Incorporating the Diploma in Teaching in the
Transcription
Incorporating the Diploma in Teaching in the
Plymouth University School of Education Programme Handbook 2011/2012 Postgraduate Certificate in Education (Incorporating the Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector) Bicton College Cornwall College City College Plymouth Exeter College Petroc Somerset College South Devon College Truro and Penwith College University of Plymouth This document can be made available in other formats upon request. Contents: Welcome 3 Brief Description of Programme 4 Distinctive Features 4 Programme Aims 4 Entry Requirements 5 Accreditation of Prior Learning 5 Intended Programme Learning Outcomes 5 Modes of Learning 6 Tutorial Support 6 Mentors 7 Attendance 7 Assessment Arrangements 7 University Regulations 9 Facilities 9 Students with Specific Learning Difficulties/Disabilities 9 Equal Opportunities 10 Student Feedback 10 Course Reps 10 Careers Information and Development 10 Contact Details 10 Programme Structure and Pathways 12 DEFINITIVE MODULE RECORDS 14 Coursework Criteria 72 Observation Criteria 73 IDP Criteria 76 Ethical Principles for Research 77 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Postgraduate Certificate in Education (Incorporating the Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector) Welcome to the Programme The University and its partner colleges have been successfully delivering teacher education programmes, in various iterations, since 1984. It began as a part-time programme for serving practitioners, and nine years ago a full-time route was developed for pre-service teachers. In 2007 a new set of standards was developed by Lifelong Learning UK (LLUK). Teacher education programmes are now endorsed or quality marked by the Standards Verification Unit of LLUK, known as SVUK. This programme has achieved the necessary SVUK endorsement and quality marking. The programme consists of six core modules and two enhancement modules. Over the eight modules, you will explore and analyse current ideas related to learning and teaching in post compulsory education and training, also known as the Lifelong Learning sector. The programme will offer a balance of practical skills, reflection and related education theories. The core modules will be concerned with the processes of learning and teaching, assessment, continuing personal and professional development, curriculum design and implementation, inclusive learning, and wider professional practices. The opportunity to consider all these areas specifically in the light of your own professional life, subject specialisms and experience will be central to your professional development. Through individual professional development planning, the programme gives students the chance to evidence their developing practical skills, knowledge and understanding in relation to a range of aims and targets, and also to reflect upon the complex relationships between practice and theory. Whilst focusing on both generic and subject specific knowledge, understanding and skills, the programme will also involve the development of knowledge, understanding and skills in language, literacy, numeracy and ICT. You will be expected to evidence your personal skills and identify how, as a teacher/tutor, you can support your own learners’ needs in these areas, in relation to the level at which your learners are studying, and the demands of your learners’ curricula. Assigned tutors will support your academic work and observe you teaching. Your mentor will support your development in the work place, particularly in relation to your subject specialism and pedagogic skills. The active relationship between tutors, mentors and students is intended to be that of colleagues working together to achieve good educational practice, and to ensure that students reaches their full potential. Page 3 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Brief Description of Programme The Postgraduate Certificate in Education is a 120 credit teacher training award for gradute teachers in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Plymouth University has been successfully offering a PGCE Programme in conjuction with partner colleges for the last twenty years. The Programme is subject to OFSTED inspections of Initial Teacher Education. The Programme has to comply with the sector requirements set out by Lifelong Learning UK (LLUK) and is endorsed by its subsiduary Standards Verification UK (SVUK). Distinctive Features In line with the professional standards for teachers in the Lifelong Learning Sector, the practical teaching element of the Programme is integrated into all modules. Each module is 15 credits with 60 credits of the award at Level 6 and 60 credits at Level 7 in line with LLUK’s unit structure. Each Level 7 module has a Level 6 version to allow students not meeting the Programme’s Level 7 criteria to be assessed against the Level 6 criteria. Students achieving 120 credits at Level 6 or above (of which 60 credits is not at Level 7) will be awarded the Professional Graduate Certificate in Education. The Programme is offered by the School of Education on a full-time basis across one academic year and on a part-time basis across two academic years by the following partner colleges: Bicton College, City College Plymouth, Cornwall College, Exeter College, Petroc, Somerset College, South Devon College, and Truro and Penwith College. Cornwall College, Exeter College, and Truro and Penwith College also offer the Programme on a full-time basis. Programme Aims In line with the Professional Standards and SEEC descriptors, the programme aims: 1. To develop comprehensive knowledge of teaching and learning theories 2. To develop deep and systematic knowledge of professional and curriculum issues 3. To develop the ability to apply knowledge of teaching and learning theories to teaching practice without support 4. To develop a high degree of autonomy with own personal development 5. To develop the ability to critically engage in critical reading, research and investigation, and reflective practice 6. To develop the ability to demonstrate a high degree of innovation, creativity and enterprise skills in own studies 7. To develop subject specific teaching skills 8. To develop the ability to develop own professional practice without guidance 9. To develop generic teaching skills 10. To develop reflective practice skills Page 4 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Entry Requirements All appropriately qualified candidates will be given equal consideration during the selection process. Plymouth University does not tolerate discrimination on the grounds of gender, ethnicity, colour, disability, religion, nationality, age, sexual orientation or any other irrelevant distinction. Academic requirements: A bachelors degree (or equivalent) relevant to the subject the student is planning to teach. Literacy skills at Level 2 Numeracy and ICT skills at Level 1 Non-academic requirements: All students will be required to complete a satisfactory CRB Enhanced Disclosure, register with the Independent Safeguarding Authority and complete a criminal convictions self-declaration form. All students must be deemed fit to teach. An interview is a pre-requisite for entry onto this Programme. Part time Programme: evidence from an employer of 150 hours of teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector in a full teaching role for the duration of the Programme. Full time Programme: students will not be permitted to start the Programme unless a suitable placement can be secured by the University. Accreditation of Prior Learning The School of Education will consider claims for Accreditation of Prior Learning (APL). Students wishing to apply for APL will be referred to the School of Education’s APL Guide. Intended Programme Learning Outcomes Knowledge and Understanding On completion graduates should have developed: 1. Comprehensive knowledge of teaching and learning theories 2. Deep and systematic knowledge of professional and curriculum issues Cognitive and Intellectual Skills On completion graduates should have developed: 3. The ability to apply knowledge of teaching and learning theories to teaching practice without support 4. A high degree of autonomy with own personal development Key and Transferable Skills On completion graduates should have developed: Teaching and Learning Strategies and Methods: Lectures, directed study and interactive discussions Assessment Strategies: Coursework Teaching and Learning Strategies and Methods: Directed study, seminars, teaching practice and presentations Assessment Strategies: Coursework Teaching and Learning Strategies and Methods: Creative problem solving and directed Page 5 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 5. The ability to critically engage in critical reading, research and investigation, and reflective practice 6. The ability to demonstrate a high degree of innovation, creativity and enterprise skills in own studies Employment Related Skills On completion graduates should have developed: 7. Subject specific teaching skills 8. The ability to develop own professional practice without guidance Practical Skills On completion graduates should have developed: 9. Generic teaching skills 10. Reflective practice skills study Assessment Strategies: Coursework Individual Development Plan Teaching and Learning Strategies and Methods: Supervised teaching practice by a subject specialist mentor Assessment Strategies: Teaching observations and reports by a subject specialist mentor Teaching and Learning Strategies and Methods: Supervised teaching practice by a course tutor Assessment Strategies: Teaching observations by course tutor Individual Development Plan Modes of Learning Direct contact time for each module includes a combination of lectures, interactive group seminars, group tutorials/meetings, and mediated VLE interactions. With each module students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of further study to complete the module. This is supported by individual tutorials by a designated personal tutor. Each module has a professional practice component. Students will undertake teaching practice which is partly supervised by a subject specialist mentor and a course tutor. Teaching observations and reports will by completed by the mentor and tutor. Students will also develop an Individual Development Plan as part of their professional practice. Each module also has a coursework component. Students will undertake one coursework task devised by their delivery centre per module. Tasks will include essays, presentations, seminars, portfolios, reports, and creative problem solving. The PGCE/Cert Ed Partner College QA Coordinator will agree all tasks with the delivery centre before the tasks are given to students. The PGCE/Cert Ed Partner College QA Co-ordinator will ensure that each delivery centre: a) only uses one coursework task per module b) uses a range of inclusive tasks across the modules being delivered c) uses a task that is appropriate to meet the assessed learning outcomes linked to the coursework component of the module d) uses a task that is appropriate to the Level being assessed Tutorial Support Tutorials are mandatory to ensure access to tutors in consistent across the Partnership with each student being designated a personal tutor. Tutorials enable students to discuss progress in relation to the Programme aims, general study skills, progress towards the Professional Standards, coursework requirements and any personal issues. Students studying at Levels 6 and 7 will be supported in becoming autonomous as learners. Where it is thought appropriate, Page 6 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 students will be referred for specialised support, such as that offered by Disability Assist, or by the counselling services. The Partnership has a strong track record for supporting students with disabilities and other personal needs. Mentors Every Student must have a suitable mentor. Mentor support plays a key role in professional development, especially in relation to developing subject specific knowledge, understanding and pedagogical skills. If you are a part-time student, you will be asked to elect a mentor to support you throughout the programme. This mentor will be a specialist in your subject area and should have a post compulsory teacher education qualification, or suitable experience. They will be asked to observe your teaching on occasions and to meet with you on a regular basis to discuss your professional development. Students are expected to develop a strong, active and meaningful working relationship with their mentor, and to work together with them to develop and evaluate achievement of targets for improvement. The ways in which the University can support mentorship will be discussed on the programme. Part Time students should see the Part Time Mentor Handbook. Full Time students are supervised and supported in practice by selected mentors in their placement centre. Please read about this role in the Placement Policy Handbook, and the Full Time Mentor Handbook. Attendance If you are unable to attend a session, you should ensure that a message is conveyed to your tutor. It is expected that you will attend all taught sessions. When attendance falls to 80% of the module, that is when two of ten sessions has been missed, continuation on the programme is subject to review, and Students will be asked to arrange a meeting with their tutor, to discuss how missed content can be covered through additional study. If suitable arrangements can be made to cover missed content, the student will be allowed to continue their studies. If you are likely to miss a taught session, it is important to ask for notes/handouts to be kept for you by a group member and to meet with them or your tutor to review the session. Full Time Students: if you are unable to attend your placement, you must inform your mentor and the Placement Coordinator immediately, so that cover can be arranged for your teaching. It is your responsibility to ensure that this information reaches your mentor and the Placement Coordinator. Failure to inform the placement centre of an absence may be considered as professional misconduct. Assessment Arrangements These will be published with the module briefings and you must comply with the directions given by their tutors for each module and particularly note the hand-in deadlines. Referencing Conventions The standard referencing system for the provision is the Harvard System and details of this are available in all libraries, and in the Study Skills pack. It can also be accessed online through the student portal. The University also has an excellent guide on referencing called ‘Cite them right’ and this is available on the portal. Page 7 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Plagiarism Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty, and means using the ideas and words of others without acknowledging that you have done so. In serious cases this might involve deliberately trying to pass off the words and ideas of others as one’s own. You have now joined an academic community where plagiarism is taken very seriously. Cases of suspected plagiarism will be referred to a committee for review, and should the committee decide that academic dishonesty has taken place, action will be taken. The latter may take several forms, including the re-writing of an assignment, and in serious cases the student will be told to withdraw from the programme. To avoid the risk of plagiarising, you will need to use the Harvard referencing system accurately and consistently. Overlength or Underlength of Assignments There is a leeway of 10% of words either way but if this is breached, students will be penalised and required to resubmit. Please note that quotations do not contribute to the word count of an assignment. Return of Assessed Work All work will normally be returned to you within four working weeks of the hand-in date. Supportive feedback will be provided, connected to the assessment criteria. Marks will be provisional until the Award Assessment Board has confirmed the results. Publication of Final Results At the end of your programme, you may be required to submit all completed work for review by the External Examiner. The Award Assessment Board will decide whether you have completed the programme successfully and you will be notified of your success within a short period of time. You will then be invited to the University or Partner College Graduation ceremony. Extenuating Circumstances We recognise that you may be prevented from submitting work on time for good reasons. Extenuating circumstances are granted in exceptional circumstances, in accordance with the University regulations. If health, or any other circumstance, may prevent you from meeting a deadline then you must fill in an extenuating circumstances form. It must be accompanied by corroborating evidence e.g. a medical certificate and/or letter detailing the work pressures (except in the case of bereavement). The case for the extenuating circumstances is then filed with the Programme Leader and your circumstances will be considered by a Faculty Screening Panel. Please keep your tutor apprised of any problems. Please note that students are normally allowed a maximum of 20 working days from the original deadline for the submission of coursework. Interruption of Study or Withdrawal from the Programme On rare occasions a student may find that they are unable to continue their study at present. Reasons vary, but may include ill health, bereavement, family difficulties or severe changes in patterns of work. In these circumstances, where continuation on the programme is not possible, you may apply to interrupt their studies. If possible, this process should start with a one-to-one tutorial with your academic/personal tutor. The length of interruption and the proposed date for resuming studies can be discussed at this point. If you are unable to meet with your tutor, please inform the Programme Administrator as soon as possible. Note that you will need to inform your Local Authority of your decision, and that this may affect your funding. Requests for interruption of study must be made on the appropriate form, available from your tutor or from the Programme Administrator. Full Time students must follow the above procedure, but if they are unable to meet their tutor they must inform their Placement Co-ordinator immediately to ensure that all teaching Page 8 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 commitments can be covered by other staff. If you are in receipt of a bursary, this will stop. When you resume your studies, the resumption of a bursary cannot be guaranteed. Should you decide for any reason to withdraw from the programme, we would strongly recommend that you discuss this beforehand with your tutor. Withdrawal will have implications for the award you receive. Please note the following: Students who wish to withdraw from a module must complete the appropriate form by the published deadline. Students who do not formally withdraw by the published deadline and subsequently do not complete the module will be deemed to have failed the module. The University has a maximum period of registration for all awards (available on the portal at http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/plymouth/main.htm). If you are currently employed, withdrawal may also have implications for your future employment, and we recommend that you discuss this with your employing institution. University Regulations It is the student’s responsibility to be familiar with the relevant Academic Regulations. The following are important University regulations: Regulations for the Certificate in Education, Postgraduate Certificate in Education and Professional Graduate Certificate in Education (Incorporating the Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector) - available on the portal at http://intranet.plymouth.ac.uk/studhand/intranet.htm (Information for Current Students) Examination and Assessment Offences - available