You can simply down load the document and read

Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
JOHN S. LEONARDO
United States Attorney
District of Arizona
DONALD E. CONRAD
Assistant United States Attorney
Arizona State Bar No. 5347
Two Renaissance Square
40 North Central Avenue, Suite 1200
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408
Telephone: (602) 514-7500
Facsimile: (602) 514-7662
E-mail: [email protected]
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
United States of America,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
FIRST AMENDED
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
FORFEITURE IN REM
1) $16,238.99 Seized from Wells Fargo
Bank Account Number XX2758;
2) $189.44 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX0892;
3) $4,811.75 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX1531;
4) $8,006.83 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX5746;
5) $43.46 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX4887;
6) $288.56 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX3579,
7) $119,980.00 Seized from Wells Fargo
Safety Deposit Box XX1721;
22
8) $4,842.55 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank
Account Number XX7693;
23
9) $2,163.00 in United States Currency; and
24
10) MidFirst Bank Cashier’s check no
1196582 in the amount of $76,635.97,
25
CV 11-02571-PHX-SPL
Plaintiff,
Defendants.
26
27
28
1
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 2 of 14
1
Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its attorneys, JOHN S. LEONARDO,
2
United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, and Donald E. Conrad, Assistant United
3
States Attorney brings this complaint and alleges as follows in accordance with Supplemental
4
Rule G(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
5
NATURE OF THE ACTION
6
1. This is a verified complaint for forfeiture in rem seeking to forfeit and condemn to
7
the use and benefit of the United States of America the following property: 1 ) $ 1 6 , 2 3 8 . 9 9
8
Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX2758; 2) $189.44 Seized from Wells Fargo
9
Bank Account Number XX0892; 3) $4,811.75 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number
10
XX1531; 4) $8,006.83 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX5746; 5) $43.46
11
Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX4887; 6) $288.56 Seized from Wells Fargo
12
Bank Account Number XX3579, 7) $119,980.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Safety Deposit Box
13
XX1721; 8) $4,842.55 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX7693; [and] 9)
14
$2,163.00 in United States currency; and , 10) MidFirst Bank Cashier’s check no 1196582 in the
15
amount of $76,635.97, (cumulatively referred to as “defendant currency”).
16
2. This is a civil action in rem, seeking the forfeiture of [United States] defendant
17
currency pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) because [the currency] it represents proceeds of
18
trafficking in controlled substances or was used or intended to be used in exchange for controlled
19
substances or was used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of Title II of the Controlled
20
Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.
21
3. This is a civil action in rem, seeking the forfeiture of United States currency pursuant
22
to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C) because the defendant currency constitutes or is derived
23
from proceeds traceable to a violation of, or conspiracy to commit a violation of, 21 U.S.C. §
24
841 and/or § 846, which are offenses constituting “specified unlawful activity” under 18 U.S.C.
25
§ 1956(c)(7) and or 1957 or property traceable to such property.
26
27
28
2
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 3 of 14
1
4. In addition, this is a civil action in rem, brought to enforce the provision of 31 U.S.C.
2
§ 5317(c)(2) for the forfeiture of property involved in a violation of 31 U.S.C.§ 5324(c)(1) and
3
(3) or a conspiracy to commit such a violation, to wit: currency in an amount greater than
4
$10,000 was structured in amounts smaller than $10,000 to avoid the reporting requirements of
5
31 U.S.C. § 5316(b), which was transported into the United States from or through a place
6
outside the United States and no Cash and Monetary Instrument Report (CMIR) was filed
7
disclosing the information required in 31 U.S.C. § 5316(b).
8
5. In addition, this is a civil action in rem, brought to enforce the provision of 31 U.S.C.
9
§ 5317(c) for the forfeiture of property involved in a violation of 31 U.S.C.§ 5316(a)(1)(A) or
10
a conspiracy to commit such a violation, to wit: currency in an amount greater than $10,000 at
11
one time was transported from a place in the United States to or through a place outside the
12
United States and no Cash and Monetary Instrument Report (CMIR) was filed disclosing the
13
information required in 31 U.S.C. §5316(b).
