REGULAR MEETING

Transcription

REGULAR MEETING

TELEPH ONE 805/ 922-1 726
FAX 805/922-0677
Website: www.fly2smx .com
SANTA MARIA
P U BLIC A IR P ORT D ISTRICT
SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Monday
March 14, 2016
Administration Bldg.
Airport Boardroom
3:00 P.M.
REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA
This agenda is prepared and posted pursuant to the requirements of the California
Government Code Section 54954.2. By listing a topic on this agenda, the Santa
Maria Public Airport District has expressed its intent to discuss and act on each
item. The Santa Maria Public Airport District welcomes orderly participation at its
meetings from all members of the public. This includes assistance under the
Americans with Disabilities Act to provide an equally effective opportunity for
individuals with a disability to participate in and benefit from District activities. To
request assistance with disability accommodation, please call (805) 922-1726.
Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting would enable the Santa Maria
Public Airport District to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to
this meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Engel, Rafferty, Lahr, Adams, Baskett
1.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 22, 2016.
2.
COMMITTEE REPORT($):
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
3.
AVIATION SUPPORT & PLANNING (Standing or Ad Hoc)
ADMINISTRATION & FINANCIAL (Standing or Ad Hoc)
MARKETING & PROMOTIONS (Standing or Ad Hoc)
CITY & COUNTY LIAISON
STATE & FEDERAL LIAISON
VANDENBERG LIAISON
BUSINESS PARK COMMITTEE (Ad Hoc)
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT.
32 1 7 T ERMINAL DRIVE • SANTA M A RIA , CA LI FORNIA 93455
4.
MANAGER OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION REPORT.
a)
Demand Register
5.
DISTRICT COUNSEL’S REPORT. (Ray Biering and Joshua George)
6.
PUBLIC SESSION: Statements from the floor will be heard during public
session. Request to Speak forms are provided for those wishing to address
the board. After completing the form, please give it to the Clerk. Requests
requiring board action will be referred to staff and brought on the next
appropriate agenda. Members of the public are cordially invited to speak on
agenda items as they occur. Staff reports covering agenda items are
available for review in the offices of the General Manager on the Tuesday
prior to each meeting. The Board will establish time limit for receipt of
testimony. The board reserves the right to establish further time limits for
receipt of testimony.
7.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE MANAGER OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION
TO ATTEND THE LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT SKILLS FOR WOMEN
COURSE IN SAN DIEGO APRIL 5, 2016.
8.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GENERAL MANAGER AND ONE DIRECTOR OR
STAFF MEMBER TO ATTEND THE JUMPSTART 2016 AIR SERVICE MEETING
IN DENVER, CO JUNE 13-15, 2016.
9.
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACT
WITH RAVATT ALBRECHT & ASSOCIATES FOR BIDDING AND
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION FOR THE ADMIN HVAC REPLACEMENT
PROJECT.
10.
STUDY SESSION/BUDGET DISCUSSION-COMMERCIAL AVIATION AREA
11.
CLOSED SESSION. The Board will hold a Closed Session to discuss the
following item(s):
a. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Re: 1424 Fairway Dr. (Gov.
Code Section 54956.8)
b. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8 with Real
Property Negotiators (Chris Hastert and Ray Biering) between the District
and Jesus & Xochitl Becerra regarding 4000 S. Blosser Rd., Unit 58, Santa
Maria, CA.
c. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Re: 4100 Foxenwood Lane.
(Gov. Code Section 54956.8)
12.
DIRECTORS’ COMMENTS.
13.
ADJOURNMENT.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT
DISTRICT HELD FEBRUARY 22, 2016
The Board of Directors of the Santa Maria Public Airport District held a Regular
Meeting at the regular place at 3:00 p.m. Present were Directors Engel, Lahr,
Rafferty, Adams and Baskett, General Manager Hastert, Manager of Finance and
Administration Reade and District Counsel Biering.
1.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD JANUARY 28, 2016.
Director Rafferty made a Motion to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes held
January 28, 2016. Director Lahr Seconded and it was carried by a 5-0 vote.
2.
COMMITTEE REPORT(S):
a) AVIATION SUPPORT & PLANNING (Standing or Ad Hoc) – No committee
meeting was held.
b) ADMINISTRATION & FINANCIAL (Standing or Ad Hoc) – The committee met
on the 16th to discuss the hangar area for the budget. The committee also
discussed the possibility of switching the 457(b) plan to another provider.
c) MARKETING & PROMOTIONS (Standing or Ad Hoc) – No committee
meeting was held, however, there is a possibility of getting a billboard.
d) CITY & COUNTY LIAISON – No committee meeting was held.
e) STATE & FEDERAL LIAISON –. There will be a meeting with the biologists in
the upcoming week regarding the Business Park.
f)
VANDENBERG LIAISON – Mr. Hastert has requested to speak with the
travel coordinator at Vandenberg. Once that person is identified a committee
meeting will be scheduled.
g) BUSINESS PARK COMMITTEE (Ad Hoc) – No committee meeting was held.
3.
GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT. Mr. Hastert met with the Grand Jury on the
18th to give them a tour of the airport. If the agenda setting committee is agreeable,
Mr. Hastert would like to schedule agenda setting the Wednesday following the
Board meeting. The Board President asked Mr. Hastert to look into the state of
General Aviation and how it affects Santa Maria Public Airport District. Mr. Hastert
has a meeting with Bob Trimborn, the retired Airport Manager of the Santa Monica
Airport, on the 23rd to discuss General Aviation.
-1-
General Manager Hastert,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
Manager of Finance & Administration Reade and Director Rafferty will be attending
the Santa Barbara County Chapter of Special Districts Association meeting the
evening of the 22nd. The speaker will be from Montecito Fire Protection District
discussing the Gibraltar fire which was contained quickly and surrounded by
retardant from the Forest Service tanker base as well as other means.
4.
MANAGER OF FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION REPORT.
Ms. Reade, the Manager of Finance and Administration, presented the Demand
Register to the Board for review and approval.
a)
Demand Register.
The Demand Register, covering warrants 062102
through 062224 in the amount of $321,778.49 was recommended for
approval as presented. Director Baskett made a Motion to accept the
Demand Register as presented. Director Rafferty Seconded and it was
carried by a 5-0 vote.
b)
Budget Report.
Received and filed.
c)
Budget Deviation.
Ms. Reade presented the Budget Deviation to the
Board to review and approve. Director Lahr made a Motion to approve.
Director Rafferty Seconded and it was carried by a 5-0 vote.
d)
Delinquent Tenant.
Received and filed.
5.
DISTRICT COUNSEL’S REPORT. Nothing to report.
6.
PUBLIC SESSION: Statements from the floor will be heard during public session.
Request to Speak forms are provided for those wishing to address the board. After
completing the form, please give it to the Clerk. Requests requiring board action
will be referred to staff and brought on the next appropriate agenda. Members of
the public are cordially invited to speak on agenda items as they occur. Staff
reports covering agenda items are available for review in the offices of the General
Manager on the Tuesday prior to each meeting. The Board has established a fiveminute time limit for receipt of testimony. The board reserves the right to establish
further time limits for receipt of testimony.
No one requested to speak.
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
7.
Study Session/Budget Discussion-Hangar/Owner Build Area.
Mr. Hastert
explained this is a discussion of the hangar area operating on the current budget.
This is a tool to evaluate next year’s budget for this particular area. The first item
discussed is the breakdown of the hangar area revenues and expenses. There
are two ways these are calculated, with depreciation and without depreciation. The
District is currently at a loss in the hangar area for this year’s budget. Revenue
has been growing over time to target reaching a breakeven point. The second item
is the breakdown of the administration area. This is distributed to all areas since
there is no specific revenue source for administration. Administration is split up
evenly between Hangar Area, FBO Area, the Terminal and revenue generating
land. The typical way of keeping hangar rents on track is to do a CPI increase each
year which is the staff recommendation for the upcoming year. Director Baskett is
concerned with birds getting into the hangars and building nests. Mr. Hastert
proposed two options to eliminate the issue. One would be to seal the hangars,
which may be difficult with the structural design. The second would be to get
licensed in nest removal and inform tenants to contact us when nests are built.
Director Engel discussed his concern with the level of active hangar tenants. Mr.
Hastert explained that the District will be gathering information on how many
airworthy aircraft are being stored in District hangars and will present options to
increase business to the Board at a later time.
8.
Authorization for the President and Secretary to execute the First Amendment of
Ground Lease-Vehicle Parking Lot between the District and Rotocraft Leasing
Company, LLC. Mr. Hastert explained that Freeport-McMoRan is looking for ways
to trim costs due to low demand for transport to the oil platforms. The parking lot
is the best option to reduce costs without losing the option for higher demand.
Rotocraft Leasing has asked the District for a flexible lease with the parking lot to
allow for increased business but only pay for what they utilize each month.
Rotocraft Leasing would maintain the largest lot each month and add extra parking
space on a month to month basis as needed. Director Baskett made a Motion to
approve, Director Adams Seconded and it was carried by a 5-0 vote.
9.
Authorization for the President and Secretary to execute a contract with Newton
Construction for security upgrades. Mr. Hastert explained this is a yearly upgrade
that is necessary to maintain District security. Director Rafferty made a Motion to
approve, Director Lahr Seconded and it was carried by a 5-0 vote.
RECESS: At 3:50 p.m.
Return to OPEN SESSION: At 3:55 p.m. the Board and staff reconvened to Open
Session.
10.
CLOSED SESSION. At 3:55 p.m. the Board went into Closed Session to discuss
the following item(s):
a.) Conference with Real Property Negotiator Re: 1424 Fairway Dr. (Government
Code Section 54956.8)
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
b.) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8 with Real Property
Negotiators (Chris Hastert and Ray Biering) between the District and Carlos
Solorio and Maria Alejandre regarding 4000 S. Blosser Rd., Unit 60, Santa
Maria, CA
At 4:12 p.m., the Board and staff reconvened to Open Public Session.
There was no reportable actions.
11.
DIRECTORS’ COMMENTS.
Director Lahr had no comment.
Director Baskett has asked General Manager Chris Hastert to give a tour of the
airport on March 7, 2016 to a representative from Satair. Satair is part of the Airbus
Group which has been looking at Santa Maria for a future heavy MRO to support
an American/French built, Russian designed aircraft. Satair would like to visit the
site and eventually support Airbus Aircraft all over the western hemisphere.
Director Rafferty noted that the new meeting time worked well.
Director Baskett added that Alan Hancock has been refocusing their education
program on practical classes and more technical training. Director Baskett will ask
the college president if he would be interested in opening an Aviation school for
both A &P and flight training.
Director Adams had no comment.
Director Engel had no comment.
12.
ADJOURNMENT. Director Engel made a Motion to adjourn to a Regular Meeting
to be held on March 14, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. at the regular meeting place. Director
Adams moved that Motion, Director Lahr Seconded and the Motion was carried by
a 5-0 vote.
ORDER OF ADJOURNMENT
This Adjournment Regular Meeting of the Board
of Directors of the Santa Maria Public Airport District is
hereby adjourned at 4:17 p.m. on February 22, 2016.
_____________________________
Carl Engel, President
_____________________________
Hugh Rafferty, Secretary
-4-
2015-2016
DEMAND REGISTER
SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT DISTRICT
Full consideration has been received by the Santa Maria Public Airport District for
each demand, numbers 062225 to 062300 on Heritage Oaks Bank in the total
amount of $223,720.55.
__________________________________________
CHRIS HASTERT
_____________________
DATE
GENERAL MANAGER
The undersigned certifies that the attached register of audited demands of the
Santa Maria Public Airport District for each demand, numbers 062225 to
062300 on Heritage Oaks Bank in the total amount of $223,720.55 has been
approved as being in conformity with the budget approved by the Santa Maria
Public Airport District and funds are available for their payment.
VERONEKA READE
MANAGER OF FINANACE AND ADMINISTRATION
DATE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT
DISTRICT APPROVED PAYMENT OF THE ATTACHED WARRANTS AT
THE MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2016.
_______________________________________
HUGH RAFFERTY
SECRETARY
Santa Maria Public Airport District
Demand Register
Check
Number
Date
062225*
062226*
062227*
062228*
062229*
062230*
062231*
062232*
062233*
062234*
062235*
062236*
062237*
062238*
062239*
062240*
062241*
062242*
062243*
062244*
062245*
062246*
062247*
062248*
062249*
062250*
062251*
062252*
062253*
062254*
062255*
062256*
062257*
062258*
062259*
062260*
062261*
062262*
062263*
062264*
062265*
062266
2/19/2016
2/19/2016
2/19/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
2/22/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/2/2016
3/9/2016
Check
Amount
Vendor Name
Public Employees' Retirement System
Hartford
PERS - Retirement
Chuck Adams
Adamski Moroski Madden & Green, LLP
Bagby Plumbing Service & Repair
David E. Baskett
Comcast
Carl Engel, Jr.
Fedak & Brown LLP
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
J B Dewar, Inc
Don Lahr
PATHPOINT
Hugh Rafferty
Santa Barbara Cnty Special District Assoc.
Tom's Mobile Repair Service, Inc.
Visa
Aflac
AT&T
Brumit Diesel, Inc.
Carquest Auto Parts
Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
City of Santa Maria-Util Div
Comcast
De Lage Landen
Federal Express
Hartford
McMasters and Carr
PERS - Retirement
Quinn Rental Services
San Luis Powerhouse
SB County Air Pollution
Statewide Safety & Signs, Inc
Verizon
Advantage Answering Plus
Clean Tech Environmental , Inc.
HealthSmart Benefit Solutions, Inc.
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
PERS - Medical
Bedford Enterprises, Inc.
Page 1 of 2
$3,846.28
$3,224.78
$4,407.06
$200.00
$6,869.00
$287.18
$100.00
$317.16
$200.00
$1,055.00
$577.08
$283.35
$200.00
$1,120.53
$200.00
$120.00
$255.00
$6,426.30
$638.60
$190.37
$248.70
$207.95
$270.08
$3,451.20
$549.23
$74.55
$19.12
$22.10
$3,224.78
$527.73
$4,407.06
$120.17
$495.00
$1,249.77
$244.56
$647.54
$235.00
$145.00
$41.08
$14,433.60
$9,781.02
$241.20
Description
Retirement
Deferred Income
Retirement
Directors Fees
Legal Service
Building Maint. - Terminal
Directors Fees
Cable/Internet /Digital Voice
Directors Fees
Annual Audit
Fuel Expense - Gas/Diesel
Directors Fees
Airport Maintenance Service
Directors Fees
Monthly Chapter Meeting
Heavy Equip Maint.- Mechanical
Business Travel & Enter.
Voluntary Ins. - Employee
Phone Service
Heavy Equip Maint.- Mechanical
Auto Maint. - Mechanical
Lighting Maintenance
Water Invoices
Cable/Internet /Digital Voice
Lease/Maint. - Copier
Freight & Common Carrier
Build. Maint. - Admin.
Deferred Income
Safety Equipment
Retirement
Generator Maintenance
Permits
Signs
Telephone Expense
Answering Service
Waste Oil Removal
Employee Vision Coverage
Terminal/Admin./Main Hangar
Medical Benefits
Trash Removal
Demand Register
Check
Number
062267
062268
062269
062270
062271
062272
062273
062274
062275
062276
062277
062278
062279
062280
062281
062282
062283
062284
062285
062286
062287
062288
062289
062290
062291
062292
062293
062294
062295
062296
062297
062298
062299
062300
Date
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
3/9/2016
Check
Amount
Vendor Name
Berchtold Equipment Company
Bomar Security & Investigation
Brayton's Power Wash & Sweep
Clark Pest Control
De Lage Landen
Fastenal Company
Hayward Lumber Company
Ray Heath
J B Dewar, Inc
J.D. Humann Landscape Contr.
Limotta Internet Technologies
Mar Teeny Designs
McMasters and Carr
Mission Uniform Service
Napa Auto Parts
Orchard Supply Hardware
Pacific Telemanagement Services
PERS - Retirement
Petty Cash Fund
ReadyRefresh by Nestle
Ross Reality
County of Santa Barbara EHS/ CUPA
ServiceMaster CBM
Sherwin-Williams
S Lombardi & Assoc., Inc.
Tri-Counties Plant Service
Ultrex Business Solutions
Verizon
Verizon Wireless
Zee Medical Service Company
AT&T
Praxair
Principal Financial Group
*Approved by One Board Member
Total Checks Written
Page 2 of 2
$1,376.63
$7,153.89
$500.00
$448.00
$921.46
$80.18
$7.92
$29.24
$3,575.20
$337.25
$3,846.80
$1,339.50
$400.00
$134.18
$305.72
$20.86
$228.09
$227.92
$3,815.00
$227.30
$68.53
$93,000.00
$1,021.00
$11,065.30
$226.76
$15,690.67
$825.00
$89.99
$117.13
$628.72
$203.19
$211.68
$1,198.44
$3,244.87
$223,720.55
Description
Heavy Equip Maint - Mechanical
Security Service
Street Sweeping
Pest Control - Terminal & Adm.
Lease/Maint. - Copier
Shop Supplies
Build. Maint. -Fire Station
MHP - Maintenance
Consulting Service
Fuel Expense - Gas/Diesel
Landscape Maintenance
Computer Support Services
Web Page Maint.
MHP - Maintenance
Uniform Service
Auto parts
Hardware & Supplies
Pay Phone Service
Retirement
Reimburse Petty Cash Fund
Water Delivery
Brokerage Services
Permit
Janitorial Services
MHP - Maintenance
Airport Advertising
Interior Plants Maint.
Office Supplies
Telephone Expense
Cell Phones
First Aid
Phone Service
Shop Supplies
Dental, Life & Disability
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 14, 2016
Board of Directors
Veroneka Reade, Manager of Finance and Administration
Agenda Item 7 Authorization for the Manager of Finance and Administration
to attend the Leadership & Management Skills for Women Course in San Diego April 5, 2016
Conference Costs
Hotel:
Meals:
Registration:
Manager of Finance and Administration
Meals
Registrations
Ground Transportation
Total
Attendees
1
1
1
Days
Rate
2
2
$ 173.00
$
60.00
$ 199.00
$ 272.000
Total
$
$
$
$
$
The current balance of the "Business Travel" account including the previously approved travel
is $37,454.00. After the estimated travel costs listed above are added the total
spent will be approximately $38,391.00. The approved budgeted amount is $50,350.00
therefore the remaining budget after this conference will be approximately
$11,959.00
346.00
120.00
199.00
272.00
937.00
A N E M P O W E R I N G D AY O F T R A I N I N G
LEADERSHIP &
MANAGEMENT
Skills for Women
Discover fresh ideas and new techniques
to influence, motivate and mentor others
Become the leader you’ve always wanted
to be! Attend this dynamic, results-oriented
training and learn how to …
● Gain respect through your words, actions and judicious
“use of power”
● Improve your decision-making and problem-solving skills
● Shatter the old cliché of the “aggressive” woman
(compared to the “assertive” man)
ENROLL TODAY!
PHONE
1-800-556-3009
FAX
913-967-8847
● Motivate and mentor: you and your team will reap
the benefits
● Tap into the realities of power, politics and leadership
to cultivate and use your influence
● Lead in times of crisis by keeping your cool — and seeing
that others keep theirs
● Establish your image as a leader by coming across as
authoritative, self-possessed and in control
● And much, much more! (See inside for details)
Call now to reserve your spot — seats fill
fast for this popular course!
ONLINE
www.careertrack.com
MAIL
CareerTrack
P.O. Box 219468
Kansas City, MO
64121-9468
Success strategies for effectively
developing the leader within you
What makes a great leader?
Think of the leaders you admire — both men and women. Great leaders are able to see
all sides of an issue, stay calm in the midst of chaos and easily defuse conflicts. Adept at
championing their causes, they are charismatic public speakers, persuasive communicators
and empathetic listeners. To top it off, they usually possess strong organizational and
delegation skills.
Great leaders bring out the best in others because they know how to build trust,
encourage confidence and command respect. Most important, however, is the ability
of great leaders to inspire others to want to follow their initiatives, adapt their ideas
and perform above and beyond their own capabilities on a regular basis. How can you
become a more powerful, effective and respected leader? Read on …
Leadership with a woman’s touch …
This seminar will empower you, inspire you and boost your confidence as a leader.
Through real-world case studies, eye-opening exercises and spirited discussion, you will
learn how to bring out the best in your people and lead from a position of firmness,
fairness and quiet strength.
•Discover the areas where women traditionally lack power as leaders, and learn
