Editorial New Members Change of Address IM 2005
Transcription
Editorial New Members Change of Address IM 2005
ISSN 1466-3570 February 2005 No. 19 NEWSLETTER of the UK SLIDE RULE CIRCLE Editor: Colin Barnes, 189 Mildenhall Road, Fordham, Ely, Cambs. CB7 5NW England Tel: 01638 720317 e-mail: [email protected] Editorial New Members A warm welcome to the following new members: I think we can be justifiably proud of the fact that this is the twentieth issue of our newsletter and that our international membership now stands at over 100. Gareth Morris 56 Rimswell Road Stockton-on-Tees TS19 7LJ 01642 896724 garethmorris@hotmail/com Jim Quinn 72 Lansdown Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 1BH 01453 757898 George Singer 9 Mountfield Gardens Tunbridge Wells Kent 01892 536822 Change of Address Paul Garcia Skid Stick, Pilot Issue 0, August, 1998 6 Westgate Terrace Westgate Street Long Melford Suffolk C1O 9DW 01787 313152 When I consider that, when I started collecting slide rules, I thought I was the only idiot with such an interest, it is comforting to know I am not alone. I am sure most of us were in the same situation, collecting in isolation, so our meeting together is of great benefit to us all. This raises the question regarding the number of ‘lost souls’ who may still be wandering in the wilderness! Whilst blowing our own trumpet, we must not forget that the formation of the Oughtred Society was probably the biggest catalyst in creating a greater awareness of the slide rule which in turn led to the formation of not only the UKSRC but also the Dutch Kring and German RST. With the considerable cross membership among the groups, there must be some 800 known slide rule enthusiasts around the world. Again a puzzle has been solved. Thanks to all those who took part in our little competition to identify last issue’s mystery object. The results and names of the winners are to be found below. Thank you all for your contributions. Heinz Joss From March 1st, 2005 Heinz’s telephone and fax numbers change to:Tel: 0041 44 844 0156 Fax: 0041 44 844 5844 Hugh Tidy New email address:[email protected] Willy Robbrecht New email address:[email protected] Peter Soole Now using his UK address:58 Granville Way Sherborne Dorset DT9 4AT IM 2005 Members will already have received registration details for IM 2005 to be held in Cambridge. It now remains for the organising committee to finalise details which, as those who have previously undertaken this task will know, is something of a juggling act! With 1 ©2004 The UK Slide Rule Circle and the contributors Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 this in mind your cooperation is earnestly requested to help ease the load. The following points have already been raised in the Registration Pack but it is important to emphasise them. Organising committee, speakers, enquiries and Proceedings – Colin Barnes [email protected] Peter Hopp [email protected],uk Correction Did anyone notice the mistake? Despite checking, an error crept into the IM 2005 Information Pack. The Delegate Registration form gives a date of Friday 25th, this should, of course, read Friday 21 st. Many apologies, I hope this hasn’t caused too much confusion! Venue: Quy Mill Hotel, Cambridge Alternative accommodationFor details of other hotels, guest houses and bed & breakfast accommodation in the Cambridge area, contact: The Tourist Information Centre www.visitcambridge.org Please consider at the earliest opportunity the presentation of papers. Your committee will welcome all approaches from potential speakers whether from home or abroad. Apart from any formal talks, short presentations on a special subject will also be welcome. In addition to helping in preparing the agenda, early notification of contributions will assist in ensuring that these presentations can be included in the “Proceedings”. At IM 2002 at Leamington Spa, a fantastic display of Fuller calculators provided an excellent opportunity to make comparisons and view the design developments that had taken place over the years of production. This year a similar display is planned with the subject being the slide rules of Aston & Mander (including those bearing various initials of Aston etc.). Those who have an Aston & Mander rule are asked to bring them to the meeting for display. Perhaps you might also borrow rules from non-attendees to help complete the picture. (It is only fair to note however that this must be at the owner’s risk). Ray Hems is preparing a database of these rules and will welcome details of any A & M rules that you or fellow collectors have. Please supply details of type, size, material and address given for A & M. As part of this survey, Ray would also like to record any known examples of Instruction Books relating to A & M slide rules. Finally please register your attendance or intention to do so at the earliest opportunity. The same applies with regard to arranging your hotel accommodation. Aston & Mander Survey – Ray Hems [email protected] Registration – Tom Martin [email protected] Help! Charles Hoare In searching for information and products from A & M (see above) it has become obvious that Charles Hoare had a close association with this company. They appear to have been the sole makers of his general and specialist engineering slide rules and were his post restante address. We hope to have a short presentation or informative article on Hoare to add to the Cambridge Proceedings. In addition to telling Ray Hems about any relevant A & M products that you would be willing to lend to the Cambridge exhibition could you please send any information on Hoare to Tom Martin? In particular would owners of copies of “The Slide Rule and How to Use it” by Chas. Hoare CE please let Tom have the following information on any copies in your possession: Impression/Edition; Date; Publisher; Printer; Pouch (present or not, paper/cloth, size); Slide rule (size); Comments (anything particular about the edition). Any biographical information on Charles Hoare would also be very welcome. [email protected] Pickworth In a similar vein will owners of copies of C.N.Pickworth’s “The Slide Rule” please let Peter Hopp have information on the Edition and date. He will contact you for any further information. 2 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 [email protected] Poly and multi-slide In my paper on Poly-slide Rules for IM 2002 at Cambridge I discussed about 50 of these rules, defined as having two or more contiguous slides. I am now updating the paper to add more poly-slide rules, and also to include a new section on multi-slide rules, those with two or more non-contiguous slides. I have found the following poly-slide rules not in my first paper. Dutch cubic equation solver Pickworth Cotton, Hoelscher, Essex, Brown, Robertson. Child. Gisholt Miller Pictures of the Barth slide rules Bowles compressed air Fox & Co metallurgical slide rule by Blundell with a slide within the single main slide. I have an example, thanks to a member. Anonymous well made wooden rule apparently for pricing timber. If any members can inform me of any other poly slide rules, I would be most grateful. I have only just started on Multi-slide rules, having acquired a Watson “Performaster” Road Haulage slide rule with three slides and, a rule by Dring & Fage with three slides that relate to the duty on spirits and has monetary scales in shillings and pence, Peter Hopp has a similar rule. made new solutions accessible. And I could go on with more and more…. Looking ahead to the year 2014 my plan is to compile all that knowledge of logarithms which is available right now. 2014 is the 400th anniversary of the first publication of logarithms by John Napier (Mirifici Logarithmorum Canonis Descriptio). So, for that year a proper publication should be ready. 