Bremerton School District No. 100-C
Transcription
Bremerton School District No. 100-C
March 15, 2012 Bremerton School District No. 100-C Study and Survey Prepared by: Bremerton School District No. 100-C Study and Survey 1 Prepared by NAC|Architecture March 15, 2012 2 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Executive Summary The Bremerton School District had a Study and Survey performed on the facilities in the District. This Study and Survey included a full review of the existing facilities, development of a long range plan that included community and District participants who identified facility needs and education direction. Facilities A 2006 Bond Issue provided additions to the High School and Middle School sites. The existing buildings on these sites were not modernized and are aging. The elementary school buildings are also aging. Most of these buildings will need capital investment to prolong the life of the building and improve the educational setting. The original High School building, West Hills Elementary and Kitsap Lake Elementary are currently eligible for Capital Assistance from the State while the other buildings are not eligible until after 2020. The aging condition means that many of the building systems are near the end of their usable life and require more resources to keep the buildings operational. The District will need to consider full modernization and/or new-in-lieu replacement of most of the inventory within the next 15 years. Long Range Educational Plan The Bremerton School District prides itself on meeting the needs of ALL students. The School District recognizes that there is wonderful diversity within their population and that many of the students in the District learn in different ways. To meet the needs of all students, the District has made an effort to provide options and support to meet different students’ needs in different ways. Input from educators, administrators, community members, facilities personnel, and others provided input to frame the Long Range Plan. The District’s Long Range Educational Plan is to continue this focus on providing options and support for students. These options range from Special Education, to programs for Highly Capable Students, to alternative programs such as a Spanish Immersion Elementary, a Montessori School, and a STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) focused school, in addition to providing comprehensive schools for all K-12 learners. It is important that the facilities in the District support this long range plan. The educational options and special education services provided at the schools require space and put a higher demand on building area and flexibility of the spaces to serve the programmatic needs. As a result the District does not have any surplus space and some programs need more space to better meet the educational needs. Demographic Data The general demographic information indicates that the population is generally stable and outlook indicates current stability with the possibility of modest growth. There is reason to belive that the educational options will increase enrollment at a faster rate than the predicted population growth. 3 Ability to Provide Capital Funds The Bremerton School District meets the statutory and fiscal requirements for eligibility to compete for state assistance for construction projects. The Bremerton School District currently has available bonding capacity. It is noted that the average home value is lower in this District compared with others in the Puget Sound region; accordingly capital bond and levy efforts need to be sensitive to the fact that Bremerton voters are required to accept a higher percentage of taxes on their homes to raise an equivalent amount of capital funds compared to wealthier districts. Housing Emergency and Racial Imbalance There is not a housing emergency nor is there a racial imbalance. New and/or Additions to Existing School Facilities New building area is needed to properly accommodate the growing STEM school and Montessori school at West Hills STEM Academy. The current enrollment levels and OSPI area per student ratios indicate that this addition is not eligible for State Capital assistance funds. Modernization or Replacement of Existing School Facilities The aging inventory of buildings in the District will need to be addressed over the next 10-15 years with Modernizations and New-in-Lieu construction. These projects are expected to be eligible for state funding assistance. 4 Additionally, the District has some support buildings that do not house direct instruction that need to be replaced. Also there are several small works projects that need to be addressed to provide the needed functionality and/or extend the life of buildings that are not otherwise targeted for modernization in the near term. These projects are not expected to receive state funding assistance. None of the proposed work is a result of defered maintenance, the District has remained active in the upkeep of their buildings. Time Line The time line provided in the Study and Survey reflects a pace that makes sense for facility needs; funding will need to be addressed for these items. The time line is dependent on funding which will require School Board action and approval by the voters. Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts The neighboring districts do not have underutilized facilities that would be appropriate for the needs of the Bremerton School District. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 PRELIMINARIES Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Board Approval Form 1066 CHAPTER 1 Inventory and Area Analysis of Existing Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 School Addresses School District Map Inventory and Area Analysis Bremerton High School Renaissance High School Mountain View Middle School Armin Jahr Elementary School Crownhill Elementary School Kitsap Lake Elementary School Naval Avenue Early Learning Center View Ridge Elementary School 5 West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy West Sound Technical Skills Center Administration Building CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 4 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 7 CHAPTER 8 Consolidated Facilities Child Nutritional Services Center Long-Range Educational Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 Demographic Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 Ability to Provide Capital Funding Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 Existence of a Housing Emergency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Racial Balance or Imbalance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Type and Extent of New and/or Additions to Existing Facilities . . . Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization or Replacement of Existing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . School Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 . 269 . 273 . 277 CHAPTER 11 Estimated Capital Cost to Restore Major Facility Systems Due to Deferred Maintenance . . . . 287 Time Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 Inventory of Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts . . . . . . . . . 295 CHAPTER 12 Need to Adjust School Attendance Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 CHAPTER 9 CHAPTER 10 6 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 1 Inventory and Area Analysis (1) An inventory and area analysis of existing school facilities within the District, a description of the types and kinds of systems and subsystems used in those facilities and their physical condition. 7 8 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 School Addresses Bremerton School District #100-C 134 Marion Avenue North Bremerton, WA 98312-3542 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-1000 (360) 473-1040 Bremerton High School 1500 13th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-0800 (360) 473-0820 Renaissance High School 3400 1st Street Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-1080 (360) 792-1350 Mountain View Middle School (7-8) 2400 Perry Avenue Bremerton, WA 98310 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-0600 (360) 473-0620 Mountain View Middle School (Annex) 2442 Perry Avenue Bremerton, WA 98310 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-0700 (360) 473-0720 Armin Jahr Elementary School 800 Dibb Street Bremerton, WA 98310 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4100 (360) 473-4120 Crownhill Elementary School 1500 Rocky Point Road NW Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4200 (360) 473-4210 Kitsap Lake Elementary School 1111 Carr Boulevard Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4300 (360) 473-4320 Naval Avenue Early Learning Center 900 Olympic Avenue Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4400 (360) 473-4420 Schools 9 View Ridge Elementary School 3250 Spruce Street Bremerton, WA 98310 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4500 (360) 473-4520 West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy 520 National Avenue South Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4600 (360) 473-4620 West Sound Technical Skills Center 101 National Avenue North Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-0550 (360) 478-5090 Educational Support Facilities 10 Administration Building 3400 1st Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-1000 (360) 473-1040 Consolidated Facilities 200 Bruenn Avenue Bremerton, WA 98312 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-0500 (360) 473-0520 Child Nutritional Services Center 1300 East 30th Street Bremerton, WA 98310 Phone: Fax: (360) 473-4716 (360) 473-4743 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 School District Map 9 5 3 4 6 1 7 8 13 11 12 2 11 10 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Bremerton High School Renaissance High School Child Nutritional Services Center Mountain View Middle School Armin Jahr Elementary School Crownhill Elementary School Kitsap Lake Elementary School 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Naval Avenue Early Learning Center View Ridge Elementary School West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy West Sound Technical Skills Center Administration Building Consolidated Facilities 92 227,338 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 K-5 K-5 PS-3 Crownhill Elementary School Main Building 2P Totals Kitsap Lake Elementary School Main Building 2P Totals Naval Avenue Early Learning Center Main Building P 19 & 20 P 24 & 25 P 37 & 38 Boys & Girls Club Totals 900 Olympic Avenue 1111 Carr Boulevard 1500 Rocky Point Road 800 Dibb Street 23 23 37,342 26 48,932 37,342 26 28 47,815 48,932 28 24 34,895 47,815 24 34,895 137,519 TOTAL MS Area K-5 57 137,519 Armin Jahr Elementary School Main Building P 24 & 25 P 26 & 27 P 28 P 29 & 30 Totals 40 17 227,338 1 193,953 27,985 5,400 91 OSPI Area Classrooms 98,568 38,951 2400 Perry Avenue 2442 Perry Avenue 3400 1st Street 1300 High Avenue 1500 13th Street Site Address Mountain View Middle School Main Building 6th Grade Building 4P Totals 6-8 11-12 Renaissance Alternative High School P1&2 P3&4 P5&6 P7&8 P 9 & 10 Totals TOTAL HS Area 9-12 Grade Level Bremerton High School Main Building 2006 Addition Auto Shop P 604 & 605 P Drawbridge Totals School/Facility 12 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 7,200 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 900 1,800 6,300 3,600 3,600 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,800 9,000 1,800 4,600 6,400 Portable Area 2 2 2 2 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 7 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 10 2 4 6 Portable Classrooms 377 505 512 369 881 136 1,722 Students FTE 11/2010 484 528 528 481 1,274 1,671 Capacity 6.35 10.65 10.64 11.18 22.52 4.30 29.42 Acres 68.43 78.66 82.56 81.22 83.02 98.57 N/A 76.88 90.77 52.95 (Auto Shop) Bldg Rating 1994 Add & Mod 1957 1992 1996 1987 Addition 1993 Add & Mod 1968 1993 2008 2002 1988 2006 1940's Year(s) Built N/A N/A N/A Consolidated Facilities Child Nutritional Services Center (old Junior High building) TOTAL Other Area N/A N/A 31,500 N/A Administration Building 1300 East 30th Street 200 Bruenn Avenue 278,650 136,359 40,100 N/A 15 70,691 3400 1st Street 1,800 1,800 15 70,691 11-12 1,800 1,800 1,800 900 900 1,800 1,800 1,800 9,000 Portable Area West Sound Technical Skills Center - Regional Main Building PCC Totals 101 National Avenue 27 48,207 620,032 27 48,207 23 37,984 TOTAL K-12 Area 520 South National Avenue 23 37,984 OSPI Area Classrooms 255,175 PS-6 West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy Main Building KCR Totals 3250 Spruce Avenue Site Address TOTAL Elementary Area K-5 Grade Level View Ridge Elementary School Main Building P 21 & 22 P 23 P 24 P 25 & 26 P 27 & 28 P 29 & 30 Totals School/Facility 13 N/A N/A 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 10 Portable Classrooms N/A 1,247 Currently off roles N/A 515 528 528 Capacity N/A N/A 505 516 403 Students FTE 11/2010 31.05 3.50 4.30 16.44 15.84 23.36 Acres 51.36 36.84 71.38 80.09 76.63 79.25 Bldg Rating 1956 1960 1962 1967 1978 1947 1985 1945 1977 1988 1988 1960 Addition 1967 Addition 1994 Add & Mod 1952 Year(s) Built 14 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Bremerton High School 15 Aerial Photo 16 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General – Facility Basic Information Name Bremerton High School Address 1500 13th Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Academic Grade Levels 9-12 Area of Site 29.42 Tax Parcels 3797-010-001-009; 3797-008-001-0102; 142401-1-019-2008; 142401-1-027-2008; 3797-011-010-006 Building Area (to date) 227,338 Number of Buildings 3 (HS, physical ed, auto shop) Year Built 1988 Modernizations and Additions, Date and (Sq Ft) 2006 addition (27,985) Total number of classrooms 93 Capacity/Current Enrollment 1,671/1,722 B. Site The high school is sited at the south end of the property. Six tennis courts sit to the northwest of the school and a track/football field and bleachers are situated at the northeast side of the property. There are two large rectangular practice fields adjacent the school building and the football field. C. Exterior Walls Split faced structural concrete block construction. D. Roof Concrete tile roof over metal decking with metal trusses. E. Storm Water Control City storm water. F. Boiler with large central air handlers for each floor and large area. The auditorium is air conditioned with a heat pump. Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas. H. Controls ATS. I. City water. Water 17 J. Electrical Schedule 26. K. Security System Auto shop only has Mountain Alarm. L. Intercom System Dimensional. M. Clocks With intercom. N. Fire Alarm Edwards. 18 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 19 BREMERTON HIGH SCHOOL SITE 20 BREMERTON HIGH SCHOOL Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 21 22 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Area Calculations for: Bremerton High School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals First Floor Academic Wing 1 37,529 Second Floor Academic Wing 1 41,595 Third Floor Academic Wing 1 37,529 Auditorium/Stage 1 15,855 Gym/Music/Commons First Floor 1 27,210 Gym/Music/Commons Second Floor 1 34,235 Auto Shop 1 5,400 Vocational Ed Building 1 1,200 2007 Additions: Choir, Media, Commons Extension, Fitness Center 1 27,985 227,338 23 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: BremertonHighSchool(1988buidling) BuildingName: MainBuilding Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:HighSchoolͲMultiͲStory Component 24 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 76.88 ComponentScore 87% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 90% 47% 90% 72% 86% 33% 90% 39% 75% 60% 60% 90% 90% 45% 90% 90% 30% 72% 90% 90% 90% BCAScore 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 1.88 1.88 NotRated 0.86 0.86 10.03 6.82 2.76 0.44 9.67 5.57 3.94 0.12 0.05 2.19 1.52 0.19 0.02 0.45 8.31 4.28 1.80 0.54 0.05 0.00 1.65 7.13 1.73 0.09 4.86 0.36 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 48% 0.10 0.50 0.50 5.42 3.59 1.74 0.09 NotRated 14.06 0.01 2.34 11.53 0.12 0.06 2.29 2.28 0.01 8.41 0.01 0.90 0.76 6.75 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.67 0.30 0.18 0.19 0.09 0.09 2.32 0.09 0.27 1.03 0.27 0.67 0.66 0.60 0.06 99% 91% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 60% 90% 60% 60% 100% 100% 90% 90% 90% 86% 90% 60% 90% 90% 60% 90% 93% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% 60% 25 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: BremertonSchoolDistrict BremertonHighSchool(1988buidling) MainBuilding KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Settling Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 36% 27% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 14% 9% 41% 27% 27% 23% 9% 32% 27% 23% 6% 32% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight HighSchoolͲMultiͲStory 90% NotRated 90% 90% 87% Component Score boilerroomandsomeothersmallsmall walls Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 26 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x P U 27 N/A 23% 27% 41% 11% 3% 6% 27% 45% 23% 23% 9% 14% 14% 36% 27% 9% 36% 14% 6% 8% 8% 3% 6% 3% 45% 23% 23% 9% 15% 15% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 Weight 39% 90% alotofdamagedtilethroughoutallareas oftheroof.Flatroofareaisalsofailing. installedin1987andcannotgetpartsfor doorhardware installedin1987 86% 33% structuralblockwallssomewater problemsrequiringthewalltobesealed heavytileroofneedsevaluation;concern forlongͲtermroofstructure Notes 72% 90% 47% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E 0.55 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 x x x 0.4 0.1 x x x x 0.5 0.5 x x 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.35 0.15 0.5 x x x 0.4 Weight 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x x x x U x x x x P 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 F x x x x x x G 28 23% 27% 41% 50% 41% 24% 6% 9% 6% 45% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% 21% 9% 30% 6% 15% 9% 15% 15% 9% 15% 15% 36% 0% Assessment CategoryScore 90% 90% 45% 90% 90% 60% 60% 75% Component Score hardwarefailingandnopartsavailable entryandotherareasareshowingwear Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x F x x x x x x x P U 29 N/A 5% 9% 9% 8% 18% 5% 14% 36% 27% 14% 14% 36% 23% 14% 9% 32% 14% 45% 23% 23% 8% 5% 6% 21% 9% 90% 5% 5% 9% 54% 9% 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 91% 99% 48% 90% 90% 90% 72% 30% Component Score Noabrasivenosingorcontrastingcolor wearinginstalledin1988 somebentsupprotsandwaterdamage Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentssecure Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x 0.95 0.05 0.3 0.3 0.4 x x x x 0.3 0.3 0.4 x x x 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.5 0.5 1 x x x x x NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.45 0.25 0.3 95% 5% 100% 18% 18% 24% 18% 18% 24% 50% 32% 9% 33% 21% 6% 45% 45% 59% 9% 14% 9% 45% 45% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.5 0.5 Weight x x N/A 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 U x x x x P 0.1 0.05 0.05 x x x F x x G x x E 30 Notes Inlibrarycomputerareaandnewaddition tomainbuidling 90% 100% 100% 60% 60% 25yearoldsystemcontinuestooperate, butrequiresregularmaintenanceand repair 60% 90% NotRated inshopsareaonly;andfiresystemworks asdesigned 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Controls Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x F P U 31 N/A 14% 14% 36% 27% 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 50% 41% 50% 9% 9% 18% 41% 23% 9% 18% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% 59% 23% 9% 39% 15% 6% 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 Weight 60% 90% 90% 60% 90% 86% 90% 90% 90% Component Score stillworkingonacardsystem AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years tͲ8'sinstalled2010 onlyemergencypanelispoweredbythis unit Notes 12/28/20 D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x 0.75 0.25 x x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x 0.75 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 Weight x x N/A 0.75 0.25 U x x P 0.65 0.25 0.1 x F x x x x x x x x x x G 32 45% 15% 45% 15% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 59% 23% 9% 6% 9% 14% 55% 9% 41% 23% 9% 18% Assessment CategoryScore 60% 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 93% 90% Component Score startingtoshowwear gateswork Edwardspaneldifficulttoprogramandfix asrequestedbytheprincipal Notes 12/28/20 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: BremertonHighSchoolNewAdditions(2007) BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 OverallBCAScore: 90.77 BuildingType:Junior/SeniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes ComponentScore 100% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated BCAScore 1.33 1.33 0.00 0.00 2.04 2.04 NotRated 0.72 0.72 13.23 9.11 4.12 NotRated 13.08 8.67 3.94 0.42 0.05 4.88 3.86 0.25 0.02 0.75 11.89 4.35 1.00 1.10 0.05 N/A 5.39 11.16 3.51 0.10 7.35 NotRated 33 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component 34 C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore BCAScore 100% 0.20 0.00 NotRated 6.75 4.47 2.13 0.10 0.05 6.41 0.01 5.90 NotRated 0.30 0.20 2.79 2.78 0.01 10.73 NotRated 1.00 1.34 8.39 1.52 0.50 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.38 NotRated 0.18 0.20 0.09 0.09 2.17 0.09 0.30 1.14 NotRated 0.64 1.60 1.50 0.10 NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 99% 90% 90% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict BremertonHighSchoolNewAdditions(2007) A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30% 25% 10% 35% 15% 10% 45% 30% NotRated NotRated NotRated 27% 36% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 30% 25% 10% 35% 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight Assessment CategoryScore G Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories E Junior/SeniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory BuildingProfileType: 90% NotRated 100% 100% 100% Component Score partialburiedwallononesideofbuilding Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 35 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm N/A Weight 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 x x x x x 0.25 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 