how to overcome common obstacles to success
•Take a look at how women leaders at today’s top corporations make the most
of their influence and visibility
•See how you can become the type of leader who inspires loyalty, deep commitment,
and exceptional achievement
True leaders are able to accomplish their goals and make a difference in the world
even as they stay true to their personal values, ethics and beliefs. Join us for this
empowering, exciting day of training … and come away with a renewed sense of
optimism, a firmer commitment to yourself and your career and the practical
knowledge to make it all happen.
We look forward to seeing you there!
Can you honestly learn to be a better leader through just one day of training?
Absolutely! This seminar is designed to deliver the most information in the least amount of time. The
specialists at CareerTrack have worked tirelessly to compile hundreds of hours of material from many different
sources. They have distilled that information down to the best of the best — only the most relevant, timely
and reliable leadership and team-building tools and techniques made the cut. The result is a power-packed,
highly focused seminar that delivers the training you need and allows you to build on what you learn throughout the day. From the psychology of leading others to skills such as organization and communication, you will
find that superior course content marks this seminar as one of the most comprehensive, worthwhile training
sessions you’ve ever attended — or your money back!
2
5 reasons you must not miss
this incredible opportunity!
It’s your chance to:
1. Discover the truth about women and leadership in the 21st century.
Over the past two decades, women in the corporate world have made great strides in leadership. There
are more women CEOs, more women in leadership roles at major corporations and more women than
ever before in the workforce. Despite this, women in leadership roles still face a unique set of challenges,
problems and obstacles. Leadership and Management Skills for Women takes an in-depth look at how
you can swiftly develop your skills and become a more powerful, persuasive and respected leader.
2. Identify and capitalize on your own personal leadership style.
Your leadership style is all your own — as one-of-a-kind as you are. This seminar will help you pinpoint
the approach that best suits your personality and behavior characteristics. We’ll arm you with the tools
and techniques to develop your specific strengths, and show you how to minimize your weaker areas. You
will learn how to cultivate a stronger professional image and to eliminate behaviors that may
inadvertently harm your credibility.
3. Learn the proven leadership “tricks” that work for others — and make them work for you, too!
This course is in no way about creating “cookie cutter” leaders. However, there are a number of essential
leadership skills and valuable techniques known to bring favorable results in a broad variety of situations.
To that end, we’ll familiarize you with the strategies and approaches today’s top leaders rely on to instill
loyalty, develop smart solutions and tackle common leadership challenges with authority, confidence and
decisive action.
4. Find out the truth about team leadership — and how you can succeed where so many others fail.
Getting a team of individuals to pull together and work toward common goals can be both frustrating —
and extremely rewarding. Developing, motivating and guiding a team to achieve success calls for a set of
highly specialized skills. In this seminar, we’ll cover team-building strategies that deliver results every time.
You will discover foolproof techniques for building morale, increasing productivity, dealing with team
conflicts and setting and implementing realistic team goals.
5. Boost your working knowledge of critical leadership skills.
Most leaders are not “born” leaders. They are people who, having been thrust into leadership roles, have
learned — through trial and error — how to lead effectively. You’ll come away from this seminar with
a wealth of information, invaluable ideas and priceless strategies that you can immediately put to use
to achieve your leadership goals. We’ll teach you how to mentor, motivate and inspire others through a
variety of practical, proven methods. You will learn what it takes to gain the respect of others, project a
strong and positive professional image and build your effectiveness as a leader.
Learn to lead so that others want to follow! Mark the date, clear your
calendar and enroll today: www. careertrack.com
3
Course Content
Determining Your Leadership IQ —
How Much Do You Really Know?
Positioning Yourself as a Powerful,
Effective Leader
● The characteristics of effective leaders in the
21st century workplace (Hint: they’re not
what they once were)
● How to overcome fear and female stereotypes
● What women bring to the leadership role: a
look at our unique contributions
● Tips for adapting your leadership style to
either gender
● The traits that help us or hold us back — and why
● What you should know about working with
different age groups: Veterans, Boomers,
Generation X, Generation Y and Millennials
● How to find out which of the many myths and
stereotypes are working against you
● How to wield your natural leadership powers
more effectively
● 5 characteristics all successful women leaders
share — and how to cultivate them in yourself
● Office politics: strategies for avoiding potential
minefields and remaining a “neutral party”
Discovering Your Leadership Style —
It’s as Individual as You Are!
● How to use informal lines of power to boost
your leadership status
● How to identify your own unique leadership
style and use it to your advantage
● The art of dealing with power plays — without
losing your “femininity”
● Why you should understand and appreciate
other leadership styles — even if they aren’t
right for you
Strengthening Your Personal
Leadership Style
● Emotional intelligence: its role in leadership,
and why many women have a natural edge here
● How to overcome or minimize your leadership
weaknesses while capitalizing on your strengths
● A look at personality traits and how they
affect leadership style
● How to put an end to traditional myths and
stereotypes about “women leaders”
● Your leadership present and future — why
you should know and capitalize on the strengths
of your leadership style
● The image of a leader — strategies for coming
across as authoritative, self-possessed and
in control
Who shoul
Enroll today at
www.careertrack.com
4
If you’re a woman who is ready to take the next step in
organization or improve your decision-making and pro
Team leaders, managers, supervisors, department head
has recently stepped into a leadership role — will bene
leadership potential, acquire the tools and techniques
set the course for a brighter career future.
Program Schedule
Check-in: 8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.
Program: 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.
● Why it’s important to increase your influence
and power without succumbing to dirty
office politics
● How to become known for your sound
decision-making and savvy problem-solving skills
● Ways to neutralize conflict between individuals,
teams and departments — and channel
it productively
● Negotiation skills that put you on the path
to success and bring win-win agreement
every time
Developing the High-Impact Communication
Skills Every Leader Must Have
● Tips for messages that really come across:
creating communications that move others to act
● The nervous presenter — how to stay calm
when presenting ideas to top management
and let your natural expertise, professionalism
and style show through
Leading Your Team Successfully
● Relationship-building skills that will rally your
“troops,” boost morale and get people to
trust and respect one another
● How to manage expectations and reduce
surprises
● The dos and don’ts of leading others
● Guidelines for developing long- and short-term
strategies for leading
● How to make motivating and mentoring work
for you and the team
● Simple techniques that bring out the best in
your team members
● Praise, rewards and recognition — how to
show you value your team members and
encourage them to perform at their peak
Planning and Organizing — Essential
Leadership Tools
● 5 ways to make a powerful, positive impact at
a meeting
● How to quit letting things happen, set goals
and take charge of the future
● Hints to help you shatter the old cliché of the
“aggressive woman” and assert yourself
without seeming pushy
● Why the superwoman role is a bad idea — and
how to set priorities that make sense
● How to listen for power and influence —
instead of empathy
● The “Wise Use Movement”: making time
work to your advantage as you move toward
your goals
● Succession planning: what it is, why all good
leaders use it and how you can use it too
ld attend?
n your career, expand your role as a leader within your
oblem-solving skills, you shouldn’t miss this course.
ds, small business owners — and any woman who
efit. This seminar will help participants reach their full
they need to perform their jobs more effectively and
5
Affordable Tuition • Group Discount
Enroll Today! Hurry, our seats fill fast. Guarantee your
enrollment by paying your tuition today. You will receive a
confirmation once your registration is complete. Payment is
due before the program.
Quick Confirmation! To receive your confirmation within 48 hours,
please complete the Quick Confirmation section of the registration
form. Be sure to provide us with your email address and/or fax number.
Program Schedule
Check-in: 8:30 a.m. – 9:00 a.m.
Program: 9:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m.
Cancellations and Substitutions
You may cancel your registration up to 10 business days before the
program, and we will refund your tuition less a nominal cancellation
fee. Substitutions and transfers may be made at any time to another
program of your choice scheduled within 12 months of your original
event. Please note that if you do not cancel and do not attend, you
are still responsible for payment.
Please Note
● You will be notified by email, fax, and/or mail if any changes
are made to your scheduled program (i.e., date, venue, city,
or cancellation).
● Walk-in registrations will be accepted as space allows.
● For seminar age requirements, please visit
http://www.careertrack.com/faq.asp#agerequirements.
● Please, no audio or video recording.
● Lunch and parking expenses are not included.
● Dressing in layers is recommended due to room
temperature variations.
● You will receive a Certificate of Attendance at the end
of the program.
Tax-Exempt Organizations
If you are tax-exempt, enter your tax-exempt number in Section 6 on
the Registration Form. Please mail or fax a copy of your Tax-Exempt
Certificate with your registration for payment processing.
On-Site Training Solutions
Get the Results You’re Looking For!
Bring our powerful, high-impact training programs
to your organization and show your employees
that you’re serious about their professional growth
and achieving critical organizational goals and
objectives.
Choose From Over 150 Courses!
From management development to customer
service, our comprehensive library of courses
provides a learning experience that is engaging,
interesting and intriguing!
Tailor the Training to Meet
Your Specific Needs!
We’ll help you choose the appropriate courses
for your organization and tailor each one to
address your specific goals, issues and scheduling
concerns.
Maximize Your Training Budget!
On-Site Training allows you to train work groups,
teams and entire departments for less than the
cost of traditional public seminars or other
training options.
Give your staff the skills, knowledge and
confidence they need to meet tough workplace
challenges head-on, realize their full potential
and perform at their peak.
For a free consultation, visit us online
at careertrack.com/onsite
or call us at
1-800-944-8503
Tax Deduction
If the purpose of attending a CareerTrack program is to help you
maintain or improve skills related to employment or business,
expenses related to the program may be tax-deductible according
to I.R.C Reg. 1.162-5. Please consult your tax adviser.
Continuing Education Credit
CareerTrack offers Continuing Education Credits that are based on
program length and completion. Credits are issued according to the
National Task Force for Continuing Education guidelines, and approval
is at the discretion of your licensing board. Questions and concerns
should be directed to your professional licensing board or agency.
Continuing Professional Education (CPE)
CareerTrack is registered with the National Association of State
Boards of Accountancy (NASBA) as a sponsor of continuing
professional education on the National Registry of CPE Sponsors.
State boards of accountancy have final authority on the acceptance
of individual courses for CPE credit. Complaints regarding registered
sponsors may be submitted to the National Registry of CPE
Sponsors through its website: www.learningmarket.org. This course
qualifies for 6 CPE credits. To obtain a certificate documenting your
CPE credits, please visit http://www.careertrack.com/certificate.
Certificates will be available 10 days after your event has ended.
6
Guaranteed Results!
All of our seminars are 100% SATISFACTION
GUARANTEED! We’re confident that this seminar
will provide you with the success strategies to
help you develop your leadership skills. If for any
reason you are dissatisfied, send us a letter
(Attn: Customer Relations) within 30 days of
your seminar attendance stating the
reason you were not satisfied, and we will
arrange for you to attend another one of
our seminars or receive a full refund —
hassle-free.
Update Your Contact Information!
Simply make corrections to the mailing label on the
back page of this brochure. Mail corrections to P.O.
Box 413884, Kansas City, MO 64141-3884, or fax to
913-967-8847. We’ll change our records for the very
next update. Thanks!
Copyright 2015
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 14, 2016
Board of Directors
Veroneka Reade, Manager of Finance and Administration
Agenda Item 8 Authorization for the General Manager and one Director or staff
to attend the Jump Start 2016 Air Service Meeting in Denver, CO June 13-15, 2016.
Conference Costs
Hotel:
Meals:
Registration:
General Manager and one Director
Meals
Registrations
Air Fare
Ground Transportation
Total
Attendees
2
2
2
2
Days
3
3
Rate
$ 214.00 $
$
60.00 $
$ 1,550.00 $
$ 655.00 $
$ 157.00 $
$
The current balance of the "Business Travel" account including the previously approved travel
is $38,391.00. After the estimated travel costs listed above are added the total
spent will be approximately $44,602.00. The approved budgeted amount is $50,350.00
therefore the remaining budget after this conference will be approximately
$5,748.00
Total
1,284.00
360.00
3,100.00
1,310.00
157.00
6,211.00
Agenda
Please see below for conference agenda. All events will be held at the Denver Marriott City
Centerunless otherwise noted.
Sunday June 12, 2016
Small Airports Committee Meeting - 2pm to 5pm (Open to all registered attendees)
Click here for more information
Monday June 13, 2016
Full day of educational sessions - 9am to 5pm
Educational sessions include:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Keynote Speech - Barry Biffle, President, Frontier Airlines
Seth Kaplan, Managing Partner, Airline Weekly, Glory Lost and Found: How Delta Climbed
from Despair to Dominance in the Post-9/11 Era
Aviation Reporters’ Perspective Roundtable: Aviation Daily, FlightGlobal, The Globe and Mail
Industry Update
Plane Talk Sessions: JetBlue, Virgin America, and WestJet
Air Service Wins: A Celebration
Evening reception - 5:00pm to 7:00pm
Tuesday June 14, 2016
•
•
Airport/airline one-on-one meetings - 9am to 5pm
Host Airport Event
Wednesday June 15, 2016
•
Airport/airline one-on-one meetings - 9am to 3pm
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES
FOR THE SANTA MARIA AIRPORT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING
REPLACEMENT/UPGRADE PROJECT
By this Service Agreement ("Agreement") dated March 14, 2016, by and between SANTA
MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT DISTRICT, a public airport district of the State of California ("District")
and RAVATT ALBRECHT & ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Engineer"), District hires Engineer to perform,
and Engineer agrees to perform, the professional Architect and Structural Engineering services
described below, subject to the following terms, conditions and provisions:
Scope of Agreement. Engineer shall perform construction management and inspection services
for the HVAC replacement project for the Santa Maria Administrative Building, Santa Maria,
California, as further described in Exhibit “A”, a Five (5)-page proposal from the Engineer dated
February 25, 2016.
1.
Time of Performance. Engineer shall commence work upon execution of this
agreement, and shall complete services as listed on Exhibit “A” on or by February 28, 2017.
2.
Compensation. District shall compensate Engineer for all services to be provided
by Engineer under this Agreement, including all labor, materials, and expenses, as invoiced for
services completed on a time and materials basis as set forth in Exhibit “A”, not to exceed Nineteen
Thousand One Hundred Sixty Dollars ($19,160.00). There shall be no charge made or
reimbursement given for mileage or travel time in Santa Maria, California.
3.
Materials and Documents. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement,
Engineer will bear the cost and expense of all materials and supplies, used or needed by Engineer
in the performance of the Services and the work product to be delivered to District. District shall be
the owner of all drawings, mylars, reproducibles, plans, specifications, test results, and other
documents, data and work products, produced or resulting from the services of Engineer, subject
to the terms outlined herein, including copyright. District will make available all existing plans, maps,
data and information it has that may be needed by Engineer to perform the Services. Engineer may
retain copies of the original documents for its files.
The District acknowledges that any and all information produced by Engineer under this
agreement, including plans, specifications, data, reports, construction documents or electronic files
(“documents”), are instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, such documents will become
the property upon completion of work and payment in full of all monies due the Engineer. In the
event the District consents to, allows, authorizes, or approves of changes to such documents, and
these changes are not approved in writing by the Engineer, the District recognizes that such
changes and the results thereof are not the responsibility of the Engineer. Therefore, the District
agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the Engineer, its
officers, directors, employees, and sub-consultants (collectively, Engineer) against any claims,
damages, liability or costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and defense costs, arising or
allegedly arising from or in any way connected with the unauthorized reuse or modification of the
documents by the District or any person or entity that acquires or obtains the documents from or
through the District. In the event that Engineer’s services are terminated in accordance with this
agreement, this provision shall also apply to documents delivered to District after such termination.
Such delivery shall be contingent upon payment in full of all monies then due Engineer.
1
4.
party hereto.
Assignment. This Agreement or any interest herein shall not be assigned by either
5.
Engineer Independent Contractor. The parties intend that Engineer shall be an
independent contractor in performing the Services provided by this Agreement. District is interested
only in the results to be achieved, and the conduct and control of the work will lie solely with
Engineer. Engineer is not to be considered an agent or employee of District for any purpose, and
the officers, employees and agents of Engineer are not entitled to any of the benefits that District
provides for its employees, including workers' compensation insurance. It is understood that
Engineer is free to contract for similar services to be provided to others while under contract with
the District.
6.
Engineer's Records. Full and complete Project records of the Engineer's services
and expenses and records between District and Engineer shall be kept and maintained by Engineer
and shall be retained by Engineer for three (3) years after District makes final payment to Engineer
hereunder and all pending matters regarding the Engineer's Services and the Project are closed.
District, the FAA, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized
representatives shall have access to any books of account, documents, papers, and records of
Engineer for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.
7.
Termination. District may terminate this Agreement upon failure by Engineer to
perform the terms and conditions of this Agreement within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice
from District specifying the manner in which Engineer has failed to satisfactorily perform. In the
event of such termination, Engineer shall not be entitled to further compensation from District.
Engineer may terminate this Agreement upon giving the District ten (10) calendar days prior
written notice for any of the following: (1) breach by the District of any material term of this
Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms (2) transfer of District ownership of the
project by the District to any other persons or entities not a party to this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties here to reach accord on the fees and charges for any
additional services required because of such changes.
8.
Suspension or Abandonment of Project. District may at any time suspend or
abandon a project or any part thereof. In the event District should determine to suspend or abandon
all or any part of any project, it shall give written notice to Engineer, who shall immediately terminate
all work upon that portion of the project suspended or abandoned in the notice. Within thirty (30)
days of the date of notice of suspension or abandonment, District shall pay to Engineer, as full and
final settlement, compensation for all of Engineer's Services performed and costs and expenses
incurred prior to receipt of notice of suspension or abandonment in a prorated amount equal to the
proportion that the Engineer's Services rendered to the date of receipt of such notice bears to the
total compensation the Engineer would have received had the project been completed.
9.
Indemnification. Engineer shall indemnify and hold harmless District, its directors,
officers, employees and agents from and against any and all loss, damage, liability, reasonable
defense costs, expenses which District may incur, sustain or be subject to, including attorneys' fees,
arising out of with the Services or work to be performed by Engineer, to the extent caused by the
negligence, act or omission of Engineer, its officers, agents, employees or subconsultants, or
anyone employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, excepting
only where attributable to the active negligence or willful misconduct of District.
2
10.
Insurance. Engineer shall, at Engineer's expense, take out and maintain during the
duration of this Agreement, the following types and amount of insurance insuring Engineer and
Engineer's officers and employees:
Automotive Liability, General Liability and Public Liability and
Property Damage Insurance:
Automobile liability and
comprehensive general liability insurance, including public liability,
property damage liability, and contractual liability coverage, providing
bodily injury, death and property damage liability limits of not less
than $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence.
Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance. Professional errors
and omissions insurance with liability limits of not less than
$1,000,000 per occurrence or claim.
Before or concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, Engineer shall file with
the District a certificate or certificates of insurance, issued by the insurance carrier, covering the
specified insurance. Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellation,
Engineer shall provide a thirty (30) day written notice to District prior to implementation of a reduction
of limits or material change of insurance coverage as specified herein, of any policy before the
expiration of thirty (30) days (ten (10) days notice for non-payment of premium) after the District
shall have received notification by U. S. first class mail from the insurance carrier. District shall be
named an additional insured for each policy, without offset to any insurance policies of District.
11.
District's Designated Representative. District designates its General Manager as
its "Designated Representative." The Designated Representative is authorized to review critique
and approve the services of Engineer.
12.
Extra Services. There will be no payment of extra Services by Engineer unless
they are expressly authorized in writing by District's Board of Directors before the Services are
performed.
13.
Project Manager. James Williams shall be the Engineer's Project Manager and
shall be directly involved in the performance and supervision of the Services. Engineer shall not
change its Project Manager without District's prior written approval.
14.
Notices. Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be given by United States mail,
postage prepaid, addressed to the parties hereto as follows:
DISTRICT:
3217 Terminal Drive
Santa Maria, CA 93455
Attention: General Manager
ENGINEER:
James Williams, Architect
Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 528
3
15.
Invoices and Payment. At regular intervals during the performance of the Services,
and upon completion of the Services, Engineer shall send an invoice to District describing the
Services performed, the cost of the Services, and the percentage of contract completed. District
shall pay any undisputed invoice, or any undisputed portion of an invoice, within thirty (30) days of
District's receipt of the invoice.
16.
Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
17.
Waiver. The waiver of any term, provision or condition of this Agreement by any
party shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or
any other term, provision or condition of this Agreement.
18.
Entire Agreement. This Agreement, including exhibits, constitutes the entire
Agreement between District and Engineer. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous
communications, representations or agreements, whether oral or written, relating to the subject
matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by a written instrument signed by
both District and Engineer. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only in identifying
the various provisions, and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement nor be used in interpreting
the same.
19.
Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute between the parties hereto, arising out
of or relating to this Agreement or the breach or interpretation thereof, which results in either party
initiating an action, arbitration, proceeding, or appeal, the prevailing party shall be entitled, in
addition to such other relief as may be granted, to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs as fixed by
the court, arbitrator or other hearing officer, to be paid by the losing party.
20.
Time. Time is of the essence in this Agreement.
21.
Authority. The individuals executing this Agreement warrant they are expressly
authorized to do so on and in behalf of their respective parties.
22.
Negotiated Agreement. The terms and conditions of this Agreement have been
negotiated by the parties. Each party is represented by legal counsel. Each party and its legal
counsel have reviewed this Agreement. Any rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are
to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement or
any exhibits hereto.
23.
Interpretation and Venue. This Agreement is to be interpreted in accordance with
the laws of the State of California. Any legal action relating to this Agreement shall be brought in
the court of appropriate jurisdiction in the County of Santa Barbara, State of California.
24.
Time for Performance. Except as otherwise expressly provided for in this
Agreement, should either party be prevented or delayed from the performance of any act required
by this Agreement by reason of any act of God, strike, lockout, labor trouble, inability to secure
materials, or any other cause except financial inability, not in the control of the party required to
perform the act, the time for performance of the act will be extended for a period of time equivalent
to the period of delay and performance of the act during the period of delay will be excused.
4
25.
Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the
successors and assigns of the parties hereto, but nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as a
consent by District to any assignment of this Agreement or any interest therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be fully
executed.
Approved as to form on behalf of District:
DISTRICT:
____________________________
General Manager
________________________
President
Approved as to form:
________________________
Secretary
______________________
District Counsel
Engineer:
______________________
James Albrecht, P.E.
Vice President
5
February 25, 2016
Chris Hastert
General Manager
Santa Maria Public Airport
3217 Terminal Dr.
Re: Santa Maria Airport District Office Air Conditioning Replacement / Upgrade
Dear Mr. Hastert;
Thank you for considering Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc. for your project. This proposal is
based on the plans we developed and our discussions with you. The scope of work includes
Bidding and Construction Administration for the bidding and construction of the job. The detailed
scope of designated services is outlined below.
We are ready to negotiate with you to be sure our services meet your expectations. This proposal
is valid for 60 days from the date above. We can start work within one week of your acceptance
of this proposal.
Our fee for the designated services described below is:
$ 19,160.00
Bidding and Construction Administration
Page 1 of 5
Corporate Office
Central California
805-928-5002
805-786-4391
P.O. Box 528, 3203 Lighting Street, Santa Maria, CA, 93456-528
1371 North Pacific Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401
SCHEDULE OF DESIGNATED SERVICES
Construction Administration and Management:
Tasks associated with this phase include shop drawing review, responses to field questions, and
site visits to observe construction. When construction is complete, we will provide As- Constructed
drawings that include any changes to our permitted design.
We will provide Bidding and Construction Management Services as follows:
1. Prepare the Bid Package Project Manual which shall include:
General Conditions
Submittals requirements
Change Order requirements
Contractors, Owner’s, and Architect’s Responsibilities
Payments procedures
Substantial Completion
A proposed phasing schedule for use by the contractor in bidding.
A proposed site layout showing contractor parking and laydown area to assist the
contractor in bidding.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Conduct the Bid Opening meeting.
Review of Bids
Attend a pre-construction conference with the Contractor and Airport Officials.
Conduct weekly Construction Progress meetings with the General Contractor and Owner.
Respond to Construction Requests for Information.
Review the Contractor’s product submittals.
Review the Contractor’s daily reports.
Review the Contractor’s Pay Requests versus the Project Schedule and Schedule of
Values.
No Construction Consultation, Observation, testing and Inspection Services by a special
inspector are expected to be required on this project and are not included in this proposal.
DELIVERABLES
Contract bidding documents as described above.
EXCLUSIONS
Added services beyond the scope identified above, if required, would be provided on a time and
materials basis. We would advise you prior to commencing with any such work and provide an
estimate for the fees necessary for that work. The following items are excluded from our proposal.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
Printing and reproduction
Redesign due to contractors or clients requested changes from original design.
Plan review or permit fees paid to public agencies
Site improvements
Interior Design
Structural engineering and seismic analysis of the project.
On-site meetings outside of those stated in the schedule of services.
Hazardous construction materials identification or abatement planning
Soil testing and materials testing.
Design of scaffolding and supports
Page 2 of 5
Corporate Office
Central California
805-928-5002
805-786-4391
.
INVOICES
Invoicing will be as described in our Rate Sheet (see Exhibit “A”)
Designated Services. Unless otherwise provided, the Engineer's/Engineering designated services
consist of those services identified in the Schedule of Designated Services as being performed by
the Engineer, Engineer's employees and Engineer's consultants, and as described in the
Descriptions of Designated Services.
Changes In Project Scope. Services required because of significant changes in the Project
including, but not limited to, size, quality, or complexity.
Contingency or Contingent Services. In the event unforeseen conditions warrant additional
services including but not limited to: additional design, additional city processing, additional
consultant coordination, or additional working drawings or details above and beyond the scope of
work typical as required by municipal agencies to obtain a building permit as described by the
California Building Code. The Client, will be notified by the Engineer in writing, in the event such
services are required. Prior to the start of work for any Contingent services or contingency, written
authorization will be required by the client.
CLIENT'S RESPONSIBILITIES
Access to the Project Site. The Client shall provide appropriate and acceptable means to access
the location of work by the Engineer for the purposes of measuring, examining, inspecting, etc.
CADD Files. Per the contract, the electronic "Computer-Aided Drafting and Design (CADD)"
drawing files created by the Architect will be made available to the Prime Construction Contractor
for use in preparation of construction drawings and data related to the referenced contract.
Representative. The Client shall designate a representative authorized to act on the Client's behalf
with respect to the Project. The Client or such authorized representative shall render decisions in a
timely manner pertaining to documents submitted by the Engineer in order to avoid unreasonable
delay in the orderly and sequential progress of the Engineer's services.
Notice. Prompt written notice, shall be given by the Client to the Engineer if the Client becomes
aware of any fault or defect in the Project or nonconformance with the Contract Documents.
Information. The Client shall provide full information regarding requirements for the Project
including but not limited to all available as-built drawings of the existing facility.
Tests, Inspections and Reports Furnished by Client. Where necessary, the Client will take full
responsibility for structural, mechanical, chemical, air and water pollution tests, tests for hazardous
materials, and other laboratory and environmental tests, inspections and reports required by law or
the Contract Documents, or unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.
Legal, Accounting and Insurance Services Furnished by Client. The Client shall furnish all
legal, accounting and insurance counseling services required for the Project.
USE OF PROJECT DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
Engineer's Reserved Rights. The Drawings, Specifications and other documents prepared by the
Engineer for this Project are instruments of the Engineer's service for use solely with respect to this
Project and, unless otherwise provided, the Engineer shall be deemed the author of these
Page 3 of 5
Corporate Office
Central California
805-928-5002
805-786-4391
documents and shall retain all common law, statutory and other reserved rights, including the
copyright.
Limitations on Use. The Project Drawings, Specifications and other documents developed in the
performance of this project shall be submitted or returned to and become property of the Airport
District.
Thank you for considering Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc. Please don’t hesitate to call our
Santa Maria office with any questions.
Sincerely,
James Albrecht, P.E.
Vice President and Principal Engineer
Page 4 of 5
Corporate Office
Central California
805-928-5002
805-786-4391
Exhibit “A” RATE SCHEDULE SHEET
RAVATT, ALBRECHT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Effective January 1, 2013
EMPLOYEE RATES
Principal Architect
Professional Architect / Project Mgr
Senior Designer
Designer
Principal Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Mechanical Engineer
Plumbing Engineer
Senior CAD
Drafting/CAD/Clerical
150.00
150.00
110.00
95.00
150.00
150.00
110 .00
110.00
85.00
75.00
$
MILEAGE RATE (REIMBURSABLE)
.70 mile
REPRODUCTION COSTS (REIMBURSABLE)
Copies
$
Transparencies
Blueprints
Mylar Prints
Cad Plots Bond Paper
8.00 (24 x 36)
.20 (8 ½ x 11)
.25 (8 ½ x 14)
1.00 (8 ½ x 11)
2.50 (24 x 36)
4.00 (30 x 42)
25.00 (24 x 36)
43.75 (30 x 42)
5.00 (11 x 17)
Color Glossy Paper
10.00 (30 x 42)
15.00 (24 x 36)
20.00 (30 x 42)
Typesetting, Graphics, Printing
Actual Invoice plus 15%
CONSULTANT FEES (REIMBURSABLE)
The fees charged by all consultants used by our company will be charged at the actual cost plus 15% to cover overhead and
administrative expenses.
BILLING AND PAYMENTS
Billing will be made on a monthly basis unless arranged otherwise. Payments are due and payable on presentation. Interest
payments at the rate of 1 ½% per month will be charged on balances which are more than 30 days past due.
Page 5 of 5
Corporate Office
Central California
805-928-5002
805-786-4391
Revenue
FBO Area
Account
Number
64410-176
64410-177
64410-178
64410-179
64410-180
64410-183
64410-184
64410-185
64420-115
64420-117
64420-119
64420-121
64420-123
64420-125
64420-409
64420-410
64420-438
64420-439
64420-440
64420-441
64420-442
64420-443
64420-444
64420-446
64420-447
64420-448
64420-449
64420-450
64459-203
Account Description
Main Hangar - All Counties Delivery
Main Hangar - Artcraft Paints
Main Hangar - Tricor Calif
Main Hangar - Art-Craft 116, 117, 118
Main Hangar - Mike Lewis
Main Hangar - S B Cellular
Main Hangar - Ravatt, Albrecht & Assoc.
Main Hangar Suites 119-128
Corporate Hangar FBO 3115 Airpark
Corporate Hangar FBO 3117 Liberator & 3115 Airpark
Corporate Hangar FBO 3119 Liberator
Corporate Hangar FBO 3125 Liberator Paint Hangar
Corporate Hangar FBO 3409 Corsair
U.S. Forrest -Land Use Revenue
CALSTAR
Corporate Hangar FBO - CC Jet Center
Corporate Hangar FBO 3950 Mitchell (English Air)
Corporate Hangar FBO 3948 Mitchell (CCJC)
Corporate Hangar FBO 3944 Mitchell (Kinney)
Corporate Hangar FBO 3940 Mitchell (CPA)
Corporate Hangar FBO Arctic Air
Customs User Fees
Rotocraft Leasing - Parking Lot
MOF 3015/3025 Airpark Drive
CC Jet Center Forest Service Dispatch
CCJC (GA Terminal)
Utility Reimbursement - Main Hangar
Totals
14/15
Budget
6,860
39,451
2,230
3,236
24,134
14,786
42,820
27,080
7,369
4,194
48,116
30,233
40,000
10,993
47,580
16,596
5,915
16,314
82,932
40,980
27,828
2,557
3,503
10,726
25,050
581,480
15/16
Budget
6,894
39,648
2,241
3,252
24,858
14,860
43,034
7,564
42,449
7,718
7,406
4,214
48,357
62,808
40,000
11,048
47,580
16,778
5,944
16,395
35,276
43,166
27,967
5,040
3,520
10,620
21,600
600,238
Change
34
197
11
16
724
74
214
7,564
42,449
(19,361)
37
21
241
32,575
55
182
30
82
(47,657)
2,186
139
2,483
18
(106)
(3,450)
18,758
% Change
0%
0%
1%
0%
3%
1%
0%
-71%
0%
0%
1%
108%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
-57%
5%
0%
97%
0%
-1%
-14%
3%
Expense
FBO Area
Account
Number
74110-203
74110-204
74120-203
74130-125
74130-203
74140-400
74150-125
74150-203
74260-400
74290-400
74300-400
74311-203
74315-400
74331-400
74335-400
74340-400
74350-400
74445-125
74445-203
Account Description
14/15
Budget
Electricity - Main Hangar
Utilities 3940 Mitchell Rd.
Gas- Main Hangar
Water - Paint Hangar
Water - Main Hangar
Trash - Main Hangar & FBO's
Emergency Phone Lines - Paint Hangar
Emergency Phone Lines - Main Hangar
Landscaping - FBO
Miscellaneous Supplies
Building Maint - FBO Hangar Area
Janitorial Sv Main Hangar & FBOs
Fire Sprinkler Maintenance
Pavement - Ramps & Tiedowns
Unscheduled Maintenance/FBO
Drainage Maintenance
Fencing & Gates
Fire Alarm Service - Paint Hangar
Fire Alarm Service - Main Hangar
Total
24,015
1,297
635
879
1,369
4,020
2,424
504
1,416
2,000
12,750
1,752
2,500
2,600
1,500
2,800
630
780
63,871
15/16
Budget
29,404
1,490
444
856
927
4,468
2,762
2,246
2,172
500
10,350
1,868
2,500
3,500
1,500
2,800
420
420
68,626
Change
5,389
193
(191)
(24)
(442)
448
338
1,742
756
(1,500)
(2,400)
116
900
(210)
(360)
4,755
% Change
22%
15%
-30%
-3%
-32%
11%
14%
346%
53%
-75%
-19%
7%
0%
35%
0%
0%
-33%
-46%
7%
FBO Area Summary
Revenue
Expense
Depreciation
Admin Depreciation Distributed
Salaries & Benefits Distributed
Security
Admin Expenses Distrtibuted
Net Operating Income/(Loss)
Net Operating Income/(Loss) Excluding Depreciation
14/15
Budget
581,480
63,871
72,680
10,530
353,147
23,202
211,491
(153,440)
(70,231)
15/16
Budget
600,238
68,626
89,196
10,530
381,173
16,455
219,871
(185,614)
(85,888)
Change
18,758
4,755
16,516
(0)
28,026
(6,747)
8,380
(32,173)
(15,657)
% Change
3%
7%
23%
0%
8%
-29%
4%
21%
22%
Revenue
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
67910-921 Misc Income - Late Charges
67910-931 Misc Income - Rebates - PG&E
67910-951 Misc Income - Airport Access Cards
Totals
7,000
6,000
8,000
21,000
1,575
1,350
1,800
4,725
Owner
Build
175
150
200
525
FBO
1,750
1,500
2,000
5,250
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
1,750
1,500
2,000
5,250
1,750
1,500
2,000
5,250
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
4,111
566
542
3,780
64
615
223
201
7,383
471
132
2,950
254
4,111
566
542
3,780
64
615
223
201
7,383
471
132
2,950
254
Expense
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
87030-488 Worker's Compensation
87030-489 Employee Vision Coverage
87110-150 Electricity - Shop
87110-217 Electricity - Adminstration Building
87120-150 Gas - Shop
87120-217 Gas - Adminstration Building
87130-150 Water - Shop
87130-217 Water - Adminstrative Building
87130-500 Water - Landscaping
87140-150 Trash -Shop
87140-500 Trash - Paper Recycling
87160-501 Cellular Phone Service
87160-502 Security Phone Lines
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
16,443
2,266
2,170
15,122
255
2,459
892
806
29,533
1,886
528
11,800
1,015
3,700
510
488
3,402
57
553
201
181
6,645
424
119
2,655
228
Owner
Build
411
57
54
378
6
