Syahrul Aminullah [email protected]

Managing International Collaborative Working and Raising Excellence
“Responsibilities From R&D Domestic Industry to Support
The Great Indonesia”
Syahrul Aminullah
[email protected]
Global Education Dialogues
The Power of Consortia: how can universities solve the global grand research challenges?
British Council in partnership with the Republic of Indonesia Department for Higher Education (Dikti) and
the Vice Rector Forum for International Collaboration
20-21 November 2014, JW Marriott Hotel, Medan, North Sumatra
SYAHRUL AMINULLAH
Mobile Phone.+62-855-7800-476. skype:syahrulaminullah1
Email: [email protected], [email protected]
============================================================
CURRICULUM VITAE
============================================================
PERSONAL DATA
Place Data of Birth
Gender
Marital Status
Religion
Nationality
: Metro, February 1th, 1967.
: Male
: Married
: Moslem
: Indonesia
EDUCATION
20102011
2012
2013
2002-2004
1998 – 2000 :
1991 – 1994 :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
PhD (Candidate), Public Policy University of Indonesia
Master Class, Salford University, Manchester,UK
Study Visite, STANFORD University, California, USA
Study Visite, UNIRIO, Brasil
Master Science in Development Country Management, STIA-LAN-UI
Bachelor Degree in Public Health, University of Indonesia
Bachelor in Techniciant Medical Laboratory Technologist, (MLT/AAK) Bandung, West Java
WORK EXEPRIENCE
Head of Division for Industry, Assistant Deputy, Science and Technology Investment,
Deputy Science and Technology Resources , Ministry for Research and Technology.
Head of Sub Division Proverty Rigth for University, Assistant Deputy, PR and Standardisation,
Deputy Science and Technology Resources , Ministry for Research and Technology
Head of Sub Division University, Assistant Deputy, Science and Technology Investment,
Deputy Science and Technology Resources , Ministry for Research and Technology
Head of Sub Division for Health and Medicine, Assistant Deputy, Medicine,
Deputy Development of Science, Ministry for Research and Technology
Outline
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Introduction
Economic Profiles
National R&D’s Expenditure
Resources of Science and Technology
Actors commitment on R&D expenditures
Nawa Cita and R&D
Conclusion
Introduction
Statement of Mr President
“Saya kecewa karena selama lima tahun
anggaran subsidi BBM bernilai Rp714
triliun. Sementara, untuk
kesehatan, anggarannya hanya Rp220
triliun, sedangkan infrastruktur mencapai
Rp570 triliun. Masa dana untuk
kesehatan atau untuk membangun lebih
kecil ketimbang dana subsidi BBM?“
Jokowi Widodo, President RI , at University
Technology Queensland (QUT), Australia
4 November 2014
Sources: http://dunia.news.viva.co.id/news/read/558590-begini-cara-jokowi-sapa-warga-indonesia-di-australia
Competitiveness is the key
The competitiveness of a nation is no longer
determined by the abundance natural
resources and cheap labor, but rather is
determined by technological innovation and
the use of knowledge, or a combination of
both.
Competitiveness the whole province of Indonesia
Sources: Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010
Indonesia strategy to face Middle-Income Trap
Development Process
Middle-income trap
Stages
Low-income group
GDP per
kapita
(PPP, 2005)
< US$2,000
Source of
growth
Lower-middle
income goup
Upper-middle
income goup
US$2,000 –
US$7,250
US$7,250 –
US$11,750
> US$11,750
• Rely on primary
sector
• Low value
added industry
• Efficiency
driven growth
• Innovative-based
industry
• Resource driven
• Labor intensive
industry
• Skilled labor
• Sophisticated
industry
1970 - 1990
Ministry of Finance
High-income
group
1990 – now
• Higher value
added based
industry
???
• High productivity
???
8
Leading Industry
Food Industry
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Industri pengolahan ikan
Industri pengolahan susu
Industri pengolahan minyak nabati
Industri pengolahan buah-buahan dan
sayuran
Industri Minuman.
Industri tepung.
Industri gula berbasis tebu.