10 years from now looks far away, but from my recent experience with editing the Dennert & Pape Aristo book - which took 3 years - I know that time runs fast. And, since all contributions were made voluntarily, you cannot put any pressure on the contributors. That is why I am asking the slide rule collecting community if there are interested contributors for this “Logarithms” project. I am looking for people who would like to contribute in whatever form they want - as long as it relates to logarithms. So far I only have a rough idea of the content/title: “Logarithms tables and applications”. The publication should be bilingual, English and German. As a starting point for my endeavour I considered IM 2004, where we dedicated one day just to the logarithms, and the topics of that day could stand as examples for contributions, e.g. table makers (like Vlacq and Vega), calculating logarithms (like Briggs and the differences calculating machines), historical background (like Archimedes, Napier, and Buergi). Those IM articles are published under www.rechenschieber.org. So, if any of the reader feels triggered to at least think about a contribution, please contact me. I see my role as collector and coordinator of those contributions, keeping the whole project progressing. I look forward to hearing from you and would be pleased to answer any questions. Klaus Kühn [email protected] I would also welcome information on more of these multi-slide devices. Bruce Williams [email protected] Feedback Slide Rules and Hydrometers Logarithms I started to collect slide rules some years ago and own a nice collection with all kinds of different examples showing the history of this mathematical instrument (calculating aid). Recently my interest turned to logarithms. Logarithms are not only the foundation/basis of the SR, they have contributed an overwhelmingly - have revolutionized - the approach to astronomical, navigational, surveying, and all kinds of mathematical calculations. The use of logarithms facilitated a lot of calculations or Tom I read with interest your plea in Skid Stick issue 18 regarding hydrometers. I am a member of the Tool & Trades History Society (TATHS) and we maintain a collection of tools within the Amberley Working Museum near Arundel in West Sussex. One of the items in a cabinet of “curiosities and novelties” is a Hydrometer, measuring “Degrees Twaddell”. Looking at the inventory which I inherited from the founder of our local group, it states: “Item 28 3 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 Hydrometer for measuring specific gravity of liquids in Degrees Twaddell (Degree Twaddell = 200 (s.g - 1); s.g = 1+ Degrees Twaddell / 200). Distilled water =zero” There is then a footnote: “See Newsletter 32, page 8”. This is a report of the Winter 1991 Meeting of TATHS, held at the Bath Industrial Heritage Centre at the Camden Works in Bath, the home of the Bowler Collection. By one of those wonderful circular coincidences, the meeting was organised by Mark and Jane Rees. Mark sadly died a couple of years ago, and Jane has only just stood down as Chairman of TATHS, but Jane is credited as the source of the photograph of George Bousefield on page 3 of Skid Stick! The article describes what sounds like a very interesting day, and ends with the sentence “We all went home with one useless piece of information - we now know what the expression ‘a load of twaddle’ means”. The editor’s footnote (I think Mark was the editor at that time) explains “Twaddle = Empty Verbosity = Prosy Nonsense. A term in use in the late 18th / early 19th centuries, in today’s parlance ‘rubbish’. Mr. Twaddell in the mid19th century invented a hydrometer and scale of measurement of density, presumably transposed in popular use to describe sugar fluids of (particular) density. Popular usage then confused both words, and the term ‘twaddle’ became more generally to describe (abusively, particularly by beer drinkers) the sugar syrup used as the basis for most popular soft drinks”. access to the marvellous Clifton work, I can send you a scanned copy if you'd like. You also noted that you think this is a ship builder’s rule, but I think it may more properly be called a “ship carpenter’s” rule, since it notes measurements for “Mizon Top...M(ain) Top, Sprits Top and Bowsprit” all of which I think are parts of masts and rigging for a sailing ship. I have a ship carpenter’s rule that I think is British made for the Swedish trade that also references mast proportions that a carpenter would use. You may well have gotten this information already from your English friends, but since I had the information readily at hand, I thought I send it anyway. Best regards, Bob Sauer Granville, Ohio, USA [email protected] Weather Forecaster With reference to the little piece by Heinz on his weather forecaster in the last Skid Stick and the accompanying editor's note, I attach heads-and-tails scans of my Negretti and Zambra weather forecaster (bought in Geneva four or five years ago). Identical in general design to the one you showed, but not in detail. Top and bottom discs white opaque celluloid, middle disc translucent celluloid. Overall diameter 55mm. Best wishes Paul Crowther Coggeshall Dear Werner, I was interested in the “Heather” Coggeshall rule you wrote about in the recent “Skid Stick”. From the presence of both AG and WG gauge points, the rule must date from before 1824, when the ale and wine gallons were made the same size. I also find that Gloria Clifton in “Directory of British Scientific Instrument Makers 1550-1851” lists William Heather as working from 1793 to 1812 at 157 Leadenhall St., London, apparently at the “Nautical Warehouse” as a “Hydrographer, Engraver, Mathematical instrument maker, Nautical instrument maker and Chart & Map seller.” From 1799 to 1804 he is reported to have been in business as “Heather & Williams”, but the given name of the “Williams” is not noted. If you do not have Another source (or it was at one time) is Past Times. The one I got from them is engraved (?) brass one side, with the interpretation of the letters on a thin plastic disc trying to emulate engraved brass stuck (more or less) on the back. Made in Taiwan. Overall diameter 56mm. Best regards, Francis Wells [email protected] Twelve of the Best Derek Slater’s article in Skid Stick No. 18 saying that any collection should have no more than twelve items intrigued me. My 4 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 collection is small but this seemed to be an interesting challenge and here is the result. Firstly I set the following criteria: sentimental/emotional value, nice to use (I use my slide rules in other hobbies) and any other reasons that seem good to me. The sentimental value selection yielded the following rules: 1. Hemmi electrical engineer’s rule, model number unknown. My father bought this when he was a student in the early 1930s and it must have been a considerable financial outlay for him. He gave it to me when he upgraded in the early 1950s to rules (2) and (3). 