CLR Investor and Analyst Day 2014 Presentation
Transcription
CLR Investor and Analyst Day 2014 Presentation
Forward-Looking Information Cautionary Statement for the Purpose of the “Safe Harbor” Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements included in this presentation other than statements of historical fact, including, but not limited to, statements or information concerning the Company’s future operations, performance, financial condition, production and reserves, schedules, plans, timing of development, returns, budgets, costs, business strategy, objectives, and cash flow, are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, the words “could,” “may,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “budget,” “plan,” “continue,” “potential,” “guidance,” “strategy,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such identifying words. Forward-looking statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and assumptions about future events and currently available information as to the outcome and timing of future events. Although the Company believes the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable and based on reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that such expectations will be correct or achieved or that the assumptions are accurate. When considering forward-looking statements, readers should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements described under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, registration statements and other reports filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and other announcements the Company makes from time to time. The Company cautions readers these forward-looking statements are subject to all of the risks and uncertainties, most of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company’s control, incident to the exploration for, and development, production, and sale of, crude oil and natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, commodity price volatility, inflation, lack of availability of drilling, completion and production equipment and services and transportation infrastructure, environmental risks, drilling and other operating risks, lack of availability and security of computer-based systems, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating crude oil and natural gas reserves and in projecting future rates of production, cash flows and access to capital, the timing of development expenditures, and the other risks described under Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, registration statements and other reports filed from time to time with the SEC, and other announcements the Company makes from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described in this presentation occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. This cautionary statement should also be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that the Company, or persons acting on its behalf, may make. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, the Company disclaims any duty to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. 2 CLR: Exceptional Future Quantifying the Potential Jack Stark President and COO Exceptional Future From Growing Assets Potential Undrilled Net Wells 10,000 20,000 Net Unrisked Resource Potential + Proved Reserves 9,600 18,600 18,000 9,000 Other 8,000 Net Unrisked Resource Potential MMBoe Potential Undrilled Net Wells 16,000 7,000 14,000 12,000 Other 11,400 SCOOP 6,000 10,000 4,900 5,000 8,000 SCOOP 8.5 Billion Boe Potential 4,000 Bakken 6,000 Bakken 3,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 1,000 0 Investor Day 2012 Investor Day 2014 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 160 Woodford Spacing 120-320 Woodford Spacing Proved Reserves Proved Reserves 0 Investor Day 2012 Investor Day 2014 1.1 Billion Boe Proved 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 160 Woodford Spacing 120-320 Woodford Spacing Bakken SCOOP Other 4 Superior Portfolio: CLR Bakken and SCOOP Type Curves SCOOP Condensate 1,725 MBoe (13% Oil) 73% ROR Boe per day 1,000 SCOOP Springer 940 MBoe (67% Oil) 105% ROR Bakken 603 MBoe (85% Oil) 45% ROR 100 SCOOP Condensate SCOOP Oil 655 MBoe (57% Oil) 30% ROR SCOOP Springer SCOOP Oil Bakken 603 ROR based on: $90 oil /$4 gas 10 0 10 20 30 Month 40 50 60 5 Northern Region The Bakken Maximizing Profitability Gary Gould Senior Vice President, Operations and Resource Development State of the Bakken Field – Steady industry rig count – New infrastructure in place – Operators shifting from HBP to full-field development • Recovery factor has increased with density drilling Higher recovery factor = more recoverable resources – 62-96 billion barrels of oil (on a stock tank basis) • Enhanced completions are unlocking more potential – ~25% uplift in production – Potential EUR uplift 300 1,200 ND & MT Rigs Oil (MBo per day) Gas (MBoe per day) 250 1,000 200 800 150 Development Efficiency 600 100 400 50 200 0 Jan-09 (MBoe Per Day) – Recovery factor of ~15% – Evidence from Hawkinson simulation suggests as high as 20%+ • Bakken Field Production and Rig Count Orderly development underway Rig Count • 0 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 8 Bakken: CLR Track Record of Successful Execution Track record of successful execution • • • 58% annual production growth rate over the last three years • 110,000 90,000 80,000 Industry leader in natural gas capture 60,000 Industry leader in density pilots and lower bench testing D&C capital reduced to $7.5 million/well prior to enhanced completion testing (late 2013) BOEPD NetNet Boe per day 100,000 Largest quarterly production gain in the most recent quarter (+11,100 Boe per day) – CLR selling 85%+ of gas volumes – Industry average of 60-70% • Bakken Net Production Growth 70,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1Q 09 1Q 10 1Q 11 1Q 12 1Q 13 Q1 14 9 Bakken: What’s New for Continental? • Detailed geologic and reservoir studies completed 75 geologic areas, microseismic study and reservoir simulation • Resource potential refined and quantified 4.1 Billion Boe potential, ~11,800 net undrilled wells and TF2 included • Inventory ranked and prioritized 28 type curve economic models, development drilling prioritized by highest ROR • Density pilots providing clarity for full-field development ~7-9 wells in each MB and TF1, ~3-5 wells in TF2; based on current model • Enhanced completions very promising ~25% uplift in production; Potential uplift in EUR • High-volume lift installations Increasing production for enhanced ROR 10 Bakken: CLR Culture of Maximizing Profitability If You Like Our Track Record, You’ll Like Our Future Even More Optimization: Maximizing Profitability • Resource potential refined and inventory ranked – – • Drilling activity: Prioritized based on ROR – – • Larger proppant volumes Slickwater or hybrid fluids Production lift optimization: Increasing production – – – • Development drilling activity Realized capital savings from pad drilling Completions: Bigger with ~25% production uplift – – • Quantity Inventory: 4.1 Billion Boe undrilled potential Quality Inventory: Type curve economic models by area Long stroke pumping units Electric submersible pumps Gas lift Well density for maximum profitability – – Maximizing economics Evaluating optimum combinations of well spacing, completion design and artificial lift 11 The Bakken Bakken Petroleum System Update, Middle Bakken and Three Forks Detailed Reservoir Studies Updated Resources Potential Leasehold Update Tony Moss Senior Exploration Geologist Jennifer White Senior Petrophysicist Stan Wilson Vice President, Resource