presentations

Transcription

presentations
Introduction: retrofitting commercial buildings, a new
focus with important results for policy-makers
Roberto Lollini
EURAC Research Bolzano
Energy Day, June 13, 2016
Smart strategies and policies for sustainable shopping centres:
energy efficient and cost-competitive retrofitting solutions
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy project
Objective
Re-conceptualize shopping malls through deep retrofitting through a
comprehensive systemic approach involving innovative technologies and
optimizes solution sets.
Targets
• Up to 75% reduction of energy demand
• Power peak shaving
• 50% increased share of renewable energy source
• Improved indoor environmental quality
Numbers
• 3 demo cases
• 4 years
• 23 organizations and 3 third parties
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy project
PARTNERS
23 organizations from industry, SMEs and research institutions, covering:
• Monitoring and control system manufacturer
• HVAC, Refrigeration and Lighting manufacturer
• Storage systems manufacturers
• Solar system manufacturer
• Materials manufacturer
• Building enterprises
• R&D experts (building physics,
HVAC+R systems, monitoring,
lighting, materials)
• Engineering/Architectural consultants
• Building owners
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Why shopping centers?
•
Gross leasable area (GLA) per 1000 capita in EU-28+NO+CH is 224 m²
•
More than 119.2 million m2 shopping centre GLA in the EU28+NO+CH
•
Shopping centre renovation rate (RR) is 4.4%
•
RR of residential sector is 1.2%
CommONEnergy Deliverable 2.1
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Why shopping centers?
•
Final energy
consumption of the
shopping centre stock
was 32.2 TWh in 2013
CommONEnergy Deliverable 2.1
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Why shopping centers?
source: http://www.buildingsdata.eu/
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Shopping centre: a peculiar case of building
Nearly all retail locations use mechanical cooling systems to ensure indoor
comfort temperatures and mechanical ventilation to ensure adequate air
exchange, primarily for hygienic reasons.
These energy uses are responsible for around 40% of the total electricity
consumption of a shopping centre.
Share of total energy demand in retail buildings ( Retail forum sustainability 2009)
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy project
WP2 context  finished
WP3+WP4 technology solutions development + modelling  prototyping
proofing/validating, finalizing, assessing
WP5 solution-sets, methodologies (but also as a way to “sell” technologies!!)
 running and to be finalized asap
WP6 demonstration (of technologies and methodologies)  3 different stages:
• MVAL: almost finished
• CitySyd: designing, procurement and implementation running together (men at work!)
• COOP Modena/Grosseto: design phase almost finalised, under procurement,
implementation in Jun-Sep 2016
We (partners, local stakeholders, and EC) are waiting for first measured results
WP7 communication, dissemination, exploitation (market expectation/penetration)
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Sales Growth 2000-2012 and GLA per Capita
17.50%
Slovakia
High share - high growth
Markets
Low share - high growth
Markets
15.00%
Av. Sales Growth 2000-2012, [%]
Bulgaria
12.50%
Hungary
Romania
10.00%
Latvia
Luxembourg
Lithuania
7.50%
Estonia
Poland
5.00%
Belgium
Cyprus
Greece
2.50%
Czech Republic
Malta
Germany
Switzerland
Low share - low growth
Markets
0.00%
0
Croatia
Finland
France
Italy
Portugal
Spain
Denmark
Ireland
Slovenia
Norway
Austria
Sweden
Netherlands
United Kingdom
225
High share - low growth
Markets
450
675
GLA per 1000 Capita, [m²/1000 capita]
Source: ICSC, Eurostat
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy Reference Buildings
Selection criteria
• Climate condition
• Market saturation
• Location
• Shopping centre
typology
