Independent Forest Audit Report - Lac Seul Forest

Transcription

Independent Forest Audit Report
for the Lac Seul Forest
for the Period April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2011
Prepared by:
John Cary R.P.F.
Dr. Rob Foster
Isabel Gannon R.P.F.
Craig Robinson R.P.F.
Andy Purton R.P.F.
Matthew Hollands R.P.F., M.B.A.
© Queen’s Printer for Ontario 2012
Front cover photos of caribou habitat by:
Dr. Robert F. Foster
Northern Bioscience
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Final Audit Report
2011 Lac Seul Forest Independent Forest Audit
Contents
1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 5
2.0 Table of Recommendations and Best Practices .................................................................................... 7
3.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1 Audit Process ................................................................................................................................... 10
3.2 Management Unit Description ........................................................................................................ 10
3.3 Current Issues.................................................................................................................................. 13
3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit ................................................................................. 13
4.0 Audit Findings ...................................................................................................................................... 14
4.1 Commitment ................................................................................................................................... 14
4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement ............................................................................ 14
4.2.1 Local Citizens Committee ......................................................................................................... 14
4.2.2 Aboriginal Involvement ............................................................................................................ 14
4.2.3 Issue Resolution and Individual Environmental Assessments ................................................. 15
4.3 Forest Management Planning ......................................................................................................... 15
4.3.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 15
4.3.2 Planning and Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 15
4.3.3 Caribou Mosaic......................................................................................................................... 16
4.3.4 Forest Inventory ....................................................................................................................... 17
4.3.5 Trend Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 17
4.3.6 Long-Term Management Direction .......................................................................................... 20
4.4 Plan Assessment and Implementation............................................................................................ 20
4.4.1 Areas of Concern ...................................................................................................................... 20
4.4.2 Harvest ..................................................................................................................................... 20
4.4.3 Renewal .................................................................................................................................... 22
4.4.4 Tending and Protection ............................................................................................................ 25
4.4.5 Renewal Support ...................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.6 Access ....................................................................................................................................... 25
4.5 System Support ............................................................................................................................... 26
4.6 Monitoring ...................................................................................................................................... 26
4.7 Achievement of Management Objectives and Forest Sustainability .............................................. 27
4.7.1 RPFO and/or Year Ten Annual Reports .................................................................................... 28
4.7.2 Assessment of Objective Achievement .................................................................................... 31
4.7.3 Conclusions Regarding Sustainability of the Crown Forest...................................................... 31
4.8 Contractual Obligations................................................................................................................... 32
4.9 Conclusions and Recommendations on Future Licence Actions .................................................... 33
Appendix 1 –Recommendations and Best Practices................................................................................... 34
Appendix 2 – Management Objectives Table ............................................................................................. 46
Appendix 3 – Compliance with Contractual Obligations ............................................................................ 55
Appendix 4 – Audit Process ........................................................................................................................ 58
A4.1 Audit Purpose and Principles ........................................................................................................ 58
A4.2 Audit Process ................................................................................................................................ 59
A4.3 Field Sampling ............................................................................................................................... 59
A4.4 Summary of Consultations and Aboriginal Involvement .............................................................. 61
Appendix 5 – List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................... 65
3|Page
Final Audit Report
Appendix 6 – Audit Team Members and Qualifications ............................................................................. 66
A.6.1 Auditor Biographies ..................................................................................................................... 66
List of Figures
Figure 1. Lac Seul Forest............................................................................................................................. 10
Figure 2. Forest unit distribution of the Lac Seul Forest as presented in the 2011-2021 Forest
Management Plan. ...................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 3. Forest age class distribution of the Lac Seul Forest. .................................................................... 12
Figure 4. Planned and actual annualized harvest area for the Lac Seul Forest between 1991 and 2011...18
Figure 5. Planned vs. actual annualized volume (m3) by planning term from 1991 to 2011...................... 18
Figure 6. Example of snag retention observed on the Lac Seul Forest. ...................................................... 21
Figure 7. Felled and bundled trees unskidded in IFA Block 11 along Root Bay after harvest. ................... 22
Figure 8. The appearance of localized rutting in IFA Block 51. ................................................................... 23
Figure 9. A heavy residual hardwood canopy that will interfere with future conifer renewal tending
efforts.......................................................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 10. Example of white birch renewal treatment risking failure due to a lack of site preparation.... 24
Figure 11. Creosote lumber bridge abutments left in place at a demobilized and rehabiltated bridge
crossing. ...................................................................................................................................................... 26
Figure 12. Changes in the southern continuous distribution line (“Caribou Line”) for application of
caribou mosaic on the Lac Seul Forest for successive forest management plans in relation to OMNR
Cervid Ecological Zones (CEZ). .................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 13. Lac Seul First Nation in relation to caribou mosaic Block 36 and the Lac Seul First Nation
Forestry Planning Area. ............................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 14. Hazel and alder competition occupying a white birch renewal effort. ..................................... 43
List of Tables
Table 1. Proportion of the actual area harvested that received a silviculture treatment between 1991
and 2011 on the Lac Seul Forest. ................................................................................................................ 19
Table 2. Proportion of natural and artificial renewal treatments on the Lac Seul Forest between 1991
and 2011 ..................................................................................................................................................... 19
Table 3. Comparison of McKenzie Forest Products Inc. and MNR compliance report status during the
audit term. .................................................................................................................................................. 27
Table 4. Harvest area by forest unit for each plan term on the Lac Suel Forest....................................... 28
Table 5. Silviculture and regeneration success by forest unit on the Lac Seul Forest............................... 29
Table 6. Silviculture and regeneration success for areas of natural disturbance on the Lac Seul Forest...30
Table 7. Procedures audited by risk category.............................................................................................60
Table 8. Total area, sampling target, and actual area sampled as part of the IFA for the 2006 to 2011
forest management activities on the Lac Seul Forest. ................................................................................ 61
4|Page
Final Audit Report
1.0
Executive Summary
This Independent Forest Audit Report presents the findings of the 2011 Audit of the Lac Seul Forest,
which was a Sustainable Forest Licence managed by McKenzie Forest Products Inc. and administered by
the Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) Sioux Lookout District in northwestern Ontario. The audit
examined planning and operational activities during the five year period from April 1st 2006 to March
31st2011.
The audit findings resulted in nine recommendations of which seven are directed at District MNR and
the balance at Corporate MNR. The subjects of these recommendations are to address exceptions to
standards and also include calls for support.
The District is asked to seek MNR’s science support to better manage hardwood canopies especially in
the forest’s southern areas and deal with an aspect of its caribou management zone which may impact
forest management and First Nations. They should develop a new strategy to manage chipper debris
accumulation and evaluate and monitor decommissioned water crossings when leaving structures in
place. As well, some work is required to remove and utilize harvested wood near Lac Seul and lastly to
tend regenerating stands that are eligible for tending, but were not treated.
Corporate MNR is asked to provide, for forest management purposes, additional resources for the
identification of species-at-risk on the Lac Seul Forest and for the urgent production of the enhanced
forest resource inventory.
The auditor concludes that management of the Lac Seul Forest was in compliance with the legislation,
regulations and policies that were in effect during the audit term, except for the minor variances noted
in this report. The auditor also concludes that the Forest was managed in compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Sustainable Forest Licence formerly held by McKenzie Forest Products. Forest
sustainability is being achieved, as assessed through the Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol.
In the light of the surrender of the Sustainable Forest Licence by McKenzie Forest Products and the
subsequent actions taken by District MNR to place the Lac Seul Forest under a Forest Resource Licence,
the auditor agrees that District assume responsibility for the implementation of the Forest Management
Plan to ensure the Forest’s sustainability.
The auditor acknowledges that the Crown, at its discretion in the future, may use the appropriate
arrangements at its disposal to delegate and assign responsibilities to third parties as part of
implementation of its action plan.
The auditor recognizes and underscores that, at the time of this report; the District MNR is the sole
steward with responsibility for forest management of the Lac Seul Forest.
The auditor wishes to point out that McKenzie Forest Products Inc. announced its bankruptcy April 26,
2011 and was in receivership for the duration of the audit process. The McKenzie Forest Products
trustee in receivership relinquished the Sustainable Forest Licence and transferred it to the District MNR
in March 2012.
In addition to this situation, TECO Natural Resource Group Limited, which was awarded the
responsibility to conduct the audit, announced their bankruptcy immediately after the field site visit in
5|Page
Final Audit Report
September 2011. The audit responsibility was then transferred to John Cary R.P.F. by the receiver in
February 2012 which then permitted the team to prepare and complete the audit report.
With the relinquishment of the SFL to the Crown and the Forest being issued a local Forest Resource
Licence, MNR’s Sioux Lookout District takes on the overall responsibility for planning and operations on
the Lac Seul Forest.
The auditor’s agreement with this course of action entrusts that MNR takes the necessary actions and
acts as the steward of this Forest.
John Cary R.P.F
Lead Auditor
October 2012
6|Page
Final Audit Report
2.0
Table of Recommendations and Best Practices
Conclusion and Recommendation on Future Licence Actions
regulations and policies that were in effect during the audit term, except for the minor variances noted in
this report. The auditor also concludes that the Forest was managed in compliance with the terms and
conditions of the Sustainable Forest Licence formerly held by McKenzie Forest Products. Forest
Sustainability is being achieved, as assessed through the Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol.
In the light of the surrender of the Sustainable Forest Licence by McKenzie Forest Products and the
subsequent actions taken by District MNR to place the Lac Seul Forest under a Forest Resource Licence,
the audit team agrees that District MNR assume responsibility for the implementation of the Forest
Management Plan to ensure the Forest’s sustainability.
The auditor recognizes that the Crown, at its discretion in the future, may use the appropriate
implementation of its action plan to address the recommendations of this audit report.
The auditor also recognizes and underscores that, at the time of this report, the District MNR is the sole
steward with responsibility for forest management of the Lac Seul Forest.
Best Practice
Best Practice - McKenzie Forest Products is recognized for excellence in its overall implementation of its
post-harvest assessment program and its highly refined effort to prescribe and develop silvicultural
ground rules best suited to the specific collection of micro-sites present within the forest complex to
effectively establish appropriate conifer regeneration.
Recommendations Directed to District MNR
Recommendation 2 – District MNR should designate Block #36 as an Adaptive Management Zone block,
or use another designation that permits forest management on a flexible timeline that is appropriate to
support the Lac Seul First Nation community and its economic development initiatives.
Recommendation 4 - District MNR shall ensure that the skid bundles left in the Independent Forest Audit
Block 11 along Root Bay are removed and the land treated silviculturally to minimize the loss of
productive land and to recover Crown dues.
Recommendation 5 - District MNR shall monitor the implementation of the strategies to manage chipper
debris contained in the 2011 Forest Management Plan to determine their efficacy in minimizing the loss
of productive land and to ensure that effective silviculture occurs.
Recommendation 6 - District MNR shall work with appropriate science support to develop effective
prescriptions to manage residual hardwood canopies that may affect forest renewal.
Recommendation 7 - District MNR shall consult the appropriate science support to develop a Silvicultural
Ground Rule to regenerate white birch dominated stands and to examine the costs of an acceptable
7|Page
Final Audit Report
silvicultural treatment of these hardwood dominated sites within a conifer complex while considering
their conversion in the caribou management zone.
Recommendation 8 - District MNR shall ensure that all eligible stands from 2008 onwards are tended by
the end of 2013.
Recommendation 9 - District MNR should carefully evaluate long-term environmental liability when
decommissioning water crossings, particularly when leaving culverts or other structures in situ.
Recommendations Directed to Corporate MNR
Recommendation 1 - Corporate MNR should provide sufficient resources to conduct additional inventory
and monitoring of forest-dependent species at risk to adequately support forest management planning
on the Lac Seul Forest.
Recommendation 3 – Corporate MNR should place a high priority on the completion of the new
enhanced Forest Resource Inventory for the Lac Seul Forest, so that it will be available for the
preparatory work and input to the 2016 forest management plan.
8|Page
Final Audit Report
3.0
Introduction
This audit report presents the results of the 2011 Lac Seul Forest independent forest audit (IFA). The IFA
process is guided and directed by the 2011 Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol (IFAPP). The
IFAPP document forms the basis by which the auditor assesses the conformance and compliance of the
auditees in their undertaking of forest management on the Lac Seul Forest against provincial regulations
and requirements. The five years of management implementation from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2011
are of specific interest to the auditor. Additionally, the auditor is to consider the forest management
planning process and development of the 2011-2021 forest management plan (FMP) for the Lac Seul
Forest.
The audit preparation, its plan, and the site visit was carried out by an audit team directed by TECO
Natural Resource Group Limited (TECO) (formerly Timberline) in compliance with Ontario Regulation
160/04 of the Crown Forest Sustainability Act (CFSA) and the conditions of the Class Environmental
Assessment Approval for Forest Management on Crown Lands in Ontario (2003). Information on the
audit team and the role of each auditor is presented in Appendix 6 of this report.
TECO declared bankruptcy on October 5, 2011, with the assets of the firm then being held by the trustee
(The Bowra Group Inc.). All work by the audit team ceased at this time. Through negotiation between
the trustee, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR), and a co-lead auditor, responsibility for the