2. K+E Log-Log Duplex Decitrig, N4081-3 3. K+E Ever-There, 4097D My father was a chemical engineer and in the early 1930s a colleague visited the USA and brought back the above two K+E rules for his own use. On a subsequent visit he brought back two more for my father who made good use of them until he retired in the mid 1970s. 4. K+E Jet-log Jr. Duplex Decitrig E4181J. This was a gift from my father in the mid 1960s. By that time I had ceased doing complex calculations so it has hardly ever been used 5. Faber-Castell log-log rule of the late 1930s in a teak case. This belonged to a dear friend who carved the box with little more than a penknife when he was an engineer on merchant ships on the North Atlantic Convoys in WW II. We now come to rules selected for other reasons: 6. Faber-Castell student’s Rietz 111/87. This was recommended to students on my physical chemistry course and I suspect that it was probably one of the most popular rules ever made. 7. Faber-Castell Advanced Rietz-N 57/88. While I find that this rule looks cluttered and lacks the elegance of the 111/87 it is much easier to do vectors on it. 8. Faber-Castell Mannheim with reciprocal scale, 1-60. This rule lives in my den and is the one that I use for most of my hobby calculations. I believe that it is a good example of a rule that will do everything most people need. 9. Hemmi Mannheim rule of the 1930s with horseshoe cursor. This rule is a real gem. Its only drawback is the lack of a reciprocal scale and if I broke the delicate cursor I would be heartbroken, hence it is for looking at only. 10. Hemmi RK40 pocket rule. A very nice polyphase rule. It has rearside cursors at both ends of the stock so that when looking up log9 you don’t have the problem of slide nearly falling out. Why oh why didn’t Faber-Castell adopt such a useful idea, even if it meant having only two scales on the rear of the slide? I now have two more to find and have selected: 11. An Otis King. This tended to be the rule of choice for industrial analytical chemists who liked the higher accuracy. Also they only needed to multiply and divide short functions. Having worked in the chemical industry I have some sentimental attachment even though I never used one in anger. 12. Faber-Castell students rule 52/82. This is a very nice rule which I often use for my more advanced calculations. I prefer it to the K+E Log Duplex Decitrig as you can find trig values without first aligning the slide in the stock. Well this is my selection. If allowed one more I would choose the Thornton PIC 132, electrical engineers 20" rule with magnifying cursor. I have added this only to include a 20" rule in my selection. I don’t need higher accuracy and find it to be very cumbersome to use. No wonder they were not very popular. Gerald Stancey Be’spoke Calc. In response to last issue’s mystery object, Bill Thacker has received three answers all giving the same explanation for the Be’spoke Calculator. from Tom Martin: My Granny had one. It immediately brought back memories of the 1940's with her sitting by her paraffin lamp on a Tuesday night using it for randomised lines for her Littlewoods football pools. from Mike Minihane: a similar response. from Francis Wells a more detailed reply: “Skid Stick” has been somewhat slow in reaching me in the Alps, so you probably already have the answer to your query. If not, here goes. Various details - the 1,2,X and the number of cylinders – irresistibly bring to my mind the old "Penny Points" section of the football pools. In case you or anyone else needs reminding, in this section 1 was entered for a home win and if correct counted one point, 2 was for an away win and counted 5 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 two points and X was for a draw and counted three points. Obviously, those scoring the most points in any week took the really big dividend and I think there were two minor dividends for slightly smaller scores. Entries were made for 12 matches, corresponding to the 12 brown cubes, but it was also common to "perm" any 12 from 13 (or 14 or 15), which would explain the three additional orange cubes. (Permuting from more than 15 was regarded as snobbishly expensive, even at a penny a go.) For some reason, the penny points pool later lost out in popularity to the draw-based Treble Chance, which used only Xs, so that the 1s and 2s faded out of the picture somewhat (although they still exist very prominently here in the French pools). What I believe this gadget (it can hardly be called a calculator) did was to spare the punter the intellectual effort of wondering whether Accrington Stanley was actually going to grind Scunthorpe United into the dust, or probably the mud -- not to mention having to ponder over the likely results of the other 11,12,13 or 14 matches -- by simply letting him twirl the cubes individually or collectively (I assume they turn fairly freely) and trust to what came up. I find it slightly puzzling that there should be two faces of each cube giving a home win as the result, but this may simply be to give a closer, if still very crude, approximation of the actual distribution of probabilities. Dredging up all this now largely useless information has brought back one slightly ironic memory. I once, with a few friends, actually won a dividend. However, when the cheque actually arrived, it paid for only about a tenth of the party we had thrown on learning the news. But at least it was a good party. worry USE HOW? Boss new year day her palm roll Limited and press down on table. Brown cube monthly ration collect item for collect. Orange cube bonus special days borne or family start. All happy now. If no suggest Standard six mean FamilyCollectlimited or largest eighteen happy Family-Collectlimited but warn pouting squabble silence with false choose. For Pat Applid” When I saw your gadget picture I had just been looking up some Curta references on a computer-translated German website, the inventor of the Curta being referred to as Curt Heart Strongly for Curt Herzstark! The following alternative and intriguing suggestion has been put forward by John St Clare: I have been away and have only just seen the issue of Skid Stick No 18 with your funny object in it. It seems pretty obvious to me that the illustrated object is an abacus for adding numbers to the base of three. The “x” represents zero or (a la Roman) ten. Just turn set the cubes to “xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx” i.e. “000000000000000” and start adding your numbers. So for 5 plus 3 just turn cube one until it reaches 2 and then the next one indicates that you turn cube two to one and so on. Once you have done the addition you will have “22” on the first two cubes. On the basis that four answers the same must be the correct answer, the first one received shall adjudged (by e-mail times) to be the winner. Congratulations to Mike Minihane who wins by a whisker. In the humorous category Mike Williams wins for his magnificent translation. Prizes are on their way. Meeting Reports and from Mike Williams: IM 2004 Bad-Driberg, Germany I guess it’s a randomising gadget fir football pools. You place it between your palms, roll it to and fro, then press it flat onto a table. You read your pool entries from the vertical column. However … I have traced an instruction sheet which I believe refers to this device. It reads: “Purchase for thank you a large fifteen Family-Collectlimited. For one use this each January the Family-Collect be allowed mean value fifteen extra collect items new yearr. Never he more than thirty random manner satisfactory control well family tension The “10th International Meeting for Slide Rule and Calculating Machine Collectors” consisted of a 3-day meeting held at Bad Driburg near Paderborn in Germany, 24 -26 September 2004. Our hosts had selected a spacious hotel, health and conference centre off the main tourist routes that proved an ideal venue for all the events and the delegates and partners attending. In all there were some 43 delegates from Germany and another 24 from as far afield as Australia and the USA. Inevitably the 6 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 bulk of the contributions were given in German but we were most appreciative of the efforts made by Klaus Kühn and his fellow committee members to provide excellent translations of all major points. The first day included an interesting lecture on “Calculating on Lines” (a sort of 2D abacus) by Manfred Weidauer, a series of talks on the collection and construction of calculating machines and an extensive display and swap market. For UK slide rule collectors the meat of the meeting was on the Saturday, entitled the “Aristo Day”. A series of 12 lectures celebrated the publication of a comprehensive 440 page book “Dennert & Pape ARISTO 1872 – 1978” edited by Klaus