• Building typology
• Opening year
Brussels, 13.6.2016
Heating & cooling Dominated
Well-developed markets
GE/KA
GE/KA
GE/KA
ME/BC/DO/ ME/BC/DO/
WA/GB
WA/GB
ME/DO/GB
Urban
Location
Suburban
Small shopping mall
Shopping centre
typology
Medium & large Shopping mall
Spezialised and Others
Reconceptualized building
Building typology
Shopping Center purpose
Before 1990
Opening year
BC/WA
ME/GE/KA/D
CS/BC/WA
O/GB
CS/ME/GE/BC/KA
/DO/WA/GB
PA/ST
ST
PA
ME/GE/KA/D
O/ST/GB
CS/BC/PA/
WA
GE
GE
GB
BC/DO/WA
ME
ME
GB
CS/BC/KA/D
O/WA
ME/GE
ME/GE
PA/ST
Opening year
Building typology
KA
CS/PA/ST
CS
PA/ST
KA
GE
KA
BC/DO/WA/ ME/BC/DO/
GB
WA
CS/BC/KA/D CS/ME/GE/
O/WA/GB BC/DO/WA
GB
GB
PA/ST
ST/GB
KA/DO
PA
CS/BC/WA
ME/GE
ME/GE
PA/ST/GB
KA/DO/ST/G
ME/GE/DO
B
CS/BC/PA/
CS/BC/WA
WA
GB
ME/GE
KA/ST
ST
GB
CS/BC/KA/D CS/BC/DO/
O/WA
WA
ME/GE
KA
PA/ST
PA/ST/GB
CS/BC/KA/D
O/WA
After 2002
Medium and large
Shopping mall
CS
Between 1990 and
2002
Small shopping
mall
ST/PA
Reconceptualized
building
Suburban
CS/PA
Specialised and
Others
Urban
ST
Market saturation
Emerging markets
Shopping centre
typology
Emerging markets
Location
Market saturation
Heating & cooling
Dominated
PA/ST
Before 1990
Cooling Dominated
CS
EUSEW 2016
Shopping center
purpose
Climate condition
CS/PA/ST
Well-developed
markets
Heating Dominated
Cooling Dominated Climate condition
Selection criteria
Heating Dominated
CommONEnergy Reference Buildings
PA/ST
KA
ME/GE
ME/GE
ME/GE
CS/BC/KA/DO/PA
/ST/WA/GB
CS/BC/DO/
WA
CS/ME/GE/
BC/DO/WA
Between 1990 and 2002
GB
KA/PA/ST
GB
After 2002
KA/PA/ST
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
The physical structure of shopping centres is in a state of constant change due to the
changing requirements of the retail trade.
Owners and managers questionnaire: "When was the shopping centre last
rehabilitated/upgraded?"
Owners and managers questionnaire: Interpretation of the follow up question
where respondents are asked to describe the actions taken. Several replies could
Brussels,
be characterised as multiple refurbishments and extensions
to the13.6.2016
original centre.
EUSEW 2016
Architectural and aesthetic quality in shopping centres
 Sustainable planning requires the consideration of universal design,
energy efficiency and aesthetic qualities at the same time.
 Buildings should be adaptable and spaces general and flexible both in
terms of usage and energy consumption but functionality and technology
should not be allowed to dominate at the cost of aesthetic and
architectural quality.
 Response to the survey suggests that the sustainable shopping centres of
the future will have high architectural quality with focus on legibility,
durability and energy use.
Emporia shopping centre,
Malmø, Sweden
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
The needs of shopping centres: a list of indicators
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Stakeholders in retrofitting processes
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting
 The need to reduce energy use in shopping centres is in itself a driver
based on the needs to reduce operational costs and overhead costs.
 Thermal and visual comfort issues and potential improvement could
be drivers to improve lighting and thermal aspects related mainly to
the envelope, HVAC system and lighting devices
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting
 The need to have systems easier to control and maintain is a driver
especially regarding the greater management and flexibility that
could lead to economic benefits taking advantage of building-grid
interaction aspects
 Lack of knowledge among stakeholder levels is a barrier to energy
use reductions. Increasing knowledge potentially function as a driver
for implementing actions to achieve energy use reductions.
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Drivers for shopping centres energy retrofitting
Costs associated with retrofitting may be both drivers and barriers.