Development Don Key Northern Land Manager Middle Bakken and TF1 Delivering Excellent Results Grade A reservoirs of the Bakken Petroleum System • IMMATURE BAKKEN Maximizing economics in proven areas Expanding economic footprint OOIP and type curve EUR models supports up to 8 wells per zone 10,000 7,500 # HZ Producers Proximity to source rock 6% average porosity Focused on optimizing completion and lift technology – – • ND – – CANADA MT • TF Bakken Bakken Wells, n= 6,808 TF Wells, n= 2,495 5,000 2,500 18 Miles TF1 Producer 0 Middle Bakken Producer 13 Gamma Ray Resistivity Lower Three Forks Update Lodgepole Productivity proven, economic areas identified Upper BAKKEN Middle 73 wells completed in LTF to date, 59% CLR-operated Integrating into field development to maximize ROR and recovery of OOIP Industry LTF Producers Lower 1 THREE FORKS BAKKEN PETROLEUM SYSTEM 308’ MBKKN • • Investor Day 2012 Investor Day 2014 2 TF2 2 53 3 TF3 0 18 4 TF4 0 2 Total 2 73 Birdbear 14 Lower Three Forks Well Performance LTF Prospective Outline 300 Cumulative Production (MBoe) Inside Prospective Outline Outside Prospective Outline IMMATURE BAKKEN Prospective outline defined and confirmed by CLR and industry LTF results ND MT CANADA 250 200 150 100 50 603 MBoe Model 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Days on Production 15 Defining the Lower Three Forks Fairways Geologic Requirements for LTF Development: Bakken Structure Map CANADA CANADA – MT MT ND ND 1. Lower Bakken source rock Highest oil saturation in areas where the Lower Bakken Shale > 10’ thick STRUCTURAL ENHANCEMENT 2. Pore pressure gradient – MAXIMUM OVERPRESSURE (>0.65 psi/ft) 3. Structural position – – Vertical permeability enhancement Areas of structural deformation IMMATURE BAKKEN – Pore pressure > capillary pressure to source Lower Benches from LBS > 0.65 psi/ft 4. Reservoir quality 18 Miles + 18 Miles 16 Bakken Petroleum System (BPS) Current Productive Fairways • CANADA MT Multiple zones contribute to recoverable reserves throughout the Bakken Field ND • MB & TF1 Extent of saturation in lower reservoirs of the system is heavily influenced by bottom-hole pressure MB, TF1, TF2 Basin Province MB, TF1, TF2 & TF3 Maximum overpressure + structure MB, TF1 & TF2 Maximum overpressure MB & TF1 Transitional area MB or TF1 More normally pressured areas Stratigraphic targets and development pattern specific to geologic areas MB, TF1, TF2 & TF3 MB or TF1 IMMATURE BAKKEN • Contributing Zones MB & TF1 18 Miles 17 BPS: Detailed Petrophysical Analysis Basin-Wide Petrophysical Model Connected Porosity Isolated Porosity IMMATURE BAKKEN Three Forks 2nd Bench Regional Mapping of Petrophysical Data by Geologic Area FIB-SEM Cube Three Forks 2nd Bench White-Light Core Photo + + Routine Core Analysis Log Analysis Advanced Core Analysis 18 Bakken Field-Wide Analysis • Field-wide petrophysical model provides more clarity of BPS than ever before • Wells with core utilized to build petrophysical model 12 CLR-operated cores • • • • • – IMMATURE BAKKEN – CANADA MT ~3,400 Bakken/Three Forks wells completed since Investor Day 2012 ND • Porosity/saturation Capillary pressure Geochemical analysis FIB-SEM 3D analysis High-tier petrophysical data 20 industry cores/logs • Porosity/saturation • 226 well logs analyzed • Mapped petrophysical attributes of all horizons in BPS Legend: CLR Core Industry Core Well log 18 Miles 19 Updated Bakken OOIP and Estimated Recovery • 413 - 643 BBo in place (P50 – P10) CLR UPDATED ESTIMATES Expected recovery factor increased to ~15% based on production from density pilots and reservoir simulation – • • Projection of recoverable reserves increased across the field Guiding effort to increase profitability by identifying areas with highest recoverable reserves and well economics More granular perspective on CLR inventory – – OOIP gridded by horizon, by DSU Inventory calculated by DSU based on OOIP and PDP production Original Oil In Place 413-643 BBo Est. Recovery Factor ~15% Potentially Recoverable Reserves 62-96 BBo OOIP and Recoverable Reserves (Billion Bo) • 1,000 643 413 96 100 62 P50 P10 10 1 OOIP Recoverable Reserves 20 Bakken Net Unrisked Resource Potential and Drilling Inventory 8+ years of 600+ MBoe wells Potential Undrilled Net Wells Net Unrisked Resource Potential 4,500 14,000 4,100 Net Unrisked Resource Potential (MMBoe) Potential Undrilled Net Wells 10,000 4,000 11,800 12,000 9,200 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 3,500 3,400 TF2 3,000 TF1 2,500 2,000 MB 1,500 Proved Undeveloped Reserves 1,000 500 0 Investor Day 2012 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing Investor InvestorDay Day2014 2012 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 0 Investor Day 2012 Investor Day 2014 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 160 MB & TF1/320 TF2 Spacing 21 CLR: Bakken’s #1 Leasehold Owner Bakken total • 1,197,884 net acres North Dakota • 892,824 net acres 91% HBP in de-risked area 120 Miles ‒ Montana • 305,060 net acres • 84% HBP in de-risked area Expansion Mode 25 Miles Continental Acreage De-risked area 22 Continued Growth through Trades, Acquisitions and Leasing Progress since 2012 CLR Investor Day • Strategic trades to consolidate Leasehold Acquired By: operated position 11% ‒ 47 trades with 22 industry participants 32% • Acquisitions ‒ 24 acquisitions ‒ 81,200 net acres 57% • Leasing ‒ 144,600 net acres Acquisitions Leasing Strategic Trades* * Strategic trades included to show scope of activity 23 The Bakken Conclusions on Density Pilots Hawkinson Microseismic and Reservoir Simulation Study Stan Wilson Vice President, Resource Development Allan Schlosser Senior Staff Geophysicist Density Pilots Increasing Recovery and Bringing Value Forward from Bakken Petroleum System 6 producing density pilots 4 CLR: • • – CLR Rollefstad 1,320’ CLR Wahpeton 660’ CLR: Mack, Lawrence, Hartman 660’s COP: 6 density pilots KOG: 1 density pilot OAS: 2 density pilots WLL: 5 density pilots Testing 4 – 8 wells per zone 15 of the 23 pilots include wells in LTF IMMATURE BAKKEN • 800’: Polar and Smokey 17 future pilots in progress/announced – – – – – • 1,320’: Hawkinson, Rollefstad, Tangsrud 660’: Wahpeton 2 KOG: • • CLR Tangsrud 1,320’ ND – CANADA MT • CLR Hawkinson 1,320’ 18 Miles Producing Density Pilot Future Density Pilot 25 Hawkinson Takeaways • Technical and economic success Industry’s largest microseismic project Full DSU development validated (4 zones on 1,320’ spacing) – Average well performance exceeds 603 MBoe model by 50%+ – Project ROR >100% – – • Reservoir simulation conclusions – – – – – Stimulations were contained within BPS Stagger wellbores instead of stacking No lateral communication on 1,320’ spacing in Middle Bakken and Three Forks Opportunity for enhanced stimulations Modeling supports future infill MB drilling 26 Hawkinson Unit Performance Hawkinson: Middle Bakken 250,000 200,000 200,000 Cumulative Boe Cumulative Boe Hawkinson: Three Forks 250,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 0 100 200 0 300 0 100 Days MB TF1 200 300 Days TF2 TF3 603 MBoe Model Area Average 27 Hawkinson Cutting-Edge Microseismic Project • Largest downhole project ever conducted industry-wide – 283 stages monitored and imaged – ~1.2 million data points recorded • Provides unprecedented 3D visualization of a fully drilled and stimulated Drilling Spacing Unit (DSU) 10 wells monitored 28 Microseismic Study Results Model of sand-propped fractures for all zones • Significant un-propped area exists between wellbores (1,320’ spacing / 330’ stage) – Models suggest sand-propped fractures extend 280’-340’ in each direction from the wellbores based on integrating