High and tight
Transcription
High and tight
17 the daily deal T hu r sday Decembe r 17 2009 BANKRUPTCY INSIDER a n a b s o l u t e p r i o r i t y f o r b a n k r u p t c y p r o f e s s i o na l s Week of Thursday, December 17, 2009 High and tight Bankruptcy Database The Deal’s online resource for information on filings, advisers, bankruptcy M&A, DIP fundings, exit loans and more. It’s part of your subscription to The Deal Pipeline and pipeline.thedeal.com. As lawyer pay rises, the gap between New York and Delaware shrinks W hile the five largest bankruptcies of 2009 were filed in Manhattan, the difference in pay scale between what debtor counsel there and in Delaware earn is a mere $8 per hour in the New York court’s favor. At least that’s according to a pipeline. thedeal.com study of the five largest cases in terms of assets filed this year in each of those popular bankruptcy venues. The average hourly rate for debtor Volume 6, Issue 24 21 Deal doctors Greenberg Traurig Maher adds Norley, Alberts moves to Dickstein Shapiro, MidOcean Partners appoints Miller chairman Special section: Year in review 23 Debtor-in-possession loans Bankrupt companies secured 356 postpetition loans through Nov. 15, with existing lenders dominating the landscape 30 Exit financings New money remains in short supply, but lending options for debtors are increasing and prices are dropping 33 Private equity filings Easy and cheap debt at the tail end of the buyout boom left many bankruptcies in its wake this year 38 Venture capital filings With capital markets constricted, some 40 VC companies fell into bankruptcy, with a majority heading to liquidation Bankruptcy Insider is published every other Thursday as a feature in The Daily Deal, a service of The Deal Pipeline. For demonstration and subscription information, please call 888-257-6082. close print counsel in the cases filed in Manhattan— Chrysler LLC, Lyondell Chemical Co., General Growth Properties Inc., CIT Group Inc. and General Motors Corp.— is $913, versus $905 for the largest cases filed in Wilmington—Capmark Financial Group Inc., Nortel Networks Inc., R.H. Donnelley Corp., Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. and AbitibiBowater Inc. In reprising the study—we first did it in 2001, looking at large cases and hourly rates for 1990, 1995 and 2000—the $8 gap is the narrowest when comparing those years and cases in 2005 and 2009 in both venues for debtor counsel. Just as interesting, perhaps, is that the $68 schism among associates in the 2009 cases ($604 per hour in Delaware versus $672 in New York) and the $46 gap among paralegals ($227 per hour in Delaware versus $273 in New York) represent the widest in the five years studied. Nowadays, debtor counsel such as Deryck Palmer of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP in the Lyondell case make $1,050 per hour. But in the cases pipeline.thedeal.com looked at in 2001, the hourly rates understandably were much lower. For example, the top earner, Harold Novikoff at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, was billing $675 per hour in W.R. Grace & Co.’s Delaware case. One bankruptcy academic, Lynn LoPucki, Security Pacific Bank professor of law at the UCLA School of Law, calculates that bankruptcy fees have risen at a rate of about 8% to 10% yearly for each CONTINUED > back < Index > cover search view 18 the daily deal Th urs day December 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS the past five years nationwide, regardless of court. That rise is about double the rate of inflation and is about on par with the rising costs of healthcare, he says. But bankruptcy lawyers disagree. They claim the work is getting harder and requires longer hours. “The biggest differences between 2005 and 2009 are the size of the matters, the complexity and the number of large cases that have been filed,” says Richard Cieri of Kirkland & Ellis LLP, who charged $795 per hour to work on Calpine Corp., one of the biggest New York cases in 2005. “Cases now are much larger.” Another New York bankruptcy attorney, who asked not to be named, agrees. “Bankruptcy cases these days have become more and more complicated,” he notes. “Cases these days are also shorter, with several large companies emerging in months instead of years. Our partners and associates are doing more and more work per hour.” Palmer, for example, has logged 1,428 hours of work for the first eight months of Lyondell’s bankruptcy case. And there are attorneys that are charging even more. Witness Adam Plainer of Jones Day, a debtor counsel for Chrysler. Plainer is in Jones Day’s London office and is billing $1,175 an hour (the weak U.S. dollar is likely a factor in that, too), but his part of the case has only consumed about 15.9 hours of work, and so we’re not including him in our analysis. Still, bankruptcy attorneys can’t dispute that they’ve seen a healthy bump in their hourly rate. The highest earners for the largest 2005 cases we looked at in New York and Delaware—N. Lynn Hiestand and J. Gregory Milmoe of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP—each billed $835 per hour for their work in Refco Inc.’s New York bankruptcy. Palmer’s rate is 26% higher, far beyond the rate of inflation. “The rates reflect the tremendous increase in demand,” Cieri says. And Milmoe himself believes bankruptcy attorneys still may not be getting their due. “I do not think that bankruptcy fees have gone up compared to other legal close print fees,” Milmoe says, pointing to a study he’s seen in which several M&A lawyers are charging in excess of $1,100 per hour. “To the contrary, I think bankruptcy fees are lagging behind increases in other fees, on a per-hour basis.” LoPucki isn’t sympathetic to that argument. “There’s no one controlling rates,” he says. “The debtor doesn’t have much incentive to control fees, since a lot of it is essentially being paid by the creditors. The court can’t control fees, because the cases would simply go elsewhere. Put yourself in the judges’ position. If all of the judges in New York got together and said, ‘We’re going to draw a line on fees,’ lawyers will take cases to Delaware.” Partners are not the only ones reaping the benefits of the higher billing rates. Associates who do a significant portion of the work in modern-day bankruptcies as a whole have also received a significant boost in salaries. Take Reuven Falik, an associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP working on the 2009 Delaware bankruptcy filing of AbitibiBowater. The $660 that he is billing per hour is about 33% more than the $495 that Marion Quirk of Skadden charged for serving in a similar role in 2005 in another Delaware case, Birch Telecom Inc. Falik did not return calls for comment. (Besides Birch Telecom, the other 2005 Delaware cases we studied were Foamex International Inc., Meridian Automotive Systems Inc., FLYi Inc. and American Business Financial Services Inc. In New York, besides Calpine and Refco, we looked at Delphi Corp., Northwest Airlines Corp. and Delta Air Lines Inc.) The same increases also apply to paralegals. Cadwalader is billing $385 for Wendy Kane in Lyondell, the most in the 2009 cases we looked at. That rate is 60% higher than the top rate for 2005 cases—the $240 that Kirkland billed for Beth Friedman in Calpine. The pay scale in Delaware is growing faster than the one in New York, too. The highest-earning debtor counsel in the Delaware cases billed at an average of $905 per hour, a 21% higher clip in 2009 than the $747 they did in 2005. In the New York back < Index > cover cases, there was a 17% rise between 2009’s $913 and 2005’s $779. The top associates fared the best, however. Delaware associates are earning a whopping 45% more today than they did in 2005, with their average rate for five cases rising to $604 an hour from $417. Associates in New York are narrowly outpaced but still enjoy a 44% increase in pay ($672 in 2009 versus $468 in 2005.) The boost for paralegals mirrored those of partners. In Delaware, the $227 per hour average in 2009 was 27% loftier than 2005’s $179. In Manhattan, the $273 average rate in 2009 was an impressive 52% higher than the $180 four years earlier. What associates and paralegals are billing is noteworthy, since they are amassing more billable hours than partners. But one reason for this, Milmoe says, is that “partners delegate work down for cost efficiency.” After all, assigning mundane paperwork to a paralegal billing for $150 an hour is more cost efficient than having a $950 per hour partner deal with it. In 2005, there was little difference between the pay scale of paralegals in New York and Delaware. Manhattan had a $1 an hour edge. The mere fact that the gap has widened by $45 since then speaks to the fact that Manhattan is attracting many more cases. Alas, it’s something that Delaware, which once before eclipsed Manhattan’s dominance as a bankruptcy venue, is aware of. “Of course,” LoPucki says. “They compete for the big cases. Big-case bankruptcy is a business for Delaware. It’s an important industry for the state. In New York, it’s an important industry for the bankruptcy community. Neither jurisdiction wants to lose big cases.” And neither really has. In 2005, of the 10 largest Chapter 11 cases, six were filed in New York and one was filed in Delaware. Their dominance has grown in 2009; of the 10 largest Chapter 11 cases, six were filed in Manhattan and three were filed in Delaware. That means hourly pay for partners, associates and paralegals is only likely to keep growing in both jurisdictions. n —Kevin Fung search view 19 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW BANKRUPTCY FEES LARGEST CASES Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 DELAWARE 2005 Debtor counsel / co-counsel Hourly fee Partner Hourly fee Associate Paralegal Hourly fee Various paralegals $125-$195 Various paralegals $155 Debbie Laskin $175 Lauren Hoeflich $165 Debtor: Birch Telecom Inc.* Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP $825 J. Gregory Milmoe Mark S. Chehi 695 Alan Kornberg $785 Brian Hermann 585 $495 Marion Quirk Christopher Chow 430 Justin Brass, Ephraim Diamond 435 Pang Lee 310 Debtor: Foamex International Inc.* Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP Pauline K. Morgan M. Blake Cleary Debtor: Meridian Automotive Systems Inc.* Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP James Conlan, Larry Nyhan Janet Henderson Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP $460 Joseph Barry $325 385 Kenneth Enos 225 $725 Paul Caruso $450 650 Lori Kujawski 250 $475 Robert Brady $345 Edward Kosmowski, Edmon Morton 95 Susan Summerfield Thomas Hartzell $170 D.M. Sciabarassi $205 $325 Debbie Laskin $175 225 Michelle Smith 110 220 Ian Fredericks Debtor: FLYi Inc.* Jones Day Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP Paul Leake $725 Brad Erens 605 $460 Brendan Linehan Shannon 385 M. Blake Cleary Debtor: American Business Financial Services Inc.* Blank Rome LLP Thomas Biron, Michael Brownstein Hangley Aronchick Segal & Pudlin $595 Raymond Patella 300 Joseph Dworetzky $505 Alan Promer $430 S. Friedman 260 K.M. Neff, R.S. Barr Joseph Malfitano Ian Fredericks $275 J. Staib 195 L. McCloskey $275 Matthew Hamermesh $210 J. Recchiuti 190 M. Dero $150 Jennifer Grieves, Christine Hewlett 300 DELAWARE 2009 Debtor: Capmark Financial Group Inc.† Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP $625-$995 Richards, Layton & Finger PA Mark Collins $675 $385-$625 Jason Madron $345 Lee Kaufman 275 $155-$275 Aja McDowell $195 Various paralegals $275 Debtor: Nortel Networks Inc.* Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP James Bromley $940 Lisa Schweitzer 870 Robert Dehney $725 Derek Abbott, Eric Schwartz 550 Jesus Beltran, Sandrine Cousquer, Sanjeet Malik $605 Daniel Butz $415 210 Various paralegals 265 Erin Fay $205 Angela Conway, Renae Fusco Emma Campbell, Jason Kittinger 190 Debtor: R.H. Donnelley Corp.* Sidley Austin LLP James Conlan Jeffrey Bjork, Paul Caruso Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP $925 700 $625 Bojan Guzina Nancy Lusk $190 Melissa Bertsch, Casey Cathcart $155 375 Various associates Robert Brady $610 Edmon Morton 480 $325 Kenneth Enos 310 $925 Bojan Guzina $625 650 Peter Booth Donald Bowman 145 Anastasia Joseck Debtor: Smurfit Stone Container Corp.* Sidley Austin LLP James Conlan, Larry Nyhan Dennis Twomey Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP 315 Robert Brady $610 Matthew Lunn $375 Edmon Morton 480 Robert Poppiti 260 Kelley Cornish $925 Reuven Falik $660 $230 Nancy Lusk 150 Michelle Smith Debtor: AbitibiBowater Inc.* Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP 395 Various associates Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP Joel Waite Pauline Morgan $610 Sean Greecher $330 600 Pilar Kraman 240 William Keller, Joseph Monzione $225 165 Sharon-Cind Meister $210 Debbie Laskin 145 Anastasia Joseck Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 20 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW BANKRUPTCY FEES LARGEST CASES Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 NEW YORK 2005 Debtor counsel / co-counsel Hourly fee Partner Hourly fee Associate Paralegal Hourly fee Various paralegals $60- $230 Various paralegals $75-$230 Debtor: Refco Inc.* Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP N. Lynn Hiestand, J. Gregory Milmoe Eric Davis, Felicia Gerber Perlman $835 Various associates $540 695 Loren Friedman, Douglas Herrmann, Karen Skomorucha 295 $826 Chris Dickerson, Christian Pilkington $540 Debtor: Delphi Corp.* Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP N. Lynn Hiestand John Lyons 645 Allison Verderber Herriott 354 Debtor: Northwest Airlines Corp.* Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Bruce Zirinsky Gregory Petrick $800 Ingrid Bagby, Deborah Piazza 665 Alexander Strom $470 Peter Vail $215 230 Donna Kirk 100 Debtor: Calpine Corp.* Kirkland & Ellis LLP Richard Cieri Edward Sassower $795 Leonard Budyonny, Evan Gartenlaub, Javier Schiffrin 520 Robert Urband $455 Beth Friedman $240 330 Michael Levin 105 Debtor: Delta Air Lines Inc.† John Fouhey, Marshall Huebner, Benjamin Kaminetzky Davis Polk & Wardwell $495-$785 $195-$475 $70-$220 NEW YORK 2009 Debtor: Lyondell Chemical Co.* Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Deryck Palmer Christopher Mirick $1,050 Scott Griffin, Doug Mintz 700 Various associates $615 Wendy Kane $385 335 Victoria Taylor 135 Debtor: CIT Group Inc.† Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP $730-$995 $360-835 $175-$295 Debtor: GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES INC.* Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP Marcia Goldstein Kelly Dybala Kirkland & Ellis LLP James Sprayregen $950 Elisa Lemmer 725 Gabriel Morgan $965 Chad Husnick, Scott Kitei $640 Kathleen Lee, Christopher Stauble $245 355 Ramesh Dhanaraj 95 $610 Beth Friedman $275 Debtor: General Motors Corp.† Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP $650-$950 $355-$640 $155-$290 Debtor: Chrysler LLC* Jones Day Corinne Ball, David Heiman 575 Carl Black $600 E.L. Goodman, D.M. Hirtzel, M.B. Stone $900 V. Roovers 225 A.K. Sobczak G.R. Howard *Interim fee application † Retention motion close $275 250 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com print back < Index > cover search view 21 the daily deal Thursday Decem ber 17 2009 DEAL DOCTORS MOVERS & SHAKERS L yndon Norley has joined Greenberg Traurig Maher LLP to launch its restructuring practice. Before joining the U.K. branch of Greenberg Traurig LLP, the London shareholder led the European restructuring practice of Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. He was debtor counsel for Dura Automotive Systems Inc. and advised the administrators of Collins & Aikman Europe. In addition, Norley has worked on the restructurings of Groupe Eurotunnel SA, J.L. French Automotive Castings Inc., Nybron Flooring International, Sea Containers Ltd. and UAL Corp. Dickstein Shapiro LLP has added Sam J. Alberts to its bankruptcy and creditors’ rights practice in Washington. Alberts previously led the Washington financial restructuring and insolvency group of White & Case LLP. Before that, he was a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP. He has served as debtor counsel for Sunchase Capital Partners XI LLC and Mirant Corp., represented creditors of MCSi Inc., Hospital Partners of America Inc. and Lehman Brothers International (Europe) Ltd. and was liquidating trustee of Doctors Community Healthcare Corp. Middle-market private equity firm MidOcean Partners LP has named restructuring veteran Robert S. Miller chairman. Miller last served as executive chairman of Delphi Corp. (he earlier was chairman and CEO) and has also led the incourt restructurings of Bethlehem Steel Corp. and Federal-Mogul Corp. He began his career at Ford Motor Co. in 1968 and subsequently worked at Chrysler Corp. for 13 years, where he led the financial negotiations with some 400 lenders and the federal government that resulted in the Chrysler Corp. Loan Guarantee Act of 1979. Miller was a senior partner at investment bank James D. Wolfensohn Inc. from 1992 to 1993. He currently is a director of American International Group Inc., Symantec Corp. and UAL. Former MidOcean chairman Mark An- close print gelson remains a board member. In September he became chairman and CEO of World Color Press Inc., the post-Chapter 11 name of Quebecor World Inc. He previously was nonexecutive chairman. MidOcean appointed Angelson chairman in December 2007 following his retirement as CEO of printing services company R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Investment management firm Consilium Investment Management has launched a fund focused on debtor-in-possession financing and superpriority loan opportunities. In a statement, Consilium chief investment officer Jonathan Binder said “reduced competition and recent history of increasing bankruptcies have created an opportunity of unusual magnitude for participating in DIP financing.” The firm called attention to what it said was the current “highly constrained” role of banks in postpetition funding. Consilium joins the roster of firms that recently launched funds that at least in part will participate in DIP financing: Tennenbaum Capital Partners LLC (the $330 million Tennenbaum DIP Opportunity Fund LLC), Sankaty Advisors LLC (roughly $673 million raised for Sankaty DIP Opportunities Fund), Third Avenue Management Inc. (Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund, a mutual fund), Brookfield Asset Management Inc. (a C$1 billion [$950 million] distressed-debt fund) and Marlin Equity Partners LLC (the $650 million Marlin Equity III LP). The vehicles are part of a wave of new distressed debt and equity funds. Brad Hillier has shifted to the New York office of AlixPartners LLC. The director formerly was national service line leader for KPMG LLP’s restructuring network and led its cash and liquidity service. He earlier was a director at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Investment bank Global Hunter Securities LLC has added Steve Sebastian as co-head of financial advisory and restruc- back < Index > cover turing services. The managing director will work with counterpart Jeff Zolkin from a new Los Angeles office. Sebastian previously was a managing director at Chanin Capital Partners. Before that, he provided financing to middle-market companies at Ravenscourt Capital and worked at Bear, Stearns & Co. and Bankers Trust Co. He has been financial adviser to Crescent Jewelers Inc. and investment banker for Legacy Estate Group LLC. Sarah Smith has joined the London office of Bingham McCutchen LLP. The Bingham partner was co-head of Sidley Austin LLP’s international finance group in London and led the firm’s Singapore finance practice from 1996 to 1998. She will initially focus on general restructuring and finance matters. Fred Zeidman is the newest principal at XRoads Solutions Group LLC. He joins the firm’s global energy practice in Houston. Zeidman most recently was chief restructuring officer of Transmeridian Exploration Inc. and interim president of Nova Biosource Fuels Inc. He also served as CEO, president and chairman of Seitel Inc. during a turnaround of the company. The International Women’s Insolvency & Restructuring Confederation honored N. Lynn Hiestand on Dec. 4 as 2009 Woman of the Year in Restructuring. The Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP partner, who serves as co-head of the law firm’s European corporate restructuring practice, switched to restructuring in the early 1990s from mergers and acquisitions work. She helped build Skadden’s London restructuring practice. The group, founded in 2004, now has 11 fulltime members. She recently has represented Nokia Siemens Networks BV in its bid for the wireless infrastructure business of Nortel Networks Corp.; Koenigsegg Automotive AB and investors in their bid for Saab Automobile AB; Nomura Holdings CONTINUED > search view 22 the daily deal Thursday Decem ber 17 2009 DEAL DOCTORS MOVERS & SHAKERS < PREVIOUS Inc. in its acquisition of certain Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. assets; Hayes Lemmerz International Inc.; and the joint liquidators of Flightlease Holdings (Guernsey) Ltd. and other affiliates of Swissair Group AG. Hiestand previously was debtor counsel for Comdisco Inc., Delphi, Kmart Corp. and Refco Inc.; represented asset acquirer UC Rusal in the Kaiser Aluminum Corp. case; and advised lender Deutsche Bank AG in the OAO NK Yukos case. She began her career at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP after clerking for Judge Pierce Lively of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP has elected five new partners, including financial restructuring associates Evan Fleck and Tyson M. Lomazow in New York. Fleck represents the official committee of unsecured creditors of Lehman Brothers and has served as debtor counsel to Northwest Airlines Corp. and Enron Corp. He also has represented the creditors’ committee of Heartland Automotive Holdings Inc. and Calpine Corp. noteholders. Lomazow has advised debtor Corn Exchange LLC, the DIP agents for Hayes Lemmerz and Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc., unsecured banks of Capmark Financial Group Inc. and the creditors’ committee of VI Acquisition Corp. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP has appointed three new partners and six new counsel, effective Jan. 1, including business finance and restructuring attorneys Ronit Berkovich and Elisa Lemmer. Berkovich, a New York senior associate, joins Weil’s partnership. She serves as debtor counsel for BearingPoint Inc., Motors Liquidation Co., Lehman Brothers and Lenox Group Inc. and previously represented WorldCom Inc., Parmalat Finanziaria SpA and Vertis Inc., as well as the examiner of FiberMark Inc. Lemmer, a Miami associate, will become counsel. close print turing; bidder Ice Edge Holdings LLC in the Dewey Ranch Hockey LLC case; and first-lien lenders of UTGR Inc. Hottest debtor-inpossession lenders Ranked by number of new loans and total loan volume during the three months ended Dec. 10 Rank 1 2 Rank Firm No. of new DIPs General Electric Co. 5 Bank of America NA 3 Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch 3 Firm Volume ($mill.) 1 Bank of America NA $557.5 2 3239432 Nova Scotia Co. 219.0 3 Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch 175.0 4 Wilmington Trust FSB 150.0 Goldman Sachs Lending Partners LLC 105.0 Jefferies Finance LLC 105.0 5 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com Latham & Watkins LLP has named 23 new partners and 13 new counsel, effective Jan. 1. New tax partner Julie Marion in Chicago and corporate partners Dirk Kocher in Hamburg, Rory Negus in London, Kilian Helmreich in Munich and Hiroki Kobayashi in Tokyo all have some experience with corporate restructuring or insolvency. Similarly, finance counsel Olivier Vermeulen in Doha, Qatar, has debt restructuring experience, and employment law counsel Lionel Vuidard in Paris has advised in restructurings. Scott Greenberg will be the newest special counsel in the financial restructuring department of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP next year. The New York attorney has represented Lyondell Chemical Co., Atkins Nutritionals Inc. and Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers of New York; the Portland Trailblazers in an out-of-court restruc- back < Index > cover White & Case has elected 33 partners, including four in its global financial restructuring and insolvency practice. New York-based Scott Greissman joined the firm in January 2004 and represents potential acquirer Pilot Travel Centers LLC in the Flying J Inc. case. Michael Shepherd joined the Miami office of White & Case in 2006. Thierry Bosly in Brussels is counsel to interested parties of Lobster Land Sea Products, creditor Frank Roberts & Sons Ltd. in the Nucta NV case and lenders to Plastal Holding AB. London-based Mark Glengarry has represented Cordiant Group plc, a steering committee of lenders for JVH Gaming Group, Deutsche Bank in several restructurings and aircraft finance parties in the Delta Air Lines Inc. and Northwest Airlines Corp. cases. Iker I. Arriola Peñalosa in Mexico City and Carsten Rodemann in Berlin also have restructuring experience. Citigroup Inc. may have edged Bank of America Corp. for top DIP lender in 2009 through Nov. 15 (see story, page 23), but it’s BofA that ends the year as the hottest postpetition lender. The Charlotte, N.C., bank provided $557.5 million in DIP funding in the three months ended Dec. 10, far outdistancing 3239432 Nova Scotia Co., which lent C$230 million ($219 million) to AbitibiConsolidated Inc. General Electric Co. was the most prolific lender, supplying $41.83 million through five DIPs. BofA and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch finished second for their involvement in three loans. Figures for all the hottest DIP lenders are down sharply since the last time Bankruptcy Insider checked on March 31. That’s not surprising, however, since DIP issuance has tailed off from $14.24 billion in the first quarter to $2.25 billion for the three months ended Dec. 10. n —David Elman search view 23 the daily deal T hur s day Dece mber 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Wresting the reins With debtors deeply leveraged, prepetition lenders have had firm control of debtor-in-possession lending D espite a severe restriction in credit markets that traces its roots to the late 2008 bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., it has been a record-setting year for debtor-in-possession financing by almost any measure, and to be sure, an imaginative one. For all the talk of a virtually nonexistent DIP lending market, debtors in 2009 had raised 356 DIPs totaling $59.67 billion through Nov. 15, compared with 300 DIPs totaling $17.36 billion over the same period a year earlier, according to pipeline. thedeal.com. (See table, pages 26 to 29.) Obviously, this year’s numbers are substantially skewed by the mammoth DIPs lent by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and Export Development Canada in the megabankruptcies of General Motors Corp. (which received $33.3 billion in DIP financing) and Chrysler LLC ($4.96 billion). But even after removing those government-funded cases from the equation, debtors had secured $21.41 billion in DIP financing through Nov. 15, still more than last