on the portal and also in Plymouth University Student Handbook Regulations on Late Coursework and Extenuating Circumstances - available on the portal and also in Plymouth University Student Handbook Appeals procedure - available on the portal Complaints procedure - available on the portal (in full) and a summary is available in Plymouth University Student Handbook. All assessed work is submitted on the deadline stated in each of the modules’ briefings. In the case of non-submission or failure, most students will be given a further opportunity to submit within a required period of time. The Award Assessment Board will write to the student to confirm the requirements. Facilities During your induction you will meet key tutors and be shown library and ICT facilities. You will also be shown how to access Plymouth University’s portal where you can remotely access the University’s online library catalogue and online journals. You will also be allocated a University of Plymouth email account which you will should regularly for messages. You can set up your University of Plymouth email account to forward messages to another email address if this is more convenient. For more information on Plymouth University Students’ Union visit www.upsu.com Students with Specific Learning Difficulties/Disabilities The course team has a lot of experience of helping and advising students with learning difficulties. You should not hesitate to talk to your tutor if you have any worries about learning difficulties, whether you declared these at the outset or not, or if you are only now coming to question whether indeed you may have a learning difficulty. The University has a specialist unit, Page 9 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Disability Assist Services, and you can contact them for guidance and support on 01752 232278 (see University of Plymouth Student Handbook for more details). Equal Opportunities The University is committed to the promotion of Equal Opportunities for all its students and staff. It intends to pursue policies and practices that do not discriminate against any groups or individuals, either directly or indirectly, on the grounds of gender, ethnicity, colour, disability, religion, age, occupation, marital status or sexual orientation. (See University of Plymouth Student Handbook for more details.) Student Feedback Student evaluation of the quality of learning and teaching experiences they have during their studies is central to the continuing development of the programme. Student groups are asked to undertake a review at the end of each module in collaboration with the tutors who have worked with them on that module. This feedback informs staff planning of the next module with that particular group, and feeds into formal Annual Programme Monitoring process. All modules are reviewed at the Local Programme Committee, where representatives from student groups comment on all aspects of the provision. Course Reps A course rep is there to represent the views of the students on individual courses. They proactively seek out and identify student views on matters relating to the student experience, and in turn, represent these views at various meetings. They should then feedback the outcome of that meeting to their course members. Staff are keen to have student input in these meetings, and use student views as an important tool in monitoring student opinion, and making changes to improve the quality of the education they provide. Course reps provide an essential link between the student body and the University. For more information on how to become a course rep or if you have any other queries then please visit www.upsu.com/coursereps Careers Information and Development Students who successfully complete a SVUK endorsed DTLLS award can go on to request that the Institute for Learning (IfL) confer Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills (QTLS). DTLLS awards do not automatically confer QTLS; there is a period of professional formation required, and students will be informed about this during their studies. Students will also be informed any further IfL requirements for QTLS including Literacy and Numeracy skills at Level 2. Students completing the Postgraduate Certificate in Education and Professional Graduate Certificate in Education will be able to progress to the International Masters Programme with the possibility of any Level 7 credits achieved being considered for APL. Contact details All written communication, submission of forms and coursework should go to: Student Reception Services, School of Education, Rolle Building, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA Telephone: 01752 585332 Page 10 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Denise Summers Acting Programme Leader (Post Compulsory Education & Training) Email: [email protected] Deborah Branton Senior Programme Administrator Email: [email protected] Liz Cross Cert.Ed/PGCE Tutor Email: [email protected] Sue Exley CertEd/PGCE Tutor Email: [email protected] Lelie Grzegorski Cert.Ed/PGCE Tutor Email: [email protected] Shirley Hughes CertEd/PGCE Tutor Email: [email protected] Wendy Lambert-Heggs CertEd/PGCE Tutor / Placements Co-ordinator Email: [email protected] Denise Summers CertEd/PGCE Tutor and Partnership Co-ordinator Email: [email protected] Russell Shobrook Cert Ed/PGCE Tutor / Mentor Co-ordinator [email protected] Simon Webster CertEd/PGCE Tutor Email: [email protected] Page 11 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Programme Structure and Pathways Full-Time Programme Autumn Term 11/AU/M Spring/Summer Term 11/SP/M Core Module Processes of Learning and Teaching (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC12th September 2011 Hand In: 3pm 18th November 2011 Core Module Theories and Principles for Planning and Enabling Learning (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 31st October 2011 Hand In: 3pm 6th January 2012 Core Module Continuing Personal and Professional Development (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC 9th January 2012 Hand In: 3pm 2nd March 2012 Core Module Curriculum Development for Inclusive Practice (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC 5th March 2012 Hand In: 3pm 18th May 2012 Core Module Enabling Learning and Assessment (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 12th September 2011 Hand In: 3pm 18th November 2011 Enhancement Module 1 (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 31st October 2011 Hand In: 3pm 6th January 2012 Core Module Processes of Learning and Teaching (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC12th September 2011 Hand In: 3pm 18th November 2011 Core Module Theories and Principles for Planning and Enabling Learning (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 9th January 2012 Hand In: 3pm 2nd March 2012 Core Module Continuing Personal and Professional Development (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC12th September 2011 Hand In: 3pm 18th November 2011 Core Module Curriculum Development for Inclusive Practice (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC 9th January 2012 Hand In: 3pm 2nd March 2012 Core Module Enabling Learning and Assessment (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 31st October 2011 Hand In: 3pm 6th January 2012 Enhancement Module 2 (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC 9th January 2012 Hand In: 3pm 2nd March 2012 Core Module Wider Professional Practice (Level 7 15 credits) Start: WC 5th March 2012 Hand In: 3pm 18th May 2012 Part-Time Programme Autumn Term Year 1 11/AU/M Spring/Summer Term Year 1 11/SP/M Autumn Term Year 2 11/AU/M Spring/Summer Term Year 2 11/SP/M Enhancement Module 1 (Level 6 - 15 credits) Start: WC 5th March 2012 Hand In: 3pm 18th May 2012 Enhancement Module 2 (Level 7 - 15 credits) Start: WC 31st October 2011 Hand In: 3pm 6th January 2012 Core Module Wider Professional Practice (Level 7 15 credits) Start: WC 5th March 2012 Hand In: 3pm 18th May 2012 Page 12 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Delivery Centres will select one enhancement module from box (1) below and one enhancement module from box (2) below for each cohort of students. Enhancement Module (1) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Enhancement Module (2) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Skills for NonSpecialists Behaviour Management Resources for Learning and Teaching Embedding Information Learning Technology into the Curriculum Education in Prisons Mentoring and Coaching Teaching Employability Skills Independent Study Education for Sustainable Development Teaching 14-16 Work Related Qualifications Developing Cultural Diversity and Community Cohesion in the Curriculum Teaching for Innovation Creativity and Enterprise Personal Tutoring Independent Study Page 13 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS651 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Processes of Learning and Teaching (Incorporating PTLLS) PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module addresses the processes, principles and theories of planning, preparing and enabling learning. It focuses on the professional knowledge, skills and understanding required in a practical teaching and learning context. It investigates key aspects of the roles and responsibilities of teachers, trainers and tutors in the Lifelong Learning Sector. The module incorporates the LLUK PTLLS and Planning and Enabling Learning units of assessment. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To enable graduates to develop and confidently apply the practical skills, comprehensive knowledge and critical understanding which underpin professional educational practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the role of a teacher in the Lifelong Learning Sector 2. Analyse potential social and cultural barriers to learning in terms of age, gender and transgender 3. Apply basic lesson planning concepts to enable learning of a complex nature 4. Critically evaluate and develop own strengths and weaknesses against the Minimum Core 5. Reflect on teaching performance using the Professional Standards INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Schemes of work, lesson plans and forms of record keeping. Aims, objectives, outcomes and differentiation. Approaches to teaching and learning. Planning a teaching and learning session which meets the needs of individual learners. Different ways to establish ground rules with learners which underpin appropriate behaviour and respect for others. Social and cultural barriers to learning. Legislation relating to gender and gender reassignment. Appropriate and effective teaching and learning approaches to engage and motivate learners. Adapting session plans to meet the aims and needs of individual learners and/or groups. Using of a variety of delivery methods, communication methods and resources and justifying the choice. The use of emerging technologies in teaching and learning. Establishing and maintaining an inclusive learning environment. Every Child Matters, safeguarding and E-safety Setting learning goals and different methods of initial assessment. Opportunities for learners to provide feedback to inform practice. Reflective Practice. Processes of Assessment. Functional Skills. Minimum core and Professional Standards. Role and responsibilities, and boundaries of own role as a teacher. Key aspects of relevant current legislative requirements and codes of practice. Parties and points of referral available to effectively meet the potential needs of learners. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Jane Shipman Session* 10/AU/M Page 14 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 1500-2000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 4 and 5 will be assessed through an individual development plan, including a skills audit and development points drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain D (Planning for Learning) of the Professional Standards. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Appleyard, N. and Appleyard, K. (2009) The Minimum Core for Language and Literacy: Knowledge, Understanding and Skills. Exeter: Learning Matters. Armitage, A., Bryant, R., Dunnill, R., Flanagan, K., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Kent, J., Lawes, S. and Renwick, M. (2007) Teaching and Training in Post Compulsory Education. (3rd edn.) Maidenhead: Open University Press. Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Duckworth, V., Wood, J., Dickinson, J. and Bostock, J. (2010) Successful Teaching Practice in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Huddlestone, P. and Unwin, L. (2008) Teaching and Learning in Further Education: Diversity and Change. London: Routledge. Recommended Texts Eastwood, L., Coates, J., Dixon, L., Harvey, J., Ormondroyd, C. and Willamson, S. (2009) A Toolkit for Creative Teaching in Post-Compulsory Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Gravells, A. and Simpson, S. (2009) Equality and Diversity in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Reece, I. and Walker, S. (2006) Teaching, Training and Learning: A Practical Guide. (6th edn.) Sunderland: Business Education Publishers. Wallace, S. (2007) Teaching, Tutoring and Training in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Journals Journal of Further and Higher Education Journal of Vocational Education and Training Websites www.golddust.org www.lsneducation.org.uk www.equalityhumanrights.com www.ifl.ac.uk Page 15 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS652 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Enabling Learning and Assessment PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module examines, analyses and applies theories, principles and processes of assessment in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Central themes will include equality of opportunity and diversity, validity and reliability, and the promotion of assessment as an integral element of learning. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1)PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To develop the detailed professional knowledge, critical understanding and autonomous skills required for a graduate to design, plan and conduct a range of assessment modes (formal and informal) to enable learning and progression. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of assessment strategies 2. Analyse own assessment practices and make reasonable adjustments for a range of disabilities 3. Apply assessment strategies to critically evaluate the extent to which learning of a complex nature has taken place in a teaching session 4. Identify own action points for development of practice 5. Demonstrate autonomy for own learning by completing guided study activities towards the Minimum Core INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Theories and principles of assessment in relation to practice in own specialist area. The role of assessment in evaluation and quality processes. The implications of equality and diversity issues in assessment for teachers and learners. Disability Discrimination Act. Formal and informal assessment. Formative and summative assessment. Assessment for Learning. Sustainable assessment approaches. Peer and self assessment. Assessment schemes, methods and instruments. Notions of fairness, validity, reliability, sufficiency and appropriateness in assessment. The use of emerging technologies in assessment. Maximising learners’ success in assessment in a learning environment. Recording and reporting learning progress and achievement, using organisational and/or awarding institution protocols. Verbal and written feedback on assessment. Skills and approaches to negotiate targets and strategies for improvement and success for learners. Minimum Core and Professional Standards. Reflection-as-action. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Russell Shobrook Session* 10/AU/M Page 16 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 1500-2000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 4 and 5 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points for developing teaching practice drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain E (Assessment for Learning) of the Professional Standards and guided study activities for the Minimum Core. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Clarke, A. (2009) The Minimum Core for Information and Communication Technology: Knowledge, Skills and Understanding. Exeter: Learning Matters. Ecclestone, K. (2003) Understanding assessment and qualifications in post-compulsory education principles, politics and practice. Leicester: NIACE. Jarvis, P. (2010) Adult Education and Lifelong Learning, Theory and Practice. (4th edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Peart, S. (2009) The Minimum Core for Numeracy: Knowledge, Understanding and Skills. Exeter: Learning Matters. Usher, R., Bryant, I., and Johnston, R. (1997) Adult Education and the Postmodern Challenge. New York: Routledge. Recommended Texts Barnes, C., Oliver, M. and Barton, L. (eds.) (2002) Disability Studies Today. Cambridge: Polity Press. Boud, D. (2000) ‘Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society’, Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 2, 151-167. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. (2003) Assessment for Learning. London: Nelson. Davies, J. and Ecclestone, K. (2008) ‘‘Straitjacket’ or ‘springboard’ for sustainable learning?: the implications of formative assessment practices in vocational learning cultures.’ The Curriculum Journal, 19, 2, 71-86. Swain, J., French, S., Barnes, C. and Thomas, C. (eds.) (2004) Disabling Barriers – Enabling Environments. London: Sage. Journals Journal of Further and Higher Education Journal of Vocational Education and Training Websites www.golddust.org www.qcda.gov.uk www.equalityhumanrights.com www.ofsted.gov.uk www.guardian.co.uk/education www.tes.co.uk www.independent.co.uk/news/education/ Page 17 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS653 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Theories and Principles for Planning and Enabling Learning PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: Through reflective practice and autonomous study, this module evaluates some of the theories, policies and principles for enabling inclusive learning. Communication, resources, teaching and learning strategies and organisation policies are critically analysed. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To allow graduates to critically examine the relationship between the theories and principles for enabling learning and the context of the learner’s own professional practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of theories and principles of learning 2. Apply theories and principles of learning to identify and solve a complex practice based problem 3. Demonstrate the autonomous ability to improve own subject specialist teaching 4. Critically evaluate selected lessons from practice using the Minimum Core and the Professional Standards 5. Identify ways to improve own approaches to planning and enabling learning INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Theories and principles of learning and communication. Using a range of approaches to support classroom management. Selection and use of teaching and learning strategies with reference to theories and principles of communication and inclusive learning. Application up to date knowledge of own specialist area to enable and support inclusive learning, following organisational, statutory and other regulatory requirements. Factors affecting learning and their potential impact on learner achievement. Ways in which theories and principles of learning and communication can be applied to promote inclusive practice. Applying the Minimum Core to practice. Selecting emerging technologies with reference to theories and principles of communication and inclusive learning. Exploring the teaching of values. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Mary Turner Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 18 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 1500-2000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation and a report by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 4 and 5 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points for developing teaching practice drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain B (Learning and Teaching) of the Professional Standards and the Minimum Core. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Armitage, A., Bryant, R., Dunnill, R., Flanagan, K., Hayes, D., Hudson, A., Kent, J., Lawes, S. and Renwick, M. (2007) Teaching and Training in Post Compulsory Education. (3rd edn.) Maidenhead: Open University Press. Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Brookfield, S. D. (1995) Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Duckworth, V., Wood, J., Dickinson, J. And Bostock, J. (2010) Successful Teaching Practice in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Vizard, D. (2007) How to Manage Behaviour in Further Education. London: Sage. Recommended Texts Barton, D. and Tusting, K. (2006) Models of Adult Learning: a literature review. Leicester: NIACE. Eastwood, L., Coates, J., Dixon, L., Harvey, J., Ormondroyd, C. and Willamson, S. (2009) A Toolkit for Creative Teaching in Post-Compulsory Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Fairclough, M. (2008) Supporting Learners in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Gravells, A. and Simpson, S. (2009) Equality and Diversity in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Weyers, M. (2006) Teaching the FE Curriculum: Encouraging Active Learning in the Classroom. London: Continuum. Journals Research in Post-Compulsory Education Studies in the Education of Adults Websites www.direct.gov.uk/en/EducationAndLearning/AdultLearning/index.htm www.niace.org.uk www.nrdc.org.uk/ (adult literacy and numeracy) http://www.behaviour4learning.ac.uk/ Page 19 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS654 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Continuing Personal and Professional Development PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module seeks to empower graduates through personal and professional development. Graduates will undertake analysis to inform an honest, effective and robust evaluation of their continuing professional and development as part of their role in the Lifelong Learning Sector. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to reflect upon their personal and professional development and to enable an informed transformation of their practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Investigate the range of roles and responsibilities of a teacher in the lifelong learning sector 2. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of subject specialist pedagogy and continued development in teaching practice 3. Analyse breadth of practice experience 4. Reflect on own personal and professional development INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Teaching roles and contexts in the lifelong learning sector. Roles and responsibilities of a subject specialist. Subject specialist pedagogy. Impact of beliefs, assumptions and behaviours on learners. Impact of teacher’s own skills on learners. Theories, principles and models of reflective practice. Models of continuing personal and professional development. Self assessment and autonomy in learning. Breadth of Practice. Identifying CPD opportunities and evaluating the impact on own practice. Quality assurance. Theories, principles and models of Education for Sustainable Development. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Sue Exley Session* 10/SP/SU/M & 11/AU/M Page 20 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALO 1 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 2 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 3 and 4 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points for own personal and professional development drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain C (Specialist Learning and Teaching) of the Professional Standards and breadth of practice experience. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Brookfield, S. D. (1995) Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Hitching, J. (2008) Maintaining your Licence to Practise in the Lifelong Learning Sector Exeter: Learning Matters. Jarvis, P. (2010) Adult Education and Lifelong Learning, Theory and Practice. (4th edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Villeneuve-Smith, F., West, C. and Bhinder, B. (2009) Rethinking continuing professional development in further education. London: Learning & Skills Network. Recommended Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner. Buckingham: Open University Press. James, D. and Biesta, G. (2007) Improving Learning Cultures in Further Education. London: Routledge. Kennedy, A. (2005) ‘Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis‘, Journal of In-Service Education, Vol 31, No 2, 235-250. Orr, D.W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals Journal of Education and Work Websites http://www.jrf.org.uk/ Joseph Rowntree Trust www.standardsverificationuk.org/ http://www.eauc.org.uk/sorted/home www.esdtoolkit.org Page 21 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS655 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Curriculum Development for Inclusive Practice PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module explores theories, principles and implementation of programmes of learning and their impact on teaching and learning within the Lifelong Learning Sector. It focuses on understanding curriculum design, equality and diversity, social, economic, political and cultural differences on teaching and learning within own specialist area. The module empowers graduates to critically evaluate individual subject specialism, approaches, strengths and development needs in relation to inclusive curriculum design. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To develop an understanding of the history, concepts and models of curriculum; to analyse theories and approaches to curriculum practice and design that may differ within an educational/training context; to enable issues of inclusion and subject specialism to be explored and critiqued. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of curriculum theories and principles within own subject specialist area 2. Evaluate the social cohesion of curricula with regards ethnicity, race, religion and sexual orientation 3. Demonstrate continued development in own subject specialist teaching 4. Examine access and progression in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Curriculum theories, principles, ideologies and models. Curriculum design and implementation for specialist subjects and different cohorts of learners. Different curriculum contexts in the lifelong learning sector. Legislation relating to ethnicity, race, religion and sexual orientation. Social cohesion and religious tolerance. The impact of social, economic and cultural differences on learning. Challenging discriminatory behaviour in a learning environment. Proposing changes to curriculum design. Equal Opportunities. Developing a sustainable curriculum. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Mark Glasson Session* 10/SP/SU/M & 11/AU/M Page 22 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation and a report by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALO 4 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain F (Access and Progression) of the Professional Standards. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Bloomer, M. (2002) Curriculum Making in Post -16 Education – The social conditions of studentship. (2nd edn.) London: Routledge Grundy, S. (1987) Curriculum: Product or Praxi. Lewes: Falmer. Kelly, A. V. (2009) The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. (6 th edn.) London: Sage. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. and Taubman, P. M. (2004) Understanding Curriculum. New York: Peter Long Publishers Inc. Recommended Texts Avis, J. (2007) Education, Policy and Social Justice: Learning and Skills. London: Continuum. Cantle, T. (2005) Community Cohesion: A New Framework for Race and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Evans, K., Hodkinson, P. and Unwin, L. (eds.) (2002) Working to Learn: Transforming Workplace Learning. London: Kogan Page. Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., Rees, G., Spours, K. and Wilde, S. (2009) Education for all: the future of education and training for 14-19 year olds. Abingdon: Routledge. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals British Journal of Educational Studies British Educational Research Journal Websites www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES_Diversity_&_Citizenship.pdf http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/wholeschool/Communitycohesion/communitycohesionresourcepack/intro/ Page 23 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS656 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Wider Professional Practice PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module focuses upon notions of professionalism and wider professional practice. It specifically empowers graduates to examine professional conduct and accountability, quality assurance, quality improvement, Education for Sustainable Development, and self evaluation through reflexive processes. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module will provide a forum for a critical evaluation of the graduate’s own practice and conduct in relation to institutions, quality issues, Education for Sustainable Development, policies and continuous professional development as well as provide the opportunity to broaden graduates’ experiences through the exploration and modelling of good practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of issues of professionalism 2. Evaluate Education for Sustainable Development in teaching practice 3. Demonstrate proficiency and capacity in teaching practice 4. Demonstrate autonomy with own personal development 5. Reflect on own professional values and practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Concepts of professionalism and core professional values for teachers in the lifelong learning sector. Equality of opportunity and respect for diversity. The contribution of learning to personal development, economic growth and community regeneration. Impact of own values and judgements on learners. Professional conduct and accountability in the lifelong learning sector. Implications and impact of government policies on teaching and learning in the lifelong learning sector. Roles of regulatory bodies and systems and inspection regimes in the operation of the lifelong learning sector. Integration of Education for Sustainable Development in teaching practice. Statutory requirements and underpinning principles in relation to own subject specialism. Quality assurance, improvement and procedures. The differences and relationship between evaluation and assessment. Validity and reliability of data. The effectiveness of data collection methods/instruments. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Simon Webster Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 24 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 4 and 5 will be assessed through an individual development plan with action points drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain A (Professional Values and Practice) of the Professional Standards. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study . Reading List: Core Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner Buckingham: Open University Press. Lea, J., Hayes, D., Armitage, A., Lomas, L. and Markless, S. (2003) Working in Post-compulsory Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press. McGhee, P. (2003) The Academic Quality Handbook: Enhancing Higher Education in Universities and Further Education Colleges. London: Kogan Page. Orr, D. W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S., Irving, D., Maiteny, P. and Salter, J. (2005) Linkingthinking: New perspectives on thinking and learning for sustainability. Recommended Texts Bolton, G. (2005) Reflective Practice Writing for Professional Development. (2nd edn.) London: Sage. Hitching, J. (2008) Maintaining your Licence to Practise. Exeter: Learning Matters. Moon, J. (2008) Critical Thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2005) Total Quality Management in Education. London: Paul Chapman. Stibbe, A. (ed.) (2009) The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy. Dartington: Green Books Ltd. Tilbury, D. and Wortman, D. (2004) Engaging people in sustainability. Cambridge: IUCN. [Online] http://app.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2004-055.pdf Journals International Journal of Lifelong Learning Websites http://www.lsc.gov.uk/whatwedo/sustainable-development.htm http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/content/download/7126/ 73002/file/Ofsteds%20 Sustainable %20 Development%20Action%20Plan Page 25 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS657 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Embedding Literacy and Numeracy Skills for Non-Specialists PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module introduces the key concepts and skills for effective embedding of literacy and numeracy skills within subject areas. It addresses creative approaches which help your learners to feel more motivated, and how you can make the delivery of literacy and numeracy skills more relevant and energetic. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1) PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: Literacy and numeracy skills are currently seen as an integral part of all areas of the Lifelong Learning Sector. The aim of this module is to promote and support the effective embedding of opportunities to develop literacy and numeracy skills in any subject. Assessed Learning Outcomes At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the features of a positive learning environment. 2. Evaluate a range of strategies and approaches for developing relevant literacy and numeracy skills in your specialist area. 3. Apply strategies and approaches for developing relevant literacy and numeracy skills in your specialist area. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Activities and approaches that promote collaborative working and meet needs of learners. Teaching and learning techniques which develop the skills and approaches of all learners and promote learner autonomy. Activities designed to promote collaboration and learner autonomy. Purposeful learning environments where learners feel safe, secure, confident and valued. Strategies to promote and maintain appropriate behaviour, communication and respect for others. Motivating environments which encourage learners to reflect on, evaluate and make decisions about their learning. Effective resources for literacy development. Resources to support literacy requirements of programmes. Effective resources for numeracy development. Resources to support numeracy requirements of programmes. Identifying and addressing literacy, language and numeracy development in specialist area. Strategies with learners to address individual learning needs and overcome identified barriers to learning. Evaluating the success of planned learning activities. Own personal skills in literacy, language and numeracy are appropriate for the effective support of learners. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX PARTNER INSTITUTION: FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES MODULE LEADER: Mary Turner (For FHSW) NAME OF SITE: Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 26 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Barton, D. and Tusting, K. (eds.) (2005) Beyond Communities Of Practice: Language, Power And Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baxter, M., Coben, D., Leddy, E., Richards, L., Tomlin, A. and Wresniwiro, T. (2006) Measurement wasn’t taught when they build the pyramids – was it? The teaching and learning of common measures in adult numeracy. London: NRDC. Casey, H., Cara, O., Eldred, J., Grief, S., Hodge, R., Ivanicv, R., Jupp, T., Lopez, D. and McNeil, B. (2006) “You wouldn’t expect a maths teacher to teach plastering …”: Embedding LLN in post-16 vocational programmes – the impact on learning and achievement. London: NRDC Papen, U. (2005) Adult Literacy as Social Practice: More than Skills. Abingdon: Routledge. Roberts, C., Baynham, M., Shrubshall, P., Brittan, J., Cooper, B., Gidley, N., Windsor, V., Eldred, J., Grief, S., Castellino, C. and Walsh, M. (2005). Embedded teaching and learning of adult literacy, numeracy and ESOL: seven case studies. London: NRDC. Recommended Texts Cranmer, S., Kersh, N., Evans, K., Jupp, T., Casey, H. & Sagan, O. (2004) Putting good practice into practice: literacy, numeracy and key skills within apprenticeships. London: NRDC. Gardner, H. (2006) Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons. (2nd edn.) New York: Basic Books. Goleman, D. (1996) Emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury. Grief, S. (2007) Collaborative Writing. London: NRDC. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Websites www.nrdc.org.uk www.nrdc.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_822.pdf http://www.lluk.org/documents/minimum_core_may_2007_3rd.pdf http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm Page 27 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS658 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Behaviour Management PRE-REQUISITE(S): None CO-REQUISITE(S): None COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: The aim of this unit is to provide students with an opportunity to reflect upon the behaviours they encounter in their learners and evaluate effective strategies for managing these. Learners will consider a range of theories relevant to behaviour management and the features of current legislation and organisational policy concerning behaviour management in the lifelong learning sector. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK Pass / fail (P1) PRACTICE Pass / fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage reflection on the behaviours students encounter in their own learners and relate these to relevant theories of learning and behaviour management. To develop the necessary skills to evaluate their own strategies of behaviour management and to acquire current and up to date knowledge of relevant legislation and organisational policies concerning behaviour management. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the theories and strategies for the management of behaviour in learning situations. 2. Evaluate policies and procedures relating to behaviour management in own professional practice. 3. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the legislation regulating behaviour management in the Lifelong Learning Sector with special reference to the use of force, safeguarding and equality and diversity. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Types of behaviours in a learning environment. Factors influencing behaviour in learning environments. Managing learner behaviour. Managing our behaviour. Theories of behaviour management. Use of verbal and non – verbal communication. Being assertive. Positive interventions and preventative strategies. Behaviour contracts. Organisational policies concerning behaviour. Legislation concerning behaviour management. Guidelines on the use of ‘reasonable force’. Establishing and maintaining an equitable and inclusive learning environment. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Cathy Davies Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 28 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Dix, P. (2007) Taking Care of Behaviour: Practical Skills for Teachers. Harlow: Pearson Education. Evertson, C. and Weinstein, C. (2006) Handbook of Classroom Management. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Macleod, G. (2006) ‘Bad, mad or sad: constructions of young people in trouble and implications for interventions.’ Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 11, 3, 155-167. Macnab, N., Visser, J. and Daniels, H. (2008) ‘Provision in further education colleges for 14- to 16-yearolds with social, emotional and behavioural difficulties.’ British Journal of Special Education, 35, 4, 241246. Vizard, D. (2007) How to manage behaviour in further education. London: Sage. Recommended Texts DfES (2009) The Use of Force to Control or Restrain in Further Education. London: DfES. Robertson, J. (2004) Effective Classroom Control. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Rodgers, B. (2006) Classroom Behaviour. (2nd edn) London: Paul Chapman Publishing. Sage, R. (2006) ‘Communicating with students who have learning and behaviour difficulties.’ Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 10, 4, 281-297. Turner, C. (2000) ‘A Pupil With Emotional And Behavioural Difficulties Perspective: Does John Feel That His Behaviour Is Affecting His Learning?’ Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 5, 4, 13-18. Journals Journal of Further and Higher Education. Websites http://www.behaviour4learning.ac.uk/ Page 29 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS659 MODULE TITLE: CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 Resources for Learning and Teaching PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This practical module enables learners to focus on a significant resource development to support them in the delivery of their subject area, and to evaluate its effectiveness. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1) PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS To explore, research and critically evaluate resources in your subject area, and to identify and develop resources for your subject specialist area. Assessed Learning Outcomes At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the design features of learning resources in your subject area. 2. Evaluate the use of resources available to support learning in your subject area including the use of new and emerging technologies. 3. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the legal requirements and responsibilities with the use of learning resources. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: The development of practical skills in resource design, development and management Inclusion, equality and diversity Copyright and intellectual property rights (including online) Subject specific resourcing Evaluating resources Issues of resource design, including collaboration Managing resources APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER INSTITUTION: FACULTY: Education MODULE LEADER: Mary Turner (For FHSW) NAME OF SITE: Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 30 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook Schedule of Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Ashcroft, K. and James, D. (1998) The Creative Professional: learning to teach 14-19 year-olds. London: Falmer BECTA (2010) Harnessing Technology Review 2009: The role of technology in Further Education and Skills. http://feandskills.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=41523&page=1886&catID=1868 (Accessed: 25.2.10). BECTA (2010) Inspiring learners. http://feandskills.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?cfid=1476190&cftoken =29154&resID=41515&page=1886&catID=1868 (Accessed: 25.2.10). Butcher, J. (2005) Developing Effective 16-19 Teaching Skills. London: Routledge. Harris, S. (2002) Innovative Classroom Practice using ICT in England. Clough: NFER. Recommended Texts Coffield, F ., Moseley D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. (2004) Should we be using Learning Styles? What research has to say to practice. London: LSRC. Coffield, F. (2008) Just suppose teaching and learning became the first priority. London: Learning & Skills Network. Entwistle, N. (1998) Styles of Learning and teaching. London: David Fulton. Hill, C. (2003) Teaching using Information and Learning Technology in Further Education. Exeter: Learning Matters. Thorne, K. (2002) Blended Learning: How to integrate Online and Traditional Learning. London: Kogan Page. Websites http://www.qia.org.uk/ http://www.intute.ac.uk/supportdocs/fe.pdf http://tre.ngfl.gov.uk/server.php http://www.curriculumonline.gov.uk/Default.htm http://www.a6training.co.uk/resources/RandomGroupGenerator.xls http://excellence.qia.org.uk/page.aspx?o=ferl.aclearn.resource.id6117 http://inclusion.ngfl.gov.uk/ http://www.jisc.ac.uk Page 31 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS660 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Embedding Information Learning Technology into the Curriculum PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module examines the planning, preparation and delivery of meaningful lessons that use a range of Web 2.0 applications to embed learning in a range of curricula. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (Please consult DMR guidance notes – this is an example) (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: Enable learners to develop and apply the ICT and ILT skills, knowledge and understanding which underpin professional educational practice in the Lifelong Learning Sector. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the use Web 2.0 applications in learning contexts. 2. Demonstrate personal and professional development by applying Web 2.0 to own learning. 3. Develop and critically evaluate an activity or resource that utilises ILT effectively and can be demonstrated to peers. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Own role, responsibilities and boundaries of role in relation to teaching Understand appropriate specialist teaching and learning approaches in specialist area Demonstrate activity/ resource and lesson planning skills Understand how to deliver ILT-based activities/ use ILT-based resources which motivate learners and assess knowledge and understanding Own professional development needs, setting targets and evaluating personal learning strategies and practices E-safety APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Bex Ferriday Term* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 32 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Castells, M. and Haraway, D. (2006) Cyberculture Theorists. Kentucky: Routledge. Clarke, A. (2006) Teaching Adults ICT Skills. Exeter: Learning Matters. Salmon, G. (2006) e-tivities – The Key to Active Online Learning. Abingdon: RoutledgeFalmer. Turkle, S. (1997) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster. Whalley, J., Welch, T. and Williamson, L. (2006) E-Learning in FE. London: Continuum. Recommended Texts Hill, C., (2007) Teaching with e-learning in the Lifelong Learning Sector (Achieving QTLS). Exeter: Learning Matters. Hill, C., (2003) Teaching Using Information and Learning Technology in Further Education. Exeter: Learning Matters. McKeown, S., (1997) Supporting The Learner: Introducing ILT Issues And Teaching Strategies To Meet Individual Needs. London: Further Education Development Agency. Journals The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Technology and Learning Websites www.becta.org.uk www.jisc.ac.uk Page 33 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS661 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Education in Prisons PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module addresses the policies, theories and principles that govern education in prisons in England. The nature and functions of teaching and learning in prisons will be investigated along with the difficulties and opportunities presented. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To advance the practice and knowledge of graduates already teaching in prisons, and to enable graduates who do not teach in prisons to understand the broader issues associated with this sector. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the policies and practices associated with education in prisons. 2. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the theories and principles of teaching and learning applicable to education in prison. 3. Analyse, using a range of techniques, the particular needs of prisoners in terms of potential barriers to learning and opportunities presented. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Purposes of prison. Media representation and public perception. Prisoners as an excluded group. Diversity, equality and access to education. Barriers to learning. National organisation of prisons. Security issues, demands on prisoners’ time, and their impact on education. Education contractors, tendering process. Key Performance Targets (KPTs) Instrumental curriculum. Offender Learning Journey Reducing Reoffending – the seven pathways with the part that education and training plays. Quality Improvement. Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons. Ofsted. Organisations linked with prisons and prisoner welfare. Successful initiatives in education and training. – e.g.Storybook Dads, Guitar Doors, Fathers Inside Theory and prisons. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Dr Phil Bayliss Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 34 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Bhatti, G. (2010) ‘Learning behind bars: Education in prisons.’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 31-36 Braggins, J. and Talbot, J. (2005) Wings of Learning: the role of the prison officer in supporting prisoner education. London: The Centre for Crime and Justice Studies. Department for Education and Skills (2004) The Offenders Learning Journey: learning and skills provision for Adult Offenders in England. London: The Stationery Office. Englebright, L. and Pettit, I. (2009) E-Learning in the Secure Estate. Leicester: NIACE. Feinstein, L. (2002) Quantitative Estimates of the Social Benefits of Learning 1: Crime, Research Report No. 5. London: Centre for Research into the Wider Benefits of Learning. Nashashibi, P., Boffey, K., Harvey, S. and Rowan, T. (2006) Just Learning? Case studies in improving offender education and training. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency. Recommended Texts Aitken, J. (2009) Locked Up Potential: A Strategy for Reforming Prisons and Rehabilitating Prisoners. London: Centre for Social Justice. Bromley Briefings (2009) Prison Fact File. London: Prison Reform Trust. O’ Brien, R. (2010) The Learning Prison. London: RSA. Prisoners’ Education Network (2009) Brain Cells. London: Prisoners’ Education Network Schuller, T. (2009) Crime and Lifelong Learning. Leicester: NIACE. Websites www.hmprisonservice.gov.uk/ Page 35 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS662 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Mentoring and Coaching within Post 16 Education and Training PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: The aim of this module is for graduates to critically examine, evaluate and comment upon mentoring and coaching within their teaching context. Graduates will conduct coaching and mentoring interventions as part of this process. It will encourage graduates to consider the impact mentoring and coaching has from the perspectives of the student and the organisation. Graduates will critically analyse existing mentoring and coaching programmes and identify areas for improvement based upon a range literature, both historical and contemporary, and their own reflections. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To enable graduates to develop and apply the practical skills, knowledge and understanding of mentoring and coaching which underpin professional educational practice in the Lifelong Learning Sector. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Critically analyse and evaluate mentoring and coaching within own teaching context. 2. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the theories of mentoring and coaching and how these link to own practice. 3. Evaluate appropriate mentoring and coaching interventions with own learners. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: The relationship between teaching, mentoring and coaching and subject specialism: theories, principles and models Ways of encouraging learner autonomy and self assessment The boundaries, roles and responsibilities of the teacher as a mentor and coach Policies, legislation and codes of practice relevant to mentoring and/or coaching within own professional practice context Personal and professional development, including self assessment and target setting Professional knowledge and understanding of the management of mentoring and coaching Diversity, inclusion and equality of opportunity within mentoring and/or coaching APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Russell Shobrook Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 36 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student should log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Brockbank, A. and McGill, I. (2006) Facilitating Reflective Learning Through Mentoring and Coaching. London: Kogan Page. Clutterbuck, D. (2004) Everyone Needs a Mentor. London: CID. Klasen, N. (2002) Implementing Mentoring Schemes: A practical guide to successful programmes. Oxford: Elsivier. Parsloe, E. (1992) Coaching, Mentoring and Assessing: A practical guide to developing competence. London: Kogan Page. Templeton, L. (2003) ‘Into the Fray on the Very First Day: lessons from an unconventional mentor’, Mentoring and Tutoring, 11(2), 163-175 [Online] http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content =a713685487?words=lolly%7ctempleton&hash=3986438464 (Accessed: 24.3.10). Recommended Texts Jackson, P. (1992) ‘Helping Teachers Develop’, 62-74, in Hargreaves, A. Fullan, M. (eds.) Understanding Teacher Development. New York: Teachers College Press. Megginson, D. and Clutterbuck, D. (2005) Techniques for Coaching and Mentoring. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Miller, K. (2005). Communication Theories. New York: McGraw Hill. Pask, R. and Joy, B. (2007) Mentor-Coaching: A guide for educational professionals. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill. Shea, G. (2002) Mentoring - How to develop successful mentor behaviours. London: Axzo Press. Journals Journal of Mentoring and Tutoring International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring Research in Post-Compulsory Education Page 37 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS663 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Teaching Employability Skills PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module addresses the key principles and skills of effectively teaching employability skills to students in the Lifelong Learning Sector. It explores key ideas underpinning employability and provides opportunities for insights into particular challenges and strategies for action. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To equip teachers with the key conceptual and procedural skills to teach employability skills effectively. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the key concepts, values and appropriate terminology for teaching employability skills. 2. Evaluate techniques and resources for teaching and assessing employability skills. 3. Review and evaluating own strengths and weaknesses within the context of teaching employability skills and plan teaching strategies. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: National policies and contexts Employability skills and employment Personal qualities, skills and competencies Strategies and resources for employability skills delivery Creative communication techniques Environment and personal presentation Developing students’ inter-personal skills Group contracts, rewards and penalties Constructive feedback techniques Professional updating and development APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Teresa Thomas Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 38 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Ball, S. (2008) The Education Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press. Evans, K., Hodkinson, P. and Unwin, L. (eds.) (2002) Working to Learn: Transforming Workplace Learning. London: Kogan Page. Hind, W. and Moss, S. (2005) Employability Skills. Tyne and Wear: Business Education Publishers. Martin, R., Villeneuve-Smith, F., Marshall, L. and McKenzie, E. (2008) Employability Skills Explored. London: LSN. UK Commission for Employment and Skills (2009) The Employability Challenge. London: UKCES. Recommended Texts Gravells, A. (2010) Delivering Employability Skills in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters. Greatbatch, D. and Lewis, P. (2007) Generic Employability Skills II. Nottingham: South West Skills and Learning Intelligence Module. Journals Career Development Quarterly Journal of Vocational Education and Training Journal of Education and Work Websites http://highereducation.cbi.org.uk/policy/employability/what-are-employability-skills - CBI www.deloitte.co.uk/employability - Deloitte http://www.pwc.com/uk/en/careers/student/employability.jhtml - Price Waterhouse Cooper Page 39 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS664 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Independent Study PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module provides the opportunity to work independently by pursuing professionally focused inquiry into a selected educational area. The module will offer both professional and personal development for graduates working as autonomous learners. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1)PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to produce a professionally focused, investigative study that could update their specialist knowledge and understanding, enhance their practice, contribute to curriculum development, or develop quality assurance within their lifelong learning context. To provide the opportunity for graduates to develop and apply their knowledge and understanding of professional inquiry. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Develop skills in acting as autonomous and self-directed learners 2. Develop a comprehensive knowledge of a selected aspect of the lifelong learning sector 3. Apply a method of professional inquiry 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: The process of producing a proposal for professional inquiry Approaches to professional inquiry, including: developing an argument, data collection and analysis, developing practice through a project, reflective practice, reviewing a body of knowledge, and creative problem solving A review of the proposed study with a tutor A review of the current literature and research An action plan that establishes a timescale for the study and targets for tutorials An ethics protocol Analysis and evaluation of the professional inquiry APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: SFES MODULE LEADER: Mark Glasson Session* 10/AU/M & 10/SP/SU/M Page 40 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be expected to engage in approximately 130 hours of autonomous study and be able to access individual tutorial support. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. All students are required to submit a proposal at the start of the module. Students who undertake two independent study modules as part of the programme must show how the proposals are sufficiently different for each module. Reading List: Core Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner. Buckingham: Open University Press. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (2001) How to Research. (2nd edn.) Maidenhead: Open University Press. British Educational Research Association (2004) Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Nottingham: BERA. Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research. London: Sage Publications. McNiff, J., Lomax, P. and Whitehead, J. (2003) You and Your Action Research Project (2nd edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Recommended Texts Carr, W. (ed.) (1989) Quality in Teaching. London: The Falmer Press Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2007) The Sage Handbook of Action Research – Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage. Fisher, A. (2001) Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Koshy, V. (2009) Action Research for Improving Educational Practice. London: Sage. McGhee, P. (2003) The Academic Quality Handbook: Enhancing Higher Education in Universities and Further Education Colleges. London: Kogan Page. Page 41 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS665 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Education for Sustainable Development PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module addresses the processes, principles and theories of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) with an emphasis on an exploration of the social, economic and environmental factors. It focuses on local, national and international policies, strategies and action plans and encourages a critical analysis of the ethical issues and values underpinning the concept. Various educational theories will be explored to encourage developing approaches which move from the ‘transmissive’ to the ‘transformative’. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To enable graduates to develop the knowledge, understanding, values and skills to integrate Education for Sustainable Development within their professional practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the theories and policies of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). 2. Apply theories of ESD within own professional practice showing an awareness of ethical implications. 3. Evaluate the ways in which embedding ESD has influenced your developing practice. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Theories of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Local, national and international policies, strategies and action plans within own area of professional practice including Every Child Matters Ethical issues and values related to ESD Application of theories of ESD and policies, strategies and action plans Models of critical and systems thinking Potential of research to support development of ESD Plans to develop own professional practice through integration of ESD Educational ideologies including vocational, social, liberal and transformative Addressing cultural diversity in relation to ESD APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Dr Denise Summers Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 42 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Boud, D. (2000) ‘Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society.’ Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 2, pp151-167. Miller, J. P. (2007) The Holistic Curriculum (2nd ed). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Orr, D. W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S., Irving, D., Maiteny, P. and Salter, J. (2005) Linkingthinking - New perspectives on thinking and learning for sustainability. Godalming: WWF. [Online] Available at: http://www.eauc.org.uk/file_uploads/linkingthinking-302.pdf (Accessed: 18.1.10) Stibbe, A. (2009) The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy. Totnes: Green Books. Recommended Texts Harding, S. (2006) Animate Earth. Dartington: Green Books Ltd. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. [eds] (2001) Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Rosenberg, M. D. (2003) Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. California: Puddledancer Press. Selby, D. (2007) ‘As the heating happens: Education for Sustainable Development or Education for Sustainable Contraction?’ International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol 2, Nos 3/4, 249-267. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals Journal of Education for Sustainable Development Websites http://www.eauc.org.uk/sorted/home www.esdtoolkit.org http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/ http://www.lsc.gov.uk/whatwedo/sustainable-development.htm http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/content/download/7126/ 73002/ file/Ofsteds%20Sustainable%20Development%20Action%20Plan http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/ Page 43 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS666 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Teaching 14-16 Work-Related Qualifications PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: The module is designed for graduates working or intending to work with students aged 14-16 who are studying work-related and applied courses. In doing so it focuses on recent curriculum initiatives (for example the new Diplomas), the learning needs of younger learners, working with employers, teacher as facilitator, and the relationships between theory, application and the world of work. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1) PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module introduces the knowledge, skills and values needed to support the learning of students aged 14-16 who are studying work-related and applied qualifications. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Analyse the key national policies, initiatives and provisions for work-related education showing an awareness of the legal and statutory responsibilities of teachers. 2. Evaluate and demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the principles of behaviour for learning. 3. Apply and evaluate work-related teaching and learning strategies that engage and motivate learners. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: National and local policies, initiatives and provision for younger learners Social and developmental factors influencing younger learners Motivating young learners Regulations, legislation and professional expectations relating to the education of younger learners National policy and guidance on behaviour for learning Bullying and managing behaviour Functional Skills Inclusion and support for younger learners School and post-compulsory learning environments APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Teresa Thomas Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 44 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. These tasks will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Davies, J. and Biesta, G. (2007) 'Coming to college or getting out of school? The experience of vocational learning of 14-16 year-olds in a further education college.' Research Papers in Education, 22 (1), 23-41. Foskett, H. and Lumby, J. (2005) 14-19 Education: Policy, Leadership and Learning. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2008) Education and Training 14-19: Curriculum, Qualifications and Organization. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Ellis, S. and Todd, J. (2009) Behaviour for Learning: Proactive Approaches to Behaviour Management. Abingdon: Routledge. Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., Rees, G., Spours, K. and Wilde, S. (2009) Education for all: the future of education and training for 14-19 year olds. Abingdon: Routledge. Recommended Texts Coffield, F., Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Steer, R., Edward, S. and Finlay, I. (2007) Policy, learning and inclusion in the learning and skills sector. TLRP Research Briefing. London: TLRP Ginnis, P. (2001) Teacher's Toolkit: Raise Classroom Achievement with Strategies for Every Learner. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing. McCrone, T. and Morris, M. (2004) Research into the impact of pre-16 Vocational Education. London: Centre for Economic Performance ( CEP), London School of Economics. [Online] http://cep.lse.ac.uk/research/skills/Skills_Publications/McCrone_Morris_2004.pdf (Accessed: 26.2.10) Raffe D. and Spours K. (eds.) (2007) Policy-making and Policy Learning in 14-19 Education. London: Bedford Way Papers. Websites http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publications &ProductId=DCSF-00500-2008& www.direct.gov.uk/diplomas http://www.behaviour4learning.ac.uk/ Page 45 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS667 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Developing Cultural Diversity and Community Cohesion in the Curriculum PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module promotes inclusion and fairness for all with a specific focus on how issues of cultural diversity can inform curriculum development in the lifelong learning sector. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module aims to promote cultural diversity in the curriculum to enhance community cohesion. It will provide a forum for developing graduates’ knowledge to enable them to evaluate their own practice in relation to issues of cultural diversity. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate comprehensive knowledge of models, theories and practices of cultural diversity to promote community cohesion in own professional practice. 2. Analyse and evaluate own curriculum and practice for areas of possible racial discrimination and plan ways to introduce and use alternatives identified. 3. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Policy, legislation and codes of practice i.e. European Human Rights Act Race Relations Amendment Act 2000., Single Equality Bill (due to become an Act in 2010),), Ofsted, Every Child Matters, Government departments - Department for Children, Schools and families (DCSF) and Department for Business, innovation and Skills (BIS) Exploring key terms and definitions e.g. equality, diversity, inclusion, differentiation, social and community cohesion, cultural diversity Theories and models e.g. , Piaget ideas on assimilation and adaptation, Swan Report, Tomlinson Report , developing awareness of cultural diversity in diverse and also less diverse communities Critical analysis of duty to promote diversity and citizenship in the curriculum (DFES 2007) Review led by Sir K. Ajegbo National and international perspectives on cultural diversity and community cohesion (e.g. see Gallagher (2004) in reading list) Challenging stereotypes and raising aspirations Develop listening to different ‘voices’ for example through guest speakers, visits and audio visual resources Own personal and professional frameworks in relation to exploring cultural diversity and social inclusion including an exploration of own ethnicity. Development of reflective practice and CPD APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Sarah Chave Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 46 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. These tasks will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core texts Ajegbo, K. (2007) Diversity and Citizenship Curriculum Review. [Online] http://publications.teachernet.go.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES_Diversity_&_Citizenship.pdf (Accessed: 24.2.10) Arora, R. K. (2005) Race and ethnicity in Education. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Cantle, T. (2005) Community Cohesion: A New Framework for Race and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Haw, K. (2009) From hijab to jilbab and the myth of British identity: being Muslim in contemporary Britain a half generation on. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 12 (3), 363-378. Taylor, E., Gillborn, D. and Ladson-Billings, G. (eds.) (2009) Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Recommended Texts Gallagher, T. (2004) Education in Divided Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge. Kelly, P. (ed.) (2005) Multiculturism reconsidered: ‘Culture and equality’ and its critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Troutman Jr, P. L., Unger, J., Ramirez, M G and Saddler S. (2001) ‘Looking for artefacts and agency: a basic approach to diversity for pre -service and in service teachers.’ Intercultural Education 12, 2, 209221. Weiss, G. (2008) ‘Can an Old Dog Learn New Tricks? Habitual Horizons in James, Bourdieu and Merleau Ponty.’ In Weiss, G. (ed.) (2008) Refiguring the Ordinary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Journals Intercultural Education International Journal of Intercultural Relations Race, Ethnicity and Education Websites http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/ http://www.janeelliott.com (blue eyes/brown eyes experiment) http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/assimacc.htm http://www.plymouthcfcd.co.uk – Plymouth Centre for Faiths and Cultural Diversity http://www.universities-scotland.ac.uk/raceequalitytoolkit/Race%20Equality%20Toolkit.pdf Page 47 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS668 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Teaching FOR Innovation Creativity and Enterprise PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module is an opportunity for authentic experiential engagement with the pedagogy, processes and methodologies of creative problem solving enabling students to practice, model and develop innovative, creative and enterprising thinking and behaviours. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To develop conceptual and procedural skills that can confidently be applied to teaching for innovation, creativity and enterprise. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate, through the creative problem solving process, a comprehensive knowledge of theories, principles and practices of innovation, creativity and enterprise. 2. Evaluate processes of mindset shift and attitudinal change within self and learners. 3. Reflect on teaching and learning for innovation, creativity and enterprise and apply to own practice. 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Authentic creative problem solving process Innovation, creativity and enterprise (ICE) ideologies, theories, principles, ideas, methodologies, processes, systems, practice ICE conceptualisation and contextualisation for teaching and learning Modelling practice Mindsets, attitudes, habits of mind, ways of thinking, imagination Developing persistence, resilience, perseverance, curiosity Dealing with risk and failure The impact of process on product outcomes The impact of process on personal and professional development The impact of process on practice Using and trusting personal and professional judgement APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Steve Harris Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 48 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Adams, K. (2006) The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. Washington: National Center on Education and The Economy. Craft, A., Jeffrey, B. and Leibling, M. (ed.) (2001) Creativity in Education. London: Continuum. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997) Creativity. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial. Dweck, C. S. (2008) Mindset:The New Psychology of Success – How we can learn to fulfil our Potential. New York: Ballantine Books. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G. and Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative Problem Solving An Introduction. (4th edn.) Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc. Recommended Texts Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M. and Wisdom, J. (eds.) (2006) Developing Creativity in Higher Education - An imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge. Miller, J. P. (2007) The Holistic Curriculum. (2nd edn.) Toronto: OISE Press. Pope, R. (2005) Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. London: Routledge. Robinson, K. (2001) Out of our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd. Trilling, B. and Fadel, C. (2009) 21st Century Skills, Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Journals Creativity and Innovation Management Creativity Research Journal Research in Post-Compulsory Education Journal of Educational Enquiry Teaching in HE Thinking Skills and Creativity Websites http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/ www.ltscotland.org.uk/creativity Page 49 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS669 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: The Role of the Personal Tutor PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module will explore the diverse expectations and perceptions that shape the role of the Personal Tutor. It will provide a forum for discussion of the challenges and the many opportunities of providing effective support for students and the teaching and learning strategies that support this. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to develop their understanding of the role of a Personal Tutor in relation to student expectation and organisational policies. To enable graduates to develop a range of teaching, learning and assessment strategies to provide effective support. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Analyse the range of perceptions of the role of the Personal Tutor in the Lifelong Learning Sector 2. Demonstrate a comprehensive knowledge of the range of teaching, learning and assessment approaches available to the Personal Tutor 3. Reflect on teaching and learning approaches as a Personal Tutor in own professional practice 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Developing an effective tutorial curriculum Teaching, learning and assessment strategies for tutorial Developing effective Individual Learning Plans Raising achievement through tutorial Developing effective study skills Personal learning and thinking/reflection skills Advice and guidance Supporting vulnerable young people through tutorial Embedding citizenship, global and sustainable themes through tutorial Embedding the development of language, literacy, numeracy Theories and principles of communication with groups and individuals. The impact of regulatory bodies and inspection regimes on tutorial practices. Methods of self evaluation and personal action planning. How principles of equality, diversity and inclusion can be promoted through tutorial. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Debra Johnson Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 50 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student with be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Ecclestone, K. and Hayes, D. (2009) The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Edwards, R., Harrison, R. and Tait, A. (eds.) (1998) Telling Tales: Perspectives on Guidance and Counselling in Learning. London: Routledge. Goleman, D. (2006) Emotional Intelligence. (10th ed.) London: Bantham Books. Heron, J. (2001) Helping the Client – A Creative Practical Guide. (5th ed.) London: Sage Publications. McLeod, J. (2007) Counselling Skills. Maidenhead: OU Press and McGraw Hill. Recommended Texts Covey, S. (2004) The seven habits of highly effective teenagers. London: Simon Schuster. Furedi, F. (2004) Therapy Culture – Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge. Huddleston, P. and Unwin, L. (2008) Teaching and learning in further education: diversity and change. (3rd ed.) London: Routledge. Lindon, J. and Lindon, L. (2000) Mastering Counselling Skills. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Noddings, N. (2003) Happiness and Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. Websites http://www.fetn.org.uk http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32102.aspx http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/ete/lifelonglearningandskills Page 51 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS670 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 6 MODULE TITLE: Independent Study (2) PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module provides the opportunity to work independently by pursuing professionally focused inquiry into a selected educational area. The module will offer both professional and personal development for graduates working as autonomous learners. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1)PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to produce a professionally focused, investigative study that could update their specialist knowledge and understanding, enhance their practice, contribute to curriculum development, or develop quality assurance within their lifelong learning context. To provide the opportunity for graduates to develop and apply their knowledge and understanding of professional inquiry. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Develop skills in acting as autonomous and self-directed learners 2. Develop a comprehensive knowledge of a selected aspect of the lifelong learning sector 3. Apply a method of professional inquiry 4. Demonstrate continued development in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: The process of producing a proposal for professional inquiry Approaches to professional inquiry, including: developing an argument, data collection and analysis, developing practice through a project, reflective practice, reviewing a body of knowledge, and creative problem solving A review of the proposed study with a tutor A review of the current literature and research An action plan that establishes a timescale for the study and targets for tutorials An ethics protocol Analysis and evaluation of the professional inquiry APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: SFES MODULE LEADER: Mark Glasson Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 52 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 6 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s level 6 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be expected to engage in approximately 130 hours of autonomous study and be able to access individual tutorial support. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. All students are required to submit a proposal at the start of the module. Students who undertake two independent study modules as part of the programme must show how the proposals are sufficiently different for each module. Reading List: Core Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner. Buckingham: Open University Press. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (2001) How to Research. (2nd edn.) Maidenhead: Open University Press. British Educational Research Association (2004) Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Nottingham: BERA. Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research. London: Sage Publications. McNiff, J., Lomax, P. and Whitehead, J. (2003) You and Your Action Research Project (2nd edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Recommended Texts Carr, W. (ed.) (1989) Quality in Teaching. London: The Falmer Press Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2007) The Sage Handbook of Action Research – Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage. Fisher, A. (2001) Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Koshy, V. (2009) Action Research for Improving Educational Practice. London: Sage. McGhee, P. (2003) The Academic Quality Handbook: Enhancing Higher Education in Universities and Further Education Colleges. London: Kogan Page. Page 53 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS754 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Continuing Personal and Professional Development PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module seeks to empower graduates through personal and professional development. Graduates will undertake analysis to inform an honest, effective and robust evaluation of their continuing professional and development as part of their role in the Lifelong Learning Sector. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to reflect upon their personal and professional development and to enable an informed transformation of their practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Critically investigate the range of roles and responsibilities of a teacher in the lifelong learning sector 2. Demonstrate a deep and systematic knowledge of subject specialist pedagogy and continued development in teaching practice 3. Critically analyse breadth of practice experience 4. Reflexively examine own personal and professional development INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Teaching roles and contexts in the lifelong learning sector. Roles and responsibilities of a subject specialist. Subject specialist pedagogy. Impact of beliefs, assumptions and behaviours on learners. Impact of teacher’s own skills on learners. Theories, principles and models of reflective practice. Models of continuing personal and professional development. Self assessment and autonomy in learning. Breadth of Practice. Identifying CPD opportunities and evaluating the impact on own practice. Quality assurance. Theories, principles and models of Education for Sustainable Development. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Sue Exley Session* 10/SP/SU/M & 11/AU/M Page 54 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALO 1 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 2 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 3 and 4 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points for own personal and professional development drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain C (Specialist Learning and Teaching) of the Professional Standards and breadth of practice experience. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Brookfield, S. D. (1995) Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Hitching, J. (2008) Maintaining your Licence to Practise in the Lifelong Learning Sector Exeter: Learning Matters. Jarvis, P. (2010) Adult Education and Lifelong Learning, Theory and Practice. (4th edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Villeneuve-Smith, F., West, C. and Bhinder, B. (2009) Rethinking continuing professional development in further education. London: Learning & Skills Network. Recommended Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner. Buckingham: Open University Press. James, D. and Biesta, G. (2007) Improving Learning Cultures in Further Education. London: Routledge. Kennedy, A. (2005) ‘Models of Continuing Professional Development: a framework for analysis‘, Journal of In-Service Education, Vol 31, No 2, 235-250. Orr, D.W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals Journal of Education and Work Websites http://www.jrf.org.uk/ Joseph Rowntree Trust www.standardsverificationuk.org/ http://www.eauc.org.uk/sorted/home www.esdtoolkit.org Page 55 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS755 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Curriculum Development for Inclusive Practice PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module explores theories, principles and implementation of programmes of learning and their impact on teaching and learning within the Lifelong Learning Sector. It focuses on understanding curriculum design, equality and diversity, social, economic, political and cultural differences on teaching and learning within own specialist area. The module empowers graduates to critically evaluate individual subject specialism, approaches, strengths and development needs in relation to inclusive curriculum design. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To develop an understanding of the history, concepts and models of curriculum; to analyse theories and approaches to curriculum practice and design that may differ within an educational/training context; to enable issues of inclusion and subject specialism to be explored and critiqued. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a deep and systematic knowledge of curriculum theories and principles within own subject specialist area 2. Critically evaluate the social cohesion of curricula with regards ethnicity, race, religion and sexual orientation 3. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in own subject specialist teaching 4. Critically examine access and progression in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Curriculum theories, principles, ideologies and models. Curriculum design and implementation for specialist subjects and different cohorts of learners. Different curriculum contexts in the lifelong learning sector. Legislation relating to ethnicity, race, religion and sexual orientation. Social cohesion and religious tolerance. The impact of social, economic and cultural differences on learning. Challenging discriminatory behaviour in a learning environment. Proposing changes to curriculum design. Equal Opportunities. Developing a sustainable curriculum. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Mark Glasson Session* 10/SP/SU/M & 11/AU/M Page 56 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation and a report by a subject specialist mentor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALO 4 will be assessed through an individual development plan with agreed action points drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain F (Access and Progression) of the Professional Standards. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a subject specialist mentor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Avis, J., Fisher, R., and Thompson, R. (2009) Teaching in Lifelong Learning - a guide to theory and practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Bloomer, M. (2002) Curriculum Making in Post -16 Education – The social conditions of studentship. (2nd edn.) London: Routledge Grundy, S. (1987) Curriculum: Product or Praxi. Lewes: Falmer. Kelly, A. V. (2009) The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. (6 th edn.) London: Sage. Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P. and Taubman, P. M. (2004) Understanding Curriculum. New York: Peter Long Publishers Inc. Recommended Texts Avis, J. (2007) Education, Policy and Social Justice: Learning and Skills. London: Continuum. Cantle, T. (2005) Community Cohesion: A New Framework for Race and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Evans, K., Hodkinson, P. and Unwin, L. (eds.) (2002) Working to Learn: Transforming Workplace Learning. London: Kogan Page. Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., Rees, G., Spours, K. and Wilde, S. (2009) Education for all: the future of education and training for 14-19 year olds. Abingdon: Routledge. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals British Journal of Educational Studies British Educational Research Journal Websites www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES_Diversity_&_Citizenship.pdf http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/wholeschool/Communitycohesion/communitycohesionresourcepack/intro/ Page 57 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS756 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Wider Professional Practice PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module focuses upon notions of professionalism and wider professional practice. It specifically empowers graduates to examine professional conduct and accountability, quality assurance, quality improvement, Education for Sustainable Development, and self evaluation through reflexive processes. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module will provide a forum for a critical evaluation of the graduate’s own practice and conduct in relation to institutions, quality issues, Education for Sustainable Development, policies and continuous professional development as well as provide the opportunity to broaden graduates’ experiences through the exploration and modelling of good practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a deep and systematic knowledge of issues of professionalism 2. Critically evaluate Education for Sustainable Development in teaching practice 3. Demonstrate proficiency and capacity in teaching practice 4. Demonstrate a high degree of autonomy with own personal development 5. Reflexively examine professional values and practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Concepts of professionalism and core professional values for teachers in the lifelong learning sector. Equality of opportunity and respect for diversity. The contribution of learning to personal development, economic growth and community regeneration. Impact of own values and judgements on learners. Professional conduct and accountability in the lifelong learning sector. Implications and impact of government policies on teaching and learning in the lifelong learning sector. Roles of regulatory bodies and systems and inspection regimes in the operation of the lifelong learning sector. Integration of Education for Sustainable Development in teaching practice. Statutory requirements and underpinning principles in relation to own subject specialism. Quality assurance, improvement and procedures. The differences and relationship between evaluation and assessment. Validity and reliability of data. The effectiveness of data collection methods/instruments. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Simon Webster Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 58 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2000-2500 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. ALOs 4 and 5 will be assessed through an individual development plan with action points drawn from an evaluation of an arranged series of lessons using Domain A (Professional Values and Practice) of the Professional Standards. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria. Both these tasks must be successfully completed for a student to pass the Practice mode of the module. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Individual Development Plan criteria are shown in Appendix 3 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student will teach a minimum of 19 hours of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner Buckingham: Open University Press. Lea, J., Hayes, D., Armitage, A., Lomas, L. and Markless, S. (2003) Working in Post-compulsory Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press. McGhee, P. (2003) The Academic Quality Handbook: Enhancing Higher Education in Universities and Further Education Colleges. London: Kogan Page. Orr, D. W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S., Irving, D., Maiteny, P. and Salter, J. (2005) Linkingthinking: New perspectives on thinking and learning for sustainability. Recommended Texts Bolton, G. (2005) Reflective Practice Writing for Professional Development. (2nd edn.) London: Sage. Hitching, J. (2008) Maintaining your Licence to Practise. Exeter: Learning Matters. Moon, J. (2008) Critical Thinking: an exploration of theory and practice. London: Routledge. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2005) Total Quality Management in Education. London: Paul Chapman. Stibbe, A. (ed.) (2009) The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy. Dartington: Green Books Ltd. Tilbury, D. and Wortman, D. (2004) Engaging people in sustainability. Cambridge: IUCN. [Online] http://app.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2004-055.pdf Journals International Journal of Lifelong Learning Websites http://www.lsc.gov.uk/whatwedo/sustainable-development.htm http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/content/download/7126/ 73002/file/Ofsteds%20 Sustainable %20 Development%20Action%20Plan Page 59 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS765 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Education for Sustainable Development PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module addresses the processes, principles and theories of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) with an emphasis on an exploration of the social, economic and environmental factors. It focuses on local, national and international policies, strategies and action plans and encourages a critical analysis of the ethical issues and values underpinning the concept. Various educational theories will be explored to encourage developing approaches which move from the ‘transmissive’ to the ‘transformative’. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To enable graduates to develop the knowledge, understanding, values and skills to integrate Education for Sustainable Development within their professional practice. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate a deep and systematic knowledge and understanding of the theories and policies of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). 2. Apply, showing initiative and originality, theories of ESD within own professional practice showing a critical awareness of ethical implications. 3. Critically evaluate the ways in which embedding ESD has influenced your developing practice. 4. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Theories of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Local, national and international policies, strategies and action plans within own area of professional practice including Every Child Matters Ethical issues and values related to ESD Application of theories of ESD and policies, strategies and action plans Models of critical and systems thinking Potential of research to support development of ESD Plans to develop own professional practice through integration of ESD Educational ideologies including vocational, social, liberal and transformative Addressing cultural diversity in relation to ESD APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Dr Denise Summers Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 60 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Boud, D. (2000) ‘Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society.’ Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 2, pp151-167. Miller, J. P. (2007) The Holistic Curriculum (2nd ed). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Orr, D. W. (2004) Earth in Mind – On Education, Environment and the Human Prospect – 10th Anniversary Edition. Washington DC: Island Press. Sterling, S., Irving, D., Maiteny, P. and Salter, J. (2005) Linkingthinking - New perspectives on thinking and learning for sustainability. Godalming: WWF. [Online] Available at: http://www.eauc.org.uk/file_uploads/linkingthinking-302.pdf (Accessed: 18.1.10) Stibbe, A. (2009) The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy. Totnes: Green Books. Recommended Texts Harding, S. (2006) Animate Earth. Dartington: Green Books Ltd. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. [eds] (2001) Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Rosenberg, M. D. (2003) Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life. California: Puddledancer Press. Selby, D. (2007) ‘As the heating happens: Education for Sustainable Development or Education for Sustainable Contraction?’ International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Vol 2, Nos 3/4, 249-267. Sterling, S. (2001) Sustainable Education: Re-visioning Learning and Change. Dartington: Green Books. Journals Journal of Education for Sustainable Development Websites http://www.eauc.org.uk/sorted/home www.esdtoolkit.org http://www.unesco.org/education/tlsf/ http://www.lsc.gov.uk/whatwedo/sustainable-development.htm http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/content/download/7126/ 73002/ file/Ofsteds%20Sustainable%20Development%20Action%20Plan http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/ Page 61 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS766 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Teaching 14-16 Work-Related Qualifications PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: The module is designed for graduates working or intending to work with students aged 14-16 who are studying work-related and applied courses. In doing so it focuses on recent curriculum initiatives (for example the new Diplomas), the learning needs of younger learners, working with employers, teacher as facilitator, and the relationships between theory, application and the world of work. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1) PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module introduces the knowledge, skills and values needed to support the learning of students aged 14-16 who are studying work-related and applied qualifications. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Critically analyse the key national policies, initiatives and provisions for work-related education showing a critical awareness of the legal and statutory responsibilities of teachers. 