the microseismic data with stimulation modeling • Stimulations are contained vertically within 2 miles the Bakken Petroleum System – Clearly documents the stimulations break through Lower Bakken and Three Forks shales • Stimulations migrated towards existing producers (lower pressure) – Highlights the potential for significant unstimulated rock at unit boundaries – Supportive evidence for reducing toe & heel setbacks 1 mile 10 wells monitored 29 3D Visualization: Hawkinson Microseismic Study Model of sand-propped fractures 10 wells monitored 30 Reservoir Simulation Results Opportunity to test Middle Bakken infill • Staggered wellbores can improve drainage in the BPS • Enhanced completions improve productivity and potentially reduce wells needed per DSU • Stimulation energy is drawn towards existing wells – – Guidelines for developing units with producing wells Section lines are inadequately drained Colors are Pressure Values • Hawkinson: Middle Bakken Formation only Sand-Propped Model Reservoir Model – May 2014 31 Hawkinson Pressure Depletion Simulation Reservoir Pressure May 2014 Cumulative production prior to simulation forecast totaled 2.5 Million Boe 32 Rollefstad • Conclusions – Staggering wellbores provide superior density pattern to stacking – Strong Three Forks 2 production – Optimizing artificial lift 90,000 80,000 Cumulative Boe 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 0 20 MB 40 TF1 TF2 Days 60 TF3 80 100 603 MBoe Model * Rollefstad Federal 8-2H-3 well not included due to mechanical/operational issues 33 Wahpeton: 660’ Test Results • Conclusions – Exceptional early results for Middle Bakken wells at 660’ spacing – Overall results indicate drilling pattern in Lower Bench was beyond optimal density • Noteworthy, one TF2 well was drilled as close as 330’ spacing 100,000 90,000 Cumulative Boe 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 0 20 MB TF1 40 TF2 Days TF3 60 80 100 603 MBoe Model 34 The Bakken Operational Optimization Boost Economics/Maximize Value Drilling, Completions & Production Alan McNally Drilling Manager Chris Nichols Completions Manager Tyler Bolton Senior Reservoir Engineer Kevin Murray Production Engineering Manager Bakken Drilling Performance Cycle Times Improvement (2012 – 2014) Spud to TD 20% Lateral Days 28% Mobilization Year 2012 2014 15% Wells Drilled on Multi Well Pads Wells per Rig per Year 20 15 16 12 12 8 4 45% 75% 0 2012 2013 2014 Est. 2014: 82% of fleet is currently pad capable 36 Bakken Drilling Performance • Operational gains ̶ Technology ̶ • Bits • Motors • Fluids Tool reliability ̶ • 31% one run laterals (2-mi) • 10% improvement in MWD Continual upgrading of fleet • 16% reduction in nonproductive time (NPT) • 2% of NPT is rig repair Avg. Drilling Cost per Lateral Foot $410 $398 $390 $372 $370 $354 $350 $337 $330 $324 $320 $310 $310 $290 $270 $250 2012 4Q 12 2Q 13 13Q4 4Q 13 2Q 14 37 Bakken Enhanced Completions Comprehensive Testing Program • CLR has most completion tests of any Bakken operator - Range of tests to-date included: • • • - Larger proppant volume Slickwater Hybrid Greatest aerial extent of tests— all areas of operations Williams, Mountrail, McKenzie and Dunn Counties showing greatest potential for uplift Legend: Area of improved well performance Slickwater Large proppant volume Hybrid 38 2014 Bakken Enhanced Completions Large Proppant Volume Advantages Slickwater Advantages Hybrid Advantages • High conductivity • Fastest transition from old designs • Least amount of horsepower • Complex fractures • Upward growth is limited • Complex fractures • High near wellbore conductivity • Moderate horsepower requirements 39 Bakken Enhanced Completion Evolution Proppant Pumped per Well 2013 • Various types of proppant in different areas 6,000,000 5,000,000 Variables: hybrid, slickwater and larger proppant volume – • • Expanded testing to broader geologic area Increasing job volumes Implemented program-wide testing in high impact areas– rate of return driven Transformed ND stimulation fleet while maintaining cost structure 2.7MMlbs 4.6MMlbs 3.2MMlbs 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 2014 • 60-well test program – 4.2MMlbs 4,000,000 3,000,000 • 5.4MMlbs Q3 2013 $0.70 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 E Pumping and Materials Cost per lb Proppant $0.66 $0.65 $0.64 $0.60 $0.60 $0.58 $0.56 $0.55 $0.50 $0.45 $0.40 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 E 40 Bakken Enhanced Completions Cross Link Large Proppant Volume Cross Link Large Proppant Volume Average Offset Well (610 MBOE) 603 Model 200 The incremental $0.9 MM of capital to conduct the enhanced completion is returned in less than a year 90,000 80,000 180 160 70,000 140 60,000 120 50,000 100 15,000 Boe (20%) Production increase after 180 Days 40,000 30,000 80 60 20,000 40 10,000 20 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Well Count Cumulative Production (Boe) 100,000 200 Days Capital and Economics Type Standard CWC Incr. Capital CWC 200K+ Proppant $7.8MM $0.9MM $8.7MM Incr. EUR (MBoe) 104 +17% Time to Incr. Payout Incr. NPV10 Incr. Rate of Return 0.9 yrs $1.9MM 100% 41 Bakken Enhanced Completions Slickwater Slick Water Average Offset Well (574 MBOE) 603 Model 200 The incremental $1.3 MM of capital to conduct the enhanced completion is returned in less than a year 120,000 180 160 100,000 140 120 80,000 27,000 Boe (27%) Production increase after 300 Days 60,000 40,000 100 80 60 40 20,000 20 0 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Well Count Cumulative Production (Boe) 140,000 350 Days Capital and Economics Type Standard CWC Incr. Capital CWC Slickwater $7.8MM $1.3MM $9.1MM Incr. EUR (MBoe) 156 +27% Time to Incr. Payout Incr. NPV10 Incr. Rate of Return 0.9 yrs $2.7MM 100% 42 Bakken Enhanced Completions Hybrid Type Hybrid 180K+ Proppant Average Offset Well (501 MBOE) The incremental $1.4 MM of capital to conduct the enhanced completion is returned in less than a year 120,000 603 Model 200 180 22,000 Boe (57%) Production increase after 100 Days 160 100,000 140 120 80,000 100 60,000 80 60 40,000 40 20,000 20 0 0 0 20 40 60 80 Days 100 120 140 Well Count Cumulative Production (Boe) 140,000 160 Capital and Economics Type Standard CWC Incr. Capital CWC 200K Hybrid $7.8MM $1.4MM $9.2MM Incr. EUR (MBoe) 167 +33% Time to Incr. Payout Incr. NPV10 Incr. Rate of Return 0.9 yrs $2.9MM 100% 43 2014 Bakken Enhanced Completions To Date Williams, McKenzie, Mountrail and Dunn Counties Completion Method Gross Incremental Completed Wells Capital Well Cost Tested ($MM) ($MM) Range of Production Uplift (%) Average 30-90 Day Uplift Capital Increase (%) Incremental EUR MBoe % Incremental ROR (%) Large Proppant Volume 22 $0.9 $8.7 10-180% 5-15% 12% 104 17% >100% Slickwater 16 $1.3 $9.1 0-100% 20-35% 17% 156 27% >100% Hybrid 6 $1.4 $9.2 0-120% 45-60% 18% 167 33% >100% Total 44 Conclusions: Path Forward: • Completion testing successful in key parts of basin • Optimize completions by testing greater stage counts (40+) and larger volumes • Hybrid/slickwater showing greatest uplift and economics • Transition to hybrid/slickwater exclusively in good areas • Some areas showed variable results • Focus efforts on best economic areas; continue to test new technologies in others 44 Optimized Artificial Lift & Production Facilities Increasing Production • Artificial lift optimization – Long stroke pumping unit (LSU) – Electric submersible pump (ESP) – Gas lift (GL) • Optimized water handling – Production and disposal facilities – Gathering and distribution systems • Central tank batteries 45 Higher Capacity Artificial Lift Installations Increasing by Quarter ESP Gas Lift Long Stroke Unit 