61
22
20
738
47
13
295
25
FBO
4,111
566
542
3,780
64
615
223
201
7,383
471
132
2,950
254
Expense
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
87160-504 Adminstration Office - Monthly Service
87160-505 Adminstration Office - AT&T Toll Calls
87160-507 Adminstration Office - Fax Line
87160-508 Aircraft Rescue & Firefighting Ring Down from Tower
87160-509 Tower Telephone
87160-510 Shop Phone
87160-511 Answering Service
87210-500 Security Supplies
87230-500 Janitorial Supplies
87240-500 Small Tools
87260-150 Shop Supplies
87270-531 Fuel Expense - Gas/Oil
87270-532 Fuel Expense - Diesel Fuel/Oil
87275-500 Solvent
87280-546 First Aid
87280-547 Safety Equipment
87280-548 Training Supplies
87286-500 Uniform Service
87290-500 Sundries
87300-150 Building Maintenance - Shop
87300-217 Building Maint - Admin Building
87300-221 Clean HVAC Terminal
87321-150 Equipment Maintenance - Shop
87322-500 Radio Maintenance
87324-521 Maintenance/Lease - Copy Machine
6,533
3,063
866
619
1,044
2,610
2,820
4,400
13,486
5,250
4,050
13,875
13,321
800
653
3,380
600
7,600
4,910
3,950
9,170
3,000
750
1,000
6,545
Owner
Build
FBO
1,470
689
195
163
77
22
1,633
766
217
587
635
315
3,034
1,181
911
3,122
2,997
180
147
761
135
1,710
1,105
889
2,063
65
71
35
337
131
101
347
333
20
16
85
15
190
123
99
229
652
705
350
3,372
1,313
1,013
3,469
3,330
200
163
845
150
1,900
1,228
988
2,293
169
225
1,473
19
25
164
188
250
1,636
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
1,633
766
217
619
1,044
652
705
3,350
3,372
1,313
1,013
3,469
3,330
200
163
845
150
1,900
1,228
988
2,293
3,000
188
250
1,636
1,633
766
217
652
705
350
3,372
1,313
1,013
3,469
3,330
200
163
845
150
1,900
1,228
988
2,293
188
250
1,636
Expense
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
87324-523 Maintenance - Postage Machine
87328-500 Fire Extimguisher Service
87360-536 Automotive Maintenance - Mechanical
87360-537 Automotive Maintenance - Tires
87370-541 Heavy Equipment Maint - Mechanical
87370-542 Heavy Equipment Maintenance - Tires
87370-543 ARFF Vehicle Maintenance
87380-554 Fuel System Fire Alarm Service
87400-500 Directors Fees
87412-500 Payroll Processing Fees
87414-500 Annual Audit
87420-500 Legal Counsel Services
87422-500 Legal Services Contigencies
87430-500 Engineering Services
87442-500 Security Services Contingencies
87443-500 Security Sys Maint & Repair
87450-500 Janitorial Service - Administrative
87470-500 Landscaping Services
87472-500 Landscaping Contingencies
87475-500 Internet/Web Page Maintanence
87520-566 Freight & Common Carrier
87520-567 Postage
87520-568 Printing & Stationery
87520-570 Office Supplies/Equipment
87520-572 Books & Publications
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
1,561
1,400
8,000
4,000
11,500
2,500
6,000
420
21,000
3,892
25,000
86,108
0
25,000
0
14,020
10,433
3,924
20,000
19,940
1,191
2,168
1,643
14,961
500
Owner
Build
FBO
351
315
1,800
900
2,588
563
39
35
200
100
288
63
390
350
2,000
1,000
2,875
625
95
4,725
876
5,625
19,374
0
5,625
0
3,155
2,347
883
4,500
4,487
268
488
370
3,366
113
11
525
97
625
2,153
0
625
0
351
261
98
500
499
30
54
41
374
13
105
5,250
973
6,250
21,527
0
6,250
0
3,505
2,608
981
5,000
4,985
298
542
411
3,740
125
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
390
350
2,000
1,000
2,875
625
6,000
105
5,250
973
6,250
21,527
0
6,250
0
3,505
2,608
981
5,000
4,985
298
542
411
3,740
125
390
350
2,000
1,000
2,875
625
105
5,250
973
6,250
21,527
0
6,250
0
3,505
2,608
981
5,000
4,985
298
542
411
3,740
125
Expense
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
87530-581 Computer Supplies
87530-583 Computer Support Services
87540-600 Dues and Membership
87540-601 Dues -AAAE
87540-603 Dues - SWAAAE
87540-605 Dues - Chamber of Commerce
87540-606 Dues - National Notary Association
87540-607 Dues - CA Special Districts Association
87540-608 Dues - AAAE ARDF CA Airport Storm
87540-610 Costco Membership
87540-618 Santa Maria Times
87540-628 Pro-rata Share of LAFCO Budget
87600-596 Advertising - Legal
87600-599 Advertising - Airport Advertising
87615-500 Bad Debt Expense
87618-500 Election Expense
87620-692 Emergency Exercises
87630-591 Insurance - Airport Liability
87630-592 Insurance - Auto, Fire, Property
87630-595 Insurance - General Liability Insurance
87650-643 Permits
87650-644 Hazardous Waste Fees
87650-646 Storm Water Permits
87660-500 Education
87670-500 Business Travel & Entertainment
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
11,800
51,790
4,822
4,050
510
1,000
150
5,817
2,200
165
150
4,035
1,758
100,500
1,000
0
500
30,000
62,265
21,254
5,024
0
1,128
8,000
50,350
Owner
Build
FBO
2,655
11,167
1,085
911
115
225
34
1,309
495
37
34
908
396
6,863
225
0
295
1,241
121
101
13
25
4
145
55
4
4
101
44
763
25
0
2,950
12,408
1,206
1,013
128
250
38
1,454
550
41
38
1,009
440
7,625
250
0
6,750
14,010
4,782
1,130
0
254
1,800
11,329
750
1,557
531
126
0
28
200
1,259
7,500
15,566
5,314
1,256
0
282
2,000
12,588
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
2,950
14,568
1,206
1,013
128
250
38
1,454
550
41
38
1,009
440
77,625
250
0
500
7,500
15,566
5,314
1,256
0
282
2,000
12,588
2,950
12,408
1,206
1,013
128
250
38
1,454
550
41
38
1,009
440
7,625
250
0
7,500
15,566
5,314
1,256
0
282
2,000
12,588
Expense
Administration
Account
Number
Account Description
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
87679-500 Employee Recognition
87700-791 Training Live Burn
88680-681 SM Chamber Econ Develop
88680-685 Museum of Flight
88680-691 Business Park Planning & Marketing
88680-692 Consulting - Mktg Aviation Related
88680-702 Contributed Capital
Totals
3,500
26,500
30,000
0
25,000
64,410
0
1,002,307
Owner
Build
FBO
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
875
788
88
875
6,750
0
750
0
6,617
0
186,634
735
0
20,737
7,500
0
12,500
7,353
0
219,871
875
26,500
7,500
0
12,500
42,353
0
367,694
FBO
Terminal
231,473
29,415
75,365
44,920
381,173
231,473
29,415
75,365
44,920
381,173
FBO
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
193,827
85,914
279,741
11,402
5,054
16,455
7,500
0
7,353
0
207,371
Salaries and Benefits
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
Salaries
Contract Staff
Benefits
Retirement
Totals
771,575
98,050
251,216
149,734
1,270,576
208,325
26,474
67,828
40,428
343,056
Owner
Build
23,147
2,942
7,536
4,492
38,117
Rev Gen
Land
77,158
9,805
25,122
14,973
127,058
Security Services
15/16
Hangar Area
Budget
Police
Bomar
Totals
228,031
101,076
329,107
10,261
4,548
14,810
Owner
Build
1,140
505
1,646
11,402
5,054
16,455
Depreciation
12/13
Hangar Area
Budget
Admin Depreciation
Totals
50,142
50,142
10,028
10,028
Owner
Build
1,003
1,003
FBO
10,530
10,530
Terminal
Rev Gen
Land
17,550
17,550
11,031
11,031
BUILDINGS HISTORY
ADDRESS
3115 Airpark Dr. 3-Hangar/1-Large Office
3117 Liberator St. 3-Hangar, Office & Restrooms
3119 Liberator St. Hangar (Moved from Hancock Field) (A)
3119 Liberator St. Hangar (Moved from Hancock Field) (B)
3121 Liberator St. Hangar
3123 Liberator St. Office
3125 Liberator St. Paint Hangar
3203 Lightning St. Main Hangar
3203 Lightning St. Main Hangar
3217 Terminal Dr. District Office
3335 Corsair Cr. General Aviation Bldg.
3335 Corsair Cr. Remodel to Customs Bldg.
3409 Corsair Cr. Hangar
3940 Mitchell Rd.
3944 Mitchell Rd.
3948 Mitchell Rd.
3950 Mitchell Rd.
YEAR
1974
1975
COST
40,876
88,940
1974
1962
1978
1942
1959
1976
1990
2006
1976
1982
16,110
1974
1980
483,127
438,449
172,646
135,000
294,538
228,414
16,110
44,216
TYPE
Steel
Steel
Wood/Steel
Wood/Steel
Steel
Wood
Concrete
Wood
Wood
Concrete
Stucco/Wood
HANGAR
11,235
8,006
Steel/stucco
Steel/Stucco
Wood/Steel
Steel
Steel
11,724
15,500
7,520
2,120
6,000
24,455
1 ST.
2,162
3,840
3,960
2,100
1,050
12,360
8,240
736
4,870
1,169
1,915
3,324
1,120
2ND
7,406
2,386
2,755
TOTAL
11,235
10,168
3,850
3,960
2,100
1,050
12,360
40,101
736
48,780
1,169
Fire Protection
None
None
None
None
None
None
Fire Sprinklers
Fire Sprinklers
Fire Sprinklers
None
None
16,025
21,579
8,640
2,100
2,100
None
None
None
None
None
Dimension
34'-9" x 321'-4"
43'-6" x 234'
40' x 96'
55' X 72'
42' x 50'
30' x 35'
60' x 206'
120' x 210'
15'-8" x 46'-4"
54'-4" x 92'3"'
90' x 150'
90' x 152'-5"
125' x 153'
80' x 108'
42' x 50'
60' x 100'
Ravatt Albrecht and Associates
23 January 2015
Santa Maria Public Airport Hangar Study
1 of 89
SANTA MARIA PUBLIC AIRPORT
MAIN HANGAR
REPORT OF PHASE ONE DESIGN CONTRACT:
INVESTIGATION
Consultants:
Cannon Corporation Structural Engineering
EORM Environmental Compliance Services
AC&E Cost Estimating Service
Plenaire Landscape Architects
Above Grade Civil Engineering and Surveys
23 January 2015
2 of 89
Preliminary Construction Report
Table of Contents
Reports
Accessibility Study- Ravatt Albrecht and Associates
3
Structural Report- Cannon Associates
10
Asbestos Report-EORM
14
Lead Report-EORM
26
PCB Report-EORM
38
Comparison of earlier Schematic Design Estimate (2013) with
the new Schematic Design Estimate- AC&E
84
Cost Analysis-AC&E
85
Full Size Drawings (separate enclosure)
Preliminary Parking and Layout Plan- Ravatt Albrecht and Associates
Preliminary Landscape Plan-Pleinaire Landscape Architects
Preliminary Grading Plan-Above Grade Engineering
23 January 2015
3 of 89
Main Hangar Accessibility Study.
1. This report reviews the Accessibility of the Santa Maria Public Airport Hangar.
2. Description of Existing Building: This is a summary of the status of accessibility of the Santa
Maria Public Airport Hangar per the 2013 California Building Code.
a. The existing hangar building constructed in the early 1940’s as a military aircraft hangar
and operations control building.
b. The Santa Maria Public Airport management wishes to improve the appearance and
marketability of the hangar. The goal is to improve the appearance and functionality of
the building without substantially altering the exterior appearance
c. The primary use of the hangar is maintenance and refurbishment of aircraft.
d. The remainder of the occupied space is used for offices.
e. Summary of existing usage:
i. 70% of area: An aircraft painting and upholstery business
ii. 10% An architect’s office and a construction services business office.
iii. 2 package courier businesses.
iv. An office housing cellular phone equipment (with no permanent occupants)
3. Condition of the building and site, and significant issues.
a. The existing siding is most likely a product called Robertson’s Protected Metal Siding.
This product was installed when the building was constructed, and can contain asbestos
and PCB’s. The siding has been tested and the coating contains 65% asbestos; PCB
testing revealed contamination in the siding material itself, and a low level in adjacent
wood trim and other materials.
b. There are no accessible restrooms.
c. Walking distance from the parking lot side of the building to restrooms on the airport side
may exceed that allowed by code (500 feet per the Plumbing Code).
d. The building has received site improvements and interior improvements over the years,
but none of the improvements meet current accessibility codes.
e. One exterior stair and one interior stair do not meet current Building Code standards.
4. Code and local requirements to upgrade the accessibility of the facility when improvements
are proposed are as follows:
a. The value required to be spent on accessibility improvements will be determined by the
Code Authority to be at least 20% of the improvement cost, when the cost of
improvements exceed a number called the “Current Valuation Threshold”. Priority of
improvement work; Valuation Threshold. The cost of the siding replacement is included
in the calculation of the valuation threshold.
b. Per 2013 California Building Code Section 11B-202.4, Path of Travel requirements in
Alterations, Additions, and Structural Repairs. Per 2013 California Building Code Section
11B-202.4 Exception 8, requires that improvements to accessibility be made when the
cost of alterations exceed the current valuation threshold. The cost of the accessibility
improvements should be at least 20% of the construction cost.
i. For the purposes of this exception, the adjusted construction cost of alterations,
structural repairs or additions shall not include the cost of alterations to path of
travel elements required to comply with Section 11 B-202.4.
ii. In choosing which accessible elements to provide, priority should be given to those
elements that will provide the greatest access in the following order:
1. An accessible entrance;
2. An accessible route to the altered area;
Page 1 of 7
23 January 2015
4 of 89
3. At least one accessible restroom for each sex;
4. Accessible telephones;
5. Accessible drinking fountains; and
6. When possible, additional accessible elements such as parking, storage and
alarms.
c. The annual valuation threshold is based on the January, 1981 threshold of $50,000.00
as adjusted using the ENR 20 Cities Construction Cost Index, as published by
Engineering News-Record, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, for January of each year.
The current valuation threshold for 2015 is $147,863.00. If the siding is replaced, the
cost for this project will exceed that amount.
d. The Schematic Estimated of the project cost is 2,070,645.79. 20% of that cost is
$414,129.16
We believe the city would accept the parking remediation and some restroom upgrades
as acceptable remediation.
5. Proposed Scope of Project
a. Regrading and repaving the existing parking area to improve drainage, improve the
parking layout, provide accessible parking, provide improved accessibility to downstairs
offices, and provide some landscaping for appearance.
b. Upgrading of existing downstairs restrooms on the Airport side to be Accessible.
c. Evaluation of accessibility to the second floor office areas.
d. Addition of another downstairs accessible restroom on the parking lot side.
e. Some of the possible non-accessibility related improvements under study are:
f. Encapsulating or replacing the exterior siding.
g. Replacing the existing single pane windows in the office areas for improved energy
conservation.
6. Detailed evaluation of Accessible Entrances:
a. The site is generally fairly flat, and providing accessibility to the lower levels will present
no major issues.
b. Lower level path of travel, doors and entrances.
c. The entrances on the East facing side of the building will require some site work to meet
standards. Most of the entrances are about 7 inches above the finish grade. There is
generally a lot of ponding in this area during rains, so one solution may be to raise the
grade along the North side slightly, and then provide a sidewalk across the front with a
4” curb. Access to the sidewalk can then be easily provided with a series of curb ramps
onto the sidewalk, accompanied by standard Accessible parking spaces.
Page 2 of 7
23 January 2015
5 of 89
Typical existing threshold on the Ground Level, east side.
d. The entrances on the West facing side of the building generally present fewer issues.
The thresholds are lower and in most cases may be accommodated by long tread
theresholds or a sidewalk.
`
Typical existing threshold on the Ground Level, west side.
Page 3 of 7
23 January 2015
6 of 89
7. Stairs:
a. East Side.
Access to second levels does not meet current accessibility standards. There is one
exterior stair on the North side that meets the current code. This stair rises to
approximately 3’6” above the second level, and then enters the upper level. Inside there
is a second stair down to the second floor level, that does not meet the current code.
There is also an interior single flight wooden stair that does not meet current code for
rise and run and handrails. To comply completely, this stair should be removed and
replaced with a compliant stair. However, space is limited to construct the stair, as it
would cause lengthening the stairwell by several feet.
Alternately, compliant handrails could be provided to increase safety.
Minimum General Requirements for stairs; Summary
West Side (Airport side).
There is one stair to the second level that does not meet current code. The risers are
higher and the treads are shorter than allowed in the Code, and the steps have noncompliant open risers. The handrail/guardrail is sub-standard height at (31-1/2” high),
and is made of approximately 1” square tube material; thus there is no compliant
handrail or guardrail. The treads are a serrated open grate material, and there are no
tread edge markings.
Page 4 of 7
23 January 2015
7 of 89
FIGURE 1: Existing airport-side stairs
Possible remediation:
Partial remediation could be accomplished by removing the existing guardrails and
removing existing guardrails and adding new guardrails and handrails, and adding steel
plates to close the open risers. This work would be labor intensive and, if the stair is to
be remediated, it may be more economical to replace the stair with a prefabricated unit.
Page 5 of 7
23 January 2015
8 of 89
8. Restrooms:
There are restrooms open to the West (airport) side of the building. The path of travel is
level to the entrances. They do not meet current accessibility code.
They will require some demolition to become accessible. The existing doors are
narrower than code requirements, and the interior clearances are not present. It may be
possible to keep the perimeter walls intact to minimize the construction but it would
require reduction in fixture count.
There are interior restrooms that are accessed from the North high bay. The restrooms
likewise do not have adequate clearances but remediation may be possible within the
existing perimeter. Again, the existing fixture count would be reduced.
Page 6 of 7
23 January 2015
9 of 89
FIGURE 2: Existing and Proposed Restroom Layouts
9. Summary and Recommendations: We met with Mark Green from the City of Santa Maria
to discuss the scope of the project. Mr. Green stated that the City likely would NOT
require the following items:
a. Mr. Green stated that the City likely would not require the following items:
i. Elevators to the second floor.
ii. Remediation of the non compliant stairs, beyond possible adding
compliant handrails.
iii. Restroom improvements.
b. Mr. Green stated it was likely that improving the accessibility to the parking lot
side of the building, and adding accessible parking could very well meet the 20%
level of improvement costs standard required by the Code. The Schematic
Estimate was not complete at the time of the meeting.
10. Other areas where improvements could be done to help meet the valuation threshold:
Other Path of Travel improvements:
Adjust hardware on the existing access gates to be compliant height.
Provide signage for directions to accessible restrooms and office spaces.
Restrooms improvements:
Airport Side: Remodel the existing restrooms to provide 2 new restrooms (One
men’s and one women’s) on the airport side.
Because of the travel distance to existing restrooms is greater than 500 feet for
the downstairs offices, provide accessible restrooms (one men’s and one
women’s) on the parking lot side.
Stairs:
Parking lot side:
Construct a new stair from the top of the exterior stair to the second floor level
(inside the office).
Airfield side:
Install new guardrails and handrails on the stair on the airfield side as stated
above, or, if more economical, replace it with a pre-engineered stair.
Page 7 of 7
23 January 2015
10 of 89
23 January 2015
11 of 89
23 January 2015
12 of 89
23 January 2015
13 of 89
23 January 2015
14 of 89
2401 Gonzales Road
Suite 180
Oxnard, CA 93036
800.790.6236
www.eorm.com
May 12, 2014
Mr. Jim Williams
Project Manager
Ravatt-Albrecht Architects
PO Box 528
Re:
Limited Asbestos Sampling – Santa Maria Airport Main Hanger, Exterior & Interior
Siding, Ventura, California; EORM Project No. 14.0623
Mr. Williams:
At the request of Ravatt-Albrecht Architects, Environmental and Occupational Risk Management, Inc.
(EORM®) performed limited Asbestos Sampling of the main hanger at Santa Maria Airport located at
3203 Lightning Street in Santa Maria, California. The Asbestos Sampling was performed on May 5, 2014
by Mr. Mark Thrift, a State of California Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC #13-5044).
A total of nine (9) bulk samples were collected for Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis. Suspect
materials identified and sampled included: Exterior and Interior Metal Siding Coating.
Sampling and Analysis
Bulk samples were submitted to the laboratory under chain of custody and analyzed by PLM using
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 600/R-93/116, July 1993, in accordance with 40 CFR
763, Subpart F, Appendix A (AHERA), and if applicable, the point Count Method 600/R-93/116,
July 1993, by Forensic Analytical (Forensic), located in Rancho Dominquez, California. Forensic holds a
National Institute of Standards and Technology/National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NIST/NVLAP) Accreditation No. 101459-1, and American Industrial Hygiene Association Registration
No. 101629. Bulk samples of suspected Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) were examined under a
stereomicroscope to identify suspect fibers. A polarized light microscope equipped with a dispersion
staining objective lens was used to determine which of the suspect fibers are asbestos. The various
asbestos minerals were identified on the basis of their unique optical characteristics. Reported asbestos
percentages were based on visual volume estimates. Laboratory analysis reports and chain of custody
are provided as Attachment 2 to this report.
EORM Project: 14-0623 Ravatt-Albrecht Santa Maria Airport Hanger Limited Asbestos Survey 051214
23 January 2015
Mr. Jim Williams, Ravatt-Albrecht Architects
15 of 89
Page 2
Findings
Asbestos-Containing Materials
Asbestos was detected in the following material sampled by EORM:

