bq11 - Library - Conservation International
Transcription
bq11 - Library - Conservation International
B Q USHMEAT UARTERLY Issue Number 11 Newsletter of the Bushmeat Crisis Task Force Spring/Summer 2004 Bushmeat Working Groups Around the World Update FOCUS: Bushmeat & Primate Conservation / Health Impacts Feature Stories Policy Updates 1 Species Conservation Groups and the BCTF January – April 2004 4 Bushmeat & Health Impacts 6 HIV/AIDS and Biodiversity ► ► ►► ► Conservation Linkages ► 9 Country Profile: EQUATORIAL GUINEA BCTF News 11 12 January – May 2004 News to Use Jobs and Grants Calendar of Events 22 H HIIV V//A AIID DS S & & BBiiooddiivveerrssiittyy CCoonnsseerrvvaattiioonn LLiinnkkaaggeess Species Conservation Groups and the Bushmeat Crisis Task Force While unsustainable bushmeat hunting impacts a diversity of wildlife, the threat to a few charismatic species brought attention to the crisis in the late 1990’s. African great apes have been hit particularly hard by the growing trade, and their plight forced wildlife conservation groups to evaluate what they were doing about the bushmeat crisis. For many organizations, this concern has evolved into action that benefits not only apes but also other primates, elephants, duikers, rodents, cats, civets, pangolins, reptiles, birds, and any animal hunted for sale as food. Several groups are also tackling root causes, such as poverty and lack of information. Organizations focusing on primate conservation have been part of BCTF since the beginning. The American Society of Primatologists (ASP), Bonobo Conservation Initiative, Bonobo Protection Fund, The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International (DFGFI), The Gorilla Foundation, International Gorilla Conservation Programme, The Jane Goodall Institute (JGI), The Primate Conservation and Welfare Society, and The Primate Society of Great Britain were all organizational signatories to the February 1999 Consensus Statement calling for immediate action to address the bushmeat crisis in tropical African countries. Primates, and great apes in particular, illustrate many of the major concerns regarding bushmeat: their reproductive rate is too slow to support sustainable hunting, their closeness to humans makes them vectors for diseases deadly to people, Bushmeat Working Group Updates 15 October 2003 – January 2004 New reports for: Bristol Zoo Gardens ◊ CITES BWG ◊ GRASP ◊ IUCN-ROCA ◊ Liberia BWG ◊ Oakland Zoo ◊ Bushmeat Crisis Africa (PAAZAB) ◊ UK Tropical Forest Forum ◊ World Bank CEO Working Group and orphaned infants and juveniles are frequently offered for sale after the rest of the family is sold as food. Public concern for these issues is high, and every BCTF Supporting Member engages in primate conservation or protection in some capacity. Many BCTF partners – including the recently formed Pan African Sanctuaries Alliance (PASA) and the Great Ape Survival Project (GRASP) – are focused entirely on this task. Three current BCTF Supporting Members include primate conservation in their core mission: ASP, DFGFI and JGI. The following summaries provide a glimpse of what these groups do to promote or conduct research and work with communities to stem the bushmeat trade. American Society of Primatologists By Dr. Janette Wallis, Chair of the ASP Conservation Committee The American Society of Primatologists (ASP) is the professional society within North America dedicated to the study of primates. Our 650 members study primates in the wild, in laboratories, in zoos, and in sanctuaries. Our research covers every imaginable topic, including cognition and intelligence, health and husbandry, behavioral ecology and conservation. Although habitat destruction is still the leading threat to most primate species worldwide, hunting has become the primary concern for many species – particularly in Africa and Asia. Thus, the bushmeat crisis is of key importance to members of the ASP. In 1997, before AZA’s formal interest led BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY to the formation of BCTF, ASP member Anthony Rose conducted a special workshop at the annual ASP conference entitled “The African primate bushmeat crisis.” This was the first time many ASP members were made aware of the severity of hunting pressures on primates. The ASP’s Conservation Committee took note of the topic and sought ways to address it within the Committee. In 1999, the year BCTF was founded, another special session was held at the ASP annual conference. “The African bushmeat crisis: New findings, theory, and solutions” was co-organized by ASP members Tara Stoinski and Anthony Rose. Several of the founding members of BCTF were present at that ASP session to discuss plans for the future and to invite ASP’s involvement. When the BCTF was formed, ASP became a Contributing Member, and in 2001 became a full Supporting Member, with a seat on the Steering Committee shortly thereafter. At the 2002 ASP conference, a special session, “Solutions to the African bushmeat crisis: The Bushmeat Crisis Task Force and collaborative action planning,” was coorganized by Natalie Bailey, Dieter Steklis, Patrick Mehlman, Tara Stoinski, Christina Ellis, and Janette Wallis. Thus, the ASP’s annual meetings have served as an educational resource for the topic of bushmeat and we support the BCTF’s activities. However, ASP plays an unusual role within BCTF. Because we are a professional society, we are made up of members, officers, and committees that function purely as volunteers. Thus, unlike other members of BCTF, we do not have personnel employed to carry out bushmeat research, education, awareness or enforcement on behalf of ASP. Still, we play an important role as a source of information and expertise. We have facilitated BCTF staff and fellow BCTF Supporting Members in various ways, such as helping with the development of educational materials, making referrals for habitat country contacts, and editing the scientific content of BCTF literature. Beyond the financial support provided to BCTF, the ASP’s Conservation Committee can directly aid bushmeat projects through its annual Small Conservation Grants. Competition for these grants (maximum of $1500 each) has grown steadily over the years; during 2001, we received 22 proposals, in 2004, 45. Of the 11 grants awarded in 2003, 3 mentioned prevention of hunting or snare injuries as a specific part of the project. Many of the grants Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 have been awarded for broad-based conservation education projects that include hunting as one of many threats to a primate population. Moreover, it is well recognized that the mere presence of researchers and field assistants can help to reduce hunting pressures. The ASP Conservation Committee is currently planning a document that discusses the hunting threat to nonhuman primates. Moreover, members of the ASP, particularly the Conservation Committee, remain ready to aid the BCTF in whatever way we are able. For more information about the American Society of Primatologists, visit our web site at www.asp.org or feel free to contact the Chair of the ASP Conservation Committee (and BCTF Steering Committee Member, representing ASP), Dr. Janette Wallis ([email protected]). The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Summary prepared by BCTF The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International (DFGFI, or the Gorilla Fund), originally founded as the Digit Fund, carries on the gorilla conservation legacy of Dian Fossey. DFGFI is committed to gorilla protection, science, field research, education and awareness, and economic development. Activities take place on many levels and places, involving people from Rwanda and elsewhere in Africa, the United States, and around the world. Recently, DFGFI has begun to increase and diversify its programs to address pressing conservation challenges beyond the range of mountain gorillas, including an area of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) covering more than three million hectares. This area has been identified as a unique eco-region with worldwide conservation significance. The area (referred to officially as the Maiko Tayna Kahuzi-Biega Landscape) has a very high level of species richness, many unique to this area and highly threatened. It supports an unusual combination of charismatic species, as well as about 97% of the distribution and population of eastern lowland gorillas. Like many areas in the world today, it is undergoing a biological and conservation crisis, suffering from over-hunting, mining, and expanding human population pressure as people Page 2 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY clear land for agriculture and large commercial grazing. Recent surveys indicate the population of eastern lowland gorillas has plummeted, from an estimated 17,000 individuals in 1994 to 5,000 today. Some of DFGFI’s most important activities include: • Monitoring and protecting the mountain gorillas residing Rwanda's Parc National des Volcans, through the Karisoke Research Center's programs, including tracking and anti-poaching patrols. • Sharing knowledge and experience to promote the use of common gorilla monitoring protocols and practices. • Collecting demographic, behavioral and environmental data, often in collaboration with universities in Africa. • Funding small-scale development activities in communities near the gorilla habitat, in support of the local people. • Training rangers and trackers. • Bringing GIS and remote sensing technology to collaborating universities in Africa. Training students and trackers in applying these powerful land use planning technologies. • Promoting public awareness of gorilla conservation via media and other communication projects. • Partnering with important gorilla conservation projects in other areas, such as the Tayna Gorilla Reserve in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has awarded the Gorilla Fund over a half million dollars, as part of its Congressional Gorilla Directive. These funds are now enabling DFGFI to greatly expand and enhance its programs in the Albertine Rift area of Africa, including high-tech projects that will map out the mountain gorillas' dwindling habitat, programs to assist with health problems in populations living near the gorillas, support for local conservation and development initiatives, and new schools and other education projects. Since 2000, the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International has been operating in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) by supporting a series of community-based conservation and development projects. The flagship project, The Tayna Gorilla Reserve, is a 700 km2, nationally recognized Nature Reserve that is totally managed by a system of traditional African governance. Because of its success, seven other similar projects covering a region of more than 10,000 km2 are in development and have organized themselves into an association called UGADEC (Union des Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Associations de Conservation des Gorilles pour le Développement Communautaire à l'Est de la République Démocratique de Congo). In partnership with Conservation International (CI), DFGFI has just strengthened its conservation program in eastern DRC. The new program will protect a large portion of the range of eastern lowland gorillas and the other fauna and flora found in their habitat, through a group of unique community-based preserves. This initiative