audit was assigned and transferred to John Cary R.P.F. in February 2012. This action allowed the audit
team to complete the analysis and reporting portion of the audit.
During the audit term, the Lac Seul Forest was managed under Sustainable Forest Licence (SFL) #542455
held by McKenzie Forest Products Inc., a subsidiary company of the Buchanan Group of companies, who
operated a local sawmill at Hudson, Ontario. In support of the administration of the SFL, McKenzie
Forest Products Inc. employed Green Forest Management Inc. for forest management plan development
and administration. Buchanan Woodlands Inc. was also hired with responsibility for implementation of
forest operations, including regeneration, maintenance, and protection activities, and ensuring delivery
of wood products to McKenzie Forest Products Inc. and other area mills.
McKenzie Forest Products filed for bankruptcy protection on April 26, 2011. BDO Canada Ltd. was
appointed as the trustee in receivership. In March 2012, the trustee surrendered the SFL to the MNR
and MNR assumed responsibility for managing the Forest. The Lac Seul Forest shown in Figure 1 is now
administered by the Sioux Lookout District of MNR’s Northwestern Region.
A Forest Resource Licence (FRL) has been issued by MNR to Obishikokaang Resource Corporation, an
economic development company of the Lac Seul First Nation. The auditor understands that, through this
FRL, the Lac Seul Forest FMP will be implemented. Additionally, the response to the final audit report
and the preparation and implementation of the action plan will occur through this licence arrangement.
For the purposes of this report and despite the surrender of its SFL, McKenzie Forest Products Inc., its
supporting businesses, overlapping licencees, and the Sioux Lookout District of MNR were considered as
the auditees of this IFA.
9|Page
Final Audit Report
Figure 1. The Lac Seul Forest.
3.1 Audit Process
The audit process involved a pre-audit meeting (May 9, 2011 in Sioux Lookout), the collection and
review of supporting documentation, a week of field visits (September 12-16, 2011) in Sioux Lookout
and on the Lac Seul Forest, and the preparation and submission of the audit report. Sites visited during
the audit were selected as part of the pre-audit meeting. Input from stakeholders, review of documents
and records, and observations of the implementation of forest management activities on the Lac Seul
Forest were compiled and considered by the audit team in the preparation of preliminary findings
presented at the closing meeting and incorporated into the final report.
The principles by which the audit is undertaken and the sampling results are presented in detail in
Appendix 4.
3.2 Management Unit Description
The Lac Seul Forest is located within the Sioux Lookout District in MNR’s Northwest Region and is a little
over 1.0 million ha in size. Crown land, that may be available for forest management, accounts for 74%
of this area, with the balance attributed to other Crown land which includes those lands reserved for
10 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
provincial parks and protected areas. Water accounts for approximately one-quarter of the total area
within the Lac Seul Forest. Lac Seul and its bays, fingers, and tributary waterways defines access and
land use throughout the central and southwestern portions of the Forest.
The communities of Sioux Lookout and Hudson are found in the south-central portion of the Forest
accessed by Highway 72 and Highway 662, respectively, and the Canadian National main rail line.
The forest landscape is dominated by conifer ecosystems. The southern portion of the Forest has
experienced fire suppression and timber extraction for a longer period than the northern portion of the
Forest. However, modern silviculture has only been actively applied during the past 15 to 20 years.
Consequently, the southern portion of the Forest has a greater proportion of mixedwood forest units
and a higher prominence of balsam fir than the northern part.
The northern portion shows two distinctive forest unit patterns. North of Sioux Lookout, the Forest is
dominated by conifers with two bands of spruce-dominated forest units split through the centre by an
earlier succession, jack pine-dominated forest. Other conifer, white and red pine, balsam fir, and poplar
forest units are relatively minor in comparison to the conifer and mixedwood forest units. Figure 2
shows the proportion of each forest unit.
Figure 2. Forest unit distribution for the Lac Seul Forest as presented
in the 2011 to 2021 forest management plan.
Source: 2011-2021 Lac Seul Forest FMP
Figure 3 presents the age class structure of all forest units combined. The age class distribution of the
Forest shows a reduced area in the 21-40 year class. This gap is consistent across all forest units except
COMX2 and BFDOM which reflect an area relatively equal to the next older age class. Wildfire control
implemented in the region during the past 40 years has limited the extent of natural disturbance during
this time. The spike in forest area in the 0-20 age class reflects the increase in forest utilization for wood
products and a large forest fire in 2003.
11 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 3. Forest age class distribution of the Lac Seul Forest.
Source: 2011-2021 Lac Seul FMP
The allowable harvest from the forest is approximately 600,000 m3 annually. Nearly 85% of this available
volume is conifer. During the audit term however, the forest generated only 10% of its forecast Crown
dues. The economic downturn and mill closures during the audit term had a significant impact on the
amount of area and volume harvested. Deliveries to facilities in other communities, such as Dryden,
became extremely important since the mill in Hudson remained closed during the last three years of the
audit term.
The economic impact of the forest greatly benefited the communities of Sioux Lookout, Hudson, and Lac
Seul First Nation. Prior to the shutdown of the McKenzie Forest Products Inc. mill in Hudson, it was
reported that 78% of the wood harvested from the Lac Seul Forest was processed there. A number of
overlapping licences are active on the Lac Seul Forest, with operators and licencees from the former Lac
Seul Forest Management Agreement, Abitibi-Sioux Lookout Crown Management Unit, and the Sioux
Lookout Crown Management Unit. These licences were administered by the SFL holder when the Crown
management unit was amalgamated with the Lac Seul Forest several years ago.
Caribou habitat management drives forest management on the northern portion of the Forest. The
Caribou Conservation Plan and redefinition of the southern extent of the area affected by caribou was
introduced late in the planning term for development of the 2011-2021 FMP. Tourism is also a
significant influence on forest management decision-making.
12 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
3.3 Current Issues
The IFAPP requires the auditor to consider high priority issues identified by the auditees. The following
five themes were identified by the SFL holder and district MNR for investigation during the audit.
1. Application of Caribou Management: Auditees and stakeholders alike mentioned incorporation
of caribou management and the caribou recovery strategy in response to requirements under
the species at risk legislation as concerns affecting forest management on the Lac Seul Forest.
Concerns were expressed about:
a. viability of harvest opportunities and the quality of caribou habitat several decades from
now when strategies result in harvest allocations in older age classes. Probable changes
in the biological function of the forest and forest succession dynamics will influence
wood quality and stand structure.
b. loss of forest access
c. restriction or constrained access to local resources for economic development and
community use
2. Planning Direction Processes: Concern was expressed regarding the timing of direction received
during the forest management planning process. Specific impacts were experienced during plan
development with planning for road decommissioning, the Caribou Conservation Plan, caribou
habitat regulation, and application of the Landscape Guide.
3. Utilization: Changes in fibre demand and forest industry economic challenges resulted in a
change in wood flow and the overall demand for fibre during the audit term. Concerns were
expressed regarding hardwood utilization during the audit term. In addition, chipping activities
increased during the audit term potentially leading to different forest monitoring and
compliance issues that were previously not encountered on the Forest.
4. Issue Resolution: A few tourism agreements were finalized during the audit term; however the
issue resolution process impacted or caused delay for some aspects of the forest management
planning schedule for the 2011-2021 FMP.
5. First Nations: Each community within the Lac Seul Forest expressed concerns specific to their
area. An operational concern was also expressed about the open-ended period for First Nation
comment and the impact on the timing of operations for administrative amendment requests.
3.4 Summary of Consultation and Input to Audit
Several types of media were used to consult with stakeholders and gain input to the audit. These
consisted of notice letters, newspaper ads, an on-line survey on the TECO website, and direct calls to
specific stakeholders. The auditor made presentations and held discussions with the Local Citizens
Committee (LCC). Contact and discussion also occurred with several overlapping licencees.
Notice of the audit was also issued by the MNR Native Liaison Officer following discussion with the
auditor to facilitate contact between the auditor and the two First Nations that fall within the
boundaries of the Lac Seul Forest.
More detailed information concerning the consultations for the audit is presented in Appendix 4.
13 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
4.0
Audit Findings
This section of the report presents the findings of the auditor. Further details for each recommendation
are found in Appendix 1.
4.1 Commitment
The commitment principle was deemed to be met since the Lac Seul Forest is certified under the
Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) standard. The Company confirmed that the annual surveillance
audits required to maintain the certification were completed.
4.2 Public Consultation and Aboriginal Involvement
The public consultation process and the efforts to include First Nations in the forest management
process were found to have been implemented as required. Public consultation opportunities were
provided during the development of the FMP, plan amendments, and annual work schedules as per the
Forest Management Planning Manual for Ontario’s Crown Forests (2009) (FMPM). Additionally,
opportunities were afforded to the public to initiate the issue resolution process or request an individual
environmental assessment. Public participation is discussed further in Appendix 4.
4.2.1 Local Citizens Committee
The auditor determined that the LCC functioned as required. Changes made during the audit term to
address recommendations from the previous audit were considered by the Committee to have been
effective. Members of the LCC believed that they were more actively involved in the planning for the Lac
Seul Forest 2011-2021 FMP compared to previous FMPs.
The auditor noted that the brief statement of agreement or disagreement with the FMP from the LCC
was not included in the main text on Page V of the Lac Seul Forest 2011-2021 FMP, as required in the
FMPM (page B-11). The auditor acknowledges this omission but does not consider it as significant and
notes that the statement was completed and included in the supplemental documentation. The active
participation of the LCC was demonstrated by other means during the planning process and is discussed
further in Appendix 4.
4.2.2 Aboriginal Involvement
The MNR identified five aboriginal communities (Slate Falls First Nation, Lac Seul First Nation, Cat Lake
First Nation, Ojibway Nation of Saugeen, and Mishkeegogamang First Nation) with interests on, or
association with, the Lac Seul Forest landbase. Two of these communities are found within the
boundaries of the Forest; the communities and reserve lands of Lac Seul First Nation are located along
Lac Seul, west of the community of Hudson, and the Slate Falls First Nation community and reserve are
located in the northeast portion of the Forest.
A representative from both Slate Falls First Nation and Lac Seul First Nation were planning team
members for the 2011-2021 FMP. The auditor determined that the FMPM requirements for Aboriginal
consultation were effectively addressed and the District Manager prepared the Condition 34 Report as
required. Further discussion of the participation of First Nations in the forest management process is
discussed in Appendix 4.
14 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
A recommendation arose from this audit to allow the designation of a caribou mosaic block as an
Adaptive Management Zone to benefit the economic development initiatives of the Lac Seul First
Nation.
4.2.3 Issue Resolution and Individual Environmental Assessments
These issues were noted as high priority during development of the Lac Seul Forest IFA audit plan. The
auditor found that the public were appropriately informed of their right to initiate the issue resolution
process and request an individual environmental assessment related to the 2011-2021 FMP.
Where issue resolution was applied and individual environmental assessments undertaken, the
timelines and content of the process as directed by the FMPM were followed. Issues that arose during
FMP development were dealt with in a timely manner and the issues were addressed in the FMP. The
FMP was approved without undue delay, despite the challenges dealing with these requests posed for
the planning team and the forest stakeholders. The auditor felt the process worked as designed.
4.3 Forest Management Planning
4.3.1 General
The Lac Seul 2011-2021 FMP was appropriately prepared and met all the FMPM requirements. There
was representation from the LCC, overlapping licensees, and Aboriginal communities on the planning
team. The required analyses were conducted for forest cover, wildlife habitat, and disturbance
frequency and the socio-economic description was compiled. The development of the long-term
management direction contained the appropriate information (management considerations, base
model development, desired forest and benefits, objectives). The three mandatory management
assessments required by the Forest Resource Assessment Policy were examined in the FMP. Plan
objectives and indicators were well documented. Targets and desirable levels for objectives were found
to be moving towards their intended goals.
The planned operations and areas of concern (AOC) in the 2011-2021 FMP contained the appropriate
information, were well documented, and included the requirements from the Forest Management
Guide for Conserving Biodiversity at the Stand and Site Scales (2010) (Stand and Site Guide). Road
planning was consistent with the proposed management strategy and supported the development of
the Forest over time, including road decommissioning to support caribou and remote tourism strategies.
4.3.2 Planning and Species at Risk
The Lac Seul Forest 2011-2021 FMP has a comprehensive description of confirmed and potential species
at risk and adequately described existing forest-dependent, threatened species and how they might be
affected by forestry activities. The only species with habitat that could require protection under the
provincial Endangered Species Act are woodland caribou, wolverine, and whip-poor-will. Although the
list of species is complete and their basic habitat requirements are understood, the distribution of these
species and their habitat on the Lac Seul Forest are not specifically known. Recommendation 1
addresses this issue.
Caribou calving areas were identified and appropriate AOC prescriptions were developed and applied.
Habitat modelling was undertaken for woodland caribou, but there was inadequate survey effort to
confirm actual habitat use. This may limit the effectiveness of the caribou mosaic approach in protecting
critical habitats for caribou.
15 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
No surveys were undertaken for other threatened species at risk, including wolverine and whip-poorwill, nor were specific AOC prescriptions developed for these or Special Concern, forest-dependent
species.
Species at risk stewardship funding was used by McKenzie Forest Products Inc. to establish a pilot study
to examine chipper and slasher debris management and road decommissioning techniques to enhance
caribou habitat renewal on the Lac Seul Forest.
4.3.3 Caribou Mosaic
Since 1992, woodland caribou habitat on the Lac Seul Forest has been managed spatially using a
“caribou mosaic” approach, a pattern of planned forest harvest and deferral areas intended to ensure
the provision of sufficient tracts of caribou winter habitat on the landscape at all times. The southern
limit of the caribou mosaic on the Lac Seul Forest has progressively moved south since 1992.This reflects
an increased understanding of the existing use of the landscape by caribou rather than a southward
range expansion over this time period. As a result, 89% of the Lac Seul Forest is now managed using the
caribou mosaic compared to 72% in 1996 and only 37% in 1992. The southern edge of the mosaic is
now largely aligned with what is believed to be the southern limit of the continuously occupied range of
caribou and corresponds to the revised boundaries of the Churchill Range of the Caribou Conservation
Plan. It now encompasses a one km buffer along the southern shoreline of Lac Seul, including Reserve
Island adjacent to Lac Seul First Nation, designed to protected caribou calving sites on Lac Seul Islands.
The application of the caribou management program on the Forest has been identified as a high priority
issue. Caribou habitat management is viewed by the auditor as driving forest management on the Lac
Seul Forest. As on adjacent management units, the southern limit of the continuous distribution line
(Caribou Line) was extended for woodland caribou over the past several FMPs. The MNR reported that,
during this extension of the Caribou Line, managers were to apply management practices for caribouoccupied range for those portions of the range where an overlap existed. This applied to the extended
management strategies associated with CEZ C into CEZ B. The broad management direction to maintain
a moderate-to-high density moose population would be a lower level priority through the application of
the caribou habitat management in this area.
The Caribou Conservation Plan and redefinition of the southern extent of the area affected by caribou
were introduced late in the planning term for the 2011-2021 FMP. Through review of draft documents
and contact with regional MNR, the planning team was able to incorporate and refine its caribou
management strategies into the 2011-2021 FMP without causing a delay in plan approval.
The auditors found that 2011-2021 FMP Block 36 located northeast of the Lac Seul First Nation Reserve
could have better served that community if it were designated with a more flexible harvest time
horizon. The auditor believes that caribou habitat considerations may be met while accommodating
economic and community use opportunities near the reserve. Recommendation 2 is presented to