Reducing overheads and operational costs may be considered a driver
for energy retrofitting among stakeholders.
However if the costs of implementing energy efficient measures
outweigh the costs achieved by energy use reductions then the
measures will not be implemented.
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Trends in shopping centres




The state of constant flux
Size and location matters
Leisure and pleasure
Green Retail
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Shopping centres in EPBD / EED
Paula Rey García
Directorate-General for
Energy
Energy Efficiency
Buildings Team Leader
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Thank you for your kind attention!
[email protected]
www.eurac.edu
Brussels, 13.6.2016
CommONEnergy Day
BPIE, Brussels
Dr. Veronika Schröpfer
13 June 2016
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
The Architects’ Council of Europe (ACE)
 The representative organisation of
the architectural profession at EU
level, founded in 1990
 43
Member
Organisations
representative at national level in 31
countries
 Regulatory bodies and professional
associations
 ca. 560,000 architects
Member Organisations
Member Organisations with
special status
Observer Members
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Objectives (1/2)
➔To be the single voice of architects in Europe
➔To promote and defend the architectural profession at
EU level towards the EU institutions
➔Advancing Architectural Quality in the Built Environment
➔Supporting Sustainable Development of the Built
Environment
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Objectives (2/2)
Advocating Quality in Architectural Practice
Fostering cross-border cooperation and
facilitating European practice
To devote itself to a better understanding
of architectural and cultural values
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
Ensuring High Standards of Qualification
for architects
Delegates from all Member Organisations
11 Members
6 elected, including President
5 by rotation
2 years mandate
WORK GROUPS
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Based in Brussels
EXECUTIVE BOARD
PERMANENT SECRETARIAT
GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
Structure
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
The ACE Executive Board
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
The ACE Secretariat Brussels
Mr Ian Pritchard
ACE Secretary General
Dr Veronika Schröpfer
Project Officer
Mrs Caroline André
Head of Administration
Mr Pierre Obajtek
Policy Officer
Mr Gerardo Ambrosecchia
Communications Officer
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Access to the
Profession
Practice of the
Profession
Responsible
Architecture
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
Three Working Areas
Access to the Profession
BECOMING AN ARCHITECT IN THE EU
COORDINATOR DUBRAVKO BACIC
3 work groups:
professional practical experience (PPE) leading to registration
• Continuing Professional Development (CPD)
2. Regulatory Questions & Issues
• Access to regulated professions within EU
3. Joint Working Group with EAAE (EU Association Architectural
Education)
• Best Diploma prize
• Erasmus+ project
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
1. Professional Qualifications Directive, PPE and CPD
• Professional Qualifications Directive revision every 5 years
• Automatic recognition  5+2: 5 years education + 2 years
Practice of the Profession
HARMONIZATION & MOBILITY
COORDINATOR GEORG PENDL
3 work groups:
2.Public Procurement/ Architectural Design Contests
• Advocate the use of quality based selection in Public and
•
Private Procurement
10 rules for design competitions
3.Trade in Services
• Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) with parallel
organisations at global scale to facilitate the export of Architectural
services. (e.g. Canada, USA)
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
1.Scope of services
• Fee scales
• Insurance requirement for cross-boarder practices
RESPONSIBLE ARCHITECTURE
PROMOTING ARCHITECTURAL QUALITY & SUSTAINABILITY
COORDINATOR PEDRO RAVARA
3 work groups:
1. WG Environment and Sustainable Architecture (ESA)
achieve its targets for reducing energy consumption (EPBD,
EED)
2. WG Urban and Housing Issues (UI)
• Promoting an integrated, holistic approach to spatial
planning, urban and rural development with a focus on reuse
3. BIM
•
Building Information Modelling
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