Industri Bahan Penyegar, meliputi
Industri Pengolahan Kakao, dan
Industri Pengolahan Kopi
Pharmaceutical, Health
and Cosmestics Industry
1.
2.
Farmasi, jamu dan kosmetik.
Alat Uji dan Kedokteran.
Textiles Industries
1.
2.
3.
4.
Industri benang dan kain,
Produk tekstil/garmen,
produk alas kaki, serta
produk plastik dan karet untuk
keperluan rumah tangga
5. Industri pengolahan
kayu, Industri pengolahan
rotan, Industri furnitur, industri
kertas
ICT and Electronics
Industry
1. industri Alat transmisi
telekomunikasi darat,
2. Konten telematika,
3. Komponen elektronika, serta
4. komponen solar cell
Transportation
Industry
1. Industri Kendaraan bermotor
roda 2,
2. Kendaraan bermotor roda 4,
3. kapal nelayan,
4. kereta api,
5. komponen pesawat, dan
6. roket peluncur
Power Plant Industry
1. industri Pembangkit Listrik Sel
Surya,
2. Industri Biodiesel,
3. Industri Pembangkit Listrik
Tenaga Nuklir,
4. Industri Pembangkit Listrik
Tenaga Uap/Batubara, serta
5. Industri Pembangkit Listrik
Tenaga Uap/Gas
9
Criteria of Industry
Business
Capital
Aset
Big
>50 M
>10 M
Midle
Omset /thn
500 Jt sd 10
2,5 M sd 50 M M
Small
Omset/Th
300 jt-2,5M
Housing
Industry
Omzet/th
1 jt sd 200 jt
Manpower
Technology
100 org >
20-99 org
Total Unit
4.968 unit
(0,01%)
Biasa
48,977 unit
(0,09%)
50 jt sd 500 jt 5-19 org
Sederhana
629,418 unit
(1,11%)
Sd 50 jt
Sgt sederhana 55.586.176
unit (98,79%)
2-4
Dif: Kemenperin, BI dan Kem UMKM
Sumber : UU No.20/2008: Data BPS 2012
Low Value Added on Export – Import
IMPOR
(dalam Ribu
Ton)
M = Million
T = Ton
SITC 28731
Al Ore
Juta Ton
Refining
$ 190 M
$ 956 M
441 Ribu T
379 Ribu T
SITC 28732
Alumina
SITC 6841
Al & Al Alloy
Unwrought
SITC 6842
Al & Al Alloy
Worked
Extrusion
Rolling
Casting
Smelting
Fabricating
$ 335 M
$ 424 M
$ 522 M
140 Ribu T
126 Ribu T
168 Ribu T
EKSPOR 2011
Sources : Kemenperin 2013
SITC 69X
Other Mfg
Prod of Al
Economic
Profile
Provinsi
1 Aceh
2 Sumatera Utara
3 Sumatera Barat
4 Riau
5 Jambi
6 Sumatera Selatan
7 Bengkulu
8 Lampung
9 Kepulauan Bangka Belitung
10 Kepulauan Riau
Sumatera
11 DKI Jakarta
12 Jawa Barat
13 Jawa Tengah
14 DI. Yogyakarta
15 Jawa Timur
16 Banten
Jawa
17 Bali
Jawa & Bali
18 Kalimantan Barat
19 Kalimantan Tengah
20 Kalimantan Selatan
21 Kalimantan Timur
Kalimantan
22 Sulawesi Utara
23 Sulawesi Tengah
24 Sulawesi Selatan
25 Sulawesi Tenggara
26 Gorontalo
27 Sulawesi Barat
Sulawesi
28 Nusa Tenggara Barat
29 Nusa Tenggara Timur
30 Maluku
31 Maluku Utara
32 Papua Barat
33 Papua
34 Nusa Tenggara, Maluku & Papua
Jumlah 34 Provinsi
Gross Domenstic Product, Province 2004 2012
2004
2004
2005
2005
50 357
118 101
37 359
114 246
18 488
64 319
8 105
36 016
11 797
36 737
495 524
375 562
305 703
193 435
22 024
341 065
73 714
1 311 503
28 987
1 340 490
29 750
18 300
28 028
133 704
209 782
15 728
14 659
44 745
10 268
2 802
3 836
92 037
22 146
13 004
4 048
2 369
6 577
24 843
72 986
2 210 818
2009
2009
71 987
236 354
76 753
297 173
44 127
137 332
16 385
88 935
22 998
63 893
1 055 936
757 697
689 841
397 904
41 407
686 848
152 556
2 726 253
60 292
2 786 545
54 281
37 162
51 460
285 591
428 494
33 034
