Tree Biomechanics and Risk Assessment
Transcription
Tree Biomechanics and Risk Assessment
Tree Biomechanics and Risk Assessment Texas Tree Conference, Texas Chapter of the ISA Waco, Texas October 2, 2013 Frank W. Telewski, Ph.D. W.J. Beal Botanical Garden and Campus Arboretum Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University Outline Tree structure and anatomy Intro to tree biomechanics • • • Primary vs. Secondary Growth Wood (xylem) – Stress v. strain – Tension, compression, torsion – Volume v. material properties – Conifers – Angiosperms • • • • • Diffuse porous • Ring porous • Tropisms – Gravitropism • Compression wood • Tension wood – Phototropism • • Crown architecture BREAK Basic terms • • • • 2 moment of area Elastic modulus Density brashness Bending and buckling Sway and damping Fracture mechanics Root plate stability – Soil – Roots • BREAK Outline Why trees Fail Hollow trees- detecting Branch and canopy failure Root failure Cradle to the Grave • Tree care Primary vs. Secondary Growth • Primary Growth- from the apical meristem, provides for tree height growth, and initial diameter growth • Secondary Growth- from the vascular and cork cambia, provides radial growth or increase in girth (diameter) Primary vs. Secondary Growth http://www.moodlesite.info/files/BiologyExploringLife04/0-13-115075-8/text/chapter20/concept20.4.html Primary vs. Secondary Growth http://www.moodlesite.info/files/BiologyExploringLife04/0-13-115075-8/text/chapter20/concept20.4.html MATURE PHLOEM DIFFERENTIATING PHLOEM MATURING PHLOEM RADIALLY ENLARGING PHLOEM DIVIDING PHLOEM (Phloem mother cells) CAMBIUM DIFFERENTIATING XYLEM CAMBIAL INITIAL (dividing) CAMBIAL ZONE DIVIDING XYLEM (Xylem mother cells) RADIALLY ENLARGING XYLEM MATURING XYLEM (Secondary cell wall formation) MATURE XYLEM Wood (Secondary Xylem) • Functions: – Conduct water up the stem – Storage of photosynthate • Carbohydrates (sugar, starch) • Proteins • Lipids (fat) – Mechanical Strength Types of Wood • • • • • • Juvenile wood vs. mature wood Sapwood vs. heart wood Earlywood vs. latewood Non-porous wood vs. porous wood Ring porous wood vs. diffuse porous wood ‘Normal wood’ vs. reaction wood Juvenile wood vs. Mature wood • Juvenile wood is the first wood formed in a stem or branch and will continue to be formed for a few years. – – – – – Large cells Thin cell walls Low wood density (weak, but fast to produce) Short cells Cellulose Microfibrils have a larger fiber angle in cells • Mature wood is formed as the cambium and tree ages. – – – – – Smaller cells Thicker cell walls Higher wood density (stronger, but slower to produce) Longer cells Cellulose Microfibrils have a smaller fiber angle in cells What are cellulose microfibrils? The arrangement of cellulose microfibrils in wood cells are important to mechanical properties http://www.metriguard.com/fiber.php Sapwood vs. Heartwood • Sapwood: – – – – – Water conducting elements are dead (tracheids and vessels) Parenchyma are alive Usually light or white in color Capable of responding to injury- barrier formation But less resistant to decay • Heartwood: – – – – – No longer conducts water, conducting elements can be blocked Parenchyma are dead Usually a darker color, more prized by wood workers Can no longer respond to injury More decay resistant due to secondary products Juvenile wood vs. Mature wood Sap wood vs. Heart wood Heart Wood Sap Wood http://ifbholz.ethz.ch/natureofwood/pc/jr/jr2.html Heartwood vessels of oak are sealed by parenchyma cells which grow into the lumen space. These ingrowths are known as tyloses. Earlywood vs. Latewood • Non-porous wood – Wood of conifers • Tracheids – Conduct water – Provide mechanical support – Earlywood- tracheids • Cells thin walled • Large lumens • Low density – Latewood- tracheids • Cells thick walled • Small lumens • High density • Porous wood – Wood of most angiosperms • Vessels – Conduct