year’s total and way ahead of the pace through the same period in 2007 (206 DIPs totalling $13.45 billion) and 2006 (186 DIPs totalling $6.35 billion). But the raw numbers don’t tell half of the story. One of the defining aspects of this bankruptcy cycle is the heavily layered capital structures debtors enter Chapter 11 with and how those complicated structures define the real power brokers in each case. “The systemic problem is the fact that the pyramid [of corporate debt] is so broad at the base, there are so many co-lenders in each loan, it’s almost like a sociological experiment” trying to get them on the same page, says Scott Baena, chair of the restructuring and bankruptcy group at Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP. The Miami attorney says in modern Chapter 11 restructurings a debtor rarely negotiates directly with the agents for its close print prepetition debt. These agents have essentially been reduced to the role of “ballot-takers,” he says. Deeply levered debtors also usually have little or no unencumbered assets to offer traditional strategic DIP lenders as collateral. Absent a priming battle in bankruptcy court—a rare occurrence, but always lengthy and expensive—a DIP lender cannot move in and prime an existing lender’s security interests. Add to that a decline in valuations virtually across the board, which leaves a very slim equity cushion (if there’s one at “We still haven’t seen a really true, new DIP lender, one that’s looking for an opportunity to lend strictly for a return on capital.” —Brett Barragate all) that DIP lenders can look to as security. The result, regardless of third parties with the funds and desire to enter the lucrative DIP market, has been a shift to an era of postpetition financing dominated by existing lenders, which, more often than not, happen to be traditional banks with no real appetite for bankruptcy lending. For example, not including Treasury and EDC, Citigroup Inc. was the biggest DIP lender this year through Nov. 15, providing $2.4 billion through seven loans. Bank of America Corp. is next with 29 DIPs totaling $2.33 billion, followed by General Electric Co. ($1.12 billion, 22 DIPs), UBS AG ($953.17 million, seven DIPs), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ($911.99 million, two DIPs), Wells Fargo & Co. ($876.83 million through a back < Index > cover 2009 high of 33 DIPs), Deutsche Bank AG ($856.34 million, seven DIPs) and J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. ($826.7 million, 11 DIPs). Since the credit markets dried up, “we still haven’t seen a really true, new DIP lender, one that’s looking for an opportunity to lend strictly for a return on their capital,” says Brett Barragate, co-head of Jones Day’s financial institutions litigation and regulation group. Barragate, like many of the bankruptcy professionals interviewed for this article, noted that in the rare case when a debtor could raise a third-party DIP this year, it usually came from an investor looking to acquire its assets out of bankruptcy and using the loan as a bridge to a Section 363 sale. For example, Sun Capital Partners Inc. used the strategy to purchase Catterton Partners portfolio company Lang Holdings Inc. out of bankruptcy. Lang entered Chapter 11 on July 16 with a $16 million DIP from Sun Capital affiliate Sun Lang Finance LLC. The Boca Raton, Fla., investment firm teamed with Catterton to form LHI Enterprises Inc. to buy Lang. Sun Capital credit-bid roughly $15 million outstanding on its DIP, while Catterton credit-bid a portion of debt it acquired from prepetition lender Bank of America. “The concept of hiring an investment banker to get the right terms for DIP financing and get [lenders] to compete against each other” largely no longer exists in the current Chapter 11 landscape, says Cathy Hershcopf, a partner in Cooley Godward Kronish LLP’s bankruptcy and restructuring group. This dominance of traditional banks in the market for DIP lending has changed the landscape of how DIPs are structured. Refinancing, or rolling up, outstanding debt into a DIP loan is by no means a new phenomenon. But in 2009, existing lend- CONTINUED > search view 24 the daily deal T hursday Dece mber 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS ers were as forceful and creative as ever in rolling up their debt, which gives them priority above almost all other creditors in repayment. The end result was not a lot of bang for the overall buck, so to speak, for debtors. The 356 DIPs raised by debtors through Nov. 15 include $50.37 billion, or 84.4%, “new money.” Take GM and Chrysler out of the equation, though, and the remaining DIPs include $12.11 billion, or just 56.5%, in new money. (For more on the top newmoney lenders, see page 25.) In other words, DIP lenders excluding Treasury and EDC used almost half of their total DIP commitments to roll up their existing debt. Rolling up large amounts of debt often does not afford debtors with enough new capital to survive a Chapter 11 case and often serves only as a means for existing lenders to keep the lights on long enough to liquidate their collateral. Though it filed for Chapter 11 in late 2008, Circuit City Stores Inc. is perhaps the best and well-known example of the consequences to this practice. The electronics retailer entered bankruptcy armed with a $1.1 billion DIP from existing lenders led by BofA, GE Capital Markets Inc. and Wells Fargo Retail Finance LLC. The size of the DIP was misleading, however, as it rolled up some $898 million outstanding on Circuit City’s $1.3 billion prepetition line of credit. When Circuit City could not raise $75 million in junior financing as required by the DIP’s terms—and when it missed revenue projections to boot—its DIP lenders pulled the plug and forced the chain into liquidation. In early 2009, two bankruptcies brought with them the introduction of a new, creative way to incentivize lenders to fund large DIP loans with new capital. Lyondell Chemical Co.’s $8.5 billion DIP (the second-largest commitment in 2009, behind only GM’s) and Aleris International Inc.’s $1.62 billion DIP both feature a dollar-for-dollar rollup of prepetition debt. Lyondell’s DIP includes a $6.5 billion close print term loan, half of which is new funding, while the remainder rolls up prepetition debt. (The DIP also includes a $1.52 billion revolver, expandable to $2 billion, to replace existing working capital facilities.) Similarly, in addition to a $575 million revolver, Aleris’ DIP rolls up as much as $540 million in term debt and contains roughly $500 million in new money. Such a structure gives lenders incentive to lend new money to a bankrupt company and provides debtors with enough capital—and time—to successfully reorganize. “What we saw this year in the way of these imaginative devices is a testament to how we started the year without [financing] and clawed our way through it with incentive-driven DIPs.” —Scott Baena “What we saw this year in the way of these imaginative devices is a testament to how we started the year without [financing] and clawed our way through it with incentive-driven DIPs,” Baena says. On the heels of Lyondell and Aleris’ creative DIPs, it seemed in the beginning of the year that virtually every bankruptcy loan with a substantial new-money commitment would include a dollar-for-dollar rollup. ION Media Networks Inc. entered bankruptcy in May with a $300 million DIP that included $150 million in new money and rolled up an equal portion of existing debt. (The broadcast television station operator ultimately scrapped the rollup portion of the loan after it met resistance from first-lien lenders not invited to participate in the rollup, a routine objection when the technique is used.) back < Index > cover But rather than becoming the new norm in bankruptcy financings, DIPs with this structure may be only a sign of the turbulent times of early 2009. “The only reason you need a rollup is that there’s no third-party capital available for a DIP,” says Mark Cohen, head of restructuring and workout at Deutsche Bank. “Rollups are a sign of a fractured market.” Cohen, who led Deutsche’s team that participated in Aleris’ DIP, says it is unlikely there will be more dollar-for-dollar rollups going forward “unless we see another market setback.” “They are not a normal market feature” but rather a classic example of defensive DIP financing, he says. While Aleris and Lyondell were able to persuade their existing lenders to commit new money in bankruptcy by creating innovative DIP structures, dozens of other companies were forced to consent to more basic rollups of their debt through DIP loans. One debtor in particular, though, became the envy of all bankrupt companies. General Growth Properties Inc., which owns and operates 200 malls in 44 states, entered Chapter 11 with a $375 million all-new-money DIP from equity holder Pershing Square Capital Management LP but ultimately found itself with three prospective lending groups. Interest in providing GGP with a DIP was such that the debtor decided to hold an auction to choose the best proposal, a scenario unheard of in the current DIP market and rare at any time. The Chicago company eventually chose a $400 million DIP from existing unsecured creditors led by Farallon Capital Management LLC. The loan, like at least one other proposal, can be paid back by converting outstanding debt to equity, a sign that the lenders on board see value in a reorganized GGP. “The fact that there was a potential equity upside in the DIP set it apart,” says David Feldman of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, counsel to Farallon in the CONTINUED > search view 25 the daily deal Th ursday De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS ION Media has the option to either pay back its DIP in cash or convert the facility into a 62.5% equity stake upon exiting bankruptcy. That such equity conversions have crept into DIP agreements this year is a sign of the times. The conversion gives debtors something extra to offer in excase. Though GGP had the Pershing DIP change for the DIP and also helps them in place when it filed bankruptcy, it did avoid raising more cash in unfavorable not draw down from the loan. Instead, markets to pay down the loan upon exitit used some $209 million in cash collating bankruptcy. eral to fund operations of its malls But for those on the bottom of during the first three weeks of its bankruptcy’s pecking order, such case. All the while, GGP solicited as unsecured creditors, the innorival proposals. vation can increasingly take them “The company went out and Corporate debtors got a government bailout as G-men out of the money, especially with cut a deal initially on a DIP that drove bankruptcy financing with unmatched velocity. The valuations down virtually across many parties believed was a rich U.S. Department of the Treasury took the checkered flag the board. deal for the DIP lender. That’s as the most powerful “new money” DIP lender in 2009 Equity conversions in DIP why parties that had a stake in through Nov. 15. agreements are “really not favored GGP felt that they could do betTreasury pumped $28.1 billion of high-octane financial by the court because they come to ter,” says Feldman, referring to the fuel into two stalled automakers, Chrysler LLC and Generthe disadvantage of prepetition Farallon-led group, and the third al Motors Corp. The government of Canada rode shotgun creditors who were hoping for bidder, Goldman Sachs Group on the car company deals, with its Export Development some of the equity value,” BarInc., owed about $225 million in Canada vehicle churning out $10.2 billion in new-money ragate says. “You’re taking someprepetition debt. volume. thing off the table [for the junior To be sure, GGP was not the Chasing the federal funds rate, from the private seccreditors], and courts are generonly debtor to enter Chapter 11 tor, were Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and UBS ally reluctant” to approve them. this year with a DIP loan not faAG. Merrill Lynch Capital Corp.’s $812.5 million injection Cohen says equity convervored by other creditors. But uninto insolvent Lyondell Chemical Co. was the engine that sions in DIP loans are a product like most debtors in this current propelled BofA into third place, which revved up 24 transof debtors’ inability to raise tracycle, GGP had something to offer actions worth $2 billion. Citi, meanwhile, provided $1.6 bilditional third-party financing in a third-party lender. lion through five deals. UBS rounded out the top five with bankruptcy. Much like dollar-for“The view was that there was seven deals valued at $945 million. —Neil Malcolm dollar rollups, he does not expect enough equity in some of the to regularly see such features in properties and some significant DIPs as credit markets improve. Top “new money” DIP lenders unencumbered assets ... and [ex“We’re at the front end of what Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 tra] cash on the balance sheet” to I think will be a very good part No. of New-money serve as collateral, Feldman says, of the cycle,” says Cohen, who Rank Lender * volume commitments ($mill.) speaking about Farallon’s interest expects to see “a wave” of exit fiU.S. Department in particular. nancings in 2010. 