December 2015
Transcription
December 2015
Compliments of the Season “Trumping In” Waverley Bridge Club Newsletter www.waverleybridgeclub.com.au Phone: 03 9807 6502 December 2015 BEST WISHES FOR CHRISTMAS AND THE NEW YEAR As we say hello to December and wonder where the year has gone, I would like to wish everyone a very safe and enjoyable festive season in the company of loved ones and friends. ABN 86 643 699 219 NOVEMBER DUPLICATE WINNER Congratulations to our November duplicate winner, Jenny Gray, who topped the month with an average of 63.5%. I would also take this opportunity to sincerely thank you for your continuing patronage of WBC throughout 2015. While playing bridge can be extremely frustrating at times, I hope you agree with me that the social benefits derived from enjoying the company of others in our club environment are most important and do ease the pain of that bad bid or missed contract . I trust that 2016 will prove to be a rewarding year for all at WBC and I greatly look forward to seeing you on a regular basis around the bridge table. Rob Quirk, President CHRISTMAS PARTIES - Please bring a plate of Christmas goodies to share for lunch. This year we are also having a Friday party! Monday December 14 from 10.00 am. Afternoon players please arrive around 12.15 - 12.30 pm Tuesday December 8 - 7.30 pm Thursday December 17 - 7.30 pm Friday December 18 - 10.30 am st 1 10 points nd 2 9 points rd 3 8 points th 4 7 points th 5 6 points th 6 5 points th 7 4 points th 8 3 points th 9 2 points th 10 1 point Jenny Gray Libby Persson Dell Macneil Barry Levi Michael Pogson Sylvia Kudelka Julia Guttman Nicole McManamny Inpa Inpanathan Percy Cundasamy 1 RANK PROMOTIONS LATEST NATIONWIDE PAIRS RESULTS Congratulations to the following players who have recently achieved rank promotions. Event 21 from November 6 21st in Australia: Sally Thornton, Philip McDermott 27th in Australia: Kumara Nainanayake, Sena Hasthanayake. Graduate Master 2+ MP Carol Jaffit, Rosalyn Rodger, Ken Greig Club Master 5+ MP Kevin Neville, Leslie Macpherson, Graham Hubbard, Shirley Wardell, Margaret Stanley, Daphne Norman and Michael Meehan Local Master Barbara Love 15+ MP *Local Master Rosie Derek and Jean Ballas 25+ MP **Local Master 35+ MP Lisa Yoffa, Harold Dalton and Nancy Langham Regional Master 50+MP Penny Blakey, Margaret Willcox and Mary Enter National Master Marina Darling 150+MP (incl. 75+ red) *National Master Dell Macneil 200+MP (incl 100+ red) Silver Life Master David Yoffa 500+MP (incl 300+ red & gold) Gold Life Master Laura Ginnan 750+MP (incl 450+ red & gold) RECENT RESULTS SWISS TEAMS 1st Krolikowski: Andrzej Krolikowski, Rob Stewart, Michael Gurfinkiel, Martin Willcox 2nd Day: Mary Day, Paul Edwards, Penny Blankfield, Sue Read 3rd Jay: Jan Jay, Elizabeth Gralinska, Lyndall Shaw, Chandradeep Chakravorty UPCOMING NATIONWIDE PAIRS DATES Friday December 4 and 19 Nationwide Pairs offers a chance to compete in an Australia-wide competition from the comfort of your local club with the chance of winning Red Points. Event 22 from November 20 31st in Australia: Graeme Neale, Margaret Perry 50TH ANNIVERSARY Congratulations to Rupert and Tammy Ferdinands on the occasion of their 50th wedding anniversary on November 6. Rupert, who has been a member of WBC for quite a few years now, came from Sri Lanka after quite an extraordinary sporting career, being a national representative in tennis and Davis Cup team member. He is a Hall of Fame tennis coach, now retired. He was also a first class cricketer in Sri Lanka. Best wishes to both of you Rupert and Tammy, and hoping you enjoy many happy years to come!! HAVE YOU HEARD OF LIGHTNER DOUBLES? The Lightner double is a lead-directing double of a slam contract, developed by American bridge pioneer Theodore A. Lightner. He was born in 1893 and died in the year 1981 and was one of the leading bridge personalities in the early days of the evolving game of bridge. The Lightner Double During his investigation of slam contracts and the first card to be played to a slam he realized that experienced opponents would be most likely to make their contract, or at worst fail by one trick. In this case, making a penalty double was unlikely to be very profitable, or helpful. Theodore Lightner chose a new meaning for a double of a freely bid slam contract. He states: A double by the hand not on lead is conventional. The partner on lead is requested to choose an unusual lead which may result in the defeat of the contract. Note that it is not always possible to defeat the contract and any lead by the partner will not always defeat the contract. The concept is that an unusual lead may defeat the contract. 1. A Lightner double excludes the lead of a trump. Please note that there is no lunch break in the NWP section. 