introduce flexibility into the application of the caribou mosaic for Block 36 adjacent to the Lac Seul First
Nation Reserve.
16 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
4.3.4 Forest Inventory
The audit team reviewed the use of the Forest Resources Inventory (FRI) in the preparation of the 20062011 and 2011-2021 FMPs. The state of the inventory is critical to the success of the forest modeling
exercise and to the ability to implement the results of the model on the ground over the
implementation of the FMP. The current Lac Seul forest inventory is from 1997. The auditors noted that
the current inventory poorly reflects the density of previously insect-killed balsam fir stands in the
southern portion of the Forest, and the inventory standard it was created with does not contain
information attributes of the digital FRI (eFRI) under production and scheduled for delivery late 2016.
The Lac Seul Forest is highly constrained by the caribou mosaic which controls harvest opportunities in
20 year blocks. Within that timeframe, the block is to be harvested, then the block is closed to further
disturbance until the next rotation. The current inventory, if used in the next FMP cycle, will
inadequately address the constraints posed by the caribou blocks. Forest stands of appropriate age and
yield must be available in the forest model to meet the needs of the caribou strategy and the economic
requirements of the timber harvest. Errors and inaccuracies in the current inventory will reveal
themselves when on the ground habitat constraints and the required timber volumes cannot be
achieved because appropriate stand types were not accurately reflected in the inventory.
(Recommendation 3)
4.3.5 Trend Analysis
The audit team reviewed the Trend Analysis as provided by McKenzie Forest Products Inc. in June 2011.
The report author corrected an error in the yield information detected by the auditor. Following this
revision, the yields from the 2006-2011 plan period were within 2% of the previous FMP period. The
analysis was prepared with the required elements from Appendix C of the IFAPP. The trends identified
were consistent with the observations and analyses of the auditor.
The Trend Analysis confirmed that the forest condition is moving towards the targets and desired levels
to support achievement of forest objectives. The economic downturn, and the resulting lower than
anticipated harvest, was provided as a reason for achievement of less than planned levels for harvest
renewal and tending. The Company indicated in the document that effort was placed on establishing
renewal with the conscious decision to defer tending. This is consistent with auditor observations.
Area harvested during the past four planning terms totaled 14,259 ha, or 57% of the planned harvest.
The allowable area for harvest increased substantially following amalgamation of the Forest and
utilization of the planned area rose to 75%. The economic decline experienced during the 2006-2011
plan term reduced utilization dramatically to 33% of the planned area (Figure 4).
The volume and area harvested similarly reflects this pattern. Figure 5 shows the increasing volume and
utilization followed by the collapse in the last term due to the economic downturn of the forest industry.
Volume harvested during the audit term was far less than during the previous terms.
17 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
8000
7000
6000
5000
Planned (ha)
4000
Actual (ha)
3000
2000
1000
0
1991-1996
1996-2001
2001-2006
2006-2011
Figure 4. Planned and actual annualized harvest area for the Lac Seul Forest between 1991 and 2011.
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
Planned
400,000
Actual
300,000
200,000
100,000
1991-1996
1996-2001
2001-2006
2006-2011
3
Figure 5. Planned vs. actual annualized volume (m ) by planning term from 1991 to 2011.
A comparison of the actual area to receive renewal treatment in relation to the total area harvested by
the end of the 20-year period from 1991 to 2011 revealed that the renewal area was greater than the
area harvested within the period. Table 1 shows that renewal treatments in the 1996-2001 period were
implemented on approximately half of the area harvested. Renewal efforts accelerated in the
subsequent two planning terms. The effort during the 20-year term resulted in treatment of 115% of the
allocated land base, reflecting treatment of ABC XYZ lands and areas of a 2003 burn that were treated
with funding from the Forestry Futures Trust. The area identified that remains to be assessed is
consistent with the area harvested and the lag time anticipated to achieve renewal success.
18 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
1991-1996
Plan Term
1996-2001 2001-2006
Total
2006-2011
Actual Area (ha) Harvested
(Trend Analysis AR 7)
2,634
3,334
5,805
2,486
14,259
Actual Area (ha) Receiving a
Renewal Treatment (Trend
Analysis AR 9)
2,782
1,618
8,375
3,555
16,330
% Harvested Area Receiving a
Renewal Treatment
106%
49%
144%
143%
115%
% Harvested Area Reported as
Successfully Regenerated
(Trend Analysis AR 10)
89%
56%
4%
1%
Table 1. Proportion of the actual area harvested that received a silviculture treatment between 1991 and 2011 on the Lac
Seul Forest.
Most (84%) of the area renewed over the 20-year period was treated artificially by planting, seeding, or
scarification (Table 2). This ratio is relatively consistent in the first two plan terms. Renewal efforts
associated with the 2003 fire and prescribed burn area increased the amount of artificial treatment
during the 2001-2006 term (94%). Increased harvest of poplar-dominated forest units and a reduced
demand for conifer, due to the closure of the Hudson mill, account for the reduction during the latter
term (67%) and the corresponding increase in the application of natural prescriptions (33%).
Treatment Type
Natural Regeneration
Artificial Regeneration
1991-1996
24%
76%
Plan Term
1996-2001
2001-2006
17%
6%
83%
94%
Total
2006-2011
33%
67%
16%
84%
Table 2. Proportion of natural and artificial renewal treatments on the Lac Seul Forest between 1991 and 2011.
The Trend Analysis indicated that efforts within the caribou mosaic to achieve conifer-dominated
working groups and silvicultural success were more effective than in those areas south of the Caribou
Line where the forest demonstrates a gradation toward mixedwood forest units with higher levels of
hardwood. Additionally, on the drier northern sites, hardwood proportions decline and fade out of sites
at a younger age, allowing the stand to revert to a conifer-dominated forest unit.
With the increased average age of stands required to achieve the caribou mosaic requirements, the midto-later term future harvest operations will experience reduced yields and higher amounts of defect and
cull material will occur due to the older age of the stands. Future planned volumes reflected this
anticipated change in volume recovery.
19 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
4.3.6 Long-Term Management Direction
The Long-Term Management Direction was found to be comprehensive and addressed the requirements
of the FMPM. A delay to the Stage 2 Review was due to the late release of provincial direction for the
Caribou Conservation Plan and the Stand and Site Guide. Despite this delay, the planning team
demonstrated that the habitat requirements were met for each term of the analysis. Rationales were
provided where areas for specific forest units exceeded maximum or minimum levels to achieve specific
habitat components in another planning term. In general, the planning team demonstrated in the FMP
that the forest is managed within the natural variation targets by forest unit and by forest landscape
class.
The 2011-2021 FMP documented that forecast harvest volumes were less than in previous planning
terms. The available volume, however, exceeded or was only slightly less than historically harvested
volumes. The effort and diligence required to develop a Long Term Management Direction that satisfied
the targets and objectives for habitat, forest cover, and the social and economic environment is
acknowledged by the auditor.
4.4 Plan Assessment and Implementation
Implementation of the 2006-2011 FMP for the Lac Seul Forest was assessed by the auditor through a
review of records and sampling of activities that occurred within the Forest (see Appendix 4).
Assessments by the auditor of the effectiveness of forest management implementation and
observations on compliance on the Lac Seul Forest follow.
4.4.1 Areas of Concern
Areas of concern were inspected for integrity and adherence to the appropriate prescription during the
audit site visits. Reserve widths and confirmation of the value(s) associated with the AOC were assessed
by the audit team, both in the field and in the FMP. The audit team found that timing restrictions were
observed and AOC widths were suitable for the values and slopes observed. Compliance reports by MNR
documented instances where infringements on AOCs occurred. The corrective actions and/or penalties
assessed in these instances met the timelines and were deemed appropriate by the auditor.
4.4.2 Harvest
Harvest on the Lac Seul Forest during the 2006-2011 audit term was approximately half the amount that
occurred during the previous FMP terms.
4.4.2.1 Snag Management
Snag retention followed the Natural Disturbance Pattern Emulation Guide (NDPEG) with a minimum of
25 trees/ha, although requirements for large diameter conifers were difficult to achieve on some sites.
Improvement in the density and consistency of snag retention (Figure 6) was observed during the last
three years of plan implementation. This demonstrated the effectiveness of training and the success of a
focused compliance monitoring program.
20 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 6. Example of snag retention observed on the Lac Seul Forest.
4.4.2.2 Utilization
Utilization was identified as a high priority issue during the preparation for this audit and was generally
found to be good except in the few instances noted in this report. During the audit site visits, the
Company identified that it had a record of the locations where wood was left. Ministry of Natural
Resources confirmed through its records, compliance reports, and interviews that it was aware of these
inventories and the situation was being monitored. Mill closure, very weak hardwood market
conditions, and insolvency frustrated the efforts of McKenzie Forest Products Inc. to move this timber.
With the surrender of the SFL to MNR, the auditor understands that the situation is now in the hands of
the District MNR.
The helicopter inspection of IFA Block 11 along Root Bay found that felled and bunched wood ready for
skidding remained in the block (Figure 7). This wood was apparently left following the last mill
shutdown. The Company indicated during the audit site visit that silviculture and slash management
activities are scheduled for this block during the 2012-2013 annual work schedule. This area also was,
and remains, a cause for concern for a tourism operator that flies customers over this area regularly.
Recommendation 4 addresses this issue.
Considerable discussion occurred during the audit site visit about the impact of changing harvest
methods on roadside utilization and the status of the productive forest area. This aspect of utilization
was also included as a high priority issue during preparation for this audit. Full tree chipping was
introduced to the Forest during the past three years. This processing method results in accumulations of
bark and wood chips at landings where the wood is processed and the chips are loaded into vans. The
Company informed the auditor that several different strategies were tested to determine the
effectiveness in reducing or mitigating the amount of roadside chipper debris and thereby reducing the
potential loss of productive forest area. Recommendation 5 addresses this situation.
21 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 7. Felled and bundled trees unskidded in IFA Block 11 along Root Bay after harvest.
caribou habitat renewal on the Lac Seul Forest. The appropriateness of using this funding to achieve
forest harvesting and silvicultural objectives is debatable; however, the Company did demonstrate a link
between habitat and access rehabilitation in its application. Despite these trials, the Company’s effort
was seen by the auditor as insufficient to resolve concerns about changing harvesting methods.
4.4.2.3 Site Disturbance
The distribution of soil types on the Lac Seul Forest contains relatively minor areas of fine textured (7%)
and organic (17%) soils. These sites are considered at risk of site disturbance if planned forestry activities
are not undertaken without specific operational considerations. IFA Site inspection Block 51 had rutting
present in portions of the block. Ground inspection by the audit team of this rutted area found that the
disturbance was not severe or extensive (Figure 8). Despite their unsightly appearance, these areas are
small and localized and will not have a mid- or long-term significant effect on site productivity or
sustainability.
4.4.3 Renewal
The auditor observed effective establishment of conifer renewal by the Company. Table 1 indicated that
silviculture treatments were keeping pace with the harvest. Despite the harvest lag of three to four
years, the Company treated an area that surpassed the amount of area harvested. This indicated that
the efforts made to ensure renewal of the backlog of ABC XYZ areas, including activities funded by the
Forestry Futures Trust, were effective.
22 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 8. The appearance of localized rutting in IFA Block 51.
Company silviculture personnel demonstrated a thorough, active interest and knowledge of their land
base and the status of silvicultural treatments. Each harvested area was walked and received a post
harvest prescription and application of the appropriate silvicultural ground rule (SGR) from the FMP. The
level of effort and attention to detail to direct and apply appropriate conifer renewal strategies was
applauded by the auditor. The level of supervisory effort to implement the resulting silviculture
strategies was also recognized and acknowledged as an important part of implementation of the
Company`s renewal program.
Best Practice - McKenzie Forest Products Inc. is recognized for excellence in its overall implementation
of its post-harvest assessment program and the highly refined effort to establish silvicultural ground
rules best suited to the specific collection of micro-sites present within the forest complex to effectively
establish appropriate conifer regeneration.
The auditor did, however, identify circumstances within the silviculture program where the residual
hardwood component within some stands indicated additional support was required to facilitate conifer
renewal (Figure 9). A renewal site where the hardwood component was retained as standing timber in
excess of required snag guideline requirements was recognized by the auditor as a challenge to effective
silviculture treatment of the prescribed conifer SGRs. Company personnel confirmed that the canopy
interferes with conifer release efforts by intercepting the aerial application of herbicide. The challenge
the residual canopy poses, from a utilization perspective due to poor hardwood market conditions, was
acknowledged by MNR. Although an isolated and infrequent situation, the auditor makes
Recommendation 6 to ensure that MNR will act to address this concern.
At another field stop where harvesting had taken place, the Company had applied a prescription with
the objective of renewing the white birch component of the area. A review of the FMP identified that an
SGR was lacking for this treatment. Ground inspection of this site found that the scarification work to
facilitate conifer renewal adjacent to this patch did not continue through the area targeted for white
birch regeneration. The canopy of small diameter white bitch was also relatively intact (Figure 10).
23 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 9. A heavy residual hardwood canopy that will interfere with future conifer renewal tending efforts.
Figure 10. Example of white birch renewal treatment risking failure due to the lack of site preparation.
This small site is in an area within a much larger conifer complex and, therefore, technically met the
overall existing criteria for harvest. However, MNR and the Company admitted that the criteria, required
to access stands with this level of a hardwood component when hardwood markets did not exist, had
not been developed. The Company also recognized the difficulty in achieving successful conifer renewal
with this level of residual hardwood. While the auditor understands the Company’s intent to use
24 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
scarification as a renewal strategy under a hardwood canopy for this site, Recommendation 7 identifies
that, in the opinion of the auditor, renewal success would not be achieved.
4.4.4 Tending and Protection
McKenzie Forest Products Inc. demonstrated excellent stewardship in its pre-planning and scheduling of
tending sites through its renewal monitoring efforts. However, major problems in program
implementation during the audit term were acknowledged by the Company and recognized by the
auditor.
The auditor was informed that sufficient silviculture funding exists in the Forest Renewal Trust Account
to fully support and implement the required tending program. This failure to implement effective and
timely tending may negate the silvicultural investment already made in these sites for previous
treatments. The auditor noted, and confirmed through onsite observations, that the stands at risk of not
achieving the target SGR were those that required tending to protect and release the conifer
component. The auditor anticipates that, although this will have a small impact on long-term forest
yield, the untreated stands may not meet long-term SGR targets. Recommendation 8 will correct this
situation. Assessed free-to-grow (FTG) stands met their target SGR when tending occurred at the
appropriate time in stand development.
4.4.5 Renewal Support
McKenzie Forest Products Inc. works with other local forestry managers and took the lead to maintain
three of four local tree improvement areas. Two of these areas were inspected during the audit. The
forest companies within the area, along with the MNR, are doing an effective job of monitoring and
managing these areas.
4.4.6 Access
Road construction objectives for the Forest were only partially achieved (25%) during the audit term,
with 24.8 kilometres of primary road and 11.3 kilometres of branch roads constructed. Provincial
funding received during the term was directed at improvements, construction, and maintenance as
required. During the site visits, the auditor viewed completed construction resulting from this funding.
No concerns or issues were noted and the work quality met the required standards.
Culvert and bridge installations observed conformed to the guidelines noted in the Environmental
Guidelines for Access Roads and Water Crossings. It was also evident that the auditee used criteria from
the Stand and Site Guide for removal of water crossings to determine the appropriate decommissioning
activities based upon biological, water quality, engineering, and safety factors, as required.
Water crossings were generally installed using appropriately sized culverts; slopes were stable and at