40 # of Lift Installations 35 34 Quarterly % of installations with higher capacity lift 30 73% 25 61% 21 53% 19 20 15 14 41% 29% 10 6 5 1 6 3 34% 7 4 9 6 8 7 4 0 2013 Q3 3Q 2013 2013 4QQ4 2013 2014 Q1 1Q 2014 2014 Q2 2Q 2014 2014 Q3E 3Q 2014 2014 Q4E 4Q 2014 46 Bakken Artificial Lift Optimization Beating Prior Rod Pump Area Averages 2. Beating the 603 MBoe type curve utilizing ESPs 3. Expanding field boundaries and unlocking value through enhanced completions and higher volume artificial lift 1 Cumulative Production (Boe) 1. Maximizing the value of standard completions using higher volume lift (long stroke unit) Area Average 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 Lift Installed 10,000 0 0 603 MBoe Type Curve Northern Well (ESP) 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 Lift Installed 10,000 0 0 50 Days 100 150 3 Cumulative Production (Boe) Cumulative Production (Boe) 2 Cecilia 1-27H1 (LSU) 50 Days 603 MBoe Type Curve 60,000 100 150 Exploration Well (GL) 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 Lift Installed 10,000 0 0 25 Days 50 75 100 47 Optimized Water Handling: LOE Reduction Current Under Construction Planned 9 2 4 Produced Water Gathering System 150 miles 175 miles 100 miles Freshwater Distribution System 25 miles 25 miles 125 miles Salt Water Disposal Wells (SWDs) • SWDs and produced water gathering systems offer significant cost savings compared to trucking water to 3rd party facilities • Currently 45% of produced water is handled at CLR facilities with growing capacity to support current and future operations • Freshwater distribution systems provide maintenance water to existing wells and low cost freshwater for completions operations 48 Optimized Central Tank Batteries (CTBs) • 6 CTBs are currently servicing as many as 14 wells each with plans for up to 28 wells per facility • Benefits include a smaller footprint, cost savings and flexibility to easily expand for future wells • Leveraging success from Cedar Hills 49 Bakken Development Cost Evolution Bakken Completed Well Cost ($MM) $12M Operational efficiency leads to reduced well cost Cost reduction allows for completions testing Encouraging enhanced completions results drive optimization testing $0.6 $10M $1.6 $1.2 $9.2 $9.4 $0.2 $8M $8.0 $10.0 $7.8 $6M $4M $2M $0M 2012 2013 1st Half 2014 2nd Half 2014 50 Putting It All Together to Maximize Profitability “Ears Back” in Antelope Gross Average Quarterly Production (Boe per day) 14,000 Keys to Development • One of the highest rate of return areas • Impressive EURs (700-1,000+ MBoe) 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 • 41 wells currently drilling / completing Boe per day 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 • 3-5 rigs actively drilling • 350-400 total wells for full development • Utilizing enhanced completions • Optimizing lift for higher production volumes . 51 Southern Region Southern Region Platform for Growth Production History Assembling the Leasehold John Haiduk Geologic Manager Mark Fisher Land Manager SCOOP: What’s New for Continental? Rivals the Bakken net resource potential to CLR Excellent economics Springer discovery in the heart of SCOOP • 3.6 Billion Boe net unrisked resource potential to CLR • Bakken-or-better RORs • New oil play: 118,000 net acres oil, 77,000 net acres condensate/gas Woodford EUR per well increased • Extended laterals Density projects already underway • 1 producing, 3 drilling Leasehold +176% since 2012 Investor Day • 471,000 net acres Optimizing operations • Increasing rig count and accelerating development 54 SCOOP: Another Large Platform for Growth Unrisked Resource Potential Rivals the Bakken 3.6 Billion Boe net unrisked resource potential • • 3.6 320% over Investor Day 2012 4,744 net unrisked drilling locations – – – +326% over Investor Day 2012 80% operated 30 years of operated inventory (30 rigs) 7,000 3.5 6,000 3.0 5,000 646,000 net combined (Woodford/Springer) resource leasehold acreage – 4.0 471,000 net acre leasehold in SCOOP, which contains a 451,000 net acre leasehold in Woodford and a 195,000 net acre leasehold in Springer Shale ⁽²⁾ Net Resources, Billion Boe – 8,000 Well Count • Unrisked Drilling Inventory and Net Resource Potential⁽¹⁾ 2.5 4,744 4,000 2.0 3,000 1.5 2,000 1.0 1,000 0.5 0.0 0 Net Wells 1 Net Resource 2 Potential Proved Undeveloped Reserves (1) Based on 80% NRI and 120 to 320 acre spacing (2) The Springer Shale leasehold contains ~20,000 net acres which is only prospective for the Springer Shale, and does not include the Woodford. 55 SCOOP: Rapid Production Growth Woodford & Springer • ~34,300 Boe per day average in 2Q14 • 96 Non-operated wells, +75 wells since Investor Day 2012 35,000 70 CLR Rig Count 30,000 60 25,000 50 20,000 40 30 15,000 18 10,000 6 6 7 Investor Day Q3 2012 Q4 Q1 2013 5,000 0 7 9 Q2 21 23 20 11 10 Q3 Q4 Q1 2014 Q2 0 CLR Rig Count • 112 CLR-operated wells, +86 wells since Investor Day 2012 80 SCOOP (62% Liquids) Net Boe per day – 46% Oil, 74% total liquids – 2Q14 exit rate of ~36,300 Boe per day Net Daily Production 40,000 56 CLR: SCOOP’s #1 Leasehold Owner • • • • Early entrant advantage Timely recognition of play concept Play confirmation through initial delineation success Dominant leasehold position in both the oil and condensate fairways with ongoing leasing and acquisition initiatives Net Leasehold Growth 500,000 471,000 net acres of leasehold 471,000 Net Acres 400,000 300,000 200,000 170,600 100,000 0 Inv. Day 2012 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 9/18/2014 57 Teamwork Drives Results with Land Progress since 2012 CLR Investor Day • Acquisitions – 153 acquisitions (16,531 oil and gas leases) Leasehold Acquired By: 2% • Extensive fee leasing – 16,382 oil and gas leases • Challenges to entry…it is not for everyone – Title complexity • Average lease size: 8 net acres • Historic production with depth severed leasehold 48% 50% – Massive internal and external manpower investment Acquisitions Leasing Poolings 58 Woodford Overview An Area with Vast Legacy Oil Production High Quality Reservoir Characteristics Andy Rihn Senior Exploration Geologist The Perfect Recipe for Long-Term Success SCOOP Woodford Overview • A long legacy of oil production – – • Oklahoma City Woodford: primary source rock for the conventional reservoirs – • 3.2 billion barrels of oil conventionally produced from 60 reservoirs 3 of the top oil-producing counties in Oklahoma Vast majority of the oil generated remains in the Woodford Woodford key components – – – – – Thickness: 100-950’ TOC: 4-10% Superior porosity / permeability Brittleness: natural and induced fractures Basin-centered: over-pressured (up to 0.7 psi/ft) Industry wells CLR leasehold 15 Mi. 60 Woodford Update • SCOOP Industry Activity Map Developing and expanding 2014 2013 2009 2011 2010 2012 – ~45% De-risked • Increasing EUR/well with extended laterals • Distinct oil, condensate and gas fairways De-risked Hansell – Top CLR oil fairway producers: • • Chalfant Hansell IP: 973 Boe per day (90% Oil) Simms IP: 809 Boe per day (83% Oil) – Top CLR condensate fairway producers: • • • • Claudine IP: 18.1 MMcfe per day (8% Oil) Chalfant IP: 16.2 MMcfe per day (13% Oil) Both state record IPs for 4,500’ and extended laterals Doubled rig count in the last 12 months – 19 operated SCOOP Woodford rigs currently – Planned average 21 rigs in 2015 69 Rigs Active in SCOOP Claudine Simms Expanding 15 Mi. • 3 density projects underway ‒ 1 producing: BEAN ‒ 2 drilling: Poteet and Good Martin • 1,100 square miles of 3D seismic data New Hz Hz. 2014WDFD Woodford WDFD Hz Hz. Woodford CLR Acreage Oil Fairway Condensate Fairway Gas Fairway 61 Woodford