Kuhn and Karl Kleine. The book brings together a series of biographical and technical articles produced by our German friends to outline the history of slide rule and mathematical instrument production by this famous company. The book is accompanied by two CD ROMs giving – supplementary material selected English translations catalogues patents and registered designs slide rule instruction manuals picture gallery of D&P/ARISTO slide rules and more These CDs provide material of as much interest to the practical collector as the book itself. Obviously it was not possible to provide all this information in book form but what is the life of a CD? Members should take the opportunity of adding this publication to their libraries as advertised elsewhere in this issue (see Bookworm). We were privileged to have Hans Dennert’s widow, Mrs Irene Dennert at the meeting. We learnt that Hans Dennert had deposited some company material with the Museum des Arbeits in Hamburg. Since then much material and the company papers have gone to the Deutsches Museum in Munich. The two museums are now collaborating on a combined catalogue. It is intended that the main archive will be in Munich and a representative selection displayed in Hamburg. Two other books of interest also appeared at the meeting – “Albert Nestler, Innovation und Qualitaet, Zusammenarbeit mit anderen Herstellern und mit Erfindern” by Guus Craenen. This book contains a series of articles on the Nestler family, Nestler slide rule development and work for other manufacturers. A brief paragraph in English at the start of each chapter indicates its contents. “De LOGA Calculators” by Nicco Smallenburg surveys LOGA calculating drums and discs. The main text is in Dutch but a 16 page English summary provides model lists and example calculations. This book is also accompanied by a CD which provides a comprehensive photographic record of LOGA models. The morning session on the third day included an interesting session of four papers on the history of logarithm tables, starting with Archimedes idea of logarithms! Other contributions included a paper on the calculating machines of Mueller, Babbage, Schuetz, Wiberg etc. and short presentations on items of special interest. For the partners programme there were guided tours of Bad Driburg and Paderborn and district including an unscheduled choral rehearsal in the cathedral. The meeting concluded with a combined visit to the Heinz Nixdorf Museums Forum (HNF) in Paderborn. This is reputedly the largest museum for computer history in the world and has an excellent display in a purpose built building. It’s well worth the visit if you are in the area and has hands-on interest if you are with the family. For a virtual tour go to www.hnf.de This short note cannot adequately survey more than 20 major contributions to the meeting. Unfortunately those outside the Aristo Day exist only as a series of hand-outs – it is to be hoped that they are published. The D & P ARISTO book is a major achievement but it is perhaps a matter of regret that the sequence has been broken and there is nothing labelled “10th International Proceedings”. Pictures taken at IM 2004 can be seen at: www.Rechenschieber.org Tom Martin [For future planning, please note that there has been a reversal of the usual venue/date sequence. IM 2006 will be back in Germany followed by IM 2007 in The Netherlands. Ed.] UKSRC Autumn Meeting, Bocking In attendance: Peter Hopp John St Clare Colin Barnes Rod Lovett Derek Slater Victor Burness Gerald Stancey Nigel Panrucker Jim Bready Tom Martin John Hunt Snr Dave Nichols Bruce Williams Ray Hems 7 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 The Autumn meeting of the UKSRC took place on 10th October at the villa of Peter and Carol Hopp in downtown Bocking - a sort of dormitory of Braintree, Essex. Some 14 UK members managed to find this obscure location to exchange pleasantries and the occasional rule or two. The theme of the meeting was Meteorological slide rules and several interesting specimens were on display, including several versions - or 'Marks' as government departments and the military tend to term corrections to previously recognised shortcomings - of the rather nice Blundell Harling pilot balloon rule. These were used by Met Office operatives to calculate upper air speed and direction based upon the track of a small weather balloon. The Mark V version, with its 4 cursors, shiny knobs at each end of the slide (to facilitate movement) and the well made wooden box in which it was stored, was particularly impressive. To the uninitiated, operation of these devices probably required some dexterous manipulation of the cursors whilst observing a fast disappearing balloon in order to resolve some dynamic trigonometry calculations. Under such conditions, the appearance of the computer was probably a blessing. Small groups of members clustered to discuss their latest discoveries and exchange thoughts and ideas - some attendees seemed to continue discussions which had been started at the previous meeting - always a good sign of active involvement. One nice aspect of these meetings is that there will inevitably be one member who knows some obscure facts about a specific rule or a manufacturer about which others can learn to their benefit. Such expertise is priceless for an interest such as ours. One surprise at the meeting was the appearance of a very rare Aristo No. 10065, System Grüter rule with its 3 extra slides stored neatly in its box. The only other example of this desirable rule was thought to be on the inventory of the Deutsches Museum in Munich. After a sumptuous lunch with suitable refreshments, the formal part of the meeting was devoted to addressing the likely events and topics for the next International Meeting to be held near Cambridge in October, 2005. The meeting ended late afternoon upon conclusion of these discussions. Attendees would like to express their appreciation to Peter and Carol Hopp for opening their house for this meeting and a special thanks to their daughter, Sue, who helped manage the catering and maintained a good supply of coffee, tea and bickies. David Nichols Musings 19 Peter Hopp Firstly, Happy Xmas and New Year for 2005; secondly, thank you all for the lovely feedback from both SS 18 and Gazette 5! Answers to SS queries have come from our world-wide readers, it is much appreciated. There is much I agreed with in the Editorial, and Derek’s “12 slide rules” are being mused on as I write. There have been some super examples of sellers’ “bulls..t” in Skid Stick, I again had a great chuckle at the delightful conversation between the antique shop owner and his wife also reported in SS18 courtesy of Derek. As a keen fan of human frailty I have reported my own sightings from the mere odd, through to the genuinely crazy in the world of buyers and sellers. It is always amusing to try and figure out what “impression” the seller is trying to create, and I would classify as “merely odd” the standard response from some antique shop owners to a request for slide rules: “Oh we had one of those, I sold it just last week, they are extremely rare”. My response depends very much on mood and whether there is anything else of interest in the shop that requires continued good manners. The one that has happened to me and our esteemed editor, in different shops which had better remain nameless, and which left me absolutely speechless (a rare occurrence!) is the shop owner who introduced himself with “Oh you can’t afford that…!”. The TV programme “Grumpy Old Men” approaches human frailty in a refreshing way and finds my family disappearing in different directions with me punching the air and shouting at the television in pleased agreement that others find our new Britannia not as “cool” as some would wish! A great friend, an ex submariner, and they really are a rare and exceptional breed, told me a tale that I have been itching to find an opportunity of translating into a real-life situation. The scene: a post WW2 dieselelectric sub under way, the Captain is in his cabin. There is a knock on the curtain. Capt: “Come in!”