14
6. In addition, this is a civil action in rem, brought to enforce the provision of 31 U.S.C.
15
§ 5317(c)(2) for the forfeiture of funds involved in structuring activities in violation of 31
16
U.S.C. § 5324, in order to avoid the requirement to file a Currency Transaction Report pursuant
17
to 31 U.S.C. § 5313, or any conspiracy to commit any such violation, and any property traceable
18
to any such violation or conspiracy.
19
20
THE DEFENDANTS IN REM
7. The defendants consist of the following property:
21
1) $16,238.99 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX2758;
22
2) $189.44 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX0892;
23
3) $4,811.75 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX1531;
24
4) $8,006.83 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX5746;
25
5) $43.46 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX4887;
26
6) $288.56 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX3579;
27
28
3
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 4 of 14
1
7) $119,980.00 Seized from Wells Fargo Safety Deposit Box XX1721;
2
8) $4,842.55 Seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number XX7693; and
3
9) $2,163.00 in United States currency,
4
all seized on June 28, 2011, by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and
10) MidFirst Bank Cashier’s check no 1196582 in the amount of $76,635.97,
5
6
8. The [defendants (collectively referred to as, “defendant currency” are] defendant
7
currency is presently in the custody of the United States Marshals Service in Phoenix, Arizona.
8
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
9
9. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over an action commenced by the United
10
States under 28 U.S.C. § 1345, and over an action for forfeiture under 28 U.S.C. § 1355(a). This
11
Court also has jurisdiction over this particular action under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
12
10. This Court has in rem jurisdiction over the defendant property pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
13
§ 1355(b)(1)(A) because acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred in this district,
14
and 28 U.S.C. § 1355(b)(1)(B), incorporating 28 U.S.C. § 1395, because the action accrued in
15
this district.
16
11. Upon the filing of this complaint, the plaintiff requests that the Clerk issue an arrest
17
warrant in rem pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(3)(b), which the plaintiff will execute upon the
18
defendant property pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1355(d) and Supplemental Rule G(3)(c).
19
12. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1355(b)(1)(A) because acts
20
or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred in this district, and 28 U.S.C. § 1395, because
21
the action accrued in this district and the property is located in this district.
22
13. The defendant currency is now, and during the pendency of this action, will be in the
23
jurisdiction of this Court and is located in the District of Arizona.
24
FACTS
25
14. Beginning in February 2011, the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”),
26
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other law enforcement agencies have conducted an
27
28
4
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 5 of 14
1
investigation of the drug trafficking and money laundering activities of a large scale
2
methamphetamine and cocaine drug trafficking organization based in the Republic of Mexico
3
and Arizona.
4
15. The investigation identified Efrain Gustavo Lopez -Gutierrez (“CHOLO”) and his
5
associates, Irvin Manuel Coronel (“GORDO”) and Michael Navarette-Lopez (“CUATE”) as
6
significant members involved in the Phoenix-based drug trafficking organization.
7
16. From May 3, 2011 - May 18, 2011, law enforcement intercepted wire
8
communications over a cellular telephone utilized by Efrain Gustavo Lopez -Gutierrez
9
(hereafter, “CHOLO”).
10
17. During the monitoring period, numerous telephone conversations were intercepted
11
between Wilfrido Aldana-Cantu (“ARQUI”), an unidentified person known only as “UM2783",
12
CHOLO, GORDO, CUATE, and other drug-trafficking associates during which they discussed
13
what appeared to be drug trafficking activity.
14
May 10, 2011
15
18. On May 10, 2011, law enforcement intercepted a series of conversations between
16
ARQUI, CHOLO, UM2783, GORDO and CUATE in which they discussed the apparent
17
delivery of $320,000 in drug proceeds to ARQUI.
18
19. Investigation revealed that on May 10, 2011CHOLO instructed CUATE to retrieve
19
$320,000 of drug proceeds from a black Honda Accord parked in the garage area of 4719 N.