is made possible by USAID’s Central African Regional Program for the Environment (CARPE), in support of the Congo Basin Forest Partnership. Through funding from CARPE and CI’s Global Conservation Fund, DFGFI is expected to receive about $1 million each year for three years. This grant award will permit DFGFI to expand and support the UGADEC programs, and also to begin support for the rehabilitation of Maiko National Park, a 10,000 km2 park that has never received any international support. For more information about DFGFI and its work, visit www.gorillafund.org. The Jane Goodall Institute Summary prepared by BCTF The mission of the Jane Goodall Institute (JGI) is to advance the power of individuals to take informed and compassionate action to improve the environment of all living things. Specifically, JGI works to: • Increase primate habitat conservation • Increase awareness of, support for and training in issues related to our relationship with each other, the environment and other animals (leading to behavior change) • Expand non-invasive research programs on chimpanzees and other primates • Promote activities that ensure the well-being of chimpanzees, other primates and animal welfare activities in general JGI is a founding member of BCTF, and Jane Goodall herself has a been a champion for raising awareness about the bushmeat crisis in many of her speaking engagements and as a keynote speaker for BCTF events. Page 3 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY JGI understands that they must address economic and social development needs for conservation to be effective. JGI’s Africa Programs division works to “ensure the long-term protection and survival of wild ape populations through the empowerment of the poor and disadvantaged people with whom they share their homes.” Field personnel in Cameroon, Congo, Kenya, Uganda, South Africa and – of course – Tanzania (home of the Gombe chimpanzees first studied by Dr. Goodall) work with communities to improve agricultural yields, build capacity for community-centered conservation and development, and raise public awareness about conservation issues. JGI also supports chimpanzee sanctuaries, refuges for the orphans of the bushmeat trade which are sold as pets. The Institute operates sanctuaries in the Repubic of Congo and Kenya, provides support to Ngamba Island Sanctuary in Uganda, and has plans to open a new sanctuary soon in South Africa. Bushmeat activities conducted by JGI staff are founded on the following guiding principles: • • Humans have a responsibility to address the conservation threats imposed by global politics, industrial exploitation, population growth, economic greed, and bad governance. The best way to preserve our natural heritage is to invest in meeting the needs of people. Clearly the environmental challenges humanity faces in the 21st century and beyond would be less difficult in a world with slower population growth. • Sustainable livelihoods, development, and conservation are possible and effective measures to conserve biodiversity and human diversity. • Respect for local communities, culture, and heritage guide field activities. • A transparent and flexible manner is used in creating and implementing joint activities. • Partnerships will achieve greater results than acting independently. • Every individual matters, and every individual can make a difference. Through their various programs, JGI strives to eliminate the illegal commercial bushmeat trade in endangered species, and to regulate the legal trade—as part of an integrated approach toward sustainable forest resource management. Their objectives address the various stakeholders, especially the role of women, with the ambition to affect long-term sustainable change by increasing the opportunity and ability to live sustainably. JGI Africa Programs has a new website with more details on all of the programs introduced here, as well as many others. Visit www.janegoodall.org/ africa-programs to learn more about JGI’s work in the field. Bushmeat, Health and Conservation Impacts by Natalie Bailey, BCTF In Africa and around the world, policy makers, NGOs and the public are increasingly focusing attention on the threat that zoonotic (cross species) disease transmission poses to human health. Global transportation of people, wildlife and livestock, combined with increasing opportunities for crossspecies disease transmission has already resulted in the global emergence of diseases such as SARS, monkeypox, Ebola and HIV/AIDS. Evidence that HIV/AIDS arose from the transfer of chimpanzeeborne SIV (simian immunodeficiency virus) to humans, probably through blood-to-blood contact during the hunting and butchering of bushmeat was first published in 1999 (Gao et al. 1999). More recently, Ebola, monkeypox and SARS outbreaks have demonstrated the ease with which humans can contract and spread certain wildlife diseases, particularly those of non-human primates. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Two major factors are at play in the spread of emerging infectious diseases. First, demand for bushmeat in Africa, Asia and other parts of the world have increased the number of hunters and traders as well as both meat and live animal markets. In markets, viruses have millions of opportunities to cross over to other species and can potentially recombine into new viral strains (WCS 2003). Second, global air transportation allows for rapid movement of infected individuals (whether animal or human), which may contribute to the rapid spread of diseases. The SARS outbreak of 2003 is a vivid example of a disease that jumped across species borders into humans and was rapidly spread around the world, infecting individuals from approximately 30 countries. A monkeypox outbreak in the U.S. in 2003 demonstrated the risks of importation of live wildlife into the U.S. when prairie dogs housed with imported monkeypox-carrying African rats spread the disease to exotic pet owners. Page 4 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY HIV/AIDS Researchers seeking information on the origins of HIV/AIDS have demonstrated compelling evidence that bushmeat hunting and preparation may have introduced SIVcpz into human populations (Gao et al. 1999). Published in the same month that the Bushmeat Crisis Task Force was formed, this paper demonstrated that Pan troglodytes troglodytes (central chimpanzee) was the primary reservoir of HIV1 and that the species had been the source of at least three independent introductions of SIVcpz into the human population. In this and subsequent papers, authors noted that the prevalence of the bushmeat trade and the blood-to-blood contact common in hunting and preparation of bushmeat may provide opportunities for future crossover events from chimpanzees and other primates (Gao et al. 1999, Hahn et al. 2000, Wolfe et al. 2000, Daszak et al. 2000, Peeters et al. 2002, Wolfe et al.2004). At least 18 different primate SIVs have been found in at least 26 different primate species, putting humans who hunt and prepare primate bushmeat at risk for numerous genetically divergent viruses (Hahn et al. 2000, Peeters et al. 2002). Opportunities for recombination of similar retroviruses (including the newly-identified human infection of simian foamy virus, or SFV) indicate an even greater potential global health challenge (Wolfe et al.2004). Ebola Ebola is a rapidly spreading, devastating disease that affects both human and primate populations. Hemorrhagic fevers such as Ebola can result in high mortality as they spread through dense areas. On several occasions, Ebola outbreaks have been first observed in apes, only to infect humans when infected apes are hunted or found dead in the forest, and later consumed. The 2002 Ebola outbreak in Republic of Congo and Gabon was explicitly linked to bushmeat consumption; as a result, the Government of Gabon began strictly enforcing bans on bushmeat hunting (Lawson 2002). Ebola outbreaks have occurred at least eight times in various African countries since 1994; five outbreaks involving eight different viral strains occurred in Gabon and Republic of Congo since 2001, with each human outbreak linked to the handling of a dead animal (gorilla, chimpanzee or duiker) (Leroy et al. 2004). Ebola outbreaks are catastrophic to apes as well as to humans. Both bushmeat hunting and Ebola outbreaks have contributed to a 50% decline in ape populations in Gabon since 1983 (Walsh et al. 2003). In addition, researchers have found indicators that gorilla, chimpanzee and duiker populations may have declined by as much as 50-88% during a 2003 Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 outbreak in the Lossi Reserve, Republic of Congo (Leroy et al. 2004). In response, veterinarians, human health agencies and conservationists are making urgent calls for control of bushmeat hunting, health education and wildlife monitoring. Actions Addressing Global Disease Risks More recently, the global outbreak of SARS and the emergence of monkeypox in the Midwestern region of the U.S. have raised further concerns from health professionals and conservationists regarding the demand for and global transportation of wildlife. SARS has been linked to burgeoning wildlife markets in China, where demand for masked palm civets and other species of wildlife has increased with the growing population (Bhattacharya and MacKenzie 2003). In a matter of just a few weeks, the disease had flown around the world on commercial airliners. The monkeypox case demonstrated the many ways that a disease could be transmitted, as it moved from imported African giant rats to prairie dogs to humans (CDC 2003). Within the BCTF network, government agencies and NGOs are working together to focus on the importance of collaboration across sectors (conservation, human health professionals, wildlife veterinarians, policy makers, etc.) to encourage integrated decision-making, public awareness, fundraising and action regarding the bushmeat trade and emerging diseases. A recent meeting jointly held with the Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) and the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) brought together representatives of each of these sectors to discuss solutions to these issues, with bushmeat as a major focus of the meeting. Further information will be posted to the BCTF website as developments continue. References Bushmeat, Health and Conservation Impacts Bhattacharya, S and D. MacKenzie. 2003. Exotic market animals likely source of SARS. New Scientist. Available online: http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99993763. CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention). 2003. Questions and answers about Monkeypox. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/qa.htm. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. 2000. Emerging Infectious Diseases of Wildlife--Threats to Biodiversity and Human Health. Science 287:443-9. Gao F, Bailes E, Robertson DL, Chen Y, Rodenburg CM, Michael SF, Cummins LB, Arthur LO, Peeters M, Shaw GM, Sharp PM, Hahn BH. 1999. Origin of HIV-1 in the chimpanzee Pan troglodytes troglodytes. Nature 397:436-41. Page 5 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY References (continued) Hahn BH, Shaw GM, De Cock KM, Sharp PM. 2000. AIDS as a Zoonosis: Scientific and Public Health Implications. Science 287(5453):607-14. Lawson, A. 2002. Monkey brains off the menu in Central Africa. Reuters. 