. Enter one very large and extremely oily stoker who salutes: “Sir, I am not allowed to call you a twit, am I?” (You may substitute the most vulgar/rude description you can think of here). Capt: “Er, No Williams, you can’t!” Stoker: “But you can’t stop me thinking you’re a twit can you?”, 8 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 salutes and exits with considerable aplomb having made his point perfectly in an extremely “proper” way! Generally I must admit to thinking bad thoughts and not saying them, perhaps real curmudgeonlyness only comes with ever increasing age and gout! Recently I read something that came as a bit of a shock – initially! This was that the slide rule was also the mark of “lack of couth”. I say initially, because on further musing I did think that perhaps I have met some in the engineering profession who have been somewhat lacking in social graces. To be fair, some were hardly house-trained and rather like a surly teenager in any company! The particular reference that started this train of thought comes from Genius by James Gleick, the story of Richard Feynman and modern physics. Feynman, another of my heroes, was quite some guy. Apart from “discovering” Quantum Physics and a Nobel Prize he was also one of the leading lights on the Manhattan Project while still in his early 20’s. “Let none say that the engineer is an unsociable creature who delights only in formulae and slide rules.” So pleads The Tech, the MIT 1938 yearbook. Gleick continues: Some administrators and students did worry about the socialisation of this famously awkward creature. One medicine prescribed by the masters of student life was Tea, compulsory for all freshmen. (“But after they have conquered their initial fears and learned to balance a cup and saucer while conversing with the wife of the professor, compulsion is no longer necessary.”) an old favourite from an Aristo catalogue, which complements the similar image I used in Musings 10. The poor lad in that image has obviously been bedevilled by the same girl for a number of years, and here he is, several years before, still wishing he had a slide rule while his smarty-pants neighbour was still showing off to “Sir” with her rotten slide rule! The course of true love never did run smooth. I wonder whether there was a third picture in the series with them as young married couple (and who is “wearing” the slide rule?) Reminder To those who have renewed their subscriptions to Skid Stick, my thanks. May I remind others that fees are now due for 2005 and also the fact that subscriptions to the Oughtred Society may also be paid (£25.00) by forwarding your cheque, made payable to Colin Barnes, within the next three weeks. Bookworm The following three titles have been briefly reviewed in Tom Martin’s report on IM 2004: Dennert & Pape ARISTO 1872-1978. Klaus Kühn and Karl Kleine, ISBN 3-88603-863-7, Pub. W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag GmbH. Price: €65.00 + postage. I feel sure that no English or European University ever went so far as to try and “socialise” its engineering, physics or mathematical inmates, am I right? This work is a comprehensive history of D & P of some 430 pages in hardback format plus two CDs which are of particular practical value to collectors. For further information and ordering contact: Klaus Kühn [email protected] ALBERT NESTLER Innovation und Qualität. Guus Craenen, published by the author. Price:€50.00 + postage. Which image to use in this Musing has taxed me somewhat, there has been a particularly rich crop latterly, with even two obits on succeeding days which included pictures of the person with a slide rule (see last SS). I finally decided to use 9 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 This is a companion volume to Craenen’s book published in 2001 and provides further information particularly with regard to the ‘special’ slide rules manufactured by Nestler. P/back, A4 format Further information and ordering contact: Guus Craenen [email protected] Further UKSRC Reprints Instructions for the use of the Vector Slide Rule. The Vector Slide Rule by Blundell Rules Ltd. A 10 page transcript of the mimeographed instruction sheet that accompanied the rule. Code 16/14. Price £0.50p + postage. A. G. Thornton “P.I.C.” Catalogue (abridged edition). Leaflet No. L194. Illustrated price list of slide rules and accessories. 8pages. Code 16/15. Price £0.50p + postage. De LOGA Calculators, Nicco Smallenburg, published by the author. ISBN 90-9018513-5 Price, €30.00 + €10.00 p&p UK The Slide Rule Extended by Major-General Hannyngton, published by Aston & Mander, 1884. 32 pages. Code: 16/16. Price, £2.50 inc. p&p (UK) A Description of Major-General Hannygton’s Slide Rule by Joseph A Galbraith, A,M, published by Aston & Mander. 18 pages. Code: 16/18. Price, £1.50 inc. p&p (UK) The book is in the Dutch language, but it has a Summary through the whole book of about 16 pages. The photo CD has about 200 pictures of all the produced LOGA Calculators and circular slide rules. For further information and ordering contact: [email protected] Barometer Makers and Retailers 1660-1900, Edwin Banfield, ISBN 0-948382-06-6, Pub. Baros Books. Price £9.95 The “P.I.C.” A. C . Electrical Slide Rule leaflet No. L 193, 4 page with illustration, description and prices. Code: 16/19. Price 75p inc p&p (UK). Masterpieces of Slide Rule Art, published by A. G. Thornton c.1933? 24 pages illustrated with descriptions and prices of rules and accessories. Code: 16/20. Price £2.00 inc. p&p (UK). Despite its name, the scope of this book goes far beyond the makers of barometers to include makers and dealers in mathematical, nautical, optical and philosophical instruments. Entries are short and concise but will be found extremely useful and a valuable initial source for further research. Each entry gives the name and location of the retailer. Where known, a range of dates giving the life span, active period etc of the maker concerned is included. A highly recommended book. Faber-Castell Yellowing & Staining Gareth Morris In September 2004 I contacted the UKSRC through the web with an enquiry regarding the slight yellowing of the plastic of Geroplast Faber-Castell rules. I had heard that, despite received wisdom, this could be reversed by exposing the rule to bright sunlight 10 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 and wondered if this was in fact true. Subsequently I also made enquiries regarding the brown staining resulting from what appeared to be result of the ink leaching from the scales. The rumour that yellowing could be reversed by sunlight was known but there seemed little definite evidence. The idea of the ink leaching from scales seemed generally accepted but the reason unknown. I also put these questions to Larry Stewart at Sphere Research in Canada who has obviously researched this subject and kindly supplied the comprehensive results of his findings in the following two messages. for about a year and they are stable. I recommend that you leave them out of their cases unless you are transporting them. The staining effect happens regardless of the materials that their cases are made from. One of my rules was in a plastic case, the other one, leather. Larry Stewart Well, I told you that I would try to respond with a little more alacrity, right? So, here I am. I'm going to address the points of your letter in their order to avoid confusion. I'm puzzling over your report of a "funny smell" from your Rules. I can't remember such a phenomenon, but then again, I'm a smoker so I might not have noticed. The other possible culprit for the smell is the environment where the Slide