x x x x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 x x x x 25% 10% 25% 50% 25% 25% 20% 25% 25% 10% 10% 10% 30% 15% 40% 15% 30% 15% 15% 40% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 35% 10% 10% 45% 23% 27% 41% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 U x x x P 0.3 F x G x x x x x x x x E 36 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 90% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E G F P U 37 N/A N/A N/A N/A 10% 25% 15% 25% 25% 35% 15% 50% 30% 15% 15% 40% 50% 50% 30% 20% 40% 10% 55% 45% 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 N/A N/A N/A 10% 25% 25% 40% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.25 0.3 0.45 40% Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.5 0.25 0.25 x x x x x x x x 25% 15% 10% 35% 15% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 x x x x x 10% 60% 10% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 25% 15% 10% 35% 15% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 30% 15% 15% 40% 30% 15% 15% 40% 30% 25% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 15% 30% Assessment CategoryScore x x x x Weight 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A x x x x U 0.3 0.25 P x x F 0.15 0.3 G x x E 38 100% NotRated 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E G F P U 39 N/A 10% 5% 5% 65% 10% 15% 10% 50% 50% 45% 25% 30% 50% 50% 55% 35% 10% NotRated NotRated NotRated 30% 30% 40% 30% 30% 40% 100% 95% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 x x x 59% 23% 9% 0.65 0.25 0.1 39% 15% 6% 45% 25% 10% 20% 55% 10% 15% 20% 55% 45% x x x 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 x x x x NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 25% 5% 25% 25% 20% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 N/A x x x x U 0.55 0.45 P x x x x x F 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 G x x x x x x E 40 NotRated tiedintothemainbuidlingsystem tiedintomainbuidlingsystem 90% 90% AgingVOIPsystem;componenetsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years Manygreenfeatures Notes 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E x x x x x x x x x x G F P U 41 N/A NotRated 41% 23% 9% 18% 9% 10% 15% 55% 10% 59% 23% 9% 68% 23% 75% 25% 75% 25% NotRated NotRated 75% 25% 75% 25% 75% 25% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% gratsciencelabs Usesthemainbuidlingsystem 90% 90% partofthemainbuidlingEdwardspanel whichisdifficulttomaintainandchange tiedintothemainbuidlingsystem Notes 99% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: BremertonHighSchoolAutoShop BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:HighSchoolͲSingleStory Component 42 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 52.95 ComponentScore 51% 51% 63% 60% 60% 60% 57% N/A 35% 18% 30% 68% 33% 72% 60% NotRated 90% 75% 60% 74% N/A 30% 47% 60% 81% N/A BCAScore 2.04 2.04 0.00 0.00 2.84 2.84 0.00 0.72 0.72 3.71 0.00 3.71 N/A 3.81 2.83 0.83 0.12 0.03 1.69 1.49 0.18 0.02 NotRated 8.41 4.50 1.50 0.73 0.04 N/A 1.65 6.10 1.16 0.06 4.78 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 48% 0.10 0.00 N/A 5.76 3.89 1.74 0.09 0.05 2.47 0.01 2.34 NotRated 0.06 0.06 2.61 2.60 0.01 7.80 NotRated 0.69 0.60 6.51 1.44 0.42 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.49 0.30 NotRated 0.19 0.09 0.09 2.32 0.09 0.27 1.03 0.27 0.67 0.66 0.60 0.06 N/A 91% 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% NotRated 30% 60% 100% 100% NotRated 60% 60% 83% 84% 60% 90% 90% 60% NotRated 93% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% 60% 43 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict BremertonHighSchoolAutoShop Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Settling Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x G x x x 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 x x x N/A N/A N/A x x 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight x N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 U x P 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 x x x x x x x F 18% 24% 18% 18% 18% 24% 9% 9% 27% 18% 9% 15% 6% 21% 9% 15% 6% 21% Assessment CategoryScore HighSchoolͲSingleStory 60% 60% 63% 51% 51% Component Score Pitforservicingcars 1940'sbuildingbuiltfortransitcompany Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 44 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x G x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x x x x x x x P x U 45 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 5% 9% 12% 9% 5% 0% 5% 6% 8% 8% 3% 3% 3% 30% 15% 23% 3% 15% 15% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 21% 3% 6% 27% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 15% 18% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 Weight 33% 68% 30% 18% 35% N/A 57% 60% Component Score 1986roof Gettingveryoldandused singlepanewithorginalwoodframes brickwallsuninsulated Asphaltshingleroofnotleaking Notes 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x G 0.4 0.1 x x 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.55 0.45 0.3 0.2 x x x 0.5 0.5 x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 33% 41% 24% 6% 18% 12% 30% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.35 0.15 0.5 6% 15% 15% 36% 0% Assessment CategoryScore 6% 15% 9% 15% 15% 0.4 Weight 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x x x x U 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 P x x x F 46 N/A 74% 60% 75% 90% Notes Installedbymaintenanceovertheyears NotRated none 60% 72% Component Score 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x P U 47 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23% 9% 9% 32% 9% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 54% 9% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 8% 5% 6% 21% 9% 18% 9% 9% 24% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 9% 5% 9% 24% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 9% 8% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 5% 9% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 91% N/A 48% N/A 81% 60% 47% 30% Component Score paintedblockandbrick somebentsupprotsandwaterdamage Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentssecure Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x 0.95 0.05 x 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 x x x 0.3 0.3 0.4 95% 5% 100% 18% 18% 24% 9% 9% 12% NotRated NotRated NotRated 45% 45% 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.5 0.5 x x 41% 23% 27% 33% 21% 6% 0.45 0.25 0.3 x x x 45% 45% 59% 9% 14% 9% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.5 0.5 Weight x x N/A 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 U x x x x x x x P 0.1 0.05 0.05 x x x F x x G x x E 48 100% 100% 60% 30% NotRated 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% Component Score Oldheatingboxesanddisitribution newboilerswiththeoldheatingboxesand distribution inshoparea Notes 12/28/20 D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Controls Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F P U 49 N/A NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 15% 3% 15% 15% 12% 33% 27% 50% 6% 9% 18% 41% 23% 9% 12% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% 59% 23% 9% 39% 15% 6% 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 Weight 60% 90% 90% 60% 84% 83% 60% 60% NotRated Component Score Sonitol AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years tͲ8'sinstalled2010 Oldsystem Notes 12/28/20 D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x 0.75 0.25 x x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x 0.75 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 Weight x x N/A 0.75 0.25 U x x P 0.65 0.25 0.1 x F x x x x x x G 50 45% 15% 45% 15% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 59% 23% 9% 6% 9% 14% 55% 9% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 60% 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 93% NotRated Component Score startingtoshowwear liftshavebeenreplacedasneeded gateswork Edwardspaneldifficulttoprogramandfix Notes 12/28/20 Renaissance High School 51 Aerial Photo 52 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Renaissance High School 3400 1st Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Academic Grade Levels 11-12 Area of Site 4.3 Tax Parcels 152401-4-017-2003 Building Area to date 9,000 Number of Buildings 5 portables Year Built 2002 Modernizations and Additions, Date and (Sq Ft) N/A Total number of classrooms 10 Capacity/Enrollment XXX/136 B. Site Renaissance High School consists of five double portables situated around a central “courtyard”. The School shares its property with the Administration Building. Directly north of the portables there is a long grassy expanse, reaching to the far north property line. Adjacent the east property line is a narrow greenbelt separating a community track and field. C. Exterior Walls Wood frame double portable classrooms with temporary foundations. Wood panel siding, D. Roof Asphalt shingle roof E. Storm Water Control City storm F. About half are strip heating with A/C the rest have heat pumps Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Electric H. Controls Honeywell programmable thermostats 53 I. Water City water J. Electrical Schedule 24 meter at each portable K. Security System Sonitrol L. Intercom System none M. Clocks none N. Fire Alarm Edwards 54 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 55 RENAISSANCE HIGH SCHOOL SITE Area Calculations for: Renaissance High School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals 1/2 Classrooms (2) 1 1,800 3/4 Classrooms (2) 1 1,800 5/6 Classrooms (2) 1 1,800 7/8 Classrooms (2) 1 1,800 9/10 Classrooms (2) 1 1,800 9,000 56 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Mountain View Middle School 57 Aerial Photo 58 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Mountain View Middle School 2400 Perry Avenue Bremerton, WA 98310 Academic Grade Levels 6-8 Area of Site – 22.52 Tax Parcels 122401-4-120-2000 Building Area to date 137,519 Number of Buildings 2 Year Built 1993 (Main Building) Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 2008 Addition (6th Grade Building) (38,951) Total number of classrooms 57 Capacity/Enrollment 900/881 B. Site Mountain View is surrounded on the north and east sides by three separate fields all at different elevations. To the south east is a soccer/football field, in the northeast corner are two baseball diamonds and directly to the north are two more baseball diamonds (totally six). A clump of trees separates the two northern fields and a narrow string of trees lines the length of the east property line, separating the fields from a residential zone. C. Exterior Walls Both buildings are steel frame with metal stud walls. The gym area is tilt up concrete construct. The main/older building is brick exterior and the newer building is partial brick with metal siding. D. Roof Main building has metal roof with the insulation between the metal roof and the supporting metal pan deck. The new building has asphalt shingle roofing E. Storm Water Control All drain into the city storm water system around the school. The storm detention pond that has an overflow that drains into county system at times F. Hydronic heat pump system with a heat pump for each room area. There are 2 multi-step electric boilers to provide heat and a cooling tower for cooling in the main building and two gas fired boilers and a cooling tower for the newer building. Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Electric only for main building, Gas heating for the newer building. H. Controls ATS controls for both buidings 59 I. Water City water J. Electrical Main building is schedule 43 and the newer building is schedule 25 K. Security System none L. Intercom System Electrocom M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Edwards in new building and Simplex in older builiding. 60 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 61 MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE 62 MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL First Floor Plan Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 63 MOUNTAIN VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL Second Floor Plan Area Calculations for: Mountain View Middle School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals Main Building First Floor 1 60,847 Main Building Second Floor 1 37,721 6th Grade Building First Floor 1 27,222 6th Grade Building Second Floor 1 11,729 137,519 64 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: MountainViewMiddleSchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 OverallBCAScore: 81.14 BuildingType:Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes ComponentScore 87% N/A 90% NotRated 90% 90% 80% 83% 72% 47% 60% 83% 63% 90% 83% 75% 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% 83% 81% 60% 74% 83% BCAScore 1.16 1.16 0.00 N/A 1.84 1.84 NotRated 0.72 0.72 13.16 9.11 3.28 0.78 8.37 6.24 1.83 0.25 0.04 3.24 2.43 0.23 0.02 0.56 9.97 3.92 0.90 0.66 0.05 0.00 4.45 8.81 2.84 0.06 5.40 0.33 65 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component 66 C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore BCAScore 86% 0.17 0.57 0.57 6.03 4.02 1.92 0.09 NotRated 10.22 NotRated 5.31 4.50 0.24 0.16 2.79 2.78 0.01 9.29 0.01 0.90 1.21 7.17 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.35 NotRated 0.17 0.18 0.09 0.09 1.67 0.00 0.20 0.77 0.20 0.50 1.42 1.35 0.07 98% 90% 90% 90% NotRated NotRated 90% 90% 81% 81% 100% 100% 90% 90% 90% 86% 90% 60% 90% 90% NotRated 84% 90% 90% 90% 68% 68% 68% 68% 90% 68% SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict MountainViewMiddleSchool A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity x x x x x x x x x x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14% 9% 41% 27% NotRated NotRated NotRated 27% 36% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 27% 23% 6% 32% 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight Assessment CategoryScore G Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories E Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory BuildingProfileType: 90% NotRated 90% N/A 87% Component Score Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 67 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E N/A Weight x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 x 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 x U x x x P 0.3 x F x G 68 23% 6% 23% 45% 15% 23% 12% 15% 15% 6% 6% 6% 9% 0% 24% 14% 9% 14% 14% 36% 45% 23% 15% 21% 9% 9% 41% 23% 27% 41% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 63% 83% sealantandflashingisfailinginplaces weatheringstrippingispoorandcannotbe foundforreplacing 47% 60% bricksurfaceneedstobesealed;concerns forwaterinfiltrationduetopriorrepairs andvaporbarrier somewaterproplemsalongearthquake joints Notes 72% 83% 80% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x F x P U 69 N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 23% 14% 15% 23% 32% 14% 30% 27% 14% 14% 36% 45% 45% 18% 12% 24% 6% 50% 41% 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 23% 27% 41% 9% 23% 23% 36% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.25 0.3 0.45 12% Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% 75% 83% 90% Component Score wireglassforfirerating Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E N/A Weight Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 U x x P 0.15 0.3 x F x x G 70 9% 54% 9% 90% 3% 5% 23% 9% 9% 32% 14% 45% 23% 15% 23% 5% 6% 32% 9% 18% 9% 9% 24% 27% 9% 9% 36% 27% 15% 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 90% 98% 86% 83% 74% 60% 81% 83% Component Score wearingcarpetbecomingatrippinghazard Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x F P U 71 N/A 9% 5% 5% 59% 9% 14% 9% 45% 45% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 50% 32% 9% 50% 32% 9% 18% 27% 36% 18% 27% 36% 100% 95% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight Notes occupancysensorsinrooms 81% 100% 100% 81% coolingtower;recentlyreplacedmotor, coilsaging 90% 90% NotRated allelectricbuilding NotRated 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/201 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 x x x 59% 23% 9% 39% 15% 6% 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 41% 23% 9% 18% 50% 9% 9% 18% 50% 41% 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 14% 14% 36% 27% 5% Assessment CategoryScore x x x x x x x x x x 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 x x 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.55 0.45 x x x 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 Weight x x x x x N/A 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 U x x x x P 0.05 x F x G 72 NotRated 90% 90% 60% 90% 86% 90% 90% 90% Component Score AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years tͲ8's;nooccupancysensorforlights,no daylightswitching Notes 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x F x P U 73 N/A N/A N/A 45% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 45% 23% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 59% 23% 9% 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 3% 9% 14% 55% 9% 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 68% 23% 41% 23% 9% 12% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.75 0.25 NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight 68% 90% 68% 68% 68% 68% 90% 90% 90% 84% Component Score agingpanel,hardtoprogram Notes 12/28/20 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: MountainViewSixthSchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 OverallBCAScore: 96.04 BuildingType:Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory Component 74 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore 96% N/A 80% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 87% 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 99% 94% 100% BCAScore 1.28 1.28 0.00 N/A 1.62 1.62 NotRated 0.80 0.80 15.18 10.12 4.12 0.94 13.03 8.67 3.94 0.37 0.05 4.13 3.86 0.25 0.02 NotRated 11.81 4.35 1.00 1.10 0.05 0.00 5.31 10.77 3.16 0.10 6.91 0.40 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 100% 0.20 0.58 0.58 6.75 4.47 2.13 0.10 0.05 11.41 0.01 5.90 5.00 0.30 0.20 2.79 2.78 0.01 10.74 0.01 1.00 1.34 8.39 1.54 0.50 0.30 0.54 0.20 0.36 NotRated 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.09 1.57 N/A 0.27 1.03 0.27 NotRated 1.60 1.50 0.10 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 90% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% 90% NotRated 100% 100% 75 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict MountainViewSixthSchool Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity x x x x x x x x x F x P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 30% 40% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 9% 3% 41% 27% N/A N/A N/A N/A 30% 25% 6% 35% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight Assessment CategoryScore G Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories E Middle/JuniorHighSchoolͲMultiͲStory BuildingProfileType: 100% NotRated 80% N/A 96% Component Score somesettlementinthegymandother areasthatarecausingsomeconcern buildingopennedinJan2008 Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 76 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E x x x x x G x F P U 77 N/A 30% 25% 30% 45% 35% 10% 10% 45% 50% 25% 25% 30% 15% 15% 40% 30% 15% 40% 15% 18% 23% 23% 6% 9% 9% 50% 25% 25% 10% 25% 25% 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 Weight 100% 100% 87% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score automatichandicapcloseriseasily damagedbystudentscausingtheneedfor constantrepair Notes 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.4 0.1 x x x x x 0.3 0.2 x x 0.55 0.45 0.5 0.5 x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x x x NotRated NotRated NotRated 25% 30% 45% 55% 45% 40% 10% 30% 20% 50% 50% 30% 15% 15% 40% 10% 25% 25% 40% 0.35 0.15 0.5 40% Assessment CategoryScore 10% 25% 15% 25% 25% Weight 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x x x U 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 P x x x x F 0.4 G x E 78 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% NotRated 100% 100% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E x x x x x x G x F P U 79 N/A 14% 30% 30% 25% 27% 14% 14% 36% 30% 14% 15% 40% 25% 9% 10% 35% 15% 50% 25% 25% 25% 15% 10% 35% 15% 90% 5% 5% 10% 60% 10% 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 99% 90% 99% Component Score telegraphingslabcracks Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Weight 0.5 0.5 N/A x x U 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 P x x x x F 0.1 0.05 0.05 G x x x E 80 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 95% 100% 30% 30% 40% 30% 30% 40% 55% 35% 10% 55% 35% 10% 50% 50% 45% 25% 30% 50% 50% 65% 10% 15% 10% 10% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score firesystemonly Notes 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x E x x x G x x x F P U 81 N/A 5% 15% 15% 40% 30% 25% 5% 25% 25% 20% 55% 45% 55% 10% 15% 20% 45% 25% 10% 20% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% 65% 25% 10% NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight NotRated 100% 90% 60% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Component Score AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years Notes 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 x x NotRated NotRated 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 68% 23% 0.75 0.25 x x 75% 25% 75% 25% 68% 23% 0.75 0.25 x x 68% 23% 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A 59% 23% 9% 9% 9% 14% 50% 9% 41% 23% 9% 18% NotRated Assessment CategoryScore x x 0.75 0.25 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.1 Weight x x x N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 U x x x x x P 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 F x x x x G x x E 82 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% 90% Component Score ratedwithmainbuilding Notes 12/28/20 Armin Jahr Elementary School 83 Aerial Photo 84 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Armin Jahr Elementary School 800 Dibb Street Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels K-5 Area of Site 11.18 Tax Parcels 4585-000-002-0201 Building Area to date 34,895 Number of Buildings 2 Year Built 1968 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1987 Addition (2,097), 1993 (13,282) Modernization & Addition Total number of classrooms 24 Capacity/Enrollment 481/369 B. Site Armin Jahr is surrounded by dense woods to the north and west sides, and in the southwest corner of the property. A playground with play structure exists along the northwest length of the building. Immediately northwest of the playgrounds is a large, irregular shaped field outlined by the woodlands. C. Exterior Walls Wood frame with brick exterior 85 D. Roof Metal roof on metal trusses over an old flat roof E. Storm Water Control City water F. Boiler and cooling tower with hydronic water loop to heat pumps for each room to heat and cool building has A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Electric H. Controls ATS I. City water Water J. Electrical Schedule 43 K. Security System None L. Intercom System Electricom M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Edwards 86 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 87 ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE 1 4 88 3 2 ARMIN JAHR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Area Calculations for: Armin Jahr Elementary School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals 1 Classroom Building 1 15,772 2 Gymnasium 1 2,954 3 1987 Addition 1 2,887 4 1992 Classroom Addition 1 12,382 5 Covered Play .5 900 34,895 89 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: ArminJahrElementarySchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory Component 90 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 78.58 ComponentScore 83% N/A 90% N/A 90% N/A 77% N/A 86% 65% 50% 60% 63% 83% 68% 71% 90% 75% 45% 90% NotRated 90% 81% 81% 78% N/A BCAScore 3.19 3.19 0.00 N/A 3.66 3.66 N/A 0.72 0.72 2.23 N/A 2.23 N/A 10.25 7.52 2.47 0.24 0.03 4.63 3.88 0.21 0.01 0.53 9.66 3.48 0.75 0.54 0.05 NotRated 4.85 7.33 2.68 0.08 4.41 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 83% 0.17 0.00 N/A 10.12 7.33 2.70 0.09 N/A 11.57 NotRated 7.66 3.53 0.24 0.14 2.34 2.33 0.01 9.36 NotRated 1.03 1.21 7.13 1.13 0.35 0.30 0.36 0.12 0.31 NotRated 0.14 0.17 0.07 0.07 0.90 0.00 0.27 0.07 0.06 0.50 1.08 1.02 0.06 N/A 87% 90% 90% N/A NotRated 71% 71% 81% 69% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 90% 86% 71% 60% 60% 60% NotRated 71% 85% 68% 60% 90% 60% 60% 68% 60% 60% 91 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict ArminJahrElementarySchool Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x X X X G X F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight 27% 36% N/A N/A N/A 14% 9% 41% 27% N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 15% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory 90% N/A 90% N/A 83% Component Score Nosignsofmoistureonthefloor None slabingoodshape Pavementaroundthebuildingwithpretty gooddrainageinmostareas Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 92 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E X x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x P U 93 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 14% 9% 36% 18% 9% 24% 14% 12% 15% 8% 3% 9% 3% 30% 15% 15% 6% 23% 23% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 32% 9% 9% 27% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight Theweatherstrippingandthedooorsare showingsignsofuse.Mostoftheother componentsarechangedastheyfail. 