount of improvement as noted by a conversation between the parent (or patient alone if an adult over 18 years) and the psychologist; and number of comorbid factors (eg, depression, cerebral palsy, chronic indigestion, hair pulling, seizures, autism, obsessive compulsive behavior). The time period covered in the review was 18 months. The individual patients were treated for a period of 8–10 weeks with staggered starting of treatment. If no relief of symptoms was observed in the first 3–4 weeks of treatment, while administering the amino acid dosing protocol values of Tables 1 and 2, a urine sample was collected. Urinary serotonin and dopamine assay results were then subjected to OCT assay interpretation in order to define the needed change in amino acid dosing values. The goal of treatment was resolution of symptoms or achieving urinary serotonin and dopamine in the phase 3 therapeutic ranges, whichever came first.3–7 The amino acid dosing values of the protocol were developed by NeuroResearch Clinics Inc, Duluth, MN.3–7 The statistician performing data analysis had no exposure to any aspects of active patient treatment, prior hypotheses, treatment expectations, and anticipated results in the data relating to the study. The researchers performing the charting were also blind to any hypotheses being evaluated. A P value # 0.05 was considered statistically significant. JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) software was used to perform the statistical analysis. For the purposes of the study, participants 16 years of age and younger were placed on the pediatric dosing protocol (Table 1). Participants 17 years of age and older were placed on the adult dosing protocol (Table 2). mg 5-HTP/mg L-tyrosine Table 1 Pediatric protocol for patients aged 16 years of age and younger mg 5-HTP/mg L-tyrosine Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Morning 4 pm 7 pm 75/750 112.5/1125 112.5/1125 75/750 112.5/1125 112.5/1125 – – 112.5/1125 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Morning Noon 4 pm 150/1500 225/2250 150/1500 – – 150/1500 150/1500 225/2250 225/750 In addition to the basic amino acid dosing values, other daily cofactors generally required for synthesis of the monoamine and maximum benefit from the protocol were administered. These included vitamin C 1000 mg, calcium citrate 220 mg, vitamin B6 75 mg, folate 400 µg, L-lysine 500 mg, L-cysteine 4500 mg for adults and 2250 mg for children, and selenium 400 µg for adults and 200 µg for children. In general, L-dopa in the form of standardized mucuna pruriens 40% was added when the recommendation of the first urinary OCT assay interpretation demonstrated its need, which was a frequent occurrence.4 Patients were seen weekly. The initiation of a treatment prescription with amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine was at the level 1 dosing values of Tables 1 and 2. If the symptoms persisted after one week of treatment, the dosing was advanced week to week to level 2, then level 3. Patients who did not achieve relief of symptoms on level 3 dosing values had a urine sample collected after one week on that dosage; serotonin and dopamine levels were determined and reported in µg of monoamine per g of creatinine. Reported values were then subjected to OCT assay interpretation. Reporting of urinary monoamine levels as µg of mono amine per g of creatinine compensated for the specific gravity of the urine.3–7 OCT assay interpretation Peer-reviewed publications from 2009 and 2010 outlined a novel urinary “three-phase model” of urinary serotonin and dopamine response to simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors in significant amounts. This three-phase model is the basis for OCT assay interpretation.2–7 A 2010 paper proposed a novel renal organic cation transporter model which potentially describes the etiology of the “three-phase response” of serotonin and dopamine during simultaneous administration of their amino acid precursors in varied daily dosing values.3 The urinary neurotransmitter testing model should with the OCT assay interpretation model used in this study. The urinary neurotransmitter testing model merely attempts to determine if urinary neurotransmitter levels are high or low, making no provision for phase determination or OCT submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 33 Dovepress Hinz et al f unctional status interpretation. The flawed science behind the urinary neurotransmitter testing model was discussed in a 2010 paper.6 The serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulus are metabolized by the kidneys, and significant amounts do not reach the final urine. Serotonin and dopamine found in the urine, in patients not suffering from a monoamine- secreting tumor, primarily represent monoamines that are newly synthesized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys and have never been in the central nervous system or peripheral system. The fate of the newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine inside the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells is primarily dependent upon the interaction of the basolateral monoamine transporters and the apical monoamine transporters of these proximal tubule cells. The basolateral monoamine transporter transports both serotonin and dopamine to the renal interstitium where they ultimately end up in the peripheral system via the renal vein. The apical monoamine transporters transport the newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine not transported by the basolateral monoamine transporter to the proximal nephrons and, from there, ultimately end up in the final urine as waste.3,24 Serotonin and dopamine are found in two states. The endogenous state is found when no amino acid precursors are administered. The competitive inhibition state is found when significant amounts of both serotonin and dopamine precursors are simultaneously administered. Proper OCT assay interpretation requires that the serotonin and dopamine systems be simultaneously placed in the competitive inhibition state prior to OCT assay interpretation.3–7,24 The basis for OCT assay interpretation requires that two or more urinary serotonin and dopamine assays be performed while taking serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors at significantly varied dosing values. The results are then compared to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in response to the change in amino acid precursor dosing values.2–7 A urinary serotonin or dopamine value less than 80 µg or 475 µg of monoamine per g of creatinine, respectively, is defined as a phase 2 response. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value greater than 80 µg or 475 µg of monoamine per g of creatinine, respectively, is interpreted as being in phase 1 or phase 3. Differentiation of phase 1 from phase 3 is a follows. If a direct relationship is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is referred to as a phase 3 response. An inverse relationship is referred to as a phase 1 response. The phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary 34 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress serotonin is defined as 80–240 µg of serotonin per g of creatinine. The phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary dopamine is defined as 475–1100 µg of dopamine per g of creatinine.2–7 Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected about six hours prior to bedtime, with 4 pm being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve the dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of one week during which time the patient was taking a specific daily dosing of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine where no doses were missed. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN) which is operated under the direction of one of the authors (TU, hospital-based pathologist, dual board-certified in laboratory medicine and forensic pathology). Urinary dopamine and serotonin were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527, both from Immuno Biological Laboratories Inc, Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by CLIA to perform these assays. OCT assay interpretation was performed by one of the authors (MH, NeuroResearch Clinics Inc). Results The retrospective chart review of this pilot study covered the treatment of 85 children aged 4–18 years diagnosed under DSM-IV criteria to have ADHD. The age distribution of the study group was 4–8 years (n = 7), 9–12 years (n = 36), and 13–18 years (n = 22). The mean age of the subjects was 12.2 years. There were 51 boys and 34 girls evenly distributed across the three age ranges. Of the 85 patients, 62 (72.9%) had previously taken a stimulant drug for ADHD, and 23 (27.1%) had no history of treatment with an ADHD stimulant drug. There were 28 patients (30.0%) currently taking an ADHD drug while 57 (70.0%) were not. The breakdown of drugs taken at the start of treatment was as follows: 14 were taking amphetamine enantiomers; five were taking methylphenidate; five were taking atomoxetine; three were taking other drugs not specifically defined; and one was taking a combination of amphetamine enantiomers with atomoxetine. Parents sought treatment under this novel approach primarily due to concerns over lack of drug efficacy and/or drug side effects. The ADHD-RS inventory was administered at the start and end of treatment. Results indicated that group Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress ADHD treatment with monoamine amino acid precursors Table 3 Changes in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale scores at initiation and end of treatment Table 5 Percentage of the entire group (n = 85) achieving complete relief of symptoms by weeks 5 and 8 Group ADHD-RS changes 2s 3s Pre-Rx End-Rx t-test P 4.6 8.3 1.2 2.3 8.42 12.26 ,0.001 ,0.001 Abbreviations: Rx, treatment; ADHD-RS, Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale. scores (2 and 3) on the ADHD-RS scale (behavioral symptoms of ADHD) decreased significantly (P , 0.001) from the first to the second testing. ADHD-RS results are shown in Table 3. The decrease in 2 and 3 scores shown in Table 3 occurred regardless of the variable being investigated, including age and gender. This reduction in symptoms is noteworthy. Prior to treatment, the number of significant ADHD behavioral indicators that were displayed as “often” or “very often” were in the 5–9 range. Only two post-treatment behavioral indicators were noted. The only variable that approached significance (P , 0.08) was gender. More males experienced a decrease in symptoms in the ADHD-RS (3) from 8.9 to 2.3 versus females in whom this score decreased from 7.1 to 2.2. In addition to the statistical analysis parameters that were identified on the DSM-IV, the following observations were calculated relating to other issues. Some of the more compelling findings are included in the tables. The results shown in Table 4 revealed that 67% of the participants achieved significant improvement with only amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine. Patients who achieved no significant relief of symptoms with only amino acid precursors represent a subgroup in whom urine samples were collected and OCT assay interpretation was utilized. In this subgroup, 30.3% achieved significant relief of symptoms following two or three urine assays. The total percentage of patients showing significant improvement was 77%. Referring to Table 6, a further 10% of patients who had taken stimulant drugs in the past reported complete symptom relief. There seems to be some advantage for the effectiveness of the amino acid supplement treatment when there is a history of having taken stimulant drugs in the past. Table 4 Percentage of the entire group (n = 85) achieving significant relief of symptoms by weeks 3 and 8 (P , 0.05) Significant relief Week 3 Week 8 67% 77% Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Complete relief Week 5 Week 8 30% 33% As noted in Table 7, a potential advantage was identified with the administration of amino acid precursors relating to taking ADHD drugs. Urine tests did not typically occur until visit 4, and were indicated if the patient did not show significant improvement with relief of the majority of major ADHD symptoms after one week taking level 3 dosing values of Table 1 or Table 2. Those who experienced control of symptoms prior to or at visit 4 were excluded from urine testing. Results of the patients who had an OCT assay are shown in Table 8. Therefore, it appears that urine testing with OCT assay interpretation was beneficial because urinary serotonin and dopamine assay interpretation defined the proper dosing values. To establish urinary serotonin and dopamine phases firmly requires two assays performed with varied amino acid precursor dosing values. The significant relief values of 64% prior to testing and 70% after two assays noted in Table 7 and Table 8 represent only one amino acid dosing change, with the confidence of knowing the serotonin and dopamine phases. Discussion The data generated in the study were compared with data generated in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Tables 9 and 10 summarize the results of this literature search. It would appear that the placebo effect is strong in ADHD studies, because 28%–40% of placebo patients achieved significant relief of symptoms in the atomoxetine studies reviewed (Table 10), and 14%–31% had a placebo benefit in the methylphenidate study (Table 9). To meet the criteria for approval under FDA guidelines, a drug has to demonstrate efficacy and safety.32 The amino acids and cofactors used in this retrospective study are classified by the FDA as generally recognized and accepted as Table 6 The percentage of patients with and without a history of taking a stimulant for treatment of ADHD who experienced complete relief of symptoms at weeks 5 and 8 No stimulant drug in past Stimulant drug in past Week 5 Week 8 22% 32% 28% 35% submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 35 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 7 Effect of taking and not taking a prescription ADHD drug on the endpoint of the study Not taking a drug Week 5 Week 8 Significant relief Complete relief 64% 28% safe (GRAS), in the same category as supplemental vitamins and minerals.33 There are no safety concerns with the amino acids based on this FDA position. All of the amino acids and components used in the study are sold in the US over the counter without a prescription. The drugs prescribed for ADHD have potentially controversial concerns associated with them, including neurotransmitter depletion, neurotoxicity, drug side effects, and adverse reactions; this amino acid approach in comparison has none of these concerns associated with it. This gives a significant advantage to this amino acid approach if studies continue to bear out that it is similar or superior to prescription ADHD drugs in its efficacy. This retrospective study was performed in order to focus on the structure needed for a formal prospective study. In the course of this study, the following observations and considerations came to light. The administration of properly balanced amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine with OCT assay interpretation resulted in improvement that appears to be superior to methylphenidate and atomoxetine (Tables 9 and 10). This certainly provides encouragement to undertake further studies. Even if the finding was that use of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors with OCT assay interpretation was equal to reported efficacy values found with atomoxetine and methylphenidate, it is asserted that this approach would be superior because it does not share the adverse reactions, Table 8 Approximately 59% of patients in the group achieved relief of symptoms with administration of amino acids and no testing Urine test group Two tests Three tests 70% 78% Notes: If no response was observed after treatment with the three amino acid dosing levels of Table 1 or Table 2, organic cation transporte assay interpretation was initiated leading to an increase in the number of patients in the study who experienced significant relief of symptoms. potential depletion of neurotransmitters, and neurotoxicity concerns reported with the group of drugs prescribed for ADHD treatment. There is variance identified and reported in children who were and were not taking drugs during this study. Future studies need to be designed to address the impact of amino acids on subgroups such as this. A further identified issue in this study that needs to be corrected in future studies is the timeline of the study. In response to the lack of amino acid efficacy at visit 4 (taking level 3 dosing values for one week from Tables 1 and 2), OCT assay interpretation was started. For children in the study for 10 weeks, three urinary tests were obtained. Experience leading up to this study suggested that a significant number of patients with ADHD do not achieve relief of symptoms until both urinary serotonin and dopamine are in the phase 3 therapeutic ranges. Data analysis revealed that it typically takes 2–8 urine tests with OCT assay interpretation to achieve this goal. Provisions need to be made in future studies to move away from rigid time guidelines and position the studies as a process independent of time where the endpoint is urinary serotonin and dopamine in the phase 3 therapeutic ranges or relief of symptoms, whichever comes first. Table 9 Retrospective study results, significant improvement in patients (Table 4) versus reported results in double-blind, placebocontrolled studies taking methylphenidate n % improved % placebo improved % drug improvement over placebo Pilot study results Methylphenidate studies AA with OCT assay interpretation Study 126 Study 227 Study 328 85 77% (Table 4) N/A 154 64% 27% 97 52% 31% 18 58% 14% N/A 37% 21% 44% Notes: The “% placebo improved” row represents percentage of subjects taking placebo who experienced significant remission of symptoms to the defined threshold of the study or greater. The bottom row is the advantage of the drug over placebo in the study cited. Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; OCT, organic cation transporter. 36 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress ADHD treatment with monoamine amino acid precursors Table 10 Retrospective study results, significant improvement in patients (see Table 4) versus reported results in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of patients taking atomoxetine n % improved % placebo improved % drug improvement over placebo Pilot study results Atomoxetine studies AA with OCT assay interpretation Study 129 Study 230 Study 331 85 77% (Table 4) N/A 618 71% 28% 36 54% 40% 84 59% 31% N/A 43% 14% 28% Notes: The “% placebo improved” row represents percentage of subjects taking placebo who experienced significant remission of symptoms to the defined threshold of the study or greater. The bottom row is the advantage of the drug over placebo in the study cited. Abbreviations: AA, amino acid; OCT, organic cation transporter. It is also suggested that the scrutiny of this retrospective study be expanded to identify more phenotype traits. Incorporation of expanded data fields such as this into further studies would facilitate more indepth comparison with other studies and statistical evaluation of subgroups. This analysis does provide some initial evidence of the efficacy of amino acids in significantly reducing symptoms associated with ADHD. Tables 9 and 10 reveal the efficacy of this treatment protocol to be potentially superior to results seen with prescription drugs. Future studies are needed to investigate the reliability of these observed effects. If these results can be replicated in controlled studies, then such important issues as cause and effect for the changes in ADHD symptoms, potential mediating variables, and long-term uses can be further investigated and clarified. Conclusion Based on the FDA guidelines, the amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine, used in this study, are classified as GRAS, meaning no significant safety concerns exist about their use. The next question to ponder is whether the approach is effective. The FDA has not set the bar very high in demonstrating efficacy of prescription drugs. There are numerous examples of drugs being approved that are only 7%–13% more effective than placebo.4 Under these conditions, it would appear that the findings of this study have the potential to demonstrate at least that level of efficacy in a prospective study based on Tables 9 and 10. The purpose of this paper was to document formally the results and findings generated during the course of this retrospective pilot study involving 85 children, and define parameters that allow focus on a future prospective study. It is the goal of this paper to spark interest, research, awareness, Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 and scrutiny of these findings, and to raise awareness of potential neurotransmitter depletion and neurotoxicity issues relating to ADHD drugs. Disclosure This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from CHK Nutrition, Duluth, MN. MH discloses his relationship with DBS Labs Inc and NeuroResearch Clinics Inc. TU discloses his relationship with DBS Labs. The other authors report no disclosures. References 1. Michelson D, Buitelaar JK, Danckaerts M, et al. Relapse prevention in pediatric patients with ADHD treated with atomoxetine: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;4:896–904. 2. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 4. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: A comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 7. Stein A, Hinz M. Uncini Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease, a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder IV, Fourth Edition. Text Revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. 9. Shire US Inc. FDA approved prescribing information for neutral sulfate salts of dextroamphetamine and amphetamine. Available from: http:// pi.shirecontent.com/PI/PDFs/AdderallXR_USA_ENG.PDF. Accessed Oct 14 2010. 10. Concerta®. FDA approved prescribing information for methylphenidate. Available from: http://www.concerta.net/sites/default/files/pdf/Pre scribing_Info-short.pdf. Accessed Oct 14, 2010. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 37 Dovepress Hinz et al 11. Novartis. FDA approved prescribing information for dexmethylphenidate. Available from: http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/ focalin.pdf. Accessed Oct 14 2010. 12. Lilly. FDA approved prescribing information for atomoxetine. Available from: http://pi.lilly.com/us/strattera-pi.pdf. Accessed Oct 14 2010. 13. ADHD & ADD Information Centre. FDA approved prescribing information for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. Available from: http://www. adhdinfocentre.com/vyvanse/Vyvanse%20Prescribing%20Information. PDF. Accessed Oct 14 2010. 14. National Institute on Drug Abuse. The neurobiology of ecstasy (MDMA). 2010. Available from: http://www.nida.nih.gov/pubs/ teaching/Teaching4/Teaching.html. Accessed Sep 2010. 15. Stenfors C, Yu H, Ross S. Pharmacological characterization of the decrease in 5-HT synthesis in the mouse brain evoked by the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor citalopram. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001;363:222–232. 16. De Abajo F, Jick H, Derby L. Intracranial haemorrhage and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50: 43–47. 17. Meier R, Schlienger R, Jick H. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of developing first-time acute myocardial infarction. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:179–184. 18. Dalton S, Johansen C, Mellemkjær L, et al. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:59–64. 19. Trouvin J, Gardier A, Chanut E. Time course of brain serotonin metabolism after cessation of long-term fluoxetine treatment in the rat. Life Sci. 1993;52:187–192. 20. Advokat C. Literature review: Update on amphetamine neurotoxicity and its relevance to the treatment of ADHD. J Atten Disord. 2007;11: 8–16. 21. Ricaurte G, Mechan A, Yuan J, et al. Amphetamine treatment similar to that used in the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder damages dopaminergic nerve endings in the striatum of adult nonhuman primates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;315:91–98. 22. Berggin P. Psychostimulants in the treatment of children diagnosed with ADHD: Risks and mechanism of action. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine. 1999;12:3–35. 23. Bright Futures. Vanderbilt ADHD Diagnostic Teacher Rating Scale. Available from: http://www.brightfutures.org/mentalhealth/pdf/ professionals/bridges/adhd.pdf. Accessed Oct 14 2010. 24. Koepsell H, Schmitt B, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. 25. Delgado P, Moreno F. Role of norepinephrine in depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61 Suppl 1:5–12. 26. Greenhill L, Findling R, Swanson J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modified-release methylphenidate in children with attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2002;109:E39. 27. Wilens T, McBurnett K, Bukstein O, et al. Multisite controlled study of OROS methylphenidate in the treatment of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:82–90. 28. Stein M, Sarampote CS, Waldman ID, et al. A dose-response study of OROS methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pediatrics. 2003;112:404–413. 29. Svanborg P, Thernlund G, Gustafsson P, et al. Atomoxetine improves patient and family coping in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Swedish children and adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18: 725–735. 30. Faraone S, Biederman J, Spencer T, et al. Efficacy of atomoxetine in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A drug-placebo response curve analysis. Behav Brain Funct. 2005;1:16. 31. Michelson D, Allen AJ, Busner J, et al. Once-daily atomoxetine treatment for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1896–1901. 32. US Food and Drug Administration. About Science & Research at FDA. 2010. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/About ScienceResearchatFDA/default.htm. Accessed Nov 9 2010. 33. US Food and Drug Administration. Generally recognized as safe. 2010. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/ GenerallyRecognizedasSafeGRAS/def ault.htm. Accessed Nov 9 2010. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal 38 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Open Access Journal of Urology Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index O r i g i n al R e s e a r c h Open Access Full Text Article Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Open Access Journal of Urology 3 February 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3DBS Laboratories, Duluth, MN, USA 1 Background: The purpose of this paper is to present the results of statistical analysis of spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays in correlation with spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine findings previously published by the authors. Our research indicates a need for physicians and decision-makers to understand the lack of validity of this type of spot baseline monoamine testing when using it in the decision-making process for neurotransmitter deficiency disorders. Methods: Matched-pairs t-tests were performed for a group of subjects for whom spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays were performed on samples collected on different days then paired by subject. Results: The reported laboratory test results for urinary serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, obtained on different days from the same subjects, differed significantly and were not reproducible. Conclusion: Spot baseline monoamine assays, in subjects not suffering from a monoaminesecreting tumor, such as pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome, are of no value in decision-making due to this day-to-day variability and lack of reproducibility. While there have been attempts to integrate spot baseline urinary monoamine assays into treatment of peripheral or central neurotransmitter-associated disease states, diagnosis of neurotransmitter imbalances, and biomarker applications, significant differences in day-to-day reproducibility make this impossible given the known science as it exists today. Keywords: neurotransmitter testing, epinephrine, norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/OAJU.S16637 A previously published paper by the authors of this paper discussed the reproducibility of spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine assays. 1 This companion paper discusses the reproducibility of spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine assays, and explores the feasibility and validity of using spot urinary norepinephrine or epinephrine assays in subjects not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor as a basis for decision-making. The paper then correlates the novel spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine findings reported here with our earlier reports relating to spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine. Urinary neurotransmitter testing samples can be generated in several ways. “Spot urine” is a single urine sample obtained at a specific time.1 A 24-hour urine sample is a collection of all urine excreted in a defined time period, and is used when the total daily excretion of a substance by the kidneys into the urine is to be studied. One application of the 24-hour urine test is in the diagnosis of monoamine-secreting tumors. Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 19–24 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 19 Dovepress Hinz et al ollection of a 24-hour urine sample is burdensome, and C requires the subject to carry sample collection materials during all daily activities.2,14 Urinary monoamines exist in two states, ie, “the endogenous state”, found when no amino acid precursors of the monoamines are being administered, and “the competitive inhibition state”, found when significant amounts of both serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are being administered simultaneously. Obtaining urine samples in the endogenous state is known as “baseline testing”.3 The focus of this paper is spot urine measurements obtained in the endogenous state, which is also known as “baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing”. Spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing samples obtained in the endogenous state are of no value in patients not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor, such as pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome, due to a lack of reproducibility of the testing involved.1 Previously published peer-reviewed literature has established the validity and utility of OCT interpretation of monoamine assays in the competitive inhibition state when performed under proper conditions.1,3–5 Materials and methods Results of statistical analysis of spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing of serotonin and dopamine assays have been discussed and published previously by the authors of this paper.1 Novel statistical results of spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing of norepinephrine and epinephrine assays from a database accumulated by two of the authors of this paper are reported here. Urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine samples obtained on different days from the same subject were statistically analyzed using a matchedpairs t-test. A P value #0.05 was considered to reveal a significant difference between groupings. JMP (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected six hours prior to bedtime, with 4 pm being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve urinary dopamine and urinary serotonin. Samples were shipped to DBS Laboratories, Duluth, MN. Urinary norepinephrine and dopamine were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527; Immuno Biological Laboratories Inc, Minneapolis, MN). DBS Laboratories is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments to perform these assays. 20 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Results In order for laboratory testing to be valid it needs to be reproducible. The following is a discussion of the statistical reproducibility of spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing of norepinephrine and epinephrine performed on a group of subjects in whom two urine samples were obtained on different days. The matched-pairs t-test was used to evaluate these spot baseline samples. To complete the serotonin and catecholamine discussion, previously published data by the authors relating to spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing of serotonin and dopamine is included, because norepinephrine and epinephrine production and balance are related to balanced levels of serotonin and dopamine. Spot baseline norepinephrine matched-pairs t-test The following norepinephrine data are novel. The laboratory values are reported in µg of norepinephrine per g of creatinine. From a matched-pairs group of n = 54, the mean and standard deviation (SD) for both spot baseline norepinephrine urinary assay groups was determined. For Group 1, the mean norepinephrine value was found to be 64.66 (±148.98). For Group 2 (spot baseline norepinephrine testing performed on a different day after the first assay), the mean norepinephrine value was found to be 42.01 (±173.39). All data greater than the value found in calculating the sum of two SDs plus the mean were removed from consideration, revealing a group of n = 44. This matched-pair values group was then analyzed using the matched-pairs t-test, revealing a P value of 0.0399. These findings indicate that spot baseline urinary norepinephrine levels do differ in a statistically significant manner when spot baseline assays are performed on different days from the same subject. This supports the assertion that spot urinary norepinephrine values are not uniform or reproducible from day to day. The epinephrine group (n = 44) comprised 21 females aged 48.22 (±13.34) years and 23 males aged 46.31 (±14.63) years. Spot baseline epinephrine matched-pairs t-test The following epinephrine data are also novel. The laboratory values are reported in µg of epinephrine per g of creatinine. From a matched-pairs group of n = 135, the mean and the SD for both spot baseline epinephrine urinary assay groups was determined. For Group 1, the mean epinephrine value was found to be 6.55 (±5.5). For Group 2 (spot baseline testing performed on a different day after the first assay), the mean epinephrine value was found to be 10.4 (±14.12). Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 Dovepress All data greater than the value found in calculating the sum of two SDs plus the mean were removed from consideration, leaving a group of n = 122. This matched-pair values group was then analyzed using the matched pairs t-test, revealing a P value of ,0.0001. These findings indicate that spot baseline urinary epinephrine levels do differ in a statistically significant manner when spot baseline assays are performed on different days from the same subject. This supports the assertion that spot urinary epinephrine values are not uniform or reproducible from day to day. The epinephrine group (n = 122) comprised 63 females aged 59.09 (±11.87) years and 59 males aged 45.89 (±18.72) years. Spot baseline serotonin matched-pairs t-test A 2010 peer-reviewed paper by the authors presented results of a novel spot serotonin matched-pairs t-test (n = 134). Spot baseline–baseline grouping of urinary serotonin samples obtained on different days from the same patient revealed a P value of 0.0080. This indicates that spot baseline urinary serotonin levels differ in a statistically significant manner when they are performed on different days from the same subject. This supports the assertion that spot urinary serotonin values are not uniform or reproducible from day to day.1 Spot baseline dopamine matched-pairs t-test A 2010 peer-reviewed paper by the authors of this paper presented results of a novel spot dopamine matched-pairs t-test (n = 138). Spot baseline–baseline grouping of urinary dopamine samples obtained on different days from the same patient revealed a P value of 0.0049. This indicates that spot baseline urinary dopamine levels differ in a statistically significant manner when they are performed on different days from the same subject. This supports the assertion that spot urinary dopamine values are not uniform or reproducible from day to day.1 Results of the four matched-pairs t-tests shown in Table 1 reveal that there are significant differences between spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing performed on different days from the same subject for all four monoamines under scrutiny. Simply asserting that testing differs significantly and is not reproducible from day to day in the same subject may not have the impact of reviewing the data used for the statistical analysis. The data in the accompanying tables illustrate that the urinary neurotransmitter testing results are not Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 Urinary neurotransmitter testing Table 1 Matched-pairs t-test values. A P value ,0.05 indicates that a significant difference between the test 1 grouping and test 2 grouping exists on different days in the same individual. Spot baseline monoamine assays are not uniform and reproducible from day to day in the same subject, and therefore the testing is not reproducible or valid Norepinephrine Epinephrine Serotonin Dopamine n P value 44 122 134 138 0.0399 ,0.0001 0.0080 0.0049 reproducible from day to day, and that spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing is not a valid foundation for medical decision-making. Tables 2–5 contain the paired results of 160 spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter tests. All values are reported in µg of monoamine per g of creatinine. The urine samples analyzed were collected approximately six hours prior to bedtime, with 4 pm being the most common time of collection. A review of all samples collected at other times of the day revealed results that were similar to the aforementioned findings. Spot baseline urinary monoamine samples differed significantly from day to day in the same subject, regardless of the time collected, and were not reproducible. Discussion In the scientific world, there are two highly polarized views regarding the validity of spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing. One view advocates that baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing has no value in patients not suffering from a Tables 2a, b Serial spot baseline–baseline norepinephrine assays from the same subject. Some of the norepinephrine data used to determine the norepinephrine matched-pairs t-test values found in Table 1. Comparison of norepinephrine 1 with norepinephrine 2 from the same subject (by row) illustrates the lack of test reproducibility. The number of days column is the number of days between urinary sample collection dates a) Sort: High-low by NE-1 b) Sort: High-low by NE-2 Days (n) NE-1 NE-2 Days (n) NE-1 NE-2 217 58 28 41 32 19 42 41 50 29 595.42 479.59 416.86 399.75 386.01 381.86 357.80 301.00 268.04 232.14 270.20 8.50 132.37 49.38 540.17 10.62 61.73 203.70 31.36 261.01 272 225 32 79 217 29 189 41 28 64 145.46 7.67 386.01 151.44 595.42 232.14 132.09 301.00 0.97 214.24 861.92 581.60 540.17 482.38 270.20 261.01 233.98 203.70 195.92 186.00 Abbreviation: NE, norepinephrine. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 21 Dovepress Hinz et al Tables 3a, b Serial spot baseline–baseline epinephrine assays from the same subject, including epinephrine data used to determine the epinephrine matched-pairs t-test values found in Table 1. Comparison of EPI-1 with EPI-2 from the same subject (by row) illustrates lack of test reproducibility. The number of days column is the number of days between urinary sample collection dates a) Sort: High-low by EPI-1 b) Sort: High-low by EPI-2 Days (n) EPI-1 EPI-2 Days (n) EPI-1 EPI-2 43 22 364 27 46 49 380 185 42 41 36.06 24.83 22.81 21.37 20.44 18.80 18.59 16.49 14.80 12.86 3.90 9.58 11.99 3.22 14.76 6.69 13.83 4.87 8.43 6.57 77 272 104 35 42 46 98 380 225 22 8.98 13.09 8.43 8.62 14.80 20.43 6.39 18.59 6.16 24.83 29.09 16.37 15.34 15.01 14.99 14.76 14.10 13.83 13.42 13.02 Abbreviation: EPI, epinephrine. monoamine-secreting tumor.1,3–5 The other view advocates that it is very beneficial, and that it has numerous applications in medical decision-making, including diagnostic, therapeutic, and biomarker applications.6–12 The purpose of this writing is to educate medical practitioners regarding the selection of laboratory testing for neurotransmitter diseases so that they do not use invalid testing methods. The science supporting the view of the authors is as follows. It is a well-known fact that norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine do not cross the blood–brain barrier. These monoamines are filtered at the glomerulus and are then metabolized by the kidneys. Significant amounts of these monoamines filtered at the glomerulus do not reach the final urine. Monoamines found in the urine of patients not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor are primarily synthesized by structures in the kidneys.1,3–5,13 Spot baseline testing lacks reproducibility and is of no value in patients not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor.1 Those who claim that spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing is valid assert that monoamines cross the blood–brain barrier, are filtered at the glomerulus, and simply excreted into the urine without further renal involvement. They conclude that spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing is a valid assay for peripheral and central nervous system neurotransmitter levels.6–12 Spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing of norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine is not reproducible from day to day in the same subject; therefore, this type of testing is not valid. An infinite number of assays performed on an infinite number of days would generate an infinite number of differing test results.1 The following are true, based on the statistics put forth in this paper and the lack of reproducibility as demonstrated in this writing: • Spot urinary neurotransmitter testing is not a reliable assay for peripheral or central nervous system function; the majority of serotonin and catecholamine molecules found in the urine of patients not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor have never been in the peripheral or central nervous system, having been synthesized by renal structures • Spot urinary neurotransmitter testing does not correlate with monoamine neurotransmitter-related disease states in patients not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor • Spot urinary neurotransmitter testing, due to lack of reproducibility, cannot assist the health care practitioner in making informed decisions regarding the choice Tables 4a, b Serial spot baseline-baseline serotonin assays from the same subject, including some of the serotonin data used to determine the serotonin matched-pairs t-test values found in Table 1, from a previously published paper by the authors.1 Comparison of serotonin 1 with serotonin 2 from the same subject (by row) vividly illustrates lack of testing reproducibility. The number of days column is the number of days between urinary sample collection dates a) Sort: High-low by Serotonin 1 b) Sort: High-low by Serotonin 2 Days Serotonin 1 Serotonin 2 Days Serotonin 1 Serotonin 2 42 28 32 41 98 42 79 29 217 19 9885.64 5178.39 3309.76 2451.00 2157.10 1569.16 1159.95 1005.58 828.22 763.47 179.65 415.45 1191.05 4049.95 368.47 432.35 5194.81 851.43 2275.38 31.14 272 79 41 41 103 217 204 47 383 32 307.07 1159.95 2451.00 96.77 9885.65 828.22 276.97 227.30 60.32 3309.76 6004.24 5194.81 4049.95 3655.97 3246.75 2275.38 2183.79 2000.00 1996.24 1191.05 22 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 Dovepress Urinary neurotransmitter testing Tables 5a, b Serial spot baseline–baseline dopamine assays from the same subject, including dopamine data from a previous study used to determine the dopamine matched-pairs t-test values found in Table 1.1 Comparison of dopamine 1 with dopamine 2 from the same subject (by row) illustrates the lack of test reproducibility. The number of days column is the number of days between urinary sample collection dates a) Sort: High-low by dopamine 1 b) Sort: High-low by dopamine 2 Days (n) Dopamine 1 Dopamine 2 Days (n) Dopamine 1 Dopamine 2 46 41 204 28 77 27 58 168 28 29 7854.32 1129.58 1034.63 785.00 652.35 498.23 419.82 405.20 387.64 372.51 1884.93 2891.23 71.76 181 1288.47 68.80 88.41 180.51 169.78 208.49 41 98 6 103 46 28 77 314 47 383 1129.58 300.37 138.81 164.50 7854.32 785.00 652.35 197.72 785.00 289.88 2891.23 2623.79 2504.14 2109.03 1884.93 1806.00 1288.48 1220.54 853.00 430.71 of amino acids, or the dosing value for intervention with a disease state associated with monoamine neurotransmitters • Spot urinary neurotransmitter testing, due to lack of reproducibility, does not have a place in clinical practice for identifying biomarkers of peripheral or central nervous system function and disease states • Spot urinary neurotransmitter testing cannot determine monoamine imbalances that exist in subjects because the results are not reproducible • Spot baseline monoamine assays cannot serve as a predictor of expected efficacy once amino acid precursors are started due to lack of reproducibility. There is evidence that urinary monoamines, such as norepinephrine reported on 24-hour urine samples, may be elevated in a specific group of patients with depression.15 However, these are group findings, and do not necessarily translate to individual testing validity on spot testing due to the lack of reproducibility of the test from day to day in the same subject. Conclusion This research underscores the fallacy of the attempt to use spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing as a potential biomarker in the treatment of patients with presumed monoamine neurotransmitter-related diseases who are not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor. Levels of urinary norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine, found in the urine on spot baseline testing, differ significantly from day to day in the same subject. Results are not reproducible, so spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing in the endogenous state in subjects not suffering from a monoamine-secreting Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 tumor is of no clinical value. Health care practitioners need to understand this difference when selecting a form of testing for their patients. It is hoped that this writing will spark interest and scrutiny of the topic, leading to advancement of the relevant science. Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine, a comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 2. Smythe G, Edwards G, Graham P, Lazarus L. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma by simultaneous measurement of urinary excretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Clin Chem. 1992;38: 486–492. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 4. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology. 2010;3:171–177. 6. Alts J, Alts D, Bull M. Urinary Neurotransmitter Testing: Myths and Misconceptions. Osceola, WI: NeuroScience Inc; 2007. 7. Watkins R. Validity of urinary neurotransmitter testing with clinical applications of CSM (Communication System Management) model. Asheville, NC: Sanesco International; 2009. Available at: http://www.neurolaboratory.net/lab/neurolab%20pdf.%20 files/2009%20Urinary%20NT%20White%20Paper.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010. 8. Theirl S. Clinical relevance of neurotransmitter testing. The Original Internist. December 2009. Available at: http://www.clintpublication. com/documents/Dec_OI_2009.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010. 9. Sanesco. Neurolab baseline sample report. Available at: http://sanesco. net/images/files/resourcelibrary/baseline_sample_report.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2010. 10. Neuroscience. Assessing nutritional imbalances. Available at: https:// www.neurorelief.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 131&Itemid=48. Accessed November 24, 2010. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 23 Dovepress Hinz et al 11. Kellermann G, Bull M, Ailts J, et al. Understanding diurnal variation. Technical Bulletin Issue 4. Osceola, WI: NeuroScience Inc; January 9, 2004. Available at: https://www.neurorelief.com/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=224&Itemid=48. Accessed November 24, 2010. 12. Marc D, Ailts J, Ailts-Campeau D, et al. Neurotransmitters excreted in the urine as biomarkers of nervous system activity: validity and clinical applicability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:635–644. 13. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 14. Hughes J, Watkins L, Blumenthal J, Kuhn C, Sherwood A. Depression and anxiety symptoms are related to increased 24-hour urinary norepinephrine excretion among healthy middle-aged women. J Psychosom Res. 2004;57:353–358. Dovepress Open Access Journal of Urology Publish your work in this journal The Open Access Journal of Urology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, editorials, reviews and commentaries on all aspects of adult and pediatric urology in the clinic and laboratory including the following topics: Pathology, pathophysiology of urological disease; Investigation and treatment of urological disease; Pharmacology of drugs used for the treatment of urological disease. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/open-access-journal-of-urology-journal 24 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Open Access Journal of Urology 2011:3 International Journal of General Medicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index C a s e r e po r t Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: International Journal of General Medicine 25 February 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA 1 Abstract: An extensive list of side effects and problems are associated with the administration of l-dopa (l-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) during treatment of Parkinson’s disease. These problems can preclude achieving an optimal response with l-dopa treatment. Purpose: To present a case study outlining a novel approach for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease that allows for management of problems associated with l-dopa administration and discusses the scientific basis for this treatment. Patients and methods: The case study was selected from a database containing 254 Parkinson’s patients treated in developing and refining this novel approach to its current state. The spectrum of patients comprising this database range from newly diagnosed, with no previous treatment, to those who were diagnosed more than 20 years before and had virtually exhausted all medical treatment options. Parkinson’s disease is associated with depletion of tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. Exacerbating this is the fact that administration of l-dopa may deplete l-tyrosine, l-tryptophan, 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), serotonin, and sulfur amino acids. The properly balanced administration of l-dopa in conjunction with 5-HTP, l-tyrosine, l-cysteine, and cofactors under the guidance of organic cation transporter functional status determination (herein referred to as “OCT assay interpretation”) of urinary serotonin and dopamine, is at the heart of this novel treatment protocol. Results: When 5-HTP and l-dopa are administered in proper balance along with l-tyrosine, l-cysteine, and cofactors under the guidance of OCT assay interpretation, the long list of problems that can interfere with optimum administration of l-dopa becomes controllable and manageable or does not occur at all. Patient treatment then becomes more effective by allowing the implementation of the optimal dosing levels of l-dopa needed for the relief of symptoms without the dosing value barriers imposed by side effects and adverse reactions seen in the past. Keywords: Parkinson’s, Parkinsonism, Parkinson’s disease, l-dopa, 5-HTP Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S16621 There is a need to effectively control and manage the problems associated with l-dopa treatment in every Parkinson’s patient allowing full access to the l-dopa dosing level needed by each Parkinson’s patient in order to achieve optimal relief of symptoms.1,2 This novel approach allows for the full access to the required l-dopa dosing values through minimization or elimination of the undesirable l-dopa side effects. This is the first attempt to formally document some of the results seen and the experience gained in refining this novel protocol as applied to Parkinson’s disease. Based on clinical experience gained with this novel protocol, it is asserted that virtually all of the problems encountered in the administration of l-dopa for Parkinson’s International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 165–174 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 165 Dovepress Hinz et al disease are caused by the improper management of systems impacted by l-dopa and/or the concomitant use of carbidopa with l-dopa. This case study was selected as the focal point for a discussion of a novel Parkinson’s disease treatment protocol. The case was not selected due to extraordinary results; it was selected as an illustration of typical results seen with this protocol. The purpose of this paper is to outline the basic protocol as a reference point for future prospective studies. The patient is a Vietnam veteran working as a computer specialist who at the age of 55 years began to experience tremor in the left upper extremity, which led to the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The patient was referred to the practice of one of the authors of this paper for intravenous (IV) glutathione treatment by a prominent neurologist. The patient had exhausted virtually all nonsurgical medical approaches in the treatment of his Parkinson’s disease. His neurologist advised him that the only remaining option available in the United States was deep brain stimulation. This option was not agreeable to the patient. This paper is based on research started in 1997 that has consistently focused on the study, interactions, and applications of serotonin, dopamine, and their amino acid precursors. The hypothesis of this writing is that the majority of side effects and problems observed during treatment of Parkinson’s disease with l-dopa are caused by mismanagement of the amino acid precursors and systems affected by l-dopa. Side effects and/or adverse reactions tend to be the dose-limiting events associated with administration of only l-dopa. These include but are not limited to nausea, involuntary movements, and psychiatric problems. 1,2 In order to address these l-dopa problems, medications that potentiate l-dopa and/or dopamine are conventionally administered. These include decarboxylase inhibitors (carbidopa),3 dopamine agonists,4 glutamate (n-methyl-d-aspartic acid [NMDA])-blocking drugs,5 anticholinergics, 6 MAO-B inhibitors,7 and COMT inhibitors.8 All of these drugs are second-line support drugs in comparison to the correctional action and potential of l-dopa.9 This novel approach for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease is dependent upon the administration of l-dopa in adequate amounts to control symptoms through minimization of side effects and adverse reactions by establishing a proper balance between the dopamine and serotonin systems with the concomitant use of 5-hydroxytyrptophan (5-HTP), l-tyrosine, and a sulfur amino acid under the guidance of organic cation transporter (OCT) assay interpretation.10–14 166 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress The primary symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are the result of degeneration of the post-synaptic neurons of the substantia nigra. The very process of Parkinson’s disease is associated with depletion of dopamine (DA), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT).15–17 Parkinson’s disease depletion of these systems is compounded by further depletion with l-dopa. As noted in the literature, administration of only l-dopa or improperly balanced l-dopa further depletes: • l-tyrosine13,18,19 • serotonin10,14,18,20–25 • l-tryptophan18 • sulfur amino acids (glutathione and S-adenosylmethionine)10,13,14,26–28 • epinephrine29 l-dopa depletion of l-tyrosine Patients with Parkinsonism suffer from low levels of tyrosine hydroxylase prior to treatment.15,17 The depressed levels of tyrosine hydroxylase inhibit conversion of l -tyrosine to l -dopa. It is known that l -dopa depletes l-tyrosine.13,18,19 The interaction of l-tyrosine and l-dopa is covered in the discussion section of this manuscript. Other considerations of l-tyrosine depletion by l-dopa that need to be explored are the impact on other systems where l-tyrosine acts as a precursor, such as with thyroid hormones. l-dopa depletion of serotonin Patients with Parkinsonism suffer from inadequate levels of serotonin as a result of the disease state. 15,16 On average, Parkinson’s disease patients have a 50% depletion of serotonin prior to starting treatment.16 Significant dosing values of l-dopa induce the competitive inhibition state leading to further serotonin depletion through processes relating to interaction of serotonin and dopamine in synthesis, transport, and metabolism.10,14,18,20–25 Definitive steps need to be taken during administration of l -dopa to keep serotonin in proper balance with dopamine.10,13,14 In the competitive inhibition state the serotonin and catecholamine systems function as one single system (herein referred to as the “serotonin–dopamine system”).10–14 While in the competitive inhibition state changes to one component of the serotonin–dopamine system will effect changes to all components of both systems.11,14 The solution is concomitant administration of 5-HTP along with l-dopa to prevent the serotonin depletion.10,13,14 International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Dovepress l-dopa Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease depletion of sulfur amino acids It is known that administration of l-dopa depletes sulfur amino acids.10,13,14,26–28 The implications of this are extensive. Glutathione is a sulfur amino acid and a powerful antioxidant that neutralizes neurotoxins that may cause Parkinson’s disease and other neurotoxic events in the body.25 Implications of sulfur amino acid depletion relating to Parkinson’s disease include but are not limited to the depletion of: • glutathione leading to progression of Parkinson’s disease if the neurotoxic agents that are a component of the etiology are still present and being absorbed into the system25 • the enzymes required to synthesize l -tyrosine to l-dopa13,17,19 • s-adenosyl-methionine, the body’s one carbon methyl donor10,13,14,26–28 • epinephrine29 Carbidopa in treatment Carbidopa is a general decarboxylase inhibitor. It inhibits l-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD), the enzyme that catalyzes synthesis of both serotonin and dopamine from 5-HTP and l-dopa, respectively. Carbidopa does not cross the blood– brain barrier. It exerts its actions peripherally. In Parkinson’s disease it is administered to decrease peripheral conversion of l-dopa to dopamine. This results in the need for a lesser dose of l-dopa peripherally while still giving the higher level in the CNS with fewer side effects, especially nausea. Carbidopa is used to address the side effects seen when improperly balanced l-dopa is administered; there is no direct therapeutic value of carbidopa in treatment of Parkinson’s disease.30 Carbidopa’s inhibition of AAAD potentiates peripheral serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and e pinephrine depletion as synthesis by AAAD is compromised. N orepinephrine and acetylcholine regulate autonomic nervous system function. The administration of carbidopa with l-dopa is replete with peripheral autonomic dysfunction problems that often develop.30 Administration of carbidopa/l-dopa preparations leads to a “double depletion” of peripheral serotonin. One cause of depletion is carbidopa inhibition of AAAD; the other cause is improperly balanced administration of l-dopa which decreases peripheral serotonin synthesis and transport through competitive inhibition along with increasing the metabolism of serotonin.10,13,14 Materials and methods Organic cation transporter functional status determination (herein referred to as “OCT assay interpretation”) along International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 with the amino acid dosing values described in this paper were developed by NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc (Duluth, MN). All of the amino acid components, including l-dopa, are available over the counter without a prescription in the United States. Treatment was initiated with administration of 5-HTP, l-tyrosine, and l-dopa at the dose levels shown in Table 1. In addition to the amino acids noted in Table 1, the following cofactors were administered daily: 1) vitamin C 1,000 mg; 2) calcium citrate 220 mg; 3) vitamin B6 75 mg; 4) folate 400 mcg; 5) l-lysine 500 mg; 6) l-cysteine 4,500 mg; 7) selenium 400 mcg. l-dopa in the form of mucuna pruriens 40% standardized was used. Peer-reviewed literature suggests that l-dopa from the mucuna pruriens source has more rapid onset of action and a longer time of effectiveness leading to the conclusion that it may be a superior source of l-dopa in treating Parkinson’s disease.31 OCT assay interpretation overview Serotonin and dopamine are found in two states. The endogenous state exists when no amino acid precursors are administered. The competitive inhibition state occurs when significant amounts of the monoamine precursors are simultaneously administered. Proper OCT assay interpretation requires that both serotonin and dopamine be placed in the competitive inhibition state prior to the assay interpretation being performed for the results to be valid. The scientific basis for OCT assay interpretation is novel having been published in 2009 and 2010. At the heart of this approach is the “3-phase model.”10–14,32 The goal of this novel approach is to keep the urinary serotonin in the phase III therapeutic range, no higher than 800 µg serotonin per gram of creatinine, through proper manipulation of 5-HTP in combination with l-dopa dosing values under the guidance of OCT assay interpretation.3,7,8,19,20 Table 1 Parkinson’s dosing values at protocol initiation. Serotonin and dopamine precursors initially administered. One week after start of the second dosing level, a urine sample was obtained for OCT assay interpretation mg 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP)/mg L-tyrosine/mg L-dopa Morning Initial visit 7 days into treatment 14 days into treatment Noon 4 pm 150/1,500/120 – 150/1,500/120 150/1,500/360 0/0/240 150/1,500/360 Initiate organic cation transporter assay interpretation submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 167 Dovepress Hinz et al To facilitate replication of results the following data is included. Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples collected for this study were as follows. Urine samples were collected about 6 hours prior to bedtime with 4:00 pm being the most frequent collection time point. The samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve the dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples were collected after a minimum of 1 week during which time the patient was taking a specific daily dosing of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine where no doses were missed. Laboratory studies were conducted by DBS Laboratories under the direction of Thomas Uncini, MD, one of the authors. The assays were performed using commercially available radioimmunoassay kits from Immunol Biological Laboratories, Inc (Minneapolis, MN). Assays were interpreted by Marty Hinz of NeuroResearch Clinics. Evaluation of treatment results The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) on presentation into the practice and before the start of the protocol as compared to the results 2 years into the amino acid treatment is seen in Table 2. Results The only portion of the patient’s history that seems relevant to the etiological factors involved in the development of the Parkinson’s disease was his exposure to Agent Orange during the course of his tour of duty in Vietnam while serving in the military. Agent Orange is a known neurotoxin. Early in the patient’s clinical course the symptoms were mild and untreated. As the symptoms increased in the left upper extremity he was prescribed carbidopa–levodopa. The patient was opposed to taking the carbidopa–levodopa at that time and pursued alternative medicine options. Over the next 18 months, the patient was treated with IV glutathione, amantadine, trihexyphenidyl, primidone, and propranolol. The amantadine gave no relief. The trihexyphenidyl was given in an attempt to relieve the tremor, but the tremor continued to progress extending into the patient’s left Table 2 Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS)33 Mentation behavior mood Daily activities of living Motor examination Complications of therapy Totals 168 Start of treatment 2 years into treatment with amino acids 9 16 16 1 42 0 3 0 0 3 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress lower extremity compounded by severe balance and gait issues. Primidone provided some relief from the tremor, but it caused severe nausea requiring discontinuance of the medication. Propranolol provided no relief. IV glutathione was effective in diminishing the tremor, but results lasted only about 30 hours. The patient was then again prescribed carbidopa– levodopa in combination, which was completely ineffective. It was also suggested by that physician that the patient seek out additional IV glutathione treatments nearer to his home as that was the only approach that achieved some relief of symptoms. In October 2008, the patient presented at the practice of one of the authors of this paper for IV glutathione treatment. The patient was having increasing difficulty with every aspect of life. He was very self-conscious of the constant tremor in his left arm and left leg, which interfered with sleep and sitting comfortably in a chair, and made him feel conspicuous in public. He was having great difficulty working at his job as a computer specialist for a large computer corporation and found it almost impossible to type on a keyboard or to maintain focus during conference calls. He was also experiencing severe anxiety, depression, panic attacks, and insomnia. On the first visit it was apparent that IV glutathione had not achieved any meaningful or lasting relief of symptoms in the past and that it was another brief band-aid approach to the disease. After obtaining a comprehensive medical history and performing a physical examination the patient was offered the novel treatment approach discussed in this report. The use of comprehensive amino acid support in conjunction with OCT assay interpretation was discussed with the patient and he agreed to the treatment plan. Within 4 months of initiating treatment the patient experienced dramatic improvement in the tremor in both the upper and lower extremities. He regained coordination in his left hand and was once again able to use the computer keyboard. He resumed his hobby of guitar playing and was able to perform proficiently. His gait and balance were restored. The depression improved significantly. Anxiety was significantly relieved. The patient had lost his fear of going out in public. In the 2 years since initiation of treatment the patient has continuously maintained the benefit of the treatment, with no surgical intervention as previously recommended by his neurologist and no prescription medications. There appears to have been some progression of the damage associated with the Parkinson’s neurons since International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Dovepress Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease initiation of treatment, as there has been a need for increasing the dosage of the l -dopa. This has been managed by increasing the l-dopa dosing value while continuing to monitor the balance of the levels with OCT assay interpretation. The reason for asserting that this represented a progression of disease state versus tachyphylaxis of l-dopa, which is commonly seen during treatment of Parkinson’s disease, is covered in the Discussion section. The amino acid dosing that the patient was taking at the initiation of this study, 2 years after starting on the program, is found in Table 3. The amino acid dosing values administered in treatment were guided by OCT assay interpretation to assist in proper titration of the levels of l-dopa, l-tyrosine, and 5-HTP. This assured that the patient achieved proper therapeutic levels of amino acids while keeping serotonin and dopamine in the proper balance required for minimization of side effects and adverse reactions while optimizing outcomes. The urinary serotonin and dopamine levels obtained during stabilization of the patient were as shown in Table 4. At the April 29, 2010 collection date sample of Table 4, the patient was suffering from nausea and on–off effect secondary to serotonin imbalance and inadequate l-tyrosine administration, respectively. The nausea improved by the May 18, 2010 collection date sample. Subsequent to the May 18, 2010 collection date the l-tyrosine was increased incrementally to 10,375 mg per day and the l-dopa was gradually lowered. By mid-June, the nausea and on–off effect became minimal. Discussion Etiology of the disease The literature is clear that l-dopa holds the highest potential for relief of symptoms, but dosing values in many patients are limited by side effects.9 With administration of l-dopa, side effects and adverse reactions may be the dose-limiting event that prevents attaining optimal dosing values. The following discussion is aimed at defining the basis for an Table 3 The current amino acid dosing values that the patient is taking, plus cofactors found in the discussion associated with Table 1 Present daily amino acid dosing values in mg/day L-dopa 5-HTP l-tyrosine l-cysteine l-tryptophan International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 14,700 37.5 10,375 4,500 375 effective treatment that controls the problems associated with administration. There are a host of problems encountered in group treatment with l-dopa that have not been displayed in this patient’s course of treatment.1,30 Future prospective studies under this protocol are indicated to define a more exact incidence of each of these events and their impacts on treatment. While this is a case study report, the authors of this paper possess data on the amino acid dosing needs of over 254 Parkinson’s patients who have been treated in the refinement of this novel approach to its current state. At the core of this approach is the administration of l-dopa, which is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Table 5 lists the group dosing ranges of 5-HTP and l-dopa seen during refinement of this novel Parkinson’s disease treatment approach with the guidance of OCT assay interpretation. As noted in Table 5, dosing value needs are highly individualized. Group dosing value needs of l-dopa and 5-HTP to control the symptoms vary in exceptionally large ranges. The l-dopa dosing value found in the “high” column of Table 5 has not been described previously in the literature for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. It appears that adverse reactions have precluded reaching these dosing values in the past. The chief dose-limiting factor tends to be nausea.2 Our experience indicates that the only way a patient can safely and effectively be titrated to the high l-dopa dosing values found in Table 5 is with OCT assay interpretation guiding amino acid dosing values. In Table 3 of this case study the daily l-dopa dosing value of 14,700 mg per day is large. The authors of this paper were unable to locate previous literature discussing this type of dosing value being routinely available to patients if needed without seeing a problem significant enough to cut back the treatment below the therapeutic threshold. Review of the literature reveals that a significant group of patients develop the gastrointestinal (GI) side effects that limit further increases in l-dopa with dosing values in the 3,000 to 4,000 mg per day range. Certainly there are Parkinson’s patients that need much more than 3,000 to 4,000 mg per day of l-dopa, but these patients are barred from the optimal treatment benefits of l-dopa as a result of the side effects.1,2 The huge dosing variance seen during group treatment of the Parkinson’s patients in Table 5 shows that one-size dosing does not fit all. l-dopa submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 169 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 4 Serotonin and dopamine values reported in μg of monoamine per g of creatinine. Amino acid dosing values reported in mg/day 1 Date 2 Serotonin 3 Serotonin phase 4 Dopamine 5 Dopamine phase 6 5-HTP 7 L-tyrosine 8 L-dopa 10/23/2008 10/30/2008 11/6/2008 11/18/2008 12/11/2008 1/8/2009 1/22/2009 2/12/2009 3/19/2009 4/13/2009 6/1/2009 6/18/2009 7/28/2009 9/8/2009 1/7/2010 4/29/2010 5/18/2010 1,309.1 1,882.1 7,506.8 3,962.9 2,192.5 106.7 399.9 202.1 1,175.8 395.2 386.3 130.2 84.9 386.3 710.2 4,848.6 724.9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 345.8 341.4 792.9 1,212.2 1,364.7 1,900.6 1,170.8 1,747.7 1,489.9 1,149.9 1,814.6 1,729.7 2,915.7 1,730.0 2,029.8 1,346.0 1,505.7 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 200.0 200.0 300.0 100.0 100.0 37.5 37.5 37.5 100.0 100.0 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 75.0 212.5 37.5 1,500 3,000 3,000 3,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,875 4,875 4,875 3,875 5,750 7,125 6,375 300 300 450 1950 3600 6300 6300 8400 15,750 12600 11,550 12,600 12,600 12,600 14,700 13,350 14,700 Notes: 1) Date of urine sample collection; 2) urinary serotonin reported; 3) serotonin phase; 4) urinary dopamine reported; 5) dopamine phase; 6) 5-HTP dosing value at time of sample collection; 7) l-tyrosine dosing value at time of sample collection; 8) L-dopa dosing value at time of sample collection. Management of L-dopa depletion of serotonin The serotonin depletion symptoms seen in Parkinson’s disease and l-dopa administration fall into three categories: 1) disease symptoms associated with inadequate serotonin levels; 2) side effects and adverse reactions; and 3) tachyphylaxis of l-dopa. Depression is a prominent disease associated with inadequate serotonin levels in Parkinson’s disease patients during treatment with l-dopa. Proof of this is the response to the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, citalopram.34 Other monoamine-related disease symptoms resulting from depletion of serotonin by the disease and l-dopa are covered in the following discussion.10–13 Simply administering some 5-HTP with l-dopa is not optimal. When serotonin levels that are too high in phase III depletion of dopamine may occur through competitive inhibition.10,14,35,36 Nausea associated with the administration of l-dopa is a sign of serotonin and dopamine imbalance. If Table 5 5-HTP and L-dopa group dosing parameters based on OCT assay interpretation during treatment N = 714. 5-HTP and L-dopa dosing value range (low-high), mean, and standard deviation 5-HTP L-dopa Low High Mean SD 37.5 mg 120 mg 2,100 mg 25,230 mg 300 mg 1,680 mg 330.3 mg 3,652 mg Note: OCT assay interpretation refers to organic cation transporter functional status determination. 