Thickness Expands Across Leasehold 2013 – 2014 Exploratory Program Development Program Initiated North 130’ 150’ Hunton 245’ South 380’ 560’ W o o d f o r d 950’ 230’ 295’ 465’ Hunton Gamma Ray Brittleness 25 Mi. 62 The SCOOP Woodford: Condensate Fairway Extended Laterals Well Economics BEAN and Poteet Density Projects Candace Cantrell Senior Reservoir Engineer Woodford: Condensate Fairway 10,000:1 – 100,000:1 gas/oil ratio • CLR unrisked resource potential Oklahoma City – 2.0 net Billion Boe • CLR unrisked drilling locations – 1,554 net operated locations – 775 net non-operated locations • 206 industry wells producing – 87 CLR operated wells • 223,000 net acres 15 Mi. • 15 rigs estimated for 2015 CLR Woodford Hz Industry Woodford Hz CLR Acreage Oil Fairway Condensate Fairway Gas Fairway 64 Higher Returns With Extended Laterals EUR: 1,725 MBoe • • • 1,600 Normalized to 7,500’ lateral Completed well cost: $12.2 MM ROR: ~75% at $90/$4 prices Extended laterals: ~70% added resource for ~40% added cost ̶ ̶ Plan to drill 10,000’ laterals where possible: lateral length of future locations expected to average 7,500’ Extended laterals allow access to 600’-900’ of reservoir previously not drilled due to setback and drilling requirements for 640 acre spacing Condensate Fairway (53% Liquids) Oil 13% Gas 47% 1,400 1,200 240 210 180 1,000 150 800 120 600 90 400 60 200 30 0 0 0 6 12 18 24 Producing Months 7,500' Oil IP Rate, Bbl/day Oil Initial Decline 280 1.1 Oil EUR, MBo 295 Gas b factor 7,000 58% 1.2 Gas EUR, MMcf 8,580 Equivalent EUR, MBoe 1,725 Minimum Decline Lateral Length, ft Capital, $MM 36 130% 61% Oil b factor Gas Initial Decline 30 Condensate ROR vs Gas Price Condensate Type Curve Data Gas IP Rate, Mcf/day NGL 40% 270 4,500' Act. Well Count Ext. Act. Well Count 4,500' Act. Production Ext. Type Curve (Normalized to 7,500' LL) Ext. Act. Production (8,700' Avg LL) 6% 7,500' 12.2 110% ROR ̶ Boe per day • Condensate Fairway Type Curve 1,800 Well Count Woodford Condensate Fairway 90% 70% 50% Oil Price: $90/BBL 30% $2 $3 $4 $5 Natural Gas Price, $/MCF $6 Oil Differential: -2.3%, Gas Differential Premium: +38% 65 Early Success at BEAN Density Project Woodford Condensate Fairway 4 well project – – – – – – • • Combined IP: 8,300 Boe per day Project EUR: 7,428 MBoe 4,500’ laterals 2 wells upper Woodford, 2 wells lower Woodford 660’ spacing between wellbores Recorded micro-seismic Performance supports drilling up to 8 wells per DSU Accelerated learning—leveraging Bakken experience 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Producing Months 7 8 9 10 Top View Arrington Upper Woodford • Bearden 1-25H (4,500') Eula Mae 1-26H (4,500') Arrington 1-23H (4,500') Newy 1-24H (4,500') (2012) 4,500' Type Curve Newy 1 MILE 1 MILE UPPER UPPERWOODFORD WOODFORD Eula Mae Upper Woodford – Bearden, Eula Mae, Arrington and Newy wells Average interest: 84% WI, 68% NRI Lower Woodford – Lower Woodford B.E.A.N. Project, SE Grady County Boe per day (Avg. 54% liquids) • BEAN Density Test 2,500 Bearden 660’ ~150’ LOWER WOODFORD LOWER WOODFORD 66 Poteet Density Project Underway • Poteet Unit, NE Stephens County – – • Within 5 miles of BEAN density test Average Interest: 94% WI, 76% NRI 10 well density – now drilling – – – – – Drilling 95% complete Dual horizon (upper and lower Woodford) 1,026’ interwell spacing (same horizon), 513’ offset 7,500’ laterals Simultaneous stimulation • 1st sales expected late 4Q 2014 • 2 additional density projects planned for 2015 in the condensate fairway Boe per day (50% total liquids) Woodford Condensate Fairway Parent Well: Poteet 1-17H 1,800 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Poteet 1-17H (4,500' Lateral) (2012) 4,500' Type Curve 0 6 12 18 24 Producing Months 30 36 2014 Full-Scale Density Project UPPER WOODFORD LOWER WOODFORD Existing Well New Wells 67 The SCOOP Woodford: Oil Fairway Extended Laterals Good Martin Density Project Dan Harms Resource Development Manager Woodford: Oil Fairway <10,000:1 gas/oil ratio • CLR unrisked resource potential Oklahoma City – 615 net MMBoe • CLR unrisked drilling locations – 946 net operated locations – 473 net non-operated locations • 312 industry wells producing – 25 CLR operated wells • 169,000 net acres • 6 rigs estimated for 2015 15 Mi. CLR Woodford Hz Industry Woodford Hz CLR Acreage Oil Fairway Condensate Fairway Gas Fairway 69 Unlocking the Woodford Oil Fairway EUR: 655 MBoe • • • Normalized to a 7,500’ lateral Completed well cost: $12.2 MM ROR: ~30% at $90/$4 prices Extended laterals: ~70% added resource for ~40% added cost ̶ ̶ Plan to drill 10,000’ laterals where possible: lateral length of future locations expected to average 7,500’ Extended laterals allow access to 600’-900’ of reservoir previously not drilled due to setback and drilling requirements for 640 acre spacing Oil Fairway (83% Liquids) Gas 17% NGL 26% Oil 57% 120 Act. Well Count Ext. Act. Well Count Act. Production (4,100' Avg LL) Ext. Type Curve (Normalized to 7,500' LL) Ext. Act. Production (9,500' Avg LL) 500 400 100 80 300 60 200 40 100 20 0 0 0 6 12 Oil Type Curve Data 7,500' Oil IP Rate, Bbl/day Oil Initial Decline Oil b factor Oil EUR, MBo Gas IP Rate, Mcf/day Gas Initial Decline Gas b factor Gas EUR, MMcf Equivalent EUR, MBoe Minimum Decline Lateral Length, ft Capital, $MM 400 18 24 Producing Months 50% 30 36 Oil ROR vs Oil Price 59% 1.1 40% 440 780 49% 1.3 1,290 655 6% 7,500' 12.2 ROR ̶ Boe per day • Oil Fairway Type Curve 600 Well Count Woodford Oil Fairway 30% 20% Gas Price: $4/MCF 10% $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 Oil Price, $/BBL Oil Differential: -2.3%, Gas Differential Premium: +38% 70 Good Martin Density Project Underway Woodford Oil Fairway Good Martin Unit, Grady County – – • • 1st CLR oil fairway infill 8-well density – now drilling – – – – – – • • Offsetting the Hansell well Average interest: 66% WI, 53% NRI Drilling 70% complete Single horizon 660’ spacing between wellbores 7,500’ laterals Simultaneous stimulation Planned microseismic Boe per day ( 71% Oil ) • Parent Well: Hansell 1-3-34XH 1,400 Hansell 1-3-34XH (9,800' Lateral) 1,200 Extended Type Curve (Normalized to 7,500' LL) 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 0 1 2 3 2015 Full-Scale Density Project 4 5 6 7 Producing Months 330’ 8 1320’ 9 2640’ 660’ 1st sales expected in 1Q 2015 2 additional density projects planned for 2015 in the oil fairway 10 11 12 1320’ 330’ UPPER WOODFORD LOWER WOODFORD 1 MILE Wells 71 Woodford: Dry Gas Fairway Dan Harms Resource Development Manager Dry Gas Fairway Woodford >100,000:1 gas/oil ratio • CLR unrisked resource potential – • Oklahoma City 3.2 Tcfe (528 net MMBoe) CLR unrisked drilling locations – – 509 net operated locations 73 net non-operated locations • 59,000 net acres • Leased primarily for Springer Shale potential • Provides future opportunity and optionality on higher gas prices – – Currently limiting capital allocation Focusing on higher returns in the condensate and oil fairways 15 Mi. CLR Acreage Oil Fairway Condensate Fairway Gas Fairway 73 Southern Operations Drilling Efficiencies Completions Updates Corey Russell Drilling Manager Scott Donnelly Completion Manager Drilling Efficiency Improving During Delineation SCOOP Woodford • Shift to extended laterals • Optimizing operations - Fit for purpose rig fleet - Applying rotary steerable when optimal - Improving bit and motor technology applications - Utilizing improvements in drilling hydraulics 4,500' Lateral Extended Lateral 75% % of Well Count - Yielding lower drilling costs - ~50% decrease in $/lateral foot, based on average 9,128’ lateral Shift to Longer Laterals 100% 50% 25% 0% 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 