• Seeking a leading role for architects in helping the EU
RESPONSIBLE ARCHITECTURE
Plus:
1. Research & Innovation Panel (R&I)
research results of EU projects related to EEB (Energy
Efficient Buildings & Districts) and the role of the architect in
energy renovation
2. Architects Against Climate Change Campaign (AACCC)
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
• Participation in EU funded projects, dissemination of
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
PUBLICATIONS
Sustainable Construction Glossary
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Housing (Paris, France) - Dietmar Feichtinger Architectes
PUBLICATIONS
Sector Study every 2 years
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
EU-funded Projects of ACE
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Advisory Board
• Commercial = 28% of non-residential building stock
• Majority already built
• Approach includes architectural quality and passive
solutions
• Large potential in adaptive façades, natural ventilation
strategies and micro-layout design to improve thermal
zoning
• In line with our manifesto  role/ importance of
architect in retrofitting process
• Tools and training
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Thank you for your attention
www.ace-cae.eu
[email protected]
ACE Project Officer, Dr. Veronika Schröpfer – CommONEnergy Day, BPIE, Brussels, 13.06.2016
Brussels – Energy Day
FRAMING POLICIES
TRANSFORMING SHOPPING MALLS INTO LIGHTHOUSES OF
ENERGY EFFICIENT ARCHITECTURE
Maarten De Groote
Head of Research
Buildings Performance Institute Europe
13/06/2016
From historic market places to modern centres
Setting the scene
•
The European wholesale and retail contributes around 11% of EU’s GDP
•
Around 7 percent of all retail and wholesale buildings are shopping centres
•
Strong increase of Gross Leasable Area (GLA) in the EU28+NO
million m² GLA
112
25
1970
NOWADAYS
Defining ‘shopping centre’
•
Shopping centres vary in function, typology, form, size & shopping purpose
•
CommONEnergy definition for ‘shopping centre’
A formation of one or more retail buildings comprising units and ‘communal’
areas which are planned and managed as a single entity related in its location,
size and type of shops to the trade area that it serves. The centre has
1) a retail complex containing several stores or units and
2) a minimum GLA of 5,000 m2
Social and environmental context
Location
Town Centre
Shopping/
urban
Type of
Size
development
5,000 – 19,999
m2
Neighbourhood
centre/
community centre
Speciality centre
(e.g. market halls,
or historical
buildings)
Regional centre
Super-regional
centre
Anchor store Trip purpose
Supermarket
Convenience
or hypermarket shopping
Traditional
markets,
tourist shops
Leisure,
convenience
shopping
None
Household
shopping,
Comparison
shopping, leisure
Medium/ large
20,000 –
shopping
79,999 m2
centres
One or more
department
stores
Comparison
shopping
Very large
shopping
centres
Several
department
stores,
entertainment
centres
Comparison
shopping,
leisure
Small
shopping
centres
Retail Park and
Factory Outlets
Out-of-Town
Shopping/
suburban
GLA (m2)
Usually 5,000
m2 and above
5,000 – 30,000
m2
80,000 m2 and
above
Gross Leasable Area of shopping centres
UK+FR+IT = 50% of EU+NO
IEECB 2016
Shopping centre GLA per capita
Largest GLA per capita and
highest market saturation
1. Sweden
2. Norway
3. Netherlands
4. UK
New energy
efficient
buildings
Extensions,
upgrades and
renovations
IEECB 2016
Extreme high renovation rates
•
Analysis of data on 3400 shopping centres indicates an annual renovation
rate of 4.4%
•
The renovation rate of the whole building stock in Europe is around 1%
•
Confirmed by facility managers from reference shopping centre
•
Mainly to update the buildings to modern lifestyles
 Window of opportunities for implementing energy saving measures
Energy consumption in EU’s shopping centres
•
Total energy consumption of the whole shopping centre building stock in
Europe has not yet been calculated
RESIDENTIAL
SHOPPING
CENTRES
BUILDINGS
• Space heating (67%)
• Water heating (13%)
• Electrical appliances (11%)
• Cooking (6%)
• Lighting (2%)
•
•
•
•
•
Store lighting
Ventilation
Heating
Cooling
Food refrigeration
Specific energy use in different shop categories
•
Composition of the energy consumption varies from one retailer to another
•
Mean floor area and specific energy use in different shop categories
Anchor
Stores
Number of shops
Mean floor area
[m²]
Mean spec.