Exterior coating adhered to the metal siding located throughout the exterior of the hanger,
comprising approximately 20,000 square feet (observed) and containing 65% Chrysotile
asbestos. This material was in fair condition at the time of the survey.

Interior coating adhered to the metal siding located in the north hanger bay, comprising
approximately 2,000 square feet (observed) and containing 65% Chrysotile asbestos. This
material was in fair condition at the time of the survey.
Recommendation
Pursuant to EORM’s ACM assessment findings, EORM recommends that individuals performing work in
areas containing identified ACM do not disturb the identified ACM. If previously unidentified materials
are encountered during performing work at the Subject Site, EORM recommends that the RavattAlbrecht Architects be notified immediately, and unidentified materials be sampled before any
disturbance takes place. In addition, all future abatement activities with the potential for disturbing
identified ACM shall be performed by a licensed and registered asbestos abatement contractor, as well
as properly trained and qualified personnel. These activities should employ state-of-the-art techniques
and be conducted in accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations.
Limitations of Bulk Sampling
Reasonable effort is made by EORM personnel to locate and sample suspect materials. However, for any
facility the existence of unique or concealed asbestos-containing materials and debris is a possibility.
This report is intended to be used in planning for construction or demolition. This report is not intended
to be a construction document.
This report does not provide an evaluation of health risks to building occupants. EORM does not
guarantee or warrant that the workplace is safe, nor does EORM’s involvement in this property relieve
the owner/operator of any continuing responsibility of providing a safe workplace.
Should you have any questions about these findings or our recommendations, please call me at
(805) 288-5074.
Sincerely,
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Mark Thrift
Anthony Price
Mark Thrift, CAC #13-5044
Consulting Specialist
Anthony Price, CAC#07-4200
Senior Consultant
Attachments
23 January 2015
16 of 89
Attachment 1
Attachment 1
Asbestos Bulk Sampling Logs
23 January 2015
Client: Ventura County
Site: Santa Maria Airport Main Hanger
Project No: 14.0623
Inspector(s): Mark Thrift
17 of 89
ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLING LOG
Santa Maria Airport
Main Hanger
Santa Maria, CA
05/05/14
Sample #
Material Sampled
Sample Location
Location In
Room
Quantity
Analytical Results
1
Exterior Coating (On Metal Siding)
Exterior
Northwest
~20,000 SF
65% Chrysotile
N
F
M
L
L
2
Exterior
West
R-1
NA
N
F
M
L
L
3
Exterior
Southeast
R-1
NA
N
F
M
L
L
4
Exterior
East
R-1
NA
N
F
M
L
L
5
Exterior
East
R-1
NA
N
F
M
L
L
6
Exterior - Upper Level
East
R-1
NA
N
F
M
L
L
7
Interior Coating (On Metal Siding)
Interior
Northwest
~2,000 SF
65% Chrysotile
N
F
M
L
L
8
Interior
Northwest
R-7
NA
N
F
M
L
L
9
Interior
Northeast
R-7
NA
N
F
M
L
L
Friability Condition
Air
Contact Vibration
Erosion
23 January 2015
18 of 89
Attachment 2
Attachment 2
Laboratory Analytical Results
23 January
2015
Forensic
Analytical
19Final
of 89
Laboratories
Report
Bulk Asbestos Analysis
(EPA Method 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation)
EORM
Mark Thrift
2401 E. Gonzales Road
Suite 180
Oxnard, CA 93036
Job ID/Site:
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
14.0623; Santa Maria Airport Main Hanger
Date(s) Collected: 05/05/2014
Sample ID
Lab Number
1
50862854
Layer: Paint
Layer: Black Tar
Layer: Black Felt
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:
Cellulose (20 %)
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Chrysotile
ND
ND
65 %
4670
B190829
05/07/14
05/08/14
05/08/14
05/08/14
4670-1
FALI Job ID:
Total Samples Submitted: 9
Total Samples Analyzed: 2
Asbestos
Percent in
Asbestos
Percent in
Type
Layer
Type
Layer
Asbestos (46%)
2
50862855
Comment: Sample not analyzed due to prior positive result in series.
3
50862856
4
50862857
5
50862858
6
50862859
50862860
7
Layer: Paint
Layer: Black Tar
Layer: Black Felt
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:
Cellulose (10 %)
Chrysotile
ND
ND
65 %
Asbestos (33%)
8
50862861
9
50862862
1 of 2
2959 Pacific Commerce Drive, Rancho Dominguez, CA 90221 / Telephone: (310) 763-2374 (888) 813-9417 / Fax: (310) 763-8684
23 January 2015
20 of 89
Report Number:
Date Printed:
Client Name: EORM
Sample ID
Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
B190829
05/08/14
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Steven Takahashi, Laboratory Supervisor, Rancho Dominguez Laboratory
Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such
report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.
Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for the
use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials
analyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples were
received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.
2 of 2
23 January 2015
21 of 89
23 January 2015
22 of 89
23 January 2015
23 of 89
Attachment 3
Attachment 3
Certifications
23 January 2015
24 of 89
23 January 2015
25 of 89
23 January 2015
26 of 89
2401 East Gonzales Road
Suite 180
Oxnard, CA 93036
805.288.5070
www.eorm.com
December 8, 2014
Mr. Chris Hastert
General Manager
3217 Terminal Drive
Re:
Limited Lead Sampling, Santa Maria Airport Main Hangar
3203 Lightning Street, Santa Maria, CA – EORM® Project No.14-1261
Mr. Hastert:
At the request of the Santa Maria Public Airport (SMPA), Environmental and Occupational Risk
Management, Inc. (EORM®) performed limited Lead Sampling of the exterior and select interior areas of
the Main Hangar Building located at 3203 Lightning Street in Santa Maria, California. The Lead Sampling
was performed on November 20, 2014 by Mr. Anthony Price, a California Department of Public Health
Lead Inspector/Assessor (CDPH) #11388. Following are EORM’s findings and recommendations.
Sampling
XRF Spectrum Lead Analyzer
This Lead Based Paint (LBP) Sampling was performed using the Environmental Protection Agency/U.S.
Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) standards for testing lead-based paint in residential housing,
modified for commercial structures. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s (HUD) Guideline Document Lead-Based Paint: Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation and
Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, published in the Federal Register, June 1995, coatings
that are found to have a lead concentration of at least 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2) are
considered to be LBP. It should be noted however, that other jurisdictions and agencies define LBP in
different ways. For instance, concentrations of lead greater than 0.7 mg/cm2 are considered to be LBP
by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. In addition, any interior or exterior residential
paints that have lead concentrations greater than 600 parts per million (0.06 percent) are considered to
be LBP by both the Consumer Products Safety Commission and the Los Angeles County Department of
Health Services.
23 January 2015
27 of 89
Paint Chip Sampling
EORM collected a total of six (6) paint chip sample during the Lead Sampling. At the completion of the
sampling, the paint chip was placed in a plastic sampling bag, sealed, uniquely labeled, and forwarded
under chain of custody, to the laboratory for analysis.
A copy of the chain-of-custody is included in Attachment 2.
Laboratory Analysis
Paint Chip Samples
The collected paint chip samples were analyzed for total lead by FAAS in accordance with EPA Method
7420. The paint chip samples were analyzed by Forensic Analytical Laboratories (Forensic) located in
Rancho Dominguez, California. Forensic is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association
(ID # 101629) to perform lead analysis on paint chip samples via EPA Method 7420.
A copy of the laboratory analysis report and the chain-of-custody is included in Attachment 2.
Findings
XRF Summary Results
The following materials were found to be lead based paint as determined by XRF:
•
Yellow and beige, metal, structural steel, located throughout the interior of the building,
containing up to 2.4 mg/cm² of lead. This material was found to be in an intact condition at the
time of the survey.
•
Grey, metal, sliding bay doors, located on the north and south ends of the building, comprising
approximately two (2) doors and containing up to 1.9 mg/cm² of lead. This material was found
to be peeling at the time of the survey.
All materials that were found to be in a peeling condition at the time of the survey need to be brought
to an intact condition.
Paint Chip Samples
EORM collected a total of six (6) paint chip sample during the survey.
Table 1 below summarizes EORM’s findings.
Table 1: Summary of Paint Chip Sample Results
Sample
Number
Sample Location
Concentration
(wt. %)
Method Reporting
Limit (wt. %)
Material Sampled
1
Yellow Paint on Robertson’s
Siding
Paint Booth Bay
0.22
0.02
2
Grey Paint on Robertson’s
Siding
North Exterior Wall
0.19
0.02
3
Grey Paint on Wood Window
Casing
East Side – Exterior
0.22
0.02
23 January 2015
28 of 89
Sample
Number
Material Sampled
Sample Location
Concentration
(wt. %)
Method Reporting
Limit (wt. %)
4
Siding
South Exterior Wall
0.045
0.006
5
White Paint on Wood
Window Casing
West Side – Exterior
<0.006
0.006
6
Siding
West Exterior Wall
0.036
0.006
Recommendations
Lead
EORM recommends that any disturbance of the identified LBP and LCP be performed in accordance with
all federal, State, and local regulations dealing with disturbance of lead containing materials. Any paint
in poor condition is to be stabilized prior to any demolition. Any lead-based paint in poor condition
that may require stabilization is to be performed by a lead-based paint certified contractor selected by
NBVC under the supervision of an environmental consultant. Workers shall have a minimum of
24 hours of lead training and be registered with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH).
Any work that disturbs these materials must be performed in accordance with these and any other
applicable standards. Prior to disposal, lead waste characterization sampling must be performed and
waste materials must be disposed of properly based on the characterization analysis.
Limitations of Sampling
Reasonable effort is made by EORM personnel to locate and sample suspect materials. However, for any
facility the existence of unique or concealed lead-containing materials and debris is a possibility.
This report is intended to be used in planning for construction or demolition. This report is not intended
to be a construction document.
This report does not provide an evaluation of health risks to building occupants. EORM does not
guarantee or warrant that the workplace is safe. Further, EORM’s involvement in this property does not
relieve the owner/operator of any continuing responsibility of providing a safe workplace.
Should you have any questions about these findings or our recommendations, please don’t hesitate to
call me at (805) 288-5071.
Thank you for allowing EORM this opportunity to provide our services to you.
Sincerely,
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Anthony Price
Jessica Smith
Anthony Price, CDPH #11388
Senior Consultant
Jessica Smith
Consultant
23 January 2015
Attachment 1
XRF Summary Results
29 of 89
23 January 2015
30 of 89
Client: Santa Maria Public Airport
Site: Main Hangar ‐ 3203 Lightning Street
EORM Project # 14.1261
Reading No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Site
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Room
Component
paint booth bay
paint booth bay
paint booth bay
paint booth bay
paint booth bay
paint booth bay
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
outside
suite 201
suite 201
Shutter Cal
calibrate
calibrate
calibrate
WALL
WALL
structural steel
DOOR
DOOR
WALL
WALL
WALL
DOOR
DOOR
WALL
WALL
WINDOW
WINDOW
DOOR
DOOR casing
WALL
WALL
WINDOW
WALL
DOOR
WINDOW
WINDOW
Side
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
C
C
B
B
Substrate
robertsons siding
robertsons siding
METAL
METAL
METAL
robertsons siding
robertsons siding
robertsons siding
METAL
METAL
robertsons siding
robertsons siding
WOOD
WOOD
METAL
METAL
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD
rbertson siding
METAL
WOOD
WOOD
Condition
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
Color
YELLOW
YELLOW
YELLOW
YELLOW
YELLOW
YELLOW
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
Results (Pos/Neg)
Results (mg/cm²)
Positive
Positive
Positive
Negative
Negative
Positive
Positive
Positive
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Positive
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Positive
Negative
Negative
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.1
0.1
1.8
1.2
2.4
0.1
‐1.2
0.1
0.2
1.9
‐0.4
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
2.6
0.3
0.0
23 January 2015
31 of 89
Client: Santa Maria Public Airport
Site: Main Hangar ‐ 3203 Lightning Street
EORM Project # 14.1261
Reading No.
Site
Room
Component
Side
Substrate
Condition
Color
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
Main Hangar
suite 201
suite 201
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
OUTSIDE
structural steel
WALL
WINDOW
WALL
WALL
downspout
downspout
DOOR casing
calibrate
calibrate
calibrate
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
METAL
WOOD
WOOD
rbrtson siding
rbrtson siding
METAL
METAL
METAL
INTACT
INTACT
PEELING
PEELING
PEELING
INTACT
INTACT
INTACT
BEIGE
BEIGE
BEIGE
grey
grey
grey
grey
grey
Results (Pos/Neg)
Results (mg/cm²)
Positive
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Positive
Positive
Positive
Positive
1.6
0.2
0.2
‐0.6
0.1
0.4
0.3
5.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
23 January 2015
32 of 89
Attachment 2
Paint Chip Sample Laboratory Analysis Report and Chain-ofCustody
23 January 2015
Final Report
33 of 89
Forensic Analytical Laboratories
Metals Analysis of Paints
EORM
Anthony Price
2401 East Gonzales Road
#180
Oxnard, CA 93036
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
4670
M156117
11/24/14
12/01/14
12/01/14
12/01/14
Job ID / Site: 14-1261, Main hangar-3203 Lighting St., Santa Maria Airport
Date(s) Collected: 11/20/14
4670
FALI Job ID:
Total Samples Submitted: 6
Total Samples Analyzed: 6
Sample Number
Lab Number
Analyte
Result
Result
Units
Reporting
Limit*
Method
Reference
PC1
LM108394
Pb
0.22
wt%
0.02
EPA 3050B/7420
PC2
LM108395
Pb
0.19
wt%
0.02
EPA 3050B/7420
PC3
LM108396
Pb
0.22
wt%
0.02
EPA 3050B/7420
PC4
LM108397
Pb
0.045
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420
PC5
LM108398
Pb
< 0.006
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420
PC6
LM108399
Pb
0.036
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420
* The Reporting Limit represents the lowest amount of analyte that the laboratory can confidently detect in the sample, and is not a
regulatory level. The Units for the Reporting Limit are the same as the Units for the Final Results.
Seyla Te, Laboratory Supervisor, Rancho Dominguez Laboratory
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results,
reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s)
tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The client
is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard
resulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal
guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard Operating
Procedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.
1 of 1
23 January 2015
34 of 89
23 January 2015
35 of 89
23 January 2015
Attachment 3
Certifications
36 of 89
23 January 2015
37 of 89
23 January 2015
38 of 89
23382 Mill Creek Drive
Suite 110
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
949.420.0655
www.eorm.com
January 5, 2015
Chris Hastert, General Manager
3217 Terminal Drive
Re:
Limited PCB Survey – Santa Maria Airport, Main Hangar Building –
EORM® Project No. 14-1261
Dear Mr. Hastert:
In response to a request made by Jim Williams of Ravatt-Albrecht Architects, Environmental and
Occupational Risk Management, Inc. (EORM®) collected Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) bulk samples at
the Santa Maria Airport, Main Hangar Building located at 3217 Terminal Drive in Santa Maria, California.
This bulk sampling was done in conjunction with the upcoming exterior renovations to the main hangar
building in order to facilitate paint/surface stabilization and repainting of the exterior surfaces.
The bulk sampling was performed on November 20, 2014 by EORM Senior Consultant Mr. Bruce White,
and EORM Senior Consultant Mr. Anthony Price. Mr. White prepared this report that describes the