least 10% below grade. Bridge installations met the requirements of the relevant guides.
Cribbing and bridge abutments were left in place when decommissioning water crossings on the Wind
Block (WI120). During decommissioning of the bridge on the Wapesi River near Wind Lake, creosote
bridge abutments were left in place on the approach to the former water crossing location (Figure 11).
25 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 11. Creosote lumber bridge abutments left in place at a demobilized and
rehabiltated bridge crossing.
Greater concern for potential long-term environmental liability is noted by the auditor regarding
culverts left in place along the otherwise decommissioned Wind Lake road system, particularly since no
harvesting is planned in this mosaic block until 2091-2111. Eventual failure of the metal from corrosion
or damming by beavers may likely result in washouts and accompanying sedimentation downstream.
Regular monitoring of the culverts is complicated by decommissioning of the bridges along this road
network. Recognizing the significant costs associated with culvert removal, the auditor notes that MNR
remains responsible for the road and any future liability under the federal Fisheries Act.
Concern about these two aspects of roadway decommissioning led the auditor to make
Recommendation 9.
4.5 System Support
The Forest is certified by the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) and recently underwent its annual
surveillance audit. All staff and contractor training requirements were met through conformance to the
SFI program. Additionally, all planning team members had taken the appropriate FMP training.
Document control measures used by the Company and MNR were satisfactory. Back-up processes were
in place for both the MNR and the Company and obsolete documents are appropriately controlled.
Documentation requested by the audit team was current and was provided in a timely manner. The
audit team observed that MNR is moving to digital documents only (no paper copies) and a
policy/systematic approach towards maintaining digital files.
4.6 Monitoring
Surveys of post-regeneration success were conducted twice during the audit term in a timely and
appropriate manner. The Company’s approach of gathering areas and surveying them every two or
three years is viewed by the auditor as an efficient way to manage staff resources and workload. A
formal structure and sampling methodologies were not evident from interviews with Company
26 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
personnel. However, the auditor believes that the on-the-ground presence of Company staff and their
direct involvement in the monitoring and management of the Forest, along with low turnover in key
staff positions, has ensured the quality of the Company’s silviculture program.
Compliance monitoring by the Company and the MNR was undertaken as required. A good working
relationship between the parties was evident. The MNR conducted periodic spot checks of the
Company’s compliance reports. Review of compliance reporting during the audit term found that during
periods of full production, MNR conducted 30-50% of the number of inspections performed by the
Company. Inspections were roughly equal during the last three years of the audit term when there was
low activity on the Forest.
The number of “not in compliance” reports declared each year was relatively equal for the Company
(10%) and District MNR (17%) (Table 3). This suggests that the two parties responsible for ensuring that
good forestry practices occurred on the Forest were relatively well aligned and shared an appreciation
of compliance standards and conduct.
Status
2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011
Total
%
MFP MNR MFP MNR MFP MNR MFP MNR MFP MNR MFP MNR MFP MNR
Not in Compliance 13
6
5
6
3
3
1
1
2
22
18 10% 17%
In Compliance w ith Comments
1
8
8
4
2
2
1
24
0% 22%
In Compliance 87
21
69
21
18
10
16
10
5
4
195
66 89% 61%
Total Inspections 101
35
74
35
21
17
17
13
5
8
218 108 100% 100%
Table 3. Comparison of McKenzie Forest Products Inc. and MNR compliance report status during the audit term.
“Not in compliance” findings were noted and corrective actions undertaken as required. Interviews
indicated that these items were generally addressed immediately by the Company, which created a
good degree of confidence and trust with MNR. No specific trends were noted when comparing findings
from year to year and rarely were there repeated incidences of “not in compliance” findings. An
example is the MNR’s awareness and documentation of wood left or unskidded at roadside and the
monitoring of this utilization issue with the Company until the sites were appropriately cleared and
rehabilitated. Another example is the Company’s training of overlapping licencees on specific instances
of non-compliance. The MNR and the Company conducted this aspect of their monitoring obligations in
an appropriate manner.
4.7 Achievement of Management Objectives and Forest Sustainability
Twenty-one objectives were established within the 2006-2011 FMP. Information provided by the
auditee indicates the achievement of twelve objectives and partial movement towards the others (see
Appendix 2). All forest cover objectives (COV1 to COV5) and both silviculture objectives (SILV1 to SILV2)
were achieved. Mixed success occurred with efforts to achieve the forest diversity objectives (FD1 to
FD6) and the social and economic objectives (SOC1 to SOC8). Achievement of these objectives was
affected by the low harvest levels that occurred during the audit term. Consequently, it will require
several planning terms to move the forest structure towards specific area or age targets.
27 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
4.7.1 RPFO and/or Year Ten Annual Reports
4.7.1.1 Analysis of Forest Disturbances
The natural disturbance emulation targets were achieved for most size classes. The lower than planned
harvest levels meant that the desired and forecasted target was not achieved for one size class. A new
disturbance template was created for the approved 2011-2021 FMP and the allocations were planned in
a manner that achieved the desired ranges for the 2011-2021 FMP. Not achieving the target for one
specific size class will not impact future achievement of disturbance size objectives as projected by the
2011-2021 FMP.
4.7.1.2 Renewal Success
Table 4 provides the actual area harvested for each forest unit by FMP term. Table 5 shows the results
of monitoring efforts and the rates of silvicultural and regeneration success. Renewal assessments were
conducted on 64% of the area harvested during the past four plan terms.
Forest
Unit
BFMX
BFPUR
COMX1
COMX2
HWDMX
OC
PJPUR
POPUR
PW_PR
SBLOW
SPUP
Total
Harvest Area (ha) by Plan Term
91-96 96-01 01-06 06-11
0
0
906
194
189
597
436
9
0
0
775
431
0
0
3
198
127
156
100
162
1
6
0
1
1,362
1,024
866
388
63
0
47
87
4
1
4
0
158
440
794
335
730
1,110 1,872
681
2,634
3,334 5,803
2,486
Total
1,100
1,231
1,206
201
545
8
3,640
197
9
1,727
4,393
14,257
Table 4. Harvest area by forest unit for each plan term on the Lac Seul Forest.
Source: Trend Analysis – Table AR-7
28 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Assessment of Regeneration and Silviculture Success
Projected
Forest
Unit
BFMX
BFPUR
COMX1
COMX2
HWDMX
OC
PJPUR
POPUR
PW_PR
SBLOW
SPUP
Total
%
Forest Unit Silvicultural
(ha)
234
10
558
117
48
1
1,351
134
48
537
1,151
4,189
Success
42%
91%
60%
50%
47%
20%
49%
42%
100%
48%
37%
46%
Other
%
Forest Unit Regeneration
(ha)
329
1
367
119
55
4
1,396
185
586
1,922
4,964
Success
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
96%
100%
100%
100%
% Harvest
Area
Assessed
51%
1%
77%
118%
19%
63%
75%
162%
533%
65%
70%
64%
Table 5. Silviculture and regeneration success by forest unit on the Lac Seul Forest.
Source: Trend Analysis – Table AR-13
Regeneration is considered to be silviculturally successful when the assessed forest condition is
determined to have achieved the intended forest unit assigned by the SGR. Different sites respond
differently and the time required to meet regeneration standards for silvicultural success can vary from
three to nineteen years. Silvicultural success ranged from 37% for SPUP (spruce upland) to 60% for
COMX1 (conifer-dominated mixedwood). The auditee’s assessment indicated that an average of 46% of
the renewal treatments achieved the intended forest unit.
The assessment of the auditee also considered 100% of the assessed harvested area to have been
regenerated to an acceptable standard, if not to the intended forest unit. The achievement of the
acceptable standard is defined as regeneration success.
The auditor sampled stands assessed for their FTG status as part of the audit site visits. The assessment
did not cover the same time frame as that presented within the annualized figures of the Trend Analysis,
focusing instead on the FTG that was assessed and reported during the audit term. The auditor’s
inspection found that 4,231 ha of 4,626 ha (91%) were found to have achieved regeneration success.
While the trend observed over time indicated high variability in silvicultural success of regeneration, the
assessment of the most recent FTG work found good movement towards the silvicultural targets.
Similar variability was noted with regeneration results for renewal of natural disturbance areas where
the desired forest unit was achieved on only 34% of the area (Table 6).
29 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Natural Disturbance
Projected
Forest
Unit
BFMX
BFPUR
COMX1
COMX2
HWDMX
OC
PJPUR
POPUR
PW_PR
SBLOW
SPUP
Total
%
Other
Forest Unit Silvicultural
(ha)
330
44
83
1,097
23
1,447
958
3,982
Success
0%
57%
9%
22%
0%
0%
37%
6%
0%
49%
26%
34%
%
Forest Unit Regeneration
(ha)
14
249
451
294
389
13
1,893
357
1,495
2,678
7,833
Success
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
98%
100%
99.4%
Table 6. Silviculture and regeneration success for areas of natural disturbance on the Lac Seul Forest.
The auditor’s verification of FTG status supports the assertion in the Trend Analysis that, in the caribou
management portion of the Forest, conifer-dominated cover types are increasing. Field observations
confirmed that those regenerating sites that were at risk of not achieving their target SGR were sites
that required tending. These observations emphasize the importance of forest tending to the
maintenance and achievement of forest cover objectives and the significance of the failure of the
auditee to achieve an effective tending program during the audit term as addressed in Recommendation
8. The lack of tending puts the forest at a long-term risk of a shift to increased hardwood within its
forest cover.
4.7.1.3 Independent Forest Audits
The IFA Action Plan and Status Report indicated movement on all recommendations from the past 20012006 audit. The auditor found the recommendations associated with the LCC had been effectively
addressed. Program changes where forest management activities were dependent on the Ministry of
the Environment were effectively administered through a coordinated effort involving local, regional,
and Corporate MNR, demonstrating effective movement on this prior audit finding.
Resource stewardship agreements and discussions with tourism operators both remained high priority
issues during this audit term. While the direction of the prior audit finding was to Corporate MNR,
during the development of the last plan the Company found the following to be an effective and helpful
tool in managing relationships with area tourism interests. An operational-based, two-page
memorandum of agreement, with an attached map of the area from the FMP, served to identify specific
operating concerns and cooperation details that were documented and signed between the Company
and the tourism operator. This proved to be an effective and useful tool to assist the Company`s
operations manager with coordinating activities that may impact on area tourism operations. This
simple tool may prove more responsive and effective than the more cumbersome, formal, lengthy, and
30 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
expensive resource stewardship agreement process. The auditor acknowledges the efforts of both the
Company and MNR with arriving at a practical way of managing the issue.
Efforts by MNR to obtain additional socio-economic information on remote tourism and road-based
recreation were recorded as part of the preparation for the 2011-2021 FMP. The MNR also conducted
studies and monitored specific areas for both compliance and the collection of land use information.
Various tools were employed, including remote data logging devices and other technology, to assist with
determining use. The Company took care in coordinating and validating datasets used for modelling and
generation of FMP tables to ensure consistency and accuracy during plan development.
A number of prior audit findings regarding policy effectiveness were addressed by MNR through the
development and implementation of the Stand and Site Guide.
The District MNR chose a balanced approach in dealing with Forest Resource Licences associated with
red and white pine allocations to log home builders. The auditor agreed with this approach and felt it
was appropriate in making resources available to local interests while ensuring that regulatory and
environmental activities occur appropriately on the Forest.
Based on the above considerations, it is the auditor`s opinion that considerable and concerted effort
occurred during the audit term to address the findings of the previous IFA.
4.7.2 Assessment of Objective Achievement
Review of progress towards the 2006-2011 FMP objectives was facilitated by the Company’s preparation
of the Trend Analysis and the AR10 annual report issued March 28, 2011. Twenty-one objectives were
considered. These objectives addressed forest development (6), social aspects (8), forest cover or
habitat (5), and silviculture (2).
In general, the Forest was found to have met its forest cover and silvicultural objectives. Suitable habitat
was maintained for moose, caribou, marten, black bear, black-backed woodpecker, and Canada lynx.
Protection of fish habitat was also found to be well addressed. Regeneration was found to have met its
targets and the land base was considered maintained.
Achievement of specific forest development and social targets that were affected by market demand for
wood fibre were challenging during the audit term. The decline in timber harvested due to mill closures
and weak market demand reduced Crown dues to 10% of that forecast by the FMP. Employment targets
and development of forest access were also impacted. The reduced harvesting also affected
achievement of forest unit age class and area targets and planned targets for disturbance sizes as well.
4.7.3 Conclusions Regarding Sustainability of the Crown Forest
The primary goal of the 2006-2011 FMP was to achieve a healthy, sustainable forest ecosystem.
Sustainability of the forest is vital to the well-being of forest-based activities and Ontario communities.
Objectives were developed in the FMP for benefits and outcomes achieved by managing forest cover.
Management objectives set for the 2006-2011 FMP were considered to be met with the exception of
harvest-dependent objectives. This failure was due to market factors far beyond the control of McKenzie
Forest Products Inc. Specifically, the reduced harvest during the audit term compromised the plan’s
objectives.
31 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Additionally, the auditor identified specific recommendations to address concerns associated with the
lack of effective tending (Recommendation 8) and utilization and management of the productive land
base (Recommendations 4 and 5).
Under-achievement of the social and economic objectives occurred because of the severe economic
downturn that resulted in the shutdown of the Hudson mill. The impacts on the mill and local and
regional communities represent a significant economic change. There was a severe under-harvest during
the implementation of the FMP due to the economic downturn. The auditee asserts that impacts on
sustainability were mitigated by reallocating unharvested allocations in the 2011-2021 FMP.
The spatial assessment of natural disturbance targets was achieved for most size classes. Residual
undisturbed patches that emulated the distribution of those associated with historical fire disturbances
were implemented. Spatial caribou and marten habitat targets were also achieved. Projections in the
previous FMP and in the 2011-2021 FMP indicate that caribou habitat is progressing towards desired
levels.
The audit team concluded that forest sustainability was achieved on the Lac Seul Forest during the audit
term with the exceptions addressed in this report.
4.8 Contractual Obligations
The Company conformed to the requirements and terms of SFL #542455. The Company honoured the
intent of its wood directives contained within the licence. Market issues during the audit term affected
the Company’s ability to sell timber. All plans and reports were submitted as required. Salvage licences
were issued to address natural disturbances during the audit term. The disturbance from a recent
tornado was observed during the helicopter inspection as a narrow, tangled trail of timber over several
kilometers with trees laid down in a complex spiral pattern. This suggests very limited operational
potential.
Notices and protection of mining posts were observed as operating practices during the audit term.
Compliance plans were prepared and implemented. General conformance was maintained and no
serious wasteful practice reports were noted. The MNR and the Company demonstrated effective
monitoring and awareness of stockpiled wood on the Forest, with plans in place to remove this fibre.
The Action Plan and Status report satisfactorily recorded and demonstrated effective movement
towards resolution of the findings from the previous audit. Training was used to reduce compliance
issues with specific overlapping licencees.
Monitoring occurred regarding the protection of the forest resource. It was determined through
coordination with MNR that a jack pine budworm outbreak was minor and no treatment or additional
action was necessary.
The Forest Renewal Trust Accounts were managed well during the audit term with maintenance of
minimum balances and calculation, analysis and validation of the Renewal Rate. However, payments due
in the latter term of the audit period were not paid and these amounts are subject to the Company’s
declaration of bankruptcy.
The area sampled in support of the Specified Procedures Report was found to have received the
prescribed treatment. No auditor concern resulted from this review. Work was undertaken as reported.
32 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Good conformance to licence conditions was demonstrated by the Company during the audit term.
Specific discussion concerning contractual obligations is presented in Appendix 3.
4.9 Conclusions and Recommendations on Future Licence Actions
regulations, and policies that were in effect during the audit term, except for the minor variances noted
in this report. The auditor also concludes that the Forest was managed in compliance with the terms and
conditions of SFL #542455, formerly held by McKenzie Forest Products Inc.. Forest Sustainability is being
achieved, as assessed through the IFAPP.
In light of the surrender of the SFL by McKenzie Forest Products Inc., and the subsequent actions taken
by District MNR to place the Lac Seul Forest under a Forest Resource Licence issued to Obishikokaang