energy use
[kWh/m2a]
Clothing
Hobby
Home
Supermarket
Other
Services
Not
categorised
(14)
89
6
15
8
90
31
(3205)
421
241
645
824
174
318
(158)
180
206
244
456
385
288
Bottom-up appproach
•
Essential to have an overview on the store composition per GLA to
make estimations and develop energy consumption patterns
•
Specific Energy consumption [kWh/m2a] of shopping centres
Specific energy
consumption of
shops [kWh/m2a]
Specific energy
consumption of
the common area
[kWh/m2a]
Total specific
energy
consumption per
GLA [kWh/m2a]
Small shopping centre
280
117
309
Medium shopping centre
263
117
292
Large shopping centre
248
117
278
Very large shopping centre
228
117
257
Total average
261
117
IEECB 2016
290
Total energy consumption of shopping centres
The total final energy consumption of shopping centres in the
EU28+NO+SI is estimated to be 32.2 TWh
• Largest energy consumption: UK, DE, ES, FR, IT
• Account for 54% of the total energy consumption
Combining sales growth, GLA per capita and annual energy
consumption
IEECB 2016
Functional patterns and socio-cultural aspects
•
Main stakeholder are customers, tenants, management and community
•
Trips to shopping centres are often multipurpose and tenants benefit from
customer traffic not generated by them
•
The main priority for tenants and managers is encouraging customers to choose
their shopping centre (e.g. tracking visitors)
•
Reasons why customers choose where to shop?
1. Location
2. Physical environment
3. Range of products available
4. Tenant mix
Functional patterns and socio-cultural aspects (2)
•
Customer satisfaction is main starting point at understanding functional patterns
•
Shopping centre attractiveness affects
•
•
Sales for the tenants
•
Price of rental spaces
•
Tenants to cooperate in marketing efforts
Areas to be addressed when upgrading the shopping centre?
MANAGERS
TENANTS
• Reduced energy demand
• Customer satisfaction
• Architectural quality
• Improved orientation
• Durability
• Customer satisfaction
• Thermal comfort & IAQ
• Worker satisfaction
• Cost
Individual measures with largest saving potential
•
Lighting: adapt or reduce the installed power density
•
Air infiltration: heat losses due to poor air-tightness and the many entrances
•
Thermal bridges and poor insulation levels
•
Increase the indoor operative summer temperature
•
Improving Energy Management Systems
 Measures should be combined in a set of solutions
Integrated approach for retrofitting
•
Not just technical systems: social systems whose everyday functional
patterns are based on satisfying customers
•
Attractive solutions for customers: optimising indoor environmental quality
and comfort
•
Needs of the surrounding community
•
Flexible interior spaces: enabling to adapt according the tenant’s request
•
Improving architectural and aesthetic quality
•
Comprehensive planning approach
•
Integrate entire life cycle
•
Involve all stakeholders
Drivers for (deep) energy retrofits
Need to reduce operational and overhead costs - ESCO approach?
Improving thermal and visual comfort induce the buildings’ efficiency
User-friendly and more efficient building management system
Increase knowledge on energy consumption at end-user level
Reflection on the relevance of requirements
•
Multiple legal requirements, e.g. work environment, major renovation,
replacing technical systems, accessibility public places
•
Organisational structure: owners - facility managers – tenants customers (e.g. tenants agreements or guidelines, contracts with
energy suppliers)
•
Distinguish energy use according to end-use functions
Some good practices on policy measures in
France
•
New commercial buildings are required to
have
solar
panels
or
plant-covered
rooftops
•
New parking spaces – incl. commercial
zones – should be equipped with charging
points for electric vehicles
•
Commercial buildings >2000m2: execution
of energy audit, set up an appropriate
renovation plan and implement measures
IEECB 2016
Recommendations for policy makers
•
Stimulate innovative business models (e.g. ESCO’s) and new technologies (e.g. multipurpose façade systems, SIM’s)
•
Address the retrofit of shopping centres in the national Renovation Strategies (EED art.4)
•
Energy performance requirements for new construction, retrofit and operation,
specifically designed for shopping centres (or commercial buildings)
• E.g.: wholesale and retail ‘subcategory’ are not included in the nZEB definition in
many countries: AT, BE, CZ, HR, LV, PT, RO, SK
•
Awareness and stimulation of green building certification schemes
•
Shopping centres as pilot cases for becoming energy-hubs, interacting with the energy
system
H&C
strategy
EED
RED
Labelling
ECODESIGN
New
Energy
Market
Energy
Union
EPBD
THANK YOU!