YE14 Avg Drilling $/Lateral Ft $1,500 $1,250 $1,000 • Rigs contracted to execute 2015 plan $750 $500 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 YE14 75 Drilling: Managing Costs During Rapid Growth SCOOP Woodford 2014 Completed Well Cost Target of $12.2 MM for 7,500’ Lateral SCOOP Woodford Average Completed Well Cost: $20 20 18 16 Millions $14.0 $13.7 Avg. Lateral 8,000’ $12 $9.9 Avg. Lateral 9,100' $9.1 14 12 10 $9.1 Rig Count $16 8 $8 6 4 $4 2 0 $0 2012 2013 4,500' Lateral Extended Lateral 1H14 Woodford Rig Count 76 Completions: Managing Costs During Rapid Growth SCOOP Woodford • Leveraging purchasing power – – Leader, dominant operator in the play Capitalizing on economies of scale Stimulation size and cost per stage 228 – $140 Produced water recycling lowering system cost for water supply and disposal Ongoing infrastructure projects being considered and negotiated to accommodate future market capacity 2012 2013 Stim cost/stg (m$) YTD 2014 Stim size/stg (m-lbs.) Days from rig release to first production 70 57 • Technology expanding the play – – – $139 Dedicated stimulation and wireline crews Consistent, repeatable operations • Expanding infrastructure – 235 $193 • Lowering cycle times – – 213 51 Drilling deeper targets Longer laterals Larger treatments 2012 2013 YTD 2014 77 Springer Shale Discovery Revealing Stealth Play Great Economics Hartley Unit Will Parker Senior Exploration Geologist Jennifer White Senior Petrophysicist Dan Harms Resource Development Manager Corey Russell Drilling Manager Announcing CLR’s Newest Oil Discovery: Springer Shale • Incremental value created from in-house exploration Chesterian Osagean Meramec Compounds value as resource was already leased for Woodford Middle Upper • Atoka Sands Morrow Sands Springer Shale Discovery! Caney Shale Sycamore Limestone Woodford Shale Ulsterian • 118,000 net acres in the oil fairway • 77,000 net acres combined in the gas/condensate fairways Deese Sands Springer Sands Mississippian – 195,000 net acres today, up ~540% since 2012 Investor Day Morrowan Atokan Des Moinesian Missourian Reservoir in the heart of SCOOP Devonian • Cayugan – 127 net MMBoe oil fairway – 320 net MMBoe, or 1.9 Tcfe, combined in the gas/condensate fairways Hoxbar Sands Hunton Limestone Niagaran 447 MMBoe net unrisked resource potential to CLR Silurian • Pennsylvanian 2012 Stealth Play Becomes Reality 79 Springer Shale Oil Fairway CLR: KL Fulton 1-21H • IP: 2,122 boepd 118,000 net acres in the oil fairway – – 46,000 net acres derisked by 11 producers and Woodford well control 72,000 net acres of additional upside, currently testing SCOOP CLR: Birt 1-13H IP: 793 boepd Oct. 2013 CLR: Wilkerson 1-20H CLR: Gala 1-22H IP: 2,038 boepd IP: 765 boepd Jan. 2013 CLR: Sweet 1-2H • 127 MMBoe net unrisked recoverable resource potential from 46,000 net derisked acres – 215 net locations • 188 net operated locations • 27 net non-operated locations – – • CLR: Burkes 1-28H IP: 593 boepd CLR: Lynn 1-13H IP: 1,897 boepd CLR: Scott Trust 1-15H IP: 403 boepd CLR: Ball 1-19H IP: 1,037 boepd 67% oil, 84% liquids in fairway 80-320 acre spacing/20% recovery factor Apr. 2013 CLR: Anne 1-11H IP: 848 boepd CLR: Robert Jo 1-8H IP: 1,429 boepd Successful exploration – – – – • IP: 597 boepd Discovery well: Wilkerson 1-20H (Jan. 2013) Delineation well: Ball 1-19H (Apr. 2013) Confirmation well: Birt 1-13H (Oct. 2013) 2014: continued confirmation program Significant resource potential upside – First density pilot drilling (128-acre spacing) Springer Fairway 12 Miles SCOOP Outline CLR 2013 Key Wells Springer Fairway CLR Springer Shale Completions CLR Leasehold CLR Springer Shale Wells WOC 80 Repeatability Confirmed by 11 CLR Producers Springer Shale Oil CLR Operated Springer Shale Wells 2,200 2,000 Wilkerson 1-20H: Discovery Well Ball 1-19H: Delineation Well Birt 1-13H: Confirmation Well P < 90 Days on production 940 MBoe EUR Type Curve (4,500') 1,800 Boe per day 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 0 2 4 6 • Results from 11 CLR operated wells – – – • 30 day avg. IP: 700 Boe per day Avg. 4,037’ laterals Avg. 83% WI August Springer Shale production averaged 3,629 net Boe per day 8 10 Producing Months 12 Well Wilkerson 1-20H Ball 1-19H Birt 1-13H 14 16 IP Current Rate Boe per day Boe per day 2,038 1,037 793 363 290 225 18 20 Cumulative Production 293 MBoe (20 mos) 229 MBoe (16 mos) 114 MBoe (11 mos) 81 Springer Shale Oil EUR/Well Model: 940 MBoe Completed well cost: $9.7 MM ROR: >100% at $90/$4 prices Type curve based on wells with > 30 days of production • First extended lateral to be drilled in 4Q14 • Delineation and density testing underway – – 3 rigs currently drilling delineation 5 rigs on infill pilot 600 20 400 300 200 10 100 0 0 0 6 12 18 24 Producing Months 4,500' (84% Liquids) Gas 16% NGL 17% Oil 67% Oil IP Rate, Bbl/day Oil Initial Decline Oil b factor Oil EUR, MBo Gas IP Rate, Mcf/day Gas Initial Decline Gas b factor Gas EUR, MMcf Equivalent EUR, MBoe Minimum Decline Lateral Length, ft Capital, $MM 670 180% 62% 160% 1.25 867 120% 1.4 100% 1,230 80% 940 6% 4,500 9.7 36 140% 735 56% 30 Oil ROR vs Oil Price Springer Shale Type Curve Springer Shale Fairway 30 500 ROR – 40 Well Count Type Curve (Normalized to 4,500' LL) Act. Production (4,066' Avg LL) 700 Boe per day • • • Springer Shale Type Curve 800 Well Count Exceptional Economics Gas Price: $4/MCF 60% $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 Oil Price, $/BBL Oil Differential: -2.3%, Gas Differential Premium: +38% 82 CLR Research Identifies Springer Shale Resource Reservoir Middle Osagean Meramec Chesterian Morrowan Atokan Des Moinesian Missourian Upper Cayugan Ulsterian Niagaran Mississippian Devonian Silurian Hoxbar Sands Gamma Ray Resistivity Deese Sands 105’ Pennsylvanian Exploration Success Drives Incremental Value Atoka Sands Morrow Sands Springer Sands Springer Shale Caney Shale SEM Photo – Kerogen Porosity Sycamore Limestone Woodford Shale Hunton Limestone Proprietary data: • 2 whole cores • Dozens of sidewall cores • Play-wide petrophysical analysis • Rock mechanics studies • SEM ion milling Key observations: • Up to 150’ thick • Highly siliceous • Organics rich • Low clay • Great porosity & permeability • Over-pressured • Excellent stimulation containment Porosity 83 First Density Project Underway: Hartley Unit Springer Shale Oil • Hartley Unit, Grady County – Average Interest: 87% WI, 70% NRI • Offsets Wilkerson discovery well • 5-well density – now drilling – – – 1,055’ spacing between wellbores 4,500’ laterals Simultaneous stimulation Hartley Density Project Springer Fairway 12 Miles CLR 2013 Key Wells CLR Leasehold CLR Springer Shale Completions 330’ 1320’ 2640’ 1st sales expected in 1Q 2015 1055’ • 3 additional density projects planned for 2015 in the Springer fairway 1320’ 330’ SPRINGER • SCOOP 1 MILE Proposed Wells 84 Gas/Condensate Fairway Springer Shale • – • 1.9 Tcfe (320 net MMBoe) CLR unrisked drilling locations – – 182 net operated locations 17 net non-operated locations • 77,000 net acres • Provides future opportunity and optionality on higher gas prices – – • SCOOP CLR unrisked resource potential Springer Fairway Currently limiting capital allocation Focusing on higher returns in the Springer Shale oil fairway Oil to liquids-rich contacts needed to determine exact fairways, undetermined at this point leaving additional upside for greater condensate value 12 Miles SCOOP Outline Springer Fairway CLR Acreage 85 Already Realizing Drilling Efficiency Gains Springer Shale Oil ̶ Operational improvement as activity grows Yielding lower drilling costs 36% decrease in days on well ̶ 1-mile lateral 80 • Optimizing Springer Shale drilling program 60 40 20 0 Applying the latest technology Managing dynamic drilling hydraulics Utilizing advanced earth modeling Optimizing wellbore design 2012 2013 YTD 2014 Springer Shale CWC $16 10 8 $12 Millions ̶ ̶ ̶ ̶ Springer Shale Spud to Rig Release 6 $8 4 $4 $-0 2 0 2012 2013 CWC (1) Rig Count ̶ 100 Days • Rapid knowledge gain YTD 2014 Springer Rig Count YTD 2014 figures include complet ions cost estimates for recently drilled wells 86 Southern Resource Potential John Haiduk Geologic Manager CLR’s Upside: Southern Unrisked Resource Benefit of Stacked Plays Net Acres⁽¹⁾ Potential Net Wells Net Unrisked Resource Potential (MMBoe) 9,000 27 4 Springer 195,000 414 447 Caney 70,000 430 160 Meramec “STACK” 102,000 454 507 NW Cana Woodford 45,000 360 475 Woodford 451,000 4,330 3,143 Hunton 13,000 20 30 Totals 885,000 6,035 4,766 Penn. Sands (1) Acreage total is for combined resource prospective areas. 