50% 63% Newmetalroofisdoinggood.Thegutter sealantsarefailing. Metalframedwindowinstalledin70'sand doublepanewithfairlygoodprotection capability 65% 60% Mostwallsbuiltinthe60'soutof masonry,stuccoandshotcrete,andinfair togoodshape Pitchedmetalroofinstalledin80sover originalflatroof.Metalroofisnotbuiltto resistshear.Nostructuraldamagehas occurredyet.noinsulation,nostructural deckatroofplane Noneexcepttoattic Notes 86% N/A 77% N/A Component Score 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x F x x x P U 94 N/A 50% 41% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.25 0.3 0.45 24% 6% 9% 6% 30% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% 32% 9% 30% 9% 15% 14% 15% 15% 9% 15% 23% 36% 12% Assessment CategoryScore 0.55 0.45 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 Weight Notes installedin1994 wireglassdoesnotmeetcurrentsafety andfirecodes Redonein1994andingoodshape. someofthecoverwalkareashowssigns ofneedingattention Somesealsarestartingtofail Reworkedin1994andonlyflashingstothe roofarestartingtocauseconcern NotRated None 90% 45% 75% 90% 71% 68% 83% Component Score 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x F P U 95 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23% 9% 6% 32% 9% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 54% 9% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 23% 9% 6% 32% 14% 27% 9% 9% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 27% 9% 9% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 27% 23% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 87% N/A 83% N/A 78% 81% 81% 90% Component Score None showingsignsofwear showingsignsofwear inprettygoodshapebutused Overallasinstalledin1994 Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 x x x 1 0.95 x x x x x x x x x x 0.55 0.35 0.1 86% 90% 18% 27% 24% 18% 27% 36% 33% 32% 6% 33% 32% 6% NotRated NotRated 0.5 0.5 x N/A N/A N/A 45% 45% 59% 9% 14% 9% 6% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 U x x P 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 x F x x x x x x G 96 fordrysprinkleronly Notes 90% certifiedsprinklersystemand extinguishers certifiedextinguishersannuallyand properlysecured couldusemorecleaningandmaintenace, controlledbyDDCsystem 69% 90% somedamageovertheyears,controls updatedtwice,filterschangedandbelts checked3timesayear hydrinicsystem,coolingtowerreplaced 2009,somecompressorsandmotors replacedastheyfail installedin1994hydronicheatpump systemelectricboiler,workingasdesigned 81% 71% 71% NotRated Noneallelectricbuilding N/A 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x F P U 97 N/A 5% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 50% 41% 50% 9% 9% 18% 27% 23% 9% 12% 39% 15% 6% 39% 15% 6% 39% 15% 6% NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years NotRated none 60% 60% 60% 71% Nooccupancysensors meetscode 90% 86% installedin1994andmeetscodeschedule 43powerwithtransformeronporperty Notes 90% NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x x x x x x x G 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 Weight 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x x x x 0.75 0.25 x x x 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A N/A x x U 0.65 0.25 0.1 x P x x x x F 98 45% 15% 45% 15% 45% 23% 45% 15% 45% 15% 68% 23% 45% 15% 39% 23% 6% 3% 9% 9% 55% 9% 27% 23% 9% 12% NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 60% 60% 68% Allareshowingwear.bookcasesarevery old,kitchenequipmentingoodshapeand tablesaregood. servicablebutisshowingwear servesneedsoftheschool continuallyupdatedbutshortlifeand needtokeepcurrentismorethanbudget allows playgroundequipmentisshowingwear. Musicisgood 60% 60% kitchenandjanitorialequipmentisupto date Gatesworkandareusedasneeded Worksasdesignedbuthasasome componentfailuresthathavebeenfixed. olderpanelandaproblemgettingboards orprograming.Pasttheconfidencetests andworksasdesigned Asrequestedbyprincipal Notes 90% 60% 68% 85% 71% Component Score 12/28/20 Crownhill Elementary School 99 Aerial Photo 100 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Crownhill Elementary School 1500 Rocky Point Road Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels K-5 Area of Site 10.64 Tax Parcels 152401-2-027-2005 Building Area to date 47,815 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1996 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) N/A Total number of classrooms 28 Capacity/Enrollment 528/512 B. Site At the northwest corner of the property lies a baseball diamond, with a narrow stretch of trees on the west edge separating the field from a residential area. To the northeast lies court and playground. At the south end lies a paved playground with foursquare courts and a soft-surface, semi-circular playground with play structure. C. Exterior Walls Metal frame with brick and stucco exterior 101 D. Roof Asphalt shingle roof over wood decking E. Storm Water Control City storm water F. Boiler with heating unit for each room. No A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls Barber Coleman DDC I. City water Water J. Electrical Schedule 25 K. Security System Sonitol L. Intercom System Dimensional M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Edwards 102 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 103 CROWNHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE CROWNHILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 First Floor Second Floor 104 Area Calculations for: Crownhill Elementary School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals First Floor 1 32,912 Second Floor 1 14,083 Covered Play .5 820 47,815 105 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: CrownhillElementarySchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory Component 106 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 79.72 ComponentScore 90% N/A 90% NotRated 90% 83% 80% 90% 90% 86% 87% 90% 45% 83% 90% NotRated 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 86% 86% 78% 83% BCAScore 1.20 1.20 0.00 N/A 1.84 1.84 NotRated 0.72 0.72 12.47 8.35 3.28 0.85 11.58 7.80 3.37 0.37 0.05 1.96 1.74 0.21 0.02 NotRated 10.75 3.92 0.90 0.99 0.05 0.05 4.85 9.32 3.00 0.09 5.73 0.33 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 86% 0.17 0.57 0.57 6.03 4.02 1.92 0.09 0.00 5.75 0.01 5.31 NotRated 0.27 0.16 2.79 2.78 0.01 9.66 NotRated 0.90 1.21 7.55 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.65 0.30 0.18 0.17 0.09 0.09 1.64 0.00 0.20 0.68 0.09 0.67 1.24 1.15 0.09 98% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 81% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% 60% 90% 85% 90% 60% 68% 60% 90% 90% 68% 90% 107 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict CrownhillElementarySchool Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x x x x x G F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 36% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 14% 9% 41% 27% N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 23% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory 90% NotRated none greatshape None N/A 90% mostofthebuildingisonpilingwithgrade beamsinstalledin1995.2storybuilding Notes 90% Component Score Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 108 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x F x P U 109 N/A 27% 15% 27% 41% 21% 9% 9% 41% 45% 23% 23% 27% 14% 14% 36% 27% 9% 36% 14% 18% 23% 23% 9% 9% 6% 45% 23% 23% 3% 15% 15% 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 Weight 45% 90% 87% 86% 90% 90% 80% 83% Component Score asphaltshinglesarefailingandneeded repairedeveryyear;mobilesafetyanchors agoodwindowsystem asphaltshinglesarefailingandneeded repairedeveryyear Notes 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E 0.55 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 x x x 0.4 0.1 x x x x 0.3 0.2 NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.35 0.15 0.5 23% 27% 41% 50% 41% 36% 9% 27% 18% 45% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% 9% 23% 14% 23% 23% 9% 15% 23% 36% 12% Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 Weight x x N/A 0.5 0.5 U x x x P 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x F x x x x x x x x x x x x G 110 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 83% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x F P U 111 N/A 14% 27% 27% 23% 27% 9% 14% 36% 27% 9% 14% 36% 23% 9% 6% 32% 9% 45% 23% 15% 23% 9% 9% 32% 14% 90% 3% 5% 9% 54% 9% 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 90% 98% 86% 83% 78% 86% 86% 90% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 1 0.95 x x x 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 95% 100% 18% 27% 36% 27% 27% 36% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.55 0.35 0.1 x x x 50% 32% 9% 0.55 0.35 0.1 x x x 45% 45% 41% 23% 27% 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.25 0.3 x x x 45% 45% 59% 9% 14% 9% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore x x 0.5 0.5 Weight x x N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 U x x x x P 0.1 0.05 0.05 x F x x x G x E 112 100% 100% 81% 90% Notes installednewboilersin2008and2009 fordrysprinklersystemonly fanneedmorecleaning ingoodshape NotRated None 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x F P U 113 N/A 5% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 50% 41% 50% 9% 14% 18% 41% 23% 9% 18% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% 59% 23% 9% 39% 15% 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight 60% mostlyoperatorerrorandsensitiveto motionlikeceilinghangingdisplays. Notenoughbudgettokeepcurrent becauseoftechnologychanges 90% 90% AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years TͲ8withoccupancysensors;nodaylight zoneswitching meetscode Notes 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 Weight x x x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A N/A x x U 0.75 0.25 x P x x x x x F x x x x x x x x x x x x G 114 68% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 45% 15% 45% 23% 45% 15% 59% 23% 9% 3% 9% 9% 55% 9% 41% 23% 9% 18% 6% Assessment CategoryScore gatesworkokay 60% 90% 68% 1996ornewerandrepalcedasneeded updatedin1994 someplaytoysareold 90% 90% Alwayschangingandnotenoughbudget tokeepup 60% 68% WebbasedDDCrecentlyupdated,other systemwork Panelneedstobeupdated camerasasprincipalrequests Notes 90% 85% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Kitsap Lake Elementary School 115 Aerial Photo 116 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Kitsap Lake Elementary School 1111 Carr Boulevard Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels K-5 Area of Site 10.65 Tax Parcels 3719-002-047-0205; 3719-002-028-0109; 3719-002-028-0208; 3719-002-028-0307; 3719-002-028-0406; 3719-002-029-0108 Building Area to date 48,932 Number of Buildings 2 Year Built 1992 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) N/A Total number of classrooms 26 Capacity/Enrollment 528/505 B. Site Kitsap Lake Elementary is situated centrally within its property boundaries. To the east and south of the building lies a large grassy expanse. Between the building and the grassy zone, a smaller playground occurs. Along the entire length of the west property line is a narrow, densely wooded area. C. Exterior Walls Wood frame with brick exterior D. Roof Asphalt shingles over wood deck support by wood trusses E. Storm Water Control City storm water F. Boiler with heating unit for each room. No A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls Barber Coleman DDC I. City water Water 117 J. Electrical Schedule 25 K. Security System none L. Intercom System Dimensional M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Silent Knight 118 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 119 KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE 120 KITSAP LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 121 Area Calculations for: Kitsap Lake Elementary School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington B10Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals First Floor 1 35,535 Second Floor 1 12,567 Covered Play .5 820 48,932 122 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: KitsapLakeElementarySchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes OverallBCAScore: 78.66 ComponentScore 87% N/A 90% 90% 90% 90% 69% 90% 90% 72% 84% 83% 53% 60% 60% 65% 65% 90% 90% 90% 90% 74% 90% 90% 78% 90% BCAScore 1.16 1.16 0.00 N/A 1.92 1.84 0.08 0.72 0.72 12.80 9.11 2.84 0.85 11.03 7.80 2.84 0.35 0.04 2.67 2.03 0.15 0.01 0.48 8.75 2.81 0.90 0.99 0.05 0.05 3.96 9.50 3.16 0.09 5.73 0.36 123 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component 124 C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore BCAScore 78% 0.16 0.57 0.57 6.03 4.02 1.92 0.09 0.00 6.07 0.01 5.63 NotRated 0.24 0.18 2.79 2.78 0.01 9.66 NotRated 0.90 1.21 7.55 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.20 NotRated NotRated 0.20 0.09 0.09 2.03 0.00 0.27 1.03 0.07 0.67 1.22 1.15 0.07 99% 90% 90% 90% 90% 90% 96% NotRated 81% 90% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% NotRated NotRated 100% 90% 90% 90% 90% 68% 90% 68% 68% SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict KitsapLakeElementarySchool A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x x x x x x x G x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14% 9% 41% 27% 27% 27% 36% 27% 36% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 27% 23% 6% 32% Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory 90% 90% 90% N/A 87% Component Score thebackofthebuidlinghassomestanding water Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 125 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E N/A Weight x x x x x x x x x 0.25 x x x 0.1 0.25 x 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 x x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 x x x x x x 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 U x x x x P 0.3 x F x G 126 8% 6% 15% 45% 23% 15% 18% 23% 23% 9% 6% 6% 18% 5% 36% 14% 27% 14% 14% 36% 45% 23% 23% 11% 9% 9% 41% 23% 27% 41% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 53% 83% 84% 72% 90% 90% 69% 90% Component Score asphaltrooffailing,libraryofminimal slopeandguttersseemundersizedinareas backdraftdampersneedsomehelp startingtoshowwear cannotfindtheweatherstrippingforthe windows Notes 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F P U 127 N/A 24% 6% 15% 15% 24% 6% 15% 9% 15% 15% 21% 14% 30% 18% 9% 14% 24% 45% 45% 27% 18% 36% 9% 50% 41% 23% 27% 41% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight 90% 90% 90% allgrillsandrollupdoorsworkproperly reworkedin2011toputinsiesmic sheetingontheexistingframethatwas notalwaysplumb 65% 90% frontentryisdiscoloring,otherareasare showingsignsofwear gettingoldinstalledin1992 Notes 65% 60% 60% Component Score 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.1 0.6 0.1 x x x 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 x x x x 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.9 0.05 0.05 x x x x x x x x 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.3 0.25 0.15 0.3 Weight x N/A 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 U x x x x x P 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x F x x x x x x G 128 9% 54% 9% 90% 5% 5% 15% 9% 9% 32% 14% 45% 23% 23% 23% 5% 6% 32% 14% 27% 14% 14% 36% 27% 14% 14% 36% 18% 15% 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 90% 99% 78% 90% 78% 90% 90% 74% Component Score carpetinstalledin1992isbecoming trippinghazard somedamagedandbentbecauseofwear overtheyears Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x F P U 129 N/A N/A N/A N/A 45% 45% 55% 32% 9% NotRated NotRated NotRated 18% 27% 36% 27% 27% 36% 100% 95% 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 45% 45% 0.5 0.5 41% 23% 27% 59% 9% 14% 9% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 100% 100% 90% 81% Notes boilershavebeenreplacedandDDC undatedin2010 forfiresprinklerdrysystemonly replacefiresystemin2010 Notabletogetenoughfreshairinto buidlingasdesigned NotRated None 96% 90% 90% 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 x x x x 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 x x x 59% 23% 9% 0.65 0.25 0.1 39% 15% 6% 41% 23% 9% 18% 50% 9% 14% 18% 50% 41% x x x 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight x x x x N/A 0.55 0.45 U x x P 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 x x x F x x x x x G 130 Notes AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years TͲ8'swithoccupancysensorsthroughout thebuidling NotRated None 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% 90% 90% NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x x x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x F P U 131 N/A N/A N/A 68% 23% 68% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 59% 23% 9% 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 10% 10% 15% 55% 10% 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 68% 23% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.75 0.25 NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight 68% 68% 90% 68% 90% 90% 90% 90% 100% Notes 1992showingwearandneedsupdated 1992itwasnew playgroundequipmentisshowingwear gateswork firesystemreplacedandtocurrentcodes in2010 NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 132 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Naval Avenue Early Learning Center 133 Aerial Photo 134 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Naval Avenue Early Learning Center 900 Olympic Avenue Bremerton, WA 98310 Academic Grade Levels PS-3 Area of Site 6.35 Tax Parcels 142401-3-048-2009 Building Area to date 37,342 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1957 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1994 Modernization & Addition (6,578) Total number of classrooms 23 Capacity/Enrollment 484/377 B. Site The Naval Avenue property is divided by bus only road that go between public streets to the north and south of the property. To the east is a long grassy playfield surrounded by a path that fills the eastern portion of the site. To the west of the road, between the road and school building are two separate play areas and portables. The southernmost play area contains three play structures. C. Exterior Walls Concrete base walls with metal frame to support the old flat roof structure. There is window infill and framed wall in between the structural colums. D. Roof Metal roof over wood frame deck and supports that were installed in 1986 over the flat roof. E. Storm Water Control City storm water system F. Gas fired boiler for hydronic heat system with a unit for each 4 classrooms located in the attic space with a heat coil to adjust the heating into each classroom. No air conditioning Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls ATS DDC heating controls I. Water provided by the city Water 135 J. Electrical Schedule 25 electric with schedule 24 to the portables K. Security System None L. Intercom System Electrocom M. Clocks With intercom system N. Fire Alarm Edwards installed in 1994 136 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 137 NAVAL AVENUE EARLY LEARNING CENTER SITE 138 NAVAL AVENUE EARLY LEARNING CENTER Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Area Calculations for: Naval Avenue Early Learning Center Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals Original Building 1 29,834 1992 Additions 1 6,578 Covered Play .5 930 37,342 139 