water • Fibers – Provide mechanical Support – Earlywood and Latewood depend if diffuse porous or ring porous. See subsequent slides. Non-Porous wood (conifers) Conifers: radial files of cells (for most species) Note: colors are inverted! This is an x-ray! Conifers: radial files of cells (for most species) Non-porous (vessel-less) wood Tracheids Tracheids Resin ducts Resin ducts Horizontal rays Horizontal rays Porous Wood (angiosperms) Ring Porous vs. Diffuse Porous Ring porous: large earlywood vessels Vessels Fibers Rays Diffuse porous: small vessels throughout Vessels Fibers Rays Reaction wood • Compression wood (conifers) – Round shaped tracheids – Higher lignin content – Cellulose microfibrils with steeper angle (perpendicular to the long axis of the cell • Tension wood (porous wood angiosperms) – Gelatinous fibers (more cellulose) – Fewer vessels – Cellulose microfibrils approaching vertical (parallel to long axis of the cell • Flexure wood (both in conifers and angiosperms) – Less lignin – Cellulose microfibrils intermediate between tension wood and normal wood Maintaining trees in equilibrium with their mechanical environment Normal Angiosperm Wood Tension Wood Compression Wood Opposite wood Tension wood Opposite wood White Oak (Quercus alba) Compression wood Eastern White Pine (Pinus strobus) What’s in a cell wall? • Normal wood and Tension wood gelatinous fiber • Normal wood and Compression wood tracheid Kwon et al. 2001. Phytochemistry 57:847-857 Land slipping and snow load on slopes can cause trees to tilt, resulting in a sweeping stem with reaction wood. In order to reorientate limbs and trucks, reaction wood creates internal growth strains, tension and compression. When cut, these strains are released and can cause severe splitting and kickback, a hazard to the urban forester and the forester alike. Wind Effects in Trees Flexure wood (below) and ‘normal’ wood (above) in Fraser fir (Abies fraseri) Combining the different concepts of wood together Different wood formation will induce internal growth strains to maintain the mechanical equilibrium within the tree to its mechanical environment. Bert and Danjon 2006. For Ecol and Man 222:279-295 Types of Tropisms • Gravitropism (geotropism)- response to gravity – Negative gravitropic (shoots) – Positive gravitropic (roots) • Phototropism- response to light Negative Gravitropism Negative Gravitropism Gravity Negative Gravitropism Gravity Auxin Positive Phototropism Sun Light Positive Phototropism Auxin Positive Phototropism Tropisms interact within a tree and by organ: Branches are neutral gravitropic and phototropic, where as shoots are negatively gravitropic and positively phototropic. Crown Architecture • Conical- excurrent branching habit – Common in conifers – Lombard poplars – other ‘Fastigate trees’ • Rounded- decurrent or deliquescent branching habit – Most temperate deciduous trees Crown Architecture Time for a Break Introduction to Tree Biomechanics • To make a stronger tree you need one of two things: – Stronger Wood (mechanical property) • Density • Elastic Modulus – More Wood (volume) • Second moment of inertia Introduction to Tree Biomechanics • Basic terms – Wood density g/cc or lbs/cu. Ft. – Elastic Modulus (Young’s modulus) kg/mm2 – Second Moment of Cross Sectional Area (moment of inertia of plane area m4) – Stress – Strain – Bending – Tension – Compression – Torsion – Shear – Fracture Wood density • In green wood (living trees), wood density scales proportionally with the elastic modulus • The modulus of rupture scales with the 1.25 power of wood density Factors influencing Wood Density • What is wood density? • Genetic • Environmental – Drought – Nutrients – Mechanical requirements • Tropisms • Wind Wood Density (mass/volume; usually reported as kg/m3) Annual ring of a ‘hard pine’ Low density earlywood Thin cell wall, large lumen Annual ring of a ‘soft pine’ High density latewood Thick cell wall, narrow lumen What determines density? • Most important factor: ratio of cell wall (cellulose, lignin, and hemicellulose) to lumen space (air) • Packing density: amount of cell wall material packed into a cell wall • Lignin:Cellulose ratio Importance of Density • Density (δ ) and Mechanics – δ = Cell wall:air space + cellulose:lignin + packing – δ Proportional to “strength”, used in construction – δ Correlated to Young’s Elastic Modulus- BUT… reaction wood is an exception The bending moment: Applied force Compression Side Tension Side Stress and Strain relations in plants: Lessons from the world of mechanics • Stress- applied force • Strain- resultant deformation or change in the object or material being stressed (response) • Elastic deform • Plastic deform Elastic Plastic limit • Tolerate the stress deformation • Avoid the stress Stress Elastic range Strain Strength • Material property, the Elastic modulus (E) can be obtained from the slope of the stress-strain curve. It is a material property • Amount of material in the cross-section being loaded (I) is critical to strength or resistance to bending (stiffness). – It can be determined from the dimensions of the object being tested • (remember how to make a stronger tree?) • E (material property) X I (amount of material) = stiffness or EI Strength of Douglas fir Timbers 2 x 8 vs. 2 x 12 2 x 12 2 x 8 Floor Joist h E, Elastic modulus of Douglas fir = 13 x 109 N/m2 (Gpa) I, Second moment of cross sectional area = I = bh3/12 b h = 8” = 0.2032 m b = 2” = 0.0508 m I = 0.0508 x 0.20323/ 12 I = 0.0508 x 0.0084/12 I = 0.0004 /12 I= 3.5518 x 10-5 EI = 46.17 x 104 N/m2 2 x 8 Scaffold Plank Floor Joist h b EI = 2.89 x 104 N/m2 h h = 12” = 0.3048 m b = 2” = 0.0508 m I = 0.0508 x .20323/ 12 I = 0.0508 x 0.0283 /12 I= 0.0014/12 I= 1.1987x 10-4 EI = 155.83 x 104 N/m2 b The same principle applies to columns or cylinders: For a Douglas Fir Tree I = πD4/64 D=2m I = 0.7854 m4 EI = 10.2 x 109 N/m2 D D I = πD4/64 D=1m I = 0.2618 m4 EI = 3.4 x 109 N/m2 D d I = π/64 (D4 – d4) D=2m d=1m I = 0.7363 m4 EI = 9.6 x 109 N/m2 Practical Application of the Cylinder From E. Thomas Smiley, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratories “Hugo Broken Trees” What about trees with different densities or values of E? Northern white cedar compared to cherry bark oak N. White cedar E = 4.4 x 109 N/m2 D I = πD4/64 D=2m I = 0.7854 m4 EI = 3.5 x 109 N/m2 Cherry bark oak E = 12.3 x 109 N/m2 D Chapter 5: Mechanical Properties of Wood, David E. Kretschmann In: General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190 http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr190/chapter_05.pdf I = πD4/64 D=1m I = 0.2618 m4 EI = 3.3 x 109 N/m2 The Hazard Beam Point of attachment to trunk Applied force Snow, Ice Tension Side Compression Side Wood is weaker under compression than under tension! Pine branch as a Hazard Beam Compression Failure Types of Mechanical Loads on Trees The induction of bending moments Self-Loading: perceiving one’s own weight Euler’s Buckling- g Cell within vertical stem F = maximum or critical force (vertical load on column) E = modulus of elasticity I = area moment of inertia l = unsupported length of column K = a constant for one end fixed and the other end free to move laterally K = 1/4; g Critical Heightρ = density E = Young's modulus r = radius vertical column of circular cross section CA CB CA ~ CB Stem under compression load due to acceleration of Gravity Stem failure (Euler’s Buckling) due to exceeding hcrit (McMahon 1973) Euler’s BucklingIn Larix at Strbske Pleso after blowdown or windthrow event. Self-loading and growth induced internal pressures (growth strains) • Circumnutations- correction for self-support? • Regulation of stem taper (allometry) • Compressive force induce callus cell differentiation (Lintilhac & Vesecky, 1981; Barnett & Asante, 2000) • Maintain organization of the vascular cambium (Brown & Sax, 1962; Makino et al., 1983) • Induction of a vascular cambium and 2nd growth in Arabidopsis (Ko et al., 2004) Gravitropism: sensing of differential loading on plasmamembrane? Static load, or displacement meeting requirement of presentation time Cell on tension side of stem g Telewski 1993 TA TB Cell on compression side of stem Tension side TA > TB CA Compression side CB CA < C B Pressure Waves: Thigmorphogenesis • Wind • Water currents and tides • Mechanical contact – Fungal penetration peg – Animals brushing past vegetation – Roots or stems pushing through soil • Sound? Pressure Waves: Thigmorphogenesis Buoyancy g Currents Aquatic Algae Lateral pressure Alternating Return sway Due to sway (damping) beyond vertical, presentation time requirement may not met g Wind Return Sway T C 0 Land Plants Sway, Damping and Streamlining • The branches of trees act to counter balance or damp sway in trees. • Without damping, a tree could go into oscillation and fail. Think the Tacoma Narrows Bridge in a wind. • Pruning, opening up a crown, will impact a trees ability to damp. Streamlining reduces drag in the canopy and thus in the entire tree Streamlining of crowns reduce wind loading by reducing the speed specific drag. Avoidance of stress by shedding the load. Telewski & Jaffe 1986 Fracture Mechanics Crack in silver maple that sealed up, note included bark. This is very susceptible to cracking again Self-splitting tree: Unusual radial fracture pattern in a Tree of Heaven, note ‘cat face’ growth pushing open the crack to the lower right Continued cambial growth is actually forcing this crack open. Steep Branch Angles • Steep branch angles tend to be weak • Examples: – Elm – Bradford pear • Fracture Mechanics- included bark, crack propagation (think windshield and stone chip) Steep branch angles can lead to fractures, weak points due to included bark Note bark pucker! Sudden branch drop/summer drop • Usually observed on wind-still, sunny days • Observation- more common during drought, after a rain • Fatigue? • Wood brashness? • Incipient decay? • Repetitive water loading and unloading (transpiration) Tight growth rings in Oak- potential source of brashness Time for a Break WHY TREES FAIL Frank W. Telewski Professor and Curator W. J. Beal Botanical Garden and Campus Arboretum Michigan State University So, why do trees fail? • The Four Aces–Wood quantity and quality (branches, stems, & roots) –Canopy architecture –Disease –Soil conditions Smiley and Fraedrich 1992. Journal of Arboriculture 18:201-204 Most Common Tree Failures at MSU • Branch Breakage – Wind – Ice – Snow – Self-pruning/dead • Trunk Failure (wind snap) • Root Plat Failure (wind throw) • Sudden Branch Drop Tree Assessment • Evaluate tree for structural soundness/likelyhood of failure • Evaluate site for potential damage/liability Visual Assessment • Look for defects – – – – – Scars Hollows Cracks Seams (sealed cracks, usually a ‘pucker’) Fungal fruiting bodies • Heart rot • Root rot – – – – – Root Plat lifting or leaning Dead or broken branches Old cabling or bolts Butt swelling, slumping Girdling roots Scars worth testing Scars- bark death in Kentucky Coffee Tree Don’t get fooled Large hollows can be revealed by small openings Weak crotch in elm with crack and scar Before Structural Failure Crackweak branch crotch Branch was removed to reduce weight on crack, crack closed. After Structural Failure Crackweak branch crotch Before After Pins to measure crack opening and closing Frost CracksWood still solid, but future cold will reopen these cracks Accelerated bark growth in Honey Locust Check old cables This Norway spruce has an unusually wide base, sharp taper for this area. When tested, it was found to be hollow. Diseases: Wood rotting fungi • Root Rots • Butt Rots • Heart Rots –loss of heartwood not critical as long as the outer third of the stem is solid Heart Rot: What appears solid may not be solid. Central hollow log, but everything within the red line is decayed. 