2. A Lightner double excludes any suit bid by the defenders. Play starts at 10.30 and ends at around 1.30. Table fees for NWP sessions are $10 for members and $12 for non-members. There is no need to pre-enter, just come along on the day. 3. A Lightner double may exclude any suit not yet bid, but this is conditional. 4. It is also conditional that the defender, who uses the Lightner double, to expect to ruff the lead of a 2 side suit mentioned by the opponents, or otherwise to win the first two top tricks in that suit. Note: As a variation to the original concept other variations have occurred, the most common being that the double asks partner to lead the first side suit bid by dummy. In any case, using the above mentioned guidelines, the partner is more or less supposed to work out the lead from the context of the auction. Generally speaking, partner is asked to: 1. Lead dummy's side suit, if one has been bid 2. Lead declarer's side suit, if one has been bid 3. Failing having the above, choose an unusual lead this will often be leader's longest suit - doubler is likely to have a void in that suit. A Lightner double, hoping that partner will find a heart lead. The Lightner double is not in effect if the opponents are sacrificing at the 6- or 7-level. In those situations, it's more practical to use regular penalty doubles. Playing Lightner doubles, the opening leader can also infer what to lead if his partner did NOT double. For example, if the opponents bid a side suit en route to a slam contract and partner does not double, the inference is that partner does NOT want a lead of the enemy side suit. Following is a good example of when not to double, if you are using Lightner doubles… WEST NORTH 1♦ 3NT 5♥ All pass Again, the double asks partner to NOT lead any suit that your side has bid. 2♥ Pass Double You hold the following hands and hear the auctions as given below. ♠5432 ♥653 ♦AT9876 ♣void The player held: ♠Jxxx ♥AKJxx ♦109xx ♣-- OPP 1♥ 3♥ PARTNER Pass Pass OPP 2♣ 6♥ YOU Pass Double1 1 This is a Lightner double. You are requesting the lead of a club - the first side suit bid by your right hand opponent. ♠762 ♥void ♦AT987 ♣K9842 OPP PARTNER 1♠ 3♣ 6♠ Pass OPP 3♠ Pass YOU 5♣ Double1 EAST Pass Pass Pass SOUTH 2♣ 4NT 6NT and doubled, expecting the contract to fail. His partner, however, thought they were playing Lightner doubles, and led a club (the first suit bid by dummy)! North made the contract with an overtrick. So, by using Lightner doubles you are giving up the chance of making a penalty double of contracts like this. However, it is probably worth the sacrifice. If you pass, partner will always lead a heart, and sacrificing 100 points is good insurance. Many pairs won't be in slam and plus 100 is probably going to be a very good score. You don't need plus 200. CHRISTMAS/NEW YEAR BRIDGE 1 Once again, this is a Lightner double. It asks partner not to lead a club, but to find an unusual lead. You hope that partner will lead a heart. ♠A762 ♥void ♦76 ♣10876532 OPP 1♦ 4NT 6♦ PARTNER Pass Pass Pass OPP 3♦ 5♦ Pass YOU Pass Pass Double1 Thursday December 24 am - Open Thursday December 24 pm - Closed Friday December 25 - Closed Saturday December 26 - Normal sessions resume Thursday December 31 am - Open Thursday December 31 pm Open Friday January 1 - Normal sessions resume. 3 A LOOK AT NEGATIVE DOUBLES Most of us play some kind of negative doubles. When is a double 'negative'? When partner has opened the bidding and there has been an overcall. What does the double promise? Usually: At least the points required to make a response Exactly four cards in any unbid major If two majors have been bid, length in both minors With values a negative double can deviate from the above, if bidder would have to make a two level response, and there is no other sensible action. Doubler needs to have a plan about the possible outcomes of the auction. With fewer than 10 points and unable to make a 2-level response, a negative double can be made when holding a 6-card suit, able to be bid at the 2-level on the second round of the auction: e.g. holding: ♠94 ♥KQ10973 ♦QJ8 ♣83 AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♠ Pass NORTH 1♣ 1NT (say) EAST 1♠ Pass SOUTH X 2♥ This now promises long hearts and fewer than 10 HCP. With 10+ HCP you would have bid 2♥ immediately. You are not promising a shortage in opponent's suit. SOUTH ?? 6. ♠874 ♥KQ62 ♦QJ95 ♣94 7. ♠K6 ♥QJ84 ♦873 ♣QJ42 8. ♠76 ♥A52 ♦K43 ♣AJ963 AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♣ EAST 1♦ SOUTH ?? 