170 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress serotonin levels are too high or too low, nausea from l-dopa can become a significant problem. When 5-HTP and l-dopa are in proper balance and nausea associated with l-dopa displays, it is much milder and more easily manageable, resolving in a matter of days in most cases. Additional management of residual nausea may be through the implementation of smaller, more frequent l-dopa dosing values. With proper serotonin– dopamine balance nausea is no longer an l-dopa dose-limiting event for virtually all patients and the use of carbidopa is no longer needed. Since the development of nausea is the result of serotonin levels that are either too high or too low and the high or low status of the serotonin relative to dopamine cannot be distinguished clinically, OCT assay interpretation is indicated to properly clarify and manage the problem. Even with judicious and generous use of OCT assay interpretation in this case study, this patient developed some transient nausea, but it was not significant enough to avoid maintaining the l-dopa dosing values at the level needed for continued relief of Parkinson’s symptoms or the stopping of the l-dopa, and within a matter of days the symptoms resolved.10–14 Tachyphylaxis (where a drug stops working) of l-dopa is associated with depletion of serotonin by l-dopa. When serotonin levels become too depleted, any beneficial effects of l-dopa will not be observed regardless of how high the l-dopa dosing values are raised. When tachyphylaxis occurs, the typical response is to increase the daily l-dopa dosing value, which only further depletes serotonin. As treatment International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Dovepress progresses, with further increases of the l-dopa dosing values, the time between tachyphylaxis events decreases and the patient’s l-dopa dosing values spiral ever higher. The indicated approach is OCT assay interpretation in order to balance serotonin and its precursors with the l-dopa and dopamine, thereby managing the problem effectively.10–14 The results section noted a decrease in effectiveness in the l-dopa in this patient in early 2009. In the results section it was asserted, “There appears to have been some progression of the damage associated with the Parkinson’s neurons since the initiation of treatment, as there has been a need for increasing the dosage of the l-dopa. This has been managed by increasing the l-dopa dosing value while continuing to monitor the balance of the levels with OCT assay interpretation.” The decreased effectiveness of l-dopa is primarily due to one of three events: 1) lack of patient compliance; 2) serotonin depletion leading to l-dopa tachyphylaxis; or 3) further neuronal damage causing progression of the disease. The patient’s medication journal ruled out concerns in the area of compliance. OCT assay interpretation revealed that the urinary serotonin was in phase III and in the desired range, ruling out serotonin depletion concerns associated with l-dopa tachyphylaxis. By exclusion, further progression of disease in the form of progression of neuronal damage had occurred. The three primary causes of decreased response to prescribing l-dopa noted in this paragraph need to be fully appreciated and implemented since the treatment approach to the perceived decrease in efficacy of l-dopa is very different. Management of dopamine fluctuations with l-tyrosine As noted in previous writings by two of the authors of this paper, urinary dopamine levels fluctuate on urinary assay significantly if proper levels of l-tyrosine are not co-administered with l-dopa in the competitive inhibition state.37 This fluctuation in the competitive inhibition state is a direct reflection of OCT2 activity of the basolateral monoamine transporters of the proximal convoluted tubule cells of the kidneys.11,38 Research experience leading up to this writing has shown that patients taking l-dopa required minimum administration of 5,000 to 6,000 mg per day of l-tyrosine to prevent significant urinary dopamine fluctuations.10,13 It is a novel finding of this research that l-tyrosine depletion and dopamine fluctuations are associated with the on–off effect. The patient in this study began to experience on–off effect. Instead of increasing the l-dopa dosing, the l-tyrosine dosing values were increased International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease as noted in Table 3. The maximum required l-tyrosine dosing value encountered for control of on–off effect in all patients studied leading up to the writing of this paper was 20,000 mg per day. Management of sulfur amino acid depletion by l-dopa The sulfur amino acid l-cysteine was selected for use due to its role in synthesis of enzymes that catalyze monoamine synthesis. Theoretically, from the standpoint of enzymes that catalyze monoamine synthesis, any sulfur amino acid, with the exception of n-acetyl-cysteine and glutathione, may serve as a sulfur donor in enzyme synthesis. From a database developed by one of the authors of this article containing over 1.931 million patient-days of amino acid treatment in patients not suffering from Parkinson’s disease, objective results revealed optimal l-cysteine dosing was 4,500 mg per day. No objective changes were observed with the daily dosing values of l-cysteine at or below 2,250 mg per day and no additional response was seen in dosing values greater than 4,500 mg per day.10,13,14 Administration of proper levels of sulfur amino acids prevents depletion of all of the following: glutathione; the enzymes that catalyze amino acid precursors into monoamines; S-adenosylmethionine; and epinephrine.10,13,14 It is asserted that metabolism of toxins utilizes a large amount of sulfur amino acids in the form of glutathione each day. Administration of IV glutathione is analogous to temporarily plugging a hole in a bucket leaking sulfur amino acids. The effect of IV glutathione is a temporary band-aid approach, with sulfur amino acid levels returning to the previous state and a relapse of symptoms within one to two days of administration. A superior approach is the daily administration of proper levels of sulfur amino acids from the start of treatment so that sulfur amino acid depletion does not have to be further addressed.10,13,14 Management of paradoxical amino acid reactions Most Parkinson’s disease patients treated under this novel approach do not achieve gradual relief of symptoms as the l-dopa dosing values are increased. Symptom cessation tends to be abrupt, analogous to turning a light switch from off to on.10,13,14 Paradoxical reactions with concomitant administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors occur in approximately 5% of patients. A paradoxical reaction is submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 171 Dovepress Hinz et al defined as an outcome to treatment that is the opposite of what is expected. In the Parkinson’s disease patients being treated with balanced amino acid precursors, the most common paradoxical reactions are agitation and confusion, although any disease process related to monoamine diseases may be exacerbated such as depression, insomnia, or anxiety. With most Parkinson’s disease patients, paradoxical reactions occur after many weeks or months when the l-dopa dosing value is on the threshold needed for control of Parkinson’s disease symptoms late in treatment.10,13,14 Achieving the results noted in this case study is dependent upon proper management of any paradoxical reactions that may develop and being able to differentiate a paradoxical reaction from a side effect or adverse reaction. Proper management of paradoxical reactions in the Parkinson’s patient is to adequately increase the l-dopa dosing value. With a proper increase, the paradoxical reaction will resolve in 1 to 2 days. Physicians who are not properly oriented to the management of paradoxical reactions may tend to inappropriately decrease the l-dopa dosing when a paradoxical reaction displays, then increase the l-dopa dosing slowly. This approach only leads to the patient being exposed to the l-dopa dosing range that induced the paradoxical reaction for a prolonged period of time and may lead to failure when symptoms of a paradoxical reaction are observed for a prolonged period of time causing the l-dopa dosing value to be decreased further or stopped.10,13,14 Categorizing symptoms associated with carbidopa/l-dopa administration The FDA-approved prescribing information for carbidopa/ l-dopa preparations was reviewed and a list of side effects, adverse reactions, and problems associated with administration was generated.34 Each side effect was then placed in one or more of the general categories listed below by the authors of this paper. While the listing of each side effect may be open to further discussion, these are the categories that have evolved in this research project since 2001. The six categories of carbidopa/l-dopa side effects are as follows: Category 1: Problems caused by depletion of serotonin by l-dopa: Tachyphylaxis (the l-dopa stops working). Category 2: Problems caused by imbalance of serotonin and dopamine: Nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, decreased mental acuity, depression, psychotic episodes including d elusions, euphoria, pathologic gambling, impulse control, confusion, dream abnormalities including 172 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress nightmares, anxiety, disorientation, dementia, nervousness, insomnia, sleep disorders, hallucinations and paranoid ideation, somnolence, memory impairment, and increased libido. Category 3: Problems caused by dopamine fluctuations due to inadequate tyrosine levels: On-off effect, motor fluctuations, dopamine fluctuations, implicated as an etiology of dyskinesia. Category 4: Problems caused by depletion of sulfur amino acids by l-dopa: Bradykenesia (epinephrine depletion implicated), akinesia, dyskinesia, dystonia, chorea, extrapyramidal side effects, fatigue, abnormal involuntary movements, and depletion of glutathione potentiating further dopamine neuron damage by neurotoxins. Category 5: Problems caused by paradoxical amino acid reactions: Confusion, dizziness, headache, palpitations, dyspnea, anxiety, agitation, increased tremor, faintness, exacerbation of any disease related to the monoamine (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) neurotransmitters, and exacerbation of any central disease process associated with the serotonin and catecholamine systems. Category 6: Peripheral problems caused by peripheral depletion of serotonin and catecholamines by carbidopa: Glossitis, leg pain, ataxia, falling, gait abnormalities, blepharospasm (which may be taken as an early sign of excess dosage), trismus, increased tremor, numbness, muscle twitching, peripheral neuropathy, myocardial infarction, flushing, oculogyric crises, diplopia, blurred vision, dilated pupils, urinary retention, urinary incontinence, dark urine, hoarseness, malaise, hot flashes, sense of stimulation, dyspepsia, constipation, palpitation, fatigue, upper respiratory infection, bruxism, hiccups, common cold, diarrhea, urinary tract infections, urinary frequency, flatulence, priapism, pharyngeal pain, abdmoninal pain, bizarre breathing patterns, burning sensation of tongue, back pain, shoulder pain, chest pain (noncardiac), muscle cramps, paresthesia, increased sweating, falling, syncope, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia (weakness), dysphagia, Horner’s syndrome, mydriasis, dry mouth, sialorrhea, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, phlebitis, agranulocytosis, hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia, rash, gastrointestinal bleeding, duodenal ulcer, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, angioedema, urticaria, pruritus, alopecia, dark sweat, abnormalities in alkaline phosphatase, abnormalities in SGOT (AST), SGPT (ALT), abnormal Coombs’ test, abnormal uric acid, hypokalemia, abnormalities in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), increased creatinine, increased serum LDH, and glycosuria. International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Dovepress Conclusion The Parkinson’s disease process is known to be associated with depletion of serotonin, tyrosine hydroxylase, norepinephrine, and dopamine. l -dopa is known to deplete serotonin, serotonin precursors, tyrosine, and the sulfur amino acids. The dosing range of serotonin precursors needed for the individual patient to achieve proper balance with l-dopa administration appears to be in a relatively narrow range with some of the side effects being displayed if the serotonin is either too high or too low. The most prominent dose-limiting events in the use of l-dopa are the GI symptoms of nausea and vomiting along with psychiatric problems. The patient in this case study had the l-dopa, 5-HTP, l-tyrosine, and l-cysteine administered in proper balance. OCT assay interpretation was implemented early in order to get out in front of amino acid imbalance problems before they occurred. Everything used in the treatment of this patient is recognized by the FDA as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) and available over the counter without a prescription in the United States. This paper is the product of nine years of research in the area of serotonin and dopamine precursor administration as guided by OCT assay interpretation and statistical analysis of numerous large databases. The protocol has been refined since 2001 and appears ready for prospective studies. This paper is an attempt to document what is known prior to further studies. The goal of this paper is to share some of the knowledge gained prior to expanding group studies, spark interest in this area of research, and hold these observations up to scrutiny for Parkinson’s disease patients and their caregivers. The administration of properly balanced amino acid precursors used here for Parkinson’s disease does hold potential in other research areas as evidenced by previous peer-reviewed writings of the authors since 2009. Disclosure MH discloses ownership of DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA. TU discloses directorship of DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA. AS reports no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Barbeau A. L-Dopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease: A critical review of nine years’ experience. Can Med Assoc J. 1969;101(13): 59–68. 2. Peaston M, Bis-Nchine J. Metabolic studies and clinical observations d uring L-Dopa treatment of Parkinson’s disease. BMJ. 1970;1: 400–403. International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease 3. FDA-approved carbidopa/levodopa prescribing information. Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_sinemet_cr.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2011. 4. FDA-approved ropinirole prescribing information. Available from: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_requip.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2011. 5. FDA-approved amantadine prescribing information. Available from: http:// www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/016023s041, 018101s016lbl.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2011. 6. FDA-approved trihexylphenidyl prescribing information. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/pro/trihexyphenidyl.html. Accessed January 20, 2011. 7. FDA-approved rasagiline mesylate prescribing information. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/monograph/rasagiline-mesylate.html. Accessed J anuary 20, 2011. 8. FDA-approved entacapone prescribing information. Available from: http://www.pharma.us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/comtan.pdf. Accessed J anuary 20, 2011. 9. Mayo Clinic Parkinson’s disease. Available from: http://www.mayoclinic. com/health/parkinsons-disease/DS00295/DSECTION=treatments- and-drugs. Accessed J anuary 20, 2011. 10. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Baton Rouge, FL: CRC Press; 2009: 465–481. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine, a comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 14. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clinical & Experimental Gastroenterology. 2010;3: 171–177. 15. Charlton C, Crowell B, Parkinson’s disease-like effects of S-adenosylL-methionine: Effects of l-dopa. Pharmacolo Biochem Behav. 1992; 43:423–431. 16. Mones R, Elizan T, Siegel G. Analysis of l-dopa induced dyskenesias in 51 patients with Parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34:668–673. 17. Charlton C. Depletion of nigrostriatal and forebrain tyrosine hydroxylase by S-adenosyl methionine: A model that may explain the occurrence of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Life Sci. 1997;61(5): 495–502. 18. Karobath M, Diaz J Huttunen M. The effect of l -dopa on the concentrations of tryptophan, tyrosine, and serotonin in the rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;14:393–396. 19. Zhelyaskov D, Levitt M, Udenfriend S. Tryptophan derivatives as inhibitors of tyrosine hydroxylase in vivo and vitro. Mol Pharmacol. 1968;4:445–451. 20. Garcia N, Berndt T, Tyce G, Knox F. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277 (5 Pt 2):R1476–R1480. 21. Ng K, Chase T, Colburn R, Kopin I. L-Dopa induced release of cerebral monoamines. Science. 1970;170:76–77. 22. Borah A, Kochupurackal P, Mohanakumar P. Long-term l-dopa treatment causes indiscriminate increase in dopamine levels at the cost of serotonin synthesis in discrete brain regions of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2007;27:985–996. 23. Soares-da-Silva P, Pinto-do-O P. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117: 1187–1192. 24. Wuerthele S, Moore K. Studies of the mechanisms of l-dopa induced depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the mouse brain. Life Sci. 1977; 20:1675–1680. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 173 Dovepress Hinz et al 25. Zeevalk G, Manzino L, Sonsalla PK, Bernard LP. Characterization of intracellular elevation of glutathione (GSH) with glutathione monoethyl ester and GSH in brain and neuronal cultures: Relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2007;203:512–520. 26. Ritvo E, Yuwiler A, Geller E. Effects of l-dopa in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1971;1(2). 27. Benson R, Crowell B, Hill B. The effects of L-Dopa on the activity of methionine adenosyltransferase: Relevance to L-Dopa therapy and tolerance. Neurochemical Res.1993;18(3):325–330. 28. Liu X, Wilson K, Charlton C. Effects of l-dopa treatment on methylation in mouse brain: Implications for side effects of l-dopa. Life Sci. 2000;66(23):2277–2288. 29. Fuller R, Hemrick-Luecke S, Perry K. Effects of l-dopa on epinephrine concentration in rat brain: Possible role of inhibition of norepinephrine N-methyl transferase by S-adenosyl homocysteine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982;223(1):84–89. 30. FDA-approved carbidopa/l-dopa prescribing information. Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_sinemet_cr.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2011. 31. Katzenschlager R, Evans A, Manson A, et al. Mucuna pruriens in Parkinson’s disease: A double blind clinical and pharmacological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1672–1677. 32. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 33. Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (UPDRS). Available from: http://www.mdvu.org/library/ratingscales/pd/updrs.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2011. 34. Menza M, Marin H, Kaufman K. Citalopram treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease: The impact on anxiety, disability, and cognition. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;16(3):315–319. 35. Andrews D, Patrick R, Barchas J. The effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine on dopamine synthesis and release in rat brain striatal synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978;30:465–470. 36. Awazi N. Guldberg H. On the interaction of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine with dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum arch. Pharmacology. 1978;303:63–72. 37. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 38. Koepsell H, Schmitt B, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine Publish your work in this journal The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient.The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/ testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/international-journal-of-general-medicine-journal 174 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine 2011:4 International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index Review Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 19 July 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 1 Clinical Research, Neuro Research Clinics Inc, Cape Coral, FL; 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL; 3Laboratory, Fairview Regional Medical Center-Mesabi, Hibbing, MN, USA Abstract: Spot baseline urinary monoamine assays have been used in medicine for over 50 years as a screening test for monoamine-secreting tumors, such as pheochromocytoma and carcinoid syndrome. In these disease states, when the result of a spot baseline monoamine assay is above the specific value set by the laboratory, it is an indication to obtain a 24-hour urine sample to make a definitive diagnosis. There are no defined applications where spot baseline urinary monoamine assays can be used to diagnose disease or other states directly. No peer-reviewed published original research exists which demonstrates that these assays are valid in the treatment of individual patients in the clinical setting. Since 2001, urinary monoamine assay sales have been promoted for numerous applications under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. There is no published peer-reviewed original research that defines the scientific foundation upon which the claims for these assays are made. On the contrary, several articles have been published that discredit various aspects of the model. To fill the void, this manuscript is a comprehensive review of the scientific foundation and claims put forth by laboratories selling urinary monoamine assays under the spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model. Keywords: monoamine, serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, urine, urinary Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S22783 About 10 years ago, a laboratory began selling urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. It was claimed that these assays had a direct relationship with the levels of the monoamine neurotransmitters in the brain and peripheral nervous system. The marketing model also made numerous previously unknown claims regarding medical applications of urinary monoamine assays. Attached to each monoamine assay report from the laboratory were recommendations for treating monoamine neurotransmitter-related diseases, such as depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, using nutritional supplements in conjunction with the testing. The recommended nutritional supplements in all cases were sold exclusively by those selling the laboratory assays.1–4 This medical treatment methodology continues to be marketed today by several laboratories, physicians, other types of caregivers, and directly to the public over the Internet. In the process, the scope of urinary monoamine assay marketing claims has increased. This review examines the validity of this approach. Without the benefit of published peer-reviewed research discussing or supporting the scientific foundation of the testing, many physicians and caregivers have joined laboratories in expanding the Internet marketing campaign for this type of testing coupled with nutritional supplement sales.1–4 International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 101–113 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 101 Dovepress Hinz et al This manuscript reviews and discusses the validity of clinical applications promoted to enhance the sales of urinary serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and/or epinephrine (herein referred to as “monoamine”) assays. The reference point for this discussion and review is ten peer-reviewed research papers relating to clinical applications of monoamine assays published by the authors of this manuscript since 2009 (as listed in Table 1).5–14 The topic is the rationale, validity, and clinical impact of marketing claims used to sell urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. It is the hypothesis of this manuscript that Table 1 Overview and summary of previous papers by the authors of this paper Authors Comments Hinz5 Use of serotonin and dopamine precursors guided by organic cation transporter optimization in the treatment of depression. This is written by the chairman of the research committee, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, MN, based on laboratory data provided by and in collaboration with Marty Hinz. The paper documents the response of urinary serotonin and dopamine to administration of L-tyrosine in a large group. Publishing of a new organic cation transporter model relating to monoamine transport. Discusses the validity of day to day reproducibility of spot baseline urinary serotonin and dopamine samples in the same subject. Findings were that testing differs significantly from day to day in the same subject and is not reproducible. Differentiation of major affective disorder from depression-dominant bipolar disorder and treatment with serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, guided by transporter assay optimization. A treatment protocol for treatment of Crohn’s disease with amino acids guided by organic cation transporter functional status determination. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, guided by organic cation transporter assay optimization. Discusses the validity of day to day reproducibility of spot baseline urinary norepinephrine and epinephrine samples in the same subject. Findings were that testing differs significantly from day to day in the same subject and is not reproducible. Management of Parkinson disease with organic cation transporter optimization in a manner that allows for management and control of all problems associated directly and indirectly with L-dopa administration during treatment. A paper written in response to an editor invitation. The paper reviews a paper titled, “Non-validity and clinical relevance of neurotransmitter testing”. Trachte et al14 Hinz et al6 Hinz et al7 Hinz et al8 Stein et al13 Hinz et al9 Hinz et al10 Hinz et al11 Hinz et al12 102 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing model” is not a model based on science, but is a business marketing tool, and a model formulated to drive laboratory sales of urinary monoamine assays. There is no original research published in scientific journals that discusses or defines the scientific foundation of the model. It is hereby asserted that the foundation upon which the model rests is clinically unproven. The alleged scientific foundation put forth in promotional sales material under this marketing model contradicts known science, especially in the areas of renal physiology and blood–brain barrier permeability. There is no formal laboratory test known as the “urinary neurotransmitter testing”. From an objective scientific perspective, the proper nomenclature for the relevant laboratory testing is “urinary monoamine assays”. The monoamines, ie, serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, do not function exclusively as neurotransmitters. They carry out other major neurotransmitter, neurohormonal, regulatory, autocrine, and paracrine functions. The monoamines found in the urine have not, do not, and will not function exclusively as neurotransmitters. Therefore, it is not appropriate to refer to urinary monoamine assays as “neurotransmitter testing” and ignore the other major functions of these monoamines in the body.15 Urinary monoamines exist in one of two states. The “endogenous state” is the normal day-to-day state. This occurs when a subject is taking no amino acids. The “competitive inhibition state” is found when significant amounts of both serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are being taken simultaneously.6,9–11,13 This clinical review is undertaken exclusively to discuss the testing performed in the endogenous state with spot baseline urine samples. The following applications are direct quotes from a laboratory website7 that is promoting some of the alleged attributes of the spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter marketing testing model. These include, but are not limited to: • “…. baseline (urinary neurotransmitter) testing is the best approach to determine the neurotransmitter functional status of the central and peripheral nervous systems” • “Administration of amino acid precursors directly impacts urinary monoamine levels; therefore, the results of monoamine assays merely need to be interpreted as being either high or low values with no need to make consideration for other forces impacting urinary monoamine levels between renal synthesis and showing up in the final urine” • “Baseline testing of urinary monoamines prior to starting supplemental amino acid precursors is required in order to define the amino acid precursor starting dose needed in treatment” International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress • “Baseline (urinary) monoamine assays in the absence of supplemental amino acid precursors are required to diagnose and define the serotonin and dopamine imbalance in the central and peripheral nervous systems” • “Baseline (urinary) monoamine assays can serve as a reference point to gauge treatment effectiveness after amino acid precursors are started” • “Baseline (urinary) monoamine assays can be used to reduce the risk of side effects when amino acid precursor treatment is started”. The “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” (herein referred to as “the marketing model”) claims that the clinical applications for the test are based on science, yet when the alleged scientific claims supporting the marketing model are examined, they are contradicted by known science. At present, the only clinically proven use for spot baseline urinary monoamine assays is as a screening test for pheochromocytoma or carcinoid syndrome to determine if a 24-hour urine test is needed to diagnose these diseases definitively. This application is hereby specifically excluded from consideration in this manuscript. Physician marketing claims Physicians and other caregivers are promoting sales of urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” on the Internet. It is easy to find this type of advertising. This section discusses how some physicians were induced to promote this marketing model. The section ends with examples of marketing claims by physicians and caregivers currently found on the Internet. This “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” has become known as the “pee in a cup and we will determine the neurotransmitter levels in your brain model”. It is asserted that the alleged scientific statements driving sales of urinary monoamine assays are deceptively simple and intuitively seductive. The actual science required to support or contradict “the marketing model” is found primarily in the renal physiology literature and blood–brain barrier permeability. It is asserted that this area of monoamine renal physiology is extraordinarily complex, especially for the uninitiated. Physicians have implicit trust that the laboratory is giving accurately reported results and advice. For most physicians, this trust is cultivated by a history of dealing with only hospital and/or clinic-based laboratories under the medical direction of physicians who implement widely accepted International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Urinary monoamine assay treatment standards and testing policies. A basic flaw here is that the laboratories selling urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” are not clinic-based or hospital-based. They are freestanding facilities directed and staffed by chemists who have no medical training or medical license.16–18 These laboratories are claiming, in their marketing, to have the expertise to tell physicians how to treat their patients, on a broad level, on the basis of the laboratory studies they perform. These laboratories provide “technical support” to assist physicians in treating their patients. The quality of this technical support raises concerns. Routine technical support is given by individuals with no formal medical training, no first-hand experience in patient care, and no medical licensure. In some cases, individuals with only a high-school degree, who are trained only from a marketing standpoint, advise physicians on how to treat their patients with clinically unproven methods in order to optimize sales of nutritional supplement products sold by the laboratory. While arguably it is the responsibility of the physician to implement or reject treatment advice, the whole concept of laboratory owners and employees with no firsthand patient care training, experience, or medical licensure, telling doctors how to treat their patients with clinically unproven methods may be construed as the unlicensed practice of medicine by unqualified individuals. At the very least it is a potential recipe for disaster.16–18 It is not hard to find physicians and other caregivers who are advertising the sale of urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Their numbers have grown in recent years. Some of the examples of Internet marketing of urinary monoamine assays under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” by physicians and other caregivers include the following assertions: • “Neurotransmitter testing is now available to detect brain neurotransmitter imbalances”19 • “Neurotransmitter testing is used to detect imbalances in brain and body chemistry”20 • “We now have (urinary neurotransmitter) laboratory tests that can accurately measure neurotransmitter levels and greatly simplify the task of developing a proper supplement plan, eliminating much of the guesswork and trial and error. They are also affordable and noninvasive in that they use a simple urine sample. A baseline test is usually critical to understanding a person’s unique patterns and designing the most appropriate supplement program”21 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 103 Dovepress Hinz et al • “… approach is based on a baseline (urinary) measurement of your neurotransmitter and/or hormone levels. The initial testing of your levels from a urine or saliva sample constitutes your baseline”22 • “Neurotransmitter testing to detect brain neurotransmitter imbalances! Testing helps to determine exactly which neurotransmitter levels are out of balance and helps to determine which therapies are needed for an individualized treatment plan”23 • “For this to be most effective, it should include a specialized urinalysis test that provides a reliable means of measuring excretory values of neurotransmitters. The (name of company) neurotransmitter urinalysis panel can be utilized to establish baseline, therapeutic, and maintenance protocols”24 • “Neurotransmitters are naturally occurring chemicals within the brain that relay signals between the nerve cells and are required for proper brain and body function. The approach is based on a baseline (urinary) measurement of your neurotransmitter and/or hormone levels”.25 Laboratory marketing claims This section discusses how the marketing model arrived at its current state, along with examples of the marketing claims made to fuel urinary monoamine testing. The marketing model is promoted primarily for disease states that have a high positive placebo effect. In many studies, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression are associated with a positive placebo effect of 40%–50%.5,9 Almost half of the patients with these diseases improve significantly in 1 month while being treated with placebo. However, under the marketing model, when this happens, those promoting the marketing model take credit for all cases that have improved. Because almost half of the patients show significant improvement within 1 month, there is little upon which to challenge the veracity of the laboratory claims of treatment efficacy for the average physician not aware of the placebo statistics. Indeed, physicians have said under questioning, “I like this approach; at least half of my patients get better in the first month”. This approach completely ignores the placebo effect while quietly exploiting it in the background for the marketing of urinary monoamine assays.5,9 Virtually any properly licensed laboratory can perform urinary monoamine assays. It is the clinical applications promoted for these urinary monoamine assays that differentiate one laboratory from another. The following are direct quotes from urinary monoamine assay marketing under the urinary neurotransmitter marketing model. 104 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress A 2007 marketing paper noted, “Studies have demonstrated intact neurotransmitter transport out of the CNS, into the periphery, via blood–brain barrier transporters. Renal filtration of neurotransmitters via specific transporters is welldocumented. Researchers have provided examples of urinary neurotransmitter measurements that correlate with CNS (central nervous system) tissue concentrations”.26 On September 22, 2010, a laboratory website27 promoting and selling urinary monoamine assay under the spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model on the Internet noted that baseline testing is recommended with regard to urinary monoamine assays in marketing for all neurotransmitter-related conditions for several reasons: • “First, it reveals imbalances that may be present in the nervous system, thereby establishing a quantitative need for intervention. Symptoms alone often do not provide the information needed to effectively target the underlying neurotransmitter imbalances” • “Next, baseline testing allows for more informed decisions to be made regarding intervention selection” • “With neurotransmitter data in hand, practitioners can choose products that target neurotransmitter imbalances” • “Likewise, neurotransmitter testing shows which interventions may not be suitable for a particular individual, reducing the chance of unwanted side effects” • “Finally, the baseline test provides an important reference point to monitor the effects of therapy. Retests can be compared to baseline data to evaluate progress made in the restoration process” • “In addition to baseline testing, periodic retesting is used to indicate a need for change in a patient’s dosing regimen”. The websites of other laboratories have posted the following on their web pages supporting sales of urinary monoamine assays under the spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model: • “(Company name) line of formulas designed to address the communication system imbalances found through testing. TNT formulations may be used as anchor products during the initial therapeutic phase, following a baseline (urinary) test”28 • “For this to be most effective, it should include a specialized urinalysis test that provides a reliable means of measuring excretory values of neurotransmitters. From those findings an individualized protocol including transdermal amino acid supplementation is devised to improve the quantity and ratios of neurotransmitters in the International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress brain. The first step is to identify baseline (urinary) neurotransmitter levels”2 • “The optimal range is suggested for the interpretation of baseline (urinary neurotransmitter testing) values. If neurotransmitter values fall above or below the optimal range, your nervous system may be out of balance”29 • “In support of urinary neurotransmitter assessment, studies have demonstrated that intact neurotransmitter is transported from the CNS to the periphery, via specific BBB transporters, followed by renal filtration of neurotransmitters with subsequent excretion in the urine”.30 Scientific issues There is a highly polarized divergence between published peer-reviewed science and the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. In this section we discuss the key points of this divergence. In order to enable the reader to sort out which claims from caregivers and laboratories are correct, it is important to identify and discuss the scientific foundation the marketing model is resting on. The validity of the spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model used to promote sales of urinary monoamine assays rests on correct answers to the following questions. What is the permeability of the blood–brain barrier regarding the monoamines under normal conditions? Are significant amounts of monoamines found in the final urine synthesized by kidney structures under normal conditions? What is the level of reproducibility of urinary monoamine testing results from the same subject on a day-to-day basis? Blood–brain barrier permeability Some variations of “the marketing model” rest on claims that measurement of urinary monoamines has a direct relationship with the monoamine levels found in the brain. This gives rise to the concept “pee in a cup and we will determine the neurotransmitter levels of your brain model”. Two specific considerations exist in the marketing model when claiming that monoamines cross the blood–brain barrier. The first assumption is that monoamines found in the final urine contain monoamines that have been in the central nervous system. The second requirement is that the monoamines in the final urine are in constant equilibrium with the monoamines found in the central nervous system and peripheral nervous system. Embodied in the marketing model is the concept that monoamines must cross the blood– brain barrier then come to equilibrium with the peripheral nervous system and final urine, leading to one large pool of monoamines in constant equilibrium throughout the body. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Urinary monoamine assay The idea that monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier under normal conditions has been widely accepted in science for over 60 years. This fact has been referenced heavily over time, as noted in the sampling of 104 references noted in support of the following four bullet points: • “Serotonin does not cross the blood–brain barrier”5–7,31–69 • “Dopamine does not cross the blood–brain barrier”70–93 • “Norepinephrine does not cross the blood–brain barrier”94–107 • “Epinephrine does not cross the blood–brain barrier”.108–131 In order for claims made under the spot urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model to be valid, monoamines must cross the blood–brain barrier. This is contrary to the over 100 references cited above. When those promoting the original laboratory marketing model, which is still promoted by some today, became cognizant that these monoamines did not freely cross the blood–brain barrier, the model began to change. The new marketing argument asserts that transporters move monoamines across the blood–brain barrier in amounts significant enough to affect equilibrium between the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and final urine. It continues to be asserted that monoamines in the final urine are composed of monoamines that have been in the central nervous system.30 A review of transporter physiology is in order. The monoamines are primarily transported by organic cation transporters (OCT).132 It is recognized that the OCT of the liver, intestines, kidneys, and brain are “identical and homologous”.133 In 2010, the authors of this paper published the most recent refinement to the monoamine OCT model.6 Even if there were transporters that transported monoamines out of the brain to the peripheral nervous system, there would be no equilibrium or direct relationship, as asserted by the marketing model, between the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system, and final urine. The amounts of monoamines that are transported vary greatly over time. During transport, OCT affect monoamine gradients where the amount of monoamine on one side of the transporter is not the same as the amount on the other side of the transporter. In addition, monoamine concentrations on either side of the transporter rise and fall independent of each other. This leads to a situation where if transport did occur, the monoamines in the central nervous system are not in equilibrium and do not share a direct relationship with levels in the peripheral nervous system and final urine, as alleged by the marketing model.6 In the transporter version of the marketing model, the laboratories involved continue to assert that urinary submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 105 Dovepress Hinz et al onoamine levels correlate with monoamines in the central m nervous system and are a measurement of monoamines that have been in the central nervous system.7,19–30 A published discussion of blood–brain barrier transport under one of the current marketing models written by the staff of a laboratory selling under the marketing model appeared in a 2010 review article (ie, no original research was reported) published by a psychology journal that had decided it had the expertise to publish on peer-reviewed issues relating to monoamine renal physiology and blood–brain barrier physiology.30 Figure 1 accompanying that review is a reproduction from Ohtsuki.134 The article claimed that both illustrations represent transport of monoamines across the blood–brain barrier. Close examination of the reference shows that the assertions of Ohtsuki are contrary to the psychology review article in noting that there is no known mechanism for these monoamines that transports them across the blood–brain barrier. The only thing that the figures from these two articles illustrate is how the monoamines are transported into the endothelial cells of the blood–brain barrier where they affect regulation and that the monoamines are not transported across the blood–brain barrier.30,134 There is no peer-reviewed published research that supports the marketing model versions which expound that, under normal conditions, monoamines cross the blood–brain barrier and are in equilibrium with the peripheral nervous system, urinary monoamine assays are of monoamines that have been in the brain, and assays of monoamines found in the final urine have a direct relationship with levels found in the brain. There is no scientific support for any of these propositions. Source of urinary monoamines The second major issue reviewed is “the source of synthesis of monoamines found in the urine under normal conditions”. The selling of urinary monoamine assays under the “the marketing model” has made no scientific room for the possibility that a significant source of synthesis of the monoamines found in the final urine is from sources other than the peripheral or central nervous systems. The marketing model claim is that urinary monoamines found in the final urine are monoamines filtered at the glomerulus, and measurement of monoamines in the final urine is a direct assay of the monoamines of the peripheral and/or central nervous systems. The marketing model fails to account for known scientif ic facts that are contrary to these assertions.30 Science notes that significant amounts of monoamines found in the urine, under normal conditions, have never been 106 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress in the central and/or peripheral nervous systems. The final urine, under normal conditions, is composed of significant amounts of monoamines synthesized by structures found in the kidneys. The following referenced statements support this set of facts: • “Most of the serotonin or dopamine found in the urine is synthesized in the kidney. Therefore, the excreted neurotransmitters must be synthesized in the kidneys and escape reabsorption into the blood in order to be excreted in the urine”14 • “These findings provide further evidence that the increase in urine serotonin after administration of both serotonin precursors (5-HTP; glu-5-HTP) is largely due to serotonin synthesized within the kidney”135 • “… free urine serotonin reflects actual biosynthesis by the kidney”136 • “These results are consistent with the intrarenal formation of serotonin by renal decarboxylase with attendant alterations in renal hemodynamics and salt and water excretion”137 • “Dopamine and serotonin in the urine are believed to reflect mainly the tubular decarboxylation of filtered or circulating L-dopa and L-5-HTP, respectively”138 • “Intrarenal dopamine (3,4-dihydroxyphenethylamine; DA) and serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) are synthesized abundantly by renal proximal tubular cells from L-3,4dihydroxyphenylalanine and 5-hydroxy-L-tryptophan, respectively”139 • “These data indicate that urinary free dopamine is mainly derived from plasma dopa, which is converted by dopa decarboxylase in the kidney”140 • “Urinary dopamine excretion was not diminished by sympathectomy, was increased by L-dopa (but not tyrosine or dopamine 4-Osulphate) in the perfusate and was virtually abolished by prior treatment with the dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, carbidopa. These results confirm the importance of renal extraneuronal dopamine production, from circulating L-dopa, as a contributor to urinary dopamine excretion”141 • “The data indicates that urinary free dopamine in a high sodium diet is mainly derived from the renal tubular cells”142 • “Plasma dopa is the main source of urinary dopamine”143 • “All of the components of a complete dopamine system are present within the kidney”144 • “It is concluded that (urinary) dopamine and serotonin are accumulated and likely formed within proximal convoluted tubular cells”145 International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress Urinary monoamine assay Abluminal membrane Luminal membrane Endothelial cell BRAIN BLOOD Glutamine Glutamate EAAT1 EAAT2 1:3:6 ratio EAAT3 NH4+ Low capacity independent carrier system Glutamate aspartate Glutamate GABA GAT2/BGT-1 Serotonin SERT GABA transporter GABA NET Serotonin Norepinephrine NET Dopamine Histamine HA transporter HA transporter Histamine Epinephrine Agmatine Agmatine PEA PEA Figure 1 Serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine are transported across the abluminal membrane surface of the blood–brain barrier into the endothelial cells where they affect regulatory function. They do not cross the blood–brain barrier since they do not cross the luminal membrane. Reprinted from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol 35, Issue 3, Marc et al, Neurotransmitters excreted in the urine as biomarkers of nervous system activity: Validity and clinical applicability, p 635–644, Copyright 2011, with permission from Elsevier. Abbreviations: EAAT, excitatory amino acid transporter; GABA, γ-aminobutyric acid; GAT2/BGT-1, GABA/betaine transporter; HA, histamine; NET, norepinephrine transporter; PEA, phenylethylamine; SERT, serotonin transporters. • “... (urinary) dopamine is phosphaturic and is synthesized by kidney proximal tubule”146 • “... urinary norepinephrine is not solely derived from plasma by glomerular filtration but also arises from an unidentified renal source”147 • “… the renal nerves were the main sites of the (urinary) norepinephrine synthesis”148 International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 • “Perfusion of L-dopa and free dopamine led to the generation of norepinephrine in the kidney. This synthesis was abolished when the kidney was denervated, suggesting that the renal nerves were the main sites of the (urinary) norepinephrine synthesis”148 • “Several recent studies have demonstrated that dopamine can be generated from L-dopa in the isolated perfused submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 107 Dovepress Hinz et al rat kidney, and those findings led to the conclusion that most of the urinary dopamine could be derived from circulating L-dopa (in the kidneys)”148 • “Recent studies from our laboratory have suggested that urinary NE (norepinephrine) may be derived, in part, from intrarenal sources in man”149 • “We have previously reported that in standing humans a significant portion of urinary norepinephrine is derived from processes other than glomerular filtration”149 • “Net production was observed for NE (norepinephrine), DA (dopamine), and NM (normetanephrine) in the renal metabolic compartment, suggesting that a portion of these compounds excreted in the urine may result from intrarenal synthesis or metabolism of these materials”149 • “… urinary epinephrine may not simply be filtered from the bloodstream” and “urinary epinephrine was derived from the kidney”150 • “We conclude that appreciable portions of renal and urinary epinephrine are synthesized in the kidney by an enzyme distinct from PNMT”.151 In reviewing the validity of the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” it is important to determine what is being assayed and where it came from. The first assertion of the model claims that it is urinary neurotransmitters that are being assayed. Considering the neurohormonal, regulatory, paracrine, and autocrine functions of monoamines, the monoamine population found in the urine has not exclusively functioned as neurotransmitters. This marketing model hinges on claims that the final urine is composed of monoamines that have functioned only as neurotransmitters, which have crossed the blood–brain barrier, and have been simply filtered at the glomerulus, and then excreted directly into the final urine. Therefore, the marketing model, has assumed that there is constant equilibrium between the monoamines of the central and peripheral nervous systems and the monoamines found in the final urine which have allegedly only functioned as neurotransmitters. This marketing model is simply not valid. There is no direct relationship between monoamines in the final urine and monoamines in the peripheral or central nervous systems, and under normal conditions, significant amounts of monoamines found in the final urine have not been in the peripheral or central nervous systems, but have been newly synthesized by structures in the kidneys. Day-to-day reproducibility of assays The reproducibility of testing techniques in the laboratory, as commonly addressed by precision and accuracy studies, is 108 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress not what is being discussed here. It is the reproducibility of urinary monoamine assay results obtained from the same subject from one day to the next that is under discussion. It would appear that none of the laboratories selling urinary monoamine testing under this marketing model bothered to verify the day-to-day reproducibility of testing in the same subject. The authors of this paper published multiple original research papers where the topic was “matched-pairs t-test” analysis of baseline monoamine assays performed on different days from the same subject. Each matched pair was made up of a urine sample obtained from a subject on one day (test 1) paired with a urine sample from the same subject on a different day (test 2). These test 1 and test 2 matched pairs were then grouped and analyzed using the “matched-pairs t-test”. It was found that the urinary level of all four monoamines (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) between test 1 and test 2 for the group differed significantly from day to day (P , 0.05). The amount of each monoamine found in test 1 and test 2 urine samples was not consistent and reproducible on a day-to-day basis in the same individual.7,10 The following statement illustrates the impact of this finding: “It is asserted that if one hundred baseline urinary monoamine assays from the same subject were obtained on one hundred different days, one hundred different laboratory values would be reported. In the process, no firm reproducible laboratory data from one day to another day would be generated and no reliable clinical decision making could occur using this type of data”.7,10 These findings invalidate the ability to use “baseline monoamine assays” for anything more than a coarse screening tool, under the only clinically proven applications known, for monoamine hyperexcreting tumors,7,10 which is something we are not discussing in this paper. Unproven science of biomarkers The alleged scientific foundation of the marketing model continues to change. The marketing model still continues to assert that all of the urinary monoamines found in the final urine under normal conditions have been in the peripheral and central nervous systems, despite the overwhelming peer-reviewed published research evidence to the contrary. The marketing model now asserts that urinary monoamines can be used as biomarkers of common diseases, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression, although these claims are clinically unproven with no published original research that would support or define treatment of the individual patient in clinic. The only published original research on the topic discredits the biomarker approach for several of the reasons already discussed in this paper, not the International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress least of which is the lack of day-to-day consistency of test results in the same subject.30 The business model for the marketing of urinary monoamine assays as biomarkers of disease has certainly arrived. The most extensive writing on the topic is a 2010 literature review found in a psychology journal and containing no original research.30 Contrary to the claims of the biomarker marketing model cited, 30 the final urine being assayed contains significant amounts of urinary monoamines synthesized by the kidneys. The actual monoamine levels found in the final urine when corrected for specific gravity considerations by use of the monoamine to creatinine ratio which compensates for dilution of the urine, is an assay of the forces within the kidneys that impact the monoamines between synthesis and the f inal urine. The OCTN2 transporters of the apical surface and the OCT2 transporters of the basolateral surfaces of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells have a major impact on monoamine concentrations found in the final urine.13 The marketing model is silent on this interaction. The most recent review of urinary biomarker applications had numerous references citing group results of urinary monoamine trends. The authors then made the jump, without proper studies in place, to asserting that these group results are valid for use in treatment of individual patients in the clinical setting.30 Group study results cannot be used or equated to treatment parameters in an individual. Even if a group trend was found for a specific disease, the day-to-day significant changes in urinary monoamine assays from the same individual would invalidate the clinical applications of the group trend finding.7,10 The question is raised, “What is the possible impact to the medical community of laboratories selling clinically unproven urinary biomarker tests?” One of the references cited in the bibliography of the 2010 biomarker review paper30 notes the following: “Perhaps most worrisome is the problem of premature clinical application (of biomarkers), both because of the risk for harm to patients (misdirected in treatment decisions) and for the cynicism about biomarkers in general this engenders; still, the need for useful biomarkers is so great that sometimes enthusiasm and optimism may overtake consideration of results from carefully conducted controlled clinical trials. To paraphrase the film Jerry Maguire, ‘show me the data!’ must be the watchword if clinicians are to make prudent choices for their patients”.152 The authors of this paper assert that the statement immediately above, in citing “premature clinical applications” of International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Urinary monoamine assay biomarker testing,152 are discussing the exact problem associated with the urinary monoamine marketing model of biomarkers at this time. Careful review of the references cited revealed no definitive clinical trials or support regarding use of spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing in biomarker applications for treatment of individuals in the clinical setting. The statement referenced above is correct in that premature use of an unproven biomarker application can risk causing harm to the patient. Examples of the harm supported under the statement include152 but are not limited to: • A diagnosis of a false normal state when disease exists • Misdiagnosis of disease states • Medical treatment decisions that make the disease state worse • Initiation of unnecessary treatment • Delay in implementing available beneficial treatment • False hope given where no hope exists, leading to distress when this is realized • Interference with the doctor–patient relationship when expected results promoted by the laboratory do not turn out as advertised due to unrealistic expectations of care. Conclusion The “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” used to promote sales of urinary monoamine assays is not valid and has no scientific foundation. For the claims of the marketing model to be valid, monoamines would need to cross the blood–brain barrier and be in constant equilibrium with the peripheral nervous system and final urine. As demonstrated by at least 100 citations, these monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier. While one version of the marketing model seems to recognize this and asserts that the monoamines are transported out of the central nervous system, the very literature cited in making these transporter assertions specifically illustrates that monoamines are not transported out of the central nervous system to the peripheral nervous system. For the marketing model to be valid, monoamines found in the final urine need to be composed primarily of the monoamines from the peripheral system that are merely filtered and placed in the final urine as claimed. A significant amount of monoamines found in the final urine are synthesized by the kidneys. These monoamines perform other major functions in the body. Therefore, identifying and calling these monoamine assays of the final urine, “neurotransmitter testing” is not appropriate. For the marketing model to be valid, urinary monoamine assays obtained from the same subject need to be consistent from one day to the next (P . 0.05 on the “matched-pairs submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 109 Dovepress Hinz et al t-test” using paired samples from the same subject obtained on different days). Previous published literature indicates that this is not the case; urinary monoamines differ significantly from day to day in the same subject. The bottom line is that the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” used to sell urinary monoamine assays has not been clinically proven. The original scientific research supporting the model, if it exists, cannot be found in published science. It is postulated that after 10 years of using this marketing model to sell urinary monoamine assays it would be helpful if the first original research scientific peer-reviewed paper outlining the foundation of the model would be formally written in order to subject it to appropriate peer review. It is the goal of this writing to spark interest and dialog on the validity of the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model” used in support of urinary monoamine assay sales. We hope that those using this marketing model directly or indirectly in patient care will come forth and enter into meaningful dialog. It is suggested that those promoting this marketing model publish their original research findings in order to facilitate a proper scientific dialog on the topics of monoamine renal physiology and blood–brain barrier permeability in relation to marketing claims. Disclosure MH discloses ownership of NeuroResearch Clinics Inc. TU discloses laboratory directorship of DBS Laboratories, Duluth, MN. References 1. Sanesco International. Available from: http://www.sanesco.net/ practitioner-information/targeted-nutritional-therapy/34. Accessed May 14, 2011. 2. Sabre Sciences Inc. Available from: http://www.atlanticnature.net/df/ atlanticnature/hormone.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2011. 3. Neurogistics Inc. Available from: http://www.neurogistics.com/ TheProgram/index_body.asp. Accessed May 14, 2011. 4. NeuroScience Inc. Technical guide. 4th ed, May, 2006. Available from: https://www.neurorelief.com/images/Education/TechGuide/ techguide-may06.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2011. 5. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine; a comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 9. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7: 31–38. 110 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 10. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2011;3:19–24. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Non-validity and clinical relevance of neurotransmitter testing. 13. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease, a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 14. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009:227–235. 15. Bogaard H, Abe K, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voelkel NF. The right ventricle under pressure cellular and molecular mechanisms of right-heart failure in pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2009;135:794–804. 16. NeuroScience Inc. Available from: https://www.neurorelief.com/index. php?p=cms&cid=47&pid=0. Accessed May 14, 2011. 17. Sanesco International. Available from: http://www.sanesco.net/ practitioner-information/clinical-technical-support. Accessed May 14, 2011. 18. Neurogistics. Available from: http://www.neurogistics.com/Clinician SpecificIn0949.asp. Accessed May 14, 2011. 19. Integrative Psychiatry. Available from: http://www.integrativepsychiatry. net/neurotransmitter_tests.html. Accessed May 14, 2011. 20. Ten Penny Health Medicine. Available from: http://www.tenpennyimc. com/viewpage.aspx?pagename=neurotransmitter_testing%20%20& CurNavId=153. Accessed May 14, 2011. 21. Natural Health Solutions. Available from: http://doctorvolpe.com/ anxiety-and-depression. Accessed May 14, 2011. 22. Holistic Naturopathic Centre. Available from: http://www. holisticnaturopath.com/neurotrans.htm. Accessed May 14, 2011. 23. Carol Perkins. Neurotransmitter testing to detect brain neurotransmitter imbalances. Available from: http://www.ndaccess.com/NaturalChoices/ PageNew.asp?PageID=21. Accessed May 14, 2011. 24. Future of Wellness. Available from: http://www.futureofwellness.net/ neuroendrocrin.html. Accessed May 14, 2011. 25. Online Wellness Community. Natural alternative to balancing your brain chemistry to treat depression, anxiety and ADD. Available from: http://www.onlinewellnesscommunity.org/blog/2011/02/natural- alternative-to-balancing-your-brain-chemistry-to-treat-depressionanxiety-and-add-dr-bronner-handwerger Accessed May 14, 2011. 26. Alts J, et al. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: myths and misconceptions. Oseola, WI: NeuroScience Inc; 2007. 27. NeuroScience Inc. Available from: https://www.neurorelief.com/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=131&Itemid=48. Accessed September 22, 2010. 28. Sanesco International. Available from: http://www.sanesco.net/ practitioner-information/glossary. Accessed May 14, 2011. 29. NeuroScience Inc. Available from: http://www.modernherbalist.com/ brochures/neurotransmitters101-brochure.pdf. Accessed May 14, 2011. 30. Marc D, Ailts JW, Campeau DC, Bull MJ, Olson KL. Neurotransmitters excreted in the urine as biomarkers of nervous system activity: validity and clinical applicability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35: 635–644. 31. Klee G, Bertino J, Callaway E. Clinical studies with LSD-25 and two substances related to serotonin. J Ment Sci. 196;106:301–308. 32. Garattini S, Valzelli L. Serotonin. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 1965. 33. Krikorian A. The psychedelic properties of banana peel: an appraisal. Econ Bot. 1968;22:385–389. 34. Glassman A. Indole amines and affective disorders. Psychosom Med. 1969:31. 35. Plonk J, Feldman J. Adrenal function in the carcinoid syndrome: effects of the serotonin antagonist cyproheptadine. Metabolism. 1975;24: 1035–1046. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress 36. Sabelli HC, Mosnaim AD, Vazquez AJ. Biochemical plasticity of synaptic transmission: a critical review of Dale’s principle. Biol Psychiatry. 1976;11:481–524. 37. Ferrari C, Caldara R, Rampini P, et al. Inhibition of prolactin release by serotonin antagonists in hyperprolactinemic subjects. Metabolism. 1978;27:1499–1504. 38. Loizou L. Uptake of monoamines into central neurones and the bloodbrain barrier in the infant rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1970;40:800–813. 39. Gill D, Clarke M. Early controlled trials. BMJ. 1966;312:1298. 40. Garfinkel P, Warsh J, Stancer H, et al. CNS monoamine metabolism in bipolar affective disorder. Evaluation using a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34:735–739. 41. Piggott L. Overview of selected basic research in autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 1979;9:199–216. 42. Millhorn D, Eldridge F, Waldrop R. Prolonged stimulation for respiration by endogenous central serotonin. Respir Physiol. 1980;42: 171–188. 43. Pollock, J, Rowland N. Peripherally administered serotonin decreases food intake in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981;15:179–183. 44. Israngkun P, Newman HA, Patel ST, Duruibe VA, Abou-Issa H. Potential biochemical markers for infantile autism. Chem Neuropathol. 1986;5:51–70. 45. Calogero A, Bernardini R, Margioris A. Effects of serotonergic agonists and antagonists on corticotropin-releasing hormone secretion by explanted rat hypothalami. Peptides. 1989;10:189–200. 46. Amenta F, Zaccheo D, Collier W. Neurotransmitters, neuroreceptors and aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 1991;61:249–273. 47. Mann JJ, McBride PA, Brown RP, et al. Relationship between central and peripheral serotonin indexes in depressed and suicidal psychiatric inpatients. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:442–446. 48. Wise S. Clinical studies with fluoxetine in obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. l992;55:l8lS–184S. 49. Polidori C, Zeng Y, Zaccheo D, et al. Age-related changes in the visual cortex: a review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1993;17:145–164. 50. Pijl H, Toornvliet A, Meinders A, Leuven JA, Van Kempen CM. Low serum cholesterol and serotonin metabolism. Results may have been affected by confounding. BMJ. 1996;312:221. 51. Oliveira V, Moreira E, Farah VD, Consolim-Colombo F, Krieger EM, Irigoyen MC. Cardiopulmonary reflex impairment in experimental diabetes in rats. Hypertension. 1999;34:813–817. 52. Siu L, Chapman W, Moore M. Use of the somatostatin analogue octreotide acetate in the treatment of encephalopathy associated with carcinoid tumor: case report. Am J Clin Oncol. 1997;20:558–561. 53. Carley D, Radulovacki M. Role of peripheral serotonin in the regulation of central sleep apneas in rats. Chest. 1999;115:1397–1401. 54. Portas C, Bjorvatn B, Ursin R. Serotonin and the sleep/wake cycle: special emphasis on microdialysis studies. Prog Neurobiol. 2000;60: 13–35. 55. Carley D, Depoortere H, Radulovacki M. R-zacopride, a 5-HT3 antagonist/5-HT4 agonist, reduces sleep apneas in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001;69:283–289. 56. Berry R, Hayward L. Selective augmentation of genioglossus electromyographic activity by 5-hydroxytryptophan in the rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;74:877–882. 57. Gupta A, Silman A. Psychological stress and fibromyalgia: a review of the evidence suggesting a neuroendocrine link. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;6:98–106. 58. Pyle A, Argyropoulos S, Nutt D. The role of serotonin in panic: evidence from tryptophan depletion studies. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2004;16: 79–84. 59. Berry R, Koch G, Hayward L. Low-dose mirtazapine increases genioglossus activity in the anesthetized rat. Sleep. 2005;28:78–84. 60. Jones D, Story A. Serotonin syndrome and the anaesthetist. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:181–187. 61. Whitaker-Azmitia P. Behavioral and cellular consequences of increasing serotonergic activity during brain development: a role in autism? Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005;23:75–83. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Urinary monoamine assay 62. Li Y, Kerr B, Kidd M, Gonyou HW. Use of supplementary tryptophan to modify the behavior of pigs. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:212–220. 63. Shattock P, Whiteley P. The role of tryptophan in autism and related disorders. Nutrition Practitioner. 2006;1–9. 64. Carley D, Olopade C, Ruigt G, Radulovacki M. Efficacy of mirtazapine in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep. 2007;30:35–41. 65. Zhao Z, Chiechio S, Sun YG, et al. Mice lacking central serotonergic neurons show enhanced inflammatory pain and an impaired analgesic response to antidepressant drugs. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6045–6053. 66. Makkonen I, Raili Riikonen R, Kokki H, Airaksinen MM, Kuikka JT. Serotonin and dopamine transporter binding in children with autism determined by SPECT. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:593–597. 67. Yadav V, Ryu J, Suda N, et al. Lrp5 controls bone formation by inhibiting serotonin synthesis in the duodenum. Cell. 2008;135:825–837. 68. Wulsin L, Musselman D, Otte C, et al. Depression and whole blood serotonin in patients with coronary heart disease from the Heart and Soul Study. Psychosom Med. 2009;71:260–265. 69. Kobayashi T, Hasegawa H, Kaneko E, Ichiyama A. Gastrointestinal serotonin: depletion due to tetrahydrobiopterin deficiency induced by 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxypyrimidine administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2010;298:G692–G699. 70. Fangman A, O’Malley W. L-dopa and the patient with Parkinson’s disease. Am J Nurs. 1969;69:1455–1457. 71. Srimal R, Dhawan B. An analysis of methylphenidate induced gnawing in guinea pigs. Psychopharmacologia. 1970;18:99–107. 72. Leon A, Spiegel H, Thomas G, Abrams WB. Pyridoxine antagonism of levodopa in parkinsonism. JAMA. 1971;218:1924–1927. 73. Smythe G, Edwards G, Graham P, Lazarus L. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma by simultaneous measurement of urinary excretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Clin Chem. 1992;38: 486–492. 74. Verde G, Oppizzi G, Colussi G, et al. Effect of dopamine infusion on plasma levels of growth hormone in normal subjects and in acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol. 1976;5:419–423. 75. Weiner R, Ganong W. Role of brain monoamines and histamine in regulation of anterior pituitary secretion. Physiol Rev. 1978;58: 905–976. 76. Quinn N. Fortnightly review: drug treatment of Parkinson’s disease. BMJ. 1995;310:575. 77. Mason L, Cojocaru T, Cole D. Surgical intervention and anesthetic management of the patient with Parkinson’s disease. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1996;34:133–150. 78. Volkow N, Fowler J, Gatley S, et al. PET evaluation of the dopamine system of the human brain. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1242–1256. 79. Checkley S. Neuroendocrine tests of monoamine function in man: a review of basic theory and its application to the study of depressive illness. Psychol Med. 1980;10:35–53. 80. Nishino T, Lahiri S. Effects of dopamine on chemoreflexes in breathing. J Appl Physiol. 1981;50:892–897. 81. Pollock, J, Rowland N. Peripherally administered serotonin decreases food intake in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981;15: 179–183. 82. Greenamyer J. Glutamate-dopamine interactions in the basal ganglia: Relationship to Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1993; 91:255–269. 83. Ward S, Bellville J. Effect of intravenous dopamine on hypercapnic ventilatory response in humans. J Appl Physiol. 1983;55: 1418–1425. 84. Morton J, Connell J, Hughes M, et al. The role of plasma osmolality, angiotensin II and dopamine in vasopressin release in man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1985;23:129–138. 85. Seri I, Tulassay T, Kiszel J, et al. Effect of low-dose dopamine infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin secretion in preterm infants with hyaline membrane disease. Biol Neonate. 1985;47:317–22. 86. Al-Damluji S, Rees L. Effects of catecholamines on secretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in man. J Clin Pathol. 1987; 40:1098–1107. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 111 Dovepress Hinz et al 87. Hoffman B, Lefkowitz R. Catecholamines and sympathomimetic drugs. In: Gillman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors. Goodman and Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1990. 88. Levein N, Thorn S, Wattwil M. Dopamine delays gastric emptying and prolongs orocaecal transit time in volunteers. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16:246–250. 89. Bell D, McLellan T, Sabiston C. Effect of ingesting caffeine and ephedrine on 10-km run performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34: 344–349. 90. Bergerot A, Storer R, Goadsby P. Dopamine inhibits trigeminovascular transmission in the rat. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:251–262. 91. Scanlon M, Weightman D, Shale D, et al. Dopamine is a physiological regulator of thyrotrophin (TSH) secretion in normal man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;1:7–15. 92. Allen G, Land J, Heales S. A new perspective on the treatment of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase def iciency. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;97:6–14. 93. Rubí B, Maechler P. Minireview: new roles for peripheral dopamine on metabolic control and tumor growth: let’s seek the balance. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5570–5581. 94. Maas J, Landis D. Brain norepinephrine and behavior: a behavioral and kinetic study. Psychosom Med. 1965;27:399–407. 95. Przybyla A, Wang S. Neurophysiological characteristics of cardiovascular neurons in the medulla oblongata of the cat. J Neurophysiol. 1967;30:645. 96. Purves M. Do vasomotor nerves significantly regulate cerebral blood flow? Circ Res. 1978;43:485–493. 97. Morillo E, Gardner L. Bereavement as an antecedent factor in thyrotoxicosis of childhood: four case studies with survey of possible metabolic pathways. Psychosom Med. 1979;41:545–555. 98. Brewster D, Dettmar P, Lynn A. Modification of the proline residue of TRH enhances biological activity and inhibits degradation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1980;66:65–71. 99. Brewster D, Dettmar P, Metcalf G. Biologically stable analogues of TRH with increased neuropharmacological potency. Neuropharmacology. 1981;20:497–503. 100. Kawano Y, Ferrario C. Neurohormonal characteristics of cardiovascular response due to intraventricular hypertonic NaCl. Am J Physiol. 1984;247(3 Pt 2):H422–H428. 101. Saito T, Ishizawa H, Tsuchiya F, Ozawa H, Takahata N. Neurochemical findings in the cerebrospinal fluid of schizophrenic patients with tardive dyskinesia and neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism. Jpn JP sychiatry Neurol. 1986;40:189–194. 102. Johnston J, Balachandran A. Effects of dietary protein, energy and tyrosine on central and peripheral norepinephrine turnover in mice. J Nutr. 1987;117:2046–2053. 103. Thomas G, Scott C, Cummins J. Adrenergic regulation of growth hormone secretion in the ewe. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 1994;11: 187–195. 104. Elrod R, Peskind E, DiGiacomo L, Brodkin KI, Veith RC, Raskind MA. Effects of Alzheimer’s disease severity on cerebrospinal fluid norepinephrine concentration. Am J Psychiatry. 1997; 154:25–30. 105. Cameron O, Zubieta J, Grunhaus L. Effects of yohimbine on cerebral blood flow, symptoms, and physiological functions in humans. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:549–559. 106. De Keyser J, Zeinstra E, Frohman E. Are astrocytes central players in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis? Arch Neurol. 2003;60: 132–136. 107. Rodrigues S, LeDoux J, Sapolsky R. The influence of stress hormones on fear circuitry. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2009;32:289–313. 108. Sobocinska J, Kozłowski S. Osmotic thirst suppression in dogs exposed to low ambient temperature. Physiol Behav. 1987;40:171–175. 109. Weil-Malherbe H, Axelrod J, Tomchick R. Blood-brain barrier for adrenaline. Science. 1959;129:1226–1227. 112 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 110. Pinson R, Bloom B, Buck C. Some central nervous system drugs designed from metabolic considerations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962;96: 336–344. 111. Baust W, Niemczyk H. Studies on the adrenaline-sensitive component of the mesencephalic reticular formation. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26: 692–704. 112. Berkowitz B, Spector S. Effect of caffeine and theophylline on peripheral catecholamines. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;13:193–196. 113. Frohman L. Clinical neuropharmacology of hypothalamic releasing factors. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:1391–1397. 114. Mathew R, Ho B, Francis D, Taylor DL, Weinman ML. Catecholamines and anxiety. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1982;65:142–147. 115. Deniard M, Meignen J, DeFeudis F. Reversal of reserpine-induced ptosis in the mouse by alpha-adrenoceptor-agonists. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;80:243–248. 116. Sarmento A, Borges N, Azevedo I. Adrenergic influences on the control of blood-brain barrier permeability. Arch Pharmacol. 1991;343: 633–637. 117. Taylor J, Neal R, Ford J, Ford TW, Clarke RW. Prolonged inhibition of a spinal reflex after intense stimulation of distal peripheral nerves in the decerebrated rabbit. J Physiol. 1991;437:71–83. 118. Heilman K. The neurobiology of emotional experience. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;9:439–448. 119. Horinaka N, Artz N, Cook M, et al. Effects of elevated plasma epinephrine on glucose utilization and blood flow in conscious rat brain. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H1666–H1667. 120. Janssen S, Arntz A, Bouts S. Anxiety and pain: epinephrine-induced hyperalgesia and attentional influences. Pain. 1998;76:309–316. 121. Home P. The Effects of Glucose on the Memory and Attention of Newborn Human Infants. Montreal, Canada: School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition McGill University; 1999. 122. Cameron O. Interoception: the inside story – a model for psychosomatic processes. Psychosom Med. 2001;63:697–710. 123. Cameron N, Erskine M. c-FOS expression in the forebrain after mating in the female rat is altered by adrenalectomy. Neuroendocrinology. 2002;77:305–313. 124. De Kloet E, De Jong I, Oitzl M. Neuropharmacology of glucocorticoids: focus on emotion, cognition and cocaine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;13:585:473–482. 125. Karlamangla A, Singer B, Greendale G, Seeman TE. Increase in epinephrine excretion is associated with cognitive decline in elderly men: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30:453–460. 126. Korte S, Koolhaas J, Wingfield J, McEwen BS. The Darwinian concept of stress: benefits of allostasis and costs of allostatic load and the trade-offs in health and disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005; 29:3–38. 127. Sonner J, Xing Y, Zhang Y. Administration of epinephrine does not increase learning of fear to tone in rats anesthetized with isoflurane or desflurane. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1333–1337. 128. Brandt K, Sünram-Lea S, Qualtrough K. The effect of glucose administration on the emotional enhancement effect in recognition memory. Biol Psychol. 2006;73:199–208. 129. Flint R, Bunsey M, Riccio D. Epinephrine-induced enhancement of memory retrieval for inhibitory avoidance conditioning in preweanling Sprague-Dawley rats. Dev Psychobiol. 2007;49:303–311. 130. Janitzky K, Linke R, Yilmazer-Hanke D. Disrupted visceral feedback reduces locomotor activity and influences background contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 JOlaHsd mice. Behav Brain Res. 2007;182: 109–118. 131. Winter B, Breitenstein C, Mooren F, et al. High impact running improves learning. Neurobiol Learning Mem. 2007;87:597–609. 132. Koepsell H, Schmitt BM, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. 133. Koepsell H. Organic cation transporters in the intestine, kidney, liver, and brain Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:243–266. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 Dovepress 134. Ohtsuki S. New aspects of the blood-brain barrier transporters: its physiologic roles in the central nervous system. Biol Pharm Bull. 2004;27:1489–1496. 135. Wa T, Burns N, Williams B, Freestone S, Lee M. Blood and urine 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine levels after administration of two 5-hydroxytryptamine precursors in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995;39:327–329. 136. Sole M, Madapallimattam A, Baines A. An active pathway for serotonin synthesis by renal proximal tubules. Kidney Int. 1986;29: 689–694. 137. Seri I, Tulassay T, Kiszel J, et al. Effect of low-dose dopamine infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin secretion in preterm infants with hyaline membrane disease. Biol Neonate. 1985;47:317–322. 138. Vieira-Coelho M, Soares-Da-Silva P. Apical and basal uptake of L-dopa and 5-HTP and their corresponding amines dopamine and 5-HT in OK cells. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(5 Pt 2):F632–F639. 139. Wang Z, Srragy H, Felder R, Carey R. Intrarenal dopamine production and distribution in the rat: physiological control of sodium excretion. Hypertension. 1997;29:228–234. 140. Suzuki H, Nakane H, Kawamura M, Yoshizawa M, Takeshita E, Saruta T. Excretion and metabolism of dopa and dopamine by isolated perfused rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1984;247(3 Pt 1):E285–E290. 141. Adam W, Adams BA. Production and excretion of dopamine by the isolated perfused rat kidney. Renal Physiol. 1985;8:150–158. 142. Kambara S, Yoneda S, Yoshimura M, et al. The source and significance of increased urinary dopamine excretion during sodium loading in rats. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi. 1987;63:657–663. Japanese. Urinary monoamine assay 143. Zimlichman R, Levinson P, Kelly G, Stull R, Keiser H, Goldstein D. Derivation of urinary dopamine from plasma dopa. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988;75:515–520. 144. Carey R. Theodore Cooper Lecture: renal dopamine system: paracrine regulator of sodium homeostasis and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2001;38:297–302. 145. Hagege J, Richet G. Proximal tubule dopamine histofluorescence in renal slices incubated with L-dopa. Kidney Int. 1985;27:3–8. 146. Isaac J, Berndt TJ, Knox FG. Role of dopamine in the exaggerated phosphaturic response to parathyroid hormone in the remnant kidney. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;126:470–473. 147. Henry DP, Dentino M, Gibbs PS, Weinberger MH. Vascular compartmentalization of plasma norepinephrine in normal man: the relationships between venous and arterial norepinephrine concentration and the urinary excretion of norepinephrine. J Lab Clin Med. 1979;94:429–437. 148. Buu NT, Duhaime J, Kuchel O. Handling of dopamine and dopamine sulfate by isolated perfused rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1986;250(6 Pt 2): F975–F979. 149. Boren DR, Henry DP, Selkurt EE, Weinberger MH. Renal modulation of urinary catecholamine excretion during volume expansion in the dog. Hypertension. 1980;2:383–389. 150. Ziegler MG, Aung M, Kennedy B. Sources of human urinary epinephrine. Kidney Int. 1997;51:324–327. 151. Ziegler MG, Kennedy B, Elayan H. Rat renal epinephrine synthesis. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:1130–1133. 152. Cook IA. Biomarkers in psychiatry: potentials, pitfalls, and pragmatics. Prim Psychiatry. 2008;15:54–59. International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease Publish your work in this journal The International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal focusing on the pathophysiology of the kidney and vascular supply. Epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment interventions are covered as well as basic science, biochemical and immunological studies. The journal welcomes original research, clinical Dovepress studies, reviews & evaluations, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/international-journal-of-nephrology-and-renovascular-disease-journal International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease 2011:4 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 113 Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index C as e R e port Microperforation prolotherapy: a novel method for successful nonsurgical treatment of atraumatic spontaneous anterior sternoclavicular subluxation, with an illustrative case This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 5 June 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Alvin Stein 1 Scott McAleer 2 Marty Hinz 3 1 Stein Orthopedic Associates, PA, Plantation, FL, USA; 2University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA; 3 Clinical Research, Neuroresearch Clinics, Inc, Cape Coral, FL, USA Background: Surgical repair of an atraumatic spontaneous anterior subluxation of the sterno clavicular joint (herein referred to as the “SCJ”) is often associated with poor outcome expectations. With traditional treatment, successful conservative therapy usually incorporates major lifestyle alterations. This manuscript discusses a novel approach known as “microperfo ration prolotherapy”. To illustrate the technique, the care of a patient who benefitted from this treatment is reviewed. Purpose: To present a novel form of treatment with an illustrative case that demonstrates the potential efficacy of microperforation prolotherapy of the SCJ. Patient and methods: A novel approach to treatment of bilateral subluxation of the sterno clavicular joint with microperforation prolotherapy is discussed. The clinical course of a 21-yearold male with bilateral subluxation of the SCJ, which seriously hampered the patient’s athletic and daily living activities, is used as a backdrop to the discussion. Results: Following microperforation prolotherapy, the instability of the SCJ was replaced by full stability, complete range of motion, and the opportunity to engage in all of the athletic endeavors previously pursued. There is no scar or other cosmetic defect resulting from the treatment received. Conclusion: Anterior sternoclavicular joint subluxation has a poor record of complete recovery with surgical procedures or conservative measures with regard to providing restoration of full lifestyle function. This manuscript documents a novel microperforation prolotherapy treatment that induced healing and restored full stability to the ligament structures responsible for the condition in a completely safe and effective fashion, allowing the patient to resume full lifestyle activities without restriction. The exceptional response to treatment noted here is encourage ment for further studies. Keywords: sternoclavicular joint subluxation, shoulder pain, sternoclavicular instability, spontaneous instability, anterior subluxation Introduction Correspondence: Alvin Stein 6766 West Sunrise Blvd, Suite 100A, Plantation, FL 33313, USA Tel +1 954 581 8585 Fax +1 954 316 4969 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress DOI: 10.2147/OAJSM.S20579 Presentation and documentation of this successful microperforation prolotherapy outcome in the literature is novel, having never been previously done. The manuscript is intended to discuss this novel microperforation prolotherapy method with an illus trative patient history that documents the successful treatment of complete bilateral spontaneous anterior subluxation of the sternoclavicular joints (herein referred to as the “SCJs”) which occurred during the course of repetitive insult from powerlifting and various martial arts. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 47–52 © 2011 Stein et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 47 Dovepress Stein et al Understanding and mastery of anatomy is imperative for successful outcomes. The lead author of this paper has been performing prolotherapy for 16 years and orthopedic surgery for over 30 years before that. During this time, treatment of other cases of SCJ injury with surgery and then with prolotherapy had not warranted a case report or other paper documenting outcomes. Milder cases of SCJ instability responded to prolotherapy with successful relief of pain and return to full activity. A persistently painful postoperative case was rendered pain-free by prolotherapy. The degree of instability experienced by this patient was so severe that its resolution by prolotherapy warranted a write up of the case. It is felt that the dramatic result obtained was due to the novel microperforation technique used. Past medical history The patient is a 21-year-old college student who gave a history of being active in various forms of high impact athletics, including powerlifting, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, mixed martial arts, and a long history of freestyle bicycle motocross (BMX), stemming from youth. No specific episode could pinpoint the etiology for the presenting condition, but the patient had crashed many times while engaging in freestyle BMX. In addition, though not identifying any defining event while powerlifting, there was suspicion that heavy bench press exercises may have contributed to the problem affecting the patient’s SCJs. During the course of warm-ups for the various workout sessions, the patient started to experience a clunking sensation at the sternoclavicular joints bilaterally. The SCJs would visibly sublux and then spontaneously reduce without any discomfort. One day after a workout the patient came home, laid down on the floor to play with his dog, placed his right arm under his chest and, upon moving, experienced a catching sensation followed by an audible ripping sound and locking of the SCJ as forward flexion of the right arm was attempted. The pain associated with this event was severe and persisted for several weeks. From that point on, the joints became increasingly unstable and each subluxation event became excessively painful. The painful sensation was isolated to the right SCJ, while the left side continued to be hypermobile, but with out any associated discomfort. Considering the degree of reported instability and immense pain, it is probable that the right SCJ suffered a complete dislocation with concomitant injury to the articular disc. Upon seeking medical attention, the patient had such anxiety over the possibility of a painful episode that there 48 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress was refusal to put the arm through a normal range of motion; thus, the extent of instability was not fully appreciated by the first examining physician. A subsequent consultation with a second doctor revealed the true extent of instability, and it was speculated that he had torn away the anterior capsule of the SCJ. As the initial severe pain started to subside, the splinting of the area associated with the initial injury also subsided. This allowed the full extent of the instability to be recognized clinically. This was a major instability with the joint separation in excess of 2 cm on reclining and relaxing the shoulder girdle tension. X-ray studies of the SCJs failed to demonstrate any pathology. The patient was advised by two separate competent shoulder surgeons that surgical intervention for atraumatic anterior SCJ instability was not recommended and carried a large risk of complications. Unhappy over the prospect of being unable to get relief of symptoms and the problem, the patient actively researched other options for treatment. This led to articles about prolotherapy and, eventually, to a prolotherapist. Methods and materials The basic premise of joint instability can be attributed to liga ments failing to keep the bones in proper approximation with each other. Ligaments are avascular structures composed of collagen that accumulate microtears when stretched from 4% to 8% of their original length. Macroscopic tears may be observed when a ligament is stretched past 8%, with complete rupture occurring around 12%.1–3 Under these parameters, a 1-cm long ligament can stretch 1.2 mm and be completely torn. In a joint such as the SCJ, where maximum strength and complete restoration of physiological length is needed to regain the full stability, conservative therapy, without prololiferative stimulation, has little chance of regaining this full strength and stability. The avascular nature of liga ments decreases their healing potential and under the best circumstances a damaged ligament may heal to its original length, but only 50%–75% of its original tensile strength.1,2,4 Other tissues, such as muscle and bone, have an abundant blood supply that enables them to bleed when injured. This bleeding acts as a humoral message to the body which iden tifies the area of damage and initiates the wound healing cascade.1,2,4–13 The microperforation prolotherapy injection process creates an acute, controlled local inflammation and an osmotic type of bruise on the cells at the fibro-osseous junction between the ligaments and the bony attachments and within those ligamentous tissues themselves.1,2,4,5,9 This initiates Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 Dovepress the healing process. The objective is to bring activity into an indolent and unresponsive healing process that fails to restore normal tissue turgor and strength to the damaged areas.1–6,8,9,14–16 Multiple punctures of the fibro-osseous junction around the joint at the sternal margins and on the clavicular head at the attachments of the capsular ligaments were done. The capsular tissues were also perforated. At each perforation, enough proliferant solution was injected into the tissues to create the inflammatory response to induce healing. There is a clear attempt to get all of the tissues involved in the healing process. A hiatus between treatments is usually 3 weeks to allow some tissue healing to take place and then the process is reactivated until the desired healing has occurred. It can be done more frequently or less frequently as circumstances demand without losing the beneficial effects of the treatment.9 The patient’s healing ability, including their nutritional status and the extent of the damage, determines the speed of resolution of the problem. The solutions used are hypertonic osmotic proliferants (dextrose and glycerin), irritants (dextrose, phenol, guaiacol, tannic acid, and plasma quinine urea), particulates (pumice), or chemotactics (sodium morrhuate arachadonic acid from cod liver oil). The injections place the hypertonic solution at the ligament level. The body attempts to neutralize the hypertonic solution by adding more fluid to the area. This creates the localized irritation and inflammation that sum mons the reparative process to the area so that healing may begin. The other additives serve to enhance the initiation of the reparative process.1–5,9,16 The process activates the normal physiological principles of wound healing where the inflammation stimulates the migration of platelets with their platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF). Neutrophils, macrophages, and proteases become active debriding the damaged tissues. These PDGFs represent cytokines that stimulate the chemotaxis, mitosis, and the production of extracellular matrix, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation required to support healing. Other growth factors that are part of any normal tissue healing process are, theoretically, activated by this process.1–5,7,10,11,14,16 This phase lasts 3–5 days and sets the stage for the proliferative stage to occur.5,10,11 In the proliferative stage, collagen is laid down. Fibroblastic proliferation predominates and is oriented in the direction of the ligaments that are healing. Movement is encouraged, and it directs the fibroblastic proliferation that forms the new ligaments.1–5,7,10,11,14,16 This proliferative stage lasts from the end of the inflammatory stage upward to 3 months.5,10,11 Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 Microperforation prolotherapy The third stage is the remodeling stage, where the new ligament tissue increases its cross-linking and its fiber orientation to form the new ligaments that are developing to repair the damaged structures. Tissues contract to their physiological length restoring the stability and integrity to the joint treated.1–5,7,10,11,14,16 This stage can last up to 2 years.5,7,10,11 With prolotherapy, chronic indolent injuries are converted into acute injuries that go on to heal the damaged area. In treatment, platelet rich plasma (PRP) may be used. It is a concentrate of the platelets in the patient’s own blood and is harvested from a peripheral vein and concentrated to extract platelets in a reduced quantity of plasma that is injected back into the damaged tissues. This brings a high volume of platelets into the area immediately instead of waiting for the body to deliver platelets to the damaged area. This procedure stimulates a greater healing response.3,12,13 A histological study of prolotherapy-treated ligaments displayed an increased number of active fibroblasts, greater amounts of collagen, and an increase in collagen size and variation.14,17 These changes are accompanied by increased thickness, mass, and ligament-to-bone-junction strength in animal models.18,19 Results At the patient’s first visit, approximately 4 months after the painful subluxation-dislocation episode, examination revealed extreme instability in the SCJs, especially on the right side. The separation was in the vicinity of 2 cm with abduction elevation movements of the right upper extremity. In recumbency, the medial end of the clavicle moved anterior approximately 2 cm confirming clinically that this was indeed a major instability of these joints. The pectoralis muscle was tight from the patient’s unwillingness to move the arm, and it could not be stretched out without disrupting the SCJ on the right side. The same movement on the left side caused the joint to sublux. Microperforation prolotherapy is indicated for ligament laxity, degeneration, and disruption if the damage is in a confined space. The patient’s SCJ constituted a confined space, and the capsular and ligament tissues were readily identifiable as to location for injection. The joint separation made access to all parts of the joint capsule most acces sible without any extraordinary techniques. The patient was considered a candidate for this treatment. The technique described above was employed by injecting the hyperosmotic proliferant 22% dextrose and procaine approximately 9 mL into each SCJ capsular and ligament tissue. Heat and gentle exercise were recommended, and the submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 49 Dovepress Stein et al patient was told to avoid any anti-inflammatory medication during the healing process. The patient had a very mild tightness in the SCJ area and did not have any severe pain. After 5–6 weeks, he felt some reduction in the popping and could realize more freedom of movement without the anxiety associated with the subluxations. The patient was a student, whose combined travel and treatment time in clinic encompassed a full day away from school. As a matter of convenience, he had three treatment sessions with each of two different prolotherapists closer to school who used a more traditional form of prolotherapy treatment. The patient did not feel that he made an acceptable amount of progress with those six treatments. This lack of progress made the patient realize that the more aggressive treatment yielded a better outcome and he returned to the clinic 4 1/2 months later for reevaluation. The right side was still hypermobile but was not popping. The left side was popping. Both sides were still painful. Platelet-rich plasma injection using the same micro perforation technique was employed at this time. It was obtained using the Harvest® method with 60 mL of blood yielding 10 mL of PRP, which was injected into the ligament structure around each SCJ following the same technique as our original session. Progressive improvement was observed at each sub sequent visit with increasingly greater levels of stability observed over the intervening weeks. Several additional sessions of the microperforation prolotherapy treatment were administered using hypertonic 22% dextrose plus 1 mL of the chemotactic sodium morrhuate and procaine. The sixth and final microperforation prolotherapy treat ment was given 13 months after the initial injection session. The patient had much more stability and experienced no popping. When the patient was lying down, he felt that the joints separated more than normal. This was confirmed on examination. Close examination showed some tenderness at the posterior part of the SCJ on palpation of that area. As a result, another microperforation prolotherapy treatment was given, especially injecting the SCJ posterior capsular area. To easily and safely access this area, a bent needle technique was utilized that allowed controlled access to the joint capsule from the anterior direction with the needle directed anterior keeping all vital structures safely out of harm’s way. A solution of 5 mL of 22% dextrose with procaine was used in each joint. A 4-month hiatus of treatment was recommended to allow the tissues to continue to heal without further stimulation. The patient was last examined in February 2011, 20 months after he first presented in the clinic. At this visit 50 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress he had complete stability of both sternoclavicular joints with no evidence whatsoever of tendency to subluxation and no weakness of the shoulder girdle or apprehension of upper extremity movement. He was content with the treatment and was pleased that he had not suffered any surgical incisions or complications from a surgical procedure. From every point of view the shoulder and the SCJs are completely normal with no clinical evidence of a problem having existed. Discussion Treatment – the standard surgical approach Surgical treatment for atraumatic anterior dislocation/ subluxation of the SCJ remains controversial, with no published studies demonstrating efficacy for a large sample size.20–31 Numerous authors have gone on the record recommending avoidance of surgery, especially for the type of dislocation described here.23–28,32–35 Complications reported by various authors include, in no order of frequency, pneumothorax, repeat surgery for bony erosions, hardware failure and/or migration, severe postoperative pain and limited function, persistent instability, cosmetic defects, and nonunion.21,26,28 Rockwood and Odor stated: “Operative treatment for spontaneous anterior subluxation of the SCJ is rarely, if ever, indicated”.28 Echlin et al stated: “Operative repair is reserved for either posterior dislocation or nonremittent symptoms that signifi cantly affect either daily or athletic activities”.23 Treatment – the standard conservative approach A case of a swimmer with bilateral SCJ subluxation reported in the literature states that a successful resolution relied on physical therapy and alternative sports like jogging and cycling.23 The therapy was not described as curative, and the patient continued to have instability of the SCJs, necessitating the cessation of all sports requiring exaggerated overhead movements. In a case report by DiFabio et al,22 they described complete resolution of bilateral SCJ subluxation through the use of immobilization followed by 9 months of physical therapy. There was no mention of sporting activity. Treatment – microperforation prolotherapy Wound healing follows physiological principals starting with inflammation which serves to clear out the damaged tissue. As vascularity increases, growth factors, enzymes, and other Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 Dovepress cells required for this debridement are summoned to the area of damage. Cleansing takes place during the 3–5 days of inflammation and is followed by a period of laying down new collagen.1–5,7,10,11,14,16 The collagen process starts anywhere from 3 to 5 days of inflammation upwards to 3 months. Maturation of the collagen occurs over a period of time, pro gressively upwards to almost 2 years as tissues become more oriented, stronger, and contract to physiological length and strength.5,7,10,11 The end result of the healing process stimulated by prolotherapy techniques is the thickening of the ligament structures and the return of the tensile strength to normal. In 2002, Chen et al7 reported on a ligament healing response technique called microperforation. In this article, the authors demonstrated a technique for treating laxed liga ments, especially the medial collateral ligament area of the knee, with open surgery. The procedure uses a rake shaped like a paddle with 14 sharp teeth to create multiple acute rips and microperforations along the course of the medial collateral ligament of the knee at the time of doing open sur gery on an anterior cruciate ligament. The approach specified that “the spikes must be driven into the bone to achieve a better bleeding response”. Review of the approach indicated that the patient should be advised of increased bruising and ecchymosis and pain as a result of this type of surgery to stimulate the medial collateral ligament into an acute healing process. “Microperforation, despite its trauma remains less invasive than conventional surgical procedures and avoids their complications”. The positive ideas of this technique are to avoid denervation of the ligament and devascularization of the ligament tissue, preserve physiometric attachments, and avoid pressure necrosis from hardware insertion. The procedure would create an acute healing environment for laxed ligaments and future developments could foresee using this procedure for other weakened ligaments in the body. It was advised that the procedure be reserved to certain classes of injury to the medial collateral ligament, but that future investigation may find other uses for the procedure.7 In actuality, the technique takes a relatively avascular damaged structure and forces it into an acute inflammatory response. These tissues then progress through the phases of healing, which include inflammation, debridement, new collagen lay down, and maturation. This is the body’s physi ological response to damage. Microperforation prolotherapy offers the opportunity to do precisely what is described by this previous peer-reviewed article. However, we do it in a far more elegant fashion with much less necessity for bleeding and sheer tissue damage than has been created by this type of surgical procedure. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 Microperforation prolotherapy It is performed elegantly with a fine needle inserted through the skin and into the subcutaneous tissue. The needle is then directed to the ligament structures where multiple perforations accompanied by injection of the appropriate amounts and types of solutions create the tissue injury that impels the final healing. Multiple sessions without the need for open surgery and anesthesia accomplish the same goals as the open surgery described above. We accomplish regeneration and maturation of ligaments, thereby eliminating instability, and we restore nor mal function without surgical scars and without any prolonged period of confinement. It is all done in a clinic setting. Torretti and Lynch31 reviewed the current literature relat ing to SCJ injuries. The authors analyzed many types of treatments and clearly recognized the importance of the posterior sternoclavicular capsular ligament as the main anteroposterior component for stability. The authors reviewed the relative strength of the various repairs and summarized that “although there has been a small but significant advance ment in the cumulative knowledge of the sternoclavicular joint, there still remains a number of unanswered questions. Controlled comparisons of a variety of treatment methods will be needed to reliably assess clinical outcomes”.31 It is hypothesized that microperforation prolotherapy be seriously considered as a proper treatment for the ligamentous injuries of anterior sternoclavicular dislocation and other applications where significant ligamentous injury is involved in a confined space. Conclusion This manuscript describes and presents a novel form of microperforation prolotherapy used to treat bilateral atraumatic spontaneous anterior dislocation of the SCJ that was causing severe morbidity. Results of this novel microperforation pro lotherapy, applied to the capsular ligaments about the SCJ, appear to be a completely satisfactory alternative to surgery. The treatment has allowed the patient to return to full, normal function with no residual observable findings indicating the previous presence of this problem. This novel microperforation prolotherapy has been able to accomplish a complete return to full functional stability of the SCJs, without any scar or com plication, in an acceptable time frame. Based on the positive results obtained in this difficult case, further study and more extensive use of microperforation prolotherapy are indicated. It is the purpose of this writing to share observations and spark interest in further studies of this technique. Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 51 Dovepress Stein et al References 1. Linetsky FS, Manchikanti L. Regenerative injection therapy for axial pain. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2005;9(1):40–49. 2. Linetsky FS, Trescot AM, Manchikanti L. Regenerative injection therapy. In: Manchikanti L, Singh V, editors. Interventional Techniques in Chronic Non-Spinal Pain. Paducah, KY: ASIPP Publishing; 2009: 87–98. 3. Reeves DK, Fullerton BD, Topol G. Evidence-based regenerative injection therapy (prolotherapy) in sports medicine. In: Seidenberg PH, Beutler PI, editors. The Sports Medicine Resource Manual. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders (Elsevier); 2008:611–619. 4. Linetsky FS, Stanton-Hicks M, O’Neill C. Prolotherapy. In: Wallace MS, Staats PS, editors. Pain Medicine & Management, Just the Facts. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004:318–324. 5. Banks AR. A rationale for prolotherapy. J Orthopaedic Medicine. 1991;13(3):54–59. 6. Centeno CJ, Elliott J, Elkins WL, Freeman M. Fluoroscopically guided cervical prolotherapy for instability with blinded pre and post radio graphic reading. Pain Physician. 2005;8(1):67–72. 7. Chen LC, Cooley VJ, Rosenberg TD. Medial collateral ligament healing response technique: microperforation. Techniques Knee Surgery. 2002;1(1):36–42. 8. Grote W, Delucia R, Waxman R, Zgierska A, Wilson J, Rabago D. Repair of a complete anterior cruciate tear using prolotherapy: a case report. Int Musculoskelet Med. 2009;31(4):159–165. 9. Hackett GS. Ligament and Tendon Relaxation (Skeletal Disability) Treated by Prolotherapy (Fibro-Osseous Proliferation). 3rd ed. Springhill, IL: Charles C Thomas Publishers; 1958. 10. Hotter A. The physiology and clinical implications of wound healing. Plast Surg Nurs. 1984;4(1):4–15. 11. Hunt TK. Basic principles of wound healing. J Trauma. 1990;30(12): S122–S128. 12. Sampson S, Gerhardt M, Mandelbaum B. Platelet rich plasma injection grafts for musculoskeletal injuries: a review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008;1(3–4):165–174. 13. Tate KS, Crane DM. Platelet rich plasma in musculoskeletal medicine. J Prolotherapy. 2010;2(2):371–376. 14. Klein RG, Dorman TD, Johnson CE. Proliferant injections for low back pain: histologic changes of injected ligaments and objective measure ments of lumbar spine mobility before and after treatment. J Neurol Orthop Med Surg. 1989;10(2):123–126. 15. Ongley MJ, Dorman TA, Eek BC, et al. Ligament instability of knees: a new approach to treatment. Man Med. 1988;3:152–154. 16. Reeves DK, Hassanein K. Long term effects of dextrose prolotherapy for anterior cruciate ligament laxity: a prospective and consecutive patient study. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003;9(3):58–62. 17. Dorman TA, Ravin TH. Diagnosis and Injection Techniques in Orthopedic Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1991. 18. Aneja A, Karas SG, Weinhold PS, et al. Suture plication, thermal shrinkage, and sclerosing agents: effects on rat patellar tendon length and biomechanical strength. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33(11):1729–1734. 19. Liu YK, Tipton CM, Matthes RD, et al. An in situ study of the influence of a sclerosing solution in rabbit medial collateral ligaments and its junction strength. Connect Tissue Res. 1983;11(2–3):95–102. 20. Abiddin Z, Sinopidis C, Grocock CJ, Yin Q, Frostick SP. Suture anchors for treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(3):315–318. 21. Booth CM, Roper BA. Chronic dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint: an operative repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(140):17–20. 22. Di Fabio S, Fusi P, Bonaspetti G, Pazzaglia UE. Bilateral spontaneous atraumatic anterior subluxation of the sternoclavicular joint. J Orthop Traumatol. 2004;5(2):110–112. 23. Echlin PS, Michaelson JE. Adolescent butterfly swimmer with bilateral subluxing sternoclavicular joints. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(4):e12. 24. Gleason BA. Bilateral, spontaneous, anterior subluxation of the sternoclavicular joint: a case report and literature review. Mil Med. 2006;171(8):790–792. 25. Hiramuro-Shoji F, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA. Atraumatic conditions of the sternoclavicular joint. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(1):79–88. 26. Reilly P, Bruguera JA, Copeland SA. Erosion and nonunion of the first rib after sternoclavicular reconstruction with Dacron. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(1):76–78. 27. Rockwood CA Jr, Groh GI, Wirth MA, Grassi FA. Resection arthro plasty of the sternoclavicular joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(3): 387–393. 28. Rockwood CA Jr, Odor JM. Spontaneous atraumatic anterior sub luxation of the sternoclavicular joint. J Bone Surg Am. 1989;71(9): 1280–1288. 29. Rudzki JR, Matava MJ, Paletta GA. Complications of treatment of acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(2):387–405. 30. Sadr B, Swann M. Spontaneous dislocation of the sterno-clavicular joint. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979;50(3):269–274. 31. Torretti J, Lynch SA. Sternoclavicular joint injuries. Curr Opin Orthop. 2004;15(4):242–247. 32. Bahk MS, Kuhn JE, Galatz LM, Connor PM, Williams GR. Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular injuries and clavicular, glenoid, and scapular fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:209–226. 33. Bicos J, Nicholson GP. Treatment and results of sternoclavicular joint injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(2):359–370. 34. Garretson RB, Williams GR. Clinical evaluation of injuries to the acro mioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(2): 239–254. 35. Lemos MJ, Tolo ET. Complications of the treatment of the acromio clavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries, including instability. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22(2):371–385. Dovepress Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Publish your work in this journal Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, reviews and commentaries on all areas of sports medicine. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/open-access-journal-of-sports-medicine-journal 52 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine 2011:2 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index Open Access Full Text Article O r i g i nal R e s e a r c h APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 4 August 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc, Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA 1 Background: The monoamines serotonin and dopamine are known to exist in two separate states: the endogenous state and the competitive inhibition state. The presence of the competitive inhibition state has been known to science for many years, but from a functional standpoint it has been noted in the literature as being “meaningless.” Methods: A large database of monoamine transporter response to amino acid precursor administration variations with clinical outcomes was accumulated. In the process, a new organic cation transporter (OCT) model has been published, and OCT functional status determination along with amino acid precursor manipulation methods have been invented and refined. Results: Methodology was developed whereby manipulation of the OCT, in the competitive inhibition state, is carried out in a predictable manner. This, in turn, has disproved the long-held assertion that the monoamine competitive inhibition state is functionally meaningless. Conclusion: The most significant aspect of this paper is the documentation of newly recognized relationships between serotonin and dopamine. When transport of serotonin and dopamine are both in the competitive inhibition state, manipulation of the concentrations of one will lead to predictable changes in concentrations of the other. From a functional standpoint, processes regulated and controlled by changes to only serotonin can now be controlled by changes to dopamine, and vice versa, in a predictable manner. Keywords: catecholamine, monoamine, competitive inhibition state Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S22667 Serotonin and the catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) belong to a group of chemicals herein known as “monoamines.” The monoamines function independently, controlling and/or regulating bodily functions. These functions include, but are not limited to, neurotransmitter, neurohormone, regulatory, autocrine, paracrine, and autonomic control.1–3 This paper documents novel observations of the competitive inhibition state, which was previously thought to be functionally meaningless. The physiologic observations of this state are deemed the “apical regulatory super system” (APRESS), which occurs with simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors in significant amounts. “Super system” is defined as the fusion of two independent systems into one. Changes to one or more components of either system affect changes to all components in a predictable manner. In the balanced competitive inhibition state,3–8 serotonin and catecholamines undergo super system fusion. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 457–463 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 457 Dovepress Hinz et al Monoamines exist in one of three states: endogenous, unbalanced competitive inhibition, and balanced competitive inhibition.3–8 The “endogenous state” is achieved by dietary intake alone when no supplemental monoamine amino acid precursors are being administered.3–8 The competitive inhibition state cannot be achieved through dietary modification; it is established when significant amounts of monoamine precursors are simultaneously administered. 3–8 Competitive inhibition state literature notes “… functional relevance of the competitive inhibitory effect … is most probably meaningless.”9 Functional relevance is achieved with the ability to assay and regulate transport of the monoamines in a predictable manner with organic cation transporter (OCT) functional status determination. Except by random chance, it is impossible to achieve the balanced competitive inhibition state without OCT functional determination.3–8 Differentiating “unbalanced” and “balanced” competitive inhibition is discussed later in this paper. The foundation of APRESS is that in the competitive inhibition state, transport changes to one monoamine lead to predictable changes in all monoamines. These changes are not intuitive. Endogenous state observations are not applicable to APRESS (see Tables 1–4). This writing introduces APRESS as a novel physiologic state adhering to unique transporter properties that are counterintuitive to rules of the endogenous state. This paper discusses only the following limited aspects of monoamine interaction in APRESS. • Functions impacted and/or controlled in the endogenous state only by changes in serotonin concentrations may also be impacted or controlled by changes in dopamine concentrations in APRESS. • Functions impacted and/or controlled in the endogenous state only by changes in dopamine concentrations may also be impacted or controlled by changes in serotonin concentrations in APRESS. Methods and materials Since 2009, the authors of this paper have published eleven peer-reviewed original research papers relating to the simultaneous manipulation of the serotonin and catecholamine systems with amino acid precursors under guidance of OCT assay interpretation.3–8,10–14 APRESS embodies the common thread of these writings: serotonin and catecholamine fusion into one system. Previous publications outlined much of the novel scientific foundation of APRESS, but its impact, novel abilities and other considerations have not been fully explored and documented. Following are research components used to define the novel physiologic attributes of APRESS in the body. These components, observations, and networking applications include, but are not limited to: • Over 1000 monoamine databases relating to the endogenous and competitive inhibition states.15 • A master database documenting over 2 million patient-days of monoamine amino acid transporter manipulation.15 • Review and interpretation of over 100,000 urinary monoamine assays in the endogenous or competitive inhibition state.15 • Defining the three-phase monoamine transporter response of serotonin and dopamine observed during simultaneous administration of their precursors.3–8,10–14 • A network of over 1000 physicians manipulating nutrients in APRESS.15 Serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulous are metabolized by the kidneys; significant amounts do not make it into the final urine. Newly synthesized renal serotonin and dopamine meet one of two fates, as illustrated in Figure 1. The three-phase response of urinary monoamines is used to determine the functional status of the basolateral OCT2 of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells.3–8,10–14 Urinary levels are dependent upon the interaction of the basolateral OCT2 and the apical OCTN2 in transporting newly synthesized monoamines out of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells (see Figure 1).3–8,11,12,16 Proper OCT interpretation requires obtaining two or more urinary monoamine assays while taking significant amounts of varied precursor dosing values consistently for 5 days minimum to achieve equilibrium. Serial assays are then compared to determine the impact of precursor dosing value changes.3–8,10–14 The following urinary monoamine values were reported in µg of monoamine per g of creatinine to compensate for specific gravity fluctuations. A urinary serotonin or dopamine Table 1 Impact of increasing amino acid precursor dosing values of System A in phase 3 System A System B Amino acid intake Synthesis Metabolism Transport Post transporter Urinary Increased Same Increased Decreased Increased Increased Increased Decreased Increased Decreased Increased Increased Note: The response to increasing one monoamine precursor of serotonin or dopamine in competitive inhibition. 458 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress APRESS Table 2 Impact of decreasing amino acid precursor dosing values of System A in phase 3 System A System B Amino acid intake Synthesis Metabolism Transport Post transporter Urinary Decreased Same Decreased Increased Decreased Decreased Decreased Increased Decreased Increased Decreased Decreased Note: The response to decreasing one monoamine precursor of serotonin or dopamine in competitive inhibition. value less than 80 or 475, respectively, is defined as a phase 2 response. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value greater than 80 or 475, respectively, is interpreted as being in phase 1 or phase 3. If a direct relationship is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is a phase 3 response. An inverse correlation is a phase 1 response. The phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary serotonin is 80–240. The phase 3 therapeutic range for urinary dopamine is 475–1100.3–8,10–14 Urine samples were collected 6 hours prior to bedtime after a minimum of 1 week on a specific dosing value, with no missed doses of amino acid precursors. The most frequent collection time point was 4 PM. Samples were stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve the monoamines and shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN) which is operated under the direction of one of the authors (Thomas Uncini, MD). Urinary monoamines were assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527, both from Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc, Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. OCT assay interpretation was performed by one of the authors (Marty Hinz).3–8,10–14 Results Three primary functions affect intracellular and extracellular serotonin and catecholamine levels: synthesis, metabolism, and transport.3–5,7,8,10–12 These functions occur in either the endogenous or competitive inhibition state.3–8 The relationship between serotonin and dopamine regarding synthesis, metabolism, and transport in the endogenous state appears to be random. Matched pairs t-test analysis of endogenous urinary monoamines reveals significant day-to-day changes (P , 0.05) in a subject. In the competitive Table 3 Urinary monoamine concentrations per phase Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Serotonin Dopamine .80 ,80 .80 .475 ,475 .475 Phase 3 therapeutic ranges Serotonin Dopamine 80–240 475–1100 Note: Units are in μg of monoamine per g creatinine. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 inhibition state, predictable changes occur to all monoamine components with changes to individual precursor dosing values of either system.6,10,12 Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD) catalyzes serotonin and dopamine synthesis. Monoamine oxidase (MAO) catalyzes metabolism of serotonin and dopamine. OCT transports monoamines and their precursors in and out of proximal convoluted renal tubule cells. When significant amounts of balanced serotonin and dopamine precursors are administered simultaneously under guidance of OCT assay optimization, the balanced competitive inhibition of APRESS is established.6,10,12 Immediate precursors of serotonin and dopamine presenting at the AAAD need to be in balance. If not, precursors of one system will dominate AAAD, compromising nondominant monoamine synthesis.6,10,11 Serotonin and dopamine need to be in balance or the dominant monoamine increases MAO activity and metabolism of the nondominant system.6,10,12 Monoamine renal physiology is complex. Prior to the authors writing this paper, the sequence of events from the monoamines and their precursors being filtered at the glomerulous to them appearing in the system or final urine had not been documented. Until this research, direct clinical measurement and evaluation of monoamine OCT functional status did not exist, rendering the competitive inhibition state functionally meaningless.9 Serotonin, dopamine, and their precursors filtered at the glomerulous are taken up from the proximal tubules by OCT2 transporters into the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells where the monoamines are metabolized. Significant amounts do not make it to the final urine under normal conditions.3–8,11,12 Precursors are then synthesized into new monoamines, which are preferentially transported by the basolateral OCT2 to the system or excreted via the apical OCTN2 as urinary waste. Interpretation of urinary monoamine levels in the competitive inhibition state is an interpretation of the functional status of the basolateral OCT2.3–8,11,12 Previous writings by the authors of this paper refined the basolateral OCT2 transporter model.3 The OCT of the liver, kidneys, bowels, and brain are “identical and submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 459 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 4 Effect of increasing only L-dopa dosing values in the competitive inhibition state Day # Urinary serotonin Urinary dopamine Serotonin phase Dopamine phase 5-HTP mg/day dosing value L-dopa mg/day dosing value 0 (test 1) 8 (test 2) 84 473 289 786 3 3 2 3 900 900 120 360 Notes: Serotonin phase 3/3; Dopamine phase 2/3; units are in μg of monoamine per g creatinine. Abbreviation: HTP, hydroxytryptophan. homologous.” Precursors cross the blood–brain barrier then come to equilibrium throughout the body. 16 Under the dual gate lumen transporter model, there are separate serotonin and dopamine gates at the lumen entrance. These gates independently regulate lumen access by the respective monoamine. While either gate can be partially closed, blocking access, both gates are never simultaneously partially closed.3 Serotonin and dopamine basolateral OCT2 transport exists in three transport phases. In phase 1 the entrance gate is partially closed, restricting access to the nonsaturated lumen. If the gate at the lumen is partially closed (phase 1), Serotonin newly synthesized by the kindey it will open as the total amount of serotonin and dopamine presenting at the transporter increases. In phase 2 the gate of the nonsaturated lumen is open. In phase 3 the entrance gate of the saturated lumen is open.3–8,10–14 Now the question becomes: how can functions controlled only by serotonin or dopamine in the endogenous state be controlled in a predictable manner by changes to either in the competitive inhibition state? Once the transporter is saturated with both serotonin and dopamine (phase 3), an increase in one monoamine being transported will cause the amount of the other monoamine being transported to decrease. Tables 1 and 2 document the Basolateral transporters (OCT2) Dopamine newly synthesized by the kidney Apical transporters (OCTN2) To renal vein The newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine are preferentially transported out of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells by the basolateral transporters (OCT2) The serotonin and dopamine not transported by the basolateral transporter are transported as waste to the final urine via the apical transporters (OCTN2) To final urine Figure 1 The interaction of OCT2 and OCTN2. Newly synthesized serotonin and dopamine are transported preferentially by the basolateral OCT2. Functional status of the OCT2 is determined by assaying the urinary monoamines not transported by the OCT2, which are transported by the OCTN2 to the final urine as waste.3–8,11 Abbreviation: OCT, organic cation transporter. 460 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress impact of placing both systems into competitive inhibition as verified by OCT assay determination.3–8,10–14 In Tables 1 and 2, “System A” is either L-dopa or 5-hydroxytryptophan (immediate dopamine and serotonin precursors respectively), with “System B” the opposite precursor. With both systems in phase 3, a single precursor increase leads to a decrease in the post-transporter levels of the other system through competitive inhibition, just as a decrease of one amino acid precursor leads to an increase in post-transporter levels of the other system. In the competitive inhibition state, these levels can be changed by making changes to amino acid precursor dosing values of either system. Interpretation of urinary levels of serotonin and dopamine, with amino acid dosing changes in the competitive inhibition state, are complex. In Table 1, the precursor increase causes decreased synthesis of the nondominant monoamine (system B) through AAAD competitive inhibition. Increased activity of the MAO enzyme system is induced, leading to increased metabolism of the nondominant monoamine. The key to optimal balanced control is to place the serotonin and dopamine in the therapeutic phase 3 ranges of Table 3. This cannot be done empirically. The dosing levels of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) need to reach the phase 2/phase 3 inflection point between 37.5 and 2400 mg per day.15 The L-dopa dosing level to reach this inflection point is between 30 and 2100 mg per day. Dosing values of serotonin precursors are independent from dopamine precursors, meaning any combination of precursors in a large spectrum is possible. OCT assay to determine levels of serotonin and dopamine not transported by the basolateral OCT2 is required.3–8,10–14 In test 1 of Table 4, serotonin is phase 3 and dopamine transport is phase 2. Between tests, L-dopa was increased to 360 mg per day, causing an increase in dopamine transported by the OCT2 and in the urine. Less serotonin was then transported by the OCT2 as dopamine transport increased, excluding serotonin from the OCT2 transporter through competitive inhibition, and more serotonin appeared in the final urine as waste. In the first assay, serotonin was 84 µg of serotonin per g creatinine and in phase 3. An increase in L-dopa leads to a decrease in the serotonin phase 2/phase 3 inflection point (inverse relationship). The same is true regarding 5-HTP increases and the dopamine phase 2/phase 3 inflection point. In test 2, APRESS effect is not optimal. The urinary serotonin is too high, causing excessive exclusion of dopamine transport even though the dopamine is in the therapeutic range. Optimal serotonin and dopamine Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 APRESS transport is seen only with both serotonin and dopamine in their phase 3 therapeutic ranges. Even though on test 2 the urinary dopamine is in the phase 3 therapeutic range, this observation is meaningless until both serotonin and dopamine are simultaneously in therapeutic ranges. If both systems are not in therapeutic phase 3 ranges defined in Table 3, further optimization is needed to maximize transporter balance. With the lowering of daily 5-HTP dosing values due to OCT2 transporter imbalance, the urinary dopamine levels at the OCTN2 transporter entrance will drop secondary to decreased serotonin transport, facilitating increased dopamine transport. This causes less serotonin and dopamine to show up in the final urine as waste. The general direction of urinary serotonin levels in transport and final urinary levels can be predicted in the competitive inhibition state; the exact amount of movement secondary to amino acid precursor changes, however, is individualized.3–8,10–14 Full interpretation of large-scale results may be quite confusing at times for the uninitiated. Extraordinarily complex relationships not covered in this writing exist based on determination of OCT2 transporter status. These complexities are beyond the scope of this paper.3–8,10–14 The unbalanced competitive inhibition state, a pathologic state The hallmark of the unbalanced competitive inhibition state is “pathological depletion of monoamine components.” When unbalanced amino acid precursors are administered, one system dominates and the other is nondominant. The dominant system overwhelms and depletes the nondominant system. Most significant depletions occur in weeks or months although some may take years.4,5,8,10,11 • L-tryptophan or 5-HTP depletes dopamine when domi nant.4,5,8,10,11 • L-tyrosine or L-dopa depletes serotonin when domi nant.4,5,8,10,11 L-dopa and 5-HTP are the immediate dopamine and serotonin precursors, respectively. Both are synthesized into the monoamine without biochemical feedback regulation.7 The following clinical situation illustrates unbalanced depletion of a nondominant system. In Parkinson’s disease, serotonin and dopamine are depleted by the disease. L-dopa treatment alone leads to serotonin depletion by inhibiting serotonin AAAD synthesis. Administering only L-dopa increases the activity of the MAO system, depleting the nondominant serotonin when balanced levels of 5-HTP are not being administered. Side effects associated with administration of only L-dopa, which are submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 461 Dovepress Hinz et al related to serotonin imbalance, include but are not limited to tachyphylaxis due to serotonin depletion, problems of improperly balanced monoamines, problems caused by dopamine fluctuations, and problems resulting from sulfur amino acid depletion.7 Problems associated with dominant levels of 5-HTP are a mirror image of the L-dopa problems. The common practice of administering only 5-HTP without properly balanced dopamine precursors depletes dopamine.7 • Refractory depression can be successfully treated without drug side effects. • In Crohn’s disease, OCT genetic transporter defects that cause Crohn’s symptoms and interstitial colonic serotonin to be markedly elevated can be treated.4 • Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder preliminary treatment studies (N = 85) published in 2011 reveal efficacy results greater than atomoxetine or methylphenidate.5 Discussion Serotonin and dopamine may exist in three basic states: the endogenous state, the unbalanced competitive inhibition state, and the balanced competitive inhibition state. Physiologic observations in the endogenous state have no bearing or relationship with the competitive inhibition state. The balanced competitive inhibition state is the foundation for APRESS. APRESS is a registry of the activities impacted by manipulating the balanced competitive inhibition state. The ability to affect and regulate bilateral serotonin or dopamine concentration changes with a single monoamine adjustment in a predictable manner is the foundation of APRESS. This leads to the ability to define interactions and gain control in a physiologic state that until now was thought to be functionally meaningless. APRESS is indeed based on a unique physiologic state that is not meaningless. It is a new frontier that cannot be achieved through dietary manipulation alone or without OCT functional status determination, a procedure that can be performed in medical clinics. APRESS is not a state that can be optimally achieved by empirical administration of amino acid precursors. Once in this clinical competitive inhibition state, the scientific observations of the endogenous state are no longer valid. APRESS is a new physiological world in and of itself. It is in need of research to define its far-reaching parameters and implications. It is the goal of this writing to stimulate interest and discussion relating to this novel state known as APRESS. Functions dependent on only serotonin or dopamine concentrations in the endogenous state can be impacted in a predictable manner by changes in levels of either in the balanced competitive inhibition state which is the foundation of APRESS.4,5,8,10,11 APRESS physiology is not intuitive. An intimate knowledge of monoamine physiology in the endogenous state may even be a distraction to mastering the complex state of APRESS. Observations and rules formulated for the endogenous and unbalanced competitive inhibition states are typically not valid in guiding amino acid precursor adjustments.3–8,10–14 The physiological and clinical management observations entered into the APRESS catalog have just started. It contains the following: • Functions controlled by dopamine in the endogenous state can be controlled with changes to serotonin and vice versa. • The balanced approach does not deplete monoamines.3–8,10–14 • Administration of targeted and balanced amino acid precursors leads to optimal results in disease and dysfunction management.3–8,10–14 • The approach directly addresses and treats the cause of problems, unlike the symptom management approach with prescription drugs.3–8,10–14 • Properly balanced serotonin and dopamine does away with side effect dosing value barriers providing the opportunity to reach levels of needed amino acid intake not possible in the unbalanced state.3–8,10–14 • Parkinson’s disease patients can be treated with L-dopa levels needed to control symptoms without reaching a side-effect induced dosing barrier.7 • Management of the extensive list of side effects associated with L-dopa and carbidopa in treatment of Parkinson disease.7 • Bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole can be differentiated from major affective disorder then treated effectively.11 462 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Conclusion Disclosure MH owns NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc; AS reports no disclosures; TU reports a directorship of DBS Laboratories. References 1. Pazos-Moura C, Ortiga-Carvalho T, Gaspar de Moura E. The autocrine/ paracrine regulation of thyrotropin secretion. Thyroid. 2004;13:2. 2. O’Hara J, Ho W, Linden D, et al. Enteroendocrine cells and 5-HT availability are altered in mucosa of guinea pigs with TNBS ileitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2004;287:G998–G1007. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 Dovepress 4. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Neff R, et al. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access J Urol. 2011;3:19–24. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4;165–174. 8. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 465–481. 9. Soares-da-Silva P, Pinto-do-O PC. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation. Br J Pharmacol. 1996; 117:1187–1192. 10. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis. Open Access J Urol. 2010;2: 177–183. APRESS 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. “Non-validity and clinical relevance of neurotransmitter testing”: a review of the paper. Funct Neurol Rehabil Ergon. 2011. In press. 13. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model.” Int J Nephrol Renovascular Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 15. NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. Medical research, medical education databases and records. 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA. 16. Koepsell H. Organic cation transporters in the intestine, kidney, liver, and brain. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:243–266. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peerreviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011:7 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 463 Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index O r i g i n al R e s e a r c h Open Access Full Text Article Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 19 October 2011 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics Inc, Cape Coral, FL; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL; 3DBS Labs Inc, Duluth, MN, USA 1 Background: Disagreement exists regarding the etiology of cessation of the observed clinical results with administration of reuptake inhibitors. Traditionally, when drug effects wane, it is known as tachyphylaxis. With reuptake inhibitors, the placebo effect is significantly greater than the drug effect in the treatment of depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, leading some to assert that waning of drug effects is placebo relapse, not tachyphylaxis. Methods: Two groups were retrospectively evaluated. Group 1 was composed of subjects with depression and Group 2 was composed of bariatric subjects treated with reuptake inhibitors for appetite suppression. Results: In Group 1, 200 subjects with depression were treated with citalopram 20 mg per day. A total of 46.5% (n = 93) achieved relief of symptoms (Hamilton-D rating score # 7), 37 (39.8%) of whom experienced recurrence of depression symptoms, at which point an amino acid precursor formula was started. Within 1–5 days, 97.3% (n = 36) experienced relief of depression symptoms. In Group 2, 220 subjects were treated with phentermine 30 mg in the morning and citalopram 20 mg at 4 pm. In this group, 90.0% (n = 198) achieved adequate appetite suppression. The appetite suppression ceased in all 198 subjects within 4–48 days. Administration of an amino acid precursor formula restored appetite suppression in 98.5% (n = 195) of subjects within 1–5 days. Conclusion: Reuptake inhibitors do not increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the central nervous system. Their mechanism of action facilitates redistribution of monoamines from one place to another. In the process, conditions are induced that facilitate depletion of monoamines. The “reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory” of this paper offers a novel and unified explanation for the waning of response seen after a reuptake inhibitor is started, independent of a drug or placebo etiology. Keywords: reuptake inhibitor, depletion, tachyphylaxis, relapse, serotonin, dopamine Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S24798 Tricyclic antidepressants, nonspecific reuptake inhibitors, became available in 1956.1 They dominated depression treatment until the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), fluoxetine, became available in 1988.1 The sympathomimetic anorectics, including phentermine, diethylproprion, and phendimetrazine, induce weight loss through appetite suppression. Their mechanism of action is thought to include norepinephrine reuptake inhibition.2 As with the rest of the reuptake inhibitors, the mechanism of action of amphetamines is unknown. However, it is thought to be due to dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, which induces appetite suppression. Amphetamines are also used in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).3 These classes of Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 69–77 © 2011 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 69 Dovepress Hinz et al reuptake inhibitors are also approved for other applications. Fluvoxamine, an SSRI, is approved only for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and social anxiety syndrome.4 Bupropion hydrochloride, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is indicated for smoking discontinuation.5 Reuptake inhibitors share the property of tolerance, that is waning of the drug’s effects. In other classes of drugs this effect is known as tachyphylaxis. Tachyphylaxis is formally defined as a “diminished response to later increments in a sequence of applications of a physiologically active substance”6 (ie, the drug stops working and its clinical effects are no longer observed). The concept of reuptake inhibitor tachyphylaxis is controversial. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies reveal that in depression and ADHD treatment, the placebo response is greater than the drug effect in relief of symptoms.7,8 This leads to the argument that discontinuation of a drug’s clinical effects predominantly represents a placebo relapse rather than drug tachyphylaxis.9,10 This paper presents the novel reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory, which explains why symptoms that are controlled at the start of treatment return, irrespective of the cause of initial relief (placebo relapse or drug tachyphylaxis). Under this novel theory, a relative nutritional deficiency occurs, a situation that can only be managed with administration of proper levels of nutrients. The following scientific facts exist. The monoamines – serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine – do not cross the blood–brain barrier. There are a finite number of monoamine neurotransmitter molecules in the central nervous system (CNS). Reuptake inhibitor drugs do not increase the total number of these centrally acting monoamine molecules in the CNS. The only way to increase the total number of monoamine molecules in this finite CNS universe is through a nutritional approach with administration of properly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors. These precursors cross the blood–brain barrier and are synthesized in the CNS into new monoamine molecules.8,9,11–16 Methods and materials Serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine are herein referred to as “monoamines”. A comprehensive search of the literature was performed, specifically focusing on depletion of monoamines by reuptake inhibitors, reuptake inhibitor tachyphylaxis, and placebo relapse of depression and ADHD symptoms. Two pilot study groups were identified. Group 1 was composed of 200 subjects taking the SSRI citalopram for depression, which was screened initially with the Diagnostic 70 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria17, then tracked with the Hamilton-D rating scale for depression. The number of Group 1 subjects who initially achieved relief of depression symptoms (Hamilton-D ≤ 7) was n = 93. Subjects who did not initially achieve relief of depression symptoms on 20 mg of citalopram each morning (Hamilton-D . 7) were excluded from the study. The next criterion for inclusion was the return of depression symptoms (n = 37) while taking the prescribed reuptake inhibitor drug. Group 2 was composed of 220 patients taking a combination of citalopram and phentermine for appetite suppression during bariatric treatment (see Table 2). Since tools do not exist for evaluating drug-induced appetite suppression, the following novel questions were used; a positive answer to any question indicated inadequate appetite suppression. “Since your last office visit have you: been inappropriately snacking on food, been inappropriately nibbling on food, eaten more than your calorie prescription, or needed to use willpower to stay away from food in order to keep on your diet?” The number of Group 2 subjects who achieved initial control of appetite was n = 198. Subjects who did not initially achieve adequate appetite control were excluded from the study. The next criterion for inclusion was the loss of appetite suppression (n = 198) while taking the prescribed reuptake inhibitor drugs. Subjects were instructed to immediately report the return of depression symptoms or loss of appetite control. Subjects were then continued on the drug(s) and started on monoamine amino acid precursors and cofactors in divided doses at the following daily dosing values: L-cysteine 4500 mg, L-tyrosine 3000 mg, vitamin C 1000 mg, L-lysine 500 mg, 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) 300 mg, calcium citrate 220 mg, vitamin B6 75 mg, folate 400 µg, and selenium 400 µg. A full discussion of the scientific basis for each of these amino acid and cofactor nutrients is covered in the authors’ previous writings.8,9,11–16,20–22 A brief overview is as follows. L-tyrosine and 5-HTP are dopamine and serotonin precursors, respectively. Vitamin C, vitamin B6, and calcium citrate are cofactors required in the synthesis of serotonin and/or dopamine. L-cysteine is administered to compensate for L-tyrosine-induced depletion of sulfur amino acids. Folate is required for optimal sulfur amino acid synthesis. Selenium is given in response to cysteine’s ability to concentrate methylmercury in the CNS. L-lysine prevents loose hair follicles during bariatric treatment. Results Group 1: depression A group of 200 patients who were positively diagnosed with depression on DSM-IV depression criteria screening and had Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Dovepress Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors a Hamilton-D depression score . 7 (see row 1, Table 1) were identified. All were started on citalopram 20 mg per day in the morning. Two weeks after the initiation of treatment with citalopram 20 mg, 93 subjects were diagnosed with remission of depression (Hamilton-D # 7; row 2, Table 1). The remission group continued citalopram 20 mg each morning. All were instructed to immediately report if depression returned. They were then followed in clinic every 2–4 weeks. In the 18 months after symptom control had been achieved, 37 subjects experienced return of depression (Hamilton-D . 7; row 3, Table 1). They were re-evaluated using the Hamilton-D depression scale within 14 days of return of symptoms then started on the amino acid formula discussed in the Materials and methods section. On this amino acid formula, 36 of the 37 subjects reported relief of symptoms, with a mean time of 1.9 days and a range of 1 to 5 days (see Tables 3 and 4). Follow-up 6 months later revealed no return of depression symptoms in those subjects taking the amino acid formula. Group 2: appetite suppression Group 2, comprising 220 subjects, was started on 15 mg of phentermine in the morning with 20 mg of citalopram at 4 pm for control of appetite in a bariatric medicine program. One week later, independent of the appetite control in place, all were increased to 30 mg of phentermine in the morning with 20 mg of citalopram at 4 pm. One week later, 198 subjects were found to have adequate appetite suppression and were then followed with weekly visits to monitor appetite suppression. Novel questioning (as covered in the Methods and materials section) revealed inadequate appetite control in all subjects within 4–48 days, at which point the drugs were continued and the amino acid formula outlined in the Methods and materials section was started. Within 1–5 days, 195 of the 198 subjects (98.5%) experienced return of adequate appetite suppression. A consistent phenomenon occurred with Group 2 participants. When the amino acid precursor formula was added, each participant in Group 2 was able to retrospectively identify the exact day that appetite suppression was restored. This observation is consistent with a novel and sharply demarcated monoamine threshold. When monoamine levels were above the threshold, appetite suppression was observed. When monoamine levels were below the threshold, appetite suppression effects were not observed. Discussion The following definitions are put forth. Two basic types of nutritional deficiencies may occur: a “deficiency of nutrient Table 1 Hamilton-D rating scale scores for Group 1 (depression, n = 37) n Mean Hamilton score Hamilton score ranges Standard deviation of Hamilton Score Pretreatment score (.7) 200 10 8–21 3.39 Scores two weeks after starting drug (#7) 93 5 1–7 1.76 Score when effects no longer observed 37 12 7–23 3.61 Score one week after starting amino acids 36 4 0–7 1.99 Demographics Female Demographics Male n (%) Age range (years) Mean age (years) SD (years) n (%) Age range (years) Mean age (years) SD (years) n = 126 (63.0%) 18.1–74.2 51.9 10.5 n = 60 (64.5%) 22.3–74.2 52.8 10.2 n = 24 (64.9%) 23.4–68.2 50.7 9.1 n = 23 (63.9%) 23.4–68.2 50.6 9.1 n = 34 (37.0%) 25.4–81.6 54.1 11.5 n = 33 (35.5%) 25.4–74.5 53.2 11.1 n = 13 (35.1%) 25.4–67.4 51.1 9.8 n = 13 (36.1%) 25.4–67.4 51.1 9.8 Notes: Row 1: Hamilton-D score prior to starting citalopram 20 mg in the morning. Row 2: Hamilton-D score after relief of depression achieved on citalopram 20 mg per day. Row 3: Hamilton-D score when initial relief of symptoms after starting citalopram was no longer observed. Row 4: Hamilton-D score one week after the amino acid and cofactor formulation was started in combination with citalopram 20 mg. Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 71 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 2 Group 2 demographics of bariatric group by gender at start of treatment and at evaluation of quality of appetite suppression 220 entering study 198 with adequate appetite suppression studied Demographics Female Demographics Male n (%) Mean age (years) Age range (years) Age SD (years) n (%) Mean age (years) Age range (years) Age SD (years) 173 (78.6%) 46.1 18.1–69.6 10.1 157 (79.3%) 46.1 18.8–68.2 9.7 47 (21.4%) 49.2 19.3–63.5 9.4 63 (20.7%) 49.2 19.3–63.5 9.3 Table 4 Group 1 subjects achieved relief of depression symptoms after starting citalopram and then experienced a return of symptoms. The amino acid precursor formula was then administered in combination with citalopram, and the listed study parameters were observed. Group 2 subjects achieved appetite suppression after starting citalopram and phentermine in combination, then experienced a return of appetite. The amino acid precursor formula was then administered in combination with citalopram and phentermine and the listed parameters were observed n Group 1 37 Group 2 198 Effects restored (n, [%]) Mean time to restore effects (days) Range (days) Standard deviation 36 (97.3%) 1.6 days 1–3 0.26 days 195 (98.5%) 1.9 days 1–5 0.39 days Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation. intake” and a “relative nutritional deficiency.” Relative nutritional deficiencies arise from changes in system status or from system needs that give rise to increased nutrient dosing needs that are beyond the limits of dietary modification. The theoretical model of monoamine depletion The central theory of this paper rests on the following foundation: reuptake inhibitors facilitate conditions that deplete monoamines, reuptake inhibitors will not function if monoamine depletion is significant enough, and when significant monoamine depletion occurs, the placebo effect and/or drug effect may no longer be observed. The monoamines exist in one of two states. (1) The endogenous state is the normal day-to-day state found when no amino acid precursors are administered. In this state, monoamine levels are at or below the normal values of the reference range. (2) The competitive inhibition state is observed when significant amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are simultaneously administered. In this state, monoamine levels are higher than are normally found in the system.8,11,13–16 Table 3 Group 1 achieved relief of depression symptoms after starting citalopram then experienced return of symptoms leading to the listed observation. Group 2 achieved appetite suppression then experienced a lapse in the control of hunger leading to the listed observations n Group 1 37 Group 2 198 Mean (days to discontinuation of effects after starting the drug[s]) Range (days to discontinuation of effects after starting the drug) Standard deviation 164 22 34–490 4–48 107.5 9.1 72 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress The mechanism of action for reuptake inhibitors is only theoretical; objective measurements do not exist. A debate exists over drug tachyphylaxis versus placebo relapse when there is a return of symptoms of depression or ADHD after being controlled at the start of the drug. Relapse supporters claim their argument makes room for recurrence of symptoms in the presence of a large placebo effect combined with a small drug effect.9,10 It is postulated that the following novel reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory is a viable explanation, especially in light of the amino acid observations summarized in Tables 1, 3, and 4 plus the differentiation of synaptic and postsynaptic electrical dysfunction. The reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory states that reuptake inhibitors deplete the monoamines serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine in all subjects not ingesting adequate amounts of balanced nutrients; when depletion is significant enough, a point is reached where the effects of the drug and/ or the placebo effect are no longer observed. The uniform and consistent response observed with low-dose amino acid dosing values, which uniformly places all subjects in the lower end of the competitive inhibition state, supports the reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory. The reported numbers (n) in rows 3 and 4 of Table 1 are higher than expected based on expected drug response alone, meaning that these subjects are a mix of placebo responders and drug responders. Note that >97% of this group responded to the administration of amino acid precursors. It is therefore concluded that this is a synaptic phenomenon related to monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors, which is the primary cause of placebo relapse and drug tachyphylaxis. Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Dovepress It is proposed that monoamine depletion is the correct description of the event that occurs when drug or placebo effects observed after the start of a reuptake inhibitor are no longer present in the endogenous state. With monoamine depletion, the synaptic monoamine levels decrease due to a relative nutritional deficiency that is beyond the capabilities of dietary modification to correct. The effects of placebo and/or drug efficacy will not be available if there are not enough monoamines in the system. With significant monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors, there may be a return of the original disease symptoms or new onset of disease symptoms. Relapse versus tachyphylaxis Some argue that, with reuptake inhibitor treatment of depression and ADHD, the placebo effect is the dominant force facilitating the clinical response; therefore, the appropriate term when symptoms return after a reuptake inhibitor response is observed is “relapse,” rather than drug tachyphylaxis.9,10 The placebo effect in depression ranges from 30% to 45%, and drug efficacy over placebo ranges from 7% to 13%.7 Double-blind, placebo-controlled depression studies reveal that the efficacy of placebo is three to six times greater than that of reuptake inhibitors. In these studies, the drug effect is so small that 87%–93% treated with a reuptake inhibitor can expect relief of symptoms no greater than that provided by placebo.7 Double-blind, placebo-controlled ADHD studies of atomoxetine indicate placebo efficacy in the range of 28%–40%, with drug efficacy 12%–26% greater than placebo. Studies support the conclusion that 74%–88% of ADHD patients treated with atomoxetine can expect relief of symptoms no greater than that provided by placebo.8 Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors Monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier. When monoamine depletion of the CNS occurs, the only way to address this relative nutritional deficiency and increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the CNS is through nutritional means, with the simultaneous administration of properly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors with cofactors. These precursors cross the blood–brain barrier and are then synthesized, freely or with biochemical feedback regulation depending on the amino acid, into new monoamines, which, when levels are high enough, restore the efficacy of the drug or placebo effect.8,9,11–16,21 Depletion of platelet monoamines: peripheral evidence Platelets contain 90% of the releasable serotonin stores. Reuptake inhibitor studies demonstrate that 90% of platelet serotonin is depleted in about 3 weeks. Over 80% of the total releasable serotonin is depleted within 3 weeks after starting reuptake inhibitors. The mechanism of platelet depletion is attributed to blocking reuptake transport of serotonin into platelets while allowing for transport out of the platelets. Once outside the platelets, the serotonin is exposed to the monoamine oxidase enzymes that affect metabolism at a higher rate leading to depletion. This is the same mechanism of action observed with monoamine transport in and out of the presynaptic neurons of the CNS, as illustrated in Figures 1–3.23–30 Depletion in CNS Do reuptake inhibitors facilitate CNS monoamine depletion? In excess of 80% of the releasable stores of serotonin are depleted after 3 weeks of reuptake inhibitor treatment. Monoamine depletion The primary theory expounded by this paper is that when symptomatic relief related to a drug or placebo wanes, it is primarily due to drug-induced monoamine depletion. Monoamine depletion studies done in conjunction with amino acid precursor utilization have demonstrated that a decrease in monoamine concentrations is associated with the waning or outright discontinuation of the drug-induced effects.18,19 Serotonin and dopamine are synthesized from the amino acid precursors 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and L-3,4dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa), respectively. L-dopa is synthesized from L-tyrosine and 5-HTP is synthesized from L-tryptophan. Dopamine is the precursor of norepinephrine, which, in turn, is the precursor of epinephrine.7,8,11–16,20–22 Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Figure 1 Inadequate levels of neurotransmitters in the synapse are associated with compromised electrical flow in the postsynaptic neurons, leading to suboptimal regulation of function and/or development of symptoms.34 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 73 Dovepress Hinz et al with reuptake inhibitor administration. These morphological changes are found with all reuptake inhibitors reviewed. A spectrum of depletion is concluded.31 Differentiating synaptic and postsynaptic dysfunction Figure 2 With administration of reuptake inhibitors, blockage of monoamine transport back into the presynaptic neurons leads to a net redistribution of neurotransmitter molecules from the presynaptic neuron to the synapse. Increased levels of synaptic monoamines lead to increased flow of electricity which causes adequate regulation of function and/or relief of symptoms.34 There is disagreement over the depletion of monoamines by reuptake inhibitors in the CNS. Supporters of reuptake inhibitors assert that there is no evidence of CNS monoamine depletion by these drugs. Those in opposition, including the National Institute on Drug Abuse, claim that reuptake inhibitors deplete CNS monoamines.23–30 One paper bridges the gap, its authors initially recognizing articles claiming reuptake inhibitors do not deplete monoamines in the CNS. The article then identifies pathological and morphological changes that occur with drug depletion and goes on to explain that these same changes are seen Figure 3 When the monoamines are in the vesicles of the presynaptic neuron they are not exposed to the enzymes that catalyze metabolism (monoamine oxidase and catechol-0-methyl transferase). They are safe from metabolism. When they relocate outside the vesicles presynaptic neuron, they are exposed at a greater frequency to these enzymes. Reuptake inhibitors create a mass migration of monoamines causing increased metabolic enzyme activity and metabolism of monoamines. This leads to monoamine depletion if significant amounts of balanced serotonin and dopamine precursors are not coadministered with the reuptake inhibitor.34 74 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress While the focus of monoamine reuptake inhibitor depletion is on synaptic monoamine levels, there are other causes of electrical dysfunction, such as receptor desensitization and receptor down regulation. While these may be valid topics, they do not apply here. The phenomenon observed here is clearly electrical dysfunction of synaptic origin, whereas receptor desensitization, receptor down regulation, bundle damage, and so forth, are all postsynaptic processes linked to the postsynaptic neurons. As discussed in the authors’ previous work, there are unique observations that define synaptic electrical dysfunction versus postsynaptic-driven electrical dysfunction. Considerations are as follows. Correcting monoamine depletion-associated synaptic electrical dysfunction in the endogenous state involves addressing the problem nutritionally to increase monoamine concentrations from low to normal.7,8,11–16,20–22 Correcting dysfunction associated with postsynaptic structures requires nutritionally establishing monoamine levels in the competitive inhibition state, where monoamine levels are higher than those found in the endogenous (normal) state.7,8,11–16,20–22 Differentiation between synaptic and postsynaptic electrical dysfunction is possible by observing the clinical response to group administration of nutrients (amino acid precursors with cofactors), shown in Table 5.7,8,11–16,20–22 When dysfunction is due to low or inadequate synaptic monoamine levels associated with depletion, returning monoamine levels to the normal reference range of the population in the endogenous state will correct the problem.7,8,11–16,20–22 In Group 1 and Group 2, over 97% of subjects who experienced waning of initial drug effects were suffering from monoamine electrical dysfunction secondary to developing a relative nutritional dysfunction. These subjects were placed on the lowest (starting) amino acid dosing value required to induce the competitive inhibition state leading to a positive and uniform response. As discussed more thoroughly below, when synaptic monoamine electrical dysfunction is present, returning monoamine levels to the normal range for the population or immediately above normal restores the initial effects observed with administration of the drug.7,8,11–16,20–22 When the electrical dysfunction is due to postsynaptic neuron structural impairment, the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor dosing values required to fully Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Dovepress Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors Table 5 Observed differences between synaptic and postsynaptic electrical dysfunction Electrical dysfunction is corrected with monoamines in which state? Returning monoamines to normal levels Uniform response to a low-dose competitive inhibition amino acid dosing value Individualized amino acid dosing value needed Requires adjusting amino acid dosing values for optimal group results Need to obtain organic cation transporter functional status determination for optimal results Synaptic dysfunction Postsynaptic dysfunction Endogenous state Competitive inhibition state Will restore function Yes Will not restore function No No Yes No Yes No Yes compensate for the dysfunction are not uniform and are highly individualized.7,8,11–16,20–22 As the authors have previously discussed, the following considerations exist while documenting the novel effects of nutritional dosing value alterations on organic cation transporter (OCT) function status in the competitive inhibition state. The serotonin and dopamine precursor dosing values needed to compensate for postsynaptic monoamine–associated electrical dysfunction in the competitive inhibition state range from very low to very high. When optimal amino acid precursor dopamine values in the competitive inhibition state are achieved, as evidenced by properly balanced OCT serotonin and dopamine transport, the serotonin amino acid dosing value is independent of the dopamine amino acid dosing value. In addition, if OCT functional status interpretation considerations are not affected, the dosing values of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors needed to effectively optimize and restore postsynaptic monoamine–related electrical function have been demonstrated to be random relative to serotonin and dopamine assay levels. 7,8,11-16,20-22 In the case of reuptake inhibitor placebo relapse and/or reuptake inhibitor tachyphylaxis, the amino acid dosing values required to correct the relative nutritional deficiency are relatively low, uniform, and constant. This is consistent with synaptic monoamine electrical dysfunction in endogenous state. It is not consistent with the highly individualized group-dosing value needs observed in the competitive inhibition state, which is linked to postsynaptic monoamine electrical dysfunction (see Table 5).7,8,11–16,20–22 Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Neurotransmitter depletion by reuptake inhibitors It is known that the reuptake inhibitor methamphetamine depletes dopamine,32 which facilitates the neurotoxicity.8 SSRIs are known to decrease serotonin synthesis.33 The nonspecific reuptake inhibitor amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant) is known to deplete norepinephrine.34 The National Institute on Drug Abuse has posted figures (Figures 1–3) on its website, which are in the public domain. These figures illustrate how reuptake inhibitors deplete monoamines.35 Other depletion-related problems Monoamine depletion may explain other problems associated with reuptake inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration requires that reuptake inhibitors display a black box warning regarding the risk of suicidal ideation while taking these drugs.4,5 It is postulated that this increased suicide risk may be associated with monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome is an exacerbation of symptoms or new onset of symptoms that occurs when attempts are made to stop a reuptake inhibitor. The patients typically, do not like the way they feel when attempts to stop the drug are made; consequently they are trapped into taking a drug that provides little relief of symptoms because they feel worse without the drug.37 It is postulated that reuptake inhibitor–induced monoamine depletion plays a role in this phenomenon. Customarily, when the clinical effect of a reuptake inhibitor stops, the response is to increase the daily dosing value of the drug, start a second reuptake inhibitor, or stop the first drug then substitute a second drug. It is postulated that all of these actions further facilitate monoamine depletion. General observations It is postulated that if the reuptake inhibitor drug was introduced into an environment in which synaptic monoamine homeostasis always existed, with no postsynaptic issues arising, the drug would theoretically continue to function indefinitely. However, this is not the case. It is well known that these drugs, in the endogenous state, are associated with return of symptoms, discontinuation syndrome, placebo relapse, drug tachyphylaxis, suicidal ideation, reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome, induced relative nutritional deficiency, and a number of other problems. Reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory is the only model that unifies and explains the phenomena described in this paper submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 75 Dovepress Hinz et al when the nutritional responses of Group 1 and Group 2 are considered. Reuptake inhibitors are a drug class that offer only 7%–13% of patients relief of depression symptoms that is greater than that provided by placebo.7 They make the disease cause worse by depleting the centrally acting monoamine neurotransmitters in all patients who do not ingest adequate amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, which leads to a relative nutritional deficiency. They also expose 100% of patients to drug side effects and the economic costs of the drugs. Worldwide annual sales of antidepressants coming off patent between 2011 and 2016 is placed in excess of US$255 billion.37 If 87% of patients taking these drugs had no hope of achieving relief of depression symptoms greater than that provided by placebo, this would mean that US$221.9 billion is being spent annually for treatment that is no more effective than a sugar pill. This number increases when the cost of drugs already off patent are included. The Internet is replete with claims that 5-HTP should not be administered with reuptake inhibitors due to concerns of serotonin syndrome. The authors firmly assert that this is not correct. There are no reported cases of serotonin syndrome resulting from concurrent use of 5-HTP with reuptake inhibitors in the literature. Since 1997, the authors have amassed over 2 million patient-days of treatment experience using 5-HTP with reuptake inhibitors from over 1000 medical clinics, with not one case of serotonin syndrome documented. Conclusion SSRIs used in the treatment of depression and ADHD are associated with low efficacy and high placebo response. This leads to controversy in defining the cause for the discontinuation of symptomatic relief observed after starting a reuptake inhibitor. Prior to this paper, the question was, “When depression symptoms return, is it due to drug tachyphylaxis or a placebo relapse?” This paper puts forth the unified concept of the reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory. Relative nutritional deficiency can exist when dietary intake is normal and changes to the system occur that cannot be met through dietary modification alone. Increased metabolism and inadequate synthesis of monoamines create an environment where the relative nutritional deficiency associated with reuptake inhibitor treatment evolves. When this happens, administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors is the only course available to compensate for CNS monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. The ability of reuptake inhibitors to induce a relative nutritional deficiency leading secondarily to depletion of monoamines 76 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress has been overlooked and is of serious concern. When monoamine depletion is extensive enough, placebo relapse occurs, drug tachyphylaxis occurs, symptoms of disease return, new onset of disease symptoms may occur, increased incidence of suicidal ideation may be facilitated, and reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome may be observed, regardless of the initial cause of symptomatic relief (placebo effect versus drug effect). Reuptake inhibitors do not increase the total number of monoamines in the CNS. Their mechanism of action facilitates redistribution of monoamines from one place to another, which, in turn, sets up conditions that favor depletion of monoamines if proper levels of nutrients are not administered. Physicians currently prescribe reuptake inhibitor drugs that are only 7%–13% more effective than placebo in treating depression7 and only 12%–26% more effective than placebo in treating ADHD.8 Reuptake inhibitors are known to further deplete the very monoamines whose inadequate synaptic levels are implicated in the etiology of numerous diseases and conditions. This makes the cause of the disease (ie, inadequate monoamine levels) worse. Monoamine depletion is a relative nutritional deficiency that cannot be managed adequately by dietary modification. In the treatment of depression, 87%–93% of patients taking these drugs cannot expect relief of symptoms that is greater than that provided by placebo.7 In the treatment of ADHD, 74%–88% of patients cannot expect relief of symptoms greater than that provided by placebo.8 However, 100% of patients are subjected to the side effects, the cost of the drugs, development of a relative nutritional deficiency, and depletion of m onoamines by reuptake inhibitors if simultaneous administration of properly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors does not occur. Reuptake inhibitors are the only class of drugs that the authors are aware of that make the cause of the disease (inadequate levels of monoamines) that is being treated worse. With experience comes insight: the manufacturer of citalopram reported that one of the authors of this article was the largest private practice prescriber of this drug in 1999, the first full year after the drug became available in the USA. This paper attempts to raise the level of awareness, understanding, stimulate further studies, and facilitate dialog regarding monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Disclosure MH discloses ownership of NeuroResearch Clinics Inc, Cape Coral, FL. TU discloses laboratory directorship of DBS Labs, Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 Dovepress Duluth, MN. AS declares no conflicts of interest in relation to this paper. References 1. Frank R, Glied S. Better but Now Well: Mental Health Policy in the United States since 1950. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2006. 2. Mantzoros C. Nutrition and Metabolism: Underlying Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2009. 3. Dextroamphetamine and amphetamine (CII) prescribing information. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/ label/2007/011522s040 lbl.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2011. 4. Fluvoxetine prescribing information. Available from: http://www. luvoxcr.com/LUVOX-CR-PI.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2011. 5. Bupropion prescribing information. Available from: http://us.gsk.com/ products/assets/us_zyban.pdf. Accessed July 30, 2011. 6. Merriam-Webster online dictionary http://www.merriam-webster.com/ medical/tachyphylaxis?show = 0&t = 1312033095. Accessed July 30, 2011. 7. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 9. McGrath P, Stewart J, Quitkin F. Predictors of relapse in a prospective study of fluoxetine treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1542–1548. 10. Michelson D, Buitelaar J, Danckaerts M. Relapse prevention in pediatric patients with ADHD treated with atomoxetine: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43:896–904. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: A comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2011;3:19–24. 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: A case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 15. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 16. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:457–463. 17. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, 1994 (American Psychiatric Association) p. 372 18. Delgado P, Miller H, Salomon R, et al. Tryptophan-depletion challenge in depressed patients treated with desipramine or fluoxetine: implications for the role of serotonin in the mechanism of antidepressant action. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;46:212–220. 19. Page M, Detke M, Dalvi A, et al. Serotonergic mediation of the effects of fluoxetine, but not desipramine, in the rat forced swimming test. Psychopharmacology. 1999;147:162–167. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors 20. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 21. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease, a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010:3:171–177. 22. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 23. Alvarez J, Sanceaume M, Advenier C, et al. Differential changes in brain and platelet 5-HT concentrations after steady-state achievement and repeated administration of antidepressant drugs in mice. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1999;10:31–36. 24. Dalton S, Johansen C, Mellemkjar L, et al. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:59–64. 25. Wagner A, Montero D, Martensson B, et al. Effects of fluoxetine treatment of platelet 3H-imipramine binding, 5-HT uptake and 5-HT content in major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 1990;20:101–113. 26. Yuan Y, Tsoi K, Hunt R. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of upper GI bleeding: Confusion or confounding? Am J Med. 2006;119:719–727. 27. Meier C, Schlienger R, Jick H. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of developing first-time acute myocardial infarction. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52:179–184. 28. Fuller R, Wong D. Serotonin uptake and serotonin uptake inhibition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;600:68–78. 29. de Abajo FJ, Jick H, Derby L, Jick S, Schmitz S. Intracranial haemorrhage and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;50:43–47. 30. Layton D, Clark D, Pearce D, Shakir SA. Is there an association between reuptake inhibitors and the risk of abnormal bleeding? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57:167–176. 31. Kalia M, O’Callaghan J, Miller D, et al. Comparative study of fluoxetine, sibutramine, sertraline and dexfenfluramine on the morphology of serotonergic nerve terminals using serotonin immunohistochemistry. Brain Res. 2000;858:92–105. 32. Cooney C, Wise C, Poirier LA, Ali SF. Methamphetamine treatment affects blood and liver S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) in mice: correlation with dopamine depletion in the striatum. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998;844:191–200. 33. Stenfors C, Yu H, Ross S. Pharmacological characterisation of the decrease in 5-HT synthesis in the mouse brain evoked by the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor citalopram. Arch Pharmacol. 2001;363:222–232. 34. Galun E, Flugelman M, Glickson M, et al. Failure of long-term digitalization to prevent rapid ventricular response in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Chest. 1991;99:1038–1040. 35. National Institute of Drug Abuse. The neurobiology of ecstasy. Slides 9–11. Available from: http://www.nida.nih.gov/pubs/teaching/ Teaching4/Teaching.html. Accessed July 29, 2011. 36. Black K, Shea C, Dursun S. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome: proposed diagnostic criteria. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000;25:255–261. 37. Forbes. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/07/25/ general-health-care-us-generics-bonanza_8582330.html. Accessed July 31, 2011. Dovepress Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Publish your work in this journal Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal exploring patient safety issues in the healthcare continuum from diagnostic and screening interventions through to treatment, drug therapy and surgery. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, clinical, epidemiological and post-marketing surveillance studies, risk management, health literacy and educational programs across all areas of healthcare delivery. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/ testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/drug-healthcare-and-patient-safety-journal Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2011:3 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 77 International Journal of General Medicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index O riginal R esearch The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: International Journal of General Medicine 13 February 2012 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 1 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc, Cape Coral, FL, 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, 3 Fairview University Medical Center, Hibbing, MN, USA Background: The monoamine hypothesis has been recognized for over half a century as a reference point to understanding electrical dysfunction associated with disease states, and/or regulatory dysfunction related to synaptic, centrally acting monoamine concentrations (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine). Methods: Organic cation transporters (OCT) are a primary force controlling intracellular and extracellular (including synaptic) concentrations of centrally acting monoamines and their amino acid precursors. A new type of research was analyzed in this paper (previously published by the authors) relating to determining the functional status of the nutritionally driven organic cation transporters. It was correlated with the claims of the monoamine hypothesis. Results: Results of laboratory assays from subjects not suffering from a hyperexcreting tumor show that centrally acting monoamine concentrations are indistinguishable in subjects with and without disease symptoms and/or regulatory dysfunction. Analysis of centrally acting monoamine concentrations in the endogenous state reveals a significant difference in day-to-day assays performed on the same subject with and without monoamine-related disease symptoms and/or regulatory dysfunction. The day-to-day difference renders baseline testing in the endogenous state non-reproducible in the same subject. Conclusion: It is asserted that the monoamine hypothesis, which claims that low synaptic levels of monoamines are a primary etiology of disease, is not a valid primary reference point for understanding chronic electrical dysfunction related to the centrally acting monoamines. Furthermore, the “bundle damage theory” is a more accurate primary model for understanding chronic dysfunction. The “bundle damage theory” advocates that synaptic monoamine levels are normal but not adequate in states associated with chronic electrical dysfunction and that levels need to be increased to compensate for the chronic postsynaptic electrical dysfunction due to existing damage. The monoamine hypothesis, in failing to accurately explain the etiology of chronic neuronal electrical flow dysfunction in the endogenous state, is reduced to no more than a historical footnote. Keywords: monoamine hypothesis, monoamine theory, serotonin, dopamine, neuronal dysfunction, bundle damage theory Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S27824 This paper is the continuation of a series of original research papers published by the authors on the topic of nutritionally driven organic cation transporter (OCT) functional status determination (herein referred to as OCT assay[s]). This paper correlates original research previously published by the authors on the topic of transporter-driven centrally acting monoamine observations with the monoamine hypothesis.1–12 International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 135–142 © 2012 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 135 Dovepress Hinz et al The centrally acting monoamines serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine (herein referred to as “monoamine[s]”) exist in one of two states. The “endogenous state” is present when no supplemental amino acids are being administered, and the “competitive inhibition state” is found when significant amounts of serotonin and/or dopamine amino acid precursors are simultaneously administered.1–7 Previous literature described the competitive inhibition state as “functionally meaningless.” The basis for this assertion was the inability to alter monoamine levels with amino acid precursors and then objectively quantify the changes.7 With the perfection of the novel OCT assay analysis by the authors, the competitive inhibition state is no longer functionally meaningless.1–12 Since the early 1960s, the monoamine hypothesis has been a reference point for understanding the etiology of the electrical defects associated with monoamine-related disease and the mechanism of action of reuptake inhibitors. The monoamine hypothesis posits that depression is caused by decreased monoamine function in the brain. The hypothesis originated from early empirical clinical observations and has been generally recognized to mean that low concentrations of synaptic monoamines are a primary factor in the etiology of depression, other monoamine-related disease states, and regulatory dysfunction.13 The bundle damage theory was first published in 2009. It advocates that although synaptic levels of monoamines are normal in chronic monoamine-related disease states, these levels are inadequate in compensating for postsynaptic damage to structures conducting electricity.8 In this manuscript, the new conclusions about monoamine hypothesis and the bundle damage theory are compared with the original research of the authors. When inadequate levels of monoamines exist, the only way to increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the brain is through administration of their amino acid precursors. This is because monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier. The amino acid precursors can cross the barrier, and are synthesized into new monoamines. Whether the synaptic levels are lower than normal or normal at the start of management, nutritional status is a primary consideration in addressing problems associated with inadequate monoamines.4,6,10 There are two primary types of nutritional deficiencies. The monoamine hypothesis advocates that an absolute nutritional deficiency (AND) is the core issue of monoaminerelated electrical dysfunction, whereas the bundle damage theory advocates a relative nutritional deficiency (RND).8 136 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress An AND occurs when not enough nutrients are included in the diet, leading to nutritional concentrations that are not adequate for establishing normal synaptic monoamine levels (the monoamine hypothesis). A relative nutritional deficiency occurs when synaptic levels are normal in the endogenous state but not high enough to compensate for damage to the postsynaptic neuronal structures that conduct electricity (the bundle damage theory). The organic cation transporters (OCT) are primary determinants of intracellular and extracellular (including synaptic) monoamine concentrations.13 Previously published literature by the authors provides proof that in the endo genous state transporter-dependent monoamine concentrations are indistinguishable in subjects with and without monoamine-related disease and/or regulatory dysfunction. These findings are an integral part of the challenge to the validity of the monoamine hypothesis.4,6,10 Methods and materials Original research results by the authors1–12 outlined a novel methodology for nutritionally driven OCT assay analysis that defines the phase of monoamine transport, status of transporter entrance gates, transporter lumen saturation status, and transporter balance status between the monoamines and their amino acid precursors. These are all critical to determining whether the relative concentrations of the centrally acting monoamines are being effectively transported.1–12 Nutritionally driven OCT functional status determination Under normal conditions, serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulus are metabolized by the kidneys, which prevent significant amounts of these peripheral monoamines from being found in the final urine. Urinary serotonin and dopamine, in subjects not suffering from a monoaminesecreting tumor, represent monoamines newly synthesized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells of the kidneys. These monoamines have never been in the central or peripheral systems. Once synthesized, their fate is dependent upon the interaction of the basolateral monoamine transporters (OCT2) and the apical monoamine transporters (OCTN2). The OCT2 transports serotonin and dopamine to the interstitium. These monoamines then end up in the peripheral system via the renal vein. The OCTN2 of the apical membrane transports the serotonin and dopamine not transported by the OCT2 to the proximal nephrons of the kidneys, before sending them to the urine as waste. Proper OCT assay requires that initially the serotonin and dopamine systems International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress are placed in the competitive inhibition state simultaneously, while administering adequate amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors. The assay results are then compared in order to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine concentrations associated with changes in amino acid precursor dosing values.2,3,5,6,11 A urinary serotonin or dopamine value less than 80 µg or 475 µg of monoamine per gram of creatinine, respectively, is defined as a phase 2 response. A urinary serotonin or dopamine value greater than 80 or 475 µg of monoamine per gram of creatinine, respectively, is interpreted as being in phase 1 or phase 3. Differentiation of phase 1 from phase 3 is as follows. If a direct relationship is found between amino acid dosing and urinary assay response, it is referred to as a phase 3 response. An inverse relationship is referred to as a phase 1 response. The phase 3 optimal range for urinary serotonin is defined as 80–240 µg of serotonin per gram of creatinine. The phase 3 optimal range for urinary dopamine is defined as 475–1,100 µg of dopamine per g of creatinine.2,3,5,6,11 Processing, management, and assay of the urine samples are as follows: urine samples are collected about 5–6 hours prior to bedtime, with 4:00 pm being the most frequent collection time point. The samples are stabilized in 6 N HCl to preserve the dopamine and serotonin. The urine samples are collected after a minimum of 1 week, during which time the patient has been taking a specific daily dosing of amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine where no doses are missed. Samples are shipped to DBS Laboratories (Duluth, MN). Urinary dopamine and serotonin are assayed utilizing commercially available radioimmunoassay kits (3 CAT RIA IB88501 and IB89527, both from Immuno Biological Laboratories Inc, Minneapolis, MN). The DBS laboratory is accredited as a high-complexity laboratory by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) to perform these assays. OCT assay interpretation is performed by one of the authors (Marty Hinz, MD, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc). Results The authors previously published “matched pairs t-test” results for the transporter-dependent, centrally acting monoamine concentrations in the endogenous state from the same subject on different days. This current paper is a continuation of this discussion based on original research that expands on the scope and implications of these scientific findings within the context of the monoamine hypothesis.4,6,10 In this previously published original research, spot baseline urinary assays for each monoamine were obtained International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis for the first test on day one and for the second test on a different day. Both occurred at the same time of the day for each subject. The two tests from each subject were then paired, and a statistically significant grouping of matched pairs was subjected to the “matched pairs t-test.” The results are a critical component in forming the foundation of the conclusions in this paper.4,6,10 These original research studies reported that spot baseline urinary serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine concentrations in the endogenous state differ in a statistically significant manner from day to day in the same subject. This supports the conclusion that under normal conditions baseline urinary monoamine testing is not uniform or reproducible from day to day in the same subject. The functional status of these organic cation transporters determines intracellular and extracellular (including synaptic) concentrations of these monoamines. Furthermore, it was concluded that it is virtually impossible to distinguish, via laboratory assay interpretation, individuals with or without disease or regulatory dysfunctions, even those dysfunctions that were traditionally assumed to be associated with low levels of synaptic, centrally acting monoamine levels.4,6,10 Discussion The monoamine hypothesis holds that low concentrations of synaptic monoamines are the primary etiology of monoamine-related chronic electrical dysfunction.13 The corollary to this premise is that returning synaptic monoamine levels to normal will resolve electrical dysfunction. In correlating the perspective of the monoamine hypothesis with peer-reviewed literature published by the authors since 2009, the following considerations and conclusions exist. Differentiation of those with and without disease There is no objective proof demonstrating that low in situ levels of centrally acting monoamine concentrations in the synapse are the primary etiology under normal conditions.14 There is no objective method that identifies individuals with low concentrations of transporter-dependent monoamine concentrations in the endogenous state.13 Transporter-associated concentration trends in groups of subjects have been identified, but the day-to-day variability of monoamine concentrations in each individual comprising the group reveals that it is not possible to identify individuals with electrical dysfunction on laboratory testing and/or transporter analysis who are suffering from low levels of monoamines relative to the normal reference range.4,6,11 Diets devoid of submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 137 Dovepress Hinz et al critical amino acids will induce an AND with associated disease symptoms, but diets such as this are not the normal endogenous state of humans who develop monoamine or regulatory dysfunction-related symptoms.15,16 Synaptic monoamine concentrations are primarily dependent on the functional status of the nutritionally driven organic cation transporters. The monoamines and their amino acid precursors are “organic cations” that are transported by the three primary electrogenic organic cation transporter types, each of which has several subtypes: OCT1, OCT2, and OCT3. The OCT of the liver, brain, kidney, and bowels are identical and homologous.17 Of the three transporter types, the OCT2 has tissue expression primarily in the kidney and the brain. OCT assay analysis has led to the ability to define the phases of monoamine transport, transporter saturation status, the status of monoamine and precursor transporter balance, the amount of waste (unneeded) monoamines the transporters are excreting, and the status of transporter entrance gates. After doing this OCT assay analysis, we can define the individualized amino acid dosing values needed for optimal flow of electricity through damaged postsynaptic bundles as evidenced by clinical outcomes.12,13 There is no objective documentation that identifies individuals with low concentrations of transporter-dependent monoamine concentrations in the endogenous state. Transporter-associated concentration trends in groups of subjects have been identified, but the day-to-day variability of monoamine concentrations in each individual comprising the group reveals that it is not possible to identify individuals with electrical dysfunction on laboratory testing and/or transporter analysis who are suffering from low levels of monoamines relative to the normal reference range. 4,6,10 In the endogenous state, under the monoamine hypothesis, low synaptic concentrations of monoamines are a primary cause of electrical dysfunction.14 If this were true, the significant fluctuations in transporter-dependent monoamine concentrations from day to day in the individual should lead to clinical states where the findings would wax and wane in a manner consistent with day-to-day observed fluctuations in transporter-driven monoamine concentrations as documented in same subject studies (matched pairs t-test). This is not the case. The etiology of chronic problems is not low concentrations of monoamines that need to be returned to normal as predicted by the monoamine hypothesis; it is concentrations that are normal but not high enough to compensate for postsynaptic neuronal damage. Addressing this electrical defect properly requires the system to be placed into the competitive 138 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress inhibition state in order to be able to increase monoamine levels to above normal to reach the threshold level needed to establish the adequate electrical flow required. Analysis of transporter-driven monoamine needs reveals that postsynaptic electrical conduction damage in patients with chronic disease is so high that the day-to-day monoamine fluctuations of the endogenous state are below the threshold needed to attain symptom relief. Therefore, chronic symptoms do not wax and wane as might be predicted by the laboratory results obtained in the endogenous state.5,8 Previous writings of the authors demonstrated relative nutritional deficiencies in Parkinson’s disease,5 chronic depression,9,12 Crohn’s disease,2 and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder without any findings that would support an AND.3 Restoration of regulatory function in these RND conditions is only possible when transporterdependent monoamine concentrations are elevated above normal and properly balanced in the competitive inhibition state (see Figure 1).1–12 Many disease states have been recognized as having a common etiology of postsynaptic bundle damage associated with insult.1–12 Different areas of damage to the nerve bundles result in different disease entities. These entities all share a common pathology of inadequate levels of the monoamine-driven electrical activity that is required to power the functions of the body. This results in the relative nutritional deficiency that requires monoamine levels higher than normally found in the synapse to overcome the damaged areas of the nerve bundles. Parkinson’s disease demonstrates this deficiency and the ability of targeted amino acid precursor supplementation to restore function.5 Parkinson’s disease as a prototype Parkinson’s disease is a prototype disease that illustrates the mechanism of action of postsynaptic neuron damage and its compensation. Chronic damage to the postsynaptic dopamine fibers of the substantia nigra induce an RND that is not just dopamine related but is related to all of the centrally acting monoamines. This RND causes Parkinson’s disease symptoms by compromising the flow of electricity regulating fine motor control. The monoamine levels of Parkinson’s patients prior to treatment are found to be in the normal range. Proper management of Parkinson’s disease requires an increase in the synaptic levels of dopamine with a higher than normal administration of L-dopa. Increasing the synaptic neurotransmitter with L-dopa is analogous to turning up the voltage. It causes more electricity to flow through the remaining viable postsynaptic, electricity-conducting neuronal structures. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis When enough electricity is once again flowing, control of symptoms is effected.5 Dietary management The monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier. The only way to increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the brain – to a level that is higher than is possible with dietary modification – is with supplemental nutritional support through administration of properly balanced amino acid precursors and cofactors. These cross the blood–brain barrier and are synthesized into new monoamines.1–12 The immediate amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine, 5-HTP and L-dopa, respectively, freely cross the blood–brain barrier to synthesize into their respective m onoamines without biochemical feedback inhibition (Figure 2). At equilibrium the amino acid precursors have a similar effect on all identical and homologous OCTs and subtypes throughout the body.12 When synapse-related electrical compromise is present, the monoamine hypothesis advocates that an AND exists, ie, low synaptic monoamine levels are present and returning these levels to normal will restore adequate electrical flow. This would predict that an optimized normal diet, with no supplemental nutrients, will restore the low levels of synaptic monoamines back to normal, leading to relief of the electrical dysfunction that is causing the disease or regulatory dysfunction. This does not happen. Literature has not described dietary modification as a valid and/or effective approach in management of monoamine-related synaptic electrical dysfunction under normal conditions. Under the bundle damage theory, as discussed in the next section, when neuronal electrical compromise (due to postsynaptic damage) is significant, a relative nutritional deficiency is concomitantly present. Proper compensation requires that the system be placed in the competitive inhibition state where synaptic monoamine levels are higher than normal; this cannot be achieved with dietary modification alone. Administration of properly balanced supplemental amino acid precursors L-tryptophan Depletes L-tyrosine Dopamine Serotonin Depletes Sulfur amino acids Depletes Depletes Depletes Depletes 5-HTP L-dopa Figure 1 If dopamine precursors (L-tyrosine and/or L-dopa) are not in proper balance with serotonin precursors (5-HTP and/or L-tryptophan), depletion of serotonin or dopamine will occur. All components of the system need to be in proper balance. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 under the guidance of OCT assay analysis is needed. This ensures proper amino acid and monoamine transport balance and compensates for the electrical defect. The balance between serotonin precursors, dopamine precursors, and sulfur amino acids is critical, as profound interactions exist between these substances. When administration of these substances is not in proper balance, an additional amino acid-induced RND develops (see Figure 1).1–12 There are many things that can be gleaned out of Figure 1, such as administering only 5-HTP facilitates depletion of dopamine. Giving only L-dopa facilitates depletion of serotonin, sulfur amino acids, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan. The administration of properly balanced 5-HTP with L-dopa establishes transporter-dependent synaptic monoamine concentrations at levels higher than normal. These levels compensate for the relative nutritional deficiency and resultant electrical deficit.18 In contrast, the monoamine hypothesis has never demonstrated that under normal conditions returning synaptic monoamine levels to normal is effective. The bundle damage theory Under the bundle damage theory, relative nutritional deficiency is the cause of chronic electrical dysfunction observed with centrally acting monoamine-related problems. This is supported by the fact that in the endogenous state all subjects with and without disease have similar and indistinguishable monoamine levels. The primary source of the chronic electrical dysfunction under the bundle damage theory is damage to the postsynaptic structural components involved with electrical conduction. In this state, the levels of synaptic monoamines are normal and an RND exists.8 A list of almost 1200 known neurotoxins found in the environment serves as a backdrop for this discussion.19 Neurotoxins, trauma, biologics, and/or genetic predisposition contribute to postsynaptic structural damage which compromises electrical flow when synaptic monoamine levels are normal. This damage tends to be cumulative. The flow of electricity between the pre- and postsynaptic neurons is mediated by synaptic levels of centrally acting monoamines. This causes electrically dependent functions to be improperly regulated.5,8 Individual dendrite structures of postsynaptic neurons do not facilitate electrical flow as a single entity. Multiple postsynaptic structures, functioning as bundles, regulate function. The bundle damage theory states that a significant factor in the development of monoamine-related electrical dysfunction disease or regulatory dysfunction submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 139 Dovepress Hinz et al Amino acids Monoamine neurotransmitters L-tryptophan 5-HTP Serotonin L-tyrosine L-dopa Dopamine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Figure 2 The centrally acting monoamines with their amino acid precursors. occurs when the electrical flow through the postsynaptic neuron bundles regulating function is compromised by damage. In order to optimally restore neuron bundle regulatory function, synaptic neurotransmitter levels involved with transference of electrical flow across the synapse into the remaining viable postsynaptic neuron structures must be increased to levels higher than are normally found in the system. This in turn results in restoration of adequate electrical flow, relief of symptoms, and/or resolution of regulatory dysfunction.8 Support for the bundle damage theory is that restoration of normal neuronal electrical flow can be accomplished by increasing monoamine concentrations into the competitive inhibition state, where organic cation transporter-driven and synaptic monoamine concentrations are higher than those found in the endogenous state. The situation is managed as a relative nutritional deficiency. Instead of ascribing the symptom etiology to low concentrations of transporter-dependent synaptic monoamines in chronic states, it is more accurate to attribute the cause to synaptic monoamine concentrations being chronically inadequate to compensate for electrical dysfunction induced by postsynaptic structural damage. When chronic monoamine-related deficiency states exist, this terminology more appropriately explains the need to increase synaptic monoamine concentrations into the competitive inhibition state.4,6,10 The World Health Organization’s observation, consistent with the bundle damage theory, is that higher toxicant exposure (in developed countries) contributes to the higher rate of depression and other monoamine-related disease.8 Relative nutritional deficiency, secondary to postsynaptic structural damage, may be the only issue in which proper management allows for removing the RND from the clinical picture. This is to ensure that any other possible concomitant disease and regulatory dysfunction etiologies or mechanisms of action may be focused on more clearly. Reuptake inhibitors The mechanism of action of reuptake inhibitors is unknown, but it is theorized that blocking of transporter reuptake leads to increased concentrations of synaptic monoamines and 140 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress restoration of electrical flow. Reuptake inhibitor efficacy in the treatment of depression is low. Double-blind, placebocontrolled studies consistently reveal reuptake inhibitor depression efficacy of 7% to 13% greater than placebo. From another perspective, this means 87% to 93% of patients treated with reuptake inhibitors for depression can expect to achieve results no greater than placebo. The authors previously reported the novel findings that the effects of reuptake inhibitors on transporter-driven monoamine concentrations revealed serotonin concentrations changed ,50 µg/gr creatinine. These very small OCTdriven changes in monoamine concentrations are consistent with the low efficacy of the reuptake inhibitors. Group analysis shows no statistical significance.9,18 If simply establishing synaptic monoamine concentrations in the normal range under an absolute nutritional deficiency approach as predicted by the monoamine hypothesis were all that is required, it would be expected that reuptake inhibitor efficacy would be higher than reported. This is not the case. In previously published manuscripts by the authors, subjects with depression were managed under the relative nutritional deficiency approach using monoamine precursor nutritional support with 5-HTP and L-dopa which elevated the mean serotonin and dopamine concentrations higher than normal into the desired competitive inhibition phase 3 range, leading to restoration of electrical flow. This procedure produced magnitudes of increased levels of the transporter-driven serotonin and dopamine concentrations, far beyond the increases observed with reuptake inhibitors alone.1–12 The required serotonin and dopamine precursor dosing values are independent of each other in the competitive inhibition state. Optimal daily ranges exist when all monoaminerelated diseases are examined in the competitive inhibition state. Some variances of the high end of the range may occur when the individual diseases are examined. The 5-HTP daily effective therapeutic range is .0 mg to 2400 mg. The L-dopa daily effective therapeutic range (in subjects not suffering from Parkinson’s disease or Restless Leg Syndrome) is .0 mg to 2100 mg. The tyrosine daily effective therapeutic range is .0 mg to 14,000 mg.1–12 International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis Table 1 A comparison of the monoamine hypothesis and the bundle damage theory Synaptic monoamine levels when electrical dysfunction exits Neuronal system status Monoamine hypothesis Bundle damage theory Low Normal Normal Postsynaptic structural damage leading to compromised electrical flow Higher than normal (competitive inhibition state) Monoamine levels required to restore electrical flow Etiology Nutritional deficiency Conclusion on the basis of the etiology Absolute nutritional deficiency, dietary modification (no supplements) will correct the problem Laboratory observations From a laboratory standpoint, in the endogenous state, unable to distinguish those with and without disease contrary to predictions of the monoamine hypothesis Literature has never described dietary modification that simply returns synaptic monoamine levels to normal as a valid approach in management of monoamine-related electrical dysfunction Empirical observations that increasing synaptic monoamine levels leads to clinical improvement without proof that simply returning monoamine levels to normal is what is happening Undermining the concept Support for the concept Normal (endogenous state) Recurrent damage due to neurotoxins, trauma, biologics and/or genetic predisposition Relative nutritional deficiency, properly balanced supplementation needed to establish monoamine levels higher than normal OCT assay determination in the competitive inhibition state allows for predictable outcomes to nutritionally driven monoamine changes None Published literature on difficult to treat cases of Parkinson’s disease, chronic depression, Crohn’s disease, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, where synaptic levels are initially normal then intentionally increased to higher than normal to compensate for chronic electrical damage Abbreviation: OCT, organic cation transporter. Table 1 juxtaposes the monoamine hypothesis against the bundle damage theory. Conclusion The authors of this manuscript have published more than a dozen peer-reviewed papers on the topic of centrally acting monoamines and administration of their precursors. This paper correlates previous original research findings of the authors with the monoamine hypothesis and is a continuation of the scientific discussion.1–12 While there has been previous literature that has discredited the monoamine hypothesis, this paper sheds further light on the topic. The monoamine hypothesis is based on the assumption that synaptic concentrations of monoamines are lower than normal in monoamine-related, central neuronal electrical dysfunction states. This supports the assertion that addressing the problem under an absolute nutritional deficiency strategy by returning synaptic monoamine concentrations to normal would be effective. The contents of this paper prove that this does not happen.13 The bundle damage theory states that monoamine concentrations are normal but not adequate, due to an RND in subjects with and without chronic disease. In order to restore adequate electrical flow and compensate for postsynaptic damage, organic cation transporter-driven synaptic International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 monoamine levels must be increased to a level greater than those concentrations found in the endogenous state, under a monoamine amino acid RND approach outlined in previous peer-reviewed original research publications.8 The key difference between the monoamine hypothesis and the bundle damage theory is the perception that electrical dysfunction is caused by low synaptic concentrations of monoamines versus normal synaptic concentrations of monoamines that are not high enough to compensate for postsynaptic structural damage. Analysis of monoamine concentrations in subjects in the endogenous state with and without the presence of monoamine-related electrical dysfunction reveals that it is impossible to differentiate these subjects based on laboratory testing.4,6,10 Reuptake inhibitors have low efficacy in the treatment of monoamine-related disease. Their focus is treatment of the disease without addressing the proper balance of monoamines and precursors required under the relative nutritional deficiency approach. This is consistent with findings that reuptake inhibitors cause no statistically significant changes in transporter-dependent monoamine concentrations.12 In chronic disease states the leading cause of electrical dysfunction is monoamine-related RND, secondary to damage to postsynaptic neuronal structures caused by submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 141 Dovepress Hinz et al n eurotoxins, trauma, biologics, and/or genetic predisposition. The only way to compensate for damaged electrical flow is to properly balance serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state through administration of amino acid precursors under the guidance of OCT assay determination.2,3,5,7,8 Postsynaptic electrical dysfunction may not be the only etiology of monoamine-related dysfunction. Proper administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, under the guidance of OCT assay determination, removes concerns of RND from the clinical picture, facilitating the ability to clearly focus on other possible etiologies as needed. The monoamine hypothesis is simply not a valid concept. It is the goal of this manuscript to stimulate interest and dialogue regarding the etiology of synaptic monoamineassociated electrical dysfunction. Disclosure MH discloses ownership of NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. TU discloses lab directorship of DBS Labs, Duluth, MN. AS reports no conflict of interest related to this paper. References 1. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 2. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease, a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 4. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2011;3:19–24. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:1–7. 8. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. 9. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 10. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine; a comprehensive analysis. J Urol. 2010;2:177–183. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Journal of International Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety. 2011;3: 69–77. 13. Krishnan V, Nestler E. The molecular neurobiology of depression. Nature. 2008;455:902–984. 14. Soares-da-silva P, Pinto-do-O PC. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117:1187–1192. 15. Young S, Smith S, Pihl R. Tryptophan depletion causes a rapid lowering of mood in normal males. Psychopharmacology.1987;2:173–177. 16. Smith K, Fairburn C, Cowen D. Relapse of depression after rapid depletion of tryptophan. Lancet. 1997;349(9056):915–919. 17. Koepsell H. Organic cation transporters in the intestine, kidney, liver, and brain. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:243–266. 18. Scorecard.org. Neurotoxicants. Washington, DC: Green Media Toolshed. Available from: http://scorecard.goodguide.com/healtheffects/chemicals-2.tcl?short_hazard_name=neuro&all_p=t. Accessed December 16, 2011. 19. Koepsell H, Schmitt B, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine Publish your work in this journal The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient.The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/ testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/international-journal-of-general-medicine-journal 142 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 International Journal of General Medicine Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index O riginal R esearch Open Access Full Text Article Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: International Journal of General Medicine 7 May 2012 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 1 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics Inc, Cape Coral, 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, 3 DBS Labs, Duluth, MN, USA Background: Two primary categories of nutritional deficiency exist. An absolute nutritional deficiency occurs when nutrient intake is not sufficient to meet the normal needs of the system, and a relative nutritional deficiency exists when nutrient intake and systemic levels of nutrients are normal, while a change occurs in the system that induces a nutrient intake requirement that cannot be supplied from diet alone. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the primary component of chronic centrally acting monoamine (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) disease is a relative nutritional deficiency induced by postsynaptic neuron damage. Materials and methods: Monoamine transporter optimization results were investigated, reevaluated, and correlated with previous publications by the authors under the relative nutritional deficiency hypothesis. Most of those previous publications did not discuss the concept of a relative nutritional deficiency. It is the purpose of this paper to redefine the etiology expressed in these previous writings into the realm of relative nutritional deficiency, as demonstrated by monoamine transporter optimization. The novel and broad range of amino acid precursor dosing values required to address centrally acting monoamine relative nutritional deficiency properly is also discussed. Results: Four primary etiologies are described for postsynaptic neuron damage leading to a centrally acting monoamine relative nutritional deficiency, all of which require monoamine transporter optimization to define the proper amino acid dosing values of serotonin and dopamine precursors. Conclusion: Humans suffering from chronic centrally acting monoamine-related disease are not suffering from a drug deficiency; they are suffering from a relative nutritional deficiency involving serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors. Whenever low or inadequate levels of monoamine neurotransmitters exist, a relative nutritional deficiency is present. These precursors must be administered simultaneously under the guidance of monoamine transporter optimization in order to achieve optimal relative nutritional deficiency management. Improper administration of these precursors can exacerbate and/or facilitate new onset of centrally acting monoamine-related relative nutritional deficiencies. Keywords: nutritional deficiency, serotonin, dopamine, monoamine Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S31179 It is much more desirable to identify, address, and eliminate the cause of a disease than to treat its symptoms. Until this research project defined the relative nutritional deficiencies associated with disease and dysfunction of the centrally acting monoamines due to low or inadequate levels of neurotransmitters, there was no awareness of these nutritional deficiencies and no ability to address them properly and optimally.1 The authors of this paper have published extensively on the topic of monoamine amino acid precursor International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 413–430 © 2012 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 413 Dovepress Hinz et al management relating to various diseases and dysfunctions. Further research in the areas covered in the previous writings has revealed a relative nutritional deficiency (RND) etiology not previously recognized or reported. The novel concept of a monoamine-related RND is developed in this paper.1–13 Serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine are “centrally acting monoamines” (herein referred to as monoamine[s]), and are also involved in the control and regulation of peripheral functions. This novel concept hypothesizes the etiology of chronic disease and/or regulatory dysfunctional symptoms to be inadequate levels of monoamines as opposed to low levels of synaptic monoamines. The RND described herein are the most prevalent type of nutritional deficiency afflicting humans. An extensive list of diseases, conditions, and dysfunctions has been identified in which synaptic monoamine RND are recognized (see Appendix A and Appendix B).1–13 It is postulated that over 80% of humans suffer from symptoms relating to a serotonin and/or catecholamine RND. Monoamine-related RND was unrecognized prior to this research due to the inability to manage and verify results of monoamine transporter manipulation objectively. The organic cation transporters (OCT) are the primary determinants of intercellular and extracellular monoamine concentrations throughout the body. Absolute nutritional deficiency versus RND Two primary categories of nutritional deficiency exist, ie, absolute nutritional deficiency and RND.1 Insufficient dietary nutrient intake causes absolute nutritional deficiencies. An absolute nutritional deficiency can be corrected by optimizing nutrient intake in the diet. Management of the problem is often enhanced by administration of nutritional supplements, but they are not required.1 When an RND exists, nutritional intake and systemic nutrient levels are normal. However, systemic needs are increased above normal by outside forces and cannot be achieved by dietary modification alone. Burns and postsurgical patients are examples where an RND may develop.1 In this paper, the authors discuss the novel finding that an RND is the primary etiology whenever there is a chronic disease or dysfunction relating to a compromise in the flow of electricity through the presynaptic neurons (axons) across the synapses then through the postsynaptic neurons (dendrites). An extensive list of diseases, conditions, and dysfunctions has been identified in which synaptic monoamine RND are recognized (see Appendix A and Appendix B).1–13 414 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress The monoamine-associated RND is by far the most prevalent constellation of nutritional deficiencies found in humans (see Appendix A and Appendix B). It is postulated that over 80% of humans suffer from symptoms relating to a serotonin and/or catecholamine RND. Conditions prior to in situ monoamine transporter optimization (MTO, referred to in some previous papers as OCT functional status optimization) made it impossible to achieve consistent results with the administration of monoamine amino acid precursors. With the invention and refinement of MTO, the ability to study, manipulate, and optimally manage monoamine-related RND became clinically possible.1–13 Four primary classes of monoamine-associated RND have been identified by this research project: • RND associated with monoamine disease or dysfunction • RND induced by inappropriate administration of amino acids • RND induced iatrogenically or by the administration of certain drug classes • RND associated with genetic defects or predisposition. Endogenous versus competitive inhibition state Serotonin and dopamine, and their precursors, exist in one of two distinctly unique and physiologically divergent states, ie, the endogenous state and the competitive inhibition state.1–8,11–13 The monoamine hypothesis advocates that the etiology of disease symptoms and/or regulatory dysfunction in the endogenous state is low synaptic monoamine concentrations which induce trans-synaptic electrical defects. Under this model, an absolute nutritional deficiency type of approach is advocated, where simply returning synaptic monoamine levels to normal corrects the electrical problem, leading to relief of disease symptoms. None of this is true. There is no documentation illustrating that merely establishing normal synaptic neurotransmitter levels is effective in correcting an electrical defect.1 Subjects in the endogenous state, with and without monoamine-related disease, if not suffering from a monoamine-secreting tumor, cannot be differentiated by laboratory monoamine assays including MTO. Statistical distribution of monoamine levels are the same in subjects with and without disease.1,5,7,11 The term “competitive inhibition” refers primarily to interaction between monoamines and their amino acid precursors in synthesis, metabolism, and transport. The competitive inhibition state occurs when significant amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are administered simultaneously. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines The daily dosing values of serotonin and/or dopamine precursors required for the system to enter into the competitive inhibition state cannot be achieved by diet alone. When the etiology of chronic symptoms is postsynaptic electrical compromise, the system needs to be placed into the competitive inhibition state in order to elevate synaptic monoamines high enough to compensate for the postsynaptic damage. Optimization of synaptic monoamine levels in order to facilitate optimal flow of electricity is only possible with simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine precursors guided by MTO.1–8,11–13 Etiologies of postsynaptic neuron damage Significant damage to the postsynaptic neurons of the serotonin and catecholamine systems may theoretically have numerous etiologies. The most common1 are (in order of frequency of occurrence): • neurotoxin-induced • trauma-related • biology-related • genetic predisposition. These four categories interact and are interconnected. For example, patients suffering from the genetic disease CharcotMarie-Tooth, which afflicts approximately 1 in 2500 humans, have a list of over 50 drugs that are potentially neurotoxic in the presence of this genetic state but are not toxic to patients without the genetic disorder.14 In patients suffering from chronic monoamine-related disease, there is permanent damage to the structures of the postsynaptic neurons that conduct electricity, such as occurs in Parkinson’s disease.1 This damage is permanent and does not spontaneously reverse with time. Parkinson’s disease is not the only monoamine-related disease where humans suffer significant permanent postsynaptic damage.6 Based on MTO results, virtually all patients with chronic monoamine-associated disease have permanent postsynaptic damage caused by outside forces.1 Synaptic monoamine levels These monoamines do not cross the blood–brain barrier. Drugs do not increase the total number of monoamine molecules Amino acids in the brain; their mechanism of action only facilitates movement of monoamines from one place to another. The only way to increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the brain is by administration of their amino acid precursors which cross the blood–brain barrier where they are then synthesized into new monoamine molecules.1 Serotonin is synthesized from 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) which is synthesized from L-tryptophan. Dopamine is synthesized from L-dopa which is synthesized from L-tyrosine. Epinephrine is synthesized from norepinephrine which is synthesized from dopamine (see Figure 1).1,8 Prior to development of MTO, no method existed to manage properly and objectively the amino acid and monoamine interaction problems found in Figure 2 that are observed in the competitive inhibition state. The very act of administering amino acid precursors may cause amino acid and/or monoamine depletion, leading to an RND. The administration of improperly balanced amino acids may lead to an RND environment with increased side effects, adverse reactions, and suboptimal results.1,8 The key to addressing an amino acid precursor imbalance during administration is the novel method of simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine precursors, along with sulfur amino acids in a proper balance, as defined by MTO.1,8 Review of the chemical properties of the immediate monoamine precursors, L-dopa and 5-HTP, shows that they hold tremendous and extraordinary potential in the management of RND. L-dopa and 5-HTP are freely synthesized to dopamine and serotonin, respectively, without biochemical feedback inhibition. Each freely crosses the blood–brain barrier. It is possible to achieve any required level of serotonin and dopamine to optimize synaptic monoamine levels in the brain with these nutrients. MTO reveals that it is not the concentration of monoamines that is critical for optimal results; it is the balance between serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state, as defined by MTO, that is most critical in re-establishing and optimizing the postsynaptic flow of electricity.1,8 Even though 5-HTP has had increasing usage by physicians, the literature, dating back to the 1950s, has never Monoamine neurotransmitters L-tryptophan 5-HTP Serotonin L-tyrosine L-dopa Dopamine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Figure 1 Synthesis of serotonin and the catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine). Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 415 Dovepress Hinz et al Depletes Depletes Dopamine Serotonin Depletes Sulfur amino acids L-tyrosine Depletes L-tryptophan Depletes 5-HTP Depletes L-dopa Figure 2 Amino acid precursor-induced monoamine relative nutritional deficiency. Administration of improperly balanced monoamine precursors and/or sulfur amino acids may lead to far reaching relative nutritional deficiencies. This depletion of amino acids and monoamines can only be corrected with proper administration of nutrients as guided by monoamine transporter optimization. Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. supported truly successful, consistent, and reproducible use of 5-HTP in management of nutritional deficiencies. MTO clearly explains this problem, ie, the unbalanced approach to the use of amino acid precursors.8 The literature on Parkinson’s disease demonstrates that the L-dopa dosing value potential is limited due to side effects and adverse reactions. In addition, the effectiveness of L-dopa wanes with time (tachyphylaxis). While L-dopa is recognized as the most effective nutritional management for Parkinson’s disease, it is common to use other much less effective alternative Parkinson’s medications, such as agonists and metabolic enzyme inhibitors, initially and for as long as possible in the management of Parkinson’s disease, saving L-dopa for last due to all of the problems and side effects associated with its unbalanced administration. As noted in previous writings, utilizing MTO technology will virtually eliminate all side effects and problems associated with L-dopa administration which stem from improper balance of serotonin, 5-HTP, L-tryptophan, L-tyrosine, and sulfur amino acids. Optimal 5-HTP and L-dopa results require MTO. It is only under these conditions that efficacy increases significantly, and side effects virtually resolve or are made manageable.6 Specific examples of the dominant monoamine depleting the nondominant monoamine are listed here and illustrated in Figure 2.1,8 • • • • • • • • • • 5-HTP may deplete dopamine L-tryptophan may deplete dopamine L-dopa may deplete serotonin L-dopa may deplete L-tryptophan L-dopa may deplete L-tyrosine L-dopa may deplete sulfur amino acids L-tyrosine may deplete serotonin L-tyrosine may deplete 5-HTP L-tyrosine may deplete sulfur amino acids Sulfur amino acids may deplete dopamine 416 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress • Sulfur amino acids may deplete serotonin MTO in the competitive inhibition state reveals that effecting change to one component will effect change to all components of the serotonin-catecholamine system, as depicted in Figure 2, in a predictable manner. Unbalanced administration of precursors causes the dominant monoamine to exclude the nondominant monoamine in synthesis and transport, leading to depletion and evolution of an RND relating to the nondominant system in the process. A novel finding of this research is that when depletion of the nondominant system is great enough, the effects of the dominant system will no longer be observed at any dosing value. This is a severe RND state.8 The L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase enzyme catalyzes conversion of 5-HTP and L-dopa to serotonin and dopamine, respectively. Reviewing Figure 3, administration of unbalanced enzyme-dominant dosing values of 5-HTP or L-tryptophan will cause the serotonin side of the equation to dominate L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase and deplete the dopamine/catecholamine side of the equation through compromise of synthesis. This causes an RND of the nondominant dopamine/catecholamine systems. The same is true in reverse with the administration of L-dopa. When the dopamine side is dominant at the enzyme relative to the serotonin side, a serotonin-related RND will occur (see Figures 2 and 3).1–8,11–13 The activity of the monoamine oxidase enzyme system, which catalyzes monoamine metabolism, is not static. If levels of one system become dominant, monoamine oxidase activity will increase, leading to depletion and an associated RND of the nondominant system via accelerated metabolism (see Figures 2 and 4).1–8,11–13 Tryptophan 5-HTP Tyrosine L-dopa Aromatic amino acid decarboxylase Serotonin Dopamine Figure 3 Improperly balanced amino acid precursor administration leads to depletion of the nondominant system causing a relative nutritional deficiency of that system through competitive inhibition at the L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase by the dominant system during synthesis of serotonin and dopamine. Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines Dopamine norepinephrine epinephrine Serotonin MAO COMT HVA 5-HIAA Figure 4 Domination of the monoamine oxidase enzyme system by one system leads to increased enzyme activity resulting in depletion of the nondominant system with an associated relative nutritional deficiency through increased metabolism. Abbreviations: COMT, catechol-O-methyltransferase; MAO, monoamine oxidase; 5-HIAA, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; HVA, homovanillic acid. Synthesis (Figure 3) and metabolism (Figure 4) of monoamines is dependent on OCT which regulates movement of amino acids and monoamines in and out of cellular structures where these functions take place. This functional status can only be determined in situ with monoamine oxidase.1–8,11–13 OCT-dependent metabolism takes place both inside and outside of cells. If one system dominates the transporter, the nondominant system will be excluded from transport, leading to suboptimal regulation of function secondary to increased metabolism, and decreased synthesis of the nondominant system (see Figure 5). When unbalanced amino acid precursors and/or monoamines are present at the transporter entrance, systemic monoamine concentrations, which are dependent on transport, will not be optimal. This leads to an amino acid-induced RND along with suboptimal regulation of function.1–8,11–13 Dopamine phase 2 or 3 at the transporter. Competitive inhibition in place Gate open To the urine OCT gate-lumen regulation Basolateral monoamine transporter lumen Serotonin phase I at the transporter. Gate regulation in place To the urine Gate partially closed Figure 5 In the competitive inhibition state, organic cation transport of serotonin and catecholamines needs to be in proper balance to ensure optimal regulation of function and optimal synthesis of both systems and prevent monoamine-induced and/or amino acid-induced relative nutritional deficiencies. Abbreviation: OCT, organic cation transporters. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 When the established effects of the dominant system d issipate, secondary to depletion of the nondominant system, it is caused by an amino acid-induced RND associated with the nondominant monoamine system. This research has tracked the etiology of L-dopa tachyphylaxis to a novel serotonin-related RND, ie, serotonin is depleted due to serotonin precursor nutrient needs being greater than can be achieved with an optimal diet in the face of L-dopa depletion of serotonin and serotonin precursors. This is supported by the novel findings that administering proper levels of serotonin precursors as guided by MTO can reverse L-dopa tachyphylaxis quickly.1–8 Centrally acting monoamine RND The bundle damage theory notes that damage to the postsynaptic structural components involved with electrical conduction is the primary cause of electrical dysfunction associated with the monoamine-related diseases, not low synaptic neurotransmitter levels. As previously noted, when these electrical dysfunctions are present on a chronic basis, monoamine levels and nutrient levels are in the normal range on laboratory studies.1,8 The damage to the postsynaptic neurons leads to a compromise in the regulatory flow of electricity. When the flow of electricity is compromised enough, symptoms and dysfunction develop.1 Parkinson’s disease is a prototype in the study of monoamine-related RND. It is well known that in Parkinson’s disease there is damage to the dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra in the brain. L-dopa is administered in order to increase dopamine levels to compensate for the compromised electrical flow that results from the damage. MTO evaluation shows that the only viable explanation for chronic electrical dysfunctional diseases that are present in patients who have normal synaptic monoamine levels is damage to the postsynaptic neuron structures (bundle damage theory). This is the classical presentation observed with the Parkinson’s disease model where electrical dysfunction secondary to postsynaptic neuron damage has been identified and has caused an RND problem related to inadequate intake of the dopamine precursor. It is the novel findings of this research project that, as with Parkinson’s disease, postsynaptic neuronal damage with the associated RND is common in all chronic monoamine-related illnesses for which the etiology is electrical dysfunction.6 Prior to management of monoamine RND, the amount of nutrients entering the brain is normal but it is not high enough to facilitate synthesis of monoamines at the levels needed to allow the OCT to function up to the required flow potentials encoded in the transporter. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 417 Dovepress Hinz et al Materials and methods The primary forces responsible for establishing monoamine levels throughout the body are synthesis, metabolism, and transport. Transport dominates with its control and regulation over synthesis and metabolism.1,8 The first step in the RND management protocol is simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors in dosing values great enough to place the monoamine system into the competitive inhibition state. Then, 1 week later, a urine sample is obtained, monoamine assays are performed, and MTO interpretation is done. This enables a proper decision on the modification of amino acid dosing values in order to achieve both the serotonin and dopamine in the optimal phase 3 ranges.3,4,6,12 If the MTO-guided amino acid dosing value changes do not yield the desired results in 1 week, another specimen is obtained and submitted for additional MTO-guided dosing change recommendations. The optimal phase 3 ranges of serotonin and dopamine are achieved with the benefit of MTO. This is a complex task because, in the competitive inhibition state, changing one amino acid precursor changes all components of the equation shown in Figure 2.3,4,6,12 Two or more urinary serotonin and dopamine assays, performed on different days while taking different amino acid dosing values, are required for absolute MTO verification of phases and dosing recommendations. The patient must be taking monoamine precursors in significantly varied doses for five or more days continuously to allow for equilibration of the system to the dosing change. The results of these serial assays are then compared to determine the change in urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in response to the change in amino acid precursor dosing values.3,4,6,12 At the initial visit it is recommended that the following adult amino acid dosing values be initiated: L-cysteine 4500 mg, L-tyrosine 3000 mg, vitamin C 1000 mg, L-lysine 500 mg, 5-HTP 300 mg, calcium citrate 220 mg, vitamin B6 75 mg, folate 400 µg, and selenium 400 µg. The pediatric dosing values (,17 years) are half the adult dosing values. A full discussion of the scientific basis for each of these amino acid and cofactor nutrients is covered in previous writings by the authors. A brief overview is as follows: L-tyrosine and 5-HTP are dopamine and serotonin precursors, respectively. Vitamin C, vitamin B6, and calcium citrate are cofactors required in the synthesis of serotonin and/or dopamine. Folate is required for optimal synthesis of sulfur amino acids. Selenium is given in response to the ability of cysteine to concentrate methylmercury in the central nervous system. L-lysine prevents loose hair follicles in a bariatric medical practice. L-cysteine is administered 418 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress to compensate for L-tyrosine-induced depletion of sulfur amino acids.3,4,6,12 The literature verifies that baseline monoamine testing in the endogenous state, prior to starting monoamine amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine, is of no value due to lack of reproducibility when monoamine testing is performed on multiple days from the same subject. Therefore, baseline testing has no place in monoamine-related RND management.3,4,6,12 In the competitive inhibition state, laboratory testing has reproducibility on successive test dates. MTO can assist in selecting the appropriate dose of the respective amino acid precursors to achieve the required transporter flow of monoamines and amino acids for optimal RND management.3,4,6,12 Three-phase transporter response When postsynaptic damage compromises electrical flow at that postsynaptic location, the OCT is encoded with optimal monoamine transporter configuration and flow rates to compensate for the damage. When the monoamine flows are optimized immediately above the phase 2/phase 3 inflection point, as discussed in this section, there is optimal restoration of postsynaptic electrical flow. However, when a significant RND exists, encoded OCT needs cannot be met by dietary intake alone, and this is the basis of the RND.1–13 In the competitive inhibition state, three phases of OCT subtype 2 (OCT2) transporter response are observed. The status of monoamines in the endogenous state may be referred to as phase 0. In phase 0, the serotonin or dopamine entrance gates are at maximum closure, although still partially open, and the concentrations of monoamine presenting at the transporter are too low for the entrance gate to impact access of the monoamine to the transporter. In phase 0, the monoamines simply access the OCT2 without restriction. Since urinary monoamine levels are a measurement of monoamines not transported by the OCT2, urinary monoamine levels are random in phase 0, not affected by the entrance gate or transporter.1–13 Proper use of MTO deciphers the optimal flow of serotonin and dopamine as established by amino acid precursor administration which is encoded in OCT2 by the damaged system. Proper implementation of MTO revolves around identification of the phase 1, phase 2, and phase 3 of both urinary serotonin and dopamine responses during administration of varied amino acid precursor dosing values (the competitive inhibition state). While an experienced interpreter may often be able to determine the serotonin and dopamine International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines phases with one test, a high degree of certainty exists only when two urinary monoamine assays are compared while taking varied amino acid dosing values. Referring to Figure 6, in phase 2, the urinary serotonin and dopamine levels are low (serotonin ,80 µg and dopamine ,475 µg of monoamine per g of creatinine). In phase 1, there is an inverse relationship between amino acid dosing and urinary monoamine levels. In phase 3, there is a direct correlation between amino acid dosing values and urinary monoamine levels on assay. The amino acid dosing values where the phase inflection points occur is highly variable and unique to each individual.1–13 Assayed urinary serotonin and dopamine values are reported in µg of monoamine per g of creatinine in order to compensate for fluctuations in urinary specific gravity. The phase 3 optimal range for urinary serotonin is defined as 80–240 µg of serotonin per g of creatinine. The phase 3 optimal range for urinary dopamine is defined as 475–1100 µg of dopamine per g of creatinine.1–13 Urine samples are usually collected 6 hours prior to bedtime, with 4 pm being the most frequent collection time point. For most patients, 6 hours before bedtime is the diurnal low point of the day.1–13 Organic cation transporters The authors have published numerous peer-reviewed articles on the topic of in situ MTO.1–13 These publications outlined the novel first and only in situ methodology for OCT functional status determination of encoded transporter optimization in humans. This paper establishes the novel RND etiology and traits associated with chronic monoamine-associated diseases and regulatory dysfunctions, ie, postsynaptic damage-induced electrical compromise and the resultant relative RND. The monoamines and their amino acid precursors are moved across cell walls by complex molecules known as transporters. Depending on their orientation with the cell Urinary monoamine levels Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Optimal range � � Increasing the daily balanced amino acid dosing � � Figure 6 The core part of monoamine transporter optimization, ie, the three phases of transporter response to varied amino acid precursor dosing values. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 wall, transporters may move these substances in or out of the cells.1 The three primary actions that determine monoamine neurotransmitter levels everywhere in the body are synthesis, metabolism, and transport. Transporters dominate and regulate synthesis and metabolism. Synthesis is dependent on transport of amino acids into the cells. Metabolism depends on transporters to move neurotransmitters into the environment where enzymes break them down. Ultimately, intercellular and extracellular (including synaptic) monoamine and amino acid precursor levels are functions of and dependent on transporters.1–8,11–13 The following key points establish synaptic monoamine neurotransmitter levels. Monoamine neurotransmitters are stored in storage vesicles found in the presynaptic neuron. When an electrical pulse travels down the presynaptic neuron, it causes the vesicles to fuse to the presynaptic neuron cell wall, at which point neurotransmitters are excreted into the synapse. This is not the controlling event that regulates synaptic neurotransmitter levels. The synaptic monoamine levels are a function of simultaneous interaction of two transporter types. High affinity transporters are found on all neurons where monoamines are synthesized. The OCT2 regulates synaptic neurotransmitter levels by transporting neurotransmitters that escape high affinity transport. It is the OCT2 that essentially fine tunes the intercellular and extracellular monoamine levels of the brain and kidneys. OCT2 are also located on the cell membrane of the presynaptic neuron. The OCT2 perform the reuptake function, whereby the neurotransmitters are returned back into the presynaptic neurons where they are stored in the vesicles, waiting to be released anew on impulse into the synapse.15 For many years, laboratories have attempted to decode results found when neurotransmitters are assayed. The primary approach has been to determine simply whether levels were high or low. This did not work because it did not take into account the effects of transporters. This high/low approach to assay interpretation, as a guide to amino acid dosing values, was no more effective than simply giving amino acid precursors randomly.5,7,11 There are three specific items1–13 that allow for the validity of MTO: • The various subtypes of transporters are “identical and homologous” throughout the body. • OCT encoding occurs in an identical and homologous manner that facilitates raising levels of monoamines to establish levels high enough to relieve symptoms. • Most importantly, OCT2 are found in only a few places in the body, mainly the kidneys and synapses of submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 419 Dovepress Hinz et al the brain; they are encoded identically and enable MTO determination to be an effective tool for establishing the optimal levels of amino acid precursor administration. Based on in situ OCT observations, when the patient is suffering from chronic monoamine neurotransmitter-related disease, MTO is the only method available that allows for establishment of balanced serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitter levels needed to compensate optimally for the defective electrical flow in the brain and to relieve the RND induced by postsynaptic damage.1–13 Most patients, by history, are simultaneously suffering from three or more monoamine deficiency diseases.9 This etiology is consistent with multifocal RND. The entire clinical picture presents as multiple monoamine-related disease, but needs to be managed as a single problem with one etiology, ie, a monoamine RND relating to suboptimal function of OCT2.1,8 The MTO defines: • The phase of serotonin and dopamine in OCT transport in the competitive inhibition state; • the status of the serotonin and dopamine OCT entrance gates; • the status of serotonin and dopamine OCT lumen saturation; and • the OCT balance status between the monoamines and their amino acid precursors.1–13 All four of these functions are critical to determining the following in the competitive inhibition state: • Optimal dosing values of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors. • Facilitation of optimal transport of serotonin and catecholamines. Results The results shown in the following tables are from urinary monoamine assays which demonstrate the extreme individual variability of serotonin and dopamine precursor needs in monoamine-related RND management under the guidance of MTO in order for both serotonin and dopamine to achieve the phase 3 optimal ranges. All three subjects in Tables 1–3 were suffering from depression with no other monoamine-related RND states present. In all three cases, when both serotonin and dopamine were established in the phase 3 optimal ranges, relief of depression symptoms was obtained. All three patients noted no relief of symptoms until both the serotonin and dopamine were established in these ranges. The US Department of Agriculture recommended daily allowances are intended for a normal population to meet 420 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress inimal daily nutrient needs, ie, to prevent absolute nutritional m deficiencies. Proper management of RND is intended to be under the care of a physician because achieving a balance of neurotransmitters may require administration of nutrients in dosing values which are well above the US Department of Agriculture recommended daily allowances.16 Serotonin and dopamine amino acid dosing required to meet encoded optimal monoamine transporter flow varies greatly over large dose ranges. There is no relationship, from patient to patient, between the ultimate dosing values of serotonin and dopamine precursors required to establish serotonin and dopamine concentrations at the optimal flow encoded in the OCT. The following ranges were extracted from a database containing over 2.4 million patient-days of amino acid management experience where monoamine-related RND were optimized with MTO. The effective therapeutic range was defined as the amino acid dosing values, within two standard deviations of the mean, that were associated with serotonin or dopamine in the phase 3 optimal range. Excluded from the data were patients suffering severe postsynaptic dopamine injury, such as Parkinson’s disease and restless leg syndrome. • The daily effective therapeutic range of 5-HTP as evidenced by a phase 3 serotonin in the 80 to 240 µg/g creatinine range was found to be .0 mg to 2400 mg. • The daily L-dopa effective therapeutic range as evidenced by phase 3 dopamine in the 475 to 1100 µg/g creatinine range was found to be .0 mg to 2100 mg. • The daily effective therapeutic range of L-tyrosine as evidenced by dopamine response to L-dopa administration was found to be .0 mg to 14,000 mg. The dosing values of 5-HTP, L-dopa, and L-tyrosine are independent of each other. Some variability in the high-end range values may occur when individual RND-associated disease states are examined versus this entire group of diseases. Using L-tyrosine as an example, dosing values of 14,000 mg per day were unknown in the literature prior to this research. However, when amino acid dosing values are established with MTO, these seemingly high doses are uniformly well tolerated by patients, because electrical flow and the system revert back to normal. Discussion The OCT2 of the brain fine tunes monoamine neurotransmitter levels. The OCT2 of the brain and kidneys are identical and homologous and share certain specific traits, including being genetically identical with regard to DNA sequencing.16 In order to understand the significance of the amino acid International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines Table 1 Patient with depression suffering from postsynaptic serotonin neuronal damage, as evidenced by the level of 5-HTP required to control the RND Urinary serotonin and dopamine reported in μg monoamine per g of creatinine Amino acids (μg/day) Date Serotonin Serotonin phase Dopamine Dopamine phase 5-HTP L-dopa L-tyrosine 11/1/2011 1/18/2011 12/4/2011 873 27 187 1 2 3 536 986 491 3 3 3 300 600 900 240 240 120 3000 4000 5000 Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; RND, relative nutritional deficiency. dosing value variables found in Tables 1–3, it is necessary to review OCT2 transporter physiology. Serotonin and dopamine transport across the basolateral membrane of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells is identical to the mechanism of action in the brain. A high affinity transporter is involved and the OCT2 transports and fine tunes monoamine neurotransmitter levels not transported by the high affinity transporters.17 The urinary assays of Tables 1–3 represent monoamines that are newly synthesized in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells and are not transported across the basolateral membrane by the high affinity OCT2 system. These newly synthesized monoamines, not transported by the basolateral transporter system, are transported via the OCTN2 through the apical membrane, finally ending up in the urine.1,8 The high affinity OCT2 system in the brain primarily functions as the monoamine reuptake transporters located on the presynaptic neurons. Synaptic monoamine levels represent monoamines that have not been transported into the presynaptic neurons. This is a functional transporter characteristic of the brain and is identical and homologous to OCT2 function of the proximal renal tubule cells. The synaptic monoamine levels are analogous to the monoamine concentrations found in the urine. Monoamine reuptake inhibitor drugs interact with OCT2 transporters.1–13 When postsynaptic damage associated with compromise in the flow of electricity occurs leading to development of disease symptoms: • An increase in synaptic monoamine levels compensates by facilitating the increased flow of electricity. • OCT2 transporters are encoded to establish monoamine concentrations required to compensate for the problem. This is evidenced by the monoamine/amino acid dosing value variability in correlation with the clinical response of symptom resolution. • Serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor administration results in synaptic and urinary monoamine levels following the three phase response.1–13 As noted in Figure 6, the optimal amino acid dosing values as identified by MTO places the serotonin and dopamine in phase 3 just above the phase 2/phase 3 inflection point. In the optimal phase 3 dosing range, the OCT2 entrance gates are fully open, and the flow through the transporter has become saturated with serotonin and dopamine. This occurs at the phase 2/phase 3 inflection point as the total amount of serotonin and dopamine presenting at the transporter entrance increases. In the competitive inhibition state, the concentration of serotonin and dopamine reported on assay is not as important as achieving proper balance of the monoamines in the optimal phase 3 ranges as defined by MTO.1–13 For example, a serotonin concentration of 230 µg/g creatinine may appear to be in the optimal range if only concentration values are considered. However, when this laboratory value is found to be in phase 1, a completely different physiological state emerges, ie, one of suboptimal synaptic function and restricted monoamine access to the transporter because the system gives priority to elevating synaptic monoamine levels at the expense of optimizing monoamines stored in the presynaptic vesicles.1–13 Table 2 Patient with depression suffering from postsynaptic catecholamine neuronal damage as evidenced by the level of L-dopa required to control the RND Urinary serotonin and dopamine reported in μg monoamine per g of creatinine Amino acids (μg/day) Date Serotonin Serotonin phase Dopamine Dopamine phase 5-HTP L-dopa L-tyrosine 10/4/2011 10/22/2011 11/6/2011 3392 2343 216 3 3 3 554 283 694 1 2 3 300 150 37.5 240 480 720 3000 1500 375 Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; RND, relative nutritional deficiency. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 421 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 3 Patient with depression suffering from postsynaptic serotonin and catecholamine neuronal damage as evidenced by the levels of 5-HTP and L-dopa required to control the RND Urinary serotonin and dopamine reported in μg monoamine per g of creatinine Amino acids (μg/day) Date Serotonin Serotonin phase Dopamine Dopamine phase 5-HTP L-dopa L-tyrosine 8/4/2011 8/22/2011 9/6/2011 10/4/2011 10/22/2011 11/6/2011 11/23/2011 12/9/2011 1496 1288 1213 761 364 168 64 161 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 362 178 86 152 187 248 417 513 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 240 360 480 720 960 1200 1440 1440 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10,000 Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; RND, relative nutritional deficiency. Synaptic monoamine levels and presynaptic vesicle monoamine levels are a function of OCT2 functional status. When compromise in electrical flow is present, the OCT2 is encoded with the monoamine transporter flow characteristics required for optimal flow through the presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic systems. This novel transporter encoding variability is vigorously displayed in Tables 1–3, where MTO defines the required optimal serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors.1–13 A hypothesis of this research states that, in the endogenous state, when postsynaptic neuron damage occurs, a point is reached where the transporters are unable to alter the flow of available monoamines sufficiently to keep the electrical flow at a level great enough for the system to function normally and the patient to be symptom-free. When the total monoamine concentration in the system is normal but too low for the transporters to optimize synaptic levels, it is the result of an RND of serotonin and/or dopamine; this requires resolution with a nutrient-based amino acid precursors approach any time low or inadequate levels of monoamine neurotransmitters exist.1–13 One of the foundations for monoamine-associated RND and the ability to compensate for this problem is illustrated in Tables 1–3. The body responds to postsynaptic neuron damage by encoding the OCT2 in a unique and individualized manner that facilitates synaptic monoamine compensation. However, monoamine levels that are high enough to allow the OCT2 to compensate are not achievable on a regular diet, so the system languishes in the phase 0 state.1–13 By administration of properly balanced nutrients (amino acids), optimal synaptic monoamine levels are established and relief of symptoms and/or proper regulation of function occur. As discussed in the Results section, the amino acid dosing values required to achieve optimal OCT2 function 422 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress vary greatly and are very individualized. Once the proper amino acid dosing needed to relieve symptoms is found, it becomes that patient’s standard nutrient intake requirement to compensate for the RND unless further postsynaptic damage is experienced.1–13 The site of postsynaptic neuron damage in the brain dictates the nature of the RND and the monoamine-associated disease symptoms that are manifest. With Parkinson’s disease, damage occurs in the dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra. Patients suffering chronic depression sustain postsynaptic damage to the regions of the brain that control affect and mood. This could be a damage-associated RND of the serotonin, dopamine, or norepinephrine postsynaptic neurons or any combination thereof (Tables 1–3).1–13 The amino acid dosing values found in Table 3 deserve some additional reflection. The dosing values of 5-HTP and L-tyrosine are novel, and much larger than reported in the previous literature. The dosing value of L-dopa for this nonParkinson’s patient is relatively large as well. Administration of the novel amino acid dosing values needed to properly address RND which are this large, with successful resolution of symptoms, would not be possible or considered without MTO. Side effects and adverse reactions due to imbalanced administration of amino acid dosing values of this magnitude without MTO guidance would prohibit dosing values such as this, effectively establishing an amino acid dosing barrier. Further, without MTO, there is no objective amino acid dosing value guidance in addressing the RND; it is a random event in an environment where individual needs vary on a large scale and the dosing needs of serotonin and dopamine precursors are independent of each other. When serotonin and dopamine levels are increased to levels required to address the RND and proper balance is achieved with MTO International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress guidance, these amino acid dosing values, such as found in Table 3, are exceptionally well tolerated and generate the desired result of safely alleviating symptoms. The key is proper balance. MTO reveals that if side effects and adverse reactions occur during amino acid administration, they are not due to a specific amino acid; rather, imbalance between the serotonin and dopamine systems is the cause. The lack of unmanageable side effects, such as those observed when only L-dopa is administered for management of Parkinson’s disease, is attributable to the balanced administration of the precursors which restore neuronal electrical flow and system function to normal.1–13 Administration of proper levels of amino acids does not make the patient high or euphoric. In response to establishing the serotonin and dopamine in the phase 3 optimal ranges, symptoms resolve and the patient simply feels normal. What matters is getting the required levels of balanced amino acids into the system to compensate for the RND associated with the electrical defect under the guidance of MTO without regard to how large the amino acid dosing value has become, as long as the need is indicated.1–13 Amino acid-induced RND An RND of the nondominant system occurs when there is an improper balance between the serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors. The three primary forces that regulate concentrations of centrally acting monoamines t hroughout the body are synthesis, metabolism, and transport. The serotonin and catecholamine systems are so heavily intertwined in the competitive inhibition state that they need to be managed as one system under MTO guidance to achieve optimal results. Changes to one component of either system will affect all components of both systems in a predictable manner.8 Giving only 5-HTP or only L-dopa or improperly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors (Figure 2) will, over time, create many problems which result in needless patient suffering from suboptimal monoamine levels, increased side effects, and false expectations during medical care.8 Unbalanced administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors causes: • One system to dominate over the other system in synthesis, transport, and metabolism (see Figures 3–5) leading to depletion of the nondominant system.8 • Increased incidence of side effects due to administration of improperly balanced amino acids.8 International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines • The inability to achieve the amino acid dosing values needed to optimize MTO fully, which prevents both optimal management of the RND and restoration of proper postsynaptic neuron flow.8 Iatrogenic or drug-induced RND Depletion of monoamine neurotransmitters is known in the literature to be associated with administration of reuptake inhibitors. Reuptake inhibitors are not just prescription drugs used for treatment of depression and attention-deficit disorder, but are also available as street drugs, such as amphetamines, “Ecstasy,” and methamphetamine. Reuptake inhibitors deplete monoamines via their mechanism of action, which induces an RND. All amphetamines also have serious neurotoxic potential and are fully capable of inducing a neurotoxin-associated RND, with postsynaptic neuron damage in addition to the reuptake inhibitor-driven RND. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are also known to decrease serotonin synthesis, leading to a drug-induced RND. The nonspecific reuptake inhibitor amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant) is known to deplete norepinephrine, leading to a drug-induced RND.13 A series of illustrations (Figures 7–9) have been posted on The National Institute on Drug Abuse’s website. These f igures show how reuptake inhibitors deplete monoamine neurotransmitters leading to the induction of an RND.13 Drugs that work with neurotransmitters do not function properly if there are not enough synaptic neurotransmitters available. The end stage of reuptake inhibitor-induced Figure 7 Prior to reuptake inhibitor treatment, inadequate levels of neurotransmitters in the synapse cause a disease-associated relative nutritional deficiency leading to compromised electrical flow through the postsynaptic neurons resulting in suboptimal regulation of function and/or development of symptoms. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 423 Dovepress Hinz et al Figure 8 Administration of reuptake inhibitors blocks monoamine transport back into the presynaptic neurons. This leads to a net redistribution of neurotransmitter molecules from the presynaptic neuron to the synapse. The increased synaptic level of monoamines increases post-synaptic flow of electricity leading to restoration of adequate regulation of function and/or relief of symptoms. RND occurs when there is severe depletion of the neurotransmitters: • Drug stops working. • Discontinuation syndrome is so strong that the patient cannot discontinue the drug even though there is no perceived benefit. • Suicidal ideation develops. When this happens, administration of properly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors will correct the RND, restore the effects of the drug, and restore the normal functioning of the system.13 Disease-induced RND Inadequate flow of postsynaptic electricity is associated with virtually all chronic monoamine-related diseases. Figure 9 The drug-induced relative nutritional deficiency. When the monoamines are in the vesicles of the presynaptic neuron, they are not exposed to the enzymes that catalyze metabolism (monoamine oxidase and catechol-O-methyltransferase). They are safe from metabolism. When they are relocated outside the vesicles of the presynaptic neuron, they are exposed to these enzymes at a greater frequency. Reuptake inhibitors create a mass migration of monoamines causing increased metabolic enzyme activity and metabolism of monoamines. This leads to the druginduced relative nutritional deficiency if significant amounts of balanced serotonin and dopamine precursors are not coadministered with the reuptake inhibitor. 424 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress In all cases where synaptic monoamine levels are normal but not adequate such as states where low or inadequate levels of monoamine neurotransmitters occur, there is a monoamineassociated RND. Even with the use of reuptake inhibitor drugs, proper management of these problems involves addressing the RND by administering the monoamines and their amino acid precursors. Optimization can only be achieved with MTO. The ability of MTO to address monoamine-related RND is so definitive that proper implementation leads, with absolute certainty, to determining whether monoamine neuronal electrical dysfunction is a component of the disease picture. The examples below illustrate how proper application of monoamine transport optimization can lead to recognition and resolution of the RND and also allow for observation of other problems not clearly anticipated as disease etiologies. Major affective disorder Chronic major affective disorder (depression) has an RND present which leads to monoamine levels in the central nervous system being too low to achieve optimal postsynaptic flow of electricity. Properly balanced amino acid precursors are necessary; dietary nutrient intake alone is not sufficient to establish high enough monoamine levels to optimize transporter-dependent synaptic monoamines.9,12 Contrary to the popular assertion that 5-HTP is indicated for depression, MTO reveals that use of only 5-HTP for depression is contraindicated. Many patients with depression respond only to drugs with dopamine and/or norepinephrine reuptake inhibition properties. Administration of only 5-HTP leads to an amino acid-induced RND of the catecholamines which leads to exacerbation of depression, especially in patients whose depression is dominated by catecholamine dysfunction. Use of only 5-HTP depletes catecholamines. When catecholamine depletion is great enough, any clinical benefits initially observed with the administration of 5-HTP will be no longer present.1–13 Reuptake inhibitors have only marginal effectiveness in addressing the symptoms associated with depression and no ability to address the etiology of the RND. In doubleblind studies of major affective disorder, only 7%–13% of patients achieve symptom relief greater than placebo. Drug administration reveals subgroups of patients suffering from major affective disorder who achieve greater efficacy with a serotonin, dopamine, or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor or combination. The area of the brain that controls affect involves interactions of all three of these monoamines. The mechanism and site of action in the affected area of the International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress brain will dictate which of these monoamines are primarily involved. While recognizing that any of several monoamines may be involved while displaying identical symptomatology, the exact determination of which ones are primarily involved is not required. The MTO approach simultaneously optimizes levels of all three of these monoamines in transport, based on interpretation of information encoded in the transporters.9,12,13 Standard management for many patients with depression includes prescribing reuptake inhibitor antidepressants. If proper levels of nutrients are not administered concomitantly with the drug, monoamine neurotransmitter depletion may and often does occur, leading to a drug-induced RND.9,12 Two primary types of depression are recognized here, ie, major affective disorder and bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole (bipolar depression). As was previously noted in the literature, when OCT serotonin and dopamine levels were established with MTO in the optimal phase 3 ranges, all subjects whose depression did not resolve were suffering from bipolar depression.12 A review of the clinical history prior to initiation of management revealed that these patients had no response to bipolar medications in the past and had no response when amino acids were optimized. These patients had all been treated with a mood-stabilizing drug without success. This is an RND that requires both serotonin and dopamine to be placed in the phase 3 optimal ranges before the effects of mood-stabilizing drugs are observed. When the amino acid dosing values required for MTO were achieved and a mood-stabilizing drug (lithium 300 mg twice a day or valproic acid 250 mg two or three times a day) was added, .98% of cases experienced resolution of depressive bipolar symptoms in 1–3 days. These bipolar depressive patients were suffering from damage at a central nervous system site distinctly different from that of major affective disorder. Bipolar patients require addition of a mood-stabilizing drug that had previously yielded no benefit but became effective once the RND was properly addressed with the aid of MTO.12 Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines L-dopa is recognized as the most effective management option for Parkinson’s disease, but is generally not used firstline due to the exceptionally large amount of iatrogenically induced significant side effects and problems that evolve over time. Previous literature published by the authors asserts that virtually all of the problems associated with administration of L-dopa and/or carbidopa are caused by iatrogenic mismanagement of the large number of RND associated with the disease, L-dopa, and/or carbidopa. These RND involve all three major classes of RND, ie, disease-associated, amino acid-induced, and drug-induced.6 The Parkinson’s disease-associated RND is characterized by damage to the postsynaptic dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra. The extremely high synaptic dopamine levels required to restore normal flow of electricity cannot be established by dietary intake alone.6 Parkinson’s disease-associated RND management may require L-dopa dosing values up to 200 times greater than the needs of other monoamine disease processes, as high as 25,000 mg per day. MTO reveals that the OCT2 are encoded to elevate synaptic dopamine vigorously, to the point that serotonin is excluded from the transporter leading to development of a Parkinson’s disease-associated serotonin RND. Other Parkinson’s disease RND include norepinephrine and epinephrine which are dependent on dopamine levels for synthesis and are inadequate when the disease is present.6 The three primary monoamine RND associated with Parkinson’s disease are shown in Figure 10. The only practical way to increase the depleted levels of monoamines and amino acids noted in Figure 10 is by administration of amino acid precursors guided by MTO.6 Administration of L-dopa is also known to induce RND associated with L-tyrosine, sulfur amino acids, L-tryptophan, Status in Parkinson’s disease Status with L-dopa Rx Serotonin (Central) Depleted Further depleted Dopamine (Central) Depleted Norepinephrine (Central) Depleted Parkinson’s disease Epinephrine (Central) Depleted Serotonin (Peripheral) Depleted Standard medical management of Parkinson’s disease uses L-dopa and carbidopa. This approach literally turns into a case study of how many iatrogenic side effects and adverse reactions can be amassed during amino acid mismanagement of patients. Under this approach, traditionally there is a total disregard for the interactions of L-dopa and the peripheral monoamine status induced by carbidopa (see Figure 2).6 Dopamine (Peripheral) Depleted Further depleted Norepinephrine (Peripheral) Depleted Further depleted Epinephrine (Peripheral) Depleted International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 L-tyrosine Tyrosine Hydroxylase Further depleted Status with Carbidopa Rx Further depleted Further depleted Depleted Depleted L-tryptophan Depleted 5-Hydroxytryptophan Depleted Sulfur amino acids Depleted Figure 10 Basis for multiple relative nutritional deficiencies associated with Parkinson’s disease. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 425 Dovepress Hinz et al 5-HTP, and serotonin (see Figure 2).6 The following are previously published categories of L-dopa-associated problems that are now correlated with an L-dopa-associated RND.6 Serotonin-related RND induced by L-dopa A serotonin RND is the primary reason the L-dopa quits functioning (tachyphylaxis, ie, L-dopa stops working).6 L-dopa tachyphylaxis is precipitated by depletion of serotonin when dominant levels of L-dopa are administered. Administration of 5-HTP to restore the balance guided by MTO is required to manage this RND properly. RND-induced transport imbalance between serotonin and dopamine This RND-related problem is responsible for a number of side effects associated with the administration of L-dopa in a dominant manner, ie, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, decreased mental acuity, depression, psychotic episodes including delusions, euphoria, pathological gambling, impulse control, confusion, dream abnormalities including nightmares, anxiety, disorientation, dementia, nervousness, insomnia, sleep disorders, hallucinations and paranoid ideation, somnolence, memory impairment, and increased libido.6 An imbalance in the administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors is responsible for all of the above listed side effects and adverse reactions. MTO is required when serotonin precursors are started in combination with L-dopa. Several of the side effects, such as nausea, may be caused by administering the serotonin amino acid precursor at levels that are either too high or too low. Since the status of serotonin could be too high or too low, the level cannot be empirically determined and MTO is required. L-tyrosine RND L-tyrosine RND may contribute to the associated on-off effect, motor fluctuations, or dopamine fluctuations.6 MTO has identified fluctuations in dopamine transport that respond to L-tyrosine administration. The etiology of this phenomenon remains unknown. L-dopa-induced sulfur amino acid RND L-dopa-induced sulfur amino acid RND is associated with bradykinesia (epinephrine depletion implicated), akinesia, dystonia, chorea, extrapyramidal side effects, fatigue, abnormal involuntary movements, and depletion of glutathione, potentiating further the dopamine neuron damage done by neurotoxins.6 Patients with Parkinson’s disease as a group have 426 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress significantly depleted sulfur amino acid levels, leading to an associated RND which is exacerbated by administration of L-dopa. Neurotoxins are the leading etiology of postsynaptic dopamine damage in Parkinson’s disease. Glutathione is the body’s most powerful toxin-neutralizing agent and is synthesized from sulfur amino acids. When a sulfur amino acid RND occurs, it may accelerate the progression of Parkinson’s disease due to increased susceptibility to further neurotoxic insult. Carbidopa-induced peripheral serotonin and catecholamine RND Carbidopa-induced peripheral serotonin and catecholamine depletion cause RND that are associated with numerous side effects and adverse reactions, ie, dyskinesia, glossitis, leg pain, ataxia, falling, gait abnormalities, blepharospasm (which may be taken as an early sign of excess dosage), trismus, increased tremor, numbness, muscle twitching, peripheral neuropathy, myocardial infarction, flushing, oculogyric crises, diplopia, blurred vision, dilated pupils, urinary retention, urinary incontinence, dark urine, hoarseness, malaise, hot flashes, sense of stimulation, dyspepsia, constipation, palpitation, fatigue, upper respiratory infection, bruxism, hiccups, common cold, diarrhea, urinary tract infections, urinary frequency, flatulence, priapism, pharyngeal pain, abdominal pain, bizarre breathing patterns, burning sensation of tongue, back pain, shoulder pain, chest pain (noncardiac), muscle cramps, paresthesia, increased sweating, falling, syncope, orthostatic hypotension, asthenia (weakness), dysphagia, Horner’s syndrome, mydriasis, dry mouth, sialorrhea, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, phlebitis, agranulocytosis, hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia, rash, gastrointestinal bleeding, duodenal ulcer, HenochSchonlein purpura, decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, angioedema, urticaria, pruritus, alopecia, dark sweat, abnormalities in alkaline phosphatase, abnormalities in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (alanine aminotransferase), abnormal Coombs’ test, abnormal uric acid, hypokalemia, abnormalities in blood urea nitrogen, increased creatinine, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase, and glycosuria.6 The problem in this category is a carbidopa-induced RND of peripheral serotonin and catecholamines, and is best managed by not using carbidopa in the first place. It is not needed when MTO is properly utilized. Carbidopa was originally employed in an effort to control the nausea associated with L-dopa administration, a side effect and RND manageable by MTO. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Carbidopa inhibits peripheral synthesis of serotonin and catecholamines by L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase. In the process, peripheral monoamines develop an associated RND with a plethora of symptoms (see above). By far, the largest group of RND-related side effects and adverse reactions in the management of Parkinson’s disease are due to carbidopa-induced RND. All of the reasons for which carbidopa is added to L-dopa can be safely and easily managed with MTO.6 Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder RND Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have revealed drug efficacy (reuptake inhibitor and stimulant) greater than placebo in 14%–41% of patients studied.4 Drug treatment revolves around administration of reuptake inhibitors, such as atomoxetine (a norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) and stimulants. The stimulants are divided into two classes, ie, amphetamine and nonamphetamine. Both classes have dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake properties, along with the potential for neurotransmitter depletion.4 ADHD patients are exposed to drug-induced RND: • from reuptake inhibitors which deplete neurotransmitters • from the amphetamines (neurotoxins) which cause brain damage. All of this is avoided with the amino acid administration approach guided by MTO, because ADHD responds well to this RND.4 A previous study indicated that pediatric ADHD management with amino acid administration guided by MTO which addressed the associated monoamine RND may be more effective than methylphenidate and atomoxetine.4 Crohn’s disease RND Crohn’s disease is a prototype for studying genetically associated RND. There is a known genetic defect of OCTN1 and OCTN2 transporters in the proximal and distal colon of patients suffering from Crohn’s disease. As with the OCT, the OCTN is capable of transporting organic cations, including serotonin, dopamine, and their precursors. In Crohn’s disease, the serotonin content of the mucosa and submucosa of the proximal and distal colon is significantly increased. The only reasonable explanation, as verified by clinical response, is that the OCTN1 and OCTN2 genetic deficits induce increased synthesis and tissue levels of serotonin. Based on MTO with Crohn’s patients, it appears that a severe imbalance between high serotonin levels and RND-associated dopamine transport, synthesis, and metabolism contributes significantly International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines to disease symptoms. The literature suggests that much of the clinical constellation found with Crohn’s disease is induced by serotonin toxicity in the colon exacerbated by dopaminerelated RND that exist simultaneously.3 Control of the disease symptoms and resolution of all gut lesions has been shown to occur with proper MTO-guided balanced amino acid dosing, without the use of any drugs and in cases where conventional drugs have had no positive effect.3 Other diseases The rest of the diseases and regulatory functions listed in Appendix A and Appendix B share the same basic approach to diagnosis, etiology, and RND management. If a monoamine-related RND is suspected where synaptic monoamine levels are not high enough to compensate for postsynaptic electrical defects, the amino acid dosing values needed to correct the problem can be identified and achieved with MTO. Conclusion The authors have published multiple papers relating to MTO. In the course of further research and writing efforts, it was realized that the most basic etiological factors relating to monoamine disease had not been previously discussed, ie, the presence of RND. The purpose of this paper is to clarify how common an etiology RND is and why it needs to be considered. Neurotoxic, traumatic, biological, and genetic components that induce permanent brain damage are real. Without an objective guidance tool such as MTO, specific problems relating to the association of these RND with this damage is not properly recognized or managed with either drugs or amino acids. Most physicians do not recognize toxicity as a cause of these diseases and few understand the existence of the common RND-based etiology. The treatment of symptoms with drugs, rather than addressing and resolving underlying RND with nutrients, leads to gross failures during management, prolonged unneeded disability, exacerbation of the disease, and morbidity. Many things are explained by becoming cognizant of the role of chronic postsynaptic damage, as associated with RND. In double-blind studies of the treatment of depression, reuptake inhibitors are only 7%–13% more effective than placebo. The monoamine RND model makes sense out of that information. Reuptake inhibitors are only able to increase transporter-driven synaptic monoamine levels minimally in phase 0 which, in the longer term, may lead to monoamine depletion after the response. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 427 Dovepress Hinz et al The RND models discussed in this paper have demonstrated how the damage might be related to either dopamine, norepinephrine, or serotonin neurons, or a combination of these. MTO defines the proper balance of amino acids in order to establish adequate synaptic levels of monoamines to compensate for postsynaptic damage and the electrical deficit, while relieving the etiological RND. It is the goal of this writing to stimulate interest and dialog based on these novel observations. The ability to address the cause of a problem with nutrients is more desirable than only treating the symptoms with a drug. Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Discrediting the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 2. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 4. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2011;3:19–24. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: A case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 428 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011; 7:1–7. 9. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009. 10. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis. Open Access Journal of Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:69–77. 14. CMTA Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association [homepage on the Internet]. Glenolden, PA: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association; 2006–2011. Available from: http://www.cmtausa.org/index.php?option=com_con tent&view=article&id=68&Itemid=42. Accessed February 12, 2012. 15. Andreas B, Ulrich K, Dagar M, et al. Human neurons express the polyspecific cation transporter hOCT2, which translocates monoamine neurotransmitters, amantadine, and memantine. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:342–352. 16. Food and Nutrition Information Center [homepage on the Internet]. USDA National Agricultural Library; updated 2012. Available from: http://fnic.nal.usda.gov/nal_display/index.php?info_center=4&tax_ level=1&tax_subject=620. Accessed February 12, 2012. 17. Wing-Kee L, Markus R, Bayram E, et. al. Organic cation transporters OCT1, 2, and 3 mediate high-affinity transport of the mutagenic vital dye ethidium in the kidney proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;296:F1504–F1513. International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Dovepress Nutritional deficiencies and centrally acting monoamines Appendix A Partial listing of central nervous system monoamine dysfunction-related diseases Appendix B Partial list of peripheral functions regulated by serotonin and/or dopamine Parkinson’s disease Obesity Bulimia Anorexia Depression Anxiety Panic attacks Migraine headaches Tension headaches Premenstrual syndrome Menopausal symptoms Obsessive compulsive disorder Obsessionality Insomnia Impulsivity Aggression Inappropriate aggression Inappropriate anger Psychotic illness Fibromyalgia Chronic fatigue syndrome Adrenal fatigue/burnout Hyperactivity Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder Hormone dysfunction Adrenal dysfunction Dementia Alzheimer’s disease Traumatic brain injury Phobias Chronic pain Nocturnal myoclonus Irritable bowel syndrome Crohn’s disease Ulcerative colitis Cognitive deterioration Organ system dysfunction Management of chronic stress Cortisol dysfunction Regulation of phosphate Loss of serotonin transporters associated with irritable bowel syndrome Hyperammonemia Hyperammonemia associated with retardation Regulation alterations in diabetes Regulation of renal function Regulation of renal hemodynamics Blood pressure regulation Potassium regulation Sodium regulation ATP regulation Regulation of receptors outside the central nervous system including but not limited to: • adrenal gland • blood vessels • carotid body • intestines • heart • parathyroid gland • kidney • urinary tract Regulation of renin secretion Regulation by autocrine or paracrine fashion Regulation in essential hypertension Regulation of angiotensin II Regulatory functions in shock Regulatory functions in septic shock Regulation of oxidative stress Regulation of glomerular filtration Regulation of functions that strengthen, examples include but are not limited to: • bone marrow • spleen • lymph nodes Regulation of dopamine in bone marrow cells including but not limited to: • splenocytes • lymphocytes from lymph nodes International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 429 Dovepress Hinz et al Regulation of sympathetic nervous system Regulation of platelet function Regulation of function in prostate cancer Regulation of syncope due to carotid sinus hypersensitivity Regulation of dialysis hypotension Regulation of cardiophysiological function Regulation of adrenochromaffin cells Regulation in hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension Regulation in Tourette’s syndrome Regulation of drug absorption and elimination Regulation in pre-eclampsia Regulation of fluid modulation and sodium intake via actions including but not limited to: • central nervous system • gastrointestinal tract Regulation of tubular epithelial transport Regulation of modulation of the secretion and/or action of vasopressin, which in turn causes changes in, but not limited to: • renin • aldosterone • norepinephrine • epinephrine • endothelin B receptors Regulation of fluid and sodium intake by way of “appetite” centers in the brain Regulation in idiopathic hypertension Regulation of alterations of gastrointestinal tract transport Regulation of detoxification of exogenous organic cations Regulation of prolactin secretion Regulation affecting memory Regulation of receptors in the central and peripheral system Regulation of fluid and electrolyte balance including but not limited to: • blood vessels • gastrointestinal tract • adrenal glands • sympathetic nervous system • hypothalamus • other brain centers Regulation of phosphorylation of DARPP-32 Regulation of dependent effects of psychostimulants and opioids Regulation of neuronal differentiation Regulation of neurotoxicity Regulation of transcription Regulatory effects on fibroblasts Regulation of melatonin synthesis in photoreceptors Cyclic regulation of intraocular pressure Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine Publish your work in this journal The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient.The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/ testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/international-journal-of-general-medicine-journal 430 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress International Journal of General Medicine 2012:5 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index R e v ie w 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 18 July 2012 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Thomas Uncini 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc, Cape Coral, 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3University Medical Center Mesabi Hibbing, MN, USA 1 Abstract: L-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) is the immediate precursor of serotonin. It is readily synthesized into serotonin without biochemical feedback. This nutrient has a large and strong following who advocate exaggerated and inaccurate claims relating to its effectiveness in the treatment of depression and a number of other serotonin-related diseases. These assertions are not supported by the science. Under close examination, 5-HTP may be contraindicated for depression in some of the very patients for whom promoters of 5-HTP advocate its use. Keywords: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan, L-5-HTP, L-5-hydroxytryptophan Introduction In the United States, the nutritional supplement 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) became available over the counter in April of 1995.1 Previously, it was only available by prescription. Its intuitively seductive appeal has encouraged its increasing use while disregarding the actual science which stands in sharp contrast to the general perceptions of the public and many physicians.2–15 The argument for using 5-HTP Correspondence: Marty Hinz 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S33259 When placed in the proper context, the following basic chemical properties2–15 explain the failure of 5-HTP to achieve consistent results. The following scientific facts are generally accepted without dispute: • In central nervous system disease states associated with synaptic serotonin dysfunction, synaptic serotonin levels in the brain must be increased to induce optimal outcomes. • Serotonin does not cross the blood–brain barrier. • 5-HTP freely crosses the blood–brain barrier. • 5-HTP is freely converted to serotonin without biochemical feedback inhibition. • When infinitely high amounts of 5-HTP are administered, it is theoretically possible to achieve infinitely high levels of serotonin. One limiting factor is the availability of the enzyme L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD), which freely catalyzes the conversion of 5-HTP to serotonin. The basic facts listed above form the basis of a very appealing and vehemently defended scenario, “5-HTP is all that is needed when levels of serotonin need to be increased effectively and safely.” Inadequate levels of serotonin in the brain have been associated with numerous disease states and here is a nutrient that can theoretically raise serotonin levels as high as needed.16–18 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 323–328 © 2012 Hinz et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. 323 Dovepress Hinz et al Short-term efficacy of 5-HTP alone Generally, efficacy studies related to 5-HTP fall into one of two categories: open (nonblinded) and double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. One naturopathic physician, who is considered by some to be a 5-HTP expert,17 interprets the results from an open study on his web site as follows:18 He reported one of his more impressive studies that involved 99 patients who were described as suffering from therapy resistant depression. These patients had not responded to any previous therapy including all available antidepressant drugs as well as electro convulsive therapy. Specifically reported was, “These therapy resistant patients received 5-HTP at dosages averaging 200 mg daily but ranging from 50 to 600 mg per day. Complete recovery was seen in 43 of the 99.”18 There are two points that require further discussion. First, the naturopath claims that only 5-HTP was administered to patients in the study.18 A review of the entire study revealed that a combination of 5-HTP with carbidopa was administered.19 Carbidopa is a general decarboxylase inhibitor that inhibits peripheral synthesis of the centrally acting monoamines (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine). It affects the response to 5-HTP dosing values by significantly increasing the availability of 5-HTP in the central nervous system.10 A comprehensive literature search of the use of 5-HTP for treating depression revealed that administration of 5-HTP alone is not very effective. To compensate for this efficacy problem, 5-HTP is often used in combination with other drugs and/or substances. There are more published studies examining the use of 5-HTP in combination with another substance than the use of 5-HTP alone. Second, according to the naturopath’s web site, 43 of 99 (43.4%) subjects taking 5-HTP and carbidopa achieved relief of depression.18 The web site notes that “such significant improvement in patients suffering from long-standing, unresponsive depression is quite impressive…”18 This illustrates a second flaw: this magnitude of improvement is no greater than that of a placebo. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of depression have consistently revealed that the placebo effect after 30 days of depression treatment ranges from 30%–45%.13 It is inaccurate to describe the referenced study as “One of the more impressive studies…” 18 when the efficacy rate was only 43.4%. This statement reveals a lack of understanding of the complex and large impact the placebo effect has in treating patients with depression.13 A review of peer-reviewed studies does not support the effectiveness of 5-HTP as follows: 324 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 1. “Trials performed do not provide evidence for an antidepressant effect of 5-HTP.”20 2. 