Resource Corporation, the auditor agrees that District MNR assume responsibility for the
implementation of the FMP to ensure sustainability of the Forest.
The auditor acknowledges that the Crown, at its discretion in the future, may use appropriate
implementation of its action plan.
33 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 1 –Recommendations and Best Practices
INDEPENDENT FOREST AUDIT – RECORD OF FINDING
Best Practice
Principle: 4; Plan Assessment and Implementation
Criterion: 4.4; Renewal
Procedure(s): 4.4.1, Review and assess in the field the implementation of approved renewal operations.
Include assessment whether the renewal treatment was consistent with the FOP, and the FOP
consistent with the SGR.
Background Information and Summary Evidence:
•
Post-harvest site inspection, recording and mapping and prescribing SGRs that reflect the best
treatment for site conditions, resulting in superior allocation of stock and seed on appropriate
sites
•
Allocating and implementing appropriate supervisory resources to ensure implementation of a
complex silvicultural program
Discussion: Conifer regeneration efforts were exceptionally well done. Company silviculture personnel
demonstrated active knowledge of their land base and the status of silvicultural treatments. The
exceptional practice was the demonstrated ground assessment of each harvest area. Each harvested
block was walked by competent and experienced personnel to determine and document a postharvest
prescription and application of the appropriate silvicultural ground rule from the FMP. The level of effort
and attention to detail to direct and apply appropriate conifer renewal strategies was applauded by the
auditor. The level of supervisory effort to implement the resulting silviculture strategies was also
recognized as an important part of implementation of the Company`s renewal program. It is the
allocation of sufficient resources to support qualified personnel applying their professional discretion to
match the silviculture treatment for the specific complex of micro-sites that is recognized as the best
practice.
Best Practice - McKenzie Forest Products is recognized for its excellence in its overall implementation of
its post-harvest assessment program and the highly refined effort to prescribe and develop silvicultural
ground rules best suited to the specific collection of micro-sites present within the forest complex to
effectively establish appropriate conifer regeneration.
34 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 1
Principle: 3; Forest Management Planning
Criterion: 3.3; Management Unit Description
Procedure(s): 3.3.4.1 FMP Description of other forest resources dependent on forest cover
•
•
Distribution, abundance, and habitat use on the Lac Seul Forest by species at risk is poorly
understood
2011-2021 FMP: Under Objective 3 (i.e., maintain caribou habitat) and Indicator 3i (other
forest- dependent species at risk)
Discussion: The Lac Seul Forest FMP has a comprehensive description of confirmed and potential
species at risk. The only forest-dependent, threatened species with habitat that could require protection
under the provincial Endangered Species Act are woodland caribou, wolverine, and whip-poor-will.
Although the list of species is complete and their basic habitat requirements are understood, the
distribution of these species and their habitat on the Lac Seul Forest is not specifically known.
The 2011-2021 plan text states that “both summer and winter use has been well documented
throughout the Lac Seul Forest” for caribou, but additional information is required to better understand
caribou habitat use and movement patterns on the Lac Seul Forest, particularly in the southern portion
of the mosaic where, to date, there has been relatively little survey effort.
Prior to the 2011-2021 plan, only seven caribou were radio-collared in the mid-1990s on the over 1.0
million ha of the Lac Seul Forest. Another five were added more recently, most in the central portion of
the FMU. As part of MNR’s caribou range assessment, aerial surveys and calf recruitment surveys have
recently been conducted and 20 radio-collars have been put on caribou on the Churchill Range. As the
Lac Seul Forest represents 46% of the Churchill Range, this will provide important information for
understanding how caribou move through the Forest and adjacent landscapes throughout the year.
The northern portion of the Lac Seul Forest is within the core range of wolverine (a threatened species)
in Ontario and most of the FMU is within the proposed Western Recovery Zone for wolverine. Wolverine
distribution, abundance, and habitat use on the Lac Seul Forest are unknown, thus no AOCs were
prescribed or implemented in the 2011-2021 Lac Seul Forest FMP.
Similarly, the distribution, abundance, and habitat use on the Lac Seul Forest by other forest-dependent
species at risk such as olive-sided flycatcher, Canada warbler, and rusty blackbird are poorly known.
Recently listed under the provincial Endangered Species Act, no targeted surveys have been undertaken
for these bird species. Additional surveys are required to meet Objective 3 (maintain caribou habitat)
and Indicator 3a (other forest-dependent species at risk) of the 2011-2021 FMP.
Recommendation 1 - Corporate MNR should provide sufficient resources to conduct additional inventory
and monitoring of forest-dependent species at risk to adequately support forest management planning
on the Lac Seul Forest.
35 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 2
Procedure(s): 3.3.4.1 FMP Description of other forest resources dependent on forest cover
•
•
Caribou defined southern limit changed from planning term to planning term
Orientation of mosaic and proximity to Lac Seul First Nation Reserve creates opportunities for
innovative approaches to achievement of ecological and social objectives
Discussion: Since 1992, woodland caribou habitat on the Lac Seul Forest has been managed spatially
using a “caribou mosaic” approach as per the 1999 draft Forest Management Guidelines for the
Conservation of Woodland Caribou: A landscape approach. The caribou mosaic or dynamic caribou
habitat schedule is a pattern of planned forest harvest and deferral areas intended to ensure the
provision of sufficient tracts of caribou winter habitat on the landscape at all times. The southern limit of
the caribou mosaic on the Lac Seul Forest has progressively moved south since 1992 (Figure 12).
In the current 2011-2021 FMP, the eastern portion of Reserve Island is an 8,057 ha “C” block (Block 36)
scheduled for harvest in 2051-2071 (Figure 13). This designation would prevent Lac Seul First Nation
from implementing their new forestry business plan. The FMP indicated that, during development of the
Long-Term Management Direction, the community expressed support for an alternate management
zone approach for this area.
In the northern portion of the Lac Seul Forest adjacent to high use summer caribou areas along the Cat
River system, Block 7 (6,270 ha) is designated as an adaptive management zone (AMZ) to ensure the
intent of the Caribou Conservation Plan is met while providing for educational and economic
opportunities for the adjacent First Nation community of Slate Falls.
The auditor feels that caribou protection in Block 36 can be achieved while still accommodating
economic opportunities for the First Nation in the near term. The auditor’s rationale is based on the use
of open designation harvest blocks as applied elsewhere on the forest, the lack of known winter use of
Block #36 by caribou, and the standard 1000 metre AOC prescription along the shoreline of Lac Seul.
This should provide adequate spring/summer protection for calving and nursery habitat on the adjacent
Lac Seul islands. Community hunting pressure should also ameliorate the impact of moose and wolf
populations in this zone. Thus scheduling of the block for harvest will not impair caribou protection.
Recommendation: 2 District MNR should designate Block #36 as an Adaptive Management Zone block,
or use another designation that permits forest management on a flexible timeline that is appropriate to
support the Lac Seul First Nation community and economic development initiatives.
36 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 12. Changes in the southern continuous distribution line (“Caribou Line”) for application of caribou
mosaic on the Lac Seul forest for successive forest management plans in relation to OMNR Cervid
Ecological Zones (CEZ).
37 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Figure 13. Lac Seul First Nation in relation to caribou mosaic Block 36 and the Lac Seul First Nation Forestry Planning Area.
38 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 3
Procedure(s): 3.3.2.2, Assess implications of the FRI on development of the FMP by considering land
ownership, land type, provincial forest type, and age class.
•
•
•
•
Currently using 1997 planning inventory
Two-tiered stands not captured well
Operational constraints associated with caribou mosaic
Improved FRI will result in improved operations planning
Discussion: The audit team reviewed the use of the FRI and its incorporation into the 2006 and 2011
FMPs. The inventory is a critical component of the FMP and the development of the Long-Term
Management Direction since it provides the spatial detail required to model serial stages, natural
disturbance regimes, and wildlife habitat as well as the anticipated yields of timber. In the forest estate
modeling conducted prior to plan approval, the forest inventory reflects the current state of the forest,
and then is projected in the model to predict the future forest condition by aging, disturbing, harvesting
and regenerating the forest through time. In a forest such as the Lac Seul, the state of the inventory is
critical to the success of the forest estate modeling exercise, and the ability to implement the results of
the model on the ground over the following years of the FMP.
The Lac Seul Forest is highly constrained by the caribou mosaic which covers over 89% of the land area.
Each ‘block’ in the caribou mosaic is ‘open’ for timber harvest for only 20 years at a time. Within that
timeframe, the block is to be harvested, after which the block is closed to further disturbance until the
next rotation. Therefore the pattern of harvest blocks and leave blocks across the forest becoming
regimented through the coming decades, as the caribou mosaic strongly dictates the locale of timber
harvesting. Issues arise when the inventory does not accurately reflect current ages, or current species
compositions, or proper yields. When the harvest moves in the future to new ‘open’ caribou blocks, if
the timber is not present in the volumes predicted, the harvest will not meet expectations and put the
forest economy at risk.
In this highly constrained operating environment, where there is limited flexibility for timber harvesting,
the accuracy of the inventory is paramount to successfully implementing the FMP in the future. The
current Lac Seul Forest inventory is from 1997, with many disturbances currently not captured. The
inventory poorly reflects the density of previously insect-killed balsam fir stands in the southern portion
of the forest and the inventory standard it was created with does not contain two-tiered stands.
Recommendation 3: Corporate MNR should place a high priority on the completion of the new enhanced
Forest Resource Inventory for the Lac Seul Forest, so that it will be available for the preparatory work and
input to the 2016 forest management plan.
39 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 4
Criterion: 4.3; Harvest
Procedure(s): 4.3.1 Assess whether harvest and logging methods were appropriate and effective and
whether wood utilization followed the scaling manual considering such items as wood left onsite.
•
•
•
Harvest operations, located especially close to tourism establishments should be carefully
controlled
Utilization standards not met
Operational shutdown associated with mill closure
Discussion: Utilization was generally good, however it was noted that some tree length hardwood was
left at the roadside in two blocks in the northeast portion of the Forest. The wood was left due to
challenges experienced with hardwood markets as well as an early Spring break up. A second location
on the Forest had conifer short wood piled on a skidway on a gravel road. The Company demonstrated
that it had a record of the locations where wood was left and the MNR confirmed their knowledge of
the inventory. Mill closures and weak hardwood market conditions have frustrated the Company’s
efforts to move this timber.
The helicopter inspection of Block 11 along Root Bay found felled and bunched wood ready for skidding
left in the block. This wood was left following the last mill shutdown. The Company indicated that
silviculture and slash management activities are scheduled for this block during the 2012-2013 Annual
Work Schedule. The volume of wood left in this harvest block will result in a loss of productive area and
is a wasteful practice as defined by the scaling manual. This area also was, and remains, a cause for
concern for a tourism stakeholder that flies customers through this area on a regular basis.
Recommendation 4 - District MNR shall ensure that the skid bundles left in the Independent Forest Audit
Block 11 along Root Bay are removed and the land treated silviculturally to minimize the loss of
productive land and to recover Crown dues.
40 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 5
Principle: Principle 4; Plan Assessment and Implementation
Criterion: 4.3; Harvest
Procedure(s): 4.3.1 Assess whether harvest and logging methods were appropriate and effective and
whether wood utilization followed the scaling manual.
•
Cumulative effect of slash and chipper debris piles occupying productive land
Discussion: Considerable discussion occurred during the audit site visits about the impact changing
harvest methods were having on the accumulation of roadside and landing debris and potential loss of
productive forest area. Full tree chipping was introduced to the Forest during the past three years. This
processing method results in accumulations of bark and wood chips at landings where the wood is
processed and the chips loaded into chip vans. The Company informed the audit team that several
different strategies were tested to determine the effectiveness in reducing or mitigating the presence of
roadside chipper debris and thereby reducing the potential loss of productive forest area.
The use of chippers on the forest is a relatively new operation. The Company considers chipper residue a
function of the harvest operation. Mills receiving chipped wood from the Lac Seul Forest consider the
residue a silviculture treatment, which means that the Company should pay for this work through its
silviculture program. McKenzie Forest Products Inc. disagreed with this assertion, believing that the
debris was a function of the harvest that should be dealt with as a harvest operating cost not as a
transfer of the cost to the silviculture program and thus a depletion of its silvicultural fund.
caribou habitat renewal on the Lac Seul Forest. The appropriateness of using this funding to achieve
forest harvesting and silvicultural objectives is debateable; however, the Company did demonstrate a
link between habitat and access rehabilitation in its application. Despite these trials, the Company’s
effort was seen by the auditor as insufficient to resolve concerns about changing harvest methods.
Recommendation 5 - District MNR shall monitor the implementation of the strategies to manage chipper
debris contained in the 2011 Forest Management Plan to determine their efficacy in minimizing the loss
of productive land and to ensure that effective silviculture occurs.
41 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 6
Consistent with the SGR.
•
Concern with the adequacy of regeneration in stands with high residual hardwood canopy
Discussion: A renewal site where the hardwood component was retained as standing timber in excess
of required snag guideline requirements was recognized by the auditor as a challenge to effective
silviculture treatment of the prescribed conifer SGRs. Company personnel confirmed that the canopy
interferes with conifer release efforts by intercepting the aerial application of herbicide. The challenge
the residual canopy poses, from a utilization perspective due to poor hardwood market conditions, was
acknowledged by MNR.
Operations conformed to the intent of the Northwest Region’s strategy for allocations containing
hardwood when markets are not viable. This strategy acknowledges the increased use and frequency of
herbicide applications. It is the opinion of the auditor, and the Company concurs, that retention of the
canopy in this situation is not a desired outcome.
Recommendation 6 - District MNR shall work with appropriate science support to develop effective
prescriptions to manage residual hardwood canopies that may affect forest renewal.
42 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 7
Principle: Principle 4; Plan Assessment and Implementation
consistent with the SGR.
•
Silvicultural ground rule to regenerate white birch in mixed conifer stand (CONMX2) was not
developed
Discussion: At a field stop where harvesting had taken place, the Company had applied a prescription
with the objective of renewing the white birch
component of the harvested area. The site was
an island of birch within a larger complex of
pine-dominated conifer. A review of the FMP
identified that a silvicultural ground rule was
lacking for this treatment. As well, ground
inspection of this site found that the
scarification work to facilitate conifer renewal
that surrounded this patch did not continue
across the area that was targeted for white
birch. The canopy over this site was also
relatively undisturbed.
The auditor
acknowledges the intent of the company’s
renewal strategy for this site. It is the auditor’s
opinion that based on the strategy employed,
the intended renewal would not be achieved.
Subsequent effort, including assessment and
tending, will be required to regenerate this site
to an acceptable renewal standard. Figure 14
shows how portions of the site have a heavy
shrub layer. Site preparation would have
allowed establishment of white birch that
could have kept pace with the shrub layer had
this treatment been applied.
Figure 14. Hazel and alder competition occupying a white birch renewal effort.
Recommendation 7 - District MNR shall consult the appropriate science support to develop a Silvicultural
Ground Rule to regenerate white birch dominated stands and to examine the costs of an acceptable
silvicultural treatment of these hardwood dominated sites within a conifer complex while considering
their conversion in the caribou management zone.
43 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 8
Criterion: 4.5; Tending and Protection
Procedure(s): 4.5.1, Review and assess in the field the implementation of approved tending operations.
•
Limited tending since 2007
•
Tending is not keeping pace with the planned targets
•
Potentially small yield impact for short term deferral
•
Stands may not meet long-term SGR targets affecting wood and habitat supply assumptions
•
Lower conifer component may impact caribou objectives
Discussion: McKenzie Forest Products Inc. demonstrated excellent stewardship in its preplanning and
scheduling of tending sites through its renewal monitoring efforts. This effort, however, was
undermined by the lack of delivery of a tending program. For two years of the audit term no tending was