32 461
99 955
25 656
7 069
9 403
207 578
44 015
24 179
7 070
4 691
18 144
76 887
174 986
2010
2010
79 145
275 057
87 227
345 774
53 858
157 735
18 600
108 404
26 713
71 615
1 224 127
861 992
771 594
444 666
45 626
778 564
171 748
3 074 189
67 194
3 141 384
60 542
42 571
59 823
321 764
484 700
36 809
37 314
117 862
28 377
8 057
10 985
239 404
49 632
27 746
8 085
5 390
26 873
87 733
205 459
2011
2011*)
87 995
314 372
98 957
413 706
63 355
182 390
21 269
127 908
30 416
80 238
1 420 607
982 521
860 982
498 764
51 785
884 503
192 227
3 470 783
74 029
3 544 812
66 913
49 048
68 187
391 408
575 556
41 831
44 312
137 390
32 113
9 154
12 884
277 684
48 825
31 222
9 599
6 039
36 179
76 559
208 422
2012
2012**)
71 093
181 820
59 799
210 003
32 077
109 896
12 874
60 922
17 895
51 826
808 205
566 449
526 220
312 429
32 917
536 982
122 844
2 097 841
44 003
2 141 844
43 541
27 932
39 439
222 629
333 541
24 081
23 219
69 272
17 953
4 761
6 193
145 478
33 522
19 137
5 699
3 160
10 367
55 380
127 266
2008
2008
73 548
213 932
70 955
276 400
41 056
133 665
14 916
73 719
21 421
58 575
978 187
677 045
633 283
367 136
38 102
621 392
139 865
2 476 822
51 916
2 528 738
49 133
32 760
45 844
314 814
442 550
28 698
28 728
85 143
22 203
5 907
8 297
178 975
35 315
21 656
6 270
3 862
13 975
61 516
142 594
3 556 334
4 271 045
4 653 539
5 295 074
6 027 082
6 731 535
2007
2007
56 952
139 618
44 675
139 019
22 487
81 532
10 134
40 907
14 172
40 985
590 480
433 860
389 245
234 435
25 338
403 392
84 622
1 570 892
33 946
1 604 839
33 869
20 983
31 794
180 289
266 936
18 763
17 117
51 780
12 981
3 481
4 423
108 545
25 683
14 810
4 571
2 583
7 914
43 615
99 176
2006
2006
69 353
160 377
53 030
167 068
26 062
95 929
11 397
49 119
15 921
46 216
694 471
501 772
473 187
281 997
29 417
470 627
97 867
1 854 868
37 388
1 892 256
37 715
24 480
34 670
199 588
296 454
21 216
19 310
60 903
15 270
4 062
5 125
125 887
28 597
16 904
5 080
2 818
8 946
46 895
109 240
2 669 975
3 118 308
Catatan :
Perbedaan antara jumlah PDRB 33 PROVINSI dan PDB Indonesia antara lain disebabkan oleh diskrepansi statistik
96 161
351 118
110 104
469 073
72 654
206 331
24 173
144 561
34 325
91 717
1 600 218
1 103 738
946 861
556 480
57 034
1 001 721
212 857
3 878 690
83 939
3 962 629
75 027
55 876
75 923
419 102
625 928
47 198
51 062
159 427
36 601
10 368
14 408
319 064
49 529
35 253
11 469
6 918
42 760
77 765
223 695
Gross Domectic Product Indonesia 2010-2012
Rank of Economic and GDP Percapita ASEAN Country 2010-2012
National R&D’s
Expenditure
Gross Expenditure for R&D
Comparison World Science and Technology Budget
2012
Science and Technology National Budget Reduction
Ratio for Science and Technology Budget to GDP, 1969-2006
UNESCO 1% GDP National
Policy on R&D Spending,
Comparative With Any Country
Pembangun an
Nasional
Semesta
Berencana
GB
HN
GB
HN
UK
USA
Rumania
GB
HN
GB
HN
RPJMN
RRC
NAWA
CITA
RPJMN
BRASIL
National Contribution Spending for Research 2009
GOV
42,8%
HE
38,5%
Sources: LIPI 2010
INDUSTRY
18,7%
Sample: Spending R&D on Local
Government (Province)
No
Instiusi Lemlitbang
% Tase
1.