20
Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. CHOLO and UM2783 then coordinated the delivery of $320,000
21
in drug proceeds to ARQUI.
22
20.
Later that same day, ARQUI deposited $9,000 into his personal checking account
23
number XX7693 and $9,200 in joint saving account number XX1060 at the Wells Fargo
24
Branch located at 23405 N Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona.
25
26
27
28
5
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 6 of 14
1
21.
On May 11, 2011, ARQUI deposited a total of $80,800 in ten Wells Fargo bank
2
accounts, at various branches in amounts that never exceeded $10,000. All the accounts are
3
associated with ARQUI or a family member.
4
5
6
22.
On May ll, 2011, ARQUI also opened and accessed safety deposit box XX721
at the Wells Fargo branch located at 13015 N. Tatum Blvd., Phoenix, Arizona.
23.
On May 12, 2011, the funds deposited in accounts XX1060, XX7319, XX4014
7
were transferred online to ARQUI’s personal checking account. The funds deposited to account
8
XX0892 were transferred to account XX3579.
9
24. Agents identified eleven Wells Fargo bank accounts and the safety deposit box
10
mentioned above that pertain to ARQUI,
11
(“OSCAR”), and another relative, Jose Pedro Cardenas (“JOSE”).
12
25.
his father-in-law Oscar Verdugo-Cardenas
ARQUI has one sole checking account numbered XX7693; a joint savings
13
account with his wife, Claudia Rosalva Cardenas Marquez (Claudia) numbered XX1060; a joint
14
checking account with Claudia numbered XX7160; a joint checking account with Maria Aurora
15
Cantu de Aldana (Maria), believed to be his mother, numbered XX7319; and a joint savings
16
account with Maria numbered XX4014.
17
26.
Bank records indicate Claudia and Maria are homemakers and have no reported
18
income. ARQUI is a self-employed architect and lists his business phone number as a Mexican
19
phone number.
20
27.
JOSE has control over four accounts at Wells Fargo Bank. One money market
21
savings account numbered XX4887; one checking account numbered XX3579; and two
22
business checking accounts in the name of Sonmex Fund LLC numbered XX0892 and XX2758.
23
28.
OSCAR has control of two joint accounts with his wife Rosalva Cardenas
24
(Rosalva): one joint checking account numbered XX1531 and one joint savings account
25
numbered XX5746.
26
27
28
6
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 7 of 14
1
29.
Bank records indicate OSCAR is an attorney with a gross income of $3,000 per
2
month. All but one of the phone numbers listed are Mexican phone numbers. No Social
3
Security number is listed.
4
30.
Investigation revealed that from October 12, 2010 to March 30, 2011, twenty cash
5
deposits totaling $128,050 were made among four accounts on seven occasions. The deposits
6
were made in amounts never exceeding $10,000 dollars and were subsequently transferred to
7
ARQUI’s personal checking account.
8
9
31.
On May 11, 2011, ARQUI wrote a check to OSCAR for $56,000 from his
personal checking account.
10
32.
On May 13, 2011, JOSE wrote a check to OSCAR for $36,500 from Account
11
number XX3579.
12
33.
On May 13, 2011, OSCAR deposited both checks to Account number XX1531
13
to fund the cashier’s check used to purchase the residence located at 6505 E. Betty Elyse Lane,
14
Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254.
15
34.
Through investigation and surveillance law enforcement determined that ARQUI,
16
OSCAR and JOSE deposited and stored drug proceeds through their various Wells Fargo
17
accounts and safe deposit box and converted those proceeds into real property and transferred
18
a portion of the proceeds into Mexico in an attempt to launder the illicit funds.
19
35.
On May 24, 2011 at 9:54 a.m. two individuals made deposits at two different
20
tellers at the Wells Fargo Branch located at 250 E 4th St., Calexico, California. The deposits
21
were made to ARQUI’s personal checking account and account number XX7319 in the amount
22
of $9,000 each.
23
36.