9. ♠9852 ♥AKQ7 ♦8764 ♣2 10. ♠AQ98 ♥KQ652 ♦8 ♣K62 11. ♠QJ84 ♥876 ♣K92 ♣874 12. ♠QJ953 ♥KQ932 ♦8 ♣J4 Choose a bid for each hand then see page 7 for a discussion. WHO HAS THE ACE? As West, you are defending a 3NT contract after a 1NT : 3NT auction. You lead the ♥K and see the following dummy. Partner follows with the ♥7. Who has the ♥A, and what is partner's ♥7 telling you? What card do you lead at trick 2? North (dummy) ♠AQ6 ♥J93 ♦853 ♣QJ94 in the auction: WEST EAST 2♣ West (you) ♠J105 ♥KQ108 ♦K742 ♣83 East ♠7 Choose your answers, then see page 12. Are you and your partner in agreement about how high you play them? Many people like doubles to be negative up to 4♥. Have a look at the following hands and choose an action in the auctions given above the hands. AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♣ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. EAST 1♥ SOUTH ?? ♠9862 ♥K4 ♦QJ96 ♣532 ♠Q8752 ♥J94 ♦QJ96 ♣5 ♠A42 ♥873 ♦QJ64 ♣532 ♠7642 ♥A9 ♦KQ986 ♣J7 ♠KQ74 ♥72 ♦AKQ6 ♣K62 4 PLAYING WITH FINESSE - for improvers If all we had to do to make our contracts was play off a bunch of Aces and Kings, this would be a fairly boring game. Luckily for us, this is nowhere near the truth and bridge offers us endless opportunities to try to create tricks where none existed originally. And one of the main ways of developing extra tricks is by becoming adept at the art of the Finesse! You are in 3NT and the Club King is led: Dummy ♠KQ32 ♠7652 ♦AQJ ♣98 Lead: ♣K You ♠A76 ♥AK8 ♦962 ♣A43 After thanking partner for his dummy, your next job is to count your winners - the rock solid tricks that you will take without losing the lead. So, Spades 3; Hearts 2; Diamonds 1; Clubs 1. You have seven winners ready to 'cash'. Which means you need two more. Which suit looks to be the most likely to yield the extra tricks you need? You might win a fourth spade, if the opposing cards break 3/3, but that is only one extra trick, and you need two - without losing the lead. The moment you lose the lead, they will run a large number of club tricks. The only logical answer is diamonds - you have every top diamond except the King. Under what circumstances can you win two more tricks in diamonds? With the King missing you might expect that you have to lose one trick. You can take the three diamond tricks you need to make your contract every time the King of diamonds is in the West hand - if it is sitting 'under' the Ace. All you have to do is make sure that you lead a diamond from your hand, not from the dummy. (Good tip when playing a hand. Lead low cards towards high cards. Don't lead high cards!) So, win the lead with the ♥A in your hand, and lead a diamond. When West plays a low card - playing the King would not help him - you play the Jack from the dummy. Your contract depends on the placement of that ♦K. If West has the King and didn't play it, you will take the first trick with the Jack. If East has the ♦K and plays it on your Jack, you have done your best, but sadly you are going off in your contract. You have a 50% chance, which is much better than almost no chance at all if you just play the ♦A. Let's say that the ♦J wins the trick. Wonderful. It looks as if the ♦K is in the West hand, but your work is not yet over. You still have to take a trick with the ♦Q. So, lead a spade to the Ace in your hand and then lead another diamond (don't lead high cards, lead low cards towards high cards). Now when West follows with another low diamond you play the Queen from dummy. Now you can take 3 spades, 2 hearts, 3 diamonds and 1 club to make your nine tricks. You have just performed a double finesse perfectly. Have a look at some common holdings and decide how to play them to maximise your chances of making tricks. 1. ♦AQ ♦32 2. ♦KJ3 3. ♦AJ10 4. ♦AJ6 ♦A76 ♦Q6 ♦Q5 5. ♦Q74 ♦A92 1. Lead the ♦3 from your hand and play the ♦Q when West follows with a low card. You will take the trick with the Queen every time West has the King but didn't play it. 2. Now you can take three tricks if West has the ♦Q. Play the ♦A, then lead a low diamond to the Jack. This will take the trick the 50% of the time that West has the queen. 3. You have every high card except the King. This time, lead the Queen from your hand following low from dummy if West doesn't play the King. Now, if the Queen wins the first trick, you are still in the correct hand to lead the ♦6 and play the Jack from the dummy. 4. Things change a bit now. You no longer have all the missing high cards. Now if you lead the Queen, you should expect West to play the King if he has it, following the dictum - cover an honour with an honour. If he does that, you will have to play the Ace and then your only other winning card will be the Jack and you will have to lose a trick. Your best chance is to lead low and play the Jack. If that wins, next play the Ace hoping that West only had ♦Kx and the king will drop. 5. Using the same principle, defender will cover an honour with an honour, it is completely pointless leading the Queen now. If you lead the Queen and East has the King, he will play it, you will have to play the Ace and you will never win two tricks. In this case you have to lead a low card from your hand, hoping the West has the King and has to decide whether to play it and let you win the second trick with the Queen and the third with the Ace, or to let you win the first trick with the Queen. Once again, a 50% chance of finding the missing King where you want it. 5 ♠AQ ♥AQ108 ♦85 ♣Q10942 MAKING THE BEST POSSIBLE SCORE Nil Vulnerable, you are South and hold: ♠J10843 ♥K4 ♦A9843 ♣K ♠4 ♥9652 ♦J1072 ♣AJ85 ♠J10853 ♥K4 ♦A9643 ♣K and the auction proceeds: WEST NORTH 1♣ EAST 1♠ SOUTH ?? What should you do now? 1. 