1 January 2002. Available online: http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/13873/newsDate/ 1-Jan-2002/story.htm. Leroy EM, Rouquet P, Formenty P, Souquiere S, Kilbourne A, Froment JM, Bermejo M, Smit S, Karesh W, Swanepoel R, Zaki SR, Rollin PE. 2004. Multiple Ebola Virus Transmission Events and Rapid Decline of Central African Wildlife. Science 303(5656):387-90. Peeters M, Courgnaud V, Abela B, Auzel P, Pourrut X, Bibollet-Ruche F, Loul S, Liegeois F, Butel C, Koulagna D, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Shaw GM, Hahn BH, Delaporte E. 2002. Risk to Human Health From a Plethora of Simian Immunodeficiency Viruses in Primate Bushmeat. Emerging Infectious Diseases 8(5). HIV/AIDS and Biodiversity Conservation Linkages Walsh PA, Abernethy KA, Bermejo M, Beyers R, Wachter P, Akou ME, Huijbregts B, Mambounga DI, Toham AK, Kilbourn AM, Lahm SA, Latour S, Maisels F, Mbina C, Mihindou Y, Ndong Obiang S, Effa EN, Starkey MP, Telfer P, Thibault M, Tutin CEG, White LJT, Wilkie DS. 2003. Catastrophic ape decline in western equatorial Africa. (NATURE | 6 APRIL 2003). Wildlife Conservation Society. 2003. Press Release: The problem is, pigs and other animals do fly. July 2003. www.wcs.org. Wolfe ND, Eitel MN, Gockowski J, Muchaal PK, Nolte C, Prosser AT, Torimiro JN, Weise SF, Burke DS. 2000. Deforestation, hunting and the ecology of microbial emergence. Global Change and Human Health 1(1):10-25. Wolfe ND, et al. Naturally acquired simian retrovirus infections in central African hunters. THE LANCET 363, 932-937. 2004. www.thelancet.com Adults and children estimated to be living with HIV/AIDS as of end 2003 by Judy Oglethorpe, WWF US and Nancy Gelman, Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group The HIV/AIDS pandemic is having large impacts on conservation in Africa through loss of institutional capacity for conservation, and increased use of natural resources including bushmeat. AIDS (Acquired ImmunoDeficiency Syndrome which is the late stage of infection caused by HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is affecting every person, organization, and sector in Africa, and the disease is quickly spreading in Asia and the Pacific, Latin America, and Eastern Europe. It causes long periods of illness, and is significantly reducing life expectancy. An estimated 34-46 million people are living with HIV/AIDS (see map diagram). Approximately 3 million people died globally from AIDS in 2003, approximately 2.3 million in Sub-Saharan Africa. The disease is impacting local and national economies, governance structures, agricultural production, food security, and education. The erosion of social structures and increase in AIDS-orphans, who grow up without family stability, could lead to future global insecurity. These societal changes directly and indirectly impact biodiversity conservation and natural resource management, including the illegal hunting of bushmeat. Increased Natural Resource Use by AIDSImpacted Households As rural households lose salary remittances from cities or the capacity for heavy agricultural labor due to HIV/AIDS, they turn increasingly to natural resources as the ultimate livelihood safety net. In many areas medicinal plants and wild foods are being Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Western Europe Eastern Europe & Central Asia North America 520 000 – 680 000 1.2 – 1.8 million East Asia & Pacific 790 000 – 1.2 million 700 000 – 1.3 million North Africa & Middle East Caribbean South 350 000 – 590 000 470 000 – 730 000 & South-East Asia 4.6 – 8.2 million Sub-Saharan Africa Latin America 25.0 – 28.2 million Australia 1.3 – 1.9 million & New Zealand 12 000 – 18 000 Total: 34 – 46 million 00002-E-4 – 1 December 2003 overcollected, bushmeat hunting has increased, and in certain places timber consumption for coffins and charcoal production is causing deforestation. This unsustainable use erodes the resource base for the future. Some protected areas face increasing threat as people seek access to natural resources that are no longer available outside. This occurs at a time when park guards may be patrolling less as they are ill from the disease, taking care of family members with AIDS, or attending funerals. Changes in Land Use Due to AIDS Land management is changing as people rely on practices such as fire or extensive farming that can be more damaging to vegetation and wildlife. Traditional knowledge of sustainable land management and resource use is being lost as parents die before passing it on to their children. It is likely that resource control systems by traditional leaders such as hunting of bushmeat are breaking down. Land inheritance can be affected in places where widows and orphans cannot inherit land Page 6 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY because of national land policies or traditional practices. Even if national policies are in place for them to inherit, they may be evicted because of land-grabbing. All these factors can result in less sustainable use of land and resources. Loss of Conservation Capacity Wildlife management is also affected directly through loss of human capacity. The conservation community has already lost key champions, leaders and staff in government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), communities, training and research organizations, and private sector. National park and wildlife conservation personnel are especially vulnerable to HIV/AIDS as many work in remote areas away from their families for a large proportion of time. This makes them more likely to have sexual relations with other partners. They may not have access to HIV/AIDS awareness information or condoms. When staff are lost, the institutional experience and memory of the conservation organization suffers. Precious conservation funds are being diverted to pay for AIDS costs such as funerals and sick leave. The full scale of the HIV/AIDS problem to conservation capacity and institutional development has not yet been realized. This situation is expected to get much worse as the HIV/AIDS pandemic peaks in many countries in Africa and grows more severe in other regions of the world. Sharing Coping Strategies to Deal with AIDS’ Impact to Conservation The Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) (comprising African Wildlife Foundation, Conservation International, The World Conservation Union, Wildlife Conservation Society, World Resources Institute and WWF US) has been working with partners to identify the impacts of AIDS on conservation and natural resource management, and ways to mitigate them (www.abcg.org). Partnerships have since been developed with African organizations that have developed best practices, such as KwaZulu Natal Wildlife, and the Wildlife and Environmental Society of Malawi. Several workshops and conference presentations have been organized or catalyzed including at the World Parks Congress where HIV/AIDS was highlighted as “an emerging issue for conservation” in the Durban Accord, the final communiqué of the Congress (http://www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/ wpc2003). Other outreach has included Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 dissemination of a poster, and fundraising is currently underway by WWF for a manual for conservation organizations, and for further studies and sharing of best practices. An HIV/AIDSconservation community of practice has recently been established through FRAME (www.frameweb.org). Women in Malawi using charcoal for cooking and cleaning. Photo by Daulos Mauambeta What can be done? The conservation sector can play an important role in helping to deal with the impacts of the HIV/AIDS pandemic on the capacity of staff working on protected area management and bushmeat trade, and local communities involved in communitybased natural resource management. We can also help AIDS-impacted households to use their natural resources more sustainably. Activities include: Develop organizational policies on HIV/AIDS Many conservation organizations, such as African Wildlife Foundation, Kwa Zulu Natal Wildlife, and WWF-Eastern Africa have developed workplace policies on HIV/AIDS. Activities include: developing prevention, treatment, and care programs in the workplace including HIV/AIDS awareness and condom provision, wellness programs, provision of anti-retroviral drugs if there is an adequate health infrastructure, encouraging HIV testing, dealing with stigma and low morale issues, and managing benefits and life insurance. Build conservation capacity The conservation community must build capacity to deal with the loss of staff due to the disease. We can adapt training programs (e.g. train more people in a broader range of skills on short courses rather than investing heavily in a few people for higher degrees; promote training at home base rather then sending people away from families for training, Page 7 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Collaborate with other sectors The conservation sector needs to collaborate with other sectors to obtain technical assistance (e.g. health sector for employee HIV/AIDS awareness and health programs) and to reduce environmental impacts (e.g. working with agriculture and food security sectors to promote less labor-intensive agricultural production with low environmental impacts, to keep pressure off natural resources and reduce harmful impacts such as too frequent or extensive fires). AIDS Orphans at Chiuzira Orphan Centre in Malawi. Photo by Daulos Mauambeta. such as through distance learning). We can also incorporate HIV/AIDS into natural resource curricula. Southern African Wildlife College, for example, has a module on HIV/AIDS in their wildlife management diploma course. Work with AIDS-Impacted Communities on Conservation-based Enterprises Efforts by organizations such as the Wildlife and Environmental Society of Malawi include targeting AIDS-impacted communities in order to work with them on conservation enterprise development activities such as guinea fowl rearing, beekeeping for honey collection, and the production and marketing of indigenous fruit juices such as baobab and tamarind, based on sustainable practices. These activities are not labor-intensive, can be undertaken by grandparents, AIDS orphans and people in the early stages of AIDS. Such activities take the pressure off other natural resources such as bushmeat. We can also provide strategies for the sustainable use of medicinal plants that are used to treat some of the illnesses associated with HIV/AIDS. M MO OR RE E IIN NFFO OR RM MA ATTIIO ON N Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group (ABCG) Information on the linkages between HIV/AIDS and natural resource management in East and Southern Africa and examples of coping strategies on how conservation organizations and local communities practicing community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) are dealing with the impacts of HIV/AIDS: http://www.abcg.org or http://www.frameweb.org/ev.php?ID=6786_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 The HIV/AIDS pandemic is a multisectoral issue that must be addressed by each sector of society. The conservation sector can make an important contribution as natural resources provide alternative livelihood strategies to AIDS-impacted households. We need to ensure that these resources are used as sustainably as possible, and at the same time try to maintain conservation capacity. The AIDS pandemic threatens to undermine achievement of our common conservation mission in Africa, and we need to do all we can to prevent