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: NavalAvenueElementarySchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory Component 140 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 68.67 ComponentScore 74% N/A 86% N/A 60% 83% 77% N/A 68% 74% 48% 68% 53% 80% 57% 45% 72% 90% 72% 60% NotRated 69% 72% 77% 74% N/A BCAScore 2.84 2.84 0.00 N/A 3.48 3.48 N/A 0.48 0.48 2.23 0.00 2.23 N/A 9.01 5.93 2.82 0.23 0.03 3.78 3.23 0.20 0.01 0.34 8.29 2.79 0.90 0.86 0.03 NotRated 3.72 6.75 2.38 0.08 4.15 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings 69% N/A 69% 65% 75% 90% 90% 77% NotRated 60% 60% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 60% 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 88% 90% 60% 90% 68% 60% NotRated 60% 60% 0.14 0.00 N/A 7.83 5.82 1.94 0.08 0.00 8.62 0.01 8.32 NotRated 0.18 0.12 2.60 2.59 0.01 9.34 NotRated 1.03 0.80 7.51 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.36 NotRated 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.41 0.00 0.27 0.08 0.06 NotRated 1.08 1.02 0.06 141 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict NavalAvenueElementarySchool Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x G x x x x x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight 18% 24% N/A N/A N/A 9% 9% 41% 27% N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 15% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory 60% N/A 86% N/A 74% Component Score Oldslabsomesettling None Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 142 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x P x U 143 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 14% 9% 36% 27% 9% 24% 14% 12% 8% 8% 6% 9% 6% 30% 15% 23% 6% 23% 0% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 21% 6% 9% 41% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 15% 27% 41% 18% Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight 53% 68% Metalroofgood.Guttersareundersized anddrainsallsmall.Causingblockage whichcancausewatertogetinthe building. newin1994 newin1994 74% 48% watercomesinwhenguttersblockeddue topoordesignandinstall None N/A 68% Oldflatroofcoverwithwoodsupported metalframeroofinthe80's Notes 77% 83% Component Score 12/28/2 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x x x x x x x x x x 33% 27% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.25 0.3 0.45 36% 6% 18% 12% 45% 45% 18% 9% 9% 36% 21% 9% 15% 6% 15% 14% 15% 8% 6% 15% 23% 36% 24% Assessment CategoryScore 0.55 0.45 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 x x Weight 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 N/A x x U 0.4 x P x F Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage x x x x x x x G x E Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm 144 NotRated 60% 72% 90% 72% 45% 57% 80% Component Score allworkasdesigned installedin1994 manywallsareblockwallinstalledin1956 Installedinthe80'swithtehroofand startingshowwear!! sealsaregettingold,andupperwindows intheclassroomshavesomeproblems Flashingarestartingtoshowwear Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F x P U 145 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15% 9% 9% 32% 9% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 36% 6% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 15% 5% 9% 32% 9% 18% 9% 14% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 18% 9% 9% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 18% 15% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 9% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 69% N/A 69% N/A 74% 77% 72% 69% Component Score Someofthepipingwasinstalledin1956 Oldoriginalceilingrefinishedin1994and isshowingwear!! startingtoshowwear someblockwallsinbuidlingthatshoware notpleasanttoappearance Manyceilingsareglueontilethatwas reworkedin1994 Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 0.95 x 0.3 0.3 0.4 x x x 1 0.3 0.3 0.4 95% 100% 18% 18% 24% 18% 18% 24% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.55 0.35 0.1 x x x 50% 21% 6% 0.55 0.35 0.1 45% 45% 41% 23% 27% x 0.45 0.25 0.3 30% 45% 39% 6% 14% 6% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.5 0.5 x x x 0.5 0.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A x U 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 P x x F x x x x x x x x x x G x E 146 100% 100% 60% 60% Notes replacingsmallcondensateboilersas needed Onfiresprinkler Partofsewerpipinginstalledin56 someofthesewersysteminstalledin1956 supplyandreturnaircouldbetter NotRated None 77% 90% 90% 75% 65% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x F P U 147 N/A 5% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 33% 27% 50% 9% 14% 18% 41% 23% 9% 18% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight NotRated 90% 90% 60% 90% 90% 60% 90% Notes TͲ8'swithoccupancysensors someolderpanelsandwiringstillinuse NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x x x x x x x x x x x G 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x x 45% 15% 45% 15% NotRated NotRated 0.75 0.25 45% 23% 68% 23% 45% 15% 59% 23% 9% 6% 9% 9% 55% 9% 41% 23% 9% 18% NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 45% 15% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 Weight 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A N/A x x U 0.75 0.25 P x x x x x F 148 60% 60% NotRated 60% 68% 90% 60% 90% 88% 90% Component Score showingwear showingwear Playgroundequipmentwearing Gateswork PanelisoldDOSsystemneedstobe replaced Asrequestedbytheprincipal Notes 12/28/20 View Ridge Elementary School 149 Aerial Photo 150 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address View Ridge Elementary School 3250 Spruce Street Bremerton, WA 98310 Academic Grade Levels K-5 Area of Site 23.36 Tax Parcels 3972-000-001-0502; 3972-000-002-0006; 3972-000-002-0150; 3972-000-003-0005; 3972-000-003-0104 Building Area to date 37,984 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1952 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1960, 1967, 1994 Modernization & Addition (6,235) Total number of classrooms 23 Capacity/Enrollment 528/403 B. Site The View Ridge site contains 3 baseball fields, two to the east and one to the south. There is a playground with play structure, and soccer field directly to the north of the building. The property line also severs a football field and track, which is shared with the Bremerton Junior High property, at its southeast edge. A densely wooded area is located in the far southeast corner of the lot. C. Exterior Walls Wood frame with some brick and some concrete metal frame and window infill D. Roof Flat built-up roof over wood decking. Some areas sloped shingle. E. Storm Water Control City storm F. Boiler for hot water system that supplies a roof top heating unit for each 4 classrooms with a heating coil to adjust final heat into classroom. No A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls ATS heating controls 151 I. Water City water J. Electrical Schedule 25 K. Security System none L. Intercom System Dimensional M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Edwards with panel being change to Silent Knight in Nov 2011 152 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 153 VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE 4 3A 4 3 5 4 2 6 7 8 9 1 154 VIEW RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Area Calculations for: View Ridge Elementary School Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals 1 Existing Classrooms 1 8,723 2 Classroom Addition 1 4,480 3 Administration 1 3,608 3A Administration Addition 1 1,755 4 Existing Classrooms 1 8,540 5 Library 1 2,989 6 Music Room Addition 1 1,392 7 Gymnasium 1 4,800 8 Kitchen Addition 1 560 9 Covered Play Area 0.5 1,137 37,984 155 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: ViewRidgeElementarySchool BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory Component 156 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 75.31 ComponentScore 83% 83% 83% N/A 69% N/A 47% N/A 86% 86% 60% 75% 29% 63% 75% 50% 90% 90% 90% 90% NotRated 83% 90% 90% 74% N/A BCAScore 3.19 3.19 0.00 0.00 3.36 3.36 N/A 0.55 0.55 1.36 N/A 1.36 N/A 11.12 7.52 3.27 0.29 0.04 2.30 1.76 0.16 0.02 0.37 9.95 3.48 0.90 1.07 0.05 NotRated 4.45 7.39 2.98 0.09 4.15 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 86% 0.17 0.00 N/A 10.11 7.33 2.70 0.08 0.00 9.87 0.01 9.46 NotRated 0.24 0.16 2.60 2.59 0.01 9.74 NotRated 1.03 1.21 7.51 1.27 0.41 0.30 0.38 0.18 0.33 NotRated 0.16 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.87 0.00 0.20 0.08 0.09 0.50 1.22 1.15 0.07 N/A 87% 90% 75% 90% 60% 87% NotRated 81% 81% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 90% 83% 60% 63% 90% NotRated 81% 85% 90% 90% 68% 68% 90% 68% 68% 68% 157 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict ViewRidgeElementarySchool Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x F P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight 18% 24% N/A N/A N/A 9% 6% 41% 27% 27% 15% 9% 32% 27% 15% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore ElementarySchoolͲSingleStory 69% N/A 83% 83% 83% Component Score carpetswearingcreatingsome tippinghazards boilerroomisonlylocation Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 158 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x P x U 159 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 9% 14% 36% 27% 9% 36% 14% 12% 15% 15% 6% 6% 6% 45% 15% 15% 9% 0% 8% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 11% 6% 3% 27% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight 29% 75% 60% 86% 86% N/A 47% N/A Component Score flatroofthatneedstobereplaced, downspoutsareundersizeandneedtobe upgraded replacedin1994 replacedin1994 flatroofneartheendofit'slife, Notes 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E 50% 41% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.25 0.3 0.45 36% 9% 27% 18% 45% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% 11% 9% 30% 9% 15% 14% 15% 23% 9% 15% 15% 24% 12% Assessment CategoryScore 0.55 0.45 0.4 0.1 x x x x 0.3 0.2 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 Weight x x N/A 0.5 0.5 U x x x x P 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x G 160 NotRated 90% 90% 90% 90% 50% 75% 63% Component Score installedin1994 oldsystemisfailingandbeingreplacedby woodsheatingasneeded showingwear showingwear Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x F x P U 161 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 23% 5% 6% 32% 9% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 54% 9% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 23% 9% 9% 32% 14% 27% 14% 14% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 27% 14% 14% 36% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 27% 15% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 87% N/A 86% N/A 74% 90% 90% 83% Component Score carpetswearingcreatingsometripping hazards Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 0.95 0.3 0.3 0.4 95% 100% 27% 18% 36% 18% 27% 36% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 50% 32% 6% 30% 30% 41% 23% 27% 45% 30% 59% 9% 14% 9% 6% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.5 0.5 x x x x x x 0.45 0.25 0.3 1 x x x x x x x x x 0.5 0.5 U x P 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 x x F x x x x x x G x E 162 100% 100% 81% 81% Notes onsamemeterastheoldJuniorHigh building.Willneedotbechangedwhen buidlingisdemolished forfiresprinklersystemonly somevelocityproblemsduetodesign causingdraftyareas NotRated None 87% 60% 90% 75% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x F P U 163 N/A 5% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 50% 41% 50% 9% 14% 18% 41% 15% 9% 18% 39% 15% 6% 39% 15% 9% 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight NotRated 90% 63% 60% 83% 90% 90% 90% Notes AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years tͲ8'swithoccupancysensors Partofschedule31campuswitholdJunior Highbildingthatisclosed.Willhavetobe changedwhenJrhighisdemolished NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 Weight x x x x x x x 0.75 0.25 x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x x x 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 x 0.75 0.25 U x x x P 0.65 0.25 0.1 x x x F x x x x x x x G 164 45% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 59% 23% 9% 3% 9% 9% 55% 9% 41% 23% 6% 12% NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 68% 68% 68% 90% 68% 68% 90% 90% 85% 81% Component Score startingtoshowsomewear Playgroundequipmentiswearingand needstobereplaced gateswork olddospanelneedstobereplacedbutis stillprovidingcoverageforadequatefire protection asrequestedbytheprincipal Notes 12/28/20 West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy 165 Aerial Photo 166 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy 520 National Avenue South Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels PS-6 Area of Site 15.84 Tax Parcels 222401-2-043-2006; 222401-2-070-2002; 222401-2-075-2007; 222401-2-099-2009 Building Area to date 48,207 Number of Buildings 4 Year Built 1988 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) N/A Total number of classrooms 27 Capacity/Enrollment 528/516 B. Site The West Hills building is located at the far west side of its property. To the east of the building are two playgrounds with play structures and further east lies a large bootshaped field outlined by a walking path. At the far northeast corner of the property is a densely wooded area. C. Exterior Walls Wood frame with stucco exterior. 167 D. Roof Concrete tile roof over a wood deck with wood .trusses E. Storm Water Control In the county but storm is into the city storm F. Boilers with central units for each end of the building and the gym No A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls Barber Coleman DDC I. City water Water J. Electrical Schedule 25 K. Security System None L. Intercom System Electricom M. Clocks With intercom N. Fire Alarm Edwards 168 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 169 WEST HILLS S.T.E.M. ACADEMY SITE Covered Play 170 WEST HILLS S.T.E.M. ACADEMY Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 171 Area Calculations for: West Hills S.T.E.M. Academy Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals Lower Floor 1 29,015 Upper Floor 1 23,176 Covered Play Area 0.5 2,016 48,207 172 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: WestHillsElementary BuildingName: STEM Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes OverallBCAScore: 76.63 ComponentScore 69% 51% 90% NotRated 81% 83% 60% 90% 81% 72% 66% 90% 38% 83% 53% 60% 77% 90% 78% 90% 83% 90% 81% 90% 86% 90% BCAScore 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 1.84 1.84 NotRated 0.65 0.65 11.67 8.35 2.47 0.85 10.18 7.02 2.84 0.28 0.05 2.11 1.45 0.21 0.01 0.45 10.02 3.33 0.90 0.86 0.05 0.04 4.85 9.74 2.84 0.09 6.28 0.36 173 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component 174 C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore BCAScore 83% 0.17 0.57 0.57 6.05 4.05 1.92 0.09 N/A 5.74 0.01 5.31 NotRated 0.24 0.18 2.79 2.78 0.01 9.28 NotRated 0.90 1.21 7.17 1.47 0.45 0.30 0.54 0.18 0.37 NotRated 0.18 0.19 0.09 0.09 2.03 0.00 0.27 1.03 0.07 0.67 1.11 1.02 0.09 99% 91% 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% NotRated 81% 90% 100% 100% NotRated 90% 90% 86% 90% 60% 90% 90% NotRated 90% 93% 90% 90% 90% 90% 68% 90% 60% 90% SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: BremertonSchoolDistrict WestHillsElementary STEM KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x G x x x x x x x F x P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 15% 6% 21% 14% 9% 41% 27% NotRated NotRated NotRated 18% 36% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 27% 15% 6% 21% Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight ElementarySchoolͲMultiͲStory 81% NotRated somedrainageproblemsareaddressed eachyear gymwallandotherbelowgradewallsare inprettygoodshape 51% 90% mostofbuidlinghassomebelowgrade aspectsthathavehadsomewater problems Notes 69% Component Score Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 175 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x F x x x x x P U 176 N/A 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight 15% 3% 8% 45% 23% 23% 12% 15% 15% 9% 9% 6% 9% 14% 36% 14% 18% 14% 14% 36% 45% 23% 23% 11% 3% 6% 41% 15% 27% 41% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 38% 90% 66% 72% 81% 90% 60% 83% Component Score tileroofsystemisdisappearingandneeds toberepalced doorsandhardwareareshowingsignsof use Windows/sealshaveneededreplacing Sealsatjointsrequireregularmaintenance tileroofisfallingandinneedofconstent repairtokeepwaterintrusiondown Notes 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x F x P x U 177 N/A 12% 9% 15% 23% 36% 9% 0% 14% 15% 15% 21% 9% 30% 18% 14% 9% 36% 45% 45% 18% 18% 36% 6% 50% 41% 15% 27% 41% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight 83% 90% 78% 90% 77% 60% 53% 83% Component Score showingwearsinceinstalledin1988 partitionbyfrontentryhaswaterdamage thatkeepsreoccurring Skylightsbythefrontentryhavealways leakedandcannotfindacontractoror solutiontothisproblem.Thesealsand glazingareshowingwearfromage Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E N/A Weight Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x 0.1 0.6 0.1 x x x 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 x x x 0.9 0.05 0.05 x x x x x x x 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x x x x x x 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 U x x P 0.15 0.3 x F x x G 178 9% 54% 9% 90% 5% 5% 15% 14% 9% 32% 14% 45% 23% 23% 23% 9% 9% 32% 14% 27% 14% 14% 36% 18% 14% 14% 36% 27% 23% 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 91% 99% 83% 90% 86% 90% 81% 90% Component Score carpethasbeenreplacedbutisshowing wearagain waterdamagefrontentry,manyhallways havemuralsaspaintedbythestaff Nottocurrentcode,butnotfailures Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x F P U 179 N/A N/A N/A N/A 45% 45% 50% 32% 9% NotRated NotRated NotRated 18% 27% 36% 27% 27% 36% 100% 95% 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 45% 45% 0.5 0.5 N/A N/A N/A 59% 9% 14% 9% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 100% 100% 90% 81% Notes replacecondensateboildersasneeded onsprinklersystemonly hardtogetmakeupairintothesystem; questionfulloverheadintakelevels NotRated None 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 59% 23% 9% 39% 15% 6% x x x 0.65 0.25 0.1 41% 23% 9% 18% 0.65 0.25 0.1 x x x 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 50% 9% 9% 18% 50% 41% x x x x x x x x 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight x x N/A 0.55 0.45 U x x P 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 x F x x x x x x G 180 NotRated 90% 90% 60% 90% 86% 90% 90% Notes AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years tͲ8'sinstalled2010;notincurrentcode compliancefordaylightcontrols reachingloadcapacitiesinsomeareas NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x F P U 181 N/A N/A N/A 68% 23% 68% 23% 45% 23% 68% 23% 45% 15% 68% 23% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 59% 23% 9% 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 6% 9% 14% 55% 9% 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 68% 23% 41% 23% 9% 18% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.75 0.25 NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight wearingoutandreplacingformicaas needed showingwear 90% playgroundequipmentneedstobe replaced Gateswork firepanelworksbutneedstobereplaced Asrequestedbytheprincipal Notes 60% 90% 68% 90% 90% 90% 90% 93% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 182 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 West Sound Technical Skills Center 183 Aerial Photo 184 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address West Sound Technical Skills Center 101 National Avenue North Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels 11-12 (ages 16-19) Area of Site 16.44 Tax Parcels 3777-001-001-0101 Building Area to date 70,691 Number of Buildings 2 Year Built 1977 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1998 miscellaneous tenant improvement type work for program support. Total number of classrooms 15 Capacity/Enrollment 500/505 B. Site The Technical Skills Center is flanked at the west and northwest property lines by a heavily wooded canopy. A paved zone separates the building from the east edge of the property, which is grassy and spotted with trees. C. Exterior Walls Concrete tilt up walls painted on the exterior and CMU D. Roof Single ply Stevens roof installed in 1990 E. Storm Water Control City storm water F. Heat pumps to all the areas 185 Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Electric schedule 43. Some gas to kitchen and paint booth. H. Controls ATS I. City water Water J. Electrical Schedule 43 K. Security System None L. Intercom System Electricom M. Clocks None N. Fire Alarm Edwards 186 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 187 WEST SOUND TECHNICAL SKILLS CENTER SITE 188 WEST SOUND TECHNICAL SKILLS CENTER Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: WestSoundTechnicalSkillsCenter BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:SkillsCenter Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes OverallBCAScore: 66.32 ComponentScore 74% N/A 57% 90% 90% 44% 57% N/A 51% 77% 6% 60% 53% 80% NotRated 60% 86% 90% 33% 90% N/A 69% 86% 60% 38% N/A BCAScore 2.94 2.94 0.00 N/A 2.57 2.57 0.00 1.08 1.08 3.71 0.00 3.71 N/A 7.76 4.18 3.53 0.02 0.03 3.01 2.36 0.20 NotRated 0.45 7.90 4.28 1.80 0.40 0.05 N/A 1.38 4.52 2.14 0.06 2.21 N/A 189 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm 190 C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 56% N/A 90% 44% 75% 90% NotRated 63% 63% 69% 78% 100% 100% NotRated 84% 90% 86% 60% 60% 60% 60% NotRated NotRated 90% 60% 90% 68% 68% NotRated 68% 60% 60% 0.11 0.00 N/A 4.83 3.87 0.84 0.08 0.05 10.74 NotRated 2.46 8.07 0.14 0.08 2.61 2.60 0.01 8.61 NotRated 0.97 0.90 6.75 1.08 0.30 0.30 0.36 0.12 0.18 NotRated NotRated 0.18 0.06 0.06 4.06 0.09 1.44 2.03 NotRated 0.50 0.66 0.60 0.06 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict WestSoundTechnicalSkillsCenter A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E x x x x x x x G x x x x x F x P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 27% 27% 36% 27% 36% 0.3 0.4 9% 3% 27% 18% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 15% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight SkillsCenter 90% 90% 57% N/A 74% Component Score