Balitbang Prov Sumut
0,25
2.
Balitbang Prov Riau
0,66
3.
Balitbang Prov Sumatera Selatan
0,21
4.
Bidang Litbang Prov Lampung
0,04
Sample: Spending R&D on
Hingher Education
No
Instiusi Lemlitbang
%Tase
1.
Universias Sumatera
Utara
0,18
2.
Univ Bandar Lampung
4,3
3.
Universitas Indonesia
2
4.
Institut Teknologi
Bandung
4,71
5.
Balitbang Prov Banten
0,14
6.
Bidang Litbang Prov Jabar
0,004
5.
Universitas Gajah Mada
3,18
7.
Balitbang Prov Jawa Tengah
0,14
6.
Universitas Airlangga
5,5
8.
Balitbang Prov Jawa Timur
0,19
7.
Universitas Al Azhar
Jakarta
2
9.
Balitbang Prov Kalimantan Barat
0,12
8.
0,01
10.
Balitbang Prov Kalimantan
Selatan
0,11
Universitas Pelita
Harapan
9.
0,16
11.
Balitbang Prov Kalimantan Timur
0,21
Universitas Tanjung Pura
Kalbar
12.
Balitbang Prov Sulawesi Selatan
0,2
10.
Universitas Nusa
Cendana NTT
0,72
11.
Universitas Hasannudin
2
Sources: Aminullah, 2013
Resources of
Science and
Technology
Total of University
University
Institute
College
Diploma
Polytechnique
 519
 59
1.384
 1.030
 193
3.185
Higher
Education
Sources: Dirjen Dikti, 2012
Big Industry 4.968 unit
Reseacher Resources in Higher Education
Reseacher  240.000
(Th 2012)
3.185
Higher Education
University 519
Institut

59
College 1.384
Diploma  1.030
Politeknik  193
Actors commitment
on R&D
expenditures
K/L/BPP/PT K 7 Fokus KRT
Priority Scale
Policy Content
Imlementation Content 
76,7 %
51,7%
42,5%
Inter-Relation of Organization
42,5%
Resources of Planning
49,2%
Actor Charateristics
33,3%
Appropriate of budget utilities  50,8%
Sources: Aminullah 2013
69%
48,3%
34,5%
34,5%
31,9%
24,1%
34,5%
77,4%
54,8%
29%
25,8%
48,4%
16,1%
58,1%
7 LPNK BPP
UNIV
90,9 60%
63,6 45%
54,5 45%
72,7 45%
54,5 65%
54,5 40%
63,6 50%
94,1%
52,9%
52,9%
47,1%
29,4%
58,8%
58,8%
Actors perception at Regional R&D Institute
on the importance of R&D Budgedting
70
65
60
60
50
50
45
45
45
45
40
40
40
40
Paling Penting
35
Lebih Penting
30
Cukup Penting
25
Kurang Penting
25
Tidak Penting
20
20
15
20
15
10
10
5
0
0
Skala Prioritas
0
Isi Kebijakan
5
0
Kontek
Pelaksanaan
0
Hubungan Inter
Organisasi
0
Sumber Daya
Perencana
0
Karateristik
Pelaksana
Pengguna
0
Ketepatan
Penggunaan
Anggaran
Actors perception at Higher Education and R&D Institute
on the importance of R&D Budgedting
100
94,1
90
80
70
60
58,8
52,9
50
58,8
58,8
52,9
Paling Penting
47,1
41,2
40
41,2
Lebih Penting
35,3
30
29,4
Cukup Penting
29,4
Kurang Penting
20
11,8
10
0
11,8
5,9
5,9
5,9
5,9
0
0
0
0
Skala Prioritas
Isi Kebijakan
Kontek
Pelaksanaan
Tidak Penting
5,9
0
Hubungan Inter Sumber Daya
Organisasi
Perencana
0
Karateristik
Pelaksana
Pengguna
0
Ketepatan
Penggunaan
Anggaran
Nawa Cita
and R&D
MILESTONE
The Great of Indonesia
RnD
Industry
&
Higher
Education
GDP
GDP
GDP
GDP
GDP
Rp.315,9 M
to
Rp.23,71T
Rp.2,09T
to
Rp.955,75T
Rp.2,09T
to
Rp2.295,82 T
Rp2.295,82T
to
Rp8.241,86 T
Rp.8.241,86T
to
Rp.25.000 T ?