On the same day, ARQUI crossed northbound into the United States from Mexico
24
at the Nogales West Port of Entry at 12:06 p.m. Law Enforcement databases confirmed that
25
ARQUI did not declare the transportation of U.S. currency in excess of $10,000 dollars.
26
27
28
7
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 8 of 14
37.
1
Later that day, at the same Calexico, California Wells Fargo branch, two
2
additional deposits of $9,900 each were made to ARQUI’s personal checking account and
3
account number XX7160. The cash deposits made to Accounts XX7160 and XX7319 were
4
later transferred to ARQUI’s personal checking account.
38.
5
On May 25, 2011, JOSE and OSCAR crossed northbound into the United States
6
from Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry in the early evening. Law Enforcement databases
7
confirmed that neither JOSE nor OSCAR declared the transportation of U.S. currency in excess
8
of $10,000 dollars.
39.
9
On May 26, 2011, ARQUI made three deposits under $10,000 each, to his
10
personal checking account, account number XX7160 and account number XX7319 totaling
11
$27,050 ($8,550, $9,500, & $9,000) at the Wells Fargo branch located at 13015 N Tatum Blvd,
12
Phoenix, Arizona. ARQUI also accessed his safe deposit box located at the same branch during
13
this same time period.
40.
14
On May 26, 2011, OSCAR purchased Cashier’s Check #0631302601 in the
15
amount of $105,595.16 made payable to First American Title for the remaining down payment
16
for the purchase of the residence located at 6505 E. Betty Elyse Lane, Scottsdale, Arizona
17
85254.
18
41.
Prior to the purchase of the Cashier’s Check, OSCAR transferred funds to and
19
from Account number XX5746 netting a remaining co-mingled balance in ARQUI’s personal
20
checking account.
21
42.
22
23
On May 26, 2011, ARQUI also wrote a $25,000 check made payable to Banco
Monex SA which was later endorsed in Mexico.
43.
On June 3, 2011, OSCAR and ARQUI crossed northbound into the United States
24
from Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry in the early evening. Law Enforcement databases
25
confirmed that neither JOSE nor OSCAR declared the transportation of U.S. currency in excess
26
of $10,000 dollars.
27
28
8
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 9 of 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
44.
On June 3, 2011, the United States District Court issued an order authorizing the
interception of wire communication over another cellular telephone utilized by CHOLO.
45.
Investigation revealed that on June 4, 2011, ARQUI received $56,000 of drug
proceeds from CHOLO and CUATE.
46.
On the same day investigation revealed ARQUI accessed his safety deposit box
located at 13015 N Tatum Blvd, Phoenix, Arizona.
47.
On June 10, 2011, ARQUI crossed northbound into the United States from
8
Mexico at the Nogales Port of Entry. Law Enforcement databases confirmed that ARQUI did
9
not declare the transportation of U.S. currency in excess of $10,000 dollars.
10
48.
On June 11, 2011, ARQUI made three deposits in account numbers XX7693,
11
XX7160 and XX7319 $15,000 ($7,000, $3,000, & $5,000) at the Wells Fargo branch located
12
at 14595 N Scottsdale Rd, Scottsdale, Arizona.
13
49.
To summarize the recent Wells Fargo banking activity, from May 10, 2011
14
through June 11, 2011, $184,415 was deposited and transferred between eleven account
15
associated with ARQUI or one of his family members. The funds ultimately were disposed of
16
through the purchase of Cashier’s Checks for the down payment of real property; transfers to
17
Mexico; payment for services; travel, spending, etc.
18
50.
Between May 10, 2011 and June 4, 2011 ARQUI received $376,000 in cash from
19
CHOLO.
20
investigation. Only $184,415 was deposited into the eleven various accounts.
21
51.
The source of the money is from the drug trafficking organization under
ARQUI accessed the Wells Fargo Safe deposit box three times. The first time
22
was May 10, 2011, the day he received $320,000, the second occasion was May 26, 2011, and
23
the third time was the same day he received $56,000, June 4, 2011.