Inautomotiveareathepitsaredry Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 191 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x G x x 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight 0.25 0.1 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x x x U 0.5 0.25 0.25 x x x x x x x x P x x x x x x x x x F 192 15% 6% 8% 30% 15% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3% 3% 18% 9% 36% 14% 9% 9% 9% 24% N/A N/A N/A 11% 3% 3% 41% 8% 9% 27% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 53% 60% Roofing21yearsoldandduefor replacement.flatroofslopedsomeusing insulationin1990 exposedtoelementssince1977andin needofreplcement notmanywindowandreworkedin2009 77% 6% CracksintiltͲupcont,jointsshowwear, requiremonitoring.Noknownstruct damage. singleplyroofinstalledin1990showing sigsofwearandrequiresrepairseachyear heaviliycracked Notes 51% N/A 57% 44% Component Score 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x P U 193 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6% 15% 14% 15% NotRated 21% 9% 30% 27% 9% 14% 36% 45% 45% 9% 6% 12% 6% 50% 41% 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 N/A N/A N/A 6% 15% 23% 36% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.25 0.3 0.45 24% Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight N/A 90% 33% Allworkasdesigned hardwarefailingandnopartsavailable mostareconcreteblock,Temporary movablepartitionsintheofficeareas someclassroomareasneedtobereplaced 86% 90% entryandotherareasareshowingwear andhavebeeninstalledasbudgetspermit Notes 60% NotRated 80% Component Score 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x x X X x x G Weight x x x X X x N/A N/A N/A 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 x 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 x x x x X 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A x x U 0.15 0.3 x x x x P x F 194 9% 54% 9% N/A N/A N/A 15% 5% 6% 21% 9% N/A N/A N/A 15% 5% 3% 11% 5% 18% 9% 9% 24% 27% 9% 14% 36% 18% 15% 9% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 90% N/A 56% N/A 38% 60% 86% 69% Component Score wearinginstaledin1977shopareashave exposedinsulationwhichisnotdarkand grudgey somebentsupportsandwaterdamage Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x E x x x x x x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x F x P U 195 N/A 9% 5% 5% 20% 6% 9% 9% 30% 45% 41% 23% 27% NotRated NotRated 33% 21% 9% 33% 21% 9% 18% 27% 24% 27% 27% 24% 100% 95% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight inshopsareaandfiresystemworksas designedNewcompressorinstalledin 2010fortheshoparea mainsewerlineinthebudilinghasasag andneedsconstantmaintenance Notes 100% 100% 78% 69% 63% 63% Heatpumponeastsidearefrom1989, agingandgenerallypoorcondition,HPon westside(shops)installedin2004inshop areasinfairtogoodcondition. seenoteaboveforheatpunmps NotRated Electricbuilding.Gastothekitchenand paintboothonly(notheating) 90% 75% 44% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x 39% 15% 6% NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 x x x x x x 39% 15% 6% 39% 15% 6% 0.65 0.25 0.1 x x x 27% 15% 6% 12% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 50% 9% 9% 18% 50% 41% 23% 5% 23% 23% 12% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight x x x x x N/A 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 U x x P 0.55 0.45 x F x x x x x x x G 196 NotRated 60% 60% 60% 60% 86% 90% 84% NotRated Component Score tͲ8'sinstalled2010 Notes 12/28/201 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E x x x x x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x F x P U 197 N/A NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 3% 9% 14% 55% 9% 39% 15% 6% 68% 23% 45% 23% 45% 23% NotRated NotRated 45% 23% 45% 15% 45% 15% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight 60% 60% 68% NotRated 68% 68% 90% 60% 90% NotRated Component Score gateswork Edwardspaneldifficulttoprogramandfix Notes 12/28/20 198 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Administration Building 199 Aerial Photo 200 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Administration Building 3400 1st Street Bremerton, WA 98337 Academic Grade Levels N/A Area of Site 4.3 Tax Parcels 152401-4-017-2003 Building Area to date 31,500 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1945 Modernizations and Additions, Date and (Sq Ft) Total number of classrooms N.A Capacity/Enrollment N/A B. Site The Administration Building shares its property with the Renaissance High School. There is a long grassy expanse directly east of the building, reaching to the far north property line. Adjacent the east property line is a narrow greenbelt separating a community track and field. Renaissance uses the gym area for PE. C. Exterior Walls Concrete with metal frame in-filled with windows and stucco. 201 D. Roof Sloped shingle roof with wood trusses over flat roof E. Storm Water Control City storm water F. Boiler with unit ventilators in larger spaces and small units in attic for smaller offices. No A/C Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls Pneumatic with time clocks I. City water Water J. Electrical Schedule 25 K. Security System Mountain Alarm L. Intercom System None M. Clocks None N. Fire Alarm Edwards 202 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 203 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: AdministrationBuilding BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:Administrative Component 204 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 71.38 ComponentScore 90% 81% 86% N/A NotRated 83% 63% N/A 69% 81% 80% 60% 48% 56% 65% 75% 90% 90% 90% 90% N/A 90% 99% 99% 83% N/A BCAScore 4.74 4.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 NotRated 6.97 3.13 3.84 N/A 8.63 4.50 2.43 1.60 0.10 3.41 3.21 0.07 0.06 0.07 7.62 2.48 0.22 3.66 0.09 N/A 1.18 9.54 0.91 0.04 5.19 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 86% 3.40 0.00 N/A 3.07 0.67 0.51 1.89 0.00 7.87 1.02 5.77 NotRated 0.82 0.26 3.15 2.71 0.44 13.38 0.00 3.86 0.26 9.25 1.92 0.73 0.97 0.22 NotRated 0.72 0.24 0.24 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.00 0.37 0.22 0.15 N/A 73% 90% 45% 72% 90% 56% NotRated 36% 36% 90% 90% 90% 90% 60% 96% 90% 60% 90% NotRated 100% 100% 96% 0% 90% 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% 90% 205 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict AdministrationBuilding Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E X X X x X X X X X X G N/A N/A N/A NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 9% 9% 41% 27% 18% 23% 9% 32% 27% 23% 9% 32% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A X U N/A N/A N/A N/A P X F Administrative NotRated N/A 86% 81% 90% Component Score somesettlingovertheyears structuralysound Notes Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 206 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E X X X X X X X X X X X X G X X X X X X X X X X X X X F X X P U 207 N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 14% 14% 24% 27% 9% 36% 9% 18% 15% 23% 9% 9% 6% 30% 15% 15% 6% 23% 8% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 11% 6% 6% 41% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 N/A N/A N/A 15% 27% 41% 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 Weight 48% 60% 80% 81% 69% N/A 63% 83% Component Score Asphaltroofisinneedofreplacement windowsinstalledinthe80'saredouble pane Asphaltroofisinneedofreplacement Notes 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.55 0.45 0.4 0.1 X X X X 0.3 0.2 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 Weight X X N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.5 0.5 U X X X X X P 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 X X X X X F X X X X X X X X X G 208 N/A N/A N/A 50% 41% 36% 9% 27% 18% 45% 45% 27% 14% 14% 36% 32% 14% 30% 6% 8% 14% 15% 23% 9% 8% 15% 24% 12% Assessment CategoryScore N/A 90% 90% 90% 90% 75% 65% 56% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm X X X X X X E X X X X X X x x x x X X X X X X G X x x F P U 209 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15% 14% 9% 32% 14% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 36% 9% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 23% 9% 9% 32% 14% 30% 14% 15% 40% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 30% 14% 15% 40% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 27% 23% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 14% 27% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight 73% N/A 86% N/A 83% 99% 99% 90% Component Score showingwearsincesomeisglueontile thatasrefinishedin1997butisstartingto bedated installedin1997andstartingtoshow somewear 1997 redonein1997 Notes 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 X X E x X X X X X X X X 0.95 1 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 X X 0.5 0.5 0.45 0.25 0.3 x x X X 0.5 0.5 Weight X N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 X U X X X X X P 0.1 0.05 0.05 x F X X G 210 95% 90% 18% 18% 0% 18% 18% 0% 17% 0% NotRated 50% 0% 6% 45% 45% 41% 23% 9% 45% 0% 59% 9% 14% 9% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore aircontrolswithatimeclockneeds updatedfixedsupplyairlouvers aircontrolsforheating nosprinklersinthebuilding Notes 100% 90% 36% 36% None Manyunitvetalatorsforeachlargespace. Installedinthe80'sandnoiseyplusvery littlecontrolforcomfort NotRated evaporatorinSupsarea,andACin computerserververarea 56% 90% 72% 45% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm X X X E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X G x x x X X F P U 211 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 14% 14% 36% 27% 23% 5% 23% 23% 18% 33% 27% 55% 9% 14% 18% 41% 23% 9% 18% 39% 15% 6% 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated NotRated 65% 25% 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.05 Weight 100% Notes AgingVOIPsystem;componentsfailingͲ saidtobeunsupportedin3Ͳ4years someveryoldpanelsinforsomeareas NotRated None 90% 60% 90% 96% 60% 90% 90% Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x x x U N/A Weight X Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 X X 0.75 0.25 X X N/A N/A 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A x x 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A x x 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A x x 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A 0.65 0.25 0.1 X X X 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 P X X X X F 0.1 X X X G X E 212 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% N/A N/A 68% 23% 68% 23% 68% 23% 0% 0% 0% 9% 9% 14% 55% 9% 45% 25% 10% 20% 10% Assessment CategoryScore 90% 90% 90% N/A 90% 90% 90% 0% 96% 100% Component Score None audio/visualequipmentisgood gatesonlyandtheywork Noneusepnumaticcontrolsforheating Notes 12/28/20 Consolidated Facilities 213 Aerial Photo 214 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Consolidated Facilities 200 Bruenn Avenue Bremerton, WA 98312 Academic Grade Levels N/A Area of Site – 3.5 Tax Parcels 3826-000-002-0004 Building Area to date 40,100 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1947 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1985 converted to support building Total number of classrooms N/A Capacity/Enrollment N/A B. Site Consolidated Facilities sits on an industrial site, This site is the location for the District transportation, warehouse, grounds and maintenance departments. Needs parking for busses,,trucks, and service equipment and maintenance vehicles and parking for bus drivers and maintenance people. C. Exterior Walls Masonry and wood frame 215 D. Roof Wood frame flat roof with built up roofing system E. Storm Water Control City storm F. Electric resistance heating in all occupied spaces Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Electric H. Controls In some individual thermostats with an old load shedding controls I. Water City J. Electrical PSE schedule 43 K. Security System none L. Intercom System none M. Clocks none N. Fire Alarm Old Gamewell Zans 200 O. Fire Sprinkler In paint shop and fire storage room 216 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 217 CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES SITE 218 CONSOLIDATED FACILITIES Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Area Calculations for: Consolidated Facilities Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals* Main Building 1 30,673 30,673 219 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: BremertonSchoolDistrict FacilityName: ConsolidatedFacilities BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter Evaluator'sCompany: NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict Date: 10/31/2011 BuildingType:MaintenanceandOperations Component 220 A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OverallBCAScore: 36.84 ComponentScore 38% N/A 56% 30% 39% 24% 14% N/A 47% 14% 48% 30% 0% 23% 26% 30% 17% NotRated 60% N/A 51% 53% 33% 30% 41% N/A BCAScore 0.81 0.81 0.00 N/A 4.92 4.92 0.00 1.15 1.15 1.44 0.00 1.44 N/A 8.75 1.99 1.78 4.96 0.02 0.32 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.23 0.35 0.09 NotRated 0.15 N/A 0.00 0.11 0.92 0.04 0.03 0.81 N/A OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings ComponentScore BCAScore 33% 0.03 0.00 N/A 4.60 3.79 0.71 0.06 0.05 3.35 NotRated 3.20 N/A NotRated 0.15 0.82 0.81 0.01 5.39 NotRated 0.87 0.30 4.23 3.60 1.80 1.80 NotRated NotRated 0.17 NotRated NotRated 0.17 0.00 NotRated 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 N/A 0.08 0.18 NotRated 0.18 N/A 72% 71% 60% 90% NotRated 41% N/A NotRated 48% 60% 60% NotRated 83% 30% 36% 90% 90% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 85% NotRated 60% 60% 60% N/A 60% NotRated 60% 221 SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 BremertonSchoolDistrict ConsolidatedFacilities Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E G X X X X F X X 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight X X X N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 U X X X X P 9% 12% 9% 9% 12% 5% 6% 27% 18% N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 15% 3% 11% Assessment CategoryScore MaintenanceandOperations oldboilerroomisblowgradeandhas waterproblemsandcondensateproblem becauseoflackofventalation Asbestosareaandconnotenterbuthave beentoldthereisstandingwaterunder sounthendofthebuidling 39% Slabongradeinpartofthewarehouse areathatwasinstalledinthe80's None Old1040'sfoundationstillholdingbutis startingtohaveproblems Notes 30% 56% N/A 38% Component Score Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 222 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E X G X X X X X F X X X X X X X X X X X X X P X X X X X X X X X U 223 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 9% 9% 5% 24% 9% 0% 0% 5% 6% 23% 8% 6% 3% 3% 15% 8% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0% 0% 0% 14% 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.5 0.25 0.25 15% 9% 0% 18% Assessment CategoryScore 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight Oldwoodframeindowswithsingleply glass.Puttyisfailingandaredifficultto open. Olddoorswithadequatelocksand hardwareforsecurity. Oldventsthatareneededforrestrooms andotherareaswork.Therearenot screens. Flatroofwithnoupgradedsafetysystems. Guttersundersizedandmanymiising sealantsthathavecrackedorbeen damagedbybirdsovertheyears 14% 48% 30% 0% None N/A keepsoutelemetsbutisinpoorshape withnomaintenaceperformedoverthe past20years.Needsinsulation. flatroofisinbadshapeandhasbeen patchedforthepast20yearstoattempt tokeepoutwater. 14% 47% woodfloorislevelbutinpoorshape.No finishleftandisdeteriating. Notes 24% Component Score 12/28/20 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E G X X X NotRated NotRated 0.5 0.5 N/A N/A N/A 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.55 0.45 15% 9% 27% N/A N/A 24% 6% 18% 12% 0% 5% 0% 12% 11% 5% 15% 6% 8% 5% 8% 0% 3% 0% 8% 12% 0% Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.4 Weight 0.4 0.1 N/A N/A N/A X X X X X X X U 0.3 0.2 X X X X X X X X X X X P X X X F 224 51% N/A 60% Notes Mostarelatheandplasterandhave erosionfromwaterandpeelingpaint. porchesinpoorshape allinverypoorshape Allflashinghavefailedandarenow caulkingmaterial.Everyhtingelseisold anddeteriating. woodflooringislevelbutwearing None Lockssecureareasandthatisaboutit. NotRated None 17% 30% 26% 23% Component Score 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E X X G X X X X X X X F X X X X X X X X X X X X X P X X X U 225 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 8% 5% 3% 21% 5% 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 N/A N/A N/A 9% 36% 9% 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.1 0.6 0.1 0% 5% 3% 21% 5% 9% 5% 5% 12% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 9% 0% 0% 24% 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 18% 8% 0.3 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 9% 18% Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight Systemisoldbutwellmaintained None N/A 72% Waterdamagedceilingwithpatchwork coveringareas,therestisinneedof maintenance None N/A 33% concreteokayforwarehousebuttherest oftheflooringisinverypoorshape Allinpoorshape 30% 41% Waterdamageandpeelingpaintorno paintleft. Wherethereisgridiswasinstalledinthe 80'sandhassomewaterdamge. Notes 33% 53% Component Score 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 X X X X X X X X X X X G X X X X X F X X X X P U 226 N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.95 1 86% 60% 18% 18% 12% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 N/A N/A N/A 0.55 0.35 0.1 17% 21% 3% NotRated NotRated 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.35 0.1 41% 23% 27% 45% 15% 39% 9% 14% 9% 9% 5% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight compressorsforshopsareadequateand working. tiedtothecitysewersystemandthereis nofireloop Inoldprintroomandnotused. Allelectricstripresistanceheat.Wall thermastatcontrols 90% 60% 48% sprinklersysteminthepaintshopanda storageroom. extinguishersarewhererequiredand certifiedannually ventsworkasdesignedandwindowsopen NotRated None N/A 41% Notes oldbutisworkingfine NotRated Allelectric 90% 60% 71% Component Score 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E X X X X X X X X X X X X G X X F X X X X X P U 227 N/A 5% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 23% 5% 23% 15% 18% 17% 14% 17% 3% 5% 12% 41% 23% 9% 18% 59% 23% 9% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 0.55 0.45 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight oldtechnologywitht12"sinplacedas needed.Switchcontrols. upgradedin2008 36% 90% NotRated None NotRated None NotRated None upgradedin2008 Stillsomefusepanelswiththeoldwiring leftinthebuilding. 30% 90% Newserviceinstalledinthe80'swhen kitchenwashereandisingoodshape Notes 83% NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm X E X G Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A X X X X 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A X X 45% 15% NotRated NotRated 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 45% 15% N/A N/A 45% 15% 45% 15% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 45% 15% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.75 0.25 9% 6% 9% 55% 6% NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight N/A N/A N/A X X U N/A N/A P X X X X X F 228 adequateforbuilding None 60% adequateforbuilding NotRated None 60% N/A shopequipmentadequate adequateforbuilding 60% 60% docksgatesandequipmentworkandare serviceble Oldfirepanelstillpassesconfidencetests butusesolddevices. Notes 60% NotRated 85% NotRated None Component Score 12/28/20 Child Nutritional Services Center 229 Aerial Photo 230 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 A. General - Facility Basic Information Name Address Child Nutritional Services Center 1300 East 30th Street Bremerton, WA 98310 Academic Grade Levels 7-8 Area of Site – 31.05 Tax Parcels 122401-2-037-2006 Building Area to date 136,359 Number of Buildings 1 Year Built 1956 Modernizations and Additions, (Date and Sq Ft) 1960, 1962, 1967, 1978 (Removed from OSPI roles 2007) Total number of classrooms 57 Capacity/Enrollment 1,247/Currently off roles B. Site The Child Nutritional Services Center sits on 31 acres which includes a baseball field, softball field and four tennis courts. The property line serves a football field and track, which is shared with the View Ridge Elementary property, at its northeast corner. Further to the northeast is a heavily wooded area separating the property from a residential neighborhood. C. Exterior Walls Concrete with metal frame with windows infill. Most windows are broken D. Roof Built up roof on a slope over existing flat roof system E. Storm Water Control City storm F. Boiler for gym area only and a gas force air system for the kitchen area Mechanical System G. Fuel Source Gas H. Controls None 231 I. Water City water J. Electrical Schedule 31 campus with View Ridge K. Security System Sonitrol L. Intercom System None M. Clocks None N. Fire Alarm Silent Knight 232 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 233 CHILD NUTRITIONAL SERVICES CENTER Area Calculations for: Child Nutritional Services Center Bremerton School District #100-C Bremerton, Washington Area Number Area Name SF Factor Totals* 1 1954 Main Building 1 74,975 2 1954 Classroom Building G (D-Wing) 1 4,800 3 Gymnasium 1 18,760 4 1960 C-Wing Addition 1 4,306 5 1962 B-Wing Addition 1 6,720 6 1967 Small Gym Addition. 1 7,984 7 1967 H-Wing Addition 1 2,304 8 1978 Science Building (I-Wing) 1 5,040 9 1978 A-Wing Addition 1 6,720 10 1978 Office Addition 1 4,750 234 136,359 * Actual square footage figures are approximate. No accurate data available. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 BuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: BuildingType:CentralKitchen Component A10ͲFoundations A1010ͲStandardFoundation A20ͲWalls A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure A40ͲSlabsonGrade A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade A4040ͲPitsandBases A60ͲBuildingSubdrainage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage B10ͲSuperstructure B1010ͲFloorConstruction B1020ͲRoofConstruction B1080ͲStairs B20ExteriorVerticalEnclosures B2010ͲExteriorWalls B2020ͲExteriorWindows B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents B30ͲExteriorHorizontalEnclosures B3010ͲRoofing B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures C10ͲInteriorConstruction C1010ͲInteriorPartitions C1020ͲInteriorWindows C1030ͲInteriorDoors C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. C20ͲInteriorFinishes C2010ͲWallFinishes C2020ͲInteriorFabrications C2030ͲFlooring C2040ͲStairFinishes C2050ͲCeilingFinishes D10ͲConveying D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems D20ͲPlumbingFixtures D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage BremertonSchoolDistrict CentralKitchen(ratingkitchenareaonly,smallportionofbuilding) OldBremertonJuniorHighSchool KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 OverallBCAScore: ComponentScore 57% 50% 60% N/A 51% 60% 47% N/A 60% 35% 81% 60% 38% 45% 38% 60% 65% 45% 48% 44% N/A NotRated 51% 42% 48% N/A 33% N/A 68% 86% 51.36 BCAScore 3.24 3.24 0.00 0.00 4.70 4.70 N/A 0.24 0.24 2.42 0.00 2.42 N/A 8.81 7.15 0.70 0.80 0.17 2.45 2.38 0.02 0.02 0.03 6.71 3.26 0.06 3.34 0.05 N/A NotRated 6.40 1.13 0.52 2.94 N/A 1.81 0.00 N/A 5.76 1.05 1.20 235 OSPIBuildingConditionAssessmentSummaryForm Component 236 D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir D30ͲHVAC D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems D3020ͲHeatingSystems D3030ͲCoolingSystems D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System D3060ͲVentilation D40ͲFireProtection D4010ͲFiresSuppression D4030ͲFireSuppressionSpecialties D50ͲElectrical D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower D5040ͲLighting D60ͲCommunication D6010ͲDataCommunications D6020ͲVoiceCommunications D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring D70ͲElectronicSafetyandSecurity D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm D80ͲIntegratedAutomation D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls E10ͲEquipment E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment E1030ͲCommercialEquipment E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment E1090ͲOtherEquipment E20ͲFurnishings E2010ͲFixedFurnishings E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 ComponentScore BCAScore 60% N/A 3.50 N/A 4.89 0.70 2.37 N/A 1.44 0.38 1.92 1.49 0.43 1.86 NotRated 0.23 0.19 1.44 0.08 0.04 0.04 N/A NotRated 0.13 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.10 0.71 0.00 N/A 0.84 0.09 0.06 0.03 60% 50% N/A 60% 51% 60% 60% NotRated 39% 30% 36% 60% 60% N/A NotRated 60% 60% 82% 0% 53% 53% 60% N/A 60% 30% 30% SchoolDistrict: FacilityName: BuildingName: Evaluator'sName: Evaluator'sCompany: Date: BremertonSchoolDistrict CentralKitchen(ratingkitchenareaonly,smallportionofbuilding) OldBremertonJuniorHighSchool KevinFlanagan&RonCarpenter NACArchitecture&BremertonSchoolDistrict 10/31/2011 A1010ͲStandardFoundation Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterLeaks A2020ͲWallsforsubgradeenclosure Cracks&Separation Drainage Vegetation WaterPenetration A4010ͲStandardSlabsonGrade Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage WaterPenetration A4040ͲPitsandBases Settling WaterPenetration Structuraldamage A6010ͲBuildingSubdrainage Drainage Membraneintegrity Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories BuildingProfileType: E G x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x P U N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 24% 0.3 0.4 9% 6% 27% 18% 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 18% 15% 6% 11% 18% 15% 3% 21% Assessment CategoryScore 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.1 0.35 Weight CentralKitchen oldboilerroom 50% 51% N/A 60% Partofthebuilding.Onlyratingthe kitchenarea Notes 57% Component Score Excellent(E):Neworeasilyrestorableto“likenew”condition;onlyminimalroutinemaintenancerequired. Good(G):SomePreventativemaintenanceand/orcorrectiverepairrequired. Fair(F):Failstomeetcodeandfunctionalrequirementsinsomecases;failure(s)areinconvenient;extensivecorrectivemaintenanceandrepairrequired. Poor(P):Consistentsubstandardperformance;failures(s)aredisruptiveandcostly;failsmostcodeandfunctionalrequirements;requiresconstantattention,renovation,or replacement.MajorCorrectiverepairoroverhaulrequired. Unsatisfactory(U):NonͲoperationalorsignificantlysubstandardperformance.Replacementrequired. BuildingConditionAssessmentScoringForm 237 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Gutters,downspouts,scuppers,roofdrains,etc. Settling B1010ͲFloorConstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1020ͲRoofConstruction WaterPenetration Levelnessofridges,eaves,gables,etc. Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B1080ͲStairs Structuraldamage Settling Componentssecure B2010ͲExteriorWalls WaterPenetration Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage B2020ͲExteriorWindows WaterPenetration Weatherstripping Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage B2050ͲExteriorDoorsandGrilles Hinges Locks Door Closers Windows&Grills Weatherstripping B2070ͲExteriorLouversandVents Structuraldamage Screens Componentssecure B3010ͲRoofing Safetysystems Slopesandrunoffs Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x G 0.3 0.15 0.4 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.1 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.45 0.3 Weight x x 0.25 0.1 0.25 0.5 0.25 0.25 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x U x x x x x x x x x x P 0.2 0.25 0.25 0.1 0.1 0.1 x x x x x x x x x x F 238 8% 3% 15% 30% 15% 15% 18% 23% 23% 6% 6% 6% 9% 5% 12% 9% 18% 9% 9% 24% N/A N/A N/A 11% 6% 3% 27% 15% 18% 27% 9% Assessment CategoryScore 38% 60% 81% 35% 60% N/A 47% 60% Component Score mostdownspoutsundersized oldsinglepaneglazingwithmetalframe hippedroofoverflatroof.Inpoorshape onlyrepairingtheareaoverthekitchen Notes 12/28/20 Structuraldamage(vanes,separation,etc.) Componentssecure C1060ͲRaisedfloorconstruction Levelness Softspots,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage Lites C1040ͲInteriorGrillesandGrates Cracks,separations,damagedormissing materials,weathersealant,etc. B3020ͲRoofAppurtenances Structuraldamage Flashings Componentssecure Weatherhoods B3060ͲHorizontalOpenings/Penetrations Structuraldamage(ducts,chimneys,etc.) Flashings Componentssecure Weatherseals Glazing B3080ͲOverheadExteriorEnclosures Supportstructure Componentssecure Coverings C1010ͲInteriorPartitions WaterDamage Plumbness Warpage,swellingorsettling Structuraldamage C1020ͲInteriorWindows Windowinsulationfailure Structuraldamage C1030ͲInteriorDoors Locks Closers Structuraldamage(cracks,warpage,swellingor settling,rust,separation,alignment,etc.) Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x x P U 239 N/A N/A N/A N/A 6% 8% 9% 8% 8% 21% 9% 30% 18% 14% 9% 24% 15% 30% 18% 12% 12% 6% 17% 27% 0.1 0.25 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.55 0.45 N/A N/A N/A 6% 8% 8% 24% 0.1 0.25 0.25 0.4 0.25 0.3 0.45 12% Assessment CategoryScore 0.4 Weight N/A 44% 48% 45% 65% 60% 38% 45% Component Score Notes 12/28/20 C1070ͲSuspendedCeilingConst. Levelness Componentssecure Structuraldamage(sagging,separation, breakage.etc.) WaterDamage C2010ͲWallFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2020ͲInteriorFabrications WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flakingorsettling Structuraldamage C2030ͲFlooring WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Sealant C2040ͲStairFinishes StructuralDamage Settling Componentssecure C2050ͲCeilingFinishes WaterDamage Aesthetics Chipping,swelling,flaking,scoring,etc. Structuraldamage Penetrations D1010ͲVerticalConveyingSystems InspectionsCurrent Aesthetics Functionality D2010ͲDomesticWaterDistribution Pressure Waterquality Leakage Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x G x x x x x x x F x x x x x x x x x x P x x U 240 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.9 0.05 0.05 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.5 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.1 0.35 0.15 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 9% 36% 9% N/A N/A N/A 8% 0% 0% 21% 5% N/A N/A N/A 15% 5% 3% 21% 5% 9% 5% 5% 24% 18% 5% 5% 24% NotRated NotRated 0.3 0.25 0.3 0.15 0.15 0.4 NotRated NotRated Assessment CategoryScore 0.15 0.3 Weight Notes 68% N/A 33% N/A 48% 42% 51% oldglueontileceilinginpoorshape oldflooringshowingseverewear yearsofwearsince1956 NotRated oldglueontileceilinginpoorshape Component Score 12/28/20 Fixtures Waterheaters Backflowprevention D2020ͲSanitaryDrainage Flow Vents Traps Cleanouts D2030ͲBuildingSupportPlumbingSystems Sewer/SepticSystem Fireloop D2050ͲGeneralServicesCompressedAir Compressor Distribution Controls D3010ͲFacilityFuelSystems Distribution Controls D3020ͲHeatingSystems HeatingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3030ͲCoolingSystems CoolingUnit Controls SupplyAir D3050ͲFacilityHVACDist.System Supply&Return Ducting/Piping Controls D3060ͲVentilation FansͲSupply&Exhaust Ducting/Piping Controls D4010ͲFiresSuppression UptoDateInspection D4030FireSuppressionSpecialties UptoDateInspection Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E x x x x G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x P U 241 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 18% 18% 24% 9% 18% 24% 60% 57% 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.95 33% 11% 6% 0.55 0.35 0.1 0.55 0.35 0.1 30% 30% 0.5 0.5 30% 30% 0.5 0.5 N/A N/A N/A 59% 9% 9% 9% 0.65 0.1 0.15 0.1 0.45 0.25 0.3 6% 3% 5% Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 0.05 0.05 Weight 60% 60% 51% 60% N/A 50% 60% N/A 60% 86% Component Score installednewductingforroofexistingroof topunit usingrooftopsystemsinceslabfloor heatngsystemisfailing Notes 12/28/20 Componentssecure D5010ͲFacilityPowerGeneration Testschedule Maintenanceschedule Generatorunit Controls D5020ͲElectricalServiceandDistribution Transformers Vaults MainSubpanels EMT,wiring Motors D5030ͲGeneralPurposeElectricalPower Branchpanels Branchwiring D5040ͲLighting Fixtures Switches,wiring Controls Coverage D6010ͲDataCommunications Components Distribution Controls Connectivity D6020ͲVoiceCommunications Components Distribution Controls D6030ͲAudioͲVideoCommunication Components Distribution Controls D6060ͲDistributedComm/Monitoring Components Distribution Controls D7010ͲAccessControlandIntrusionDefection Components Distribution Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm E G Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 x x 39% 15% NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 N/A N/A N/A 39% 15% 6% 27% 15% 6% 12% 17% 3% 5% 12% 17% 14% 0.65 0.25 0.1 0.65 0.25 0.1 x x x 0.55 0.1 0.15 0.2 x x x 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.55 0.45 NotRated NotRated NotRated NotRated 0.15 0.15 0.4 0.3 15% 3% 8% 8% 6% 3% Assessment CategoryScore 0.05 Weight x x N/A N/A N/A N/A x x x U 0.25 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.2 P x x x x x x x x F 242 60% NotRated N/A 60% 60% 36% 30% 39% NotRated Component Score comesthroughaseparateroominthe closedpartofthebuilding everythingisold Notes 12/28/20 Controls D7030ͲElectronicSurveillance Components Distribution Controls Coverage D7050ͲDetectionandAlarm Components Distribution Controls UptoDateInspection Coverage D8010ͲIntegratedAutomationFacilityControls Components Distribution Controls E1010ͲVehicleandPedestrianEquipment Components Controls E1030ͲCommercialEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1040ͲInstitutionalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1070ͲEntertainmentandRecreationalEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E1090ͲOtherEquipment Generalequipmentcondition Functionality E2010ͲFixedFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality E2050ͲMovableFurnishings Generalfurnishingcondition Functionality Componentand ComponentAssessmentCategories OSPIBuildingConditionEvaluationForm x E G x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x F x x x x x x P x x x U 243 45% 15% 23% 8% 23% 8% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 45% 8% 0.75 0.25 N/A N/A 45% 8% 0.75 0.25 0.75 0.25 0% 0% 0% 0.65 0.25 0.1 N/A N/A 6% 6% 9% 55% 6% 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.55 0.1 45% 15% 27% 15% 6% 12% 0.45 0.25 0.1 0.2 0.75 0.25 6% Assessment CategoryScore 0.1 Weight N/A N/A N/A 30% 30% 60% N/A 60% 53% 53% 0% 82% 60% Component Score couldbemorefunctionaliflayedout differently gateswork Alsocoverstheclosedpartofthebuilding Notes 12/28/20 244 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 2 Long Range Educational and Facilities Plan (2) Long Range (i.e., minimum of six years) educational and facilities plan setting forth the projected facility needs and priorities of the District based on the educational plan. 245 246 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 2. Long-Range Educational and Facilities Plan Community The Bremerton School District is located in Kitsap County and primarily serves people in the City of Bremerton though there are areas of the School District that include unincorporated Kitsap County beyond the city limits. The City of Bremerton has a population of approximately 38,000, while the District encompasses a larger area with a population of approximately 45,000 people. Bremerton is located on the Puget Sound. The city fronts waterways in multiple directions with Sinclair Inlet to the south, Dyes Inlet crosses between east and west Bremerton, and Port Orchard Bay is to the east. Bremerton is a transportation hub for the Olympic Peninsula area with car ferry service connection to downtown Seattle and highways connecting Bremerton to the rest of the peninsula as well as to the Tacoma Narrows. Bremerton is the largest city on the Olympic Peninsula. The Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and Naval Base Kitsap are the largest employers in Bremerton; Harrison Hospital is the largest private employer. Additionally there are many small and mid-sized business as well as significant retail stores. School District The School District serves a student population of approximately 5,200 students in Kindergarten through Grade 12. The District also offers preschool and Early Childhood Care and Education Partnership (ECEAP) programs. Improving student achievement is the District’s primary goal. The Bremerton School District supports a diverse population and prides itself on meeting the needs of ALL students. It has established its HOPE Goals: H - Hold high expectations for students, staff and parents O - Offer options of opportunities for students to achieve P - Provide safe, supportive, respectful, informative learning environments for students and staff. E - Encourage partnerships with families/communities To support this mission, the District makes a focused effort to support programs and initiatives that reach out to a variety of students and families across the District. The School District provides free All-Day Kindergarten Programs and a broad range of special education and Title I programs. These programs have received state and national recognition. After-school and earlymorning tutoring programs are available to help students reach both their educational goals and state standards. The student population is very diverse, 45% of the population is Non-white and / or multi-racial. Approximately 60% of the students are on free or reduced lunch plans (compared to the state average of 43%). To better respond to the diversity of the population and the diversity of learning styles and student needs, the District provides a broad variety of educational options for students. 247 The efforts of the District are somewhat successful as reflected in the recent graduation rates. For 2010, the estimated on time graduation rate was 81% and the actual cohort graduation rate was 75%, both exceeding the state average of 76% and 72% respectively. This graduation rate reflects significant improvement from a rate that was frequently below 50% 8-10 years ago. Standardized test scores are generally at or slightly below state averages, the District continues to focus on improvement this area as well. School Facilities The Bremerton School District has the following facilities for PK-12 education: Grade Level School Name Special focus/ Programs PK-3 Naval Avenue Early Learning Center Comprehensive K-3, Spanish emersion option K-4 PK-5 Armin Jahr Elementary School Comprehensive Elementary PK-5 Crown Hill Elementary School Comprehensive Elementary PK-5 Kitsap Lake Elementary School Comprehensive Elementary PK-5 View Ridge Elementary School Comprehensive Elementary PK-6 West Hills STEM Academy Comprehensive K-3, STEM 4-6, Montessori 4-8 by 2013 option K-3 6-8 Mountain View Middle School Comprehensive Middle School 9-12 Bremerton High School Comprehensive High School 11-12 Renaissance High School Alternative High School 11-12 West Sound Regional Skill Center Bremerton is the Host District for the Regional Skills Center 248 Additionally the District offers the Alliance Academy for Partnership and support of Home School Students and parents; this does not have a spate facility. Educational Programs Goals + Increase achievement by offering options for students and families + + Increase achievement by providing services and programs to support a broad variety of student needs. Develop partnerships with community + Support Students needs early to foster development of academic skills in younger learners General The curriculum at the Bremerton School District follows current best practices that include project based learning which engages the student beyond traditional lectures. Students will frequently work independently and in small groups as well as with the full class. This educational delivery method inherently uses more space than old lecture format education because students need space to move, meet in small groups or focus on independent work while other students are working on different activities nearby. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Special Education All Bremerton schools, grades PK-12, follow an inclusion model for teaching students with special needs. This model helps students learn in the classroom setting along with their peers. Each school has an inclusion classroom which provides additional support for students needing more direct instruction in small groups. Every effort is also made to keep students at their home school. By recognizing each child’s differences, the District provides the instruction and support services needed to help make sure that every child achieves. To assist with this, the District provides services such as Occupational Therapy (OT), Speech Language Pathology (SLP), Physical Therapy (PT), English Language Learners (ELL) and Psychological Services at every school. The Bremerton School District recognizes there is a high “at risk” population in Bremerton. The homeless population has doubled; the District provides Family Rooms at some schools that are valuable to supporting core needs of these at risks students. The District collaborates with other community organizations in this effort. More space is needed to accommodate family rooms. The special education services provided at the schools require a significant amount of building area for the specialist to work with students. The extent of these programs puts a high demand on the building areas throughout the District such that all permanent facilities are fully utilized and portables are needed at some schools to support the needs of Special Ed Programs. The Special Education program also includes a Highly Capable Program for students that can benefit from a more challenging academic load. This is offered for students after first grade who have been assessed by the District to be highly capable. Preschool The District provides to a network of Early Childhood Care and Education Partnership (ECEAP) programs for 3-5 year old students. This has proven to be successful preparing students for kindergarten; prior to this program (started in 2001) 4% of the kindergarten students in Bremerton knew their letters, that number is now 64%. Bremerton works in partnership with early education and preschool providers including preschools, head start programs, and faith based programs to increase foundational skills in literacy, math, focus and self-control. The Bremerton School District also provides services to special needs pre-school students. There are currently 4 classrooms in the District dedicated to these students. Future needs – Provide a Preschool at each elementary to improve achievement by building strong foundations and reducing transitions. Kindergarten Bremerton offers free full day kindergarten for all students which provides students added learning time. On average, between 88% - 98% of the kindergarteners are reading at or above the benchmark by the yearend. Future needs – Meet the need of the stated proposal that in 2015 all schools will have state funded full-day kindergarten. Continue to monitor Kindergarten programs, best practices, student achievement and student needs. 249 Elementary Comprehensive - The School District offers a fully comprehensive elementary school curriculum for K-5 students, this includes in-class instruction following the District’s standard curriculum with regular specialist including Music, Health and Fitness, and Multi-media. The elementary schools also provide special education services to assist students with specific needs based on their IEP. Special Education programs are as noted previously in this chapter. In following the inclusive model, each school has a special education support room, and each elementay school has a full time interventionist. Future needs – Engineering is Elementary (EIE) is a STEM type program that is being integrated into the core curriculum at all elementary schools. Another new program is ACHIEVE 3000. A program geared to enhance informational learning in Science and Social Studies. No added space is currently attributed to these programs. Additionally, provide better infrastructure to support future technology needs. Conditions at schools are not always conducive for education – refer to Building Conditions and chapters 7 and 8 for specific changes proposed. Spanish Immersion – Naval Avenue Early Learning Center offers an optional Spanish immersion program for K-4 students. This program is intended for non-Spanish speaking students to learn the standard core elementary school curriculum in a Spanish speaking setting so that students learn the Spanish language inclusively with other core subjects. This program is open to all students in the district and to out of District students too. The program currently has 7 classrooms of students. 