88 New Ventures Exploration New Ventures Exploration Driven Commitment to Innovation Tony Barrett Geologic Manager CLR – Exploration Driven Organic Growth Through Science, Technology, and Innovation Focus on Unconventional Reservoirs Bakken, MT • City of Enid wells—OK (1984) Bakken/Three Forks, ND Red River • CLR shifts to oil (1985) • Ames Hole—OK (1991) • Red River⁽¹⁾—ND (1995) • Bakken—MT (2003) • Bakken⁽²⁾/Three Forks—ND (2004) Ames Hole Anadarko Woodford • Arkoma Woodford—OK (2006) City of Enid Wells Arkoma Woodford SCOOP: Woodford and Springer • Anadarko Woodford—OK (2008) • SCOOP Woodford—OK (2012) • SCOOP Springer—OK (2013) ( 1 ) F i r s t o i l f i e l d i n t h e U . S . t o b e d e v e l o p e d e x c l u s i v e l y w i t h h o r i zo n t a l d r i l l i n g (2) Drilled first commercially successful well in the North Dakota Bakken to be both h o r i zo n t a l l y d r i l l e d a n d f r a c t u r e s t i m u l a t e d 91 Growing our Exploration Portfolio Investor and Analyst Day 2012 Active Exploration Projects 2014 Active Exploration Projects Project Expected Product CLR Net Acres Project Expected Product CLR Net Acres Stealth A Gas/Oil 5,000 Stealth 1 Oil 30,000 Stealth B Gas/Oil 8,970 Stealth 2 Gas/Oil 140,000 Stealth C Oil 30,500 Stealth 3 (New) Oil/Gas 130,000 Stealth D Oil/Gas 17,200 Stealth 4 (New) Oil 15,000 Stealth E Oil 25,000 Stealth 5 Oil 153,000 Stealth F Gas/Oil 23,500 Stealth 6 (New) Gas/Oil 54,000 110,170 Stealth 7 Oil 17,000 2012 Total Leasehold 2014 Total Leasehold 539,000 5X growth in leasehold position in two years! 92 Continental’s Commitment to Exploration and Innovation Continues • Committed to organic growth through the drill bit in our core areas and in our New Ventures Exploration programs • Continuously adding the right staff and experience to grow our exploration programs ̶ ̶ 2012: 8 total New Ventures Exploration staff 2014: 24 total New Ventures Exploration staff • Currently pursuing seven New Ventures projects with >500,000 net acres of committed leasehold outside of our core areas • 100% of all new projects are horizontal targets in unconventional reservoirs • Always enhancing our technical understanding of unconventional plays with the acquisition of advanced data sets and analysis 93 Finance Financial Strategy Financial Update Supporting Strong Margins Capital Efficiency Budget 2014-2015 Guidance John Hart Senior Vice President, CFO and Treasurer Financial Strategy • Financial framework built for long-term value generation: – Strong entrepreneurial spirit – Exploration-focus – Leader in oil and liquids focused asset basins • Maintain production mix of 68% to 70% oil in each year of five year plan • 80+% liquids when including natural gas liquids • Exceptional, disciplined growth with multi-decade oil-weighted inventory • Investment grade, pure-play E&P company – Low leverage – Ample liquidity and flexibility – Industry leading financial metrics 96 YTD Operational & Financial Highlights • 2Q14 production of 167,953 Boe per day – • • On track to achieve 27% to 30% growth for 2014 – Mid-year 2014 proved reserves: 1.2B Boe • – Up 31% over mid-year 2013 1H 2014 EBITDAX of $1.6B Up from $1.3B (24%) for 1H 2013 Marketing strategy and opex focus drive strong cash margin – 75% cash margin ($55.84 per Boe) for 1H 2014 Production (Boe per day) EBITDAX ($MM) 180,000 167,953 160,000 120,000 $2,000 $1,500 80,000 61,865 60,000 37,324 $1,643 $1,304 $1,000 43,318 $811 $500 20,000 0 $2,840 $1,963 97,583 100,000 40,000 2Q EBITDAX 1H14 EBITDAX FY EBITDAX $2,500 135,919 140,000 $3,000 $708 $451 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2Q 2014 $0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 $868 2Q14 1H14 See appendix for reconciliation of net income and operating cash flows to EBITDAX. 97 Oil & Gas Marketing: Supporting Strong Margins • Significant takeaway, gathering and processing infrastructure exists in the Bakken and SCOOP with additional expansion underway – Bakken • New long-haul pipe to be in service 2H14 (Pony Express) with additional pipeline additions expected • Continued portfolio approach to maximize value – SCOOP • • • • Embedded regional gathering system in place 100+ HP of new gathering compression facilities being added in 2014 and 2015 100+ miles of header/expansion pipe to be in place by YE2014 Enable currently constructing incremental ~1Bcf per day of SCOOP processing capacity by March 2017 • Continental is well positioned with a competitive advantage in our primary plays due to the scale of our operations • Strong corporate focus on marketing to generate strong margins; among industry leaders 98 Cost Discipline Driving Excellent Margins ($ per Boe) $80 • Strong/stable cash margins(1) $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 Cash Margin $53.52 Cash Margin $55.45 Cash Margin $55.84 74% 74% 75% 75% $3.95 $2.38 $5.58 $4.74 $2.07 $6.02 $4.74 $2.08 $4.73 $2.24 $6.32 $6.10 $5.49 $5.69 $5.50 $5.62 2012 2013 2Q2014 1H2014 Cash Margin $48.59 $20 $10 $0 Production Expense P/S Tax & Other G&A(2) Interest • Margin scales as costs remain flat • Strong oil price and cost focus continues to drive excellent margins Cash Margin (1) See “Continuing to Deliver Excellent Margins” in the Appendix for the method of calculating cash margin.. (2) Excludes G&A related to Equity based compensation and relocation expense. 99 Capital Efficiency Recycle Ratio – Industry Leader⁽¹⁾ Gas weighted(2) Oil weighted • Recycle Ratio = Cash margin/3 yr F&D per Boe 5.0x • Exploration leadership enables low finding and development costs 4.5x 4.5x 4.2x • Efficient operator - evidenced by low operating costs per Boe 4.0x 4.0x • Oil and liquids focused, generating high margins 3.5x 3.3x 3.0x 2.7x 2.4x 2.5x 2.3x 2.1x 2.0x 1.5x 1.5x 0.9x 1.0x 0.8x 0.5x 0.2x 0.0x CLR RRC COG DNR KOG CXO Avg Large Cap Peers APC WLL SD CHK DVN PXD Avg Small/Mid Cap Peers (1) Source: KeyBanc, 8/11/2014 (2) Source: KeyBanc, 8/11/2014 – “Gas weighted” are those peers whose 2013 YE Reserves are greater than 50% gas 100 2014 Production Growth vs Market Cap 80% Lower Market Capitalization YoY Production Growth(1) 70% CLR 2012 60% 50% CLR 2014 27% to 30% Growth(2) $27B to $30B Market cap AREX 40% KOG OAS CLR 2007 17% Growth $4B Market cap 30% NFX 20% COG XEC WLL CLR 2010 CLR 2007 SWN NBL MUR MRO DVN QEP $0 $10 1) 2) APC PXD CHK LPI SD 0% RRC EQT CXO SM UPL DNR 10% CLR 2014 $20 $30 Market Cap($B)(1) APA $40 For companies other than CLR, based on 08/28/14 Market Cap and Consensus Estimates for 2014 production growth CLR 2014 updated guidance $50 Lower Growth $60 101 3.8x 4.4x 4.7x MRO 6.0x CHK 4.7x 6.1x DVN APA 6.2x NFX 5.0x 6.2x QEP AREX 6.5x OAS 6.0x 5.7x 6.5x 6.8x DNR SWN 7.0x SD 6.7x 7.0x WLL EOG 7.2x 7.5x KOG XEC 