sampling methods and laboratory analysis, presents the sampling results and applicable standards,
and provides conclusions and recommendations where applicable. Quality assurance review of the
report was provided by EORM Senior Consultant Mr. Stephen Riedman, CIH, CSP, CHMM.
Sampling Methods
Bulk Sample Collection
EORM collected a total of twelve (12) bulk samples from various surfaces that may be impacted by the
presence of PCBs during the exterior renovation project. Each sample was collected from the suspected
surface, placed into an individually labeled, new plastic zipper closure bag, and sealed for subsequent
shipment to the analytical laboratory. The samples were kept at room temperature not exceeding eighty
degrees Fahrenheit (80oF), and placed into an oversized cardboard container for transportation to the
lab. All substrate samples were collected in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Region 1 document titled “Standard Operating Procedure for Sampling Porous Surfaces for
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)”.
The bulk samples were collected from the interior and exterior sides of the hangar doors and siding,
window sills, caulking, asphalt at drip line, concrete at drip line, and soil adjacent to drip line areas.
Table 1 below summarizes the sampling locations, in addition to the log and map in Attachment 2
and the photographs in Attachment 3.
23 January 2015
39 of 89
Bulk Sample Laboratory Analysis
The twelve (12) bulk samples were transported along with a Chain-of-Custody (COC) form to ALS
Environmental located in Kelso, Washington. ALS Environmental is accredited under the California
Department of Public Health (CDPH) Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP Number
2795) to perform analysis for PCBs in these samples.
In the laboratory, the twelve (12) bulk samples were prepared and analyzed for PCBs in accordance with
EPA Extraction Method 3541 and Analytical Method 8082A (gas chromatography). The PCB
concentrations are provided as Aroclors 1254 and/or 1260, in milligrams per kilograms (mg/kg), which is
equivalent to parts per million (ppm).
The COC form and laboratory analytical results are described in the following Table 1, and included in
Attachment 1.
Table 1 – PCB Bulk Sample Results (11-20-14)
Laboratory
Analytical
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Result
(mg/kg,
or ppm)
PCB Congener
Or Type
0.90
Aroclor 1254
0.83
Aroclor 1260
0.88
Aroclor 1254
Sample #
Sampling Location/Description
NW-01
Asphaltic Paper/AdhesiveNorthwest Door Pocket Interior
NE-01
Asphaltic Paper/AdhesiveNortheast Door Pocket Interior
8082A
0.017
0.38
Aroclor 1260
NW-02
Asphaltic Paper/AdhesiveNorthwest Elevation Door Frame
8082A
0.33
97
Aroclor 1254
ASP-01
Asphalt-Apron At Drip LineNortheast Corner Of Hangar
8082A
0.017
0.48
Aroclor 1254
WS-01
Wood Siding And Window Sill by
Artcraft Entry Door-West
Elevation
8082A
0.050
2.3
Aroclor 1254
WS-02
Window Sill-Window Sill By
Double Door-West Elevation
8082A
0.091
0.24
Aroclor 1254
ASP-03
Asphalt-Asphalt Below Drain
Spout On North Elevation
8082A
0.017
0.35
Aroclor 1254
S-01
Asphaltic Paper/AdhesiveExterior Corrugated Siding-South
Elevation
8082A
1.7
340
Aroclor 1254
WS-03
Window Sill-South Elevation On
2nd Floor By Ravatt Office Entry
At Landing
8082A
0.027
0.52
Aroclor 1254
CLK-02
Caulking-Below Corrugated
Material On East Elevation Of
Hangar
8082A
0.034
1.7
Aroclor 1254
SOIL-01
Soil-Soil Between Concrete Slabs
Near Middle Entry Of East
Elevation
8082A
0.35
None
Detected
None Detected
CONC-01
Concrete-Concrete 1/4" Top
Surface slab At Drip Line Near
Middle Entry Of East Elevation
8082A
0.24
None
Detected
None Detected
8082A
0.034
23 January 2015
40 of 89
Conclusions
Ten (10) of the twelve (12) bulk samples contained detectable levels of PCBs:
•
Two (2) samples (NW-02, S-01) were greater than 50 mg/kg (ppm). The PCB congener or type
identified was Aroclor 1254.
•
Two (2) samples (WS-01, CLK-02) were less than 50 mg/kg (ppm), but greater than 1.0 mg/kg
(ppm). The PCB congener or type identified was Aroclor 1254.
•
Six (6) samples (NW-01, NE-01, ASP-01, WS-02, ASP-03, WS-03) were less than 1.0 mg/kg (ppm),
but at detectable levels. The PCB congener(s) or type(s) identified were Aroclors 1254 and 1260
in the first two (2) samples, and only Aroclor 1254 in the last four (4) samples.
•
Two (2) samples (SOIL-01, CONC-01) did not contain detectable levels of PCBs at the locations
indicated.
The EPA considers manufactured materials with non-liquid PCB levels greater than 50 mg/kg (ppm) to be
“PCB bulk product waste” as defined in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulation (CFR), Part 761.3.
The definition of “PCB bulk product waste” includes "non-liquid bulk wastes or debris from the
demolition of buildings and other man-made structures manufactured, coated, or serviced with PCBs”.
PCB bulk product waste does not include debris from the demolition of buildings or other man-made
structures that is contaminated by spills from regulated PCBs which have not been disposed of,
decontaminated, or otherwise cleaned up in accordance with Subpart D of Part 761. Other PCB bulk
product wastes may include, but are not limited to, mastics, sealants, or adhesives containing non-liquid
PCB levels greater than 50 mg/kg (ppm).
Waste materials with PCB levels less than 50 mg/kg (ppm) but greater than 1 mg/kg (ppm) are defined
as PCB remediation waste in 40 CFR 761.3. PCB remediation waste includes soil, rags, and other debris
generated as a result of any PCB spill cleanup.
Excluded PCB products are PCB-containing materials with concentrations less than 50 mg/kg (ppm)
including, but not limited to, non-Aroclor inadvertently generated PCBs as a by-product or impurity
resulting from a chemical manufacturing process.
Recommendations
Based upon the above bulk sample findings and recent reinterpretation by the EPA of the definition of
“PCB bulk product waste” and “PCB remediation waste”, the EPA allows building materials
(i.e., substrates) “coated or serviced” with PCB bulk product waste (e.g., caulks, paints, mastics, sealants)
to be managed as a PCB bulk product waste at the time of disposal, even if the PCBs migrated from the
overlying PCB bulk product waste into the underlying substrate. Since the facility is only being renovated
and is not being demolished, the waste designation applies only to the PCB-containing materials that are
being disposed of.
The following recommendations are provided to the owner for the intended renovations and/or
alterations to the airport hangar:
•
Notification in writing to the contractor(s) performing work on the facility where PCBs have
been identified
23 January 2015
41 of 89
•
Preparation of an Abatement Strategy Plan in accordance with the EPA work plan designating
the regulatory requirements that apply when dealing with PCB-laden materials, or PCB waste
generated as the result of any operations that disturb the identified PCB-containing materials
•
Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during any disturbance of PCB-containing materials
•
Submission of a Risk-Based Disposal application for approval. To sample, clean-up, or dispose of
building materials contaminated with PCBs in a manner other than described under 40 CFR Part
761.61(a), submit an application to the EPA under the Risk-Based Disposal option. The
application must contain the information described in the notification requirements outlined in
40 CFR Part 761.61(a)(3). The EPA may request other information necessary to evaluate the
application. The EPA will issue a written decision on each application for a risk-based method,
and will approve an application if the EPA finds that the method will not pose an unreasonable
risk of injury to health or the environment. Contact the EPA Regional PCB Coordinator to discuss
the necessary requirements under the risk-based option.
•
Packaging of any waste generated during renovation activities as either PCB bulk product waste
or PCB remediation waste, in accordance with the results of the waste characterization and
TTLC/STLC sampling and analysis of the waste stream
•
Use of an on-site observation service to ensure compliance with the Abatement Strategy Plan
and regulatory requirements by the contractor(s)
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please contact me at (949) 420-0658.
Regards,
Reviewed by:
Bruce White
Stephen Riedman
Bruce White
Senior Consultant
Stephen Riedman, CIH, CSP, CHMM
Senior Consultant
Attachments
Attachment 1: Chain-of-Custody & ALS Environmental Analytical Results
Attachment 2: Bulk Sample Log & Map of 12 Sampling Locations
Attachment 3: Santa Maria Airport Hangar Site Photographs
23 January 2015
42 of 89
Attachment 1
Chain-of-Custody & ALS Environmental Analytical Results
23 January 2015
43 of 89
ALS Environmental
ALS Group USA, Corp
1317 South 13th Avenue
Kelso, WA 98626
T: 1-360-577-7222
F: 1-360-636-1068
www.alsglobal.com
December 15, 2014
Analytical Report for Service Request No: K1413240
Bruce White
EORM, Inc. (Envionmental & Occupational Risk Managment, I
23382 Mill Creed Drive
Suite 110
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
RE: Santa Maria Airport-Main Hangar/14-1621
Dear Bruce:
Enclosed are the results of the sample(s) submitted to our laboratory on November 24, 2014. For your reference,
these analyses have been assigned our service request number K1413240.
Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. The test
results meet requirements of the current NELAP standards, where applicable, and except as noted in the
laboratory case narrative provided. For a specific list of NELAP-accredited analytes, refer to the certifications
section at www.alsglobal.com. All results are intended to be considered in their entirety, and ALS Group USA
Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) is not responsible for use of less than the complete report. Results apply
only to the items submitted to the laboratory for analysis and individual items (samples) analyzed, as listed in the
report.
Please contact me if you have any questions. My extension is 3375. You may also contact me via email at
[email protected].
Respectfully submitted,
ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental
Janet Malloch
Project Manager
Page 1 of __________
22
R I G H T S O L U T I ON S | R I G H T P A R T N E R
23 January 2015
44 of 89
Acronyms
ASTM
American Society for Testing and Materials
A2LA
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CAS Number
Chemical Abstract Service registry Number
CFC
Chlorofluorocarbon
CFU
Colony-Forming Unit
DEC
Department of Environmental Conservation
DEQ
Department of Environmental Quality
DHS
Department of Health Services
DOE
Department of Ecology
DOH
Department of Health
EPA
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
ELAP
Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program
GC
Gas Chromatography
GC/MS
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
LOD
Limit of Detection
LOQ
Limit of Quantitation
LUFT
Leaking Underground Fuel Tank
M
MCL
Modified
Maximum Contaminant Level is the highest permissible concentration of a substance
allowed in drinking water as established by the USEPA.
MDL
Method Detection Limit
MPN
Most Probable Number
MRL
Method Reporting Limit
NA
Not Applicable
NC
Not Calculated
NCASI
National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement
ND
Not Detected
NIOSH
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
PQL
Practical Quantitation Limit
RCRA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
SIM
Selected Ion Monitoring
TPH
tr
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Trace level is the concentration of an analyte that is less than the PQL but greater than or
equal to the MDL.
23 January 2015
Inorganic Data Qualifiers
*
The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
#
The control limit criteria is not applicable. See case narrative.
The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the
DOD or NELAC standards.
The result is an estimate amount because the value exceeded the instrument calibration range.
B
E
J
U
i
X
Q
H
The result is an estimated value.
The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected ("Non-detect") at or above the MRL/MDL.
DOD-QSM 4.2 definition : Analyte was not detected and is reported as less than the LOD or as defined by the project. The
detection limit is adjusted for dilution.
The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.
See case narrative.
See case narrative. One or more quality control criteria was outside the limits.
The holding time for this test is immediately following sample collection. The samples were analyzed as soon as possible after
receipt by the laboratory.
Metals Data Qualifiers
#
J
E
The percent difference for the serial dilution was greater than 10%, indicating a possible matrix interference in the sample.
M
N
S
U
The duplicate injection precision was not met.
W
The Matrix Spike sample recovery is not within control limits. See case narrative.
The reported value was determined by the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
The post-digestion spike for furnace AA analysis is out of control limits, while sample absorbance is less than 50% of spike
absorbance.
i
X
+
Q
The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a matrix interference.
*
The result is an outlier. See case narrative.
#
A
B
A tentatively identified compound, a suspected aldol-condensation product.
C
D
E
J
N
The analyte was qualitatively confirmed using GC/MS techniques, pattern recognition, or by comparing to historical data.
See case narrative.
The correlation coefficient for the MSA is less than 0.995.
Organic Data Qualifiers
P
U
i
X
Q
The analyte was found in the associated method blank at a level that is significant relative to the sample result as defined by the
DOD or NELAC standards.
The reported result is from a dilution.
The result is presumptive. The analyte was tentatively identified, but a confirmation analysis was not performed.
The GC or HPLC confirmation criteria was exceeded. The relative percent difference is greater than 40% between the two
analytical results.
The MRL/MDL or LOQ/LOD is elevated due to a chromatographic interference.
See case narrative.
Additional Petroleum Hydrocarbon Specific Qualifiers
F
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample matches the elution pattern of the calibration standard.
L
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a
greater amount of lighter molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
H
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product, but the elution pattern indicates the presence of a
greater amount of heavier molecular weight constituents than the calibration standard.
O
Y
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles an oil, but does not match the calibration standard.
Z
The chromatographic fingerprint does not resemble a petroleum product.
The chromatographic fingerprint of the sample resembles a petroleum product eluting in approximately the correct carbon range,
but the elution pattern does not match the calibration standard.
45 of 89
23 January 2015
Agency
ALS Group USA Corp. dba ALS Environmental (ALS) - Kelso
State Certifications, Accreditations, and Licenses
Web Site
Alaska DEC UST
Arizona DHS
Arkansas - DEQ
California DHS (ELAP)
DOD ELAP
Florida DOH
Hawaii DOH
Idaho DHW
ISO 17025
Louisiana DEQ
Maine DHS
Michigan DEQ
Minnesota DOH
Montana DPHHS
Nevada DEP
New Jersey DEP
North Carolina DWQ
Oklahoma DEQ
Oregon – DEQ (NELAP)
South Carolina DHEC
Texas CEQ
Washington DOE
Wisconsin DNR
Wyoming (EPA Region 8)
Kelso Laboratory Website
http://dec.alaska.gov/applications/eh/ehllabreports/USTLabs.aspx
http://www.azdhs.gov/lab/license/env.htm
http://www.adeq.state.ar.us/techsvs/labcert.htm
http://www.cdph.ca.gov/certlic/labs/Pages/ELAP.aspx
http://www.denix.osd.mil/edqw/Accreditation/AccreditedLabs.cfm
http://www.doh.state.fl.us/lab/EnvLabCert/WaterCert.htm
46 of 89
Number
UST-040
AZ0339
88-0637
2795
L14-51
E87412
Not available
http://www.healthandwelfare.idaho.gov/Health/Labs/CertificationDrinkingW
aterLabs/tabid/1833/Default.aspx
http://www.pjlabs.com/
http://www.deq.louisiana.gov/portal/DIVISIONS/PublicParticipationandPer
mitSupport/LouisianaLaboratoryAccreditationProgram.aspx
Not available
http://www.michigan.gov/deq/0,1607,7-135-3307_4131_4156---,00.html
http://www.health.state.mn.us/accreditation
http://www.dphhs.mt.gov/publichealth/
http://ndep.nv.gov/bsdw/labservice.htm
http://www.nj.gov/dep/oqa/
http://www.dwqlab.org/
http://www.deq.state.ok.us/CSDnew/labcert.htm
http://public.health.oregon.gov/LaboratoryServices/EnvironmentalLaborator
yAccreditation/Pages/index.aspx
http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/envserv/
http://www.tceq.texas.gov/field/qa/env_lab_accreditation.html