Rules were stored for the intervening years before they found their way to you. Leather cases, cardboard, and paper can really absorb (or produce) a very acrid smell from humidity, mould, mildew, or very stale air. This sort of thing just adds to the chemical "soup" surrounding the Slide Rule, exacerbating the problem. Now, as to the stain you show in your picture, that is indeed the chemical reaction from the mould release agent used in the production of the Rule. It seems to really cluster along the edges of the slide and the stator. Since the actual structure of the parts is complicated by the tongue and groove, they really concentrated the release agent in these areas to assure that they would come out cleanly from the mould. If you look at the stain with a good loupe or other magnifying glass (10-20X) you will see that it is really very deep into the plastic. If the stain was more shallow, that could be explained by the ink losing its oil, but you will notice that other areas on the Rule that are filled with the very same black pigment remain unaffected. Also, the amount of stain is disproportionate to the amount of pigment in the incised lines. I know, I wished fervently that the ink was the culprit because that would have been relatively easy to fix. In fact, on my 2/83N the stain is all along the edge of the plastic, on both faces, far beyond the presence of any pigment. It is a thoroughly nasty situation! I am flattered that you consider my previous reply worthy of publishing. If you think that others would be interested, feel free to pass it along, and thank you very much. I do hope that you will be able to stop the progression of staining on your Rules before they become extremely ugly. I have several Faber-Castell pocket Rules that were a horror to see. I nearly died the first time that I took them out of their cases and discovered the From Larry Stewart, Ottawa, Canada: I am very sorry for the long delay in replying to your query on the yellowing that is so prevalent in Faber-Castell rules. I have a number of different rules including the 2/83N, 2/82N, and the 1/54. Interestingly enough, it seems to be only the solid plastic body rules that suffer from this staining. Michael O'Leary found out that the likely culprit was the mouldrelease agent used to get the plastic parts out of the mould. Over time, (roughly 30-40 years), a chemical reaction takes place that causes the plastic to yellow, and in some cases the plastic also shrinks. It is almost as if the plastic structure collapses. You might notice this by tilting the affected rule and allowing the light to slant off the surface. You will see a shadow where the plastic has shrivelled and now lies lower than the original surface. Thoroughly nasty! I have had quite good success with placing these rules in the window and letting the sun restore the whiteness of the plastic. This process can take months, (my rules were really stained), and I alternated faces on the parts each day. You should examine the pigments in the incised lines and figures to see if the colours that you DO want are fading. If there is any indication that they are, remove the rule from the sunlight immediately. The analysis that I have done leads me to believe that there is an “outgassing” from the chemical reactions in the plastic. Since the bleaching of the affected rules by sunlight, I have left them on my drawing table, in the open air, so that the gases do not remain enclosed with the rule itself. Amazingly enough, the staining has not returned. Eventually the chemical reaction will cease because the chemical agent will have precipitated out of the plastic's matrix. How long this will take is anyone's guess, really. I have left the two worst rules “open air” now 11 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 stain. It made the discolouration on the bigger Rules look like slight blemishes! Speaking of degrees of staining, keep a careful watch of your affected Rules. I noticed that the stain began to appear in other areas on the Slide Rule later on. My 2/82N had been fine for years, then one day I noticed that the same thing was starting on it, but not along the edges. It began along the bottom edge of the Slide Rule, on the LL3 scale, between the 2.5 and the 3 marking. I immediately removed it from its case, cleaned the Rule with soap and water, (I even tried Windex), placed it in the sunlight for several days, and I have, as previously stated, left the Rule in the open air since that time. Interestingly enough, the stain faded and there has been no further occurrence of that stain, nor have any new ones started anywhere on the Rule. As to the 2/83N, I am happy to report that it is about 85% better. There is still a faint stain along the slide and adjacent body sections, but it much improved. I am not certain whether I can ever get the Rule back to its original condition, certainly I can do nothing about the areas where the plastic has shrunken and collapsed, those are permanent scars, I'm afraid. However, the Rule still functions beautifully and remains a prized instrument. I hope that you will have the same success and you will have the satisfaction of having saved a wonderfully crafted tool from a saner, more amazing time! Let me know how it goes, okay? Larry Stewart [Ed’s note: Our thanks to Larry for his interesting replies and his permission to reprint his findings. If members have any further information on this subject your comments would be appreciated for future publication. Larry mentions the possible contamination resulting from storage in paper, card and leather containers. The problem with leather cases was the subject of correspondence in SS. See “Letters”, Gerald Stancey SS 8 and John Knott SS 9. The idea of wrapping in ‘clingfilm’ may be sound but I seem to recall warnings about certain types of film being used in contact with food. So beware.] three centuries. Its use in all imaginable professions is, in my opinion, a valid reason for putting the slide rule on an international list of “Objects of World Heritage” How to reach this goal? My proposal is as follows: Let us try personally, or as representatives of our respective national collector’s organisations, to find ways to make contact with those officials who are responsible for formulating such procedures as outlined above. Using the coming year to research this proposal we can report the results of these activities at IM 2005 when perhaps, as an international group, we can form a coordinated proposal for submission to an official responsible for a “World Heritage List”. I hope these proposals will start in European countries and the USA. I talked with some friends during IM 2004 in Bad Driberg, and all of them had positive reactions. Let me have your thoughts on this idea. Success! IJzebrand Schuitema Maria van Boechoutlaan 8 3984 PH Odijk The Netherlands tel: 00 31 30 6563315 Sir, I would like to thank you for publicising the sale of the Vade Mecum slide rule that we offered on eBay in October. Considerable interest was shown in this item and it realised a figure well beyond our expectations. Thank you Carol Smith STAEDTLER, Nürnberg Letters to the Editor Sir, With this letter I would ask for the attention of members to an idea that has been with me for some time. All of us collectors will agree that the slide rule has occupied an important place in our social history for more than Fig. 1 Staedtler slide rule Rietz system no. 4860 from 1937 (Faber-Castell 1/87) 12 www.sliderules.org.uk Dieter von Jezierski Staedtler slide rules before WW II In the German version of my book on page 107 Rechenschieber-eine Dokumentation (not in the English version “A Journey through three Centuries”), I give some information about Staedtler. Here follows a translation: The J. S. Staedtler–Mars Lead Pencil Factory added slide rules to its sales program especially for the export market