24
Surveillance and Traffic Stop of ARQUI
25
26
27
28
9
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 10 of 14
1
52.
On May 26, 2011, at approximately 6:40 p.m., Officers of the Arizona
2
Department of Public Safety stopped ARQUI, driving a white Ford pickup bearing Sonora
3
Mexico license plate UX-62-563, for excessive window tint.
4
5
53.
ARQUI stated he was a businessman in the construction and real estate business
in San Carlos, Sonora.
6
54.
The passenger in the vehicle was identified as Dulce Gallegos-Gaxiola.
7
55.
ARQUI stated he attended the University of Arizona in Tucson and had lived in
8
the US in the past.
9
56.
DPS Officers obtained written consent to search the vehicle from ARQUI.
10
57.
A search of the vehicle by DPS and U.S. Customs revealed no contraband.
11
58.
ARQUI stated he had around $3,000 in U.S. currency which he showed the
12
officers. Gallegos had the currency in a black bag with the rest of the luggage in the back seat
13
of the truck. DPS Officers observed the currency which consisted mostly of $100 and $20
14
dominations with rubber bands around them.
15
16
17
18
19
59.
During the search, one of the officers overheard ARQUI tell Gallegos “they don’t
know our tricks” in Spanish.
60.
On June 4, 2011, law enforcement conducted surveilleance of ARQUI while he
was at a residence located at 6505 E. Betty Elyse Lane, Scottsdale, Arizona.
61.
Agents observed three vehicles with Sonora, Mexico registrations. A White Ford
20
Expedition bearing Sonora Mexico registration XXX2524 was included in the vehicles
21
observed at the residence. This vehicle is registered to Claudia Cardenas, ARQUIs wife. This
22
is also the same vehicle in which ARQUI traveled northbound across the U.S.-Mexico border
23
that same morning.
24
62.
According to the Maricopa County Recorder, Oscar Verdugo Cardenas (ARQUI’s
25
father-in-law) purchased the residence located at 6505 Betty Elyse Lane, Scottsdale. The
26
purchase price of the property was approximately $370,000 and the down payment was
27
28
10
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 11 of 14
1
2
approximately $111,000.
63.
The down payment consisted of a personal check written by Oscar Verdugo
3
Cardenas for $5,000 on March 31, 2011 from his personal account at Wells Fargo numbered
4
XX1531 and a Cashier’s Check purchased from Wells Fargo on May 26, 2011 in the amount
5
of $105,595.16 from account number XX5746.
6
Income / Source of Funds
7
64.
A review of bank records indicate that ARQUI is an architect in Mexico.
8
65.
ARQUI utilizes Social Security number XXX-XX-2349, but is not a United
9
10
11
States Citizen. Arizona Department of Economic Security records were queried and no records
of wages were located.
66.
JOSE utilizes Social Security number XXX-XX-1435, but is not a United States
12
Citizen. Arizona Department of Economic Security records were queried and no records of
13
wages were located.
14
15
16
17
18
19
67.
According to bank records OSCAR is an attorney with gross monthly income of
$3,000. OSCAR does not have a Social Security Number and is not a United States Citizen.
68.
According to Wells Fargo records OSCAR’s business phone number is a Mexican
phone number.
69.
Agents have not identified any legitimate sources of income that would generate
large amounts of United States currency in the United States for ARQUI, JOSE, or OSCAR.
INDICTMENT
20
21
70. On September 6, 2011, a Federal Grand Jury returned a Second Superceding
22
indictment charging Wilfrido Aldana-Cantu, aka ARQUI, Oscar Verdugo-Cardenas, aka
23
OSCAR, Jose Pedro Cardenas, aka JOSE, with one count of Conspiracy to Commit Promotional
24
Money Laundering and one count of Conspiracy to Commit Concealment of Money Laundering
25
in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).
26
27
28
11
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 12 of 14
1
Verified Claims
2
71. On September 29, 2011, JOSE Pedro Cardenas submitted a seized asset claim to the
3
IRS claiming ownership of Wells Fargo bank account number XX2758 and Wells Fargo Bank
4
Account Number XX0892,held in the name of Sonmex Fund, LLC.