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/eap/labs/lab-accreditation.html
http://dnr.wi.gov/
L14-50
03016
WA01276
9949
053-999-457
CERT0047
WA01276
WA005
605
9801
WA100010
61002
T104704427
C544
998386840
http://www.epa.gov/region8/water/dwhome/wyomingdi.html
www.alsglobal.com
NA
Analyses were performed according to our laboratory’s NELAP-approved quality assurance program. A complete listing of
specific NELAP-certified analytes, can be found in the certification section at www.ALSGlobal.com or at the accreditation bodies
web site.
Please refer to the certification and/or accreditation body's web site if samples are submitted for compliance purposes. The states
highlighted above, require the analysis be listed on the state certification if used for compliance purposes and if the method/anlayte
is offered by that state.
23 January 2015
47 of 89
ALS ENVIRONMENTAL
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
EORM, Inc.
Santa Maria Airport-Main Hanger/ 14-1621
Misc. Solid
Service Request No.:
Date Received:
K1413240
11/24/14
Case Narrative
All analyses were performed consistent with the quality assurance program of ALS Environmental. This report
contains analytical results for samples designated for Tier I data deliverables. When appropriate to the method, method
blank results have been reported with each analytical test.
Sample Receipt
Twelve misc. soild samples were received for analysis at ALS Environmental on 11/24/14. The samples were
received in good condition and consistent with the accompanying chain of custody form. The samples were stored
at room temperature upon receipt at the laboratory.
PCB Aroclors by EPA Method 8082
Second Source Exceptions:
The analysis of PCB Aroclors by EPA 8082A requires the use of dual column confirmation. The Initial Calibration
Verification (ICV) evaluation criteria were not met on the confirmation column for Aroclor 1260 in CAL13624. The
ICV criteria were met on the alternate column. The data quality was not affected. No further corrective action was
necessary.
Surrogate Exceptions:
The control criteria for Decachlorobiphenyl in sample S-01 were not applicable. The analysis of the sample required
a dilution, which resulted in a surrogate concentration below the reporting limit. No further corrective action was
appropriate.
Elevated Detection Limits:
The detection limit was elevated for all target Aroclors in samples NW-01 and CLK-02. The sample extracts were
black in color and viscous, which prevented concentration of the extracts to the normal final volume. The samples
were concentrated to the lowest feasible volume prior to instrumental analysis. The detection limits were elevated to
reflect the higher final volume.
The detection limit was elevated for multiple target Aroclors in several field samples. The chromatogram indicated
the presence of non-target background components. The matrix interference prevented adequate resolution of the
target compounds at the normal limit. The results were flagged to indicate the matrix interference.
Samples NW-02 and S-01 required dilution due to the presence of elevated levels of target analyte. The reporting
limits were adjusted to reflect the dilution.
The detection limit was elevated for all target Aroclors in samples WS-01, WS-02, WS-03, and CONC-01 due to
less than optimal sample mass available for analysis.
Approved by______________________________________________
23 January 2015
48 of 89
Sample Notes and Discussion:
The samples in this data set appear to have been subjected to environmental stresses such as weathering, causing
pattern degradation and changing the peak ratios. When pattern degradation occurs, correct identification and
quantitative analysis of the individual Aroclors can be subjective. Care was taken to report the Aroclor(s) with the
best pattern match.
Two Aroclors were identified in samples NW-01 and NE-01: Aroclor 1254 and Aroclor 1260. When mixtures of
PCB Aroclors are present in a sample, correct identification and quantitative analysis of the individual Aroclors can
be subjective. Care is taken to minimize the possibility of double-counting PCBs. Analytical peaks are selected
based on the best resolution possible for that particular sample. However, when a mixture of Aroclors 1254 and
1260 is present in a sample, the potential exists for a high bias from contribution of one Aroclor to another due to
common peaks or peaks that cannot be completely resolved.
No other anomalies associated with the analysis of these samples were observed.
Approved by______________________________________________
23 January 2015
49 of 89
Date:
Client:
Ravatt-Albrecht Architects
Site:
-----~.,,-------
Project #:
1-----------
----
Santa Maria Airport- Main
Hangar
------
--------------
-----
14-1621
-----------------------
Inspector(s):
-
----
-
---
B. White, A. Price
BULK SAMPLE FIELD LOG-Chain of Custody
Sample Number
+
J
Material Sampled
Sample location
Quantity
Analytical Method
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
TAT
Condition
Normal
P
Normal
P
Normal
P
Normal
F
NW-Ol
Asphaltic Paper/Adhesive
Northwest Door Pocket Interior
NE-Ol
Northeeast Door Pocket Interior
NW-02
Northwest Elevation Door Frame
ASP-01
Asphalt
Apron at drip line NE corner of hangar
NW-03
NW corrungated material by door frame
N/A
N/A
P
ASP-02
Asphalt
By Artcraft Entry Door- north elevation
N/A
N/A
F
W5-01
Wood siding and window sill
By Artcraft Entry Door- west elevation
Normal
P
WS-02
Window Sill
Window sill by double door west elevation
Normal
P
A5P-03
Asphalt
Asphalt below drain spout on north
elevation
Normal
F
Exterior corrugated siding- south elevation
Normal
P
N/A
P
Normal
P
Normal
P
Normal
G
Normal
F
5-01
ClK-Ol
Caulking
WS-IB
WindowSill
ClK-02
Caulking
SOll-Ol
Soil
CONC-Ol
Concrete
..
NA =Not Analyzed Condition Codes: G =Good; F =Fair; P = Poor
South elevation near hangar door on left
side
South elevation on 2nd floor by Ravatt office
entrv at landing
Below corrougated material on east
elevation of hangar
soil between concrete slabs near middle
entry of east elevation
Concrete 1/4 top surface slab at drip
iline near middle entrv of east elev
Page
of __+-_
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
N/A
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as
appropriate
23 January 2015
[
For lab use only
]
ANALYTICAL REQUEST FORM
D
D
1.
2. Date
.,'
50 of 89
_,
REGULAR Status
RUSH Status Requested - ADDITIONAL CHARGE
RESULTS REQUIRED BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
DATE
CONTACT ALS SALT LAKE PRIOR TO SENDING SAMPLES
_-'--'-_;,....;;;.--=..;"-"-_ _ _ _ _ _
4. Quote No.
ALS Project Manager
5. Sample Collection
Address
Sampling Site
"" ') I 3!'
<" . ,
I
if V _ - l f ,
,
'"'=I: -.. •
Industrial Process
Telephone
Date of Collection
Fax Telephone (
Time Collected
'-
V " ...
j
E-mail Address
Date of
Billing Address (if different from above)
Chain of Custody No.
-!
"
I
vt=! "'
v
:,,::? V ,~"
.-.
•
6. How did you first learn about ALS?
7. REQUEST FOR ANALYSES
Client Sample Number
Laboratory Use Only
\JLQ.
Matrix'
Sample Volume
.4'tf/'c~~J)
() /,(h""OI 1,1
,('
C~W\II\J
VV
w
,\
()
~f\!1A~'
•
ANALYSES REQUESTED - Use method number if known
Units**
tV6 -. f: v.) eoB~. :3<;"40 0~
\3gD %\~ .~ ~Jl,c) JJ\~~
r
i
3
j
I
Iw~
'\
\
/
/
\\j
'\. \
*
Specify: Solid sorbent tube. e.g. Charcoal; Filter type; Impinger solution; Bulk sample; Blood; Urine; Tissue; Soil; Water; Other
3
3
** 1. llg/sample
2. mg/rn
3. ppm 4. % 5. llg/m
6. _ _ (other) Please indicate one or more units in the column entitled Units**
Comments __________________________________________________________________________________________
Possible Contamination and/or Chemical Hazards
7. Chain of Custody (Optional)
Relinquished by
DatelTime _ _"-'---'~..!-'-!._:__--_ _- - - - - - - -
.
Received by
_______________________________ Datenime _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___
Relinquished by
__________________________ Date/Time _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-1
Received by
DatelTime
960 West LeVoy Drive I Salt Lake City, UT 84123
800-356-9135 or 801-266-7700 I FAX: 801-268-9992
ALS Environmental
23 January 2015
1.
Samples were received via?
2.
Samples were received in: (circle)
3.
Were custody seals on coolers?
PDX
Envelope
NA
y
Hand Delivered
Other_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Huhhlp
Wrap
y
I
Gel Packs
Wet Ice
Dry Ice
Sleeves
Did all bottles arrive in good condition (unbroken)? Indicate in the table below.
7. Were all sample labels complete (i.e
preservation, etc.)?
8. Did all sample labels and tags agree with
9.
N
Tracking Number
5.
6.
NA
If present, were they signed and dated?
N
Thermometer
10
Packing material:
Courier
If yes, how many and where? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
If present, were custody seals intact?
4.
51 of 89
papers? Indicate major discrepancies in the table on page 2.
Were appropriate bottles/containers and volumes received for the tests indicated?
NA
N
NA
NA
N
N
NA
N
NA
N
10. Were the pH-preserved bottles (see SMa GEN SOP) received at the appropriate pH? Indicate in the table below
Y
N
11. Were VOA vials received without neaUSpace Indicate in the table below.
Y
N
Y
N
Q:;/
12. Was C12lRes negative?
I
~ample
IU
on !::Sottle
I
~ample
IU
on
t.o
.,.if>•.. ...••
IClentlTlea oy:
l,,:Ul,,:
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
Sample 10
Bottle Count
Bottle Type
Out of Head·
Temp space Broke
pH
Reagent
I
Volume
added,
Reagent Lot
Number
i
I Initials
I
,
I
I
I
Time
,
]
~
l
l
I
Notes, Discrepancies, & Resolutions:_____________________________________.
ALS Group USA, Corp. dba ALS Environmental
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
52 of 89
EORM, Inc. (Envionmental & Occupational
Santa Maria Airport-Main Hangar/14-1621
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Service Request: K1413240
Date Collected: 11/20/2014
Date Received: 11/24/2014
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
NW-01
K1413240-001
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.085
0.12
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.90
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.074
0.11
0.034
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
0.83
0.20
0.034
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
74
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:37
u:\Stealth\Crystal.rpt\Form1mNew.rpt
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
53 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
NE-01
K1413240-002
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.098
0.20
0.098
0.048
0.017
0.049
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.88
0.098
0.098
0.098
0.035
0.061
0.017
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
0.38
0.098
0.017
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
50
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:41
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
54 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
NW-02
K1413240-003
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Analyte Name
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND U
ND U
ND U
2.0
3.9
2.0
0.33
0.33
0.33
20
20
20
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND U
ND U
97 D
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.33
0.33
0.33
20
20
20
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
2.0
0.33
20
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
109
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:44
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
55 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
ASP-01
K1413240-004
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.099
0.20
0.14
0.077
0.017
0.14
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.48
0.099
0.099
0.099
0.073
0.046
0.017
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.099
0.017
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
89
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:47
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
56 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
WS-01
K1413240-005
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.32
0.59
0.32
0.32
0.050
0.32
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
2.3
0.30
0.55
0.30
0.11
0.55
0.050
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.30
0.050
1
12/03/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
91
43-148
12/10/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:50
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
57 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
WS-02
K1413240-006
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.54
1.1
0.54
0.20
0.091
0.40
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.24 J
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.15
0.20
0.091
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.54
0.091
1
12/03/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
99
43-148
12/10/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:53
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
58 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
ASP-03
K1413240-007
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.094
0.017
0.13
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.35
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.049
0.061
0.017
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.10
0.017
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
84
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:56
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
59 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
S-01
K1413240-008
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Analyte Name
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND U
ND U
ND U
9.8
20
9.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
100
100
100
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND U
ND U
340 D
9.8
9.8
9.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
100
100
100
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
9.8
1.7
100
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
155
43-148
12/11/14
Outside Control Limits
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:41:59
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
60 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
WS-03
K1413240-009
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND U
ND U
ND U
0.16
0.32
0.16
0.027
0.027
0.027
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND U
ND U
0.52
0.16
0.16
0.16
0.027
0.027
0.027
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.16
0.027
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
93
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:42:02
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
61 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
CLK-02
K1413240-010
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.057
0.034
0.18
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
1.7
0.24
0.23
0.20
0.24
0.23
0.034
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND Ui
0.40
0.40
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
56
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:42:05
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
62 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
SOIL-01
K1413240-011
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.098
0.20
0.12
0.065
0.017
0.12
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.098
0.11
0.35
0.050
0.11
0.35
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND Ui
0.33
0.33
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
86
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:42:08
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
63 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
CONC-01
K1413240-012
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND Ui
ND U
ND Ui
0.14
0.27
0.14
0.040
0.023
0.11
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND Ui
ND Ui
ND Ui
0.14
0.14
0.24
0.039
0.071
0.24
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND Ui
0.17
0.17
1
12/03/14
12/11/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
95
43-148
12/11/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:42:11
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Analytical Results
64 of 89
Misc. solid
Client:
Project:
Sample Matrix:
Date Collected: NA
Date Received: NA
Sample Name:
Lab Code:
Method Blank
KWG1416114-3
Units: mg/Kg
Basis: Wet
Extraction Method:
Analysis Method:
EPA 3541
8082A
Level: Low
Result Q
MRL
MDL
Dilution
Factor
Date
Extracted
Date
Analyzed
Extraction
Lot
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
ND U
ND U
ND U
0.097
0.20
0.097
0.017
0.017
0.017
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
ND U
ND U
ND U
0.097
0.097
0.097
0.017
0.017
0.017
1
1
1
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/03/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