Maarten De Groote
[email protected]
Buildings Performance Institute Europe
Focus on the demonstration cases: lessons-learned and
replication potential
Roberto Lollini
EURAC Research Bolzano
Energy Day, June 13, 2016
Smart strategies and policies for sustainable shopping centres:
energy efficient and cost-competitive retrofitting solutions
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy demo-cases
3 demo cases have been selected representing a variety of building
typologies, architectural/technological features and climatic
boundary conditions
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CommONEnergy demo-cases
CitySyd, Trondheim, NORWAY
Mercado de Val (MVAL), Valladolid, SPAIN
COOP Canaletto, Modena, ITALY
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Demo-cases progress
Concept  Solution-set  Designing 
Procurement  Implementation  Assessment
• MVAL Valladolid: almost finished
• CitySyd Trondheim: designing, procurement and implementation
running together (men at work!)
• COOP Modena/Grosseto: design phase almost finalised, under
procurement, implementation in Jul-Sep 2016
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES: timing
MAIN REASONS FOR DELAYS
• Environmental negotiations (parking and provisional
market)
• Procurement procedure / Implementation procedure
• Unforeseen issues (underground stream)
• Adaptation to works/EU project needs/amendments
• Different language/cultural approach to the works:
practitioners vs researchers …
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES:
state of progress
Running works:
• Façade system commissioning
• iBEMS setting up and commissioning
• Coupling iBEMS and “standard” BEMS
and next:
• Training on iBEMS operation
• Monitoring, and building performances assessment
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Mercado del Val, Valladolid/ES
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
COOP Canaletto, Modena/IT
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
COOP Canaletto, Modena/IT
• Coupling of R + HVAC: coupling will be realized by installing two heat
exchangers before the gas cooler
• CO2 trans-critical refrigeration plant
• Optimized LT and MT cabinets
 Application of variable air flow fan to the display cabinet
 Optimised air distribution and air vents layout for the cabinets in the
supermarket with the aim to reduce mist on the glass (linear diffusers)
• Free cooling using the AHU during the night
• Daylighting using solar tubes and very efficient artificial lighting
• Functional painting on the roof
• iBEMS
• PV/batteries/eV (in Grosseto/IT)
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
N
Main entrance
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
Ground floor
First floor
Jens Hoff shop
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
•
•
•
•
•
Jens Hoff shop light tubes
Jens Hoff shop lighting solution
Skylight
Natural ventilation
iBEMS
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
• Jens Hoff shop
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
CitySyd, Trondheim/NO
• Natural ventilation
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods
Passive
Active
‘Conventional’
Solution sets
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods
Energy analysis
Solution sets
Economic evaluation
Continuous
commissioning
Environmental impact
assessment
Socio-cultural
assessment
Replication potential and
standardization needs
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Systemic retrofitting solution-sets and methods
Step 0 – Evaluation of
available sources/tools
Step 1 – Strategy
definition: solution-set
Step 2 – Model definition:
numerical description
Step 3 – Solution-set
analysis: simulations
Step 6 – Fill in IDP
library
Step 5 – Share &
Discussion
NO
NO
Energy
demand
reduced
by 75%
YES
YES
PBT < 7
years
Step 4 – Costs/Benefits
PBT & NPV estimation
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Example of simulation study: KATANE’ – CATANIA (Italy).