5
72. On September 29, 2011, Rosalva Cardenas submitted a seized asset claim to the IRS
6
claiming ownership of Wells Fargo bank account number XX1531 and Wells Fargo Bank
7
Account Number XX5746,held in the name of Oscar V. Cardenas and Rosalva Cardenas.
8
73. On September 29, 2011, OSCAR Verdugo Cardenas submitted a seized asset claim
9
to the IRS claiming ownership of Wells Fargo bank account number XX1531 and Wells Fargo
10
Bank Account Number XX5746, held in the name of Oscar V. Cardenas and Rosalva Cardenas.
11
74. On September 29, 2011, JOSE Pedro Cardenas submitted a seized asset claim to
12
the IRS claiming ownership of Wells Fargo bank account number XX4487 and Wells Fargo
13
Bank Account Number XX3579, held in the name of Jose P. Cardenas.
14
75. On September 26, 2011, Wilfrido Aldana “ARQUI” submitted a seized asset claim
15
to the IRS claiming ownership of Wells Fargo bank accounts XX7693, XX1060, XX7160,
16
XX7319, XX4014, XX721 and United States currency in the amount of $2,163.00.
17
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
18
76. Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the defendant currency
19
represents proceeds of trafficking in controlled substances or was used or intended to be used
20
in exchange for controlled substances or were used or intended to be used to facilitate a
21
violation of Title II of the Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq. and are, therefore,
22
subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(6).
23
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
24
77. Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the defendant currency
25
represents proceeds that has been involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation
26
of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 or 1957 or a conspiracy to commit such a violation and are, therefore,
27
28
12
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 13 of 14
1
subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A).
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
2
3
78. Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the defendant currency
4
constitutes proceeds traceable to a violation of, or conspiracy to commit a violation of 21 U.S.C.
5
§§ 841 and/or 846, which are offenses constituting “specified unlawful activity” under 18
6
U.S.C. § 1956 (c)(7) or 1957, or property traceable to such property and is, therefore, subject
7
to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C).
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
8
9
79.
Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the above described
10
defendants are property within the jurisdiction of the United States which is subject to forfeiture
11
pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) as currency involved in a violation of
12
18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B)(ii) or a conspiracy to commit such a violation, to wit: currency in
13
an amount greater than $10,000 at one time was received into the United States from or through
14
a place outside the United States to avoid with the intent to evade the currency reporting
15
requirement of 31 U.S.C. § 5316.
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
16
17
80.
Based upon the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the above described
18
defendants are subject to forfeiture pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5317(c)(2) for the forfeiture of
19
funds involved in structuring activities in an effort to avoid the requirement to file a Currency
20
Transaction Report pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 5313, or any conspiracy to commit any such
21
violation, and any property traceable to any such violation or conspiracy in violation of 31
22
U.S.C. § 5324.
23
24
25
26
27
28
13
Case 2:11-cv-02571-SPL Document 56 Filed 05/20/13 Page 14 of 14
1
WHEREFORE, the United States of America prays that process of warrant in rem issue
2
for the arrest of the defendants; that due notice be given to all parties to appear and show cause
3
why the forfeiture should not be decreed; that judgment be entered declaring the defendant be
4
forfeited to the United States of America for disposition according to law; and that the United
5
States of America be granted such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper, together
6
with the costs and disbursements of this action.
7
DATED this 20th day of May, 2013.
8
JOHN S. LEONARDO
United States Attorney
District of Arizona
9
10
11
S/Donald E. Conrad
DONALD E. CONRAD
Assistant United States Attorney
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I hereby certify that on May 20, 2013, I filed the foregoing with the Clerk’s Office
using the ECF system, which electronically transmitted a Notice of Filing to the following
(registered or non-CM/ECF) CM/ECF users:
Sean K. McElenney
[email protected]
19
20
21
by: Regina M. Spurlock _
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
14