KWG1416114
Aroclor 1260
ND U
0.097
0.017
1
12/03/14
12/10/14
KWG1416114
Analyte Name
Surrogate Name
Decachlorobiphenyl
%Rec
Control
Limits
Date
Analyzed
Note
91
43-148
12/10/14
Acceptable
Note
Comments:
Printed:
12/12/2014
Form 1A - Organic
23:42:14
Merged
Page
SuperSet Reference:
RR173798
1 of
1
23 January 2015
Attachment 2
Bulk Sample Log & Map of 12 Sampling Locations
65 of 89
23 January 2015
Date:
11/10/2014
Client:
Ravatt‐Albrecht Architects
Site:
Santa Maria Airport‐ Main Hangar
Project #:
14‐1621
Inspector(s):
B. White, A. Price
66 of 89
BULK SAMPLE FIELD LOG‐Chain of Custody
Sample Number
Material Sampled
Sample Location
Quantity
Analytical Method
SW8082; 3540 or 3550 as appropriate
TAT
Condition
Normal
P
Normal
P
Normal
P
Normal
F
NW‐01
Northwest Door Pocket Interior
NE‐01
Northeeast Door Pocket Interior
NW‐02
Northwest Elevation Door Frame
ASP‐01
Asphalt Apron at drip line NE corner of hangar
NW‐03
NW corrungated material by door frame
N/A
N/A
P
ASP‐02
Asphalt
By Artcraft Entry Door‐ north elevation
N/A
N/A
F
WS‐01
Wood siding and window sill
By Artcraft Entry Door‐ west elevation
Normal
P
WS‐02
Window Sill
Window sill by double door west elevation
Normal
P
ASP‐03
Asphalt
Asphalt below drain spout on north elevation
Normal
F
Exterior corrugated siding‐ south elevation
Normal
P
CLK‐01
Caulking
South elevation near hangar door on left side
N/A
N/A
P
WS‐03
Window Sill
P
Caulking
Normal
P
SOIL‐01
Soil
Normal
G
CONC‐01
Concrete
Normal
CLK‐02
South elevation on 2nd floor by Ravatt office entry at landing
Below corrougated material on east elevation of hangar
soil between concrete slabs near middle entry of east elevation
Normal
F
S‐01
NA = Not Analyzed Condition Codes: G = Good; F = Fair; P = Poor
Concrete 1/4" top surface slab at drip line near middle entry of east elev
Page ______ of ______
23 January 2015
ASP-03
67 of 89
WS-02
WS-01
NW-01
ASP-01
S-01
NW-02
WS-03
CLK-02
CONC-01
SOIL-01
NE-01
23 January 2015
Attachment 3
Santa Maria Airport Hangar Site Photographs
68 of 89
23 January 2015
East Elevation depicting siding and windows
CONC-01 Concrete from ¼” of top surface at drip line, east elevation
69 of 89
23 January 2015
SOIL-01 Soil between concrete slabs on east elevation of hangar
Photo depicting soil accumulation at drip line on east elevation on top of caulk material
70 of 89
23 January 2015
WS-03 Window sill on 2nd Floor Elevation by Ravatt-Albrecht entry
Horizontal shot of metal in between layers of asphaltic material
71 of 89
23 January 2015
ASP-01 Asphalt at Apron drip line NE corner of hangar
CLK-02 Caulking below corrougated material east elevation
72 of 89
23 January 2015
S-01 Asphaltic Material on Exterior Corrugated Side – South Elevation
ASP-03 Asphalt below drain spout on North Elevation
73 of 89
23 January 2015
WS-02 Window Sill by Double Door on West Elevation
WS-01 Wood Siding and window sill by Artcraft Entry Door
74 of 89
23 January 2015
NW-02 Aspaltic Paper on Door Frame
75 of 89
23 January 2015
Sample Ne-01 – Northeest Pocket Door to Hangar
NE-01 Asphaltic Paper – Interior of Pocket Door
76 of 89
23 January 2015
Sample NW-01 Asphaltic Paper – Interior of Pocket Door
Vertical Depicting Layered Coating on Both Sides of Metal Siding
77 of 89
23 January 2015
Typical Penetration throught PCB material and substrate
Close up of penetration through PCB material and substrate
78 of 89
23 January 2015
Degredation to Layered Coating and Substrate
Close Up or Multiple Layered Exterior Coating
79 of 89
23 January 2015
North Elevation of Hangar
East Elevation of Hangar
80 of 89
23 January 2015
West Elevation of Hangar Offices
Front of Hangar – Runway (South) Elevation
81 of 89
23 January 2015
SE Corner of Hangar
SW Corner of Hangar
82 of 89
23 January 2015
Stairwell to Ravatt-Albrecht Architects
83 of 89
23 January 2015
84 of 89
Main Hanger Exterior Refurbishment Project
2013 - 2015 Estimate Comparison Page
2013 Estimate
Parking Lot Paving
East
South
North
West
Haz Mat Remediation
ADA Compliant Restroom
General Conditions
Total Estimated Cost
Total Cost Of Additional Work
2015 Estimate
$261,366.20
$335,574.98
$138,039.69
$147,231.92
$361,373.36
Unknown Scope
Not in Scope of Work
$469,912.23
$335,574.98
$138,039.69
$147,231.92
$361,373.36
$170,269.02
$178,160.35
$201,555.13
$270,084.23
$1,445,141.28
$2,070,645.78
$625,504.50
Increased in Scope
No Change
No Change
No Change
No Change
Added to Project
Added to Project
23 January 2015
85 of 89
Santa Maria, Ca
Schematic Design Estimate
08 January 2015
For:
Ravatt Albrecht & Associates
3203 Lightning St.
Santa Maria,Ca 93455
Estimate Produced by
A C & E Support Services
805 349-0049
3203 Lightning St.
Santa Maria, Ca 93455
23 January 2015
86 of 89
Schematic Summary Page
Base Projected Cost
Scope of Work:
Replace Siding - Replace Windows Replace Translucent Panels -Parking LotADA Compliant Restroom - Haz Mat
$2,070,645.79
Allow for Hazmat Remediation (Included in
Scope of Work)
$170,269.02
Deduct 1
Deduct Window Replacement
($91,252.45)
Deduct 2
Deduct Replacement of Translucent Panels
($91,801.09)
Work Area Subtotals
Parking Lot Paving
East
South
North
West
HAZ Mat Remediation
ADA Compliant Restrooms
Base Estimated Cost
$469,912.23
$335,574.98
$138,039.69
$147,231.92
$361,373.36
$170,269.02
$178,160.35
General Conditions
$1,800,561.56
$270,084.23
Total Projected Cost
$2,070,645.79
Deduct Window Replacement
East
South
North
West
($93,532.34)
($767.44)
($91,252.45)
Total Estimated Deduct (Window
Replacement)
Deduct Replacement of Translucent Panels
East
South
North
West
($185,552.23)
($45,054.93)
($46,746.16)
Total Estimated Deduct (Translucent
Panels Replacement)
($91,801.09)
23 January 2015
87 of 89
Site Work
Schematic Estimate
Total Estimated Cost to Replace Parking Lot
Paving
$469,912.23
Site Work East Side of Hanger
Work Code
2.110101100
2.110108100
2.110111100
2.200301100
2.580701100
2.600102100
2.600206100
2.600401100
2.600509100
2.600514100
2.600514100
2.600610100
2.600709100
2.600711100
2.700108100
2.700109100
2.740202100
2.760203100
2.760206100
2.760209100
2.760218100
3.050105100
3.050409100
4.200102100
Description
General Conditions
Remove Pavement, Asphaltic Concrete,
Remove Concrete Curb/Gutter,
Remove Concrete Sidewalk, Outside Building
Re Grade Parking Lot
Parking Lot Pole Light
Asphaltic Concrete, 2", On 6" Base
Pavement, Sealer
Fine Grading
Planter Curbs
Conc Curb
Conc V Gutter
Concrete Walk Ways & H C Ramps
H C Signs
Parking Paint Striping
Man Gate
Vehicle Gates
Irrigation
Ground Cover
Small Shrubs
Shrubs Medium to Large
Tree, 48" Box, Guyed
Masonry Wall Footings
Concrete Slab
Masonry Wall @ Trash Enclosure
Total Estimated Cost to Replace Parking Lot
Paving
Quantity
$427,192.94
39340.00
180.00
1800.00
1522.00
1.00
36140.00
36140.00
51950.00
370.00
180.00
1284.00
1800.00
3.00
36140.00
1.00
2.00
15810.00
15810.00
153.00
140.00
10.00
4.00
2.00
180.00
$469,912.23
Unit of
Measure
SF
LF
SF
CY
EA
SF
SF
SF
LF
SF
SF
SF
EA
LF
EA
EA
SF
SF
ea
EA
EA
CY
CY
SF
Unit Cost
Cost
10.00%
$1.16
$3.74
$2.77
$3.20
$5,142.23
$6.17
$0.20
$0.21
$33.28
$8.07
$12.47
$13.40
$349.98
$0.10
$837.12
$1,195.51
$1.48
$0.87
$11.40
$57.79
$707.97
$669.46
$875.93
$23.52
$42,719.29
$45,815.66
$673.15
$4,991.87
$4,873.15
$5,142.23
$223,158.71
$7,079.54
$10,881.67
$12,314.81
$1,451.79
$16,005.74
$24,121.70
$1,049.93
$3,641.77
$837.12
$2,391.01
$23,427.47
$13,758.21
$1,743.85
$8,090.95
$7,079.65
$2,677.84
$1,751.86
$4,233.27
Siding & Window
Replacement Detail
23 January 2015
Work Code
Description
East
South
88 of 89
North
2.120302100
2.120804100
2.121301100
2.121104100
Remove Shed Roof @ Restroom
Remove Wood Siding
Lead Paint Abatement
Asbestos Abatement Siding
$12,732.00
$22,935.00
$38,196.00
$12,555.87
$1,458.00
$804.09
$38,196.00
$12,555.87
2.120808100
2.120808100
2.130102100
2.130105100
2.150101100
Remove Wall, Metal Siding, No Save
Remove Translucent Panels
Remove Door Hardware
Remove Windows
Remove Rain Gutters & Down Spouts
$30,176.47
$12,641.20
$721.65
$11,428.29
$796.22
$16,520.24
$16,520.24
$270.62
$93.77
$270.62
5.110701100
5.110803100
5.110804100
Shed Roof @ Restroom
Msc Exterior Work
Galvanized Siding & Fabricated Trim
$17,500.89
$64,057.79
$9,580.94
$35,068.73
$9,580.94
$35,068.73
6.140505100
Install New T11 Plywood
7.200101100
7.600208100
7.600302100
Add For Insulated Wall Panels
Rain Gutter
Down spout, Galvanized Iron, 6" Round
$28,052.09
$3,727.97
$993.93
8.200404100
8.700265100
8.800201100
8.800211100
8.900102100
New Ext Wood Doors
Door Hardware
Install New Plastic Translucent Panels
Install new Windows
Storefront System, Floor 8' To 10'
$815.74
$126.95
$32,413.73
$82,104.05
9.800323100
9.800323100
9.800409100
9.800415100
9.800504100
9.800506100
Paint Overhang
Paint Trim
Paint Exterior Metal Stairs
Paint Roof Ladder
Paint Doors & Frames
Prep & Paint Hanger Doors
10.500608100
Remove and Reinstall Signage
15.140302100
15.370302100
15.370305100
15.430102100
15.430102100
15.550201100
Water supply Penetrations
R & R Wall Fans & A C Units
R & R fans @ Plastic Panels
Large Gas Pipe Penetrations
Small Gas Pipe Penetrations
Fire Sprinkler Penetrations
16.160204100
16.160205100
16.160205100
16.160205100
16.180304100
16.190101100
16.240103100
16.500203100
16.500204100
R & R Security Cam
R & R Security Lights
R & R Lights @ Translucent Windows
T V Receiver Dishes
R & R Ext Speaker
R & R Electrical Outlets
R & R Electrical Panels
Small Elec. Conduit Penetrations
Large Elec. Conduit Penetrations
$1,796.81
$5,008.00
$17.03
$2,484.80
$491.47
$15,357.24
$47.61
$47.61
$673.67
$898.40
$898.40
$931.80
$4,957.92
$931.80
$4,957.92
$737.21
$846.38
$381.53
$755.32
$1,257.68
Sub Totals
$286.91
$1,871.47
$335,574.98
East
Deduct Window
Replacement
2.130105100 Remove Windows
8.800211100 Install new Windows
8.900102100 Storefront System, Floor 8' To 10'
Deduct Replacement of
Translucent Panels
2.120808100
8.800201100
15.370305100
16.160205100
$15,357.24
Remove Translucent Panels
Install New Plastic Translucent Panels
R & R fans @ Plastic Panels
R & R Lights @ Translucent Windows
$11,428.29
$82,104.05
$453.19
$1,510.64
$151.06
West
Totals
$12,732.00
$20,366.28
$1,458.00
$804.09
$101,856.00
$68,413.02
$26,796.70
$12,641.20
$1,082.48
$10,613.66
$796.22
$90,013.65
$25,282.39
$2,345.37
$22,135.71
$1,592.44
$29,853.28
$15,540.79
$56,883.31
$29,853.28
$52,203.56
$191,078.55
$5,976.00
$5,976.00
$24,910.26
$3,727.97
$993.93
$83,676.83
$7,455.94
$1,987.86
$1,631.47
$190.43
$32,413.73
$76,251.50
$4,387.29
$2,447.21
$412.59
$64,827.46
$159,029.23
$4,387.29
$748.67
$1,796.81
$5,008.00
$34.06
$3,727.20
$748.67
$5,390.42
$10,016.00
$51.09
$8,075.60
$9,915.84
$1,474.42
$2,703.10
$423.19
$1,144.58
$1,117.41
$1,269.58
$1,526.11
$1,117.41
$2,265.96
$604.26
$5,030.72
$3,773.04
$603.57
$3,542.94
$860.74
$2,495.30
$2,495.30
$573.82
$860.74
$860.74
$573.82
$261.91
$724.28
$3,542.94
$2,008.38
$6,862.06
$138,039.69 $147,231.92
$361,373.36
$982,219.95
$286.91
$261.91
$1,147.65
South
$286.91
$286.91
North
$93.77
$673.67
$573.82
$573.82
$573.82
$120.71
West
$10,613.66
$76,251.50
$4,387.29
$12,641.20
$32,413.73
$286.91
$12,641.20
$32,413.73
$1,117.41
$573.82
HAZ Mat Remediation
$170,269.02
Lead Paint Abatement
Asbestos Abatement Siding
$101,856.00
$68,413.02
23 January 2015
89 of 89
ADA Compliant Restroom
Schematic Estimate
Total Estimated Cost to Remodel Restrooms
to ADA Compliant
Work Code
1.922222222
1.999999000
2.110106100
2.120201100
2.120804100
2.120804100
2.120907100
2.130102100
2.140101100
2.140102100
2.140111100
3.050403100
6.100105100
8.100405100
8.201103100
8.300102100
8.700208100
9.200703100
9.200807100
9.300304100
9.300305100
9.700202100
9.800306100
10.150106100
10.150203100
10.400301100
10.400601100
10.400801100
10.400901100
10.401005100
10.401109100
10.501401100
15.000104100
15.100205100
15.120105100
15.120119100
15.120121100
15.120206100
15.120207100
15.160305100
15.370103100
16.010120100
16.170104100
16.190103100
16.190114100
16.600415100
16.700202100
Description
Design Contingency
Contractor O / H / P
Saw Cut & Remove Conc Floor In R R
Remove Ceiling
Remove Walls
Remove Plaster On Wall
Remove Flooring
Remove Doors
Remove Toilet Compartments
Remove Plumbing Fixtures
Remove Existing Sewer & Trench
Repair Conc Floor
Install new Walls
Doors & Frame
Shower Doors
Access Panel, Aluminum, 24" X 24"
Door Hardware
Install New drywall
Drywall Ceiling
Wall Tile
Shower Tile
Vinyl Floor Tile & Cove
Painting
Toilet Partition
Urinal Screen
Waste Receptacle,
Napkin Dispenser,
Soap Dispenser
Tissue Dispenser
Grab Bar
Mirror
Lockers
Rough Plumbing
Heater, Hot Water,
Lav
Urinal
Water Closet
Shower Valves
Utility Sink
Floor Drains
Exhaust Fans
Rough Electrical
Switches
Duplex Outlet, Ground Fault Interrupter
J-Box Outlet & Equipment Connection
Lighting Fixtures
OCC Sensor
$178,160.35
Quantity
147544
154922
650
650
1200
3048
650
7
9
20
1
12
1130
5
1
4
5
2224
650
820
125
72
3000
4
2
4
2
5
6
4
4
12
14
1
4
2
6
1
1
5
5
650
16
5
4
14
4
Unit of
Measure
Unit Cost
$0.05
$0.15
$8.93
$2.80
$1.34
$1.05
$2.65
$104.99
$296.50
$208.06
$2,217.49
$1,217.69
$7.10
$965.78
$530.25
$115.44
$405.52
$3.91
$2.96
$13.61
$17.87
$44.84
$1.21
$1,387.66
$359.10
$464.46
$938.09
$59.41
$46.90
$240.75
$1,144.66
$50.63
$728.62
$1,276.09
$569.09
$999.30
$1,023.63
$901.33
$1,927.99
$538.71
$398.42
$10.19
$138.99
$148.89
$328.50
$304.73
$232.10
%
%
SF
SF
SF
SF
SF
EA
EA
EA
ls
CY
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
SF
SF
SF
SY
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
FIX
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
SF
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
Cost
$7,377.20
$23,238.30
$5,803.55
$1,821.69
$1,603.18
$3,213.07
$1,720.02
$734.93
$2,668.51
$4,161.13
$2,217.49
$14,612.30
$8,022.12
$4,828.90
$530.25
$461.75
$2,027.60
$8,690.30
$1,925.92
$11,163.94
$2,234.12
$3,228.67
$3,635.45
$5,550.65
$718.20
$1,857.85
$1,876.19
$297.07
$281.41
$963.00
$4,578.64
$607.62
$10,200.74
$1,276.09
$2,276.37
$1,998.61
$6,141.76
$901.33
$1,927.99
$2,693.54
$1,992.12
$6,623.84
$2,223.86
$744.44
$1,314.00
$4,266.24
$928.40
RAVATT ALBRECHT
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
Corporate Office
3203 LightNing St.
Santa Maria Airport
PO BOX 528
(805) 928-5002 FAX (805) 928-0195
Central California
1371 PACIFIC STREET
San Luis Obispo CA 93401
(805) 786-4391 FAX (805) 786-4792
3203 Lightning Street
-
SHEET CONTENTS:
DATE:
10/10/2014
SHEET
OF
x
SEE DOOR SCHEDULE FOR REMARKS ON ACCESSIBILITY OF EXISTING DOORS
EXISTING STAIR; RECENT FABRICATION; MEETS CURRENT STANDARD TO TOP
OF LANDING ONLY
APPROXIMATE 5" RISE AT E EXISTING THRESHOLD; EXISTING SHORT
CONCRETE RAMPS ARE NON-COMPLIANT.
RAVATT ALBRECHT
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
EXISTING INTERIOR STAIR RISE AND RUN DO NOT MEET CURRENT CODE
STANDARDS (RISE IS " VS. 7" MAXIMUM; TREAD RUN IS " VS. 11" MINIMUM.
PARTIAL REMEDIATION; ADD COMPLIANT GRIPPABLE HANDRAILS AND
EXTENSIONS
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
EXISTING EXTERIOR STAIR: RISE AND RUN ARE NOT COMPLIANT, HAS NON
COMPLIANT OPEN RISERS; EXISTING TREADS ARE OPEN SERRATED GRATE;
HANDRAILS/GUARDRAILS ARE NON-COMPLIANT
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
Corporate Office
3203 LightNing St.
Santa Maria Airport
EXISTING ROLLING DOOR STACKING SPACE
PO BOX 528
(805) 928-5002 FAX (805) 928-0195
DEMOLISH OLD CONCRETE RAMP AND ADD NEW 1:12 SLOPE CONCRETE
RAMP AND LANDING.
Central California
POSSIBLE NEW SIDEWALK AND CURB ACROSS FRONT OF BUILDING.
1371 PACIFIC STREET
(805) 786-4391 FAX (805) 786-4792
ADD ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND CURB CUTS ALONG PROPOSED FRONT
SIDEWALK AND CURB,
EXISTING THRESHOLD HEIGHTS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
-
SHEET CONTENTS:
DATE:
10/10/2014
SHEET
OF
x
RAVATT ALBRECHT
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
ARCHITECTURE
GREG RAVATT, AIA
JIM ALBRECHT, PE
Corporate Office
3203 LightNing St.
Santa Maria Airport
PO BOX 528
(805) 928-5002 FAX (805) 928-0195
Central California
1371 PACIFIC STREET
(805) 786-4391 FAX (805) 786-4792
-
SHEET CONTENTS:
DATE:
10/10/2014
SHEET
OF
x
\\Kevin\c1\Drawing File\Ravatt Albrecht\Santa Maria Airport Parking Lot\Landscape\Conceptual\CLP.dwg, 12/19/2014 2:11:29 PM, DWG To PDF.pc3
SANTA MARIA AIRPORT HANGAR PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
Santa Maria, California / 2014.12.19
92 of 93
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN / CLP-01
Ravatt Albrecht & Associates, Inc.
Architecture & Engineering
3203 Lighting Street
Santa Maria, California, 93455
93 of 93

REGULAR MEETING

Transcription

Similar documents

Megadoor improves conditions inside Interjet`s hangar

10x10 Oct 11 Newsline Ad Santa`s Arrival

PASADENA`S NEW LUXURY HOTEL

Texas Chapter January Newsletter

May - the Santa Maria Camera Club

ESO - Música II - Solucionario

AIRMAN`S INFORMATiON MANUAL

April

February 2015 - Texas Chapter Antique Airplane Association

Agenda Item - Santa Maria Public Airport