Energy balance
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Example of simulation study: KATANE’ – CATANIA (Italy).
1. Reduce internal gains and energy consumption by:
Installing of more efficient lighting systems and automatic control lighting
switch on/off
2. Reduce cooling need by:
Insulating the roof and installing reflective coatings
3. Reduce energy consumption for ventilation and cooling need by:
Exploiting existing automated openings to enhance stack natural ventilation
in common areas and using adaptive comfort ranges as set-points
4. Reduce refrigeration consumption by:
Using trans-critical system with features able to manage high external
temperature5. Peak shaving by:
PV+battery system
Brussels, 13.6.2016
PV+battery
Refrigeration – transcritical
system
Natural ventilation
Roof insulation (5cm) +
reflective coatings (0.8)
Efficient lighting
EUSEW 2016
Primary energy
To be updated with setpoint settings according to
adaptive comfort ranges
Brussels, 13.6.2016
PV+battery
Refrigeration – transcritical
system
Natural ventilation
Roof insulation (5cm) +
reflective coatings (0.8)
Efficient lighting
EUSEW 2016
Energy balance
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Thermal comfort – Fanger model
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Stakeholders workshop in Madrid
•
•
A crucial chance to present the project achievements to possible
users/clients and address the final fine tuning in the last year of the project
Very short introduction to project approaches and methods:
–
–
–
–
•
•
•
Integrative Modelling Environment
Technical/economic analysis
Continuous commissioning
Sustainability assessment
Presentation of the solution-sets as applied for the 11 case studies: 3
demo-cases and 8 reference buildings in different climate, social, and
economic contexts (simulators with active role, but presenting the
performance of CommONEnergy technologies)
Relaxed agenda to allow open discussion, giving our hosts room for
comments and networking (partners and invited stakeholders)
Tight scheduling of preliminary actions to prepare at best the workshop,
also sharing in advance simulation results
Brussels, 13.6.2016
EUSEW 2016
Thank you for your kind attention!
[email protected]
www.eurac.edu
Brussels, 13.6.2016
DEVIMO CONSULT
2016
L E A D I N G Y O U T O T H E M A I N B E N E LU X H OT S P OT S
2016
71 millions
VISITORS
765.000 M2
UNDER MANAGEMENT
36
SHOPPING CENTERS AND RETAIL PARKS
60%
OF BELGIUM’S LARGEST
SHOPPING CENTERS
1.400 shops
35%
OF THE RETAIL RENTAL
INCOME PERCEIVED
IN BELGIUM
Belgium’s leader in
Shopping center management
1
2
3
Innovation
Fun shopping
Experience
A concept imported from the United
States, the shopping centre or “mall”
takes its first steps in Belgium marking
the emergence of “out of town
shopping” and “car culture”.
Consumer habits are
changing. Themed shopping
centres are all the rage. The
act of shopping becomes
more complex.
The contents replace the container!
Faced with e-commerce, the centres
have to re-invent themselves and
appeal primarily to the consumer’s
emotions.
1968
Creation
The history of Devimo
begins with the construction
of Woluwe Shopping Center.
1983
Birth of Devimo Consult
The company specialises
in day-to-day operation
and management.
2012
The roadmap for the future
Devimo adapts and charts
a new course.