1 of the Treasury 2 $28,094.0 Despite the competition for That surge, already building, 2 Export Development Canada 2 10,166.0 its DIP, though, GGP still paid a would be welcome news to debtsteep price. The loan is priced at ors and DIP lenders alike. Barra3 Bank of America Corp. 24 1,968.1 LIBOR plus 1,200 basis points (a gate says that absent a functionhigh but not unheard-of coupon ing exit financing market, debtors 4 Citigroup Inc. 5 1,588.5 in the first half of the year) and with no light at the end of the 5 UBS AG 7 945.0 includes a 3.75% exit fee for Fartunnel will continue to be hard allon. pressed in raising third-party DIP 6 Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 2 832.5 Most notably, however, Faralfinancing. lon and the other lenders parThat, of course, would leave 7 General Electric Co. 15 640.9 ticipating in the loan can convert traditional banks to fill the void as 8 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 8 634.9 outstanding amounts on the DIP they’ve done for the better part of into either 8% of GGP’s fully di2009. 9 Deutsche Bank AG 6 587.7 luted common stock or 9.9% of Says Barragate of mainstream the common stock issued on the banks dominating the DIP lend10 Wells Fargo & Co. 22 409.6 effective date of a reorganization ing landscape: “It’s become sort *Includes commitments by affiliates or units Source: pipeline.thedeal.com plan, court filings show. Similarly, of a fact of life.” n —John Blakeley Department of finance close print back < Index > cover search view 26 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Fresh funds “New money” debtor-in-possession financing Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Commitment ($mill.) Debtor % new money Filing date Debtor Commitment ($mill.) % new money Filing date 100.0% 1/2/09 Crescent Oil Co. $3.3 100.0% 2/7/09 Recycled Paper Greetings Inc. 10.0 100.0 1/2/09 S & K Famous Brands Inc. 13.0 42.3 2/9/09 Interlake Material Handling Inc. 41.5 15.6 1/5/09 Caritas Health Care Inc. 19.6 100.0 2/10/09 Smitty’s Building Supply Inc. 10.5 47.0 1/5/09 SkyMark Holdings Inc. 1.7 100.0 2/11/09 Lyondell Chemical Co. 8,500.0 38.2 1/6/09 Foothills Texas Inc. 2.5 100.0 2/11/09 Lyondell Chemical Co. 75.0 100.0 2/11/09 0.5 100.0 2/11/09 Broadstripe LLC $15.0 100.0 100.0 1/7/09 Pliant Corp. Clearwater Natural Resources LP 10.0 100.0 1/7/09 IdentiPHI Inc. MGP Auburn Gresham LLC 0.8 100.0 1/9/09 Aleris International Inc. 1,615.9 42.8 2/12/09 Retail Pro Inc. 1.3 100.0 1/10/09 Nailite International Inc. 3.0 100.0 2/13/09 Merisant Worldwide Inc. 20.0 100.0 1/11/09 Pacifica of the Valley Corp. 24.6 0.0 2/17/09 Tronox Inc. 125.0 100.0 1/12/09 Cascade Grain 2.0 0.0 2/17/09 Apex Silver Mines Ltd. 35.0 100.0 1/12/09 Forward Foods LLC 4.0 100.0 2/17/09 Shane Co. 10.5 100.0 1/12/09 Flying J Inc. 11.5 100.0 2/18/09 Tarragon Corp. 6.3 100.0 1/12/09 Foamex International Inc. 95.0 59.0 2/18/09 Think Global AS 5.7 100.0 1/13/09 WL Homes LLC 30.9 74.1 2/19/09 Gottschalks Inc. 125.0 100.0 1/14/09 Terra Nostra Resources Corp. 0.1 0.0 2/19/09 3.5 100.0 1/14/09 Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. 0.4 100.0 2/20/09 VeraSun Energy Corp. 110.6 27.7 1/15/09 Blue Note Caribou Mining 0.8 100.0 2/20/09 Pecus ARG Holding Inc. 71.5 6.7 1/15/09 Ritz Camera Centers Inc. 85.0 35.9 2/22/09 Marine Drive Properties Ltd. 2.1 100.0 1/15/09 Philadelphia Newspapers LLC 25.0 100.0 2/22/09 65.0 100.0 1/16/09 Pasadera Country Club LLC 1.2 100.0 2/24/09 160.0 0.0 1/23/09 Everything But Water LLC 11.0 100.0 2/25/09 1.2 100.0 1/23/09 Ittierre SpA 38.3 100.0 2/25/09 750.0 100.0 1/26/09 We Recycle! Inc. 0.0 100.0 2/25/09 5.0 100.0 1/26/09 Summitt Logistics & Brokerage LLC 4.2 100.0 3/2/09 29.2 14.2 1/27/09 100.0 SLS International Inc. 0.6 100.0 3/3/09 0.2 1/27/09 58.0 20.7 1/28/09 Autobacs Strauss Inc. 20.0 100.0 3/3/09 Brighter Minds Media LLC 3.5 0.0 1/29/09 Tahera Diamond Corp. 0.4 100.0 3/3/09 Renew Energy LLC 2.5 100.0 1/30/09 Jameson House Properties Ltd. 4.7 100.0 3/4/09 Global Aircraft Solutions Inc. 1.0 100.0 1/30/09 G.I. Joe’s Holding Corp. 51.2 8.2 3/4/09 Agriprocessors Inc. 25.0 67.8 1/30/09 Magna Entertainment Corp. 62.5 100.0 3/5/09 Ernie Haire Ford Inc. 1.0 100.0 2/3/09 1.3 100.0 3/5/09 235.0 31.9 2/3/09 Right Start Acquisition Co. 2.5 100.0 2/3/09 Innovatier Inc. 0.2 100.0 2/3/09 Wadley Regional Medical Center Propex Inc. Hartmarx Corp. HPG International Inc. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. Rock Well Petroleum Inc. TallyGenicom LP Millennium Transit Services LLC Equity Media Holdings Corp. Spectrum Brands Inc. Solstice LLC Pacific Energy Resources Ltd. 182.7 21.9 3/8/09 St. Mary’s Hospital 20.0 55.0 3/9/09 0.5 100.0 3/9/09 135.0 29.6 3/10/09 Tahera Diamond Corp. 3.9 100.0 3/10/09 Ghost Town Partners LLC 0.5 100.0 3/11/09 North American Scientific Inc. 1.0 100.0 3/11/09 We Recycle! Inc. Milacron Inc. ManagedStorage International Inc. 32.9 0.0 2/4/09 On-Site Sourcing Inc. 38.8 100.0 2/5/09 6.7 50.8 2/5/09 80.0 100.0 2/5/09 Millennium Transit Services LLC 0.1 100.0 2/5/09 Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp. 12.0 100.0 2/6/09 Contech U.S. LLC 7.2 100.0 2/6/09 Bruno’s Supermarkets LLC 4.0 100.0 2/6/09 Qimonda Richmond LLC Bruno’s Supermarkets LLC Fortunoff Holdings LLC Strasburg-Jarvis Inc. 5.1 3.2 3/11/09 Scottsdale Auto Salon LLC 0.3 100.0 3/11/09 Biltrite Rubber (1984) Inc. 1.5 100.0 3/12/09 Appalachian Oil Co. 3.4 100.0 3/12/09 60.0 100.0 3/13/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 27 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Fresh funds “New money” debtor-in-possession financing Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Commitment ($mill.) Debtor % new money Filing date Debtor Commitment ($mill.) Amerlink Ltd. $0.2 100.0% 3/16/09 Humboldt Creamery LLC Drug Fair Group Inc. 40.0 0.0 3/18/09 Wingspeed Corp. Fairchild Corp. 23.0 13.0 3/18/09 Albidon Ltd. Fairchild Corp. 4.0 100.0 3/18/09 Tekoil & Gas Corp. Chemtura Corp. % new money Filing date 100.0% 4/21/09 1.0 100.0 4/21/09 $3.0 8.8 100.0 4/23/09 23.0 100.0 4/23/09 400.0 78.4 3/18/09 Fairmont Resort Properties Ltd. 4.6 100.0 4/24/09 Greenbrier Hotel Corp. 19.0 100.0 3/19/09 Daufuskie Island Properties LLC 1.5 100.0 4/24/09 Extreme Retail (Canada) Inc. 0.5 100.0 3/19/09 St. Lawrence Homes Inc. 0.8 100.0 4/24/09 Sportsman’s Warehouse Inc. 85.0 100.0 3/20/09 American Community Newspapers LLC 6.0 100.0 3/20/09 Source Interlink Cos. T H Agriculture & Nutrition LLC Varig Logistica SA 5.0 0.0 4/27/09 385.0 58.4 4/27/09 7.5 100.0 3/20/09 Phoenix MC Inc. 1.4 100.0 4/27/09 MMC Precision Holdings Corp. 20.0 16.6 3/22/09 Sheldon Good & Co. Auctions Northeast LLC 2.0 100.0 4/29/09 Bi-Lo LLC 125.0 36.0 3/23/09 Mark IV Industries Inc. 3.4 0.0 3/23/09 Chrysler LLC Active Wallace Group Inc. Fleetwood Enterprises Inc. 80.0 22.9 3/24/09 Crown Village Farm LLC Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corp. 0.9 83.3 3/25/09 Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. Innovation Luggage Inc. 0.4 14.3 3/26/09 Waterworks Inc. DM Industries Ltd. 10.0 0.0 3/27/09 Millennium Transit Services LLC 0.1 100.0 3/27/09 Meadowcraft Inc. 90.0 100.0 4/30/09 4,960.0 100.0 5/1/09 5/1/09 5.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 5/1/09 7.5 100.0 5/3/09 Dewey Ranch Hockey LLC 17.0 100.0 5/5/09 Norwood Promotional Products Holdings Inc. 30.0 59.0 5/5/09 58.0 8.3 3/28/09 Bachrach Acquisition LLC 6.5 100.0 5/5/09 0.4 100.0 3/30/09 Lisbon Valley Mining Co. LLC 18.1 100.0 5/5/09 Zounds Inc. 1.0 100.0 3/30/09 Medico Labs Inc. 0.1 0.0 5/6/09 Medical Intelligence Technologies Inc. 0.6 100.0 3/31/09 AGT Crunch Acquisition LLC 6.0 100.0 5/6/09 TVI Inc. 19.0 100.0 4/1/09 Stock Building Supply Holdings LLC 100.0 100.0 5/6/09 BT Tires Group Holding LLC 27.9 10.8 4/2/09 Crucible Materials Corp. Zohar Waterworks LLC 3.4 100.0 4/2/09 General Growth Properties Inc. Palmdale Hills Property LLC 1.8 100.0 4/2/09 St. Lawrence Homes Inc. 0.2 100.0 4/3/09 Fairmont Resort Properties Ltd. 69.4 0.0 5/6/09 400.0 100.0 5/6/09 Forticell Bioscience Inc. 0.6 100.0 5/7/09 F.T. Silfies Inc. 11.9 20.0 5/7/09 Jane & Co. 5.1 19.6 4/6/09 Sencorp 29.8 22.7 5/8/09 Transmeridian Exploration Inc. 0.7 100.0 4/6/09 Badanco Acquisition LLC 16.0 53.1 5/11/09 Indalex Holdings Finance Inc. 86.0 15.8 4/7/09 Roma Foods of Oklahoma Inc. 2.5 80.0 5/11/09 0.1 100.0 4/7/09 Diplomat Construction Inc. 0.2 100.0 5/11/09 30.0 100.0 4/7/09 Hayes Lemmerz International Inc. 200.0 50.0 5/12/09 Tempe Land Co. LLC 43.3 100.0 4/7/09 Energytec Inc. 1.5 100.0 5/13/09 Ultra Stores Inc. 30.0 69.7 4/9/09 Chardon Rubber Co. 3.4 0.0 5/15/09 Strategic Resource Acquisition Corp. Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings Inc. Millennium Transit Services LLC Flying J Inc. Noble International Ltd. 0.5 100.0 4/10/09 Chardon Rubber Co. 0.3 0.0 5/15/09 20.0 100.0 4/13/09 Fatburger Restaurants of California Inc. 2.2 100.0 5/15/09 40.0 50.0 5/17/09 5.0 100.0 5/17/09 32.0 100.0 5/17/09 9.7 100.0 4/15/09 Pacific Ethanol Holding Co. LLC General Growth Properties Inc. 400.0 100.0 4/16/09 Petrorig I Pte Ltd. AbitibiBowater Inc. 360.0 100.0 4/16/09 TXCO Resources Inc. AbitibiBowater Inc. 210.0 0.0 4/16/09 J.G. Wentworth LLC Denison Foods LLC 0.3 100.0 4/17/09 Ion Media Networks Inc. Dayton Superior Corp. 10.0 46.5 5/19/09 150.0 100.0 5/19/09 165.0 21.2 4/19/09 Terra Nostra Resources Corp. 0.2 0.0 5/21/09 Sterling Mining Co. 1.0 100.0 4/20/09 Mahalo Energy (USA) Inc. 2.0 0.0 5/21/09 Red Top Rentals Inc. 2.6 100.0 4/20/09 Al Baskin Co. 2.0 100.0 5/21/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 28 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Fresh funds “New money” debtor-in-possession financing Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Commitment ($mill.) Debtor % new money Filing date Commitment ($mill.) Debtor % new money Filing date Rosseau Resort Developments Inc. $12.8 0.0% 5/22/09 LaVigne Inc. 100.0% 7/9/09 Anchor Blue Retail Group Inc. 20.0 0.0 5/27/09 Cabrini Medical Center 5.0 0.0 7/9/09 Metaldyne Corp. 18.5 100.0 5/28/09 Golfers’ Warehouse Inc. 1.5 1.3 7/9/09 Particle Drilling Technologies Inc. Caraustar Industries Inc. General Motors Corp. $0.1 1.6 100.0 5/30/09 Electroglas Inc. 2.0 0.0 7/9/09 75.0 100.0 5/31/09 TH Properties LP 3.0 100.0 7/9/09 33,300.0 100.0 6/1/09 Clayton Construction Co. Ltd. 1.2 100.0 7/9/09 Butler International Inc. 30.0 32.8 6/1/09 Fraser Papers Inc. 8.1 100.0 7/10/09 Genmar Holdings Inc. 50.0 28.1 6/2/09 Pro-Health LLC 6.0 100.0 7/10/09 Prospect Homes of Richmond Inc. 1.6 100.0 6/2/09 November 2005 Land Investors LLC 8.0 100.0 7/10/09 DTZ Rockwood Inc. 0.4 100.0 6/3/09 Bashas’ Inc. 45.0 0.0 7/12/09 DTZ Rockwood Inc. 0.4 100.0 6/3/09 J.L. French Automotive Castings Inc. 15.0 100.0 7/13/09 Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. 18.0 100.0 6/5/09 RathGibson Inc. 80.0 25.0 7/13/09 Goodcrane Corp. 0.6 100.0 6/5/09 NV Broadcasting LLC Berean Christian Stores Inc. 2.0 100.0 6/9/09 Flying J Inc. Nova Holding Clinton County LLC 28.0 100.0 7/13/09 100.0 100.0 7/14/09 2.0 0.0 6/9/09 Santa Fe Holding Co. 4.0 100.0 7/15/09 Crescent Resources LLC 110.0 100.0 6/10/09 Enos Lane Farm Properties LLC 0.1 100.0 7/16/09 Hendricks Furniture Co. 2.5 100.0 6/10/09 Biopure Corp. 0.5 100.0 7/16/09 Heidtman Mining LLC 0.6 100.0 6/12/09 Lang Holdings Inc. 16.0 100.0 7/16/09 Isolagen Inc. 2.5 100.0 6/15/09 TH Properties LP 0.3 100.0 7/16/09 W.C. Wood Corp. 0.4 100.0 6/16/09 West Hawk Energy USA LLC 1.8 100.0 7/20/09 Building Materials Holding Corp. 80.0 0.0 6/16/09 O2Diesel Corp. 0.4 53.5 7/21/09 100.0 48.8 6/17/09 Champion Motor Group Inc. 6.0 100.0 7/22/09 4.0 100.0 6/17/09 Lavatec Inc. 1.0 100.0 7/24/09 Fraser Papers Inc. 20.0 100.0 6/18/09 QSGI Inc. 0.5 100.0 7/24/09 Fraser Papers Inc. 79.0 0.0 6/18/09 Arclin US Holdings Inc. 25.0 100.0 7/27/09 0.0 100.0 6/22/09 Stant Corp. 11.0 100.0 7/27/09 70.0 100.0 6/24/09 Applied Solar Inc. 1.5 0.0 7/28/09 TXP Corp. 0.5 100.0 6/24/09 Station Casinos Inc. 150.0 100.0 7/28/09 G & S Metal Consultants Inc. 15.6 0.0 6/24/09 ProtoStar Ltd. 17.0 100.0 7/29/09 Trilogy Development Co. LLC 0.8 100.0 6/25/09 ProtoStar Ltd. 6.0 100.0 7/29/09 Nexient Learning Inc. 0.9 100.0 6/26/09 Rainbows United Inc. 1.5 100.0 7/30/09 Eddie Bauer Holdings Inc. Critical Access Health Services Corp. Millennium Transit Services LLC Quelle GmbH Bison Buildings Holdings Inc. 25.0 41.7 6/28/09 Element Aluminum LLC 0.5 100.0 7/31/09 TXP Corp. 0.5 100.0 6/29/09 GPS Industires Inc. 1.3 100.0 7/31/09 Pumpkin Patch LLC 3.0 100.0 6/29/09 East Cameron Partners LP 4.0 0.0 8/1/09 Robert Manufacturing Co. Grede Foundries Inc. 55.0 82.3 6/30/09 Crabtree & Evelyn Ltd. 40.0 100.0 7/1/09 Cooper-Standard Automotive Holdings Inc. 0.1 100.0 7/2/09 Shermag Inc. 20.0 100.0 7/2/09 2.6 100.0 7/3/09 Evident Technologies Inc. 2.7 50.0 Kainos Partners Holdings Co. LLC 1.5 55.8 500.0 Henry Dunay Designs Inc. Grede Foundries Inc. Adaltis Inc. Lear Corp. Global Safety Textiles Holdings LLC International Metals & Chemicals Group LP CCS Medical Inc. 0.9 100.0 8/2/09 200.0 100.0 8/3/09 2.8 100.0 8/3/09 Hill Country Galleria LP 3.7 100.0 8/3/09 Philadelphia Newspapers LLC 15.0 100.0 8/4/09 7/6/09 Solstice LLC 1.5 100.0 8/4/09 7/6/09 Solstice LLC 3.0 100.0 8/4/09 100.0 7/7/09 Evergreen Transportation Inc. 5.0 0.0 8/4/09 25.0 100.0 7/7/09 Aerisa Inc. 0.2 100.0 8/4/09 1.0 0.0 7/7/09 Stinson Petroleum Co. 5.0 100.0 8/4/09 10.0 100.0 7/8/09 Global Safety Textiles Holdings LLC 5.0 100.0 8/12/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 29 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Fresh funds “New money” debtor-in-possession financing Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Commitment ($mill.) Debtor Altra Nebraska LLC $0.6 % new money 0.0% Filing date Debtor Commitment ($mill.) 8/13/09 Questex Media Group Inc. SkyPower Corp. 15.0 0.0 8/13/09 iGourmet LLC Tango Grill Inc. 0.1 100.0 8/17/09 Canwest Global Communications Corp. Avery Environmental Services Inc. 0.2 0.0 8/17/09 PDCC Development LLC % new money Filing date 100.0% 10/5/09 100.0 10/5/09 94.4 0.0 10/6/09 0.3 100.0 10/7/09 30.0 100.0 10/7/09 $15.0 0.2 0.5 100.0 8/19/09 7677 East Berry Avenue Associates LLP Chiyoda America Inc. 1.7 100.0 8/19/09 Accuride Corp. 50.0 100.0 10/8/09 Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co. 5.0 100.0 8/19/09 True Temper Sports Inc. 90.0 11.1 10/8/09 8/19/09 True Temper Sports Inc. 0.9 0.0 10/8/09 Global Charter Services Ltd. Beech Tree Corp. 0.3 100.0 Sunra Coffee LLC 0.6 100.0 8/21/09 One Twenty Nine LLC 0.8 100.0 10/8/09 Opus South Corp. 4.4 100.0 8/24/09 Tavern on the Green LP 6.5 7.7 10/8/09 150.0 100.0 8/24/09 Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co. 6.0 100.0 10/12/09 Cabi Downtown Inc. 2.0 100.0 8/25/09 Whittaker Builders Inc. 1.0 100.0 10/15/09 South Louisiana Ethanol LLC 0.1 100.0 8/25/09 PJC Technologies Inc. 3.0 0.0 10/19/09 FormTech Industries LLC 8.5 100.0 8/26/09 Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. 