in 1959. The models were then being purchased Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 from the German maker Nestler. The original product range was of 12 variants of the most popular systems in 10 inch and 5 inch versions. Duplex 10 and 5, Darmstadt 10 and 5, Elektro 10 and 5, Rietz 10 and 5, SchulRietz 10, Schul loglog 10, Multiplex 5, Kaufmann 10 and 5, all classified as 54…-series. From 1971 there was an additional series 544A, 544S, 544LL, 544DLL, for schools, purchased from the Japanese maker FUJI KEIKI, Tokyo. Robert has also a Staedtler Darmstadt no. 54108 (identical to Nestler 21) My thanks to Robert Adams for his information. Yet another pencil making company (opened in 1878) was that of Johan Faber, brother of Lothar von Faber of Nürnberg. In 1885 the company became a family corporation (Johan Faber A.G.). There was serious competition between Johan and the A.W.Faber firms until 1931 when the two firms merged. Johan Faber also supplied slide rules. These were obtained from Nestler and supplied especially to the South American market. From 1905 these contained the series 9201, 9202, Technical Pocket model, 9203 – 9205, (Rietz) as standard technical rules and 9206, Electro. These were sold up to the 1930s with the “crossed hammers” logo of Johan Faber. A glass cursor with folding magnifying glass was also supplied. In September I bought on ebay.com, an interesting Staedtler slide rule from 1931. It was, no doubt, made by FaberCastell, the greatest lead pencil company and also known as a slide rule maker at that time. It is a slide rule made of pear-wood with celluloid facings, a metal frame cursor of that time with glass, the metal strips imbedded in the stator and the wooden pegs to secure the laminated celluloid. It can be identified as 12/37 (made in September 1937). System Rietz. It is Staedtler no. 4860 – J.S. Staedtler—MARS Made in Germany. Conclusion: Three known lead pencil factories in Nuremberg supplied slide rules, too. Johan Faber from 1905 until 1931 (purchased from Nestler, another slide rule maker). Fig 3 Staedtler slide rule no. 54106 J.S. Staedtler from 1937 (from FC (identical to Nestler no. 37) only 1/87, and from Nestler and Fuji Fig. 2a Keiki) until 1975. Detail of the cardboard box A.W. Faber-Castell from 1882 as slide rule with an at that time used logo of maker until 1975. Staedtler with MARS J.S.Staedtler Bavaria A.G. Thornton Booklets Nigel Panrucker Fig. 2b the reverse side of the stator with part of the label and with the identifiable manufacturing date no. 37 blind stamped The ten-year period from 1930 to 1940 was a very productive one for this company. It devised, patented and manufactured not just one additional system of trigonometrical scales for their slide rules but two. The first was patented in 1933 (No. 411090) and known as their differential series. This series comprised four different arrangements of scales known as models ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’. With three different lengths of rule, there were thus twelve rules in all in this particular series. The second was patented in 1938 (No. 468257) and appeared as models ‘E’ and ‘F’. Model ‘F’ is the A.C. Electrical slide rule detailed in my article in Gazette 3 (2002) and entitled “Which Trig Scales? – Fig. 2c reverse side of the slide with sin, sin/tg and tg The International Meeting 2004 in Bad Driburg brought to light a further fact about Staedtler slide rules before WW2. Collector friend Robert Adams from Australia reported on his Staedtler items which includes no. 54106 Electro, identified by him as a Nestler 37, see Fig 3. 13 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 Take Your P.I.C.” This may have been made in the three usual lengths. However it would appear that model ‘E’ (a simplified version of model ‘F’) was only made in one size – 10” long. A fairly wide range of booklets was produced to introduce the new scales and the concepts behind their compilation. Others were intended to help slide rule users to get the best out of all the scales available. Just recently two most informative booklets have come to light. The first is an abridged catalogue giving brief details of rules with the standard trig scales, together with those with differential trig scales as well as those with the A.C Electrical scales. (Thornton booklet No. 194 – UKSRC reprint No. 16/15). The second is a full catalogue for just the twelve slide rules with the differential trig scales only including cursor types and numbers plus excellent illustrations. (Thornton booklet No. 181 – UKSRC reprint 16/20). Thornton slide rules will be featuring quite prominently at the forthcoming IM 2005. May I suggest that copies of these reprints will be of benefit to those attending and also those unable to do so. Finally, may I ask, who could resist a copy of the second booklet bearing the title “Masterpieces of Slide Rule Art”? it, cannot get one to do it. So I got Cocker the famous writing master, to do it, and I sat an hour beside him to see him design it all, and strange it is to see him, with his natural eyes, to cut so small at his first designing it, and reading it all over, without any missing, when, for my life, I could not with my best skill, read one word or letter of it’ (10 Aug. 1664). ‘On the next day comes Cocker with my rule, which he hath engraved to admiration for goodness and smallness of work. It cost me 14s. the doing.’ Apparently the machines attracted some little notice but the man in the street was not impressed, as is so usual when a new invention is brought out. Pepys saw one at a dinner and this is his observation: 14 March 1668: ‘ ...and there, among many other things my Lord [i.e. Hinchingbroke had Sir Samuel Morland’s late invention for casting up of sums of £.s.d. which is very pretty but not very useful.’ From SLIDE RULES IN GUNTER, EARLY SCIENCE AT OXFORD pp61-74 Samuel Morland’s adding machine dated 1666 Robert Hooke was another one who disparaged them. In his Diary 31 January 1672./3 he records: ‘Saw Sir S. Morland’s Arithmetic engine Very silly-‘, but then Hooke was a rival inventor. The machines were advertised for sale in the London Gazette, as witness the following advertisement which appeared in the issue of 16-20 April 1668: ‘Sir Samuel Morland has found out two very usefull instruments; the one serving for addition and subtraction of any numbers of Pounds, Shillings, Pence and Farthings or of any other coins, Weights, and Measures, the other for the ready performance of Multiplication and Division, together with the Extraction of the Square and Cube Roots and that to any number of Places required.’ The time was not ripe for the extended use of such machines because the need had hardly yet been felt. Still more to the point is that methods of interchangeable manufacture, which alone could make possible the production of such machines on any Bruce Williams During the second half of the seventeenth century spiral forms of the slide rule were devised. The earliest is attributed to Milburne, a Yorkshireman, by Hutton, 1 and another to T. Brown, who projected Gunter's line ‘into a kind of spiral of 5, 10, or 20 turns, more or less’, and used ‘flat compasses, or an opening, index’.2 Of Brown little is known, but Professor Cajori3 conjectures that he may be the instrument-maker named by Pepys in his diary. ‘Abroad to find out one to engrave my tables upon my new sliding-rule with silver plates, it being so small that Brown who made 1 Art. ‘Gunter s Line' in Philos. and Math. Dictionary, London, 1815. 2 Stone, Mathematical Instruments, p. 16, London, 1723 3 History of the Logarithmic Slide Rule, p. 16, 1909. 