this. Guinea fowl rearing is a viable activity for AIDS-impacted households, and can provide an alternative source of protein to wild bushmeat. Photo by Daulos Mauambeta. AIDS Brief on Community-Based Natural Resource Management- http://www.afr-sd.org/Environment/AIDS%20Briefall-150%20res.pdf HIV/AIDS and Community-Based Natural Resource Management Toolkit - http://www.afr-sd.org/Environment/ AIDS Toolkit-150 res.PDF Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) - http://www.fao.org/forestry/hiv-aids Page 8 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Equatorial Country Profile: Guinea Article by Dr. Janette Wallis, BCTF Steering Committee (Content in text boxes adapted from information provided by John Fa and Lise Albrechtsen, Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust) In the fall of 2003, I had the unique opportunity to live and work on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea (E.G.), Africa, as part of Arcadia University’s Education Abroad Program. Arcadia faculty Gail Hearn (biologist) and Wayne Morra (economist) have played an important role on the island. Their Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program (BBPP) employs local people to conduct monkey censuses and monitor the bushmeat trade in mammals and sea turtles. Their annual expedition to the Gran Caldera de Luba brings international attention to the tiny island. With this long-standing association, it was natural that Arcadia’s already impressive study abroad program be expanded to include E.G. as an education site. I was invited to teach a course for their fall ‘03 program at the Universidad Nacional de Guinea Ecuatorial (UNGE). leaders; though the presence of police and military is readily apparent throughout the country, neither of these are aimed at protecting animals and their habitat. In fact, some hunting concessions may be indirectly controlled by the military, making animal protection work difficult and potentially dangerous. On Bioko the only conservation activity comes indirectly from BBPP; the presence of the census takers likely provides some discouragement to hunters. However, it is unclear whether the forest census-takers are really capable of discouraging hunting, since they do not carry arms and have no official authority to enforce the law. More worrying is that many of the turtle census-takers are ex-turtle hunters, and have clearly indicated that they would return to that profession if the funding for the census runs out (which it may; see end of this article). It is critical that these monitoring efforts continue into the future, with careful oversight of and safety measures in place for census personnel. Conservation action is badly needed in Equatorial Guinea. Of particular concern are the primates. There are seven species of monkeys on Bioko: • • • • • • • Bioko drill (Mandrillus leucopheaus poensis) Preuss’s guenon (Cercopithecus preussi insularis) Bioko red-eared guenon (C. erythrotis erythrotis) Bioko putty-nosed guenon (C. nictitans martini) crowned guenon (C. pogonias pogonias) Bioko black colobus (Colobus satanas satanas) Bioko red colobus (Procolobus penantii penantii) Equatorial Guinea (E.G.) is a tiny central African country, only 28,051 km2 (smaller than the state of Maryland) and about a half million people. It consists of a mainland block of land (Rio Muni), nestled ALL seven subspecies are endangered, according to between Cameroon and Gabon, and several small the 2003 IUCN Red List, and a more comprehensive volcanic islands near the coasts of Cameroon and assessment of the island may result in some of these Nigeria. The largest of these islands is Bioko, home of being elevated to critically endangered. The island also the nation’s capital, Malabo. A former Spanish colony, has at least two endangered species of bushbabies E.G. is unique in being (Euoticus pallidus pallidus and the only African country Galago alleni alleni). PROTECTED AREAS: After independence from for which Spanish is the Furthermore, the mainland Spain in 1968, the protected area system established national language. Much during the Spanish rule was completely abandoned, portion of the country of of the world has never leading to excessive deforestation and hunting of Equatorial Guinea (Rio Muni) is heard of Equatorial wildlife. In 1988, eight areas (three National Parks) home to two endangered great Guinea. Those who have were formally accorded protection; two areas in Bioko apes, central chim-panzees (Pan know it as an Island, five in Rio Muni, as well as the entire island of t. troglodytes) and western 2 Annobón, for a total of 3167km . In 1999, Equatorial uncommonly beautiful lowland gorillas (Gorilla g. Guinea participated in the Yaoundé Forest Summit in place with a long history gorilla), as well as the vulnerable Cameroon, and following on commitments made of political turmoil - and mandrill (Mandrillus sphinx). there created the “Law on Protected Areas of recent wealth from Equatorial Guinea” in 2000. This increased the offshore oil discoveries. All told, E.G. has eleven number of protected areas from eight to thirteen 2 endangered primate species or zones covering a total area of 5860 km . There are three official subspecies With the exception of National Parks in E.G., Madagascar, which is ecologically one on Bioko and two on the mainland, and a number distinct from mainland countries and not typically of additional “protected areas.” Unfortunately, the included in Africa-wide comparisons, Equatorial Guinea designation of protected lands and signing of has the highest number of endangered primate tax on international agreements (CBD, CITES, etc.) have not the continent. Unfortunately, this tiny country makes translated into conservation action by the nation’s little effort to protect them. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 9 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Photo diary Equatorial Guinea, like its neighbors Cameroon and Gabon, struggles with enforcing laws that ban hunting of threatened wildlife and animals in protected areas. EQUATORIAL GUINEA CAMEROON A western tree hyrax (Dendrohyrax dorsalis) and a red-eared guenon (Cercopithecus e. erythrotis) for sale at the central market in Malabo, Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea. If bushmeat items do not sell within the first couple of days, the market matrons smoke the carcasses to reduce the rotting process (and smell). These carcasses are several days old, but were eventually purchased for consumption. Photo by Janette Wallis. GABON Map created using www.MultiMap.com. This giant pangolin (Manis gigantea) was being carried by two men walking just outside the boundary of Monte Alen National Park, on the mainland portion of Equatorial Guinea. The men refused to say whether the pangolin came from within the Park. Notice the front left foot of the animal is missing, likely a result from a wire snare encountered long ago. Sadly, he was still alive when this photo was taken. Photo by Janette Wallis. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 10 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY In 2002, a protected area demarcation plan for Bioko was jointly sponsored by Conservation International and the Bioko Biodiversity Protection Program and carried out by graduate students from Spain’s Alcalá University (Javier García and David Fernández) and personnel from UNGE and the Ministry of Forestry. Several thousand yellow signs were posted in strategic locations, warning that the area is protected and hunting is illegal. Unfortunately, there has been no follow-up to determine whether these signs have made an impact. By all appearances, they have not, but with no data, it is impossible to assess the efficacy of this project. Moreover, the “protected” designation is not supported by guards or wildlife management personnel. Thus local hunters have little reason to modify their behavior. other words, we were standing in the middle of the only National Park on the island and a government employee openly displayed his illegally killed animal. Later, the students practiced their census techniques at another location within the National Park. We found 14 spent shotgun cartridges – and not one mammal – on a 4 km census. As the semester drew to a close, we flew from Bioko to the mainland part of E.G. to visit Monte Alen National Park. Our first bushmeat experience there was very troubling: we discovered a red duiker carcass in one of the university vehicles that had carried us on our journey! It was said to be purchased by the driver for a university official. Later, as we drove along the Park’s border to our campsite, we encountered two men carrying a giant pangolin out A survey of hunters, conducted by David Fernández, of the forest (i.e., out of the National Park; see Claudio Posa, and UNGE students found that most photo). Once inside the Park, we again found a hunters keep only a few small, trapped, non-primate number of spent shotgun cartridges - in the same species for their families, because large mammals general area where we later saw elephants, several (monkeys, duikers) and preferred animals (porcupine, monkey species, and pangolin) can fetch better prices chimpanzee and gorilla at market. Assessment of the WILDLIFE: There are currently about 141 mammal nests. bushmeat market in Malabo species and 392 bird species recorded for Equatorial Guinea. The current threats to biodiversity come from indicates fewer adult monkey How can Equatorial changes in the habitat via logging and agriculture, and Guinea’s students – the carcasses are for sale, suggestthe offtake from hunting wild animals. The pressure on country’s future leaders – ing a potentially serious decline the local fauna has led to twenty-one species being in monkey populations (Hearn & adopt a serious attitude listed as critically endangered, endangered or Morra, personal communication). to wildlife protection if all vulnerable on the IUCN’s Redlist. Of these 21, twelve species are threatened due mainly to harvesting, or around them they see The study also determined that with hunting being one of the main factors. their country’s authorities almost all monkey carcasses are ignore laws and particiobtained by shotgun – as pate in the bushmeat trade? How can conservationists opposed to snares. Hearn and Morra, along with other concerned conservation-ists, have called for an hope to make a contribution when cooperation and law increased effort to enforce the national law prohibiting enforcement is lacking? Arcadia University has pledged to further develop its educational initiative through gun ownership (with certain exceptions), which would UNGE on Bioko, while reducing its conservation greatly reduce the hunting threat to Bioko’s primates. activity (pulling back support for the Bioko Biodiversity The low priority given conservation was very apparent Protection Program). Their hope is that conservation during my brief stay in E.G. and, more importantly, NGOs, with better funding and more staffing, will step was consistently evident to the university students in in to address habitat and wildlife protection. As part of my charge. For example, during visits to the central their commitment to the Congo Basin Forest market of Malabo (see photo), we saw carcasses of Partnership (CBFP), Conservation International (CI) several mammals and reptiles, some of them known has some long-range plans for E.G., primarily to train to be endangered, all of them known to be illegally guards for protected areas, but unfortunately their obtained. Yet, the only uniformed person we witnessed focus is limited to the mainland (NOTE: the Congo interacting with the market matrons was in the proBasin Forest Project focuses activity on 11 landscapes cess of purchasing a duiker, not enforcing the law. in mainland Central Africa and excludes the islands off During another field trip, we drove to the highest point the west coast.) In comparison, Bioko Island is in on the island, Pico Basilé National Park. At 3000 desperate need of conservation action. Whether meters, at the top of “Pico”, rests a state-operated anyone will act quickly enough to save the endangered antenna and telecommunications center. While the primates, sea turtles and other animals of Equatorial students visited with the center’s staff, an employee Guinea – on the mainland or especially on Bioko appeared with a grey duiker shot earlier in the day. In remains to be seen. I am not optimistic. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 11 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Policy Updates January 2004 – March 2004 Select HERE for Policy Updates archives and latest additions NEW RESOURCE - CBD Forest Portal www.biodiv.org/programmes/areas/forest/portal/home.shtml CITES 13th Conference of Parties: 2-14 October 2004 in Bangkok, Thailand. Bushmeat Resolution expected. Preparation documents are available at: www.cites.org/eng/cop/index.shtml Environment ministers from Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Mali, Niger and Senegal meeting at a roundtable organized by UNESCO on 26 January 2004, expressed concern for the ongoing environmental degradation and increasing poverty across the African continent, and committed to promoting the use of biosphere reserves as operational sites for sustainable development in the fight against poverty and in implementing the action plan of the environment initiative of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). A project launched involving UNESCO’s Man and the Biosphere Programme and UNEP will explore how West African biosphere reserves can be developed and maintained, while allowing human activities such as ecotourism. The areas chosen include the Pendjari Biosphere Reserve in Benin, which is ringed by 30 villages, the Mare aux Hippopotames Biosphere Reserve wetlands in Burkina Faso, and the Comoé Biosphere Reserve in Côte d’Ivoire, which has about 210 people living in its core area. Also included are the Boucle de Baoulé in Mali, fringed by dense forests with many nearby ethnic groups, the Niokolo-Koba Biosphere Reserve in Senegal, as well as the million-hectare transboundary ‘W’ Region Biosphere Reserve in Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger. Source: Sustainable Africa Newsletter, received 8 May 2004. Related links: UN Wire, 27 January 2004: www.unwire.org/UNWire/20040127/449_12465.asp On 19 February 2004, during the 7th Conference of Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity (www.biodiv.org) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from 9-20 February, the Republic of Congo announced plans to expand its protected area network to further conserve the region’s immense biodiversity, one of the key goals of the Seventh Conference of the Parties for the Convention on Biological Diversity.Congo’s Minister of Forestry Economy, Henri Djombo, announced that Congo will officially gazette the Bambama-Likana National Park, a Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 unique and spectacular mosaic of rolling savanna and gallery forest inhabited by elephants, chimpanzees, lions, and other forest wildlife, along with plans to expand marine reserves along the coast and the creation of new protected areas along Congo’s southern border. The Bambama-Likana park will form a trans-boundary protected area with Bateke Plateau National Park in Gabon. The Congo government also plans to connect the protected areas of Conkouati-Douli National Park in Congo and Mayumba National Park in Gabon to protect the globally important beaches, swamps, and coastal forests of Congo’s coastline, including some of the most important sea turtle nesting areas in the world. To the south, the government envisions the creation of a trans-boundary protected area along the borders of Angola and DRC. With support from the WCS, the Republic of Congo has launched an evaluation program for the country’s protected areas, and it plans to create a national service for protected areas and wildlife management. For more information, see the Wildlife Conservation Society website. Source: Congo Basin Forest Partnership (www.cbfp.org) From 1-2 March 2004, in Douala, Cameroon, Global Forest Watch (GFW), in collaboration with Interafrican Forest Industries Association (IFIA), World Conservation Union (IUCN) and World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), brought together the key forest stakeholders for a two day workshop to select forest concession monitoring indicators for a regional forest reporting system. This system will independently document the industry's logging practices in the region, and highlight the companies that are making the most significant strides toward sustainability. The workshop received support from the German government (BMZ), World Bank, U.S. Forest Service, and the USAID Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment. Source: www.globalforestwatch.org Congolaise Industrielle des Bois (CIB), a forest industry headquartered in Pokola, Republic of Congo, announced on 29 March 2004 that it will work with the Tropical Forest Trust (TFT) towards the goal of achieving certification according to the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standards. CIB would become the first FSC-certified industry in Central Africa. Source: www.tt-timber.com Page 12 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Bushmeat Crisis Task Force News January - April 2004 Select HERE for previous BCTF updates to the Bushmeat Quarterly Announcements After much preparation, BCTF staff are moving their offices from the American Zoo and Aquarium Association to the Wildlife Conservation Society (Washington, DC office) in July. Changes in contact information will be posted to the website and circulated to our networks at that time. The Bushmeat IMAP initiative has three notable pieces of news: (1) Global Forest Watch (GFW) has hired a GIS analyst for our joint implementation of the GIS components of the project. The analyst will start in July, gathering and compiling the initial datasets identified as relevant to bushmeat in Central Africa. We expect the first analyses and map products at the end of this year. (2) The International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) is supporting BCTF travel to Cameroon to meet with targeted information suppliers and users of the IMAP, to determine opportunities and protocols for data sharing. We will also be following up with other contacts regarding education and public awareness at this time. (3) A Beta version of the Bushmeat IMAP web portal should be available in late July 2004. Initial components will include a searchable references database, project descriptions and locations, and existing baseline data from the GFW interactive map server. Highlights The latest Staff and Supporting Member activities are reported ten times a year in the Bushmeat Bulletin, a two-page newsletter available at www.bushmeat.org/bulletin. Issues are archived online and include news back to October 2003. Highlights from January – April/May 2004 are provided below. JANUARY 2004 - www.bushmeat.org/bulletin/04January.html Innovative Conservation Support Supporting and Contributing Members are the foundation of BCTF, providing funding for staff and offices. Many have given above and beyond the minimum, and a few members and individuals have found particularly creative ways to support BCTF, including public contribution boxes, earmarked gift-shop receipts, and donated promotional items. The Gift of Time: BCTF Volunteers & Interns BCTF would not be able to function without the hundreds of hours given each year by volunteers. We would like to recognize some of the contributions that our student volunteers and interns have made for BCTF over the years and take this opportunity to thank them once again for their generosity, talent, and hard work, FEBRUARY 2004 - www.bushmeat.org/bulletin/04February.html Sustainability Highlighted at Debate On 10 February, BCTF Steering Committee member Elizabeth Bennett represented the Wildlife Conservation Society at the Bushmeat Debate, a series of presentations on the sustainability of commercial trade in bushmeat and the need to reconcile wildlife conservation with human needs. Despite varied perspectives, the debate revealed there is more agreement than disagreement on the nature of the bushmeat problem and the tools needed to solve it. Student Research Addresses the Bushmeat Crisis Since BCTF began, more than 100 students have contacted us for assistance with papers, presentations or projects focused on the bushmeat crisis and its solutions. From 5th grade to graduate school, we have helped students find reports, reach experts, and clarify questions. A few students have worked closely with staff and SC to perform research which greatly enhances BCTF’s ability to quickly gather and convey information on complex aspects of the bushmeat trade. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 13 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY MARCH 2004 - www.bushmeat.org/bulletin/04March.html Health and Wildlife Conservation Linkages Demand Collaboration On 8 March 2004, BCTF held a joint meeting with the Africa Biodiversity Collaborative Group and the Wildlife Conservation Society entitled “HEALTH MATTERS: The Importance of the Interface between Wildlife, Domestic Animal and Human Health for Conservation Success in Africa.” The meeting was wellattended by individuals from a diversity of government agencies and NGO's, and provided an opportunity to share information and discuss examples of their initiatives to address the connections at the wildlife health/ domestic animal health/ human health interface. Central African Timber Companies Agree to Independent Oversight When European timber companies, environmental groups, research organizations, and African forestry officials met from 1-2 March in Douala, Cameroon to negotiate the future of logging in central Africa, the discussion took an unusual turn. After years of debating how to track logging practices in remote African rainforests, timber companies agreed to be independently monitored by Global Forest Watch on more than 30 performance measures. APRIL/MAY 2004 - www.bushmeat.org/bulletin/04April-May.html Film Student Works to Raise Awareness about Gorillas’ Plight among her Peers While most BCTF-assisted student projects result in a class research paper, film student Sarah Nagy’s senior project is a documentary film about gorillas and the threats to their survival. Inspired to raise awareness and action among young people like herself, Sarah committed to making a film aimed at high school students and college undergraduates about what is happening to gorillas, and what can be done to help. UPDATE: African Regional Wildlife Colleges After a successful first bushmeat training session in July 2003, the École de Faune de Garoua in Cameroon is revising the course for a second offering this July/August 2004. In other news, all three regional colleges have recently affirmed their commitment to be regional centers for information gathering and management in support of the Bushmeat IMAP. Collaboration for Conservation This spring, Conservation International’s 2004 annual meeting included a public session on collaboration, organized to better understand why organizations form alliances, what elements contribute to success, the challenges to cooperatively addressing an issue, and how and when to evolve or end a partnership. BCTF’s Heather Eves was among five presenters invited to share their experiences with functioning conservation collaboratives. New on the BCTF Website Media & Reports Recent articles for which BCTF contributed or provided background support: The Events page includes links to information form the “Health Matters” symposium co-organized by ABCG, WCS and BCTF (www.bushmeat.org/events.htm) Health Risks From Bushmeat May Reach U.S. Shores, Pacific News Service, 29 April 2004, Amanda T. Hawn. The look of the Documents page was revised, and French and Portuguese versions of the Southern African Wildlife College Bushmeat Training Workshop (6-8 August 2002) have been added (http://www.bushmeat.org/docs.html) BCTF Steering Committee member Dr. David Wilkie (Wildlife Conservation Society-Living Landscapes Program) and New York-based writer Kim Larsen appeared on the Leonard Lopate radio show (WNYC - New York) on 12 March 2004 to discuss the bushmeat trade in Central Africa. The show is archived: visit www.