7.6x UPL 8.7x LPI 7.9x 8.8x 9.7x CLR 9.0x CXO 9.9x COG 10.5x 12.3x PXD 3.0x $10Bn+ Market Cap & 15%+ Production CAGR MUR SM APC NBL EQT - RRC Enterprise Value / 2014E EBITDAX 12.0x 2X Multiple Compression Strong Stock Price Catalyst CLR 2015 multiple at 7.9x CLR 11.5x 12.5x 13.5x FANG ATHL 13.6x 15.0x AR CLR Valuation Industry Competitors Source: Company filings, research reports, and FactSet as of 9/5/14. As prepared by Bank of America Merrill Lynch 102 Strong Liquidity and Financial Profile Financial Ratios and Ratings Agency Net Debt/2Q Annualized EBITDAX⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾ 1.55x Leveraged Cash Margin (1H14)⁽³⁾ $55.84 Moody's Baa3 Net Debt/June 30 Proved Reserves(1) $4.47 3 Year All-in F&D ($/Boe) (YE13) $12.61 S&P BBB- $30,351 3 Year Avg. Recycle Ratio (YE13) 4.5x Net Debt/June Daily Production(1) Investment Grade Debt Maturities Summary 2500 5% 2000 ($MM) Credit Ratings 4.5% 1500 1000 500 Undrawn No maturities in five year plan $1,750 7.375% $200 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 4.9% $1,500 7.125% 0 3.8% $2,000 $1,000 $400 2019 2020 2021 2022 Credit Facility 06/30/14 Callable 10/1/2015 Callable 4/1/2016 Callable 3/15/2017 (1) Pro forma for 7/11/14 redemption of $300 million of 8.25% senior notes due 2019. (2) See appendix for reconciliation of net income and operating cash flows to EBITDAX. (3) See “Continuing to Deliver Excellent Margins” in the Appendix for the method of calculating cash margin. 2023 2024 $700 2044 103 Track Record of Success 9% CLR Bond Yield BB Index YTW BBB Index 8.375% 8.360% Investment Grade 7.500% 8% 7.125% 6.900% 7% 6.460% 6.070% 5.330% 6% May 2014 Inaugural IG Offerings 10 Year 3.8% ($1B) 30 Year 4.9% ($700mm) 5.000% 5.180% 4.500% 5.000% 5% 4.240% 4.625% 4.490% 4.350% 3.843% 4.060% 4% 3.720% 3.330% $685MM equity offering in March 2011 3% CLR Ratings: 3.560% Sep-09 Mar-10 Sep-10 Mar-12 Aug-12 Apr-13 $300 MM $200 MM $400 MM $800 MM $1.2 B $1.5 B $1.0 B B1/BB B1/BB Ba2/BB+ Ba2/BB+ Ba2/BB+ Baa3/BBB- B2/BB Redeemed July 2014 May-14 104 Five Year Plan Update MBoe per day 350 300 250 Five Year Plan Announced in October 2012 Goal 300 MBoe Per day by YE2017 200 150 100 50 98 MBoe per day 130 MBoe per day 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 105 On Track to Reach 3X Target 1 Year Early MBoe per day 350 300 250 200 150 136 100 50 0 Reach 300 MBoe per day in late 2016 175 98 MBoe per day 2012 (1) 130 2013 2014 Original 5 Year Plan (1) Midpoint of guidance range 2015 2016 2017 Updated 5 Year Plan 106 2014 Capital Expenditures Budget Total Capital Expenditures ($4.55B) $140 MM Other Drilling Leasehold $300 MM • Accelerating 2014 to capture value Other $165 MM • Bakken: Enhanced completions • SCOOP: Springer Oil Development (~100% ROR) –catalyst for acceleration SCOOP Drilling $1,095 MM Bakken Drilling $2,850 MM Expected 2014 Exit Rate ~200,000 Boe per day Average operated rigs Net wells 45 375 107 2015 Capital Expenditures Budget Total Capital Expenditures ($5.2B) Other Drilling $180 MM Leasehold $300 MM SCOOP Drilling $1,450 MM Continuing value acceleration in Bakken and SCOOP Other $240 MM Average Operated Rigs Bakken Operated 22 204 SCOOP Operated 29 100 Other Operated 2 20 n/a 84 53 408 Outside Operated Bakken Drilling $3,030 MM Net Wells Totals 108 Annual Guidance 2014 2015 27% to 30% 26% to 32% $4.55B $5.2B $5.60 to $6.00 $5.50 to $6.00 8% to 8.5% 7.5% to 8.5% G&A expense per Boe $2.00 to $2.50 $2.25 to $2.75 Non-cash equity compensation per Boe $0.70 to $0.90 $0.75 to $0.95 $20.00 to $22.50 $20.00 to $22.50 ($8.00) to ($11.00) ($9.00) to ($11.00) +$1.00 to $1.50 +$1.00 to $1.50 Income tax rate 37% 37% Deferred taxes 90% to 95% 90% to 95% Production growth (YOY) Capital expenditures (non-acquisition) Operating Expenses: Production expense per Boe Production tax (% of oil & gas revenue) DD&A per Boe Average Price Differentials: NYMEX WTI crude oil (per barrel of oil) Henry Hub natural gas (per Mcf) * Bold items above in guidance denote a change from the previous disclosure. This is the first time 2015 guidance has been released. 109 Summary • CLR has done an outstanding job managing growth – Industry leading, oil concentrated growth with cost discipline – Track record of adding value through Exploration • Bakken • SCOOP • Springer – Strong balance sheet providing strategic flexibility – Exceptional capital efficiency – 300,000 Boe per day production by YE 2016 – a year ahead of schedule under our current 5 year plan Goal: Rapidly bring value forward while maintaining Investment Grade balance sheet 110 Continuing to Deliver Excellent Margins Realized oil price ($/Bbl) Realized natural gas price ($/Mcf) Oil production (Bopd) Natural gas production (Mcfpd) Total production (Boepd) 2012 $84.59 $3.73 68,497 174,521 97,583 2013 $89.93 $4.87 95,859 240,355 135,919 2Q2014 $92.31 $5.43 116,441 309,074 167,953 1H2014 $91.12 $6.20 111,447 292,847 160,255 EBITDAX ($000's) (1) $1,963,123 $2,839,510 $867,938 $1,643,345 Average oil equivalent price (excludes derivatives) $65.99 $72.04 $74.09 $74.53 Production expense Production tax and other G&A (3) Interest Total cash costs $5.49 $5.58 $2.38 $3.95 $17.40 $5.69 $6.02 $2.07 $4.74 $18.52 $5.50 $6.32 $2.08 $4.74 $18.64 $5.62 $6.10 $2.24 $4.73 $18.69 Cash margin Cash margin % $48.59 74% $53.52 74% $55.45 75% $55.84 75% Key Operational Statistics (per Boe) (2) 1) 2) 3) See “EBITDAX Reconciliation to GAAP” in Appendix for a reconciliation of GAAP net income and operating cash flows to EBITDAX. Average costs per Boe have been computed using sales volumes and exclude any effect of derivative transactions. Excludes G&A related to Equity based compensation and relocation expense. 111 EBITDAX Reconciliation to GAAP The following tables provide reconciliations of our net income and operating cash flows to EBITDAX for the periods presented: In thousands Net income Interest expense Provision for income taxes Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion Property impairments Exploration expenses Impact from derivative instruments: Total (gain) loss on derivatives, net Total cash received (paid), net Non-cash (gain) loss on derivatives, net Non-cash equity compensation EBITDAX $ In thousands Net cash provided by operating activities Current income tax provision Interest expense Exploration expenses, excluding dry hole costs Gain (loss) on sale of assets, net Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation Other, net Changes in assets and liabilities EBITDAX 2009 372,986 2,551 23,232 6,138 709 2,872 (3,890) 46,050 $ 450,648 $ $ 2009 71,338 23,232 38,670 207,602 83,694 12,615 1,520 569 2,089 11,408 450,648 $ 2010 168,255 53,147 90,212 243,601 64,951 12,763 $ 2011 429,072 76,722 258,373 390,899 108,458 27,920 $ 2012 739,385 140,708 415,811 692,118 122,274 23,507 $ 2013 764,219 235,275 448,830 965,645 220,508 34,947 2Q2014 1H2014 $ 103,538 $ 329,772 72,841 135,816 60,808 193,675 326,871 599,732 79,316 137,524 11,205 16,018 262,524 302,198 (64,143) (97,407) 198,381 204,791 14,978 26,017 867,938 $ 1,643,345 130,762 35,495 166,257 11,691 810,877 30,049 (34,106) (4,057) 16,572 $ 1,303,959 (154,016) (45,721) (199,737) 29,057 $ 1,963,123 191,751 (61,555) 130,196 39,890 $ 2,839,510 2010 $ 653,167 12,853 53,147 9,739 29,588 5,230 (3,513) 50,666 $ 810,877 2011 $ 1,067,915 13,170 76,722 19,971 20,838 -(4,606) 109,949 $ 1,303,959 2012 $ 1,632,065 10,517 140,708 22,740 136,047 15,618 (7,587) 13,015 $ 1,963,123 2013 $ 2,563,295 6,209 235,275 25,597 88 -(1,829) 10,875 $ 2,839,510 $ $ 2Q2014 1H2014 $ 741,791 $ 1,432,453 1,552 3,104 72,841 135,816 6,822 11,635 2,135 (6,363) --(1,309) (11,317) 44,106 78,017 $ 867,938 $ 1,643,345 112