A unique expertise in the Benelux
GLA
(sqm)
Shops Visit./year Number
(millions) of sites
SHOPPING CENTERS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
City 2 Shopping Mall
The W Shopping Woluwe
L’esplanade
Westland Shopping
Grand Bazar
Waasland Shopping Center
Anspach
Stockel Square
Ninia Shopping Center
Shopping Gent-Zuid
Belval Plaza SC
Galerie Toison d’Or
51.000
44.400
56.700
37.450
17.900
45.600
8.200
8.500
13.850
11.200
36.400
11.300
105
136
136
126
50
140
19
48
38
42
86
39
13,1
6,5
7,6
7,0
5,9
6,1
5,2
4,2
3,5
3,2
3,7
4,0
RETAIL PARKS
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Shopping Cascade
Shopping Pajot
Les Dauphins
Bierges
Leonardo Retail Park
Shopping Plaza
Oostakker
Zaventem
Ath Shopping
Marius Renard
Zwijnaarde
Houdeng-Goegnies
N60
Apollo Park Douai
28.900
27.700
22.300
21.200
20.000
18.600
17.700
15.000
9.000
8.800
8.000
7.800
13.750
27.645
18
19
26
7
6
11
6
8
21
6
3
16
13
31
CONSULTANCY Marketing, technical, project management
27
28
29
Bellefleur
Manufacture 65
Côté Senne
26.000
10.500
6.900
25
12
16
MAIN STREETS
30
31
Belgium
The Netherlands
93
104
The main shopping centers and retail parks
in Belgium and Luxembourg
ANTW. / ST NIKLAAS
GLA
Shops
ANDERLECHT
37.450 sqm
126
Visitors/year 7 millions
Visitors/year
45.600 sqm
140
6,1 millions
ANTWERPEN
GLA
Shops
Visitors/year
17.900 sqm
50
5,9 millions
GLA
Shops
GLA
Shops
Visitors/year
BRUSSELS
GLA
Shops
Visitors/year
51.000 sqm
105
13,1 millions
WOLUWE-SAINT-LAMBERT
44.400 sqm
136
6,5 millions
LOUVAIN-LA-NEUVE
56.700 sqm
136
Visitors/year 7,6 millions
GLA
Shops
BRUSSELS
GLA
Shops
15.000 sqm
20
BELVAL
36.400 sqm
86
Visitors/year 3,7 millions
GLA
Shops
The main shopping centers and retail parks
in Belgium and Luxembourg
GENT
11.200 sqm
42
Visitors/year 3,2 millions
GLA
Shops
MOUSCRON
GLA
Shops
BRUSSELS
GLA
Shops
20.000 sqm
6
22.300 sqm
26
WOLUWE-SAINT-PIERRE
GLA
Shops
Visitors/year
NINOVE
13.850 sqm
38
Visitors/year 3,5 millions
8.500 sqm
52
4,2 millions
BRUSSELS
GLA
Shops
GLA
Shops
SINT-PIETERS-LEEUW
27.700 sqm
19
Visitors/year 5 millions
GLA
Shops
BRUSSELS
GLA 12.400 sqm
Shops 39
Visitors/year 4,0 millions
Visitors/year
8.200 sqm
19
5,2 millions
Reporting tool
Structure of the reporting tool
Yearly quantitative reporting
Measurement of 5 KPI’s
KPI’s
Energy
 Total Energy Consumption
(electricity, gas, fuel, urban
network, renewable energy)
TENTATIVE OBJECTIVES
Objectives 2020
Between 5% and 30% decrease of kwh/m²
 Water consumption
Objectives 2020
-10% of Liters/Visitor
 Waste management
Objectives 2020
Increase the waste recycling rate of 20%
Water
Waste
 Charging spaces for electric
vehicles or bicycles
 Bicycle car parks
Objectives 2020
All shopping centers equipped
Mobility
 Local development
Philantropy
Objectives 2020
At least one collaboration with local people in every Shopping Center
Reporting on energy
If significant evolution, please comment
Reporting on energy
If significant evolution, please comment
Tools for energy management
Tools for energy management
Results / Objectives Tools: energy management
Objectives
• Below 100 kWh/m²/year
• Below 30 Wh/m²/opening
hour
Reporting and tools on water consumption
Reporting and tools on waste management
If significant evolution, please comment
Actions
• Opening hours of the waste room
• Supervision of the storage room
• Automatic individual weight/retailer
Reporting and tools on mobility
Reporting and tools on local development
• Installing beehives on the roof
• Free leased square meters for local people or non profit association
• Free training provided: Medical care
Avenue Jules
Bordetlaan, 142
1140 Evere
www.devimo.be
L E A D I N G Y O U T O T H E M A I N B E N E LU X H OT S P OT S