2NT - showing 10 - 12 with a spade stopper? 2. 2♦ - 10+ with a 5-card diamond suit? 3. Pass - for whatever reason?; or 4. Panic!!!!!? Only one good answer here, and it is certainly not No. 4. There is a very good little 'rule' which should be applied here - the longer you are in opponent's suit, the faster you should pass! Next point - make your pass 'in tempo' - don't rush to pass (no matter what the rule says), and don't think about it before you pass. A smooth pass is in order. Hesitating might make it difficult for partner to act when he has the illegal information that you had a hand that needed thinking about. What you are hoping is that partner, when the bid returns to him, with re-open with a double - this is a corollary of Negative Doubles, briefly discussed on page 7. If he does this, you can then pass, converting his double into a penalty double. The auction would look like this: WEST Pass NORTH 1♣ Double EAST 1♠ Pass SOUTH Pass Pass West however, now chose to bid 1NT, which is passed back to you. What do you do now? WEST Pass 1NT NORTH 1♣ Double Pass EAST 1♠ Pass Pass SOUTH Pass Pass ?? At equal vulnerability you should probably double now - and this is a penalty double. If your side can make 3NT, it means that opponents will go 3 off, which doubled would be -500 for them - a top score for you. This is the hand in the next column ♠K9762 ♠J73 ♦KQ ♣763 North, judging that you had long strong spades to justify your pass of the first double, led his ♠A and continued with the ♠Q, dummy played low and declarer pitched a heart. North switched to a low club and South's ♣K won the trick. South then led the ♠Jto establish an extra spade trick and North discarded the ♦8 - discouraging. Not needing any more information South switched to the ♥K and a low heart, making four heart tricks - and thus winning the first 9 tricks, for three down - +500 to the good guys. If North South had played in 3NT, they would have scored only 400. The East hand is a very good example of a really awful overcall. If you are going to insist on overcalling with only 9 HCP, then you should have a hand that looks like this: ♠AK1093 ♥7 ♣Q984 ♣873 or better! PLAN THE PLAY - TWO WAYS 6♣S Lead: ♠K ♠A ♥Q3 ♦AQ32 ♣AQT432 ♠J2 ♥AK4 ♦9876 ♣KJ65 You are in 6♣ and North leads the ♠K. Work out two ways to make the contract, then see page 8 Gifts of time and love are surely the basic ingredients of a truly merry Christmas. 6 A LOOK AT NEGATIVE DOUBLES from page 3 AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♣ EAST 1♥ SOUTH ?? 1. ♠9862 ♥K4 ♦QJ96 ♣532 Double: This promises a 4-card spade holding and 6 or more HCP. 2. ♠Q8752 ♥J94 ♦QJ96 ♣5 1♠: Now your bid of 1♠ promises 5 or more spades. (If you had only 4, you would have made a Negative Double) 3. ♠A42 ♥873 ♦QJ64 ♣532 Pass: All dressed up with no place to go! If there had been no overcall, you would have responded 1NT, but now that bid would promise a Heart winner. So, despite the fact that you have 7 HCP, there is no sensible bid that you can make. 4. ♠7642 ♥A9 ♦KQ986 ♣J7 Double: To show the 4-card spade suit. Don't bid 2♦ unless you are strong enough to 'reverse' by bidding your 5-card suit then your 4-card suit. You need at least 12 HCP to do this. 5. ♠KQ74 ♥72 ♦AKQ6 ♣K62 Double: The fact that you are strong makes no difference to the Negative Double, which shows 4 spades and at least 6 HCP. AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♠ EAST 2♣ SOUTH ?? 6. ♠874 ♥KQ62 ♦QJ95 ♣94 2♠: You have 3 spades, so choose to raise partner rather than make a negative double to show 4 hearts. 7. ♠K6 ♥QJ84 ♦873 ♣QJ42 Double: Showing a 4-card heart suit and 6 or more points. 8. ♠76 ♥A52 ♦K43 ♣AJ963 Pass!!: You are hoping that when the auction gets back to partner, he will 're-open' with a double, which you will leave in for penalties. You cannot make a penalty double if you are using Negative Doubles. AUCTION: WEST NORTH 1♣ EAST 1♦ SOUTH ?? 9. ♠9852 ♥AKQ7 ♦8764 ♣2 Double: Showing exactly 4 cards in each major and 6 or more HCP. 10. AQ98 ♥KQ652 ♦8 ♣K62 1♥: You don't have exactly 4 cards in each major, so bid the 5-card suit. 11. ♠QJ84 ♥876 ♣K92 ♣874 1♠: You don't have exactly 4 cards in each major, so bid the 4-card suit. 12. ♠QJ953 ♥KQ932 ♦8 ♣J4 1♠: Don't make a Negative double with 2 x 5 card suits. Plan to bid both suits in the auction, unless of course partner supports your spades. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THE VULNERABILITY MAKE? - for new players I often hear new players saying - 'I don't want to bid game, we are vulnerable!' So, how does vulnerability affect your scores? Playing in a duplicate session, when everyone in the room has the same vulnerability on each board played, means that being either vulnerable or nonvulnerable makes no difference at all in a noncompetitive auction. The relative size of the score is not important, just the fact that you have a higher or lower score. Minus 50 or minus 100 makes no difference to your position because your score is held up against the same penalty at other tables. It is no worse going 3 down vulnerable and scoring minus 300 than it is to go 3 down non-vulnerable and scoring minus 150. It is not the size of the score, but where your score stands when compared to everyone else's scores. What you do risk, if you choose not to reach a game contract, is the loss of the big game bonus (300 if nonvulnerable and 500 if vulnerable), and will thereby suffer a bad score if most of the other pairs playing the same hand reach and make the game. So, in freely bid auctions, don't refuse to bid game because of the vulnerability if the auction indicates that you have the values needed. However, in competitive auctions, vulnerability can make all the difference in the world. If both sides are bidding energetically WEST 1♥ NORTH 2♠(weak) EAST 4♥ SOUTH ?? and South holds: ♠J85 ♥987 ♦42 ♣AQ952 7 what South does next is very dependent on the vulnerability. We are now entering the realm of the penalty double. If East/West are non-vulnerable they will score 420; if they are vulnerable they will score 620. If North/South bid 4♠ as a sacrifice, assuming that the 4♥ contract will make, they must expect to be doubled, and can only afford to go two off if the vulnerability is equal, or one off if it is unfavourable in other words if they are vulnerable and East/West are not. If the vulnerability is favourable - if they are non-vulnerable and the opponents are vulnerable, then they can afford to go three light in their contract and still get a better score. If opponents can make 3♥ and you overcall 3♠, which is not doubled - once again vulnerability enters into it. If they make their contract, they will score 140. Not vulnerable, if you go 2 off in 3♠, you only lose 100, but vulnerable you would get the ghastly score of minus 200 - or, as it is called, the kiss of death. So, in competitive auctions, be a little more circumspect if you are vulnerable. Try to get your opponents to the three level, but be wary of bidding 3 of your own suit if your values are suspect. PLAN THE PLAY - TWO WAYS from page 6 ♠A ♥Q3 ♦AQ32 ♣AQT432 6♣ Lead: ♠K Here is a brief chart that shows the various scores for sacrificing and going down against a making opposition game when non-vulnerable and vulnerable. 1. You are non-vulnerable OPP'S BID YOUR BID Opp. 4♥ 4♠X Making Non Vul Non Vul 1 off 420 -100 YOUR BID 4♠X Non Vul 2 off -300 YOUR BID 4♠X Non Vul 3 off -500 Too much Opp. 4♥ Making Vulnerable 620 -300 -500 -100 2. You are vulnerable OPP'S BID YOUR BID Opp. 4♥ 4♠X Making Vulnerable Non Vul 1 off 420 -200 Opp 4♥ Making Vulnerable 620 -200 YOUR BID 4♠X Vulnerable 2 off -500! Too much YOUR BID 4♠X Vulnerable 3 off -800! Much too much -500 -800 Too much In part-score competitive auctions, vulnerability is a factor also. If you can make 1NT for a score of 90, but opponents bid 1NT ahead of you, it can be a tragedy or a triumph. If they are Non Vulnerable and make 6 tricks on the hand, which is all they can make if you can make 7 tricks, they only score minus 50 - giving you a bad score. On the other hand, if they are vulnerable and make the same 6 tricks, they now score minus 100 - giving you a good score on the board. ♠J2 ♥AK4 ♦9876 ♣KJ65 The success of the contract appears to depend on the ♦K being found, but this is not so. Presuming North has the ♠Q, he can be endplayed. 1. Win the ♠A, draw trumps, eliminate hearts and lead the ♠J, pitching a losing diamond on this losing spade. Now, North must lead a diamond into declarer’s ♦AQ or lead a major allowing the ♦Q to be pitched, ruffing in dummy. 2. And, once again - - - Ruff the ♠J, eliminate hearts and run the ♦9. If South covers, so do you. If East wins ♦K, he is endplayed. Experienced players will give you a tip “When you see AQ9, think endplay” HOW SHOULD THIS HAND HAVE BEEN BID? South holds: WEST Pass ♠KJ5 ♥Q9872 ♦AK5 ♣93 NORTH 1♦ 1♠ EAST Pass Pass SOUTH 1♥ ?? South thought for quite a while, then bid 3NT choosing a game contract with his 13 HCP opposite partner's opening bid. This did not turn out well. The opponents took the first five club tricks and South thought, 'every time I bid No Trumps it is a horrid failure. I hate No Trumps!' So, what went wrong? 8 Bidding No Trumps without a winner in clubs was not a good idea. It is a near certainty that opponents will lead a club. There is a very nice convention that all partnerships should discuss - this is 'Fourth Suit Forcing' - in other words, a bid by South of 2♣ in this auction would have done several things. 