250 Future needs – The program is planned to grow to provide a K-8 Spanish Immersion option. Added classroom space may be needed at that time. Montessori - A free public Montessori option is offered for grades 1-3 at West Hills STEM Academy. Future needs - The program will expand in school year 2012-13 to add another classroom and expand the grade levels served. Added classroom space is required to accommodate this. STEM – In school year 2011-12, The District began offering a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) focused academy for preschool and 4-6 grade learners. This is housed at West Hills STEM Academy. This curriculum follows STEM principals for a deeply integrated/cross department approach. The student learning is project based and through the course of the project the students will learn and apply skills in math, science, writing, social studies, and reading along with the integrated use of technology and engineering. STEM programs typically require more space than traditional programs because of the integrated nature of the program requires the uses of different equipment and facilities (such as science labs and technology labs) routinely though the day rather than as a scheduled class. The STEM program in Bremerton has open enrollment and accepts all students from the district and from other Districts. The number of out of district attendees is expected to increase as the program becomes more established. Future needs - This program is scheduled to expand to include 7th grade in school year 2012-13, and 8th grade the following year (2 classes per grade have are proposed). The longer range vision includes integrating some STEM principals into the standard education for K-3 students. The District plans to use the “Project Lead the Way” curriculum for middle school students. With the added enrollment and grade levels, added space will be needed for classrooms, labs, technology, as well as added space for lunchroom and health and fitness programs to accomodate the added students Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Middle School Comprehensive –The School District offers a full comprehensive middle school curriculum for 6-8 grade students at Mountain View Middle School. The typical school day is set up with 8 periods (including lunch) blocked into 2 parts and follows a departmental model. Students have a broad offering of programs including core academic and elective classes that are geared toward preparing student for high school. The Middle School also provides special educatin and Title 1 for students as well as honors classes. Future needs - Middle School curriculum is planned to introduce more STEM type programs and options into the comprehensive school. No facility changes are proposed with this program. STEM Middle School – As noted above, the West Hills STEM Academy will expand to provide the STEM option for middle school age students. West Hills STEM Academy is geographically located in a different part of the District from Mountain View Middle School so West Hills could be a geographic option for Middle School Students on the west part of Bremerton. High School Standard – The School District offers comprehensive high school curriculum for 9-12 grade students that generally follows a departmental model. Students have 8 periods in the typical school day including lunch. The School has a broad offering of programs including core academic courses and elective classes as well as Special Education, a behavioral program and a “Drawbridge” program which merges two subjects in one class. The academic program is designed to prepare students for higher education, the work place and to be good citizens. 251 Future needs - Improve infrastructure for technology. Alternative - The School District offers an alternative high school at a separate campus as a school of choice. This School offers all required curriculum for earning a Washington State High School Diploma with options available for the foreign language requirement necessary to attend a 4-year university for 11th-12th grade. Future needs - The Alternative school option is planned to expand to offer programs for 9th and 10th grades. Technical Skill Center – 10th and 11th grade students may attend the regional technical skills center which offers career specific training in various technical fields. The skill center has a separate 10 year plan document that is being produces separately from this study and survey Future needs - Future needs / changes will be addressed in the separate 10 year plan. They have been submitted to OSPI for skill centers. 252 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 The Long-Range Facilities Plan of the District The District constructed new facilities as additions at the High School and Middle School Level in 2005-2008. The other school facilities range from 18-25 years old or since their last modernization. These buildings reflect the issues to be expected from buildings of this age in that many core components are at the end of their usable life. Additionally the some of the spaces and layouts of the schools are not conducive to the current educational needs. The District obtained input from the following sources to identify the long-range plan. + The Citizen’s Facilities Advisory Committee + + + The Capital Facilities Plan Functional needs observed or reported by District staff Maintenance needs observed or reported by District staff + District Leadership Committee Based on the input collected from these sources, the following long-range needs were identified: + + Facility Issues to address in 1-4 Years: – Roof replacement at Bremerton HS and West Hills STEM Academy – Middle School STEM program Addition at West Hills STEM Academy – – – – New central kitchen /Child Nutritional Services Center Upgrade fire alarm panels to meet new codes Roof replacement at Kitsap Lake, Crown Hill, View Ridge and Administration Building General energy upgrades – Updated student technology Facilities Facility Issues to address in 5-9 Years: – Replace Naval Avenue Elementary school* – Improve restrooms and concession area at Memorial Stadium – Replace carpeting at schools – Replace or rebuild the Facilities/Transportation building – – – Replace telephone system Add additional surveillance cameras for safety Demolish old East High building except for gyms 253 + Facilities Issues to address in 10+ Years: – – – Replace the BHS Auto Shop * Replace boilers in need of replacement Fix parking and traffic issues at West Hills, Crown Hill, Kitsap Lake, View Ridge, Armin Jahr, and Bremerton HS. – – Upgrade sports fields at Mountain View Middle School, Memorial Stadium, and old East High site Add fire sprinklers to the Administration Building – – – – Purchase additional classroom technology Upgrade building access with electronic access control Replacement of View Ridge – possibly on the Trenton site* Modernization or replacement of Armin Jahr* – – Modernization of Kitsap Lake* Modernization and addition to West Hills STEM Academy * indicates that the project is anticipated to receive OSPI matching funds Anticipated Outcomes of the Study The anticipated outcomes of the study and resultant actions are: 254 1. To ensure that students are housed in facilities that are safe, healthful and supportive. 2. To ensure that facilities are capable of supporting the Bremerton School District’s educational programs. 3. To ensure that - at various points in time - the student capacities of school facilities are matched to the expected number and location of students. 4. To ensure that school facilities are provided and operated through the most cost-effective process including reduced maintenance needs and energy cost. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 3 Demographic Data (3) Demographic data including population projections and projected economic growth and development. 255 256 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 3. Demographic Data Census Data The 2010 census information for the City of Bremerton reports 37,729 people, this is a 1.3% increase from 2000; this percentage increase is significantly lower than the Statewide population change which increased by 14.1%. Some other notable areas where the Bremerton’s census information compares with the statewide average:. Bremerton Statewide average Racial diversity (% of whites) 74.0% 77.3% High School Graduates 88.6% 89.4% (based on % of people over 25 and older) People with bachelor’s degrees 19.6% 30.8% (based on % of people over 25 and older) Home Ownership rate 41.5% 65.3% Per capita income $21,726 $29.320 People in poverty 19.4% 11.8% At the time this study and survey was written, the unemployment rate is listed at 7.5% compared to a state average of 9.1%. Evaluation of Data The overall population of Bremerton has remained somewhat level since the 1970s (approximately 36,000 then), over this same time period the State population has basically doubled, so by comparison Bremerton has become a smaller city relative to other places in the state. Based on the history of Bremerton and the current data, the population and general demographics are likely to remain stable inside the City. The City had developed a plan to foster growth but due to the recession, the City has not seen the anticipated growth; it remains to be seen if that grown will occur after economic recovery has taken place. The lower than average home ownership rate in Bremerton reflects the impact of the Navy population that is more transient and needs rentals. Other factors are that a large portion of the housing stock is aging (from the 1940s and 50s), newer houses that meet the contemporary buyers needs are more frequently developed outside of the City, thus the older houses generally remain in Bremerton as rentals while new home ownership expands outside of the City. The aging homes tend to have lower rents and provide housing for the lower income population which then affects the overall averages listed in the census. Some new housingdevelopments are occurring in Bremerton including a large proposed multi-phased redevelopment of the West Park area. The first phase of work at the Bay Vista Development at West Park is a mix of commercial with residential, the developer has agreed that the project will have an impact of an added 53 students in the next couple of years. Implications to School District Educationally, the implications are that the School District population tends to have higher free and reduced lunch and higher special needs among students. The general demographics indicate that the parents in Bremerton are less likely to have college degrees (other data indicates that their children of parents who have not attended college are less likely to attend college themselves). While the census shows the level of higher education is significantly lower, the high school graduation rate essentially matches the state average. The Bremerton School District can take some level of credit for that because the School District has a relatively high graduation rate despite the challenges of this demographic. 257 The Bremerton School District includes area beyond the City of Bremerton; the total population listed in the area of the School District is 44,966. Kitsap County on the whole has grown significantly in the past 10 years, some of that growth has been in unincorporated areas around Bremerton. The areas of Enetai and Tracyton in east Bremerton have seen more growth than the city. This area has a fairly strong commercial area along Wheaton Way, the area includes Harrison Hospital and it generally has higher housing values. The Cohort projections from OSPI (at end of this section) indicate very modest growth in the next 5 years. The demographic information appears to support a similar expectation. The School District has taken on new programs such as free all-day kindergarten, a Montessori program option, and STEM elementary option that may prove to be attractive for prospective families to start their children in Bremerton and continue in the District. Due to these types of changes, the enrollment in the District is expected to grow at a rate faster than the census growth or Cohort projections would indicate. The Census and Cohort do not account for changes (that data looks back on what has happened). The District will need to track the success of the new programs to better project how they will affect enrolment beyond the effect of the total population growth. Economic The top employers in Bremerton include Naval Base Kitsap, the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Harrison Hospital, Teletech, the Bremerton School District and Olympic College. 258 The retail core of Kitsap county has somewhat shifted to Silverdale over the preceding decades. The City of Bremerton’s comprehensive plan and vision is that the revitalized downtown core will be an incentive for more housing and better density, which can then better support more business and jobs. From early 2000 to the start of the recession in 2008, the City of Bremerton had made notable efforts to improve economic vitality in the City. This includes several projects to revitalize the downtown core of Bremerton, the Ferry terminal and the waterfront. This development was to be a basis to spur further private development. The recession stalled several of these programs; however some are showing signs of returning to life. The first phase of the West park housing development is in progress, economic recovery will bring on further development. The Navy and Shipyard have provided a certain level of stability in Bremerton, potential changes in federal spending could affect this to some degree but there is no reason to believe there would be any significant changes in the next 6 years. Slow economic recovery currently tempers expectations of noticeable growth, so the current demographic information indicates continued stability of the population and likely limited increase in the economic base. Due in part to the history of the shipyard, Bremerton has a long tradition of skilled manufacturing and production work beyond the shipyard. This includes production and manufacturing of aerospace products. Recent growth at Boeing is expected to have a noticeable effect on Bremerton in the role of machining and producing components in support of Boeing’s manufacturing. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 OSPPI Cohort Enrollment Projections 259 2010 Census Data for City of Bremerton, WA Further information Want more? Browse data sets for Bremerton (city) People QuickFacts 260 Bremerton Washington Population, 2010 Population, percent change, 2000 to 2010 Population, 2000 Persons under 5 years, percent, 2010 Persons under 18 years, percent, 2010 Persons 65 years and over, percent, 2010 Female persons, percent, 2010 37,729 1.3% 37,259 7.0% 19.5% 11.9% 46.9% 6,724,540 14.1% 5,894,121 6.5% 23.5% 12.3% 50.2% White persons, percent, 2010 (a) Black persons, percent, 2010 (a) American Indian and Alaska Native persons, percent, 2010 (a) Asian persons, percent, 2010 (a) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, percent, 2010 (a) Persons reporting two or more races, percent, 2010 Persons of Hispanic or Latino origin, percent, 2010 (b) White persons not Hispanic, percent, 2010 74.0% 6.7% 2.0% 5.5% 1.3% 7.6% 9.6% 69.5% 77.3% 3.6% 1.5% 7.2% 0.6% 4.7% 11.2% 72.5% Living in same house 1 year & over, 2005-2009 Foreign born persons, percent, 2005-2009 Language other than English spoken at home, pct age 5+, 2005-2009 High school graduates, percent of persons age 25+, 2005-2009 Bachelor's degree or higher, pct of persons age 25+, 2005-2009 74.6% 7.4% 11.0% 88.6% 19.6% 81.1% 12.1% 16.5% 89.4% 30.8% Housing units, 2010 Homeownership rate, 2005-2009 Housing units in multi-unit structures, percent, 2005-2009 Median value of owner-occupied housing units, 2005-2009 Households, 2005-2009 Persons per household, 2005-2009 Per capita money income in past 12 months (2009 dollars) 2005-2009 Median household income 2005-2009 People of all ages in poverty - percent, 2005-2009 17,273 41.5% 42.5% $210,200 15,009 2.32 $21,726 $38,060 19.4% 2,885,677 65.3% 25.9% $277,600 2,512,327 2.52 $29,320 $56,384 11.8% Business QuickFacts Total number of firms, 2007 Black-owned firms, percent, 2007 American Indian and Alaska Native owned firms, percent, 2007 Asian-owned firms, percent, 2007 Hispanic-owned firms, percent, 2007 Women-owned firms, percent, 2007 Manufacturers shipments, 2007 ($1000) Merchant wholesaler sales, 2007 ($1000) Retail sales, 2007 ($1000) Retail sales per capita, 2007 Accommodation and food services sales, 2007 ($1000) Geography QuickFacts Land area in square miles, 2010 Persons per square mile, 2010 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Bremerton 2,450 S S S F 31.7% NA 177,409 696,388 $19,850 64,932 Bremerton 28.41 1,328.2 Washington 551,340 S 1.2% 6.8% 3.2% 28.7% 112,053,283 76,790,966 92,968,519 $14,380 12,389,422 Washington 66,455.52 101.2 Chapter 4 Ability to Provide Capital Funding Support 261 262 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 4. Ability to Provide Capital Funding Support TThe Bremerton School District is currently a district that meets the statutory and fiscal requirements for eligibility to compete for state assistance for construction projects. The Bremerton School District currently has available bonding capacity. Assessed Valuation Assessed valuation in 2011 Non voted capacity Remaining capacity Outstanding debt = $3,454,947,204 = $12,971,981 = $149,991,634 = $22,967,273 Allowable bonded indebtedness = $177,458,900 There is a current outstanding bond amount of $30,578,525 with 14 years remaining to pay off. The tax rate on that bond is 1.07 / $1000 There is a current $ $43,000,000 M&O levy that is in year 1. The tax rate on the levy is $3.065. State Assistance The 2011 state Construction Cost Allowance is $188.55. The Bremerton School District match ratio in 2011 is 56.33. The School District has capital facilities that are eligible for matching funds and the District intends to address maintenance and facility needs that are not matchable. Per the proposed Phase I plan, the District would seek voter approval of a Capital Levy in 2012 of approximately $7.5-8.0 million over 4 years. Additionally, the Phase II plan would propose a Capital Bond in or around 2016 that would seek another $40 +/- million in local funds. This amount would be supplemented by anticipated state matching funds to complete the proposed projects. 263 264 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 5 Existence of a School Housing Emergency 265 266 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 5. Existence of a School Housing Emergency No housing emergency exists per the definition contained in WAC 180-27-115(1). No current district schools have been damaged from catastrophes or natural disasters such as fire, earthquakes, wind damage, or other related structural failures. 267 268 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 6 Racial Balance or Imbalance (6) The need to improve racial balance and/or avoid creation or aggravation of racial balance. 269 270 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 6. Racial Balance or Imbalance Racial Minorities make up approximately 45% of the district’s population. Minority enrollment is well distributed among the District’s schools. The Bremerton School District prides itself on its goal of meeting the needs of ALL students. The District is supportive toward diversity and providing an inclusive learning environment for students from diverse backgrounds. There are no schools in Bremerton that have a disproportionate minority population relative to other schools in the District of the same grade span. The need does not exist to improve racial balance between the schools. 271 272 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 7 Type and Extent of New and/or Additions to Existing School Facilities (7) The type and extent of new and/or additions to existing school facilities required and the urgency of need for such facilities. 273 274 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 7. Type and Extent of New and/or Additions to Existing School Facilities Space Needs and Usage Throughout the District The current OSPI formulas for Square foot per student are such that the Bremerton School District is not due matching funds for unhoused students. The OSPI formulas for area per student do not correlate accurately with the spatial needs of a District like Bremerton that is committed to meeting the broad spectrum of student needs and special program required for its population, as a result, the District has needs for additional space to support student learning. General curriculum needs at Bremerton required more space than the state formulas because the curriculum at the Bremerton School District follows current best practices that include project based learning. This educational delivery method inherently uses more space than old lecture format education because students need space to move, meet in small groups or focus as an individual while other students are working on different activities nearby. Bremerton’s focus on meeting the needs of all learners includes offering options for students to respond to different learning styles in a diverse population. Options mean more programs which often require added space . This use of space is not fully accounted for in the OSPI formulas. 