normas generales para la presentación de trabajos

Comments

Transcription

normas generales para la presentación de trabajos
Annex III.- ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL USED BY EXPERTS
Number of the paper (to be allocated by the Journal):
Title of the paper:
Expert:

Date receipt:

Date sent:
Please, assess the different sections of this protocol, carrying out the suitable suggestions and remarks, and with the
length you think more appropriate. You are expected to send the report in a maximum term of 15 days to count from the
date receipt. If it were not possible, you should report the Revista de Educación so as to avoid any delay.
PAPER DESCRIPTION (TYPE)
Research – study
Educational experience (innovation)
Essay
Report
Other: Which one?:.............................................................................................................
RECOMMENDATION (check one option)
A
It should be published as it is (or with slights formal modifications to be specified in the
global assessment of the paper).
B
It should be published after making certain corrections and presentation modifications to be
specified in the global assessment of the paper.
C
It could be published after making significant corrections and presentation modifications -to
be specified in the global assessment of the paper- taking into account the particular interest of the
topic, the relevance, approach, etc.
D
It should not be published in the Revista de Educación (Madrid), although the author(s) is
suggested to send it to other journal or publication. Which one or what
type?:…..………………………………………………
E
Not to be published
I have assessed the present article and declare not to have either financial, intellectual or personal interest as
regards this paper. I will not disseminate the information obtained through the assessment of it prior to its
publication.
Expert signature
Number of the paper (to be allocated by the Journal):
Title of the paper:
Authors:
PAPER REVIEW REPORT
Write the review in compliance with the criteria mentioned below. The length of your justification is up to
you, provided you do it appropriately.
1. PRESENTATION AND ADAPTATION TO THE REVISTA DE EDUCACIÓN GUIDELINES (CLARITY
AND LEGIBILITY, STRUCTURE, BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES). If you notice that, despite of the
interest of the content the article cannot be published without carrying out a general style correction and a detailed one
by the authors, you are requested to tell us. Please, check all the references are included in ‘Bibliographical References’.
2. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PAPER FOR THE EDUCATIONAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY AND/ OR
TEACHERS, HEAD TEAMS, EDUCATIONAL COUNCELLORS AND OTHER MEMBER OF THE
SCHOOL COMMUNITY.
3. TOPICALITY OF THE PAPER’S REVIEW (where appropriate). FOUNDATION AND THEORETICAL
CONTRIBUTIONS.
4. QUALITY – ADAPTATION OF ANY OTHER TEHCNICAL-SCIENTIFIC ASPECTS OF THE PAPER
(according to the type of paper: Research, report, essay or experience).
Design of the paper (according to the type; population and samples).
Methodology and techniques used for the collection and analysis of the information.
Results (presentation, discussion and analysis).
Conclusions (proximity to the problem and objectives; significance; aptitude).
Limitations (stated or not by authors).
Prospective (made explicit or not by authors).
Figures and tables (adequacy, aptitude, clarity).
Other relevant aspects
5. ADEQUACY OF THE TITLE
6. ADEQUACY OF THE SUMMARY (IMRYD format).
7. ADEQUACY OF KEY WORDS
GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF THE PAPER
GENERAL REMARKS (to be sent to authors)
You should include the main suggestions for the review and improvement of the paper by the authors and without
which it could not be published (use the space you consider appropriate).
_______________________________________________
CONFIDENTIAL REMARKS (as regards the acceptance of the manuscript, only for editors). You should write
them in a separate sheet of paper.
Assessor signature
Revista de Educación
San Fernando del Jarama, 14, 1º
28002 Madrid
Tel. 91 745 92 00
Fax: 91 745 92 49
E-mail: [email protected]

Similar documents