1. It is a game forcing bid; and, 2. Asks for further information from partner. And partner replies to the 2♣ FSF bid as follows: 1. With three cards in partner's major suit he should raise that suit. 2. Bid No Trumps with a stopper in the fourth suit. 3. With both of the above, choose the most descriptive action. 4. Re-bid his own five-card suit 5. Raise the fourth suit with 4-card support 6. Rebid his original suit at the appropriate level. Have a look at the following example: WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH 1♥ Pass 1♠ Pass 2♦ Pass 3♣ play in 4♦. South, with additional values, can raise to game. These options are shown below. 1. South ♠8 ♥KJ754 ♦KJ106 ♣AQ4 3NT 2. South ♠AJ8 ♥KJ762 ♦KJ108 ♣9 3♠ 3. North ♠KQ73 ♠A2 ♦A964 ♣863 4♦ Note: Fourth Suit Forcing is not used if one partner is a previously passed hand. This conventional method does not apply under these circumstances. TALKING TO JAN JAY You can't really say - Jan Jay, long time member of WBC etc. etc. If it were not for Jan's husband, Denis, there might not be a WBC at all. But, more of that later. Jan was born Jan Hosking, the eldest of four - three girls, Jan, Wendy and Lynette and a boy, Gary John. She was born and lived during her childhood in the Bentleigh area; a third generation Australian with ancestors who came from various parts of the British Isles in the mid 19th century. North holds: ♠KQ73 ♥A2 ♦A964 ♣863 He knows that game should be present, but has no clear idea what to bid. With only a 2-card Heart suit it would not be suitable to bid game in Hearts. With no stoppers in the Club suit it would not be prudent to bid game in No Trump. Since the partnership is still only on the two level, North knows there is sufficient bidding space to discover more information. By bidding the fourth, unbid, suit North informs partner that game values are present. This bid of the fourth suit requests additional information from partner. 1. With a Club stopper South will bid game in No Trump since there is no known fit. 2. South can cater for the fact that North may have a 5-card Spade suit and will show support with a 3card Spade suit. This denies a Club stopper. 3. If South supports Spades showing only a 3-card Spade suit, North can decide to declare game in Spades with a Moysian fit. However, knowing that there is an 8-card fit in Diamonds, North can opt to Jan Jay Life in Bentleigh, a growing suburb still with sections of market gardens, where Patterson Rd was still a dirt track, was great for children. Jan was, as were most of us, part of the generations of children who disappeared until it was time for tea, and remembers great times playing in vast piles of soil left by Council workers who were planning a park on old market garden land. The mountains of soil provided cubbies, climbing, caves, battle grounds and endless fun for the neighbourhood children. Jan remembers cooking potatoes, among other things, in fires lit by the 9 children. (The whole thing sounds like a litigator's picnic now doesn't it? Tunnelling into vast piles of dirt, lighting fires! Yeeks!) War time Melbourne had almost no impact on Jan; her father was a sheet metal worker at the Government Aircraft Factory, and, as an essential worker, was not allowed to join up, though he attempted to do so. So, the War for Jan was life as usual, except that she remembers her father digging a vast hole in the back garden for an air raid shelter. The shelter never eventuated, the hole filled with water and her sister Wendy fell in and nearly drowned. The hole was filled in after that. Jan must have watched too many cowboy films as a child because one day during a sisterly spat with Wendy chasing her, Jan fetched up and punched her on the chin. Wendy suffered some brief discomfort, but Jan earned herself a sprained wrist which lasted for a week. Their mother just said ‘serve you right’. After a primary schooling at the local state school, Jan went to Hampton High School, where she did typing and shorthand, gaining a job at SKF Ball Bearings after graduating from school. This was the time of Town Hall ballroom dancing on Saturday nights and one night at Hawthorn Town Hall she met an 'older' man - Denis, who took a shine to her after having the last few dances, and asked if he could drive her home. Very cautious - he was, after all 23 and she was only 17 - she agreed, on condition that he drive her girlfriend home too. It wasn't until they were about to drop the girlfriend off at her house that she realized that her planning was not that great, she would now be alone in Denis's car. However, Denis was, of course, a gentleman, and a four year courtship followed culminating in their marriage at Christ Church Bentleigh when Jan was 21. Jan says that her aunts on her mother's side did not come to the wedding - that side