carried out; in another year, when tending occurred, it was determined post-spray that the result was
ineffective because the contactor conducted the aerial spray too late in the season. No aerial tending
has occurred on the Forest for a period of four years. Insolvency issues of McKenzie Forest Products
Inc.’s parent company during the prior two years and operational challenges during the latter two years
resulted in a lack of tending on the Forest.
The auditor was informed that sufficient silviculture funding exists in the Forest Renewal Trust Account
to fully support and implement the required tending program. This failure to implement effective and
timely tending may negate the silvicultural investment already made in these sites for previous
treatments and a potential small impact to forest yield. The auditor noted, and confirmed through
onsite observations, that the stands at risk of not achieving the target silvicultural ground rule were
those that required tending to protect and release the conifer component. The auditor anticipates that
although this will have a small impact on long-term forest yield, the untreated stands may not meet
long-term silvicultural ground rule targets. Assessed FTG stands met their silvicultural ground rule target
when tending occurred at the appropriate time in stand development. At least one site that had been
tended was noted by the auditor to likely achieve FTG status the year following the audit.
Recommendation: District MNR shall ensure that all eligible stands from 2008 onwards are tended by
the end of 2013.
44 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Recommendation # 9
Criterion: 4.7; Access
Procedure(s): 4.7.1, Assess in the field the implementation of approved access activities and use
management including decommissioning.
•
Cribbing and bridge abutments left behind when decommissioning water crossings on the Wind
block (WI120)
Discussion: Documentation of the planning of roads, including decommissioning, is presented in
Supplementary Documentation 6.7.1 of the FMP. The section listed and discussed approaches to be
employed when decommissioning an access point.
Cribbing and bridge abutments were left behind when decommissioning water crossings on the Wind
block (e.g. WI120). If stable, bridge abutments can be left in place if there is the intent to re-use them.
During decommissioning of the bridge on the Wapesi River near Wind Lake, creosote bridge abutments
were left in place on the approach to the former water crossing location.
Greater concern for potential long-term environmental liability is noted by the auditor regarding
culverts left in place along the otherwise decommissioned Wind Lake road system, particularly since no
harvesting is planned in this mosaic block until 2091-2111. In addition to eventual failure of the metal
from corrosion, culverts are prone to damming by beavers, which can result in washouts and
accompanying sedimentation downstream. Regular monitoring of the culverts is complicated by the
removal of the road network, as would any repair work if a washout was to occur. Where culverts have
not been removed, the best management practice identified in the Stand and Site Guide is to excavate a
depression in the approach where floodwater can spill over the road in the event of a culvert blockage
(lining it with erosion-resistant materials if necessary). This best management practice was not
undertaken on culverts left in place on the decommissioned Wind Lake Road. While recognizing the
significant costs associated with culvert removal, MNR is still responsible for the road and any future
liability under the federal Fisheries Act.
Recommendation: District MNR should carefully evaluate local long-term environmental liability when
decommissioning water crossings, particularly when leaving culverts or other structures in situ.
45 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 2 – Management Objectives Table
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
FD1
Maintain current
biological diversity of the
forest except where it is
necessary and practical to
restore natural
disturbance and
landscape patterns.
Source: 2011 Planning Inventory The plan start levels for
2011 were used as the 2006 FMP plan end indicators for
this objective. BFMX improved between plan start and
end as it decreased to within the acceptable range.
BFPUR, OC and PWPR continued to exceed the desired
range between 2006 and 2011. All other forest units
remained within their acceptable ranges.
Company successful with maintenance of conifer dominated forest
units however market conditions will prove challenging for affecting
active management of hardwood and mixed forest types. AR10
recognized increased presence of balsam fir in southern areas
subject to fire suppression and older harvest areas not subject to
active silviculture. The importance of an active hardwood market
was acknowledged to assist with maintenance of the hardwood and
mixed forest units within the desired range.
Objective was generally met except for small area forest
units and balsam fir pure forest unit.
The Lac Seul Forest is approximately 90% conifer dominated forest
types and 10% hardwood dominated forest types. The Trend
analysis reports that within the Caribou Mosaic regeneration results
are achieving the desired conifer dominated forest condition.
Additionally the document indicated that the longer rotation cycle
will also result of the loss of the hardwood component in older
forest stands due to site conditions more favourable to conifer
under natural succession conditions.
Table 3 demonstrates in aggregate over the past three planning
terms the presence of hardwood dominated forest types
incrementally increasing on a proportional area basis.
Review of all factors suggests achievement of this objective.
Recommendation 8 identified to mitigate risk of forest cover shift to
more hardwood dominated forest types.
FD2
To provide an age class
structure that includes old
growth for all forest units,
that is representative of
the forest condition under
a natural disturbance
regime, within the bounds
The plan start levels for 2011 were used as the 2006
FMP plan end indicators for this objective. The 2011 plan
start levels indicate that old BFMX, BFPUR forest units
continue to increase above desired levels for old forest
between plan start and plan end and this trend was
projected as indicated by the medium term levels at year
2026. PJPUR remained below the acceptable range
Area within the commercially operated forest units demonstrated
movement towards the natural range of variation while less
commercially desirable forest units BFMX BFPUR’ SBLOW exceeded
the area qualified as old growth due to a lack of active management
(harvest) during the audit term.
Commercially viable forest units COMX1, COMX2, HWDMX, PJPUR,
46 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
of natural variation.
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
although it made considerable progress toward the
desired range and this trend was also projected by the
level at year 2026. SBLOW increased above the desired
range between 2006 and 2011 as projected for 2026.
The objective was achieved as most forest units
remained within the desired range between 2006 and
2011 with the exceptions noted above. The exceptions
outside of the desired ranges were forecasted to occur
as age classes alteration is limited by the available
planned and actual harvest levels. Actual harvest levels
are much lower than planned because of a severe
economic downturn that reduced harvest between 2007
and 2011 and this impacted the level of success for
achieving this objective.
SPUP all moved towards achievement of the old growth objective
during the audit term. SBLOW exceed the range during the audit
term due the economic downturn. The Trend Analysis discussion on
natural variation indicated that the excess was experienced in the
100 + age class. Small forest units POPUR, OC and PW_PR were
relatively stable demonstrated little movement due to the limited
active harvest occurring in these forest types. The Balsam fir forest
units BFMX and BFPUR exceeded their targets.
Forest is generally moving towards objective with some
exceptions.
FD3
To sustain genetic
diversity through
populations of naturally
occurring tree species,
that are adapted to local
site conditions.
The target is to use the seed zone transfer guidelines to
guide how the seed and stock is collected and
distributed in all artificial renewal programs. This
objective was achieved by using the MNR seed zone
transfer guidelines to guide how the seed and stock was
collected and distributed for all artificial renewal
programs conducted during the implementation of the
2006-11 FMP. This objective was further achieved by
tracking seed and stock movement by seed zone of
origin during all artificial renewal programs.
MNR seed zone guidelines followed. Company tracked seed and
stock movement by seed zone of origin for artificial renewal
activities.
Objective was met.
FD4
To provide a range of
harvest disturbance
patches across the
landscape that is
consistent with size and
frequency distribution
created under a natural
fire regime.
The achievement of the desired template cannot be
made in one 5 year plan period. During plan preparation
a projection was made about progress toward desired
levels by the end of the 2006 FMP, in 2011. That
projection was met or exceeded in all but the 261-520
size class. The 261-520 range was not met as the number
of disturbances declined from 6% to 3%. This occurred
because amount of actual harvest of the planned
allocations was severally hampered by an economic
AR10 indicates frequency of small disturbance patches exceeds the
natural template while there are too few medium to medium large
disturbance areas. The forest is generally close to the natural target
for the 261-520 ha disturbances and the larger disturbance areas.
47 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
downturn and mill shutdowns. Generally, progress was
made toward the desired disturbance template.
This objective was partially met.
FD5
Harvest disturbances will
be applied to the
landscape in patterns
that emulate patterns
associated with natural
disturbances. Harvest
blocks will include
residual undisturbed
patches that emulate
undisturbed residual
patched associated with
historical fire
disturbances.
The objective was achieved by the planning team during
the allocation of harvest blocks, during plan preparation.
All blocks over 130 hectares in size have residual
achieving or exceeding guideline targets.
Residual patches were applied to all harvest blocks larger than 130
ha. Patches were evident during site inspections.
FD6
Continue to reduce
balsam fir (and postsuccession stand that
were previously balsam
fir) levels towards levels
that would normally
occur in the fire driven
boreal forest ecosystem.
The objective was achieved as the balsam forest unit
were decreased by 2306 hectares. BFMX decreased by
3,257 and BFPUR increased by 951 ha.
The balsam fir land base was reduced by 2,306 ha.
SOC
1
Plan and implement
forestry operations in a
manner that considers
the Parks and
Conservation Reserves
that are present on the
forest.
This objective was met during the preparation and
implementation of the FMP. The potential to impact
parks and protected areas was very limited during the
planning and implementation of the 2006 FMP because
generally, operations were not planned in the vicinity of
these areas. One exception is access from forest roads
has the potential to impact St Raphael Park. Therefore,
the 2006 FMP provided for the installation of signage to
prevent unauthorized access to the park. Provincial
Parks and Conservation Act Signage was planned
through an amendment (#MFP06AR01) and placed
Signage installed to control access through St. Raphael Park as part
of FMP. AOCs developed for activities adjacent to Park and
Conservation areas. Other signage established through Provincial
Parks and Conservation Act. No non compliance findings.
48 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
during plan implementation in 2008 on the Sleen and
Race Lakes Roads at their entrances from the Vermilion
Road. There were no infractions from forest operations
involving parks and conservation reserves during the
implementation of the 2006-11 FMP.
SOC
2
Supply in a cost effective
manner, a continuous and
predictable supply of
suitable saw log material
to the Hudson sawmill,
and to provide other
products (i.e. hardwood
logs, residual by-products
such as chips, sawdust,
pulpwood, high value
poles and cabin logs).
Based on available harvest data for the period 20062010 (source: AR-8) the volume objectives were not
achieved. An average of 51,909 cubic metres of SPF and
26,791 cubic metres of hardwood were utilized per year.
The utilization trends for 2006-2010 are well below
normal because of the severe economic downturn that
resulted in the Hudson Mill only running sporadically
between November 2007 and the completion of the plan
on March 31, 2011.
Closure of mill and receivership of the licencee, along with Minister’s
Stage II Wood Supply Offer of SPF from the forest to Domtar Dryden
makes the Hudson mill portion of the objective moot in the current
term. Market decline and mill shutdowns during audit term affected
harvest targets. Timber was available for harvest. Allocations
incorporated into the 2011 FMP, including some bridging
allocations.
This objective was partially met.
Short-term target
SPF – 705,000, Hardwood
112,000 m3/yr
SOC
3
Long-term target
SPF – 500,000, Hardwood
112,000 m3/yr
Forestry operations will
be planned and
implemented in a manner
that considered the
diversity of social,
cultural, and
environmental values
present on the forest, in
order to provide all users
and citizens with the
opportunity to benefit
Planning and implementing prescriptions to minimize
impacts on other users of the forest and by applying and
implementing prescriptions in accordance with the
various forest management guidelines.
Planning and prescriptions developed following provincial
requirements. Recommendation 4 was issued to have unskidded
bundles removed from IFA Block 11 which was adjacent to a tourism
lake buffer. Some disenchantment was expressed by a tourism
outfitter over perceived effectiveness of road decommissioning.
This objective was largely met with some exceptions.
Additionally MNR changes through plan amendment to prescriptions
established through RSA process. IEA requests during 2011 planning
term.
Recommendation 2 identifies an opportunity to align social and
economic opportunities with the CCP requirements based on
49 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
from the from the forest.
Auditor Comments
specific local factors.
Continue to provide for
local employment in
resource sectors that are
dependent on the use of
the forest resources.
Continue to provide
opportunities in
surrounding communities
for suppliers and service
providers.
Significantly limited mill operations and variable offforest markets existed during the 2006-11 FMP. The mill
operated for 3 months in 2008 and for 5 months in 2010.
Sales of wood from the Lac Seul Forest to other regional
mills provided employment for the traditional local
crown operators and related spin off activity. Economic
conditions caused shutdowns of the Hudson mill.
SOC
5
Continue to provide for
local traditional
independent operators,
by supporting a request
from the Traditional
Operators to the SFL
holder for additional topup contractual volumes
from the forest for the
planning period, should
this extra wood become
available.
The objective was achieved as areas and associated
volumes as per the MOA's were made available to the
crown operators. Some conifer top up volume was
utilized by 2 crown operators in 2006. An amendment
was approved for 2010 to provide top up poplar volume
to many crown operators who marketed the additional
poplar volume to other regional mills. Some operators
harvested poplar volumes under MFP's SFL to feed
poplar markets in 2009.
Provisions were made for additional volumes to overlapping
licencees with extra capacity and plan amendments occurred to
allocate poplar volumes when a market emerged.
SOC
6
Provide the Ontario
Government with Crown
Dues for the use of Crown
timber resources.
MNR records indicate that $3,716,622 was actually
generated. Stumpage rates vary depending on the
conditions of markets for the products generated and
this contributed somewhat to the differences between
planned and actual levels. The stumpage rates were low
during the implementation of the 2006-11 FMP due to
poor economic conditions and this contributed to lower
amount of crown dues collected. The mill only ran at
normal capacity during the first 19 months of the plan
implementation period from April 2006 to November
2007 because of the severe global recession and the
collapse of the North American Lumber market. For the
duration of the implementation period from December
Approximately 10% of the plan’s forecast revenues were generated
for the Crown reflecting the serious market decline experienced
across North America during this period.
SOC
4
Hudson mill operations were limited during the audit term. Limited
demand for other wood products was experienced. Company closed
its operations, however facilitated opportunities for traditional
independent operators by shutting down Company operations.
This objective was partially achieved.
50 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
2007 to March 2011 the mill ran for 5 months in 2008
and 3 months in 2010.
The objective was only partially achieved as the full
allowable harvest was severely under harvested due the
lengthy McKenzie mill shut down. MFP fell behind in
stumpage because of a lack of revenue and a repayment
plan has been negotiated with the Ontario Government.
The achievement of objective SOC6 was minimal due to
poor economic conditions and lower stumpage rates in
response to product prices during the implementation of
the 2006-11 FMP.
SOC
7
SOC
8
Provide access to the
forest for the forest
industry and other
resource users on the Lac
Seul Forest.
Establish and maintain
road access in a manner
that provides accessibility
to resources for
recreation and other
The objective was partially achieved as 24.8 kilometres
of primary road constructed and 11.3 km or secondary
(branch) roads were constructed during the first four
years of the plan (2006-2009). The Ontario government
provided funding for construction and maintenance of
primary and branch roads during the implementation of
the 2006 FMP. The 2010 roads data when it becomes
available will affirm that the objective was only partially
achieved. Road construction did not achieve the target
levels because of the economic downturn that resulted
in the shutdown of the McKenzie mill for most of the
November 2007 to March 2011 period.
The 2006-2011 FMP targets for construction of roads
were 100.5 kilometres of primary road and 94.4
kilometres of secondary road for construction. Road
construction did not achieve the target levels because of
the economic downturn that resulted in the shutdown of
the McKenzie mill for most of the November 2007 to
March 2011 period.
The objective was achieved by providing and allowing
public access along most roads while restricting access
to specific areas where tourism values would be
impacted by access. Careful consideration was given to
applying any access restrictions during the preparation
Limited demand for forest product reduced the need to construct