2. Critically evaluate and demonstrate a deep and systematic understanding of the principles of behaviour for learning. 3. Apply and critically evaluate work-related teaching and learning strategies that engage and motivate learners. 4. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: National and local policies, initiatives and provision for younger learners Social and developmental factors influencing younger learners Motivating young learners Regulations, legislation and professional expectations relating to the education of younger learners National policy and guidance on behaviour for learning Bullying and managing behaviour Functional Skills Inclusion and support for younger learners School and post-compulsory learning environments APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Teresa Thomas Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 62 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. These tasks will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Davies, J. and Biesta, G. (2007) 'Coming to college or getting out of school? The experience of vocational learning of 14-16 year-olds in a further education college.' Research Papers in Education, 22 (1), 23-41. Foskett, H. and Lumby, J. (2005) 14-19 Education: Policy, Leadership and Learning. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2008) Education and Training 14-19: Curriculum, Qualifications and Organization. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Ellis, S. and Todd, J. (2009) Behaviour for Learning: Proactive Approaches to Behaviour Management. Abingdon: Routledge. Pring, R., Hayward, G., Hodgson, A., Johnson, J., Keep, E., Oancea, A., Rees, G., Spours, K. and Wilde, S. (2009) Education for all: the future of education and training for 14-19 year olds. Abingdon: Routledge. Recommended Texts Coffield, F., Hodgson, A., Spours, K., Steer, R., Edward, S. and Finlay, I. (2007) Policy, learning and inclusion in the learning and skills sector. TLRP Research Briefing. London: TLRP Ginnis, P. (2001) Teacher's Toolkit: Raise Classroom Achievement with Strategies for Every Learner. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing. McCrone, T. and Morris, M. (2004) Research into the impact of pre-16 Vocational Education. London: Centre for Economic Performance ( CEP), London School of Economics. [Online] http://cep.lse.ac.uk/research/skills/Skills_Publications/McCrone_Morris_2004.pdf (Accessed: 26.2.10) Raffe D. and Spours K. (eds.) (2007) Policy-making and Policy Learning in 14-19 Education. London: Bedford Way Papers. Websites http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publications &ProductId=DCSF-00500-2008& www.direct.gov.uk/diplomas http://www.behaviour4learning.ac.uk/ Page 63 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS767 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Developing Cultural Diversity and Community Cohesion in the Curriculum PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module promotes inclusion and fairness for all with a specific focus on how issues of cultural diversity can inform curriculum development in the lifelong learning sector. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: This module aims to promote cultural diversity in the curriculum to enhance community cohesion. It will provide a forum for developing graduates’ knowledge to enable them to evaluate their own practice in relation to issues of cultural diversity. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate deep and systematic knowledge of models, theories and practices of cultural diversity to promote community cohesion in own professional practice. 2. Analyse and critically evaluate own curriculum and practice for areas of possible racial discrimination and plan innovative ways to introduce and use alternatives identified. 3. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Policy, legislation and codes of practice i.e. European Human Rights Act Race Relations Amendment Act 2000., Single Equality Bill (due to become an Act in 2010), Ofsted, Every Child Matters, Government departments - Department for Children, Schools and families (DCSF) and Department for Business, innovation and Skills (BIS) Exploring key terms and definitions e.g. equality, diversity, inclusion, differentiation, social and community cohesion, cultural diversity Theories and models e.g. , Piaget ideas on assimilation and adaptation, Swan Report, Tomlinson Report , developing awareness of cultural diversity in diverse and also less diverse communities Critical analysis of duty to promote diversity and citizenship in the curriculum (DFES 2007) Review led by Sir K. Ajegbo National and international perspectives on cultural diversity and community cohesion (e.g. see Gallagher (2004) in reading list) Challenging stereotypes and raising aspirations Develop listening to different ‘voices’ for example through guest speakers, visits and audio visual resources Own personal and professional frameworks in relation to exploring cultural diversity and social inclusion including an exploration of own ethnicity. Development of reflective practice and CPD APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Sarah Chave Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 64 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1 and 2 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. These tasks will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO3 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core texts Ajegbo, K. (2007) Diversity and Citizenship Curriculum Review. [Online] http://publications.teachernet.go.uk/eOrderingDownload/DfES_Diversity_&_Citizenship.pdf (Accessed: 24.2.10) Arora, R. K. (2005) Race and ethnicity in Education. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Cantle, T. (2005) Community Cohesion: A New Framework for Race and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Haw, K. (2009) From hijab to jilbab and the myth of British identity: being Muslim in contemporary Britain a half generation on. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 12 (3), 363-378. Taylor, E., Gillborn, D. and Ladson-Billings, G. (eds.) (2009) Foundations of Critical Race Theory in Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Recommended Texts Gallagher, T. (2004) Education in Divided Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. hooks, b. (1994) Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. London: Routledge. Kelly, P. (ed.) (2005) Multiculturism reconsidered: ‘Culture and equality’ and its critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Troutman Jr, P. L., Unger, J., Ramirez, M G and Saddler S. (2001) ‘Looking for artefacts and agency: a basic approach to diversity for pre -service and in service teachers.’ Intercultural Education 12, 2, 209221. Weiss, G. (2008) ‘Can an Old Dog Learn New Tricks? Habitual Horizons in James, Bourdieu and Merleau Ponty.’ In Weiss, G. (ed.) (2008) Refiguring the Ordinary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Journals Intercultural Education International Journal of Intercultural Relations Race, Ethnicity and Education Websites http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/ http://www.janeelliott.com (blue eyes/brown eyes experiment) http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/assimacc.htm http://www.plymouthcfcd.co.uk – Plymouth Centre for Faiths and Cultural Diversity http://www.universities-scotland.ac.uk/raceequalitytoolkit/Race%20Equality%20Toolkit.pdf Page 65 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS768 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Teaching FOR Innovation Creativity and Enterprise PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module is an opportunity for authentic experiential engagement with the pedagogy, processes and methodologies of creative problem solving enabling graduates to practice, model and develop innovative, creative and enterprising thinking and behaviours. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1) COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1) PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To develop conceptual and procedural skills that can confidently be applied to teaching for innovation, creativity and enterprise. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Demonstrate, through the creative problem solving process, a deep and systematic knowledge of theories, principles and practices of innovation, creativity and enterprise. 2. Critically evaluate processes of mindset shift and attitudinal change within self and learners. 3. Reflexively examine teaching and learning for innovation, creativity and enterprise and apply to own practice. 4. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice. INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Authentic creative problem solving process Innovation, creativity and enterprise (ICE) ideologies, theories, principles, ideas, methodologies, processes, systems, practice ICE conceptualisation and contextualisation for teaching and learning Modelling practice Mindsets, attitudes, habits of mind, ways of thinking, imagination Developing persistence, resilience, perseverance, curiosity Dealing with risk and failure The impact of process on product outcomes The impact of process on personal and professional development The impact of process on practice Using and trusting personal and professional judgement APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Steve Harris Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 66 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Adams, K. (2006) The Sources of Innovation and Creativity. Washington: National Center on Education and The Economy. Craft, A., Jeffrey, B. and Leibling, M. (ed.) (2001) Creativity in Education. London: Continuum. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997) Creativity. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial. Dweck, C. S. (2008) Mindset:The New Psychology of Success – How we can learn to fulfil our Potential. New York: Ballantine Books. Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G. and Stead-Dorval, K. B. (2006). Creative Problem Solving An Introduction. (4th edn.) Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Inc. Recommended Texts Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M. and Wisdom, J. (eds.) (2006) Developing Creativity in Higher Education - An imaginative curriculum. London: Routledge. Miller, J. P. (2007) The Holistic Curriculum. (2nd edn.) Toronto: OISE Press. Pope, R. (2005) Creativity: Theory, History, Practice. London: Routledge. Robinson, K. (2001) Out of our Minds: Learning to be Creative. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd. Trilling, B. and Fadel, C. (2009) 21st Century Skills, Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Journals Creativity and Innovation Management Creativity Research Journal Research in Post-Compulsory Education Journal of Educational Enquiry Teaching in HE Thinking Skills and Creativity Websites http://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/ www.ltscotland.org.uk/creativity Page 67 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS769 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: The Role of the Personal Tutor PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module will explore the diverse expectations and perceptions that shape the role of the Personal Tutor. It will provide a forum for discussion of the challenges and the many opportunities of providing effective support for students and the teaching and learning strategies that support this. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK Pass/Fail (P1)PRACTICE Pass/Fail Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to develop their understanding of the role of a Personal Tutor in relation to student expectation and organisational policies. To enable graduates to develop a range of teaching, learning and assessment strategies to provide effective support. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Critically analyse the range of perceptions of the role of the Personal Tutor in the Lifelong Learning Sector 2. Demonstrate a deep and systematic knowledge of the range of teaching, learning and assessment approaches available to the Personal Tutor 3. Reflexively examine teaching and learning approaches as a Personal Tutor in own professional practice 4. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: Developing an effective tutorial curriculum Teaching, learning and assessment strategies for tutorial Developing effective Individual Learning Plans Raising achievement through tutorial Developing effective study skills Personal learning and thinking/reflection skills Advice and guidance Supporting vulnerable young people through tutorial Embedding citizenship, global and sustainable themes through tutorial Embedding the development of language, literacy, numeracy Theories and principles of communication with groups and individuals. The impact of regulatory bodies and inspection regimes on tutorial practices. Methods of self evaluation and personal action planning. How principles of equality, diversity and inclusion can be promoted through tutorial. APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: SFES PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: MODULE LEADER: Debra Johnson Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 68 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Modes: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment Criteria: The Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be able to access 30 hours direct contact time including: group sessions, group tutorials/meetings, mediated VLE interactions, individual tutorials and mentor meetings. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. Students are expected to engage in approximately 100 hours of autonomous study. Reading List: Core Texts Ecclestone, K. and Hayes, D. (2009) The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Edwards, R., Harrison, R. and Tait, A. (eds.) (1998) Telling Tales: Perspectives on Guidance and Counselling in Learning. London: Routledge. Goleman, D. (2006) Emotional Intelligence. (10th ed.) London: Bantham Books. Heron, J. (2001) Helping the Client – A Creative Practical Guide. (5th ed.) London: Sage Publications. McLeod, J. (2007) Counselling Skills. Maidenhead: OU Press and McGraw Hill. Recommended Texts Covey, S. (2004) The seven habits of highly effective teenagers. London: Simon Schuster. Furedi, F. (2004) Therapy Culture – Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age. London: Routledge. Huddleston, P. and Unwin, L. (2008) Teaching and learning in further education: diversity and change. (3rd ed.) London: Routledge. Lindon, J. and Lindon, L. (2000) Mastering Counselling Skills. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. Noddings, N. (2003) Happiness and Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. Websites http://www.fetn.org.uk http://www.lsnlearning.org.uk/search/Resource-32102.aspx http://www.excellencegateway.org.uk http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/everychildmatters/ete/lifelonglearningandskills Page 69 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH MODULE RECORD MODULE CODE: DLLS770 CREDITS: 15 LEVEL: 7 MODULE TITLE: Independent Study PRE-REQUISITE(S): N/A CO-REQUISITE(S): N/A COMPENSATABLE WITHIN THIS PROGRAMME: No SHORT MODULE DESCRIPTOR: This module provides the opportunity to work independently by pursuing professionally focused inquiry into a selected educational area. The module will offer both professional and personal development for graduates working as autonomous learners. ELEMENTS OF ASSESSMENT: (C1)COURSEWORK PASS/FAIL (P1)PRACTICE PASS/FAIL Give Subject Assessment Panel Group to which module should be linked: DLL MODULE AIMS: To encourage graduates to produce a professionally focused, investigative study that could update their specialist knowledge and understanding, enhance their practice, contribute to curriculum development, or develop quality assurance within their lifelong learning context. To provide the opportunity for graduates to develop and apply their knowledge and understanding of professional inquiry. ASSESSED LEARNING OUTCOMES: At the end of a module the learner will be expected to be able to: 1. Develop skills in acting as autonomous and reflexive learners 2. Develop a deep and systematic knowledge of a selected aspect of the lifelong learning sector 3. Apply a method of professional inquiry in an innovative and creative way to inform practice 4. Demonstrate autonomous and continued development in teaching practice INDICATIVE SYLLABUS CONTENT: The process of producing a proposal for professional inquiry Approaches to professional inquiry, including: developing an argument, data collection and analysis, developing practice through a project, reflective practice, reviewing a body of knowledge, and creative problem solving A review of the proposed study with a tutor A review of the current literature and research An action plan that establishes a timescale for the study and targets for tutorials An ethics protocol Analysis and evaluation of the professional inquiry APPROVAL: DATE OF APPROVAL: 18/03/2010 DATE OF IMPLEMENTATION: 01/09/2010 DATE(S) OF APPROVED CHANGE: XX/XX/XX FACULTY: Education SCHOOL: PARTNER (For FHSW) NAME OF INSTITUTION: SITE: SFES MODULE LEADER: Mark Glasson Session* 10/SP/SU/M Page 70 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Assessment Mode: (C1) Coursework ALOs 1, 2 and 3 will be assessed through a coursework task equivalent to 2500-3000 words. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Level 7 Coursework criteria. (P1) Practice ALO 4 will be assessed through a teaching observation by a course tutor. This task will be assessed against the Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria. Assessment criteria: The Programme’s level 7 Coursework criteria are shown in Appendix 1 of the Programme Handbook. The Programme’s Teaching Observation criteria are shown in Appendix 2 of the Programme Handbook. Schedule of Teaching and Learning: Each student will be expected to engage in approximately 130 hours of autonomous study and be able to access individual tutorial support. Each student must log a minimum of 19 hours teaching practice of which one session will be observed by a course tutor. All students are required to submit a proposal at the start of the module. Students who undertake two independent study modules as part of the programme must show how the proposals are sufficiently different for each module. Reading List: Core Texts Atkinson, T. and Claxton, G. (eds.) (2000) The Intuitive Practitioner. Buckingham: Open University Press. Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (2001) How to Research. (2nd edn.) Maidenhead: Open University Press. British Educational Research Association (2004) Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Nottingham: BERA. Crotty, M. (1998) The Foundations of Social Research. London: Sage Publications. McNiff, J., Lomax, P. and Whitehead, J. (2003) You and Your Action Research Project (2nd edn.) London: RoutledgeFalmer. Recommended Texts Carr, W. (ed.) (1989) Quality in Teaching. London: The Falmer Press Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2007) The Sage Handbook of Action Research – Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage. Fisher, A. (2001) Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Koshy, V. (2009) Action Research for Improving Educational Practice. London: Sage. McGhee, P. (2003) The Academic Quality Handbook: Enhancing Higher Education in Universities and Further Education Colleges. London: Kogan Page. Page 71 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Appendix 1 Coursework Criteria LEVEL 7 LEVEL 6 Grade A pass in demonstrating the knowledge and understanding to achieve the assessed learning outcomes linked to the coursework A fail in demonstrating the knowledge and understanding to achieve the assessed learning outcomes linked to the coursework A pass in demonstrating the knowledge and understanding to achieve the assessed learning outcomes linked to the coursework A fail in demonstrating the knowledge and understanding to achieve the assessed learning outcomes linked to the coursework Critical reading Research & investigation Communication skills Relevant and wide range of texts, to include journal articles, national and local policy documents, with accurate and consistent referencing. Reflexively evaluate reliability, validity and significance of data. Deep systematic analysis and synthesis of complex, incomplete or contradictory areas of knowledge in relation to own practice. Irrelevant and limited range of inaccurately and / or inconsistently referenced texts. Lacking deep and systematic analysis, evaluation and synthesis. Deep and systematic engagement in / with current research to encourage innovation / creativity and improve own practice. Reflexive engagement with related ethical issues. Reflexively evaluates impact on practice and learners. Consistently demonstrating highly effective and coherent communication of complex ideas and meaning. Format is appropriate, readable and accessible, with accurate and consistent grammar and punctuation. Lacking deep and systematic engagement in research, ethical implications. Lack of reflexive evaluation of impact on practice and learners. Relevant and wide range of texts to include journal articles and policy documents, with generally accurate and consistent referencing. Critically evaluate reliability, validity and significance of data. Comprehensive and detailed analysis and critique of theories and contexts and an awareness of the provisional nature of knowledge. Irrelevant and limited range of poorly sourced and referenced texts. Lacking comprehensive analysis, evaluation and critique. Engagement with own / others’ research to encourage innovation / creativity and improve own practice. Critical analysis of related ethical issues. Critically reflects and evaluates impact on own practice and learners. Lacking consistency and coherence in communicating complex ideas and meanings. Inappropriate format which lacks readability and accessibility. Inaccurate and / or inconsistent in grammar and punctuation. Effective and coherent communication of ideas and meaning, using appropriate format, which is readable and accessible, with generally accurate and consistent grammar and punctuation. Lacking engagement in research and critical evaluation of ethical issues. Lack of critical reflection of impact on practice and learners. Lack of coherency and ineffective communication of ideas and meaning. Inappropriate format and accuracy and / or inconsistency in grammar and punctuation. Page 72 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Appendix 2 1: An outstanding pass Overall characteristics: The trainee's teaching is consistently above and beyond the standards, with many outstanding features. Cert Ed/PGCE (DTLLS ) Observation of Teaching Assessment Criteria for Pass/Fail and grading practice 2. A good pass 3: A satisfactory pass Trainee’s teaching consistently meets all of the standards showing no significant weaknesses. Planning: Plans to meet the aims and needs of Plans to meet the needs of all individual learners and groups. individuals and groups. Selects and Selects and develops a wide variety develops a range of appropriate of stimulating activities and resources. activities and resources. Plans to Plans methodically to embed embed relevant elements of the development of language, literacy, language, literacy, numeracy and numeracy and ICT skills. ICT skills Standards: BP2.1; DS1; DP1.1; DP1.2; DS2; DP1.3 Resources: Uses a variety of high quality and Employs a range of engaging stimulating resources imaginatively, to resources, appropriate to the promote learning, (including, subject and range of abilities within whenever appropriate, a range of new the group, (including effective use technologies). of new technologies). Standards: BS5; BP5.1; DP2.1 Delivery of Learning: Implements a range of creative, Uses a good range of interesting, innovative and engaging learning appropriate and engaging learning opportunities, which motivate learners opportunities which motivate and encourage independence; learners; effectively incorporates incorporating, where appropriate, the new technologies, where innovative and effective use of a appropriate, range of new technologies. 4: Fail Trainee’s teaching meets the standards but with some surmountable weaknesses, or areas to develop. Trainee’s teaching does not meet a range of the standards, and/or has significant areas to develop. Plans to meet the needs of the group and most individuals. Selects appropriate activities and resources. Does not plan sufficiently or appropriately to meet the needs of individuals or groups Uses good quality resources, appropriate to the subject matter and level Uses inappropriate or poor quality resources, or fails to make effective use of satisfactory materials. Uses a range of engaging learning opportunities, which encourage learning and which include, where appropriate, the effective use of some new technologies. Fails to implement an effective range of opportunities for learning; fails actively to engage learners; does not use, or is unable to use effectively, new technologies, where these would be appropriate. Standards: BP2.2; BP2.3; BP2.4; BP2.5 Page 73 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Managing Learning: Establishes and maintains a Establishes and maintains a motivating, challenging, purposeful motivating, purposeful, positive, and inclusive learning environment for inclusive learning environment, all learners, where they feel safe, where all learners feel safe, secure, secure, confident and valued. confident and valued. Standards: AS6; AP6.1; AP6.2; BP1.1; BP 1.3 Communication: Has excellent personal communiStructures and presents information cations skills: communicates clearly and effectively. Has good, effectively and appropriately, using a effective personal communications wide variety of forms of language and skills, using a range of written, media, including written, oral and non- verbal and visual media, including verbal communication, new and new and emerging technologies. emerging technologies, to enhance Employs a good range of effective learning. Effectively employs active questioning techniques and active listening and a comprehensive range listening to promote learning of questioning techniques to promote learning. Standards: BS3; BP3.1; BP3.3 Promoting Inclusion: Establishes and consistently employs Consistently establishes and procedures with learners which maintains an appropriate standard promote and maintain high standards of behaviour, communication and of appropriate behaviour, respect for others. Promotes communication, and respect for independent learning and effective others, while challenging citizenship; demonstrates discriminatory behaviour and awareness of learners’ life attitudes. Actively promotes experiences. Challenges independent learning and effective inappropriate behaviour and citizenship, engaging with learners’ attitudes, valuing equality, life experiences, valuing equality, promoting diversity, and setting promoting diversity, and consistently high expectations. setting high and demanding expectations. Standards: AS3; BS1; BP1.2; BP 5.2; Establishes and maintains a motivating, purposeful, inclusive learning environment where all learners can feel safe, secure, confident and valued. Does not establish and maintain a safe, secure, motivating, purposeful, inclusive learning environment where all learners can feel confident and valued. Structures and presents information clearly and effectively using a range of communications media. Has effective and appropriate personal communications skills, including active listening; can employ effective questioning techniques to promote learning Is unable to structure and present information clearly and effectively. Has significant areas for development in terms of communications skills, and the use of listening and questioning techniques to promote learning. Establishes an appropriate standard of behaviour, communication and respect for others. Promotes independent learning; demonstrates awareness of learners’ life experiences, valuing equality, and promoting diversity. Does not challenge inappropriate or discriminatory behaviour and attitudes; fosters teacher-dependence; is unaware of the life experiences of own learners. Fails to promote inclusive values or to set high expectations for learners. Page 74 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Meeting Individual Needs: Comprehensively plans for individual Plans for differentiation, and Works with learners in session to needs, through negotiating learning consistently works with learners to address particular individual goals and activities, working creatively address particular individual learning needs and overcome with learners to address particular learning needs and to overcome identified barriers to learning. individual learning needs and to identified barriers to learning. CoProvides support for learners overcome identified barriers to ordinates any additional learning within the boundaries of the learning. Plans coherently for any support available within the teacher role. additional learning support provided. session. Standards: CP3.2; DP2.2; EP3.2; FS2; FP1.1; FP1.2; FP2.1 Assessment for Learning: Devises, selects, and uses effectively Devises, selects, and uses Selects and uses effectively a a wide variety of innovative and effectively a range of appropriate limited range of assessment tools, engaging assessment tools, (including assessment tools, (including where including active questioning. where appropriate, those which appropriate, those which exploit Occasionally uses new and exploit new and emerging new and emerging technologies). emerging technologies, or makes technologies). Actively promotes Uses peer- and self-assessment as use of peer- and self-assessment peer- and self-assessment as a tool a tool for learning and progression. as a tool for learning. Generally for learning and progression. Uses assessment information to gives clear and constructive Makes questioning and constructive promote learning through feedback on assessment. feedback central mechanisms for questioning and constructive stimulating reflection and learning. feedback. Standards: BP3.2; ES1; ES2; ES3; ES4; EP1.1; EP 1.2, EP 1.3 , EP 2.1; EP2.2; EP3.1; EP4.1 Subject Specialist Teaching: Designs and applies a wide range of Designs and applies a variety of Designs and applies a range of appropriate strategies in teaching own appropriate strategies in teaching appropriate strategies in teaching specialist area, using appropriate and own specialist area, using own specialist area, using innovative ways to enthuse and appropriate and engaging ways to appropriate methods to enthuse motivate learners. Designs and enthuse and motivate learners. and motivate learners. Designs employs creative and realistic Designs and employs effective and and employs suitable, relevant assessment activities relevant to realistic assessment activities assessment activities related to employment opportunities in the appropriate to work in the specialist the specialist subject area. specialist subject area. subject area. Is not aware of any individual learning needs or barriers to learning, or, where aware, fails to plan effectively for these. Is not aware of, or does coordinate effectively with any additional support available. . Uses insufficient or inappropriate assessment of learners, including inadequate use of questioning and constructive feedback. Makes little or no effective use of selfand peer assessment. Demonstrates insufficient knowledge of specialist subject; or fails to select and apply appropriate, interesting or relevant methods for delivering or assessing learner’s knowledge and skills of the subject. Standards: CS2; CS3; CS4; CP1.2; CP 2.1; CP 3.1; CP 3.5; CP 4.2; EP 2.3 Page 75 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Appendix 3 - Individual Development Plan Criteria An outstanding pass in achieving the assessed learning outcomes linked to the IDP A good pass in achieving the assessed learning outcomes linked to the IDP A satisfactory pass in achieving the assessed learning outcomes linked to the IDP A fail in achieving the assessed learning outcomes linked to the IDP Reflection Detailed and systematic evaluation of all lesson plans and challenging targets set, many of which will be innovative / creative. Rigorous and systematic evaluation of own capabilities against relevant given and self-directed targets, as listed in the Target and Review Sheet. Many of these will be complex / nonroutine / innovative / creative. Detailed and systematic end of module reflection on development of own practice and impact on learners, in relation to relevant domain. Shows awareness of organisational and Government policies and relevant research. Detailed evaluation of all lesson plans and challenging targets set, some of which will be innovative / creative. Consistent and detailed evaluation of own capabilities against given and self-directed targets, as listed in the Target and Review Sheet. Some of these will be complex / non-routine / creative. Detailed end of module reflection on development of own practice and impact on learners, in relation to relevant domain. Shows awareness of organisational and Government policies. Evaluation of all lesson plans and appropriate targets set, some of which will be creative. Evaluation of own capabilities against targets listed in the Target and Review Sheet, some of which will be non-routine / creative. End of module reflection on development of own practice and impact on learners, in relation to relevant domain. Shows awareness of organisational policies. Insufficient evaluation of lesson plans and limited / inappropriate targets set. Limited evaluation of own capabilities against targets listed in the Target and Review Sheet. Limited end of module reflection, lacking evidence of development of practice and impact on learners. No awareness of organisational policies. Implementation Submission of all elements of the IDP, as listed in the module contents sheet, which evidence autonomous development and impact on learners and demonstrate initiative and problem solving. Rigorously completed lesson plans with specific learning outcomes and using a range of learning and assessment approaches, which are challenging and encourage innovation / creativity / risk taking. Meeting targets set in Target and Review Sheet, many of which will be complex / non-routine / innovative / creative and demonstrate autonomous development in practice and impact on learners. Submission of all elements of the IDP, as listed in the module contents sheet, which evidence consistent development and impact on learners and demonstrate problem solving. Fully completed and detailed lesson plans with specific learning outcomes and using a range of learning and assessment approaches, which are challenging / encourage innovation / creativity. Meeting targets set in Target and Review Sheet, some of which will be complex / non-routine / creative and demonstrate consistent development in practice and impact on learners. Submission of all elements of the IDP, as listed in the module contents sheet, which evidence steady development of practice and impact on learners. Completed lesson plans with specific learning outcomes and using a range of learning and assessment approaches. Meeting targets set in Target and Review Sheet, some of which will be non-routine / creative and demonstrate steady development in practice and impact on learners. Non-submission of elements of the IDP as listed in the module contents sheet. Limited evidence of development of practice and impact on learners. Incomplete lesson plans with insufficient range of learning and assessment approaches. Lack of progress towards targets set in Target and Review Sheet and limited impact on learners. Page 76 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 Appendix 4 Ethical principles for research involving human participants 1. Informed consent The researcher should, where possible, inform potential participants in advance of any features of the research that might reasonably be expected to influence their willingness to take part in the study. Where the research topic is sensitive, the ethical protocol should include verbatim instructions for the informed consent procedure and consent should be obtained in writing. Where children are concerned, informed consent may be obtained from parents or teachers acting in loco parentis, or from the children themselves if they are of sufficient understanding. However, where the topic of research is sensitive, written informed consent should be obtained from individual parents. 2. Openness and honesty So far as possible, researchers should be open and honest about the research, its purpose and application. Some types of research appear to require deception in order to achieve their scientific purpose. Deception will be approved in experimental procedures only if the following conditions are met: a. b. c. Deception is completely unavoidable if the purpose of the research is to be achieved. The research objective has strong scientific merit. Any potential harm arising from the proposed deception can be effectively neutralised or reversed by the proposed debriefing procedures (see section 5). Failing to inform participants of the specific purpose of the study at the outset is not normally considered to be deception, provided that adequate informed consent and debriefing procedures are proposed. Covert observation should be resorted to only where it is impossible to use other methods to obtain essential data. Ideally, where informed consent has not been obtained prior to the research it should be obtained post hoc. Page 77 Postgraduate Certificate in Education Handbook 2011/2012 3. Right to withdraw Where possible, participants should be informed at the outset of the study that they have the right to withdraw at any time without penalty. In the case of children, those acting in loco parentis or the children themselves if of sufficient understanding, shall be informed of the right to withdraw from participation in the study. 4. Protection from Harm Researchers must endeavour to protect participants from physical and psychological harm at all times during the investigation. Note that where stressful or hazardous procedures are concerned, obtaining informed consent (1) whilst essential, does not absolve the researcher from responsibility for protecting the participant. In such cases, the ethical protocol must specify the means by which the participant will be protected, e.g. by the availability of qualified medical assistance. Where physical or mental harm nevertheless does result from research procedure, investigators are obliged to take action to remedy the problems created. 5. Debriefing Researchers should, where possible, provide an account of the purpose of the study as well as its procedures. If this is not possible at the outset, then ideally it should be provided on completion of the study. 6. Confidentiality Except with the consent of the participant, researchers are required to ensure confidentiality of the participant's identity and data throughout the conduct and reporting of the research. Ethical protocols may need to specify procedures for how this will be achieved. For example, transcriptions of the interviews may be encoded by the secretary so that no written record of the participant's name and data exist side by side. Where records are held on computer, the Data Protection Act also applies. 7. Ethical principles of professional bodies This set of principles is generic and not exhaustive of considerations which apply in all disciplines. Where relevant professional bodies have published their own guidelines and principles, these must be followed and the current principles interpreted and extended as necessary in this context. Page 78