Department of Basic Psychological Research and
Transcription
Department of Basic Psychological Research and
Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods The experience of art in the museum David Brieber Cognitive Science Research Platform University of Vienna, Austria Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods University of Vienna, Austria Although the laboratory is a common context for psychological research on art, the museum context is a common context for encountering art. Art museums are environments especially designed for a focused, reflective, and multi-sensory experience. They highlight the objects’ artistic status and foster the adoption of an aesthetic orientation. Do differences between the laboratory and museum contexts lead to differences in how people experience and behave towards art? In a series of studies, we addressed this question by using different measurement techniques and research designs. Our results showed that art experience is enhanced in the museum. Compared to the laboratory, people in the museum liked artworks more, found them more interesting, and felt more emotionally positive and aroused. Moreover, people in the museum remembered almost twice as many artworks as people in the laboratory. Differences in art experience between the museum and laboratory were also accompanied by differences in viewing behavior. On average, people in the museum spent more time viewing art than people in the laboratory. In both contexts, however, viewing time was positively related with art appreciation: the more people liked an artwork, the longer they looked at it. Interestingly, the strength of the relationship between viewing time and the experience of art was partly modulated by context. Our research demonstrates that there is a difference between the museum and the laboratory in how people enjoy and approach art. Future research should concentrate on the mechanisms underlying this museum enhancement effect and its generalizability. Our data suggests that there are certain limitations to this effect associated with the beholder’s level of art expertise, the style of artworks and the narrative structure of the art exhibition. 1 Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods Comparing visitors’ experience in museums of different art styles in a National and International perspective Stefano Mastandrea, Fridanna Maricchiolo, Giuseppe Carrus Department of Education University of Rome Tre, Italy The talk will present some researches conducted in the museum field which aimed to study visitors’ experience in national and international contexts. The first line of research includes some studies that compared the visitors’ experience and personality traits in museums of different art styles (ancient vs. modern art). Results showed that visitors of ancient art museum conducted their visits with motivation for, expectations of, and interests in acquiring understanding and knowledge, thereby referring to a more general kind of cognitive approach. The approach to the works in the collection of the modern art visitor was primarily emotional and pleasure-seeking. Visitors of modern art museum showed also higher levels in the Zuckerman Sensation seeking trait. Moreover, art museum can be considered restorative settings: the visit to a figurative art collection reduces the level of blood pressure more than the visit to abstract/modern artworks. The second line of research refers to an international research project (conducted in different countries of four continents) which aimed to investigate several psychological and pedagogical features like personality traits, motivations, emotions, attitudes and learning processes regarding the museum visits experience. In particular, it was intended to individuate which factors can predict young people museum visits. Findings show that museum visit experience carried out with the school are not so important as the museum visits conducted in autonomous way or with the family. The main results of the researches conducted will be discussed. 2 Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods What can art historians learn from eyetracking? Raphael Rosenberg Department of Art History University of Vienna, Austria For centuries the movement of the eye has been an important topic of art literature. Art historians often describe works of art assuming to follow the pathway of the beholder’s eye. Our experiments have shown that the movement of the eyes are far more complex, but that they do to some extent relate to the composition of paintings. The lecture will discuss the benefits of using eye-tracking for the advancement of art historical research. 3