new roads. Provincial funding assisted with work that was
implemented. Approximately 30% of the targeted construction
occurred.
The roads strategy was modified through amendment MFP06AR01
reflecting access restriction would be developed that protected
tourism values but did not necessarily impact access for other public
uses. Access management considered protection of specific tourism
values and long term caribou habitat. Some road decommissioning
51 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
opportunities for the
general public in areas
that are managed to
protect other value.
of amendment MFP06AR01. The amended sections of
the FMP text stated; "protection of tourism values was
balanced with keeping access unrestricted for the public
use. Access restrictions were developed so that they
didn’t unnecessarily impact the public use of roads for
other purposes." Some road decommissioning was
conducted during the plan period to protect tourism
values and to contribute to long term caribou habitat.
occurred. The company declared the majority of roads were
accessible for public use during the audit term.
COV
1
To maintain a forest
landscape that will supply
suitable current and
future habitat for wildlife,
within the bounds of
natural variation.
Targets were assigned in SFMM to bring black bear
foraging above minimum levels between term 8 and
term10. The other species obtained the minimum
desired level without imposing minimum targets in
SFMM. The selected species were reduced from 20
down to 7 between the preparation of the 2006 and
2011 FMP’s by MNR and the planning team. The 2011
plan start levels of the seven species exceeded the
minimum desired levels that were selected for both
FMP’s and this corroborates that objective COV1 was
met.
Habitat objectives were adjusted from 20 down to 7 selected species
between the 2006 and 2011 plans. Targets to achieve black bear
foraging habitat above minimum levels were instituted. The habitat
start levels for the 2011 Plan were above desired minimum levels
indicating this objective was met.
COV
2
Maintain a continuous
supply of suitable,
mature, year-round
martin habitat distributed
both geographically and
temporally across the
landscape within the
bound of natural
variation.
During the preparation of the 2006 FMP by spatially and
temporally managing marten habitat on the Lac Seul
Forest. The minimum desired proportion of marten
habitat was achieved for all three terms; 2006-26, 202646 and 2046-66. The 2011 plan start proportion of
suitable habitat corroborates that the objective was
achieved as habitat is well above the desired minimum
level.
Ample quality habitat was available for martin at the start of the
2011 plan.
COV
3
Maintain a continuous
supply of suitable,
mature, year-round
caribou habitat
distributed both
This objective was assessed during the preparation of
the 2006 FMP. The assessment indicated that the
minimum target of 40% of suitable caribou habitat was
maintained at planned start (2006) and planned end
(2011) and for the medium term at 2026. However the
Modelling indicates habitat reduction in 2016 due to current forest
structure however this level improve to meet targets in the medium
term.
52 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
geographically and
temporally across the
landscape in a manner to
ensure permanent range
occupancy within the
bound of natural
variation.
2106 projected levels fell short because of a shortage of
forest in the 21-40 age class. There was a lack of harvest
and natural disturbance 21-60 years ago causing the
shortfall in caribou habitat.
Projections in the 2006 FMP indicate that caribou is
progressing toward the desired levels and the objective
is achieved and this is corroborated by the 2011 plan
start levels.
Objective was achieved.
COV
4
To maintain a forest
landscape pattern that
will supply current and
future habitat for moose
within the bounds of
natural variation.
The objective is achieved as the minimum desired level
of moose foraging and moose winter habitat have been
achieved at plan start and plan end. The medium and
long term projected levels also exceed the minimum
desired level.
Habitat levels exceed minimum summer and winter habitat targets.
COV
5
Minimize the potential
effect of forest practices
on fish.
The objective was achieved by assigning the AOC
prescriptions and following the prescriptions during plan
implementation.
Areas of concern and buffers planned in FMP and implemented on
the ground. Site inspections by auditors found generally good
culvert installations with some exceptions.
Objective was achieved.
SILV
1
Regenerate harvested
and naturally depleted
areas with the
appropriate silvicultural
techniques.
No decrease in growing stock between 2006 FMP plan
start and 2011 FMP plan start. The 2011 FMP has road
decommissioning objectives when implemented will
lower the declines in land base and growing stock
between future planning terms.
Objective was achieved
recommendations.
SILV
2
Maintain current levels of
Crown forest area
available for timber
production.
despite
the
noted
The 2006 FMP projected trend of available area
decreases over time due to land remove for road access
and the establishment of aggregate pits. However, the
available area for 2011 FMP increased due to a portion
of reserves for water bodies being made available
through the application of the new Stand and Site
Updating of the FTG and effective silviculture implementation
demonstrated at end of plan that growing stock exceeding that
found at the start of the plan. It also exceeded the medium and long
term projected levels.
Recommendations 6, 7 and 8 were issued to address deficiencies
noted in tending and stand maintenance and creation of a specific
SGR for white birch renewal.
Changes in reserve along water bodies due to changes within the
new stand and site guide resulted in an increase in available area.
53 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
#
Objective
Auditor Assessment
Auditor Comments
Guides. The guide now allows some water quality areas
of concern to be harvested.
The objective was achieved since no decrease in
available area between 2006 FMP plan start and 2011
FMP plan start. The 2011 FMP has road
decommissioning objectives when implemented will
lower the declines in land base and growing stock
between future planning terms.
54 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 3 – Compliance with Contractual Obligations
Licence Condition
Licence Holder Performance
Payment of Forestry Futures and MNR Main office reported 19/05/11 indicated direct licencee
stumpage owed $2.5 million and other parties owed $0.5
Ontario Crown Charges
million for an aggregate of $3.4 million owing. This amount or
any outstanding amounts owed by the company will be tied up
in the bankruptcy declared April 26, 2011. Dues from other
parties may be recoverable directly by the Crown.
Wood supply commitments, MOAs, SFL Wood Commitments
Longlac Wood Industries Supply Agreement 536234
sharing
arrangements,
special 1)
noted in the SFL document. No MOA established. The auditee
conditions
indicated that no fibre shipped during audit term due to wood
cost when the hardwood facility was operating. This facility is
no longer operating making this commitment and the SFL
holder’s requirement to establish an MOA redundant.
2)
20,000 m3 annually to Buchanan Northern Hardwoods
Inc. A total of 1,162 m3 hardwood shipped 2006 to 2009. This
facility is no longer operating and the parent company
Buchanan was in Receivership during the audit term.
3)
Weyerhaeuser Dryden poplar and white birch volumes
annually to be made available. Volumes were delivered in
2007 and 2008 totalling 38,181 m3 of hardwood. The facility
no longer accepts hardwood since the facility was acquired by
Domtar Inc.
4)
Up to 41,000 m3 conifer annually to be made available
to Atikokan Forest Products. A total of 6,473 m3 were
delivered in 2006. The facilities parent company was in
Receivership during the audit term. This facility is no longer
operating.
Special SFL Conditions
MOA with all Overlapping licencees established for all but one
listed licencee. Company and MNR officials indicated
willingness to engage this individual as a licencee, however the
MOA was required as part of the process for operating on the
unit.
55 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Other Arrangements
MOA between the Buchanan Group and Bowater for a saw log
for chips arrangement.
Exchange arrangements with Abitibi involved 188,000 m3
annually company wide.
During the audit term due to industry amalgamation between
Bowater and Abitibi and changes in the economy almost all
chips produced from the Hudson mill were shipped to AbitibiBowater mills in Thunder Bay satisfying the above two wood
flow arrangements.
The McKenzie Conifer Business Plan documented the supply of
conifer logs to Hudson mill from Lac Seul Forest.
Hardwood fibre was delivered to the Weyerhaeuser Kenora
mill or a short period of time during the latter part of the audit
term when markets were viable for this product.
SFL Commitments were recognized in 2011-2021 FMP
Preparation of FMP, AWS and reports; FMPs, AWS, Annual Reports prepared as required and
abiding by the FMP, and all other requirements of the FMPM and CFSA followed and applied as
requirements of the FMPM and CFSA
required.
Wasteful practices not committed
No significant non conformances issued by MNR. Company
kept MNR aware of residual wood at roadside and in the bush
as a general practice. MNR monitored activity to confirm when
materials removed. Crown follows process for collection of
dues on wood that sits for long periods of time.
Recommendation 4 issued to address one instance MNR and
company were not aware of bundles not skidded.
Natural disturbance and salvage SFL Salvage of Fire 48 carried into early years of audit term.
Company salvaged and renewed forest impacted by severe
conditions followed
blow down event. No activity to date on timber area knocked
down by tornado.
Protection of licence area from pest Company and MNR coordinated efforts during 2008 and
damage, participation in pest control 2009jackpine budworm outbreak determining infestation was
programs
low risk. Continued monitoring was the resultant plan.
Withdrawals from the Licence area
No significant withdrawals from the Licence were noted during
the audit term.
Audit action plan and status report
Company and MNR prepared and completed action plan and
status report. Progress was demonstrated.
56 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Payment of forest renewal charges for Payments were made as required until near the end of the
audit term. Any amounts owing are now tied up in the
Forest Renewal Trust (FRT)
bankruptcy declared April 26, 2011.
Forest
Renewal
silviculture work
Trust
eligible Sampled work associated with the Specified Procedures
Report confirmed silviculture implemented as prescribed.
Sampled site during the field audit conformed the reported
work was undertaken. Prior to the bankruptcy both company
and MNR audited affirmed that minimum balance was
maintained and stumpage was paid on a regular basis.
Forest Renewal Trust forest renewal Analysis completed and submitted as required. Process
charge analysis
reviewed with plan author.
Forest
Renewal
minimum balance
Trust
account Company and MNR confirmed minimum balance maintained
each year.
Silviculture standards and assessment Company undertakes surveys and monitors renewal
performance. Sites are tracked and scheduled for survey and
program
monitored for tending requirements and FTG. Company
practice is to conduct FTG activities in two blocks of time
during an audit term to gain efficiencies of scale and manage
workflow. Updates contributed to the Planning Inventory as
required.
Aboriginal opportunities
Company reported functional relationships with the two First
Nation communities with Reserves within the forest
boundaries.
Preparation of compliance plan
Compliance plans prepared as required.
Internal
compliance Company maintained a training program supporting its
Environmental Management System and meeting its SFI logger
prevention/education program
training requirements. In addition, monitoring of compliance
trends indicated those overlapping Licences requiring specific
training. Improve compliance performance noted during the
audit term.
Compliance inspections and reporting; Compliance reports conducted on regular basis, received from
overlapping Licences and submitted, activities in line with
compliance with compliance plan
intent of the compliance plan.
SFL forestry operations on mining Operations occur regularly on mining claims. Claim holder
notified following established processes. Operators informed
claims
to protect claim posts and pickets.
57 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 4 – Audit Process
The IFA is a regulated undertaking in Ontario. The purpose of the audit, the principles by which it is
conducted, and details about its implementation are provided as follows.
A4.1 Audit Purpose and Principles
Recognizing the legislative requirement of the IFA, the purpose of the audit is to:
a) assess to what extent forest management planning activities comply with the Forest Management
Planning Manual and the [Crown Forest Sustainability]Act;
b) assess to what extent forest management activities comply with the Act, and with the forest
management plans, the manuals approved under the Act and the applicable guides;
c)
assess the effectiveness of forest management activities in meeting the forest management criteria
established for the audit;
d) compare the forest management activities carried out with those that were planned;
e)
assess the effectiveness of any action plans implemented to remedy shortcomings revealed by a
previous audit;
f)
Review and assess a licensee’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the forest resource
licence.
The assessments carried out by the auditor are guided by eight principles:
1 - Commitment
Commitment is reflected in vision, mission and policy statements of the company and in the
Company’s adherence to legislation and policies. Vision and mission statements are intended to
provide long-term guidance for the organization. Policy statements reflect how the organization’s
vision and mission will be achieved. These statements must be reflected in the day-to-day operations
of the organization.
2 - Public
Consultation and
Aboriginal
Involvement
The process of sustainable forest management planning, implementation and monitoring must be
conducted in an open consultative fashion, with the involvement of the Local Citizens Committee,
Aboriginal communities, and other parties with an interest in the operations of the forest
management unit.
3 - Forest
Management
Planning
The forest management planning process involves input from all members of the planning team as
well as public consultation and Aboriginal involvement to describe the current forest condition, values
and benefits to be obtained from the forest, the desired condition of the forest in the future, and the
best methods to achieve that goal. Planning requirements have been established which must be
followed by all forest management units.
4 - Plan Assessment
and Implementation
Verification of the actual results of operations in the field compared to the planned assumptions and
planned operations is required to be able to assess planning as well as the effective achievement of
plan objectives and compliance with laws and regulations.
5 - System Support
System support concerns resources and activities needed to support plan development and
implementation so as to achieve the desired objectives. The organization’s human resources and
information management systems must support sustainable forest management.
6 - Monitoring
Monitoring programs must be developed and implemented to assess compliance and effectiveness of
operations in relation to the FMP, laws and regulations. Operations must be reported regularly and
reporting must examine the effectiveness of these operations in achieving management objectives.
58 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
7 - Achievement of
Management
Objectives and Forest
Sustainability
Periodic assessments of the forest management unit operations must be made in order to determine
whether management objectives, including forest sustainability objectives, are being achieved. This
includes comparing the values of the planned indicators against the actual values and assessing the
reasons for any significant deviations.
8 - Contractual
Obligations
The licensee must comply with the specific licence requirements.
relevant to MNR, must be followed.
Specific requirements, when
A4.2 Audit Process
Once the contract was awarded, a pre-audit meeting was scheduled for May 9, 2011, at which time the
auditor and auditees (McKenzie Forest Products Inc. and MNR) met to discuss the logistical details of the
audit (including the audit plan), select sample sites, and obtain background information for the audit.
Documentation review and evaluation of the Trend Analysis report for the Forest was carried out in the
time leading up to the start of the audit. There was a delay in the availability of the Trend Analysis report
which was received by the auditor on June 11, 2011.
The field audit included a number of onsite activities during the week of September 12-16, 2011.
Previously selected sites were visited and the majority of interviews with MNR, the Company, and
stakeholders were scheduled at this time. The audit team sampled forestry activities that occurred on
the Forest during the audit term sufficient to demonstrate the range and diversity of activities.
The co-lead, biologist, and silviculture auditor from the audit team were accompanied by the Company’s
silviculturalist on a helicopter inspection of inaccessible areas. This view facilitated the auditors’
appreciation for the effectiveness of the management of the Forest and the landscape distribution of
forest and habitat types.
The draft audit report is normally due within 60 days of the start of the field audit. However, though an
audit schedule was originally completed, the bankruptcy of TECO in September 2011 resulted in a delay
in the delivery of the final report. The transfer of responsibility for the audit involved postponements
and delays resulting in the submission of the Draft Report on May 17, 2012 and the Draft Final Report on
July 24, 2012.
The draft final report was sent out for review then the auditor met by teleconference to present and
discuss the preliminary audit findings with the LCC (June 11, 2012) and with the auditees (June 12,
2012). Written comments resulting from these meetings were forwarded to the auditor to be
considered for revisions.
The draft final report was reviewed by the Forestry Futures Committee and the auditees also completed
their review to verify its contents and identify any significant errors. The auditor also received reviews
from corporate and regional MNR offices. The final report was submitted following the auditor’s
consideration of written comments.
A4.3 Field Sampling
The field sampling design considers risk, rarity, year of operation, and season as factors in the selection
of sites to visit during the audit field week. The object of the sampling is to capture each activity,
59 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
ensuring that both winter and summer harvests are included. The base sample is 10%; activities that are
rare or unique on the landscape will, by default, be sampled more that those activities that are common
and broadly applied.
For development of the audit plan, the auditor is required to identify those criteria for the IFAPP