3X
multiple
Evaluation on S&T policy
(before 2004)
• Weak interaction
between S&T actors
from academicians/
R&D institutes , and
other actors in the
productive sectors/
business
• Weak Socio-economic
relevance of the
university/ R&D
institutes researches
• Less synergy of
research agenda among
research organizations
S&T Policy for
S&T Policy for
2010-2014:
2014-2019:
Strengthening the
NAWA CITA
National
Innovation
System
Industrial
•
•
•
•
•
manufacture
development:
Strengthening of S&T
-industrial partnership
institution
facilitating + Higher
Strengthening the
Education and R&D
S&T Resources
Strengthening of S&T collaboration
Network
enforcing of
Increasing the S&T
competitiveness in
productivity
industrial
Increasing the S&T
manufacture.
utilization
Vision-Mision JW-JK on R&D
“NAWA CITA”
• The Birth of Great Indonesia
• There was a waekness in economic capabilities
• There was a dependently of technology capabilties
• There was a Culture Shock in technology
• Nation independency
• Innovation Advances
Rising up the productivity
- Fiscal Incentive to push investment
- Start up Science & Technology Park in any regional area
Economic Indepence
- Technological strenthening by policies
- Emerging Innovation system by sinergize among
Academic, Bussiness and Government.
Vision-Mission Content of JW-JK related with R&D
“NAWA CITA” (advance)
Nation Characters Revolution by aparatusTechno-Ideology, advancing of
technology as curicullum SLTA-PT, scholarship D3-S3 (PhD).
Industrial manufacture development:
-industrial partnership facilitating + Higher Education and R&D collaboration
enforcing of competitiveness in industrial manufacture.
Fiscal and non fiscal schemeHAKI
Culture
a. Science and Technology development in national education curiculum
system
b. Education infrastructure upgradingSD-SLTP-SLTA and Higher Education
Triple Helix concept (Etzkowitz)
GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRY
Concept to go The Birth of Great Indonesia
UNIVERSITY
Research Topics
(as a reference)
FOOD
TECHNOLOGY
MEDICAL AND
PHARMACEUTICAL
TECHNOLOGY
MATERIAL
TECHNOLOGY
RESEARCH TOPICS
DEFENSE
TECHNOLOGY
ENERGY RELATED
TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION AND
COMMUNICATION
TECHNOLOGY
TRANSPORTATION
TECHNOLOGY
Best Practice
• Experiences in Japan
research planning on
master/PhD level, has
been approved by MITI
and MEXT of Japan, by
the time seminar event
of research will be
connceted with
Industry
• Experiences in UK
research on any
University must
connceted with
Industry
Conclusion
Policy and Instrument Policy
• Supported to invest on industry target 80% from
Industry and 20% from Government
• Double tax deduction Policy for Industry
• To increase R&D’s activities in University
evaluation to Act No.18/2002P3 Sinas Iptek
• Consistency to implement Act no.12/2012
Universty to increase investation on RnD (30%
spending for RnD on operational)
• International network on R&D with research
concortium
• Instrument R&D Policy from government
Thank You
Syahrul Aminullah
Email: [email protected]
Skype: Syahrulaminullah1
Hp. +62-855-7800-476