25.0 100.0 10/21/09 Johnson Broadcasting Inc. 3.0 100.0 8/27/09 Erickson Retirement Communities LLC 20.0 100.0 10/22/09 7677 East Berry Avenue Associates LLP 15.0 100.0 8/28/09 LDG South LLC 8.4 100.0 10/23/09 0.8 100.0 8/28/09 LDG South LLC 0.3 100.0 10/23/09 20.0 100.0 8/28/09 Arena Football League LLC 0.5 100.0 10/23/09 0.1 100.0 10/23/09 10/26/09 Reader’s Digest Association Inc. TH Properties LP Commercial Capital Inc. Nukote International Inc. 26.0 15.4 9/1/09 Metcalf Paving Co. Cynergy Data LLC 25.0 100.0 9/1/09 FairPoint Communications Inc. 75.0 100.0 Cynergy Data LLC 7.5 100.0 9/1/09 Express Energy Services Operating LP 20.0 100.0 10/27/09 150.0 100.0 10/28/09 Alternative Distribution Systems Inc. 3.3 0.0 9/2/09 Visteon Corp. Friar Tuck Inn of the Catskills Inc. 0.6 100.0 9/2/09 CanArgo Energy Corp. 1.2 100.0 10/28/09 GigaBeam Corp. 1.0 0.0 9/2/09 All Land Investments LLC 0.1 100.0 10/29/09 Archangel Diamond Corp. 0.4 100.0 9/3/09 Recticel Interiors North America LLC 10/29/09 Maxtech Manufacturing Inc. 1.9 0.0 9/8/09 CIT Group Inc. PNG Ventures Inc. 2.0 0.0 9/9/09 ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. Georgetown Golf Club Inc. 0.2 100.0 9/11/09 TH Properties LP Tana Seybert LLC 6.4 15.6 9/11/09 Lazy Days RV Center Inc. Downey Regional Medical Center-Hospital Inc. 15.0 100.0 9/14/09 CrimeCog Technologies Inc. Perpetua-Burr Oak Holdings of Illinois Inc. 0.3 100.0 9/14/09 Lakota Resources Inc. 0.6 100.0 9/14/09 Barzel Industries Inc. 30.0 38.5 Aurora Oil & Gas Corp. 3.0 Sandab Communications LP 0.5 CMR Mortgage Fund II LP 6.0 Velocity Express Corp. 14.0 Action Motors Corp. 0.1 Schwing America Inc. 4.6 Vectrix Corp. 0.3 Jolt Co. 1.0 100.0 Coastal Plains Pork LLC 1.0 100.0 PS America Inc. 2.6 100.0 PTC Alliance Corp. Fountain Powerboat Industries Inc. 10.0 100.0 500.0 100.0 11/1/09 1.1 100.0 11/2/09 2.1 100.0 11/2/09 65.0 66.2 11/5/09 0.7 0.0 11/6/09 Coharie Hog Farm Inc. 1.5 100.0 11/6/09 Teton Energy Corp. 0.8 0.0 11/8/09 9/15/09 Gemcraft Homes Inc. 5.0 100.0 11/9/09 100.0 9/17/09 Wilkes Bashford Co. 0.7 100.0 11/9/09 100.0 9/23/09 NutraCea Corp. 6.8 47.1 11/10/09 100.0 9/23/09 Sea Launch Co. LLC 12.5 100.0 11/10/09 46.4 9/24/09 Premium Protein Products LLC 0.3 100.0 11/10/09 100.0 9/25/09 Michael Day Enterprises Inc. 10.5 0.0 11/10/09 100.0 9/28/09 Gemcraft Homes Inc. 25.0 35.2 11/11/09 100.0 9/28/09 Gemcraft Homes Inc. 7.0 0.0 11/11/09 9/28/09 South Texas Oil Co. 1.5 100.0 11/12/09 9/28/09 Amelia Island Co. 5.0 100.0 11/13/09 9/30/09 Standard Forwarding Co. 1.0 100.0 11/13/09 30.0 100.0 11/13/09 80.0 50.0 11/15/09 15.0 100.0 10/1/09 YL West 87th Holdings I LLC 1.5 100.0 10/1/09 Champion Enterprises Inc. Total DIP: $59.7 BILL. Total new money: $50.4 BILL. % new money: 84.4% close print back < Index > Source: pipeline.thedeal.com cover search view 30 the daily deal T hur s day Dece mber 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Time to fly The exit financing market loosened as 2009 progressed, with commitments and participants increasing, prices dropping D ebtor-in-possession loans often get much of the publicity in bankruptcy, as in most cases a company will hold off filing for Chapter 11 until it can get one and then trumpet the commitment. But as the recession spawned an outright financing crisis in late 2008 and early 2009, exit financings garnered just as much of the spotlight. Indeed, once the economy went south, many debtors found themselves in a panicked state: trapped in bankruptcy and unable to get the financing needed to escape. But a few things about the exit financing market have become clear at year’s end. First, the market has become more robust, with debtors now having a multitude of potential lenders compared with the last quarter of 2008. Second, lenders have loosened the purse strings a bit, with bankruptcy pros noting that pricing on financings has dipped. And third, while debtors these days have found it a bit easier to cobble together enough financing to bust out of Chapter 11, those loans also have started to contain more new money than they did at the onset of 2009—a trend those in the industry feel will continue. Talk to bankruptcy attorneys about the crisis in the fallout of the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. crash, and they will likely tell you that for any company filing for Chapter 11 in the fourth quarter of 2008 or early 2009, exit financing was likely a pipe dream. Even DIP financing—among the most short-term and lower-risk investments—was hard to come by. “There is a world of difference between the beginning of the year and now,” says Jay Goffman, the co-head of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP’s global restructuring group. “What you saw last fall was all the normal buyers for [exit financing debt], such as hedge funds and private equity funds—none of them were buying anything new. Every one of them panicked, so the whole lending process came to a grinding halt.” close print One investment banking source who requested anonymity recalls trying to obtain DIP financing for an ethanol plant operator in January and being unable to find a taker despite contacting more than 50 “reputable” sources. “Everyone was on cash collateral,” the banker says. Because debtors were using what typically is a short-term solution, “you need to have an asset sale as opposed to doing [a Chapter 11 plan and] exit loan.” According to pipeline.thedeal.com (see table, page 32), the exit financing market was nearly frozen at the start of the year, with only five debtors in January and six in February securing commitments for loans, notes, swaps for new debt, equity infusions or rights offerings of equity. In comparison, 12 debtors in September and 14 in October obtained commitments. In early 2009, “It was hard to find a situation where someone who wasn’t already in the deal wasn’t spearheading the [DIP or exit] financing, either for defensive purposes or strategic purposes,” says Steven Levine, the leader of Brown Rudnick LLP’s finance practice group. Bankruptcy pros point to two key fundings early in the year as signs that the investment community had started to get back into exit financings. The first was Quebecor World (USA) Inc.’s $800 million exit loan from lenders led by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. The Feb. 22 financing was not only the largest of the year to that point—and by a wide margin—but it also contained $260 million in new money (also the most substantial) and, one source contends, was some 75% oversubscribed. Another example of the thaw came from Charter Communications Inc.’s financing package. Though the cable company only recently closed on the funding and emerged from Chapter 11 on Nov. 30, Charter locked up the terms of a commitment for as much as $2 billion in equity from bondholders in March—a total that eventually came in at roughly $1.6 billion. back < Index > cover (The company also issued $1.77 billion in new notes to replace old note debt, giving Charter $3.37 billion in exit financing.) Skadden’s Goffman, who represented Vulcan Inc., the investment vehicle of Charter chairman and controlling shareholder Paul Allen, says Charter’s financing is “a good example of the fact that lending institutions and funds are feeling better about the market, better about the economy, and the funds they sell the debt to have come back to the marketplace.” Indeed, that change is reflected in the type of lenders that have been providing exit financing. The shift that has come— and that, Goffman says, will become more evident next year—is an increase in the amount of both new money in financings and the amount of outside sources taking part in them. (See page 31 for more on the top new-money exit lenders in 2009.) The investment banking source recalls, for example, seeing the same “three or four” lenders involved in just about every exit financing deal. That recollection is illustrated by the sheer amount of financings that came from prepetition and DIP lending groups. Of the 93 distinct commitments from lenders through Nov. 15, roughly half were offered by prepetition lenders. In addition, major traditional lenders J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. ($4.62 billion), Bank of America Corp. ($1.65 billion), Wells Fargo & Co. ($1.5 billion), General Electric Co. ($1.27 billion) and Credit Suisse ($905.25 million) provided the most exit financing for the period. Only two financings that closed in the first four months of the year—those given to Wellman Inc. and Yellowstone Mountain Club LLC—came from lenders that were neither a prepetition lender nor a DIP lender. By comparison, 13 such financings took place between July and November. What constitutes progress, however, continues to vary on a case-by-case basis. CONTINUED > search view 31 the daily deal Th urs day December 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS traditional variety, Skadden’s Goffman believes that a tool showing up sparingly in the tables—rights offerings—is on the verge of becoming much more prominent. Just nine commitments through Nov. 15 included a rights offering as a component, and none of them were even officially planned—let alone consummated—until mid-March, with Tropicana Entertainment LLC’s twin reorganization plans. A plan for certain Tropicana debtors included a $75 million rights offering, and the plan for the remaining debtors called for a rights offering of unspecified size as well. Both were confirmed May 5. But Goffman says that a number of rights offerings are on their way in 2010. “A lot of the deals that are being done now [have] some form of rights offering tied in with debt financing,” he says. Certainly, the merits of rights offerings appear to be debatable. Brown Rudnick’s Levine, for example, says that if a company can afford to sustain debt at a comfortable level, he might prefer that as opposed to bringing in new investors through a rights Brown Rudnick’s Levine recalls, for exoffering. The investment banking source is ample, working on the then-pending bankmore blunt, believing it to be “silly” to hold ruptcy of middle-market retailer Walking one coming right out of bankruptcy court. Co., where the key parties discussed the “If you’re really ready to be public again, terms of not only DIP financing but also go public in a year,” he says. “They always exit financing. seem a little forced to me.” “In the last couple of years, those conGoffman, however, views rights offerversations tended to be struggles where ings much more positively. the lender would be acknowledging that “It’s better to have less debt and more in their mind, the company had no real cushion built into operations in case your prospects for reorganization and would base projections don’t turn out,” he says. be pushing the company towards a liqui“When you’re trying to raise debt financdation,” he says. “It’s [specific] to this paring, it’s a lot easier to sell bonds in the marticular retailer, but it’s a sign that things are ketplace if someone is putting their money changing.” where their mouth is [and buying equity]. Another broader change bankruptcy It sends the right message.” pros point out is a markdown in the pricOne message this year’s exit financings ing of exit financings. Levine explains that convey is a lack of new money. Again, many this is evident in the Six Flags Inc. bankbelieve that as the economy rebounds, inruptcy. Levine, who represents the official vestors will start to buy debt of emerging committee of unsecured creditors, notes companies. In 2009, however, new money that Six Flags entered bankruptcy June 13 in exit loans accounted for just 25.7% of the with prepetition lenders ready to total commitments. provide a $600 million term loan To be sure, there remains the priced at either LIBOR plus 700 perhaps special case of General basis points or prime plus 750 basis Motors Corp., which has a nearly points. That loan, later included in J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. is flying high. The bank alighted $8.25 billion exit financing coma July 22 reorganization plan filed at the top of the new-money exit financing league table mitment, according to pipeline. by lead debtor Premier Internawith a lofty $1 billion in volume on 10 deals. The $820.9 thedeal.com, or more than 25% tional Holdings Inc., has not surmillion cargo J.P. Morgan provided auto parts maker Lear of the total for the year. Motors vived further revisions. Corp. represented its largest transaction.—Neil Malcolm Liquidation Co.—the estate of Instead, the latest version of the carmaker, commonly called the term loan, now $650 million, old GM—has a $1.18 billion windis priced at LIBOR plus 425 basis down facility, and the new GenTop “new money” exit lenders Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 points, with a 2% floor, and has eral Motors Co. assumed roughly “lots of banks very interested” in $7.08 billion in DIP debt when No. of New-money Lender * signing up for it, he says. (A $150 it acquired the debtor’s operacommitments volume ($mill.) million revolver shares the same tions. As the loans are entirely old 1 J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. 