principles that would be sampled during the audit process. The IFAPP qualifies the criteria as having a
low, medium, or high risk of influencing forest sustainability. Sampling of criteria with lesser influence
may be partial, but full assessment must be undertaken for those criteria considered high risk. Table 7
reflects the effort the auditor undertook to address specific IFAPP criteria during this audit.
0%
2 - Public Consultation & Aboriginal
Involvement
7
6
86%
2
% Audited
0
% Audited
2
# of Selected
Criteria
# of Selected
Criteria
# of Applicable
Criteria
(100% Audited)
High Risk
# of Applicable
Criteria
Medium Risk
1 - Commitment
Principle
# of Applicable
Criteria
Low Risk
3 - Forest Management Planning
7
7
100%
12
12
100%
42
4 - Plan Assessment & Implementation
1
1
100%
1
1
100%
10
1
1
100%
1
5
5
100%
11
7 - Achievement of Management
Objectives & Forest Sustainability
2
2
100%
15
8 - Contractual Obligations
7
6
86%
13
5 - System Support
6 - Monitoring
2
2
100%
Table 7. Procedures audited by risk category.
Table 7 shows that all applicable criteria were assessed (100% of the criteria were audited) for five of
the IFFAP principles.
The Lac Seul Forest was certified by the SFI standard at the time of the audit. The Commitment principle
is considered satisfied when a certification is maintained by the auditee as described within IFAPP for
Criteria 1 within this principle. No issues were raised during the audit to warrant further scrutiny.
60 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Six of the seven (86%) medium risk criteria were considered during the audit for the Public Consultation
and Aboriginal Involvement principle. Both of the high risk criteria were assessed as required by IFAPP.
For the Contractual Obligations principle, 86% of the medium criteria were assessed and all high risk
criteria were reviewed.
The Annual Reports for each year of the audit term were used to determine the quantity of each forest
management activity, specifically harvesting, road construction and water crossing installation, renewal
and tending, and FTG assessment. Review of queries from the Company’s GIS system and treatment
locations on a forest-scale map were used to determine a minimum sampling. Increased sampling,
based on observation in the field of a specific condition or concern, may occur during the audit site
visits. The actual sample of field sites visited is presented in Table 8.
Activity or Feature
Harvest
Site Preparation
Regeneration
Tending
Free-to-grow
Specified Procedures
Total Area
(ha)
10,559
Proposed
Sample Size
(ha)
1,056
Actual
Sample Size
(ha)
4,279
7,642
764
6,891
90%
17,956
1,796
7,597
42%
4,642
464
1,313
28%
20,928
2,093
4,626
22%
1,449
25%
5,903
Actual
Sample
(%)
41%
Table 8. Total area, sampling target, and actual area sampled as part of the IFA for 2006 to 2011 forest
management activities on the Lac Seul Forest.
A4.4 Summary of Consultations and Aboriginal Involvement
Several types of media were used to consult with stakeholders and gain input to the audit. These
consisted of newspaper ads, an on-line survey on the TECO website, notice letters, and direct calls to
specific stakeholders.
Ads were published in the Sioux Lookout Bulletin, Dryden Observer, Ignace Driftwood, Northern Sun
News, and Wawatay News.
The TECO website provided a brief forest management opinion survey; the opportunity to provide
comments and request follow-up contact from the auditor was also made available through this link.
61 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
A letter of notice was sent to all parties that had submitted comments during the 2011-2021 FMP
process, stakeholders associated with tourism on the Lac Seul Forest, and all overlapping licensees.
Letters of notice were also sent out to a further 1% sample of the rest of the District MNR mailing list. In
total, 350 letters were sent out.
The mailed notices and the online survey resulted in a number of callback requests and resulting input
from forest stakeholders. Input to the audit process by forest stakeholders assisted with field site
selection and the content of auditee interviews.
Tourism Operators
Tourism outfitters had specific concerns about harvest operations around Root Bay, the impact of access
controls, and the effort required to establish resource stewardship agreements.
Root Bay
Concern was expressed by one tourism operator through the web survey about cut timber left adjacent
to a fly-in operating area where he had specific input to keep the waterway buffer as wide as possible.
He also expressed dissatisfaction that the road remediation was not sufficiently severe to provide a
barrier to ATV traffic.
The Company indicated that a signed memorandum of agreement was on file for this operator. It was
also noted that this operator requested an independent environmental assessment, which was later
declined. During the aerial inspection of the Forest, the Company pointed out First Nations activities,
potential mining interests, and other activities around the portion of the river flowing into Root Bay
used by the tourist outfitter. Access and management strategies for the site were discussed. The block
was one of the last areas operational prior to the last shutdown of the McKenzie Forest Product Inc. mill.
The block is scheduled for slash management and silviculture treatment during the 2011-2012 Annual
Work Schedule. Recommendation 4 was issued to address the unskidded timber. This site was added to
the audit sample by helicopter, based on the input received.
Resource Agreements
Review of resource stewardship agreements on the Lac Seul Forest identified one instance where the
Company implemented measures established within the FMP to address potential concerns from a
tourism operator. After contact from the tourism operator, access control measures described within
the FMP were implemented by the Company. The MNR then determined that the implemented
measures provided a greater than anticipated barrier to public land access and required the Company to
rehabilitate the access. The MNR undertook a plan amendment that resulted in the establishment of
alternate access controls, including signage under the Public Lands Act, which restricted public access to
this area and then monitored access for compliance.
The Company and tourist operator were disappointed that their efforts to negotiate and establish a
resource stewardship agreement, complete with an access control plan built into the FMP, were not
completed. The Minister has clearly stated through policy that agreements established through a
resource stewardship agreement do not bind the Crown. In their role as administrator of public land,
MNR determined that less prohibitive measures could be implemented and undertook the FMP
amendment to achieve this result.
62 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
The auditor is in agreement with a statement by one of the stakeholders that the value of a resource
stewardship agreement is overstated, and the cost and effort involved are not worth it. The Company
and tourist operators on the Forest have evolved a memorandum of agreement that is functionally
simpler and more effective.
Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters
The Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters completed the online survey and sent a supplemental
letter describing their concerns regarding the Province’s strategy for implementation of the caribou
mosaic. The Federation would prefer a more targeted, herd-specific, population management approach
rather than the broad landscape habitat approach currently being used. This information was
considered by the auditor during this review.
Overlapping Licensees
Several overlapping licencees were contacted prior to the audit field week to discuss and review their
experiences on the Lac Seul Forest during the audit term. Overlapping licencees were initially the
Traditional Operators from the former Lac Seul Crown Management Unit.
Overlapping licencees active on the Forest reported generally good relations with McKenzie Forest
Products Inc., regarding the administration of overlapping licences and access to forest allocations
through the FMP. The system devised for allocation of timber functioned effectively. However two
licencees expressed concerns stemming from the transfer of the SFL to McKenzie Forest Products Inc.
A Traditional Operator (originally listed in Schedule F of the SFL) expressed a specific concern with how
the SFL was established through the New Business Relationship during the late 1990s. Differing points of
view existed on the desired business arrangement to accompany the amalgamation of forest units that
created the current Lac Seul Forest boundaries and the eventual assignment by MNR of the SFL to
McKenzie Forest Products Inc. The process resulted in acrimonious relationships between some parties.
Interviews with the District and the licencee holder indicated that harvest opportunities would be made
available to the Traditional Operator subject to the standard requirements accepted for operating on
the Forest, including entering into an overlapping licence agreement and other associated obligations.
The auditor is confident that, should the Traditional Operator have the capacity to sustain and satisfy
today’s operating and regulatory demands, District MNR and the Forest Resource Licence holder will
follow through with their obligations to make opportunities available to those operators.
The auditor recognizes that the forest regulatory and operating environments have changed
dramatically and become increasingly demanding over the past 15 years. The auditor anticipates the
demands and complexity of forest operations to remain challenging. The auditor acknowledges that
opportunities made available may be less satisfactory, however the demands placed on logging
operators appear consistent for all operators on the Forest.
First Nations
Written notice from the auditor inviting First Nations participation in the Lac Seul Forest IFA was issued
in late April to all First Nations noted by MNR to have an interest in the Lac Seul Forest. Following
discussions with the MNR District Native Liaison Officer, that office also issued written notices to each of
the First Nations to facilitate contact with the auditor.
63 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
The First Nations notified of the audit were Cat Lake, Lac Seul, Mishkeegogamang, Ojibway Saugeen, and
Slate Falls. The auditor made several attempts to contact the two First Nations that fall within the
boundaries of the Lac Seul Forest.
Lac Saul First Nation community’s Resources Officer and a Band councillor responsible for the forestry
portfolio met with the auditor at the OMNR district office in Sioux Lookout during the week of the site
visits.
They indicated their communities objected to MNR’s increased regulation and imposition of caribou
management on their traditional lands. They had prepared at their cost, and had obtained approval for,
a ten-year FMP for their lands. The plan became obsolete when caribou management came into force.
Recommendation 2 supports modification of the caribou mosaic strategy adjacent to the Lac Seul
Reserve to support community objectives within this portion of the Forest.
Local Citizens Committee
Interviews were held with half of the current LCC members and one former committee member.
Different LCC members participated in the opening meeting and the field visits. The auditor was
impressed with the diversity of interests on the committee. The District Manager led a review and
renewal of the membership of the LCC during the audit term to address recommendations from the
previous audit.
Interviews with LCC members confirmed opportunities for them to express their opinions were made
available during committee meetings and the meetings were orderly and, in general, respectful of the
opinions and positions of stakeholders around the table. Some LCC members expressed frustration
about delays experienced in the FMP planning process due to the timing of the release of the Stand and
Site Guide and the Caribou Conservation Plan. The District Manager was noted as being present at the
majority of meetings.
The auditors found that the LCC was actively involved in monitoring and providing input to the District
Manager on the implementation of the 2006-2011 FMP, including the review of Annual Reports, Annual
Work Schedules, amendments, compliance issues, and silviculture programs. Additionally, the District
Manager and Regional Director included the LCC in the issue resolution process during the development
of the 2011-2021 FMP.
64 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 5 – List of Acronyms
AOC - Area of Concern
CEZ - Cervid Ecological Zone
CFSA - Crown Forest Sustainability Act
COV - Identifier descriptive code from FMP denoting a Forest Cover objective
eFRI - A descriptor for the digital Forest Resource Inventory adopted as the provincial standard for new
forest inventories.
FD - Identifier descriptive code from FMP denoting a Forest Diversity objective
FMP - Forest management plan
FMPM - Forest Management Planning Manual for Ontario’s Crown Forests
FRI - Forest Resource Inventory
FRL – Forest Resource Licence
FSC - Forest Stewardship Council
FTG – Free-to-grow
IFA - Independent Forest Audit
IFAPP - Independent Forest Audit Process and Protocol
LCC – Local Citizens Committee
MNR - Ministry of Natural Resources
NDPEG - Natural Disturbance Pattern Emulation Guide
R.P.F. - Registered Professional Forester
SFI - Sustainable Forestry Initiative
SGR –Silvicultural Ground Rule
SILV - Identifier descriptive code from FMP denoting a Silviculture objective
SOC - Identifier descriptive code from FMP denoting a Social objective
TECO - TECO Natural Resource Group Limited
65 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
Appendix 6 – Audit Team Members and Qualifications
The audit team was comprised of six members. The role of lead auditor was initially shared between
John Cary R.P.F. and Matthew Hollands R.P.F., M.B.A. Following the TECO bankruptcy and the
subsequent reassignment of the audit to Mr. Cary, he assumed the lead role.
A.6.1 Auditor Biographies
Matthew F. Hollands, R.P.F., M.B.A.
Mr. Hollands is a professional forester and principal consultant of Hollands Forestry Consulting. He
brings years of forest operations, silviculture and forest business experience to the audit team. He
provided seven years of support to the Forestry Futures Committee as an audit analyst and observing
forest management practices across the province. Mr. Hollands has served several First Nations
communities and many medium-to-small enterprises through his practice. He has conducted hundreds
of chain of custody audits as lead auditor for the various forestry certification standards.
During the earlier days of his career, Mr. Hollands gained broad and valuable field and forestry
administrative experience through employment with MNR and several forest industry companies prior
to his move to the consulting field. This is Mr. Hollands first Independent Forest Audit as co-lead auditor.
John Cary R.P.F.
Mr. Cary has been involved in forestry in Ontario since 1973. Throughout his career he has been
involved in forestry matters in both northern and southern forests within the province, through his
employment with the MNR as a senior policy office and as an independent forestry consultant. He has
provided advice towards, and participated in, the formation and advancement of provincial forest policy
matters and legislation for much of his career, distinguishing himself as an advocate for good forestry
practices. Mr. Cary has conducted thirteen IFAs including four as lead auditor.
Isabel Gannon R.P.F.
Ms. Gannon is experienced as a plan author, bringing fifteen years of forest management planning
knowledge to the audit team. Ms. Gannon understands the development of background information,
forest units, strategic direction, annual work schedules, annual reports, plan amendments, and
contingency plans. She has experience with the review of forest inventories to support forest modelling
efforts for forest and habitat simulations. Ms. Gannon has also shared information supporting forest
management planning with LCCs and the general public as well as assessing socioeconomic profiles. Ms.
Gannon continues to provide her expertise in forest management planning as the principal consultant of
Gannon Forestry Consulting Inc.
Dr. Rob Foster (Zoology)
Dr. Foster is co-founder and principal of Northern Bioscience, an ecological consulting firm offering
professional consulting services supporting ecosystem management, planning, and research. He has
fifteen years research and experience in northern Ontario working on a variety of projects with direct or
indirect links to forest management planning. His experience includes investigating the impact of
herbicides on crop trees, competing vegetation, and small mammal communities; martin and peregrine
falcon habitat spatial analysis; pre-harvest surveys for rare plants and non-timber values; remote
sensing of aquatic moose feedings areas and many other assessments and studies of northern terrestrial
66 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
and aquatic ecosystems. Dr. Foster is a trained auditor under the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)
standards and has participated as an auditor in FSC, IFA, and Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) audits in
Ontario.
Craig Robinson R.P.F.
Mr. Robinson was the Senior Analyst and Manager of TECO Natural Resource Group Limited. His twenty
years experience is specialised in inventory, analysis, timber supply, GIS, database design and software
development and brings the technical strength to the audit team. Mr. Robinson is familiar with timber
supply modelling practices across Canada. He has conducted resource analysis and modelling to support
allowable annual cut and higher-level plan decision-making using various modelling packages. He has
also designed and implemented comprehensive forest inventory and sampling programs to meet
planning and modelling requirements with experience in BC, Yukon, NWT and Ontario. Craig is now
teaching natural resource management at Confederation College in Thunder Bay and runs his own
consulting company.
Andy Purton R.P.F.
Mr. Purton R.P.F. is a silviculture-focused forester experienced with Post Harvest Forest Operating
Prescriptions. Andy was employed by TECO Natural Resource Group Limited as an expert silviculturalist
until their bankruptcy. He has now moved on to Sumac Consulting in Thunder Bay. His extensive
knowledge of forest renewal following harvest, knowledge of regeneration surveys, past role in
supervising cruising for the establishment of FRI permanent sample plots, and involvement with the
establishment of Ontario Forest Research Institute (OFRI) NEBIE plots, provides the audit team a valued
resource for assessing silvicultural performance during the audit term.
67 | P a g e
Final Audit Report
This page has been left intentionally blank.
68 | P a g e

Independent Forest Audit Report - Lac Seul Forest

Transcription

Similar documents

2008 Central States Forest Soils Conference

Productivity and cost analysis of skidding machines

Landowner to Landowner - Forest Landowners Association

Feature 1

Quarterly

In Business Newsletter Fall Winter 2013

United - US Forest Service

FRE Layout - Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource

Societies favor national affiliation for insurance

4.0 MB - Center for International Forestry Research