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/episodes/03122004 and select the third interview. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Radio Interview on Bushmeat in Central Africa, Leonard Lopate Show on NPR station WNYC, 12 March 2004 Page 14 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Bushmeat Working Groups Around the World Update October 2003 – January 2004 Select HERE for previous Bushmeat Working Group updates to the BQ In an effort to keep our networks and the general public informed, BCTF provides this quarterly update on the activities of Bushmeat Working Groups (BWGs) from around the world. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact BCTF or the contacts directly associated with each BWG listed below. Past editions of the BQ and a history of news from individual Bushmeat Working Groups can be accessed online at [http://www.bushmeat.org/bq.html]. LINKS: @=contact information and previous updates to the BQ !=website for this group or organization @ ! Ape Alliance – Bushmeat Working Group No report for this period. @ ! Bristol Zoo Gardens – Bushmeat Working Group Support for the Cameroon Wildlife Aid Fund (CWAF) continues. The appointment of a full-time Education Officer has been made possible by support from Givskud Zoo and also Oakland Zoo. This will result in the development of structured programmes aimed at schools and the local community on the bushmeat trade, as well as other conservation and wildlife-related issues. We are seeking support for the second and third phases of our Community Engagement and Support Programme in communities around the Dja Reserve. Phase I concentrated on how information flows within and between these communities and the wider world, and how information is ‘trusted’ by local people. Phases II and III are the development and implementation of the programme, based on knowledge gained from Phase I. @ ! Canadian Great Ape Alliance and Great Ape Fund No report for this period. @ ! Conservation Breeding Specialist Group (CBSG) - Bushmeat Crisis Working Group No report for this period. However, CBSG may facilitate two bushmeat-related workshops in the near future: (1) a Bonobo Population-Habitat Viability Assessment, and (2) an Ebola / great apes disease risk assessment. @ ! CITES Bushmeat Working Group, Central Africa Summary: In October 2003 – January 2004 the BWG with financial support from FAO organised three national bushmeat action plan strategy workshops in Libreville, Gabon, Brazzaville, Congo and Douala, Cameroon. On the 28-29th of January 2004, at the Hotel Parfait Garden in Douala, (Cameroon) the fifth ordinary meeting of members and partners of the CITES-BWG took place. (NOTE: See IUCN-ROCA update for results of the Cameroon National Bushmeat Action Planning meeting). 5th Ordinary Meeting of the CITES BWG, 28-29 January 2004 The main objective of the 5th meeting was: a) To prepare projects on the resolution and decisions to be submitted during the next COP of the BWG to be held in Bangkok, Thailand during the last semester of the year, 2004. b) Make necessary proposals on the future of the group after COP 13. The workshop participants came up with the following recommendations: a) Place a ban on consumption of bushmeat species listed in annex 1 and a sustainable harvesting of species in annex 1&11 of the CITES convention. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 15 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY b) Amelioration of management techniques of species found in the CITES annex and exploited for consumption and commercialisation of bushmeat through enforcement of the legislation, means of information and incitative measures at the socio-economic level. c) Clear definition of the responsibilities of different government structures and agencies implicated or concerned in the improvement of the regulation of trade especially import and export and transit zones. d) Clarify of establish rules on users or property rights on CITES species exploited or commercialised as bushmeat and also implicate the local community in the follow-up of off-take on either sales and consumption; e) Identify alternative sources of protein and incitative measures to reduce pressure on bushmeat especially species on the CITES list. f) Invite member countries and other countries involved in the bush meat trade to adhere to the convention. Future of CITES-BWG after COP 13 Discussions were focused on the results and progress made by the BWG during its mandate given during COP12 .The following conclusions were made: a) Acknowledging the bushmeat crisis in Central Africa, the experience of the group should be applied so as to help countries in the sub-region find concrete solutions to the bushmeat crisis. b) The achievements of the BWG should be capitalised and adapted by the different administrative authorities through some sub-regional initiatives such as the COMIFAC or the Congo Basin Forest Partnership. c) The BWG should henceforth be called the Central African Bushmeat Crisis Task Force (CA-BCTF) The resolutions and decisions were submitted to member states of the group for revision and adoption prior to being forwarded to the CITES secretariat for submission to COP 13 (due May 13th 2004). One of the states will submit the said project on behalf of the CITES secretariat members or if necessary it will be submitted to COP 13 as a document of the secretariat. BUSHMEAT ACTIVITIES IN GABON A bushmeat strategic planning meeting took place at Lope, Libreville, Gabon from December 3-7, 2003, and was organised by the Ministry of Forest Economics, Water and Fisheries, Gabon, with technical assistance from the CA-BWG and funded by the Food and Agricultural Organisation. The workshop was attended by International NGOs, local NGOs, representatives of academic and private institutions as well as some government officials. Main Objective: Elaborate a bushmeat action plan to be submitted to the government of Gabon for approbation. Specific objectives : • Harmonise participants level of information on current bushmeat issues in Gabon • Propose a technical approach for the setting-up of a legislative and institutional framework for the implementation of the national bushmeat action plan. • Elaborate a national strategy taking into consideration priorities for the management of bushmeat related problems and finance mechanisms. BUSHMEAT ACTIVITIES IN CONGO On the 29-31st October, 2003 at Hôtel Méridien Brazzaville, Congo, the first national workshop on the bushmeat crisis was held in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 16 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Main Objective: Elaborate a national strategy and action plan for the sustainable management of the bushmeat in Congo. Recommendations: • Development of micro-projects in rural areas • Management of wildlife in community hunting zones • Creation of hunting zones • Putting in place of a follow-up committee on recommendations • Development of alternatives activities to bushmeat hunting • Creation of an autonomous structure for the management of protected areas • Creation of synergy between different actors. @ ! European Association of Zoos & Aquaria (EAZA) Bushmeat Working Group Update prepared by BCTF On 14 January 2004, the European Parliament debated and voted on the draft Motion for a Resolution 'on the protection and conservation of great Apes and other species endangered by the illegal trade in bushmeat’, already adopted by the Petitions Committee at its meeting in September. The Bushmeat Resolution was overwhelmingly supported, accepted as the ‘opinion of the Parliament’, and will be forwarded to the European Commission, the Council of Ministers, the EU Member States and the ACP countries. Adoption of the Resolution will be the final stage of the petition campaign process through the European Parliament. The petition campaign has been supported by IFAW's EU office throughout the process, and we would like to acknowledge their contribution, which has been significant. @ ! Great Ape Survival Project (GrASP) Oct 1-4: Ian Redmond of GRASP’s Technical Support Team gave a presentation at the 8th German Primatology Congress in Leipzig. Numerous scientists offered to lobby their government on behalf of GRASP. Oct 3: Lucilla Spini, a full-time UNESCO staffer working on GRASP in Paris, organized a GRASP side event in the margins of the UNESCO General Conference. Nov: The TVE documentary “Blood Timber” aired on BBC TV early in the month. The documentary looks at the plight of the Baka people of Cameroon and the apes that share their habitat. Nov: The Brigitte Bardot Foundation and the courier company DHL came on board as GRASP’s newest sponsors. Nov 1-7: GRASP Technical Support Team leader Ian Redmond visited Kinshasa (DRC) and Brazzaville (Congo) to follow up on National Great Ape Survival Plan (NGASP) workshop outcomes and discuss future activities. Nov 5: The Executive Director of UNEP, Dr. Klaus Toepfer, sent a letter on behalf of GRASP to the heads on UN field-based agencies asking them to alert their staff to the illegality of trading or consuming apes or ape products. Nov 9-10: Ian Redmond presented on GRASP at the 3rd SAGA symposium on great apes at Kyoto University in Japan. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 17 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Nov 26-28: GRASP held an intergovernmental preparatory meeting at UNESCO in Paris. Here for the first time ever, representatives from 17 of the 23 great ape range states, 7 donor governments, UN agencies and intergovernmental bodies, international NGOs and other GRASP partners met to discuss the way forward to ensure the survival of the great apes. Participants at the Paris meeting agreed upon a global great ape conservation strategy, a five-year workplan and set of rules to govern the GRASP partnership’s activities, paving the way for an intergovernmental ministerial meeting on great apes and GRASP scheduled for 2005. Media interest in the event and publicity of the plight facing the great apes was enormous, with worldwide coverage. The range states are now fully integrated into the GRASP partnership at the global level. The establishment of an interim Executive Committee will lead preparations for the 2005 intergovernmental meeting. UNESCO is now fully on board with GRASP, having hosted the Paris meeting and allocated one full-time staff member to GRASP, with inputs from several others, including those senior in the Division of Ecological Sciences. Dec: The Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International and Care for the Wild became GRASP’s newest NGO partners. Dec: GRASP secured funds for two National Great Ape Survival Plan workshops and the 2005 intergovernmental meeting from the Irish and German governments. Dec 18: GRASP launched its new fundraising strategy with letters from UNEP’s Executive Director to donor governments. Jan 14-23: Ian Redmond of GRASP's Technical Support Team attended the Orangutan PHVA workshop in Jakarta, Indonesia and subsequently met with GRASP key contacts including Focal Point Pak Widodo and potential new NGO partners. @ ! IUCN-ROCA (World Conservation Union - Central African Regional Office) BUSHMEAT ACTIVITIES IN CAMEROON National Bushmeat Action Plan for Cameroon In November 2002, IUCN-ROCA with financial assistance from the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) organised a workshop to elaborate a National Bushmeat Action Plan for Cameroon. The workshop was held from November 11-13, 2003, in Kribi, Cameroon, and had 25 participants from international NGOs (WCS, IUCN, WWF) the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MINEF) Cameroon, ECOFAC, as well as national NGOs, academic institutions and representatives of indigenous people. Objective of Workshop: • Update participants on the current status of Bushmeat in Cameroon; • Elaborate a bushmeat action plan for Cameroon and financial mechanisms; • Propose a legal and institutional framework for the implementation of the national action plan During the workshop participants were expected to: • • • • Compile, analyse and present information on the actual situation of bushmeat in the national territory; Support the government of Cameroon and other partners to develop a participatory National Bushmeat Action Plan Identify problems and make recommendations for priority measures to be taken to ensure the sustainable exploitation of bushmeat; Exchange experiences amongst various partners on the degree of implementation of the bushmeat policy; Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 18 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY • Facilitate the sharing of information on current wildlife policies and strategies for the effective management of wildlife resources; After 2 days of brainstorming, the workshop participants came up with the following recommendations: a) Creation of an independent and operational structure known as ‘Agency for the management of Wildlife and Protected Area. b) Putting in place of a platform of collaboration between stakeholders c) Putting in place of a monitoring and evaluation unit for the implementation of the national bushmeat action plan d) International committee should provide financial & technical support to MINEF in the implementation of the BAP e) Integration of the BAP in the 2004 Budget in Cameroon. f) The availability from January 2004 of human and financial resources necessary for the implementation of this strategy g) Bring together different actors to ensure that necessary action is taken to implement the national bushmeat action plan. h) A wide distribution of the BAP to all stakeholders i) The committee members should finalise by December 15, 2003 the Bushmeat Action Plan. Fighting Illegal bushmeat trade: By the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MINEF), Cameroon The anti-poaching unit of the Ministry of Environment and forestry Cameroon, last year reinforced activities to fight poaching in Cameroon. Bushmeat is becoming a cause for concern in Cameroon. With the devaluation of the CFA and the currently unemployment rate coupled with poverty more and more people are becoming involved in the bushmeat trade. MINEF through its anti-poaching unit coordinated by Mr. Etoga Gilles has been combating the bushmeat trade through several measures. A general operation was effected last year, which was aimed at cubing the current rise in bushmeat trade. The following activities were carried out: The anti-poaching unit of MINEF in collaboration with WWF-CARPO organised a workshop that was aimed at sensitising magistrates and the forces of law and order on wildlife laws and the role they can play in fighting the illegal exploitation of bushmeat. The anti-poaching operation which carried out by MINEF in the 10 provinces of Cameroon Protected Areas, villages, towns etc was aimed at identifying some issues linked to the bushmeat crisis, notably: • • • • • Identification of areas of high pressure What species are more vulnerable? Who are the actors involved in the bushmeat trade and what procedures need to be taken to track them down? What sanctions are to be given to victims? What strategies and actions should be put in place to curb the bushmeat crisis in Cameroon? The report of this project is presently being compiled and will be made available to BCTF in due course. BUSHMEAT ACTIVITIES IN EQUATORIAL GUINEA Wildlife Policy Gap Analysis The IUCN-ROCA through the IUCN/Low Guinean Forest Project funded a micro project submitted by ABIGAGE and the Ministry of forestry in Equatorial Guinea. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 19 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Objective: Analyse the current gaps in wildlife laws and policies in Equatorial Guinea and amend the existing laws that have to be integrated in the current wildlife laws to be submitted to the ministry of forestry for approbation. The project is ongoing and will be completed by June 2004. @ ! Jane Goodall Institute – Community Centered Conservation (CCC), Congo Basin No report for this period. See JGI profile in this issue. @ Liberia Bushmeat Working Group No report for this period. However, the following report on protein consumption in Liberia was completed by Forest Partners International, a Liberia BWG member. Report on Protein Consumption Survey - October 2003 By Reg Hoyt, Forest Partners International In January 2002, the Philadelphia Zoo and its partners (Society for the Conservation of Nature of Liberia, Forestry Development Authority, University of Liberia and Cuttington University College) conducted the “Urban Bushmeat & Public Opinion Survey” in eight communities throughout Liberia, West Africa. Approximately 1,900 interviews were conducted with individuals and marketers in an effort to better understand the social and economic, as well as the biologic impacts of Liberia’s bushmeat trade. Between 27 and 31 October 2003, the Philadelphia Zoo and its partner (Concerned Environmentalists for the Enhancement of Biodiversity-CEEB) conducted a follow-up survey in Monrovia to evaluate protein consumption. This survey was done immediately following the halt of hostilities that had isolated Monrovia from much of the countryside since April of 2003. Ten questions, identical to those used in 2002, and two new questions were asked of 360 persons randomly selected on the streets of Monrovia. Sex ratios were roughly equal and the ages of participants are comparable to those taking the 2002 survey. In exchange for their participation in the interview, each person was given a “Protected Wildlife of Liberia” poster. While bushmeat consumption rates remained the same, respondents reported slight declines in fish consumption and a dramatic increase in domestic meat consumption. 18% reported eating domestic meat 7 days/week in 2002, while in 2003 it had gone up to 35%. When asked what meat they most preferred, if price and availability were the same, fish declined in preference from 48% in 2002 to 31% in 2003. The preference level for bushmeat remained relatively unchanged (26%-2002, 29%-2003). Although reported bushmeat consumption rates remained the same, the amounts of money spent each week on bushmeat increased dramatically in 2003. In 2002, 19% of the respondents reported spending more than $100L (roughly $2 US) each week on bushmeat. That figured nearly doubled to 36% in 2003. A vast majority of the respondents (73%) also reported that bushmeat was less available in 2003 than in 2002. While 77% of those interviewed in 2002 felt they could do without bushmeat, only 56% respondent similarly in 2003. We believe that these results are best explained in the context of the civil conflict that gripped Liberia from April to September 2003. During the conflict, the major bushmeat production areas of the country were under rebel control and market surveys in April confirmed that bushmeat had all but disappeared from the markets. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 % of Respondents in 2002 and 2003 who said they COULD do without bushmeat 77% 56% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2002 2003 Page 20 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Although consumption rates have not appreciably changed, the amount spent per respondent has nearly doubled. This is likely due to much higher prices, and perhaps due to higher exchange rates. No formal market surveys were conducted, but local informants did report unusually high prices for bushmeat. Witnessing the dramatic decline in the availability of bushmeat during the conflict may have stimulated a great belief that respondents could not do without bushmeat. During the civil conflict, the residents of Monrovia were dependent upon fish and domestic meat. Perhaps this dependency on fish resulted in the decline in the number of those preferring fish over other sources of meat protein. The dramatic increase in domestic meat consumption (18%-35% eating domestic meat seven days/week) may be due to an increase in availability. Respondents (51%) reported that it is more available now than in 2002. However, only 22% reported spending more than $200L (approximately $4 US) during the previous week on domestic meat, compared to 45% reporting to spend an equal amount on fish. The comparison of the results of surveys conducted in 2002 and 2003 dramatically demonstrates the impacts of the civil conflict on Monrovia’s protein consumption. It also supports the need for frequent monitoring of protein consumption rates and the bushmeat trade. Monitoring is essential to understanding the socio-economic factors influencing the bushmeat trade in Liberia. I wish to thank Ralph Woods, President of CEEB, and the interviewers (Aaron Blackie, Kollie Korvayan, Jonathan Kaipay, and Albert Davies) for collecting the data presented here from 2003. Special thanks go to the Philadelphia Zoo for supporting this work. @ ! Oakland Zoo – Bushmeat Crisis Action Group We concluded our fundraising effort for a teacher's salary in Cameroon and sent $5,525 to the Cameroon Wildlife Aid Fund (CWAF) to help fund the education program at Yaounde Zoo (now a CWAF ape sanctuary). The money was raised through a number of innovative fundraising methods, including “Cookies for Conservation” sales at the Bushmeat Education Station and at special events throughout the spring and fall, money from a conservation ‘wishing well’ at the zoo, revenues from grocery store purchases by individuals who designate a percent of their purchase towards the zoo, and a portion of the proceeds from a Pepsi machine near an Oakland Zoo administrative building. was sent to CWAF via Bristol Zoo to help pay for an educator at the Sanctuary($5,525) In October, a lecture by Jo Thompson (with silent auction), as well as a “Discovering Chimps” special event in the Zoo, collectively raised over $6,000 for the snare removal project in Budongo Forest, Uganda. These funds were forwarded in December 2003. We sent $400 to support Ngamba Island Sanctuary (Uganda) in caring for the bushmeat orphan chimpanzees. All told we distributed nearly $12,000 this period to bushmeat-related projects in Africa. The Bushmeat Crisis Action Group met in January to decide this year's project to support and we chose to focus efforts on Lola ya Bonobo (a bonobo sanctuary) in the Democratic Republic of Congo. @ ! Pan-African Association of Zoological Gardens, Aquaria and Botanic Gardens (PAAZAB) – Bushmeat Crisis Africa (BCA) Update prepared by BCTF based on communications with BCA. In early November 2003, after months of planning, 25 Uniforms and associated equipment for antipoaching patrols in the Cross River National Park were sent to Nigeria. After several months of vacancy, the Bushmeat Crisis Africa Chair is Lara Mostert of Monkeyland Primate Sanctuary, Plettenberg Bay, South Africa. Lara has an ambitious set of goals for the group, starting with a new website. Monkeyland’s web master Raquel has kindly offered to design the BCA website at no charge. Lara is currently collecting information and photos for the site, with assistance from BCTF and PAAZAB members. The website is anticipated to have a fundraising section, a ‘store’ for items whose purchase will support BCA, and a ‘friends of’ department. Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 21 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY @ ! Toronto Zoo— Canadian Association for Bushmeat Awareness (CABA) No report for this period. @ ! UK Tropical Forest Forum – Bushmeat Working Group Update prepared by BCTF UKTFF Bushmeat Working Group met on 24 November 2003 and 29 March 2004. The minutes of the first meeting are posted to their website (www.forestforum.org.uk) and the agenda included the following: Presentation on links between human food security and bushmeat hunting in West Africa, by Justin Brashares !" Presentation on the Dja Reserve, Cameroon - community education programme, by Neil Maddison !" Report back on the AFLEG process and meeting in Cameroon in October, Adam Matthews !" Report on the EAZA petition for presentation to Parliament, 10 Jan 2004, Adam Matthews !" Discussion topic: Should the bushmeat issue continue to be dealt with under CITES, or would it be more appropriately dealt with under the Convention on Biological Diversity? If the latter, how best can this transfer be achieved to ensure continued international focus on bushmeat? DEFRA's Global Wildlife Division, which co-sponsors the CITES Bushmeat Working Group, would thus like the meetings views on the following: What action needs to be taken internationally through CITES, CBD, UNEP etc What action needs to be taken nationally to prevent illegal imports of bushmeat !" What needs to be done on publicity and on research !" How best to obtain coherence amongst the actions of the many different players in this field !" !" @ ! World Bank CEO Tropical Africa Working Group Bushmeat update paraphrased from input by Giuseppe Topa, Lead Forest Specialist for the Africa Region, World Bank World Bank activities related to bushmeat have been focused in Cameroon in recent months. In March 2004, the Bank partially supported a forest concession indicators workshop in Douala, Cameroon, organized by Global Forest Watch, Inter-African Forest Industries Association and World Wildlife Fund. The workshop was a success, and when specific indicators are agreed to, a system for voluntarily sharing measures of forest health and sustainable logging will be in place (see the March 2004 Bushmeat Bulletin and/or www.globalforestwatch.org for more information). Also in March, the Bank helped accelerate the review and conclusion of agreements between WCS and Camrail, to restrict transport of bushmeat on trains. We also encouraged the government of Cameroon to introduce a system of independent monitoring and follow-up of anti-poaching for protected species. Ofir Drori of the the Last Great Ape Organization, a Cameroonian NGO, has pioneered the role of civil society watchdog for wildlife law enforcement, conducting independent investigations of wildlife criminals then working with authorities to impose penalties. The government seems to have accepted this concept, but funding is still being sought to maintain and expand this operation. The Bank would be ready to support this under the PSFE (Programme Sectoriel Forêts et Environnement) if asked by the government of Cameroon. Career and Funding Opportunities Jobs, Grants, Fellowships and Training Select HERE for the latest opportunities Information in this section is now only maintained on the BCTF website, at www.bushmeat.org/bq.html Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 22 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Calendar of Events Recent and upcoming meetings related to the Bushmeat Crisis Select HERE for the latest calendar 8-12 June 2004 - 27th Meeting of the American Society of Primatologists: Madison, Wisconsin 16-19 June 2004 - IFAW Forum: Wildlife conservation: In Pursuit of Ecological Sustainability: Limerick, Ireland. BCTF keynote and poster presentation. 6 - 9 July 2004 – Wildlife as a Natural Resource – 6th International Wildlife Ranching Symposium: Paris, France. This Symposium will provide a forum to interact and exchange information and ideas on all aspects of wildlife conservation as a tool for sustainable development. Participants wishing to present a paper/presentation are invited to submit their proposal in French or English by 31 January 2004. For more information contact: Symposium Coordinator; fax: +33-1-5659-7756; e-mail: [email protected]; Internet: http://www.iisd.ca/temp/6th wildlife symp announcement.pdf 30 July - 2 August 2004 - Society for Conservation Biology 18th Annual Meeting: New York City, USA. Hunting and Wildlife Trade Session co-organized by BCTF. 23-27 August 2004 – International Symposium on Animal Welfare: Beijing, China. More info: [email protected]. 23-28 August 2004 - International Primatological Society XXth Congress: Torino, Italy 18 - 23 September 2004 - AZA Annual Conference: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Two workshops coorganized by BCTF. 27 September - 1 October 2004 – First International Ecoagriculture Conference and Practitioner’s Fair: Nairobi, Kenya. This event will be hosted by the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and co-sponsored by the Equator Initiative, UNDP and IUCN. For more information contact: Sara J. Scherr, Director, Ecoagriculture Partners; tel: +1-202-223-1313; fax: +1-202-223-3545; e-mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.ecoagriculturepartners.org/pdfs/Updates/EP%20Update%207-03.pdf 2-14 October 2004 - CITES 13th Conference of Parties: Bangkok, Thailand. Bushmeat Resolution expected. Documents available at www.cites.org. 16 October 2004 – World Food Day: Worldwide. The theme of this year’s World Food Day is “Biodiversity for Food Security.” For more information contact: e-mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.fao.org/wfd/index_en.asp 27-30 October 2004 – Mexican Zoological Association Conference. BCTF invited to present and bring global focus to the bushmeat issue. 17-25 November 2004 - 3rd IUCN World Conservation Congress, theme "People and Nature - only one World": Bangkok, Thailand 24 - 28 January 2005 – International Conference on Biodiversity: Paris, France. Sponsored by UNESCO, this conference is organized by the French Ministry of Research and New Technologies. For more information contact: e-mail: [email protected]; Internet: www.recherche.gouv.fr/biodiv2005paris Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 Page 23 BUSHMEAT QUARTERLY Call for news and articles for the Fall 2004 issue of the BQ The planned focus areas for the next issue are: The time periods covered by the next issue are: Research Topic: Sustainability Country Profile: Cameroon or South Africa Working Group Updates: February - July 2004 BCTF News: May – August 2004 Policy Updates: April – August 2004 Please send information for BQ #12 – Fall 2004 Issue according to the following schedule: Member highlights: BWG Updates: All other info: by 16 August by 23 August by 30 August Send submissions to Andrew Tobiason [email protected] BCTF Staff Heather Eves | Director Natalie Bailey | Program Coordinator Andrew Tobiason | Information Services Coordinator The Bushmeat Crisis Task Force (BCTF) is operated in conjunction with, and supported by, its task force members. BCTF is a project of the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization exempt from federal income tax under the Internal Revenue Code. BCTF Steering Committee BCTF Supporting Members www.bushmeat.org/steering.html www.bushmeat.org/support.html Executive Committee: African Wildlife Foundation American Society of Primatologists American Zoo and Aquarium Association Center for Applied Biodiversity Science - Conservation International Center for Conservation and Behavior – Georgia Tech Chicago Zoological Society - Brookfield Zoo Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Dallas Zoo Detroit Zoological Park Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Disney Wildlife Conservation Fund - Disney's Animal Kingdom The Fund for Animals Happy Hollow Corp./Happy Hollow Zoo Houston Zoo Humane Society of the United States International Fund for Animal Welfare The Jane Goodall Institute Lincoln Park Zoological Gardens Louisville Zoological Garden Oakland Zoo Oklahoma City Zoo Sedgwick County Zoo Toronto Zoo Wildlife Conservation Society World Wildlife Fund, USA World Resources Institute Zoo New England Zoological Society of Philadelphia Zoological Society of San Diego Michael Hutchins, American Zoo and Aquarium Association, Co-Chair David S. Wilkie, Wildlife Conservation Society, Co-Chair Christine Wolf, The Fund for Animals, Vice Chair Host Institution: Michael Hutchins, American Zoo and Aquarium Association Animal Protection: Christine Wolf, The Fund for Animals Kelvin Alie, International Fund for Animal Welfare Ecosystem Conservation: Elizabeth Bennett, Wildlife Conservation Society Russ Mittermeier, Conservation International Richard Carroll, World Wildlife Fund, US Lynn M. Foden, African Wildlife Foundation Species Conservation: Janette Wallis, American Society of Primatologists Christina Ellis, Jane Goodall Institute Zoos and Museums: Valerie Peckham, Philadelphia Zoo Rebecca Rose, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Kristen Lukas, Lincoln Park Zoo Anne Warner, Oakland Zoo At-Large SC Members: David Wilkie, Wildlife Conservation Society Kenneth N. Cameron, Jane Goodall Institute - Congo Allard Blom, World Wildlife Fund, US Dieter Steklis, Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Rebecca Hardin, Harvard University Tony Rose, Biosynergy Institute Samuel Fopa, Bushmeat Crisis Discussion Group - Cameroon J. Bryan Carroll, Bristol Zoo Gardens - UK Issue 11 - Spring/Summer 2004 BCTF Contributing Members Cheyenne Mountain Zoo Folsom Children's Zoo and Botanical Gardens The Little Rock Zoo Saint Louis Zoo San Antonio Zoological Gardens and Aquarium Tulsa Zoo Conservation Committee Page 24