14 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 considerable scale and at any reasonable price, had not then been thought of, much less developed; nevertheless we can say with confidence that Morland’s machines marked a distinct advance in design and construction. Had Morland done no more than this, he would have deserved credit for having made the calculating machine available for general use and of such a size that it could be carried conveniently in the pocket. £abour Saving device. The September reprint has been rubber stamped in blue: A. KING & CO., GROCERS, CONFECTIONERS, AND TOBACCONISTS, CENTRAL STOKE STORES 44 Brays Lane, COVENTRY This reprint indicates the price of the calculator is 12/6, however, by the time of the article in October’s “Grocers’ Journal” the figure is quoted as 15/- …”decided on by Mr. King in order to stimulate employment and to give expression to his fraternal attitude towards his fellow-tradesmen and with the reduction of ‘selling costs’ in view”. Other facts to emerge from the documents are that Otis was a Fellow of the Institute of Inventors, a member of the Coventry Grocers’ Association and that his calculator was shown for the first time at the stall of the Institute of Certificated Grocers at the Grocers’ Exhibition. The calculator was found in a box without its lid but, unlike most examples known, this one is of a mottled grey colour rather than black. It does look to be original and of the period. There is one anomaly – the “cursor” is stamped with the number 130. The only other example that I know of from this date is number 131 and it has its cursor stamped with the same number 131. My example would seem therefore to be a “marriage” but is it too fanciful to surmise that, given the above facts and documentation, that this was Otis Kings personal calculator, either used in his shop or as a demonstration model? [Transcripts of the above mentioned documents are available at 50p, post free] Otis King – latest Colin Barnes At an East Anglian antique fair last year I was lucky enough to find a very early and fine example of Otis King’s calculator at a very reasonable price. As important as the calculator itself was some documentation which throws further light on the story of Otis King and his invention. The base of the calculator is stamped: 15/- OΔAB 24 This is typical of the earliest examples as are the construction details. The 15/- relates to the selling price which is confirmed by a statement in the paperwork that accompanied the calculator. The significance of the OΔAB is not known but is recorded on other early examples. 24 is the number in the sequence of the first production run made by Otis King and his assistant prior to passing manufacture to Carbic Ltd. The upper cylinder carries the monetary scale and the lower the logarithmic scale both printed white on a black background. Reading the accompanying documents it is apparent that Otis designed his calculator solely for costing calculations, the introduction of a purely logarithmic calculator coming later possibly after production moved to Carbic. The documentation included a set of instructions is dated October, 1921 quoting A. King & Co. as “Sole Vendors”. Previously the earliest instructions (with the same wording and format) are dated Nov. 1921 and the name Tuck & Blakemore, Ltd. “Wholesale Distributors”. Other papers included a torn sheet from “The Certificated Grocer” magazine (undated) titled A New Pocket Calculator, a short reprinted article from “The Grocers’ Journal” of 10th September, 1921 titled The Little Marvel and another reprint from “The Grocers’ Journal” of 1st October, 1921 titled Herman van Herwijnen Memorial Dear Circle members, A few months ago, we lost our dear friend Herman van Herwijnen. As you all know, he is the author and creator of the “Slide Rule Catalogue” on CD and DVD. This work is of international acclaim and immense value to all slide rule enthusiasts. Members of the ISRG (International Slide Rule Group) discussion group on Yahoo (in which Herman participated very actively during the last four years) have arranged to have Concise make a Stadia Computer circular slide rule in memory of Herman. This is a 3.75 inch circular duplex slide rule with scales: front; D, 15 www.sliderules.org.uk Skid Stick Issue 19 February 2005 sin*cos, cos^2. and back; D, C, C', S, T1, T2, ST. The slide rule and the case will carry the inscription “Herman van Herwijnen Memorial Edition 2004”. The case will have, in addition, the logo for the International Slide Rule Group. This project is coordinated by Gary Flom, email: [email protected] Derek Slater has once again generously volunteered to host our ‘local’ meeting. The date set for our Spring Meeting is Sunday, May 15, 2005 with our usual start at about 10.30/11.00. Your usual contribution to the cost of lunch will be appreciated. Please contact Derek at least two weeks in advance of your intention to attend when he will be able to provide directions to his address. With this being the last opportunity for plans to be discussed for the forthcoming International Meeting, no other special subject is on the agenda. Please, however, bring along any interesting or unusual finds that you have to enliven the discussions. Note that the disc contains some smaller texts in the Japanese language, but the full manual will be translated to English. If you wish to place an order for one or more of these memorial discs, please send Gary Flom an email with your wishes. We don't have a final price yet due to exchange fluctuations, but expect the cost to be about $30 per unit. If the order is substantial, the shipping costs will be low per unit. The aim is to ship the memorial discs end of first quarter 2005, depending on how fast we get your orders for the last 70 units of a minimum bulk order to Concise. see also: http://www.concise.co.jp/eng0731/circle02.htm l#08 Remember that all are welcome, your thoughts and input will be appreciated. Derek Slater Grange Farmhouse Geddington Kettering Northants. NN14 1AL 01536 742288 [email protected] “The Good Old Days” In Bill Bryson’s “A Short History of Nearly Everything” (page 512) is a possibly recordbreaking example of the “good old days” of the slide rule which could have been dramatically improved by a simple PC. He describes the work in the early 1900’s of the Serbian academic Milutin Milankovitch, trying to relate the three celestial motions of obliquity, procession and eccentricity, but these being complicated by their very different periodicities, 20,000; 40,000 and 100,000 years respectively. This required “a nearly endless amount of exceedingly devoted computation”. Cutting a long story (!) short, he writes, “Happily, this was precisely the sort of repetitive toil that suited Milankovitch’s temperament. For the next twenty years, even while on holiday, he worked ceaselessly with pencil and slide rule computing the table of his cycles – work that would now could be completed in a day or two with a computer”. The work culminated in a book in 1930, his calculations having moved forward swiftly during WW1 when he was under loose house arrest as a Serbian reservist, and spent all his time calculating. “He was possibly the happiest prisoner of war in history.” concludes Bryson. Peter Hopp RST Germany News has been received from our friends in Germany that they now have a new website at: www.Rechenschieber.org This site is now operational and the previous address discontinued. Oughtred Society The new Oughtred Society website is now online at: www.oughtred,org Jim Cerny did the design work and created the site. He will continue to serve as our Webdesigner and will manage and maintain the site. Kate Matthews provided guidance as the project progressed. Her creativity and previous experience with the original website was very helpful to us. I did most of the text writing. If you don't like something you read, don't fuss at Jim! Please contact me if you have suggestions. The Oughtred Society Swap Sheet Online, which will appear about the beginning of February. Ted Hume [email protected] UKSRC Spring Meeting 16 www.sliderules.org.uk