10 $1,007.2 interest rate.) money, they drag the percentage of Overall, according to pipeline. new money for all exit financings 2 Bank of America Corp. 5 605.7 thedeal.com, maximum spreads downward. Even if the GM debt 3 Apollo Investment Corp. 3 341.8 on exit financings have dropped were completely wiped out of the 4 Credit Suisse Group 3 288.9 from 1,650 points over LIBOR in table, however, the figure would the first half of the year to 1,200 only jump to 35.7%—further evi5 Barclays plc 4 281.7 points over LIBOR in the second dence that if the shift bankruptcy 6 General Electric Co. 7 275.0 half through Nov. 15. Similarly, the pros are projecting comes to pass, highest spread above prime has it stands to completely revamp the 7 FMR LLC 2 228.8 dropped from 1,550 in the first half tables next year. Oaktree Capital 8 Management LP 2 183.1 to 1,100 in the second. In the end, that can only mean As for the types of financings good things for debtors and their *Includes commitments by affiliates or units Source: pipeline.thedeal.com provided, while most are of the attorneys. n —Ben Fidler Lear jet close print back < Index > cover search view 32 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW FLIGHT CAPITAL “New money” exit financing Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Commitment ($mill.) Debtor % new money Debtor 1/7/09 Sportsman’s Warehouse Inc. Beaudry RV Co. Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. Mecachrome International Inc. CommerceConnect Media Holdings Inc. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. Kirk Corp. Kirk Corp. Pliant Corp. Chiyoda America Inc. Z Gallerie Inc. Reader’s Digest Association Inc. Amaravathi LP MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. Think Global AS Baseline Oil & Gas Corp. Hawaiian Telcom Communications Inc. Hawaiian Telcom Communications Inc. TVI Corp. Archangel Diamond Corp. PNG Ventures Inc. Merisant Worldwide Inc. Merisant Worldwide Inc. Palmdale Hills Property LLC Star Tribune Holdings Corp. Energy Partners Ltd. Energy Partners Ltd. Arclin US Holdings Inc. Crusader Energy Group Inc. Nukote International Inc. Rhodes Cos. LLC MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. Flying J Inc. (Big West Oil LLC) Building Materials Holding Corp. Global Safety Textiles Holdings LLC Bi-Lo LLC Aurora Oil & Gas Corp. True Temper Sports Inc. Accuride Corp. Z Gallerie Inc. BioBased Technologies LLC Fremont General Corp. NTK Holdings Inc. Lear Corp. DBSD North America Inc. Eurofresh Inc. Idearc Inc. Lear Corp. Lazy Days RV Center Inc. Premier International Holdings Inc. Antioch Co. $4.0 Key Plastics LLC 25.0 100.0 1/29/09 Pittsburgh Corning Corp. 12.0 0.0 1/29/09 Gwenco Inc. 2.0 0.0 1/29/09 Wellman Inc. 35.0 100.0 1/31/09 Yellowstone Mountain Club LLC 75.0 100.0 2/3/09 1.3 0.0 2/3/09 Buffets Inc. 304.3 0.0 2/9/09 BearingPoint Inc. 402.0 5.3 2/18/09 25.0 0.0 2/22/09 800.0 32.5 2/22/09 33.0 0.0 3/5/09 1.0 100.0 3/10/09 Tropicana Entertainment LLC 75.0 100.0 3/11/09 Tropicana Entertainment LLC 15.0 100.0 3/11/09 1.0 100.0 3/19/09 Cross Lake Minerals Ltd. Philadelphia Newspapers LLC Quebecor World (USA) Inc. Comfort Co. Waterbrook Peninsula LLC Arbios Systems Inc. Motor Coach Industries International Inc. 0.0% Filing date 230.0 100.0 3/20/09 Charter Communications Inc. 3,370.0 47.5 3/27/09 Smitty’s Building Supply Inc. 14.5 27.6 4/3/09 1.0 100.0 4/3/09 Special Devices Inc. 15.0 100.0 4/8/09 Special Devices Inc. 16.5 100.0 4/8/09 Brotman Medical Center Inc. 6.0 100.0 4/14/09 Solution Technology International Inc. Utah 7000 LLC 40.0 100.0 4/20/09 Source Interlink Cos. 200.0 0.0 4/27/09 Source Interlink Cos. 785.0 0.0 4/27/09 Tropicana Entertainment LLC 150.0 46.7 5/5/09 Stock Building Supply Holdings LLC 125.0 100.0 5/6/09 Tricom SA 25.5 100.0 5/7/09 LandSource Communities Development LLC 280.0 100.0 5/13/09 SemGroup LP 800.0 31.3 5/15/09 1.0 100.0 5/28/09 5/31/09 AFC Acquisition Corp. Caraustar Industries Inc. 75.0 0.0 East Cameron Partners LP 35.0 100.0 6/3/09 Bally Total Fitness Corp. 89.0 43.8 6/10/09 Spectrum Brands Inc. 242.0 2.9 6/15/09 Spectrum Brands Inc. 218.1 0.0 6/15/09 Journal Register Co. 75.0 0.0 6/18/09 Journal Register Co. 150.0 0.0 6/18/09 Metromedia Steakhouses Co. LP 19.8 23.6 6/19/09 Journal Register Co. 6/23/09 30.0 100.0 Lisbon Valley Mining Co. LLC 2.4 100.0 6/23/09 Creative Loafing Inc. 1.0 100.0 6/30/09 General Motors Corp. 8,247.5 0.0 7/3/09 7.0 100.0 7/8/09 Tricom SA NV Broadcasting LLC Pomare Ltd. WCI Communities Inc. LandSource Communities Development LLC Dayton Superior Corp. Ultra Stores Inc. 28.0 0.0 7/13/09 2.0 100.0 7/15/09 560.0 0.0 7/17/09 13.0 100.0 7/20/09 326.0 34.6 7/24/09 30.0 0.0 7/28/09 Commitment ($mill.) $50.0 12.5 113.9 89.0 65.0 500.0 1,150.0 225.0 3.5 0.5 193.0 8.4 22.0 150.0 2.0 35.0 47.0 30.0 300.0 50.0 16.0 1.3 5.5 12.5 150.0 5.0 100.0 25.0 125.0 60.0 30.0 35.0 50.0 61.8 435.0 103.5 105.0 349.1 45.0 116.5 140.0 2.0 4.3 24.0 1,000.0 600.0 52.8 35.0 2,750.0 550.0 65.0 1,400.0 Total exit: $29.5 BILL. Total new money: $7.6 BILL. % new money: 25.7% close print back < Index > % new money 70.0% 44.0 100.0 100.0 7.7 2.2 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 16.7 0.0 100.0 0.0 70.4 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 56.4 100.0 60.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 53.6 Filing date 7/30/09 7/31/09 8/3/09 8/4/09 8/4/09 8/4/09 8/4/09 8/4/09 8/14/09 8/14/09 8/17/09 8/19/09 8/19/09 8/24/09 8/24/09 8/25/09 8/27/09 8/28/09 8/28/09 8/28/09 8/31/09 9/3/09 9/9/09 9/12/09 9/12/09 9/16/09 9/17/09 9/21/09 9/21/09 9/21/09 9/22/09 9/23/09 9/25/09 9/25/09 9/29/09 10/1/09 10/5/09 10/5/09 10/7/09 10/8/09 10/8/09 10/8/09 10/9/09 10/13/09 10/21/09 10/23/09 10/26/09 10/28/09 10/30/09 11/2/09 11/5/09 11/7/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com cover search view 33 the daily deal T hur s day Dece mber 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Buyout, boom Some 103 private equity-backed companies exploded into bankruptcy in 2009, but the filings slowed as the year wore on F or private equity-backed bankruptcies in 2009, the story, as it was in so many other areas, was liquidity. Cheap and available debt fueled many of the leveraged buyouts that later went bust, and a modest improvement in liquidity curtailed filings as the year progressed. Some 103 PE portfolio companies entered bankruptcy protection this year through Nov. 15, from greeting card company Recycled Paper Greetings Inc. on Jan. 2 to upstate New York retail chain Patrick Hackett Hardware Co. on Nov. 10. (See table, pages 35 to 37.) Companies overleveraged from their PE buyouts in the final boom years of 2006 and 2007, when debt was easy and cheap, faced the music this year as their business assumptions didn’t pan out in the credit crisis. Twenty-seven of the PE deals that went bust this year were done in 2007, and 22 were done in 2006. As a result, the two years account for more than 47% of the buyouts that landed in bankruptcy. A further 17 PE deals that were forced into bankruptcy in 2009 took place in 2005 and 11 in 2004, according to pipeline. thedeal.com. Seventeen of the buyouts gone bust were announced in 2003 or earlier, while nine had their roots in 2008 or this year. “It is not a coincidence” that many of the deals took place in 2006 and 2007, says financial adviser Scott Peltz of RSM McGladrey Inc. “There was a significant amount of liquidity and debt available.” According to bankruptcy and restructuring adviser Andrew Horrocks of Moelis & Co. LLC, in 2006 and 2007, “the debt financing markets were so conducive to buyout funds that they could borrow significant amounts of money at low costs. It was an accepted market practice to have leverage levels on companies that turned out to be unsustainable.” close print “The terms associated with the debt were highly favorable to the borrowers,” Horrocks adds. As an example, he points to lenders frequently not demanding covenant protection on their debt. One example of a company crumbling under its debt was casino operator Station Casinos Inc., owned by Colony Capital LLC and members of the founding Fertitta family. Colony Capital, Station chairman and CEO Frank J. Fertitta III and former vice chairman and president Lorenzo J. Fertitta acquired the Las Vegas company in an $8.8 billion buyout, first announced in 2006. Station, however, couldn’t maintain its debt when the economy tanked and filed for Chapter 11 protection on July 28. A drop-off in revenue as consumer spending slumped was responsible for the hardest-hit industries—retail, media, automotive, and consumer and household products—bankruptcy attorney Brett Barragate at Jones Day says. Several PE-backed media companies— including Yucaipa Cos. LLC-owned Source Interlink Cos.; NV Broadcasting LLC, whose equity was held by Arlington Capital Partners LP when it went bankrupt; and Alta Communications-owned Bluewater Broadcasting Co. LLC—were among the casualties this year. In another example, newspaper publisher Star Tribune Co. filed for bankruptcy protection Jan. 15. Equity owner Avista Capital Partners was wiped out when the company exited Chapter 11 on Sept. 28, after the debtor swapped its $393 million in secured debt led by Credit Suisse Group’s Cayman Islands branch for 95% of its reorganized stock. Senior managing director Scott Winn of Zolfo Cooper LLC, however, says he sees the list of industries forced to file for bankruptcy protection as all over the map. “It’s a greater function of what the [PE] deal looked like than how the indus- back < Index > cover try was doing,” the bankruptcy adviser says. When a PE firm has a portfolio company go bankrupt, it sometimes already has recovered a portion or all of its money through dividend recapitalizations. In such a move, a company incurs new debt to pay a dividend to private investors or shareholders. Whether that has happened depends on how old the deal is, Winn says—the newer the deal is, the less likely it is that an LBO sponsor has taken its money off the table. But even if the PE firm has recovered its investment, Winn says, bankruptcy can still hurt because the equity holders never know what sort of causes of action creditors might try to use against the firm as a negotiation tool. He adds that PE firms also try to avoid having the black mark left by bankruptcy on their portfolios. Out of the PE-backed bankruptcies in 2009, Sun Capital Partners Inc. had the most, with eight portfolio companies filing for bankruptcy. H.I.G. Capital LLC and distressed-debt affiliate Bayside Capital Inc. were next with four portfolio companies in total entering bankruptcy protection, and affiliates of CVC Capital Partners Ltd., Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Lone Star Funds each were involved in three filings. An inside source with deep knowledge of the turnaround investment industry, who asked not to be named, says Sun Capital buys fragile companies, with about 40% losing money and the remainder being unhealthy companies. The source also notes that Sun Capital buys a lot of companies, and the percentage that eventually go bankrupt is well within the PE norm of 10% to 15%. PE-backed bankruptcies as a whole started with a bang in 2009, with 40 in the CONTINUED > search view 34 the daily deal Th ursday De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS first quarter and 30 in the second quarter, but as the year dragged on, filings slowed down to 22 in the third quarter and just 11 in the fourth as of Nov. 15, according to pipeline.thedeal.com. Since then, however, six more portfolio companies have filed for bankruptcy: mattress maker Simmons Bedding Co., owned by Thomas H. Lee Partners LP; Cravey, Green & Whalen Inc.’s Arch Aluminum & Glass Co.; Quad-C Management Inc.