of the family was Catholic, and Catholics weren't permitted to go into non-Catholic churches! Denis was a primary school teacher and had worked in Thoona, not far from Benalla (Thoona, in the 2006 census, boasted a population of 474, so it must have been pretty small in the 1950's.) Denis, however, loved life in the country - as long as you could play football and cricket and tennis, life was great. After a few years he moved to Glenrowan North. A family health emergency forced him back to Melbourne, and after the marriage he worked at Glenroy North. Subsequently, he requested a transfer to Mitcham and was told curtly by the department - 'no, we indulged you once already!' Finally, some years later he was promoted and went to work at Hartwell. Shortly after the marriage Jan became pregnant and by the time she was five months along she had decided that it would be a good idea to resign. Three girls, Sue, Kerry and Fiona, came in quick succession, and Jan got very sick of being the size of a 'walrus' and not being able to go to the beach. Money was tight for the family, and Denis took a job as a dishwasher at Robs Restaurant on Waverley Road - in contravention of strict Education Department rules about holding down two jobs. At the same time he was doing a Certificate of Arts at Caulfield Tech he was a busy boy! They started making some money doing copying from stencils, Jan began working from home and there was light at the end of the tunnel - and money in the bank! Jan could see the new camper van, perfect for holidays, when Denis came home and said that he wanted to start an art gallery. The camper van turned into a second hand Ford Falcon and a used collapsible caravan. Denis got his art gallery and Jan held the fort there during the day till Denis turned up after school. Jan said that she could not sell an icecream to a dying man in the tropics, but still they persevered. The gallery was not doing well financially and Denis looked around for a source of extra income. Being an enthusiastic bridge player, he decided to start a bridge group in the gallery - playing twice a week. Very small beginnings led to larger numbers and after three or four years the group became a club - boasting numbers of up to three tables on a good night. Five moves followed, culminating in daytime bridge being introduced at Ashwood Hall, and the club members started talking about buying their own premises (this was in the early 1980s). In 1979 Jan took a job in the Law Faculty at Monash doing phototype setting and word processing - a position she stayed in until her retirement in 2011. During Denis' years of illness she continued working, but after his death in 2008 changed to part time hours - a very civilized arrangement working 10 till 3, with Fridays off. Jan had refused to learn bridge - silly game, why do you put the cards on the table? - but finally she gave in and learned from Lucy Theobald (much given to light preempts!!) Jan realized that she loved the game and has never looked back. She was immediately playing with stronger players - and remembers a match Denis, Ray Anderson, John Farr and she played in Geelong. Issued with strict orders ''Do not bid 7!!'' - they went away and shortly thereafter found themselves competing to the 7 level. Jan was terrified, but she made the contract, and when they went back to score were immediately asked - ''Did you bid the 7? Yes! Thank God!!'' 10 (The only rule about bridge is - don't make absolute rules!) And one very good argument against written bidding. Denis and Jan were playing for Waverley in an interclub competition. The bidding slip was turned over for the new hand and the opposition was bidding with Denis and Jan passing until Denis suddenly started bidding at the four level and wouldn’t shut up. They ended up in a horrendous contract doubled. Denis thought that Jan had doubled because the diagonal pass line on the other side of the bidding slip and the pass in the same box on the current side looked like a takeout double to him. After that he would only use one side of double sided bidding slips. These days Jan plays at WBC with numerous members - Elizabeth Gralinska, Shirley Baker, Grace Wadelton, Kathy Yang and Bill Bennett, and also fits in a game at Ravens with Neville Houghton. She has her family to breakfast every Saturday, is much given to going out to lunch, and is generally having a pretty good time. Jan says - 'Denis was the 'go-er', and I just came along with him. ' And I think the club and all the members are all grateful that you did, Jan - thanks from all of us. GETTING ALONG AT THE BRIDGE TABLE Yes folks, it's time for another admonition, certainly not aimed at all players, but with many, usually newer players in mind. I am regularly drawn aside after a session and asked for advice What should I do - my opponent: played slowly himself, then told me to hurry up three