2009 meta-analysis of 111 (one hundred eleven) 5-HTP / depression studies concluded, “Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-HTP and tryptophan before their widespread use can be recommended.”21 3. “While there is evidence that precursor loading may be of therapeutic value, particularly for the serotonin precursors 5-HTP and tryptophan, more studies of suitable design and size might lead to more conclusive results.”22 4. “The immediate serotonin precursor, 5-HTP, has been given to depressed patients either alone or in combination with a MAO inhibitor. The results are conflicting and, in the main, do not provide convincing evidence for an antidepressant effect for 5-HTP.”23 While there are some published pilot studies relating to small groups of subjects, the majority of these smaller studies conclude by noting that more studies are needed. The peer-reviewed literature supports the assertion that use of 5-HTP alone in the management of depression is associated with efficacy no greater than placebo and that its use is controversial.19–23 While those strongly advocating the use of 5-HTP alone believe that depression is due to serotonin dysfunction, depression may also be associated with catecholamine dysfunction, including dopamine and/or norepinephrine, or a combination of serotonin and catecholamine dysfunction.24,25 Administration of 5-HTP alone facilitates depletion of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine (see Discussion). When catecholamine neurotransmitter levels influence depression, administration of 5-HTP alone is contraindicated since it may deplete dopamine and norepinephrine, thereby worsening the disease and its underlying cause. This contraindication is not exclusive to depression, but extends to all other disease processes for which dysfunction of a catecholamine component has been implicated, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD),26 seasonal affective disorder,27 obesity,28 generalized anxiety disorder,25 and Parkinson’s disease.29 5-HTP alone contraindicated for long-term use The most significant side effects and adverse reactions may occur with long-term use (many months or longer). Administration of 5-HTP alone depletes catecholamines (dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine).12,15 When dopamine depletion is great enough, 5-HTP will no longer function.15 If other centrally acting monoamine-related Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 Dovepress disease processes involving catecholamines are present, administration of 5-HTP alone may deplete dopamine, norepinephrine and epinephrine thereby exacerbating these conditions.15 Based on monoamine transporter optimization (MTO) studies, managing depression and other centrally acting monoamine-related diseases requires a combination of properly balanced dopamine and serotonin amino acid precursors.2–15 Synthesis of serotonin from 5-HTP and dopamine from l-dopa is catalyzed by the same enzyme, L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD). Dopamine and serotonin amino acid precursor administration must be in proper balance. If only 5-HTP or 5-HTP that dominates dopamine at the enzyme is administered, it will block dopamine synthesis at the AAAD enzyme through competitive inhibition, leading to depletion of dopamine and the rest of the catecholamines.6,9,12,15,30 Metabolism of serotonin and dopamine is catalyzed by monoamine oxidase (MAO). The activity level of MAO is not static. With increasing doses of 5-HTP, which lead to increased serotonin levels, MAO activity increases. Without a properly balanced increase in dopamine there will be increased metabolism of dopamine leading to depletion.1,3,4,6,9,12,15 The synthesis, metabolism, and transport of serotonin and dopamine, along with their amino acid precursors, are primarily controlled by the functional status of transport, which is carried out by organic cation transporters (OCT). Serotonin, dopamine, and their amino acid precursors must be transported by OCT across cell walls. Transport dominates, controls and regulates synthesis and metabolism. Administration of 5-HTP alone leads to increased unbalanced transport of serotonin. Competitive inhibition at the transporters will inhibit movement of dopamine and its precursors into areas that affect synthesis and metabolism, compromising and depleting dopamine (catecholamine) levels. Long-term administration of 5-HTP alone, or in an unbalanced manner, facilitates depletion of catecholamines, negatively affecting neurotransmitter-related disease processes.3–15,31 Use of 5-HTP with a general decarboxylase inhibitor A literature review revealed that more studies have been reported using 5-HTP in combination with another substance than using 5-HTP alone due to the lack of efficacy of 5-HTP alone. One combination examined includes the use of 5-HTP with carbidopa. Carbidopa inhibits peripheral conversion of 5-HTP to serotonin and l-dopa to dopamine.32 Carbidopa was originally used in combination with l-dopa to control Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications symptoms associated with serotonin and dopamine imbalance that occur when only l-dopa was administered to manage Parkinson’s disease. The following problems have been reported with use of carbidopa to treat Parkinson’s disease.10 • “Most of the side effects observed in the management of Parkinson’s disease with the combination l-dopa and carbidopa are attributed to the carbidopa.”10,15 • “Due to the lack of specificity of l-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase, 5-HTP administration results in 5-HT (serotonin) production in dopaminergic as well as in serotonergic neurons.”23 Additionally, a previous study reported that in animals 5-HTP caused increased turnover of both dopamine and norepinephrine. They hypothesized that 5-HTP is taken up by catecholaminergic neurons, transformed into 5-HT that, in turn, could act as a false transmitter, possibly increasing the turnover of catecholamines. “The net functional result of the two opposite processes, ie, formation of a false transmitter and increased synthesis of catecholamines, is unknown. In other words, it is unknown whether 5-HTP augments or reduces catecholaminergic neuronal functions.”26 Monoamine depletion by amino acid precursors Serotonin and dopamine systems exist in two distinctly different and separate states. The endogenous state occurs when no supplemental amino acid precursors (Figure 1) are administered. The competitive inhibition state occurs when at least one serotonin and one dopamine amino acid precursor (Figure 1) are administered simultaneously. Competitive inhibition states have been described for many years, but until the publication of MTO technology, this competitive inhibition was considered to be “probably meaningless.”12,14,30 Competitive inhibition occurs during the balanced and unbalanced state. In the unbalanced state, amino acid precursors of serotonin or dopamine dominate the opposite system in synthesis, metabolism, and transport, leading to depletion of nondominant monoamine neurotransmitters (Figure 2).3,6–15 Numerous studies published since 2009 document the need to administer serotonin amino acid precursors simultaneously in proper balance with dopamine precursors in order to prevent depletion (Figures 1 and 2).2–15 Amino acids Monoamine neurotransmitters L-tryptophan 5-HTP Serotonin L-tyrosine L-dopa Dopamine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Figure 1 Synthesis pathway of serotonin and catecholamines. Abbreviation: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 325 Dovepress Hinz et al L-tryptophan Depletes L-tyrosine Dopamine Serotonin Sulfur amino acids Depletes Depletes Depletes Depletes 5-HTP L-dopa Depletes Figure 2 When an amino acid precursor of serotonin or dopamine is administered alone or in a manner that dominates the synthesis, metabolism, and/or transport of the other system, depletion may occur.12–15 Abbreviation: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan. Specific examples of a dominant monoamine depleting a nondominant monoamine and/or amino acid precursor are listed here and illustrated in Figure 2. • 5-HTP may deplete dopamine.33–37 • l-tryptophan may deplete dopamine.35 • l-dopa may deplete serotonin.2–15,38–42 • l-dopa may deplete l-tryptophan.42 • l-dopa may deplete l-tyrosine.42 • l-dopa may deplete sulfur amino acids.4,6,43–45 • l-tyrosine may deplete serotonin.46,47 • l-tyrosine may deplete 5-HTP.47 • l-tyrosine may deplete sulfur amino acids.4,6,43–45 • Sulfur amino acids may deplete dopamine.48 • Sulfur amino acids may deplete serotonin.49 Effects of 5-HTP when administered in an unbalanced manner Amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine in the competitive inhibition state are intertwined during synthesis, metabolism, and transport to the point that they function as one system. This is a deep-seated interaction as discussed in the novel concept of apical regulatory super system (APRESS), published in 2011. The paper discusses how the serotonin and dopamine systems, when properly balanced in the competitive inhibition state, function as one system. In this state, functions regulated only by serotonin in the endogenous state can be regulated by manipulating dopamine levels, and functions regulated only by dopamine in the endogenous state can be regulated by manipulating serotonin.12 Improperly balanced administration of serotonin and dopamine precursors (Figures 1 and 2) leads to decreased efficacy and increased incidence of side effects. Most importantly, if only one precursor of the serotonin and dopamine system is administered or it is administered in a manner that dominates the other system (either serotonin or dopamine) in synthesis, metabolism and transport, neurotransmitter depletion of the dominated system will occur. When this 326 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress depletion of the nondominant system is great enough, any effects observed with administration of the single or dominant amino acid will no longer be observed. An amino acid precursor no longer functioning can be observed in the management of Parkinson’s disease in which the effects of l-dopa are no longer observed over time due to serotonin depletion.7–15 A study involving properly balanced serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor dosing values guided by MTO published in 2009 and 2010 documents that administration of properly balanced serotonin and dopamine precursors is not only highly effective for managing depression, but can also be used to differentiate bipolar depression cycling heavily on the depressive pole from unipolar depression (major affective disorder).2,6 Proper balancing of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, which can only be optimized using MTO, is critical.2–15 Administration of 5-HTP in a properly balanced manner To achieve optimal efficacy, minimal side effects, and prevent depletion of other amino acids and neurotransmitters, 5-HTP must be administered in proper balance with dopamine amino acid precursors along with proper levels of sulfur amino acids. Synthesis and metabolism are controlled by transporter function. Transporters move serotonin, dopamine and their amino acid precursors into and out of cells to sites where synthesis and metabolism occur. Most important is the transporter’s ability to establish specific levels of serotonin and dopamine in numerous locations, including the synapses between pre- and post-synaptic neurons.12,15,31 MTO is an in situ method for determining the functional status of OCT responsible for establishing serotonin and dopamine levels throughout the body. Optimization requires establishing serotonin in the Phase 3 optimal range while dopamine is in its Phase 3 optimal range. The Phase 3 optimal ranges of serotonin and dopamine are independent of one another. When both serotonin and dopamine are in their respective phase 3 optimal ranges, optimization has occurred.5,7,10,11,13,15 Optimal group results cannot be obtained without MTO. The following are group effective therapeutic ranges defined by MTO during simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine precursors: • 5-HTP daily dosing values . 0 to 2,400 mg per day.14,15 • l-tyrosine daily dosing values . 0 to 14,000 mg per day.14,15 • l-dopa daily dosing values . 0 to 2,100 mg per day.14,15 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 Dovepress The effective therapeutic ranges listed above are independent of each other. For example, in one patient, a daily 5-HTP dosing value of 2,400 mg per day with an l-dopa dosing value of 30 mg per day may be required for proper balance of transport to place both serotonin and dopamine in their respective Phase 3 optimal ranges. Another patient may require 25 mg per day of 5-HTP with 2,100 mg of l-dopa for Phase 3 optimization. Dosing values required for transporter optimization are highly individualized.15 To understand the extreme variability in the dosing levels of 5-HTP and the other amino acid precursors, it is important to understand why these transporters react so differently from one individual to the next. Neurotransmitters facilitate the flow of electric signals across the synapse between the pre- and post-synaptic neurons. When a change in the overall flow of electricity across the synapse is needed, a signal is sent throughout the body that encodes the identical transporters to regulate and control neurotransmitter flow in the specific manner required to optimize this flow. When permanent damage from neurotoxins, trauma, biologicals, and/or genetic predisposition occurs to postsynaptic neurons, the electrical flow that regulates function is compromised. This process may damage areas regulating affect and mood, leading to depression. With this sequence of circumstances, a signal goes out encoding the OCT2 to increase or decrease synaptic levels of serotonin and/or dopamine in order to compensate for the electrical deficit being experienced across the synapse.2,13–15,31 Since serotonin and dopamine do not cross the blood–brain barrier, the total number of serotonin and dopamine molecules present in the brain is a function of the amount of nutrients (amino acid precursors) available to be synthesized into new neurotransmitter molecules. If the amount of neurotransmitter molecules is low or inadequate, a relative nutritional deficiency exists. Inadequate monoamine levels can only be elevated to levels required for optimal transporter function through administration of supplemental nutrient precursors guided by “Monoamine transporter optimization” (MTO).15 Optimal efficacy and minimized side effects are not a function of achieving sufficiently high amino acid dosing levels; they are a function of achieving a proper balance between serotonin and dopamine.2–15 Conclusion 5-HTP in the treatment of depression has languished for years. Intuitively, the potential is extraordinary, but from a practical level efficacy is no better than placebo. In review of the science, effective integration of 5-HTP into Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications a patient management plan is much more complicated than simply giving some 5-HTP in order to have more serotonin throughout the system. Administration of 5-HTP alone is contraindicated for depression and any process involving a catecholamine component due to its ability to facilitate depletion of these neurotransmitters. 5-HTP should be administered carefully in patients because depletion of dopamine and norepinephrine may exacerbate existing disease processes or precipitate onset of catecholamine-related problems. Administering serotonin or dopamine amino acid precursors should never involve administration of only one amino acid. Improperly balanced amino acid precursors are associated with decreased efficacy, increased side effects, and depletion of the nondominant system. Disclosure MH discloses his ownership of DBS Labs. TU discloses his medical directorship of DBS Labs. AS has no disclosures to reveal. References 1. LifeLink [homepage on the Internet]. Grover Beach: LifeLink; [cited April 21, 2012]. Available from: http://www.ilifelink.com/about_ us.html. Accessed April 21, 2012. 2. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. 3. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 4. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine; a comprehensive analysis. Research and Reports in Urology. 2010;2:177–183. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6(1):741–747. 7. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Neff R, Weinberg R, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 9. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Research and Reports in Urology. 2011;3:19–24. 10. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:165–174. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:457–463. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:69–77. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 327 Dovepress Hinz et al 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting the monoamine hypothesis: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 15. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 16. Depression: what is depression? [homepage on the Internet]. Doctor Murray; [cited April 21, 2012]. Available from: http://doctormurray. com/health-conditions/depression. Accessed April 21, 2012. 17. For depression, weight loss, carbohydrate craving, insomnia and several other health situations, 5-HTP has been found to work wonders quickly! [homepage on the Internet]. Brush Prairie: Gaia GS; [cited April 21, 2012]. Available from: http://gaiags.com/5-htp.htm. Accessed April 21, 2012. 18. What advantages does 5-HTP have over L-tryptophan? [homepage on the Internet]. 5htp.com; [cited April 21, 2012]. Avaialble from: http:// www.5htp.com/5-htp.htm. Accessed April 21, 2012. 19. van Hiele LJ. L-5-Hydroxytryptophan in depression: the first substitution therapy in psychiatry? The treatment of 99 out-patients with ‘therapy-resistant’ depressions. Neuropsychobiology. 1980;6(4): 230–240. 20. d’Elia G, Hanson L, Raotma H. L-Tryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptophan in the treatment of depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1978;57(3): 239–252. 21. Shaw K et al. Tryptophan and 5-Hydroxytryptophan for depression Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1. 22. Meyers S. Use of neurotransmitter precursors for treatment of depression. Altern Med Rev. 2000;5(1):64–71. 23. Mendels J, Stinnett JL, Burns D, Frazer A. Amine precursors and depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32(1):22–30. 24. Bupropion hydrochloride extended-release tablets prescription information. Available from: http://www.us.gsk.com/products/assets/ us_wellbutrinXL.pdf. Accessed April 21, 2012. 25. Venlafaxine prescription information [homepage on the Internet]. New York: Pfizer Inc; [cited April 21, 2012]. Available from: http://www. effexorxr.com/medication-guide.aspx. Accessed April 21, 2012. 26. van Praag HM. In search of the mode of action of antidepressants. 5-HTP tyrosine mixtures in depressions. Neuropharmacology. 1983; 2:433–440. 27. Bupropion prescription information [homepage on the Internet]. Middlesex: GlaxoSmithKline; [cited May 12, 2012]. Available from: http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_wellbutrin_tablets.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2012. 28. Sibutramine prescription information [homepage on the Internet]. Illinois: RxAbbott; [cited 12 May 2012]. Available from: http://www. rxabbott.com/pdf/meridia.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2012. 29. Sinimet CR prescription information [homepage on the Internet]. New York: Bristol-Myers Squibb; [cited May 12, 2012]. Available from: http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_sinemet_cr.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2012. 30. Soares-da-Silva P, Pinto-do-Q PC. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117(6):1187–1192. 31. Keopsell H, Schmitt BM, Gorboulev V. Organic cation transporters. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;150:36–90. 32. Chadwick D, Jenner P, Harris R, Reynolds EH, Marsden CD. Manipulation of brain serotonin in the treatment of myoclonus. Lancet. 1975;2(7932):434–435. 33. Awazi N, Guldberg HC. On the interaction of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine with dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1978;303(1):63–72. 34. Andrews DW, Patrick RL, Barchas JD. The effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine on dopamine synthesis and release in rat brain striatal synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978; 30(2):465–470. 35. Zhelyaskov DK, Levitt M, Udenfriend S. Tryptophan derivatives as inhibitors of tyrosine hydroxylase in vivo and in vitro. Mol Pharmacol. 1968;4(5):445–451. 36. Ng LKY, Chase TN, Colburn RW, Kopin IJ. Release of [3H] dopamine by L-5-hydroxytryptophan. Brain Research. 1972;45(2):499–505. 37. Stamford JA, Kruk ZL, Millar J. Striatal dopamine terminals release serotonin after 5-HTP pretreatment: in vivo voltammetric data. Brain Res. 1990;515(1–2):173–180. 38. Ritvo E, Yuwiler A, Geller E, et al. Effects of L-dopa in autism. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1971;1(2):190–205. 39. Wuerthele SM, Moore KE. Studies on the mechanisms of L-dopainduced depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the mouse brain. Life Sci. 1977;20(10):1675–1680. 40. Borah A, Mohanakumar KP. Long-term L-DOPA treatment causes indiscriminate increase in dopamine levels at the cost of serotonin synthesis in discrete brain regions of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2007;27(8):985–996. 41. García NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(5 Pt 2):R1476–R1480. 42. Karobath M, Díaz JL, Huttunen MO. The effect of L-dopa on the concentrations of tryptophan, tyrosine and serotonin in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;14(4):393–936. 43. Benson R, Crowell B, Hill B, Doonguah K, Charlton C. The effects of L-dopa on the activity of methionine adenosyltransferase: relevance to L-dopa therapy and tolerance. Neurochem Res. 1993;18(3):325–330. 44. Surtees R, Hyland K. L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (levodopa) lowers central nervous system S-adenosylmethionine concentrations in humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(7):569–572. 45. Liu XX, Wilson K, Charlton CG. Effects of L-dopa treatment on methylation in mouse brain: implications for the side effects of L-dopa. Life Sci. 2000;66(23):2277–2288. 46. Breier JM, Bankson MG, Yamamoto BK. L-tyrosine contributes to (+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced serotonin depletions. J Neurosci. 2006;26(1):290–299. 47. Fernstrom JD, Larin F, Wurtman RJ. Correlation between brain tryptophan and plasma neutral amino acid levels following food consumption in rats. Life Sci. 1973;13(5):517–524. 48. Charlton CG. Depletion of nigrostriatal and forebrain tyrosine hydroxylase by S-adenosylmethionine: a model that may explain the occurrence of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Life Sci. 1997;61(5):495–502. 49. Charlton CG, Crowell B Jr. Parkinson’s disease-like effects of S-adenosyl-L-methionine: effects of L-dopa. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992;43(2):423–431. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peerreviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal 328 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2012:8 Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index Open Access Full Text Article Review Administration of supplemental L-tyrosine with phenelzine: a clinical literature review This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 22 July 2014 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Ted Cole 3 Patricia Ryan 4 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3Cole Center for Healing, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 4Family Wellness Center, Omaha, NE, USA 1 Abstract: The subject of this literature review is the alleged relationship between L-tyrosine, phenelzine, and hypertensive crisis. Phenelzine (Nardil®) prescribing information notes: “The potentiation of sympathomimetic substances and related compounds by MAO inhibitors may result in hypertensive crises (see WARNINGS). Therefore, patients being treated with NARDIL should not take […] L-tyrosine […]”. Interest in the scientific foundation of this claim was generated during routine patient care. A comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar and PubMed revealed no reported cases of hypertensive crisis associated with concomitant administration of L-tyrosine and phenelzine. Review of current US Food and Drug Administration nutritional guidelines relating to ongoing phenelzine studies reveals no mention and requires no consideration of L-tyrosine ingestion in combination with phenelzine. This paper is intended to provide an objective review of the science to then allow the reader to formulate the final opinion. Keywords: hypertensive crisis, phenelzine, tyrosine, tyramine, stroke, phenelzine Introduction L-Tyrosine L-Tyrosine is a normal component of protein foods. It is a neutral amino acid and the precursor of the catecholamines dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. “Animal studies indicate that systemic administration of tyrosine in pharmacological quantities can reduce physiological and behavioral decrements induced by highly stressful conditions.”1 Phenelzine Correspondence: Marty Hinz NeuroResearch Clinic, Inc., 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] Nardil® (phenelzine) (Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA) is a potent inhibitor of monoamine oxidase (MAO). Phenelzine sulfate is a hydrazine derivative. It has a molecular weight of 234.27 and is chemically described as C8H12N2 · H2SO4. Phenelzine prescribing information specifically notes: “The potentiation of sympathomimetic substances and related compounds by MAO inhibitors may result in hypertensive crises (see WARNINGS). Therefore, patients being treated with NARDIL should not take sympathomimetic drugs […] or related compounds (including methyldopa, L-dopa, L-tryptophan, L-tyrosine, and phenylalanine).”2 In humans, L-tyrosine is metabolized to tyramine, L-dopa, dopaquinone, and 3-iodo-L-tyrosine. The literature is clear that the problem of phenelzine-associated hypertension is due to concomitant administration with tyramine (not tyrosine).3 107 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 107–110 Dovepress © 2014 Hinz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S67271 Dovepress Hinz et al Results No cases of L-tyrosine-induced hypertensive crisis have been documented A comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar and PubMed revealed that the first phenelzine studies were published in 1959.4 There have been no documented cases of L-tyrosine-associated hypertensive crisis. Conversely, several articles were found illustrating that when normal blood pressure exists or the subject is hypertensive, L-tyrosine lowers blood pressure.4–12 The assertion that ingestion of L-tyrosine with phenelzine induces hypertensive crisis is without scientific literature verification. When Google Scholar was searched for articles containing the exact phrase “L-tyrosine induced hypertensive crisis”, no articles were found; however, the exact phrase “tyramine induced hypertensive crisis” identified 50 articles. PubMed is the recognized “gold standard” for peer-reviewed scientific publication certification. A search there using the query “L-tyrosine, phenelzine, hypertensive crisis” failed to reveal any peer-reviewed literature. Avoidance of all L-tyrosine is not possible Phenelzine prescribing information advises against tyrosine ingestion. It makes no recommendations regarding the level of L-tyrosine restriction. The only specific food restriction guidelines are for foods high in tyramine.2 With L-tyrosine found in virtually all protein foods, the prescribing information poses a confounding problem. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) nutrient database lists 4,889 foods that contain L-tyrosine. There are 1,962 foods listed that have over 500 mg of L-tyrosine per serving. In reviewing the USDA recommendation, the established serving sizes are small. For example, the serving size for fish or beef is 3 oz, which typically contains between 600 mg and 900 mg of L-tyrosine. Most patients eat more than 3 oz of these proteins as a serving. The average meal contains more than 1,500 mg of L-tyrosine.13 Complying with the phenelzine prescribing information would induce a significant nutritional deficiency by completely eliminating all tyrosine-containing protein foods. It is impossible for any human to comply with the phenelzine prescribing information and avoid all L-dopa, L-tryptophan, L-tyrosine, and phenylalanine. Completely eliminating these four amino acids from the human diet would leave no protein-containing food to consume and would induce a significant nutritional deficiency. 108 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Phenelzine tyrosine safety record Drug safety is not established by double-blind, placebocontrolled studies. The most reliable safety (side effect) data are collected over time through prescribing to large populations. The earliest peer-reviewed literature located discussing phenelzine, by Saunders et al,4 was published on 1 July 1959. Phenelzine has been prescribed for 55 years. There are no documented cases of hypertensive crisis being induced by concomitant administration of L-tyrosine and phenelzine. Until the first case is documented in the literature, there is no scientific basis for asserting in the prescribing information that concomitant administration of L-tyrosine and phenelzine may be a problem. It appears that the warning regarding L-tyrosine found in the phenelzine prescribing information may have been placed there for a reason other than one that is found in the known scientific literature. When a significant interaction between two administered substances occurs, both substances are required to carry a warning. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers L-tyrosine ingestion so safe that it does not require it to carry a warning regarding concomitant ingestion with phenelzine. This raises the question of why phenelzine has a tyrosine warning when tyrosine is not required to carry a phenelzine warning. Current FDA guidelines Phenelzine is the subject of ongoing clinical studies under the FDA guidelines. In 2011 the FDA defined the current protocols for ongoing phenelzine drug studies, which address only foods containing tyramine. The FDA places no restriction on L-tyrosine intake in subjects involved in current phenelzine (Nardil) studies. There appears to be a divergence between the phenelzine prescribing information, which originated in the 1950s, and current phenelzine study guidelines. The updated study guidelines have not been reflected in the current prescribing information.14 Author experience The two primary authors of this paper have a database c ontaining over 3 million patient-days of experience administering L-tyrosine with virtually all prescription drugs. The authors possess L-tyrosine treatment data from over 1,400 medical practices from primarily the US and Canada, as well as many other countries around the world. Administration of MAO inhibitors is uncommon with the exception of southern California. Total phenelzine with L-tyrosine medical record data on file are approximately 43,532 patient-days. This database was started in 1999, and up to the time of this Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress writing no concerns have been raised regarding concomitant administration of L-tyrosine with phenelzine.15–29 The primary cause of phenelzineassociated hypertensive crisis The literature notes numerous documented cases of phenelzine-associated hypertensive crisis. The primary etiology of these events is patient noncompliance with restriction of high-tyramine foods.30–32 If a patient experiences a hypertensive crisis while taking phenelzine, the prescribing information offers a protocol to follow. “NARDIL should be discontinued immediately and therapy to lower blood pressure should be instituted immediately”.2 In a significant number of hypertensive crisis episodes the patient has been noncompliant with the following required restrictions.2 Phenelzine prescribing information notes: Hypertensive crises during NARDIL therapy may also be caused by the ingestion of foods with a high concentration of tyramine or dopamine. Therefore, patients being treated with NARDIL should avoid high protein food that has undergone protein breakdown by aging, fermentation, pickling, smoking, or bacterial contamination. Patients should also avoid cheeses (especially aged varieties), pickled herring, beer, wine, liver, yeast extract (including brewer’s yeast in large quantities), dry sausage (including Genoa salami, hard salami, pepperoni, and Lebanon bologna), pods of broad beans (fava beans), and yogurt. Excessive amounts of caffeine and chocolate may also cause hypertensive reactions.2 The phenelzine prescribing information takes a position with regard to L-dopa, L-tryptophan, and L-tyrosine and phenylalanine. The formal recommendation found in the prescribing information regarding these four amino acids is “[…] should not take [...]”.2 Regarding tyramine ingestion, for which there is ample scientific literature supporting the position that ingestion with phenelzine is a problem, a less restrictive warning is noted; “Hypertensive crises during NARDIL therapy may also be caused by the ingestion of foods with a high concentration of tyramine or dopamine. Therefore, patients being treated with NARDIL should avoid high protein food […]”.2 The warning for tyramine appears to be less stringent, despite the fact that according to the literature it is the primary amino acid known to induce hypertensive crisis when ingested with phenelzine. Conclusion Physicians are trained to treat patients in accordance with known science. Intuitively, it may seem that the proper thing Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Administration of supplemental L-tyrosine with phenelzine to do is place the patient on an L-tyrosine-free diet while administering phenelzine as suggested by the prescribing information. A diet truly free of L-dopa, L-tryptophan, and L-tyrosine and phenylalanine in accordance with phenelzine prescribing information raises concerns relating to nutritional deficiency, a problem that is well documented in the literature. With 55 years of prescribing experience there are no reported cases in the formal scientific literature of L-tyrosine administration with a MAO inhibitor inducing hypertensive crisis. On the contrary, numerous articles exist demonstrating how L-tyrosine actually lowers blood pressure. Although phenelzine prescribing information published years ago asserts that concomitant administration of L-tyrosine with phenelzine is a problem, recent FDA guidelines on phenelzine studies no longer mention or require L-tyrosine considerations to be made when prescribing phenelzine. The real problem is not the amino acids; it is the drug side effects that may be enhanced with amino acid administration. If the drug were not prescribed, this paper would not have been written. This article is intended to serve as a literature review, a foundation for opinion formulation, and a reference for future discussion regarding L-tyrosine, phenelzine, and hypertensive crisis. Disclosure MH discloses his relationship with DBS Labs, Inc., and NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Dollins AB, Krock LP, Storm WF, Wurtman RJ, Lieberman HR. L-tyrosine ameliorates some effects of lower body negative pressure stress. Physiol Behav. 1995;57(2):223–230. 2. Nardil® (phenelzine) [prescribing information]. New York, USA: Pfizer, Inc. Available from: http://www.pfizer.com/files/products/uspi_nardil. pdf. Accessed June 17, 2014. 3. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). KEGG tyrosine metabolism homo sapiens reference pathway. Available from: http://www.genome.jp/kegg-bin/show_pathway?org_name=h sa&mapno=00350&mapscale=&show_description=hide. Accessed June 17, 2104. 4. Saunders JC, Roukema RW, Kline NS, Bailey SD’A, et al. Clinical results with phenelzine. Am J Psychiatry. 1959;116:71–72. 5. Sved AF, Fernstrom JD, Wurtman RJ. L-tyrosine administration reduces blood pressure and enhances brain norepinephrine release in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76(7):3511–3514. 6. Deijen J, Orlebeke JF. Effect of L-tyrosine on cognitive function and blood pressure under stress. Brain Res Bull. 1994;33:319–323. 7. Bresnahan MR, Hatzinikolaou P, Brunner HR, Gavras H. Effects of L-tyrosine infusion in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1980;239(2):H206–H211. 8. Ekholm S, Karppanen H. Cardiovascular effects of L-tyrosine in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1987;143(1): 27–34. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 109 Dovepress Hinz et al 9. Deijen J, Wientjes CJE, Vullinghs HFM, Cloin PA, Langefeld JJ. L-tyrosine improves cognitive performance and reduces blood pressure in cadets after one week of a combat training course. Brain Res Bull. 1999;48(2):203–209. 10. Yamori Y, Fujiwara M, Horie R, Lovenberg W. The hypotensive effect of centrally administered L-tyrosine. Eur J Pharmacol. 1980;68(2): 201–204. 11. Glaeser BS, Melamed E, Growdon JH, Wurtman RJ. Elevation of plasma L-tyrosine after a single oral dose of L-tyrosine. Life Sci. 1979;25(3):265–271. 12. Black J, Waeber B, Bresnahan MR, Gavras I, Gavras H. Blood pressure response to central and/or peripheral inhibition of phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1981;49(2):518–524. 13. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). USDA nutrient database. Available from: http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/ndb/nutrients/report/nutrientsfrm? max=25&offset=0&totCount=0&nutrient1=509&nutrient2=&nutrient3= &subset=0&fg=&sort=f&measureby=m. Last accessed June 29, 2014. 14. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA guidance on phenelzine sulfate. Available from: www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/ guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm209250.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2014. 15. Trachte G, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 16. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. 17. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 18. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis. Open Access J Urol. 2010;2: 177–183. 19. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 20. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 21. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 22. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access J Urol. 2011;3:19–24. 23. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 24. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 25. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:1–7. 26. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. International Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety. 2011;3:69–77. 27. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 28. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 29. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 30. Boulton AA, Cookson B, Paulton R. Hypertensive crisis in a patient on MAOI antidepressants following a meal of beef liver. Can Med Assoc J. 1970;102(13):1394–1395. 31. Horwitz D, Lovenberg W, Engelman K, Sjoerdsma A. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tyramine, and cheese. JAMA. 1964;188(13):1108–1110. 32. Shulman KI, Walker SE, MacKenzie S, Knowles S. Dietary restriction, tyramine, and the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989;9(6):397–402. Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Publish your work in this journal Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, reviews and commentaries on all areas of drug experience in humans. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/clinical-pharmacology-advances-and-applications-journal 110 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index Original Research Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 22 July 2014 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Ted Cole 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3Cole Center for Healing, Cincinnati, OH, USA 1 Abstract: The amino acid L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) is prescribed for conditions where increased central and/or peripheral dopamine synthesis is desired. Its administration can establish dopamine concentrations higher than can be achieved from an optimal diet. Specific indications include Parkinson’s disease and restless leg syndrome. The interaction between serotonin and dopamine exists in one of two distinctly different physiologic states: the endo genous state or the competitive inhibition state. Management with L-dopa in the competitive inhibition state is the focus of this paper. In the past, control of the competitive inhibition state was thought to be so difficult and complex that it was described in the literature as functionally “meaningless”. When administering L-dopa without simultaneous administration of serotonin precursors, the patient is in the endogenous state. Experience gained with patient outcomes during endogenous L-dopa administration does not allow predictability of L-dopa outcomes in the competitive inhibition state. The endogenous approach typically increases the daily L-dopa dosing value in a linear fashion until symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are under control. It is the novel observations made during treatment with the competitive inhibition state approach that L-dopa dosing values above or below the optimal therapeutic range are generally associated with the presence of the exact same Parkinson’s disease symptoms with identical intensity. This recognition requires a novel approach to optimization of daily L-dopa dosing values from that used in the endogenous state. This paper outlines that novel approach through utilization of a pill stop. This approach enhances patient safety through its ability to prevent L-dopa overdose, while assisting in the establishment of the optimal therapeutic L-dopa daily dosing value. Keywords: L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, L-dopa, levodopa, Parkinson’s disease Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) is a metabolite of L-tryptophan and the immediate precursor of serotonin. L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) is a metabolite of L-tyrosine and the immediate precursor of dopamine. Dopamine does not cross the blood–brain barrier.1 L-dopa freely crosses the blood–brain barrier, then is synthesized into dopamine without biochemical feedback inhibition.2 Greater amounts of L-dopa need to be administered if increased synthesis of dopamine in the central nervous system is required.3–12 L-tyrosine does not have this ability, due to norepinephrine biochemical feedback inhibition of tyrosine hydroxylase. To understand the discussions contained herein, the concepts of the endogenous state and competitive inhibition state need to be defined.1,12–20 Humans taking no supplemental serotonin or dopamine amino acid precursors are in the endogenous state. The endogenous state also exists when L-dopa or 5-HTP 93 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 93–99 Dovepress © 2014 Hinz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S67328 Dovepress Hinz et al is administered without adequate amounts of serotonin or dopamine precursors, respectively. The amino acid intermediates 5-HTP and L-dopa do not occur in the normal diet in amounts sufficient to produce a significant metabolic effect. The competitive inhibition state does not occur with normal or optimal food intake due to biochemical feedback inhibition of L-tyrosine and L-tryptophan. Their respective conversion to L-dopa and 5-HTP in a normal or optimal diet are inadequate to establish competitive inhibition. This limits the amount of dopamine and serotonin synthesized to levels less than are required to place the system into the competitive inhibition state.12–20 When daily dopamine and dopamine amino acid requirements are higher than can be achieved in a normal or optimal diet, the state is known as a relative nutritional deficiency.12 The concept of competitive inhibition between serotonin and dopamine is well known to science. Competitive inhibition is the interaction of serotonin and dopamine that may occur in synthesis, transport, and metabolism only when adequate and properly balanced amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are administered simultaneously. Full optimization of the competitive inhibition state requires simultaneous administration of properly balanced 5-HTP, L-dopa, L-tyrosine, a thiol (L-cysteine, glutathione, S-adenosylmethionine, or L-methionine), and cofactors (vitamin C, pyridoxal phosphate, or calcium carbonate). To date, the only published methodology for optimization of the competitive inhibition state is Organic Cation Transporter Type 2 (OCT2) functional status determination.12–20 The focus of this paper is not L-dopa efficacy, which has been firmly established by numerous past studies; this paper focuses on management of L-dopa dosing utilizing a novel technique that identifies overdose in the competitive inhibition state relative to optimal daily dosing, and assists in identifying the optimal dosing range. Administration of L-dopa in Parkinson’s disease has been studied since the early 1960s.21 Since then, numerous side effects and adverse reactions have been documented.2,12 Most agree with the Mayo Clinic’s observations that L-dopa is the most effective Parkinson’s disease treatment available.22 Typically, other less effective drugs are used to control symptoms as long as possible prior to prescribing L-dopa. This delays the inevitable onset of progressive side effects and adverse reactions associated with concomitant administration of L-dopa and carbidopa (or benserazide).21 Past research documented the use of general decarboxylase inhibitors such as carbidopa and benserazide for the management of L-dopa-induced nausea.23,24 These drugs have no direct benefit in the management of Parkinson’s disease 94 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress symptoms. The primary reason for administering carbidopa or benserazide is to decrease daily L-dopa dosing requirement, thereby decreasing L-dopa-induced nausea. During L-dopa monotherapy (administration without a decarboxylase inhibitor), these side effects may prevent the patient from ingesting enough L-dopa to control symptoms.2 The enzyme L-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AAAD) catalyzes synthesis of serotonin and dopamine from 5-HTP and L-dopa, respectively. Through competitive inhibition of AAAD, carbidopa or benserazide compromises peripheral synthesis of serotonin and dopamine. This druginduced inhibition of peripheral AAAD–L-dopa metabolism leaves more L-dopa unmetabolized and available to freely cross the blood–brain barrier into the central nervous system. As a result, when carbidopa or benserazide is administered, lower L-dopa daily intake values are required to achieve the same central nervous system results.2 Carbidopa and benserazide also inhibit peripheral metabolism of 5-HTP to serotonin and can cause a drug-induced depletion of peripheral serotonin. Dopamine is metabolized to norepinephrine, which, in turn, is metabolized to epinephrine. The inhibition of dopamine synthesis may also deplete norepinephrine and epinephrine. Physicians may fail to recognize the signs, symptoms, adverse reactions, and side effects that result from this drug-induced peripheral depletion of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and/or epinephrine by carbidopa. It is known that inhibition of AAAD with drugs may induce life-threatening side effects, including myocardial infarction, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, agranulocytosis, hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia (Table 1).2,12 Hinz et al2,12 previously published papers demonstrating that L-dopa-induced nausea can be nutritionally managed by addressing serotonin and dopamine imbalance. Proper administration of 5-HTP with L-dopa effectively controls nausea, eliminates the need for carbidopa, and, as they are no longer required, removes the signs, symptoms, side effects, or adverse reactions associated with carbidopa or benserazide in virtually all patients. With the removal of carbidopa, the risks and problems associated with peripheral depletion of the centrally acting monoamines are eliminated, which is a great safety advantage. L-dopa is an amino acid that may be classified by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a drug, a medical food, or a nutritional supplement, depending upon the application. As a nutritional supplement, L-dopa is classified by the FDA as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS), with a side effect profile safe enough to allow for over-the-counter sales. The combination of L-dopa with carbidopa is only Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 Dovepress Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state Table 1 Previously published side effects and adverse reactions associated with carbidopa Carbidopa side effects Glossitis Leg pain Ataxia Falling Gait abnormalities Blepharospasm (which may be taken as an early sign of excess dosage) Trismus Increased tremor Numbness Muscle twitching Peripheral neuropathy Myocardial infarction Flushing Oculogyric crises Diplopia Blurred vision Dilated pupils Urinary retention Urinary incontinence Dark urine Hoarseness Malaise Hot flashes Sense of stimulation dyspepsia Constipation Palpitation Fatigue Agranulocytosis Hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia Rash Gastrointestinal bleeding Duodenal ulcer Henoch–Schonlein purpura Decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit Thrombocytopenia Leukopenia Angioedema Urticaria Pruritus Alopecia Dark sweat Abnormalities in alkaline phosphatase Abnormalities in serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase) or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (alanine aminotransferase) Abnormal Coombs test Abnormal uric acid Hypokalemia Abnormalities in blood urea nitrogen Increased creatinine Increased serum lactate dehydrogenase Glycosuria Note: Data from Hinz et al. L-dopa. It is the experience of Hinz et al2,12 that few physicians are aware of the availability of the nutritional supplement form of standardized L-dopa over the counter in the US, and even fewer understand the management of L-dopainduced nausea without the use of carbidopa. Table 1 is a previously published list of side effects and adverse reactions associated with peripheral depletion of centrally acting monoamines (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) due to carbidopa administration.2,12 The current standard of care for Parkinson’s disease is based on the endogenous state perspective. There is no consideration that nausea is caused by the imbalance between the serotonin and dopamine systems. The depletions of serotonin, thiols, L-tyrosine, L-tryptophan, and other monoamines associated with the clinical course of Parkinson’s disease, L-dopa monotherapy, and the use of general decarboxylase inhibitors are not addressed (see Table 2).2,12 Under the current standard of care, the etiology of the signs and symptoms associated with these depletions is not adequately recognized, understood, or controlled. Standard treatment of Parkinson’s disease under endogenous conditions is to simply increase L-dopa/carbidopa if symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are not optimally under control. Competitive inhibition research has identified the causes of the depletion and previously published the steps required to increase the synthesis in a properly balanced manner, Table 2 Depletions of centrally acting monoamines (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine), thiols, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan associated with Parkinson’s disease, L-dopa administration, and administration of a general decarboxylase inhibitor Serotonin Dopamine Norepinephrine Epinephrine Thiols 2,12 classified as a drug; it is not listed as GRAS by the FDA. Currently, in the US, if a patient experiences a carbidopa side effect, the only available form of L-dopa without carbidopa is a nutritional supplement product containing standardized Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 L-tyrosine L-tryptophan Parkinson’s disease L-dopa administration General decarboxylase inhibitor Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Peripheral depletion known Peripheral depletion known Peripheral depletion known Peripheral depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Depletion known Note: Adapted with permission from Dove Medical Press. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430.12 Copyright © 2012. Abbreviation: L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 95 Dovepress Hinz et al leading to optimal functional results. The properly balanced competitive inhibition approach avoids the extensive depletion of serotonin, thiols, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan that is known to exist with L-dopa monotherapy. It also eliminates the nausea dosing barrier that may occur when L-dopa is administered without the need for a general decarboxylase inhibitor.2,12 Materials and methods A total of 813 medical patients with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease were queried from a database owned by DBS Labs (Duluth, MN, USA). These were patients who had collected urine samples in the competitive inhibition state and then submitted them for serotonin and dopamine assay followed by OCT2 functional status determination.1,2,13–20 The Parkinson’s disease patients’ diagnostic evaluations were performed under the care of a licensed medical doctor or doctor of osteopathic medicine and then entered as a working diagnosis on submission of laboratory samples. The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease was then added to the database without further diagnostic verification. Patient demographics are as follows. Total number of Parkinson’s disease patients included for consideration in this paper: N=813 of which males were N=554 (68.14%) and females were N=259 (31.86%). The male age range was 42–95 years with a mean of 70 years and a standard deviation of 10.0 years. The female age range was 28–91 years with a mean of 66 years 8 months and a standard deviation of 10.6 years. Amino acid formulas were obtained from CHK Nutrition (Duluth, MN, USA). The following formulas were utilized: • NeuroReplete (eight pills containing 5-HTP 99% + pure 300 mg, L-tyrosine 3,000 mg, L-lysine 500 mg, vitamin C 1,000 mg, vitamin B6 75 mg, calcium carbonate 220 mg, and folate 400 µg) • D5 Mucuna 300 mg pills of 40% L-dopa standardized (each pill containing 120 mg L-dopa) • D5 Mucuna powder (one level tablespoonful [2.4 g] containing 840 mg L-dopa) • CysReplete (six pills containing L-cysteine 4,500 mg, selenium 400 µg, and folate 400 µg). The patients were started on one pill of NeuroReplete in the morning and at 4 pm to achieve 5-HTP control of L-dopa-induced dopamine and serotonin depletion symptoms, including nausea and/or vomiting. If nausea and/or vomiting become a problem, the 5-HTP daily dosing value is addressed by adjusting the NeuroReplete within the range of 37.5–600 mg per day until the symptoms are controlled. As 5-HTP levels can be either high or low relative to L-dopa 96 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress for nausea control, the first adjustment is to decrease the 5-HPT intake by 37.5 mg per day. If that change is not effective, at 3-day intervals the 5-HTP level is increased in daily incremental values going up to 112.5 mg/day, then up 150 mg per day, then 300 mg per day, then up to a maximum of 600 mg per day. No patients (N=813) experienced nausea that was refractory to this 5-HTP approach. With regard to L-dopa administration, patients were started on two pills of D5 Mucuna 40% in the morning, noon, and at 4 pm. The D5 Mucuna 40% was then increased weekly in six-pill increments (L-dopa daily dosing value increases of 720 mg) until symptoms were brought under control or an L-dopa daily dosing value of 6,720 mg was achieved, whichever came first. If there was no symptom relief at 6,720 mg per day, a pill stop, as outlined in the following section, was started in order to identify whether the daily L-dopa dosing value was overdosed or underdosed relative to optimal therapeutic dosing. The optimal therapeutic range for the daily L-dopa dosing was from 720 mg to 16,800 mg per day with a mean of 5,880 mg per day and a standard deviation of 1,190 mg. All patients were started on two pills of CysReplete three times a day, with the first dose at noon to prevent and/or reverse thiol depletion associated with Parkinson’s disease and/or the administration of L-dopa. The daily L-cysteine dose was static and not adjusted. For a discussion of the establishment of the static dosing requirements of the CysReplete formula, the reader is referred to prior writings of Hinz et al (2009).12 The pill stop protocol If the patient was experiencing residual symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease when the daily dosing value of L-dopa was established at 6,720 mg per day (equal to 56 pills each containing 120 mg of L-dopa), a 2-day pill stop of all amino acids was implemented. This was utilized to define whether the patient’s daily L-dopa intake was too high or too low relative to the optimal therapeutic dosing value. With each pill stop, one of three general outcomes was typically observed: 1. If in the morning following the first day of a complete pill stop the patient’s Parkinson’s disease symptoms, from the patient’s perspective, were markedly improved, it was interpreted that the patient was overdosed relative to the optimal daily dosing value requirements. 2. If in the morning following the first day of a complete pill stop the patient’s Parkinson’s disease symptoms were the same or worse, it was interpreted that the patient’s daily Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 Dovepress L-dopa dosing value was too low relative to the optimal therapeutic requirements. 3. If a patient experienced a deterioration of symptoms the same day that the pill stop was initiated, all amino acids should be restarted immediately at the previous daily dosing values, as the patient was underdosed. A patient’s daily L-dopa dosing value was considered to be optimal when it corresponded with the greatest relief of symptoms. At that point, no further pill stops were required. For those patients who did not achieve optimal symptom relief after the first pill stop, subsequent pill stops were undertaken. The patient who reported relief of symptoms the morning following the pill stop was designated as being given an L-dopa overdose relative to the optimal dosing needs. The overdosed value was then referenced against the daily L-dopa dosing value of the most recent previous pill stop where the patient underdosed. With these high and low values recorded, the optimal L-dopa dosing was then defined. The patient was placed on the higher daily L-dopa dosing value minus 240 mg per day of L-dopa and evaluated again in 7 days. If symptoms were not at the level experienced the morning after the pill stop when the L-dopa was overdosed, the daily dosing value was decreased another 240 mg per day. This combination of pill stops with decreases of 240 mg L-dopa daily dosing values was continued until optimal relief of Parkinson’s disease symptoms was achieved. Symptomatic relief should be on a par with the marked improvement experienced the morning after the initial pill stop where the L-dopa overdose relative to optimal therapeutic needs was identified. Those patients who failed to show improvement the morning after the pill stop were interpreted as having been administered L-dopa daily dosing values that were too low relative to the required optimal dosing needs. The L-dopa daily dosing value was then increased by 720 mg and another pill stop was performed in 1 week. The pill stop criteria require answering the following questions from the patient’s perspective with regard to overall Parkinson’s disease symptoms: whether symptoms were better, whether symptoms were worse, or whether symptoms were the same. A patient’s response to a question is not always direct. When the caregiver is not confident in the response to the questions, it is recommended that another pill stop be performed. One physician reported performing three pill stops with a patient on the same daily L-dopa dosing value before Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state being convinced that the proper clinical data were in place to make a dosing change decision. Results The pill stop concept evolved from initial observations where Parkinson’s disease patients taking higher daily dosing values of L-dopa (.10,800 mg) had either missed pills or stopped their pills during treatment. Physicians reported patients who in the morning of the day following the stopping of all amino acid pills experienced what turned out to be a period of optimal symptom relief. A brief period of time (3–6 hours) was noted with a remarkable improvement from the patient’s perspective. These patients spontaneously volunteered comments such as “This is the best I have felt in years” or “For 20 years I have wanted to feel this good”. The comments were definitive. They clearly indicated that from the patient’s perspective an abrupt dramatic and positive change in the patient’s symptoms had occurred. It was subsequently determined that in these patients the daily L-dopa dosing value in the competitive inhibition state prior to the L-dopa pill stop was too high. These patients had been unknowingly overdosed. When all amino acids are stopped, systemic L-dopa and dopamine levels decrease through the levels that are required for optimal control of symptoms. A period of optimal symptom relief occurs approximately 24 hours after the pill stop where the first L-dopa dosing was missed. Most surprising was the novel observation in the competitive inhibition state. Identical Parkinson’s disease symptoms of the same intensity were present when L-dopa daily dosing values were too high or too low relative to optimal daily dosing value. Typically, it is clinically impossible to determine whether the patient’s daily L-dopa dosing value is too high or too low without a pill stop. An L-dopa overdose cannot be determined based on traditional signs and symptoms observed in the endogenous state. These novel clinical overdose observations do not exist in the endogenous state, and observations in the endogenous state do not have predictability with regard to outcomes of amino acid administration in the competitive inhibition state. When administering properly balanced L-dopa with 5-HTP, L-tyrosine, and thiols in the competitive inhibition state, this novel pill stop approach is required to prevent L-dopa overdose and to assist in identifying the optimal therapeutic dosing range.12 As noted in Figure 1, there is an L-dopa daily dosing value range where symptoms are optimally controlled. This dosing range is very narrow: ±240 mg relative to the optimal therapeutic value. The point of optimal symptom relief is indicated with an “X”. Figure 1 also illustrates the submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 97 Dovepress Hinz et al Symptom intensity Optimal relief of Parkinson’s disease symptoms ±240 mg Daily dosing value of L-dopa Figure 1 The typical dose–response curve observed with administration of L-dopa in the competitive inhibition state (concomitant administration of L-dopa, 5-hydroxytryptophan, a thiol, and L-tyrosine). Notes: There is an abrupt cessation or return of symptoms when the daily dosing value of L-dopa is too high or too low. The dosing value associated with these abrupt changes is small, generally 120 mg per day or less. The range associated with optimal relief of symptoms is narrow: ±240 mg from the mean. Abbreviation: L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. phenomenon observed with this narrow optimal dosing value range where symptoms abruptly resolve or return with small increases or decreases of the daily L-dopa dosing value (#120 mg). When these inflection points are reached, it is not a gradual resolution or return of symptoms. The change in symptoms tends to be abrupt. Changing the daily L-dopa dosing value by 120 mg can have dramatic clinical results. In general, this is independent of the size of the daily L-dopa dose. For example, a patient was taking 10,800 mg of L-dopa per day (equivalent to 90, 120 mg L-dopa pills) in the competitive inhibition state. The patient reported being frozen in the chair and unable to stand. After a pill stop the patient was placed on 89 pills per day (10,680 mg of L-dopa). After a daily decrease in the L-dopa dosing value of only 120 mg, the patient was able to rise without assistance and ambulate. These results are common, not rare. No L-dopa discussion relative to Parkinson’s disease would be complete without touching on the topic of dyskinesias. In the competitive inhibition state, no problems or concerns were noted with dyskinesias under this approach in the 10 years of implementation. Further discussion is reserved for other papers. Discussion The novel focus of this paper is that in the competitive inhibition state L-dopa daily dosing values that are too high or too low relative to the optimal therapeutic range 98 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress manifest the same symptoms with identical intensity. This phenomenon is so pervasive that pill stop evaluation needs to be conducted with all patients if optimal relief of symptoms is not achieved when the daily dosing value is increased to a specific set point. The pill stop should be performed if relief of symptoms has not been achieved at L-dopa daily dosing values $6,720 mg per day, or if a question exists regarding the direction of the next change in the L-dopa daily dosing value. It is impossible to empirically determine with absolute certainty whether patients in the competitive inhibition state are taking too much or too little L-dopa without a pill stop. The only exception is if the L-dopa daily dosing value happens to be established at the optimal therapeutic value during a dosing adjustment. Blindly increasing the daily L-dopa dosing values in a linear manner based on endogenous reference points (status of symptoms) in the competitive inhibition state has a high potential for L-dopa overdose relative to the optimal therapeutic dosing value. In the competitive inhibition state, the daily L-dopa dosing value range where optimal relief of symptoms is obtained is as narrow as ±120 mg of L-dopa in some patients. With L-dopa daily dosing value increases of 720 mg or more, it is common to exceed the optimum dosing value, leading to an overdose situation. Conclusion This paper is about safety, not efficacy, of L-dopa. Efficacy has been established by numerous studies over the last 50 years it has been administered. The enhanced safety margin is related to L-dopa overdose management. This paper reports a novel observation relating to L-dopa in the competitive inhibition state. L-dopa daily dosing values that are either excessive or insufficient relative to the optimal therapeutic requirements are clinically associated with the exact same symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, each with identical intensity. These novel findings document that there are no clinical signs or symptoms for the physician to formulate a conclusion that the patient is overdosed on L-dopa and is above the optimal therapeutic dosing range. From a safety standpoint, the pill stop is required in the competitive inhibition state to prevent L-dopa overdose and facilitate realization of the therapeutic dosing value. It has been previously documented how depletions of serotonin, L-tyrosine, and thiols are associated with Parkinson’s disease and potentiated by L-dopa monotherapy with or without a general decarboxylase inhibitor in the endogenous state. Peripheral depletion of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine is facilitated by administration of carbidopa Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 Dovepress or benserazide. If these depletion issues are to be addressed properly, the patient has to be placed in the competitive inhibition state, and L-dopa daily dosing value needs to be guided by pill stops. The purpose of this paper is to outline a novel safety concern identified with administration of L-dopa in the competitive inhibition state that has not been previously described in the literature and to facilitate discussion of these findings. Disclosure Marty Hinz discloses his relationship with DBS Labs, Inc. and NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 2. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 3. Vieira-Coelho M, Soares-Da-Silva P. Apical and basal uptake of L-dopa and 5-HTP and their corresponding amines dopamine and 5-HT in OK cells. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(5 Pt 2):F632–F639. 4. Wang Z, Srragy H, Felder R, Carey R. Intrarenal dopamine production and distribution in the rat: physiological control of sodium excretion. Hypertension. 1997;29:228–234. 5. Suzuki H, Nakane H, Kawamura M, Yoshizawa M, Takeshita E, Saruta T. Excretion and metabolism of dopa and dopamine by isolated perfused rat kidney. The American Physiological Society. 1984:E285–E290. 6. Adam W, Drangova R. Production and excretion of dopamine by the isolated perfused rat kidney. Renal Physiol. 1985;8:150–158. 7. Kambara S, Yoneda S, Yoshimura M, et al. The source and significance of increased urinary dopamine excretion during sodium loading in rats. Nippon Naibunpi Gakkai Zasshi. 1987;63(5):657–663. 8. Zimlichman R, Levinson P, Kelly G, Stull R, Keiser H, Goldstein D. Derivation of urinary dopamine from plasma dopa. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988;75(5):515–520. Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state 9. Carey R. Renal dopamine system: paracrine regulator of sodium homeostasis and blood pressure. Hypertension. 2001;38:297–302. 10. Hagege J, Richet G. Proximal tubule dopamine histofluorescence in renal slices incubated with L-dopa. Kidney Int. 1985;27(1):3–8. 11. Isaac J, Berndt TJ, Knox FG. Role of dopamine in the exaggerated phosphaturic response to parathyroid hormone in the remnant kidney. J Lab Clin Med. 1995;126:470–473. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:1–7. 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 15. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 16. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 17. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access J Urol. 2011;3:19–24. 18. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:69–77. 19. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 20. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 21. Barbeau A. The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: a new hypothesis. Can Med Assoc J. 1962;87(15):802–807. 22. Mayo Clinic. Parkinson’s disease. Treatment and drugs. Available from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/parkinsons-disease/ basics/treatment/con-20028488. Accessed June 19, 2014. 23. Critchley E. L-dopa and carbidopa (sinemet) in the management of parkinsonism. Postgrad Med J. 1975;51:619–621. 24. Sinemet CR® (carbidopa-levodopa) [prescribing information]. Merck Sharp & Dohm Corp. Available from http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/ dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=69e575b9-f8a5-494f-b736-2520ef505cb0. Accessed July 1, 2014. Dovepress Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Publish your work in this journal Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety is an international, peer-reviewed open-access journal exploring patient safety issues in the healthcare continuum from diagnostic and screening interventions through to treatment, drug therapy and surgery. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, clinical, epidemiological and post-marketing surveillance studies, risk management, health literacy and educational programs across all areas of healthcare delivery. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/ testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/drug-healthcare-and-patient-safety-journal Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety 2014:6 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 99 Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index PERSPECTIVES Open Access Full Text Article The Parkinson’s disease death rate: carbidopa and vitamin B6 This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 21 October 2014 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Ted Cole 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3Cole Center for Healing, Cincinnati, OH, USA 1 Abstract: The only indication for carbidopa and benserazide is the management of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa)-induced nausea. Both drugs irreversibly bind to and permanently deactivate pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP), the active form of vitamin B6, and PLPdependent enzymes. PLP is required for the function of over 300 enzymes and proteins. Virtually every major system in the body is impacted directly or indirectly by PLP. The administration of carbidopa and benserazide potentially induces a nutritional catastrophe. During the first 15 years of prescribing L-dopa, a decreasing Parkinson’s disease death rate was observed. Then, in 1976, 1 year after US Food and Drug Administration approved the original L-dopa/carbidopa combination drug, the Parkinson’s disease death rate started increasing. This trend has continued to the present, for 38 years and counting. The previous literature documents this increasing death rate, but no hypothesis has been offered concerning this trend. Carbidopa is postulated to contribute to the increasing Parkinson’s disease death rate and to the classification of Parkinson’s as a progressive neurodegenerative disease. It may contribute to L-dopa tachyphylaxis. Keywords: L-dopa, levodopa, vitamin B6, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL, USA 33904 Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] Parkinson’s disease is classified as a progressive neurodegenerative disease.1 L-3,4dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) is the most effective treatment for Parkinson’s disease.2 Many patients who take it experience profound nausea, which may prevent them from reaching higher dosing values required for symptom relief.3 On May 2, 1975, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved carbidopa (MK-486),4,5 a drug whose only indication was the management of L-dopa-induced nausea. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) noted an increasing Parkinson’s disease death rate. In 2003, Parkinson’s disease was added to the top 15 causes of death; it entered the list as the 14th leading cause of death.6 The following questions are examined in this review: 1. Is carbidopa linked to the increasing Parkinson’s disease death rate? 2. Are the attributes of the nutritional collapse associated with Parkinson’s disease, L-dopa, and/or carbidopa being misdiagnosed as progressive neurodegeneration? 3. Is carbidopa involved in L-dopa tachyphylaxis? Insight into these questions required the review of Parkinson’s disease, relative nutritional deficiencies, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP) (the active form of vitamin B6), L-dopa, carbidopa, carbidopa’s side effects, the CDC-reported Parkinson’s disease death rates, the biochemistry of L-dopa-induced nausea, and of the documented alternatives to carbidopa and benserazide. 161 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 161–169 Dovepress © 2014 Hinz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S70707 Dovepress Hinz et al Benserazide Benserazide and carbidopa have identical mechanisms of action and indications. Any reference to benserazide means, “Benserazide and/or its metabolite trihydroxybenzylhydrazine.”7 While the focus of this paper is on carbidopa, the attributes shared by benserazide are noted. Drug nutrient perspective The following definition for a nutrient is utilized: A nutrient is any substance that facilitates normal system function. A drug is any substance that induces abnormal system function. A nutrient may become a drug. A drug may not become a nutrient. 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) is a nutrient. When it is administered as a single agent, dopamine depletion may occur.8–21 If it induces dopamine depletion, then 5-HTP no longer functions as a nutrient; it is a drug. L-dopa may be administered as a nutrient. When it is administered as a single agent, serotonin depletion may occur.10–18,22–29 If it induces serotonin depletion, then L-dopa no longer functions as a nutrient; it is a drug. Vitamin B6 Over 300 enzymes and proteins require PLP to function properly. 30 The f ive PLP-dependent enzymes – glutamate decarboxylase, arginine decarboxylase, histamine d ecarboxylase, aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), and sulfoalanine decarboxylase – are: [...] unrivaled in the variety of reactions they catalyze and the highly diverse metabolic pathways they are involved in, including the conversion of amino acids, one-carbon units, biogenic amines, tetrapyrrolic compounds, and amino sugars […] sulfur assimilation, incorporation in cysteine, biotin, and S-adenosyl methionine.31 L-dopa The primary pathology demonstrated in Parkinson’s disease is progressive degeneration of the substantia nigra of the brain.12 The primary etiology of Parkinson’s disease is postsynaptic dopamine neuron damage caused by neurotoxins. Progressive neuron damage induces the collapse of the electrical conduction that regulates fine motor control.12 L-dopa crosses the blood– brain barrier and it is then freely synthesized to dopamine without feedback regulation. The administration of L-dopa increases synaptic dopamine levels.32–55 It is analogous to turning up the voltage; more electricity flows through the remaining viable postsynaptic neurons. Restoration of postsynaptic electrical flow optimizes regulation of fine motor control.10,56 162 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress The only major advancements in Parkinson’s treatment occurred in the 1950s and involved the amino acid, L-dopa. This research was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 200057,58 and the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2001.59 Sweet and McDowell60 attributed the decreasing Parkinson’s death rate that occurred between 1958 and 1975 to L-dopa (from 2.9/100,000 to 1.6/100,000 of the standard population, age-adjusted).61 The National Parkinson Foundation notes that 89% of the 1 million Parkinson’s patients in the US take L-dopa/ carbidopa daily.62 While L-dopa is the most effective treatment, it is not usually the drug of choice.2 Side effects have positioned it to be one of the last drugs started in many cases.2 Parkinson’s disease is associated with the depletion of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, thiols (homocysteine, L-methionine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, S-adenosyl-homocysteine, cystathione, L-cysteine, and glutathione), L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan, and these depletions represent relative nutritional deficiencies (RNDs) where systemic nutritional synthesis requirements cannot be achieved on a normal or optimal diet.12,13,28,63–68 L-dopa may induce its own unique RND and exacerbate the Parkinson’s disease RND. When administered singularly or with an improper nutrient balance, it has the ability to induce RNDs of serotonin, thiols, L-tyrosine, and L-tryptophan.12,13 We hypothesize that if the Parkinson’s disease patient is being evaluated for the signs and symptoms of progressive neurodegenerative disease without considering the potential for, as well as the existence and ramifications of RNDs associated with the disease itself, L-dopa, and/or carbidopa, then nutritional collapse components will erroneously be attributed to progressive neurodegeneration. Carbidopa Efficacy and safety concerns must be addressed before US FDA drug approval. Conceptualize a drug that has no treatment efficacy claims under US FDA guidelines. Its sole indication is the management of the side effect of nausea induced by improperly balanced nutrient administration.3 It irreversibly binds to and permanently deactivates free PLP and PLP-dependent enzymes while inducing PLP reserve pool depletion.7 It negatively impacts the function of over 300 enzymes and proteins.30 Administering vitamin B6 counteracts its mechanism of action.3 Drugs with these attributes are being prescribed. (2S)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2hydrazino-2-methylpropanoic acid (carbidopa) is being prescribed in the US and (RS)-2-amino-3-hydroxy-N′-(2,3, Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 6.5 5.5 4.5 All ages – age-adjusted all ethnic groups male and female 328.7% increase in the death rate between 1976 and 2011 3.5 2.5 2010 2005 2000 1995 1990 1985 1.5 1980 Rate per 100,000 US standard population, age-adjusted 7.5 Figure 1 Parkinson’s disease death rates in the United States between 1976 and 2011, all ages, age-adjusted, male and female. Notes: Graph generated from multiple data sources.62,84,89 point that prescription L-dopa as a single ingredient is no longer available (Table 1). Prior to 1999, three pharmaceutical companies distributed a US FDA-approved brand name prescription forms of L-dopa as a single-ingredient drug: Bendopa® (Valent Pharm Intl); Dopar® (Shire plc, St Helier, Jersey); and Larodopa® (Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland).22 There is no public documentation explaining the reasoning 80 Rate per 100,000 US, age-adjusted 70 60 White males age 65 years and older, age-adjusted 311.0% death rate increase between 1981 and 2010 50 40 30 All ages, age-adjusted, male and female 300.1% death rate increase between 1981 and 2010 20 White males all ages, age-adjusted 233.2% death rate increase between 1981 and 2010 10 2010 2000 1990 0 1981 4-trihydroxybenzyl) propanehydrazide (benserazide) is being prescribed outside the US.2,69 L-dopa-induced nausea is a peripheral phenomenon. C arbidopa and benserazide inhibit peripheral L-dopa metabolism by AADC. 3 This increases the amount of L-dopa available to cross the blood–brain barrier. Decreasing peripheral L-dopa levels through decreased ingestion, while maintaining its levels in the central nervous system, effectively controls nausea.12 Carbidopa and benserazide control nausea by identical mechanisms.2,69 Carbidopa and the active metabolite of benserazide, trihydroxybenzylhydrazine, irreversibly bind to and permanently deactivate PLP and PLP-dependent enzymes.18,19,70–74 Normally, a Schiff base aldamine reaction catalyzes the irreversible hydrazine binding of PLP with the core protein of AADC to produce the active enzyme.5 Benserazide is completely metabolized to trihydroxybenzylhydrazine before it reaches the arterial blood. Carbidopa and trihydroxybenzylhydrazine are substrate analogues endowed with irreversible substituted hydrazine function.7 PLP is noncovalently (reversibly) bound to approximately 300 enzymes and proteins forming the PLP reserve pool.30 The molecular weight of PLP is 247.142 g/mol75 and that of carbidopa is 244.244.76 Carbidopa irreversibly binds to PLP in a 1:1 ratio.7 The recommended dietary allowance of vitamin B6 is about 1 to 2 mg/day depending on age.77 If the lowest daily dose of carbidopa (10 mg) is administered, then the system is placed into a PLP-induced RND state on the first day. Systemic vitamin B6 concentrations inversely correlate with mortality induced by coronary artery disease, colorectal cancer, stroke, heart failure, and atherosclerosis.78–83 We hypothesize that if carbidopa and benserazide significantly deplete PLP, then an increased death rate will be observed. During the first 15 years of prescribing L-dopa (1960–1975) it was administered without carbidopa, a practice that was associated with a decreasing death rate.61 On May 9, 1975, the US FDA approved carbidopa for concomitant administration with L-dopa.3 Between 1976 and 2011, the there has been an increase in the general Parkinson’s disease death rate. While numerous etiologies have been postulated to explain the increasing Parkinson’s death rate, none have impacted this 38-year trend. Parkinson’s disease is most prevalent in white males. Figures 1 and 2, when viewed together, demonstrate that the Parkinson’s death rate increase is occurring across all ages, sexes, and ethnic groups. Concomitant L-dopa/carbidopa preparations have been positioned by the manufacturers to permeate treatment to the Parkinson’s disease death rate Figure 2 Parkinson’s disease death rates in the United States between 1981–2010, in comparison to white males of all ages, and white males aged 65 years and older. Note: Graph generated from the following data source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. Health Data Interactive. www.cdc.gov/nchs/hdi.htm.84 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 163 Dovepress Hinz et al Table 1 The timeline of significant events L-dopa/carbidopa timeline 1958–1975: The Parkinson’s disease death rate decreased from 2.9/100,000 to 1.6/100,000 and was attributed to L-dopa.61 1967: The first four studies on the administration of a general decarboxylase inhibitor for the management of L-dopa-induced nausea were documented.86 1975: The original brand of L-dopa with carbidopa (Sinemet®) was approved by the US FDA.62,86 1976–2011: The Parkinson’s disease death rate increased by 328.7%.61,84 1977: The first paper demonstrating significant peripheral and central PLP depletion by carbidopa was submitted for publication.5 1999: Pharmaceutical companies discontinued distributing the prescription form of L-dopa (a single-ingredient drug leaving L-dopa/ carbidopa combinations the only prescription options).87 2003: The CDC added Parkinson’s disease to the top 15 causes of death; it entered at number 14.6 2012: Paper that asserts that carbidopa irreversibly binds to PLP and PLP-dependent enzyme molecules was published. Prior to this, carbidopa depletion of PLP was viewed as a side event, not the mechanism of action.7 Abbreviations: L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine; US FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration; PLP, pyridoxal 5′-phosphate; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. behind the virtually simultaneous discontinuation of these drugs by the three companies. When these drugs were approved, each was described as a decarboxylase inhibitor. Documentation submitted in 1997 noted significant central and peripheral PLP depletion after limited ingestion time of carbidopa.5 Now the full mechanism of action of PLP is known, giving rise to more serious concerns. It is documented that PLP freely crosses the blood–brain barrier.84 Carbidopa prescribing information states that it “[…] does not affect the metabolism of levodopa within the central nervous system.”3 This is not correct. If PLP freely crosses the blood–brain barrier allowing a peripheral and central equilibrium to exist, then both peripheral and central PLP depletion will be induced by carbidopa and benserazide. Theoretically, complete PLP depletion of the central and peripheral systems may occur. If carbidopa-induced PLP depletion is great enough for compromise of central AADC function to occur, then there will be an impairment of central dopamine synthesis. This is a previously undocumented potential etiology of L-dopa tachyphylaxis. Carbidopa prescribing information lacks full disclosure.3 There is no reference to PLP, PLP depletion, irreversible binding to and permanent deactivation of PLP and PLPdependent molecules, depletion of PLP reserve pools, risks induced by PLP depletion, potential functional compromise of over 300 enzymes and proteins, or RND induction. Simply describing carbidopa and benserazide as decarboxylase 164 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress inhibitors is analogous to describing a nuclear blast as a window breaker. Chronic administration affects virtually every system in the body.30 The mechanism of action of carbidopa and benserazide is PLP depletion.18,19,70–74 Carbidopa prescribing information only notes, “Pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6), in oral doses of 10 mg to 25 mg, may reverse the effects of levodopa by increasing the rate of aromatic amino acid decarboxylation. Carbidopa inhibits this action of pyridoxine.”3 PLP depletion is an RND event. PLP can reverse the nausea control of carbidopa and ameliorate the clinical effects of L-dopa, requiring caution during concomitant administration. We hypothesize that if these drugs are stopped and then ample vitamin B6 is administered, PLP function, PLP-dependent enzyme function, and PLP reserve pools will return to normal. The exact size of the PLP reserve pool, which is reversibly bound to about 300 enzymes and proteins, is a matter of speculation. We postulate that when normal PLP pool reserve function exists at the start of treatment, it may take 5 or more years of chronic carbidopa or benserazide ingestion, depending on the daily dosing value, before progressive clinical deterioration is demonstrated. We further postulate that without a PLP reserve pool, carbidopa or benserazide ingestion would induce PLP collapse in days. Carbidopa side effect profile L-dopa active ingredient products may be administered as a nutritional supplement or a drug. Nutritional supplements are generally recognized as safe (GRAS), allowing over-the-counter sales.12 Due to side effects, carbidopa is not GRAS.3 It may induce life-threatening events including myocardial infarction, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, agranulocytosis, hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and hypokalemia (Table 2).12,13 While carbidopa side effects require its discontinuation when the continuation of L-dopa is indicated, nutrient products are the only option. Most physicians are unaware of the availability of this L-dopa form. The carbidopa side effects and adverse reactions listed in Table 2 are a direct result of irreversible drug-induced PLP depletion, irreversible PLP-dependent enzyme binding, PLP reserve pool collapse, along with RND-induced collapse of serotonin and catecholamine synthesis.12,13,18,19,70–74,78–83 If, when equilibrated, central PLP depletion occurs as a result of peripheral PLP depletion, then central compromise, side effects, and adverse reactions are inevitable – a phenomenon not previously documented. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress Parkinson’s disease death rate Table 2 Side effects and adverse reactions associated with carbidopa Glossitis Leg pain Ataxia Falling Gait abnormalities Blepharospasm (which may be taken as an early sign of excess dosage) Trismus Increased tremor Numbness Muscle twitching Peripheral neuropathy Myocardial infarction Flushing Oculogyric crises Diplopia Blurred vision Dilated pupils Urinary retention Urinary incontinence Dark urine Hoarseness Malaise Hot flashes Sense of stimulation Dyspepsia Constipation Palpitation Fatigue Upper respiratory infection Bruxism Hiccups Common cold Diarrhea Urinary tract infections Urinary frequency Flatulence Priapism Pharyngeal pain Abdominal pain Bizarre breathing patterns Burning sensation of tongue Back pain Shoulder pain Chest pain (noncardiac) Muscle cramps Paresthesia Increased sweating Syncope Orthostatic hypotension Asthenia (weakness) Dysphagia Horner’s syndrome, mydriasis Dry mouth Sialorrhea Neuroleptic malignant syndrome Phlebitis Agranulocytosis Hemolytic and nonhemolytic anemia Rash Gastrointestinal bleeding Duodenal ulcer Henoch–Schonlein purpura Decreased hemoglobin and hematocrit Thrombocytopenia Leukopenia Angioedema Urticaria Pruritus Alopecia Dark sweat Abnormalities in alkaline Phosphatase Abnormalities in SGOT (AST) SGPT (ALT) Abnormal Coombs’ test Abnormal uric acid Hypokalemia Abnormalities in blood urea nitrogen Increased creatinine increased serum LDH Glycosuria Note: Data from Hinz et al.12,13 Abbreviations: SGOT, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; SGPT, serum glutamic pyruvic transminase; ALT, alanine transaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase. Nutritional management of nausea It was previously documented that L-dopa-induced nausea, along with Parkinson’s disease, L-dopa-associated, and carbidopaassociated RND, is definitively controlled with properly balanced administration of the nutrient 5-HTP, along with L-tyrosine, a thiol (L-cysteine, glutathione, S-adenosylmethionine, or L-methionine), and cofactors (vitamin C, vitamin B6, and calcium carbonate), as facilitated by organic cation transporter type-2 functional status analysis.12,13 AADC inhibition may be reversible or irreversible. The irreversible inhibition of AADC is the mechanism Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 of action whereby carbidopa and benserazide control L-dopa-induced nausea.3,18,19,70–74 Reversible inhibition of AADC in the competitive inhibition state is the mechanism of action whereby 5-HTP controls L-dopa-induced nausea. If 5-HTP effectively controls L-dopa-induced nausea, then carbidopa or benserazide is no longer indicated, and all detrimental effects discussed herein no longer apply. If 5-HTP is not administered in proper balance with amino acid precursors of other systems, then it will become a drug due to its depletion of dopamine.12,13 Due to the increased frequency of the onset of new druginduced side effects, carbidopa, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and catechol-O-methyl transferase inhibitors need to be stopped as 5-HTP and other nutrients are started under the nutrient protocol. If carbidopa is administered with expectations of controlling L-dopa-induced nausea, then vitamin B6 cannot be replenished while taking the drug since PLP reverses the drug effects. If there is a patient history of carbidopa or benserazide ingestion, then vitamin B6 (100–300 mg/ day) is indicated at the initiation of the nutrient protocol. Discussion Responsible physicians create an environment where optimal symptom control nurtures healing. Two medications with no efficacy claims have been prescribed for the iatrogenic mismanagement of a nutrient, L-dopa , turning it into a drug which depletes other systems.3,12,13,69 Their only indication is to alleviate nausea, a benign condition, while having the ability to profoundly compromise hundreds of system functions.3,69 In our opinion, use of these medications is a violation of the physician’s oath to first, do no harm. These drugs can create fatal events, clinical deterioration, drug-induced sequelae, and risks where none previously existed due to profound multisystem nutritional collapse.12,13,18,19,70–74,78–83 Nausea induced by improper administration of the nutrient L-dopa should not be addressed with drugs whose mechanism of action is system-wide vitamin B6 RND, which is especially true when a drug-free nutrient management approach is available. In 1941, almost 20 years before the dawn of L-dopa, Baker described a subgroup involving 25% of Parkinson’s disease patients who achieved “definite objective improvement” with vitamin B6 administration.85 In 2012, the literature noted, “Multifactorial neurological pathologies such as […] Parkinson’s disease […] have also been correlated to inadequate intracellular levels of PLP.”25 Administration of carbidopa and benserazide should be contraindicated in these patients. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 165 Dovepress Hinz et al Conclusion Between 1960 and 1974, the only prescription form of L-dopa available was the single-ingredient form that was associated with a decreasing death rate.61 In 1975, the original combination L-dopa/carbidopa drug (Sinemet®) was approved by the US FDA. Between 1976 and 2011, the CDC documented a progressive increase of 328.7% in Parkinson’s disease deaths that crossed age, sex, and ethnic boundaries.61,84 In addition, no effective way has been discovered to truly stop what has been described as neurodegeneration. The mechanism of action for carbidopa and benserazide induces irreversible binding to and permanent deactivation of PLP and PLP-dependent enzyme molecules, potentially inducing a negative impact on over 300 enzymes and proteins. Without the induction of PLP deficiency, the clinical effects of carbidopa and benserazide are not observed. It is a documented fact that these drugs may induce systemwide PLP depletion, representing an RND that is reversed with vitamin B6 administration. Administration of carbidopa may play a role in the escalating Parkinson’s disease death rate, the exacerbation of symptoms exclusively attributed to progressive neurodegeneration, and L-dopa tachyphylaxis. The full list of biochemical compromises can only be speculated due to the ability of carbidopa and benserazide to induce hundreds of intertwined peripheral and central PLP function collapses, many of which may not be fully understood at present. It is illogical to assert that an increased carbidopa-induced death rate will not occur under these circumstances. In an attempt to control a benign condition (nausea – caused by the improperly balanced administration of a nutrient, L-dopa), the patient has been exposed to the devastating consequences of these drugs. While a formidable number of studies may still be needed to define all of the PLP depletion ramifications, they become unnecessary in the effective management of Parkinson’s disease when the nutrient protocol is implemented, since carbidopa and benserazide are no longer indicated. The administration of properly balanced nutrients, under a documented nutritional protocol for the definitive control of L-dopa-induced nausea, should raise no more concern with the caregiver or patient than administration of a multivitamin; all are GRAS. Physicians should fully understand the mechanism of action of the drugs they prescribe rather than relying on the described indications provided by the drug company. Efficacy concerns relating to the discontinuation of carbidopa and benserazide are unfounded since they have no efficacy; they only deal with L-dopa side effects. Before 1976, in the precarbidopa era, 166 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress ample studies were published documenting the efficacy of L-dopa without carbidopa. Three questions are raised: 1) Is progressive neurodegeneration observed with Parkinson’s disease intrinsic to the disease, or may some symptoms be attributed to carbidopa or benserazide-induced RND? 2) Does iatrogenic druginduced poisoning, which may result in irreversible binding to and permanent deactivation of PLP and PLP-dependent enzyme molecules throughout the system, play a role in the increasing death rate noted by the CDC since 1976? 3) Is carbidopa or benserazide potentially involved in L-dopa tachyphylaxis? If the answer to these questions is yes, or even maybe, a greater focus on nutrition is indicated while discontinuing drugs such as carbidopa or benserazide. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) applies. There is much fertile ground presented here for furthering this research started in 1997. The authors encourage continued investigation, along with dialogue, into the ramifications of carbidopa and benserazide use and the known RNDs that plague the Parkinson’s disease patient. Disclosure MH discloses his relationship with DBS Labs, Inc. and NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. National Parkinson Foundation [webpage on the Internet]. What is Parkinson’s disease? Miami, FL: National Parkinson Foundation; 2014. Available from: http://www.parkinson.org/parkinson-s-disease/pd-101/ what-is-parkinson-s-disease. Accessed July 19, 2014. 2. Mayo Clinic [webpage on the Internet]. Diseases and conditions: Parkinson’s disease. Rochester, MN: Mayo Clinic; 2014. Available from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/parkinsons-disease/ basics/treatment/con-20028488. Accessed July 19, 2014. 3. SINEMET CR (carbidopa and levodopa) tablet, extended release [prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co, Inc.; 2014. Available from: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup. cfm?setid=69e575b9-f8a5-494f-b736-2520ef505cb0. Accessed July 1, 2014. 4. US Food and Drug Administration [webpage on the Internet]. Drugs@ FDA: FDA approved drug products. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2014. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda. gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm?fuseaction=Search.DrugDetails. Accessed July 19, 2014. 5. Airoldi L, Watkins CJ, Wiggins JF, Wurtman RJ. Effect of pyridoxine on the depletion of tissue pyridoxal phosphate by carbidopa. Metabolism. 1978;27(7):771–779. 6. Hoyert DL, Heron MP, Murphy SL, Kung H. National Vital Statistics Report. Deaths: Final Data for 2003. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2006. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/nvsr/nvsr54/nvsr54_13.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2014. 7. Daidone F, Montioli R, Paiardini A, et al. Identification by virtual screening and in vitro testing of human DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31610. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress 8. Andrews DW, Patrick RL, Barchas JD. The effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine on dopamine synthesis and release in rat brain striatal synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978;30(2):465–470. 9. Awazi N, Guldberg HC. On the interaction of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine with dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1978;303(1):63–72. 10. Hinz M. Depression. In: Kohlstadt I, editor. Food and Nutrients in Disease Management. Baton Rouge, FL: CRC Press; 2009:465–481. 11. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:165–174. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:457–463. 15. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 16. Hinz M, Stein A, Neff R, Weinberg R, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 17. Hinz M, Stein A, Trachte G, Uncini T. Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis. Open Access J Urol. 2010;2: 177–183. 18. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. A pilot study differentiating recurrent major depression from bipolar disorder cycling on the depressive pole. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:741–747. 19. Zhelyaskov DK, Levitt M, Udenfriend S. Tryptophan derivatives as inhibitors of tyrosine hydroxylase in vivo and in vitro. Mol Pharmacol. 1968;4(5):445–451. 20. Ng LK, Chase TN, Colburn RW, Kopin IJ. Release of (3 H)dopamine by L-5-hydroxytryptophan. Brain Res. 1972;45(2):499–502. 21. Stamford JA, Kruk ZL, Millar J. Striatal dopamine terminals release serotonin after 5-HTP pretreatment: in vivo voltammetric data. Brain Res. 1990;515(1–2):173–180. 22. Ritvo ER, Yuwiler A, Geller E, et al. Effects of L-dopa in autism. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1971;1(2):190–205. 23. Wuerthele SM, Moore KE. Studies on the mechanisms of L-dopa-induced depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the mouse brain. Life Sci. 1977;20(10):1675–1680. 24. Borah A, Mohanakumar KP. Long-term L-DOPA treatment causes indiscriminate increase in dopamine levels at the cost of serotonin synthesis in discrete brain regions of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2007;27(8):985–996. 25. Karobath M, Díaz JL, Huttunen MO. The effect of L-dopa on the concentrations of tryptophan, tyrosine and serotonin in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;14(4):393–396. 26. García NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(5 Pt 2):R1476–R1480. 27. Carta M, Carlsson T, Kirik D, Björklund A. Dopamine released from 5-HT terminals is the cause of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in parkinsonian rats. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 7):1819–1833. 28. Carta M, Carlsson T, Muñoz A, Kirik D, Björklund A. Serotonin– dopamine interaction in the induction and maintenance of L-DOPAinduced dyskinesias. Prog Brain Res. 2008;172:465–478. 29. Everett GM, Borcherding JW. L-dopa: effect on concentrations of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in brains of mice. Science. 1970;168(3933):849–850. 30. UniProt [webpage on the Internet]. UniProt. UniProt Consortium; 2014. Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=pyridoxal+AN D+organism%3A%22Homo+sapiens+%5B9606%5D%22&sort=score. Accessed July 4, 2014. 31. Paiardini A, Contestabile R, Buckle AM, Cellini B. PLP-dependent enzymes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:856076. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Parkinson’s disease death rate 32. Nicotra A, Parvez S. Apoptotic molecules and MPTP-induced cell death. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2002;24(5):599–605. 33. Fangman A, O’Malley WE. L-dopa and the patient with Parkinson’s disease. Am J Nurs. 1969;69(7):1455–1457. 34. Srimal RC, Dhawan BN. An analysis of methylphenidate induced gnawing in guinea pigs. Psychopharmacologia. 1970;18(1):99–107. 35. Leon AS, Spiegel HE, Thomas G, Abrams WB. Pyridoxine antagonism of levodopa in parkinsonism. JAMA. 1971;218(13):1924–1927. 36. Smythe GA, Edwards G, Graham P, Lazarus L. Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma by simultaneous measurement of urinary excretion of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Clin Chem. 1992;38(4):486–492. 37. Verde G, Oppizzi G, Colussi G, et al. Effect of dopamine infusion on plasma levels of growth hormone in normal subjects and in agromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1976;5(4):419–423. 38. Weiner RI, Ganong WF. Role of brain monoamines and histamine in regulation of anterior pituitary secretion. Physiol Rev. 1978;58(4):905–976. 39. Mason LJ, Cojocaru TT, Cole DJ. Surgical intervention and anesthetic management of the patient with Parkinson’s disease. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1996;34(4):133–150. 40. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Gatley SJ, et al. PET evaluation of the dopamine system of the human brain. J Nucl Med. 1996;37(7):1242–1256. 41. Checkley SA. Neuroendocrine tests of monoamine function in man: a review of basic theory and its application to the study of depressive illness. Psychol Med. 1980;10(1):35–53. 42. Nishino T, Lahiri S. Effects of dopamine on chemoreflexes in breathing. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981;50(4):892–897. 43. Pollock JD, Rowland N. Peripherally administered serotonin decreases food intake in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1981;15(2): 179–183. 44. Greenamyre JT. Glutamate–dopamine interactions in the basal ganglia: relationship to Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1993; 91(2–3):255–269. 45. Ward DS, Bellville JW. Effect of intravenous dopamine on hypercapnic ventilatory response in humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983;55(5):1418–1425. 46. Morton JJ, Connell JM, Hughes MJ, Inglis GC, Wallace EC. The role of plasma osmolality, angiotensin II and dopamine in vasopressin release in man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1985;23(2):129–138. 47. Seri I, Tulassay T, Kiszel J, et al. Effect of low-dose dopamine infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin secretion in preterm infants with hyaline membrane disease. Biol Neonate. 1985;47(6):317–322. 48. Al-Damluji S, Rees LH. Effects of catecholamines on secretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) in man. J Clin Pathol. 1987;40(9):1098–1107. 49. Hoffman B, Lefkowitz R. Catecholamines and sympathomimetic drugs. In: Gillman AG, Rall TW, Nies AS, Taylor P, editors. Goodman and Gillman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1990. 50. Levein NG, Thörn SE, Wattwil M. Dopamine delays gastric emptying and prolongs orocaecal transit time in volunteers. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16(4):246–250. 51. Bell DG, McLellan TM, Sabiston CM. Effect of ingesting caffeine and ephedrine on 10-km run performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(2):344–349. 52. Bergerot A, Storer RJ, Goadsby PJ. Dopamine inhibits trigeminovascular transmission in the rat. Ann Neurol. 2007;61(3):251–262. 53. Scanlon MF, Weightman DR, Shale DJ, et al. Dopamine is a physiological regulator of thyrotrophin (TSH) secretion in normal man. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1979;10(1):7–15. 54. Allen GF, Land JM, Heales SJ. A new perspective on the treatment of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;97(1):6–14. 55. Rubí B, Maechler P. Minireview: new roles for peripheral dopamine on metabolic control and tumor growth: let’s seek the balance. Endocrinology. 2010;151(12):5570–5581. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 167 Dovepress Hinz et al 56. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 57. Carlsson A. A Half-Century of Neurotransmitter Research: Impact on Neurology and Psychiatry. Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2000. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2000/ carlsson-lecture.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2014. 58. Kandel ER. The Molecular Biology of Memory Storage: A Dialog Between Genes and Synapses. Nobel Lecture, December 8, 2000. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/ laureates/2000/kandel-lecture.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2014. 59. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2001. Stockholm, Sweden: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences; 2001. Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/ nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/2001/advanced-chemistryprize2001. pdf. Accessed July 4, 2014. 60. Sweet RD, McDowell FH. Five years’ treatment of Parkinson’s disease with levodopa. Therapeutic results and survival of 100 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1975;83(4):456–463. 61. Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD. Deaths: Final data for 2010. National vital statistics reports; vol 61 no 4. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_04.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2014. 62. National Parkinson Foundation. The National Parkinson Foundation’s Helpline Speaks: Lessons from the 2011 Sinemet Shortage. Miami, FL: National Parkinson Foundation; 2012. Available from: http://www.parkinson.org/ Files/PDFs/NPF-Content-Documents/White-Papers/NPF466-_2011Sinemet-Shortage_WhitePaper-_Full-art. Accessed July 1, 2014. 63. Mones RJ, Elizan TS, Siegel GJ. Analysis of L-dopa induced dyskinesias in 51 patients with Parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34(6):668–673. 64. Chase TN. Serotonergic mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1972;27(4):354–356. 65. Busch AE, Karbach U, Miska D, et al. Human neurons express the polyspecific cation transporter hOCT2, which translocates monoamine neurotransmitters, amantadine, and memantine. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54(2):342–352. 66. Mayeux R, Stern Y, Williams JB, Cote L, Frantz A, Dyrenfurth I. Clinical and biochemical features of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143(6):756–759. 67. Chan-Palay V, Höchli M, Jentsch B, Leonard B, Zetzsche T. Raphe serotonin neurons in the human brain stem in normal controls and patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type and Parkinson’s disease: relationship to monoamine oxidase enzyme localization. Dementia. 1992;3(5–6):253–269. 68. Charlton CG, Mack J. Substantia nigra degeneration and tyrosine hydroxylase depletion caused by excess S-adenosylmethionine in the rat brain. Support for an excess methylation hypothesis for parkinsonism. Mol Neurobiol. 1994;9(1–3):149–161. 69. Roche. Modpar [prescribing information’. Dee Why, Australia: Roche Products Pty Limited; 2010. Available from: http://www.roche-australia. com/content/dam/internet/corporate/roche/en_AU/files/central_nervous_agents/madopar-pi.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2014. 70. Bertoldi M. Mammalian Dopa decarboxylase: structure, catalytic activity and inhibition. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;546:1–7. 71. Wu F, Christen P, Gehring H. A novel approach to inhibit intracellular vitamin B6-dependent enzymes: proof of principle with human and p lasmodium ornithine decarboxylase and human histidine decarboxylase. FASEB J. 2011;25(7):2109–2122. 72. Cellini B, Montioli R, Oppici E, Voltattorni CB. Biochemical and computational approaches to improve the clinical treatment of dopa decarboxylase-related diseases: an overview. Open Biochem J. 2012;6:131–138. 168 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 73. Bartlett MG. Biochemistry of the water soluble vitamins: a lecture for first year pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003; 67(2):Article 64. 74. Palfreyman MG, Danzin C, Bey P, et al. Alpha-difluoromethyl DOPA, a new enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitor of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase. J Neurochem. 1978;31(4):927–932. 75. DrugBank [webpage on the Internet]. Pyridoxal phosphate. DrugBank; 2013. Available from: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00114. Accessed July 20, 2014. 76. DrugBank [webpage on the Internet]. Carbidopa. DrugBank; 2013. Available from: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB00190. Accessed July 2014. 77. National Institutes of Health [webpage on the Internet]. Vitamin B6: Dietary Supplement Fact Sheet. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2011. Available from: http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/ VitaminB6-HealthProfessional/. Accessed July 20, 2014. 78. Jansen MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Buzina R, et al. Dietary fiber and plant foods in relation to colorectal cancer mortality: the Seven Countries Study. Int J Cancer. 1999;81(2):174–179. 79. Robinson K, Arheart K, Refsum H, et al. Low circulating folate and vitamin B6 concentrations: risk factors for stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease. European COMAC Group. Circulation. 1998;97(5):437–443. 80. Cui R, Iso H, Date C, Kikuchi S, Tamakoshi A; Japan Collaborative Cohort Study Group. Dietary folate and vitamin b6 and B12 intake in relation to mortality from cardiovascular diseases: Japan collaborative cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1285–1289. 81. Medrano MJ, Sierra MJ, Almazán J, Olalla MT, López-Abente G. The association of dietary folate, B6, and B12 with cardiovascular mortality in Spain: an ecological analysis. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(10):1636–1638. 82. Schnyder G, Roffi M, Flammer Y, Pin R, Hess OM. Effect of homocysteine-lowering therapy with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: the Swiss Heart study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(8):973–979. 83. Nygård O, Nordrehaug JE, Refsum H, Ueland PM, Farstad M, Vollset SE. Plasma homocysteine levels and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(4):230–236. 84. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [webpage on the Internet]. Health data interactive. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hdi.htm. Accessed July 1, 2014. 85. Baker AB. Treatment of paralysis agitans with vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride). JAMA. 1941;116(22):2484–2487. 86. Giardina G, Montioli R, Gianni S, et al. Open conformation of human DOPA decarboxylase reveals the mechanism of PLP addition to Group II decarboxylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(51): 20514–20519. 87. Barbeau A. The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: a new hypothesis. Can Med Assoc J. 1962;87:802–807. 88. US Food and Drug Administration [webpage on the Internet]. Drugs@ FDA: FDA approved drug products. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administraiton; 2014. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda. gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm. Accessed July 2014. 89. Hoyert DL, Xu JQ. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2011. National vital statistics reports; vol 61 no 6. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2012. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress Parkinson’s disease death rate Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Publish your work in this journal Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, reviews and commentaries on all areas of drug experience in humans. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/clinical-pharmacology-advances-and-applications-journal Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 169 Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Return to index PERSPECTIVES Open Access Full Text Article Parkinson’s disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 14 November 2014 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Ted Cole 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Cape Coral, FL, 2Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, 3Cole Center for Healing, Cincinnati, OH, USA 1 Abstract: When l-dopa use began in the early 1960s for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease, nausea and reversible dyskinesias were experienced as continuing side effects. Carbidopa or benserazide was added to l-dopa in 1975 solely to control nausea. Subsequent to the increasing use of carbidopa has been the recognition of irreversible dyskinesias, which have automatically been attributed to l-dopa. The research into the etiology of these phenomena has identified the causative agent of the irreversible dyskinesias as carbidopa, not l-dopa. The mechanism of action of the carbidopa and benserazide causes irreversible binding and inactivation of vitamin B6 throughout the body. The consequences of this action are enormous, interfering with over 300 enzyme and protein functions. This has the ability to induce previously undocumented profound antihistamine dyskinesias, which have been wrongly attributed to l-dopa and may be perceived as irreversible if proper corrective action is not taken. Keywords: vitamin B6, PLP, irreversible, pyridoxal 5’-phosphate Introduction Correspondence: Marty Hinz Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, 1008 Dolphin Drive, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] Serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine are centrally acting monoamines. The immediate amino acid precursor of serotonin is 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP); l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-dopa) is the immediate amino acid precursor of dopamine. The aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC; EC 4.1.1.28) enzyme catalyzes the synthesis of serotonin, dopamine, and histamine.1,2 Side effects may position l-dopa as one of the last drugs administered, despite the fact that it has the highest efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease.3 Two prominent l-dopa side effects are nausea and dyskinesias. Carbidopa is listed as a decarboxylase inhibitor and is sold in the US. It is administered in combination with l-dopa to alleviate nausea.4 It irreversibly binds to and permanently deactivates pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP) and PLP-dependent enzymes and depletes PLP reserve pools.5 The first documentation of novel carbidopa-induced dyskinesias was in 2012.1 Research into the phenomenon led to the formulation of the hypothesis that if significant depletion of histamine induces dyskinesias, then carbidopa is capable of inducing dyskinesias, which if not managed properly may be perceived as irreversible. Benserazide is a decarboxylase inhibitor sold outside of the US. The term “benserazide” refers to the drug or its metabolite trihydroxybenzylhydrazine. No efficacy claims have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for carbidopa or benserazide.6 Their only indication is management of l-dopa-induced nausea, a side effect.4,6 Double-blind studies are used to demonstrate efficacy, but are not appropriate for developing comprehensive side-effect profiles. Fatal events, which 189 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 189–194 Dovepress © 2014 Hinz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S72234 Dovepress Hinz et al can occur at a rate of one in 10,000, may not be observed during a limited-population and limited-duration study. Endogenous versus competitive inhibition The endogenous state relating to serotonin and dopamine exists when no amino acid precursors are taken, or when inadequate or improperly balanced precursors are administered. Competitive inhibition is the interaction of serotonin and dopamine that may occur in synthesis, transport, and metabolism only when adequate and properly balanced amounts of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are administered simultaneously. Organic cationtransporter type 2 functional status analysis verifies the existence of the serotonin/dopamine competitive inhibition state under the apical regulatory supersystem model. When competitive inhibition under this system exists, changes to either serotonin or dopamine concentrations individually will affect both serotonin and dopamine concentrations in a predictable manner.1,7–16 Relative nutritional deficiency A relative nutritional deficiency (RND) exists when optimal nutrient intake cannot meet system needs. Parkinson’s disease may induce many RNDs associated with depletions of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, thiols (homocysteine, l-methionine, S-adenosyl-l-methionine, S-adenosyl-homocysteine, cystathione, l-cysteine, and glutathione), l-tyrosine, and l-tryptophan.1,7,17,18–23 l -dopa may induce depletions of serotonin, thiols, l-tyrosine, and l-tryptophan, resulting in RNDs (Figure 1).1,7 Carbidopa may induce depletions of peripheral serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine, along with system-wide depletion of niacin and vitamin B6, resulting in multiple system RNDs. Over 300 enzymes and proteins require vitamin B6 for normal function.1,7,24–29 L-dopa Drug/nutrient perspective A nutrient is any substance that facilitates normal system function. A drug is any substance that induces abnormal system function. A nutrient may become a drug. A drug may not become a nutrient. When the nutrient 5-HTP is administered as a single agent, dopamine depletion may occur. If dopamine depletion is induced, 5-HTP is no longer functioning as a nutrient; it is a drug.1,7–22 When l-dopa is administered as a single agent, it may deplete serotonin, and would then be considered a drug, not a nutrient.1,7,30–34 l-dopa-induced Depletes Sulfur amino acids Serotonin Depletes Depletes Depletes Dopamine L-tyrosine Depletes nausea The only indication for carbidopa and benserazide is control of nausea resulting from improper l-dopa administration. The enzyme l-aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) catalyzes the synthesis of serotonin and dopamine by metabolizing 5-HTP and l-dopa, respectively. Through irreversible inhibition of AADC, carbidopa or benserazide compromises peripheral synthesis of serotonin and dopamine. This druginduced inhibition of peripheral metabolism of l-dopa by AADC leaves more l-dopa unmetabolized and available to freely cross the blood–brain barrier into the central nervous system. As a result, when carbidopa or benserazide is administered, lower l-dopa daily intake values are required to achieve the same central nervous system results.4,6 It is documented that 5-HTP controls l-dopa-induced nausea, utilizing the same basic chemical mechanism as carbidopa and benserazide: AADC inhibition. Carbidopa and benserazide inhibition is irreversible while 5-HTP inhibition is reversible. The use of 5-HTP is superior, since under proper administration it is a nutrient that does not deplete systems or induce abnormal system functions when properly administered.1,7,35–37 If the goal of administering 5-HTP for the control of l-dopa-induced nausea is to have it function as a nutrient, this is not merely a simple substitution. It requires concomitant L-tryptophan 5-HTP Depletes Figure 1 Administering any of the illustrated components in a dominant manner will facilitate the associated depletion. Notes: Copyright © 2012. Dove Medical Press. Adapted from Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142.15 Abbreviation: HTP, hydroxytryptophan. 190 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress administration of l-dopa with 5-HTP, along with the “core nutrients”: l-tyrosine, a thiol (l-cysteine, glutathione, S-adenosyl methionine, or l-methionine), and cofactors (vitamin C, vitamin B6, and calcium carbonate). Administration of properly balanced core nutrients needs to be guided by organic cation-transporter type 2 functional status analysis, in order to achieve a balance that does not convert the nutrients into a drug.1,7,37 All l-dopa single-ingredient products were discontinued by the pharmaceutical companies in the US in 1999.38 Concomitant l-dopa/carbidopa products became the only prescription form of l-dopa available. If an indication for l-dopa as a single ingredient is identified, it is available only as a nutritionally sourced product, such as Mucuna cochinchinensis (which is defined by the US Department of Agriculture as a synonym for Mucuna pruriens).38,39 Few physicians are aware of the existence of this product. Carbidopa dyskinesias Abnormal or impaired voluntary movements are dyskinesias.40 Movement disorders associated with Parkinson’s disease include tremors, and other uncoordinated motions. These are often seen when there are inadequate levels of l-dopa available in the system. For over 50 years, all dyskinesias experienced while taking l-dopa or concomitant carbidopa/ l -dopa preparations were described as l -dopa-induced dyskinesias.41–48 It is common for dyskinesia studies that reference administration of concomitant l-dopa/carbidopa to refer to the combination as l-dopa.49 Novel observations reporting a group of 17 Parkinson’s disease patients led to identification of carbidopa-induced dyskinesias, which had not been documented prior to 2012.1 These patients had been ingesting prescribed concomitant l-dopa/carbidopa preparations for 1–7 years. Their drugs were continued as the core nutrients were started. The mean daily dosing value of l-dopa/carbidopa was 1,000 mg and 250 mg, respectively, at the initiation of the core nutrients. The mean duration of previous drug treatment was 3 years, 7 months. Onset of dyskinesias began within the first week of treatment when the core nutrients were added. Dyskinesias were generally described as facial twitching and head bobbing due to peripheral muscle-control problems within the neck and upper shoulders. When dyskinesias developed, the l-dopa/ carbidopa was immediately discontinued and the nutritionally sourced l-dopa increased fivefold to compensate for the loss of the carbidopa effect on the central nervous system by blocking peripheral conversion of l-dopa to dopamine. This conversion to higher-dose l-dopa was monitored using the previously published pill-stop technique.37 Following this Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Parkinson’s disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia protocol, all patients achieved full resolution of dyskinesias within 4 days. This led to the hypothesis that the dyskinesias that resolved after applying the new protocol had been induced by the carbidopa and were not related to the l-dopa. There were no refractory dyskinesias experienced. PLP Histidine decarboxylase (HDC) and AADC are PLP-dependent enzymes that catalyze the metabolism of histidine to histamine.50 Each contains an apoprotein core requiring irreversible hydrazine–PLP binding for activation. PLP then becomes the active site for catalyzing reactions.5 Carbidopa and benserazide induce permanent deactivation and irreversible binding of PLP, PLP-dependent enzymes, and depletion of PLP reserve pools.1,24 While PLP freely crosses the blood– brain barrier,51 carbidopa and benserazide do not.4,6 If carbidopa and benserazide deplete peripheral PLP, then central PLP is also depleted when the system reaches equilibrium. Over 300 enzymes and proteins may be adversely affected by this extensive PLP collapse.24 Semantic change and neologisms Dyskinesias are classified as either reversible or irreversible. Between 1960 and 1975, when only the single-ingredient l-dopa was available, no l-dopa-induced irreversible dyskinesias were documented.52 In 1975, the FDA approved the combined formulation of l-dopa with carbidopa for Parkinson’s disease treatment. The neologism “ l-dopainduced irreversible dyskinesias” first appeared in the literature after 1975.53 A semantic change had occurred: the term “l-dopa-induced dyskinesias” was expanded to include l-dopa-induced irreversible dyskinesias. A 1971 article noted: “Transitory adventitious movements are the commonest dose-limiting adverse reaction to levodopa in parkinsonian patients. Prompt resolution of dyskinetic symptoms usually attends reduction in levodopa dosage or the administration of pyridoxine hydrochloride.”54 A 1999 article noted: “As Parkinson’s disease progresses, the dosage and frequency of levodopa needs to be increased to maintain control. As a result, most patients develop irreversible dyskinesias.”55 A 2012 article noted: “The most effective pharmacologic treatment for PD, levodopa, has a limited period of effectiveness (7–12 years) and is associated with irreversible dyskinesias.”56 Antihistamine dyskinesias To formulate the following observations, Hinz et al treated over 800 Parkinson’s disease patients primarily with Mucuna submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 191 Dovepress Hinz et al pruriens-sourced l-dopa, with and without carbidopa. An antihistamine is a substance that inhibits the histamine agonist, inhibits histamine synthesis, or induces physiologic antihistamine effects.57 Antihistamine effects may be exerted by 5-HTP (weak), l-dopa (strong), and carbidopa (potentially profound). AADC or HDC is exclusively responsible for catalyzing histamine synthesis. If 5-HTP induces a reversible inhibition of AADC, then a weak antihistamine effect may be present.1,16 This is a novel documentation of 5-HTP having a potential antihistamine effect. l-dopa may induce both strong and weak antihistamine effects. Dopamine metabolism to epinephrine is without biochemical regulation. Synthesis of epinephrine shares a direct relationship with dopamine. A strong physiologic antihistamine effect is associated with increased epinephrine synthesis induced by administration of l-dopa. The rapid power of epinephrine to reverse acute life-threatening histamine collapse is well known in medicine.57 l-dopa also induces a second weaker antihistamine effect through reversible inhibition of AADC.1 Carbidopa and benserazide have the ability to induce a previously undocumented profound antihistamine effect. These drugs irreversibly bind to and permanently deactivate the two PLP-dependent enzymes responsible for histamine synthesis: AADC and HDC.5,58,59 This is exacerbated by depletion of their PLP substrate and PLP reserve pools.5 Dyskinesias may be induced by prolonged high-dose antihistamine ingestion or overdose.60–63 If carbidopa is administered in high-enough and/or long-enough concentrations to cause significant collapse of histamine synthesis, then carbidopainduced antihistamine dyskinesias will occur. Discussion l-dopa-induced dyskinesias have not been observed or documented in the serotonin/dopamine competitive inhibition state. Prior to 1976 and the introduction of carbidopa, there was no documentation of “l-dopa-induced irreversible dyskinesias.”52 The molecular weight of PLP is 247.142.63 Carbidopa has a molecular weight of 244.244.64 Molecular binding of carbidopa to PLP is in a 1:1 ratio. Free adult male PLP is placed at 167 mg.65 The PLP that is noncovalently bound to about 300 enzymes and proteins represents the PLP reserve pool, which is at equilibrium with free PLP.24 The amount of PLP bound and unbound system-wide is not agreed upon. Assume carbidopa ingestion of 250 mg per day over a 4-year period, while ingesting the US-recommended daily allowance of about 2 mg of vitamin B6 per day. This reveals a potential 192 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress irreversible carbidopa PLP-induced deficiency of 0.36208 kg (0.78 lb). If PLP depletion is great enough, then administration of 2 mg per day of vitamin B6 will never reverse the profound drug-induced PLP RND and the carbidopa-induced antihistamine dyskinesias in the patient’s lifetime. The observed dyskinesias will be perceived as irreversible. Effective control of reversible l-dopa-induced dyskinesias with PLP was documented in the 15-year precarbidopa era.54 It is documented that administration of adequate amounts of PLP will reverse the AADC and HDC effects from carbidopa when it is stopped.66 If discontinuation of carbidopa with administration of ample vitamin B6 is effective over time at reversing the effects of irreversible binding of carbidopa to AADC and HDC as new molecules of these enzymes are synthesized, then the approach will be effective in reversing carbidopa-induced antihistamine dyskinesias. The PLP reserve pool is much larger than previously realized. It is made up of about 300 enzymes and proteins that are noncovalently bound to PLP. If the PLP reserve pool is significantly greater than anticipated, then adequate reversal of carbidopa PLP collapse may take administration of PLP-dosing values in excess of those previously associated with restoration of PLP collapse. For optimal restoration of PLP collapse, carbidopa or benserazide needs to be discontinued. Conclusion This paper discusses the mechanism of action whereby 5-HTP controls l-dopa-induced nausea. It also discusses the previously undocumented potential of carbidopa and benserazide to induce profound antihistamine dyskinesias that are irreversible if ample vitamin B6 replacement is not provided. During the 15 years prior to 1975, when l-dopa was prescribed without carbidopa, there was no documentation of irreversible dyskinesias. After the FDA approval of carbidopa/l-dopa, the neologism “l-dopa-induced irreversible dyskinesias” began to appear in the literature as a semantic change. After carbidopa was approved by the FDA in 1975 for concomitant administration with l-dopa, all new-onset dyskinesias have continued to be wrongly attributed to l-dopa alone. Documentation of carbidopa-induced dyskinesias did not exist until 2012. Irreversible antihistamine dyskinesias are a function of carbidopa’s mechanism of action, which causes collapse of histamine synthesis that is exacerbated by PLP collapse and PLP reserve-pool depletion. The possible hesitation of the medical community to embrace the nutritional approach by giving up the drugs (carbidopa or benserazide) is without foundation. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Dovepress The efficacy of l-dopa without the drugs carbidopa or benserazide has been amply documented in double-blind studies since 1960. There are no efficacy claims for these drugs approved by the FDA. Properly administering the nondrug protocol that incorporates the core nutrients definitively controls l-dopa-induced nausea and avoids irreversible dyskinesias. No carbidopa or benserazide is utilized in this regimen, thereby eliminating the massive vitamin B6 depletion experienced by patients taking the combined l-dopa/ carbidopa formulation. This nutritional approach should raise no concern, as all of the ingredients are classified by the FDA as being safe enough for over-the-counter sales. Disclosure MH discloses his relationship with CHK Nutrition, which was wholly divested in June 2011, along with current affiliations with DBS Labs and NeuroResearch Clinics. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 2. GenomeNet. Homo sapiens (human): 1644. Available from: http:// www.genome.jp/dbget-bin/www_bget?hsa:1644+H01161+D00405+ D00558+D01653+D03082+D08205. Accessed August 2, 2014. 3. Mayo Clinic. Parkinson’s disease: treatments and drugs. 2014. Available from: http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/parkinsonsdisease/basics/treatment/con-20028488. Accessed August 2, 2014. 4. Sinemet CR ® [prescribing information]. Available from: http:// packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_sinemet_cr.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2014. 5. Daidone F, Montioli R, Paiardini A, et al. Identification by virtual screening and in vitro testing of human DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31610. 6. Roche Australia. Madopar® [prescribing information]. Sydney: Roche Australia; 2010. Available from: http://www.roche-australia.com/ content/dam/internet/corporate/roche/en_AU/files/central_nervous_ agents/madopar-pi.pdf. Accessed August 2, 2014. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:1–10. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Validity of urinary monoamine assay sales under the “spot baseline urinary neurotransmitter testing marketing model”. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2011;4:101–113. 9. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;2011:7 1–7. 10. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 11. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 12. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7: 31–38. 13. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Urinary neurotransmitter testing: considerations of spot baseline norepinephrine and epinephrine. Open Access J Urol. 2011;3:19–24. 14. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2011;3:69–77. Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Parkinson’s disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia 15. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:135–142. 16. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 17. Carta M, Carlsson T, Muñoz A, Kirik D, Björklund A. Serotonindopamine interaction in the induction and maintenance of L-DOPAinduced dyskinesias. Prog Brain Res. 2008;172:465–468. 18. Mones RJ, Elizan TS, Siegel GJ. Analysis of L-dopa induced dyskinesias in 51 patients with parkinsonism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971;34:668–673. 19. Chase TN. Serotonergic mechanisms in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1972;27:354–356. 20. Busch AE, Karbach U, Miska D, et al. Human neurons express the polyspecific cation transporter hOCT2, which translocates monoamine neurotransmitters, amantadine, and memantine. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:342–352. 21. Mayeux R, Stern Y, Williams JB, Cote L, Frantz A, Dyrenfurth I. Clinical and biochemical features of depression in Parkinson’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:756–759. 22. Chan-Palay V, Höchli M, Jentsch B, Leonard B, Zetsche T. Raphe serotonin neurons in the human brain stem in normal controls and patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type and Parkinson’s disease: relation to monoamine oxidase enzyme location. Dementia. 1992;3:253–269. 23. Charlton CG, Mack J. Substantia nigra degeneration and tyrosine hydroxylase depletion caused by excess S-adenosylmethionine in the rat brain: support for an excess methylation hypothesis for parkinsonism. Mol Neurobiol. 1994;9:149–161. 24. UniProt. Search query results. Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/ uniprot/?query=pyridoxal+AND+organism%3A%22Homo+sapiens+% 5B9606%5D%22&sort=score. Accessed July 4, 2014. 25. Andrews DW, Patrick RL, Barchas JD. The effects of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine on dopamine synthesis and release in rat brain striatal synaptosomes. J Neurochem. 1978;30:465–470. 26. Awazi N, Guldberg HC. On the interaction of 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine with dopamine metabolism in the rat striatum arch. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1978;303:63–72. 27. Zhelyaskov DK, Levitt M, Udenfriend S. Tryptophan derivatives as inhibitors of tyrosine hydroxylase in vivo and in vitro. Mol Pharmacol. 1968;4:445–451. 28. Ng LK, Chase TN, Colburn RW, Kopin IJ. Research of [3H] dopamine by L-5-hydroxytryptophan. Brain Res. 1972;45:499–505. 29. Stamford JA, Kruk ZL, Millar J. Striatal dopamine terminals release serotonin after 5-HTP pretreatment: in vivo voltammetric data. Brain Res. 1990;515:173–180. 30. Ritvo ER, Yuwiler A, Geller E, et al. Effects of L-dopa in autism. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1971;1:190–205. 31. Wuerthele SM, Moore KE. Studies on the mechanisms of L-dopa induced depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine in the mouse brain. Life Sci. 1977;20:1675–1680. 32. Borah A, Mohanakumar KP. Long-term L-DOPA treatment causes indiscriminate increase in dopamine levels at the cost of serotonin synthesis in discrete brain regions of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2007;27: 985–996. 33. Karobath M, Díaz JL, Huttunen MO. The effect of L-dopa on the concentrations of tryptophan, tyrosine, and serotonin in rat brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 1971;14:393–396. 34. García NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:R1476–R1480. 35. Carta M, Carlsson T, Kirik D, Björklund A. Dopamine released from 5-HT terminals is the cause of L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in parkinsonian rats. Brain. 2007;130:1819–1833. 36. Everett GM, Borcherding JW. L-DOPA: effect on concentrations of dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin in brains of mice. Science. 1970;168:847–850. submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 193 Dovepress Hinz et al 37. Hinz M, Stein A, Cole T. Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2014;6: 93–99. 38. US Department of Agriculture. Mucuna chochinchinensis (Lour) A Chev Available from: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/ taxon.pl?70451. Accessed August 3, 2014. 39. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approved drug products. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/ index.cfm. Accessed September 22, 2014. 40. Google. Dyskinesia definition. Available from: https://www.google. com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGHP_enUS59 0US590&q=dyskinesia+definition. Accessed August 2, 2014. 41. Barbeau A. L-dopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease: a critical review of nine years’ experience. Canada Med Assoc J. 1969;101:59–68. 42. Krack P, Pollak P, Limousin P, et al. Subthalamic nucleus or internal pallidal stimulation in young onset Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1998;121: 451–457. 43. Fabbrini G, Brotchie JM, Grandas F, Nomoto M, Goetz CG. Levodopainduced dyskinesias. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1379–1389; quiz 1523. 44. Caparros-Lefebvre D, Blond S, Vermersch P, Pécheux N, Guieu JD, Petit H. Chronic thalamic stimulation improves tremor and levodopa induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56:268–273. 45. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:368–376. 46. Fahn S. Levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl. 2006:1–15. 47. Del Sorbo F, Albanese A. Levodopa-induced dyskinesias and their management. J Neurol. 2008;255 Suppl 4:32–41. 48. Lewitt PA, Hauser RA, Lu M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of fipamezole for dyskinesia in Parkinson disease (FJORD study). Neurology. 2012;79:164–169. 49. Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, De Deyn PP, Clarke CE, Lang AE. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. N Engl J Med. 2000;342;1484–1491. 50. Paiardini A, Contestabile R, Buckle AM, Cellini B. PLP-dependent enzymes. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014;856076. 51. Giardinia G, Montioli R, Gianni S, et al. Open conformation of human DOPA decarboxylase reveals the mechanism of PLP addition to group II decarboxylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 20514–20519. 52. Google Scholar. Search: [parkinson’s irreversible dyskinesias “l-dopa or levodopa”] with query prior to 1977. Accessed August 2, 2014. 53. Schreck J, Kelsberg G, Rich J, Ward R. Clinical inquiries. What is the best initial treatment of Parkinson’s disease? J Fam Pract. 2003;52: 897–899. 54. Weiss JL, Ng LK, Chase TN. Long-lasting dyskinesia induced by L-dopa. Lancet. 1971;1:1016–1017. 55. Greener M. New Hope for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Inpharma. 1999:3–4. 56. Landers M. Exercise-Induced Neuroprotection in a Hemiparkinsonian 6-Hydroxydopamine Rat Model [doctoral thesis]. Las Vegas: University of Nevada; 2012. 57. Oxford Dictionaries. Definition of antihistamine. Available from: http:// www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/antihistamine. Accessed August 2, 2014. 58. Kemp SF, Lockey RF, Simons FE. Epinephrine: the drug of choice for anaphylaxis. A statement of the World Allergy Organization. Allergy. 2008;63:1061–1070. 59. Wu F, Christen P, Gehring H. A novel approach to inhibit intracellular vitamin B6-dependent enzymes: proof with human and plasmodium ornithine decarboxylase and human histidine decarboxylase. FASEB J. 2011;25:2109–2122. 60. Olson K. Poisoning and Drug Overdose. 4th ed. New York: McGrawHilll; 2003. 61. Edriss H, Pfarr M. Acute respiratory distress syndrome, metabolic acidosis, and respiratory acidosis associated with citalopram overdose. 2014. Available from: http://pulmonarychronicles.com/ojs/index.php?jo urnal=pulmonarychronicles&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D= 102&path%5B%5D=213. Accessed August 2, 2014. 62. Scharman EJ1, Erdman AR, Wax PM, et al. Diphenhydramine and dimenhydrinate poisoning: an evidence-based consensus guideline for out-of-hospital management. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2006;44:205–223. 63. DrugBank. Pyridoxal phosphate. Available from: http://www.drugbank. ca/drugs/DB00114. Accessed July 20, 2014. 64. DrugBank. Carbidopa. Available from: http://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/ DB00190. Accessed July 20, 2014. 65. Pitkin R. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington: National Academies; 1998. 66. Hinz M, Stein A, Cole T. Parkinson’s disease death rate: carbidopa and vitamin B6 (PLP). Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications. 2014;6:161–169. Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications Publish your work in this journal Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, reports, reviews and commentaries on all areas of drug experience in humans. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/clinical-pharmacology-advances-and-applications-journal 194 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications 2014:6 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress open access to scientific and medical research Open Access Full Text Article Return to index Perspectives Parkinson’s disease-associated melanin steal This article was published in the following Dove Press journal: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 10 December 2014 Number of times this article has been viewed Marty Hinz 1 Alvin Stein 2 Ted Cole 3 Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., Cape Coral, FL, USA; 2 Stein Orthopedic Associates, Plantation, FL, USA; 3Cole Center for Healing, Cincinnati, OH, USA 1 Abstract: Urinary dopamine fluctuations in the competitive inhibition state were first documented in 2009. At that time, it was noted that progressively higher daily dosing values of L-tyrosine decreased the magnitude of these fluctuations. While extensive statistical analysis has been performed by the authors since 2004, it was not until 2012 that a plausible explanation was formulated. In the process, correlations with L-tyrosine administration and the on/off effect of Parkinson’s disease were defined. This paper documents the current knowledge with regard to the management of retrograde phase 1 dopamine fluctuations and investigates the hypothesis that they are caused by a melanin steal phenomenon. Keywords: fluctuations, L-dopa, dopamine, melanocyte Introduction In 2004, during interpretation of urinary serotonin and dopamine amino acid load testing, retrograde phase 1 urinary dopamine fluctuations were defined. By 2005, it was noted that increasing the daily L-tyrosine consumption significantly decreased fluctuations. The phenomenon was formally documented in 2009: […] the fluctuations in dopamine excretion were smaller in samples obtained from patients ingesting incrementally greater amounts of tyrosine; and this difference for the combined phases 1, 2, and 3 reached a high level of statistical significance (p , 0.0001) when compared to phase 0 samples.1 A potential etiology of dopamine fluctuations was not defined until 2012. This paper documents the current knowledge regarding this phenomenon as associated with the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. The primary hypothesis is that if significant retrograde phase 1 urinary dopamine fluctuations exist in the competitive inhibition state, then the primary force causing this phenomenon is melanin steal, which causes dopaquinone to preferentially utilize L-tyrosine and L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa), leading to an inconsistency of dopamine synthesis. The three-phase response Correspondence: Marty Hinz Clinical Research, NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc., 1008 Dolphin Dr, Cape Coral, FL 33904, USA Tel +1 218 626 2220 Fax +1 218 626 1638 Email [email protected] L-tryptophan is metabolized to 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), which in turn is metabolized by aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) to serotonin. L-tyrosine is metabolized to L-dopa, which in turn is metabolized by AADC to dopamine.2–8 Competitive inhibition between serotonin and dopamine exists in transport, synthesis, and metabolism when precursors of both are administered simultaneously in levels that are high enough and properly balanced.5,6 Objective verification of the competitive inhibition state is under the apical regulatory super system (APRESS) model. Under APRESS, changes in only serotonin concentrations will affect changes in dopamine concentrations in a predictable manner. The inverse is also true: changes to only dopamine concentrations will affect serotonin concentrations in a predictable 2331 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 2331–2337 Dovepress © 2014 Hinz et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S74952 Dovepress Hinz et al manner. Functions exclusively controlled by manipulation of serotonin in the endogenous state may be regulated by dopamine and/or serotonin manipulation in the competitive inhibition state. Functions exclusively controlled by manipulation of dopamine in the endogenous state may be regulated by dopamine and/or serotonin manipulation in the competitive inhibition state.5,6 Figure 1 illustrates the three phases of correlation between urinary serotonin or dopamine with the total daily dosing values of serotonin and dopamine precursors in competitive inhibition: inverse (phase 1), no (phase 2), and direct (phase 3) correlation.1 These responses are generated by the basolateral organic cation transporters type-2 (OCT-2) of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells’ (PCT) S3 segment. Under normal conditions, serotonin and dopamine filtered at the glomerulus are transported into the PCT and then metabolized, and are not found in the final urine. The serotonin and dopamine (which are centrally acting monoamines) in the final urine represent monoamines that are newly synthesized by the kidneys. The monoamines newly synthesized in the PCT are preferentially transported by serotonin transporters (SERT) and OCT-2 across the S3 basolateral border of the PCT to the peripheral circulation via the renal vein. SERT is responsible for bulk transport, while OCT-2 is responsible for fine tuning the exact final amount of monoamines transported to the system. The monoamines not transported to the peripheral system are carried across the apical PCT S3 surface by organic cation transporters novel type-2 (OCT-N2), then onto the final urine as waste.2,9 The importance of renal OCT-2 functional status analysis to the central nervous system is documented: The current knowledge of the distribution and functional properties […] of cation transport measured in intact plasma membranes is used to postulate identical or homologous transporters in intestine, liver, kidney, and brain.10 Urinary monoamine levels Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Optimal range →→Increasing the daily balanced amino acid dosing→→ Figure 1 The three-phase response of serotonin or dopamine in the competitive inhibition state. Note: Copyright © 2013. Dove Medical Press. Adapted from Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monotransport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392.9 2332 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Serotonin and dopamine both need to be conceptualized independent of each other, each with its own three-phase model. The phases illustrated in Figure 1 correlate with specific configurations which, in the competitive inhibition state, define the functional status of the OCT-2 in the transport of serotonin and dopamine. Phase 1 correlates with the transporter entrance gate inhibiting full monoamine access to the unsaturated transporter lumen. Entrance gate restriction of monoamine access to the transporter lumen dissipates as the sum total of serotonin and dopamine presenting at the gate increases. This causes increasing amounts of monoamine to be transported to the peripheral system, while decreasing concentrations observed in the final urine. Phase 2 correlates with full monoamine access to the unsaturated lumen as the effects of the entrance gate restriction are no longer present. Phase 3 correlates with full transporter lumen access as the entrance gate effects are no longer a factor while the lumen transporter is saturated. This leads to the phenomenon whereby increases in serotonin or dopamine concentrations presenting at the saturated transporter lead to increased excretion of these monoamines in the final urine.2,5,6,9 Fluctuations It takes 5 days to achieve equilibrium when the daily dosing value of a serotonin or dopamine amino acid precursor is started or changed.5,6 Urinary dopamine levels that are higher than can be achieved in phase 3 at the equilibrium of a specific amino acid dosing value are definitive evidence that urinary dopamine fluctuations are present. For example, while ingesting 120 mg of L-dopa per day, the phase 3 urinary dopamine response limit is defined as 1,500 µg of dopamine per gram of creatinine (µg/g cr). Urinary levels higher than 1,500 µg/g cr are not a phase 3 response, but represent retrograde phase 1 dopamine fluctuations, as illustrated in Figure 2. These fluctuating retrograde phase 1 urinary dopamine assay results are not reproducible. They are also revealed with repeat assays on different days with the same L-dopa dosing values. In studying this phenomenon, it is apparent that there is a force variably compromising dopamine synthesis, pulling dopamine back into phase 1, which then fluctuates. These variations are a random occurrence in the laboratory assay. The urinary dopamine assay is a single snapshot of the fluctuating urinary dopamine level in the competitive inhibition state. Serotonin levels vacillate in response to dopamine fluctuations, a phenomenon that is explained by the APRESS model.5 Methodology Table 1 is based on statistical analysis of urinary serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursor load testing performed Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 Urinary neurotransmitter levels Dovepress Parkinson’s disease-associated melanin steal Phase 1 Phase 2 h igh-complexity laboratory testing that is accredited by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA). Phase 3 120 mg L-dopa maximum phase 3 =1,500 µg/g cr x Parkinson’s disease melanin steal model When taking 120 mg of L-dopa daily, a urinary dopamine level of 2,000 µg/g cr represents a phase 1 retrograde fluctuation. →→Increasing the daily balanced amino acid dosing→→ Figure 2 Retrograde phase 1 dopamine fluctuation. Notes: At a dose of 120 mg of L-dopa, urinary phase 3 dopamine levels higher than 1,500 µg/g cr are not observed. Under these conditions, levels higher than 1,500 µg/g cr represent a phase 1 retrograde fluctuation. Copyright © 2013. Dove Medical Press. Adapted from Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monotransport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392.9 Abbreviations: cr, creatinine; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. on Parkinson’s disease patients by DBS Laboratory Services, Inc. (Duluth, MN, USA) between January 1, 2014 and September 4, 2014. Laboratory sample processing was as follows. After 1 week on a specific amino acid dosing, a urinary sample was obtained 6 hours prior to onset of the sleep cycle; 4 pm was the most frequent time of collection. After stabilization with 6 N HCl for preservation of the monoamines, the samples were shipped to DBS Laboratory Services, Inc. Commercial kits for radioimmunoassay were used (3 CAT PIA IC88501 and IB89527; Immuno Biological Laboratories, Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA). DBS Laboratory Services, Inc. performs With the induction of suboptimal L-tyrosine and/or L-dopa concentrations, retrograde phase 1 fluctuations can and will occur.1,5,6 Dopamine fluctuations may be intermittent. It is common to observe initial assays wherein the dopamine and serotonin are following the three-phase model prior to the occurrence of retrograde phase 1 dopamine fluctuations. It has been previously documented that, in the competitive inhibition state, increasing L-tyrosine daily dosing decreases dopamine fluctuations.1 Prior research has revealed that administration of progressively higher amounts of L-tyrosine can move the urinary dopamine out of phase 1, through phase 2, and into phase 3. This research further revealed that L-tyrosine alone will not establish urinary dopamine concentrations higher than 475 µg/g cr going into phase 3.5,6 The prototype for understanding the etiology of dopamine fluctuations is the exaggerated response seen in Parkinson’s disease. Retrograde phase 1 urinary dopamine levels of 20,000 to 200,000 µg/g cr are common, while levels above 2 million µg/g cr are occasionally observed. Exacerbation of dopamine fluctuations may occur as the serotonin and dopamine daily amino acid precursor dosing levels (not including L-tyrosine) increase and/or as time passes on a static dose. Table 1 Group amino acid parameters associated with the reported urinary dopamine amino acid load testing results in patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease N Mean 5-HTP Median 5-HTP Standard deviation 5-HTP 5-HTP dosing range Mean L-dopa Median L-dopa Standard deviation L-dopa L-dopa dosing range Mean tyrosine Median tyrosine Standard deviation tyrosine Tyrosine dosing range Mean urinary dopamine Median urinary dopamine Standard deviation urinary dopamine Urinary dopamine range All subjects Subjects with 2 tests 168 80 75 mg 123.8 mg 76.0 mg 37.5–300 mg 4,200 mg 4,505 mg 3,169 mg 480–12,600 mg 3,000 mg 9,345 mg 13.015 mg 375–46,500 mg 52,461 μg/g cr 83,144 μg/g cr 95,020 μg/g cr 2,047–528,840 μg/g cr 112.5 mg 127.9 mg 71.4 mg 37.5–300 mg 5,040 mg 5,595 mg 2,874.4 mg 0.0–14,280 mg 16,500 mg 18,064 mg 13,784 mg 750–46,500 mg 71,197 μg/g cr 99,086 μg/g cr 111,994 μg/g cr 6,265–528,840 μg/g cr Notes: All data are based on the last test submitted and include all subjects tested between January 1 and September 4, 2014. In the right column, subjects with fewer than three tests performed were excluded. Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; cr, creatinine; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 2333 Dovepress Hinz et al While carbidopa/L-dopa combinations are the current standard in medicine, 5-HTP, as documented in Table 1, was administered in place of carbidopa based on the following considerations. Carbidopa has no efficacy in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease symptoms. Its only indication is management of the L-dopa-induced side effect nausea.11 It is documented that carbidopa irreversibly binds to and permanently deactivates the active form of vitamin B6 (pyridoxal 5′-phosphate [PLP]), PLP-dependent enzymes, and depletes B6 reserves.12 Depletion of B6 by carbidopa and benserazide adversely affects over 300 enzymes and proteins that depend on B6 for their function.13 Both are effective in controlling L-dopa-induced nausea by the same mechanism of action, AADC inhibition.5,6,11 The inhibition caused by carbidopa is irreversible, while 5-HTP inhibition is reversible.5,6,12 A primary advantage of 5-HTP over carbidopa is that it does not irreversibly bind to nor permanently deactivate or deplete PLP, PLP-dependent enzymes, and PLP reserves, thereby avoiding system-wide nutritional deficiency and collapse of B6.12 Both Parkinson’s disease and administration of L-dopa are associated with serotonin depletion.4,14–17 5-HTP is freely metabolized to serotonin without biochemical feedback regulation. This means that it is the most powerful precursor available for serotonin synthesis in compensating for the known serotonin depletion associated with Parkinson’s disease and its treatment.5,6 L-tyrosine administration has not been previously documented at the daily dosing levels found in Table 1. It is asserted that daily L-tyrosine dosing, greater than 5,000 mg, needs to be started or increased only in response to a confirmed laboratory indication in the competitive inhibition state. Previous research by the authors has revealed that, when the laboratory indications exist, virtually all patients tolerate L-tyrosine administered at the individualized levels reflected in Table 1. The hypothesis is that if there is a tolerance to the nutrients being administered, then there was a need in the body for these nutrients. Table 2 presents real-life data from one subject. While the daily dosing value of L-dopa was decreased by 33.3% between the first and second assays, the urinary dopamine levels increased more than 16-fold. L-cysteine is administered to compensate for the ability of L-dopa to deplete thiols.5,6 The next recommended step in treatment would be to start L-tyrosine 3,750 mg twice a day for control of dopamine fluctuations and to continue adjusting the L-dopa daily dosing with pill stops consistent with previous documentation.8 L-tyrosine is an amino acid synthesized from phenylalanine. The recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for phenylalanine is 3,000 to 5,000 mg per day.18 In humans, L-tyrosine is metabolized to one of five metabolites: tyramine, 3-iodo-Ltyrosine, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, dopaquinone, or L-dopa.19 Fluctuations of tyramine, 3-iodo-L-tyrosine, and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate have not been documented. By default, this leaves the melanin system, with its precursor dopaquinone, as the prime candidate for generating L-dopa/dopamine fluctuations in the competitive inhibition state. Both melanin and dopamine fluctuations have been documented.1,4,20–25 The inverse association between the increasing daily L-dopa dosing value with the magnitude of dopamine fluctuations in the competitive inhibition state has also been documented.1,4 Not documented until now are the interactions of L-tyrosine, L-dopa, and dopaquinone, with regard to the previously documented dopamine variances.1 As noted in Figure 3, two enzymes catalyze metabolism of L-tyrosine to L-dopa: tyrosinase and tyrosine hydroxylase. Tyrosinase also catalyzes metabolism of both L-tyrosine and L-dopa to dopaquinone, the critical precursor of melanin synthesis (Figure 3).19,26 Tyrosinase is known to have higher efficacy in the conversion of dopamine to dopaquinone than in the conversion of L-tyrosine to L-dopa.27 In Parkinson’s disease, there is a 50% to 90% loss of tyrosine hydroxylase-containing cells and a 33% to 80% loss of neuromelanin-containing neurons in the substantia nigra.28 As a result, the system attempts to synthesize more melanin by increasing concentrations of β-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH).29 An increase in MSH induces increased activity in tyrosinase. Increases in tyrosinase activity, up to 90-fold, secondary to MSH stimulation have been reported.30 Melanin fluctuations have been documented in vivo and in vitro.20–22 The hypothesis is that if decreasing tyrosine hydroxylase activity and increasing tyrosinase activity is more effective in the synthesis of dopaquinone than dopamine, then this leaves melanin synthesis and fluctuations in a more primary position, while the melanininduced fluctuations of L-tyrosine and L-dopa are reflected as dopamine fluctuations on laboratory assay. Table 2 One patient’s laboratory results Date Dopamine μg/g cr 5-HTP L-tyrosine L-dopa L-cysteine July 5, 2014 September 10, 2014 2,391 42,174 75 mg 75 mg 750 mg 750 mg 2,160 mg 1,440 mg 4,500 mg 4,500 mg Notes: These data are from one subject. The dopamine of 9/10/2014 demonstrates a retrograde phase 1 dopamine fluctuation. Testing was done at the same time each day. Note the higher dopamine level with a lower L-dopa dose. Abbreviations: 5-HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan; cr, creatinine; L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. 2334 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 Dovepress Parkinson’s disease-associated melanin steal Dopaquinone Tyrosinase Tyrosinase Tyrosine Melanin synthesis Tyrosinase L-dopa Dopamine Tyrosine hydroxylase Figure 3 Tyrosinase enzyme metabolism of tyrosine and L-dopa to dopaquinone along with metabolism of tyrosine to L-dopa by tyrosinase and tyrosine hydroxylase. Note: Data from Stansley and Yamamoto.14 Abbreviation: L-dopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine. Implications The on/off effect is defined as symptoms of Parkinson’s disease that wax and wane and are not fully controlled with L-dopa. With classic on/off effect, Parkinson’s disease patients have better control early in the day, decreased control 6 to 12 hours after rising, then better control prior to onset of sleep.31,32 The results reported herein adhered to the retrograde fluctuation model and L-tyrosine was only administered for the control of fluctuations when urinary dopamine levels exceeded 40,000 μg/g cr. This paper is based on accumulated data, which reveal control of the on/ off effect in over 800 Parkinson’s disease patients treated with L-tyrosine, administered only when indicated, with no refractory cases reported. Curiously, low-protein diets have been reported to have a positive effect in the management of the on/off effect, yet this laboratory-guided amino acid administration approach ameliorates the phenomenon completely.33 In Parkinson’s disease patients, the correlation between motor fluctuations and dopamine fluctuations has been documented for several years.23–25 Until this novel approach, there was no objective, laboratory-based method for addressing the problem of dopamine-driven motor fluctuations. Observations also support the assertion that patients not exhibiting the on/off effect who are more difficult to control with L-dopa may benefit from administration of L-tyrosine in response to laboratory indications. Once enough L-tyrosine is administered to compensate for and meet dopaquinone synthesis needs, further administration of L-tyrosine optimizes dopamine synthesis by meeting some of the dopamine precursor needs (Figure 3). Discussion The need for higher levels of L-tyrosine is not absolute. Administration needs to be guided by laboratory indication. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 When laboratory indication exists, there is a tolerance of the higher dosing of L-tyrosine. Bearing in mind that the melanin system has the ability to preferentially steal the precursors of dopamine, the following question was posed: “What is the melanin system involved with that is so important that it has the ability to assume priority in the metabolism of amino acid precursors over the catecholamine system?” Melanin regulates cytokines. If optimization of melanin synthesis occurs using this approach, then this approach may be the foundation for regulating and optimizing cytokine function.34,35 No evidence has been found to support the concept that cytokine function is important enough to preferentially steal the precursors required for catecholamine synthesis and optimal function. A more compelling argument is that the various forms of melanin are DNA protective. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation may cause melanoma and other deadly events. Melanin has the ability to establish a protective barrier around DNA, protecting it from toxin damage.36,37 It is documented that “[…] melanin binds directly to DNA, it acts as a direct photosensitizer of mtDNA damage during UVA irradiation.”38 The hypothesis is that if the momentary load of toxins or UV protection fluctuates, then melanin needs will also fluctuate. Conclusion Urinary dopamine fluctuations have been recognized since 2004, but were first documented in 2009.1 Melanin concentrations are known to fluctuate under normal conditions. In Parkinson’s disease patients, there is a defect of the postsynaptic dopamine neurons found in the substantia nigra of the brain. The dark color of the substantia nigra is from neuromelaninrich cells. As the disease progresses, the substantia nigra turns progressive shades of lighter gray with the loss of neuromelanin. There is diminished tyrosine hydroxylase activity and an increase in MSH which increases tyrosinase activity. The submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 2335 Dovepress Hinz et al enhanced tyrosinase activity is more effective at synthesizing dopaquinone than L-dopa. The model is that dopaquinone/ melanin synthesis has priority in utilization of L-tyrosine and L-dopa at the expense of stable dopamine synthesis and concentrations. As a result, dopamine synthesis fluctuates as the needs of melanin synthesis are preferentially met. The diagnosis of dopamine fluctuations in the competitive inhibition state is a novel approach for determining whether there is adequate L-tyrosine supplementation in the stabilization of Parkinson’s disease patients and may be a powerful tool for the management of the on/off effect and for the control of cytokines. Disclosure MH discloses his relationship with DBS Laboratory Services, Inc. and NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. MH also discloses his relationship with West Duluth Distribution Company, which ended in June 2011. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Trachte GJ, Uncini T, Hinz M. Both stimulatory and inhibitory effects of dietary 5-hydroxytryptophan and tyrosine are found on urinary excretion of serotonin and dopamine in a large human population. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2009;5:227–235. 2. Stein A, Hinz M, Uncini T. Amino acid-responsive Crohn’s disease: a case study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2010;3:171–177. 3. Hinz M, Stein A, Neff R, Weinberg R, Uncini T. Treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with monoamine amino acid precursors and organic cation transporter assay interpretation. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:31–38. 4. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:165–174. 5. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. APRESS: apical regulatory super system, serotonin, and dopamine interaction. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2011;7:457–463. 6. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:413–430. 7. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2012;8:323–328. 8. Hinz M, Stein A, Cole T. Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2014;6:93–99. 9. Hinz M, Stein A, Uncini T. The dual-gate lumen model of renal monoamine transport. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;6:387–392. 10. Koepsell H. Organic cation transporters in intestine, kidney, liver, and brain. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:243–266. 11. SINEMET® (carbidopa levodopa) tablets [prescribing information]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck & Co., Inc.; 2014. Available from: https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/s/sinemet/sinemet_ pi.pdf. Accessed September 24, 2014. 12. Daidone F, Montioli R, Paiardini A, et al. Identification by virtual screening and in vitro testing of human DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31610. 13. UniProtKB: pyridoxal AND organism: “Homo sapiens (Human) [9606]” [webpage on the Internet]. UniProt Consortium. Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/?query=pyridoxal+AND+organis m%3A%22Homo+sapiens+%5B9606%5D%22&sort=score. Accessed September 24, 2014. 2336 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 14. Stansley BJ, Yamamoto BK. Chronic l-dopa decreases serotonin neurons in a subregion of the dorsal raphe nucleus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014; 351(2):440–447. 15. Eskow Jaunarajs KL, George JA, Bishop C. L-DOPA-induced dysregulation of extrastriatal dopamine and serotonin and affective symptoms in a bilateral rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2012;30(218):243–256. 16. García NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-dopa increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(5 Pt 2):R1476–R1480. 17. Borah A, Mohanakumar KP. Long term L-DOPA treatment causes indiscriminate increases in dopamine levels at the cost of serotonin synthesis in discrete brain regions of rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2007;27:985–996. 18. Phenylalanine [webpage on the Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available from: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary. cgi?cid=6140. Accessed September 24, 2014. 19. Tyrosine metabolism – Homo sapiens (human) [webpage on the Internet]. Kanehisa Laboratories; 2014. Available from: http://www.genome. jp/kegg-bin/show_pathway?org_name=hsa&mapno=00350&mapscale =&show_description=hide. Accessed September 24, 2014. 20. Kim O, McMurdy J, Jay G, Lines C, Crawford G, Alber M. Combined reflectance spectroscopy and stochastic modeling approach for noninvasive hemoglobin determination via palpebral conjunctiva. Physiol Rep. 2014;2(1):e00192. 21. Baquié M, Kasraee B. Discrimination between cutaneous pigmentation and erythema: comparison of the skin colorimeters Dermacatch and Mexameter. Skin Res Technol. 2014;20(2):218–227. 22. McMurdy JW, Jay GD, Suner S, Crawford G. Noninvasive optical, electrical, and acoustic methods of total hemoglobin determination. Clin Chem. 2008;54(2):264–272. 23. Chase TN, Mouradian MM, Engber TM. Motor response complications and the function of striatal efferent systems. Neurology. 1993;43 (12 Suppl 6):S23–S27. 24. Obeso JA, Luquin MR, Martínez-Lage JM. Lisuride infusion pump: a device for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 1986;1(8479):467–470. 25. de la Fuente-Fernández R, Lu JQ, Sossi V, et al. Biochemical variations in the synaptic level of dopamine precede motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: PET evidence of increased dopamine turnover. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(3):298–303. 26. Slominski A, Zmijewski MA, Pawelek J. L-tyrosine and L-dihydroxyphenylalanine as hormone-like regulators of melanocyte functions. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2012;25:14–27. 27. Redding K, Masterman D, Randall J, Collins M. Advanced Biology with Vernier. Beaverton, OR: Vernier. 2008:15–2. 28. Kordower JH, Olanow CW, Dodiya HB, et al. Disease duration and the integrity of the nigrostriatal system in Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 2013;136:2419–2431. 29. Rainero I, Kaye JA, May C, et al. Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormonelike immunoreactivity is increased in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1988;45(11): 1224–1227. 30. Fuller BB, Lunsford JB, Iman DS. Alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone regulation of tyrosinase in Cloudman S-91 mouse melanoma cell cultures. J Biol Chem. 1987;262(9):4024–4033. 31. Marsden CD, Parkes JD. “On-off” effects in patients with Parkinson’s disease on chronic levodopa therapy. Lancet. 1976;1(7954): 292–296. 32. Hardie RJ, Lees AJ, Stern GM. On-off fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. A clinical and neuropharmacological study. Brain. 1984;107(Pt 2): 487–506. 33. Sweet RD, McDowell FH. Plasma dopa concentrations and the “onoff” effect after chronic treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1974;24(10):953–956. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 Dovepress 34. Mohagheghpour N, Waleh N, Garger SJ, Dousman L, Grill LK, Tusé D. Synthetic melanin suppresses production of proinflammatory cytokines. Cell Immunol. 2000;199(1):25–36. 35. Morelli JG, Norris DA. Influence of inflammatory mediators and cytokines on human melanocyte function. J Invest Dermatol. 1993;100: 191S–195S. 36. Mouret S, Forestier A, Douki T. The specificity of UVA-induced DNA damage in human melanocytes. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012;11: 155–162. Parkinson’s disease-associated melanin steal 37. Page S, Chandhoke V, Baranova A. Melanin and melanogenesis in adipose tissue: possible mechanisms for abating oxidative stress and inflammation? Obes Rev. 2011;12:e21–e31. 38. Swalwell H, Latimer J, Haywood RM, Birch-Machin MA. Investigating the roll of melanin in UVA/UVB- and hydrogen peroxide-induced cellular and mitochondrial ROS production and mitochondrial DNA damage in human melanoma cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52(3): 626–634. Dovepress Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Publish your work in this journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment is an international, peerreviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders. This journal is indexed on PubMed Central, the ‘PsycINFO’ database and CAS, and is the official journal of The International Neuropsychiatric Association (INA). The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system, which is all easy to use. Visit http://www.dovepress.com/testimonials.php to read real quotes from published authors. Submit your manuscript here: http://www.dovepress.com/neuropsychiatric-disease-and-treatment-journal Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014:10 submit your manuscript | www.dovepress.com Dovepress 2337 Return to index 29 Depression Marty Hinz, M.D. I. INTRODUCTION Since amino acids obtained from dietary sources are the precursors of mood-regulating neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine, amino acids are considered to hold potential in treating depression. Neurotransmitter precursors are the subject of ongoing research. So why is this topic relevant to primary care medicine? Patients have taken matters into their own hands. Patients are self-treating their depression with amino acid supplements and appear to be motivated by a perceived benefit in their mood and overall health. The amino acid precursors tryptophan, tyrosine, 5-hydroxytryptophan, and L-dopa are readily available as supplements at doses that exceed feasible dietary intake. Amino acids supplements have less potential for harm and larger therapeutic effect when their use is physician-guided. This chapter presents the bundle damage theory of depression to probe the biologic basis of amino acid therapy. It offers primary care physicians a treatment protocol that implements laboratory testing to guide dosing; explains the potential side effects and how these can be minimized; offers quality regulation in product selection; and presents a protocol for simultaneous use of medication and nutrients in the treatment of clinical depression. II. EPIDEMIOLOGY Depression is a global problem. The World Health Organization notes:32 Nearly 5–10% of persons in a community at a given time are in need of help for depression. As much as 8–20% of persons carry the risk of developing depression during their lifetime. The average age of the onset for major depression is between 20 and 40 years. Women have higher rates of depression than men. Race or ethnicity does not influence the prevalence of depression. World wide depression is the fourth leading cause of disease burden, accounting for 4.4% of total Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) in the year 2000. It causes the largest amount of non-fatal burden. Disability from depression world wide is increasing. In 1990, the total years lived with disability (YLD) was 10.7%. By 2000, the YLD had increased to 12.1% worldwide.33 Mental health conditions have a tendency to move upwards in ranking, while ranked as the fourth leading cause of disease burden in 2000, it is expected that depression will move to second place by 2020, second only to heart disease.34 Population surveys suggest that while the incidence of depression is higher in the developed countries of North America and Europe than in other regions, it is nonetheless a common condition throughout the world.38 The rate difference is often attributed to underdiagnosis, but newer data suggest that the Western diet, stressful lifestyle, and higher toxicant exposures contribute to the prevailing high rates in Westernized countries.32 The monoamine theory fails to explain why the incidences of depression are increasing on a worldwide basis and is more prevalent in developed countries.1 465 TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 465 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM 466 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management III. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY THE MONOAMINE THEORY The monoamine theory of depression has long been the major framework against which the treatment of depression has been examined and developed due to the fact that the theory attempts to provide a pathophysiologic explanation for depression and the actions of antidepressants. The central premise of the monoamine theory states that it may be possible to restore normal function in depressed patients by targeting the catecholamine and/or serotonin systems with antidepressants. This theory is based on evidence that depression symptoms can be improved by administering compounds that are capable of increasing monoamine concentrations in the nerve synapses. Early research focused on deficits in the catecholamine system with specific emphasis on noradrenalin as a potential cause for depression. With further research, the theory was expanded to include the serotonin system as a cause for depression. This research has led to the use of drugs for treatment of depression that affect changes in monoamine uptake and enzymatic metabolism.1 While many of the depression treatments based on the monoamine theory appear to be initially useful, many of them lack the short-term and long-term efficacy needed for relief of symptoms in most patients. In several studies of reuptake inhibitors administered, only 8% to 13% of subjects obtained relief of symptoms greater than placebo. Remission rates for escitalopram compared to placebo in adults was studied (48.7% vs. 37.6%, P = 0.003). Here, 11.1% of subjects obtained relief greater than placebo.35 Remission rates for citalopram versus placebo in another study were studied (52.8% vs. 43.5%, P = 0.003). Here, 9.4% of patients obtained relief greater than placebo.35 Venlafaxine-XR was similar to escitralopram and citalopram (P = 0.03).35 Treatment of the elderly in the primary care setting under the monoamine theory reveals no relief of symptoms versus placebo. In the elderly (79.6 years, SD = 4.4, N = 174), it was concluded that citalopram, “was not more effective than placebo for the treatment of depression.”27 In treatment of depression in patients over 60 years of age with a mean age of 68 years, “Escitalopram treatment was not significantly different from placebo treatment” (N = 264).29 Depression treatment of children and adolescents ages 7 to 17 (N = 174) with citalopram, under a double-blind 20 mg/day, 40 mg/day option, found 24% of patients treated with placebo showed improvement versus 36% of patients taking citalopram.28 Other studies of other reuptake inhibitors revealed similar results.50–55 Reuptake inhibitors are effective in treating other disorders than those for which they were initially developed, such as obesity, panic disorder, anxiety, migraine headaches, ADHD/ADD, premenstrual syndrome, dementia, fibromyalgia, psychotic illness, insomnia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and bulimia/anorexia; yet not all drugs that increase serotonin or catecholamine transmission are effective when treating depression.1 Treatment with reuptake inhibitors is based on the monoamine theory, which does not explain why most subjects studied achieve results no better than placebo and why treatment is much less efficacious in the elderly. Neither does it explain the efficacy of treating other conditions. In sum, the mechanism and corresponding medication for the treatment of depression suggest there may be more to the underlying pathophysiology. PARKINSONISM MODEL Insights into the pathophysiology of depression can be gained from understanding another monoamine neurotransmitter disease, Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism is caused by damage to the dopamine postsynaptic neurons of the substantia nigra at levels that result in clinical compromise of fine motor movement. Parkinson’s disease has a study model of neurotoxin damage.49 A great deal of understanding about Parkinson’s disease has resulted from research and case studies involving the neurotoxin MPTP (1-methyl 4-phenyl 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine). In 1982, the first writings on MPTP appeared in the medical TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 466 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM Depression 467 literature after several heroin addicts administered synthetic heroin (MPPP) that contained the byproduct of synthesis, MPTP.9 Since that time, the MPTP mechanism of action has become the prototype in the study of Parkinson’s disease. At present, most medical school students study the ability of MPTP to quickly induce advanced Parkinson’s symptoms in patients without prior history of the disease. MPTP is a free radical neurotoxin, which interferes with mitochondrial metabolism and leads to cell death (apoptosis). It freely crosses the blood-brain barrier and has an affinity for the postsynaptic dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra, which it destroys. MPTP is chemically similar to MPPP (synthetic heroin) and may be produced as a byproduct during the illegal manufacturing of MPPP and other narcotics.9 The MPTP model of Parkinson’s disease has taught us a lot about the dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra. The main point is that if enough dopamine neurons are damaged, the flow of electrical impulses is compromised and Parkinson’s symptoms will occur. The way to compensate for neurotoxin-induced damage is to increase neurotransmitter levels higher than is normally found in the system.9 Consistent with the findings of the MPTP model, the pharmacologic treatment is dopamine agonists, which raise the existing levels of this neurotransmitter above population norms in order to boost damaged neurons. Dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine, pergolide, ropinirole, pramipexole, and cabergoline can be used as a monotherapy or in combination with L-dopa. L-dopa crosses the blood-brain barrier and is freely synthesized into dopamine without biochemical regulation.3 The elevation of dopamine in the central nervous system stimulates the remaining viable dopamine neurons of the substantia nigra by increasing the electrical flow, which results in restoration of the regulator function of the dopamine bundles and improvement of disease symptoms.7 The shortcoming is tachyphylaxis, where the dopamine agonist and/or L-dopa become ineffective. With Parkinson’s patients, establishing dopamine levels in the reference range reported by the laboratory does not provide relief of symptoms. For example, the reference range of urinary dopamine reported by the laboratory is 40 to 390 micrograms of dopamine per gram of creatinine (the neurotransmitter-creatinine ratio compensates for dilution of the urine). In our years of research, we have not observed a patient with Parkinson’s who was able to achieve relief of symptoms with dopamine levels in this range. For treatment of patients with Parkinson’s, the therapeutic range of urinary dopamine is 6000 to 8000 micrograms of dopamine per gram of creatinine. Dopamine levels of this magnitude can be achieved by administration of the amino acid precursor, L-dopa. Amino acid supplementation can reduce the tachyphylaxis generally associated with pharmacologic interventions. Once the synaptic levels of dopamine are high enough and the flow of electricity is once again adequate to regulate fine motor control, clinical resolution of the Parkinsonian tremor and other symptoms are seen.40 As with Parkinsonism, the damage to other neuron bundles of the serotonin/catecholamine pathways as seen in depression can be dealt with effectively by increasing the neurotransmitter levels higher than is normally found in the system. This has led our group to propose the Bundle Damage Theory of Depression. THE BUNDLE DAMAGE THEORY The bundle damage theory states: Neurotransmitter dysfunction disease symptoms, such as symptoms of depression, develop when the electrical flow through the neuron bundles that regulate function is compromised by damage to the individual neurons or the neuron components composing the neuron bundle which conducts electricity to regulate or control function. In order to optimally restore neuron bundle regulatory function, synaptic neurotransmitter levels of the remaining viable neurons must be increased to levels higher than is normally found in the system, which restores adequate electrical outflow resulting in relief of symptoms and optimal regulatory function. Bundles of neurons convey electricity that regulates and/or controls numerous functions in the body. If enough of the individual neurons of a bundle become damaged the flow of electricity through TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 467 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM 468 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management the bundle is diminished, leading to the function being controlled and/or regulated not controlling properly, causing symptoms of disease to develop. Technically synaptic neurotransmitter levels prior to treatment in patients with disease due to neuron bundle damage are in the normal range for the population. The bundle damage theory and the monoamine theory are not mutually exclusive of each other. Instead these two theories can be viewed a complementary in that they address different mechanisms of action leading to neurotransmitter dysfunction and compromised electrical flow out of the postsynaptic neuron. The monoamine theory addresses low levels of neurotransmitters in the synapse as the etiology of impedance of electrical flow needed to regulate function and keep disease symptoms under control. The bundle damage theory addresses damage to the primarily postsynaptic neuron structures that impede the flow of electricity needed to regulate function and keep disease symptoms under control. With the monoamine theory and the bundle damage theory the flow of electrical energy needed to regulate function is not adequate. Differentiation of the two theories lies in the etiology of the dysfunction. Under monoamine theory returning neurotransmitter levels to normal will relieve disease symptoms. Under the bundle damage theory synaptic neurotransmitter levels need to be established that are higher than the reference range of the population. It is the mechanical damage to the postsynaptic neurons as suggested by the bundle damage theory and not the synaptic neurotransmitter levels that is the primary cause of monoamine disease. This subset is composed of about 88% of adult patients and 100% of the elderly patients with depressive symptoms—the nonresponders from the depression studies above. Neurons are intended to function for life. Loss of a neuron to apoptosis is permanent, although in limited areas of the brain neurons may regenerate to replace the neurons that have undergone apoptosis.58 As neurons go into apoptosis in the postsynaptic neuron and become completely nonfunctional they tend to go through an agonizing death where the electrical brilliance with which they function slowly fades until the electrical flow through the neuron regulating function decreases and stops over time. The only way to increase neurotransmitter levels in the central nervous system is to administer amino acid precursors that cross the blood-brain barrier and are then synthesized into neurotransmitters. Increasing neurotransmitter levels in the synapse is analogous to increasing the voltage in an electrical wire, whereby turning up the voltage you get more electricity out of the other end of the wire. Turning up the voltage increases the electrical potential (pressure) of the electrons entering a partially damaged wiring connection, leading to more electrons (electricity) flowing out of the other end. In the case of neurotransmitter disease where the neurons of the neuron bundles are damaged to the point that the electricity flowing out of the neuron bundles is diminished disease develops. Increasing neurotransmitter levels will effectively increase voltage in the remaining viable neurons in the bundle, causing electrical flow out of the damaged neuron bundles to increase to the point that normal regulation and/or control is once again observed. In this state, from a clinical standpoint, the symptoms of disease are under control. ETIOLOGY OF BUNDLE DAMAGE Bundles of monoamine neurons can be impaired from neurotoxin exposures, trauma, or biological insult.56 Neurotoxin exposures are poorly defined and ongoing exposures are in contrast to the MPTP study model of Parkinsonism. The most comprehensive listing located reveals 1179 known neurotoxins.39 Susceptibility of individuals based on genetic predisposition, environmental influences, synergy between chemicals or other predisposing factors suggest that some individuals may experience neurotoxicity from many unlisted substances and at lower than threshold doses of known neurotoxins, and so was not considered. Under the bundle damage theory it is assumed that neurotoxins are the leading cause of monoamine bundle damage leading to the following speculation: TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 468 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM Depression 469 The bundle damage’s theory of repeated insult during a lifetime can explain the lack of efficacy seen in the treatment of elderly with reuptake inhibitors who presumably have greater cumulative lifetime effects from neurotoxins and other events that cause neuron damage. In the end these patients need to have neurotransmitter levels established that are much higher than can be achieved with reuptake inhibitors alone. With repeated insult more damage occurs, which is cumulative. When the damage is at the point where the neurotransmitter levels needed to control disease symptoms cannot be achieved with the use of reuptake inhibitors alone, from a clinical standpoint it appears that the drug is not working. This may explain why about 90% of adults treated with reuptake inhibitors achieve results no better than placebo. The bundle damage theory may also explain why developed countries have a higher rate of depression as the population is exposed at a higher rate to neurotoxins. Since insult exposure may be ongoing in patients with depression, optimizing nutritional status is important. Improving neuronal ability to minimize and recover from toxic insult form the basis of the antioxidant nutrients Dr. David Perlmutter explains in Chapter 28, “Parkinson’s Disease,” and the membrane-stabilizing nutrients Dr. Patricia Kane explains in Chapter 24, “Seizures.” IV. PHARMACOLOGY AMINO ACIDS Treatment of depression, as well as any other monoamine neurotransmitter diseases, is not possible through the direct administration of monoamine neurotransmitters. This is due to the fact that monoamine neurotransmitters do not cross the blood-brain barrier, as depicted in Figure 29.1.2,3,4,5 The only way to increase the levels of central nervous system monoamine neurotransmitter molecules is to provide amino acid precursors, which cross the blood-brain barrier and are synthesized into their respective neurotransmitters by presynaptic neurons.6,7 REUPTAKE INHIBITOR DEPLETION OF MONOAMINE PERIPHERAL SYSTEM Serotonin, Dopamine, Norepinephrine, Epinephrine Tryptophan, 5-HTP, L-tyrosine, L-dopa X Blood Brain Barrier The National Institute of Drug Abuse presents a detailed discussion on its website on how reuptake inhibitors deplete neurotransmitters.22 Medicines used to treat depression are not the only drugs that block reuptake; cocaine and amphetamines block reuptake as well.22 Reuptake inhibitors block CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM X Serotonin, Dopamine, Norepinephrine, Epinephrine Tryptophan, 5-HTP, L-tyrosine, L-dopa FIGURE 29.1 The monoamine neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine do not cross the blood-brain barrier; therefore, peripheral administration of these neurotransmitters will not increase central nervous system neurotransmitter levels. The amino acid precursors of these neurotransmitters do cross the blood-brain barrier. The only way to increase central nervous system neurotransmitter levels is through administration of amino acid precursors. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 469 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM 470 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management FIGURE 29.2 The effects of reuptake inhibitors on neurotransmitter levels, reuptake inhibition may deplete neurotransmitters. In the left picture, prior to treatment, neurotransmitter levels are not high enough to prevent symptoms of disease. In the center picture, reuptake is blocked, neurotransmitters move from the vesicles of the presynaptic neuron to the synapse. In the right picture, the neurotransmitters are depleted, the increase in synaptic neurotransmitter levels results in an increase in MAO and COMT metabolism (From The National Institute of Drug Abuse). the uptake of neurotransmitters back into the presynaptic neuron. In doing so, synaptic levels are increased. As synaptic neurotransmitter levels rise, relief of symptoms is observed. Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) and the Catecholamine O-Methyl Transferase (COMT) enzymes metabolize serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. The monoamine neurotransmitters are relatively stable and are not metabolized until they come in contact with the MAO and COMT enzymes. When neurotransmitters are in the vesicles of the presynaptic neuron, they are not exposed to metabolism by the MAO and COMT enzymes; they are safe and stable. When neurotransmitters are in the synapse between the presynaptic and postsynaptic neuron, they are exposed to enzymatic metabolism, which leads to the depletion of neurotransmitters if proper levels of amino acid precursors are not administered to compensate for this process.24 In depressed patients, synaptic neurotransmitter levels are not high enough to prevent disease symptoms, as illustrated in Figure 29.2. Treatment with reuptake inhibitors leads to a decrease in presynaptic neurotransmitter levels (where they are safe from enzymatic metabolism) and an increase in the number of neurotransmitters in the synapse. The blocking of neurotransmitter reuptake increases synaptic levels and the probability that neurotransmitters will experience enzymatic metabolism. With regards to Figure 29.2, the net effect of enzymatic metabolism is the depletion of neurotransmitter levels in the central nervous system. Neurotransmitters do not cross the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, the only way to increase central nervous system levels or to prevent the overall depletion of neurotransmitters when administering prescription drugs that block reuptake is to provide amino acid precursors, which are then synthesized into neurotransmitters. Administering L-tyrosine (not phenylalanine or n-acetyl-tyrosine) or L-dopa is the only way to predictably raise dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine. Administering tryptophan or 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) is the only way to predictably raise serotonin levels in the central nervous system. It is noted that 5-HTP, L-dopa, and tyrosine are available in the United States without a prescription. The ability of tryptophan to raise serotonin levels is limited because it is a rate-limited reaction. The effects of neurotransmitter depletion by drugs may have far-ranging implications. It has been found in studies that depletion of serotonin by drugs may also lead to a reduction in the number of serotonin synapses in the hippocampus.43 MONOAMINE SYNTHESIS FROM AMINO ACIDS The synthesis of serotonin and the catecholamines is illustrated in Figure 29.3. Peripheral administration of only 5-HTP (serotonin system) or only L-dopa (dopamine system) will decrease the synthesis of the other system (dopamine or serotonin respectively).57. With administration of only one amino acid precursor, the administered amino acid precursor dominates the enzyme and compromises proper synthesis of the other system’s neurotransmitters. This is due to the fact that the same enzyme catalyzes the conversion of 5-HTP to serotonin and L-dopa to dopamine everywhere in the body. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 470 9/18/08 6:48:26 PM Depression 471 OH OH OH OH OH Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase Tyrosine Hydroxylase NH2 C COOH NH2 C COOH CH2 Dopa C HN OH HC NH2 COOH Tryptophan FIGURE 29.3 precursors. C H NH CH3 Adrenaline Aromatic Amino Acid Decarboxylase HN HN CH2 CH2 HO CH2 H2N Noradrenaline OH Tryptophan Hydroxylase H CH2 H2N Dopamine H H Tyrosine HO OH Phenylethanoamine N-methyltransferase Dopamine -hydroxylase CH2 CH2 CH2 OH OH OH HC CH2 NH2 CH2 COOH NH2 5-Hydroxytryptophan Serotonin (5-HT) The synthesis of serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine from amino acid The aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase enzyme is also known as 5-HTP decarboxylase enzyme or L-dopa decarboxylase enzyme, as well as the general decarboxylase enzyme, is illustrated in a kidney in Figure 29.4 (bottom right). The implications of this fact are profound.10 The administration of only 5-HTP or L-dopa will compete with and inhibit the synthesis of the opposite precursor (dopamine and serotonin, respectively) at the enzyme. In patients with Parkinson’s, the long-term administration of L-dopa with insufficient serotonin precursor will result in depression. The literature is very clear that this depression is a serotonindependent depression, which responds optimally to the most serotonin specific reuptake inhibitor, citalopram.11 AMINO ACIDS AND MONOAMINE METABOLISM The MAO and COMT enzymes metabolize serotonin and the catecholamines, as illustrated in the kidney in Figure 29.4 (bottom left).12 The implications are that the levels of these two enzyme systems are not static; they fluctuate in response to changing neurotransmitter levels. When neurotransmitter levels are increased, enzymatic activity also increases.14,23–26 If you administer L-dopa or 5-HTP, the activity of MAO and COMT increases due to the increase in dopamine or serotonin levels, respectively. The problem occurs when L-dopa is administered without 5-HTP, both dopamine and serotonin will be subjected to increases in metabolism by these two enzyme systems. However, serotonin will not experience an increase in production, which leads to further depletion. The same rule is true of 5-HTP administered without the use of dopamine precursors. The bottom line is that the administration of 5-HTP or L-dopa that is unopposed or improperly balanced with the amino acid precursors of the other system will deplete the other system as a result of the increased metabolism of MAO and COMT, decreased synthesis, and uptake competition (as covered in the next section). TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 471 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM 472 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management Renal arterial blood Glomerulous Amino acids and Neurotransmitters Proximal Tubule Cation uptake port Neurotransmitter metabolized dopamine norepinephrine epinephrine serotonin monoamine Oxidase catecholamineO-methyl transferase Homovanillic acid Amino acids synthesized to neurotransmitters Proximal convoluted Tyrosine renal Tryptophan 5-HTP L-dopa tubules Aromatic cell amino acid decarboxylase Serotonin Dopamine 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid Final concentrated urine Renal vein into the system FIGURE 29.4 The neurotransmitters and amino acids are filtered as the glomerulous are uptaked in the proximal renal tubules by the cation ports of the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells. The proximal convoluted renal tubule cells then further filter the neurotransmitters and amino acids into separate areas where the neurotransmitters are metabolized and the amino acids are synthesized into new neurotransmitters that are then either excreted into the urine or secreted into the system via the renal veins. AMINO ACID UPTAKE In order for the synthesis of monoamine neurotransmitters to occur, the amino acid precursors must undergo uptake into the cells performing synthesis. This process occurs in numerous places throughout the body including the central nervous system, kidneys, liver, gastrointestinal tract, mesentery, lungs, and peripheral nerves. The “cation uptake ports” found in the proximal convoluted renal tubule cells are a prototype for amino acid uptake (see Figure 29.4 at the top center).16 Neurotransmitters synthesized by the kidneys are the source of urinary serotonin and catecholamines.16–19 Serotonin and the catecholamines are synthesized by the kidneys, then excreted into the urine or secreted into the system via the renal veins.20 Uptake is affected by administration of a single amino acid precursor or improperly balanced amino acid precursors as may overwhelm and compete with uptake of the other amino acids. Administration of only L-dopa inhibits uptake of 5-HTP.44 Administration of only 5-HTP has the same effect on L-dopa uptake. V. TREATMENT It is not possible to design a diet where the patient can obtain enough amino acids to affect even level 1 amino acid dosing (see Table 29.1), since the amino acid dosing requirement is higher than can be achieved with diet alone. Amino acid precursors of serotonin and dopamine have two primary applications. First, proper use of amino acid precursors will keep drugs that work with neurotransmitters TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 472 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM Depression 473 TABLE 29.1 The “Generic Amino Acid Dosing Protocol” (milligrams of 5-HTP/milligrams tyrosine) If relief of symptoms is not obtained with level 3 dosing, obtain urinary neurotransmitter testing. Use of proper levels of cofactors and sulfur amino acids is required for optimal results LEVEL 1 2 3 from depleting neurotransmitters, thus allowing the drugs to keep functioning and functioning optimally. Second, proper use of amino acids can also serve as the treatment modality. The generic protocol developed for treatment of neurotransmitter dysfunction disease relating to the catecholamine system and/or serotonin system involves the use of tyrosine, 5-HTP, and cofactors. Results do not appear to be dependent on taking the amino acids with or without food. The following cofactors need to be used along with the amino acid precursors: • Vitamin C 1000 mg/day • Vitamin B6 75 mg/day • Calcium 500 mg 500 mg/day In addition • Cysteine 4500 mg/day in equally divided doses • Selenium 400 mcg/day • Folic acid 2000 to 3000 mcg/day should also be used to prevent depletion of the methionine-homocysteine cycle (Figure 29.5) by L-dopa and presumably by L-tyrosine from which L-dopa is synthesized from, the immediate precursor of L-dopa. Administration of L-dopa leads to depletion of S-adenosyl-methionine (SAMe), a component of the methionine-homocysteine cycle that is the one carbon methyl donor of the body; proper levels of SAMe are needed in order for norepinephrine to be methylated to epinephrine. Long-term use of L-dopa without proper administration of amino acids of the methionine-homocysteine cycle leads to depletion of epinephrine.37 There is a “total loss” of sulfur amino acid associated with treatment of Parkinsonism with L-dopa as evidenced by the loss of total glutathione that occurs.41 Glutathione is synthesized in a side chain reaction off the methionine-homocysteine cycle (see Figure 29.5). The loss of total glutathione leads to a state where the body’s most powerful detoxifying agent (glutathione) is no longer functioning properly and is unable to neutralize further toxic insult leaving the patient in a state where more toxic damage is facilitated. All patients taking L-dopa and/ or L-tyrosine need to be supplemented with adequate levels of sulfur amino acid to prevent depletion of the methionine-homocysteine cycle, depletion of glutathione, depletion of epinephrine, and the other components dependent on the methionine-homocysteine cycle. While administration of any of the sulfur amino acids in the cycle is adequate if the dosing is high enough, cysteine is chosen since it costs only about 11 cents per day wholesale. Selenium 400 mcg/day needs to be administered with cysteine to prevent cysteine (sulfur amino acids) from creating an environment that contributes to central nervous system neurotoxicity from methylmercury. Administration of cysteine can potentially facilitate concentration of methylmercury TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 473 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM 474 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management Methionine Norepinephrine Folic Acid (Folate) Cycle Methionine Homocysteine Cycle Proper levels of B6 and B12 are also needed SAMe Epinephrine S-Adenosyl homocysteine Homocysteine Glutathione FIGURE 29.5 Cysteine The methionine–homocysteine cycle, the heart of the sulfur amino acids. into the central nervous system.46 Selenium binds irreversibly to methylmercury in the central nervous system rendering the methylmercury biologically inactive and nontoxic.47 Folic acid is required in order to provide optimal function of the folic acid cycle, which in turn prevents hyperhomocysteinemia from preventing the methionine-homocysteine cycle from functioning properly. As noted previously, without proper administration of amino acids of the methionine-homocysteine cycle there will be depletion of epinephrine. It would appear the second factor driving epinephrine levels beyond methionine-homocysteine cycle depletion is hyperhomocysteinemia. It can take 3 to 6 months for hyperhomocysteinemia to return to normal when proper levels of folate, vitamin B6, and vitamin B12 are provided for. It appears to be no coincidence that it can take 3 to 6 months for epinephrine levels to return to normal—a fact that appears to parallel homocysteine improvement. When the goal of treatment is to prevent depletion of neurotransmitters by prescription drugs or in associated situations where prescription drugs are no longer working effectively during treatment due to the neurotransmitter levels falling too low from depletion due to circumstance set up by the drug,45 the patient should be placed on the level 1 amino acid dosing (see Table 29.1) along with the prescription drug, cysteine, selenium, and folate. While amino acid precursors when used alone and properly are highly effective, a drug/amino acid combination may be desirable with severe disease, such as the suicidal patient, the catatonic patient, or the patient unable to take part in normal day-today functions such as work. Supplementing with amino acid precursors allows reuptake inhibitors to continue to function optimally without tachyphylaxis. When amino acids are used as the initial therapy, start all patients on the level 1 dosing protocol of Table 29.1 along with cofactors and proper methionine-homocysteine cycle support at the first visit. Patients should return in 1 week, at which time focus on how the patient’s symptoms were the previous day. Asking about the previous day’s symptoms is more indicative of changes in the system brought about by amino acid therapy since it takes 3 to 5 days for the full effects of starting or changing an amino acid dosing to be displayed. If symptoms are not fully under control in 1 week, increase to the level 2 dosing along with cofactors and proper sulfur amino acid support and instruct the patient to return in 1 week. At the 3rd visit, if symptoms are not under control, increase to the level 3 dosing along with cofactors and proper sulfur amino acid support and have the patient return to the clinic in 1 week. If in 1 week symptoms are not under control, continue the level 3 dosing and obtain a urinary neurotransmitter test of the caliber TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 474 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM Depression 475 provided by a laboratory under the direction of a hospital-based laboratory pathologist.40 Follow the amino acid dosing recommendations generated after review of testing preformed under the supervision of a board-certified laboratory pathologist. Patients should return in 1 week to discuss results and amino acid dosing changes that may be needed. Any time an amino acid dosing change occurs, patients should return in 1 week to evaluate the results. Over 60% of patients tested needed only one neurotransmitter test. This is consistent with complete resolution of symptoms after adjusting the amino acid dosing in accordance with the consultant recommendations on the test. When treating depression, if amino acid dosing changes establish both the serotonin and dopamine in the phase 3 therapeutic range (see urinary neurotransmitter testing in the following) and no relief of symptoms is achieved, consider the possibility of depressive bipolar disorder. Under treatment with the amino acid protocol approximately 2% of patients are found to suffer from depressive bipolar disorder that has not been previously diagnosed. The primary care physician at this point should continue the amino acids and initiate a psychiatric referral in order to affect starting of a mood-stabilizing bipolar drug. It is noted that as long as the amino acids are continued, over 99% of patients started on mood-stabilizing drugs such as lithium, Depakote, or Lamictil find complete resolution of depression on the standard starting dose. VI. SAFETY The following is a side effect profile developed from approximately 50 patient-years of databased treatment in hand at NeuroResearch Clinics, Inc. The following results were obtained from patients taking only amino acids with no prescription drugs: Dry mouth Insomnia Headache Nausea Dizziness Constipation 34 (2.1%) 14 (0.9%) 12 (0.7%) 10 (0.6%) 6 (0.4%) 6 (0.4%) All other side effects were reported at a rate of less than 1 in 500 visits (0.02%). No irreversible side effects were noted. Amino acid precursors are safe to administer with any prescription drug, but amino acid precursors can also cause the side effects of the prescription drugs to be displayed. Any side effect associated with the drug can be triggered. For example, a patient was taking an SSRI with the side effect of malignant neuroleptic syndrome listed. As the amino acids were started, the patient developed new onset malignant neuroleptic syndrome. When drug side effects occur, it is necessary to manage the situation as you would with any other prescription drug side effect, which in general means decreasing or stopping the drug not the amino acid. With regards to pregnancy there is nothing in the literature indicating that the amino acid precursors are a problem. Nor is there anything in the literature indicating studies have been performed indicating they are safe. In this light it is recommended that amino acid precursors not be used in the first trimester of pregnancy. VII. SYSTEMS PRIORITY The serotonin and/or catecholamine system has a role, either directly or indirectly, in controlling most of the other systems and functions in the body. For example, cortisol synthesis is controlled in part by norepinephrine. Hormone synthesis is dependent on norepinephrine. The sympathetic nervous system is controlled by norepinephrine. Other neurotransmitter systems are partially controlled by the serotonin and/or catecholamine systems. For example, the GABA neurotransmitter TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 475 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM 476 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management system is associated with control of anxiety and panic attacks. Yet when the serotonin and/or catecholamine neurotransmitter levels are brought to proper levels, as confirmed by lab testing, these diseases may be fully under control. This would indicate control of GABA by the serotonin/catecholamine system even though at this time we have been unable to identify a chemical pathway for such in the literature. VII. PATIENT EVALUATION: URINARY NEUROTRANSMITTER TESTING MONOAMINES IN THE KIDNEYS Urinary neurotransmitter testing prior to amino acid therapy is of no value. There is no correlation between baseline testing and urinary neurotransmitter phases once the patient is taking amino acid precursors. It is not necessary or even useful to measure baseline urinary neurotransmitters in treatment.40 Urinary monoamine neurotransmitters do not cross the blood-brain barrier.2–5 Urinary monoamine neurotransmitters are not neurotransmitters filtered by the glomerulous of the kidneys and excreted into the urine. They are neurotransmitters that are synthesized by the kidneys and excreted into the urine or secreted into the system via the renal veins.20 With simultaneous administration of serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors, three phases of urinary neurotransmitter response have been identified on laboratory assay of the urine (see Figures 29.6 and 29.7). The three phases of response apply to both serotonin and dopamine. In all the life forms tested that have kidneys along with serotonin and catecholamine systems, the three phases of urinary neurotransmitter response exist.40 In reviewing the literature it would appear that the three phases of urinary response to neurotransmitters were present in previous writings but were not identified as such. For example, a 1999 article notes that administration of L-dopa can increase urinary dopamine levels (phase 3) and decrease urinary serotonin levels (phase 1).42 The goal of treatment is to establish both urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in the phase 3 therapeutic range. To determine the phase of serotonin and dopamine with certainty requires two urinary neurotransmitter tests to be performed with the patient simultaneously taking a different amino acid dosing of dopamine and serotonin amino acid precursors on each test and comparing the results. Not all patients will need to have the urinary serotonin and dopamine levels in the phase 3 therapeutic range for relief of symptoms. In many cases, adjusting the amino acids so that the patient moves closer to the phase 3 therapeutic range of urinary serotonin and dopamine induces relief of symptoms. Then, no further amino acid adjustments or testing are needed unless disease symptoms return. If the patient misses one or more amino acid doses in the week prior to testing, wait until 1 week has passed with the patient properly taking all of their amino acids. In phase 1, neurotransmitters synthesized by the kidneys are inappropriately excreted into the urine instead of being secreted into the system via the renal vein where they are needed (see Figures 29.6 and 29.7). Increasing the amino acid dose in phase 1 will correct the problem of inappropriate neurotransmitter excretion. The amino acid precursor dosing of serotonin and dopamine, where the individual patient is in phase 1 varies widely in the population. The level at which the urinary serotonin is no longer in phase 1 ranges from 37.5 mg of 5-HTP per day to 3000 mg of 5-HTP per day. The level at which the urinary dopamine is no longer in phase 1 ranges from no L-dopa (with the use of L-tyrosine only in some patients) to 540 mg of L-dopa per day in the patients not under treatment for Parkinsonism or Restless Leg Syndrome. Administration of proper levels of tyrosine with L-dopa is known as a “tyrosine base.” Proper use of the tyrosine base greatly reduces wild fluctuations in dopamine levels found with administration of L-dopa alone and greatly decreases the need for L-dopa. It is postulated that the tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme is not completely shut down with the administration of L-dopa, leading to fluctuations in the L-dopa produced from tyrosine synthesized to L-dopa then dopamine, which ultimately causes fluctuations of dopamine. By providing ample tyrosine with administration of L-dopa, these fluctuations of dopamine cease and the overall dosing needs of L-dopa decrease. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 476 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM Depression 477 EFFECTIVE NOT EFFECTIVE Urinary neurotransmitter levels PHASE 1 PHASE 2 Phase 1 range PHASE 3 Phase 3 range Increasing the daily balanced amino acid dosing FIGURE 29.6 The three phases of urinary neurotransmitter excretion in response to amino acid dosing. The horizontal axis is not labeled with specific amounts; it reflects the general trend seen in the population. Amino acid dosing needs are highly individualized. The dosing level needed to inflect into the next level varies greatly throughout the general population. For example, some patients inflect into phase 3 on 37.5 mg of 5-HTP per day, while others need as high as 3000 mgday (From DBS Labs database). Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys Urine Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys Proximal convoluted renal tubule cell of the kidneys System Urine PHASE 1 RESPONSE System Urine PHASE 2 RESPONSE System PHASE 3 RESPONSE FIGURE 29.7 The three phases of urinary response to amino acid dosing (Two urinary neurotransmitter tests are required to determine the phase with certainty). PHASE 1: In phase 1, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine decreases or increases respectively. In phase 1, there is inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine instead of the system where they are needed. PHASE 2: In phase 2, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine is low (<800 μgr/ gr creatinine for serotonin or <300 μgr/gr creatinine for dopamine). In phase 2, there is no inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine. The neurotransmitters are being excreted appropriately into the system and the urine. PHASE 3: In phase 3, as the amino acid dosing increases or decreases the urinary serotonin or dopamine increases or decreases respectively. In phase 3, there are adequate systemic serotonin and dopamine levels. The excess serotonin and dopamine are appropriately excreted into the urine. By increasing the amino acid dosing of serotonin and dopamine precursors above the dosing of phase 1, the phase 2 response is observed (see Figures 29.6 and 29.7). In Phase 2, urinary neurotransmitter levels are low (<300 micrograms dopamine per gram of creatinine or <800 micrograms serotonin per gram of creatinine, the neurotransmitter-creatinine ratio compensates for dilution of the urine) and the inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters into the urine has ceased. When in phase 2, neurotransmitters are being appropriately secreted into the system and not into the urine. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 477 9/18/08 6:48:27 PM 478 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management The model used to explain phase 2 is, “inappropriate excretion of neurotransmitters has now ceased as the amino acid precursor dosing is increased and the system is now filling up appropriately.” As serotonin and dopamine amino acid precursors are increased above the phase 1 and the phase 2 levels, all patients enter the phase 3 response (see Figures 29.6 and 29.7). Further increases in the amino acid dosing lead to increases in urinary dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter levels if they are in phase 3. Phase 3 represents appropriate secretion into the system and appropriate excretion of excess neurotransmitters synthesized by the kidneys into the urine. In the case of chronic depression, research has shown neurotransmitter levels need to be established at levels that are in phase 3 and higher than the reference range reported by the laboratory in order to achieve optimal relief of group symptoms.40 In the case of serotonin, the reference range reported by the research lab is 48.9 to 194.9 micrograms of serotonin per gram of creatinine. The therapeutic range of urinary serotonin for the treatment of chronic depression is defined as 800 to 2400 micrograms of serotonin per gram of creatinine in phase 3. The reference range reported by the research lab of urinary dopamine reported by the laboratory is 40 to 390 micrograms of dopamine per gram of creatinine. The therapeutic range of urinary dopamine for the treatment of chronic depression is defined as 300 to 600 micrograms of dopamine per gram of creatinine in phase 3. It would appear that in depression, the same mechanism of action may be at work as is found in Parkinson’s disease. There is damage to dopamine and/or serotonin neuron bundles controlling affect, which can be compensated for by increasing serotonin and dopamine neurotransmitter levels higher than is normally found in the system. Just as with Parkinson’s disease, the bundle damage in chronic depression is permanent. In most patients simply returning neurotransmitter levels to normal or the reference range reported by the lab, as suggested by the monoamine theory, will not lead to relief of symptoms. As with Parkinsonism, treatment of depression may require long-term use of amino acids to control symptoms. After symptoms associated with monoamine neurotransmitter diseases are controlled with the proper administration of amino acid precursors, the need for ongoing amino acid therapy may present if symptoms have not been addressed fully under the monoamine theory. Urinary monoamine neurotransmitter testing is used only when the patient has not responded to the levels 1 through 3 of the dosing protocol. Over 80% of patients will achieve relief of depression symptoms without laboratory testing. GENERALIZABILITY Laboratory-guided supplementation with amino acid precursors is also associated with clinically favorable outcomes in RLS and peroxismal limb movement disorder, where dopamine agonists are also the first line of therapy and clinical response is readily observable by patients and documented with sleep studies. The dosing level of L-dopa at which dopamine is no longer in phase 1, in patients not suffering from RLS, ranges from 0 milligrams of L-dopa per day to 6000 mg of L-dopa per day. With a proper “tyrosine base” in place, L-dopa dosing in these patients range from 10 to 1040 mg/day. VIII. CONCLUSIONS The bundle damage theory creates a framework by which to offer patients new treatments for clinical depression. The theory underscores the importance of minimizing toxic exposures, through avoidance where possible, through diminished uptake, and through adequate nutrients. Similarly patients who have inadequate substrate for neurotransmitter synthesis may need cofactors, nutrients involved in sulfur pathways, and amino acid precursors. Patients may also receive benefit from amino acid precursors beyond what can be obtained from diet alone. There are three primary considerations in the use of amino acids for treating depression. First, proper levels of amino acids should be administered with the drugs to prevent depletion of neurotransmitters. Second, proper use of amino acids will keep the drug functioning properly, TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 478 9/18/08 6:48:28 PM Depression 479 avoiding tachyphylaxis. Third, the use of amino acids may cause a drug side effect to become active. In summary, amino acids hold more therapeutic potential and less potential for harm when administration is physician-guided. REFERENCES 1. Hirschfeld RM. History and evolution of the monoamine hypothesis of depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000; 61 Suppl 6:4–6. 2. Pyle AC, Argyropoulos SV, Nutt DJ. The role of serotonin in panic: evidence from tryptophan depletion studies. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 2004; 16:79–84. 3. Verde G, Oppizzi G, Colussi G, Cremascoli G, Botalla L, Muller EE, Silvestrini F, Chiodini PG, Liuzzi A. Effect of dopamine infusion on plasma levels of growth hormone in normal subjects and in agromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1976 Jul; 5(4):419–423. 4. Gozzi A, Ceolin L, Schwarz A, Reese T, Bertani S, Crestan V, Bifone A. A multimodality investigation of cerebral hemodynamics and autoregulation in pharmacological MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Apr 21. 5. Ziegler MG, Aung M, Kennedy B. Sources of human urinary epinephrine. Kidney International. 1997; 51:324–327. 6. Birdsall TC. 5-Hydroxytryptophan: a clinically-effective serotonin precursor. Altern Med Rev. 1998 Aug; 3(4):271–280. 7. Barker R. Adrenal grafting for Parkinson’s disease: a role for substance P. Int J Neurosci. 1989 May; 46(1–2):47–51. 8. Matsubara K, Aoyama K, Suno M, Awaya T. N-methylation underlying Parkinson’s disease. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002 Sep–Oct; 24(5):593. 9. Nicotra A, Parvez S. Apoptotic molecules and MPTP-induced cell death. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2002 Sep–Oct; 24(5):599. 10. Verbeek MM, Geurtz PB, Willemsen MA, Wevers RA. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase enzyme activity in deficient patients and heterozygotes. Mol Genet Metab. 2007 Apr; 90(4):363–369. Epub 2007 Jan 19. 11. Menza M, Marin H, Kaufman K, Mark M, Lauritano M. Citalopram treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease: the impact on anxiety, disability, and cognition. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004 Summer; 16(3):315–319. 12. Wang Y, Berndt TJ, Gross JM, Peterson MA, So MJ, Knox FG. Effect of inhibition of MAO and COMT on intrarenal dopamine and serotonin and on renal function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Jan; 280(1):R248–254. 13. Davis TL, Brughitta G, Baronti F, Mouradian MM. Acute effects of pulsatile levodopa administration on central dopamine pharmacodynamics. Neurology. 1991 May; 41(5):630–633. 14. Sakumoto T, Sakai K, Jouvet M, Kimura H, Maeda T. 5-HT immunoreactive hypothalamic neurons in rat and cat after 5-HTP administration. Brain Res Bull. 1984 Jun; 12(6):721–733. 15. Gründemann D, Köster S, Kiefer N, Breidert T, Engelhardt M, Spitzenberger F, Obermüller N, Schömig E. Transport of Monoamine Transmitters by the Organic Cation Transporter Type 2, OCT2 J Biol Chem. 1998 Nov 20; 273(47):30915–30920. 16. Wa TC, Burns NJ, Williams BC, Freestone S, Lee MR. Blood and urine 5-hydroxytryptophan and 5-hydroxytryptamine levels after administration of two 5-hydroxytryptamine precursors in normal man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar; 39(3):327–329. 17. Zimlichman R, Levinson PD, Kelly G, Stull R, Keiser HR, Goldstein DS. Derivation of urinary dopamine from plasma dopa. Clin Sci (Lond). 1988 Nov; 75(5):515–520. 18. Buu NT, Duhaime J, Kuchel O. Handling of dopamine and dopamine sulfate by isolated perfused rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1986 Jun; 250(6 Pt 2):F975–979. 19. Ziegler MG, Aung M, Kennedy B. Sources of human urinary epinephrine. Kidney Int. 1997 Jan; 51(1):324–327. 20. Ball SG, Gunn IG, Douglas IH. Renal handling of dopa, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1982 Jan; 242(1):F56–62. 21. Druml W, Hübl W, Roth E, Lochs H. Utilization of tyrosine-containing dipeptides and N-acetyl-tyrosine in hepatic failure. Hepatology. 1995 Apr; 21(4):923–928. 22. The Neurobiology of Ecstasy (MDMA) National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA), slides 9 through 11. http://www.nida.nih.gov/pubs/teaching/Teaching4/Teaching.html. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 479 9/18/08 6:48:28 PM 480 Food and Nutrients in Disease Management 23. Meszaros Z, Borcsiczky D, Mate M, Tarcali J, Szombathy T, Tekes K, Magyar K. Platelet MAO-B Activity and Serotonin Content in Patients with Dementia: Effect of Age, Medication, and Disease Neurochemical Research. June 1998:863–868. 24. Lundquist I, Panagiotidis G, Stenstrom A. Effect of L-dopa administration on islet monoamine oxidase activity and glucose-induced insulin release in the mouse. Pancreas. 1991 Sep; 6(5):522–527. 25. Robinson DS, Sourkes TL, Nies A, Harris LS, Spector S, Bartlett DL, Kaye IS. Monoamine metabolism in human brain. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977 Jan; 34(1):89–92. 26. Tunbridge EM, Bannerman DM, Sharp T, Harrison PJ. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Inhibition Improves Set-Shifting Performance and Elevates Stimulated Dopamine Release in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004 June 9; 24(23):5331–5335. 27. Roose SP, Sackeim HA, Krishnan KR, Pollock BG, Alexopoulos G, Lavretsky H, Katz IR, Hakkarainen H; Old-Old Depression Study Group. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression in the very old: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Nov; 161(11):2050–2059. 28. Wagner KD, Robb AS, Findling RL, Jin J, Gutierrez MM, Heydorn WE. A Randomized, PlaceboControlled Trial of Citalopram for the Treatment of Major Depression in Children and Adolescents Am J Psychiatry 2004 June; 161:1079–1083. 29. Bose A, Li D, Gandhi C. Escitalopram in the Acute Treatment of Depressed Patients Aged 60 Years or Older Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008 Jan; 16:14–20. 30. Schneider LS, Nelson JC, Clary CM, Newhouse P, Krishnan KR, Shiovitz T, Weihs K; Sertraline Elderly Depression Study Group. An 8-week multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sertraline in elderly outpatients with major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul; 160(7):1277–1285. 31. Posternak MA, Zimmerman M. Dual reuptake inhibitors incur lower rates of tachyphylaxis than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A retrospective study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005; 66(6):705–707. 32. Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facts and Figures: Conquering Depression, World Health Organization 2008. 33. Ustün TB, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Chatterji S, Mathers C, Murray CJ. Global burden of depressive disorders in the year 2000. Br J Psychiatry. 2004 May; 184:386–392. 34. Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization World Health Organization 43rd Directing Council July 20, 2001. 35. Einarson, TR. Evidence based review of escitalopram in treating major depressive disorder in primary care. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Sep; 19(5):305–310. 36. Meyer JH, Ginovart N, Boovariwala A, Sagrati S, Hussey D, Garcia A, Young T, Praschak-Rieder N, Wilson AA, Houle S. Elevated Monoamine Oxidase A Levels in the Brain Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006; 63:1209–1216. 37. Lo CM, Kwok ML, Wurtman RJ. O-methylation and decarboxylation of alpha-methyldopa in brain and spinal cord: depletion of S-adenosylmethionine and accumulation of metabolites in catecholaminergic neurons. Neuropharmacology. 1976 Jul; 15(7):395–402. 38. Crawford MJ. Depression: international intervention for a global problem. The British Journal of Psychiatry 2004; 184:379–380. 39. “Polluting our future: Chemical Pollution in the U.S. that Affects Child Development and Learning” in September of 2000 under the joint efforts of The National Environmental Trust, Physicians for Social Responsibility, The Learning Disabilities Association of America. 40. DBS Labs neurotransmitter data base, Tom Uncini, MD hospital base dual board certified laboratory pathologist, medical director 8723 Falcon St. Duluth, MN 55808. 41. Zeevalk GD, Manzino L, Sonsalla PK, Bernard LP. Characterization of intracellular elevation of glutathione (GSH) with glutathione monoethyl ester and GSH in brain and neuronal cultures: relevance to Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2007 Feb; 203(2):512–520. Epub 2006 Oct 17. 42. Garcia NH, Berndt TJ, Tyce GM, Knox FG. Chronic oral L-DOPA increases dopamine and decreases serotonin excretions. Am J Physiol. 1999 Nov; 277(5 Pt 2):R1476–1480. 43. Matsukawa M, Ogawa M, Nakadate K, Maeshima T, Ichitani Y, Kawai N, Okadoa N. Serotonin and acetylcholine are crucial to maintain hippocampal synapses and memory acquisition in rats Neuroscience Letters. 1997; 230:13–16. 44. Soares-da-Silva P, Pinto-do-O PC. Antagonistic actions of renal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine: effects of amine precursors on the cell inward transfer and decarboxylation. Br J Pharmacol. 1996 Mar; 117(6):1187–1192. 45. Delgado PL, Moreno FA. Role of norepinephrine in depression. Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61 Suppl 1:5–12. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 480 9/18/08 6:48:28 PM Depression 481 46. Aschner M. Brain, kidney and liver 203Hg-methyl mercury uptake in the rat: relationship to the neutral amino acid carrier. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1989 Jul; 65(1):17–20. 47. Cavalli S, Cardellicchio N. Direct determination of seleno-amino acids in biological tissues by anionexchange separation and electrochemical detection. J Chromatogr A. 1995 Jul 7; 706(1–2):429–436. 48. Lew M. Overview of Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Dec; 27(12 Pt 2):155S–160S. 49. Langston JW, Ballard P. Parkinsonism induced by 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP): implications for treatment and the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 1984 Feb; 11(1 Suppl):160–165. 50. Kasper S, de Swart H, Friis Andersen H. Escitalopram in the treatment of depressed elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Oct; 13(10):884–891. 51. Schneider LS, Nelson JC, Clary CM, Newhouse P, Krishnan KR, Shiovitz T, Weihs K; Sertraline Elderly Depression Study Group. An 8-week multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sertraline in elderly outpatients with major depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul; 160(7):1277–1285. 52. Roose SP, Sackeim HA, Krishnan KR, Pollock BG, Alexopoulos G, Lavretsky H, Katz IR, Hakkarainen H; Old-Old Depression Study Group. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depression in the very old: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Nov; 161(11):2050–2059. 53. Nemeroff CB, Thase ME; EPIC 014 Study Group. A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of venlafaxine and fluoxetine treatment in depressed outpatients. J Psychiatr Res. 2007 Apr–Jun; 41(3–4): 351–9. Epub 2005 Sep 12. 54. Donnelly CL, Wagner KD, Rynn M, Ambrosini P, Landau P, Yang R, Wohlberg CJ. 55. Sertraline in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Oct; 45(10):1162–1170. 56. Lépine JP, Caillard V, Bisserbe JC, Troy S, Hotton JM, Boyer P. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline for prophylactic treatment of highly recurrent major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 May; 161(5):836–842. 57. Takahashi M, Yamada T. Viral etiology for Parkinson’s disease--a possible role of influenza A virus infection. Jpn J Infect Dis. 1999 Jun; 52(3):89–98. 58. Anupom Borah Æ Kochupurackal P. Mohanakumar. Long-Term L-DOPA Treatment Causes Indiscriminate Increase in Dopamine Levels at the Cost of Serotonin Synthesis in Discrete Brain Regions of Rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol (2007) 27:985–996. 59. Nadareishvili Z, Hallenbeck J. Neuronal regeneration after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 5; 348(23): 2355–2356. TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 481 9/18/08 6:48:28 PM TAF-67621-08-0801-C029.indd 482 9/18/08 6:48:28 PM