-controlled lighting fixture maker QHB Holdings LLC; bookseller Borders (UK) Ltd., a portfolio company of Valco Capital Partners; building products maker Ames Holding Corp., controlled by Aurora Capital Group; and plumbing supplies maker Jones Stephens Corp., owned by Cortec Group Inc. Several factors have led to the slowdown, restructuring professionals say. Jones Day’s Barragate believes it’s due to a “miraculous recovery of the loan market and the high-yield bond market.” The latter has allowed distressed companies to issue new bonds or refinance existing bonds. Since companies are now able to refinance or extend the maturity of their debt, the rate of bankruptcies has fallen, Barragate adds. Peltz says that while there has been some improvement in the economy and liquidity, firms are willing to hold off on bankruptcies in the hope that the economy improves further and things will get better. PE firms are letting their portfolio companies “limp along because there are few viable exit strategies today,” Peltz says, adding that firms are looking for improvements in the economy as well as the flow of capital and values. Zolfo Cooper’s Winn points out that there is little upside to a filing for a PE firm. Entering bankruptcy is always the last resort and something that the equity holders try to avoid, he says. Portfolio companies are only put into bankruptcy protection when the alternative for the PE firm is to continue to close print support a company that is failing, Winn says, adding that the equity holder would much rather amend the portfolio company’s debt or do an out-of-court restructuring than file for bankruptcy—actions that are on the table more often now than at the beginning of 2009. PE firms “would rather do something out of sight ... than publicly,” he says. “Amendments and extensions [allow the PE firm to keep] kicking the can down the road and putting the problem off to another day in the hope that there will be a recovery and the [portfolio company] PE firms are only putting portfolio companies into bankruptcy protection when the alternative is to continue to support a company that is failing. can grow back into their balance sheet on some level.” Moelis’ Horrocks agrees PE firms will put off dealing with a problem as long as they can. “If a company has a broken balance sheet but no covenant issues or no maturities, there is no incentive for equity investors to step forward and fix the problem if time might bail them out,” he says. Lenders and equity holders often have different ideas about when a company’s problems should be dealt with. Lenders want the issues solved quickly before there is a further destruction of value, while equity holders want to wait, hoping that things will rebound, Horrocks says. “Dealing with the problem crystallizes the valuation of the business at that moment in time. If you own the equity and you don’t have to crystallize the loss right now, why not wait?” Horrocks asks. And when the debt is covenant-lite, as in many deals struck at the top of the back < Index > cover market, lenders can’t force equity holders to deal with the problem. In these covenant-lite deals, “lenders gave up the only hammer that they had to force equity to come to the table. The companies are overleveraged, and the creditors can’t do anything but worry,” Horrocks says. A second source, who asked not to be named, points to several overleveraged covenant-lite deals whose performance is way off in this cycle, such as Free scale Semiconductor Inc., owned by Blackstone Group LP; Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.’s First Data Corp.; and auto parts maker Allison Transmission Inc., owned by Carlyle Group and Onex Corp. The debt in these deals lacks traditional covenants, so lenders have no way of forcing equity holders to come to the table to restructure their debt, the source says. There is one final reason, however, that PE-backed filings have slowed down. The first source says PE firms may be holding off on bankruptcy filings because they are raising money for new funds. Instead of taking on the bad publicity of a filing, firms instead amend and extend the debt of their portfolio companies so they can live another day. Winn agrees that one of the reasons PE firms may be avoiding bankruptcy is to facilitate fundraising, but he adds that the only reason portfolio companies can avoid bankruptcy is because their owners are able to amend their debt outside of bankruptcy. The slowdown is “not because the PE funds are raising money right now, but because they are hoping to raise money and would rather not have a loss in their current portfolio, if they can wait to incur that until after they fundraise,” Horrocks says. “Many of the PE firms that plan to fundraise are targeting to raise funds in the next 12 to 24 months,” he concludes. “There is a bias out there that if they can put off a loss in the current portfolio, it would be wise to do that.” n —Jamie Mason search view 35 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Lost leverage Private equity-backed bankruptcies Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 PE firm Debtor Buyout ann. date Bankruptcy filing date Recycled Paper Greetings Inc. Monitor Clipper Partners LLC 11/11/05 1/2/09 Interlake Material Handling Inc. Wynnchurch Capital Ltd. 12/28/07 1/5/09 Waterford Wedgwood plc Lazard Alternative Investments LLC/Corporate Partners II 3/6/06 1/5/09 Merisant Worldwide Inc. MSD Capital LP, Pegasus Capital Advisors LP 2/3/00 1/9/09 Star Tribune Holdings Corp. Avista Capital Partners LP 3/5/07 1/15/09 Specialty Motors Group Holding Corp. (Von Weise Corp.) Sun Capital Partners Inc. 12/4/07 1/16/09 Wall Homes Inc. Jen Partners LLC, Warburg Pincus LLC 4/14/05 1/19/09 Blooming Marvellous Ltd. Arev Securities hf 8/26/07 1/28/09 Edscha AG Carlyle Group 11/12/02 2/2/09 Right Start Acquisition Co. Hancock Park Associates 12/24/03 2/3/09 Maerklin Holding GmbH Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Kingsbridge Capital Advisors 3/20/06 2/4/09 Bruno’s Supermarkets LLC Lone Star Funds 12/23/04 2/5/09 Fortunoff Holdings LLC NRDC Equity Partners LLC 2/4/08 2/5/09 Fluid Routing Solutions Intermediate Holding Corp. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 5/15/07 2/6/09 Appalachian Oil Co. Titan Global Holdings Inc. 5/2/06 2/9/09 Barton-Cotton Inc. American Capital Strategies Ltd. 9/6/07 2/9/09 Muzak Holdings LLC Abry Partners LLC 2/1/99 2/10/09 Aleris International Inc. Texas Pacific Group 8/8/06 2/12/09 Forward Foods LLC Emigrant Capital Corp. 9/18/06 2/17/09 Everything But Water LLC Bear Growth Capital Partners LP 8/31/06 2/25/09 Regal Jets LLC (JetDirect Aviation Inc.) Brantley Partners, HSBC Capital (USA) Inc., AIG Global Investment Group 4/20/06 2/25/09 Parts Holding; Autodis (Autodistribution SA) Investcorp 1/6/06 3/2/09 Robbins Bros. Corp. (William Pitt Inc.) Weston Presidio, Dorset Capital Management LLC 1/4/05 3/3/09 G.I. Joe’s Holding Corp. Gryphon Investors 1/25/07 3/4/09 Lambertson Truex LLC (Samsonite Corp.) Bain Capital LLC, CVC Capital Partners Ltd., Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan 7/5/07 3/5/09 Plastal Holding AB Nordic Capital 12/21/04 3/5/09 Sunset Aviation Inc. (JetDirect Aviation Inc.) Brantley Partners, HSBC Capital (USA) Inc., AIG Global Investment Group 6/7/07 3/6/09 GCP CT School Acquisition LLC (Connecticut School of Broadcasting Inc.) DLJ Growth Capital Partners 1/12/06 3/6/09 Milacron Inc. Bayside Capital Inc. 10/3/07 3/10/09 Masonite Corp. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. LP 12/22/04 3/16/09 Drug Fair Group Inc. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 12/5/05 3/18/09 Sportsman’s Warehouse Inc. Seidler Equity Partners 11/28/08 3/20/09 Indalex Holdings Finance Inc. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 9/19/05 3/20/09 MMC Precision Holdings Corp. Brazos Private Equity Partners LLC 3/23/06 3/22/09 Bi-Lo LLC Lone Star Funds 12/23/04 3/23/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 36 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Lost leverage Private equity-backed bankruptcies Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 PE firm Debtor Buyout ann. date Bankruptcy filing date Rileys Ltd. Greenhill Capital Partners, J.O. Hambro Capital Management Group Ltd. 7/30/07 3/25/09 F.T. Silfies Inc. Quantum Equity Partners LLC 8/1/05 3/25/09 Kampa AG Triton Beteiligungsberatung GmbH 11/2/06 3/25/09 Varig Logistica SA MatlinPatterson LLC 1/11/06 3/31/09 USI Senior Holdings Inc. (United Subcontractors Inc.) Wind Point Partners 9/30/04 3/31/09 Castle Holdco 4 Ltd. (Countrywide plc) Apollo Management LP, Oaktree Capital Management LP 2/21/07 4/2/09 Zohar Waterworks LLC Patriarch Partners LLC 8/30/05 4/2/09 BT Tires Group Holding LLC (Big 10 Tire Stores Inc.) Sun Capital Partners Inc. 11/28/06 4/2/09 Signature Aluminum Inc. H.I.G. Capital LLC 12/29/05 4/3/09 Jane & Co. Stone Canyon Venture Partners LP, Walnut Private Equity Fund LP 2/27/04 4/6/09 Katz International Coasters GmbH CBR Management GmbH; EquiVest I Fund 11/1/05 4/14/09 DWW Deutsche Woolworth GmbH & Co. OHG Argyll Partners Ltd. 10/31/07 4/14/09 Dayton Superior Corp. Odyssey Investment Partners LLC 1/19/00 4/19/09 Eurofresh Inc. Bruckmann, Rosser, Sherrill & Co. LLC 12/31/01 4/21/09 Source Interlink Cos. (Primedia Enthusiast Media Inc.) Yucaipa Cos. LLC 5/14/07 4/27/09 Victor Oolitic Stone Co. Audax Group LP 8/25/05 4/28/09 Chrysler LLC Cerberus Capital Management LP 5/14/07 4/30/09 Mark IV Industries Inc. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 1/2/08 4/30/09 Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co. Lone Star Funds 6/4/07 5/1/09 Thornburg Mortgage Inc. MatlinPatterson LLC 3/27/08 5/1/09 AGT Crunch Acquisition LLC (Crunch Fitness International Inc.) Angelo, Gordon & Co. 1/20/06 5/6/09 Riviera Group Pty Ltd. GIC Special Investments Pte Ltd., Gresham Private Equity, Ironbridge Pty Ltd. 10/11/02 5/7/09 White Energy Inc. Ares Management LLC 7/7/06 5/7/09 Gandi Innovations Ltd. TA Associates Inc. 9/14/07 5/8/09 Roma Foods of Oklahoma Inc. (Eateries Inc.) Hestia Holdings LLC 12/31/06 5/11/09 J.G. Wentworth LLC JLL Partners Inc. 7/25/05 5/19/09 Anchor Blue Retail Group Inc. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 6/1/03 5/27/09 Metaldyne Corp. RHJ International SA 9/1/06 5/28/09 Consolidated Bedding Inc. (Spring Air) American Capital Ltd., H.I.G. Capital LLC 7/17/07 5/29/09 HSF Holding Inc. (Hawaii Superferry Inc.) J.F. Lehman & Co., Norwest Equity Partners 11/2/05 5/30/09 Nukote International Inc. Richmont Capital Partners I LP 10/25/00 6/3/09 Berean Christian Stores LLC JMH Capital 8/2/06 6/9/09 MagnaChip Semiconductor Finance Co. Citigroup Venture Capital Equity Partners LP, CVC Asia Pacific Ltd., Francisco Partners LP 1/13/04 6/12/09 MIG Inc. (Metromedia International Group Inc.) CaucusCom Ventures LP, Compound Capital Ltd., Salford Capital Partners Inc. 8/22/07 6/18/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 37 the daily deal Th u r s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Lost leverage Private equity-backed bankruptcies Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 PE firm Debtor Buyout ann. date Bankruptcy filing date Bodilsen AS EQT Opportunity Fund 11/2/06 6/23/09 CCS Medical Inc. Warburg Pincus LLC 10/3/05 7/9/09 NV Broadcasting LLC Arlington Capital Partners LP 9/19/02 7/13/09 RathGibson Inc. DLJ Merchant Banking Partners LP 4/30/07 7/13/09 Lang Holdings Inc. (Lang Cos. LLC) Catterton Partners 11/20/03 7/16/09 Wilton Holdings Inc. GTCR Golder Rauner LLC 7/20/07 7/17/09 Ambassador Media Group LLC Navigator Equity Partners LLC 8/30/02 7/24/09 Stant Corp. H.I.G. Capital LLC 6/19/08 7/27/09 Arclin US Holdings Inc.; Arclin Canada Ltd. (Dynea North America) Teachers’ Private Capital (Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan) 11/21/06 7/27/09 Station Casinos Inc. Colony Capital LLC 12/2/06 7/28/09 Eyedea SA Green Recovery SAS 1/22/07 7/28/09 Mrs. John L. Strong & Co. LLC Circle Peak Capital LLC 10/7/08 7/31/09 Cooper-Standard Automotive Holdings Inc. Cypress Group LLC; Goldman Sachs Credit Partners LP 9/17/04 8/3/09 CommerceConnect Media Holdings Inc. (Cygnus Business Media Inc.) Abry Partners LLC 5/23/00 8/3/09 SkyPower Corp. Lehman Brothers Private Equity 6/11/07 8/13/09 Starfire Systems Inc. Palladium Equity Partners LLC 7/11/07 8/13/09 Ellen Tracy Inc. Radius Partners LLC, Windsong Brands LLC 4/10/08 8/14/09 Reader’s Digest Association Inc. GoldenTree Asset Management LP, GSO Capital Partners, J. Rothschild Group, Magnetar Capital, Merrill Lynch Capital Corp., Ripplewood Holdings LLC 11/16/06 8/24/09 Bluewater Broadcasting Co. LLC Alta Communications 4/30/03 8/24/09 Freedom Communications Holdings Inc. Blackstone Group LP, Providence Equity Partners Inc. 5/19/04 9/1/09 Alternative Distribution Systems Inc. Code Hennessy & Simmons LLC., William Blair Mezzanine Capital Fund II LP 9/9/99 9/2/09 Samsonite Company Stores LLC CVC Capital Partners Ltd. 7/5/07 9/2/09 Velocity Express Corp. TH Lee Putnam Ventures 5/31/00 9/24/09 Questex Media Group Inc. Audax Group LP 5/23/05 10/5/09 True Temper Sports Inc. Gilbert Global Equity Partners 2/2/04 10/8/09 Accuride Corp. Sun Capital Partners Inc. 2/27/09 10/8/09 Ascend Media Holdings LLC CCMP Capital Advisors LLC, Veronis Suhler Stevenson LLC 2002/2003 10/15/09 Stallion Oilfield Services Ltd. Carlyle Group, Riverstone Holdings LLC 2/3/05 10/19/09 NTK Holdings Inc. (Nortek Inc.) Thomas H. Lee Partners LP 7/15/04 10/21/09 Capmark Financial Group Inc. Goldman Sachs Capital Partners LP, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. 