10% decay can lead to a loss of 80% strength. Root Plate Stability Soil Condition • Soil Type • Water saturation • pH and nutrients • Soil depth • Microflora and fauna The WILD CARD • Even if all four aces are in good to excellent conditions, trees can and will fail due to wind if a strong wind comes from the non-prevailing direction or is extreme i.e. tornado or hurricane. Assessment Continued: • External testing– Least expensive, most effective way to determine if a tree is hollow is to use a mallet. • Probing: If a tree is determined to be hollow, determine the extent of the hollow – Resistograph or other electric resistance drilling method – Increment borer – Sonic Tomograph – Inclinometers Low Tech, non-invasive, highly reliableThe mallet Resistograph and other resistance drilling techniques Sonic Tomography From the Cradle to the GraveThe importance of proper tree care When a tree leaves the nursery, and is subsequently planted its growth history can and will become an issue for the arborist • Planting depth – girdling roots – In nursery – In the landscape • Staking – In the nursery – In the landscape • Soil conditions – In the nursery – In the landscape (urban soils) • Species selection/site selection (right tree, right location) To Stake or Not to Stake? Nursery stock? To stake or not to stake? Location, Location, Location? Never say ‘NEVER’ • Never stake a tree • Never leave a newly planted tree unstaked How not to stake or guy a tree... Just in case gravity fails Don’t hold back! Know the Facts: • Site conditions –exposure –soil • Species selection • Nursery stock history Site Conditions: • Is the site exposed to wind? • What is the prevailing wind direction? – If you select your own material from the nursery plots, mark the tree to identify the direction of the prevailing wind and align the tree in that direction when planting in the new site. Site Conditions: • Check soil type – Sandy soils may be loose and will allow the root ball to rotate during strong winds. – Heavy soils may hold the ball well, but inhibit new root growth out of the ball. – Check the type of soil in the ball. Is the tree loose within the ball? Species Selection • Know what form you want in a mature tree canopy – Streamlined – Non-streamlined • Select stronger wood varieties for windy locations Nursery stock history • Was the tree staked in the nursery? • How ‘tightly’ were the trees planted in the field? • How exposed was the nursery planting? • What was the prevailing wind direction at the nursery? • What type of soil was the tree grown in? • Was the tree grown in a poly house or shade house for any period of time? Ash and Honey Locust Bradford Pear and Honey Locust Prevailing wind Photos: F.W. Telewski Bradford Pear Decision: To Stake • If conditions require staking to prevent the root ball from rotating or to keep a weak nursery stock tree upright, the staking should be: – Loose to allow some stem movement to stimulate radial stem growth and root growth – Removed as soon as possible, preferably by the second growing season Give the tree room to move in response to wind… But not enough room so that it is blown over. Check periodically for abrasion of the bark and remove guys as soon as roots have successfully anchored the tree. Photos: F.W. Telewski Thank You! Questions? Acknowledgements Mark Jaffe – deceased Michele Pruyn- Biology Dept, Univ. New Hampshire Lothar Kohler – Plant Biology, MSU Frank W. Ewers – Cal Poly University Jameel Al-Haddad – Plant Biology, MSU Shawn Mansfield – University of British Columbia Some of the work presented here was supported by the National Research Initiative of the USDA Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, grant number 2005-35103-15269