times, argued with his partner all through the set made me feel uncomfortable and inadequate! I could go on and on forever, but you get the idea. These things are not necessarily reason to call the director, though they may be. If you are made uncomfortable at the table by your opponents, please speak to the director or to Mary. Other clubs have a person called a 'Recorder' - an objective person who can deal with issues like these. We do not have a Recorder as such, but we will be able to handle these problems. And of course, you could not possibly be the person being complained about - could you?? Please be very careful to treat your opponents as you would like to be treated yourself - with courtesy and, hopefully, cheerfulness. Have you checked out our great Christmas gifts for bridge playing family, friends and partners?? We have lots of good things available near the Library. As well as these we have gift vouchers available for free games for your partner. You can buy one, two, or any number of games - the perfect gift for the partner who has everything, and just needs to play more bridge!! DECISIONS! DECISIONS! You are East and hold: ♠AK ♥AKJ83 ♦1098 ♣J64 WEST Pass NORTH 1♦ 3NT EAST 1♥ All pass SOUTH 1NT Partner dutifully leads the ♥6. Dummy comes down and you see: ♠QJ87 ♥2 ♦AKQ642 ♣Q8 ♠AK ♥AKJ83 ♦1098 ♣J64 You take the first trick with the ♥K as declarer follows with the ♥9. What now? East could see four tricks for his side - 2 Hearts and 2 Spades. Where was the fifth trick coming from? It looks like declarer has one heart trick in the Queen and that the best chance of taking the 11 contract off is to hope that partner has the ♣K - there is room in his hand for that card, just. So, East switches to the ♣4. Alas, the full hand was: ♠QJ87 ♥2 ♦AKQ642 ♣Q8 ♠9532 ♠AK ♥Q76 ♥AKJ83 ♦3 ♦1098 ♣107532 ♣J64 ♠1064 ♥10965 ♦J75 ♣AK9 Declarer wraps up nine tricks in very short order and you sit there saying - how was I supposed to know that partner had the ♥Q!?! This is a very good question. The fashion for leading the highest card in partner's suit has gone to the great bridge game in the sky. And, when was the last time you bid No Trumps not exactly having a stopper in opponent's suit, as is true here. And you relied on partner, or a defensive error, or hope? So, what we need is a bit of ingenuity. Play the ♠A! Partner can see the ♠QJ in the dummy, so cannot possibly think that you are asking him for attitude in Spades. So, you want something else - and that something is a suit preference signal! If West had the ♥Q, he should play the ♠9 - a high card for the higher suit. If, on the other hand, he has the ♣K, he should follow to the ♠A with the ♠2 - a low card for the lower side suit. Did I hear you say - 'this is too hard, I'd never think of that!'? Just keep on working away, these plays will become easier to find and fewer opponents will be able to steal game contracts from you. WHO HAS THE ACE from page 4 The ♥7 look like a discouraging card, but is it? If declarer had the heart Ace he would surely have played it at trick one because then he can assure himself of a second heart trick with the heart Jack now that he knows you must have the heart Queen. So, he doesn't have the Ace. Therefore, logically, partner must have the Ace. Then why did he play the ♥7? Because he had no other choice - he must have ♥A7 only. He could not overtake the King with his Ace because then he would be setting up a trick for dummy's Jack. At trick two, lead your ♥8. The hand must look something like: ♠AQ6 ♥J93 ♦853 ♣QJ94 ♠J105 ♠8732 ♥KQ108 ♥A7 ♦K742 ♦106 ♣83 ♣107652 ♠K94 ♥6542 ♦AQJ9 ♣AK MAKING IT WORK - - The people who win at this game are the ones who, in the long run, make the fewest mistakes. Reducing your own errors is one thing. Being accepting of partner's errors is tougher. Here are some tips for minimizing trouble: Stick to your partnership understandings agreements as if they were gospel. and Don't deviate from making percentage plays unless there is overwhelming evidence that you should. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY #I have travelled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year. Editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957 #It would appear that we have reached the limits of what it is possible to achieve with computer technology, although one should be careful with such statements, as they tend to sound pretty silly in 5 years. John Von Neumann (ca. 1949) Work harder to improve your own game. You'll still be frustrated, but at least your mistakes will occur on a higher, less embarrassing level. Make a rock solid agreement with partner never to criticize each other at the table. Make an arrangement to discuss the hands at another time. Be sure to listen to partner's point of view with an open mind. Be prepared to admit that you might, on occasion, actually be the one in the wrong! 12