8/3/05 10/25/09 Express Energy Services Operating LP Macquarie Group Ltd., Wachovia Capital Partners 6/24/08 10/27/09 First Quench Retailing Ltd. (Thresher Group) Vision Capital LLP 6/12/07 10/29/09 Panolam Holdings Co. Genstar Capital LP, Sterling Group LP 8/25/05 11/4/09 Patrick Hackett Hardware Co. Seaway Valley Capital Corp. 7/20/07 11/10/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 38 the daily deal T hur s day Dece mber 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Venturing into the abyss More than three dozen venture capital-backed companies filed for bankruptcy, with most due to disappear altogether C redit starvation has affected all industries in the past two years, but venture capital-backed companies, with few tangible assets, were particularly ravaged in 2009, with most of the bloodied opting to liquidate. According to pipeline.thedeal.com, some 40 VC-backed bankruptcies were filed in 2009 through Nov. 15 (see table, pages 40 to 41), and of the 35 in the U.S., 22 of them, or 63%, entered Chapter 7 liquidation. For all of 2008, there were only 17 VC-backed bankruptcies. “Without the infusion of capital and the assurance of future profitability, a liquidation, as opposed to a reorganization, is more likely,” says Roger P. Glovsky of Lexington, Mass., law firm Indigo Venture Law Offices, which provides counsel to entrepreneurs and high-tech businesses. Since VC-backed companies are “idea companies,” they rely solely on the strength of their innovations and tend to be more vulnerable because they don’t have tangible assets, says Ron Silverman of New York law firm Bingham McCutchen LLP. “VC-backed companies are often startups in really early stages,” Silverman explains. “When things work well, the rewards are really terrific. If they don’t work, there is much less in the way of assets or contracts or anything to reorganize around. There’s nothing else to do but to shut it down.” Companies in the biotechnology/pharmaceuticals, medical devices and Internet commerce sectors are most vulnerable to economic downturns, Glovsky says. The data proves Glovsky right. Of the 124 industries and subindustries tracked by pipeline.thedeal.com, those three subsectors had the highest rates of bankruptcy. “These are all technology-based industries with high-risk, long-term research and development [needs but] no shortterm exit strategies,” Glovsky says. “These high-risk deals are less attractive when capital sources are limited and the exit op- close print portunities are pushed further out.” He also feels that many VC-backed companies had planned on obtaining later rounds of financing that ultimately didn’t materialize because of the economic slump. “With the capital markets constricted, the chance of a near-term public offering or acquisition is much less,” Glovsky adds. In the Internet commerce sector, three companies (n2N Commerce Inc., Home Decor Products Inc. and Elephant Pharmacy Inc.) sought Chapter 7 protection, while one (Home Bistro Foods Inc.) filed for Chapter 11 and another (Smartfundit. com Ltd.) petitioned for administration in the U.K. Elephant Pharmacy, a Berkeley, Calif., health and wellness retailer, said it filed for Chapter 7 on Feb. 10 because it couldn’t raise the capital to continue operating. The company had received $36 million in venture capital financing from Arthur Rubinfeld, Bay Area Equity Fund, CVS Corp., David Hadley and Tudor Investment Corp. between 2004 and 2006. N2N Commerce, which received $30 million in VC funding from General Catalyst Partners and Limited Brands Inc. in 2007, was forced into Chapter 11 on July 13 by creditors with roughly $6.8 million in claims. Of the five VC-backed medical device companies that failed this year, four sought Chapter 7 (Therative Inc., Rubicor Medical Inc., Innovative Spinal Technologies Inc. and OmniSonics Medical Technologies Inc.) while one filed for Chapter 11 (VivoMetrics Inc.). Innovative Spinal had raised $57 million in VC funding from J.P. Morgan Partners LLC, First Round Capital and Frontier Management Group between 2005 and 2008, but its CFO, John B. Henneman III, has said that his Boston company filed for liquidation simply because it ran out of money. In September, it sold itself to Integra LifeSciences Corp. for $9.25 million. The number of insolvencies hitting the biotechnology/pharmaceuticals sector was back < Index > cover hardly surprising. A report issued in January by the Biotechnology Industry Organization indicated that only 10% of the 370 public U.S. biotech companies had positive income and that 180 had less than a year of cash remaining. Six bankruptcies were filed in the subindustry, worst among all industry and subindustry groups. Five companies filed for Chapter 7 (Altus Pharmaceuticals Inc., Argolyn Bioscience Inc., Dynogen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Protein Sciences Corp. and Cogentus Pharmaceuticals Inc.), while one filed for administration in the U.K. (York Pharma plc). Plenty of other subsectors experienced at least one VC-backed bankruptcy, among them alternative energy (Greenline Industries Inc.), diversified manufacturing (Luna Innovations Inc.), homebuilding (Wall Homes Inc.), music (Muzak Holdings LLC), nanotechnology (NanoDynamics Inc.), semiconductors (Aviza Technology Inc.), telecommunications (ProtoStar Ltd.), telecommunications equipment (ThinkEngine Networks Inc.), information technology (Portaga Inc.), computer hardware and software (Ortega InfoSystems Inc.), digital entertainment (Radioscape Ltd. and SeeqPod Inc.), leisure (Travelworm Inc.), electronics (Ugobe Inc. and DeepStreem Technologies Ltd.) and new media (Joost UK Ltd., Espre Solutions Inc. and BroadRamp Inc.). Some VC-backed companies took a cheaper route to liquidation than Chapter 7. An assignment for the benefit of creditors, or ABC, proceeding saves bankruptcy court costs since an assignee is appointed by a company to assume control of its rights, titles and interests. Those assets are then liquidated and distributed to creditors. A 60-day window is given for the company to solicit the approval of the assignee’s appointment from its creditors. Among the VC-backed companies tak- CONTINUED > search view 39 the daily deal Thurs day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW < PREVIOUS ing the ABC route were New York-based Mohen Inc., an ad-supported music and video download service that shut down in March and did business as SpiralFrog, and Redwood City, Calif.-based NebuAd Inc., an online behavioral tracking startup. Outside the U.S., only one insolvent VCbacked company, online video sharing services provider Joost, appears to have liquidated. Four others sought administration in the U.K. with plans to sell themselves. One, York Pharma, was sold in August. There is more hope for after 2009, according to accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. In a report, Deloitte noted that investors have been slowing down their level of investments in VC funds and shifting to later-stage and existing portfolio companies, but the firm also revealed that a majority of VC investors believe that it is currently a better time to invest in promis- ing entrepreneurial companies. Some 53% of U.S. investors felt it was a “terrific” time; 61% of their U.K. counterparts felt the same way. “The current recession is not stopping venture capitalists from looking for the best investment opportunities in order to produce the best possible returns for their investors—regardless of borders,” the report asserted. More encouraging is Deloitte’s finding that 50% or more of the VC investors in Europe, the Americas, the U.K., Israel and the Asia Pacific region plan on boosting their investments over the next three years. Even the level of VC-backed bankruptcies in the medical device and equipment industries isn’t scaring those investors off. In Deloitte’s study, 27% of the U.S. investors in the field would increase their funding over the next three years, while 62% of those investors would hold their funding at the same level in the same time period. The situation in the semiconductor industry is much less sanguine, however. Deloitte reported that 56% of U.S. investors are expected to decrease their venture funding within the next three years. The maturity of the telecom sector has also led 36% of U.S. investors to decide to pull back on future funding. Indigo Venture’s Glovsky feels that, in today’s tough economic times, VC funds should look to invest in companies with strong customer demand in a recessionary environment and companies that can be financed through a single round of funding. “If multiple rounds of financing are needed, there is a risk that the capital markets will continue to be constrained and second or third rounds of financing will not be available,” he explains. “If success depends on development of new technology, new markets or distribution channels, or raising capital, those deals will be less attractive to VCs.” n —Carolyn Okomo deals don’t come easy in difficult markets. finding them just got easier. Source and track auctions, bankruptcies, financings, DIPs and M&A deals with the deal pipeline. Using the Find A Deal search feature, you’re one click away from more than 60,000 deals across 30 industries, updated daily by our global editorial staff. The deal dashboard for your business is at http://pipeline.thedeal.com To get a demonstration, contact Michael Crosby at 212-313-9325 or [email protected] close print back < Index > cover search view 40 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Misadventure capital Venture capital-backed bankruptcies Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Debtor Sector Investor Funding date Volume ($mill.) Filing date Ortega InfoSystems Inc. Computer hardware and software Harbinger Venture Management, Sycamore Ventures Pte Ltd. 12/5/02 $11.8 1/12/09 ThinkEngine Networks Inc. Telecom equipment Prism Venture Partners, VantagePoint Venture Partners 2/13/01 15.0 1/14/09 Portaga Inc. Leisure Ascend Venture Group LLC, Cove Harbor Partners, First Round Capital 8/15/06 5.8 1/16/09 Cogentus Pharmaceuticals Inc. Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals Apothecary Capital LLC, Keffi Group Ltd., Pinnacle Ventures, Prospect Venture Partners, Ridgeback Capital Management LLC 12/21/07 62.5 1/16/09 Wall Homes Inc. Homebuilding Jen Partners LLC, Warburg Pincus LLC 4/14/05 50.0 1/19/09 BroadRamp Inc. New media Venture Vest II 4/26/06 5.0 1/23/09 Espre Solutions Inc. New media StreamTraX Visual Communication Technologies Inc. 9/29/05 15.0 1/30/09 ManagedStorage International Inc. Information technology services Great Hill Partners LLC, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Tudor Ventures 1/16/03 22.0 2/4/09 Muzak Holdings LLC Music Bank America Capital Investors, New York Life Capital Partners, Northwestern Mutual Financial Network 10/20/00 85.0 2/10/09 Elephant Pharmacy Inc. Internet commerce Arthur Rubinfeld, Bay Area Equity Fund, CVS Corp., David Hadley, Tudor Investment Corp. 11/16/04; 09/12/06 36.0 2/10/09 Recordant Inc. Computer hardware and software Kodiak Venture Partners 2/13/06 3.0 2/10/09 Dynogen Pharmaceuticals Inc. Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals A. M. Pappas & Associates LLC, HealthCare Ventures LLC, Oxford Bioscience Partners, Abingworth Management Ltd., Atlas Venture, Medica Venture Partners, Schroder Ventures Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust 4/20/04; 11/13/02 55.7 2/23/09 Home Bistro Foods Inc. Internet commerce CEI Ventures Inc., New York Community Investment Co. LLC, Sustainable Jobs Fund LP 9/11/03 1.5 3/20/09 Mohen Inc. (SpiralFrog Inc.) Digital Entertainment Undisclosed investors 12/28/07; 04/19/06 10.9 3/20/09 OmniSonics Medical Technologies Inc. Medical devices Canaan Partners, Domain Associates LLC, GE Asset Management Inc., Hambrecht & Quist Capital Management LLC, New England Partners Capital LP, Prism Venture Partners, Johnson & Johnson Development Corp. 10/9/03; 5/30/01; 7/18/00 52.7 3/23/09 Home Decor Products Inc. Internet commerce Kinderhook Partners LP, Seymour Holtzman, 3i Venture Capital, Comcast Interactive Capital, Liberty Associated Partners LP 7/19/05; 12/20/06 72.1 3/27/09 SeeqPod Inc. Digital entertainment Undisclosed investors 4/30/08 7.0 3/30/09 Ugobe Inc. Electronics Rose Tech Ventures LLC, First Round Capital, Frontier Management Group, Band of Angels Fund, Hiyield Venture Capital 5/31/06; 10/31/06; 6/10/08 23.3 4/17/09 Radioscape Ltd. Digital entertainment Atlas Venture, Royal Bank Ventures Ltd., Scottish Equity Partners Ltd., Texas Instruments Inc., Yasuda Enterprise Development Co. Ltd., iGlobe Partners Inc. 12/10/01; 04/11/02 25.2 4/30/09 Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view 41 the daily deal Th ur s day De cember 17 2009 NEXT CHAPTER YEAR IN REVIEW Misadventure capital Venture capital-backed bankruptcies Jan. 1–Nov. 15, 2009 Debtor Sector Investor Funding date Volume ($mill.) Filing date Innovative Spinal Technologies Inc. Medical devices J.P. Morgan Partners LLC, MPM Capital LP, OrbiMed Advisors LLC 8/3/05; 09/30/08 57.0 5/15/09 NebuAd Inc. New media Menlo Ventures; Sierra Ventures 9/25/07 20.5 5/15/09 Hammerhead Systems Inc. Networking hardware and software Apex Venture Partners, Enterprise Partners Venture Capital, FirstMark Capital, Foundation Capital, Mayfield, Silver Creek Ventures 08/02/07; 01/31/06; 01/27/04 73.0 5/21/09 Nevis Networks Inc. Networking hardware and software Nokia Venture Partners 5/13/04 10.0 5/26/09 Smartfundit.com Ltd. Internet commerce BayTech Venture Capital Beratungs GmbH 12/4/08 4.1 5/26/09 Aviza Technology Inc. Semiconductors VantagePoint Venture Partners 10/17/03 50.0 6/9/09 DeepStream Technologies Ltd. Electronics Doughty Hanson Technology Ventures, Welsh Assembly Government 9/27/04 17.9 6/12/09 Protein Sciences Corp. Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals Nosan Corp. 11/13/01; 01/08/02 3.0 6/22/09 Argolyn Bioscience Inc. Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals Intersouth Partners, Quaker BioVentures Inc. 6/27/07 15.8 7/6/09 Rubicor Medical Inc. Medical devices ITX International Equity Corp., Rubicor Inc. (management), Safeguard Scientifics Inc. 8/28/06 30.0 7/10/09 n2N Commerce Inc. Internet commerce General Catalyst Partners, Limited Brands Inc. 2/5/07 30.0 7/13/09 Luna Innovations Inc. (Luna Technologies Inc.) Electronics Columbia Capital, Envest Ventures I, Novak Biddle Venture Partners, Soundview Technology, Southwest One LLC, Virginia Tech 4/23/03 3.5 7/17/09 NanoDynamics Inc. Nanotech Undisclosed investors 7/28/04 12.0 7/27/09 York Pharma plc Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals Undisclosed investors 9/19/05 9.0 7/28/09 ProtoStar Ltd. Telecommunications New Enterprise Associates, SpaceVest Capital, RedShift Ventures, VantagePoint Venture Partners 11/17/06; 09/13/06; 03/15/05 90.0 7/29/09 Greenline Industries Inc. Alternative energy Leaf Clean Energy Co. 4/8/08 20.0 8/7/09 Travelworm Inc. Leisure Cedar Street Group, Wasserstein Venture Capital 2/6/04 NA 8/13/09 Therative Inc. Medical devices Band of Angels Fund, Bessemer Venture Partners, Foundation Capital, RWI Ventures 5/17/07 9.0 8/20/09 Joost UK Ltd. (Joost NV) New media Index Ventures, Li Ka Shing Foundation, Sequoia Capital, Viacom Inc. 5/11/07 45.0 10/2/09 VivoMetrics Inc. Medical devices CSFB Private Equity, CyberFund LLC, Hammer Capital Management Inc. 8/21/00 0.0 10/16/09 Biotechnology and pharmaceuticals BankInvest Group, China Development Industrial Bank Inc., Clariden Bank, CMEA Ventures, Hotung Group, Nomura International plc, Nomura Phase4 Ventures Ltd., Palladian Group, U.S. Venture Partners, Warburg Pincus LLC 05/26/04; 12/27/01 66.0 11/11/09 Altus Pharmaceuticals Inc. Source: pipeline.thedeal.com close print back < Index > cover search view