275 Meeting the Special Education and Special Needs programs in Bremerton also requires space that is not fully accounted for in the OSPI formulas. The inclusive model of special education (as described in Chapter 2) is a valuable component in the improved student achievement that Bremerton has seen. The variety of special programs require space, even with multiple special ed programs sharing common spaces, the net result is that many spaces within schools are used for student areas in special education programs. Description of Needs for New Facilities and/or Additions to Existing Schools West Hills STEM Academy In following the long range educational plans listed in Chapter 2 of this Study and Survey, West Hills STEM academy needs to provide additional area to support the growth in the STEM program and in the Montessori Program. The STEM program is scheduled to expand from K-6 to add 7th grade in school year 2012-13 and then 8th grade the subsequent year. This growth will require at least 2 – 3 added classrooms per grade level plus an added science room and an added Computer / Technology Lab. West Hills STEM academy is also home to the District’s Montessori option program. This program is planned to grow by one grade level in school year 2012-13, so one added classroom is needed for this program. The added grade levels and enrolment place an added burden on the core facilities. Specifically the current Multi-purpose room which provides both Gym and Lunchrooms functions. To accommodate the growth at the school, it is proposed that a new Gym space is constructed for Health and Fitness classes and the multipurpose room continue to serve as a lunch room with expanded serving periods to accommodate the larger enrollment. The increase in both the Montessori and STEM programs at West Hills reflects the District’s commitment to providing options. These programs are both open to out of District Students, the number of these students is expected to grow so the District will need added space. The location of West Hills is near the highway and convenience for out of district parents. Space is also needed because the STEM program was put into an existing elementary school. The Addition will provide improved facilities for Science and Technology. STEM programs typically require more space than traditional programs because the integrated nature of the program requires students to use different equipment and areas (such as science labs and technology labs) routinely though the day as part of project work rather than as a scheduled class. Proposed Added Areas/Cost Program Space 276 Area SF Qty Tot Area Cost / SF Tot Cost Montessori Classroom 930 1 930 200 186,000 7th Grade Classroom 930 3 2,790 200 558,000 8th Grade Classroom 930 2 1,860 200 372,000 Science Lab 1,100 1 1,100 230 253,000 Tech Lab 1,100 1 1,100 200 220,000 Gym incl Storage 3,200 1 3,200 210 672,000 3,520 200 704,000 Grossing Factor * Subtot Construction Cost 14,500 SF 2,965,000 Soft Cost** 1,035,000 Total Cost 4,000,000 * Grossing Factor approx. 32% of net area for circulation, stairs, and small support areas ** Soft cost approx. 35% for permitting, taxes, design fees, surveys and other non-construction cost Cost listed are in 2011 dollars based on current costs and bid climate. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 8 Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization or Replacement of Existing School Facilities (8) A cost/benefit analysis on the need to modernize and/or replace existing school facilities in order to meet current educational needs and the current State building code. 277 278 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 8. Cost Benefit Analysis for Modernization or Replacement of Existing School Facilities General The Bremerton School District has an aging stock of buildings throughout the District. The following is not the entire list of buildings, rather a list of the main educational buildings: School View Ridge Elementary Naval Ave Early Learning Ctr Armin Jahr Elementary West Hills STEM Academy Kitsap Lake Elementary Crown Hill Elementary Mountain View MS Main Bldg Mountian View MS 6th Grade Bldg Bremerton HS Main Bldg Bremerton HS Addition Bremerton HS Auto Shop Year built 1952 1957 1968 1988 1992 1996 1993 2008 1988 2006 1940’s Last modernized 1994 1994 1993 none none none none none none none 1970 Year Eligible 2024 2024 2023 now 2012 2026 2023 2038 now 2036 now OSPI SF 37,984 37,342 34,895 48,207 48,932 47,815 98,568 38,951 90,363 26,785 5,400 Projects eligible for the State Construction Assistance Program are planned to receive state matching funds. As of 2011: the construction cost allowance is 188.55/SF of eligible space; Bremerton’s match is 56.33%. The state also provides a partial level of matching funds for project soft costs such as VE, Constructability, Ed Specs, ELCCA, Construction Management, etc. Costs listed in the following analysis are in 2011 dollars and based off current market conditions. Inflation and escalations factors will effect actual budgetting for year work occurs. General Consideration for Modernization or New-in-Lieu Construction A modernization generally has a lower basic construction cost option since it re-uses some of the existing building components. A modernization of a school would typically improve the building condition score and the functionality though the aging components often require more ongoing maintenance in the future. An evaluation would need to be done of the existing building to confirm that modernizing the existing spaces can allow the building to adequately meet the educational specifications and program needs at the school. New-in-lieu construction is often a better option if the existing building and/or site layout are inherently inefficient, ineffective or otherwise compromise the use, functionality, and safety of the school. Modernization of an occupied school also adds complexity for phasing. Portables can provide temporary classrooms to vacate 279 a portion of the building though there is a cost for the portables and the multiple moves of programs. Some spaces are unique such as Gyms, kitchens and boiler rooms and cannot be relocated to portables; special accommodations and / or compromises may be needed to allow construction in these areas. New-in-lieu construction can avoid these phasing problems if the site has adequate space to construct the new building while the existing building is occupied. If the site does not have space or the space is a poor location for the new building, then a new-in-lieu option is subject to the same phasing issues as a modernization. A School District may consider that some cost premium for new in lieu is a better long term value over a modernization. Factors that are often considered are: if the new in lieu construction offers a better use of the site, better response to the educational needs, reduced long term maintenance and operational cost, improved safety, improved health (such as air quality), and reduced disruption to learning during construction. Description of Needs for Modernization and/or Replacement of School Facilities 1. Naval Avenue Early Learning Center The School District has identified the building at Naval Avenue as high priority for replacement. This school is has the lowest building condition rating in the District, it requires a high level of maintenance, and it is the worst energy performer in the District. The building is 1-story and has 7 portables (typically double-room portables); this sprawling campus is less conducive to supporting the District’s goals for integrated, inclusive education and connection with the community. 280 The building was originally constructed in 1957 of moderate to lower construction quality. It received a modernization and small addition in 1994 that has extended the life of the building, yet the aging facility requires increasing resources from the District to maintain it. The layout and use of the site is poor in that there is no parking along the front of the building; supervision of visitors to the building is not ideal since visitors do not need to walk past the office to enter the building. A driveway to the parking area crosses between the building and the playfield which requires added supervision. The Naval Avenue site has adequate and approriate space to locate new-in-lieu construction. The estimated project cost indicates about a 10% premium for a new-in-lieu option. Considering the benefit of improving the site layout, building layout and ability to meet programatic needs as well as reduce disruption during construction would appear to make the new-in lieu option a better value for this site. A more detailed analysis will be expected when funds allow for this project to proceed. Naval Modernization Option mod (a.) site selective demo ext GCs (b.) contingency (c.) Naval New-in-Lieu Option qty unit $/unit cost 37,342 SF 150 5,601,300 700,000 new/lieu (a.) 1 LS 37,342 SF 2 74,684 12 mo 12,000 144,000 ext GCs 782,398 contingency 12% site demo qty unit $/unit cost 37,342 SF 205 7,094,980 1 LF 37,342 SF 10% 7,302,382 soft cost temp housing (d.) TOTAL 920,953 10 CR 100,000 1,000,000 11,223,335 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 1,000,000 5 186,710 828,169 9,109,859 soft cost temp housing TOTAL 3,188,451 0 12,298,310 Footnotes: a. Assumed no addition. If final programming indicated added area is needed there will be added cost. b. Mod of occupied building requires phasing that is anticipated to extend construction period by 12 months, Contractor will have addedoverhead cost for phasing and extended time on site. c. Mod typically has higher change order rate for unknown conditions, allow 2% extra contingency for that. d. Mod of occupied building will require temporary classrooms in order to vacate a portion of the existing building. Assume 10 added portable classrooms are required (approximately 1/3 of the program areas) during construction. Estimated State match assistance approximately 34,342 x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 4,561,000, this same amount of assistance applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. OSPI records indicate building is not eligable until after 2024 for State Capitol Assistance Program. *15% represents approximation of match on soft costs 2. West Hills STEM Academy The School District has identified specific needs at West Hills that need to be address due to an aging building. The Building was originally constructed in 1988 of moderate construction quality and remains in fair condition. Several components or systems within the building are nearing the end of their useful life including the roof, flooring, and mechanical components. Also, the use of the building has changed to become a STEM focused school will that serve grades K-8. An addition is required as noted in chapter 7. The STEM program has adapted reasonably well into the existing building though significant interior remodel is needed to respond to program needs. The layout generally works well and the building is well located on the site. Improvements to the parking and drop-off areas are needed to improve poor site circulation. The West Hills site has adequate and approriate space to locate new-in-lieu construction. The estimated project cost indicates about a 19% premium for a new-in-lieu option. Considering the general adequacy of the existing building and use of the site, Modernization would appear to be a better value for this project. West Hills Modernization Option mod (a.) site selective demo ext GCs (b.) contingency (c.) West Hills New-in-Lieu Option qty unit $/unit cost 48,207 SF 125 6,025,875 1 LS 700,000 new/lieu (a.) site 48,207 SF 1.5 72,311 12 mo 12,000 144,000 ext GCs 833,062 contingency 12% demo qty unit $/unit cost 48,207 SF 205 9,159,330 1 LF 48,207 SF 10% 7,775,248 soft cost temp housing(d.) 10 CR TOTAL 100,000 5 241,035 1,040,037 11,440,402 3,110,099 soft cost 1,000,000 temp housing 11,885,347 1,000,000 TOTAL 4,004,141 0 15,444,542 - See Naval Avenue for footnotes (pg 284) Estimated State match assistance approximately 48,207x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 5,888,000, this same amount of assistance applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. Building is currently eligible for the State Capital Assistance Program. 281 3. View Ridge Elementary View Ridge Elementary was originally constructed in 1952, received additions in 1960, 1967, and 1994 and was modernized in 1994. The condition of the building is fair yet it is aging and requires significant improvement to many systems and components. The layout of the building is somewhat fragmented due to the nature of additions that have occurred at different times and in different areas. The site layout is unusual in that the main parking area is across the city street from the entrance, though the primary traffic on the street is for the school, yet people must cross the road to go from the parking and drop-off area to the entrance. The location of the school is only ½ mile away from Armin Jahr elementary, it would be preferable to if the elementary schools were each more central to their draw area. The District does own property on Trenton Way approximately 1 mile away which would allow better separation of the elementary schools. A cost comparison shows that new-in-lieu will likely cost about 14% more than modernization. Further analysis beyond a Study and Survey may be needed to determine if modernization can reasonably meet the educational specifications for the View Ridge. There is room on the current site to accommodate new-in-lieu construction while leaving the existing building occupied but the the District may determine that the Trenton location is better and that would be the compelling driver for new-in-lieu. View Ridge Modernization Option 282 mod (a.) site selective demo ext GCs (b.) contingency (c.) View Ridge New-in-Lieu Option qty unit $/unit cost 37,984 SF 140 5,317,760 1 LS 37,984 SF 2 75,968 12 mo 12,000 144,000 ext GCs 748,527 contingency 700,000 12% new/lieu (a.) site demo qty unit $/unit 37,984 SF 190 1 LF 37,984 SF 10% 6,986,255 soft cost temp housing (d.) 2,794,502 10 CR TOTAL 100,000 1,000,000 10,780,758 cost 7,216,960 1,000,000 5 189,920 840,688 9,247,568 soft cost temp housing TOTAL 3,236,649 0 12,484,217 - see naval avenue footnotes (pg 284). Estimated State match assistance approximately 48,207x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 4,639,000, this same amount of assistant applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. OSPI records indicate building is not elligible until after 2024 for State Capital Assistance Program. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 4. Bremerton High School Auto Shop The Auto Shop is a stand alone building that was originally constructed in 1940 for Kitsap Transit and purchased by the District in 1970. It has not been improved and it is in poor condition. The building location is across the street from the rest of the High School which requires students to cross the arterial to get to and from class. A safer option would be to reconstruct the building area on the main schools site. The current Auto Shop land could be used to improve parking and traffic around the school. The premium for new-in-lieu is about 5%. There is very little value in the existing building. A replacement appears to be a better value considering it offers more flexibility for the use of space and routing of utilities. A new-in-lieu option would allow the District the flexibility to construct this area to serve a different program if the District determined that a different elective would better serve the educational needs in the District. Auto Shop Modernization Option mod (a.) site selective demo ext GCs (b.) contingency (c.) Auto Shop New-in-Lieu Option qty unit $/unit cost 5,400 SF 115 621,000 new/lieu (a.) 1 LS 300,000 site 5,400 SF 2 10,800 NIC 12% demo ext GCs 111,816 contingency qty unit $/unit cost 5,400 SF 130 702,000 1 LF 5,400 SF temp housing (d.) 417,446 NIC TOTAL 27,000 102,900 1,131,900 soft cost temp housing 1,461,062 5 NIC 10% 1,043,616 soft cost 300,000 TOTAL 396,165 NIC 1,528,065 - See Naval Avenue for footnotes (pg 284) Estimated State match assistance approximately 5400x 188.55 x ~15%* x 56.33 = 659,000, this same amount of assistant applies to either Modernization of New-in-lieu. Building is currently eligible for the State Capital Assistance Program. 283 Modernization Replacement of Educational Support Facilities 5. Consolidated Facilities The Districts transportation and maintenance departments operate from the consolidated facilities building. This is a former elementary school that was built in the 1947 that had been converted in 1985 to for its current use. The building has not received a proper modernization, it is aging and in generally in poor condition. It has received maintenance as needed though the primary focus of District resources on toward maintaining school buildings. This is also the transportation center for the district; the current layout of the site is not condusive for all of the District buses. The site is large enough but the building layout blocks effective use of the site. The existing building is approximately 40,000 SF, it is reasonable to expect that a replacement building could be 25,000 SF and likely meet the needs with improved efficiency from spaces designed for the intended uses. Consolidated Facilities New-in-Lieu qty unit $/unit new 25,000 SF 170 site 1 LS 40,000 SF selective demo contingency cost 4,250,000 1,000,000 5 200,000 10% 545,000 5,995,000 284 soft cost 2,098,250 temp transportation lot 200,000 TOTAL 8,293,250 This is anticipated to receive NO State matching funds as the facility is not for direct instruction. 6. Child Nutrition Services Child Nutrition Services provide the central food service to the schools in the District. This facility is currently located in the former Junior High building. This building was rated poor in the 2005 Study and Survey and was recommended to be demolished at that time. The District did not have the funds for demolition at that time nor did it have a location for the Student Nutrition Services to be located if it were demolished. The building is 6 years older and remains in poor condition. New facilities are required for the food services. Student Nutritional Services New qty unit $/unit cost new 3,000 SF 400 1,200,000 site 1 LS equipment* 40,000 SF contingency 10% 400,000 5 300,000 200,000 2,090,000 soft cost TOTAL 836,000 2,926,000 * assumes reuse and relocation of some equipment. This is anticipated to receive NO State matching funds as the facility is not for direct instruction. Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 7. Miscellaneous Projects The following are other smaller capital works projects identified as necessary in the district. These are not eligible for State Capital Assistance Program Matching funds. Project Name Approx. Cost Bremerton High School Re-Roof 2,000,000 West Hills Re-Roof 700,000 Kitsap Lake Re-Roof 600,000 Crown Hill Re-Roof 600,000 View Ridge Re-Roof 600,000 Administration Building Re-Roof 500,000 Memorial Stadium Restroom / Concessions 400,000 Upgrade Fire Alarm Panels multiple sites 500,000 Update student technology 500,000 Replace carpeting– multiple sites 900,000 Replace telephone system – District wide 300,000 Add Surveillance cameras 100,000 Demolish old East High building except for gyms 1,200,000 Fix parking and traffic issues at West Hills, Crown Hill, Kitsap Lake, View Ridge, Armin Jahr, and Bremerton HS. 1,200,000 Upgrade sports fields at MVMS, Memorial Stadium, and old East High site 1,500,000 Add fire sprinklers to the Administration Building Comments May be done as part of a modernization May be done as part of a modernization May be done as part of a modernization 285 286 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 9 Estimated Capital Cost to Restore Major Facility Systems Due to Deferred Maintenance (9) The need and the estimated capital cost to restore, to design specifications, the major systems and subsystems in the facilities that have deteriorated due to deferred maintenance. 287 288 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 9. Estimated Capital Cost to Restore Major Facility Systems Due to Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance Bremerton School District has been vigilant in the maintenance of the District’s facilities. While most of the schools are aging, they have been consistently cared for, protecting the original investment. Many school systems are, despite this on-going care, near the end of their useful life and modernization is proposed on that basis. Upon review of these facilities and the required Capital Projects, none can be described as being the result of deferred maintenance. Any projects anticipated are the result of Educational needs, required code or ADA upgrades, WSSP related energy efficiency upgrades, or replacement of systems due to age. 289 290 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 10 Time Line (10) A documentation of the District’s time line for completion of the school facilities project. 291 292 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 10. Capital Facilities Project Timelines West Hills West Hills Bremerton STEM Add Re-Roof HS Re-Roof Misc Proj Naval Replacement West Hills View Ridge STEM Mod/NL Mod 01/16 01/17 04/15 04/16 04/17 03/16 03/17 03/18 06/16 06/17 06/18 08/13 07/17 07/18 07/19 09/13 09/17 09/18 09/19 01/12 Start Design 04/12 04/12 04/12 Bid 10/12 10/12 10/12 Construction 01/13 04/13 04/13 Move-In 08/13 08/13 Start School 09/13 09/13 Ongoing 2012-2016 01/15 Master Planning 293 294 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 11 Inventory of Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts (11) An inventory of accessible unused or under-utilized school facilities in neighboring school districts and the physical condition of such school facilities, letters from adjacent school districts regarding their ability to provide facilities to house non-resident students, and the physical condition of any such facilities. 295 296 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 11. Inventory of Unused or Underutilized School Facilities in Neighboring Districts A survey of neighboring School Districts was conducted to determine if unused or underutilized space was available that would be appropriate for the identified needs of the Bremerton School District. Letters were sent to the adjacent School Districts: Central Kitsap School District and South Kitsap School District. The potential space available will not meet the identified needs of the Bremerton School District without significant capital investment. The Bremerton School Board of Directors passed a resolution stating that the survey has been completed. A copy of the resolution is included in this chapter along with copies of the returned survey letters. 297 298 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 299 300 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 Chapter 12 Need to Adjust School Attendance Areas (12) The need for adjustments of school attendance areas among or within such districts. 301 302 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012 12.Attendance Boundaries As indicated in Chapter 2 – Long-Range Educational and Facilities Plan, the District has made changes to various educational programs; proposed future facility improvements will accommodate more students in these programs. Adjustments to attendance boundaries within the District may be required at some point in the future, but no adjustments are specifically identified as required based on this Study and Survey. 303 304 Bremerton School District | Study and Survey | March 15, 2012